Skip to main content
Biology Letters logoLink to Biology Letters
. 2022 Apr 13;18(4):20220094. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2022.0094

Dietary isotopes of Madagascar's extinct megafauna reveal Holocene browsing and grazing guilds

James P Hansford 1,2,3,✉, Samuel T Turvey 1
PMCID: PMC9006009  PMID: 35414222

Abstract

Megafauna play a disproportionate role in developing and maintaining their biomes, by regulating plant dispersal, community structure and nutrient cycling. Understanding the ecological roles of extinct megafaunal communities, for example through dietary reconstruction using isotope analysis, is necessary to determine pre-human states and set evidence-based restoration goals. We use δ13C and δ15N isotopic analyses to reconstruct Holocene feeding guilds in Madagascar's extinct megaherbivores, which included elephant birds, hippopotami and giant tortoises that occurred across multiple habitats and elevations. We compare isotopic data from seven taxa and two elephant bird eggshell morphotypes against contemporary regional floral baselines to infer dietary subsistence strategies. Most taxa show high consumption of C3 and/or CAM plants, providing evidence of widespread browsing ecology. However, Aepyornis hildebrandti, an elephant bird restricted to the central highlands region, has isotope values with much higher δ13C values than other taxa. This species is interpreted as having obtained up to 48% of its diet from C4 grasses. These findings provide new evidence for distinct browsing and grazing guilds in Madagascar's Holocene megaherbivore fauna, with implications for past regional distribution of ecosystems dominated by endemic C4 grasses.

Keywords: elephant bird, hippopotamus, isotope ecology, megafauna, quaternary extinction

1. Introduction

Late Quaternary and older terrestrial ecosystems were typically dominated by megaherbivores, which shaped their environments through top–down interactions with plant communities and vegetation structure [1,2]. Megaherbivores impact diversity and structure of ecosystems by suppressing plant growth through physical disturbance and herbivory, influencing nutrient cycling within and between landscapes, and dispersing plant propagules [3,4]. However, megafauna have been disproportionately vulnerable to human-caused extinction, and many ecosystems now lack these keystone species [5]. Reconstructing the ecology of now-extinct megaherbivore guilds is essential to identify disrupted ecological processes and guide environmental management and restoration [1,6].

Late Quaternary Madagascar supported a diverse megafauna, including elephant birds, hippopotami and giant tortoises. Madagascar's megaherbivores became extinct in the late Holocene during a period of intensive anthropogenic forest clearance and conversion to open habitats around 1100–1000 BP [7–9]. Today 80% of Madagascar is covered by grassland [10,11], but the pre-disturbance distribution and extent of native grasslands remain uncertain [12,13]. Madagascar contains native grass lineages dating from the Miocene, and 40% of its grass species are unique; it contains among the world's highest grass diversity and endemism, with particularly diverse assemblages in the island's central highlands ecogeographical region [10,11]. However, there is limited evidence for regional existence of a late Quaternary vertebrate grazing guild, suggesting that endemic grasses may have been limited to small, low-density clearings [13–16].

Most trees, shrubs and herbs use a C3 (Calvin) metabolic pathway for carbon fixation during photosynthesis, whereas most tropical grasses use a C4 (Hatch-Slack) pathway [17]. Stable carbon isotope (δ13C) values in bones of animals that consumed these plants can indicate likely former presence of forests or grasslands, and isotope analysis is widely used for late Quaternary palaeoecological reconstruction [14]. Animals with pure C3 diets have δ13C values below −21.5‰ and pure C4 diets above −9‰. Reported δ13C values for Madagascar megaherbivores are interpreted as indicating forest environments [18–20]. However, some Madagascar megaherbivore subfossil sites are interpreted as open grassland biomes [21,22]. Using δ13C values to infer open-habitat grasses as dietary resources can be confused by plants using crassulacean acid metabolism photosynthesis (CAM plants); for example, the succulent plant Kalanchoë exhibits flexible CAM patterns across Madagascar, with δ13C values similar to C3 plants in humid environments and to C4 plants in dry environments [23]. The CAM-specialist extinct lemur Hadropithecus shows δ13C values of −24.2‰ in the mesic central highlands, and −9.6‰ in the arid southwest [14]. However, wetland C4 plants (rushes, sedges) also occur in Madagascar, so comparison of δ15N values between co-occurring taxa can also be included in dietary assessments using δ13C data; plants in arid environments have higher δ15N values [24], enabling differentiation between wetland and dryland C4 plants.

Research into Madagascar's extinct vertebrate ecology has mainly focused on giant lemurs, with studies of megaherbivores hindered by poorly resolved taxonomy [25]. However, recent taxonomic reassessments have clarified species diversity in elephant birds [26] and hippopotami [27], enabling the investigation of species-specific niches and landscape ecology. Here we investigate new and published dietary isotope data for all Madagascar hippopotamus and elephant bird species and for the regionally extinct giant tortoise Aldabrachelys across three distinct ecogeographical zones, to determine megaherbivore dietary niches and presence of natural open grassland habitats (e.g. savannahs, open wooded habitats) in Madagascar's late Quaternary ecosystems [25].

2. Material and methods

We assembled a database of 203 δ13C and 118 δ15N values for late Quaternary skeletal elements of all recognized Madagascar hippopotami (Hippopotamus lemerlei, n = 15; H. madagascariensis, n = 6), elephant birds (Aepyornis hildebrandti, n = 8; A. maximus, n = 3; Mullerornis modestus, n = 9; Vorombe titan, n = 11) and Aldabrachelys sp. (n = 19), and for both elephant bird eggshell morphotypes (‘thin eggshell’ representing M. modestus, n = 9; ‘thick eggshell’ representing Aepyornis or Vorombe, n = 93; [28]) (table 1). We include 243 published values (160 δ13C, 83 δ15N), and previously unreported data for 42 specimens from accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) dating of bone collagen [9] performed at the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit (ORAU). In total, 86 samples have associated radiocarbon dates, with just one predating the Holocene (NIUTSM 01539: 14 580 ± 460 BP). Collection localities cover three Madagascan ecoregions: southern arid spiny bush (n = 147, 14 localities), western succulent woodland (n = 25, six localities) and the central highlands (n = 21, four localities) (figure 1; electronic supplementary material, table S1). Ecoregions varied in megaherbivore composition; although Mullerornis occurred in highland and lower-elevation regions, A. hildebrandti and H. madagascariensis were largely/completely restricted to the central highlands, and most other species only occurred in southern and/or western ecoregions [25,30] (table 1). Aldabrachelys data are only available for the arid spiny bush, although specimens are also recorded from the central highlands [28] (table 1).

Table 1.

Mean isotope values and dietary proportion estimates for Madagascar's megaherbivores, inclusive of bone/eggshell correction and Suess correction.

taxon no. specimens δ13C (mean) s.d. est. diet proportion (mean) C3 plants est. diet proportion (mean) CAM plants s.e.
1. Arid spiny bush
 Aepyornis maximus 2 −28.42 0.71 0.93 0.07 0.04
 Mullerornis modestus (bone) 7 −26.44 0.81 0.79 0.21 0.02
 Mullerornis modestus (eggshell) 9 −25.58 0.48 0.73 0.27 0.01
 thick eggshell 93 −26.35 0.92 0.79 0.21 0.01
 Hippopotamus lemerlei 10 −21.87 2.49 0.48 0.52 0.06
 Hippopotamus sp. 18 −22.99 2.33 0.55 0.45 0.04
 Aldabrachelys sp. 18 −25.18 2.75 0.71 0.29 0.05
2. Succulent woodland
 Aepyornis maximus 1 −28.02 0.71a 0.9 0.1 0.05
 Vorombe titan 11 −29.26 0.72 0.99 0.01 0.02
 Hippopotamus lemerlei 4 −28.13 0.73 0.91 0.09 0.03
 Hippopotamus madagascariensis 3 −20.17 1.56 0.36 0.64 0.06
 Hippopotamus sp. 15 −26.07 3.71 0.77 0.23 0.07
 Aldabrachelys sp. 1 −33.52 2.75a 1 0 0.19
taxon no. specimens δ13C (mean) s.d. est. diet proportion (mean) C3 plants est. diet proportion (mean) CAM plants s.e.
3. Central highlands
 Aepyornis hildebrandti 8 −21.12 1.42 0.52 0.48 0.03
 Mullerornis modestus (bone) 1 −28.22 0.81a 0.98 0.02 0.06
 Hippopotamus madagascariensis 3 −28.27 3.25 0.99 0.01 0.12
 Hippopotamus sp. 13 −27.83 4.29 0.96 0.04 0.08

as.d. not available and arid spiny bush value used.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Madagascar ecoregions, showing localities for specimens in this study. Adapted from [29].

We assessed dietary sources using mixing models in ISSOERROR v. 1.04 [31] to investigate dietary niche differentiation between taxa within ecoregions. We calculated proportionate consumption of C3 versus CAM plants in the more arid southern and western ecoregions, and C3 versus C4 plants in the comparatively wet central highlands, which do not support significant CAM plant biomass and contain a regionally restricted endemic C4 plant community [10,11,14,15]. We used δ13C isotope values for discrimination model end-members from ref. [32]: C3 plants, arid spiny bush and succulent woodland (Beza Mahafaly), −29.4‰ (σ: 2.4, n = 240); central highlands (Tsinjoarivo): −28.5‰ (σ: 1.8, n = 49); CAM plants, arid spiny bush and succulent woodland (Beza Mahafaly): −15‰ (σ: 1.2, n = 67). C4 grass end-member values used the global mean value of −13.1‰ [33], with substituted σ and sample size from central highlands C3 plants. δ13C values used in fractionation were corrected to account for δ13C enrichment in bone (+5‰) [34] and eggshell (+2‰) collagen [35], and by +1.22‰ to account for δ13C shifts in atmospheric CO2 (Suess effect; [36]).

3. Results

In arid spiny bush, elephant birds and giant tortoises show low δ13C values (species means: −25.18 to −28.42‰), with dietary fractionation indicating these taxa all consumed mainly C3 plants and only limited amounts of CAM plants (mean estimated proportions of CAM consumption: 0.07–0.27). M. modestus (bone and thin eggshell) shows highest estimated CAM consumption (sample means: 0.21–0.27). Hippopotami (H. lemerlei and samples unidentified to species) show higher δ13C values (sample means: −21.87 to −22.99‰) and correspondingly much higher estimated proportions of CAM consumption, with C3 and CAM plants both comprising about half of their diet (mean estimated proportions, C3: 0.48–0.55, CAM: 0.45–0.52) (table 1 and figure 2; electronic supplementary material, file S1).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Observed isotope ‰ for Madagascar's megaherbivores: (a) δ13C values. (b) δ13C and δ15N values. Key: green star, Aepyornis hildebrandti; pink triangle, A. maximus; orange square, Mullerornis modestus (bone); blue triangle: Vorombe titan; open square: thin eggshell (M. modestus); open triangle: thick eggshell (Aepyornis or Vorombe); blue diamond: Hippopotamus lemerlei; purple cross: H. madagascariensis; open diamond: Hippopotamus sp.; filled circle: Aldabrachelys sp.

In succulent woodland, elephant birds (A. maximus, V. titan), giant tortoises and H. lemerlei show low δ13C values (species means: −26.46 to −33.52‰) and very low estimated proportions of CAM consumption (0.01–0.09). By contrast, H. madagascariensis shows high δ13C values (species mean: −20.16‰) and much higher mean estimated CAM consumption (0.64).

In the central highlands, M. modestus and hippopotami (H. madagascariensis and samples unidentified to species) show high δ13C values (sample means: −28.22 to −28.83‰), and are estimated to have consumed almost entirely C3 plants and minimal C4 grasses (mean estimated proportions of C4 consumption: 0.02–0.04). Conversely, A. hildebrandti shows high δ13C values (sample mean: −21.12‰) and much higher mean estimated C4 consumption (0.48).

For hippopotami, H. madagascariensis had δ15N values of 3.0–5.2‰, and H. lemerlei of 7.0–13.3‰. The lowest hippopotamus δ15N value was from Antsirabe, central highlands (1.3‰) and the highest was from Beloha, arid spiny bush (13.3‰). For elephant birds, A. hildebrandti had δ15N values of 5.0–7.8‰, A. maximus of 11.8–15.3‰, M. modestus of 6.4–16.0‰, V. titan of 5.5–13.7‰ and ‘thick eggshell’ of 8.7−17.6‰. Aldrabrachelys in arid spiny bush had values of 8.4–13.3‰. Across ecoregions, non-overlapping δ15N ranges were observed for single measurements in A. maximus (dry deciduous forest, 11.8‰; arid spiny bush, 12.7–15.3‰) and M. modestus (central highlands, 6.4‰; arid spiny bush, 6.5–15.8‰).

4. Discussion

We present the first species-level dietary niche reconstruction for Madagascar's megaherbivores, revealing a range of δ13C and δ15N values and trophic ecologies across taxa and ecoregions. Our findings indicate the former existence of multiple herbivore guilds across Madagascar. These data support previous identification of a widespread browsing guild and provide the first direct evidence for a megaherbivore grazing guild in Madagascar's central highlands.

δ13C values in hippopotamus samples indicate broad trophic niches for both species, suggesting both browsing and grazing behaviours. This contrasts with the mainland African hippopotamus (H. amphibius), which is predominantly a terrestrial grazer [37]. Madagascar hippopotami were trophically closer to Africa's extant pygmy hippopotamus (Choeropsis liberiensis), which is comparable in size to Madagascar's extinct species, and browses on forest plants [38]. Interestingly, δ15N ratios indicate more aquatic feeding in H. madagascariensis than H. lemerlei. Aquatic habitats were available for H. madagascariensis in the central highlands [25]. This result contrasts with aquatic adaptations inferred from cranial morphology in H. lemerlei [39], but is consistent with behavioural ecology (emergence onto land for feeding) in the otherwise aquatic H. amphibius, suggesting a similar lifestyle for H. lemerlei. Aldabrachelys isotopes from arid spiny bush show a comparable δ13C/δ15N signal to H. lemerlei, indicating a similar browsing niche in this ecoregion.

CAM plants comprised a substantial proportion of the diets of one or both hippopotamus species in arid spiny bush and succulent woodland, but δ13C values are lower in the central highlands, suggesting higher reliance upon C3 plants. CAM plants are relatively scarce in this region; however, they occur across numerous biomes and elevations in Madagascar, with a range of δ13C values (e.g. Kalanchoë, −11.4 to −27.3‰) [23]. CAM plant CO2 is fixed by the C3 pathway in humid environments such as the central highlands, producing δ13C values below −22‰ [23] and thus consistent with CAM consumption in this region as well. Hippopotami therefore probably consumed C3 and CAM plants across Madagascar, matching the varying δ13C pattern in the CAM-specialist Hadropithecus across different ecoregions [14].

Elephant bird δ13C values from arid spiny bush and succulent woodland fall outside the range for C4 consumption (open-habitat dryland grasses or wetland sedges and rushes). In arid spiny bush, δ13C values indicate that all elephant birds had predominantly C3 diets, with some CAM consumption by M. modestus; higher δ15N values compared to sympatric hippopotami indicate that these plants were less likely to be from wetlands. Differences between sympatric elephant birds may indicate further species-specific dietary differences; for example, higher δ15N values (e.g. in A. maximus) are associated with frugivory or omnivory (including invertebrate or small vertebrate consumption) [32], which comprise extant ratite dietary strategies [40]. Eggshell and bone values also differ in M. modestus, possibly indicating seasonal reliance upon dietary resources during oogenesis, or that eggshell and bone fractionation rates may need separate assessment.

Our most striking result is that δ13C data for A. hildebrandti provide the first evidence for grazing ecology in elephant birds. Although unique within Madagascar's ratites, grazing is also the primary dietary strategy in greater rhea (Rhea americana) [41], and other large flightless birds (e.g. geese) also have important regulatory effects on island grasslands [42]. Our results thus identify A. hildebrandti as a likely top–down regulator of native grassland ecosystems in the central highlands [13,15,16]. δ13C values for this species indicate a mixed diet containing large quantities of C4 plants (c. 48%), whereas co-occurring hippopotami consumed only tiny amounts of C4 plants (1–4%). Although A. hildebrandti had higher mean δ15N values compared to sympatric hippopotami, this disparity is much lower than between species in other ecoregions. Indeed, lower δ13C values in CAM plants within mesic conditions [23] suggest that A. hildebrandti might not have consumed any forest plants and was exclusively an open-habitat forager, consuming a mixture of C4 and CAM plants. High variability in CAM plant δ13C values complicates interpretation of results, but the likelihood of A. hildebrandti exhibiting grazing behaviour is supported by the non-matching regional δ13C signature of the CAM specialist Hadropithecus (mean: −24.2 δ13C‰) [14]. This hypothesis is consistent with the small olfactory bulb in skulls assigned to A. hildebrandti, comparable to the neuroanatomy of extant open-habitat palaeognaths [43]. However, the taxonomic identity of these crania is uncertain; they are not associated with diagnostic postcrania or locality data, and two separate skull morphotypes have been referred to A. hildebrandti [44–46].

δ13C data from skeletal collagen provide a comprehensive new understanding of Madagascar megaherbivore dietary ecology. Most available subfossils originate from southern Madagascar, and further research should investigate data across wider areas. For example, giant tortoises from the central highlands remain isotopically unstudied; these animals might also have been grazers, but their shell shape (associated with biomechanical advantage for grazing or browsing in extant species [47]) is poorly understood, making ecological inference difficult. However, whereas most modern-day open habitats on Madagascar are anthropogenic in origin, our results provide important evidence for former existence of native ecosystems dominated by endemic C4 grasses. It is clear that Madagascar supported multiple megaherbivore trophic guilds with differing relationships to native vegetation, which must have played important roles in regulating diverse natural landscapes. Madagascar's ecosystems are now highly degraded, and protection and sustainable management of landscapes and ecosystem services represents a global priority for biodiversity conservation and human well-being [48,49]. Hypotheses of what constitutes a ‘natural’ Madagascar ecosystem must therefore consider the ecologies and regulatory roles of the island's now-extinct megafauna, to support evidence-based restoration of this ecologically complex island.

Acknowledgements

We thank Ronan Allain (MNHN), Ursula Göhlich (NHMW), Jørn Hurum (UIO), Benjamin Kear (ZIUU), Sandra Chapman and Lorna Steele (NHMUK), and Karen Samonds (NIU) for access to museum collections. We thank Brooke Crowley and Laurie Godfrey for their excellent advice on pre-existing datasets. We also thank three anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback.

Data accessibility

All data are available in electronic supplementary material, file S1 [50].

Authors' contributions

J.P.H.: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, validation, visualization, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing; S.T.T.: Funding acquisition, investigation, supervision, visualization, writing—review and editing.

All authors gave final approval for publication and agreed to be held accountable for the work performed therein.

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Funding

This study was supported by a NERC Radiocarbon Facility grant no. (NF/2015/1/4) to S.T.T./J.P.H., and Research England.

References

  • 1.Malhi Y, Doughty CE, Galetti M, Smith FA, Svenning JC, Terborgh JW. 2016. Megafauna and ecosystem function from the Pleistocene to the Anthropocene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 838-846. ( 10.1073/pnas.1502540113) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hopcraft JGC, Olff H, Sinclair ARE. 2010. Herbivores, resources and risks: alternating regulation along primary environmental gradients in savannas. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 119-128. ( 10.1016/j.tree.2009.08.001) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Guimarães PR, Galetti M, Jordano P. 2008. Seed dispersal anachronisms: rethinking the fruits extinct megafauna ate. PLoS ONE 3, e1745. ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0001745) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pires MM, Galetti M, Donatti CI, Pizo MA, Dirzo R, Guimarães PR. 2014. Reconstructing past ecological networks: the reconfiguration of seed-dispersal interactions after megafaunal extinction. Oecologia 175, 1247-1256. ( 10.1007/s00442-014-2971-1) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Berti E, Svenning J-C. 2020. Megafauna extinctions have reduced biotic connectivity worldwide. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 29, 2131-2142. ( 10.1111/geb.13182) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Norris K, Terry A, Hansford JP, Turvey ST. 2020. Biodiversity conservation and the earth system: mind the gap. Trends Ecol. Evol. 35, 919-926. ( 10.1016/j.tree.2020.06.010) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Burns SJ, Godfrey LR, Faina P, McGee D, Hardt B, Ranivoharimanana L, Randrianasy J. 2016. Rapid human-induced landscape transformation in Madagascar at the end of the first millennium of the Common Era. Quat. Sci. Rev. 134, 92-99. ( 10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.01.007) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Godfrey LR, Scroxton N, Crowley BE, Burns SJ, Sutherland MR, Pérez VR, Faina P, McGee D, Ranivoharimanana L. 2019. A new interpretation of Madagascar's megafaunal decline: the ‘Subsistence Shift Hypothesis’. J. Hum. Evol. 130, 126-140. ( 10.1016/j.jhevol.2019.03.002) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hansford JP, Lister AM, Weston EM, Turvey ST. 2021. Simultaneous extinction of Madagascar's megaherbivores correlates with late Holocene human-caused landscape transformation. Quat. Sci. Rev. 263, 106996. ( 10.1016/j.quascirev.2021.106996) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bond WJ, Silander JA, Ranaivonasy J, Ratsirarson J. 2008. The antiquity of Madagascar's grasslands and the rise of C4 grassy biomes. J. Biogeogr. 35, 1743-1758. ( 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.01923.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Vorontsova MS, Besnard G, Forest F, Malakasi P, Moat J. 2016. Madagascar's grasses and grasslands: anthropogenic or natural? Proc. R. Soc. B 283, 20152262. ( 10.1098/rspb.2015.2262) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Joseph GS, Seymour CL. 2020. Madagascan highlands: originally woodland and forest containing endemic grasses, not grazing-adapted grassland. Proc. R. Soc. B 287, 20201956. ( 10.1098/rspb.2020.1956) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Crowley BE, Godfrey LR, Hansford JP, Samonds KE. 2021. Seeing the forest for the trees—and the grasses: revisiting the evidence for grazer-maintained grasslands in Madagascar's central highlands. Proc. R. Soc. B 288, 20201785. ( 10.1098/rspb.2020.1785) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Godfrey LR, Crowley BE, Muldoon KM, Kelley EA, King SJ, Best AW, Berthaume MA. 2016. What did Hadropithecus eat, and why should paleoanthropologists care? Am. J. Primatol. 78, 1098-1112. ( 10.1002/ajp.22506) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Solofondranohatra CL, Vorontsova MS, Hackel J, Besnard G, Cable S, Williams J, Jeannoda V, Lehmann CER. 2018. Grass functional traits differentiate forest and savanna in the Madagascar central highlands. Front. Ecol. Evol. 6, 184. ( 10.3389/fevo.2018.00184) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Godfrey LR, Crowley BE. 2016. Madagascar's ephemeral palaeo-grazer guild: who ate the ancient C4 grasses? Proc. R. Soc. B 283, 20160360. ( 10.1098/rspb.2016.0360) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ehleringer JR, Monson RK. 1993. Evolutionary and ecological aspects of photosynthetic pathway variation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24, 411-439. ( 10.1146/annurev.es.24.110193.002211) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tovondrafale T, Razakamanana T, Hiroko K. 2014. Paleoecological analysis of elphant bird (Aepyornithidae) remains from the Late Pleistocene and Holocene formations of southern Madagascar. Malagasy Nat. 8, 1-13. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pearson MP. 2010. Pastoralists, warriors and colonists: the archaeology of southern Madagascar. Oxford, UK: Archaeopress. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Clarke SJ, Miller GH, Fogel ML, Allan RC, Murray-Wallace CV. 2006. The amino acid and stable isotope biogeochemistry of elephant bird (Aepyornis) eggshells from southern Madagascar. Quat. Sci. Rev. 25, 2343-2356. ( 10.1016/j.quascirev.2006.02.001) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Burney DA. 1999. Rates, patterns, and processes of landscape transformation and extinction in Madagascar. In Extinctions in near time: causes, contexts, and consequences (ed. MacPhee RDE), pp. 145-164. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Samonds KE, et al. 2019. A new late Pleistocene subfossil site (Tsaramody, Sambaina basin, central Madagascar) with implications for the chronology of habitat and megafaunal community change on Madagascar's Central Highlands. J. Quat. Sci. 34, 379-392. ( 10.1002/jqs.3096) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kluge M, Brulfert J, Ravelomanana D, Lipp J, Ziegler H. 1991. Crassulacean acid metabolism in Kalanchoë species collected in various climatic zones of Madagascar: a survey by δ13C analysis. Oecologia 88, 407-414. ( 10.1007/BF00317586) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Heaton THE, Vogel JC, von la Chevallerie G, Collett G. 1986. Climatic influence on the isotopic composition of bone nitrogen. Nature 322, 822-823. ( 10.1038/322822a0) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Goodman SM, Jungers WL. 2014. Extinct Madagascar. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hansford JP, Turvey ST. 2018. Unexpected diversity within the extinct elephant birds (Aves: Aepyornithidae) and a new identity for the world's largest bird. R. Soc. Open Sci. 5, 181295. ( 10.1098/rsos.181295) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Weston EM, Lister AM. 2009. Insular dwarfism in hippos and a model for brain size reduction in Homo floresiensis. Nature 459, 85-88. ( 10.1038/nature07922) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Grealy A, Phillips M, Miller G, Gilbert MTP, Rouillard JM, Lambert D, Bunce M, Haile J. 2017. Eggshell palaeogenomics: palaeognath evolutionary history revealed through ancient nuclear and mitochondrial DNA from Madagascan elephant bird (Aepyornis sp.) eggshell. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 109, 151-163. ( 10.1016/j.ympev.2017.01.005) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yoder AD, et al. 2016. Geogenetic patterns in mouse lemurs (genus Microcebus) reveal the ghosts of Madagascar's forests past. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 19, 8049-8056. ( 10.1073/pnas.1601081113) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Agnolin FL. 2016. Unexpected diversity of ratites (Aves, Palaeognathae) in the early Cenozoic of South America: palaeobiogeographical implications. Alcheringa 41, 101-111. ( 10.1080/03115518.2016.1184898) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Phillips DL, Gregg JW. 2001. Uncertainty in source partitioning using stable isotopes. Oecologia 127, 171-179. ( 10.1007/s004420000578) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Crowley BE, et al. 2011. Explaining geographical variation in the isotope composition of mouse lemurs (Microcebus). J. Biogeogr. 38, 2106-2121. ( 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02551.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.O'Leary MH. 1988. Carbon isotopes in photosynthesis. BioScience 38, 328-336. ( 10.2307/1310735) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Tykot RH. 2004. Stable isotopes and diet: you are what you eat. Proc. Int. School Phys. ‘Enrico Fermi’ 154, 433-444. ( 10.3254/978-1-61499-010-9-433) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Johnson BJ, Fogel ML, Miller GH. 1998. Stable isotopes in modern ostrich eggshell: a calibration for paleoenvironmental applications in semi-arid regions of southern Africa. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 62, 2451-2461. ( 10.1016/S0016-7037(98)00175-6) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Keeling CD. 1979. The Suess effect: 13Carbon–14Carbon interrelations. Environ. Int. 2, 229-300. ( 10.1016/0160-4120(79)90005-9) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Cerling TE, Harris JM, Hart JA, Kaleme P, Klingel H, Leakey MG, Levin NE, Lewison RL, Passey BH. 2008. Stable isotope ecology of the common hippopotamus. J. Zool. 2, 204-212. ( 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2008.00450.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Robinson PT, Flacke GL, Hentschel KM. 2017. The pygmy hippo story: West Africa's enigma of the rainforest. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Stuenes S. 1989. Taxonomy, habits, and relationships of the subfossil Madagascan hippopotami Hippopotamus lemerlei and H. madagascariensis. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 9, 241-268. ( 10.1080/02724634.1989.10011761) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Davies SJJF. 2002. Ratites and tinamous. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Pereira JA, Quintana RD, Monge S. 2003. Diets of plains vizcacha, greater rhea and cattle in Argentina. J. Range Manage. 56, 13-20. ( 10.2307/4003875) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Summers RW, McAdam JH. 1993. The upland goose: a study of the interaction between geese, sheep and man in the Falkland Islands. Huntingdon, UK: Bluntisham. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Torres CR, Clarke JA. 2018. Nocturnal giants: evolution of the sensory ecology in elephant birds and other palaeognaths inferred from digital brain reconstructions. Proc. R. Soc. B 285, 20181540. ( 10.1098/rspb.2018.1540) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wiman C, Edinger T. 1941. Sur les cranes et les encephales d'Aepyornis et de Mullerornis. Bull. Acad. Malgache 42, 1-50. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Monnier L. 1913. Les Aepyornis. Paleontol. Madag. 8, 125-172. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lamberton C. 1934. Ratites subfossiles de Madagascar, Les Mullerornithidae. Mem. Acad. Malgache 17, 125-168. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Gerlach J. 1999. Feeding behavior and the saddleback shell of Dipsochelys arnoldi. Chelonian Conserv. Biol. 3, 496-500. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Gillespie TW, Lipkin B, Sullivan L, Benowitz DR, Pau S, Keppel G. 2012. The rarest and least protected areas in biodiversity hotspots. Biodivers. Conserv. 21, 3597-3611. ( 10.1007/s10531-012-0384-1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Robuchon M, Pavoine S, Véron S, Delli G, Faith DP, Mandrici A, Pellens R, Dubois G, Leroy B. 2021. Revisiting species and areas of interest for conserving global mammalian phylogenetic diversity. Nat. Commun. 12, 3694. ( 10.1038/s41467-021-23861-y) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hansford JP, Turvey ST. 2022. Dietary isotopes of Madagascar's extinct megafauna reveal Holocene browsing and grazing guilds. FigShare.( 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5918306) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Citations

  1. Hansford JP, Turvey ST. 2022. Dietary isotopes of Madagascar's extinct megafauna reveal Holocene browsing and grazing guilds. FigShare.( 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5918306) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Data Availability Statement

All data are available in electronic supplementary material, file S1 [50].


Articles from Biology Letters are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES