Skip to main content
Nano-Micro Letters logoLink to Nano-Micro Letters
. 2022 Apr 13;14:104. doi: 10.1007/s40820-022-00849-x

Cellulose Nanopaper: Fabrication, Functionalization, and Applications

Wei Liu 1,2, Kun Liu 1, Haishun Du 3,, Ting Zheng 4, Ning Zhang 1, Ting Xu 1,, Bo Pang 2,, Xinyu Zhang 3, Chuanling Si 1,, Kai Zhang 2,
PMCID: PMC9008119  PMID: 35416525

Highlights

  • Preparation strategies of cellulose nanopaper were elaborated.

  • Functionalization of cellulose nanopaper and its advanced applications were summarized.

  • Prospects and challenges of cellulose nanopaper were discussed.

graphic file with name 40820_2022_849_Figa_HTML.jpg

Keywords: Nanocellulose, Cellulose nanopaper, Cellulose nanocrystals, Cellulose nanofibrils, Cellulose nanomaterials

Abstract

Cellulose nanopaper has shown great potential in diverse fields including optoelectronic devices, food packaging, biomedical application, and so forth, owing to their various advantages such as good flexibility, tunable light transmittance, high thermal stability, low thermal expansion coefficient, and superior mechanical properties. Herein, recent progress on the fabrication and applications of cellulose nanopaper is summarized and discussed based on the analyses of the latest studies. We begin with a brief introduction of the three types of nanocellulose: cellulose nanocrystals, cellulose nanofibrils and bacterial cellulose, recapitulating their differences in preparation and properties. Then, the main preparation methods of cellulose nanopaper including filtration method and casting method as well as the newly developed technology are systematically elaborated and compared. Furthermore, the advanced applications of cellulose nanopaper including energy storage, electronic devices, water treatment, and high-performance packaging materials were highlighted. Finally, the prospects and ongoing challenges of cellulose nanopaper were summarized.

Introduction

As the most abundant natural polymer, cellulose is the main structural component of plant’s cell wall (Fig. 1a, c) and many microorganisms (such as fungi, bacteria, and algae) [1, 2]. Cellulose is composed of β-D-glucopyranose units linked by β-(1–4) glycosidic bonds [35]. Cellulose with a one-dimensional scale between 1 and 100 nm is called nanocellulose, which has the chemical structure characteristics of original cellulose and has received extensive scientific and technological attention in the past two decades [6, 7]. Nanocellulose not only possesses intrinsic nature of cellulose such as biodegradability, renewability, and ease of chemical modification, but also has outstanding characteristics, such as nanoscale effects, high tensile strength and elastic modulus (130–150 GPa), high specific surface area (up to several hundreds of m2·g−1), and low density (1.6 g cm−3) [8]. Owing to such excellent properties, nanocellulose has shown great potential in many emerging applications, such as biomedical materials [913], paint and coatings [14, 15], sensors [1618], photonic and electronic devices [1923], and energy storage materials [2428].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

a Schematic illustration of hierarchical fibril structure and morphologies of lignocellulose [45]. b SEM image of Acetobacter xylinus, optical photograph of BC and formation of BC [46]. c Schematics of the crystalline and disordered regions [45]. d TEM image of CNCs [47]. e TEM image of CNFs [48]. f SEM image of BC [4]

The pulping and bleaching technology of modern pulp and paper mills could be amenably upgraded for nanocellulose production, which also provides a new development strategy for traditional pulp and paper enterprises and open up a valuable path for the high-value utilization of various biomass resources [2931]. Cellulose nanopaper (CNP), a kind of film material mainly constructed from nanocellulose, has superior physical–chemical properties, such as tunable optical transmittance, high thermal stability, low thermal expansion coefficient (< 8.5 × 10–6 K−1), and good mechanical properties (high modulus of 7.1–14 GPa) [3234]. Moreover, combining nanocellulose with other functional nanomaterials would endow the CNP with diverse new functionalities, leading to the expansion of the applications from traditional areas to high-tech fields such as electronic devices, clean energy, biomedicine, and water treatment [3539].

Several reviews have summarized the development of CNP for various applications, to which the readers are directed for additional information [4044]. However, a comprehensive review about the fabrication, functionalization and emerging applications of CNP is still missing. In this review, based on the analysis of the latest research, we summarize and discuss the latest developments in the preparation, functionalization, and application of CNP. Firstly, the differences in preparation and properties of cellulose nanocrystals, cellulose nanofibrils, and bacterial cellulose are briefly introduced. Then the manufacture of CNP and its various applications, especially applications in emerging fields such as energy storage, electronic equipment, water treatment, and high-performance packaging materials, are deeply discussed. Finally, the prospects and challenges of CNP are summarized.

Fabrication of Cellulose Nanopaper

Classification, Preparation, and Performance of Nanocellulose

According to the size, morphology, preparation techniques, and sources, nanocellulose can be classified into three main categories: (1) Cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs), also known as nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC) or cellulose nanowhiskers (CNWs), are rigid rod-like particles of 10–30 nm in diameter and less than 500 nm in length (Fig. 1d) [4951]. CNC is generally obtained by hydrolysis of cellulose raw materials with strong inorganic acid or enzyme [52, 53]. In the process of hydrolysis, the amorphous area of cellulose is degraded into sugar, and the crystalline area is retained, and finally whisker-like or spherical CNC is obtained [53, 54]. Compared with cellulose raw materials, CNCs have a higher degree of crystallinity ranging from 54 to 88% [55]. (2) Cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs), also termed as nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) or microfibrillated cellulose (MFC), consist of both individual and aggregated nanofibrils (Fig. 1e) [56, 57]. The elementary fibril has a diameter of 3–5 nm and a length of 500–1000 nm, while the aggregates are in the range of 20–50 nm in diameter [58]. CNF is mainly obtained by treating cellulose raw materials with strong mechanical shear force [59]. During the treatment, the amorphous region of cellulose is usually not removed. CNF is composed of both crystalline region and amorphous region, with large aspect ratio and good flexibility [60, 61]. (3) Bacterial cellulose (BC), a kind of highly crystalline cellulose without lignin and hemicellulose, is mainly produced by Acetobacter species via a biotechnological assemble processes using low-molecular weight carbon sources, e.g., D-glucose, as feedstock (Fig. 1b, f) [62, 63]. Depending on the type of bacteria and the culturing conditions, the typical BC fibril has a diameter of 20–100 nm and a length of several microns and could be processed into various shapes such as spheres and membranes per different fermentation conditions [64]. BC is usually synthesized by a specific bacterium (e.g., glucoacetobacter). Glucose chains are generated in the bacterial cell body and extruded from the pores of the cell membrane. Several glucose chains further form microfibrils, which are intertwined to form a three-dimensional nanonetwork, namely BC.

As discussed above, different types of nanocellulose exhibit different properties, which further determines different end applications. For instance, CNCs with high crystallinity, high thermal stability, and unique chiral nematic structure could be more suitable to be used as reinforcing nanofillers for nanocomposites and to make iridescent films [65]. However, when compared to CNF and BC, the self-assembled nanostructure (e.g., film) of CNC is very brittle due to the lack of an energy-dissipating amorphous phase and its inability to form entangled networks [66]. Thus, it would be more reasonable to select CNF and BC for the fabrication of mechanically robust nanostructures such as nanopaper, foams, and aerogels.

Preparation Strategies of Cellulose Nanopaper

In 1992, Revol and coworkers firstly fabricated CNP by simply evaporating water from the aqueous CNC suspensions [67]. This work mainly focused on the chiral nematic liquid crystalline phase and the twisted fibrillary layers solidified from CNCs. Later, Dufresne et al. reported the fabrication of CNP by casting method with sugar beet cellulose nanofibers [68]. Taniguchi and coworkers prepared CNP with nanofibers from different types of natural fibers such as wood pulp fibers, tunicin cellulose, and silk fibers [69]. The obtained films with a thickness of 3–100 μm were strong, homogeneous, and translucent. In these studies, CNP exhibited much higher tensile strength than commercial print grade papers. The physiochemical properties of the resultant CNP are affected by preparation methods, filter media, drying methods, and so forth [7072]. However, the effects of such parameters on the self-assembly of nanocellulose during the preparation procedure have not been fully understood. Isogai et al. compared the CNP manufactured by CNFs with larger and smaller (< 10 nm) fibril dimeter and found that CNP prepared from finer CNFs has a higher transparency (90%), and higher tensile strength and Young's modulus (233 MPa and 6.9 GPa, respectively) [73]. Aulin et al. used dispersion casting method and coating method on base paper to prepare carboxymethyl microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) film, and the effects of relative humidity on the oxygen barrier properties of nanopaper were studied [74]. The results showed that the CNP had better oxygen barrier performance at lower humidity. Currently, there are three main methods including suction filtration, casting, and coating to produce CNP.

Filtration Method

The suction filtration method has been frequently used for preparing CNP in laboratory-scale setups (Fig. 2a). The main steps involved can be briefly described as: the nanocellulose suspension is firstly diluted to a concentration of 0.01–1.0 wt.%. After thorough mixing, the nanocellulose suspension is poured into a vacuum or pressure filtration device [79, 80]. As the filtration progresses, most of the free water is removed and nanocellulose suspension forms a dense packing layer in the bottom filter. The increase in the nanocellulose concentration induces the aggregation of nanocellulose to form a wet nanopaper. After that, the wet nanopaper is peeled from the filter and CNFs will be finally obtained after pressing and drying [81]. Sehaqui et al. developed a rapid procedure to fabricate nanopaper, involving vacuum filtration, wet paper web transfer, and vacuum drying [79]. The whole process could be completed within 1 h, indicating the great enhancement of the preparation efficiency. As verified by many studies, the size of the filter used to prepare CNP is a crucial parameter to be considered. The pore size of the traditional wire sieve is much larger than the size of nanocellulose, resulting in a low retention rate of nanocellulose. Although the use of filters with a pore size in the range of 0.1–0.65 μm or smaller can greatly reduce the loss of nanocellulose, the water removal procedure could last for several hours or even several days, which greatly reduces the viability for the large-scale production. It was shown that polyelectrolytes could be used as filter aids to improve the dewatering performance of nanocellulose suspensions. Wetterling et al. developed an electro-assisted filtration method to promote the dewatering of cellulosic materials [82]. The results demonstrated that the ionic strength had a crucial effect on the electro-assisted filtration process. Electro-assisted filtration was found to improve the dewatering rate of the studied cellulosic material, and the potential improvement compared to pressure filtration increased with the specific surface area of the solid material. Higher power is required for the electro-assisted filtration of the system with higher ionic strength.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Schematic illustration of the preparation procedure of CNP via a filtration method [75] and b casting method [76]. c Schematic illustration of the difference in how the liquid is withdrawn during the casting and filtration method [77]. d Schematic illustration of the fabrication of CNP by spraying deposition [78]

Casting Method

Compared with the suction filtration, the casting method can not only achieve a 100% retention of nanocellulose, but also result in CNP with specific microstructures by fine-tune the evaporating condition (Fig. 2b) [74]. In this method, the evaporation of the solvent usually takes several hours, during which nanofibers gradually get closer to each other, thereby increasing the interaction between the nanofibers and finally agglomerating to obtain the nanopaper. Based on this method, researchers developed a semi-industrial roll-to-roll pilot line, realizing the continuous production of CNP [83]. It is worth noting that such roll-to-roll strategy can only process CNFs-based CNP. CNCs are of lower aspect ratio and higher rigidity, thus not easy to form a continuous film through the roll-to-roll pilot line without aiding agents.

Coating Method

Unlike the casting method which processes CNP on an impermeable substrate, coating approach employs a permeable substrate, permitting the nanocellulose to deposit on it (Fig. 2c). Generally, the coating method is mainly to coat nanocellulose on a substrate with a porous surface and then remove the excess paint through a blade. After drying, a composite nanopaper consisting of a nanocellulose-formed top layer and an underlying substrate can be obtained [77]. Such nanopapers have excellent light transmittance and low oxygen permeability, demonstrating great potential as environmentally friendly barriers [84]. Compared with pure CNP, nanocomposite coatings are highly versatile, enabling CNP to combine excellent optical transmittance, high hardness, fracture toughness, and hydrophobic surface properties [85].

However, to achieve large-scale production, the following challenges need to be overcome in the coating method: (1) Nanocellulose has inherent characteristics of small size, large specific surface area, high hydrophilicity, and good water retention, leading to issues of low retention rate and dehydration difficulty during the CNP forming process. To tackle these issues, several approaches such as adding retention aids, plasticizers, or compatibilizers with nanocellulose have been developed to improve the retention rate and coating properties of nanocellulose suspensions [85]. (2) Due to the high water retention rate of nanocellulose, the efficiency of the traditional coating process is relatively low. To accelerate the dewatering process, Beneventi et al. reported a more efficient way by spray deposition of high concentrated CNFs suspension on a wet porous nylon fabric to fabricate nanopaper with excellent barrier properties and high mechanical properties (Fig. 2d) [78]. Similarly, Krol et al. used the spray deposition to fabricate CNFs-SiO2 composite nanopapers successfully [86]. For silica mass fraction above 20%, SiO2 clusters induced a net increase in air permeability and ionic conductivity up to 12 nm2 and 1.5 mS cm−1 for a SiO2 content of 33%. Shanmugam et al. reported that in terms of tensile index, the nanopaper prepared by the spraying method showed comparable performance to the nanopaper fabricated by the filtration method [87].

Emerging Methods

To accomplish high performance in nanopaper, many novel strategies have been proposed. For instance, Kumar et al. developed a roll-to-roll coating process to deposit CNFs suspension on packaging cardboard via a slot die followed by infrared and air drying. This method provided a continuous and industrially compatible process to reinforce the commercial paperboard with CNF coatings with high strength and barrier properties [88]. Chowdhury et al. further investigated the roll-to-roll coating process and found that, by simply adjusting the concentration of CNCs suspension, the anisotropy of CNCs can be achieved and controlled, which in turn affected the coating properties, e.g., the water vapor transmission rate in particular [89]. Azrak and co-workers developed an efficient approach for continuous processing of CNP through traditional single-screw extrusion [90]. It was demonstrated that highly loaded CNF/processing aid pastes (91 wt% CNF, ≤ 9 wt.% of processing aid e.g., carboxymethyl cellulose) with a solid content of 25% could be extruded at rates of up to 7.45 ± 0.47 kg/h, which significantly reduced the preparation and drying time. Intriguingly, the extruded CNP exhibited equivalent mechanical properties when compared to the CNP prepared by the conventional solution casting approach.

Functionalization of Cellulose Nanopaper

Due to the high hydrophilicity, CNP is mechanically strong in dry conditions, but weakened in a high humidity environment [91, 92]. This downside limits CNP’s practical application under all-around scenarios. The water resistance of CNP can be improved by compounding nanocellulose with hydrophobic materials prior to the formation of CNP or directly hydrophobilizing the pre-formed CNP surface [93]. For example, Cunha et al. demonstrated a facile approach to prepare moisture-stable CNP by topochemical acetylation [94]. It was found that the acetylated CNP sorbs as little as 2.0–2.3% moisture at 53%RH, which is much lower than the untreated sample (3.8–4.8%). Operamolla and co-workers reported the fabrication of hydrophobized CNP by dipping it in a dichloromethane solution of lauroyl chloride and pyridine [95]. Results indicate that the hydrophobized CNP has a more compact surface morphology than the starting CNP and exhibits significantly enhanced resistance to water. Zhu et al. treated the CNP with glutaraldehyde and obtained the modified CNP with excellent dimensional stability in water [96]. This shape-stable and transparent CNP was further used as the substrate to fabricate gravure printed antenna. In another example, Jung and co-workers reported a simple and effective way to enhance the water resistance by treating the CNP with 0.1 M octadecyltrichlorosilane for 30 s [97]. It was discovered that the contact angle of the CNP was significantly increased from 58° to 103° after treatment. The authors further demonstrated that the modified CNP could be used as promising substrate for solar cells.

In addition, enhanced performance and/or novel functionalities can be introduced into CNPs, extending their applications in value-added fields [98, 99]. In the following subsections, we will introduce a variety of emerging composite nanopapers with functional nanomaterials (e.g., nanomaterials with 0D, 1D, or 2D structure, macromolecular polymers, etc.) in recently.

Nanomaterials Functionalized Nanopaper

The integration of nanocellulose with various metal nanoparticles endows the resultant CNP with new functionalities and extends their application to unprecedented fields, e.g., sensors and catalysis [104]. For example, nanopaper possessing magnetism, nanosurface roughness, and excellent mechanical properties was obtained by incorporating Fe3O4 nanoparticles (0D) to nanocellulose CNP. Such magnetic nanopaper hold the promise to prepare magnetoelectronic devices [105]. Owing to the excellent flexibility of CNP and high conductivity of silver nanowires (AgNWs), the two constituents have been combined in transparent and conductive nanopaper [106]. The assembly of nanocellulose and other inorganic nanomaterials has become a new strategy for the development of high-performance nanopapers. For example, antibacterial property was accomplished by integrating ZnO in CNP, CNP possessing adjustable thermal conductivity was obtained by compositing sepiolite nanofibers (a kind of nanosilicate with fiber morphology of about 1–5 μm in length and 50–100 nm in diameter) with nanocellulose [107]. Layered materials (2D) such as graphite, layered metal oxides and layered silicates can be exfoliated into few- or even single-layered sheets. CNP made of nanocellulose with these two-dimensional nanomaterials has demonstrated great potential in various emerging fields such as electronics and energy devices. For instance, Xu et al. used a simple high-speed blending technology, in the presence of amphiphilic CNFs, and exfoliating graphite at the same time, the graphene can be dispersed in water in one step, and the prepared aqueous suspension is made into a flexible and lightweight graphene/CNFs paper by vacuum filtration [100]. As shown in Fig. 3a, this nanopaper showed rapid deformation or bending motion in the presence of moisture, and instantaneous recovery in the absence of moisture stimulation, simulating the closing or opening behavior of shame plants or the movement of soft robots. MXenes, two-dimensional transition metal carbides, exhibit excellent properties in many fields such as energy storage and sensor. Song et al. used a simple vacuum-assisted filtration method to prepare a flexible cellulose nanofiber (CNFs)/Ti3C2 composite membrane [108]. The synthesized Ti3C2/CNFs composite films presented outstanding flexibility because the films can be fold to any shape, which enables Ti3C2/CNFs composite films to be the potential application in flexible electronic devices for heat dissipation.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

a proposed folding mechanism and bending photograph of graphene/CNFs nanopaper [100]. b Self-Assembly of Chiral Fluorescent CQD/CNCs Nanostructures. c Patterned chiral luminescent CNCs films with 10 cm diameter under natural light (left) and at 365 nm UV light (right) [101]. d Schematic illustration of the functionalization of CNP by impregnation of CS and the followed halogenation [102]. e Schematic illustration of the assembling procedures for CNCs/CS/AgNWs TCCNP [103]

Berglund et al. fabricated fire-resistant CNP by mixing nanoclay with CNFs suspension [109]. Hu and coworkers successfully fabricated CNP with superior thermal and mechanical properties by combing CNFs with layered boron nitride nanosheets [110]. The same group also designed a double-layer nanopaper with excellent thermal conductivity, electrical insulation, and transparency by coating a thin layer of boron nitride on the surface of nanopaper [111]. As shown in Fig. 3b, Xiong et al. reported the emission of needle-like nanostructures by self-assembly of CNCs decorated with carbon quantum dots (CQDs) [101]. The chiral CQD/CNCs film exhibits a strong iridescent appearance and enhanced luminescence superposition, which is significantly higher than that of the CQD film and other reported CQD/CNCs films (Fig. 3c).

Polymer Functionalized Nanopaper

The combination of polymers and nanocellulose provides a solution to enhance the performances of nanopapers including improved mechanical and optical properties, lower surface roughness, and higher water resistance [112]. Sehaqui et al. reported the fabrication of CNP by combing 2-hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC) with CNFs suspension. Compared with CNFs-based CNP, the HEC-CNFs CNP possessed higher elongation at break and lower tensile strength [79]. Wang et al. proposed a simple method for bulk gradient nanocomposites of CNFs and custom-synthesized copolymers [113]. CNFs/copolymer mixtures with different weight ratios were directly written into filaments adjacent to each other in a stripe pattern, and then, the filaments were continuously dried to prepare CNP with mechanical gradient properties. This functionalized CNP showed great promise for stretchable electronic devices. Most recently, chitosan (CS) has been proven as a promising material for the functionalization of CNP to achieve multifunctional properties such as antibacterial ability, water resistance, and improved mechanical strength and barrier performance [114, 115]. As shown in Fig. 3d, Du et al. functionalized CNP by impregnation of CS and the followed halogenation [102]. It was found that the functionalized CNP exhibited improved mechanical strength at both dry (38.3%) and wet (512.6%) state, enhanced barrier properties towards both oxygen and water vapor, as well as excellent antibacterial performance against both S. aureus and E. coli. As illustrated in Fig. 3e, Zhang et al. used CS and TEMPO-oxidized CNCs as the fiber backbone, and AgNWs as the conductive network and successfully designed flexible transparent conductive TCCNP [103]. The results showed that with the addition of CS, the mechanical stress of TCCNP increased from 14.5 to 30.8 MPa, and it had good transparent conductivity, and the sheet resistance is 4.43 Ohm sq−1. This discovery will open the way for the further development of high-end flexible paper electronic technology using high-performance polysaccharide-based TCCNP.

Applications of Cellulose Nanopaper

Owing to the excellent properties, such as superior mechanical properties (high modulus, high tensile strength), high thermal stability, low thermal expansion coefficient, and easy adjustment of optical properties, CNP has been widely used in many emerging fields including electronic devices, energy storage, packaging materials, water treatment and so forth.

Electronic Devices

Recently, various electronic devices are highly demanded due to the rapid development of the electronic information society. Owing to the inherent advantages such as lightweight, wide range of sources, and excellent mechanical properties, CNP has shown great potential in the design and manufacturing of electronic devices [116118].

Conductive Film Materials

Many types of conductive nanopaper based on nanocellulose have been developed. Su et al. prepared a transparent conductive nanopaper by assembling polydopamine-modified nanocellulose with AgNWs [119]. The resultant nanopaper displayed the high transmission (90.93% at the wavenumber of 550 nm), good mechanical properties, and excellent corrosion resistance. Also, Hoeng et al. developed a flexible conductive film by coating CNFs/AgNWs suspension on polyetherimide (PEI) film [120]. The results showed that performances combining a sheet resistance of 13 ± 3 Ω sq−1 with a transparency of 90.1 ± 0.5% at 550 nm were achieved without any additional post-treatment to the film. Additionally, nanocellulose can also be processed into highly conductive composite by combining CNP with highly conductive materials, such as carbon nanotubes and graphene [121, 122]. Compared with the commercialized ITO/polyethylene terephthalate (PET) transparent conductive paper, such CNP had high thermal stability, renewability, biodegradability, and low thermal expansion coefficient, showing great potential in the new generation of electronic devices. Cao et al. reported the preparation of highly flexible CNF/MXene composite nanopaper through a vacuum-filtration-induced self-assembly process. The obtained CNF/MXene nanopaper exhibited a nacre-like lamellar structure, resulting in high tensile strength (135.4 MPa) and excellent folding endurance (14,260 times). Moreover, the composite nanopaper showed high electrical conductivity (739.4 S m−1) and excellent specific EMI shielding efficiency (2647 dB cm2 g−1). Most recently, Liu et al. reported the fabrication of CNFs/AgNWs nanopaper through a step-by-step self-assembly process [123]. It was found that the obtained CNFs/AgNWs nanopaper showed a unique layered structure and improved two-sidedness. The optimized sample exhibited an excellent mechanical strength (98.6 MPa) and a high conductivity (1673 S cm−1) simultaneously. As a result, the CNFs/AgNWs nanopaper was proved as a promising EMI shielding material with a high shielding effectiveness of up to 67.27 dB in the X band.

Electronic Skin

Skin electronics are flexible, stretchable, and self-healing devices that can attach seamlessly to the human skin, therefore have a bright application prospect in fields of medical diagnosis, artificial intelligence, and biological studies [128131]. Flexible CNP with the ability to adhere to various surface has been recognized as promising candidates for preparing electronic skins. Gao et al. introduced PPy into TEMPO-oxidized CNFs (TOCN) through in situ polymerization and then prepared TOCN/PPy electronic skin with surface microstructure with nylon gauze as microstructure template, as shown in Fig. 4a [124]. The prepared electronic skin exhibited excellent sensing and mechanical properties. The signal is detected in Fig. 4b when the volunteer performed a wrist bending exercise. In addition, when the wrist was bent at a certain angle, the output signal stabilized at a constant value. As shown in Fig. 4c, the electronic skin was fixed at the finger joints, and when the fingers were bent at different angles, different output signals were detected. Therefore, TOCN/PPy electronic skin had broad application prospects in health monitoring and human–computer interaction. Gao et al. developed an all paper-based piezoresistive (APBP) pressure sensor through a facile, cost effective, and environmentally friendly method [132]. This pressure sensor was based on a tissue paper coated with AgNWs as a sensing material, a nanocellulose paper (NCP) as a bottom substrate for printing electrodes, and NCP as a top encapsulating layer. Furthermore, the APBP sensor had been mounted on the human skin to monitor physiological signals (such as arterial heart pulse and pronunciation from throat) and successfully applied as a soft electronic skin to respond to the external pressure.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

a Schematic illustration of the flexible E-skin preparation. b Real-time I-t curves of wrist bending, and c finger bending [124]. d Schematic representation of the fabrication of the transparent bacterial celluloses/MXene film with Janus structure. e SSE/t value of the BCs/MXene films in the X-band region. f Schematic illustration of the EMI wave shielding mechanism of BCs/MXene film [125]. g Illustration of bioelectronic decal composed of a sheet of nanocellulose containing multiple OECTs, and expanded schematic of a single OECT decal. h OECT decal laminated to biological tissue, i.e., chicken skin, and resultant transistor performance [126]. i The operating principles of the nanocellulose tactile sensor to detect various physical stimuli such as temperature and pressure. Thermographic images and real-time mapping images of a bimodal sensor array; j when touching the sensor array by hand, it responds to pressure and temperature. k On the other hand, when touching it with a pen, it responds only to the pressure, and the response to temperature is insignificant [127]

MXene is a type of two-dimensional transition metal carbides and/or nitrides, with a large aspect ratio and metal conductivity, and is widely studied and considered as a potential wearable material. Yang et al. prepared Ti3C2Tx/BC film to construct a pressure sensor [133]. The prepared sensor device exhibited high mechanical strength (225 MPa), high sensitivity (up to 95.2 kPa−1, in < 50 Pa region), and fast response (95 ms). For the practical application demonstration, the sensor can collect tactile signals of different gestures, including holding the cylinder, expanding five fingers, pinching, and holding the mouse. In addition, the sensor can also monitor a variety of other human biological activities (such as swallowing, heartbeat, pulse, acoustic vibration, and gesture motion) and can be used as an electronic skin to map the pressure distribution, clarifying its potential applications in medical diagnosis, intelligent robot, and human–computer interaction. Ma et al. developed a BC/MXene film with Janus structure as a skin contact material (Fig. 4d) [125]. BC act as a substrate and frame to effectively capture the infiltrated MXene nanosheets, rather than simply mixing, leading to the formation of the Janus structure. The MXene-based composite film also achieved a super high SSE/t of ∼ 69,455.2 dB cm2 g−1 at a thickness of approximately 1.732 μm (Fig. 4e). The potential EMI attenuation mechanisms of BCs/MXene films are presented in Fig. 4f. It may hold the promise for broad applications of such BCs/MXene films in wearable smart electronic devices.

Additionally, Yuen et al. reported a self-adhesive ultra-thin electronic biological sticker that can collect, transmit, and detect biological fluids [126]. The device consists of a thin film organic electrochemical transistor (OECT) fabricated on a thin (< 20 μm) porous microbial nanocellulose membrane (Fig. 4f). As shown in Fig. 4g, the OECT sticker was tested on chicken skin moistened with simulated sweat to evaluate the robustness of the device performance on biological tissues with rough local contours. The results showed that the transistor performance was comparable to other devices tested, and the mA-level current and ION/IOFF ratio were close to three orders of magnitude. The uniform performance of OECT stickers on various surfaces indicated the robustness, flexibility, and stability of OECT stickers, which indicated a good prospect for future biomedical applications. Interestingly, Jung et al. reported a fully integrated vertically stacked nanocellulose tactile sensor capable of sensing temperature and pressure at the same time [127]. Figure 4h shows the relative resistance change in the pressure sensor, which had a micro-pyramid structure, principles of the thermoelectric-based temperature sensor, and the structure of tactile sensor. The authors evaluated the operation of the sensor using real-time mapping arrays and thermal images, as shown in Fig. 4i-j. When the sensor array was touched by hand, it responded to pressure and temperature. On the other hand, when touched with a pen, it only reacted to pressure, but not to temperature. The results showed that the nanocellulose-based sensor array has high sensitivity, fast response, negligible interference, and durable performance and had important research value in the fields of artificial intelligence equipment, electronic skin, and robots.

Organic Light-emitting Diodes

Organic light-emitting diodes (OLED) are light-emitting devices in the form of all-solid film. OLEDs have advantages of lightweight, low power consumption, long life, and good flexibility. Figure 5a-b illustrates a schematic diagram of the device structure. Flexible substrate is a very important part of electronic displays, and its constituent materials are required to have excellent mechanical properties, thermal stability, flexibility, and smooth surface. As shown in Fig. 5c, Najafabadi et al. sequentially deposited the cathode layer (Al and LiF), organic layer (TpPyPB), emissive layer (CBP:Ir(ppy)3), and anode layer (MoO3 and Au) on a CNCs-based CNP substrate to assembly a OLED with a maximum brightness of 74,591 cd m−2 [135]. The obtained OLED is soluble in water, which helps solve the problem of electronics recycling difficulties. Nanopaper has the potential to play an important role in various emerging electronic devices. However, compared with plastic or glass counterparts, nanopaper has some drawbacks that limit its practical application in the electronic field: (1) the relatively high surface roughness, (2) high water absorption, (3) low decomposition temperature, and (4) high material cost. Zhu et al. compared several properties of nanopaper, regenerated cellulose film, and traditionally used flexible plastics as flexible electronic substrates (Fig. 5d) [136]. Nanopaper had a much higher haze value and was an ideal choice for low-glare displays and solar cells. As shown in Fig. 5e–f, OLED devices prepared on nanopaper have stable performance in both flat and bend states. Yang et al. prepared a CNP from the acetylated CNFs and used it as OLED substrates, as shown in Fig. 5g. The effects of the degree of acetylation on the film properties related to the OLED performance, specifically the film homogeneity, flexibility, thermal stability, transmittance, and mechanical properties, were carefully investigated [137]. Zhang et al. prepared a highly transparent and conductive nanopaper (TCNP) by conducting in situ photopolymerization of conductive polymerizable deep eutectic solvent (PDES) monomer on a nanopaper substrate made of CNFs (Fig. 5h) [138]. TCNP also showed excellent optical and electrical durability after more than 6000 bend recovery at a bending angle of 150°.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

a Schematic structure of the TOLED on the CNCs-based hybrid film and b photograph of the TOLED on the hybrid substrate emitting light through bottom direction [134]. c Photograph of five inverted top-emitting OLEDs on a CNCs substrate mounted on glass (left), and an illuminated OLED on CNCs substrate (right) [135]. d Schematic drawing of a nanopaper OLED device. e Pictures of the flat and bent nanopaper OLED device. f J-V curve of the flexible OLED in the flat and bent states, respectively. The bending radius is 1.5 mm [136]. g Preparation of NFC film as a FOLED substrate [137]. h Schematic illustration of TCNP-based flexible electroluminescent devices; photographs of the flexible TCNP-based electroluminescent devices with horizontal, curved, and “Z-shaped” folding, which exhibited high luminous brightness and flexibility [138]

Energy Conversion and Storage Devices

Supercapacitors

Supercapacitor is a type of energy storage device, which is generally composed of cathode, anode, electrolyte, and separator. Comparing with batteries, supercapacitors have the advantages of high-power density, fast charging/discharging speed, and long cycle life [139, 140]. Nanopaper has excellent mechanical properties and good flexibility, therefore an excellent matrix material for the manufacturing of flexible electrodes. Cellulose is inherently non-conductivity. Integrating CNP with conductive materials possessing high electrical conductivity would efficiently resolve this issue. Li et al. prepared flexible and lightweight paper electrodes using polyaniline (PANI)-modified BC through a simple vacuum filtration method [141]. The results showed that the electrode had excellent specific capacitance (the specific capacitance was 656 F g−1 at 1 A g−1) and cycling stability (the specific capacitance remained 99.5% after 1000 charges). Wang et al. designed a flexible electrode with excellent mechanical properties by coupling nanocellulose with flexible PPy/graphene oxide (GO) composites [142]. The obtained electrode realized the rapid charge and discharge with a volumetric capacitance up to 198 F cm−3 and demonstrated good cycling stability. Zheng et al. designed a similar electrode by several steps involving vacuum filtration of CNFs and graphene nanosheets to prepare substrates, in situ polymerization of aniline to create composite electrodes, and finally assembly of all-solid-state supercapacitors [143]. Recently, several attempts have been made to fabricate PEDOT-based flexible electrodes by using CNFs as building blocks. For example, Du et al. reported a conductive PEDOT:PSS/CNFs paper electrodes for flexible supercapacitors with superior areal capacitance and cycling stability (Fig. 6a) [144]. The supercapacitor could deliver the maximum areal specific capacitance of 854.4 mF cm−2 (corresponding to 122.1 F cm−3) at 5 mV s−1 and offer the highest areal energy density of 30.86 μWh cm−2 (corresponding to 4.41 mWh cm−3). Jiang et al. developed a new and simple method for the preparation of RGO/PEDOT:PSS/BNC flexible electrode by adding GO thin slices and conducting polymer PEDOT:PSS in BNC matrix and then reducing GO by water treatment in the process of BNC mediated hydrogel growth, as shown in Fig. 6e [145]. The prepared electrode had excellent electrochemical performance (373 F g−1 at 1 A g−1) and cycle stability (approximately 85% capacitance retention rate in 1000 cycles). In addition, the lightweight device showed remarkable mechanical flexibility, performance stability under extreme mechanical deformation, and a capacitance retention rate of approximately 88% over 4500 cycles. Zhou and co-workers reported a highly flexible, hierarchical porous, conductive nanopapers electrode of CNFs@conductive MOF (CNF@c-MOF) for high performance supercapacitor [146]. The nanopaper electrodes and obtained supercapacitor both showed good electrochemical performances due to the smooth electrolyte transport and charge transfer of CNF@c-MOF film (Fig. 6b-d). As shown in Fig. 6f, Qi et al. easily achieved the thickening of the MnO2 layer by coating cellulose nanofibers on thin graphite paper [147]. The symmetrical supercapacitor assembled from optimized paper electrodes showed an extremely high volumetric energy density of 10.6 mWh‧cm−3 at a power density of 0.11 W cm−3. Another notable benefit of using CNP as the substrate was its ability to facilitate the dispersion of electroactive materials (e.g., graphene, GO, and nanotubes). This was achieved through the interaction of hydrophobic region of conductive NP (e.g., CNT and graphene) and specific crystalline faces of cellulose [148, 149], forming the hybrid complex to prevent the agglomeration or re-stacking of the electroactive particles, and in turn, promoting electrical conductivity and cycling stability of the supercapacitors. For example, Tian et al. reported that MXene (Ti3C2Tx) colloid was stably dispersed by CNFs, and nanocomposite film electrodes with independent and good mechanical properties were assembled by using stable dispersion [150]. In addition, due to the enhanced mechanical properties of Ti3C2Tx/CNFs electrode, the prepared micro-supercapacitor device can be bent and crimped without significantly reducing its charge storage performance, as shown in Fig. 6g.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

a Schematic illustration of the preparation of PEDOT:PSS/CNFs and the fabrication of PEDOT:PSS/CNP [144]. b Photograph of LED powered by the devices in series under different deformations. c Schematic diagram showing the charge transfer and electrolyte ion transport in the nanofibrous and conductive networks of CNF@c-MOF nanopapers [146]. d Photographs showing the flexibility of the components (electrode and separator) of device and a schematic showing the structure of the solid-state supercapacitor device based on RGO/PEDOT: PSS/BNC electrodes. Optical image showing the flexibility of assembled supercapacitor. LED indicator lighted by assembled device [145]. e Schematic diagram of the fabrication procedures of the electrodes from thin graphite papers grown with MnO2 layers and the electrochemical performance of the symmetric supercapacitor [147]. f Schematic illustration showing different fabrication steps for Ti3C2Tx/CNFs-based micro-supercapacitors and CV curves at a flat and roll status of Ti3C2Tx-10% CNFs-based micro-supercapacitors [150]

Fuel Cells

Fuel cells are the most promising source of green energy for road transportation, which convert chemical energy into electricity with an efficiency of up to 80%. The proton membrane is an essential part of the fuel cell and must have high proton conductivity to achieve high performance. Nafion® made of poly (perfluorinated sulfonic acid) is one of the most widely used polymer membranes for fuel cells owing to its superior thermal stability, mechanical properties, and proton conductivity. However, there are some disadvantages associated with the application of Nafion such as high production costs, complex synthesis processes, toxic intermediates, and reduced proton conductivity at high temperature. CNP, as a new type of biodegradable and inexpensive ionomer film, is suitable to manufacture proton membrane for polymer-electrolyte fuel cells and methanol fuel cells. An et al. used a simple solution method to mix the CNCs/imidazole (Im) hybrid into the Nafion matrix to prepare the Nafion/CNCs/imidazole (NCI) composite material, and then studied the effect of CNCs/Im on the performance of the NCI membrane [151]. The results demonstrated that proton conductivity of the NCI membranes changes according to the content of Nafion 117, and reached the highest value of 6.19 × 10–4 S m−1 with an Nafion 117/(CNCs/Im) ratio of 2:1. Mashkour et al. fabricated a new monolithic membrane electrode assembly (MEA) composed of BC, CNT, and nano-zycosil (NZ) and used it as the air cathode in a single-chamber MFC (SCMFC) (Fig. 7a) [152]. As a kind of nanocellulose with oxygen barrier properties, BC can maintain the anaerobic conditions of the anode compartment. For the MEA, protons crossed BC- NZ to meet electrons and oxygen at the BC-CNT interface. High water contact angle (WCA) (130°) decreased the total protons reaching the BC-CNT interface and therefore made a limiting factor to oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). While the low WCA (49°) resulted in leakage and, therefore, lower concentration of oxygen in ORR sites (because of lower soluble oxygen in the water phase rather than air). Thus, a balanced WCA (85°) not only provided a sufficient proton transfer in the reaction sites by BC but also prevents leakage by NZ coating. A balanced WCA presented better electrochemical performance for the MEA. Compared with commercial gas diffusion electrode (GDE), the resistance of MEA was significantly reduced. This finding was attributed to the uniform connection between BC, CNT, and NZ and the high conductivity of CNT. In addition, the capacitance of MEA (65 mF) was much higher than that of GDE (0.73 mF). Therefore, compared with GDE, MEA showed higher performance and lower cost in SCMFC power generation and wastewater treatment. Bayer et al. synthesized a sulfonated cellulose nanofiber (S-CNFs) membrane and successfully introduced it into a "paper fuel cell" as a substitute for Nafion (Fig. 7b) [153]. The resulting paper fuel cell had high current density (> 0.8 A cm−2) and power density (156 mW cm−2) under standard measurement conditions (H2/air; 80 °C; 95% RH; 0.1 MPa), which was due to the enhanced conductivity of S-CNFs film. Although it is difficult to directly compete with mature (but more expensive) ionomers such as Nafion, S-CNFs polymer electrolyte fuel cells (PEFC) are cheaper and open a new way for the commercialization of PEFC without Nafion. Jiang et al. used two different acid modifications to improve proton conductivity to prepare a new type of proton conductive polymer electrolyte membrane which was used in fuel cells [154]. One was a conventional inorganic acid, phosphoric acid (H3PO4), and the other was an unusual organic acid, phytic acid (PA). In particular, the membrane electrode assembly fabricated with H3PO4/BC and PA/BC membranes reached the initial power densities of 17.9 and 23.0 mW cm−2, which were much higher than those reported in the literature in a real H2/O2 fuel cell at 25 °C.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

a The preparation process of BC-CNT-NZ, the detailed configuration of SCMFC and its compartments, and the role of BC-CNT-NZ in SCMFC [152]. b Photographs of S-CNFs paper, paper fuel cells and the power density of paper fuel cells [153]. c Schematic structure of the organic solar cell on CNCs substrates (left) and image of an assembled solar cell (right) [111]. d Portable paper solar cells based on foldable and lightweight transparent conductive nanofiber paper [106]. e NCP and the device performance of NCP-based PSCs [156]

Solar Cells

Solar cells can convert the inexhaustible solar energy into electricity or heat [123]. However, due to the high cost of collector system and the low efficiency of energy conversion, the solar energy harvesting is still restricted in limited circumstances [123]. Adopting low-cost solar cell substrates is a feasible way to overcome this challenge. Nanopaper is considered as a promising green substrate for solar cell construction due to its excellent mechanical properties, adjustable optical properties, and low cost [43]. Hu et al. reported a transparent nanopaper-based solar cells, but the photoelectric conversion efficiency was only 0.21% [155]. To improve the conversion efficiency, Zhou et al. employed CNCs-based CNP possessing smoother surface (Fig. 7c) [111], observing a notable improvement in conversion efficiency of 2.7%. More importantly, the results shown that these solar cells can be easily separated into their major components using low-energy processes at room temperature, opening the door for a truly fully recyclable solar cell technology which demonstrated great recyclability. As shown in Fig. 7d, Nogi et al. reported an optically transparent conductive paper made of CNFs and AgNWs [106]. The results shown that the optical transparency and conductivity of the conductive paper were comparable to that of indium tin oxide (ITO) glass. This paper-based solar cell exhibited a high-power conversion efficiency of 3.2%, which is equivalent to an ITO glass-based solar cell. Due to the high affinity and high degree of entanglement between CNFs and AgNWs, the CNP maintained high conductivity, and the paper solar cell can still generate electricity during and after folding. Gao et al. developed transparent nanocellulose paper (NCP) with coating of acrylic resin as substrates to fabricate flexible perovskite solar cells (PSCs), which were biodegradable and easily disposable (Fig. 7e) [156]. The power conversion efficiency (PCE) of PSC based on NCP reached 4.25%. In addition, the flexible PSC exhibited good stability and maintains > 80% of the original efficiency after 50 bends. This low-cost, biodegradable NCP-based substrate with acrylic resin coating was also suitable for other functional devices, which can promote the development of flexible electronics. Additionally, Wu et al. proved that CNP can improve the efficiency of organic solar cells (OSC) and effective wide-angle light capture [19]. The highest power-conversion efficiency of the fabricated OSC reached up to 16.17%, which was much higher than that without CNP as the substrate. Although substantial efforts have been devoted to fabricating nanopaper-based solar cells, there are still many obstacles to the practical application of CNP-based solar cellulose, among which, the short service life of nanopaper-based solar cells is one of the most imperative.

Nanogenerators

Nanogenerators convert mechanical energy into electrical energy, making them ideal to fuel portable electronic devices as an alternative power source [157]. According to the power generation principle, nanogenerator is generally divided into two types: triboelectric nanogenerator (TENG) and piezoelectric nanogenerator (PENG) [158]. Yao et al. developed a flexible and transparent TENG material by pairing nanopaper as the friction layer with fluorinated ethylene propylene [159]. The high surface roughness of nanopaper provides a large surface area for contact and electrostatic charge generation. Recently, Kim et al. developed a BC-based TENG composed of Cu/BC composite nanopaper and Cu foil, yielding cumulative charge and peak power density of 8.1 μC m−2 and 4.8 mW m−2, respectively [160]. Nie et al. performed simple aminosilane modification on CNFs and prepared an A-CNFs-based flexible TENG with increased frictional charge density. Figure 8a shows the structure of TENG using A-CNFs film as the contact material and the working principle of TENG based on A-CNFs [161]. It was found that the voltage of TENG based on A-CNFs can be maintained at an almost constant level within 10,000 cycles, which indicated that its output performance was relatively stable and can provide sufficient voltage for electronic devices. Peng et al. developed a new type of bio-renewable cellulose composite friction generator (CTG) with stable power output performance [162]. The new CTG using polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) matrix and oriented cellulose nanochips (CNCFs) as effective dielectrics showed enhanced triboelectric performance, generating power 10 times that of pure PDMS film-based TENG, and can instantly light up as many as 100 multi-color commercial LEDs (Fig. 8b). Kim et al. developed a flexible all-cellulose-based TENG. As shown in Fig. 8c, a double-layer film suitable for all cellulose-based TEN can be prepared in only 20 min via vacuum filtration [163]. It was found that the cellulose morphology can affect the electrical output of TENG (open-circuit voltage and short-circuit current). The higher pressure and more passes of filtration in fabricating CNFs, the electrical outputs of the fabricated TENG were enhanced due to the increased effective contact area between CNFs side of upper paper and AgNW side of bottom paper. The results showed that the electrical outputs were maximized in case of 0.1 wt% of the AgNWs and 1000 bar/20 passes CNFs paper, corresponding to a peak open-circuit voltage of 21 V, a short-circuit current of 2.5 μA, and a power density of 693 mW m−2 for 10 MΩ of external resistance. Zhao et al. developed a piezoelectric composite nanopaper composed of BaTO3 NP and BC, and yielded good electrical properties [164]: the output voltage was 14 V; the peak current density was 190 nA cm−2; and the maximum power density was 0.64 μW cm−2. In addition, as shown in Fig. 8d, Oh et al. prepared a high-conductivity ferroelectric BC composite paper containing AgNWs and BTO NP through simple vacuum filtration, and successfully used it for the development of large-area, high-performance TENG [165]. Interestingly, Roy et al. revealed for the first time the powerful power of allicin extracted from garlic juice in enhancing the triboelectric properties of CNFs to produce high-performance TENG. Figure 8e showed the working principle of the TENG device [166]. It has been found that after allicin grafting, the mechanical strength of the CNFs membrane was stronger due to the higher degree of intermolecular and intramolecular fiber–fiber hydrogen bonds. In addition, allicin grafting rich in high dipole sulfoxide groups (–S=O) results in the CNFs membrane with high friction positiveness, so when coupled with the friction negative material PVDF, high performance TENG was realized. As a result, the peak output voltage and current reached 7.9 V and 5.13 µA, respectively, which was 6.5 times higher than that of pure cellulose-based TENG (0.80 µA, 1.23 V). Compared with pure cellulose-based TENG, the power density was also increased by 41 times. This work provided new insights for the design of next-generation sustainable energy harvesting devices. However, the output of the nanopaper-based PENG is much lower than that of the nanopaper-based TENG. PENG uses the piezoelectric effect to effectively collect micromechanical energy and convert it into electrical energy to achieve energy harvesting. For example, Wu et al. prepared TOCN/MoS2 composite membrane and applied it in PENG [167]. The one-dimensional CNFs were intercalated between the layers of MoS2 nanosheets to form a “brick–mortar structure,” resulting in the improved properties of the nanocellulose films. The obtained TOCN/MoS2 PENG output a maximum open-circuit voltage of 4.1 V and a short-circuit current of 0.21 μA, which were nearly 3 times higher than those of the neat TOCN PENG.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

a Structure of a TENG that uses the A-CNFs film as a contact material, working principle of the A-CNFs-based TENG, and stability and durability test of the TENG after 10,000 cycles [161]. b Performance comparison of pure PDMS and PDMS/CNCFs, and illustration of the triboelectric contact electrification processes with the net electric field E in composite films along the direction from the PDMS to the top Al electrode [162]. c CNFs paper: CNFs dispersions homogenized at 500 bar and 1000 bar and different numbers of passes (10, 20). Schematic of AgNWs/CNFs paper fabricated using a vacuum-filtration technique. SEM images of cellulose surface with different morphologies. And electrical output of TENG (open-circuit voltage and short-circuit current) depending on cellulose morphology [163]. d Photograph and SEM image of the BC composite paper, and picture showing an electric circuit and an array of 200 lit LED bulbs during the circuit operation by the large-area BC-TENG [165]. e Schematic illustration of the operating principle of the TENG device [166]

Packaging Materials

Considerable efforts have been devoted to developing bio-based packing materials to address environmental problems associated with petroleum-based packaging materials [168]. CNP has excellent barrier performance to minimize the penetration of oxygen, other gases, and volatile compounds, thus is a suitable packing material to increase the shelf-life of foods and prevent unnecessary odor accumulation or contamination [169]. Additionally, some desirable traits for packing materials could be achieved by functionalizing CNP with other materials [170]. For example, Vähä-Nissi et al. used TEMPO-oxidized CNFs coating and bio-based polyethylene to prepare the barrier layer of a multilayer packaging film [171]. The bio-based multilayer film provided by CNFs had an oxygen barrier and was suitable for demanding food and modified atmosphere packaging (MAP). During the storage time used in this study, the MAP bags made of these multilayer films maintained their atmosphere and shape and prevented the crushed hazelnuts from further oxidation. Leite et al. prepared transparent gelatin/rosin-grafted CNCs (Gel/r-CNCs) by solution casting composite film for antibacterial packaging [172]. Gel/r-CNCs film had moderate water vapor permeability (0.09 g mm/m2 h kPa), high tensile strength (40 MPa), and Young's modulus (1.9 GPa). Compared with traditional CNCs, the addition of r-CNCs can improve the optical properties, water vapor barrier properties and tensile properties of the gelatin film. Currently, the major obstacle of CNP for packaging application is its poor water resistance. In order to address this problem, various hydrophobic modification strategies have been proposed, such as esterification, polymer grafting, plasma fluorination, among others. For example, Oberlintner and co-workers reported an ultrafast approach to improve the CNP surface hydrophobicity by cold plasma fluorination [173]. Specifically, the CNP sample was exposed to CF4 plasma for less than 10 s, and the contact angle of the treated CNP significantly increased from 46° to 130° after only 30 s of plasma processing.

Water Treatment

Developing simple and efficient methods to purifying contaminated water is of high significance and demand. Various technologies have been developed to purify polluted water, including reverse osmosis membrane, solar evaporation, membrane filtration, etc. [174, 175]. Recently, membrane filtration technology has attracted increasing attention because of its high efficiency, good chemical stability, and small impact on the environment. It has been reported that various contaminants such as heavy metal ions, viruses, organic solvents, pesticides, and herbicides could be effectively removed by the simple membrane filtration method [176]. CNP can be used for water treatment because of its rich chemical functionality, small pore size, and excellent mechanical properties (Fig. 9d) [177]. Ma et al. developed a novel ultrafiltration membrane with a maximum pore size of 55 nm using CNFs nanopaper as the top barrier layer, PAN electrospun scaffold as the intermediate layer, and PET nonwoven fabric as the supporting substrate [178]. Hamed et al. prepared a new type of membrane composed of polydopamine (PDA) particles and BNC, which can effectively remove various metal ions and organic dyes in polluted water (Fig. 9a) [179]. Zhu et al. designed a 1, 2, 3, 4-butanetetracarboxylic acid (BTCA) modified composite membrane for heavy metal ion adsorption [180]. As shown in Fig. 9c, the composite membrane was composed of CNCs and PVA-co-ethylene. To improve the adsorption rate, NaHCO3 was used to activate the BTCA modified membrane. The results showed that the modified nanofiber membrane showed good adsorption performance for single metal ion and metal ion mixture after activation by NaHCO3, and the equilibrium adsorption capacity could reach 471.55 mg g−1 at 15 ℃. In addition, after three times of repeated use, the composite membrane was found to be stable, indicating that the NaHCO3 activated membrane was a good material for removing heavy metal ions. Wahid et al. designed a superhydrophilic/underwater superhydrophobic (SUS) membrane for oil/water (O/W) separation by blending BC nanofibers with silica particles (SiO2 MPs) followed by self-polymerization of bio-inspired PDA [181]. As shown in Fig. 9b, the composite membrane shows excellent O/W separation ability with a separation efficiency of 99.9%, showing its potential for oily wastewater treatment in the environmental field. Jiang et al. prepared an anti-biological pollution ultrafiltration membrane based on reduced graphene oxide (RGO) and BNC [182]. As shown in Fig. 9e, the ultrafiltration membrane had excellent photothermal properties and showed effective bactericidal activity under light. Karim et al. developed CNCs and CS composite membranes via freeze-drying followed by compaction. The obtained membrane with a pore size of 13–10 nm has a low water flux of 64 L (m2 h)−1 [183].

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

a Schematic illustration of membrane filtration experiment [179]. b The O/W separation tests: a mixture of oil and water was added into the filtration device equipped with the BSn@P membrane, the water was permeated while oil could not pass through the membrane [181]. c Process of BTCA modified nanofibrous membrane as heavy metal removal [180]. d Schematic illustration and photographs showing the procedures of Pd/GO/BNC membrane for water purification [177]. e Schematic diagram of photothermally activity reduced GO/bacterial nanocellulose biofouling-resistant fouling ultrafiltration membrane, and SEM images of E. coli on RGO/BNC membranes before and after irradiation [182]

Summary and Outlook

In this review, we summarized several main methods to construct CNP and key parameters governing the properties of CNP. Also, we discussed various functional CNP with special properties such as magnetism, photonic property, and conductivity, and recapitulated their potential applications in various fields. Although much progress has been achieved in these areas, there are still some obstacles needed to be overcome on the way to their practical applications.

  1. At present, there are three main methods including suction filtration, casting, and coating to produce CNP. Among them, the suction filtration method has been frequently used and has the most potential for scale-up production. However, it still requires complex and time-consuming processes such as dewatering, wet paper web transfer and drying, resulting in low efficiency. Therefore, much more efforts will be needed to develop manufacturing strategies for continuous, large-scale, and efficient preparation of CNP.

  2. The high hydrophilicity of unmodified CNP arising from the existence of abundant hydroxyl groups greatly hinders its widespread applicability. Thus, enhancing the water resistance of CNP by either introducing suitable polymers and additives or post-treatment still need further investigation.

  3. To date, a variety of approaches have been developed for functionalizing CNP by adjusting the self-assembly process or introduce extrinsic functional components. For example, the CNP can be functionalized with magnetism, antibacterial properties, electrical conductivity, and so on by introducing active materials such as magnetic nanoparticles, conducting polymers, and carbon nanomaterials. And the functionalized CNP has been applied to many emerging fields including flexible sensors, solar cells, energy storage devices, packaging materials, water treatment, among others. Nevertheless, it is still necessary to design better microscopic pore structure and surface chemistry to obtain CNP with higher performance and more functionalities.

  4. Multi-disciplinary research on CNP can be carried out, such as performing foundational study on CNP microstructure through computer simulation and big data processing, developing new assembly methods and solvents, designing advanced and intelligent nanopaper structure and functionality, so as to further broaden the application of CNP. In addition to nanocellulose, it is still necessary to develop other natural polymer materials and combine the advantages of nanocellulose and other natural polymers to construct biodegradable and sustainable composites for the replacement of nonrenewable ones.

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32071720), and Key Technology Research and Development Program of Tianjin (19YFZCSN00950) from Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Bureau, T. Xu thanks the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M702456). K. Liu acknowledges the financial support from the Tianjin Research Innovation Project for Postgraduate Students (2021YJSB198). W. Liu thanks the China Scholarship Council for the financial support (No. 202108120056) and Innovation Project of Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of Tianjin University of Science and Technology (2020005).

Funding

Open access funding provided by Shanghai Jiao Tong University.

Footnotes

Wei Liu and Kun Liu contributed equally to this work.

Contributor Information

Haishun Du, Email: hzd0024@auburn.edu.

Ting Xu, Email: xuting@tust.edu.cn.

Bo Pang, Email: pangbo0826@hotmail.com.

Chuanling Si, Email: sichli@tust.edu.cn.

Kai Zhang, Email: kai.zhang@uni-goettingen.de.

References

  • 1.Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, Simonsen J, Youngblood J. Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011;40(7):3941–3994. doi: 10.1039/C0CS00108B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zhao D, Pang B, Zhu Y, Cheng W, Cao K, et al. A stiffness-switchable, biomimetic smart material enabled by supramolecular reconfiguration. Adv. Mater. 2022;34(10):2107857. doi: 10.1002/adma.202107857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.France KJD, Hoare T, Cranston ED. Review of hydrogels and aerogels containing nanocellulose. Chem. Mater. 2017;29(11):4609–4631. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00531. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Liu W, Du H, Zhang M, Liu K, Liu H, et al. Bacterial cellulose-based composite scaffolds for biomedical applications: a review. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020;8(20):7536–7562. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c00125. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Liu K, Du H, Zheng T, Liu H, Zhang M, et al. Recent advances in cellulose and its derivatives for oilfield applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021;259:117740. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.117740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhao D, Zhu Y, Cheng W, Xu G, Wang Q, et al. A dynamic gel with reversible and tunable topological networks and performances. Matter. 2020;2(2):390–403. doi: 10.1016/j.matt.2019.10.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Liu K, Du H, Liu W, Liu H, Zhang M, et al. Cellulose nanomaterials for oil exploration applications. Polym. Rev. 2021 doi: 10.1080/15583724.2021.2007121. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Du H, Liu C, Mu X, Gong W, Lv D, et al. Preparation and characterization of thermally stable cellulose nanocrystals via a sustainable approach of FeCl3-catalyzed formic acid hydrolysis. Cellulose. 2016;23(4):2389–2407. doi: 10.1007/s10570-016-0963-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ma W, Li L, Xiao X, Du H, Ren X, et al. Construction of chlorine labeled ZnO–chitosan loaded cellulose nanofibrils film with quick antibacterial performance and prominent UV stability. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2020;305(8):2000228. doi: 10.1002/mame.202000228. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.X. Li, R. Xu, J. Yang, S. Nie, D. Liu et al., Production of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural and levulinic acid from lignocellulosic biomass and catalytic upgradation. Ind. Crops Prod. 130, 184–197 (2019). 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.12.082
  • 11.Tavakolian M, Jafari SM, Ven TGM. A review on surface-functionalized cellulosic nanostructures as biocompatible antibacterial materials. Nano-Micro Lett. 2020;12:73. doi: 10.1007/s40820-020-0408-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Xiong R, Xu RX, Huang C, Smedt SD, Braeckmans K. Stimuli-responsive nanobubbles for biomedical applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021;50(9):5746–5776. doi: 10.1039/C9CS00839J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Xiong R, Hua D, Hoeck JV, Berdecka D, Léger L, et al. Photothermal nanofibres enable safe engineering of therapeutic cells. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2021;16(11):1281–1291. doi: 10.1038/s41565-021-00976-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Liu C, Du H, Dong L, Wang X, Zhang Y, et al. Properties of nanocelluloses and their application as rheology modifier in paper coating. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2017;56(29):8264–8273. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b01804. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Herrera MA, Mathew AP, Oksman K. Barrier and mechanical properties of plasticized and cross-linked nanocellulose coatings for paper packaging applications. Cellulose. 2017;24(9):3969–3980. doi: 10.1007/s10570-017-1405-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dai L, Wang Y, Zou X, Chen Z, Liu H, et al. Ultrasensitive physical, bio, and chemical sensors derived from 1-, 2-, and 3-D nanocellulosic materials. Small. 2020;16(13):1906567. doi: 10.1002/smll.201906567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Golmohammadi H, Morales-Narváez E, Naghdi T, Merkoçi A. Nanocellulose in sensing and biosensing. Chem. Mater. 2017;29(13):5426–5446. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b01170. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fu Q, Cui C, Meng L, Hao S, Dai R, et al. Emerging cellulose-derived materials: a promising platform for the design of flexible wearable sensors toward health and environment monitoring. Mater. Chem. Front. 2021;5(5):2051–2091. doi: 10.1039/D0QM00748J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wu J, Che X, Hu H, Xu H, Li B, et al. Organic solar cells based on cellulose nanopaper from agroforestry residues with an efficiency of over 16% and effectively wide-angle light capturing. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2020;8(11):5442–5448. doi: 10.1039/C9TA14039E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pang B, Jiang G, Zhou J, Zhu Y, Cheng W, et al. Molecular-scale design of cellulose-based functional materials for flexible electronic devices. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2021;7(2):2000944. doi: 10.1002/aelm.202000944. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Du H, Parit M, Liu K, Zhang M, Jiang Z, et al. Multifunctional cellulose nanopaper with superior water-resistant, conductive, and antibacterial properties functionalized with chitosan and polypyrrole. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2021;13(27):32115–32125. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c06647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cao W, Ma C, Tan S, Ma M, Wan P, et al. Ultrathin and flexible CNTs/MXene/cellulose nanofibrils composite paper for electromagnetic interference shielding. Nano-Micro Lett. 2019;11:72. doi: 10.1007/s40820-019-0304-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Song P, Liu B, Liang C, Ruan K, Qiu H, et al. Lightweight, flexible cellulose-derived carbon aerogel@reduced graphene oxide/PDMS composites with outstanding EMI shielding performances and excellent thermal conductivities. Nano-Micro Lett. 2021;13:91. doi: 10.1007/s40820-021-00624-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.H. Liu, T. Xu, C. Cai, K. Liu, W. Liu et al., Multifunctional superelastic, superhydrophilic, and ultralight nanocellulose-based composite carbon aerogels for compressive supercapacitor and strain sensor. Adv. Funct. Mater. (2022). 10.1002/adfm.202113082
  • 25.Xu T, Du H, Liu H, Liu W, Zhang X, et al. Advanced nanocellulose-based composites for flexible functional energy storage devices. Adv. Mater. 2021;33(48):2101368. doi: 10.1002/adma.202101368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Liu H, Du H, Zheng T, Liu K, Ji X, et al. Cellulose based composite foams and aerogels for advanced energy storage devices. Chem. Eng. J. 2021;426:130817. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.130817. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ding C, Liu T, Yan X, Huang L, Ryu S, et al. An ultra-microporous carbon material boosting integrated capacitance for cellulose-based supercapacitors. Nano-Micro Lett. 2020;12:63. doi: 10.1007/s40820-020-0393-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Xu T, Liu K, Sheng N, Zhang M, Liu W, et al. Biopolymer-based hydrogel electrolytes for advanced energy storage/conversion devices: properties, applications, and perspectives. Energy Storage Mater. 2022;48:244–262. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2022.03.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Du H, Liu C, Zhang M, Kong Q, Li B, et al. Preparation and industrialization status of nanocellulose. Prog. Chem. 2018;30(4):448. doi: 10.7536/PC170830. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Liu R, Dai L, Si C, Zeng Z. Antibacterial and hemostatic hydrogel via nanocomposite from cellulose nanofibers. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018;195:63–70. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.04.085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Li X, Xu R, Yang J, Nie S, Liu D, et al. Production of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural and levulinic acid from lignocellulosic biomass and catalytic upgradation. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019;130:184–197. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.12.082. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Parit M, Aksoy B, Jiang Z. Towards standardization of laboratory preparation procedure for uniform cellulose nanopapers. Cellulose. 2018;25(5):2915–2924. doi: 10.1007/s10570-018-1759-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Miao C, Du H, Parit M, Jiang Z, Tippur HV, et al. Superior crack initiation and growth characteristics of cellulose nanopapers. Cellulose. 2020;27(6):3181–3195. doi: 10.1007/s10570-020-03015-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Miao C, Du H, Zhang X, Tippur HV. Dynamic crack initiation and growth in cellulose nanopaper. Cellulose. 2022;29(1):557–569. doi: 10.1007/s10570-021-04310-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Li Y, Zhu H, Shen F, Wan J, Lacey S, et al. Nanocellulose as green dispersant for two-dimensional energy materials. Nano Energy. 2015;13:346–354. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.02.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Tong C, Zhang S, Zhong T, Fang Z, Liu H. Highly fibrillated and intrinsically flame-retardant nanofibrillated cellulose for transparent mineral filler-free fire-protective coatings. Chem. Eng. J. 2021;419:129440. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.129440. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wang J, Chen W, Dong T, Wang H, Si S, et al. Enabled cellulose nanopaper with outstanding water stability and wet strength via activated residual lignin as a reinforcement. Green Chem. 2021;23(24):10062–10070. doi: 10.1039/D1GC03906G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Xu J, Li C, Dai L, Xu C, Zhong Y, Yu F, Si C, et al. Biomass fractionation and lignin fractionation towards lignin valorization. ChemSusChem. 2020;13(17):4284–4295. doi: 10.1002/cssc.202001491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Mackin RT, Fontenot KR, Edwards JV, Prevost NT, Grimm C, et al. Synthesis and characterization of TEMPO-oxidized peptide-cellulose conjugate biosensors for detecting human neutrophil elastase. Cellulose. 2022;29(2):1293–1305. doi: 10.1007/s10570-021-04362-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Brunetti F, Operamolla A, Castro-Hermosa S, Lucarelli G, Manca V, et al. Printed solar cells and energy storage devices on paper substrates. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019;29(21):1806798. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201806798. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Barhoum A, Samyn P, Öhlund T, Dufresne A. Review of recent research on flexible multifunctional nanopapers. Nanoscale. 2017;9(40):15181–15205. doi: 10.1039/C7NR04656A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hoeng F, Denneulin A, Bras J. Use of nanocellulose in printed electronics: a review. Nanoscale. 2016;8(27):13131–13154. doi: 10.1039/C6NR03054H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Operamolla A. Recent advances on renewable and biodegradable cellulose nanopaper substrates for transparent light-harvesting devices: interaction with humid environment. Int. J. Photoenergy. 2019;2019:e3057929. doi: 10.1155/2019/3057929. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Fang Z, Hou G, Chen C, Hu L. Nanocellulose-based films and their emerging applications. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2019;23(4):100764. doi: 10.1016/j.cossms.2019.07.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zhao D, Zhu Y, Cheng W, Chen W, Wu Y, et al. Cellulose-based flexible functional materials for emerging intelligent electronics. Adv. Mater. 2021;33(28):2000619. doi: 10.1002/adma.202000619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Shi Z, Zhang Y, Phillips GO, Yang G. Utilization of bacterial cellulose in food. Food Hydrocoll. 2014;35:539–545. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.07.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Xie H, Du H, Yang X, Si C. Recent strategies in preparation of cellulose nanocrystals and cellulose nanofibrils derived from raw cellulose materials. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2018;2018:7923068. doi: 10.1155/2018/7923068. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Du H, Liu C, Zhang Y, Yu G, Si C, et al. Preparation and characterization of functional cellulose nanofibrils via formic acid hydrolysis pretreatment and the followed high-pressure homogenization. Ind. Crops Prod. 2016;94:736–745. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.09.059. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Habibi Y, Lucia LA, Rojas OJ. Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications. Chem. Rev. 2010;110(6):3479–3500. doi: 10.1021/cr900339w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Liu K, Du H, Zheng T, Liu W, Zhang M, et al. Lignin-containing cellulose nanomaterials: preparation and applications. Green Chem. 2021;23(24):9723–9746. doi: 10.1039/D1GC02841C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Yang X, Xie H, Du H, Zhang X, Zou Z, et al. Facile extraction of thermally stable and dispersible cellulose nanocrystals with high yield via a green and recyclable FeCl3-catalyzed deep eutectic solvent system. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019;7(7):7200–7208. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b00209. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Wang H, Xie H, Du H, Wang X, Liu W, et al. Highly efficient preparation of functional and thermostable cellulose nanocrystals via H2SO4 intensified acetic acid hydrolysis. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020;239:116233. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Liu W, Du H, Liu H, Xie H, Xu T, et al. Highly efficient and sustainable preparation of carboxylic and thermostable cellulose nanocrystals via FeCl3-catalyzed innocuous citric acid hydrolysis. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020;8(44):16691–16700. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c06561. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Wang H, Du H, Liu K, Liu H, Xu T, et al. Sustainable preparation of bifunctional cellulose nanocrystals via mixed H2SO4/formic acid hydrolysis. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021;266(15):118107. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.George J, Sabapathi S. Cellulose nanocrystals: synthesis, functional properties, and applications. Nanotechnol. Sci. Appl. 2015;8:45–54. doi: 10.2147/NSA.S64386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Du H, Liu W, Zhang M, Si C, Zhang X, et al. Cellulose nanocrystals and cellulose nanofibrils based hydrogels for biomedical applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019;209:130–144. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.01.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Parit M, Du H, Zhang X, Prather C, Adams M, et al. Polypyrrole and cellulose nanofiber based composite films with improved physical and electrical properties for electromagnetic shielding applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020;240:116304. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Nechyporchuk O, Belgacem MN, Bras J. Production of cellulose nanofibrils: a review of recent advances. Ind. Crops Prod. 2016;93:2–25. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.02.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Du H, Parit M, Wu M, Che X, Wang Y, et al. Sustainable valorization of paper mill sludge into cellulose nanofibrils and cellulose nanopaper. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020;400:123106. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Liu W, Du H, Liu K, Liu H, Xie H, et al. Sustainable preparation of cellulose nanofibrils via choline chloride-citric acid deep eutectic solvent pretreatment combined with high-pressure homogenization. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021;267:118220. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Xu R, Du H, Liu C, Liu H, Wu M, et al. An efficient and magnetic adsorbent prepared in a dry process with enzymatic hydrolysis residues for wastewater treatment. J. Clean. Prod. 2021;313:127834. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127834. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Gorgieva S. Bacterial cellulose as a versatile platform for research and development of biomedical materials. Processes. 2020;8(5):624. doi: 10.3390/pr8050624. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Liu W, Du H, Zheng T, Si C. Recent insights on biomedical applications of bacterial cellulose based composite hydrogels. Curr. Med. Chem. 2021;28(40):8319–8332. doi: 10.2174/0929867328666210412124444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Gorgieva S, Trček J. Bacterial cellulose: production, modification and perspectives in biomedical applications. Nanomaterials. 2019;9(10):1352. doi: 10.3390/nano9101352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Lv D, Du H, Che X, Wu M, Zhang Y, et al. Tailored and integrated production of functional cellulose nanocrystals and cellulose nanofibrils via sustainable formic acid hydrolysis: kinetic study and characterization. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019;7(10):9449–9463. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b00714. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Benítez AJ, Walther A. Cellulose nanofibril nanopapers and bioinspired nanocomposites: a review to understand the mechanical property space. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2017;5(31):16003–16024. doi: 10.1039/C7TA02006F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Revol JF, Bradford H, Giasson J, Marchessault RH, Gray DG. Helicoidal self-ordering of cellulose microfibrils in aqueous suspension. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 1992;14(3):170–172. doi: 10.1016/S0141-8130(05)80008-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Dufresne A, Cavaillé JY, Vignon MR. Mechanical behavior of sheets prepared from sugar beet cellulose microfibrils. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1997;64(6):1185–1194. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970509)64:6&#x0003c;1185::AID-APP19&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-V. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Taniguchi T, Okamura K. New films produced from microfibrillated natural fibres. Polym. Int. 1998;47(3):291–294. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0126(199811)47:3&#x0003c;291::AID-PI11&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Peng Y, Gardner DJ, Han Y, Kiziltas A, Cai Z, et al. Influence of drying method on the material properties of nanocellulose I: thermostability and crystallinity. Cellulose. 2013;20(5):2379–2392. doi: 10.1007/s10570-013-0019-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Sosnik A, Seremeta KP. Advantages and challenges of the spray-drying technology for the production of pure drug particles and drug-loaded polymeric carriers. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015;223:40–54. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2015.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Han J, Zhou C, Wu Y, Liu F, Wu Q. Self-assembling behavior of cellulose nanoparticles during freeze-drying: effect of suspension concentration, particle size, crystal structure, and surface charge. Biomacromol. 2013;14(5):1529–1540. doi: 10.1021/bm4001734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Fukuzumi H, Saito T, Isogai A. Influence of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibril length on film properties. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013;93(1):172–177. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.04.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Aulin C, Gällstedt M, Lindström T. Oxygen and oil barrier properties of microfibrillated cellulose films and coatings. Cellulose. 2010;17(3):559–574. doi: 10.1007/s10570-009-9393-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Sehaqui H, Liu A, Zhou Q, Berglund LA. Fast preparation procedure for large, flat cellulose and cellulose/inorganic nanopaper structures. Biomacromol. 2010;11(9):2195–2198. doi: 10.1021/bm100490s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Tran A, Hamad WY, MacLachlan MJ. Fabrication of cellulose nanocrystal films through differential evaporation for patterned coatings. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2018;1(7):3098–3104. doi: 10.1021/acsanm.8b00947. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Hubbe MA, Ferrer A, Tyagi P, Yin Y, Salas C, et al. Nanocellulose in thin films, coatings, and plies for packaging applications: a review. Bioresources. 2017;12(1):2143–2233. doi: 10.15376/biores.12.1.2143-2233. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Beneventi D, Zeno E, Chaussy D. Rapid nanopaper production by spray deposition of concentrated microfibrillated cellulose slurries. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015;72:200–205. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.11.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Sehaqui H, Morimune S, Nishino T, Berglund LA. Stretchable and strong cellulose nanopaper structures based on polymer-coated nanofiber networks: an alternative to nonwoven porous membranes from electrospinning. Biomacromol. 2012;13(11):3661–3667. doi: 10.1021/bm301105s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Österberg M, Vartiainen J, Lucenius J, Hippi U, Seppälä J, et al. A fast method to produce strong nfc films as a platform for barrier and functional materials. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2013;5(11):4640–4647. doi: 10.1021/am401046x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Wang Q, Du H, Zhang F, Zhang Y, Wu M, et al. Flexible cellulose nanopaper with high wet tensile strength, high toughness and tunable ultraviolet blocking ability fabricated from tobacco stalk via a sustainable method. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2018;6(27):13021–13030. doi: 10.1039/C8TA01986J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Wetterling J, Jonsson S, Mattsson T, Theliander H. The influence of ionic strength on the electroassisted filtration of microcrystalline cellulose. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2017;56(44):12789–12798. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b03575. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Vartiainen J, Vähä-Nissi M, Harlin A. Biopolymer films and coatings in packaging applications—a review of recent developments. Mater. Sci. Appl. 2014;5(10):708–718. doi: 10.4236/msa.2014.510072. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Ansari F, Ding Y, Berglund LA, Dauskardt RH. Toward sustainable multifunctional coatings containing nanocellulose in a hybrid glass matrix. ACS Nano. 2018;12(6):5495–5503. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b01057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Rastogi VK, Samyn P. Bio-based coatings for paper applications. Coatings. 2015;5(4):887–930. doi: 10.3390/coatings5040887. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Krol LF, Beneventi D, Alloin F, Chaussy D. Microfibrillated cellulose-SiO2 composite nanopapers produced by spray deposition. J. Mater. Sci. 2015;50(11):4095–4103. doi: 10.1007/s10853-015-8965-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Shanmugam K, Doosthosseini H, Varanasi S, Garnier G, Batchelor W. Flexible spray coating process for smooth nanocellulose film production. Cellulose. 2018;25(3):1725–1741. doi: 10.1007/s10570-018-1677-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Kumar V, Elfving A, Koivula H, Bousfield D, Toivakka M. Roll-to-roll processed cellulose nanofiber coatings. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2016;55(12):3603–3613. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.6b00417. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Chowdhury RA, Clarkson C, Apalangya VA, Islam SMN, Youngblood JP. Roll-to-roll fabrication of cellulose nanocrystal-poly(vinyl alcohol) composite coatings with controlled anisotropy. Cellulose. 2018;25(11):6547–6560. doi: 10.1007/s10570-018-2019-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Azrak SMEA, Costakis WJ, Moon RJ, Schueneman GT, Youngblood JP. Continuous processing of cellulose nanofibril sheets through conventional single-screw extrusion. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2020;2(8):3365–3377. doi: 10.1021/acsapm.0c00477. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Wang M, Jia X, Liu W, Lin X. Water insoluble and flexible transparent film based on carboxymethyl cellulose. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021;255:117353. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Nguyen SV, Lee BK. Microfibrillated cellulose film with enhanced mechanical and water-resistant properties by glycerol and hot-pressing treatment. Cellulose. 2021;28(9):5693–5705. doi: 10.1007/s10570-021-03894-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Sun L, Zhang X, Liu H, Liu K, Du H, et al. Recent advances in hydrophobic modification of nanocellulose. Curr. Org. Chem. 2021;25(3):417–436. doi: 10.2174/1385272824999201210191041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Cunha AG, Zhou Q, Larsson PT, Berglund LA. Topochemical acetylation of cellulose nanopaper structures for biocomposites: mechanisms for reduced water vapour sorption. Cellulose. 2014;21(4):2773–2787. doi: 10.1007/s10570-014-0334-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Operamolla A, Casalini S, Console D, Capodieci L, Benedetto FD, et al. Tailoring water stability of cellulose nanopaper by surface functionalization. Soft Matter. 2018;14(36):7390–7400. doi: 10.1039/C8SM00433A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Zhu H, Narakathu BB, Fang Z, Aijazi AT, Joyce M, et al. A gravure printed antenna on shape-stable transparent nanopaper. Nanoscale. 2014;6(15):9110–9115. doi: 10.1039/C4NR02036G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Jung MH, Park NM, Lee SY. Color tunable nanopaper solar cells using hybrid CH3NH3PbI3−xBrx perovskite. Sol. Energy. 2016;139:458–466. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2016.10.032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Dias OAT, Konar S, Leão AL, Yang W, Tjong J, et al. Current state of applications of nanocellulose in flexible energy and electronic devices. Front. Chem. 2020;8:420. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Vicente AT, Araújo A, Mendes MJ, Nunes D, Oliveira MJ, et al. Multifunctional cellulose-paper for light harvesting and smart sensing applications. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2018;6(13):3143–3181. doi: 10.1039/C7TC05271E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Xu X, Hsieh YL. Aqueous exfoliated graphene by amphiphilic nanocellulose and its application in moisture-responsive foldable actuators. Nanoscale. 2019;11(24):11719–11729. doi: 10.1039/C9NR01602C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Xiong R, Yu S, Smith MJ, Zhou J, Krecker M, et al. Self-assembly of emissive nanocellulose/quantum dot nanostructures for chiral fluorescent materials. ACS Nano. 2019;13(8):9074–9081. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b03305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Du H, Parit M, Liu K, Zhang M, Jiang Z, et al. Engineering cellulose nanopaper with water resistant, antibacterial, and improved barrier properties by impregnation of chitosan and the followed halogenation. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021;270:118372. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Zhang H, Shi L, Feng X. Use of chitosan to reinforce transparent conductive cellulose nanopaper. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2018;6(2):242–248. doi: 10.1039/C7TC03980H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Morales-Narváez E, Golmohammadi H, Naghdi T, Yousefi H, Kostiv U, et al. Nanopaper as an optical sensing platform. ACS Nano. 2015;9(7):7296–7305. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b03097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Galland S, Andersson RL, Salajková M, Ström V, Olsson RT, et al. Cellulose nanofibers decorated with magnetic nanoparticles – synthesis, structure and use in magnetized high toughness membranes for a prototype loudspeaker. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2013;1(47):7963–7972. doi: 10.1039/C3TC31748J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Nogi M, Karakawa M, Komoda N, Yagyu H, Nge TT. Transparent conductive nanofiber paper for foldable solar cells. Sci. Rep. 2015;5(1):17254. doi: 10.1038/srep17254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Campo MMG, Darder M, Aranda P, Akkari M, Huttel Y, et al. Functional hybrid nanopaper by assembling nanofibers of cellulose and sepiolite. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018;28(27):1703048. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201703048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Song G, Kang R, Guo L, Ali Z, Chen X, et al. Highly flexible few-layer Ti3C2 MXene/cellulose nanofiber heat-spreader films with enhanced thermal conductivity. New J. Chem. 2020;44(17):7186–7193. doi: 10.1039/D0NJ00672F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Carosio F, Kochumalayil J, Cuttica F, Camino G, Berglund L. Oriented clay nanopaper from biobased components—mechanisms for superior fire protection properties. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2015;7(10):5847–5856. doi: 10.1021/am509058h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Zhu H, Li Y, Fang Z, Xu J, Cao F, et al. Highly thermally conductive papers with percolative layered boron nitride nanosheets. ACS Nano. 2014;8(4):3606–3613. doi: 10.1021/nn500134m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Zhou Y, Fuentes-Hernandez C, Khan TM, Liu JC, Hsu J, et al. Recyclable organic solar cells on cellulose nanocrystal substrates. Sci. Rep. 2013;3(1):1536. doi: 10.1038/srep01536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Fox JD, Capadona JR, Marasco PD, Rowan SJ. Bioinspired water-enhanced mechanical gradient nanocomposite films that mimic the architecture and properties of the squid beak. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135(13):5167–5174. doi: 10.1021/ja4002713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Wang B, Benitez AJ, Lossada F, Merindol R, Walther A. Bioinspired mechanical gradients in cellulose nanofibril/polymer nanopapers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016;128(20):6070–6074. doi: 10.1002/ange.201511512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Wu M, Sukyai P, Lv D, Zhang F, Wang P, et al. Water and humidity-induced shape memory cellulose nanopaper with quick response, excellent wet strength and folding resistance. Chem. Eng. J. 2020;392:123673. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.123673. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Zhao K, Wang W, Teng A, Zhang K, Ma Y, et al. Using cellulose nanofibers to reinforce polysaccharide films: blending vs layer-by-layer casting. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020;227:115264. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Yu H, Tian Y, Dirican M, Fang D, Yan C, et al. Flexible, transparent and tough silver nanowire/nanocellulose electrodes for flexible touch screen panels. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021;273:118539. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Pan Y, Qin Z, Kheiri S, Ying B, Pan P, et al. Optical printing of conductive silver on ultrasmooth nanocellulose paper for flexible electronics. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2021 doi: 10.1002/adem.202101598. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Wang Y, Huang JT. Transparent, conductive and superhydrophobic cellulose films for flexible electrode application. RSC Adv. 2021;11(58):36607–36616. doi: 10.1039/D1RA06865B. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Su Y, Zhao Y, Zhang H, Feng X, Shi L, et al. Polydopamine functionalized transparent conductive cellulose nanopaper with long-term durability. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2017;5(3):573–581. doi: 10.1039/C6TC04928A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Hoeng F, Denneulin A, Krosnicki G, Bras J. Positive impact of cellulose nanofibrils on silver nanowire coatings for transparent conductive films. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2016;4(46):10945–10954. doi: 10.1039/C6TC03629E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Zhu H, Luo W, Ciesielski PN, Fang Z, Zhu JY, et al. Wood-derived materials for green electronics, biological devices, and energy applications. Chem. Rev. 2016;116(16):9305–9374. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Kuang T, Chang L, Chen F, Sheng Y, Fu D, et al. Facile preparation of lightweight high-strength biodegradable polymer/multi-walled carbon nanotubes nanocomposite foams for electromagnetic interference shielding. Carbon. 2016;105:305–313. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.04.052. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Liu K, Liu W, Li W, Duan Y, Zhou K, et al. Strong and highly conductive cellulose nanofibril/silver nanowires nanopaper for high performance electromagnetic interference shielding. Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater. 2022 doi: 10.1007/s42114-022-00425-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Gao Y, Liu D, Xie Y, Song Y, Zhu E, et al. Flexible and sensitive piezoresistive electronic skin based on TOCN/PPy hydrogel films. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2021;138(48):51367. doi: 10.1002/app.51367. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Ma C, Cao W, Zhang W, Ma M, Sun W, et al. Wearable, ultrathin and transparent bacterial celluloses/MXene film with Janus structure and excellent mechanical property for electromagnetic interference shielding. Chem. Eng. J. 2021;403:126438. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126438. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Yuen JD, Walper SA, Melde BJ, Daniele MA, Stenger DA. Electrolyte-sensing transistor decals enabled by ultrathin microbial nanocellulose. Sci. Rep. 2017;7(1):40867. doi: 10.1038/srep40867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Jung M, Kim K, Kim B, Lee KJ, Kang JW, et al. Vertically stacked nanocellulose tactile sensor. Nanoscale. 2017;9(44):17212–17219. doi: 10.1039/C7NR03685J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Wang S, Xu J, Wang W, Wang GJN, Rastak R, et al. Skin electronics from scalable fabrication of an intrinsically stretchable transistor array. Nature. 2018;555(7694):83–88. doi: 10.1038/nature25494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Webb RC, Bonifas AP, Behnaz A, Zhang Y, Yu KJ, et al. Ultrathin conformal devices for precise and continuous thermal characterization of human skin. Nat. Mater. 2013;12(10):938–944. doi: 10.1038/nmat3755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Hammock ML, Chortos A, Tee BCK, Tok JBH, Bao Z. 25th anniversary article: the evolution of electronic skin (e-skin): a brief history, design considerations, and recent progress. Adv. Mater. 2013;25(42):5997–6038. doi: 10.1002/adma.201302240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Miyamoto A, Lee S, Cooray NF, Lee S, Mori M, et al. Inflammation-free, gas-permeable, lightweight, stretchable on-skin electronics with nanomeshes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2017;12(9):907–913. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2017.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Gao L, Zhu C, Li L, Zhang C, Liu J, et al. All paper-based flexible and wearable piezoresistive pressure sensor. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2019;11(28):25034–25042. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b07465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Yang J, Li H, Cheng J, He T, Li J, et al. Nanocellulose intercalation to boost the performance of MXene pressure sensor for human interactive monitoring. J. Mater. Sci. 2021;56(24):13859–13873. doi: 10.1007/s10853-021-05909-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Ji S, Hyun BG, Kim K, Lee SY, Kim SH, et al. Photo-patternable and transparent films using cellulose nanofibers for stretchable origami electronics. NPG Asia Mater. 2016;8(8):e299–e299. doi: 10.1038/am.2016.113. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Najafabadi E, Zhou YH, Knauer KA, Fuentes-Hernandez C, Kippelen B. Efficient organic light-emitting diodes fabricated on cellulose nanocrystal substrates. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014;105(6):063305. doi: 10.1063/1.4891046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Zhu H, Xiao Z, Liu D, Li Y, Weadock NJ, et al. Biodegradable transparent substrates for flexible organic-light-emitting diodes. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013;6(7):2105–2111. doi: 10.1039/C3EE40492G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Yang S, Xie Q, Liu X, Wu M, Wang S, et al. Acetylation improves thermal stability and transmittance in FOLED substrates based on nanocellulose films. RSC Adv. 2018;8(7):3619–3625. doi: 10.1039/C7RA11134G. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Zhang K, Chen G, Li R, Zhao K, Shen J, et al. Facile preparation of highly transparent conducting nanopaper with electrical robustness. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020;8(13):5132–5139. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b07266. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Chen W, Abe K, Uetani K, Yu H, Liu Y, et al. Individual cotton cellulose nanofibers: pretreatment and fibrillation technique. Cellulose. 2014;21(3):1517–1528. doi: 10.1007/s10570-014-0172-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Zhang Y, Zhang L, Cui K, Ge S, Cheng X, et al. Paper-based electronics: flexible electronics based on micro/nanostructured paper. Adv. Mater. 2018;30(51):1870394. doi: 10.1002/adma.201870394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Li S, Huang D, Yang J, Zhang B, Zhang X, et al. Freestanding bacterial cellulose–polypyrrole nanofibres paper electrodes for advanced energy storage devices. Nano Energy. 2014;9:309–317. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.08.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Wang Z, Tammela P, Strømme M, Nyholm L. Nanocellulose coupled flexible polypyrrole@graphene oxide composite paper electrodes with high volumetric capacitance. Nanoscale. 2015;7(8):3418–3423. doi: 10.1039/C4NR07251K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Zheng W, Lv R, Na B, Liu H, Jin T, et al. Nanocellulose-mediated hybrid polyaniline electrodes for high performance flexible supercapacitors. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2017;5(25):12969–12976. doi: 10.1039/C7TA01990D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Du H, Zhang M, Liu K, Parit M, Jiang Z, et al. Conductive PEDOT:PSS/cellulose nanofibril paper electrodes for flexible supercapacitors with superior areal capacitance and cycling stability. Chem. Eng. J. 2022;428:131994. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.131994. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Jiang Q, Kacica C, Soundappan T, Liu K, Tadepalli S, et al. An in situ grown bacterial nanocellulose/graphene oxide composite for flexible supercapacitors. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2017;5(27):13976–13982. doi: 10.1039/C7TA03824K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Zhou S, Kong X, Zheng B, Huo F, Strømme M, et al. Cellulose nanofiber @ conductive metal–organic frameworks for high-performance flexible supercapacitors. ACS Nano. 2019;13(8):9578–9586. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b04670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Qi W, Lv R, Na B, Liu H, He Y, et al. Nanocellulose-assisted growth of manganese dioxide on thin graphite papers for high-performance supercapacitor electrodes. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018;6(4):4739–4745. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03858. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Olivier C, Moreau C, Bertoncini P, Bizot H, Chauvet O, et al. Cellulose nanocrystal-assisted dispersion of luminescent single-walled carbon nanotubes for layer-by-layer assembled hybrid thin films. Langmuir. 2012;28(34):12463–12471. doi: 10.1021/la302077a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Hamedi MM, Hajian A, Fall AB, Håkansson K, Salajkova M, et al. Highly conducting, strong nanocomposites based on nanocellulose-assisted aqueous dispersions of single-wall carbon nanotubes. ACS Nano. 2014;8(3):2467–2476. doi: 10.1021/nn4060368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Tian W, VahidMohammadi A, Reid MS, Wang Z, Ouyang L, et al. Multifunctional nanocomposites with high strength and capacitance using 2D MXene and 1D nanocellulose. Adv. Mater. 2019;31(41):1902977. doi: 10.1002/adma.201902977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.An VN, Phong LPN, Nhi NV, Van TTT, Nhan HTC, et al. Effect of imidazole-doped nanocrystalline cellulose on the characterization of nafion films of fuel cells. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2021;96(11):3114–3121. doi: 10.1002/jctb.6863. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Mashkour M, Rahimnejad M, Mashkour M, Soavi F. Increasing bioelectricity generation in microbial fuel cells by a high-performance cellulose-based membrane electrode assembly. Appl. Energy. 2021;282:116150. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116150. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Bayer T, Cunning BV, Šmíd B, Selyanchyn R, Fujikawa S, et al. Spray deposition of sulfonated cellulose nanofibers as electrolyte membranes in fuel cells. Cellulose. 2021;28(3):1355–1367. doi: 10.1007/s10570-020-03593-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Jiang G, Qiao J, Hong F. Application of phosphoric acid and phytic acid-doped bacterial cellulose as novel proton-conducting membranes to PEMFC. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 2012;37(11):9182–9192. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.02.195. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Hu L, Zheng G, Yao J, Liu N, Weil B, et al. Transparent and conductive paper from nanocellulose fibers. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013;6(2):513–518. doi: 10.1039/C2EE23635D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Gao L, Chao L, Hou M, Liang J, Chen Y, et al. Flexible, transparent nanocellulose paper-based perovskite solar cells. NPJ Flex. Electron. 2019;3(1):4. doi: 10.1038/s41528-019-0048-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Zhang C, Mo J, Fu Q, Liu Y, Wang S, et al. Wood-cellulose-fiber-based functional materials for triboelectric nanogenerators. Nano Energy. 2021;81:105637. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105637. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Zhang M, Du H, Liu K, Nie S, Xu T, et al. Fabrication and applications of cellulose-based nanogenerators. Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater. 2021;4:865–884. doi: 10.1007/s42114-021-00312-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Yao C, Hernandez A, Yu Y, Cai Z, Wang X. Triboelectric nanogenerators and power-boards from cellulose nanofibrils and recycled materials. Nano Energy. 2016;30:103–108. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.09.036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Kim HJ, Yim EC, Kim JH, Kim SJ, Park JY, et al. Bacterial nano-cellulose triboelectric nanogenerator. Nano Energy. 2017;33:130–137. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.01.035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Nie S, Cai C, Lin X, Zhang C, Lu Y, et al. Chemically functionalized cellulose nanofibrils for improving triboelectric charge density of a triboelectric nanogenerator. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020;8(50):18678–18685. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c07531. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Peng J, Zhang H, Zheng Q, Clemons CM, Sabo RC, et al. A composite generator film impregnated with cellulose nanocrystals for enhanced triboelectric performance. Nanoscale. 2017;9(4):1428–1433. doi: 10.1039/C6NR07602E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Kim I, Jeon H, Kim D, You J, Kim D. All-in-one cellulose based triboelectric nanogenerator for electronic paper using simple filtration process. Nano Energy. 2018;53:975–981. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.09.060. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Zhao Y, Liao Q, Zhang G, Zhang Z, Liang Q, et al. High output piezoelectric nanocomposite generators composed of oriented BaTiO3 NPs@PVDF. Nano Energy. 2015;11:719–727. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.11.061. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Oh H, Kwak SS, Kim B, Han E, Lim GH, et al. Highly conductive ferroelectric cellulose composite papers for efficient triboelectric nanogenerators. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019;29(37):1904066. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201904066. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Roy S, Ko HU, Maji PK, Hai LV, Kim J. Large amplification of triboelectric property by allicin to develop high performance cellulosic triboelectric nanogenerator. Chem. Eng. J. 2020;385:123723. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.123723. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Wu T, Song Y, Shi Z, Liu D, Chen S, et al. High-performance nanogenerators based on flexible cellulose nanofibril/MoS2 nanosheet composite piezoelectric films for energy harvesting. Nano Energy. 2021;80:105541. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105541. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Kargarzadeh H, Huang J, Lin N, Ahmad I, Mariano M, et al. Recent developments in nanocellulose-based biodegradable polymers, thermoplastic polymers, and porous nanocomposites. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2018;87:197–227. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.07.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Wang J, Gardner DJ, Stark NM, Bousfield DW, Tajvidi M, et al. Moisture and oxygen barrier properties of cellulose nanomaterial-based films. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018;6(1):49–70. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03523. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Fotie G, Limbo S, Piergiovanni L. Manufacturing of food packaging based on nanocellulose: current advances and challenges. Nanomaterials. 2020;10(9):1726. doi: 10.3390/nano10091726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Vähä-Nissi M, Koivula HM, Räisänen HM, Vartiainen J, Ragni P, et al. Cellulose nanofibrils in biobased multilayer films for food packaging. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017;134(19):44830. doi: 10.1002/app.44830. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Leite LSF, Bilatto S, Paschoalin RT, Soares AC, Moreira FKV, et al. Eco-friendly gelatin films with rosin-grafted cellulose nanocrystals for antimicrobial packaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020;165:2974–2983. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.10.189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Oberlintner A, Shvalya V, Vasudevan A, Vengust D, Likozar B, et al. Hydrophilic to hydrophobic: ultrafast conversion of cellulose nanofibrils by cold plasma fluorination. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022;581:152276. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.152276. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Jun YS, Wu X, Ghim D, Jiang Q, Cao S, et al. Photothermal membrane water treatment for two worlds. Acc. Chem. Res. 2019;52(5):1215–1225. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Chen C, Kuang Y, Hu L. Challenges and opportunities for solar evaporation. Joule. 2019;3(3):683–718. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2018.12.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Pandya A, Shah K, Prajapati H, Vishwakarma GS. GQD embedded bacterial cellulose nanopaper based multi-layered filtration membranes assembly for industrial dye and heavy metal removal in wastewater. Cellulose. 2021;28(16):10385–10398. doi: 10.1007/s10570-021-04174-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Xu T, Jiang Q, Ghim D, Liu KK, Sun H, et al. Catalytically active bacterial nanocellulose-based ultrafiltration membrane. Small. 2018;14(15):1704006. doi: 10.1002/smll.201704006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Ma H, Burger C, Hsiao BS, Chu B. Fabrication and characterization of cellulose nanofiber based thin-film nanofibrous composite membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2014;454:272–282. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.11.055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Derami HG, Jiang Q, Ghim D, Cao S, Chandar YJ, et al. A robust and scalable polydopamine/bacterial nanocellulose hybrid membrane for efficient wastewater treatment. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2019;2(2):1092–1101. doi: 10.1021/acsanm.9b00022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Zhu Q, Wang Y, Li M, Liu K, Hu C, et al. Activable carboxylic acid functionalized crystalline nanocellulose/PVA-Co-PE composite nanofibrous membrane with enhanced adsorption for heavy metal ions. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2017;186:70–77. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2017.05.050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Wahid F, Zhao XJ, Duan Y, Zhao X, Jia S, et al. Designing of bacterial cellulose-based superhydrophilic/underwater superoleophobic membrane for oil/water separation. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021;257:117611. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Jiang Q, Ghim D, Cao S, Tadepalli S, Liu K, et al. Photothermally active reduced graphene oxide/bacterial nanocellulose composites as biofouling-resistant ultrafiltration membranes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019;53(1):412–421. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b02772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Z. Karim, A.P. Mathew, M. Grahn, J. Mouzon, K. Oksman, Nanoporous membranes with cellulose nanocrystals as functional entity in chitosan: removal of dyes from water. Carbohydr. Polym. 112, 668–676 (2014). 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.06.048 [DOI] [PubMed]

Articles from Nano-Micro Letters are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES