Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2022 Apr 13;5(4):e229622. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.9622

Errors in Results and Table 3

PMCID: PMC9008501  PMID: 35416999

In the Original Investigation titled “Effectiveness of Acupuncture for Pain Control After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial,”1 published February 28, 2022, there were errors in the Quality of Blinding subsection and the P values reported in Table 3. In terms of identifying their group assignment, the difference between the acupuncture and placebo groups was statistically significant (P = .02). In Table 3 for the perception of group allocation, there were 58 participants in the acupuncture group and 55 in the placebo group. The correct P value for the responses is P = .02. A total of 59 participants in the acupuncture group and 55 in the placebo group responded to the question, “Do you want acupuncture again?” The correct P value for the responses is P = .15. This article has been corrected.1

Reference

  • 1.Usichenko TI, Henkel BJ, Klausenitz C, et al. Effectiveness of acupuncture for pain control after cesarean delivery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(2):e220517. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0517 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JAMA Network Open are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES