Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2022 Mar 31;42:108122. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2022.108122

Data on RNA-seq analysis of the oviducts of five closely related species genus Littorina (Mollusca, Caenogastropoda): L. saxatilis, L. arcana, L. compressa, L. obtusata, L. fabalis

Arseniy A Lobov a,b,, Lavrentii G Danilov a, Alexey E Masharskiy a, Alexander V Predeus c, Natalia A Mikhailova b, Andrei I Granovitch a, Arina L Maltseva a
PMCID: PMC9011036  PMID: 35434228

Abstract

In the evolution of invertebrates, the transition from egg-layers to brooders occurred many times. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying this transition are still not well understood. Recently diverged species genus Littorina (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Caenogastropoda, Littorinimorpha): Littorina saxatilis, L. arcana, L. compressa, L. obtusata and L. fabalis might be a fruitful model for elucidation of these mechanisms. All five species sympatrically inhabit an intertidal zone. Only L. saxatilis is ovoviviparous while the other four species form clutches. Although in L. saxatilis jelly gland of the pallial oviduct function as a brood pouch, it is not deeply modified at the morphological level in comparison to egg-laying relatives. Comparative analysis of transcriptomic profiles of the pallial oviducts of these closely related species might help to uncover the molecular mechanisms of the egg-laying to brooding transition. Unraveling of the mechanisms underlying this transition in L. saxatilis is important not only in aspects of reproduction biology and strategy, but also in a broader view as an example of relatively fast evolutionary transformations. We generated an RNA-seq dataset (224 104 446 clean reads) for oviducts of five species genus Littorina. Libraries of all five species were sequenced using Illumina HiSeq 2500; additional reads for L. arcana were obtained using Illumina NovaSeq 6000. Transcriptomic profiles were analyzed in pooled samples (of three individuals) with two biological replicates for each species (each biological replicate was prepared and sequenced as a separate library). The transcriptome was assembled de novo and annotated with five assembles corresponding to each species. The raw data were uploaded to the SRA database, the BioProject IDs are PRJNA662103 (“obtusata” group) and PRJNA707549 (“saxatilis” group).

Keywords: Littorina, L. saxatilis, L. obtusata, RNA-seq, Ovoviviparity, Mollusca, Reproductive proteins

Specifications Table

Subject Zoology
Reproductive biology
Specific subject area Transcriptomics on pallial oviducts of the Molluscan closely related species
Type of data Table
Figures
Text file
How data were acquired Illumina HiSeq 2500, NovaSeq 6000
Data format Raw (FASTQ)
Analyzed (FASTA)
Parameters for data collection RNA-seq by Illumina HiSeq™ 2500 of the poly(A)-RNA libraries from oviducts of L. saxatilis, L. arcana, L. compressa, L. obtusata and L. fabalis and additionally by NovaSeq 6000 for L. arcana.
Description of data collection Periwinkles were collected from the wild population of the gravel-stony shores of the Varangerfjord (Barents Sea). After species identification, oviducts were excised, rinsed in filtered marine water and fixed by TRIzol reagent. Total RNA was isolated by the standard phenol-chloroform extraction [1]. Poly(A)-fraction was used for cDNA-libraries preparation with the NEBNext RNA Library Prep Kit. The libraries were sequenced by either Illumina HiSeq™ 2500 and/or NovaSeq 6000.
Data source location City/Town/Region: Varangerfjord
Country: Norway
Latitude and longitude and GPS coordinates for collected samples/data: 70.063201, 29.932525 (70°03′47.5"N 29°55′57.1″E)
Data accessibility Repository name: NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA)
Data identification number:
BioProjectID: PRJNA707549
BioProjectID: PRJNA662103
Instructions for accessing these data:
The raw sequence reads can be accessed via NCBI SRA with BioProjectID: PRJNA707549
Direct link to the data: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA707549
BioProjectID: PRJNA662103
Direct link to the data: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA662103

Value of the Data

  • The data represent the transcriptomic dataset of reproductive tissues of several recently diverged gastropod species pursuing different reproductive strategies. Such evolutionary transition is expected to be accompanied by rapid divergence of the specific groups of genes associated with the immune system, reproduction and development. Thus, our dataset may be informative for a wide range of specialists in evolutionary biology and contiguous areas.

  • The dataset displays genes that are expressed in pallial oviducts of gastropods with two different reproductive strategies. The data may be useful for specialists in the reproductive biology of invertebrates investigating fundamental aspects of sexual reproduction and for malacologists.

  • The dataset can be used for CDS-prediction during analysis of the Molluscan genomes, search and analysis of “orphan” genes, analysis of evolution of specific target protein groups and for specific molecular analysis, e.g. characterization of target transcripts expression patterns by in situ RNA-hybridisation.

1. Data Description

Comparative morphology of different reproductive systems has actively developed in the last centuries. Nevertheless, the molecular background of reproduction of invertebrates has been investigated only in several model objects. Particularly, the transition from egg-layers to brooders has been investigated in many invertebrate taxa at the morphological level, but molecular mechanisms responsible for such transition are still poorly investigated. From this point of view, recently diverged species genus Littorina (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Caenogastropoda, Littorinimorpha) seem to be a fruitful model for elucidation of these mechanisms.

At the Europian gravel-stony shores, periwinkles genus Littorina Férussac, 1822 subgenus Neritrema Récluz, 1869 include two groups of closely related species: “saxatilis” group (Littorina saxatilis (Olivi 1792), L. arcana Hannaford Ellis 1978 and L. compressa Jeffreys 1865) and “obtusata” group (L. obtusata (Linnaeus 1758), L. fabalis (Turton 1825)).

These species are among the most common inhabitants of the Northern Atlantic European seashores and are routinely used as a model to analyze anatomy, physiology and morphology of gastropods. Besides, they are an informative model for evolutionary ecology, especially L. saxatilis [2,3]. Particularly, differences in reproductive strategies and anatomy of reproductive system of the Neritrema species are well described [2]. Four of them form clutches and only L. saxatilis has shifted to ovoviviparity. This transition of L. saxatilis is associated with anatomical changes in the pallial oviduct: the jelly gland of the pallial oviduct function as a brood pouch. Neverheless, pallial oviduct has not deeply modified at the morphological level in comparison to egg-laying relatives, and the existence of physiological and biochemical changes, such as secretion of specific proteins and shifts in the immune system functioning, is quite expectable. Thus, the comparison based on ‘omics’-technologies between pallial oviducts of L. saxatilis and four other species may help to unravel the mechanisms underlying the egg-laying to brooding transition.

The genome of L. saxatilis has been published, and several tissue transcriptomes of the Neritrema species are available now [3,4]. Nevertheless, the transcriptomes of the pallial oviducts of closely related European Neritrema species have not been sequenced yet.

Here we present the RNA-seq raw reads and transcriptomes de novo assembled for the oviducts of five species genus Littorina: L. saxatilis, L. arcana, L. compressa, L. obtusata and L. fabalis. To reduce intragroup biological dispersion, we used pooled samples [5] – each biological replicate consisted of material from three individuals.

The raw data are stored in the NCBI database. We deposited five BioSamples corresponding to the five Neritrema species with two SRA experiments per each BioSample corresponding to the two biological replicates obtained per each species. BioSamples were separated to two BioProjects corresponding to “obtusata” (PRJNA662103) and “saxatilis” (PRJNA707549) groups of closely related species. The basic statistics and accession numbers for each file are in Table 1.

Table 1.

Resulted statistics and accession numbers of Littorina sp. oviducts assemblies.

Species BioProject accession number Number of unigenes Total unigenes lenghts, bp Average unigenes lenghts, bp Total number of clean reads BioSample accession number Biological replicate SRA accession number Instrument
L. saxatilis PRJNA707549 86 329 9 037 714 23 941 141 SAMN18209702 1 SRR13962427 HiSeq 2500
2 SRR13962426 HiSeq 2500
L. arcana 80 695 14 680 715.8 39 074 348 SAMN18209703 1 SRR13962425 HiSeq 2500
2 SRR13962424 NovoSeq 6000
L. compressa 45 182 20 682 1158.8 58 007 281 SAMN18209704 1 SRR13962423 HiSeq 2500
2 SRR13962422 HiSeq 2500
L. obtusata PRJNA662103 99 513 10 822 720.6 46 098 082 SAMN16076810 1 SRR12605103 HiSeq 2500
2 SRR12605102 HiSeq 2500
L. fabalis 58 055 11 253 680.1 56 983 594 SAMN16076809 1 SRR12605105 HiSeq 2500
2 SRR12605104 HiSeq 2500
Total number 224 104 446

The quality and completeness of obtained assemblies was estimated by the BUSCO analysis against the Metazoa database. Assemblies for all species have less than 30% of missed genes (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Bar chart demonstrates the completeness of assemblies of the oviduct transcriptomes of six species genus Littorina based on the BUSCO analysis against the Metazoa database.

For the functional annotation of the assemblies, we mapped contigs against the database of Clusters of Orthologous Groups of proteins (COGs) within the eggNOG-mapper. The oviduct transcriptomes of all species had a similar distribution pattern of the orthologous groups, with the «Function Unknown» as the most abundant category (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

top-22 categories of Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COGs) in oviduct transcriptomes of five Neritrema species.

2. Experimental Design, Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals and tissue preparation

Females of L. saxatilis, L. arcana, L. compressa, L. obtusata and L. fabalis were collected from the wild populations at the Varangerfjord gravel-stony shores near Vadsø (70°03′47.5"N 29°55′57.1"E) and transported to the laboratory. The snails were dissected no longer than 8 h after collection for the species identification according to [2,6]. The oviducts including receptacle were cut out and rinsed twice in filtered marine water. In case of L. saxatilis, the embryos were removed from the brood pouch before rinsing. Then the oviducts were cut into fragments several mm in diameter and fixed with 1 ml of TRIzol (Ambion). The samples in TRIzol were transferred to the laboratory under -20°C conditions and then stored at -80°C. Tissues from three individuals were pooled; two biological replicates were prepared for each species and analyzed as separate libraries (Table. 1).

2.2. cDNA library preparation and high-throughput sequencing

The tissues were mechanically homogenized and total RNA was isolated according to the standard protocol of TRIzol extraction [1]. The quality of RNA was tested by agarose and capillary electrophoresis using QIAxcel Advanced (QIAGEN, Germany). We used only RNA with the RNA integrity score (RIS) higher than 5. 500 ng of RNA of each sample was used for the isolation of poly(A)-fraction using NEBNext® Poly(A) mRNA Magnetic Isolation Module according to manufacturer recommendations; then the RNA was quantified by Qubit fluorometer (Invitrogen, USA) and used for library preparation using NEBNext® UltraTM Directional RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina® with NEBNext® Multiplex Oligos for Illumina® (Dual Index Primers Set 1) according to the manufacturer recommendations (https://international.neb.com/products/e7420-nebnext-ultra-directional-rna-library-prep-kit-for-illumina#Protocols,%20Manuals%20&%20Usage; accessed 17.08.2021). The quality of libraries was tested by capillary electrophoresis using QIAxcel Advanced (QIAGEN, Germany). The peak lengths of the analyzed libraries were varying from 296 to 378 bp.

Library preparation and sequencing were performed in St. Petersburg State University “Biobank” core facility (St. Petersburg, Russia) using Illumina HiSeq2500 and in the commercial service provider “Evrogen” (Moscow, Russia) using Illumina NovaSeq 6000 (“Evrogen”); 150-bp paired-end (PE) sequencing was used.

All samples were analysed in the same cell by Illumina HiSeq 2500. The second biological replicate of L. arcana (prepared with the same Library Prep Kit) was obtained using NovaSeq 6000, as HiSeq2500-run brought low reads number in this sample. Since it possibly could lead to some bias during quantitative analysis, this sample data should be used with care. However, HiSeq 2500 and NovaSeq 6000 have similar error rates [7] and our data is fully appropriate for any qualitative comparative analysis, mass spectrometric protein identification, and other non-quantitative analytical purposes.

2.3. Data filtering

The quality of the sequencing output was assessed using the FastQC software [8]. Adapters were removed using cutadapt v3.2 [9]; sequences were trimmed and filtered with the Trimmomatic v0.39 software with command trimmomatic-0.39.jar PE -threads 6 [seq_name_1 seq_name_2] seq_name_1_unpaired.fastq seq_name_1_paired. seq_name_2_unpaired.fastq seq_name_2_paired ILLUMINACLIP:Trimmomatic-0.39/adapters/TruSeq3-PE-2.fa:2:30:10:2:TRUE SLIDINGWINDOW:4:20 MAXINFO:50:0.8 MINLEN:25 [10].

2.4. De novo transcriptome assembly

Trinity RNA-Seq assembly software package version 2.9.1 [11] with the command “Trinity –seqType fq–max_memory 80G –left [LEFT_READS_FILES] –right [RIGHT_READ_FILES] –CPU 20 –min_contig_length 200 –super_transcripts –full_cleanup” was used to assemble de novo all the transcriptomes without a reference genome. Next, we used CD-HIT-est [12] to cluster similar sequences (with a comand cdhit-est -i [input_file_name] -o [output_file_name] -c 0.95 -d 0 -g 1 -r 1: with a 95% similarity rate) and Transrate v1.0.1 [13] to improve the quality of the transcriptome assembly. Transcriptome completeness was assessed using BUSCO 4.2 [14] against the Metazoa Odb10 BUSCO dataset with –evalue 1e-3. To predict the coding sequences, we used the script TransDecoder.LongOrfs [15], the minimum protein size was taken as 100 amino acids. Finally, the transcriptomes were filtered with 250 bp minimal transcript lengths and annotated with the eggNOG-mapper (accessed by 01.03.2021, http://eggnog-mapper.embl.de/) [16].

Ethics Statement

All experiments with specimens of the genus Littorina were performed in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines and were carried out in accordance with the U.K. Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act, 1986 and EU Directive 2010/63/EU for animal experiments.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Arseniy A. Lobov: Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Data curation. Lavrentii G. Danilov: Formal analysis, Software. Alexey E. Masharskiy: Investigation. Alexander V. Predeus: Formal analysis. Natalia A. Mikhailova: Project administration. Andrei I. Granovitch: Supervision, Resources. Arina L. Maltseva: Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Conceptualization.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships which have or could be perceived to have influenced the work reported in this article.

Acknowledgments

The reported data were obtained in the research project funded by RFBR (project number № 19-34-90116, PI Maltseva AL). RNA isolation was performed in ‘Molecular and Cell Technologies’ Resource Center while the high-throughput sequencing using Illumina HiSeq 2500 and transcriptome assembly were performed in the “Biobank” and “Computing Centre” Resource Centers of the Saint Petersburg State University Core facility.

Data Availability

References

  • 1.Chomczynski P., Sacchi N. The single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate–phenol–chloroform extraction: twenty-something years on. Nat. Protoc. 2006;1(2):581–585. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Reid D.G. Ray Society; London: 1996. Systematics and Evolution of Littorina. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rolan-Alvarez E., Austin C., Boulding E.G. Oceanography and Marine Biology. CRC Press; Boca Raton: 2015. The contribution of the genus Littorina to the field of evolutionary ecology; pp. 157–214. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Westram A.M., Rafajlović M., Chaube P., Faria R., Larsson T., Panova M., Ravinet M., Blomberg A., Mehlig B., Johannesson K., Butlin R. Clines on the seashore: the genomic architecture underlying rapid divergence in the face of gene flow. Evol. Lett. 2018;4:297–309. doi: 10.1002/evl3.74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Assefa A.T., Vandesompele J., Thas O. On the utility of RNA sample pooling to optimize cost and statistical power in RNA sequencing experiments. BMC Genom. 2020;21(1):1–14. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-6721-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Maltseva A.L., Varfolomeeva M.A., Lobov A.A., Tikanova P.O., Panova M., Mikhailova N.A., Granovitch A.I. Proteomic similarity of the Littorinid snails in the evolutionary context. PeerJ. 2020;8:e8546. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Stoler N., Nekrutenko A. Sequencing error profiles of Illumina sequencing instruments. NAR Genom. Bioinform. 2021;3(1):lqab019. doi: 10.1093/nargab/lqab019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.S. Andrews, FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ (accessed 8 March 2021).
  • 9.Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 2011;17:10–12. doi: 10.14806/ej.17.1.200. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bolger A.M., Lohse M., Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Grabherr M.G., Haas B.J., Yassour M., Levin J.Z., Thompson D.A., Amit I., Adiconis X., Fan L., Raychowdhury R., Zeng Q., Chen Z., Mauceli E., Hacohen N., Gnirke A., Rhind N., di Palma F., Birren B.W., Nusbaum C., Lindblad-Toh K., Friedman N., Regev A. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011;29:644–652. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fu L., Niu M., Zhu Z., Wu S., Li W. CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:3150–3152. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Smith-Unna R., Boursnell C., Patro R., Hibberd J.M., Kelly S. TransRate: reference-free quality assessment of de novo transcriptome assemblies. Genome Res. 2016;26:1134–1144. doi: 10.1101/gr.196469.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Simão F.A., Waterhouse R.M., Ioannidis P., Zriventseva E.V., Zdobnov E.M. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:3210–3212. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Vicoso B., Kaiser V.B., Bachtrog D. Sex-biased gene expression at homomorphic sex chromosomes in emus and its implication for sex chromosome evolution. PNAS. 2013;110:6453–6458. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1217027110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Huerta-Cepas J., Szklarczyk D., Heller D., Hernández-Plaza A., Forslund S.K., Cook H., Mende D.R., Letunic I., Rattei T., Jensen L.J., von Mering C. eggNOG 5.0: a hierarchical, functionally and phylogenetically annotated orthology resource based on 5090 organisms and 2502 viruses. Nucl. Acids Res. 2019;47:D309–D314. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement


Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES