Abstract
We present the first examples of tethered silanoxyiodination reactions of allylic alcohols. The products are useful silanediol organoiodide synthons and are formed with high regioselectivity and diastereocontrol. The reaction is scalable greater than 10-fold without loss of yield or selectivity. Furthermore, the products are starting materials for further transformations, including de-iodination, C─N bond installation, epoxide synthesis, and de-silylation. DFT calculations provide a basis for understanding the exquisite 6-endo selectivity of this silanoxyiodination reaction and show that the observed products are both kinetically and thermodynamically preferred.
Graphical Abstract

Tethered alkene functionalization reactions allow the synthetic chemist to transform olefins with unusual precision.1-7 Because of the predisposition for six- and seven-membered cyclic transition states, one can simply count the number of atoms from the nucleophilic auxiliary (“the tether”) where the functionalization event is likely to take place; due to geometric constraints, these reactions generally proceed with high regio- and diastereoselectivity. Our laboratory is deeply invested in developing tethered olefin functionalization reactions, and we have disclosed such reactions using sulfamate,8, 9 phosphoramidate,10 and di-tert-butyl-silanoxy tethers.11, 12
Iodofunctionalization of olefins is a particularly powerful method for the synthesis of organoiodides, which are versatile precursors for C─O,13 C─N,14 and C─C bonds15 (Scheme 1). Two particularly well-known classes within this large area are iodolactonization16-20 and iodoetherification21-24 of olefins (Scheme 2), and examples of both are found in complex molecule syntheses. Building on this precedent, we imagined a silanoxyiodination reaction, which would yield protected diol iodides in a single step and with high regio- and diastereoselectivity. We reasoned that the di-tert-butyl silyl group could be facilely removed to reveal useful iodo-diol synthons. Here, we describe our efforts to reduce this idea to practice.
Scheme 1.
Organoiodides have proven versatility.
Scheme 2.
Elegant work with iodolactonization and iodoetherification inspired this tethered silanoxyiodination.
Optimization of this tethered silanoxyiodination reaction began with (E)-di-tert-butyl(hex-2-en-1-yloxy)silanol, conveniently prepared in one step from commercially available di-tert-butylsilyl bis(trifluoromethanesulfonate) and trans-2-hexen-1-ol.11 With I2 (3 equivalents) and NaHCO3 (6 equivalents) in acetonitrile at 0 °C, we were pleased to observe 65% of desired product (Table 1, Entry 1). However, we soon discovered that these conditions were much too corrosive with other allylic silanols and led to markedly reduced product yields. The use of Ag (I) in conjunction with I2 is well known for the mild generation of I+.21, 23, 25 With AgNO3/I2 (Table 1, Entry 2) and with Ag(TFA)/I2 (Table 1, Entry 3), we did not observe any cyclized product formation. In both cases, we isolated linear alkyl iodide products, which we presume result from intermolecular opening of the transient iodonium intermediate by NO3- and CF3CO2−. We hypothesized that switching to a silver salt with a non-nucleophilic counterion would eliminate intermolecular ring-opening. With AgBF4 in acetonitrile, tetrahydrofuran, or ethyl acetate (Table 1, Entries 4-6) at 0°C, we observed ~60% cyclized product formation. Using CH2Cl2 as a solvent was markedly deleterious (Table 1, Entry 7). In THF, when the temperature was reduced from 0 °C to −15 °C, the yield of cyclized product increased slightly (Table 1, Entry 8); however, dropping the temperature further to −45 °C led to a dramatic decrease in product formation (Table 1, Entry 9). We found that Ag(OTf)/I2 in THF, Ag(OTf)/I2 in DME, and AgBF4/I2 in DME at −15 °C (Table 1, Entries 10-12) all gave comparable, good yields of cyclized product. Overall, we chose three protocols (A: AgBF4/I2/THF, B: AgBF4/I2/DME, C: AgOTf/I2/DME) for further exploration of scope.
Table 1.
Optimization of a tethered silanoxyiodination reaction.
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ag (I) (equiv.) | I2 equiv. | Solvent | Temp.a | B/Ab | |
| 1 | None | 3c | MeCN | 0 °C | 65/0 |
| 2 | AgNO3 (1) | 1 | MeCN | 0 °C | 0/0d |
| 3 | Ag(TFA) (1) | 1 | MeCN | 0 °C | 0/0e |
| 4 | AgBF4 (1) | 1 | MeCN | 0 °C | 58/0 |
| 5 | AgBF4 (1) | 1 | THF | 0 °C | 60/0 |
| 6 | AgBF4 (1) | 1 | EtOAc | 0 °C | 62/11 |
| 7 | AgBF4 (1) | 1 | CH2Cl2 | 0 °C | 22/0 |
| 8 | AgBF4 (1) | 1 | THF | −15 °C | 65/0 |
| 9 | AgBF4 (1) | 1 | THF | −45 °C | 45/0 |
| 10 | AgOTf (1) | 1 | THF | −15 °C | 70/0 |
| 11 | AgBF4 (1) | 1 | DME | −15 °C | 75/0 |
| 12 | AgOTf (1) | 1 | DME | −15 °C | 80/0 |
reaction times were between 1 and 2 hours in all cases.
Yield estimated from 1H NMR integration with methyl phenyl sulfone as an internal standard.
With 6 equivalents of NaHCO3.
Two non-cyclized products, which we presume result from NO3− opening of the iodonium intermediate.
Two non-cyclized products, which we presume result from CF3CO2− opening of the iodonium intermediate.
Examination of a variety of allylic silanol substrates (Scheme 3) with these protocols revealed that this transformation is quite general, tolerant of diverse functional groups, and in most cases, proceeds with high regio- and diastereoselectivity. We have determined the relative configuration of one of these products through X-ray diffraction analysis, which establishes that the iodine and the pendant alkyl chain are trans to each other (Scheme 3, Entry 11, CCDC: 2062814). While protocol A (AgBF4/I2/THF) gave good product yields with several substrates (Scheme 3, Entries 1 and 7), a curious side product complicated crude NMR analysis and purification. Amazingly, this side product has been previously characterized and arises from a ring-opening polymerization of THF by I2!26 We thus abandoned THF in favor of DME, and we recommend that for substrates not shown here, both protocol B (AgBF4/I2/DME) and protocol C (AgOTf/I2/DME) should be empirically tested for best results. We were pleased to find that a variety of alkyl chains (Scheme 3, Entries 1, 2, & 6), rings (Scheme 3, Entries 3-4), alkyl ethers (Scheme 3, Entry 3), ketals (Scheme 3, Entry 5), esters (Scheme 3, Entry 10), aromatic rings (Scheme 3, Entries 8 & 11), and heteroaromatic rings (Scheme 3, Entries 9 & 12) were all tolerated by our optimized protocols. Furthermore, we were not limited to disubstituted olefins. A variety of tri-substituted olefins (Scheme 3, Entries 13-15) reacted smoothly as well.
Scheme 3.
Substrate Scope.
We were pleased to see that the reaction scaled greater than ten-fold without loss of yield or selectivity (Scheme 4).
Scheme 4.
Silanoxyiodination scales greater than ten fold without loss of yield or selectivity.
Furthermore, the cyclic silanediol organoiodide products were amenable to a variety of further transformations, including, de-iodination, nucleophilic azide displacement, epoxide formation, and silicon removal (Scheme 5).
Scheme 5.
Products are versatile synthons for: (A) de-iodination (B) C-N bond formation (C) epoxide formation and (D) silicon removal.
In all cases, we exclusively observed products of 6-endo-trig cyclization reactions. In order to rationalize such exquisite selectivity for the 6-endo product over the 5-exo isomer, we turned to DFT calculations using the ORCA software package.27, 28 All calculations were performed using the B3LYP functional29, 30 with D3BJ dispersion correction31, 32 using the RIJCOSX approximation.33 The def2-TZVP basis set34 was used, and implicit THF solvation was applied using the SMD model.35 When iodine was present, the def2-ECP36 was applied automatically. Counterions were not modelled for ionic species. Further details and atomic coordinates are reported in the Supporting Information.
Upon exposing substrate alkene 1 to molecular iodine, the immediate product is an intermediate iodonium 61. Intramolecular ring closure can proceed either via a 5-exo (62) or a 6-endo (63) transition state, leading to isomeric protonated products 64 and 65. For the 5-exo pathway, both the transition state and the cationic product are more than 4 kcal/mol higher in energy than their 6-endo counterparts (Figure 1). This overwhelming preference for the 6-endo pathway agrees with the experimental absence of any 5-exo product, even in trace amounts. The origin of the 6-endo selectivity is most likely due to ring strain. For acyclic iodonium 61, the O-Si-O angle is 102.6°, which is 6.9° lower than the ideal tetrahedral angle of 109.5°. This initial acyclic perturbation is likely due to the presence of the tert-butyl groups on the silicon, a manifestation of the Thorpe-Ingold effect.37 The 6-endo transition state 63 has an O-Si-O angle of 101.3°, and the 6-endo product 65 has an O-Si-O angle of 97.6°, the latter of which is only 5° smaller than the acyclic angle on iodonium 61. By contrast, the 5-exo transition state 62 has an O-Si-O angle of 96.7°, and the 5-exo product 64 has an O-Si-O angle of 89.8°, the latter of which is now geometrically acute and 12.8° smaller than the acyclic angle on iodonium 61. Thus, the tert-butyl groups on silicon promote a Si-O-Si angle close to that required for 6-endo ring closure, while 5-exo ring closure requires a much more strained and energetically unfavorable Si-O-Si angle.
Figure 1.
DFT energies for cationic iodonium rearrangements of substrate 1.
In summary, we present the first examples of tethered silanoxyiodination reactions of allylic alcohols. The products are useful silanediol organoiodide synthons and are formed with high regioselectivity and diastereocontrol. The reaction is scalable greater than 10-fold without loss of yield or selectivity. Furthermore, the products are starting materials for further transformations, including de-iodination, C─N bond installation, epoxide synthesis, and de-silylation. DFT calculations provide a basis for understanding the exquisite 6-endo selectivity of this silanoxyiodination reaction. We expect this reaction to find much use in the construction of complex molecules containing functional group stereochemical arrays.
Experimental Section
I. General Considerations:
All reagents were obtained commercially unless otherwise noted. Solvents were purified by passage under 10 psi N2 through activated alumina columns. Infrared (IR) spectra were recorded on a Thermo Scientific™ Nicolet™ iS™5 FT-IR Spectrometer; data are reported in frequency of absorption (cm−1). NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance 400 operating at 400 and 100 MHz. 1H NMR spectra were recorded at 400 MHz. Data are recorded as: chemical shift in ppm referenced internally using residue solvent peaks, multiplicity (s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, q = quartet, m = multiplet or overlap of nonequivalent resonances), integration, coupling constant (Hz). 13C NMR spectra were recorded at 100 MHz. Exact mass spectra were recorded using an electrospray ion source (ESI) either in positive mode or negative mode and with a time-of-flight (TOF) analyzer on a Waters LCT PremierTM mass spectrometer and are given in m/z. TLC was performed on pre-coated glass plates (Merck) and visualized either with a UV lamp (254 nm) or by dipping into a solution of KMnO4−K2CO3 in water followed by heating. Flash chromatography was performed on silica gel (230-400 mesh) or Florisil (60-100 mesh).
II. Characterization of Previously Unreported Substrates
Note 1: Substrates were synthesized according to previously reported procedures. See Org. Lett. 2020, 22, 21, 8665–8669.
Note 2: Compounds 1-4, 6-8, 11, 13-17, 19, 20, 23, 25 have been reported in Org. Lett. 2020, 22, 21, 8665–8669 or in Chemrxiv 2021. https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.13679083.v1.

(E)-di-tert-butyl((6-methylhept-2-en-1-yl)oxy)silanol
Compound 5: Purified using a gradient of 0 to 10% EtOAc in hexanes on silica gel; (yellow oil, 476 mg, 83%); 1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 5.69 (ddt, J = 14.1, 6.2, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 5.59 (dtt, J = 15.3, 5.3, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 4.35 – 4.28 (m, 2H), 2.12 – 2.01 (m, 2H), 1.58 (dq, J = 13.3, 6.7 Hz, 1H), 1.33 – 1.24 (m, 2H), 1.05 (s, 18H), 0.91 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 6H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 131.6, 129.1, 64.2, 38.4, 30.0, 27.5, 27.42, 22.47, 20.46. IR 2857, 1457, 1173 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C16H33O2Si− 285.2250, Found 285.2245 (M−).

(E)-di-tert-butyl((3-(tetrahydro-2H-pyran-4-yl)allyl)oxy)silanol
Compound 9: purified using a gradient of 0 to 50% acetone/DCM; (light yellow oil, 403 mg, 67% yield); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.63 – 5.54 (m, 1H), 5.54 – 5.42 (m, 1H), 4.24 (tt, J = 4.8, 1.2 Hz, 2H), 3.89 (ddt, J = 12.5, 4.2, 1.6 Hz, 2H), 3.35 (tt, J = 11.6, 2.2 Hz, 2H), 2.20 – 2.12 (m, 1H), 1.55 (ddq, J = 12.8, 4.1, 2.0 Hz, 2H), 1.46 – 1.30 (m, 2H), 0.95 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 134.8, 134.4, 127.9, 127.6, 67.7, 64.1, 63.9, 37.3, 32.6, 32.5, 27.8, 27.4, 21.2, 20.4. IR 2933, 1473, 1127, 827, 648 cm−1.; HRMS (ESI) calculated for C16H31O3Si− 299.2048 Found 299.2055 (M−).

tert-butyl (E)-4-(3-((di-tert-butyl(hydroxy)silyl)oxy)prop-1-en-1-yl)piperidine-1-carboxylate
Compound 10: Purified using a gradient of 0 to 10% EtOAc in hexanes on silica gel; (Colorless oil, 663 mg, 83%); 1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 5.70 – 5.55 (m, 2H), 4.33 (dd, J = 4.8, 1.2 Hz, 2H), 4.11 (dt, J = 13.7, 3.6 Hz, 2H), 2.76 (ddd, J = 13.3, 12.2, 2.8 Hz, 2H), 2.14 (td, J = 10.8, 5.9 Hz, 1H), 1.74 – 1.65 (m, 2H), 1.48 (s, 9H), 1.37 – 1.25 (m, 2H), 1.05 (s, 18H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 154.9, 134.6, 128.0, 79.3, 63.9, 43.6, 38.4, 31.7, 28.4, 27.4, 20.4. IR 2857, 1457, 1173 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C21H41NO4SiNa+ 422.2703, found mass 422.2692 (MNa+).

(S,E)-((3-(1,4-dioxaspiro[4.5]decan-2-yl)allyl)oxy)di-tert-butylsilanol
Compound 12: purified using a gradient of 0 to 20% EtOAc:Hexanes; (colorless oil, 420 mg, 59% yield); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.92 (dtd, J = 15.3, 4.5, 0.9 Hz, 1H), 5.75 (ddt, J = 15.4, 7.4, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 4.62 – 4.50 (m, 1H), 4.39 (ddd, J = 4.5, 1.7, 0.7 Hz, 2H), 4.14 – 4.09 (m, 1H), 3.68 – 3.53 (m, 1H), 1.72 – 1.58 (m, 9H), 1.43 (m, 1H), 1.05 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 133.4, 127.4, 109.8, 76.2, 69.1, 63.0, 36.2, 35.4, 27.4, 25.1, 23.9, 23.8, 20.5. IR 2866, 1465, 1082, 829 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C19H35O4Si− 355.2310 Found 355.2336 (M−).

(E)-((3-(4-bromophenyl)allyl)oxy)di-tert-butylsilanol
Compound 18: purified using a gradient of 0 to 0.2% Acetone in DCM; (light yellow oil, 319 mg, 43% yield); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.57 – 7.40 (m, 2H), 7.40 – 7.16 (m, 2H), 6.61 (dt, J = 15.9, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 6.33 (dt, J = 15.8, 4.9 Hz, 1H), 4.55 (dd, J = 4.9, 1.8 Hz, 2H), 1.09 (d, J = 0.9 Hz, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 136.2, 131.7, 130.1, 128.2, 128.0, 121.1, 63.9, 27.5, 20.6. IR 3471, 2919, 1479, 1378, 829 cm−1.; HRMS (ESI) calculated for C17H26BrO2Si− 369.0891 Found 369.0867 (M−).

(E)-4-((di-tert-butyl(hydroxy)silyl)oxy)but-2-en-1-yl acetate
Compound 21: purified using a gradient of 0 to 50% Acetone in DCM on silica gel followed by a gradient of 0 to 100% Acetonitrile in 0.1%TFA-H2O on a RediSep Prep C18 column (100 Å, 5 μm, Length 250 mm ID: 20 mm, Flow rate of 15 mL/min); (light yellow oil, 288 mg, 50% yield); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.96 – 5.78 (m, 2H), 4.67 – 4.56 (m, 2H), 4.40 (dt, J = 4.0, 1.3 Hz, 2H), 2.10 (s, 3H), 1.06 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 171.1, 134.2, 123.3, 64.6, 63.0, 27.4, 20.9, 20.5. IR 3442, 2947, 1730, 1246, 829 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C14H27O4Si− 287.1684 Found 287.1661 (M−).

(E)-4-((di-tert-butyl(hydroxy)silyl)oxy)but-2-en-1-yl benzoate
Compound 22: purified using a gradient of 0 to 50% Acetone/DCM on silica gel; (light yellow semi-solid, 343 mg, 49% yield); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.09 – 7.98 (m, 2H), 7.60 – 7.53 (m, 1H), 7.44 (ddd, J = 8.2, 6.7, 1.2 Hz, 2H), 6.03 – 5.88 (m, 2H), 4.83 (tt, J = 2.3, 1.3 Hz, 2H), 4.40 (p, J = 1.4 Hz, 2H), 1.03 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 166.6, 134.2, 133.0, 130.3, 129.7, 128.4, 123.7, 65.0, 63.2, 27.5, 20.6. IR 3447, 2933, 1704, 1279, 827 cm−1.; HRMS (ESI) calculated for C19H29O4Si− 349.1841 Found 349.1813 (M−).

(E)-di-tert-butyl((3-(pyridin-3-yl)allyl)oxy)silanol
Compound 24: Purified using a gradient of 0 to 10% EtOAc in hexanes on silica gel; (Colorless oil, 411 mg, 70%); 1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 8.60 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 8.47 (dd, J = 4.9, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.71 (dt, J = 7.9, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 7.27 (dd, J = 7.9, 4.9 Hz, 1H), 6.65 (dd, J = 15.9, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.40 (ddd, J = 16.0, 5.1, 4.2 Hz, 1H), 4.58 (dd, J = 4.7, 1.9 Hz, 2H), 1.10 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 148.0, 147.9, 133.0, 132.9, 131.9, 125.3, 123.5, 63.6, 27.4, 20.5. IR 2856, 1471, 1134 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C16H28NO2Si+ 294.1884 found 294.1852 (MH+).

di-tert-butyl((3-ethylpent-2-en-1-yl)oxy)silanol
Compound 26: Purified using a gradient of 0 to 10% EtOAc in hexanes on silica gel; (Colorless oil, 409 mg, 75%);1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 5.32 (td, J = 6.5, 3.3 Hz, 1H), 4.40 (dd, J = 6.3, 1.2 Hz, 2H), 2.13 – 2.01 (m, 4H), 1.08-0.97 (m, 6H),1.05 (s, 18H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 144.6, 122.7, 60.1, 28.9, 27.4, 23.6, 20.4, 13.3, 12.5. IR 2933, 1471, 1107 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C15H31O2Si+ 271.2093 found 271.2091 (M+).

(E)-di-tert-butyl((3,7,11,15-tetramethylhexadec-2-en-1-yl)oxy)silanol
Compound 27: purified using a gradient of 0 to 0.1% acetone in DCM; (colorless oil, 400 mg, 44% yield); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.37 (tq, J = 6.3, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 4.39 (dq, J = 6.4, 0.9 Hz, 2H), 2.05 – 1.96 (m, 2H), 1.65 (t, J = 0.8 Hz, 3H), 1.56 (dp, J = 13.3, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 1.49 – 1.08 (m, 18H), 1.05 (s, 18H), 0.89 (ddd, J = 8.5, 6.6, 0.7 Hz, 12H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 137.4, 124.3, 60.4, 39.8, 39.3, 37.4, 37.4, 37.3, 36.6, 32.8, 32.7, 27.9, 27.4, 25.1, 24.8, 24.4, 22.7, 22.6, 20.4, 19.7, 19.7, 16.2. IR 2928, 1471, 1364, 1099, 827 cm−1.; HRMS (ESI) calculated for C28H58NaO2Si+ 477.4098 Found 477.4067 (MNa+).

di-tert-butyl(2-(tetrahydro-4H-pyran-4-ylidene)ethoxy)silanol
Compound 28: Purified using a gradient of 0 to 10% EtOAc in hexanes on silica gel; (Colorless oil, 401 mg, 70%); 1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 5.44 (tt, J = 6.6, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 4.39 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 3.71 (dt, J = 13.3, 5.5 Hz, 4H), 2.36 – 2.29 (m, 2H), 2.29 – 2.22 (m, 2H), 1.98 (s, 1H), 1.05 (s, 18H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 136.3, 123.1, 69.4, 68.5, 59.1, 36.6, 29.9, 27.3, 20.4. IR 2933, 1471, 1107 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C15H30O3SiNa+ 309.1856 found 309.1821 (MNa+).
III. General Protocols for Silanoxyiodination of Alkenes
Protocol A: A microwave vial was charged with stir bar, alkene substrate (0.2 mmol, 1 equivalent), AgBF4 (39 mg, 0.2 mmol, 1 equivalent) and 2 mL of anhydrous THF. The reaction vial was immersed in a bath set to −15 °C. I2 (51 mg, 0.2 mmol, 1 equivalent) was added in 1 portion. A light-yellow precipitate formed immediately upon addition of AgBF4. The heterogeneous mixture was stirred for 1 h at −15 °C and then quenched by addition of aqueous saturated Na2S2O3. The reaction mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate and transferred to a separatory funnel. The organic portion was collected, and the aqueous layer was extracted with two additional portions of ethyl acetate. The organic fractions were pooled, dried with MgSO4, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The resulting residue was purified by chromatography on Florisil (specific conditions are associated with each compound).
Protocol B: A microwave vial was charged with stir bar, alkene substrate (0.2 mmol, 1 equivalent), AgBF4 (39 mg, 0.2 mmol, 1 equivalent) and 2 mL of anhydrous DME. The reaction vial was immersed in a bath set to −15 °C. I2 (51 mg, 0.2 mmol, 1 equivalent) was added in 1 portion. A light-yellow precipitate formed immediately upon addition of AgBF4. The heterogeneous mixture was stirred for 1 h at −15 °C and then quenched by addition of aqueous saturated Na2S2O3. The reaction mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate and transferred to a separatory funnel. The organic portion was collected, and the aqueous layer was extracted with two additional portions of ethyl acetate. The organic fractions were pooled, dried with MgSO4, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The resulting residue was purified by chromatography on Florisil (specific conditions are associated with each compound).
Protocol C: A microwave vial was charged with stir bar, alkene substrate (0.2 mmol, 1 equivalent), AgOTf (51 mg, 0.2 mmol, 1 equivalent) and 2 mL of anhydrous DME. The reaction vial was immersed in a bath set to −15 °C. I2 (51 mg, 0.2 mmol, 1 equivalent) was added in 1 portion. A light-yellow precipitate formed immediately upon addition of AgOTf. The heterogeneous mixture was stirred for 1 h at −15 °C and then quenched by addition of aqueous saturated Na2S2O3. The reaction mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate and transferred to a separatory funnel. The organic portion was collected, and the aqueous layer was extracted with two additional portions of ethyl acetate. The organic fractions were pooled, dried with MgSO4, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The resulting residue was purified by chromatography on Florisil (specific conditions are associated with each compound).
IV. Characterization of Iodinated Products

2,2-di-tert-butyl-5-iodo-4-methyl-1,3,2-dioxasilinane
Compound 29: synthesized using protocol C; single diastereomer; purified using benzene on Florisil; (light yellow semi-solid, 66 mg, 92% isolated yield); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.31 (dq, J = 10.2, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 4.27 – 4.16 (m, 2H), 4.01 (td, J = 10.5, 5.2 Hz, 1H), 1.53 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 3H), 1.07 (s, 9H), 1.01 (s, 9H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 75.7, 71.0, 34.2, 27.4, 26.9, 24.8, 22.7, 19.8. IR 2960, 1474, 1136, 825 cm−1.; HRMS (ESI) calculated for C12H26IO2Si+ 357.0741 Found 357.0740 (MH+).

2,2-di-tert-butyl-5-iodo-4-propyl-1,3,2-dioxasilinane
Compound 30: synthesized using protocol A; single diastereomer; Light yellow solid; purified using a gradient of 0 to 10% EtOAc in Hexanes on silica gel; 54 mg, 70% isolated yield; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.20 – 4.09 (m, 2H), 4.05 (ddd, J = 10.2, 8.0, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 3.98 (td, J = 10.4, 4.9 Hz, 1H), 2.02 – 1.91 (m, 1H), 1.52 – 1.32 (m, 3H), 0.97 (s, 9H), 0.91 (s, 9H), 0.88 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 78.3, 71.3, 39.8, 33.2, 27.4, 26.9, 22.8, 19.9, 17.9, 13.7. IR 2960, 1474, 1135, 825 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C14H30IO2Si+ 385.1054 Found 385.1057 (MNa+).

2,2-di-tert-butyl-5-iodo-4-nonyl-1,3,2-dioxasilinane
Compound 31: synthesized using protocol A; single diastereomer; purified using benzene on Florisil; (colorless oil, 64 mg, 68% isolated yield); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.20 – 4.08 (m, 2H), 4.08 – 3.93 (m, 2H), 2.04 – 1.92 (m, 1H), 1.50 – 1.14 (m, 15H), 0.97 (s, 9H), 0.92 (s, 9H), 0.85 – 0.77 (m, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 78.5, 71.3, 37.6, 33.3, 31.9, 29.5, 29.3, 29.1, 27.4, 26.9, 24.5, 22.8, 22.7, 19.9, 14.1. IR 2927, 1473, 1133, 825 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C20H42IO2Si+ 469.1993 Found 469.1993 (MH+).

(±) 2,2-di-tert-butyl-5-iodo-4-isobutyl-1,3,2-dioxasilinane
Compound 32: synthesized using protocol B; single diastereomer; purified using 100% benzene on Florisil; (Colorless oil, 52 mg, 65%); 1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 4.28 – 4.12 (m, 3H), 3.97–4.05 (m, 1H), 2.00 – 1.84 (m, 2H), 1.44 – 1.37 (m, 1H), 1.05 (s, 9H), 0.99 (s, 9H), 0.96 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H), 0.94 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 77.2, 71.2, 46.8, 34.1, 27.4, 26.9, 24.3, 23.7, 22.8, 21.1, 19.8. IR 2957, 1364, 903 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C15H32IO2Si+ 399.1216 found 399.1253 (MH+).

2,2-di-tert-butyl-5-iodo-4-isopentyl-1,3,2-dioxasilinane
Compound 33: synthesized using protocol B; purified using 100% benzene on Florisil; single diastereomer; (Colorless oil, 73 mg, 89%);1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 4.29 – 4.02 (m, 4H), 2.14 – 2.04 (m, 1H), 1.63 – 1.46 (m, 2H), 1.43 – 1.26 (m, 2H), 1.05 (s, 9H), 1.00 (s, 9H), 0.93 (d, J = 4.9 Hz, 3H), 0.91 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 78.7, 71.2, 35.4, 33.6, 33.3, 27.6, 27.4, 26.9, 23.0, 22.8, 22.2, 19.9. IR 2956, 1137, 896 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C16H34IO2Si+ 413.1373 found 413.1370 (MH+).

2,2-di-tert-butyl-5-iodo-4-isopropyl-1,3,2-dioxasilinane
Compound 34: synthesized using protocol B; purified using benzene on Florisil; (light yellow semi-solid, 45 mg, 58% isolated yield); single diastereomer; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.32 (dd, J = 10.4, 4.2 Hz, 1H), 4.24 (t, J = 10.7 Hz, 1H), 4.21 – 4.12 (m, 1H), 4.02 (dd, J = 10.1, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 2.34 (pd, J = 6.8, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 1.07 (s, 9H), 1.04 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 12H), 0.87 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 81.7, 71.8, 33.0, 31.8, 27.6, 26.9, 23.0, 20.2, 20.0, 13.2. IR 2960, 1076, 1028, 764 cm−1.; HRMS (ESI) calculated for C14H30IO2Si+ 385.1060 Found 385.1052 (MH+).

(±) 4-(sec-butyl)-2,2-di-tert-butyl-5-iodo-1,3,2-dioxasilinane
Compound 35: synthesized using protocol B; purified using 100% benzene on Florisil; ~1:1 mixture of diastereomers; (Colorless oil, 38 mg, 48%);1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 4.36 – 4.27 (m, 1H), 4.27 – 4.14 (m, 2H), 4.08 – 4.00 (m, 1H), 2.07 (dddd, J = 18.4, 8.8, 5.1, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 1.56 – 1.46 (m, 1H), 1.46 – 1.34 (m, 1H), 1.24 – 1.14 (m, 1H), 1.07 (s, 4H), 1.06 (s, 5H), 1.04 (s, 1H), 1.03 (s, 4H), 1.02 (s, 5H), 0.97 (m, 3H), 0.87 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 82.6, 79.8, 71.9, 71.8, 39.8, 39.7, 31.6, 31.5, 27.6, 27.5, 27.0, 26.9, 26.8, 23.0, 20.4, 20.2, 16.5, 12.0, 11.7, 11.4. IR 2859, 1474, 939 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C15H32IO2Si+ 399.1216 found 399.1161 (MH+).

2,2-di-tert-butyl-4-cyclohexyl-5-iodo-1,3,2-dioxasilinane
Compound 36: synthesized using protocol B; purified using benzene on Florisil; (colorless semi-solid, 59 mg, 70% isolated yield); single diastereomer; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.34 – 4.17 (m, 3H), 3.98 (dt, J = 8.1, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 2.00 (td, J = 5.3, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 1.86 – 1.74 (m, 2H), 1.70 (dt, J = 12.6, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 1.59 (dd, J = 8.4, 3.2 Hz, 1H), 1.53 (td, J = 9.4, 3.4 Hz, 2H), 1.40 – 1.12 (m, 4H), 1.06 (s, 9H), 1.03 (s, 9H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 81.6, 71.8, 43.5, 31.1, 30.2, 27.6, 27.0, 26.5, 26.4, 26.0, 23.8, 23.0, 20.2. IR 2930, 1072, 1001, 975 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C17H34IO2Si+ 425.1367 Found 425.1358 (MH+).

2,2-di-tert-butyl-5-iodo-4-(tetrahydro-2H-pyran-4-yl)-1,3,2 dioxasilinane
Compound 37: synthesized using protocol B; purified using a gradient of 0 to 40% EtOAc/benzene on Florisil; single diastereomer; (light yellow oil, 64 mg, 75% isolated yield); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.23 (dd, J = 10.1, 3.9 Hz, 1H), 4.19 – 4.03 (m, 2H), 4.01 – 3.90 (m, 3H), 3.43 – 3.27 (m, 2H), 2.17 (ttd, J = 11.8, 3.7, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 1.92 – 1.79 (m, 1H), 1.66 – 1.52 (m, 1H), 1.32 (dddt, J = 13.3, 11.5, 3.8, 2.1 Hz, 2H), 0.98 (s, 9H), 0.93 (s, 9H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 80.5, 71.6, 68.0, 67.7, 40.5, 30.1, 29.5, 27.6, 26.9, 23.9, 23.0, 20.2. IR 2857, 1163, 1080, 825 cm−1.; HRMS (ESI) calculated for C16H32IO3Si+ 427.1166 Found 427.1162 (MH+).

2,2-di-tert-butyl-5-iodo-1,3,2-dioxasilinan-4-yl)piperidine-1-carboxylate
Compound 38: synthesized using protocol B; purified using 100% benzene on Florisil; single diastereomer; (Colorless oil, 51 mg, 48%); 1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 4.32 – 4.10 (m, 5H), 4.02 (dd, J = 10.1, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 2.70 (dd, J = 25.1, 13.4 Hz, 2H), 2.12 (ddddd, J = 13.6, 11.6, 9.7, 4.9, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 1.68 (dd, J = 28.2, 13.7 Hz, 1H), 1.52–1.45 (m, 3H), 1.47 (s, 9H), 1.03 (s, 9H), 0.98 (s, 9H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 154.9, 80.5, 79.3, 71.6, 43.9, 41.4, 30.3, 28.4, 27.5, 26.9, 23.0, 22.9, 20.1. IR 2933, 1423, 923 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C21H41INO4Si+ 526.1850 found 526.1891 (MH+).

2,2-di-tert-butyl-5-iodo-4-methylcyclohexyl)-1,3,2-dioxasilinane
Compound 39: synthesized using protocol B; purified using benzene on Florisil; single diastereomer; (colorless oil, 63 mg, 72% yield); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.24 – 4.09 (m, 3H), 3.91 (dt, J = 8.8, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 1.88 – 1.78 (m, 1H), 1.67 (ddt, J = 13.6, 5.9, 1.9 Hz, 2H), 1.54 – 1.40 (m, 3H), 1.19 (dtt, J = 12.2, 9.0, 5.6 Hz, 3H), 0.96 (s, 9H), 0.92 (s, 9H), 0.94-0.84 (m, 1H), 0.81 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 81.3, 71.8, 42.5, 35.0, 34.6, 32.7, 31.3, 30.0, 27.6, 27.0, 23.5, 23.0, 22.6, 20.2. IR 2928, 1455, 1117, 825 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C18H36IO2Si+ 439.1524 Found 439.1516 (MH+).

2,2-di-tert-butyl-5-iodo-4-((R)-1,4 dioxaspiro[4.5]decan-2-yl)-1,3,2-dioxasilinane
Compound 40: synthesized using protocol B; purified using a gradient of 0 to 5% EtOAc:Hexanes on Florisil; single diastereomer; (colorless oil, 34 mg, 35% yield); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.45 (td, J = 6.7, 3.6 Hz, 1H), 4.30 (dd, J = 10.7, 3.6 Hz, 1H), 4.22 – 4.10 (m, 2H), 4.00 – 3.92 (m, 2H), 3.81 (td, J = 10.6, 5.2 Hz, 1H), 1.72 – 1.61 (m, 1H), 1.61 – 1.46 (m, 7H), 1.33 (s, 2H), 0.99 (s, 9H), 0.93 (s, 9H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 110.3, 79.2, 77.5, 71.6, 63.7, 35.7, 35.6, 27.5, 26.9, 26.4, 25.2, 24.0, 23.8, 23.0, 20.1. IR 2933, 1110, 1058, 825 cm−1.; HRMS calculated for C19H36IO4Si+ 483.1422 Found 483.1414.

2,2-di-tert-butyl-4-(2,6-dimethylheptyl)-5-iodo-1,3,2-dioxasilinane
Compound 41: synthesized using protocol C; purified using 100% benzene on Florisil; ~1:1 mixture of diastereomers; (Colorless oil, 61 mg, 65%); 1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 4.29 – 4.15 (m, 3H), 4.06–3.99 (m, 1H), 2.03 (ddd, J = 13.6, 8.9, 2.1 Hz, 1.4H), 1.87 – 1.76 (m, 0.6H), 1.60–1.50 (m, 1H), 1.47 – 1.37 (m, 1H), 1.37 – 1.31 (m, 1H), 1.30 – 1.22 (m, 2H), 1.20 – 1.13 (m, 2H), 1.12 – 1.07 (m, 1H), 1.05 (s, 9H), 0.99 (s, 9H), 0.95 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 1.8H), 0.92 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 1.2H), 0.89 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 3H), 0.87 (d, J = 1.0 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 71.2, 71.2, 45.2, 44.7, 39.3, 39.1, 37.9, 35.6, 34.3, 29.3, 28.7, 27.9, 27.9, 27.44, 27.42, 26.9, 24.7, 24.4, 22.84, 22.81, 22.74, 22.70, 22.66, 22.59, 20.7, 19.8, 19.0. IR 2859, 1474, 906 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C20H42IO2Si+ 469.1999 found 469.2005 (MH+).

2,2-di-tert-butyl-4-ethyl-5-iodo-1,3,2-dioxasilinane-6-d
Compound 42: synthesized using protocol A; purified using benzene on Florisil followed by eluting with 20% EtOAc/hexanes on a small plug of silica gel; mixture of diastereomers; (light yellow semi-solid, 46 mg, 62% isolated yield); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.18 – 4.05 (m, 1H), 4.04 – 3.94 (m, 2H), 2.03 (dqd, J = 14.8, 7.4, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 1.58 – 1.42 (m, 1H), 0.97 (s, 9H), 0.91 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 12H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 79.5, 71.1 – 70.5 (m), 32.5, 30.6, 27.4, 26.9, 22.8, 19.9, 8.8. IR 2961, 1473, 1135, 827 cm−1.; HRMS (ESI) calculated for C13H27DIO2Si+ 372.0961 Found 372.0959 (MH+).

2,2-di-tert-butyl-4-hexyl-5-iodo-1,3,2-dioxasilinane-6-d
Compound 43: synthesized using protocol B; purified using benzene on Florisil; mixture of diastereomers; (light yellow semi-solid, 57 mg, 67% isolated yield); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.25 – 4.15 (m, 1H), 4.11 (ddd, J = 10.2, 7.8, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 4.08 – 4.00 (m, 1H), 2.13 – 1.99 (m, 1H), 1.57 – 1.45 (m, 2H), 1.38 – 1.19 (m, 7H), 1.04 (s, 9H), 0.99 (s, 9H), 0.92 – 0.87 (m, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 78.7, 71.3 – 70.7 (m), 37.7, 33.3, 31.9, 29.0, 27.6, 27.0, 24.6, 23.0, 22.7, 20.0, 14.2. IR 2957, 1473, 1088, 827 cm−1.; HRMS (ESI) calculated for C17H35DIO2Si+ 428.1587 Found 428.1578 (MH+).

2,2-di-tert-butyl-5-iodo-4-phenyl-1,3,2-dioxasilinane
Compound 44: synthesized using protocol C; purified using 100% benzene on Florisil; single diastereomer; (Colorless oil, 66 mg, 79%);1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 7.48 – 7.35 (m, 5H), 5.13 (d, J = 9.8 Hz, 1H), 4.48 – 4.30 (m, 3H), 1.14 (s, 18H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 142.4, 128.4, 128.1, 127.3, 82.0, 71.6, 34.2, 27.5, 27.0, 23.0, 20.2. IR 2859, 1471, 903 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C17H27IO2SiNa+ 441.0717 found 441.0669 (MNa+).

2,2-di-tert-butyl-4-(4-fluorophenyl)-5-iodo-1,3,2-dioxasilinane
Compound 45: synthesized using protocol B; purified using 100% benzene on Florisil; single diastereomer; (Colorless oil, 61 mg, 70%); 1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 7.46 – 7.35 (m, 2H), 7.14 – 7.03 (m, 2H), 5.11 (d, J = 10.3 Hz, 1H), 4.47 – 4.24 (m, 3H), 1.13 (s, 9H), 1.12 (s, 9H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 162.6 (d, J = 246.7 Hz), 138.4, 128.9 (d, J = 8.1 Hz), 115.0 (d, J = 21.3 Hz), 81.2, 71.5, 34.2, 27.5, 27.0, 23.0, 20.1. IR 2859, 1471, 1009 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C17H27FIO2Si+ 437.0809 found 437.0796 (MH+).

4-(4-bromophenyl)-2,2-di-tert-butyl-5-iodo-1,3,2-dioxasilinane
Compound 46: synthesized using protocol B; purified using benzene on Florisil; single diastereomer; (colorless oil, 79 mg, 80% yield); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.47 – 7.33 (m, 2H), 7.22 – 7.12 (m, 2H), 4.94 (d, J = 10.3 Hz, 1H), 4.34 – 4.21 (m, 2H), 4.13 (td, J = 10.4, 5.3 Hz, 1H), 0.99 (s, 9H), 0.98 (s, 9H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 141.4, 131.3, 129.0, 122.3, 81.4, 71.5, 33.6, 27.5, 27.0, 23.0, 20.2. IR 2944, 1475, 1110, 827 cm−1.; HRMS (ESI) calculated for C17H27BrIO2Si+ 497.0003 Found 496.9971 (MH+).

4-(4--2,2-di-tert-butyl-5-iodo-1,3,2-dioxasilinan-4-yl)phenyl)morpholine
Compound 47: synthesized using protocol C; purified using 100% benzene on Florisil; single diastereomer; (Colorless oil, 50 mg, 50%);1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 7.34 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 6.94 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 5.10 – 4.97 (m, 1H), 4.47 – 4.31 (m, 3H), 3.95 – 3.85 (m, 4H), 3.22 (dd, J = 5.8, 3.9 Hz, 4H), 1.12 (s, 9H), 1.11 (s, 9H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 151.0, 134.0, 128.1, 114.9, 81.5, 71.5, 66.8, 49.0, 34.9, 27.5, 27.0, 23.0, 20.1. IR 2857, 1101, 932 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C21H35INO3Si+ 504.1431 found 504.1426 (MH+).

4-(benzo[b]thiophen-3-yl)-2,2-di-tert-butyl-5-iodo-1,3,2-dioxasilinane
Compound 48: synthesized using protocol C; purified using 100% benzene on Florisil; single diastereomer; (Colorless oil, 37 mg, 39%); 1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 8.01 (dd, J = 7.5, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.95 – 7.88 (m, 1H), 7.48 – 7.26 (m, 3H), 5.61 (d, J = 10.6 Hz, 1H), 4.70 (dt, J = 10.5, 7.9 Hz, 1H), 4.54 – 4.42 (m, 2H), 1.17 (s, 9H), 1.08 (s, 9H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 140.3, 137.9, 137.8, 124.4, 124.3, 123.9, 122.8, 122.5, 75.5, 71.5, 31.3, 27.5, 27.0, 23.0, 20.0. IR 2833, 1428, 1007 cm−1. HRMS calculated for C19H28IO2SSi+ 475.0624 found 475.0632 (MH+).

2,2-di-tert-butyl-5-iodo-1,3,2-dioxasilinan-4-yl)methyl acetate
Compound 49: synthesized using protocol B; purified using a gradient of 0 to 100% Acetone/DCM on Florisil followed by a gradient of 0 to 100% Acetonitrile in 0.1% TFA-H2O on a RediSep Prep C18 column (100 Å, 5 μm, Length 250 mm, ID: 20 mm, Flow rate of 15 mL/min); single diastereomer; (light yellow oil, 60 mg, 72% yield); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.45 (dd, J = 11.8, 2.7 Hz, 1H), 4.27 (dd, J = 11.4, 3.6 Hz, 1H), 4.21 (dd, J = 11.8, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 4.12 (ddd, J = 7.6, 5.6, 3.6 Hz, 1H), 4.07 – 3.98 (m, 2H), 2.05 (s, 3H), 0.98 (s, 9H), 0.97 (s, 9H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 171.4, 71.5, 67.9, 66.2, 34.4, 27.5, 27.4, 20.9, 20.7, 20.5. IR 3442, 2947, 1730, 1246, 829 cm −1.; HRMS (ESI) calculated for C14H28IO4Si+ 415.0796 Found 415.0788 (MH+).

2,2-di-tert-butyl-5-iodo-1,3,2-dioxasilinan-4-yl)methyl benzoate
Compound 50: synthesized using protocol B; purified using a gradient of 0 to 50% Acetone/DCM on Florisil followed by preparative TLC; single diastereomer; (light yellow oil, 34 mg, 36% yield); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.10 – 7.99 (m, 2H), 7.62 – 7.54 (m, 1H), 7.49 – 7.40 (m, 2H), 4.78 (dd, J = 11.9, 2.7 Hz, 1H), 4.54 (dd, J = 11.9, 5.8 Hz, 1H), 4.38 (dd, J = 11.4, 3.7 Hz, 1H), 4.28 (ddd, J = 7.4, 5.7, 3.7 Hz, 1H), 4.19 (ddd, J = 7.4, 5.8, 2.7 Hz, 1H), 4.14 (dd, J = 11.3, 5.7 Hz, 1H), 1.05 (s, 9H), 1.04 (s, 9H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 167.1, 133.5, 129.9, 129.7, 128.6, 71.8, 68.5, 66.3, 34.8, 27.6, 27.5, 20.8, 20.6. IR 3447, 2933, 1704, 1279, 827 cm−1.; HRMS (ESI) calculated for C19H30IO4Si+ 477.0953 Found 477.0985 (MH+).

2,2-di-tert-butyl-5-iodo-4-phenethyl-1,3,2-dioxasilinane
Compound 51: synthesized using protocol B; purified using a gradient of 0 to 10% EtOAc in hexanes on silica gel; single diastereomer; (light yellow solid, 69 mg, 77% isolated yield); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.25 – 7.19 (m, 2H), 7.17 – 7.09 (m, 3H), 4.20 – 4.14 (m, 1H), 4.14 – 4.06 (m, 1H), 4.03 – 3.98 (m, 2H), 2.79 (ddd, J = 14.1, 9.7, 4.6 Hz, 1H), 2.65 (ddd, J = 13.6, 9.4, 7.3 Hz, 1H), 2.37 (dddd, J = 13.6, 9.3, 7.3, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 1.81 – 1.66 (m, 1H), 0.97 (s, 9H), 0.94 (s, 9H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 141.8, 128.6, 128.3, 125.8, 77.7, 71.1, 39.4, 32.7, 31.0, 27.4, 27.0, 22.8, 19.9. IR 2931, 1174, 1042, 825 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C19H32IO2Si+ 447.1211 Found 447.1208 (MH+).

2,2-di-tert-butyl-5-iodo-1,3,2-dioxasilinan-4-yl)pyridine
Compound 52: synthesized using protocol C; purified using 100% benzene on Florisil; single diastereomer; (Colorless oil, 42 mg, 50%); 1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 8.61 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 8.51 (dd, J = 4.8, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 7.65 (dt, J = 7.8, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 7.30 – 7.17 (m, 1H), 5.06 (d, J = 10.4 Hz, 1H), 4.39 – 4.26 (m, 2H), 4.19 (td, J = 10.3, 5.6 Hz, 1H), 1.02 (s, 9H), 1.02 (s, 9H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 149.7, 149.2, 137.7, 134.5, 123.1, 79.8, 71.4, 33.2, 27.5, 26.9, 23.0, 20.1. IR 2859, 1471, 937 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C16H27INO2Si+ 420.0856 found 420.0845 (MH+).

2,2-di-tert-butyl-5-iodo-4,4-dimethyl-1,3,2-dioxasilinane
Compound 53: synthesized using protocol B; purified using a gradient of 0 to 10% EtOAc in hexanes on silica gel; (light yellow semi-solid, 59 mg, 80% isolated yield); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.29 (dd, J = 11.8, 3.8 Hz, 1H), 4.24 – 4.15 (m, 1H), 4.06 (dd, J = 11.1, 3.9 Hz, 1H), 1.50 (s, 3H), 1.43 (s, 3H), 0.94 (s, 9H), 0.93 (s, 9H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 75.2, 67.7, 37.1, 31.9, 27.3, 26.3, 21.5, 20.3. IR 2967, 1475, 1165, 825 cm−1.; HRMS (ESI) calculated for C13H28IO2Si+ 371.0898 Found 371.0899 (MH+).

2,2-di-tert-butyl-4,4-diethyl-5-iodo-1,3,2-dioxasilinane
Compound 54: synthesized using protocol B; purified using 100% benzene on Florisil; (Colorless oil, 47 mg, 59%); 1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 4.54 (dd, J = 11.8, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 4.35 (t, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 4.16 (dd, J = 11.2, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 2.04 (dt, J = 14.7, 7.3 Hz, 1H), 1.89 (dqd, J = 14.6, 7.5, 2.4 Hz, 2H), 1.65 (dq, J = 14.8, 7.5 Hz, 1H), 1.05 (s, 9H), 1.03 (s, 9H), 1.06 – 0.98 (m, 6H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 77.8, 67.3, 35.2, 32.4, 28.4, 27.9, 27.3, 21.6, 21.0, 8.2, 8.2. IR 2860, 1475, 1145 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C15H32IO2Si+ 399.1216 found 399.1181 (MH+).

2,2-di-tert-butyl-5-iodo-4-methyl-4-(4,8,12-trimethyltridecyl)-1,3,2-dioxasilinane
Compound 55: synthesized using protocol B; purified using benzene on Florisil; mixture of diastereomers; (light yellow oil, 81 mg, 70% yield); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.32 – 4.19 (m, 2H), 4.06 (dd, J = 8.9, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 1.84 (tdd, J = 13.1, 11.1, 4.6 Hz, 1H), 1.55 – 0.97 (m, 23H), 0.94 (d, J = 4.6 Hz, 18H), 0.79 (dd, J = 8.4, 6.6 Hz, 12H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 76.6, 67.6, 44.2, 44.1, 39.4, 37.52, 37.50, 37.48, 37.45, 37.34, 37.28, 37.23, 37.21, 32.84, 32.82, 32.6, 32.5, 28.0, 27.5, 27.4, 24.83, 24.82, 24.48, 24.42, 23.79, 23.77, 22.75, 22.65, 21.4, 20.4, 20.0, 19.9, 19.83, 19.80, 19.77, 19.70. IR 2859, 1377, 1464, 1080, 825 cm−1.; HRMS (ESI) calculated for C28H57INaO2Si+ 603.3065 found 603.3049 (MNa+).

2,2-di-tert-butyl-5-iodo-1,3,9-trioxa-2-silaspiro[5.5]undecane
Compound 56: synthesized using protocol B; purified using 100% benzene on Florisil; (Colorless oil, 36 mg, 44%);1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 4.35 – 4.16 (m, 2H), 4.06 (dd, J = 11.0, 3.4 Hz, 1H), 3.83 – 3.67 (m, 4H), 2.36 – 2.17 (m, 2H), 1.67 (dt, J = 13.6, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 1.34 (dt, J = 13.4, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 0.95 (s, 9H), 0.96 (s, 9H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 73.4, 66.6, 63.8, 63.0, 38.5, 37.5, 33.5, 27.5, 27.2, 21.5, 20.3. IR 2861, 1471, 924 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C15H29IO3SiNa+ 435.0828 found 435.0851 (MNa+).
V. Scale-up Procedure
A round-bottom flask was charged with stir bar, alkene substrate (870 mg, 2.97 mmol, 1 equivalent), AgOTf (841 mg, 3.3 mmol, 1.3 equivalents) and 25 mL of anhydrous DME. The reaction vial was immersed in a bath set to −15 °C. I2 (830 mg, 3.2 mmol, 1.2 equivalents) was added in 1 portion. A light-yellow precipitate formed immediately upon addition of AgOTf. The heterogeneous mixture was stirred for 2 h at −15 °C and then quenched by addition of aqueous saturated Na2S2O3. The reaction mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate and transferred to a separatory funnel. The organic portion was collected, and the aqueous layer was extracted with two additional portions of ethyl acetate. The organic fractions were pooled, dried with MgSO4, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The resulting residue was purified by chromatography on Florisil (100% benzene) to yield a light yellow solid (1.14 g, 2.72 mmol, 92% yield).
VI. Procedures for Derivatization Reactions
44 (70 mg, 0.16 mmol) was dissolved in 6 mL of DCM. Tributyltin hydride (97 μl, 0.36 mmol) was added, and reaction was stirred for 12 h at 40 °C (oil bath). The reaction mixture was concentrated, and the resulting residue was purified by chromatography on silica gel to yield 57 as a colorless oil (41 mg, 83%).

Compound 57: Purified using a gradient of 0 to 10% EtOAc in hexanes on silica gel; (Colorless oil, 83%); 1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 7.48 – 7.35 (m, 4H), 7.35 – 7.26 (m, 1H), 5.22 (dd, J = 11.3, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 4.33 (ddd, J = 12.5, 11.1, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 4.21 (ddd, J = 11.0, 4.5, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 2.09 (dddd, J = 14.4, 12.5, 11.3, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 1.89 (dq, J = 14.4, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 1.15 (s, 9H), 1.13 (s, 9H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 144.9, 128.3, 127.0, 125.0, 75.9, 64.7, 39.5, 27.5, 27.2, 22.9, 20.1. IR 2859, 1473, 886 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C17H29O2Si+ 293.1937 found 293.1938 (MH+).
44 (70 mg, 0.16 mmol) was dissolved in 0.5 ml of DMF. To this solution, sodium azide (0.32 mmol, 2 equiv.) and 15-Crown-5 (0.32 mmol, 2 equiv.) were added at room temperature. The temperature of the reaction was gradually increased to 100 °C (oil bath) and kept at this temperature for 12 hrs with magnetic stirring. After consumption of starting material (followed by TLC), the reaction mixture was diluted with EtOAc and transferred to a separatory funnel. The organic layer was washed with cold water (3 x 3 ml). The organic layer was collected, dried over Na2SO4, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The resulting residue was purified by chromatography on silica gel to yield compound 58 (24 mg, 43%) as a colorless solid.

Compound 58: Purified using benzene on Florisil; single diastereomer; (Colorless solid, 54%); 1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 7.46 – 7.35 (m, 5H), 5.46 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 4.56 (dd, J = 12.5, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 4.39 (dd, J = 12.5, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 3.82 (q, J = 1.9 Hz, 1H), 1.20 (s, 9H), 1.14 (s, 9H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 140.6, 128.2, 127.7, 125.7, 76.3, 66.1, 64.4, 27.7, 27.2, 23.5, 20.7. IR 2860, 1474, 889 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C17H28N3O2Si+ 334.1951 Found 334.1960 (MH+).
TBAF in THF (1 M, 0.280 mL, 0.28 mmol) was added to compound 44 (40 mg, 0.09 mmol) in THF (2 mL) at 0 °C, and the reaction was warmed to room temperature over 16 h. Following this time, the reaction mixture was concentrated, and the resulting residue was purified by chromatography on silica gel to yield 59 (9 mg, 63%) as a colorless oil.

Compound 59: Purified using a gradient of 0 to 20% EtOAc in hexanes on silica gel; single diastereomer; (Colorless oil, 63%); 1H NMR (600 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 7.44 – 7.25 (m, 5H), 4.09 (dd, J = 12.8, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 3.97 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H), 3.84 (dd, J = 12.8, 3.8 Hz, 1H), 3.27 (dt, J = 4.2, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 1.95 (s, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 136.6, 128.5, 128.3, 125.7, 62.3, 61.1, 55.5.
HF•Pyridine (~70% HF-30% pyridine, 75 μL) was added to compound 44 (40 mg, 0.09 mmol) in THF at 0 °C, and the mixture was stirred for 5 mins. The reaction was quenched with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 and transferred to a separatory funnel. The water layer was extracted with 3 portions of ethyl acetate. The organic layers were collected, pooled, and dried with Na2SO4. After concentrating under reduced pressure, the resulting residue was purified by chromatography on silica gel to yield 60 (13 mg, 49%) as a colorless oil.

Compound 60: Purified using a gradient of 0 to 40% EtOAc in hexanes on silica gel; (Colorless oil, 49%); 1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 7.47 – 7.32 (m, 5H), 5.08 (dd, J = 6.3, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 4.53 – 4.42 (m, 1H), 4.00 (dd, J = 12.3, 4.6 Hz, 1H), 3.91 – 3.78 (m, 1H), 2.75-2.5 (bs, 2H). 13C{1H}NMR (101 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 140.8, 128.6, 128.5, 126.5, 78.5, 65.9, 41.3. IR 2926, 1455, 1002 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calculated for C9H11IO2Na+ 300.9702 found 300.9744 (MNa+).
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was supported by start-up funding provided jointly by the University of Kansas Office of the Provost and the Department of Medicinal Chemistry, an NIH COBRE Chemical Biology of Infectious Diseases Research Project Grant (P20GM113117), and a New Faculty General Research Fund Grant.
Footnotes
Supporting Information
Expanded procedures, crystal structure data, NMR spectra and computational details
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website.
REFERENCES
- 1.Degennaro L; Trinchera P; Luisi R, Recent Advances in the Stereoselective Synthesis of Aziridines. Chem. Rev 2014, 114, 7881–7929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Overman LE; Campbell CB, Hemiacetal mediated reactions. Directed synthesis of diols and acetals. J. Org. Chem 1974, 39, 1474–1481. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sarraf ST; Leighton JL, Oxymercuration of Homoallylic Alcohol Derived Hemiacetals: Diastereoselective Synthesis of Protected 1,3-Diols. Org. Lett 2000, 2, 403–405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Oswald JP; Woerpel KA, Cobalt-Catalyzed Intramolecular Silylperoxidation of Unsaturated Diisopropylsilyl Ethers. J. Org. Chem 2019, 84, 7564–7574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kotov V; Scarborough CC; Stahl SS, Palladium-Catalyzed Aerobic Oxidative Amination of Alkenes: Development of Intra- and Intermolecular Aza-Wacker Reactions. Inorg. Chem 2007, 46, 1910–1923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wang D; Weinstein AB; White PB; Stahl SS, Ligand-Promoted Palladium-Catalyzed Aerobic Oxidation Reactions. Chem. Rev 2018, 118, 2636–2679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Thomas AA; Nagamalla S; Sathyamoorthi S, Salient features of the aza-Wacker cyclization reaction. Chem. Sci 2020, 11, 8073–8088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Shinde AH; Sathyamoorthi S, Oxidative Cyclization of Sulfamates onto Pendant Alkenes. Org. Lett 2020, 22, 896–901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shinde AH; Nagamalla S; Sathyamoorthi S, N-arylated oxathiazinane heterocycles are convenient synthons for 1,3-amino ethers and 1,3-amino thioethers. Med. Chem. Res 2020, 29, 1223–1229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shinde AH; Thomas AA; Mague JT; Sathyamoorthi S, Highly Regio- and Diastereoselective Tethered Aza-Wacker Cyclizations of Alkenyl Phosphoramidates. Chemrxiv 2021. DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv.14132177.v1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Shinde AH; Sathyamoorthi S, Tethered Silanoxymercuration of Allylic Alcohols. Org. Lett 2020, 22, 8665–8669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dhokale RA; Seidl FJ; Sathyamoorthi S, A Rearrangement of Allylic Silanols. Chemrxiv 2021. 10.26434/chemrxiv.13679083.v1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nakamura E; Inubushi T; Aoki S; Machii D, Aerobic conversion of organic halides to alcohols. An oxygenative radical cyclization. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1991, 113, 8980–8982. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Matier CD; Schwaben J; Peters JC; Fu GC, Copper-Catalyzed Alkylation of Aliphatic Amines Induced by Visible Light. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 17707–17710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lipshutz BH; Wilhelm RS; Kozlowski JA; Parker D, Substitution reactions of secondary halides and epoxides with higher order, mixed organocuprates, R2Cu(CN)Li2: synthetic, stereochemical, and mechanistic aspects. J. Org. Chem 1984, 49, 3928–3938. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Denmark SE; Burk MT, Lewis base catalysis of bromo- and iodolactonization, and cycloetherification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 20655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Manuel SL; Ajoy KB; Elvia VC, Iodolactonization: Past and Present Examples. Curr. Org. Chem 2009, 13, 720–730. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Nolsøe JMJ; Hansen TV, Asymmetric Iodolactonization: An Evolutionary Account. Eur. J. Org. Chem 2014, 2014, 3051–3065. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Oderinde MS; Hunter HN; Bremner SW; Organ MG, Iodolactonization: Synthesis, Stereocontrol, and Compatibility Studies. Eur. J. Org. Chem 2012, 2012, 175–182. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Corey EJ; Weinshenker NM; Schaaf TK; Huber W, Stereo-controlled synthesis of dl-prostaglandins F2.alpha. and E2. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1969, 91, 5675–5677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bedford SB; Bell KE; Fenton G; Hayes CJ; Knight DW; Shaw D, Iodoetherification of homoallylic alcohols : A stereoselective approach to tetrahydrofurans. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 6511–6514. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Brimble MA; Edmonds MK, Synthesis of bis-2,5-linked tetrahydrofurans via iodoetherification. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 9995–10012. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lipshutz BH; Barton JC, Reagent-based stereocontrol in formation of substituted tetrahydrofurans. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1992, 114, 1084–1086. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Campbell MJ; Johnson JS, Asymmetric Synthesis of (+)-Polyanthellin A. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2009, 131, 10370–10371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Guindon Y; Slassi A; Ghiro É; Bantle G; Jung G, Stereoselective silver triflate-mediated iodocyclization of carbamates. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 4257–4260. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cataldo F, Iodine: A ring opening polymerization catalyst for tetrahydrofuran. Eur. Polym. J 1996, 32, 1297–1302. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Neese F, The ORCA program system. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci 2012, 2, 73–78. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Neese F, Software update: the ORCA program system, version 4.0. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci 2018, 8, e1327. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Becke AD, A new mixing of Hartree–Fock and local density-functional theories. J. Chem. Phys 1993, 98, 1372–1377. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lee C; Yang W; Parr RG, Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785–789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Grimme S; Antony J; Ehrlich S; Krieg H, A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys 2010, 132, 154104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Grimme S; Ehrlich S; Goerigk L, Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory. J. Comput. Chem 2011, 32, 1456–1465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Weigend F, Accurate Coulomb-fitting basis sets for H to Rn. Phys Chem. Chem. Phys 2006, 8, 1057–1065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Weigend F; Ahlrichs R, Balanced basis sets of split valence, triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for H to Rn: Design and assessment of accuracy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys 2005, 7, 3297–3305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Marenich AV; Cramer CJ; Truhlar DG, Universal Solvation Model Based on Solute Electron Density and on a Continuum Model of the Solvent Defined by the Bulk Dielectric Constant and Atomic Surface Tensions. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 6378–6396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Peterson KA; Figgen D; Goll E; Stoll H; Dolg M, Systematically convergent basis sets with relativistic pseudopotentials. II. Small-core pseudopotentials and correlation consistent basis sets for the post-d group 16–18 elements. J. Chem. Phys 2003, 119, 11113–11123. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Luh T-Y; Hu Z, Thorpe–Ingold effect in organosilicon chemistry. Dalt. Trans 2010, 39, 9185–9192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.







