Skip to main content
Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2022 Apr 18;25(2):362–377. doi: 10.1007/s13540-022-00016-4

The fractional-order Lorenz-type systems: A review

Ivo Petráš 1,
PMCID: PMC9015702  PMID: 35465148

Abstract

This paper deals with a survey of Lorenz-type systems. For the first time, a new classification of the fractional-order Lorenz-type systems was introduced. Several chaotic systems, as particular cases of the new general form, which belong to large Lorenz family, are presented together with equilibria, eigenvalues as well as attractors of these systems in 3-dimensional state space, respectively.

Keywords: Fractional calculus (primary), Fractional-order chaotic system, Chaotic oscillator, Attractor

Introduction

It is well-known that chaos theory concerns complex deterministic systems behaviour. This behaviour is known as a deterministic chaos and its investigation attracted many researcher during last few decades. Chaotic behaviour exists in many natural systems and disciplines, as for instance, meteorology, sociology, economics, engineering, ecology, chemistry, medicine, including covid-19 pandemic crisis management, and so on. One of the most popular chaotic system is a Lorenz oscillator.

The Lorenz oscillator is a 3-dimensional dynamical system that exhibits chaotic flow [11]. The Lorenz attractor was named according to Edward Norton Lorenz, who derived it from the simplified equations of convection rolls arising in the equations of the atmosphere in 1963. He for the first time used the term “butterfly effect" in his lecture named “Predictability: Does the Flap of a Butterfly’s Wings in Brazil Set Off a Tornado in Texas?” presented on December 29, 1972, at the conference of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. In chaos theory it means sensitive dependence on initial conditions and parameters. Small variations of initial condition or parameters of a dynamical system may produce large variations in the long term behaviour of the system. The phrase refers to the idea that a butterfly’s wings might create tiny changes in the atmosphere that may ultimately alter the path of a tornado or delay, accelerate or even prevent the occurrence of a tornado in a certain location. The flapping wing represents a small change in the initial condition of the system, which causes a chain of events leading to large-scale alterations of events.

Such behaviour of the chaotic system can be studied through the analysis of its mathematical model, as well as its graphical outputs as strange attractors, bifurcations, and Poincaré maps. The mathematical model is usually in the form of a set of ordinary differential equations or even more complex form, a set of fractional differential equations, where a fractional dynamics is incorporated.

In this article we will focus on generalized Lorenz-like systems described by a set of the fractional differential equations. Various known chaotic systems belong to this special class of the chaotic systems. Here, we present seven popular chaotic systems of this large family with butterfly wings-like attractors.

This paper is organized as follows. Section 1 introduced the problem. In Section 2 some preliminaries, as fractional calculus, fractional-order system model and its numerical solution are presented. Section 3 presents a survey of fractional-order Lorenz-type systems together with illustrative examples. In Section 4 some concluding remarks and further research ideas are discussed.

Preliminaries

Definition of fractional operator

The history of fractional calculus begun in letter from Leibniz to l’Hopital dated on September 30, 1695, where derivative of the order 1/2 was mentioned.

The fractional calculus is a generalization of integration and differentiation to joint non-integer q-order operator aDbq, where a and b are the bounds of the operation. The standard notation for denoting the common left-sided integro-differential operator of a function f(t) defined within the interval [at] is aDtqf(t), with qR.

There exist many definitions for the fractional-order operator (fractional-order integrals for q<0 and derivatives for q>0) but in this article we will restrict only on the Caputo definition (CD) proposed in 1967 and the Grünwald-Letnikov definition (GLD) proposed in 1867, respectively.

The CD, for n-1<q<n, can be written as [20]:

aDtqf(t)=1Γ(n-q)atf(n)(τ)(t-τ)q-n+1dτ. 2.1

In case of real systems with fractional dynamics, where the fractional derivative is used, the Caputo definition can be used because the initial conditions for the fractional differential equations with the Caputo derivatives are in the same form as for ordinary differential equations, i.e. f(n)(0)=cn, nN.

The GLD is given as follows [15, 20]:

aDtqf(t)=limhs01hsqj=0t-ahs(-1)jqjf(t-jhs), 2.2

where z is the floor function, i.e. the greatest integer smaller than z, and

qj=Γ(q+1)Γ(j+1)Γ(q-j+1) 2.3

are the binomial coefficients with q0=1. This form of the derivative definition is very helpful for obtaining a numerical solution of the fractional differential equations.

Fractional-order systems

Here, we will consider the following general incommensurate fractional-order nonlinear system represented as [19]:

0Dtqixi(t)=fi(t,x1(t),x2(t),,xn(t)),xi(0)=ci,i=1,2,,n, 2.4

where fi are nonlinear functions and ci are initial conditions. The vector representation of (2.4) is:

Dqx=f(x), 2.5

where q=[q1,q2,,qn]T for 0<qi<2, (i=1,2,,n) and xRn.

The equilibrium points of system (2.5) are calculated via solving the following equation

f(x)=0 2.6

and we suppose that E=(x1,x2,,xn) is equilibrium point of system (2.5).

Numerical solution of initial value problem

It is known that both mentioned definitions, CD and GLD, are equivalent for a wide class of the functions. For numerical calculation of fractional-order derivative we can use the relation (2.7) derived from the GLD (2.2). The expression for the numerical approximation of q-th derivative at the points khs,(k=1,2,3,) has the following general form [20]:

(k-Lm/hs)Dtkqf(t)hs-qj=0kwj(q)f(tk-j), 2.7

where Lm is the “memory length”, tk=khs, hs is the time step of calculation (definition (2.7) is valid only as hs tends towards 0 and that the accuracy of the simulation depends on the value of hs) and wj(q)(j=0,1,2,) are the binomial coefficients. For their calculation the following expression can be used:

w0(q)=1,wj(q)=1-1+qjwj-1(q). 2.8

Thus, the numerical solution of the fractional differential equation (initial value problem) of the form

0Dtqu(t)=f(t,u(t)),0tT,

can be expressed as follows [19]:

u(tk)=ftk,u(tk)hsq-j=1kwj(q)u(tk-j). 2.9

For the memory term expressed by the sum, a “short memory” principle for various memory length Lm can be used.

An evaluation of the short memory effect and convergence relation of the error between short and long memory were described and proved in [20].

Fractional-order Lorenz-type systems

The generalized Lorenz system is a 3-dimensional dynamical system with real parameters a11,a12,a21,a22, and λ3 is given in the following form [13]:

dx(t)dtdy(t)dtdz(t)dt=a11a120a21a22000λ3x(t)y(t)z(t)+x(t)00000-1010x(t)y(t)z(t), 3.1

where

a11a22-a12a21<0,a11+a22<0,λ3<0. 3.2

System (3.1) consists of separated linear part and quadratic part and it was a largest possible form that can be considered as a generalized Lorenz system in sense of structural features and the condition given by inequalities in (3.2).

It is easy to see that the above system (3.1) contains as special cases the familiar Lorenz system [11] when a12a21>0, the Chen system [7] when a12a21<0 and the Lü system [13] when a12a21=0.

Following above generalized Lorenz system (3.1) with the conditions (3.2) and taking into account the fractional calculus technique, let us define a new generalized fractional-order Lorenz-type system as follows:

0Dtq1x(t)0Dtq2y(t)0Dtq3z(t)=a11a120a21a22000a33x(t)y(t)z(t)+x(t)00000-1010x(t)y(t)z(t), 3.3

where q1, q2, and q3 are arbitrary derivative orders and λ3=a33. In case of q1=q2=q3=1 we obtain a classical integer order case defined by expression (3.1). Vector form of (3.3) is given as

Dqx=A¯x+Q(x),

where A¯=[aij]3×3 is a real matrix and Q(x) is quadratic cross-product term.

Relation (3.3) covers the fractional-order version of the Lorenz system [8] for a12a21>0, the Chen system [12] for a12a21<0, and the Lü system [4] system for a12a21=0, respectively.

In order to cover more Lorenz-type systems from a huge family and bridges between them derived from the original Lorenz system during last few decades (see e.g. [16, 23]) as well as their fractional-order versions, we can define even more general fractional-order Lorenz-type system with a class of single quadratic cross-product term Q(x), limited to forms x2(t), x(t)y(t) and x(t)z(t), which can be written as:

Dqx=A¯x+Q(x)+d,

where d=[d1,d2,d3]T is vector of constants. Extended matrix representation has the form:

0Dtq1x(t)0Dtq2y(t)0Dtq3z(t)=a11a120a21a22000a33x(t)y(t)z(t)+x(t)00000τμδ0x(t)y(t)z(t)+d1d2d3 3.4

or shorted form for a33=λ3 as

0Dtq1x(t)0Dtq2y(t)0Dtq3z(t)=A00λ3x(t)y(t)z(t)+x(t)00000τμδ0x(t)y(t)z(t)+d1d2d3, 3.5

where matrix A is given as

A=a11a12a21a22 3.6

and the matrix A has eigenvalues λ1,λ2R, where conditions are λ1,3<0 and λ2>0. It is valid only for equilibrium point at the origin E=(0;0;0). For other equilibria these conditions are not satisfied.

Except the parameters in the matrix A and in vector d, we can moderate other parameters τ, μ, and δ and obtain an additional known Lorenz-type systems, which are presented in this article, as for example, Yang system [25], Liu system [10], Shimizu-Morioka system [22], and Burke-Shaw system [21].

In Table 1 are listed the sets of the model parameters for various chaotic systems presented in this article. It is obvious that by changing the selected system parameters the other type chaotic systems could be obtained as well.

Table 1.

The values of parameters in (3.5) and (3.6) for various Lorenz-type chaotic systems with d1=d2=0.

System a11 a12 a21 a22 a33 τ δ μ d3
Lorenz (3.8) -a a c -1 -b -1 1 0 0
Chen (3.11) -a a c-a c -b -1 1 0 0
Lü (3.14) -a a 0 c -b -1 1 0 0
Yang (3.17) -a a c 0 -b -1 1 0 0
Liu (3.20) -a a c 0 -b -1 0 h 0
Shimizu-Morioka (3.23) 0 a 1 -c -b -1 0 1 0
Burke-Shaw (3.26) -a a 0 -1 0 -1 g 0 d

In addition, we present the simulation results for seven chaotic systems presented in Table 1 for certain values of the model parameters as well as the fractional orders in the fractional differential equations, respectively. All presented simulations were performed by using relation (2.9) for simulation time T=100 s and calculation time step hs=0.005 without using the short memory principle. It means that whole data history was considered for calculation of new value.

We also investigate the stability of these systems in each equilibrium point through eigenvalues [18].

Lorenz system

The famous Lorenz chaotic system is defined as [11]:

dx(t)dt=a(y(t)-x(t)),dy(t)dt=x(t)(c-z(t))-y(t),dz(t)dt=x(t)y(t)-bz(t), 3.7

where a is called the Prandtl number and c is called the Rayleigh number. All a,b,c>0, but usually a=10, b=8/3, and c=28.

The fractional-order Lorenz system is described as [8]:

0Dtq1x(t)=a(y(t)-x(t)),0Dtq2y(t)=x(t)(c-z(t))-y(t),0Dtq3z(t)=x(t)y(t)-bz(t), 3.8

where q1, q2, and q3 are derivative orders, which could be arbitrary real numbers.

The Lorenz system has three equilibria, where one is obviously in origin E1=(0;0;0) and the additional two for above values of the parameters a, b, and c are: E2=(8.4853; 8.4853; 27), and E3=(-8.4853;-8.4853;27). The Jacobian matrix J of the Lorenz system at the equilibrium point E=(x,y,z) is given as:

J=-aa0c-z-1-xyx-b. 3.9

For the equilibrium E1 the eigenvalues are λ1-22.8277, λ211.8277, and λ3=-8/3, and for the equilibria E2 and E3 we get the same eigenvalues λ1-13.8546,  and λ2,30.0940±i10.1945. All three equilibria are unstable.

In Fig. 1 is depicted the simulation result (double-scroll attractor) of the Lorenz system (3.8) for the following parameters: a=10,b=8/3,c=28, orders q1=q2=q3=0.993 and initial conditions (x(0),y(0),z(0))=(1,1,1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Strange attractor of the fractional-order Lorenz system (3.8) in state space

Chen system

In 1999, Chen found another a simple 3-dimensional autonomous system, which is not topologically equivalent to Lorenz system and which has a chaotic attractor too. The Chen chaotic system is described by the following equations [13, 26]:

dx(t)dt=a(y(t)-x(t)),dy(t)dt=(c-a)x(t)-x(t)z(t)+cy(t),dz(t)dt=x(t)y(t)-bz(t), 3.10

where (a,b,c)R3. When parameters (a,b,c)=(35,3,28), the chaotic attractor exists.

The fractional-order Chen system is described as follows [12]:

0Dtq1x(t)=a(y(t)-x(t)),0Dtq2y(t)=(c-a)x(t)-x(t)z(t)+cy(t),0Dtq3z(t)=x(t)y(t)-bz(t), 3.11

where q1, q2, and q3 are real derivative orders and where 0<q1,q2,q31.

The equilibrium points of the system with above parameters are: E1=(0;0;0)E2=(7.9373;7.9373;21), and E3=(-7.9373;-7.9373;21). The Jacobian matrix J of the Chen system at the equilibrium point E=(x,y,z) is given as

J=-aa0c-a-zc-xyx-b. 3.12

For the equilibrium E1 we obtain the eigenvalues λ1=-30.8359, λ223.8359, and λ3=-3, for the equilibria E2 and E3 we get the same eigenvalues λ1-18.4280,  and λ2,34.2140±i14.8846. All three equilibria are unstable.

In Fig. 2 is depicted the simulation result (double-scroll attractor) of the fractional-order Chen system (3.11) with the parameters a=35,b=3,c=28, orders q1=q2=q3=0.9, and initial conditions (x(0),y(0),z(0))=(-9,-5,14).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Strange attractor of the fractional-order Chen system (3.11) in state space

Lü system

The so-called Lü system is known as a bridge between the Lorenz system and the Chen system and can be written as [13]:

dx(t)dt=a(y(t)-x(t)),dy(t)dt=-x(t)z(t)+cy(t),dz(t)dt=x(t)y(t)-bz(t), 3.13

where the parameters are a=36, b=3, and c varies.

Its fractional-order version is described as follows [4]:

0Dtq1x(t)=a(y(t)-x(t)),0Dtq2y(t)=-x(t)z(t)+cy(t),0Dtq3z(t)=x(t)y(t)-bz(t), 3.14

where 0<q1,q2,q31, are arbitrary orders of derivatives, and abc are model parameters.

The Lü system (3.14) has three equilibrium points: E1=(0;0;0), E2=(7.7460;7.7460;20) and E3=(-7.7460;-7.7460;20).

The Jacobian matrix J of the Lü system at the equilibrium point E=(x,y,z) is defined as follows

J=-aa0-zc-xyx-b. 3.15

Let us consider the following parameters a=36,b=3,c=20 of the system (3.13). For equilibrium points E1 we obtain the following eigenvalues: λ1=-36, λ2=20 and λ3=-3. For the equilibria E2 and E3 we have the same eigenvalues λ1-22.6516 and λ2,31.8258±i13.6887. All three equilibria are unstable.

In Fig. 3 is depicted the simulation result (double-scroll attractor) of the fractional-order Lü system (3.14) with the parameters a=36,b=3,c=20, orders q1=0.98, q2=0.99, q3=0.98, and initial conditions (x(0),y(0),z(0))=(0.2,0.5,0.3).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Strange attractor of the fractional-order Lü system (3.14) in state space

Yang system

The Yang chaotic system is described as follows [25]:

dx(t)dt=a(y(t)-x(t)),dy(t)dt=cx(t)-x(t)z(t),dz(t)dt=x(t)y(t)-bz(t), 3.16

where abc are real parameters with a,b>0 and cR. When a=10, b=8/3, and c=16, this system is chaotic. The algebraical form of the chaotic attractor is very similar to the Lorenz-type systems but they are different and, in fact, nonequivalent in topological structures.

Its fractional-order version can be described as follows:

0Dtq1x(t)=a(y(t)-x(t)),0Dtq2y(t)=cx(t)-x(t)z(t),0Dtq3z(t)=x(t)y(t)-bz(t), 3.17

where q1, q2, and q3 are derivative orders, which could be arbitrary real numbers.

The Yang system (3.17) with above parameters has three equilibrium points: E1=(0;0;0), E2=(6.5320;6.5320;16) and E3=(-6.5320;-6.5320;16).

The Jacobian matrix J of the Yang system for the equilibrium point E=(x,y,z) is defined as follows

J=-aa0c-z0-xyx-b. 3.18

For equilibrium points E1 we obtain the following eigenvalues: λ1-18.6015, λ28.6015 and λ3=-8/3. For the equilibria E2 and E3 we have the same eigenvalues λ1-12.5570 and λ2,3-0.0548±i8.2434. The equilibrium E1 is unstable and the equilibria E2 and E3 are stable.

In Fig. 4 is depicted the simulation result (double scroll-attractor) of the fractional-order Yang system (3.17) with parameters a=10,b=8/3,c=16, orders q1=q2=q3=0.99, and initial conditions (x(0),y(0),z(0))=(0.1,0.1,0.1).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Strange attractor of the fractional-order Yang system (3.17) in state space

Liu system

Another system similar to the Lorenz chaotic system was proposed in [10]:

dx(t)dt=a(y(t)-x(t)),dy(t)dt=cx(t)-kx(t)z(t),dz(t)dt=-bz(t)+hx2(t). 3.19

The system exhibits chaotic behaviour for parameters a=10, b=2.5, c=40, k=1, and h=4.

Following the previously published fractional-order version of the Lorenz family systems, let us define a fractional-order version of system described by (3.19), which has the following form:

0Dtq1x(t)=a(y(t)-x(t)),0Dtq2y(t)=cx(t)-kx(t)z(t),0Dtq3z(t)=-bz(t)+hx2(t), 3.20

where q1, q2, q3 are derivative orders, which could be arbitrary real numbers.

The Liu system (3.20) with above parameters has three equilibrium points: E1=(0;0;0), E2=(5;5;40) and E3=(-5;-5;40).

The Jacobian matrix J of the Liu system for the equilibrium point E=(x,y,z) is defined as follows

J=-aa0c-kz0-kx2hx0-b. 3.21

For equilibrium points E1 we obtain the following eigenvalues: λ1-25.6155, λ215.6155 and λ3=-2.5. For the equilibria E2 and E3 we get the same eigenvalues λ1-17.5614 and λ2,32.5307±i10.3673. All three equilibria are unstable.

In Fig. 5 is depicted the simulation result (double scroll-attractor) of the fractional-order Liu system (3.20) with parameters a=10,b=2.5,c=40,k=1,h=4, orders q1=q2=q3=0.95, and initial conditions (x(0), y(0), z(0))=(0.2,0,0.5).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Strange attractor of the fractional-order Liu system (3.20) in state space

Obviously, the strange attractor of the fractional-order Liu system (3.20), shown in Fig. 5, is slightly different to the Lorenz attractor depicted in Fig. 1.

Shimizu-Morioka system

A simple model, the solution of which shows a behaviour as in the Lorenz model for high Rayleigh numbers was proposed in [22]:

dx(t)dt=ay(t),[4pt]dy(t)dt=x(t)(1-z(t))-cy(t),[4pt]dz(t)dt=-bz(t)+x2(t), 3.22

where we added an additional parameter a in the first equation.

Its fractional-order version was suggested in [27] and has the form:

0Dtq1x(t)=ay(t),[4pt]0Dtq2y(t)=x(t)(1-z(t))-cy(t),[4pt]0Dtq3z(t)=-bz(t)+x2(t), 3.23

where q1, q2, q3 are derivative orders, which could be arbitrary real numbers.

The Shimizu-Morioka system (3.23) with above parameters has three equilibrium points: E1=(0;0;0), E2= (0.61237;  0; 1) and E3=(-0.61237;0;1).

The Jacobian matrix J of the Shimizu-Morioka system for the equilibrium point E=(x,y,z) is defined as follows

J=0a01-z-c-x2x0-b. 3.24

For equilibrium points E1 we obtain the following eigenvalues: λ1-1.4839, λ20.6739 and λ3=-0.375. For the equilibria E2 and E3 we have the same eigenvalues λ1-1.3650 and λ2,30.0900±i0.7358. All three equilibria are unstable.

In Fig. 6 is depicted the simulation result (double scroll-attractor) of the fractional-order Shimizu-Morioka system (3.23) with parameters a=1, b=0.375, c=0.81, orders q1=0.95, q2=0.97, q3=0.99, and initial conditions (x(0), y(0),  z(0))=(0.1,0.1,0.2).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Strange attractor of the fractional-order Shimizu-Morioka system (3.23) in state space

It can be proved that there is a large open region in the (bc)-plane where the Shimizu-Morioka system has a strange attractor very similar to the classical attractor of the Lorenz model.

Burke-Shaw system

The Burke-Shaw system was derived by Burke and Shaw from the Lorenz system [21]. This system has similar algebraic structure to the Lorenz system but is topologically nonequivalent to the generalized Lorenz-type system and can be expressed as follows:

dx(t)dt=-a(x(t)+y(t)),dy(t)dt=-kx(t)z(t)-y(t),dz(t)dt=gx(t)y(t)+d, 3.25

where for parameters a=k=g=10 and d=13 or d=4.272 chaos is observed.

Its fractional-order version can be expressed as [14]:

0Dtq1x(t)=-a(x(t)+y(t)),0Dtq2y(t)=-kx(t)z(t)-y(t),0Dtq3z(t)=gx(t)y(t)+d, 3.26

where q1, q2, q3 are derivative orders, which could be arbitrary real numbers.

The Burke-Shaw system (3.26) with above parameters has two equilibrium points: E1=(1.1402;-1.1402;0.1) and E2=(-1.1402;1.1402;0.1). Obviously, due to parameter d in the model there is no equilibrium point at the origin.

The Jacobian matrix J of the Burke-Shaw system for the equilibrium point E=(x,y,z) is defined as follows

J=-a-a0-kz-1-kxgygx0. 3.27

For the equilibria E1 and E2 we obtain the same eigenvalues λ1-14.4527 and λ2,31.7263±i13.3013. Both equilibria are unstable.

In Fig. 7 is depicted the simulation result (double scroll-attractor) of the fractional-order Burke-Shaw system (3.26) with parameters a=k=g=10,d=13, orders q1=0.95q2=0.97,   q3=0.99, and initial conditions (x(0), y(0), z(0)) = (0.1, 0.1, 0.1).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Strange attractor of the fractional-order Burke-Shaw system (3.26) in state space

It should be noted, that various Lorenz-type systems are interconnected and they could be topologically equivalent or not. The Burke-Shaw system is topologically equivalent to the Lorenz system under the transformation [6].

Conclusions

In this survey paper we tried to classified a wide scale of the Lorenz-type systems, which were investigated during last years by many authors. Those authors detailed investigated the Lorenz-type chaotic systems and their characteristics as Lyapunov exponents, fractal dimensions, stability, attractors, biffurcation diagrams as well Poincaré maps, etc. However, we did not repeated this investigation again. Here we considered the fractional-order modifications of these type systems by illustrative examples. Moreover, for the first time a new general form of the fractional-order Lorenz-type system (3.5) was presented as well. New general form defined in this paper covers not only known systems and bridges between them but even conjugate systems [24] also know as hyperbolic system [3], when parameter τ=1 in (3.5). Some other Lorenz-type systems, which are not considered in this article are also particular cases of the general form (3.5), defined in this paper, as for example, Sprott systems (a few of 19 examples in [23]), Li system [9], Pehlivan-Uyaroǧlu system [17], model for El-Niño weather phenomenon [5] as well as a whole zoo of systems from the Lorenz-type family (several of 150 examples described in [16]).

There are also higher dimension Lorenz model as well as other Lorenz-type systems with a different quadratic form. However, in this brief survey presented in this article we did not consider them. It is an idea for further research.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the Slovak Grant Agency for Science under grant VEGA 1/0365/19, and by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under the contracts No. APVV-14-0892 and No. APVV-18-0526.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Čelikovský S, Vaněček A. Bilinear systems and chaos. Kybernetika. 1994;30(4):403–423. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Čelikovský S, Chen G. On a generalized Lorenz canonical form of chaotic systems. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos. 2002;12(08):1789–1812. doi: 10.1142/S0218127402005467. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Čelikovský S, Chen G. On the generalized Lorenz canonical form. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals. 2005;26(5):1271–1276. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2005.02.040. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Deng W, Li C. Chaos synchronization of the fractional Lü system. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. 2005;353:61–72. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2005.01.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Deshpande A, Daftardar-Gejji V. Chaotic dynamics of fractional Vallis system for El-Niño. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 2019;22(3):307–336. doi: 10.1515/fca-2019-0045. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dong, C., Liu, H., Jie, Q., Li, H.: Topological classification of periodic orbits in the generalized Lorenz-type system with diverse symbolic dynamics. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 154, Art. 111686 (2022). 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111686
  • 7.Chen G, Ueta T. Yet another chaotic attractor. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos. 1999;09(07):1465–1466. doi: 10.1142/S0218127499001024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Li C, Yan J. The synchronization of three fractional differential systems. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals. 2007;32(2):751–757. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2005.11.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Li XF, Chlouverakis KE, Xu DL. Nonlinear dynamics and circuit realization of a new chaotic flow: A variant of Lorenz, Chen and Lü. Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications. 2009;10(4):2357–2368. doi: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2008.04.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Liu C, Liu T, Liu L, Liu K. A new chaotic attractor. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals. 2004;22(5):1031–1038. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2004.02.060. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lorenz, E.N.: Deterministic nonperiodic flow. Journal of Atmospheric Sciences 20(2), 130–141 (1963). 10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020$<$3c0130:DNF$>$3e2.0.CO;2
  • 12.Lu JG, Chen G. A note on the fractional-order Chen system. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals. 2006;27(3):685–688. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2005.04.037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lü J, Chen G. A new chaotic attractor coined. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos. 2002;12(03):659–661. doi: 10.1142/S0218127402004620. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mahmoud GM, Arafa AA, Abed-Elhameed TM, Mahmoud EE. Chaos control of integer and fractional orders of chaotic Burke-Shaw system using time delayed feedback control. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals. 2017;104:680–692. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2017.09.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Oldham, K.B., Spanier, J.: The Fractional Calculus. Academic Press, New York (1974)
  • 16.Pan I, Das S. Evolving chaos: Identifying new attractors of the generalised Lorenz family. Applied Mathematical Modelling. 2018;57:391–405. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2018.01.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pehlivan I, Uyaroǧlu Y. A new chaotic attractor from general Lorenz system family and its electronic experimental implementation. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences. 2010;18(2):171–184. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Petráš I. Stability of fractional-order systems with rational orders: A survey. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 2009;12(3):269–298. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Petráš, I.: Fractional-Order Nonlinear Systems. Springer, New York (2011)
  • 20.Podlubny, I.: Fractional Differential Equations. Academic Press, San Diego (1999)
  • 21.Shaw R. Strange attractors, chaotic behavior, and information flow. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A. 1981;36(1):80–112. doi: 10.1515/zna-1981-0115. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Shimizu T, Morioka N. On the bifurcation of a symmetric limit cycle to an asymmetric one in a simple model. Physics Letters A. 1980;76(3):201–204. doi: 10.1016/0375-9601(80)90466-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sprott JC. Some simple chaotic flows. Phys. Rev. E. 1994;50:R647–R650. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.50.R647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yang Q, Chen G, Zhou T. A unified Lorenz-type system and its canonical form. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos. 2006;16(10):2855–2871. doi: 10.1142/S0218127406016501. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yang Q, Chen G. A chaotic system with one saddle and two stable node-foci. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos. 2008;18(05):1393–1414. doi: 10.1142/S0218127408021063. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhou T, Tang Y, Chen G. Chen’s attractor exists. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos. 2004;14(09):3167–3177. doi: 10.1142/S0218127404011296. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wei, Z., Zhang, X.: Chaos in the Shimizu-Morioka model with fractional order. Frontiers in Physics 9, Art. 636173, 8 pp. (2021). 10.3389/fphy.2021.636173

Articles from Fractional Calculus & Applied Analysis are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES