Abstract
Vascular dysfunction is frequently seen in disorders associated with cognitive impairment, dementia and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Recent advances in neuroimaging and fluid biomarkers suggest that vascular dysfunction is not an innocent bystander only accompanying neuronal dysfunction. Loss of cerebrovascular integrity, often referred to as breakdown in the blood-brain barrier (BBB), has recently shown to be an early biomarker of human cognitive dysfunction and possibly underlying mechanism of age-related cognitive decline. Damage to the BBB may initiate or further invoke a range of tissue injuries causing synaptic and neuronal dysfunction and cognitive impairment that may contribute to AD. Therefore, better understanding of how vascular dysfunction caused by BBB breakdown interacts with amyloid-β and tau AD biomarkers to confer cognitive impairment may lead to new ways of thinking about pathogenesis, and possibly treatment and prevention of early cognitive impairment, dementia and AD, for which we still do not have effective therapies.
Introduction
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is associated with vascular dysfunction1,2. Leaks in a protective filter called the blood-brain barrier (BBB) are found in AD and other dementias3. Whether or not they contribute to disease pathogenesis is a matter of debate.
Here, we examine recent human neuroimaging and fluid biomarker studies suggesting that loss of cerebrovascular integrity initiating breakdown in the BBB may lead to early cognitive dysfunction, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD. Cerebral blood flow (CBF) changes are also frequently observed in AD2, but how they influence disease process is beyond the scope of the present perspective.
Blood-brain barrier
The BBB was discovered more than 100 years ago. Initial studies with vital dyes injected into the blood stream were shown to permeate all peripheral organs while the brain remained uncoloured. This led to definition of the BBB as a biological membrane between blood and brain, which in contrast to relatively “leaky” capillaries in peripheral organs, does not allow free solute exchanges across the capillary endothelium2. Today, the barrier function remains one of the many critical functions that BBB plays for the brain. Physiological, cellular and molecular studies, and recent studies in the living human brain have revealed that the BBB plays a key role in brain metabolism and function, has an important role in disease process, and is yet poorly explored as a therapeutic target, as recently reviewed1.
Physiology
The BBB is formed by a continuous endothelial monolayer at the level of brain capillaries1 (Fig. 1), which provides 85% of endothelial surface area of the brain or 12 m2 in the human brain1. The endothelial monolayer extends along the arterioles, small arterial vessels, and venules. As recently reviewed in detail elsewhere1,4,5, the pioneering electron microscopy studies in rodents revealed the presence of tight junctions (TJs) between the neighbouring endothelial cells of the BBB that helped establish the anatomical basis of the BBB as a tightly sealed endothelial monolayer. The follow-up molecular and genetic studies identified several TJ proteins in endothelium including zonula occludens-1 (ZO1), a critical node in the organization of many protein complexes associated with TJs such as occludins, which regulate paracellular endothelial permeability, and claudins, including low molecular weight size-selective claudin-5. Other contacts between endothelial cells include adherens junctions (AJs), typified by proteins such as VE-cadherin. Importantly, a recent single-nucleus RNA-sequencing study of human brain vasculature has shown for the first time that human BBB endothelium expresses all key TJ and AJ proteins that previously had only been shown in the brains of other mammalian species6. These include adhesion molecules such as different cadherins and proto-cadherins, contactins and catenins that contribute to BBB integrity6. For further details on TJs and AJs proteins and original articles describing their function and how they were discovered over the last few decades, we refer to recent reviews1,4,5.
Figure 1. Blood-brain barrier and the associated cell types.
The brain is amongst the highest vascularized organs in the body. Oxygenated blood, nutrients and regulatory molecules are delivered to the brain via arterial and arteriolar blood vessels that branch out into brain capillaries. Carbon dioxide and metabolic end products are removed from the brain by venous drainage system. Tightly-sealed brain capillary endothelium is the key site of the blood–brain barrier (BBB). The endothelial BBB monolayer extends along the arterioles, small arterial vessels and venules. Middle inset: An arteriole branching out into small capillaries. Vascular smooth muscle cells (pink) and pericytes (green) wrap around the arterioles and capillaries, respectively. Pericytes are embedded into the basement membrane encircling endothelial cells of the capillary vessel wall. Astrocyte endfeet (blue) wrap around the capillary wall, and in places not covered by pericytes are separated from endothelial cells by the basement membrane. Together with perivascular microglia (light brown) and macrophages, and neurons (orange), these different cell types form the neurovascular unit (NVU). Right inset: Capillary cross-section illustrates the cellular composition of the NVU at the level of brain capillary.
In contrast to the relatively permeable systemic capillaries, healthy and normal brain capillaries exhibit a low rate of transendothelial bulk flow by transcytosis. This together with expression of TJs and AJs restricts the entry of most blood-derived molecules into the brain, unless they have specialized carriers and/or receptors in the brain endothelium that facilitate their transport across the BBB. In this sense, the BBB can be viewed as a selective semipermeable barrier allowing specific molecules to pass in and out of the brain. Recent studies have identified over 10,000 transcripts in the murine BBB endothelium with preferential expression of transporters in the capillary endothelium7,8. Similar data sets on BBB transporters have recently been reported in human brain endothelium6.
The selective substrate-specific transport systems at the BBB include carrier-mediated transport (CMT) of carbohydrates (e.g., glucose), amino acids, monocarboxylic acids (e.g., lactate, ketone bodies), hormones, fatty acids, nucleotides, inorganic anions, amines, choline and vitamins. These CMT systems enable transport of their respective substrates to cross BBB bi-directionally according to their concentration gradients. Some larger molecules including certain proteins and peptides can use receptor-mediated transport (RMT) to cross the BBB from blood-or brain, as for example insulin, insulin-like growth factors, transferrin, leptin and some others. RMT systems including lipoprotein receptors mediate clearance from brain of proteinaceous neurotoxic molecules that are produced in the brain such Alzheimer’s amyloid-β (Aβ) or Parkinson’s α-synuclein. Endothelial ATP-binding cassette transporters prevent brain accumulation of drugs, xenobiotics, drug conjugates, and nucleosides in the brain by active efflux from endothelium to blood. And endothelial ion transporters, such as sodium pumps, control ion concentrations in the brain. Thus, in addition to protecting the brain parenchyma from blood-derived toxic molecules, cells and microorganisms, the endothelial monolayer of the BBB regulates transport of nutrients and essential molecules across brain endothelium into the brain, and clearance into the blood of metabolic end products and endogenous neurotoxins produced by the brain. For more details, on BBB transport systems in healthy brain, and how they are affected by the disease process see recent reviews1,4,5.
Pericytes, mural cells that lie along brain capillaries, share a common basement membrane with endothelial cells. As reviewed recently1,4, N-cadherin forms peg-and-socket contacts between endothelial cells and pericytes, whereas the gap junction connexin (CX) 43 hemichannels mediate intercellular communications between pericytes and endothelial cells. Astrocytes also express gap junction proteins, some of which are important for maintaining BBB integrity, such as CX30 and CX43. These adhesion molecules originally found in murine pericytes and astrocytes were recently confirmed in human pericytes and astrocytes6.
Finally, in contrast to peripheral organs such as liver, brain does not have a storage capability for larger energy-saving molecules1,2. Its energy metabolism depends on delivery of metabolites such as glucose by CBF and transport across the BBB. Vascular smooth muscle cells and pericytes regulate CBF by constricting and dilating arterioles and capillaries, respectively2,9–11 (Fig. 1). Importantly, pericytes maintain BBB integrity, and their loss leads to BBB disruption12–16.
BBB dysfunction and neurological disorders in humans
That intact BBB is required for normal brain function is best illustrated by examples of rare monogenic human neurological disorders where the genetic mutations or defects are found to originate exclusively within brain endothelial cells, and/or BBB-associated pericytes and vascular smooth muscle cells. For example, inactivating mutations in the Solute Carrier Family 2 Member 1 (SLC2A1) gene encoding GLUT1 glucose transporter in brain endothelial cells, lead to GLUT1-deficiency syndrome, a paediatric neurological disease with early onset of seizures and microcephaly, BBB breakdown, and neuron loss17. Inactivating mutations in the Major Facilitator Superfamily Domain Containing 2A (MSFD2A) gene encoding transporter for essential omega-3 fatty acids that is enriched in brain endothelial cells, lead to BBB breakdown18,19 and microcephaly syndrome20,21. Mutations in genes encoding the BBB TJ proteins, cerebral cavernous malformation proteins or collagens lead to uncontrolled leakage of proteins and other content from blood into the brain causing neuroinflammatory response, increased microvessel fragility, cerebral haemorrhages and small vessels disease (SVD), resulting in focal neurological deficits, seizures and headaches, and/or lacunar ischemic strokes1. Mutations in NOTCH3 gene that is expressed in vascular smooth muscle cells and pericytes lead to cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infracts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL), a major cause of genetically inherited stroke in humans associated with loss of blood vessels integrity22.
Altogether, about 20 rare neurological monogenic disorders identified offer insights into causal pathogenic links between BBB dysfunction and neurological disease in humans, supporting the idea that BBB dysfunction can have neurological consequences.
Blood-brain barrier breakdown and cognitive dysfunction
Several neuropathological studies have shown BBB breakdown in AD1. However, the point at which individuals suffering from MCI and AD develop BBB breakdown has not been clear until recently. Using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA), recent studies indicated that BBB breakdown occurs early in individuals with MCI and AD-type dementia, and is an early biomarker of cognitive dysfunction23,24. The presence of gadolinium in brain reflects subtle BBB “leaks” of plasma components, and is typically caused by loss of TJ or AJ proteins, and/or increased trans-endothelial fluid transcytosis of plasma components across the BBB. According to experimental studies BBB leaks could be related to loss of pericyte coverage12,14.
Loss of BBB integrity has also been shown in MCI and AD dementia by susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) MRI detecting early cerebral microhaemorrhages25,26. This greater and more focal degree of BBB breakdown leads to extravasation of red blood cells into the brain. Lobar microhaemorrhages seen by SWI are often due to cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) that is present in many cases of MCI and AD along with amyloid deposition in brain27. However, microhaemorrhages are also seen in deep infratentorial regions related to hypertensive SVD and vascular dementia28.
The BBB dysfunction in MCI and AD is not limited only to “mechanical” types of BBB breakdown described above, and may also include dysfunction in the BBB transporters and/or receptors, such as, to name a few, loss of GLUT1 glucose transporter and P-glycoprotein 1 (P-gp) key efflux transporter of toxins, as discussed below. For details of how BBB transport systems are affected by different neurological disorders see recent review5.
The link between BBB and AD is further supported by a recent nuclear RNA sequencing study of major human brain vascular and perivascular cell types from hippocampus and cortex, which revealed that 30 of the top 45 AD genes identified by genome wide association studies (GWAS) are expressed in brain vasculature6. Vascular GWAS genes mapped to endothelial protein transport, adaptive immune and extracellular matrix pathways.
Below, we discuss recent neuroimaging studies demonstrating BBB breakdown in individuals with early cognitive impairment, MCI and AD-type dementia, and in relation to AD biomarkers amyloid-β (Aβ), tau and neurodegeneration29. But before we proceed with this discussion, we would like also to mention that earlier neuroimaging studies using computed tomography (CT)30,31, positron emission tomography (PET) with [68Ga]EDTA32, and DCE-MRI semi-quantitative analysis33 failed to detect higher BBB permeability in AD. In contrast to these earlier studies from late eighties and nineties, more recent neuroimaging studies from several groups over the last five to six years have shown age-related BBB breakdown23,34–40, BBB breakdown in MCI23,24,35,36,41,42, AD43–46, cerebral SVD47–53 and in other neurodegenerative disorders54,55. The discrepancy between earlier and recent studies could likely be attributed to use of more advanced techniques and analysis in recent studies. This includes use of MRI sequences with higher spatial and temporal resolution23,24,35,43,56, direct measurements of individual vascular input functions from the arterial inflow23,24,35,36 or the venous outflow34,37–42,44–47,49,50,52, and use of quantification methods, such as the Patlak model57, which has not been used in previous studies30–33. Some earlier studies31,33 measured only signal changes after contrast injection without applying the pharmacokinetic analysis that takes into account the tracer’s concentration in blood. One CT study30 and one PET study32 adopted pharmacokinetic models, but did not detect BBB leaks likely due to a lower ability of CT and PET to resolve cerebral anatomical structures compared to recent MRI sequences, and generally much lower spatial resolution of PET.
Mild cognitive impairment
BBB breakdown by DCE-MRI and analysis of cerebrospinal fluid
DCE-MRI studies revealed that individuals with MCI develop BBB breakdown in the hippocampus, a centre for learning and memory23 (Table 1), which correlated with increased levels of biochemical biomarkers of BBB breakdown in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) such as CSF/serum albumin ratio, Qalb, fibrinogen and plasminogen23,24 (Table 2). Increased BBB leaks (i.e., Ktrans values) correlated with increased CSF levels of soluble platelet-derived growth factor β (sPDGFRβ), a biomarker of pericyte injury23,24,58. DCE-MRI approach also revealed a more widespread BBB breakdown in MCI in the grey and normally-appearing white matter44. BBB breakdown in the hippocampus was also found during physiological aging, but to a lesser degree than in MCI23, and in grey and white matter regions vulnerable to age-related deteriorations, suggesting it is likely an underlying mechanism of age-related cognitive decline35,37,38, particularly associated with loss of memory retrieval39.
Table 1:
Blood-brain barrier breakdown in MCI and Alzheimer disease dementia detected by neuroimaging
Ref. | BBB Breakdown | Sample size | Key risk factors | AT(N) biomarkers | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCE-MRI | SWI-MRI | Age | VRFs | APOE4 | A | T | N | |||
MCI | 44, C | GM, NAWM | 33 | ✓ | ✓ | Not studied | Not studied | Yes* | ||
24, C | Hippocampus Parahippocampus Caudate nucleus |
73 | ✓ | ✓ | Not studied | Yes* CSF, PET |
Yes* CSF, PET |
Yes* | ||
35, C | Hippocampus Parahippocampus Caudate nucleus |
245 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Yes* CSF, PET |
Yes* CSF, PET |
Yes* | ||
41, C | GM, NAWM, Hippocampus | 80 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Not studied | Yes* | |||
64, C | Cortex GM (deep) Infratentorial |
67 | ✓ | Not studied | Not studied | Yes* | ||||
65, C | Cortex (siderosis) | 809 | ✓ | Not studied | ✓ | Not studied | Yes | |||
27, L | Lobes | 174 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Yes PET |
Not studied | |||
25, C | Lobes GM (deep) Infratentorial |
1504 | ✓ | ✓ | Not studied | Not studied | ||||
66, C | Lobes GM (deep) Infratentorial |
136 | ✓ | Not studied | ✓ | Yes* CSF |
Yes* CSF |
Yes* | ||
Early AD | 44, C | GM, NAWM | 33 | ✓ | ✓ | Not studied | Not studied | Yes | ||
64, C | Lobes GM (deep) Infratentorial |
67 | ✓ | Not studied | Not studied | Yes* | ||||
AD | 41, C | GM, NAWM, Hippocampus | 80 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Not studied | Yes | ||
65, C | Lobes Cortex (siderosis) |
809 | ✓ | Not studied | ✓ | Not studied | Yes | |||
27, L | Lobes | 174 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Yes PET |
Not studied | |||
25, C | Lobes GM (deep) Infratentorial |
1504 | ✓ | ✓ | Not studied | Not studied | Not studied |
The AT(N) system monitors changes in amyloid-β (A), tau (T) and neurodegeneration (N) biomarkers. “Yes” indicates that BBB breakdown was found in individuals positive for the A and T biomarkers in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and/or brain by positron emission tomography (PET), and/or N by MRI. ”Yes*” with asterisks indicates that BBB breakdown was found in individuals positive for the A, T and/or N biomarkers as well as in those that have not developed AT(N) biomarkers abnormalities. C, and L, indicate cross-sectional and longitudinal study, respectively. ✓, factor has been studied.
Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) was defined by clinical dementia rating scale of 0.5 and impairment in neuropsychological test scores in one or more cognitive domains selected from memory, attention/executive function, language tests, and global cognition; AD dementia was defined by the clinical criteria of the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders, Stroke–Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders Association and/or the National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer’s Association guidelines. Abbreviations: AD, Alzheimer disease; APOE4, variant of apolipoprotein E; BBB, blood-brain barrier; DCE-MRI, dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; SWI, susceptibility-weighted imaging sequence; GM, the entire grey matter; NAWM, the entire normal appearing white matter; VRFs, vascular risk factors.
Table 2:
Blood-brain barrier breakdown in MCI and Alzheimer disease dementia detected by CSF biomarkers
Ref. | CSF | Sample size | Key risk factors | AT(N) biomarkers | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age | VRFs | APOE4 | Amyloid | Tau | Neurodegeneration | ||||
MCI | 23, C | ↑ sPDGFRβ ↑ Qalb |
64 | ✓ | Not studied | Not studied | Yes* | ||
24, C | ↑ sPDGFRβ | 141 | ✓ | ✓ | Not studied | Yes* CSF, PET |
Yes* CSF, PET |
Yes* | |
35, C | ↑ sPDGFRβ, ↑CypA, ↑MMP9 APOE4 vs. APOE3 |
350 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Yes* CSF, PET |
Yes* CSF, PET |
Yes | |
AD | 74, M | ↑ Qalb | 1295 | Not studied | Not studied | ||||
75, L | ↑ sPDGFRβ, ↑ VEGF, ↑ VEGF/sVEGFR-1 ratio, ↑ Qalb |
1015 | ✓ | Not studied | ✓ | Yes* CSF, PET |
Not studied | ||
76, C | ↑ sPDGFRβ (CSF and serum) ↑ albumin |
78 | ✓ | Not studied | Yes* CSF |
Yes CSF |
Not studied |
Abbreviations: CypA, cyclophilin A; MMP9, matrix metalloproteinase-9; Qalb, CSF/plasma and/or CSF/serum albumin quotient; sPDGFRβ, soluble platelet-derived growth factor receptor-β; sVEGFR, soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; For definitions of MCI, AD, AT(N) biomarkers system, CSF, PET, APOE, VRFs, “Yes” and “Yes*” see footnote to Table 1. ✓: factor has been studied. C, L, and M indicate cross-sectional, longitudinal, or meta-analysis study, respectively.
Since Aβ2 and tau59,60 are both vasculotoxic, several studies have investigated the relationship between BBB permeability and Aβ and tau CSF biomarkers24,35,61. These studies revealed that neither increase in the BBB permeability in the hippocampus and parahippocampal gyrus by DCE-MRI, nor increased levels of pericyte injury biomarker sPDGFRβ in the CSF, depended on Aβ and tau CSF status24, and were found both in individuals with and without positive AD biomarkers in CSF and/or brain by PET24,35 (Table 1, Table 2). These data suggest a link between early BBB dysfunction and cognitive impairment in individuals that are in early stages in the AD continuum, but also in those that have not yet developed alterations in Aβ and tau biomarkers. Whether this latter group will develop vascular dementia, AD or mixed dementia at a later stage remains presently unknown. This should be investigated by future longitudinal studies.
A few MCI studies reported that the BBB breakdown was not influenced by vascular risk factor (VRF) burden24,35. Since the studied cohorts excluded participants with substantial cerebrovascular pathology, it is possible that interactions between traditional VRFs and BBB dysfunction in cohorts with more severe vascular lesions and vascular cognitive impairment will lead to synergistic effects. Again, this remains to be determined by future studies. Some studies have shown that BBB breakdown in MCI individuals precedes hippocampal degeneration7,18, suggesting that early BBB dysfunction may occur prior to brain atrophy. These cross-sectional findings remain to be confirmed, however, by longitudinal studies.
A recent DCE-MRI study indicated that BBB breakdown in the hippocampus and parahippocampal gyrus begins in cognitively unimpaired (CU) APOE4 carriers (ε3/ε4 and ε4/ε4), which further increases with cognitive impairment, irrespective of Aβ and tau biomarker changes in the CSF or brain by PET35. Since hippocampal volumes were not different between CU APOE4 and APOE3 carriers, these findings additionally suggest that BBB breakdown in CU APOE4 carriers preceded hippocampal atrophy that was observed only in APOE4 carriers at MCI stage35. Again, future longitudinal studies should confirm and extend these cross-sectional findings.
Interestingly, high baseline CSF levels of sPDGFRβ, a BBB pericyte injury biomarker, predicted future cognitive decline in APOE4 carriers, but not APOE3 homozygotes, and remained a significant predictor of cognitive decline after correcting for Aβ and tau status35. Elevated levels of sPDGFRβ correlated with activation of the BBB-degrading cyclophilin A (CypA)-matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) pathway in the CSF35, similar as shown before in APOE4 knock-in mice62. Since pharmacologic inhibitors of CypA have been used for non-neurological applications in humans63, it is possible that CypA inhibitors may also suppress CypA in cerebral blood vessels of APOE4 carriers, which in turn could improve vascular integrity and the associated neuronal and synaptic deficits, potentially slowing cognitive impairment.
Microbleeds by SWI-MRI
MCI patients develop microbleeds that can be detected by SWI-MRI sequences and T2* as small, round hypointense foci representing perivascular deposits of blood-derived hemosiderin phagocytosed by macrophages. Table 1 lists MCI studies showing early microhaemorrhages reflecting breakdown in the BBB mainly in the cortex and deep gray matter regions25,27,64–66. Several studies in AD linked lobar microbleeds to CAA25,27, whereas deep infratentorial microbleeds have been linked to hypertensive arteriopathy28. On 7T MRI, >75% of MCI individuals were found to develop microhaemorrhages likely of capillary and/or pre-capillary origin67,68. These are typically missed when studied by lower resolution 3T MR scanners, detecting only 21–45% microbleeds in MCI25,27,64–66, or on 1.5T detecting microbleeds in 10–15% of MCI patients.
Consistent with DCE-MRI findings35, the prevalence of microbleeds was higher in APOE4 carriers27,65,66, and was associated with increased CSF/serum albumin (Qalb) ratio66, suggesting a link between microbleeds and BBB dysfunction. Recent studies indicated that the appearance of microhaemorrhages was associated with cognitive decline and/or higher risk for dementia69–71.
Interestingly, the occurrence of microbleeds was not influenced by tau66, and in some studies preceded medial temporal lobe atrophy25,64,66. In a few studies, the incidence of lobar microbleeds was higher in participants with higher Aβ brain load on PET27, but was not associated with lower CSF Aβ42 levels66. Since most studies on microbleeds in MCI did not evaluate simultaneously Aβ pathology by PET or in the CSF, the association between regional BBB permeability changes on DCE-MRI, microbleeds, and AD biomarkers needs to be investigated by future studies.
Alzheimer’s Disease
BBB breakdown in the cortex, white matter, and some deep grey matter regions has been shown by DCE-MRI during early stages of AD44. Compared to MCI, early AD patients present with a higher prevalence of cerebral microbleeds on 3T MRI64, often localized in the occipital and parietal lobes, sites of CAA (Table 1). Cerebral microbleeds are commonly found with more advanced AD with the prevalence as high as 45% at 3T25,27,65 and up to 78% at 7T68. Although, the majority of microbleeds was typically lobar and CAA-related, the CAA-unrelated microhaemorrhages in the subcortical gray matter and infratentorial regions were also found.
Recent studies found that patients with epilepsy and AD, as well as aging mice, develop BBB leaks associated with slower cortical activity43. Moreover, these BBB leaks were related to activation of transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) in astrocytes, as shown in humans and mice56.
P-gp, an active efflux transporter at the luminal side of the BBB endothelium removes drugs, xenobiotics and Aβ from brain72. Studies using 11C-verapamil, a PET ligand for P-gp, indicated diminished P-gp activity in early AD in multiple region including hippocampus and cortex73, suggesting impaired BBB clearance.
In addition to increased CSF sPDGFRβ and Qalb in large cohort studies in AD74,75, increased CSF sPDGFRβ correlated with increased sPDGFRβ in the serum and increased CSF/serum Qalb ratio suggestive of BBB breakdown76 was also found (Table 2). Increased CSF levels of biomarkers of angiogenesis and endothelial dysfunction, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and VEGF/soluble VEGF receptor 1 (sVEGFR-1) ratio, were also found in AD75. These biomarkers were not associated with Aβ load75, suggesting that BBB endothelial dysfunction is likely independent of amyloid pathology (Table 2).
Reduced FDG-PET is often interpreted as brain hypometabolism. However, several investigators support the view that reduced transport across the BBB also contributes to reduced FDG-PET as recently reviewed77. In brief, glucose enters the brain via transport across the BBB mediated by GLUT1 glucose transporter, and if GLUT1 is deficient, deleted from the BBB, blocked genetically, inhibited pharmacologically or suppressed by disease, glucose cannot reach the brain1. Several earlier FDG dynamic PET studies have shown diminished BBB transport of glucose in AD, as reviewed elsewhere77.
Blood-brain barrier and perivascular spaces
BBB breakdown during early cognitive decline in people at risk for AD24 could lead to increased perivascular spaces (PVS) as in CADASIL22,78. The suggestion of direct leakage across the perforating vessel wall into the PVS79 is supported by work in pericyte-deficient mice which develop BBB leakage associated with increase in the size and number of PVS80. Subtle diffuse BBB leaks on DCE-MRI correlated with increasing numbers of PVS79. When enlarged, PVS in the white and deep grey matter become visible by MRI81. PVS increases at older age, with cerebral SVD82, and BBB breakdown80, indicating that they are likely markers of BBB-related vascular dysfunction. Systematic reviews of population, vascular, and neurodegenerative diseases indicate that higher number of PVS is associated in cross-sectional studies with cognitive decline, AD-type dementia, and executive dysfunction83–86.
Conclusions and future directions
The NIA-AA Research Framework classifies individuals in the AD continuum by the AT(N) biomarkers for Aβ (A), tau (T) and neurodegeneration (N)29,87. Based on recent developments in fluid and neuroimaging biomarkers, the AT(N) biomarker matrix is now expanding towards ATX(N) system, where X could represent novel candidate biomarkers for additional pathophysiological mechanisms such as neuroimmune dysregulation, synaptic dysfunction and/or BBB alterations88.
Here, we suggest the ATv(N) matrix to monitor early stages of cognitive dysfunction by adding neuroimaging and fluid biomarkers caused by an early vascular BBB breakdown (v) (Fig. 2). This model is supported by recent findings examined in this review. How biomarkers of early BBB breakdown interact with the AT biomarkers to predict cognitive decline during early preclinical stage89–92, and clinical progression from CU to MCI, and MCI to dementia, remains unclear. These interactions should be evaluated by future longitudinal studies. The ATv(N) matrix allows a possibility for each of the studied pathways, i.e., the A, T and v, to contribute to early cognitive dysfunction and neurodegeneration independently of each other or acting synergistically. In this regard, we expect that the biomarkers of BBB breakdown (v) should be helpful in predicting early cognitive dysfunction in individuals within the AD pathway, as well as in those with negative AT biomarkers that may develop a different type of dementia, such as vascular and mixed dementia, and/or convert to AD at a later stage. This should be addressed by future and ongoing longitudinal studies. The current model also does not take into account the effects of other comorbid AD vascular pathologies such as white matter changes, lacunes, microinfarcts, ischemic changes and others not discussed here. Future models incorporating other vascular changes are also warranted in the context of addressing a full picture of vascular comorbidity and interaction with A and T.
Figure 2. ATv(N) matrix.
The AT(N) system classifies individuals in the Alzheimer’s disease (AD) continuum by monitoring biomarkers for amyloid-β (A), tau (T), and neurodegeneration (N). Recent neuroimaging and fluid biomarker studies suggest that novel candidate biomarkers (X) for additional pathophysiological mechanisms should be incorporated within the AT(N) system. Adding vascular dysfunction caused by an early breakdown in the blood-brain barrier (v) should be helpful when evaluating preclinical decline, and clinical progression from cognitively unimpaired to mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and MCI to dementia both in individuals along the AD continuum and in those with negative AT biomarkers that may develop at a different type of dementia, such as vascular dementia and mixed dementia, and/or convert to AD a later stage. The ‘v’ could be chosen from neuroimaging and/or molecular biomarkers of blood-brain barrier breakdown. The ATv(N) matrix allows for A, T, and v pathways to contribute to early cognitive dysfunction and neurodegeneration independently of each other or acting synergistically. The ‘v’ does not take into account the effects of other comorbid AD vascular pathologies such white matter changes, lacunes, microinfarcts, and/or ischemic changes, and may not apply to late stage progressive AD dementia, as discussed in this Perspective.
We acknowledge limits of DCE-MRI for clinical use in AD26,93, such as lack of standardized multivendor protocol and evidence of repeatability and reproducibility. However, the DCE-MRI technique has been in clinic for more than 35 years. GBCA are injected approximately 30 million times annually for evaluation of patients with multiple sclerosis, brain tumours, and other neurological disorders94. Advanced versions of this technique have been used recently by multiple centres in research studies in individuals with cognitive problems during physiological aging, MCI, AD, SVD and other neurodegenerative disorders. It is noteworthy, the BBB leakage detected by DCE-MRI in MCI and AD is almost an order of magnitude lower than leakage seen in grey matter after acute ischemic brain injury and large arterial infracts in stroke, and/or during relapsing acute episodes in the white matter in multiple sclerosis. Nevertheless, subtle chronic leakages in the BBB that may persist over longer periods of time for decades during preclinical decline and clinical progression to dementia and AD may importantly contribute to cognitive impairment.
Developing neuroimaging biomarkers for brain endothelial dysfunction, pericytes, and vascular smooth muscle cells, and new PET ligands that selectively track BBB transport of glucose, such as 3-O-11C-methyl glucose95, will advance our understanding of the multiple BBB dysfunctions in MCI and AD. Using ultrahigh-field 7T MR scanners will substantially improve detectability of BBB capillary microbleeds in CU and MCI individuals. More effort should be directed at developing biomarkers of BBB injury in the blood, similarly as it has been recently done with phosphorylated tau to distinguish individuals developing neuronal injury with AD pathology from those with non-AD pathology, and/or with other neurodegenerative disorders96–99. Indeed, there are national efforts to create biomarkers for vascular dysfunction, i.e. MarkVCID, a consortium of US academic medical centres whose mission is to identify and validate biomarkers for SVD that produce vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia100. We expect the proposed ATv(N) matrix will stimulate more researchers and clinicians to analyse the BBB in studies and trials for early stages of cognitive impairment, MCI, AD and other dementias.
Acknowledgments
The work of B.V.Z. is supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant nos. R01AG023084, R01NS090904, R01NS034467, R01AG039452, 1R01NS100459, 5P01AG052350, and 5P50AG005142, in addition to the Alzheimer’s Association strategic 509279 grant, Cure Alzheimer’s Fund, and the Foundation Leducq Transatlantic Network of Excellence for the Study of Perivascular Spaces in Small Vessel Disease reference no. 16 CVD 05. The work of J.M.W. is supported by the Fondation Leducq (16 CVD 05), the UK Dementia Research Institute (MRC, ARUK, Alz Soc), European Union Horizon 2020, PHC-03-15, project No 666881, ‘SVDs@Target’, The Row Fogo Centre for Research into Ageing and the Brain (AD.ROW4.35. BRO-D.FID3668413), and Selfridges Group Foundation (UB190097). Graphical illustrations for Fig. 1 were made in part using BioRender (https://biorender.com). We apologize to those authors whose original work we were not able to cite due to limited number of references.
Footnotes
Declaration of interests
Drs. Barisano, Montagne, Kisler, and Zlokovic declare no competing interests related to this work. Dr. Schneider reports personal fees from National Hockey League, from National Football League, outside the submitted work; Dr. Wardlaw reports grants from UK Dementia Research Institute (MRC, Alzheimers Society, ARUK), grants from Fondation Leducq, grants from EU Horizon 2020, grants from Row Fogo Charitable Trust, grants from Selfridges Group Foundation, during the conduct of the study; grants from British Heart Foundation, grants from Stroke Association, grants from Wellcome Trust, outside the submitted work.
References
- 1.Sweeney MD, Zhao Z, Montagne A, Nelson AR & Zlokovic BV Blood-brain barrier: From physiology to disease and back. Physiological Reviews vol. 99 21–78 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Iadecola C. The Neurovascular Unit Coming of Age: A Journey through Neurovascular Coupling in Health and Disease. Neuron 96, 17–42 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kaufer D. & Friedman A. Damage to a Protective Shield around the Brain May Lead to Alzheimer’s and Other Diseases. Scientific American 43–47 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lochhead JJ, Yang J, Ronaldson PT & Davis TP Structure, Function, and Regulation of the Blood-Brain Barrier Tight Junction in Central Nervous System Disorders. Front. Physiol. 11, 914 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Banks WA, Reed MJ, Logsdon AF, Rhea EM & Erickson MA Healthy aging and the blood–brain barrier. Nat. Aging 1, 243–254 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Yang AC et al. A human brain vascular atlas reveals diverse cell mediators of Alzheimer’s disease risk. bioRxiv (2021) doi: 10.1101/2021.04.26.441262. This study identified a human atlas of brain vasculature with cell-specific gene expression datasets in blood-brain barrier endothelial cells, mural cells pericytes and other vascular-associated cell types.
- 7. Vanlandewijck M. et al. A molecular atlas of cell types and zonation in the brain vasculature. Nature 554, 475–480 (2018). This study identified a mouse atlas of brain vasculature with cell-specific gene expression datasets in blood-brain barrier endothelial cells, mural cells pericytes and other vascular-associated cell types.
- 8.Kalucka J. et al. Single-Cell Transcriptome Atlas of Murine Endothelial Cells. Cell (2020) doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mishra A. et al. Astrocytes mediate neurovascular signaling to capillary pericytes but not to arterioles. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 1619–1627 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rungta RL, Chaigneau E, Osmanski BF & Charpak S. Vascular Compartmentalization of Functional Hyperemia from the Synapse to the Pia. Neuron 99, 362–375.e4 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nortley R. et al. Amyloid b oligomers constrict human capillaries in Alzheimer’s disease via signaling to pericytes. Science 365, (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Armulik A. et al. Pericytes regulate the blood-brain barrier. Nature 468, 557–561 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Daneman R, Zhou L, Kebede AA & Barres BA Pericytes are required for blood-brain barrier integrity during embryogenesis. Nature 468, 562–6 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bell RD et al. Pericytes Control Key Neurovascular Functions and Neuronal Phenotype in the Adult Brain and during Brain Aging. Neuron 68, 409–427 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Berthiaume AA, Hartmann DA, Majesky MW, Bhat NR & Shih AY Pericyte structural remodeling in cerebrovascular health and homeostasis. Front. Aging Neurosci. 10, (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nikolakopoulou AM et al. Pericyte loss leads to circulatory failure and pleiotrophin depletion causing neuron loss. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 1089–1098 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Winkler EA et al. GLUT1 reductions exacerbate Alzheimer’s disease vasculo-neuronal dysfunction and degeneration. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 521–530 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ben-Zvi A. et al. Mfsd2a is critical for the formation and function of the blood-brain barrier. Nature 509, 507–511 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nguyen LN et al. Mfsd2a is a transporter for the essential omega-3 fatty acid docosahexaenoic acid. Nature 509, 503–506 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Alakbarzade V. et al. A partially inactivating mutation in the sodium-dependent lysophosphatidylcholine transporter MFSD2A causes a non-lethal microcephaly syndrome. Nat. Genet. 47, 814–817 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Guemez-Gamboa A. et al. Inactivating mutations in MFSD2A, required for omega-3 fatty acid transport in brain, cause a lethal microcephaly syndrome. Nat. Genet. 47, 809–813 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Henshall TL et al. Notch3 is necessary for blood vessel integrity in the central nervous system. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 35, 409–420 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Montagne A. et al. Blood-Brain barrier breakdown in the aging human hippocampus. Neuron 85, 296–302 (2015). Using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging this study demonstrated that blood-brain barrier breakdown in the hippocampus occurs during normal aging in humans and is accelerated in individuals with mild cognitive impairment.
- 24. Nation DA et al. Blood-brain barrier breakdown is an early biomarker of human cognitive dysfunction. Nat. Med. 25, 270–276 (2019). Using a cerebrospinal fluid biomarker of blood-brain barrier-associated mural cells pericytes (soluble PDGFRb) and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging this study showed that individuals with early cognitive dysfunction develop brain capillary damage and blood-brain barrier breakdown in the hippocampus irrespective of Alzheimer’s Ab and tau biomarker changes.
- 25.Shams S. et al. Cerebral Microbleeds: Different Prevalence, Topography, and Risk Factors Depending on Dementia Diagnosis—The Karolinska Imaging Dementia Study. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 36, 661–666 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Thrippleton MJ et al. Quantifying blood-brain barrier leakage in small vessel disease: Review and consensus recommendations. Alzheimer’s and Dementia vol. 15 840–858 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yates PA et al. Incidence of cerebral microbleeds in preclinical Alzheimer disease. Neurology 82, 1266–1273 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wardlaw JM, Smith C. & Dichgans M. Small vessel disease: mechanisms and clinical implications. Lancet Neurol. 18, 684–696 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Jack CR et al. NIA-AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s and Dementia vol. 14 535–562 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Caserta MT, Caccioppo D, Lapin GD, Ragin A. & Groothuis DR Blood–Brain Barrier Integrity in Alzheimer’s Disease Patients and Elderly Control Subjects. J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 10, 78–84 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dysken MW, Nelson MJ, Hoover KM, Kuskowski M. & McGeachie R. Rapid dynamic CT scanning in primary degenerative dementia and age-matched controls. Biol. Psychiatry 28, 425–434 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Schlageter NL, Carson RE & Rapoport SI Examination of Blood — Brain Barrier Permeability in Dementia of the Alzheimer Type with [ 68 Ga]EDTA and Positron Emission Tomography. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 7, 1–8 (1987). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wang H, Golob EJ & Su MY Vascular volume and blood-brain barrier permeability measured by dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in hippocampus and cerebellum of patients with MCI and normal controls. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 24, 695–700 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ha IH et al. Regional Differences in Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability in Cognitively Normal Elderly Subjects: A Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI-Based Study. Korean J. Radiol. 22, 1152 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Montagne A. et al. APOE4 leads to blood–brain barrier dysfunction predicting cognitive decline. Nature 581, 71–76 (2020). This study found that individuals bearing APOE4 (e3/e4 or e4/e4 alleles) are distinguished from those without APOE4 (e3/e3) by breakdown of the blood-brain barrier in the hippocampus and medial temporal lobe, and that high baseline levels of the blood-brain barrier pericyte injury biomarker soluble PDGFRb in the cerebrospinal fluid predicts future cognitive decline in APOE4 carriers but not in non-carriers independently of Alzheimer’s disease pathology.
- 36.Montagne A. et al. Undetectable gadolinium brain retention in individuals with an age-dependent blood-brain barrier breakdown in the hippocampus and mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimers Dement. 15, 1568–1575 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Moon W-J et al. Hippocampal blood–brain barrier permeability is related to the APOE4 mutation status of elderly individuals without dementia. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 41, 1351–1361 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Verheggen ICM et al. Increase in blood–brain barrier leakage in healthy, older adults. GeroScience 42, 1183–1193 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Verheggen ICM et al. Imaging the role of blood–brain barrier disruption in normal cognitive ageing. GeroScience (2020) doi: 10.1007/s11357-020-00282-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Li Y. et al. The relationship between blood–brain barrier permeability and enlarged perivascular spaces: A cross-sectional study. Clin. Interv. Aging 14, 871–878 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Freeze WM et al. White matter hyperintensities mediate the association between blood-brain barrier leakage and information processing speed. Neurobiol. Aging 85, 113–122 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Li M, Li Y, Zuo L, Hu W. & Jiang T. Increase of blood-brain barrier leakage is related to cognitive decline in vascular mild cognitive impairment. BMC Neurol. 21, 159 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Milikovsky DZ et al. Paroxysmal slow cortical activity in Alzheimer’s disease and epilepsy is associated with blood-brain barrier dysfunction. Sci. Transl. Med. 11, 8954 (2019). This study identified paroxysmal slow wave events as an electroencephalogram manifestation of nonconvulsive seizures in patients with Alzheimer’s’ disease and suggested blood-brain barrier pathology as an underlying mechanism and as a promising therapeutic target.
- 44. Van De Haar HJ et al. Blood-brain barrier leakage in patients with early Alzheimer disease. Radiology 281, 527–535 (2016). Using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging this study showed blood-brain barrier breakdown in the cortex, white matter and some deep grey matter regions during early stages of Alzheimer’s disease.
- 45.Van de Haar HJ et al. Neurovascular unit impairment in early Alzheimer’s disease measured with magnetic resonance imaging. Neurobiol. Aging 45, 190–196 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Van De Haar HJ et al. Subtle blood-brain barrier leakage rate and spatial extent: Considerations for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Med. Phys. 44, 4112–4125 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kerkhofs D. et al. Blood–brain barrier leakage at baseline and cognitive decline in cerebral small vessel disease: a 2-year follow-up study. GeroScience (2021) doi: 10.1007/s11357-021-00399-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Shao X. et al. Comparison Between Blood-Brain Barrier Water Exchange Rate and Permeability to Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent in an Elderly Cohort. Front. Neurosci. 14, 571480 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Uchida Y. et al. Iron leakage owing to blood–brain barrier disruption in small vessel disease CADASIL. Neurology 95, e1188–e1198 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wong SM et al. Blood-brain barrier impairment and hypoperfusion are linked in cerebral small vessel disease. Neurology 92, e1669–e1677 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zhang CE et al. Blood–brain barrier leakage in relation to white matter hyperintensity volume and cognition in small vessel disease and normal aging. Brain Imaging Behav. 13, 389 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Wardlaw JM et al. Blood-brain barrier failure as a core mechanism in cerebral small vessel disease and dementia: evidence from a cohort study. Alzheimers Dement. 13, 634–643 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- 53.Rosenberg GA et al. Validation of biomarkers in subcortical ischaemic vascular disease of the Binswanger type: approach to targeted treatment trials. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 86, 1324–1330 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Al-Bachari S, Naish JH, Parker GJM, Emsley HCA & Parkes LM Blood–Brain Barrier Leakage Is Increased in Parkinson’s Disease. Front. Physiol. 11, (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Drouin-Ouellet J. et al. Cerebrovascular and blood-brain barrier impairments in Huntington’s disease: Potential implications for its pathophysiology. Ann. Neurol. 78, 160–177 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Senatorov VV et al. Blood-brain barrier dysfunction in aging induces hyperactivation of TGFβ signaling and chronic yet reversible neural dysfunction. Sci. Transl. Med. 11, eaaw8283 (2019). This study identified dysfunction in the neurovascular unit and blood-brain barrier as one of the earliest triggers of neurological aging, and demonstrated that the aging brain may retain considerable latent capacity which can be revitalized by therapeutic inhibition of transforming growth factor β signalling.
- 57.Barnes SR et al. Optimal acquisition and modeling parameters for accurate assessment of low K-trans blood-brain barrier permeability using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 75, 1967–1977 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Sweeney MD et al. A novel sensitive assay for detection of a biomarker of pericyte injury in cerebrospinal fluid. Alzheimers Dement. 16, 821–830 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Bennett M. et al. Molecular clutch drives cell response to surface viscosity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 115, 1192–1197 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Park L. et al. Tau induces PSD95–neuronal NOS uncoupling and neurovascular dysfunction independent of neurodegeneration. Nat. Neurosci. 1–11 (2020) doi: 10.1038/s41593-020-0686-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Pan C. et al. Diagnostic Values of Cerebrospinal Fluid T-Tau and Aβ42 using Meso Scale Discovery Assays for Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Alzheimers Dis. 45, 709–719 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Bell RD et al. Apolipoprotein E controls cerebrovascular integrity via cyclophilin A. Nature 485, 512–516 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Stanciu C, Trifan A, Muzica C. & Sfarti C. Efficacy and safety of alisporivir for the treatment of hepatitis C infection. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 20, 379–384 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Heringa SM et al. Multiple microbleeds are related to cerebral network disruptions in patients with early Alzheimer’s disease. J. Alzheimers Dis. 38, 211–221 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Zonneveld HI et al. Prevalence of cortical superficial siderosis in a memory clinic population. Neurology 82, 698–704 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Poliakova T, Levin O, Arablinskiy A, Vasenina E. & Zerr I. Cerebral microbleeds in early Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurol. 263, 1961–1968 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Barisano G. et al. Clinical 7 T MRI: Are we there yet? A review about magnetic resonance imaging at ultra-high field. Br. J. Radiol. 92, 20180492 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Brundel M. et al. High prevalence of cerebral microbleeds at 7Tesla MRI in patients with early Alzheimer’s disease. J. Alzheimers Dis. 31, 259–263 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Akoudad S. et al. Association of cerebral microbleeds with cognitive decline and dementia. JAMA Neurol. 73, 934–943 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Nakamori M. et al. Lobar microbleeds are associated with cognitive impairment in patients with lacunar infarction. Sci. Rep. 10, 16410 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Toth L. et al. Traumatic brain injury-induced cerebral microbleeds in the elderly. GeroScience 43, 125–136 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Chai AB, Leung GKF, Callaghan R. & Gelissen IC P-glycoprotein: a role in the export of amyloid-β in Alzheimer’s disease? FEBS J. 287, 612–625 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Deo AK et al. Activity of P-glycoprotein, a β-amyloid transporter at the blood-brain barrier, is compromised in patients with mild Alzheimer disease. J. Nucl. Med. 55, 1106–1111 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Olsson B. et al. CSF and blood biomarkers for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 15, 673–684 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Janelidze S. et al. Increased blood-brain barrier permeability is associated with dementia and diabetes but not amyloid pathology or APOE genotype. Neurobiol. Aging 51, 104–112 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Miners JS, Kehoe PG, Love S, Zetterberg H. & Blennow K. CSF evidence of pericyte damage in Alzheimer’s disease is associated with markers of blood-brain barrier dysfunction and disease pathology. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 11, 81 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Sweeney MD et al. Vascular dysfunction-The disregarded partner of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 15, 158–167 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Ghosh M. et al. Pericytes are involved in the pathogenesis of cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy. Ann. Neurol. 78, 887–900 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Wardlaw JM et al. Lacunar stroke is associated with diffuse Blood-Brain barrier dysfunction. Ann. Neurol. 65, 194–202 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Montagne A. et al. Pericyte degeneration causes white matter dysfunction in the mouse central nervous system. Nat. Med. 24, 326–337 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 81.Debette S, Schilling S, Duperron MG, Larsson SC & Markus HS Clinical Significance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Markers of Vascular Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol. 76, 81–94 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Wardlaw JM et al. Perivascular spaces in the brain: anatomy, physiology and pathology. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 16, 137–153 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Passiak BS et al. Perivascular spaces contribute to cognition beyond other small vessel disease markers. Neurology 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007124 (2019) doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Laveskog A. et al. Associations of Vascular Risk Factors and APOE Genotype With Perivascular Spaces Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 9, e015229 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Javierre-Petit C. et al. Neuropathologic and Cognitive Correlates of Enlarged Perivascular Spaces in a Community-Based Cohort of Older Adults. Stroke 51, 2825–2833 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Sepehrband F. et al. Volumetric distribution of perivascular space in relation to mild cognitive impairment. Neurobiol. Aging 99, 28–43 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Knopman DS, Petersen RC & Jack CR A brief history of ‘Alzheimer disease’: Multiple meanings separated by a common name. Neurology vol. 92 1053–1059 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Hampel H. et al. Developing the ATX(N) classification for use across the Alzheimer disease continuum. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 17, 580–589 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Caselli RJ et al. Neuropsychological decline up to 20 years before incident mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimers Dement. 16, 512–523 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Nation DA et al. Neuropsychological decline improves prediction of dementia beyond Alzheimer’s disease biomarker and mild cognitive impairment diagnoses. J. Alzheimers Dis. 69, 1171–1182 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Duke Han S, Nguyen CP, Stricker NH & Nation DA Detectable Neuropsychological Differences in Early Preclinical Alzheimer’s Disease: A Meta-Analysis. Neuropsychology Review vol. 27 305–325 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Thomas KR et al. Objective subtle cognitive difficulties predict future amyloid accumulation and neurodegeneration. Neurology 94, e397–e406 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Raja R, Rosenberg GA & Caprihan A. MRI measurements of Blood-Brain Barrier function in dementia: A review of recent studies. Neuropharmacology vol. 134 259–271 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Gulani V, Calamante F, Shellock FG, Kanal E. & Reeder SB Gadolinium deposition in the brain: summary of evidence and recommendations. Lancet Neurol. 16, 564–570 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Kilbourn MR Small Molecule PET Tracers for Transporter Imaging. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine vol. 47 536–552 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Karikari TK et al. Blood phosphorylated tau 181 as a biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease: a diagnostic performance and prediction modelling study using data from four prospective cohorts. Lancet Neurol. 19, 422–433 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Palmqvist S. et al. Discriminative Accuracy of Plasma Phospho-tau217 for Alzheimer Disease vs Other Neurodegenerative Disorders. JAMA (2020) doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.12134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Barthélemy NR, Horie K, Sato C. & Bateman RJ Blood plasma phosphorylated-tau isoforms track CNS change in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Exp. Med. 217, (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.O’Connor A. et al. Plasma phospho-tau181 in presymptomatic and symptomatic familial Alzheimer’s disease: a longitudinal cohort study. Mol. Psychiatry 1–10 (2020) doi: 10.1038/s41380-020-0838-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Abbasi J. NIH Consortium to Study Biomarkers for Dementia. JAMA 317, 1614 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]