Abstract
The current study quantified sex differences in psychopathology among 9 and 10-year-olds, examined sex differences among those with clinically elevated symptoms and investigated if puberty moderates the relationship between sex and psychopathology. Data were obtained from the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD)® Study’s NDA data release 2.0. Results suggest that males have higher scores and greater frequency of clinically meaningful levels of psychopathology across several domains. Puberty did not interact with sex to affect psychopathology. However, as puberty advanced, the percentage of males and females with elevated scores increased.
Keywords: Psychopathology, pediatric mental health, epidemiology
1. Introduction
There is empirical evidence for sex differences in childhood mental health symptoms, with boys showing more aggression and noncompliance, and girls having more anxiety and depression (Chaplin & Aldao, 2013). Other studies suggest that sex differences in depression do not emerge until later adolescence (Wade et al., 2002). Early puberty is related to psychopathology across adolescence in both sexes (see Ullsperger & Nikolas, 2017 for review). Understanding sex differences and the role of puberty in children may clarify periods of risk and inform the developmental course of mental health disorders. The current study examines a large, diverse, sample of 9–10-year-olds to identify sex differences (1) in psychopathology, (2) among those with clinically elevated symptoms and (3) in pubertal effects on psychopathology.
2. Methods
Data were obtained from the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) ® Study’s NDA data release 2.0, which included data from 11,875 9–10-year-olds recruited from 22 sites across the United States. Exclusion criteria were minimal (Garavan et al., 2018). Participants provided informed consent/assent and study protocols were IRB approved.
11,384 participants (Medage=119 months; 47.9% female) had complete Child Behavior Checklists (CBCL; Achenbach, 2009). These parent-reported scales yield dimensional scores and clinical cut-offs (T-Score > 60) for eight syndromes (anxious/depressed, withdrawn/depressed, somatic complaints, social problems, thought problems, attention problems, rule-breaking behavior and aggressive behavior).
Random estimation mixed model analyses were conducted in SPSS to examine sex differences for each CBCL syndrome. Family was nested within site as a random factor to account for sibling relationships. Parent-reported sex was the predictor; and race/ethnicity, highest household education (HHE), pubertal development score (PDS; Petersen et al., 1988) and age were covariates. Raw CBCL scores were log transformed to correct for skewness. To account for multiple testing, an a priori alpha of p < .005 was used in all analyses.
To determine if sex differences were clinically meaningful, logistic regressions were conducted using sex to predict the likelihood of having a T-score>60 for each syndrome. Covariates were the same as above except age is adjusted for in T-scores and therefore was not included. To account for family relationships, we randomly included one participant for sibling pairs (N = 9595 after sibling exclusion).
Pubertal effects were examined using linear mixed models with puberty, sex and the interaction term as predictors and raw syndrome scores as DVs. All remaining covariates were included. Chi-square analyses were run separately by sex to assess the frequency of having any clinically elevated subscale score.
3. Results
There was a main effect of sex, with males having higher scores than females on all syndromes except anxious/depressed and somatic complaints (Table 1). Males were more likely than females to have clinically elevated scores on withdrawn/depressed, attention problems, aggressive behavior and social problems scales (Table 1). Mixed models revealed no interaction of sex and puberty on any syndrome. There was a main effect of puberty on all syndromes except anxious/depressed. The frequency of having a clinically elevated score was greater for participants of both sexes as puberty advanced (Table 1).
Table 1.
Sex differences and effects of puberty on CBCL Syndromes in 9-10 year-olds.
| AIM 1a | Estimates | p-value | SE | 95% CI (L, U) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DV: Syndrome raw score | |||||
| Anxious/Depressed | Sex | .007 | .315 | .007 | −.007, .022 |
| Withdrawn/Depressed | Sex | .044 | <.001 | .006 | .032, .055 |
| Somatic Complaints | Sex | −.009 | .149 | .006 | −.022, .003 |
| Social Problems | Sex | .046 | <.001 | .007 | .033, .059 |
| Thought Problems | Sex | .075 | <.001 | .006 | .062, .087 |
| Attention Problems | Sex | .148 | <.001 | .008 | .132, .164 |
| Rule-Breaking | Sex | .010 | <.001 | .006 | .088, .111 |
| Aggressive Behavior | Sex | .104 | <.001 | .008 | .088, .121 |
| AIM 2b | Estimates (SE) |
p-value | Exp | 95% CI Exp (L, U) | |
| DV: Above Clinical Threshold | |||||
| Anxious/Depressed | Sex | .020 (.089) | .827 | 1.020 | .856, 1.214 |
| Withdrawn/Depressed | Sex | 1.000 (.102) |
<.001 | 2.719 | 2.227, 3.320 |
| Somatic Complaints | Sex | −.010 (.085) | .906 | .990 | .837, 1.170 |
| Social Problems | Sex | .966 (.135) | <.001 | 2.627 | 2.017, 3.422 |
| Thought Problems | Sex | .189 (.089) | .034 | 1.208 | 1.014, 1.439 |
| Attention Problems | Sex | .483 (.094) | <.001 | 1.621 | 1.349,1.948 |
| Rule-Breaking | Sex | .211 (.122) | .084 | 1.235 | .972, 1.569 |
| Aggressive Behavior | Sex | .629 (.110) | <.001 | 1.876 | 1.512, 2.327 |
| AIM 3c, d | Estimates | p-value | SE | 95% CI (L, U) | |
| DV: Syndrome Score | |||||
| Anxious/Depressed | Sex | .009 | .590 | .017 | −.024, .042 |
| PDS | .015 | .008 | .006 | .004, .026 | |
| Sex X PDS | −.001 | .917 | .009 | −.019, .017 | |
| Withdrawn/Depressed | Sex | .050 | <.001 | .013 | .025, .076 |
| PDS | .020 | <.001 | .004 | .011, .028 | |
| Sex X PDS | −.004 | .567 | .007 | −.018, .010 | |
| Somatic Complaints | Sex | −.001 | .934 | .014 | −.029, .027 |
| PDS | .020 | <.001 | .005 | .010, .029 | |
| Sex X PDS | −.005 | .534 | .008 | −.020, .011 | |
| Social Problems | Sex | .028 | .063 | .015 | −.001, .057 |
| PDS | .020 | <.001 | .005 | .010, .030 | |
| Sex X PDS | .011 | .175 | .008 | −.005, .027 | |
| Thought Problems | Sex | .049 | .001 | .015 | .020, .077 |
| PDS | .008 | .099 | .005 | −.001, .017 | |
| Sex X PDS | .016 | .048 | .008 | .000, .032 | |
| Attention Problems | Sex | .133 | <.001 | .018 | .098, .169 |
| PDS | .017 | .004 | .006 | .006, .029 | |
| Sex X PDS | .009 | .367 | .010 | −.011, .029 | |
| Rule-Breaking | Sex | .067 | <.001 | .013 | .040, .093 |
| PDS | .022 | <.001 | .004 | .013, .030 | |
| Sex X PDS | .020 | .005 | .007 | .006, .035 | |
| Aggressive Behavior | Sex | .083 | <.001 | .019 | .046, .121 |
| PDS | .023 | <.001 | .006 | .011, .035 | |
| Sex X PDS | .013 | .218 | .010 | −.008, .033 | |
| 1 or More Syndromes Above Clinical Threshold X Pubertal Status | |||||
| MALES | FEMALES | ||||
| Pre-Puberty | 1,027 (24.71 %) | X2 (2) = 12.71, p = .002 |
315 (18.81%) | X2 (2) = 11.85, p = .003 | |
| Early Puberty | 365 (25.54%) | 277 (21.61%) | |||
| Mid to Late Puberty | 117 (33.33%) | 582 (23.27%) | |||
Mixed model analyses of sex differences on each syndrome raw score.
Logistic regressions of sex differences in the likelihood of being above the clinical threshold (T-score>60) for each syndrome.
Mixed models of pubertal status (PDS) X sex on each syndrome raw score.
Chi-square of the frequency (n (%)) of one or more clinically elevated syndromes (T-score>60) at each level of puberty.
Sex estimates are for males.
4. Discussion
Our results show that males, age 9-10 have greater parent-reported psychopathology than females. Specifically, males have higher scores and greater likelihood of clinically elevated scores on withdrawn/depressed, attention problems, aggressive behavior and social problems. Females do not have higher scores or more frequent clinical elevation on any syndrome, including anxious/depressed. This is inconsistent with the suggestion that girls have greater anxiety in childhood (Chaplin & Aldao, 2013). While females were more advanced in puberty (70% of males were prepubescent versus 31% of females), puberty did not interact with sex in any model. However, as puberty advanced, both sexes were more likely to have a clinically elevated syndrome score. Consistent with previous research, this suggests that among 9–10-year-olds, early puberty is associated with psychopathology in both sexes (e.g. Ullsperger & Nikolas, 2017). It will be important to continue to characterize pubertal timing and psychopathology trajectories in both sexes within this large, demographically diverse sample.
Data used in the preparation of this article were obtained from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development SM Study (ABCD Study®) (https://abcdstudy.org), held in the NIMH Data Archive (NDA). The ABCD Study is supported by the National Institutes of Health and additional federal partners
A full list of supporters is available at https://abcdstudy.org/federal-partners/. A listing of participating sites and a complete listing of the study investigators can be found at https://abcdstudy.org/principal-investigators.html. This manuscript reflects the views of the authors and may not reflect the opinions or views of the NIH or ABCD Study consortium investigators.
Highlights.
9 to 10-year-old males had greater overall psychopathology across multiple syndromes.
Males had a greater likelihood of clinically elevated scores.
Puberty did not interact with sex to affect psychopathology.
As puberty advanced, percentage of males and females with elevated scores increased.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
No conflict of interests to disclose
References
- Achenbach TM, 2009. The Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA): Development, findings, theory, and applications. Burlington: University of Vermont Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families. [Google Scholar]
- Chaplin TM, Aldao A, 2013. Gender differences in emotion expression in children: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull. 139, 735–765. 10.1037/a0030737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garavan H, Bartsch H, Conway K, Decastro A, Goldstein RZ, Heeringa S, Jernigan T, Potter A, Thompson W, Zahs D, 2018. Recruiting the ABCD sample: Design considerations and procedures. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci 32, 16–22. 10.1016/j.dcn.2018.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Petersen AC, Crockett L, Richards M, Boxer A, 1988. A self-report measure of pubertal status: Reliability, validity, and initial norms. J. Youth. Adolesc 17, 117–133. 10.1007/BF01537962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ullsperger JM, & Nikolas MA, 2017. A meta-analytic review of the association between pubertal timing and psychopathology in adolescence: Are there sex differences in risk? Psychol Bull. 143, 903–938. 10.1037/bul0000106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wade TJ, Cairney J, Pevalin DJ, 2002. Emergence of gender differences in depression during adolescence: national panel results from three countries. J. Am. Acad. Child. Adolesc. Psychiatry 41, 190–198. 10.1097/00004583-200202000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
