Skip to main content
microPublication Biology logoLink to microPublication Biology
. 2022 Apr 19;2022:10.17912/micropub.biology.000556. doi: 10.17912/micropub.biology.000556

Partial 18S ribosomal DNA sequences of nematode species collected in South Korea

Jihye Yoon 1,#, Daye Kwon 2,#, Jun Kim 3,§, Junho Lee 4,§
Reviewed by: Anonymous
PMCID: PMC9019596  PMID: 35622516

Abstract

Free-living nematodes are important model organisms in biology, and they can be collected from various materials including rotten fruit, plant, and soil. In order to explore the diversity of free-living nematodes in South Korea, we collected and isolated nematodes from rotten fruit matter from Seoul and Jeju island. Here, we report partial 18S ribosomal DNA sequences of the nematodes that we collected in South Korea between June and July of 2021. Three newly identified sequences are included.


Figure 1. Pairwise alignments between rDNA sequences of the three previously reported species and the new nematode sequences identified in this study.

Figure 1. Pairwise alignments between rDNA sequences of the three previously reported species and the new nematode sequences identified in this study.

Red arrowheads represent gaps and blue arrowheads represent mismatches. (A) Alignment of our OM688231.1 sequence to rDNA sequence of Panagrolaimus cf. rigidus (DQ285636.1). (B) Alignment of our OM688232.1 sequence to rDNA sequence of Panagrolaimus sp. FL-SType-9 (EU040129.1). (C) Alignment of our OM688233.1 sequence to rDNA sequence of Oscheius chongmingensis (MT548590.1).

Description

Free-living nematodes are important model organisms in biology, and they can be collected from various materials including rotten fruit, plant, and soil (Barrière and Félix 2005; Nigon and Félix 2017). In order to explore the diversity of free-living nematodes in South Korea, we collected and isolated nematodes from rotten fruit matter from Seoul and Jeju island. Then, we cultured them and extracted DNA to identify species through partial ribosomal RNA gene (rDNA) sequencing. Here, we report a subset of species that we collected in South Korea during June and July of 2021 ( Table 1 ).

Among 30 different samples collected from 14 rotten fruits, Caenorhabditis briggsae was the major species (n=15), followed by Chylorhabditis epuraeae (n=5). While most of the fruits had been occupied by one dominant species, we observed multiple species from 2 out of the 14 fruits (Samples 1 and 9 in Table 1 ). In addition, the majority (n=24) of the samples matched with the preexisting species and their rDNA sequences on the NCBI database, including Auanema freiburgensis ( KY680647.1 ) (Isolate 1), Caenorhabditis briggsae ( MN519141.1 ) (Isolates 2–16) , Chylorhabditis epuraeae ( LC570777.1 ) (Isolates 17–21) , Oscheius sp. IR ( MW667590.1 ) (Isolate 24) , and Oscheius tipulae ( MH983026.1 ) (Isolates 25–26).

Interestingly, we identified three species (n=6) that do not have perfect matching preexisting rDNA sequences on the NCBI database (Figure 1). Initially, these samples were determined to be closest to Panagrolaimus cf. rigidus ( DQ285636.1 ; n=2; Isolates 27–28), Panagrolaimus sp. FL-SType-9 ( EU040129.1 ; n=2; Isolates 29–30) and Oscheius chongmingensis ( MT548590.1 ; n=2; Isolates 22–23). However, each of their identity matched with Panagrolamus cf. rigidus by 98% (579/592; Figure 1A) , Panagrolaimus sp. FL-SType-9 by 99% (575/578; Figure 1B), and Oscheius chongmingensis by 83% (355/428; Figure 1C). The two isolates obtained from each species had identical variants and such variants were confirmed manually by examining graphical variant peaks. Thus, we concluded that the mismatch in identity in each species could be seen as real variants and not a sequencing error. This suggests that they are either novel species, species without reported rDNA sequences, or genetically divergent individuals of previously reported species. Therefore, in this paper, we report three rDNA sequences that have not been reported earlier. Their partial rDNA sequences are available in the NCBI database under accession numbers OM688231–OM688233.

Table 1. Sampling information

Isolate

Sample

Date

(Latitude,

longitude)

Material

Location

Closest species name

Sequence ID

Accession of newly identified sequences

1

1

7/9/2021

(33.26189,126.42172)

Tangerine

Jeju island

Auanema freiburgensis

KY680647.1

2

2

6/29/2021

(37.45424,126.95374)

Persimmon

Seoul

Caenorhabditis briggsae

MN519141.1

3

2

6/29/2021

(37.45424,126.95374)

Persimmon

Seoul

Caenorhabditis briggsae

MN519141.1

4

2

6/29/2021

(37.45424,126.95374)

Persimmon

Seoul

Caenorhabditis briggsae

MN519141.1

5

2

6/29/2021

(37.45424,126.95374)

Persimmon

Seoul

Caenorhabditis briggsae

MN519141.1

6

3

6/29/2021

(37.45424,126.95374)

Persimmon

Seoul

Caenorhabditis briggsae

MN519141.1

7

3

6/29/2021

(37.45424,126.95374)

Persimmon

Seoul

Caenorhabditis briggsae

MN519141.1

8

3

6/29/2021

(37.45424,126.95374)

Persimmon

Seoul

Caenorhabditis briggsae

MN519141.1

9

4

7/2/2021

(37.56210,126.89571)

Armenian plum

Seoul

Caenorhabditis briggsae

MN519141.1

10

4

7/2/2021

(37.56210,126.89571)

Armenian plum

Seoul

Caenorhabditis briggsae

MN519141.1

11

4

7/2/2021

(37.56210,126.89571)

Armenian plum

Seoul

Caenorhabditis briggsae

MN519141.1

12

1

7/9/2021

(33.26189,126.42172)

Tangerine

Jeju island

Caenorhabditis briggsae

MN519141.1

13

5

7/9/2021

(33.26191,126.42175)

Tangerine

Jeju island

Caenorhabditis briggsae

MN519141.1

14

5

7/9/2021

(33.26191,126.42175)

Tangerine

Jeju island

Caenorhabditis briggsae

MN519141.1

15

5

7/9/2021

(33.26191,126.42175)

Tangerine

Jeju island

Caenorhabditis briggsae

MN519141.1

16

6

7/9/2021

(33.26183,126.42200)

Tangerine

Jeju island

Caenorhabditis briggsae

MN519141.1

17

7

7/23/2021

(37.55013,127.16773)

Chinese plum

Seoul

Chylorhabditis epuraeae

LC570777.1

18

7

7/23/2021

(37.55013,127.16773)

Chinese plum

Seoul

Chylorhabditis epuraeae

LC570777.1

19

7

7/23/2021

(37.55013,127.16773)

Chinese plum

Seoul

Chylorhabditis epuraeae

LC570777.1

20

8

7/19/2021

(37.56202,126.89667)

Persimmon

Seoul

Chylorhabditis epuraeae

LC570777.1

21

8

7/19/2021

(37.56202,126.89667)

Persimmon

Seoul

Chylorhabditis epuraeae

LC570777.1

22

1

7/9/2021

(33.26189,126.42172)

Tangerine

Jeju island

Oscheius chongmingensis

MT548590.1

OM688233

23

9

7/9/2021

(33.26192,126.42178)

Tangerine

Jeju island

Oscheius chongmingensis

MT548590.1

OM688233

24

10

7/9/2021

(33.26193,126.42194)

Tangerine

Jeju island

Oscheius sp. IR

MW667590.1

25

9

7/9/2021

(33.26192,126.42178)

Tangerine

Jeju island

Oscheius tipulae

MH983026.1

26

11

7/9/2021

(33.26187,126.42205)

Tangerine

Jeju island

Oscheius tipulae

MH983026.1

27

12

6/9/2021

(33.26186,126.42227)

Tangerine

Jeju island

Panagrolaimus cf. rigidus

DQ285636.1

OM688231

28

13

6/9/2021

(33.26143,126.42175)

Tangerine

Jeju island

Panagrolaimus cf. rigidus

DQ285636.1

OM688231

29

14

6/9/2021

(33.26197,126.42221)

Tangerine

Jeju island

Panagrolaimus sp. FL-SType-9

EU040129.1

OM688232

30

14

6/9/2021

(33.26197,126.42221)

Tangerine

Jeju island

Panagrolaimus sp. FL-SType-9

EU040129.1

OM688232

Methods

For the nematode collection, we first collected rotten fruit matter - tangerine, persimmon, Armenian plum, Chinese plum - from Seoul and Jeju island. We isolated the nematodes on the day of collection. The fruits were washed and mixed with distilled water. After centrifugation, about 90% of the supernatant was removed and the pellet was mixed with the remaining supernatant. Then, the solution containing nematodes from each fruit was pipetted onto an NGM plate, and the nematodes were isolated to a new plate after 10 to15 minutes for further growth. Once initial nematodes laid eggs, we singled-out 3 adult female or hermaphrodite individuals from each plate onto new NGM plates.

After the populated growth of singled-out samples, we performed partial rDNA sequencing with nem1 and nem2 as primers (Foucher and Wilson 2002). Up to 20 bp at the beginning and the end of the sequence were trimmed by hand to remove ambiguities and primer sequences. The sequence was also trimmed for low quality. Finally, for the species diagnosis, we searched for matching sequences and species using NCBI BLAST (NCBI Resource Coordinators 2018).

Reagents

Primer set (5' to 3')nem1 (forward): GCA AGT CTG GTG CCA GCA GCnem2 (reverse): CCG TGT TGA GTC AAA TTA AG

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgments

this.convertHTML(ack)

Funding

Samsung Science and Technology Foundation [SSTF-BA1501-52] and National Research Foundation of Korea grant funded by the Korean government (MEST) [2019R1A6A1A10073437 to J.K.]

References

  1. Barrière A, Félix MA. High local genetic diversity and low outcrossing rate in Caenorhabditis elegans natural populations. Curr Biol. 2005 Jul 12;15(13):1176–1184}. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.06.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Foucher, A., and M. Wilson, 2002 Development of a polymerase chain reaction-based denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis technique to study nematode species biodiversity using the 18s rDNA gene. Molecular Ecology Notes 2 : 45-48.
  3. Nigon VM, Félix MA. History of research on C. elegans and other free-living nematodes as model organisms. WormBook. 2017 Sep 7;2017:1–84}. doi: 10.1895/wormbook.1.181.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from microPublication Biology are provided here courtesy of California Institute of Technology

RESOURCES