Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 20.
Published in final edited form as: J Invest Dermatol. 2010 Dec;130(12):2699–2701. doi: 10.1038/jid.2010.293

Paying “particle” attention to novel melanoma treatment strategies

Michele B Weiss 1, Andrew E Aplin 1
PMCID: PMC9020221  NIHMSID: NIHMS1796280  PMID: 21068733

Summary

Malignant melanoma remains the deadliest form of skin cancer due to its highly aggressive nature and the lack of effective treatments to combat it. Recent investigations into alternate melanoma treatment strategies have highlighted the exciting potential of nanoparticles in increasing melanoma cell delivery and efficacy of small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) or pharmacological inhibitors. In this issue, Chen et al. formulate a new liposomal nanoparticle for c-Myc siRNA delivery and find it highly effective in reducing c-Myc expression and inhibiting melanoma tumor growth in mouse models. Their preclinical studies underscore the importance of further investigating nanoparticle treatment options for chemo-resistant melanoma.

Introduction

The field of targeted therapeutic strategies in melanoma is entering exciting times. Malignant melanoma is the deadliest form of skin cancer and has for decades represented a paradigm for chemo-resistance. Current therapeutic options are poor and no new US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs have emerged in recent years. Current melanoma treatment mainstays, such as the alkylating agent, dacarbazine, and the immune-stimulating agent, IL-2, are plagued by lack of clinical benefit in the majority of patients and numerous side effects. However, highly encouraging results have been reported within the past fifteen months which have renewed hope that new FDA-approved drugs will be forthcoming. The phase I trial of the RAF inhibitor, RG7204/PLX4032 (Plexxikon, Inc.), found that approximately 75% of mutant B-RAF melanoma patients displayed responses by RECIST criteria (Flaherty et al., 2009). Additionally, a phase III study of Ipilimumab (Bristol-Myers Squibb), an anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) drug, improved overall median survival for metastatic melanoma patients that had received previous treatment (Hodi et al., 2010). While the outlook appears promising, some major difficulties still remain. For example, the majority of patients who initially responded to RG7204 have subsequently relapsed, raising concerns about acquired/secondary resistance. Also, despite the improved median survival data for Ipilimumab, the response rate was only 11%. Hence, the search for additional targeted therapies is urgently needed.

In this issue, an article from Chen et al. focuses on targeting c-Myc, a proto-oncogene that is well-studied in cancer. c-Myc is a basic helix-loop-helix leucine zipper transcription factor that is highly expressed in melanoma (Ross and Wilson, 1998). Importantly for the current study, c-Myc depletion in melanoma cells induces cell cycle arrest and a senescence-like phenotype (Zhuang et al., 2008). Conversely, over-expression of c-Myc in normal melanocytes inhibits mutant B-RAF-induced senescence (Zhuang et al., 2008). These phenotypes may result from alterations in the expression of several c-Myc transcriptional target genes which encode rate-limiting enzymes for dNTP metabolism (Mannava et al., 2008).

Nanoparticle-based melanoma treatment strategies

Chen et al. used a c-Myc siRNA depletion strategy combined with a unique liposomal nanoparticle formulation to increase siRNA stability and melanoma cell delivery. They developed nanoparticles formed from a DSAA carrier lipid, instead of the previously utilized DOTAP liposome particles, which were specifically targeted to melanoma cell sigma receptors via an anisamide ligand (DSAA AA+). Compared to DOTAP AA+ nanoparticles, the DSAA AA+ particles containing c-Myc siRNA evidenced higher melanoma cell delivery and c-Myc reduction in vivo. In addition, dose-dependent tumor growth inhibition was seen after intravenous administration of DSAA AA+ c-Myc siRNA particles in the syngeneic B16F10 mouse melanoma tumor model and in a human melanoma xenograft system. Perhaps the most striking finding was the complete growth inhibition of B16F10 mouse melanoma tumors when the DSAA AA+ c-Myc siRNA particles were administered in combination with paclitaxel chemotherapy. Interestingly, the biological properties of the DSAA carrier lipid itself seem to add an additional dimension to the potency of this melanoma treatment strategy. Empty DSAA nanoparticles were shown to increase ROS levels, decrease expression of the pro-survival protein Bcl-2, and increase apoptosis in B16F10 cells. Importantly, all treatments with DSAA nanoparticles were demonstrated to have low immunotoxicity. Taken together, these results highlight the potential of utilizing DSAA AA+ cationic nanoparticles to target gene expression as a new melanoma treatment option. These results, along with the possible chemotherapeutic drug combination avenues it opens, may one day offer real hope to advanced melanoma patients, especially those who may have acquired resistance to other treatments.

Chen and colleagues are not the first to utilize nanoparticles as a siRNA delivery vehicle to target melanoma tumors in preclinical assays. Tran et al. utilized topical applications of liposomal nanoparticles combined with ultrasound to promote B-RAFV600E-selective and Akt3 siRNAs to penetrate into the skin microenvironment and inhibit the growth of mutant B-RAF melanoma cells in 3-D in vitro and xenograft assays (Tran et al., 2008). These studies utilized DOTAP/DOPE/DSPE-PEG(2000)-formulated nanoparticles which may lack the ROS-generating effects observed with the DSAA-formulated nanoparticles used in the Chen et al. experiments. A separate study systemically delivered protease-activated receptor-1 siRNA incorporated into neutral DOPC liposomal nanoparticles (Villares et al., 2008). Importantly, protease-activated receptor-1 siRNA-containing liposomes decreased growth and metastasis of human melanoma cells in nude mice.

Non-liposomal nanoparticles have also been utilized of late as delivery systems for siRNAs and pharmacologic inhibitors into primary and metastatic melanoma tumors. Similar to the Chen et al. study in this issue, Zamora-avila and colleagues used the B16F10 mouse melanoma tumor model but instead focused on the treatment of melanoma lung metastases. They formulated Wilm’s tumor gene 1 siRNA-polyethylenimine nanoparticles and introduced them into the murine lung via an aerosol-based delivery system. Strikingly, these nanoparticles allowed for decreased lung tumor burden and increased survival without lung tissue damage or acute inflammatory response (Zamora-Avila et al., 2009). Yet another study expanded the scope of the use of nanoparticles to include pharmacological drug delivery with particular focus on improvement of sustained and targeted drug release. Basu et al. derived nanoparticles composed of a hexadentate-polylactic acid-glycolic acid polymer conjugated to the MEK pharmacologic inhibitor, PD98059. This formulation demonstrated increased inhibition of melanoma cell proliferation both in vitro and in vivo compared to traditional drug delivery methods (Basu et al., 2009). In addition, PD98059-conjugated nanoparticles could synergize with cisplatin treatment to demonstrate enhanced anti-tumor activity in the B16F10 mouse melanoma model.

Concluding remarks

Given the scarcity of effective treatment options available to patients with advanced melanoma, the dawn of nanoparticle delivery systems could not come at a better time. Future studies in the field should focus on potential combinations of siRNA- and chemotherapeutic/pharmacological inhibitor-contained nanoparticles since both formulations have been shown to increase delivery and effects. In addition, even though syngeneic mouse models such as B16F10 are highly important in the development of cancer therapies, it would be advantageous to extend these studies into models more relevant to human melanoma progression. Specifically, the recent conditional B-RAFV600E / PTEN-deficient metastatic melanoma mouse is an ideal disease model for preclinical studies of these nanoparticles (Dankort et al., 2009). Additional studies with human melanoma xenograft mice, which allow for representation of a wide range of melanoma genetic backgrounds and staging, would also be of value.

In conclusion, increasing evidence within the past several years has revealed that nanoparticles have the potential to improve the efficacy of current treatments and/or to open doors to strategies such as siRNA targeting which have been plagued with problems. The work of Chen et al. extends this area of research and finds that targeting melanoma tumor cells with c-Myc siRNA packaged within the new DSAA nanoparticle, alone or in combination with chemotherapy, can drastically inhibit melanoma tumor growth in several systems. These findings offer new hope for the future development of a potent and efficacious treatment strategy for advanced melanoma.

Clinical implications.

  1. Malignant melanoma is a paradigm for chemo-resistance.

  2. Nanoparticle delivery of siRNAs represents a selective approach to target any expressed mRNA in melanoma cells.

  3. c-Myc expression is elevated in melanoma and targeting c-Myc shows promise in in vivo preclinical assays.

References

  1. Basu S, Harfouche R, Soni S, Chimote G, Mashelkar RA, Sengupta S (2009) Nanoparticle-mediated targeting of MAPK signaling predisposes tumor to chemotherapy. Proc Natl Acad USA 106:7957–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dankort D, Curley DP, Cartlidge RA, Nelson B, Karnezis AN, Damsky WE Jr et al. (2009) Braf(V600E) cooperates with Pten loss to induce metastatic melanoma. Nat Genet 41:544–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Flaherty K, Puzanov I, Sosman J, Kim K, Ribas A, McArthur G et al. (2009) Phase I study of PLX4032: Proof of concept for V600E BRAF mutation as a therapeutic target in human cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:Abstract 9000. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hodi FS, O’Day SJ, McDermott DF, Weber RW, Sosman JA, Haanen JB et al. (2010) Improved survival with Ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med 363:711–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Mannava S, V G, LJ W, M I, D Z, EG S et al. (2008) Direct role of nucleotide metabolism in C-MYC-dependent proliferation of melanoma cells. Cell Cycle 7:2392–400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ross DA, Wilson GD (1998) Expression of c-myc oncoprotein represents a new prognostic marker in cutaneous melanoma. Br J Surg 85:46–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Tran MA, Gowda R, Sharma A, Park EJ, Adair J, Kester M et al. (2008) Targeting V600EB-Raf and Akt3 using nanoliposomal-small interfering RNA inhibits cutaneous melanocytic lesion development. Cancer Res 68:7638–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Villares GJ, Zigler M, Wang H, Melnikova VO, Wu H, Friedman R et al. (2008) Targeting melanoma growth and metastasis with systemic delivery of liposome-incorporated protease-activated receptor-1 small interfering RNA. Cancer Res 68:9078–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Zamora-Avila DE, Zapata-Benavides P, Franco-Molina MA, Saavedra-Alonso S, Trejo-Avila LM, Resendez-Perez D et al. (2009) WT1 gene silencing by aerosol delivery of PEI-RNAi complexes inhibits B16-F10 lung metastases growth. Cancer Gene Ther 16:892–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhuang D, Mannava S, Grachtchouk V, Tang WH, Patil S, Wawrzyniak JA et al. (2008) C-MYC overexpression is required for continuous suppression of oncogene-induced senescence in melanoma cells. Oncogene 27:6623–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES