Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2000 Dec;44(12):3351–3356. doi: 10.1128/aac.44.12.3351-3356.2000

Antibacterial Spectrum of a Novel Des-Fluoro(6) Quinolone, BMS-284756

Joan C Fung-Tomc 1,*, Beatrice Minassian 1, Benjamin Kolek 1, Elizabeth Huczko 1, Lauren Aleksunes 1, Terry Stickle 1, Thomas Washo 1, Elizabeth Gradelski 1, Lourdes Valera 1, Daniel P Bonner 1
PMCID: PMC90204  PMID: 11083639

Abstract

The in vitro spectrum of a novel des-fluoro(6) quinolone, BMS-284756, was compared with those of five fluoroquinolones (trovafloxacin, moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, ofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin). BMS-284756 was among the most active and often was the most active quinolone against staphylococci (including methicillin-resistant strains), streptococci, pneumococci (including ciprofloxacin-nonsusceptible and penicillin-resistant strains), and Enterococcus faecalis. BMS-284756 inhibited ≈60 to ≈70% of the Enterococcus faecium (including vancomycin-resistant) strains and 90 to 100% of the Enterobacteriaceae strains and gastroenteric bacillary pathogens at the anticipated MIC susceptible breakpoint (≤4 μg/ml). Against the nonfermenters, BMS-284756 inhibited 90 to 100% of Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas stutzeri, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Flavobacterium spp., and Acinetobacter spp. and 72% of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains at 4 μg/ml. Against anaerobic bacteria, BMS-284756 was among the most active, inhibiting essentially all strains tested. It had very low MICs against the fastidious and atypical microbial species, in particular against mycoplasmas or ureaplasmas, Borrelia burgdorferi, chlamydia, and gonococci. These results indicate that with its broad antibacterial spectrum, BMS-284756 should be evaluated clinically for the treatment of community and nosocomial infections.


BMS-284756 is a novel des-fluoro(6) quinolone. This means that BMS-284756 differs from recently approved quinolones (i.e., the fluoroquinolones included in this study and gatifloxacin) in that BMS-284756 lacks a fluorine at the C-6 position. BMS-284756 (also known as T-3811ME) has antibacterial activity similar to those of fluorinated quinolones, but the des-F(6) derivatives are less acutely toxic in mice (K. Hayashi, Y. Todo, S. Hamamoto, K. Ojima, M. Yamada, T. Kito, M. Takahata, Y. Watanbe, and H. Narita, Abstr. 37th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. F-158, 1997).

Quinolones can differ in their antibacterial spectra and potencies. Notable potency differences among quinolones occur in their activities versus gram-positive bacteria, pseudomonads, anaerobic bacteria, and mycobacteria. In the present study, the antibacterial spectrum of BMS-284756 is compared to those of five fluoroquinolones against 1,150 strains representing 66 bacterial species. While the antibacterial activity of BMS-284756 was reported previously by Takahata et al. (9), the present study included additional bacterial species and was performed using NCCLS-recommended susceptibility test methods, whenever they were available for specific bacterial groups.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Antimicrobial agents.

BMS-284756 was obtained from Toyama Chemical Co. Ltd., Toyama, Japan, and moxifloxacin (MFX) and ciprofloxacin (CIP) were obtained from Bayer Corporation, West Haven, Conn. Levofloxacin (LVX) and trovafloxacin (TVA) were extracted and purified from commercially available tablets and were determined to be ≥95% pure by high-performance liquid chromatography. Ofloxacin (OFX) was purchased from Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.

Bacterial strains.

All bacterial strains used in this study were clinical isolates obtained from numerous sources of broad geographical distribution. Isolates were maintained frozen in liquid nitrogen. Some of the quinolone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains were provided by Ronald Jones (University of Iowa, Iowa City).

Methicillin-susceptible (MS) Staphylococcus aureus was defined as strains for which oxacillin MICs were ≤2 μg/ml, and MS strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus haemolyticus were defined as strains for which oxacillin MICs were ≤0.25 μg/ml (4). Methicillin-resistant (MR) S. aureus strains were strains for which oxacillin MICs were ≥4 μg/ml, and MR S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus strains were strains for which oxacillin MICs were ≥0.5 μg/ml. Because the oxacillin MIC interpretative breakpoint does not correlate with mecA carriage in Staphylococcus saprophyticus (2), MS and MR categorization in this species was based on mecA detection by PCR testing. All of the S. saprophyticus strains in this study were mecA negative.

Growth inhibitory activity.

Determinations of the MICs for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria were performed by an agar dilution method in accordance with the procedure outlined by the NCCLS (4, 5). Other testing protocols used in this study were similar to those previously reported (1), with the following exceptions. Anaerobic bacterial susceptibility testing was done using brucella blood agar (5), Chlamydia pneumoniae with Hep-2 cells, and Borrelia burgdorferi with BSK H medium (Sigma).

The respective interpretative MIC breakpoints for strains susceptible, intermediate, and resistant to the quinolones are as follows: for TVA, ≤2, 4, and ≥8 μg/ml for general organisms (FDA-approved breakpoints), but ≤1, 2, and ≥4 μg/ml for Streptococcus pneumoniae and other streptococci (NCCLS-approved breakpoints), and ≤0.25 μg/ml for gonococci (susceptible breakpoint only); for MFX ≤2, 4, and ≥8 μg/ml for general organisms (FDA-approved breakpoints), but ≤1, 2, and ≥4 μg/ml for Streptococcus pneumoniae, with no interpretative MFX breakpoints for gonococci; for LVX and OFX, ≤2, 4, and ≥8 μg/ml for all organism groups (NCCLS-approved breakpoints), but for OFX only, ≤0.25, 0.5 to 1, and ≥2 μg/ml for gonococci; and for CIP, ≤1, 2, and ≥4 μg/ml for general organisms (NCCLS approved), with no interpretative criteria for Streptococcus pneumoniae and other streptococci, and ≤0.06, 0.12 to 0.5, and ≥1 μg/ml for gonococci (2).

The respective susceptible, intermediate, and resistant breakpoints used in the BMS-284756 clinical trials for this quinolone are ≤4, 8, and ≥16 μg/ml for the general organisms, ≤2, 4, and ≥8 μg/ml for MR S. aureus, and ≤2 (susceptible breakpoint only) for gonococci. The proposed ≤4-μg/ml susceptible breakpoint for BMS-284756 was based on a mean area under the curve (AUC) from 0 to infinity of 84.1 μg · h/ml following a single 400-mg oral dose of BMS-284756 (D. Gajjar, D. Grasela, A. Bello, Z. Ge, L. Christopher, Abstr. 40th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr 2259, 2000); this breakpoint is compared to the susceptible breakpoints of quinolones (TVA, MFX, LVX, and OFX) of ≤2 μg/ml and AUCs of 30 to 50 μg · h/ml (3a) following a single standard dose. For quinolones, the pharmacodynamic parameter most predictive of efficacy is the AUC/MIC ratio (6, 8). In this paper, ≤4 μg/ml was used as a point of reference in discussing the BMS-284756 MIC data.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

All of the results discussed in this section are listed in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

In vitro antibacterial activities of BMS-284756 and five comparative quinolones

Organism (n) Quinolonea MIC (μg/ml)
Range MIC50 (modal MIC)b MIC90
MS Staphylococcus aureus (27) BMS 0.016–0.03 0.03 0.03
TVA 0.016–0.06 0.03 0.06
MFX 0.03–0.06 0.06 0.06
LVX 0.12–0.25 0.25 0.25
OFX 0.12–0.25 0.25 0.25
CIP 0.12–0.5 0.25 0.5
MR Staphylococcus aureus (58) BMS 0.016–2 0.03 2
TVA 0.016–8 0.06 2
MFX 0.03–4 0.06 2
LVX 0.25–16 0.5 8
OFX 0.25–>16 1 16
CIP 0.25–>32 0.5 32
MS Staphylococcus epidermidis (10) BMS 0.03–0.06 0.03 0.03
TVA 0.03–0.06 0.06 0.06
MFX 0.06–0.12 0.12 0.12
LVX 0.12–0.25 0.25 0.25
OFX 0.25–0.5 0.5 0.5
CIP 0.12–0.5 0.25 0.5
MR Staphylococcus epidermidis (17) BMS 0.016–2 0.03 2
TVA 0.016–4 0.06 4
MFX 0.03–2 0.06 2
LVX 0.12–8 0.25 8
OFX 0.12–32 0.5 16
CIP 0.12–>64 0.25 64
MS Staphylococcus haemolyticus (10) BMS 0.03–0.12 0.03 0.03
TVA 0.03–0.12 0.06 0.06
MFX 0.03–0.12 0.06 0.12
LVX 0.12–0.25 0.12 0.25
OFX 0.25–1 0.25 0.5
CIP 0.25–0.5 0.25 0.25
MR Staphylococcus haemolyticus (18) BMS 0.03–8 0.03 4
TVA 0.03–16 0.06 16
MFX 0.06–8 0.06 4
LVX 0.12–32 0.25 16
OFX 0.25–>32 1 >32
CIP 0.25–>32 0.5 >32
mecA-negative Staphylococcus saprophyticus (15) BMS 0.06 0.06 0.06
TVA 0.06–0.12 0.12 0.12
MFX 0.12 0.12 0.12
LVX 0.25–0.5 0.5 0.5
OFX 1 1 1
CIP 0.5–1 0.5 0.5
Streptococcus pyogenes (10) BMS 0.06–0.25 0.06 0.25
TVA 0.03–0.12 0.06 0.12
MFX 0.12–0.5 0.25 0.25
LVX 0.25–1 0.5 1
OFX 1–2 2 2
CIP 0.5–1 0.5 1
Streptococcus agalactiae (10) BMS 0.06–0.12 0.12 0.12
TVA 0.12–0.25 0.12 0.25
MFX 0.25 0.25 0.25
LVX 1 1 1
OFX 2–4 2 4
CIP 1–2 2 2
Streptococcus groups C, G, and F (16) BMS 0.06–0.25 0.12 0.25
TVA 0.06–0.25 0.12 0.12
MFX 0.12–0.5 0.25 0.25
LVX 0.5–2 1 1
OFX 2–4 2 2
CIP 0.5–2 1 2
Streptococcus mitis (17) BMS 0.06–0.25 0.12 0.25
TVA 0.06–0.25 0.12 0.12
MFX 0.12–0.5 0.25 0.5
LVX 1–2 2 2
OFX 1–4 2 4
CIP 2–4 2 4
Streptococcus sanguis (18) BMS 0.06–0.25 0.12 0.25
TVA 0.06–0.25 0.12 0.25
MFX 0.12–0.5 0.25 0.5
LVX 1–2 2 2
OFX 2–4 2 4
CIP 1–4 2 4
Penicillin-susceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae (10) BMS 0.06–0.12 0.12 0.12
TVA 0.12–0.25 0.25 0.25
MFX 0.12–0.25 0.25 0.25
LVX 1–2 2 2
OFX 2–4 2 4
CIP 1–2 1 2
Penicillin-intermediate Streptococcus pneumoniae (10) BMS 0.06–0.12 0.06 0.12
TVA 0.12–0.25 0.12 0.25
MFX 0.12–0.5 0.25 0.25
LVX 1–2 1 2
OFX 2–4 2 4
CIP 1–4 2 2
Penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (10) BMS 0.06–0.12 0.06 0.12
TVA 0.06–0.25 0.12 0.25
MFX 0.25–0.5 0.25 0.5
LVX 1–2 1 2
OFX 2–4 2 4
CIP 1–8 1 2
Streptococcus pneumoniae strains for which the CIP MIC is ≥2 μg/ml (13) BMS 0.12–2 0.12 0.5
TVA 0.25–16 0.25 4
MFX 0.25–8 0.25 2
LVX 1–32 2 8
OFX 2–64 4 16
CIP 2–64 4 16
Enterococcus faecalis (18) BMS 0.25–2 0.25 0.5
TVA 0.25–8 0.5 0.5
MFX 0.25–8 0.25 0.5
LVX 1–32 1 2
OFX 2–>32 4 8
CIP 1–>32 2 2
Enterococcus faecium (13) BMS 0.06–8 4 8
TVA 0.06–8 0.5 4
MFX 0.12–16 1 4
LVX 0.5–32 2 4
OFX 0.5–>32 4 16
CIP 0.12–>32 2 8
VanA + VanB Enterococcus spp. (11)c BMS 0.25–32 4 8
TVA 0.25–16 2 8
MFX 0.25–32 2 8
LVX 1–64 2 32
OFX 2–>64 8 64
CIP 1–>64 4 >64
VanC Enterococcus spp. (8)d BMS 0.25–0.5 (0.25)
TVA 0.25–2 (0.25–0.5)
MFX 0.25–1 (0.25–0.5)
LVX 1–4 (2)
OFX 2–8 (4)
CIP 0.25–4 (1)
Listeria monocytogenes (17) BMS 0.25–0.5 0.5 0.5
TVA 0.12–0.25 0.25 0.25
MFX 0.25–0.5 0.5 0.5
LVX 1 1 1
OFX 1–2 2 2
CIP 1–2 1 1
Escherichia coli (18) BMS 0.03–0.06 0.06 0.06
TVA 0.03–0.06 0.03 0.06
MFX 0.03–0.12 0.06 0.06
LVX 0.016–0.06 0.03 0.06
OFX 0.016–0.06 0.06 0.06
CIP 0.004–0.03 0.016 0.016
Klebsiella pneumoniae (18) BMS 0.12–1 0.25 0.5
TVA 0.06–0.5 0.12 0.5
MFX 0.12–1 0.12 0.5
LVX 0.03–0.25 0.06 0.25
OFX 0.03–1 0.12 0.5
CIP 0.016–0.25 0.03 0.25
Klebsiella oxytoca (18) BMS 0.06–0.25 0.12 0.25
TVA 0.03–0.12 0.06 0.12
MFX 0.03–0.25 0.12 0.12
LVX 0.03–0.12 0.03 0.06
OFX 0.03–0.25 0.06 0.12
CIP 0.008–0.06 0.016 0.03
Enterobacter cloacae (18) BMS 0.06–0.5 0.12 0.5
TVA 0.06–0.5 0.12 0.5
MFX 0.06–0.5 0.06 0.25
LVX 0.03–0.25 0.03 0.12
OFX 0.06–1 0.06 0.12
CIP 0.008–0.25 0.016 0.03
Enterobacter aerogenes (17) BMS 0.03–1 0.12 0.25
TVA 0.03–0.5 0.06 0.12
MFX 0.03–1 0.12 0.25
LVX 0.03–0.5 0.06 0.12
OFX 0.06–1 0.06 0.12
CIP 0.008–0.25 0.016 0.06
Citrobacter freundii (18) BMS 0.06–4 0.12 2
TVA 0.03–4 0.06 1
MFX 0.06–8 0.12 1
LVX 0.03–2 0.03 1
OFX 0.06–4 0.06 1
CIP 0.004–2 0.016 0.25
Citrobacter koseri (18) BMS 0.03–0.5 0.03 0.25
TVA 0.016–0.5 0.03 0.25
MFX 0.03–0.5 0.03 0.25
LVX 0.03–0.5 0.03 0.06
OFX 0.03–1 0.06 0.25
CIP 0.004–0.5 0.008 0.06
Serratia marcescens (18) BMS 0.25–2 1 2
TVA 0.12–1 0.5 0.5
MFX 0.06–1 0.25 0.5
LVX 0.06–0.5 0.12 0.25
OFX 0.12–2 0.5 1
CIP 0.06–1 0.25 0.5
Proteus mirabilis (18) BMS 0.25–1 0.5 1
TVA 0.25–1 0.5 1
MFX 0.25–1 0.5 1
LVX 0.06–0.25 0.12 0.25
OFX 0.25–0.5 0.25 0.5
CIP 0.06–0.25 0.12 0.12
Proteus vulgaris (18) BMS 0.06–8 0.5 8
TVA 0.06–2 0.5 1
MFX 0.06–2 0.5 1
LVX 0.03–0.25 0.06 0.25
OFX 0.06–0.5 0.25 0.5
CIP 0.016–0.12 0.06 0.12
Morganella morganii (18) BMS 0.12–1 0.5 1
TVA 0.12–0.5 0.25 0.5
MFX 0.12–0.5 0.25 0.5
LVX 0.03–0.12 0.03 0.25
OFX 0.06–0.25 0.06 0.25
CIP 0.008–0.06 0.016 0.06
Providencia stuartii (18) BMS 0.12–8 0.25 2
TVA 0.12–4 0.25 1
MFX 0.25–8 0.25 2
LVX 0.12–8 0.12 8
OFX 0.06–>16 0.12 >16
CIP 0.25–>16 0.5 16
Providencia rettgeri (17) BMS 0.06–2 0.5 2
TVA 0.06–2 0.25 2
MFX 0.06–2 0.5 2
LVX 0.016–2 0.25 1
OFX 0.008–4 0.12 2
CIP 0.03–4 0.5 4
Salmonella spp. (18) BMS 0.008–0.25 0.06 0.12
TVA 0.016–0.25 0.06 0.12
MFX 0.03–0.25 0.12 0.25
LVX 0.06–0.5 0.25 0.25
OFX 0.03–0.25 0.12 0.12
CIP 0.008–0.03 0.016 0.03
Shigella spp. (18) BMS ≤0.001–0.06 0.03 0.03
TVA 0.004–0.06 0.03 0.03
MFX 0.004–0.06 0.06 0.06
LVX 0.008–0.03 0.03 0.03
OFX 0.016–0.06 0.06 0.06
CIP 0.004–0.03 0.016 0.03
Yersinia enterocolitica (13) BMS 0.03–0.06 0.06 0.06
TVA 0.03–0.12 0.06 0.06
MFX 0.06–0.12 0.06 0.12
LVX 0.016–0.06 0.03 0.06
OFX 0.03–0.12 0.06 0.12
CIP 0.004–0.03 0.03 0.03
Aeromonas hydrophila (16) BMS 0.06–1 0.12 0.5
TVA 0.03–0.25 0.03 0.12
MFX 0.016–0.12 0.03 0.12
LVX 0.008–0.03 0.008 0.03
OFX 0.008–0.06 0.016 0.06
CIP 0.002–0.016 0.004 0.016
Vibrio cholerae (13) BMS 0.001–0.25 0.004 0.008
TVA 0.004–0.12 0.004 0.008
MFX 0.008–0.12 0.016 0.03
LVX 0.004–0.12 0.008 0.008
OFX 0.008–0.12 0.008 0.016
CIP 0.002–0.004 0.002 0.004
Campylobacter jejuni (12) BMS 0.06–0.25 0.12 0.12
TVA 0.008–0.03 0.016 0.03
MFX 0.03–0.12 0.06 0.06
LVX 0.06–0.12 0.06 0.12
OFX 0.12–0.5 0.25 0.25
CIP 0.06–0.25 0.12 0.12
Pseudomonas aeruginosa (18) BMS 2–32 4 16
TVA 1–4 1 4
MFX 2–16 4 8
LVX 0.5–4 1 4
OFX 1–8 2 4
CIP 0.25–2 0.5 2
Pseudomonas fluorescens (15) BMS 0.5–8 1 8
TVA 0.12–4 0.5 4
MFX 0.25–16 1 16
LVX 0.12–2 0.25 2
OFX 0.25–8 0.5 8
CIP 0.06–2 0.12 1
Pseudomonas stutzeri (15) BMS 0.03–1 0.5 1
TVA 0.12–0.5 0.12 0.5
MFX 0.03–1 0.25 1
LVX 0.016–0.25 0.06 0.25
OFX 0.03–0.5 0.12 0.25
CIP 0.016–0.12 0.06 0.12
Burkholderia cepacia (18) BMS 4–32 8 16
TVA 1–4 2 4
MFX 2–8 2 4
LVX 2–8 2 4
OFX 4–8 8 8
CIP 2–16 4 8
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (18) BMS 0.25–8 2 4
TVA 0.12–4 0.5 1
MFX 0.12–4 0.5 1
LVX 0.25–8 0.5 2
OFX 1–8 2 8
CIP 1–32 4 8
Flavobacterium spp. (17) BMS 0.016–0.5 0.25 0.5
TVA 0.03–0.25 0.12 0.25
MFX 0.06–1 0.25 0.5
LVX 0.12–2 0.5 2
OFX 0.25–4 2 4
CIP 0.25–4 1 4
Acinetobacter baumannii (18) BMS 0.03–2 0.06 0.25
TVA 0.016–1 0.03 0.25
MFX 0.06–2 0.12 1
LVX 0.06–4 0.12 1
OFX 0.25–8 0.5 2
CIP 0.25–8 0.5 2
Acinetobacter lwoffii (18) BMS 0.03–0.25 0.06 0.12
TVA 0.016–0.12 0.03 0.06
MFX 0.03–1 0.06 0.25
LVX 0.06–1 0.12 0.25
OFX 0.12–2 0.25 1
CIP 0.12–2 0.25 1
Alcaligenes spp. (18) BMS 1–16 8 16
TVA 0.25–16 2 8
MFX 0.12–4 2 2
LVX 0.06–2 1 2
OFX 0.12–4 1 4
CIP 0.12–4 2 4
Bacteroides fragilis (18) BMS 0.12–1 0.25 0.5
TVA 0.25–0.5 0.25 0.5
MFX 0.25–1 0.25 0.5
LVX 1–4 1 2
OFX 2–8 2 4
CIP 2–64 4 8
Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron (11) BMS 0.03–1 0.5 0.5
TVA 0.12–1 1 1
MFX 0.12–2 2 2
LVX 0.25–8 4 8
OFX 0.5–16 16 16
CIP 1–16 16 16
Fusobacterium spp. (13) BMS 0.03–2 0.5 2
TVA 0.12–4 1 4
MFX 0.25–4 2 4
LVX 0.25–4 2 4
OFX 0.5–16 8 8
CIP 0.25–8 2 8
Clostridium perfringens (18) BMS 0.5–1 1 1
TVA 0.25–0.5 0.25 0.5
MFX 0.5 0.5 0.5
LVX 0.5–1 0.5 1
OFX 1 1 1
CIP 0.5–2 1 1
Clostridium difficile (25) BMS 0.25–2 0.5 1
TVA 0.25–2 1 1
MFX 0.5–1 1 1
LVX 0.5–4 4 4
OFX 1–8 8 8
CIP 1–16 8 16
Peptostreptococcus spp. (17) BMS 0.03–16 0.25 0.25
TVA 0.016–8 0.25 1
MFX 0.03–2 0.25 1
LVX 0.12–16 0.5 4
OFX 0.25–32 1 8
CIP 0.12–8 0.5 2
Propionibacterium acnes (17) BMS 0.25–0.5 0.25 0.5
TVA 0.5–1 0.5 1
MFX 0.25 0.25 0.25
LVX 0.25–0.5 0.5 0.5
OFX 0.5–1 0.5 1
CIP 0.25–0.5 0.5 0.5
CIP-susceptible Neisseria gonorrhoeae (35) BMS 0.001–0.03 0.004 0.008
TVA ≤0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005
MFX 0.004–0.06 0.008 0.03
LVX 0.008–0.03 0.008 0.016
OFX 0.016–0.12 0.016 0.03
CIP 0.002–0.016 0.004 0.008
CIP-nonsusceptible Neisseria gonorrhoeae (10) BMS 0.06–0.5 0.25 0.25
TVA 0.03–1 0.12 0.5
MFX 0.12–1 0.25 1
LVX 0.12–2 0.5 2
OFX 0.25–2 1 2
CIP 0.12–2 0.5 1
Neisseria meningitidis (17) BMS 0.008–0.016 0.008 0.008
TVA 0.004 0.004 0.004
MFX 0.008–0.016 0.016 0.016
LVX 0.016 0.016 0.016
OFX 0.016–0.03 0.016 0.03
CIP 0.004–0.008 0.004 0.008
Gardnerella vaginalis (12) BMS 0.25–0.5 0.5 0.5
TVA 0.5–2 1 1
MFX 0.25–0.5 0.5 0.5
LVX 0.5–1 1 1
OFX 0.5–2 1 2
CIP 0.5–2 1 2
Haemophilus influenzae (35) BMS 0.004–0.03 0.016 0.03
TVA 0.004–0.03 0.008 0.016
MFX 0.016–0.06 0.03 0.06
LVX 0.016–0.03 0.03 0.03
OFX 0.03–0.06 0.06 0.06
CIP 0.016–0.03 0.016 0.03
Moraxella catarrhalis (10) BMS 0.008–0.03 0.03 0.03
TVA 0.016–0.03 0.03 0.03
MFX 0.06–0.12 0.12 0.12
LVX 0.03–0.06 0.06 0.06
OFX 0.12 0.12 0.12
CIP 0.03–0.06 0.06 0.06
Bordetella spp. (14) BMS 0.06–0.25 0.06 0.25
TVA 0.03–0.25 0.06 0.25
MFX 0.06 0.06 0.06
LVX 0.06–0.12 0.06 0.06
OFX 0.12 0.12 0.12
CIP 0.12 0.12 0.12
Borellia burgdorferi (6)e BMS 0.06–0.5 (0.25)
TVA 0.5–2 (0.5–2)
MFX 2–8 (4)
LVX 4–16 (4)
OFX 2–4 (4)
CIP 2–4 (4)
Helicobacter pylori (10) BMS 0.03–0.12 0.06 0.06
TVA 0.03–0.25 0.06 0.25
MFX 0.12–0.5 0.25 0.5
LVX 0.12–0.25 0.12 0.25
OFX 0.06–0.25 0.12 0.12
CIP 0.016–0.06 0.03 0.06
Bartonella spp. (3) BMS 0.5–1 (1)
TVA 0.5–1 (0.5)
MFX 0.5–1 (1)
LVX 1–2 (1)
OFX 2–4 (2)
CIP 1–2 (1)
Legionella spp. (25) BMS 0.008–0.12 0.016 0.06
TVA 0.001–0.03 0.004 0.016
MFX 0.016–0.25 0.03 0.06
LVX 0.008–1 0.016 0.03
OFX 0.06–0.12 0.06 0.12
CIP 0.03–0.12 0.03 0.06
Mycoplasma pneumoniae (11) BMS 0.03–0.12 0.03 0.06
TVA 0.12–0.5 0.25 0.25
MFX 0.06–0.25 0.12 0.12
LVX 0.25–1 0.5 0.5
OFX 1–2 1 1
CIP 1–2 1 2
Mycoplasma hominis (11) BMS 0.008–0.25 0.03 0.03
TVA 0.016–0.12 0.03 0.06
MFX 0.03–0.12 0.06 0.12
LVX 0.25–4 1 2
OFX 0.5–8 2 8
CIP 0.5–4 1 2
Ureaplasma urealyticum (11) BMS 0.12–1 0.12 0.25
TVA 0.12–0.5 0.5 0.5
MFX 0.25–1 0.5 1
LVX 0.5–4 1 4
OFX 2–4 4 4
CIP 4–16 8 8
Mycobacterium tuberculosis (10) BMS 0.03–2 2 2
MFX 0.03–0.25 0.06 0.12
LVX 0.12–1 0.5 1
OFX 0.5–2 2 2
CIP 1–4 1 4
Mycobacterium avium- Mycobacterium intracellulare (6) BMS 0.5–8 (2)  
MFX 0.12–0.5 (0.5)
LVX 0.5–2 (1)  
OFX 8–>16 (>16)
CIP 8–>16 (8, >16)
Chlamydia trachomatis (10) BMS ≤0.004–0.016 0.008 0.016
MFX 0.03–0.06 0.03 0.06
LVX 0.25–0.5 0.25 0.5
OFX 1–2 1 2
CIP 0.25–2 1 2
Chlamydia pneumoniae (4) BMS ≤0.004–0.008 (0.008)
MFX 0.06–0.12 (0.06) 
LVX 0.5 (0.5)  
OFX 0.5–1 (1)    
CIP 0.5 (0.5)  
a

BMS, BMS-284756. 

b

Modal MICs are listed in parentheses if the number of strains tested was <10. 

c

Includes seven VanA (two E. faecalis and five E. faecium) and four VanB (two E. faecalis and two E. faecium) strains. 

d

Includes four strains each of E. gallinarum and E. casseliflavus

e

Only three of the six strains were tested with OFX. 

Gram-positive aerobic bacteria.

BMS-284756 was the most active quinolone against MS and MR staphylococci. BMS-284756 was generally 2-fold more active than TVA and MFX and 8- to 32-fold more active than LVX, OFX, and CIP. The quinolones inhibited MS staphylococci uniformly, with MICs at which 50% of the isolated were inhibited (MIC50s) and MIC90s generally being equal. By comparison, the quinolone MIC ranges were broader for MR staphylococci, with MIC50s and MIC90s differing by 32- to 64-fold. The fact that quinolone resistance is more commonly encountered among MR than MS staphylococcal clinical isolates accounts for the higher quinolone MIC90s for MR strains (3, 7). In fact, for 40 to 50% of MR strains tested, CIP MICs were ≥2 μg/ml, compared with 0% of MS strains. For all the MR S. aureus strains, BMS-284756 MICs were ≤2 μg/ml.

The quinolones can be grouped by their streptococcal and pneumococcal potencies. BMS-284756, TVA, and MFX were about 10-fold more active than LVX, OFX, and CIP against these organisms. Along with BMS-284756 (MIC90s = 0.12 to 0.25 μg/ml), LVX, TVA, and MFX covered all the streptococci and pneumococci at their susceptible breakpoints, but only BMS-284756 covered all Streptococcus pneumoniae strains with CIP MICs of ≥2 μg/ml (85% of which had OFX MICs of ≥4 μg/ml), and for 90% of the latter isolates BMS-284756 MICs were ≤0.5 μg/ml. As with streptococci, the enterococci were more susceptible to BMS-284756, TVA, and MFX than to LVX, OFX, and CIP. The quinolones were more active against Enterococcus faecalis than to Enterococcus faecium, the latter being more frequently resistant to quinolones. While BMS-284756, TVA, MFX, and LVX covered ≈90% or more of the E. faecalis and VanC enterococcal species (i.e., Enterococcus gallinarum and Enterococcus casseliflavus), only BMS-284756 covered >50% of E. faecium and VanA and VanB strains (comprised primarily of E. faecium) at ≤4 μg/ml.

Gram-negative aerobic bacteria.

The quinolones have good activities against Enterobacteriaceae. Overall, CIP was the most active against Enterobacteriaceae, except Providencia spp. BMS-284756 was less active against the Enterobacteriaceae, but for almost all of the Enterobacteriaceae strains, BMS-284756 MICs were ≤4 μg/ml, levels that are achievable in plasma for this quinolone.

For bacterial species associated with gastroenteritis (Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., Yersinia enterocolitica, Aeromonas hydrophila, Vibrio cholerae, and Campylobacter jejuni), all the quinolones showed potent and generally similar activities.

Nonfermentative bacteria.

Pseudomonal susceptibility to the quinolones is species dependent. Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, CIP remained the most active. Approximately 90% of the P. aeruginosa strains were susceptible to CIP, TVA, and LVX, 72% were susceptible to OFX and BMS-284756 (at ≤4 μg/ml), and 28% were susceptible to MFX. All Pseudomonas stutzeri strains were susceptible to the six quinolones tested. All of the Pseudomonas fluorescens strains were susceptible to LVX, compared to the 87 to 93% of strains that were susceptible to CIP, TVA MFX, and BMS-284756 (at ≤4 μg/ml) and 67% that were susceptible to OFX.

In contrast, CIP was among the least active quinolones against the pseudomonas-related species, being inactive against Burkholderia cepacia, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and other nonfermenters (Flavobacterium and Acinetobacter spp.). While BMS-284756 MIC90s for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Flavobacterium spp., and Acinetobacter spp. were ≤4 μg/ml, Burkholderia cepacia and Alcaligenes spp. were generally resistant.

Anaerobic bacteria.

The broadest antianaerobic bacterial spectra were observed with BMS-284756, TVA, and MFX. BMS-284756 was very active against anaerobic bacteria, inhibiting all but one peptostreptococcal strain at 4 μg/ml.

Fastidious bacterial species.

BMS-284756's exceptional antigonococcal activity extended to all CIP-nonsusceptible strains. Though the quinolones inhibited all CIP-susceptible N. gonorrhoeae strains, the BMS-284756 MIC90 for CIP-nonsusceptible isolates was ≤0.25 μg/ml. While TVA was 10-fold more active than BMS-284756 against CIP-susceptible gonococci, the BMS-284756 MIC90 for CIP-nonsusceptible strains was 2-fold better than that of TVA.

The quinolones were very active (MIC90s, ≤0.1 μg/ml) against Neisseria meningitidis, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Legionella spp., with good activities (MIC90s, ≤0.5 μg/ml) also against Bordetella spp. and Helicobacter pylori. Included in the quinolones' spectra were all strains of Gardnerella vaginalis (except CIP), Mycoplasma pneumoniae (except CIP), and Bartonella spp. (except CIP and OFX). Only BMS-284756 and TVA inhibited all B. burgdorferi strains, with BMS-284756 MICs being 16-fold better than those of MFX, LVX, OFX, and CIP against the Lyme disease spirochete. BMS-284756, TVA, and MFX inhibited all Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum strains tested, with MIC90s 10- to 100-fold better than those of LVX, OFX, and CIP against M. hominis and up to 30-fold better against U. urealyticum. This des-F(6) quinolone was the most active against chlamydia, with all strains being inhibited at ≤0.016 μg/ml; BMS-284756 was 100- to 1,000-fold more active than OFX and CIP, 50-fold more potent than LVX, and 10- to 50-fold better than MFX against chlamydia.

Of the quinolones tested, MFX was the most active against mycobacteria and CIP was the least active. BMS-284756 was comparable to OFX (MIC90, 2 μg/ml) against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. BMS-284756 was previously reported to have good antitubercular activity, with a MIC90 of 0.06 μg/ml (9). In the present study, the MIC90 of BMS-284756 against M. tuberculosis was 2 μg/ml. The difference in these MIC90 results against M. tuberculosis is likely due to susceptibility test differences. A broth macrodilution method was used in this study, whereas Takahata et al. (9) used a broth microdilution assay. Nevertheless, both studies concluded that the antitubercular activities of BMS-284756 and OFX are comparable. A recent study (E. J. Alvirez-Froitex and M. H. Cynamon, 9th Int. Congr. Infect. Dis., Abstr. 75.015, 2000), testing seven M. tuberculosis strains by a broth macrodilution test, yielded modal MICs of 1 μg/ml for BMS-284756 versus 0.5 and 0.06 μg/ml for LVX and MFX, respectively.

In summary, BMS-284756 is among the most active quinolones tested against gram-positive bacteria, particularly against MR S. aureus, S. epidermidis, and CIP-resistant S. pneumoniae. BMS-284756 had the broadest antianaerobic bacterial coverage, inhibiting almost all of the anaerobic bacterial strains tested. BMS-284756 was the most active quinolone against fastidious microbes (mycoplasmas, ureaplasmas, chlamydiae, CIP-nonsusceptible gonococci, and B. burgdorferi). It is active against the Enterobacteriaceae and most nonfermenters. The wide antibacterial spectrum of BMS-284756 supports its development for a broad range of indications.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Fung-Tomc J, Minassian B, Kolek B, Washo T, Huczko E, Bonner D. In vitro antibacterial spectrum of a new broad-spectrum 8-methoxy fluoroquinolone, gatifloxacin. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2000;45:437–446. doi: 10.1093/jac/45.4.437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hussain Z, Stoakes B, Massey V, Diagre D, Fitzgerald V, El Sayed S, Lannigan R. Correlation of oxacillin MIC with mecA gene carriage in coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:752–754. doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.2.752-754.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Issacs R D, Kunke P J, Cohen R L, Smith J W. Ciprofloxacin resistance in epidemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet. 1988;ii:843. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3a.Medical Economics Co., Inc. Physicians' desk reference. 50th ed. Montdale, N.J: Medical Economics Co., Inc.; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Document M7–A5. Wayne, Pa: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria. Document M11–A4. Wayne, Pa: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Preston S L, Drusano G L, Berman A L, Fowler C L, Chow A T, Dornseif B, Reichi V, Natarajan J, Corrado M. Pharmacodynamics of levofloxacin, a new paradigm for early clinical trials. JAMA. 1998;279:125–129. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.2.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Raviglione M C, Boyle J F, Mariuz P, Pablos-Mendez A, Merlo A. Ciprofloxacin-resistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an acute-care hospital. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990;34:2050–2054. doi: 10.1128/aac.34.11.2050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Schentag J J, Nix D E, Adelman M H. Mathematical examination of dual individualization principles (I): relationships between AUC above MIC and area under the inhibitory curve for cefmenoxime, ciprofloxacin, and tobramycin. DICP Ann Pharmacother. 1991;25:1050–1057. doi: 10.1177/106002809102501003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Takahata M, Mitsuyama J, Yamashiro Y, Yonezawa M, Araki H, Todo Y, Minami S, Watanabe Y, Narita H. In vitro and in vivo antimicrobial activities of T-3811ME, a novel des-F(6)-quinolone. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43:1077–1084. doi: 10.1128/aac.43.5.1077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES