Skip to main content
F1000Research logoLink to F1000Research
. 2022 Apr 6;10:1189. Originally published 2021 Nov 24. [Version 2] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.74534.2

Case Report: Therapeutic and immunomodulatory effects of plasmapheresis in long-haul COVID

Dobri D Kiprov 1,a, Ahvie Herskowitz 1, Daehwan Kim 2, Michael Lieb 2, Chao Liu 2, Etsuko Watanabe 2, Jan C Hoffman 3, Regina Rohe 1, Michael J Conboy 2, Irina M Conboy 2,b
PMCID: PMC9021669  PMID: 35464182

Version Changes

Revised. Amendments from Version 1

As per reviewers' comments, this version of our article provides the detail on the procedure of plasmapharesis and adds a couple of relevant references.

Abstract

Many patients with COVID-19 experience a range of debilitating symptoms months after being infected, a syndrome termed long-haul COVID. A 68-year-old male presented with lung opacity, fatigue, physical and cognitive weaknesses, loss of smell and lymphocytopenia. After rounds of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), the patient returned to normal activities and work. Mechanistically in the patient’s peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), markers of inflammatory macrophages diminished and markers of lymphocytes, including natural killer (NK) cells and cytotoxic CD8 T-cells, increased. Circulating inflammatory proteins diminished, while positive regulators of tissue repair increased. This case study suggests that TPE has the capacity to treat long-haul COVID.

Keywords: Immunomodulation, Long Haul Covid19, plasmapheresis, adaptive immunity, inflammation, proteomics, leukocyute subsets

Introduction

The symptoms of “long-haul” coronavirus disease 2019 (long COVID) are debilitating and prevent patients from working, which is projected to negatively impact the healthcare system and economic recovery. 1 The most common symptoms of long COVID are dyspnea with abnormal chest radiograph (CXR) findings, extreme fatigue, cognitive impairment (described as “brain fog”), myalgias, anosmia, ageusia, headache and sleep disorder. 2 Long COVID resembles myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) which is driven by autoantibodies. 3 , 4 Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) was successfully tried in patients with severe COVID-19 through various methods 5 , 6 and is typically used on patients with ME/CSF, thrombotic thrombocytopenia, 7 and other autoimmune disorders. 8 , 9 Moreover, our recently published studies suggest that TPE re-sets the circulatory proteome to healthier states, attenuating the so-called cytokine storm and enhancing the systemic determinants of tissue repair. 10 , 11 The encouraging results of these reports convinced us to try TPE on a patient with severe long COVID.

Case

A 68-year-old caucasian male attorney, who reported having been very physically active and capable of multitasking in a demanding executive position at work began to feel fatigued and short of breath on December 14, 2020. He visited an emergency room on December 18, 2020. His oxygen saturation was 90–93% on room air and he was sent home. His breathing and fatigue deteriorated, so he was admitted to the hospital on December 21, 2020. He tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by PCR and was treated with remdesivir and Decadron (dexamethasone). His status continued to worsen, and he was placed on high-flow oxygen. He was never intubated. After 11 days in the hospital, he was sent home on portable oxygen which he used intermittently.

Over the following four weeks, he felt extremely fatigued. He could only walk to the bathroom and back to bed. He could not focus on anything cognitively, which he described as “brain fog”. He was unable to do any work and could not even answer his emails. He reported he had no sense of smell nor taste. Sedimentation rate, CRP, D-dimer and ferritin were abnormal in clinical lab tests ( Figure 1B). At that time, chest radiographs and a chest CT scan revealed ground-glass appearance areas diffusely spread throughout his lungs ( Figure 1C). A PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 was negative. A serologic test for anti-SARS-COV-2 IgG antibodies was positive.

Figure 1. Clinical improvements in a long COVID patient.

Figure 1.

A. Schematics of the case. B. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CRP, D-dimer, ferritin levels were assayed before each TPE procedure and were initially elevated but normalized by the TPE. C. Chest radiographs show reduced lung opacity after TPE. D. Clouded plasma appearance was reduced by TPE.

In February of 2021, he was seen in our clinic. At that time, he was very weak and unable to walk. When he arrived at the airport, he needed a wheelchair to go from the plane to the taxi. He underwent his first TPE on February 4, 2021. One plasma volume was exchanged, using 5% albumin as an exchange fluid. The removed plasma was very dark and opaque ( Figure 1D). During his first TPE treatment, he was coughing profusely. After his first treatment, he could breathe more easily, and the cough subsided. The morning after the first TPE treatment, he could walk and was not struggling for breath. Two days later, he had no difficulty breathing and was able to walk 100 feet on a level surface but still had difficulty walking uphill.

He underwent a second TPE and two days after the second treatment he was able to walk uphill with ease and even jog. His brain fog disappeared, and he was able to get back to his daily work activities. Typical biomarkers of systemic inflammation all became quickly and robustly normalized including erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CRP, ferritin, and D-dimer 12 ( Figure 1B). The plasma from the second TPE was clear ( Figure 1D). A week later his chest radiographs showed considerable clearing of the opacities in the lungs ( Figure 1C). He also reported regaining his sense of smell and taste. He was seen in the clinic for another TPE two months later and, at that time, the patient reported that he was back to work, feeling like his normal self, and able to exercise daily without shortness of breath.

The peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and blood serum of this patient were collected and analyzed before the first round of TPE (R0) and before each subsequent round (R1–R3) ( Figure 1A). Real-time qRT PCR was used to study the levels of the markers of T cells: CD3; helper T-cells: CD4; cytotoxic T-cells: CD8; NK cells: CD94; B-cells: B220 and CD19; macrophages: CD11b; inflammatory myeloid cells: CD68; and IL-2 receptor: CD25. Before TPE, there was a prevalence of CD68+ inflammatory myeloid cells’ marker, and relatively fewer lymphocyte markers, which is indicative of a lack of adaptive immunity ( Figure 2). TPE increased the markers of T-cells, B-cells, NK cells, and diminished the markers of inflammatory macrophages, suggesting enhanced adaptive immunity and attenuated inflammatory response ( Figure 2 ). CD3, CD4 and CD19 initially diminished at 5 days after the first TPE, R1, but then steadily increased during the longer intervals of R2 and R3; CD94 and CD8, the markers of cytotoxic immune cells that combat viral infections also gradually and steadily increased ( Figure 2).

Figure 2. Effect of TPE on lymphoid and myeloid gene expression.

Figure 2.

A. The expression of T cell, B-cell NK cell markers and IL2 receptor are significantly increased in R2 and R3 compared to R0. CD11b myeloid marker increased in R1 and then returned to R0 levels. CD68 – the marker of inflammatory myeloid cells, was significantly decreased by the third round of TPE. B. The ratios of lymphoid/CD11b, lymphoid/CD68, CD25/CD11b and CD25/CD68 markers clearly demonstrate the positive effects of TPE in promoting the adaptive rather than the inflammatory immune response. Note the break in Y-axis scale. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001.

Five days after the first TPE and the initial increase of CD11b+, the levels of this marker stabilized, while the CD68 marker of inflammatory macrophages were never elevated by TPE and were diminished by R2 and R3 ( Figure 2). Plotting the ratios of T-cell and B-cell markers to myeloid and inflammatory macrophage markers (CD11b and CD68) demonstrates a rapid and robust shift toward adaptive immunity through the rounds of TPE ( Figure 2 ). The effects of TPE are particularly striking when looking at the relative increase in the CD8+/CD68+, e.g., anti-viral cytotoxic T cells in an inflammation reduced environment ( Figure 2 ).

Blood serum from the patient was profiled through comparative proteomics using RayBiotech antibody arrays, as we have published. 10 Heatmapping clearly demonstrated the profound influence of TPE on the circulatory proteome ( Figure 3A); Venn diagrams, KEGG and biological process databases uncovered 36 proteins that were commonly downregulated between the rounds of TPE, ( Figure 3B–D). In agreement with the diminished inflammation and enhanced adaptive immunity that were suggested by Figures 1 and 2, this longitudinal serum proteomics revealed significant attenuation of inflammatory factors, which was stable and lasted several months ( Figure 3E and F). Regulators of several growth factor pathways that are known to promote tissue repair increased in the systemic milieu: IGF, EGF, TGF-β ( Figure 3E and F).

Figure 3. The longitudinal profiling of serum proteome after rounds of TPE.

Figure 3.

A. Comparative heat mapping of 507 proteins between TPE rounds was done on RayBiotech Array. B. Venn diagram showing the overlap between the proteins, which were influenced by the TPE rounds. 36 shared proteins were diminished each TPE round (0.65> Fold change). C. The KEGG signaling pathway analysis. D. The top 20 list of biological processes. E. Heat mapping of the proteins that relate to Aging and Inflammaging and are decreased by TPE. F. Volcano plots of proteomics as per TPE rounds. More proteins are downregulated by the second round than by the first. The red dots represent differently expressed proteins ( P < 0.05; |Log 2FC|<1.5), while the grey dots represent proteins with P > 0.05.

These results establish rapid and significant changes in circulatory proteome of the patient, which are indicative of attenuated inflammation, productive immune response, and enhanced tissue maintenance.

Since the COVID-19 pandemic, roughly 70–80% of patients suffer various sequelae. 13 About 40% of these patients have acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and one of the main sequelae is pulmonary fibrosis. 14 Although the mechanism of COVID-19-induced ARDS may be different from classical ARDS, the onset and development of pulmonary fibrosis are commonly related to elevated inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6. 15 Accordingly, anti-inflammatory drugs attenuate COVID-19-induced pneumonia. 16 , 17

In this study, a patient who was initially healthy, quickly developed health problems after being infected with the novel coronavirus. Moreover, after two months, his health deteriorated to the point of being unable to walk, being physically short of breath, suffering mental fatigue, and diffuse ground-glass appearance was observed throughout his lungs. Clinical and biological analyses strongly suggested systemic inflammation and a lack of productive immune response. After the first TPE treatment, the dyspnea disappeared, and cough subsided. The patient was also able to walk short distances. Interestingly, these changes were observed on day 2 after the first TPE treatment. A month later, the patient was able to walk uphill easily and jog. The decrease in concentration and cognitive fog disappeared, and the patient was able to return to normal life. During the same period, inflammatory macrophage markers robustly diminished and the markers of lymphocytes increased in the blood, suggesting that TPE promoted adaptive immunity and decreased inflammatory response. Such a productive immune response shift became prominent between the second and third rounds of TPE and rounds 1 and 2 were separated by only 5 days, e.g., too quickly for changing leukocyte subset numbers. Longitudinal comparative proteomics demonstrated that many proteins that are associated with inflammaging 18 were attenuated by the rounds of TPE. For instance, pro-inflammatory factors, such as IL-1β, IL-6, and IP-10, stably decreased. In contrast, lipocalin-1 that participates in the sense of taste, and regulators of EGF, IGF, and TGF-β signaling pathways increased, demonstrating a better capacity for tissue maintenance and repair. These finidngs provide important detail on the general observation that TPE reduces the inflammation, which is known to be upregulated by long-haul COVID-19. 19 Of note, the smell/taste reception returned to normal in this patient after TPE. In summary, this case study suggests that TPE may alleviate post COVID-19 sequelae via positive shifts toward adaptive immunity and tissue repair that are concurrent with reduction of inflammation.

Methods

The study was approved by the Diagnostics Investigational Review Board ( www.dxirb.com) with study identifier - 7347. The study was performed under the written informed consent (obtained by Dr. Dobri Kiprov) from the patient for the use and publication of the patient’s data. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) was performed as described. 20 , 21 Briefly, TPE was performed using centrifugal blood cell separator (Spectra Optia, Terumo BCT, Colorado, USA). One plasma volume was removed and replaced with 5% albumin. Each procedure was followed by infusion of 2 gm, 10% Intravenous Gammaglobulin G (IVIG, Octagam 10%, Octapharma, Hoboken, NJ, USA).

Serum, plasma, and PBMC isolation

Whole blood was collected immediately before (pre) or after (post) TPE procedure in the clinic and processed into serum, plasma and PBMCs (Histopaque density) as described. 22

Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

Total RNA was extracted from PBMC using the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen), and the SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen). Real-time PCR was performed on a Bio-Rad iQ5 real-time PCR machine. The primers used for PCR are listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Primer sequences for real-time PCR.

Group Gene name Sequence
T cells CD3 Forward GATGCAGTCGGGCACTCACT
Reverse CATTACCATCTTGCCCCCAA
Helper T-cells CD4 Forward GCCAACCCAAGTGACTCTGT
Reverse TCTCCTGGACCACTCCATTC
Cytotoxic T-cells CD8 Forward ACTTGTGGGGTCCTTCTCCT
Reverse GTCTCCCGATTTGACCACAG
NK cells CD94 Forward GAGCCAGCATTTACTCCAGGAC
Reverse GCACAGAGATGCCGACTTTCGT
B cells B220 Forward ACA GCC AGC ACC TTT CCT AC
Reverse GTG CAG GTA AGG CAG CAG A
CD19 Forward AAGGGGCCTAAGTCATTGCT
Reverse CAGCAGCCAGTGCCATAGTA
Myeloid cells CD11b Forward CAGCCTTTGACCTTATGTCATGG
Reverse CCTGTGCTGTAGTCGCACT
CD68 Forward GCTACATGGCGGTGGAGTACAA
Reverse ATGATGAGAGGCAGCAAGATGG
IL-2 receptor CD25 Forward GAGAAAGACCTCCGCTTCAC
Reverse CGAGTGGCTAGAGTTTCCTG
Housekeeping b-actin Forward TGAAGTGTGACGTGGACATC
Reverse GGAGGAGCAATGATCTTGAT

Antibody array

Serum was analyzed on a Ray Biotech human L507 antibody capture array (AAH-BLG-1-4, Raybiotech), processed according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The array slides were imaged by a Molecular Devices 4000b scanner and data were calculated by Genepix. Normalization was done by bult-in positive and negative controls.

Bioinformatics analysis

The gene ID of differently regulated proteins was performed using DAVID Bioinformatics Resources (version 6.8, https://david.ncifcrf.gov), as well as the GO (Gene Ontology) analysis of the biological process (BP), molecular function (MF) and cellular component (CC), and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway. Heat maps were performed with ClustVis. 23 Volcano plots were constructed with the Graphpad Prism software version 9 (GraphPad software Inc).

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software. All values are expressed as means ± SEM for independent experiments, or SD for replicates. To determine the significance of differences among groups, comparisons were made using Student’s t-test. The P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Data availability

Underlying data

OSF: Underlying data for ‘Therapeutic and immunomodulatory effects of plasmapheresis in long-haul COVID: a case report’ https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/AXPW7. 24

The project contains the following underlying data:

[Dataset_1_qPCR raw data.xlsx] (Raw qPCR data).

[Dataset_2_Antibody array raw data.xlsx] (Antibody array raw data).

[Dataset_3_raw data of diagnosis.pdf] (Diagnosis data).

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).

Authors’ contributions

DKiprov planned and performed all clinical work, established the IRB approval, provided Figure 1 and the blood samples to the Conboy laboratory and co-wrote the manuscript; DKim provided Figure 2, bio-computation and bioinformatics for Figure 3, and participated in the manuscript writing; ML contributed to Figure 2; CL and EW performed the comparative proteomics that is shown in Figure 3 and CL provided the schematic of Figure 1A; JH, RR and AH provided clinical support; MJK contributed to the planning of this work and co-wrote the manuscript; IC planned, directed, and integrated the study, interpreted the data, and co-wrote the manuscript. All authors agreed with publication of this work.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank William Hou, Zhixin Zhang and Xiaoyue Mei for formatting the references, and Wu Love for logistics help.

Funding Statement

This research was supported by NIBIB (R01 EB023776), NIA (1R01AG071787 and R56 AG058819), NHLBI (R01 HL139605), Open Philanthropy, Sillicon Valley Community Foundation, Foster Foundation, San Francisco Foundation, Georges’ Harik Foundation, Donors’ Trust grants to IC.

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]

References

  • 1. Phillips S, Williams MA: Confronting Our Next National Health Disaster — Long-Haul Covid. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(7):577–579. 10.1056/NEJMp2109285 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Davis HE, Assaf GS, McCorkell L, et al. : Characterizing long COVID in an international cohort: 7 months of symptoms and their impact. EClinicalMedicine. 2021;38:101019. 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101019 Reference Source [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Yong SJ: Long COVID or post-COVID-19 syndrome: putative pathophysiology, risk factors, and treatments. Scand J Infect Dis. 2021;53(10):737–754. 10.1080/23744235.2021.1924397 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Wirth K, Scheibenbogen C: A Unifying Hypothesis of the Pathophysiology of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS): Recognitions from the finding of autoantibodies against ß2-adrenergic receptors. Autoimmun Rev. 2020;19(6):102527. 10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102527 Reference Source [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Khamis F, Al-Zakwani I, Al Hashmi S, et al. : Therapeutic plasma exchange in adults with severe COVID-19 infection. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;99:214–218. 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.06.064 Reference Source [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Jaiswal V, et al. : Therapeutic plasma exchange followed by convalescent plasma transfusion in critical COVID-19—An exploratory study. J Infect Dis. 2021;102:332–334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Rock G, Weber V, Stegmayr B: Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) as a plausible rescue therapy in severe vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia. Transfus Apher Sci. 2021;60:103174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Tölle M, Freitag H, Antelmann M, et al. : Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Efficacy of Repeat Immunoadsorption. J Clin Med. 2020;9(8):2443. 10.3390/jcm9082443 Reference Source [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Wunsch E, Kruk B, Snarski E, et al. : Plasmapheresis improves chronic fatigue in patients with primary biliary cholangitis. Polish Arch Intern Med. 2020. 10.20452/pamw.15690 Reference Source [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Mehdipour M, Skinner C, Wong N, et al. : Rejuvenation of three germ layers tissues by exchanging old blood plasma with saline-albumin. Aging (Albany NY). 2020;12(10):8790–8819. 10.18632/aging.103418 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Mehdipour M, Mehdipour T, Skinner CM, et al. : Plasma dilution improves cognition and attenuates neuroinflammation in old mice. GeroScience. 2021;43(1):1–18. 10.1007/s11357-020-00297-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Poudel A, Poudel Y, Adhikari A, et al. : D-dimer as a biomarker for assessment of COVID-19 prognosis: D-dimer levels on admission and its role in predicting disease outcome in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. PLoS One. 2021;16(8):e0256744. 10.1371/journal.pone.0256744 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Carfì A, Bernabei R, Landi F: Persistent Symptoms in Patients After Acute COVID-19. JAMA. 2020;324(6):603–605. 10.1001/jama.2020.12603 Reference Source [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Liu J, Zheng X, Tong Q, et al. : Overlapping and discrete aspects of the pathology and pathogenesis of the emerging human pathogenic coronaviruses SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and 2019-nCoV. J Med Virol. 2020;92(5):491–494. 10.1002/jmv.25709 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Rai DK, Sharma P, Kumar R: Post covid 19 pulmonary fibrosis. Is it real threat?. Indian J Tuberc. 2021;68(3):330–333. 10.1016/j.ijtb.2020.11.003 Reference Source [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Collins BF, Raghu G: Antifibrotic therapy for fibrotic lung disease beyond idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir Rev. 2019;28(153):190022. 10.1183/16000617.0022-2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Li Y, Li H, Liu S, et al. : Pirfenidone ameliorates lipopolysaccharide-induced pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis by blocking NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Mol Immunol. 2018;99:134–144. 10.1016/j.molimm.2018.05.003 Reference Source [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Guan W, Ni Z, Hu Y, et al. : Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(18):1708–1720. 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Mehandru S, Merad M: Pathological sequelae of long-haul COVID. Nat Immunol. 2022;23:194–202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Boada M, López OL, Olazarán J, et al. : A randomized, controlled clinical trial of plasma exchange with albumin replacement for Alzheimer’s disease: Primary results of the AMBAR Study. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2020;16(10):1412–1425. 10.1002/alz.12137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Kiprov DD: Delivery of therapeutic apheresis services in the United States. J Clin Apher. 2005;20:123–125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Mallone R, Mannering SI, Brooks-Worrell BM, et al. : Isolation and preservation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells for analysis of islet antigen-reactive T cell responses: position statement of the T-Cell Workshop Committee of the Immunology of Diabetes Society. Clin Exp Immunol. 2011;163(1):33–49. 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2010.04272.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Metsalu T, Vilo J: ClustVis: a web tool for visualizing clustering of multivariate data using Principal Component Analysis and heatmap. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(W1):W566–W570. 10.1093/nar/gkv468 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Kiprov DD, Herskowitz A, Kim D, et al. : Underlying data for ‘Therapeutic and immunomodulatory effects of plasmapheresis in long-haul COVID: a case report’. 2021. 10.17605/OSF.IO/AXPW7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
F1000Res. 2022 Apr 13. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.123022.r129947

Reviewer response for version 2

Prashant Nasa 1

Thank you for the revised manuscript. All comments have been satisfactorily answered. I approve the revised version of the manuscript.

Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?

Yes

Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for other practitioners?

Yes

Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?

Partly

Is the background of the case’s history and progression described in sufficient detail?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Management of COVID-19 related respiratory failure.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

F1000Res. 2022 Apr 7. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.123022.r129948

Reviewer response for version 2

Bernd Stegmayr 1

Apparently three TPEs were performed. The intervals of TPE are not precisely given by the authors but seem to be 5 days or more? The centrifugal technique, as used here, enables easier removal of large molecules and aggregates (compared to filtration technique) and in such instances would be favorable. Citrate anticoagulation usually used with centrifugation technique also would limit risks for subsequents bleeding if platelets are/get low. Frequent tightly performed TPE with only albumin as replacement may reduce vital plasma compounds very much and give adverse events unless substituted. 

The present Case report supports knowledge of an important clinical issue. 

No further comments.

Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?

Partly

Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for other practitioners?

Partly

Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?

Partly

Is the background of the case’s history and progression described in sufficient detail?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Long term experience with apheresis therapies and research. Specialist Internal Medicine and Nephrology.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

F1000Res. 2022 Feb 25. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.78300.r123772

Reviewer response for version 1

Prashant Nasa 1

Congratulations authors for the successful outcome of this exploratory study. I have the following points for consideration to make the discussion comprehensive.

  1. There is a recent review published in Nature on the pathology of long-haul COVID-19. It will be worth using that in the discussion. ( https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-021-01104-y). The pathophysiology of long-haul COVID-19 involving imbalance between persistent inflammation on homeostasis should be discussed and provide prospects for future controlled studies.

  2. Was plasma removed through therapeutic plasma exchange profiled through comparative proteomics? This would have helped in understanding the degree of reduction of the biomarkers with each session of TPE.

  3. Role of TPE and Plasma exchange has shown variable effects and investigators have used them in different combinations. It is worth including them in discussing ( https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(20)32289-X/fulltext)

Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?

Yes

Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for other practitioners?

Yes

Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?

Partly

Is the background of the case’s history and progression described in sufficient detail?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Management of COVID-19 related respiratory failure.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

References

  • 1. : Pathological sequelae of long-haul COVID. Nat Immunol .23(2) : 10.1038/s41590-021-01104-y 194-202 10.1038/s41590-021-01104-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. : Therapeutic plasma exchange followed by convalescent plasma transfusion in critical COVID-19-An exploratory study. Int J Infect Dis .2021;102: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.10.085 332-334 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.10.085 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
F1000Res. 2022 Jan 28. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.78300.r119963

Reviewer response for version 1

Bernd Stegmayr 1

The Case Report using Plasmapheresis (apheresis) for long-haul Covid increases awareness of the complexity of the disease and the possibilities to immunomodulate by apheresis. 

The topic is very important and the concept well described. The case is also well described. 

There is a lack of information that should be added:

  1. What type of apheresis procedure (centrifuge or filtration, leukapheresis?) was used?

  2. What type and doses of anticoagulation during apheresis was used? (citrate, LMWH, heparin?)

  3. Was a maintenance pharmacological therapy used also after initiation of apheresis to prohibit antibodies to increase?

  4. If so, what were the pharmacological doses/kg body weight and/day of such medication (or interval)?

  5. What were the time intervals between the apheresis procedures?

  6. Did you try to investigate for specific antibodies?

  7. You could add the concept of apheresis for antibody removal such as described for VITT by Rock et al. 2021 1

Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?

Partly

Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for other practitioners?

Partly

Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?

Partly

Is the background of the case’s history and progression described in sufficient detail?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Long term experience with apheresis therapies and research. Specialist Internal Medicine and Nephrology.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

References

  • 1. : Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) as a plausible rescue therapy in severe vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia. Transfus Apher Sci .2021;60(4) : 10.1016/j.transci.2021.103174 103174 10.1016/j.transci.2021.103174 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Availability Statement

    Underlying data

    OSF: Underlying data for ‘Therapeutic and immunomodulatory effects of plasmapheresis in long-haul COVID: a case report’ https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/AXPW7. 24

    The project contains the following underlying data:

    [Dataset_1_qPCR raw data.xlsx] (Raw qPCR data).

    [Dataset_2_Antibody array raw data.xlsx] (Antibody array raw data).

    [Dataset_3_raw data of diagnosis.pdf] (Diagnosis data).

    Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).


    Articles from F1000Research are provided here courtesy of F1000 Research Ltd

    RESOURCES