Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2022 Mar 28;11(4):e01105-21. doi: 10.1128/mra.01105-21

The Genome Sequence of Brucella intermedia DF13, a 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid-Degrading Soil Bacterium Isolated in Brazil

Sheila da Silva a,#, Barbara Alvarenga Peckle a,d,✉,#, José Roberto de Assis Ribeiro a, Selma Soares de Oliveira a,b, Kayo Bianco c, Maysa Mandetta Clementino c, Ida Carolina Neves Direito d, Andrew Macrae a,b,✉
Editor: Catherine Putontie
PMCID: PMC9022513  PMID: 35343769

ABSTRACT

Brucella intermedia/Ochrobactrum intermedium strain DF13 was isolated from Brazilian soil and is able to degrade 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D). Here, we report on its genome sequence, with 4,570,268 bp and a 57.8% G+C content.

KEYWORDS: Ochrobactrum intermedium; Brucella intermedia; bioremediation; biodegradation; 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D); soil

ANNOUNCEMENT

Members of the genus Brucella are Gram-negative aerobic bacilli (1), belonging to the Brucellaceae family (2, 3), and are known as human and animal pathogens (2). Based on recent and thorough genome comparisons, the genus Ochrobactrum has been reclassified and its species included within the genus Brucella (4, 5). Consequently, strain DF13, originally classified as Ochrobactrum intermedium, is synonymous with Brucella intermedia. Ochrobactrum intermedium is known to biodegrade organic pollutants (6) as well as organophosphorus pesticides (7, 8). The genus Ochrobactrum was described as capable of degrading the pesticide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) (9). Based on our interests in biodegradation, we report on this strain’s genome. The strain was isolated from topsoil, at a depth of 0 to 20 cm, from Fazendinha Agroecológica-SIPA, located at 43°40′00″W and 22°44′30″S. For isolation, a dilution (10−1) of 10 g of the soil was performed with 0.1% NaCl (wt/vol), 0.1% (wt/vol) sodium pyrophosphate, and 0.1% (vol/vol) Tween 20 after incubation at 30°C and centrifuged at 180 rpm for 20 min. Then, serial dilution (10−2 to 10−7) in 0.85% saline was performed. A total of 100 μL of each dilution was plated on a 2,4-D, MEMB selective medium (10). The strain was maintained and grew in a minimal mineral medium with 2,4-D as the sole carbon source. A single colony grown on LB medium at 28°C was used for DNA extraction using the PureLink genomic DNA minikit (Invitrogen) and was quantified with a Qubit fluorometer.

The genomic paired-end library (2 × 300 bp) with 550-bp medium-sized inserts was built using the Nextera XT DNA library preparation kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA) and sequenced on Illumina MiSeq (INCQS; Fiocruz, Manguinhos, RJ, Brazil) using the MiSeq reagent kit V3 (600 cycle). FastQC v0.11.9 (11) and Trim Galore v0.6.6 (12) tools were used to check and trim at a cutoff of >30 for quality Phred score. Genome assembly was performed combining de novo and mapping assembly techniques. SPAdes v3.15.0 (13) was used for the de novo assembly and the output was used for assembly with MeDuSa v1.6 (14) using 27 Brucella intermedia reference genomes available from the NCBI. CheckM v1.4.0 (15) and QUAST v.5.0.2 (16) were used to check assembly quality and contamination. Genomic annotation was made with NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) v5.3 (17–19). Taxonomic identification was based on the Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) v3.8.3, Pairwise Tetra-correlation (TETRA) v3.8.3, and Tetra Correlation Search (TCS) v3.8.3 from JSpeciesWS (20). The sequencing resulted in 1,036,905 raw reads (602,099,110 bp). SPAdes resulted in 53 contigs, and the MeDuSa assembly resulted in a genome length of the 4,570,268 bp based on 6 scaffolds with 95.7× coverage; the N50 value was 4,552,750 bp, and the L50 had 1 scaffold with a 57.8% G+C content in the QUAST result. CheckM showed 100% completeness and 0% contamination. PGAP annotation resulted in 4,342 genes: 4,281 coding DNA sequences (CDS), 5 rRNA genes, and 52 tRNAs genes. The TCS, ANI, and TETRA results were 0.9994, 98.65, and 0.99949, respectively, for Brucella intermedia type strain NCTC12171 (NCBI assembly accession number GCA_900454225.1). The results were 0.98984 (TCS), 82.37 (ANIb), and 0.98984 (TETRA) for Brucella daejeonensis type strain DSM 26944 (NCBI assembly accession number GCA_014199265.1). Default parameters were used for all software tools.

Data availability.

The genome sequence has been deposited at GenBank under accession number JAIQVX000000000. Raw read data are available at SRA accession number SRR15853869, BioProject number PRJNA757421, and BioSample number SAMN20961033.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ), Centro Universitário Estadual da Zona Oeste (UEZO), the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Capes), Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ), and the Programa de Pós-graduação em Biotecnologia Vegetal e Bioprocessos (PBV).

We claim that there are no conflicts of interest.

Contributor Information

Barbara Alvarenga Peckle, Email: barbarapeckle89@gmail.com.

Andrew Macrae, Email: amacrae@micro.ufrj.br.

Catherine Putonti, Loyola University Chicago.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Kassab I, Sarsam N, Affas S, Ayas M, Baang JH. 2021. A case of Ochrobactrum intermedium bacteremia secondary to cholangitis with a literature review. Cureus 13(4):e14648. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Scholz HC, Vergnaud G. 2013. Molecular characterisation of Brucella species. Rev Sci Tech 32:149–162. doi: 10.20506/rst.32.1.2189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pfefer TSL, Timme R, Kase JA. 2018. Identification of Brucella genus and eight Brucella species by Luminex bead-based suspension array. Food Microbiol 70:113–119. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2017.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Oren A, Garrity GM. 2020. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 70:4043–4049. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hördt A, López MG, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Schleuning M, Weinhold L-M, Tindall BJ, Gronow S, Kyrpides NC, Woyke T, Göker M. 2020. Analysis of 1,000+ type-strain genomes substantially improves taxonomic classification of Alphaproteobacteria. Front Microbiol 11:468. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yadav P, Yadav A, Srivastava JK, Raj A. 2021. Reduction of pollution load of tannery effluent by cell immobilization approach using Ochrobactrum intermedium. J Water Process Eng 41:102059. doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102059. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jiang B, Zhang N, Xing Y, Lian L, Chen Y, Zhang D, Li G, Sun G, Song Y. 2019. Microbial degradation of organophosphorus pesticides: novel degraders, kinetics, functional genes, and genotoxicity assessment. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 26:21668–21681. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05135-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yu MF, Xia ZZ, Yao JC, Feng Z, Li DH, Liu T, Cheng GJ, He DL, Li XH. 2021. Functional analysis of the ocnE gene involved in nicotine-degradation pathways in Ochrobactrum intermedium SCUEC4 and its enzymatic properties. Can J Microbiol 67:138–146. doi: 10.1139/cjm-2020-0118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Han L, Liu Y, He A, Zhao D. 2014. 16S rRNA gene phylogeny and tfdA gene analysis of 2,4-D-degrading bacteria isolated in China. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 30:2567–2576. doi: 10.1007/s11274-014-1680-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chong N-M. 2005. Development of a tool for measuring the degradation capacity of microorganisms for a xenobiotic. Enzyme Microb Technol 37:467–471. doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2004.06.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Andrews S. 2010. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/.
  • 12.Krueger F. 2015. Trim Galore: a wrapper tool around Cutadapt and FastQC to consistently apply quality and adapter trimming to FastQ files. https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore.
  • 13.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bosi E, Donati B, Galardini M, Brunetti S, Sagot M, Li P, Crescenzi P, Fani R, Fondi M. 2015. MeDuSa: a multi-draft based scaffolder. Bioinformatics 31:2443–2451. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2015. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Li W, O’Neill KR, Haft DH, DiCuccio M, Chetvernin V, Badretdin A, Coulouris G, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire MK, Durkin AS, Gonzales NR, Gwadz M, Lanczycki CJ, Song JS, Thanki N, Wang J, Yamashita RA, Yang M, Zheng C, Marchler-Bauer A, Thibaud-Nissen F. 2021. RefSeq: expanding the Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline reach with protein family model curation. Nucleic Acids Res 49:D1020–D1028. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Haft DH, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Brover V, Chetvernin V, O’Neill K, Li W, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire MK, Gonzales NR, Gwadz M, Lu F, Marchler GH, Song JS, Thanki N, Yamashita RA, Zheng C, Thibaud-Nissen F, Geer LY, Marchler-Bauer A, Pruitt KD. 2018. RefSeq: an update on prokaryotic genome annotation and curation. Nucleic Acids Res 46:D851–D860. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Glöckner FO, Peplies J. 2016. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 32:929–931. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The genome sequence has been deposited at GenBank under accession number JAIQVX000000000. Raw read data are available at SRA accession number SRR15853869, BioProject number PRJNA757421, and BioSample number SAMN20961033.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES