Skip to main content
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 2022 Mar 15;90(4):e00626-21. doi: 10.1128/iai.00626-21

Pseudomonas Synergizes with Fluconazole against Candida during Treatment of Polymicrobial Infection

Siham Hattab a, Anna-Maria Dagher a, Robert T Wheeler a,b,
Editor: Mairi C Noverrc
PMCID: PMC9022521  PMID: 35289633

ABSTRACT

Polymicrobial infections are challenging to treat because we don’t fully understand how pathogens interact during infection and how these interactions affect drug efficacy. Candida albicans and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are opportunistic pathogens that can be found in similar sites of infection such as in burn wounds and most importantly in the lungs of CF and mechanically ventilated patients. C. albicans is particularly difficult to treat because of the paucity of antifungal agents, some of which lack fungicidal activity. In this study, we investigated the efficacy of anti-fungal treatment during C. albicans-P. aeruginosa coculture in vitro and co-infection in the mucosal zebrafish infection model analogous to the lung. We find that P. aeruginosa enhances the activity of fluconazole (FLC), an anti-fungal drug that is fungistatic in vitro, to promote both clearance of C. albicans during co-infection in vivo and fungal killing in vitro. This synergy between FLC treatment and bacterial antagonism is partly due to iron piracy, as it is reduced upon iron supplementation and knockout of bacterial siderophores. Our work demonstrates that FLC has enhanced activity in clinically relevant contexts and highlights the need to understand antimicrobial effectiveness in the complex environment of the host with its associated microbial communities.

KEYWORDS: Candida, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, fluconazole, mucosal, polymicrobial, zebrafish

INTRODUCTION

Opportunistic microbes co-inhabit diverse host niches, leading to difficult-to-treat co-infections of immunocompromised individuals. However, we know little about how host tissue and microbe-microbe interactions affect antimicrobial sensitivity. Candida albicans and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are two of the most prolific opportunistic pathogens in the developed world, inhabit the same sites and are associated with polymicrobial infections (13). Candida is the fourth most common nosocomial pathogen and Pseudomonas is also associated with significant mono-microbial disease (46). Candida-Pseudomonas co-infections are associated with exacerbated disease, but it is not clear if co-infection should be treated with the same antimicrobials as mono-infection (710).

C. albicans and P. aeruginosa co-colonize numerous sites on the human body, including the gut, lungs, burn wounds, genitourinary tract, but most importantly they can be co-isolated in the lungs of cystic fibrosis (CF) patients (11, 12). CF is a genetic disease characterized by poor mucus clearance in the respiratory tract that leads to persistent infections and polymicrobial biofilms. P. aeruginosa infects around 70% of CF patients by the age of 30, and C. albicans is isolated in 75% of CF patients (13). Simultaneous colonization by these two pathogens has been linked to more severe clinical outcomes, due to accelerated decline in lung function and worsening of disease progression (710). However, the mechanism(s) underlying the postulated enhanced virulence are unknown, so it is difficult to determine if and how this interkingdom dialog regulates pathogenesis and therapy.

Co-infection of Candida with diverse bacteria leads to enhanced virulence (11, 14). C. albicans and P. aeruginosa interact through physical association, secreted factors and signaling molecules that can modulate important virulence factors in both pathogens. In vitro studies suggest that antagonistic interactions take place between P. aeruginosa and C. albicans through phenazines, ethanol and quorum sensing molecules (1519). Diverse in vivo studies of Candida-Pseudomonas co-infection have shown either enhanced or decreased virulence (12, 15, 1720). These in vivo studies suggest that a sophisticated understanding of the consequences of co-infection should account for multiple factors such as host environment, nutrient availability and host immune response that might shape these interactions.

C. albicans and P. aeruginosa have diverse strategies to sense host-relevant cues and adapt their cellular responses based on nutrient availability in the host (2124). Micronutrient acquisition is a crucial aspect of virulence for most pathogens, including Candida and Pseudomonas (21, 25). Niche-specific levels of iron even lead to differential dependence on iron sensing and response machinery for Candida, with iron-rich environments requiring detoxification and iron-poor environments requiring enhanced acquisition (21, 26). Interestingly, iron starvation has been linked to increased antimicrobial susceptibility in vitro (27, 28). Understanding different pathways controlling these adaptation strategies will reveal new opportunities for novel therapeutic targets and more effective uses of existing antimicrobials.

Previous studies have predominantly focused on physical and molecular interactions between C. albicans and P. aeruginosa and their effect on growth, morphology and virulence, but little is known about effects of cohabitation with antimicrobial treatment. While mixed biofilms enhance antibacterial effects, it is relatively unexplored how these fungal-bacterial interactions affect antifungal drug efficacy during infection (2931). Fluconazole (FLC) is highly effective and widely used in clinical settings to treat and prevent fungal infections, but paradoxically acts as a fungistatic drug in vitro (32). FLC tolerance is high among some clinical isolates and is associated with empirical treatment failure and worse outcomes (33), suggesting that reducing tolerance with adjuvant therapy may boost treatment success. Tolerance is frequently measured as trailing growth and manifests as slow in vitro growth of C. albicans in the presence of FLC at concentrations above the MIC, or MIC50. Fungicidal activity can be achieved in vitro with the addition of drugs such as HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, calcineurin inhibitors, phenazines or iron chelators (27, 28, 3339). Since microbes naturally produce these types of inhibitors, this raises the possibility that co-colonization or co-infection can produce conditions that enhance FLC activity.

To investigate if C. albicans-P. aeruginosa interactions affect FLC efficacy, we studied its activity in vitro and in the zebrafish infection model. Zebrafish is a powerful model organism that offers the advantage of examining infection outcomes in vivo while monitoring host and pathogen physiology through high resolution imaging (40, 41). The swimbladder is similar to the human lung, in that they are both air-filled, have a single layer epithelial lining that produces surfactant, and they share similar gene expression patterns (4246). These similarities make the swimbladder infection model a useful tool to study mucosal infections (15, 4751).

Previously, we found that P. aeruginosa and C. albicans are synergistically virulent in the swimbladder model, with enhanced invasive C. albicans growth and increased fish mortality (15). In this work, we investigated if FLC efficacy is modulated by P. aeruginosa during coculture and co-infection. Surprisingly, we observed that the combination of P. aeruginosa and FLC is synergistic against C. albicans, making the drug fungicidal and increasing its efficacy by over 3-logs. This striking effect was seen both in vitro and in vivo. Interestingly, iron supplementation led to a partial reversal of this synergy in vitro and in vivo. Taken together, these results suggest that the presence of co-colonizing or co-infecting microbes can substantially affect drug susceptibility in the vertebrate host.

RESULTS

Fluconazole is synergistic with P. aeruginosa against C. albicans in vitro.

C. albicans and P. aeruginosa are common opportunistic pathogens that are found in co-infections at multiple body sites, especially in the lungs of cystic fibrosis patients. We understand little about how co-infection affects virulence or whether treatment should be customized when both bacterium and fungus are co-isolated (13, 31). To determine if interactions between these microbes affect antimicrobial sensitivity, we performed coculture experiments to test if P. aeruginosa affects the antifungal action of fluconazole (FLC) against C. albicans. While FLC is fungistatic in vitro against C. albicans, in C. albicans - P. aeruginosa coculture it had potent fungicidal activity. FLC alone slowed growth of C. albicans while P. aeruginosa alone showed little to no effect on C. albicans growth, however the combination led to killing of greater than 1000x from the initial fungal inoculum (Fig. 1A). This loss of fungal viability is a hallmark for loss of FLC tolerance. Several FLC hyper-resistant C. albicans clinical isolates are also susceptible to this FLC-P. aeruginosa combination when supra-MICs of FLC are used (Fig. 1B). Synergy was also seen for susceptible and resistant clinical isolates of C. glabrata, which is evolutionarily distinct from C. albicans and has intrinsic FLC resistance (Fig. 1B). Fungicidal synergy was not observed with heat-killed bacteria (Fig. S1). The enhancement of FLC activity was reproducible in other media (YPD + serum) and at different temperatures (30°C, 37°C) (Fig. S2). Although these results argue for a robust bacteria-drug synergy, no in vitro conditions can truly substitute for the dynamic immune and nutritional environment found during infection.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Fluconazole is synergistic with P. aeruginosa against C. albicans and C. glabrata in vitro. (A) C. albicans + P. aeruginosa + FLC shows a fungicidal effect after coculture. P. aeruginosa and C. albicans were inoculated at 2 × 105/mL and FLC was added at 12.5 μg/mL. Drops (3 μL) of serial 10x dilutions of cocultures were plated on YPD containing antibiotics. Representative of >20 independent experiments. (B) Fungicidal effect of P. aeruginosa with FLC for multiple FLC-resistant and -sensitive clinical isolates of C. albicans and C. glabrata when tested at >2x MIC50. MIC50 was tested separately and supra-MICs of FLC were used (per measurements relevant for our assays; Table S1). Representative results of at least three independent experiments are shown.

P. aeruginosa enhances fluconazole activity against C. albicans during swimbladder infection in zebrafish.

To further examine C. albicans-P. aeruginosa interactions in the presence of FLC in vivo, we leveraged our zebrafish swimbladder co-infection model. This mucosal co-infection mimics conditions similar to human lungs and leads to synergistic virulence through enhanced fungal invasiveness (15, 50). To induce similar levels of mortality in mono- and co-infection, larvae were either mono-infected with a double dose of C. albicans (50–100 cells/fish) or co-infected with C. albicans (25–50 cells/fish) plus P. aeruginosa (50 cells/fish). We found that FLC treatment significantly reduced mortality in co-infection, although there was only a trend toward reduced mortality in the mono-infected group (Fig. 2A). This difference is reflected in different hazard ratios for FLC treatment in monoinfection (0.446, 95% CI 0.257–0.775) and co-infection (0.3255, 95% CI 0.243–0.437). This indicates that FLC is more effective in treating C. albicans-P. aeruginosa co-infection than fungal mono-infection, suggesting that there is also bacterial-drug synergy in vivo.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Fluconazole is synergistic with P. aeruginosa against C. albicans during mucosal infection. (A–E) Fish were infected in the swimbladder with either 50–100 C. albicans (mono-infection) or with 25–50 C. albicans and 25–50 P. aeruginosa, screened for fungal inoculum, then reared in water with or without 100 μg/mL FLC. (A) FLC-treatment increases survival during co-infection. Data pooled from 13 independent experiments. (B) Representative images of swimbladder infected with C. albicans or C. albicans + P. aeruginosa with or without FLC (100 μg/mL). Scale bars = 100 μm. Dotted white lines mark the boundary of the swimbladder. (C) C. albicans burden was measured by analysis of confocal z-stacks and calculation of square pixel coverage area. Graphs show medians and 95% confidence intervals. Data from 13 independent experiments. (D) Fraction of fungi surviving FLC treatment. Results are from 5 independent experiments. Monte-Carlo analysis was used to compare groups. (E) C. albicans burden calculated by CFU. Data from 5 independent experiments. (p > 0.05 NS; < 0.05 *; <0.01 **; <0.001 ***; <0.0001 ****).

The enhanced survival of FLC-treated co-infected fish could be due to effects on the fungus, the bacteria and/or the host. We found that FLC does not affect zebrafish health (Fig. S3) or P. aeruginosa growth in vitro (Fig. S4). To test if decreased mortality is due to a decrease in C. albicans burden, fish were imaged by confocal microscopy at 24, 48, and 72 hpi, and we found fewer fluorescent C. albicans cells when co-infections were treated with FLC (Fig. 2B). This burden was quantified by counting fluorescent C. albicans pixels in the swimbladder. By this measure, FLC caused no significant decrease in C. albicans burden in mono-infected fish, but it caused a significant reduction in co-infected fish at 24 hpi and 48 hpi (Fig. 2C). Additionally, we homogenized fish and measured the number of viable C. albicans CFU per fish. The fraction of fungi surviving FLC treatment was strikingly higher during mono-infection compared to the co-infection, while there were almost no viable fungi in the co-infected fish treated with FLC (Fig. 2D and 2E). This CFU data is particularly robust, as FLC inhibits hyphal formation (5254) and the process of homogenization biases against fungal hyphae, due to their strong inter-hyphal adherence and connections which tend to err on the side of undercounting. Together, these data suggest that the combination of FLC and P. aeruginosa have a fungicidal effect against C. albicans both in vitro and in vivo.

Fluconazole - P. aeruginosa synergy is associated with iron limitation.

Several molecular interactions between C. albicans and P. aeruginosa play roles in vitro and during infection, including quorum sensing, phenazine toxins, fungal morphogenesis and iron starvation (12). Iron is an important micronutrient for both C. albicans and P. aeruginosa, and iron chelation leads to enhanced FLC activity against C. albicans (27, 38, 55). To determine if P. aeruginosa enhances FLC activity against C. albicans by outcompeting for iron, we supplemented cocultures of C. albicans and P. aeruginosa and FLC with 1 mM FeCl3 in vitro. We found that iron supplementation limits but does not eliminate the synergistic fungicidal activity of the P. aeruginosa-FLC combination (Fig. 3A). Similarly, bacteria lacking the two major siderophores pyoverdine and pyochelin had a slightly reduced ability to synergize with FLC, although the rescue was not as strong as with iron supplementation and was not affected by additional iron supplementation (Fig. 3B). The clear loss in fungal viability even upon iron supplementation is consistent with an inability for iron to restore FLC tolerance. Intriguingly, at high concentrations phenazines have been shown to have a synergistic effect with azoles against C. albicans in vitro (28). However, both ΔlasR and Δphz bacterial mutants had undiminished synergy with FLC against C. albicans (Fig. 3C and D). Filamentous fungal growth also does not appear to play a role, as this synergy occurs both in YPD, with >99% yeast, and in RPMI, with >50% hyphae and pseudohyphae (Fig. S2). These results indicate that P. aeruginosa synergizes with FLC in vitro in part by out-competing C. albicans for iron, but this synergy is largely independent of previously identified mediators of Candida-Pseudomonas dialog (quorum sensing, phenazine toxin production and fungal filamentous growth).

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Iron supplementation partially reverses fungicidal effect in vitro, but phenazines and quorum sensing do not contribute to the effect. (A) FeCl3 supplementation reverses P. aeruginosa-FLC synergy in vitro. Cocultures were performed with or without FLC treatment (12.5 μg/mL) and/or FeCl3 (1 mM). Data from 3 independent experiments. (B) C. albicans growth after 48 h cocultures with P. aeruginosa WT or siderophore mutants: ΔpvdF, ΔpchB, ΔpvdFpchBA. Bar graph represents C. albicans growth in log10 CFU/mL. Data is representative of 4 independent experiments and medians with interquartile ranges from three independent experiments are shown. (C) Cocultures of C. albicans with P. aeruginosa WT or ΔlasR mutant PA14 ΔlasR mutant is synergistic with FLC. Bar graph represents C. albicans growth in log10 CFU/mL. Data is representative of 3 independent experiments. (D) Coculture of C. albicans with P. aeruginosa WT or phenazine deficient strains: PA14 Δphz, PA14 phzM::TnM, PA14 phzS::TnM in the presence or absence of FLC (12.5 μg/mL). Bar graph represents C. albicans growth in log10 CFU/mL. Data is representative of 3 independent experiments. Data shown are the median with ranges. (p > 0.05 NS; < 0.05 *; <0.01 **; <0.001 ***; <0.0001 ****).

P. aeruginosa supernatant in combination with FLC has a partial activity against C. albicans.

The implication of iron starvation in the interaction between C. albicans and P. aeruginosa suggested that secreted molecules might drive synergy with FLC. P. aeruginosa secretes a large number of virulence factors such as siderophores, phenazines and quorum sensing molecules that were previously shown to affect C. albicans growth (12). To test if known secreted factors contribute to the synergy seen with FLC and if they are transferable in conditioned media, we tested the activities of supernatants from WT P. aeruginosa, a double siderophore mutant and a phenazine mutant. Addition of the supernatant from P. aeruginosa did not affect C. albicans growth, whereas P. aeruginosa supernatant in combination with FLC completely blocked C. albicans trailing growth (Fig. 4A & Fig. S5). This is intermediate between FLC treatment alone, which results in trailing growth, and live P. aeruginosa, which synergizes to cause fungal death (Fig. 4A and Fig. S5). Conditioned media from C. albicans had no effect in combination with FLC, suggesting that the activity of P. aeruginosa supernatant is not due to a lack of nutrients, but rather from the activity of P. aeruginosa-secreted factors. Interestingly, the supernatant was not nearly as effective as live P. aeruginosa in synergizing with FLC. Supernatant from the double siderophore mutant and phenazine mutant strains performed indistinguishably from wildtype supernatant, inhibiting C. albicans trailing growth beyond the starting inoculum (Fig. 4B–D). Surprisingly, iron supplementation does not rescue C. albicans from the combination of FLC and P. aeruginosa conditioned media (Fig. S6). These results suggest that the full effects of P. aeruginosa-FLC synergy require live bacteria, while some activity can be transferred in conditioned media.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

P. aeruginosa supernatants exhibit mild synergy with FLC compared to live Pseudomonas. P. aeruginosa and C. albicans were grown overnight in YPD media at 30°C. Overnight cultures supernatants were sterile filtered and added to 4 × 105 C. albicans in YPD liquid media along with 12.5 μg/mL of FLC. After 48 h of incubation at 30°C, cultures were 10-fold diluted and spotted onto YPD plates with antibiotics to count CFU. (A) Supernatant from PA14-dTom strain, (B) Supernatant from PA01 WT and ΔpvdFpchBA, (C) Supernatant from PA14 WT and Δphz, (D) Representative images of YPD plates showing the growth of C. albicans after 24 h of incubation. Data from 3 independent experiments. (p > 0.05 NS; < 0.05 *; <0.01 **; <0.001 ***; <0.0001 ****).

Iron homeostasis plays a limited role in regulation of P. aeruginosa-mediated synergy with FLC during infection.

To test the contribution of iron homeostasis to FLC-P. aeruginosa synergy during infection, we again turned to the zebrafish swimbladder model. We treated co-infections with FLC, supplemented with different levels of iron, and monitored both fish survival and fungal burden. Remarkably, iron supplementation reduced the protective effects of FLC against co-infection-induced mortality in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 5A). Imaging revealed an increase in filamentous fungi that is usually associated with virulence but would be undercounted by homogenization and plating (15, 50, 56). To quantify this type of fungal overgrowth, we used double-blind scoring of individual fish for their level of hyphal growth, classifying fish into four categories (Fig. 5B). This semi-quantitative scoring revealed a mild but significant enhancement of fungal filamentous growth upon iron supplementation (Fig. 5C). This is also seen clearly in representative images selected from fish with median scores (Fig. 5D). Consistent with both the mild effect of siderophore deletion on FLC synergy in vitro and the intermediate effect of iron supplementation in vivo, the siderophore double mutant P. aeruginosa was not hypovirulent and did not limit the effectiveness of FLC during co-infection (Fig. 5E). Taken together with our in vitro findings, these in vivo infection results argue that iron supplementation has a limited ability to reverse P. aeruginosa-FLC synergy.

FIG 5.

FIG 5

Iron homeostasis contributes to P. aeruginosa-mediated synergy with FLC during infection. (A) FeCl3 supplementation partially reverses P. aeruginosa-FLC synergy in vivo. Zebrafish injected with indicated microbes in the swimbladder with or without the indicated amounts of FeCl3.(2 or 4 pmol). Data pooled from 4 independent experiments. (B) Hyphal growth during infection was scored using double-blind methodology. Representative images of each score: 0-no hyphal growth; 1- < 10% coverage of swimbladder; 2- 10-50% coverage of swimbladder; 3- > 50% coverage of swimbladder. (C) FeCl3 supplementation is associated with stronger hyphal growth in vivo. Data shown are the medians with interquartile ranges from three experiments. (D) Representative images of scored hyphal growth in the swimbladder at 24 hpi. Shown are median fish from each cohort. (E) FLC treatment has no loss of effectiveness in co-infections with P. aeruginosa siderophore mutant. Scale bars = 100 μm. (p > 0.05 NS; < 0.05 *; <0.01 **; <0.001 ***; <0.0001 ****).

DISCUSSION

In this study, we found that fungal-bacterial interactions can drive an unexpected enhancement in antifungal susceptibility during treatment of infection. Specifically, P. aeruginosa brings out a fungicidal activity of the normally fungistatic drug fluconazole against C. albicans. We used a transparent mucosal infection model to mimic the clinical co-infections seen in cystic fibrosis and leveraged its simplicity and amenability to intravital imaging to probe the four-part interplay of two microbial species, drug therapy and host responses. These findings are clinically relevant for several reasons. First, these two microbes are frequently found together commensally and during infection, especially in cystic fibrosis. Second, there is a scarcity of effective anti-fungals, and the action of the most orally bioavailable drug is limited by tolerance, which is associated with treatment failure. Third, our results implicate iron in infection and therapy in a new way beyond strictly as a micronutrient subjected to sequestration by the host and pathogen. The ability of P. aeruginosa to modify fungal drug susceptibility in vitro and in vivo adds a new dimension to the complexities of polymicrobial infection and raises important questions about the utilization of antifungal drugs during co-infection.

The fungicidal effect of FLC during co-infection suggests that Pseudomonas blocks C. albicans tolerance to FLC, leading to death rather than persistence or slow growth during treatment. Recent work suggests that drug tolerance should be considered alongside the traditional MIC as an indicator for clinical response—and may be even more important than MIC (33). Determination of clinically-relevant drug resistance profiles in fungi is fraught with challenges and current in vitro testing protocols do not robustly match empirical clinical efficacy (32, 33). The disconnect between in vitro testing and clinical success may be due to biotic and/or abiotic factors in the host environment or may be due to a focus on the wrong metric for resistance. Microbe-microbe cross talk alters antibacterial sensitivity in vivo (29, 57) and may be especially relevant in chronic co-infection of the immunocompromised host (13, 31). Thus, understanding how P. aeruginosa can reduce antifungal drug tolerance during treatment of infection has potentially important implications for both diagnosis and treatment.

Manipulation of iron homeostasis by P. aeruginosa is clearly one mechanism for enhancing FLC efficacy against C. albicans. This activity may be different from the iron piracy used by P. aeruginosa against other fungi, where in vitro antagonism is largely transferable with soluble factors such as siderophores (24, 58, 59). We tested other potentially contributing bacterial factors, including phenazines and quorum sensing, and fungal factors, including filamentous growth, but only iron supplementation significantly modulated the live P. aeruginosa-FLC synergy. Iron starvation is known to change FLC into a fungicidal drug, perhaps by regulating membrane fluidity, limiting mitochondrial function and/or blocking calcineurin-mediated stress responses (27, 33, 38, 55, 60). However, iron supplementation only partially reverses the effect of P. aeruginosa on FLC fungicidal activity both in vitro and during infection, and deletion of both major siderophores has minimal effects in vitro and no effect in vivo. Thus, while it is clear that P. aeruginosa has synergy with FLC against C. albicans in vitro and during co-infection, iron homeostasis is only one piece of the puzzle.

Iron is an essential micronutrient for both P. aeruginosa and C. albicans that each microbe acquires by multiple pathways during infection (22, 61, 62). Iron is important for C. albicans virulence in disseminated murine candidiasis and for epithelial invasion in vitro (63). Further, some iron chelators can work alone or in conjunction with FLC in murine models of OPC, VVC and disseminated mucormycosis (21, 39, 6466). Conversely, iron supplementation can enhance virulence in both our zebrafish model and in a murine GI disease model (17, 21). Nonetheless, clinical studies of iron chelation against fungal infection are inconclusive and suggest it may negatively impact health (6769). Thus, the prospect of using iron chelation to increase drug effectiveness during treatment of human patients holds both risks and potential benefits.

C. albicans can have both positive and negative interactions with diverse bacteria, depending on the context (12, 14, 70). In co-infection, C. albicans and P. aeruginosa are synergistically virulent in both a burn model and the zebrafish mucosal model (15, 18). However, these two microbes can exhibit antagonism in vitro and in vivo (12, 71). Furthermore, interactions of C. albicans with S. epidermidis and S. aureus in vivo are synergistic in terms of virulence but have shown antibiotic antagonism rather than synergy (72, 73). Given these disparate results, it remains to be tested whether the P. aeruginosa-FLC synergy is broadly relevant for vertebrate co-infections with Candida. It will be crucial to determine which mechanisms, beyond iron homeostasis, regulate P. aeruginosa-FLC synergy in vitro and then test those mechanisms in zebrafish and additional infection models such as the mouse cornea (7476).

The ability of P. aeruginosa to synergize with FLC against Candida is only partly transferable in conditioned media, suggesting that there are multiple bacterial contributors to this ability. Interestingly, the effect of conditioned media does not depend on iron-chelating siderophores, and iron supplementation does not reverse the effect of conditioned media. Taken together, these data suggest that siderophores and iron starvation are only effective in synergizing with FLC when live bacteria are present to scavenge the iron-replete siderophores from the media highlighting the multifactorial nature of P. aeruginosa antagonism toward Candida.

Co-infections of P. aeruginosa and C. albicans are infrequent, except in the context of chronically infected cystic fibrosis (CF) patients and those on a ventilator (10, 77, 78). In CF, co-isolation of both C. albicans and P. aeruginosa is associated with worse outcomes, and the risks of other co-infections and acquisition of drug resistance are higher (13, 31). Interestingly, iron levels have been shown to be increased in cystic fibrosis airways and have been implicated in facilitating P. aeruginosa infections (79). Work in a zebrafish model of CF suggests that P. aeruginosa is similarly more virulent in the absence of CFTR activity in this vertebrate, suggesting that this model may be informative in translation to human disease (80).

In summary, FLC and P. aeruginosa have a synergistic interaction against C. albicans that results in enhanced clearance of C. albicans. This increased efficacy of FLC is dependent, in part, on iron sequestration caused by P. aeruginosa. We do not yet know if other P. aeruginosa clinical isolates show similar effect or if the synergy also occurs against other Candida species that are intrinsically more resistant to azoles, although a similar phenomenon occurs with C. glabrata. Nonetheless, our work demonstrates that polymicrobial interactions can profoundly shift antifungal sensitivity of C. albicans. On a more general level, our results also suggest that the biotic and abiotic growth environment can influence the efficacy of antifungal drugs, pointing the way toward new strategies for developing drugs to eradicate recalcitrant infections.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ethics statement and zebrafish care and maintenance.

Adult zebrafish used for breeding embryos were housed in recirculating systems (Aquatic Habitats, Apopka, FL) at the University of Maine Zebrafish Facility. All zebrafish care protocols and experiments were performed in accordance with National Research Council guidelines (81) under Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) protocols A2015-11-03 and A2018-10-01. Larvae were reared at a density of 150/dish in 150-mm petri dishes containing 150 mL of E3 (5 mM sodium chloride, 0.174 mM potassium chloride, 0.33 mM calcium chloride, 0.332 mM magnesium sulfate, 2 mM HEPES in Nanopure water, pH 7) supplemented with 0.02 mg/mL of 1-phenyl-2-thiourea (PTU) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) to prevent pigmentation, as well as 0.3 mg/liter methylene blue (VWR, Radnor, PA) for the first 24 h to prevent microbial growth. Larvae were manually dechorionated at 24 h postfertilization, transferred into media containing E3 and PTU, and incubated at 33°C over the course of experiments. This temperature was chosen as the highest safe temperature for zebrafish health to approximate human body temperature and is regularly used for experiments with temperature-sensitive alleles. Experiments were conducted using wild-type (AB) zebrafish.

Strains and growth conditions.

The strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. Most experiments were conducted with the C. albicans reference strain SC5314 and either PA14 or PA01 P. aeruginosa strains. All experiments with mutant bacteria or fungi were conducted with matched controls from the source laboratory (see Table S1 for panel-by-panel description). C. albicans and P. aeruginosa strains were routinely refreshed from frozen stocks at −80°C and maintained on YPD (1% Bacto yeast extract, 2% Bacto peptone, 2% dextrose, 2% Bacto agar) plates or Pseudomonas isolation agar (Sigma-Aldrich) for in vitro experiments and LB agar (10 g/liter Bacto tryptone, 5 g/liter Bacto yeast extract, 10 g/liter sodium chloride, 1.2% agar; BD, San Jose, CA) supplemented with 750 μg/mL ampicillin (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA) for injection. Liquid cultures were grown overnight in YPD or LB media in a rotator wheel at 30°C. Prior to experiments, cultures were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and optical density OD 600 was measured.

TABLE 1.

Fungal and bacterial strains used

Strain name Description and Genotype Reference
Candida albicans and Candida glabrata
 SC5314-Neon C. albicans Wildtype clinical isolate, pENO1-NEON-NAT (82)
 Caf2-FR C. albicans SC5314 background; Δura3::imm434/URA3 pENO1-iRFP-NAT (15)
 SN250 C. albicans his1Δ/his1Δ, leu2Δ::C.dubliniensis HIS1/leu2Δ::C.maltosa LEU2, arg4Δ /arg4Δ, URA3/ura3Δ::imm434, IRO1/iro1Δ::imm434 (83)
sef1 Δ/Δ C. albicans his1Δ/his1Δ, sef1Δ::C.dubliniensis HIS1/sef1Δ::C.maltosa LEU2, arg4Δ/arg4Δ, URA3/ura3Δ::imm434, IRO1/iro1Δ::imm434 (83)
sfu1 Δ/Δ C. albicans his1Δ/his1Δ, sfu1Δ::C.dubliniensis HIS1/sfu1Δ::C.maltosa LEU2, arg4Δ/arg4Δ, URA3/ura3Δ::imm434, IRO1/iro1Δ::imm434 (83)
 NCO-788 C. albicans Clinical isolate (84) (Clancy and Shields, U. Pittsburgh)
 NC1 C. glabrata Clinical isolate (84) (Clancy and Shields, U. Pittsburgh)
 NC999 C. glabrata Clinical isolate (84) (Clancy and Shields, U. Pittsburgh)
 CG-4720 C. glabrata Clinical isolate (85)
 B13-TWO7229#2 C. albicans Clinical isolate #2 in series from patient. (84, 86)
 B14-TWO7230#3 C. albicans Clinical isolate #3 in series from patient (84, 86)
 B15-TWO7241#16 C. albicans Clinical isolate #16 in series from patient (84, 86)
 B16-TWO7243#17 C. albicans Clinical isolate #17 in series from patient (84, 86)
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
 PA14 dTom PA14 carrying plasmid encoding dTomato (80)
 PA14 ΔlasR In‐frame deletion of lasR (87)
 PA01 WT Wild type clinical isolate (88)
 PAO6382 PA01 ΔpvdF (89)
 PAO6297 PA01 ΔpchBA (90)
 PAO6383 PA01 ΔpvdFΔpchBA (90)
 PA14 WT Wildtype clinical isolate (91)
 PA14 Δphz In-frame deletion of phzA1-G1 and phzA2-G2 operons, phenazine negative (91)
 PA14 phzM::TnM TnM mutant, 5-MPCA negative (91)
 PA14 phzS::TnM TnM mutant, PYO negative (91)

In vitro C. albicans and P. aeruginosa coculture.

P. aeruginosa and C. albicans were individually grown overnight. P. aeruginosa was grown in GGP media (3% glycerol, 1% proteose peptone, 2.9 mM K2HPO4, 2 mM MgSO4●7H20) or LB media (10 g/liter Bacto tryptone, 5 g/liter Bacto yeast extract, 10 g/liter sodium chloride; BD, San Jose, CA) at 30°C. C. albicans was grown in YPD media at 30°C. P. aeruginosa and C. albicans cultures were combined in a 1:1 ratio with both organisms at a final concentration of 2 × 105/mL. The P. aeruginosa/C. albicans coculture was grown at 30°C for 48 h in YPD on a rotating wheel. Fluconazole (Sigma-Aldrich) was used at 12.5 μg/mL unless specified. This is significantly above the MIC50 for strains and limits any experimental variability due to slight differences in drug concentration. The spot test was performed by spotting 3 μL from each dilution using a multichannel pipette, plated on YPD agar supplemented with penicillin (250 U/mL)-streptomycin (250 μg/mL) (Lonza), 30 μg/mL gentamicin sulfate (BioWhittaker, Lonza), and 3 μg/mL vancomycin hydrochloride (Amresco, Solon, OH) and on Pseudomonas isolation agar (Sigma-Aldrich) for C. albicans and P. aeruginosa selection respectively. Plates were incubated for 24 h at 37°C.

For collecting supernatants, P. aeruginosa overnight cultures in LB or GGP were centrifuged at 21,000 × g for 2 min and supernatant was filtered using an Acrodisc 0.2 μm syringe filter (PALL corporation). Filtered supernatant was added to 4 × 105 C. albicans in YPD liquid media. 48 h post incubation, cultures were 10-fold diluted and spot tests were performed as described above.

Swimbladder infections via microinjection.

At 4 days postfertilization, zebrafish larvae were anesthetized in Tris-buffered tricaine methane sulfonate (160 μg/mL; Tricaine; Western Chemicals, Inc., Ferndale, WA) and selected for swimbladder inflation. Fish were microinjected as previously described (48). Fungal and bacterial cells were resuspended in 5% polyvinylpyrrolione (PVP; Sigma-Aldrich) and fish were injected with 4 nl of PVP control, C. albicans at 5 × 107 CFU/mL, or a C. albicans-P. aeruginosa mixture at 2.5 × 107 CFU/mL for each. The C. albicans-P. aeruginosa coculture was prepared by combining equal volumes of C. albicans at 5 × 107 CFU/mL and P. aeruginosa at 5 × 107 CFU/mL prior to injection. As indicated, FeCl3 (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to the injection solution with C. albicans and/or P. aeruginosa to a final concentration of 0.5 mM or 1 mM, for a final amount of 2 or 4 pmol per 4 nl dose. Within 1 h of injection, larvae were placed in individual wells of a 96-well glass-bottom imaging dish (Greiner Bio-One, Monroe, NC) and screened for an inoculum of 50 to 100 yeast cells for mono-infection, and 25 to 50 yeast cells for co-infection, using a Zeiss AxioVision VivaTome microscope. For mortality experiments, fish were kept at 33°C in E3 containing PTU with or without fluconazole at 100 μg/mL. Fish were held for 3 days post injection and monitored daily for survival.

Confocal laser scanning fluorescence microscopy.

At 24, 48, and 72 h post-injection, larvae were anesthetized in Tricaine and immobilized in 0.4% low-melting-point agarose (Lonza, Switzerland) in E3 containing Tricaine in a 96-well glass-bottom imaging dish (Greiner Bio-One, Monroe, NC). Confocal images were acquired using an Olympus IX-81 inverted microscope with an FV-1000 laser scanning confocal system (Olympus, Waltham, MA). The EGFP, dTomato, and Far-Red fluorescent proteins were detected by laser/optical filters with a 20× (NA, 0.7) for excitation/emission at 488 nm/505 to 525 nm, 543 nm/560 to 620 nm, and 635 nm/655 to 755 nm, respectively. Z-stacks of 15 to 25 slices, with an interslice interval between 7 and 13 μm, were collected and processed using FluoView (Olympus, Waltham, MA).

Image analysis.

The percentage of the swimbladder covered by Candida at 24, 48, and 72 hpi was determined using Fiji software (ImageJ) applied to maximum-projection images from stacks of 15 to 25 z-slices. Images were taken with identical acquisition settings to ensure comparability. The swimbladder area was delineated, and the percent coverage of Candida fluorescence above a set threshold (corresponding to background fluorescence) was calculated. Images covered the swimbladder from midline to skin in 5-μm z-slices. The number of slices per image ranged from 15 to 25, depending on the size of the fish.

Hyphal growth scoring from confocal images.

Zebrafish infected with C. albicans SC5314-Neon and PA14-dTomato with or without Fluconazole. FeCl3 (2 or 4 pmol) was co-injected into swimbladder along with C. albicans and P. aeruginosa. Fish were imaged at 24, 48, and 72 hpi and images were processed as described above. Hyphal growth of C. albicans in the swimbladder was scored blindly as follows: 0 = no hyphal growth; 1 = <10% hyphal growth; 2 between 10 and 50% hyphal growth; and 3  = >50% hyphal growth.

CFU assessments.

For CFU quantification, 5 randomly selected infected larvae were pooled and homogenized at 24, 48, and 72 hpi in 500 μL of 1X PBS. For plating, 50 μL or 100 μL of homogenate from groups was plated on both YPD agar supplemented with 250 U/mL, 250 μg/mL penicillin-streptomycin (Lonza), 30 μg/mL gentamicin sulfate (BioWhittaker, Lonza), and 3 μg/mL vancomycin hydrochloride (Amresco, Solon, OH) and on Pseudomonas isolation agar (Sigma-Aldrich) for C. albicans and P. aeruginosa selection, respectively. Plates were incubated overnight at 37°C, colonies were counted the following day, and CFU/fish was calculated.

Statistical analyses.

Statistical analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism 7 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA). Data was analyzed for normality and appropriate parametric or nonparametric tests were performed, means or medians are shown, respectively. All significant differences are indicated in the figures, with *, **, ***, and **** indicating P values of <0.05, <0.01, <0.001, and <0.0001, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were subjected to a log rank (Mantel-Cox) test, and Bonferroni correction was then used to determine statistical differences between pairs of treatments. Monte-Carlo simulation was used to analyze ratios in Fig. 2D. Mann-Whitney test was used to analyze experiments in figure panels 2C, 2E, 3A, 5C. Unpaired T-test was used for Fig. 2E Two-way ANOVA was used for Fig. 3B to D. For Fig. 4A–C, significance was established by identifying non-overlapping 95% confidence intervals.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Damian Krysan (U. Iowa) for providing Candida clinical isolates, Natalia Kirienko (Rice University), Deborah Hogan (Dartmouth University) and Andrew Koh (UT Southwestern) for providing P. aeruginosa mutants. We thank Robert Shanks (U. Pittsburgh) for consultation and providing initial P. aeruginosa supernatants. We thank Mark Nilan for outstanding zebrafish husbandry, members of the Wheeler Laboratory and Gerry Fink for comments on the manuscript, and several undergraduates for their useful contributions (Roxane Baudouin, Orlane Mombled, Jennifer Quezada-Loja, Jessica Hayden, Maria Vina Lopez, and Nikhil Vaidya). R.T.W. is a Burroughs Wellcome Fund investigator in the pathogenesis of infectious disease, S.H. is Chase fellow at UMaine, and this work was funded by NIH grant R15AI133415 and by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch project number ME0-21821, through the Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station.

Footnotes

Supplemental material is available online only.

SUPPLEMENTAL FILE 1
Supplemental material. Download iai.00626-21-s0001.pdf, PDF file, 9.5 MB (9.7MB, pdf)

Contributor Information

Robert T. Wheeler, Email: robert.wheeler1@maine.edu.

Mairi C. Noverr, Tulane School of Medicine

REFERENCES

  • 1.Neville BA, d’Enfert C, Bougnoux ME. 2015. Candida albicans commensalism in the gastrointestinal tract. FEMS Yeast Res 15. 10.1093/femsyr/fov081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Stephens WZ, Burns AR, Stagaman K, Wong S, Rawls JF, Guillemin K, Bohannan BJ. 2016. The composition of the zebrafish intestinal microbial community varies across development. ISME J 10:644–654. 10.1038/ismej.2015.140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tay WH, Chong KK, Kline KA. 2016. Polymicrobial-host interactions during infection. J Mol Biol 428:3355–3371. 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nikou SA, Kichik N, Brown R, Ponde NO, Ho J, Naglik JR, Richardson JP. 2019. Candida albicans interactions with mucosal surfaces during health and disease. Pathogens 8:53. 10.3390/pathogens8020053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Weinstein RA, Gaynes R, Edwards JR, National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance S. 2005. Overview of nosocomial infections caused by gram-negative bacilli. Clin Infect Dis 41:848–854. 10.1086/432803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gibson RL, Burns JL, Ramsey BW. 2003. Pathophysiology and management of pulmonary infections in cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 168:918–951. 10.1164/rccm.200304-505SO. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chotirmall SH, O'Donoghue E, Bennett K, Gunaratnam C, O'Neill SJ, McElvaney NG. 2010. Sputum Candida albicans presages FEV(1) decline and hospital-treated exacerbations in cystic fibrosis. Chest 138:1186–1195. 10.1378/chest.09-2996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gileles-Hillel A, Shoseyov D, Polacheck I, Korem M, Kerem E, Cohen-Cymberknoh M. 2015. Association of chronic Candida albicans respiratory infection with a more severe lung disease in patients with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol 50:1082–1089. 10.1002/ppul.23302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Horre R, Symoens F, Delhaes L, Bouchara JP. 2010. Fungal respiratory infections in cystic fibrosis: a growing problem. Med Mycol 48 Suppl 1:S1–S3. 10.3109/13693786.2010.529304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Leclair LW, Hogan DA. 2010. Mixed bacterial-fungal infections in the CF respiratory tract. Med Mycol 48 Suppl 1:S125–32. 10.3109/13693786.2010.521522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Forster TM, Mogavero S, Drager A, Graf K, Polke M, Jacobsen ID, Hube B. 2016. Enemies and brothers in arms: Candida albicans and gram-positive bacteria. Cell Microbiol 18:1709–1715. 10.1111/cmi.12657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fourie R, Pohl CH. 2019. Beyond antagonism: The interaction between candida species and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Fungi (Basel) 5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Valenza G, Tappe D, Turnwald D, Frosch M, Konig C, Hebestreit H, Abele-Horn M. 2008. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of microorganisms isolated from sputa of patients with cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros 7:123–127. 10.1016/j.jcf.2007.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.d’Enfert C, Kaune AK, Alaban LR, Chakraborty S, Cole N, Delavy M, Kosmala D, Marsaux B, Frois-Martins R, Morelli M, Rosati D, Valentine M, Xie Z, Emritloll Y, Warn PA, Bequet F, Bougnoux ME, Bornes S, Gresnigt MS, Hube B, Jacobsen ID, Legrand M, Leibundgut-Landmann S, Manichanh C, Munro CA, Netea MG, Queiroz K, Roget K, Thomas V, Thoral C, Van den Abbeele P, Walker AW, Brown AJP. 2020. The impact of the fungus-host-microbiota interplay upon Candida albicans infections: current knowledge and new perspectives. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 10.1093/femsre/fuaa060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bergeron AC, Seman BG, Hammond JH, Archambault LS, Hogan DA, Wheeler RT. 2017. Candida albicans and Pseudomonas aeruginosa interact to enhance virulence of mucosal infection in transparent zebrafish. Infect Immun 85. 10.1128/IAI.00475-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cugini C, Calfee MW, Farrow JM, 3rd, Morales DK, Pesci EC, Hogan DA. 2007. Farnesol, a common sesquiterpene, inhibits PQS production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol Microbiol 65:896–906. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05840.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lopez-Medina E, Fan D, Coughlin LA, Ho EX, Lamont IL, Reimmann C, Hooper LV, Koh AY. 2015. Candida albicans inhibits pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence through suppression of pyochelin and pyoverdine biosynthesis. PLoS Pathog 11:e1005129. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Neely AN, Law EJ, Holder IA. 1986. Increased susceptibility to lethal Candida infections in burned mice preinfected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa or pretreated with proteolytic enzymes. Infect Immun 52:200–204. 10.1128/iai.52.1.200-204.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Peleg AY, Hogan DA, Mylonakis E. 2010. Medically important bacterial-fungal interactions. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:340–349. 10.1038/nrmicro2313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ader F, Jawhara S, Nseir S, Kipnis E, Faure K, Vuotto F, Chemani C, Sendid B, Poulain D, Guery B. 2011. Short term Candida albicans colonization reduces Pseudomonas aeruginosa-related lung injury and bacterial burden in a murine model. Crit Care 15:R150. 10.1186/cc10276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chen C, Pande K, French SD, Tuch BB, Noble SM. 2011. An iron homeostasis regulatory circuit with reciprocal roles in Candida albicans commensalism and pathogenesis. Cell Host Microbe 10:118–135. 10.1016/j.chom.2011.07.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Damron FH, Oglesby-Sherrouse AG, Wilks A, Barbier M. 2016. Dual-seq transcriptomics reveals the battle for iron during Pseudomonas aeruginosa acute murine pneumonia. Sci Rep 6:39172. 10.1038/srep39172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pradhan A, Ma Q, de Assis LJ, Leaves I, Larcombe DE, Rodriguez Rondon AV, Nev OA, Brown AJP. 2020. Anticipatory stress responses and immune evasion in fungal pathogens. Trends Microbiol 29:416–427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sass G, Ansari SR, Dietl AM, Deziel E, Haas H, Stevens DA. 2019. Intermicrobial interaction: Aspergillus fumigatus siderophores protect against competition by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS One 14:e0216085. 10.1371/journal.pone.0216085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lopez CA, Skaar EP. 2018. The impact of dietary transition metals on host-bacterial interactions. Cell Host Microbe 23:737–748. 10.1016/j.chom.2018.05.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Malavia D, Crawford A, Wilson D. 2017. Nutritional immunity and fungal pathogenesis: The struggle for micronutrients at the host-pathogen interface. Adv Microb Physiol 70:85–103. 10.1016/bs.ampbs.2017.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fiori A, Van Dijck P. 2012. Potent synergistic effect of doxycycline with fluconazole against Candida albicans is mediated by interference with iron homeostasis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:3785–3796. 10.1128/AAC.06017-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Nishanth Kumar S, Nisha GV, Sudaresan A, Venugopal VV, Sree Kumar MM, Lankalapalli RS, Dileep Kumar BS. 2014. Synergistic activity of phenazines isolated from Pseudomonas aeruginosa in combination with azoles against Candida species. Med Mycol 52:482–490. 10.1093/mmy/myu012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Alam F, Catlow D, Di Maio A, Blair JMA, Hall RA. 2020. Candida albicans enhances meropenem tolerance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a dual-species biofilm. J Antimicrob Chemother 75:925–935. 10.1093/jac/dkz514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hall CW, Mah TF. 2017. Molecular mechanisms of biofilm-based antibiotic resistance and tolerance in pathogenic bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 41:276–301. 10.1093/femsre/fux010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rogers GB, Hoffman LR, Whiteley M, Daniels TW, Carroll MP, Bruce KD. 2010. Revealing the dynamics of polymicrobial infections: implications for antibiotic therapy. Trends Microbiol 18:357–364. 10.1016/j.tim.2010.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lamoth F, Lewis RE, Kontoyiannis DP. 2020. Role and interpretation of antifungal susceptibility testing for the management of invasive fungal infections. J Fungi (Basel) 7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rosenberg A, Ene IV, Bibi M, Zakin S, Segal ES, Ziv N, Dahan AM, Colombo AL, Bennett RJ, Berman J. 2018. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat Commun 9:2470. 10.1038/s41467-018-04926-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gao Y, Li H, Liu S, Zhang X, Sun S. 2014. Synergistic effect of fluconazole and doxycycline against Candida albicans biofilms resulting from calcium fluctuation and downregulation of fluconazole-inducible efflux pump gene overexpression. J Med Microbiol 63:956–961. 10.1099/jmm.0.072421-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gu W, Yu Q, Yu C, Sun S. 2018. In vivo activity of fluconazole/tetracycline combinations in Galleria mellonella with resistant Candida albicans infection. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 13:74–80. 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kaneko Y, Fukazawa H, Ohno H, Miyazaki Y. 2013. Combinatory effect of fluconazole and FDA-approved drugs against Candida albicans. J Infect Chemother 19:1141–1145. 10.1007/s10156-013-0639-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Liu S, Hou Y, Chen X, Gao Y, Li H, Sun S. 2014. Combination of fluconazole with non-antifungal agents: a promising approach to cope with resistant Candida albicans infections and insight into new antifungal agent discovery. Int J Antimicrob Agents 43:395–402. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2013.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Prasad T, Chandra A, Mukhopadhyay CK, Prasad R. 2006. Unexpected link between iron and drug resistance of Candida spp.: iron depletion enhances membrane fluidity and drug diffusion, leading to drug-susceptible cells. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50:3597–3606. 10.1128/AAC.00653-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Savage KA, Parquet MC, Allan DS, Davidson RJ, Holbein BE, Lilly EA, Fidel PL. Jr, 2018. Iron restriction to clinical isolates of candida albicans by the novel chelator DIBI inhibits growth and increases sensitivity to azoles in vitro and in vivo in a murine model of experimental vaginitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62. 10.1128/AAC.02576-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rosowski EE, Knox BP, Archambault LS, Huttenlocher A, Keller NP, Wheeler RT, Davis JM. 2018. The zebrafish as a model host for invasive fungal infections. J Fungi (Basel) 4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Tobin DM, May RC, Wheeler RT. 2012. Zebrafish: a see-through host and a fluorescent toolbox to probe host-pathogen interaction. PLoS Pathog 8:e1002349. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Oehlers SH, Flores MV, Chen T, Hall CJ, Crosier KE, Crosier PS. 2011. Topographical distribution of antimicrobial genes in the zebrafish intestine. Dev Comp Immunol 35:385–391. 10.1016/j.dci.2010.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Robertson GN, McGee CA, Dumbarton TC, Croll RP, Smith FM. 2007. Development of the swimbladder and its innervation in the zebrafish, Danio rerio. J Morphol 268:967–985. 10.1002/jmor.10558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sullivan LC, Daniels CB, Phillips ID, Orgeig S, Whitsett JA. 1998. Conservation of surfactant protein A: evidence for a single origin for vertebrate pulmonary surfactant. J Mol Evol 46:131–138. 10.1007/pl00006287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Winata CL, Korzh S, Kondrychyn I, Zheng W, Korzh V, Gong Z. 2009. Development of zebrafish swimbladder: The requirement of hedgehog signaling in specification and organization of the three tissue layers. Dev Biol 331:222–236. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.04.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zheng W, Wang Z, Collins JE, Andrews RM, Stemple D, Gong Z. 2011. Comparative transcriptome analyses indicate molecular homology of zebrafish swimbladder and mammalian lung. PLoS One 6:e24019. 10.1371/journal.pone.0024019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Archambault LS, Trzilova D, Gonia S, Gale C, Wheeler RT. 2019. Intravital imaging reveals divergent cytokine and cellular immune responses to Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis. mBio 10. 10.1128/mBio.00266-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Gratacap RL, Bergeron AC, Wheeler RT. 2014. Modeling mucosal candidiasis in larval zebrafish by swimbladder injection. J Vis Exp 93:e52182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Gratacap RL, Rawls JF, Wheeler RT. 2013. Mucosal candidiasis elicits NF-kappaB activation, proinflammatory gene expression and localized neutrophilia in zebrafish. Dis Model Mech 6:1260–1270. 10.1242/dmm.012039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Gratacap RL, Scherer AK, Seman BG, Wheeler RT. 2017. Control of mucosal candidiasis in the zebrafish swimbladder depends on neutrophils that block filament invasion and drive extracellular trap production. Infect Immun 85. 10.1128/IAI.00276-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Gonia S, Archambault L, Shevik M, Altendahl M, Fellows E, Bliss JM, Wheeler RT, Gale CA. 2017. Candida parapsilosis protects premature intestinal epithelial cells from invasion and damage by Candida albicans. Front Pediatr 5:54. 10.3389/fped.2017.00054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Johnson EM, Richardson MD, Warnock DW. 1983. Effect of imidazole antifungals on the development of germ tubes by strains of Candida albicans. J Antimicrob Chemother 12:303–316. 10.1093/jac/12.4.303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kontoyiannis DP, Tarrand J, Prince R, Samonis G, Rolston KVR. 2001. Effect of fluconazole on agar invasion by Candida albicans. J Med Microbiol 50:78–82. 10.1099/0022-1317-50-1-78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Sorgo AG, Heilmann CJ, Dekker HL, Bekker M, Brul S, de Koster CG, de Koning LJ, Klis FM. 2011. Effects of fluconazole on the secretome, the wall proteome, and wall integrity of the clinical fungus Candida albicans. Eukaryot Cell 10:1071–1081. 10.1128/EC.05011-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Demuyser L, Swinnen E, Fiori A, Herrera-Malaver B, Verstrepen K, Van Dijck P. 2017. Mitochondrial cochaperone Mge1 is involved in regulating susceptibility to Fluconazole in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida species. mBio 8. 10.1128/mBio.00201-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Seman BG, Moore JL, Scherer AK, Blair BA, Manandhar S, Jones JM, Wheeler RT. 2018. Yeast and filaments have specialized, independent activities in a zebrafish model of Candida albicans infection. Infect Immun 86. 10.1128/IAI.00415-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Rogiers O, Holtappels M, Siala W, Lamkanfi M, Van Bambeke F, Lagrou K, Van Dijck P, Kucharikova S. 2018. Anidulafungin increases the antibacterial activity of tigecycline in polymicrobial Candida albicans/Staphylococcus aureus biofilms on intraperitoneally implanted foreign bodies. J Antimicrob Chemother 73:2806–2814. 10.1093/jac/dky246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Briard B, Bomme P, Lechner BE, Mislin GL, Lair V, Prevost MC, Latge JP, Haas H, Beauvais A. 2015. Pseudomonas aeruginosa manipulates redox and iron homeostasis of its microbiota partner Aspergillus fumigatus via phenazines. Sci Rep 5:8220. 10.1038/srep08220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kousser C, Clark C, Sherrington S, Voelz K, Hall RA. 2019. Pseudomonas aeruginosa inhibits Rhizopus microspores germination through sequestration of free environmental iron. Sci Rep 9:5714. 10.1038/s41598-019-42175-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hameed S, Dhamgaye S, Singh A, Goswami SK, Prasad R. 2011. Calcineurin signaling and membrane lipid homeostasis regulates iron mediated multidrug resistance mechanisms in Candida albicans. PLoS One 6:e18684. 10.1371/journal.pone.0018684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kornitzer D, Roy U. 2020. Pathways of heme utilization in fungi. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res 1867:118817. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2020.118817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Minandri F, Imperi F, Frangipani E, Bonchi C, Visaggio D, Facchini M, Pasquali P, Bragonzi A, Visca P. 2016. Role of iron uptake systems in Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence and airway infection. Infect Immun 84:2324–2335. 10.1128/IAI.00098-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Heymann P, Gerads M, Schaller M, Dromer F, Winkelmann G, Ernst JF. 2002. The siderophore iron transporter of Candida albicans (Sit1p/Arn1p) mediates uptake of ferrichrome-type siderophores and is required for epithelial invasion. Infect Immun 70:5246–5255. 10.1128/IAI.70.9.5246-5255.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Ibrahim AS, Gebermariam T, Fu Y, Lin L, Husseiny MI, French SW, Schwartz J, Skory CD, Edwards JE, Jr, Spellberg BJ. 2007. The iron chelator deferasirox protects mice from mucormycosis through iron starvation. J Clin Invest 117:2649–2657. 10.1172/JCI32338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Ibrahim AS, Gebremariam T, Lin L, Luo G, Husseiny MI, Skory CD, Fu Y, French SW, Edwards JE, Jr, Spellberg B. 2010. The high affinity iron permease is a key virulence factor required for Rhizopus oryzae pathogenesis. Mol Microbiol 77:587–604. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07234.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Puri S, Kumar R, Rojas IG, Salvatori O, Edgerton M. 2019. Iron chelator deferasirox reduces Candida albicans invasion of oral epithelial cells and infection levels in murine oropharyngeal Candidiasis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 63. 10.1128/AAC.02152-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Chitasombat MN, Niparuck P. 2018. Deferiprone as adjunctive treatment for patients with invasive mucormycosis: A retrospective case series. Infect Dis Rep 10:7765. 10.4081/idr.2018.7765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Ibrahim AS, Spellberg B, Edwards J. Jr, 2008. Iron acquisition: a novel perspective on mucormycosis pathogenesis and treatment. Curr Opin Infect Dis 21:620–625. 10.1097/QCO.0b013e3283165fd1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Spellberg B, Ibrahim AS, Chin-Hong PV, Kontoyiannis DP, Morris MI, Perfect JR, Fredricks D, Brass EP. 2012. The Deferasirox-AmBisome Therapy for Mucormycosis (DEFEAT Mucor) study: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:715–722. 10.1093/jac/dkr375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Kapitan M, Niemiec MJ, Steimle A, Frick JS, Jacobsen ID. 2019. Fungi as part of the microbiota and interactions with intestinal bacteria. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 422:265–301. 10.1007/82_2018_117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Hogan DA, Kolter R. 2002. Pseudomonas–Candida interactions: an ecological role for virulence factors. Science 296:2229–2232. 10.1126/science.1070784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Adam B, Baillie GS, Douglas LJ. 2002. Mixed species biofilms of Candida albicans and Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Med Microbiol 51:344–349. 10.1099/0022-1317-51-4-344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Harriott MM, Noverr MC. 2009. Candida albicans and Staphylococcus aureus form polymicrobial biofilms: effects on antimicrobial resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:3914–3922. 10.1128/AAC.00657-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Leal SM, Jr, Pearlman E. 2012. The role of cytokines and pathogen recognition molecules in fungal keratitis – Insights from human disease and animal models. Cytokine 58:107–111. 10.1016/j.cyto.2011.12.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Montgomery ML, Fuller KK. 2020. Experimental models for fungal keratitis: An overview of principles and protocols. Cells 9:1713. 10.3390/cells9071713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Urwin L, Okurowska K, Crowther G, Roy S, Garg P, Karunakaran E, MacNeil S, Partridge LJ, Green LR, Monk PN. 2020. Corneal infection models: Tools to investigate the role of biofilms in bacterial keratitis. Cells 9:2450. 10.3390/cells9112450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Mear JB, Kipnis E, Faure E, Dessein R, Schurtz G, Faure K, Guery B. 2013. Candida albicans and Pseudomonas aeruginosa interactions: More than an opportunistic criminal association? Med Mal Infect 43:146–151. 10.1016/j.medmal.2013.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Schwarz C, Hartl D, Eickmeier O, Hector A, Benden C, Durieu I, Sole A, Gartner S, Milla CE, Barry PJ. 2018. Progress in definition, prevention and treatment of fungal infections in cystic fibrosis. Mycopathologia 183:21–32. 10.1007/s11046-017-0182-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Reid DW, Carroll V, O'May C, Champion A, Kirov SM. 2007. Increased airway iron as a potential factor in the persistence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in cystic fibrosis. Eur Respir J 30:286–292. 10.1183/09031936.00154006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Phennicie RT, Sullivan MJ, Singer JT, Yoder JA, Kim CH. 2010. Specific resistance to Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in zebrafish is mediated by the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator. Infect Immun 78:4542–4550. 10.1128/IAI.00302-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Council NR. 2011. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. National Academies Press, Washington, DC. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Wu Y, Du S, Johnson JL, Tung HY, Landers CT, Liu Y, Seman BG, Wheeler RT, Costa-Mattioli M, Kheradmand F, Zheng H, Corry DB. 2019. Microglia and amyloid precursor protein coordinate control of transient Candida cerebritis with memory deficits. Nat Commun 10:58. 10.1038/s41467-018-07991-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Noble SM, French S, Kohn LA, Chen V, Johnson AD. 2010. Systematic screens of a Candida albicans homozygous deletion library decouple morphogenetic switching and pathogenicity. Nat Genet 42:590–598. 10.1038/ng.605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Koselny K, Green J, DiDone L, Halterman JP, Fothergill AW, Wiederhold NP, Patterson TF, Cushion MT, Rappelye C, Wellington M, Krysan DJ. 2016. The celecoxib derivative AR-12 has broad-spectrum antifungal activity in vitro and improves the activity of fluconazole in a murine model of cryptococcosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:7115–7127. 10.1128/AAC.01061-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Lepak A, Castanheira M, Diekema D, Pfaller M, Andes D. 2012. Optimizing Echinocandin dosing and susceptibility breakpoint determination via in vivo pharmacodynamic evaluation against Candida glabrata with and without fks mutations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:5875–5882. 10.1128/AAC.01102-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.White TC. 1997. Increased mRNA levels of ERG16, CDR, and MDR1 correlate with increases in azole resistance in Candida albicans isolates from a patient infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 41:1482–1487. 10.1128/AAC.41.7.1482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Hogan DA, Vik A, Kolter R. 2004. A Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum-sensing molecule influences Candida albicans morphology. Mol Microbiol 54:1212–1223. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04349.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Holloway BW. 1955. Genetic recombination in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Gen Microbiol 13:572–581. 10.1099/00221287-13-3-572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Hoegy F, Lee X, Noel S, Rognan D, Mislin GL, Reimmann C, Schalk IJ. 2009. Stereospecificity of the siderophore pyochelin outer membrane transporters in fluorescent pseudomonads. J Biol Chem 284:14949–14957. 10.1074/jbc.M900606200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Reimmann C, Serino L, Beyeler M, Haa D. 1998. Dihydroaeruginoic acid synthetase and pyochelin synthetase, products of the pchEF genes, are induced by extracellular pyochelin in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiology (Reading) 144:3135–3148. 10.1099/00221287-144-11-3135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Morales DK, Grahl N, Okegbe C, Dietrich LE, Jacobs NJ, Hogan DA. 2013. Control of Candida albicans metabolism and biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa phenazines. mBio 4:e00526-12–e00512. 10.1128/mBio.00526-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

SUPPLEMENTAL FILE 1

Supplemental material. Download iai.00626-21-s0001.pdf, PDF file, 9.5 MB (9.7MB, pdf)


Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES