Skip to main content
BioMed Research International logoLink to BioMed Research International
. 2022 Apr 14;2022:8171831. doi: 10.1155/2022/8171831

A bibliometric analysis of clinical research on fracture-related infection

Cheng Li 1,2,, Andrew L Foster 3, Nicholas Hang Bao Han 4, Andrej Trampuz 2, Michael Schuetz 3
PMCID: PMC9023151  PMID: 35463982

Abstract

Background

Infection following orthopaedic trauma surgery is increasingly recognized as one of the major research priorities with as primary goal, improving patient care. This increased interest has been anecdotally recognized through published research, research grants, and, finally, with the development of the fracture-related infection (FRI) consensus group. In 2017, the accepted consensus definition of FRI was published, which has been followed by consensus recommendations from both a surgical and medical perspective. A bibliometric analysis was performed to objectively describe the trends in published clinical research related to FRI.

Methods

The terms related to FRI were searched in the Web of Science database between 2000 and 2020. The characteristics of clinical research on FRI regarding the author, country, journal, institution, scientific output, top 100 most cited articles, and trend topics were analyzed using Bibliometrix and WPS Office.

Results

A total of 2597 records were eligible for inclusion in this bibliometric approach, with studies originating from 89 countries, including eight languages. The United States of America (USA) published the highest number of articles and citations. International collaborations were present between 72 countries, with the most active country being the USA. The most contributive institution was the University of California. The highest number of papers and citations were from the Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured and the Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. The top 100 most cited articles were published in 27 different journals, with the number of citations ranging between 97 and 1004. The latest trend topics were related to the diagnosis of FRI.

Conclusion

The present bibliometric analysis shows the research characteristics and trends of FRI from multiple perspectives. The fact that there is an increasing number of studies being published on FRI shows the agreement among scientists and clinicians that standardization with respect to this topic is very important.

1. Introduction

Internal fixation of fractures has revolutionized modern orthopaedic trauma care over the last 50 years. When indicated, internal fixation of fractures can preserve native joints and provide adequate stability to facilitate bone healing without limiting the functional rehabilitation of patients with prolonged immobilization [1]. However, postoperative infections complicate operative fracture management and occur in 1−11% of cases [26]. The diagnosis and treatment of postoperative infections are often complex. They require a multidisciplinary approach (i.e., surgeons, infectious disease physicians, and clinical pharmacists), often result in additional surgeries and a long duration of antibiotic therapy [7, 8]. The health care system costs are immense. Trauma patients with a postoperative infection generate inpatient costs 6.5-8 times higher than their uninfected counterparts [9]. Despite adequate treatment, clinical and functional outcomes often remain poor, with high dependency rates and an inability to return to work [10].

The terminology surrounding postoperative infections has been historically inconsistent, which has hampered research efforts. Terms such as infection after fracture fixation, surgical site infection, and septic nonunion (or pseudoarthrosis) were often used interchangeably but without clear criteria to define the entity [11, 12]. Therefore, in 2017, the term fracture-related infection (FRI) was defined by an international consensus group, including the AO Foundation, Orthopaedic Trauma Association, PRO IMPLANT Foundation, and European Bone and Joint Infection Society [13]. Over the course of the past decades, FRI has increasingly been recognized as a clinical research priority to improve the outcome of this sometimes devastating complication [1416].

Bibliometrics is a method of statistical analysis used to assess a particular subject's characteristics and major developmental trends based on published research. Such an analysis has provided useful insight into the global state and trends related to different medical fields [1721]. Anecdotally, there has been a significant increase in interest in the topic of FRI in recent years through published papers, targeted research grants, and consensus statements. However, till today, bibliometric analysis related to this topic has not been performed. The present study was aimed at describing the overview of clinical studies and trends on FRI between 2000 and 2020.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Sources and Search Strategy

Bibliometric analysis was performed using the electronic database Web of Science (Science Citation Index Expanded) for articles published between 2000 and 2020. The retrieval strategy used was for the following medical subject headings or keywords: “osteomyelitis,” “septic non-union,” “septic pseudoarthrosis,” “septic pseudarthrosis,” “infected non-union,” “infected pseudoarthrosis,” “infected pseudarthrosis,” “trauma∗,” “injur∗,” “fracture∗,” “fracture related infection,” “infection after fracture fixation,” “infections after fracture,” “infection after fracture osteosynthesis,” “post-traumatic osteitis,” “post-traumatic osteomyelitis,” “infections associated with fracture-fixation devices,” and “osteomyelitis associated with open fractures.”

2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Inclusion criteria for further analysis were based on the following: (a) article describing a clinical study on FRI in orthopaedics; and (b) review article, meta-analysis, clinical trial, or guideline.

Exclusion criteria were as follows: (a) book chapters, conference proceedings, editorials, errata, or letters; (b) basic science, animal, and cadaveric studies; and (c) nonorthopaedic related fracture or infection, such as of the skull or sternum.

2.3. Data Extraction and Bibliometric Analysis

Data were identified and extracted by three authors individually (CL, AF, NH). All records were exported from the Web of Science database with text and excel document then imported into the software of Bibliometrix (University of Naples Federico II, Italy) and WPS Office (Kingsoft, China) to analyze the result, respectively [22]. Data analysis involves the author, article title, country, journal, h-index, institution, author keywords, language, number of citations, number of publications, and publication year. The impact factor and quartile of the journal were collected from the Journal Citation Reports 2020. The Bibliometrix software was utilized to construct data visualization of international collaborations, top 10 authors' average output, and trend topics.

3. Results

3.1. Publication Output

A total of 2597 articles met the inclusion criteria using the electronic Web of Science database (Figure 1). The total number of citations related to FRI is 58,690 (51,109 excluding self-citations), with an average citation frequency of 22.6 times per item. Research papers were published in eight languages. More than 94% of articles were written in English (2458), followed by German (91), French (19), Czech (16), Serbian (4), Turkish (4), Spanish (4), and Italian (1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Flow chart of article selection.

Figure 2 presents the specific amount of annual publications regarding FRI. Since 2008, the number of articles has exceeded 100 per year. The year 2019 ranked as the most productive year (253), followed by 2017 and 2018 (175 and 171, respectively).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Number of publication outputs per year.

3.2. Country

For the United Kingdom (UK), publications from England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales were merged [23]. Finally, 89 countries contributed to the FRI publications (Figure 3). Of these, the USA contributed the highest number of articles (814), followed by China (318), the UK (298), and Germany (266; Table 1). The top four countries with the most contribution, each presented more than 10 articles per year between 2016 and 2020 (Figure 4).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Global distribution and international interactions of FRI research.

Table 1.

The top 10 most productive countries in FRI.

Countries Records Total citations h-index
USA 814 25629 80
China 318 4256 34
UK 298 9383 49
Germany 266 6187 37
Switzerland 109 3139 31
India 107 1473 21
France 94 2708 21
Turkey 82 1081 19
Canada 81 5055 34
Netherlands 77 2854 27

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The annual distribution of FRI research from top 10 countries between 2000 and 2020.

Intercountry collaborations were found between 72 countries (Figure 3). The USA had the largest number of collaborations with other countries (46), followed by the UK (35) and France (31; Table 2). The most frequent collaborations were between the USA and Canada (40), followed by the USA and Germany (39), then Switzerland and Germany (32; Table 3).

Table 2.

Top countries with more than 10 collaborations.

Ranks Countries Records
1 USA 46
2 United Kingdom 35
3 France 31
4 Germany 28
5 Canada 25
6 Switzerland 23
7 Netherlands 21
8 Australia 20
9 Belgium 20
10 Austria 18
11 South Africa 18
12 Israel 16
13 Norway 16
14 Argentina 15
15 China 15
16 Finland 15
17 Italy 14
18 Denmark 13
19 Greece 13
20 Ireland 12
21 Japan 11

Table 3.

Countries with international collaborations exceeding fifteen.

From To Frequency
USA Canada 40
USA Germany 39
Switzerland Germany 32
USA UK 30
USA Switzerland 27
Belgium Switzerland 22
USA Belgium 19
United Kingdom Switzerland 18
USA Netherlands 18
Belgium Germany 17
UK Belgium 16
UK Germany 16

3.3. Organizations

The top five most productive institutions are listed in Table 4. The most productive organization was the University of California system (48), followed by Harvard University (45) and Vanderbilt University (44). Of the top five most productive organizations, four were based in the USA, and the remaining was from the University Hospital Leuven, Belgium.

Table 4.

The top five most prolific organizations in FRI.

Organization Records Total citations h-index Country
University of California System 48 2801 19 USA
Harvard University 45 1275 20 USA
Vanderbilt University 44 2097 22 USA
University System of Maryland 42 848 14 USA
University Hospital Leuven 37 1944 20 Belgium

3.4. Authors

A total of 9,842 authors contributed to FRI-related studies. Metsemakers WJ has the highest number of publications with 32 articles, followed by Giannoudis PV (31) and Obremskey WT with 25 publications each (Table 5). Figure 5 demonstrates the average output of the top 10 authors between 2000 and 2020.

Table 5.

The top 10 most productive authors in FRI.

Author Records Total citations h-index Country Affiliation
Metsemakers WJ 32 894 18 Belgium University Hospitals Leuven
Giannoudis PV 31 1080 19 UK University of Leeds
Obremskey WT 25 802 17 USA Vanderbilt University
Murray CK 25 872 13 USA San Antonio Military Medical Center
O'Toole RV 23 267 9 USA University of Maryland
Mcnally MA 21 659 14 UK Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre
Morgenstern M 20 635 13 Switzerland University of Basel
Bhandari M 18 1231 14 Canada McMaster University
Moriarty TF 17 586 13 Switzerland AO Research Institute Davos
Vallier HA 17 502 9 USA MetroHealth System

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Average output of the top 10 authors on FRI-related studies between 2000 and 2020.

3.5. Journals

All included articles were published in 339 different journals. Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured had the maximum number of papers (316), followed by the Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma (220) and International Orthopaedics (105; Table 6). The year of the first publication of an FRI study in the respective journal is depicted in Figure 6, with the majority appearing in 2008 and 2019 (24).

Table 6.

Top 10 journals ranked by the number of publications on FRI.

Source Number of publications Total citations h-index Impact factor Quartile in category
Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured 316 7352 44 2.586 Q2
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 220 8016 50 2.512 Q2
International Orthopaedics 105 1911 25 3.075 Q2
Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 91 3205 34 3.313 Q2
Bone & Joint Journal 85 3831 37 5.082 Q1
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 76 1450 23 3.067 Q2
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume 72 6935 47 5.284 Q1
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 68 2734 32 4.176 Q1
Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics 63 1927 25 2.324 Q2
Foot & Ankle International 47 1304 20 2.827 Q2

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Year of first publication from journals on FRI.

Data from the 2020 edition of journal citation reports showed 303 journals with an impact factor. The journal with the highest impact factor was The New England Journal of Medicine (74.699), followed by JAMA (Journal of the American Medical) Association (56.272), and Intensive Care Medicine (17.44; Table 7).

Table 7.

Top 10 journals ranked by the impact factor on FRI.

Source Impact factor Quartile in category Number of publications Total citations
New England Journal of Medicine 91.245 Q1 1 104
JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association) 56.272 Q1 3 90
Intensive Care Medicine 17.440 Q1 1 23
British Journal of Sports Medicine 13.800 Q1 1 8
Bone Research 13.567 Q1 2 89
Biomaterials 12.479 Q1 1 260
Age and Ageing 10.668 Q1 1 54
Journal of Nuclear Medicine 10.057 Q1 1 131
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 9.236 Q1 6 172
Clinical Infectious Diseases 9.079 Q1 6 525

All of the top 10 journals with the most number of publications and impact factors were published in English. Journals with more than 10 publications in other languages included Unfallchirurg (German, 40), Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Réparatrice de l'Appareil Moteur (French, 16), and Acta Chirurgiae Orthopaedicae et Traumatologiae Cechoslovaca (Czech, 16).

3.6. Top 100 Most Cited Articles

The number of citations for the top 100 most cited articles was defined according to the number of citations, with citations ranging between 97 and 1004 (Table 8). All included studies were published in 27 different journals, with most publications in the Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma (24), followed by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume (21), and Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured (9).

Table 8.

The top 100 most cited articles on FRI.

First authors Article title Journals Total citations Year
Govender, S Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 for treatment of open tibial fractures - a prospective, controlled, randomized study of four hundred and fifty patients Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume 1004 2002
Mckee, MD Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures - a multicenter, randomized clinical trial Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume 517 2007
Bhandari, M Internal fixation compared with arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the femoral neck - a meta-analysis Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume 346 2003
Gopal, S Fix and flap: the radical orthopaedic and plastic treatment of severe open fractures of the tibia Bone & Joint Journal 332 2000
Trampuz, A Diagnosis and treatment of infections associated with fracture-fixation devices Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured 291 2006
Jamsen, E Risk factors for infection after knee arthroplasty a register-based analysis of 43,149 cases Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume 277 2009
Flynn, JM Titanium elastic nails for pediatric femur fractures: a multicenter study of early results with analysis of complications Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics 270 2001
Widmer, AF New developments in diagnosis and treatment of infection in orthopedic implants Clinical Infectious Diseases 263 2001
Rokkanen, PU Bioabsorbable fixation in orthopaedic surgery and traumatology Biomaterials 260 2000
Castillo, RC Impact of smoking on fracture healing and risk of complications in limb-threatening open tibia fractures Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 239 2005
SooHoo, NF Complication rates following open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume 219 2009
Barei, DP Complications associated with internal fixation of high-energy bicondylar tibial plateau fractures utilizing a two-incision technique Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 217 2004
Fankhauser, F A new locking plate for unstable fractures of the proximal humerus Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 212 2005
Pape, HC Changes in the management of femoral shaft fractures in polytrauma patients: from early total care to damage control orthopedic surgery Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care 210 2002
Yazar, S One-stage reconstruction of composite bone and soft-tissue defects in traumatic lower extremities Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 205 2004
Hak, DJ Delayed union and nonunions: epidemiology, clinical issues, and financial aspects Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured 202 2014
Moro, JK Arthroplasty with a metal radial head for unreconstructible fractures of the radial head Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume 201 2001
Stannard, JP Negative pressure wound therapy after severe open fractures: a prospective randomized study Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 200 2009
Sproul, RC A systematic review of locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured 197 2011
Schmidmaier, G Prophylaxis and treatment of implant-related infections by antibiotic-coated implants: a review Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured 194 2006
Bhandari, M Treatment of open fractures of the shaft of the tibia - a systematic overview and meta-analysis Bone & Joint Journal 188 2001
O'Neill, KR Reduced surgical site infections in patients undergoing posterior spinal stabilization of traumatic injuries using vancomycin powder Spine Journal 187 2011
Zalavras, CG Local antibiotic therapy in the treatment of open fractures and osteomyelitis Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 186 2004
Kregor, PJ Treatment of distal femur fractures using the less invasive stabilization system - surgical experience and early clinical results in 103 fractures Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 185 2004
Johnson, EN Infectious complications of open type III tibial fractures among combat casualties Clinical Infectious Diseases 184 2007
Robinson, CM Adult distal humeral metaphyseal fractures: epidemiology and results of treatment Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 177 2003
Koval, KJ Fractures of the distal part of the radius Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume 174 2008
Yazar, S Outcome comparison between free muscle and free fasciocutaneous flaps for reconstruction of distal third and ankle traumatic open tibial fractures Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 174 2006
Egol, KA Staged management of high-energy proximal tibia fractures (OTA types 41) - the results of a prospective, standardized protocol Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 173 2005
Harris, AM Complications following limb-threatening lower extremity trauma Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 169 2009
Nowotarski, PJ Conversion of external fixation to intramedullary nailing for fractures of the shaft of the femur in multiply injured patients Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume 169 2000
Karger, C Treatment of posttraumatic bone defects by the induced membrane technique Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research 163 2012
Chapman, JR Randomized prospective study of humeral shaft fracture fixation: intramedullary nails versus plates Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 162 2000
Arciola, CR Etiology of implant orthopedic infections: a survey on 1027 clinical isolates International Journal of Artificial Organs 161 2005
Vallier, HA Randomized, prospective comparison of plate versus intramedullary nail fixation for distal tibia shaft fractures Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 158 2011
Im, GI Distal metaphyseal fractures of tibia: a prospective randomized trial of closed reduction and intramedullary nail versus open reduction and plate and screws fixation Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care 157 2005
Swiontkowski, MF Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in open tibial fractures - a subgroup analysis of data combined from two prospective randomized studies Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume 156 2006
Blauth, M Surgical options for the treatment of severe tibial pilon fractures: a study of three techniques Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 155 2001
Stafford, PR Reamer-irrigator-aspirator bone graft and bi Masquelet technique for segmental bone defect nonunions: a review of 25 cases Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured 154 2010
Rechtine, GR Postoperative wound infection after instrumentation of thoracic and lumbar fractures Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 151 2001
Minami, A Vascularised fibular grafts - an experience of 102 patients Bone & Joint Journal 150 2000
Barei, DP Functional outcomes of severe bicondylar plateau fractures treated with dual incisions and medial and lateral plates Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume 148 2006
Prokuski, L Prophylactic antibiotics in orthopaedic surgery Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 146 2008
Nork, SE Intramedullary nailing of distal metaphyseal tibial fractures Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume 145 2005
Skaggs, DL Lateral-entry pin fixation in the management of supracondylar fractures in children Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume 145 2004
Pollak, AN The relationship between time to surgical debridement and incidence of infection after open high-energy lower extremity trauma Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume 143 2010
Rodriguez-Merchan, EC Nonunion: general principles and experimental data Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 142 2004
Patzakis, MJ Chronic posttraumatic osteomyelitis and infected nonunion of the tibia: current management concepts Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 141 2005
McKee, MD The use of an antibiotic-impregnated, osteoconductive, bioabsorbable bone substitute in the treatment of infected long bone defects: early results of a prospective trial Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 141 2002
Harley, BJ The effect of time to definitive treatment on the rate of nonunion and infection in open fractures Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 140 2002
Ricci, WM Locked plates combined with minimally invasive insertion technique for the treatment of periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures above a total knee arthroplasty Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 139 2006
Naique, SB Management of severe open tibial fractures - the need for combined orthopaedic and plastic surgical treatment in specialist centres Bone & Joint Journal 138 2006
Mehlman, CT The effect of surgical timing on the perioperative complications of treatment of supracondylar humeral fractures in children Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume 138 2001
Edwards, C Early infection after hip fracture surgery - risk factors, costs and outcome Bone & Joint Journal 137 2008
Knop, C Late results of thoracolumbar fractures after posterior instrumentation and transpedicular bone grafting Spine 137 2001
Sebastia-Forcada, E Reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures. A blinded, randomized, controlled, prospective study Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 136 2014
Benirschke, SK Wound healing complications in closed and open calcaneal fractures Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 132 2004
Filippi, L Usefulness of hybrid SPECT/CT in Tc-99 m-HMPAO-labeled leukocyte scintigraphy for bone and joint infections Journal of Nuclear Medicine 131 2006
Anglen, JO Comparison of soap and antibiotic solutions for irrigation of lower-limb openfracture wounds - a prospective, randomized study Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume 131 2005
Leung, KS Complex tibial fracture outcomes following treatment with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology 131 2004
Herrera, DA Treatment of acute distal femur fractures above a total knee arthroplasty - systematic review of 415 cases (1981-2006) Acta Orthopaedica 128 2008
Narayanan, UG Complications of elastic stable intramedullary nail fixation of pediatric femoral fractures, and how to avoid them Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics 128 2004
Harvey, EJ Morbidity associated with ORIF of intra-articular calcaneus fractures using a lateral approach Foot & Ankle International 128 2001
Jost, B Locking plate fixation of fractures of the proximal humerus: analysis of complications, revision strategies and outcome Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 127 2013
Kettler, M Treatment of proximal humeral fractures with the PHILOS angular stable plate. Presentation of 225 cases of dislocated fractures Unfallchirurg 127 2006
Cassidy, C Norian SRS cement compared with conventional fixation in distal radial fractures - a randomized study Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume 127 2003
Sirkin, M A staged protocol for soft tissue management in the treatment of complex pilon fractures Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 124 2004
Metsemakers, WJ Infection after fracture fixation: current surgical and microbiological concepts Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured 121 2018
Stulik, J Minimally-invasive treatment of intra-articular fractures of the calcaneum Bone & Joint Journal 119 2006
Khatod, M Outcomes in open tibia fractures: relationship between delay in treatment and infection Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care 119 2003
Cole, PA Treatment of proximal tibia fractures using the less invasive stabilization system - surgical experience and early clinical results in 77 fractures Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 117 2004
Springer, BD Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty with femoral component revision Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume 117 2003
Metsemakers, WJ Fracture-related infection: a consensus on definition from an international expert group Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured 116 2018
Gosling, T Single lateral locked screw plating of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 116 2005
Takeuchi, R Fractures around the lateral cortical hinge after a medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a new classification of lateral hinge fracture Arthroscopy-the Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery 115 2012
Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society Open reduction and internal fixation compared with circular fixator application for bicondylar tibial plateau fractures - results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume 113 2006
Yun, HC Osteomyelitis in military personnel wounded in Iraq and Afghanistan Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care 111 2008
Taeger, G Damage control orthopedics in patients with multiple injuries is effective, time saving, and safe Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care 111 2005
Parsons, B Surgical management of chronic osteomyelitis American Journal of Surgery 111 2004
Lack, WD Type III open tibia fractures: immediate antibiotic prophylaxis minimizes infection Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 109 2015
Borg, T Percutaneous plating of distal tibial fractures preliminary results in 21 patients Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured 108 2004
Parameswaran, AD Pin tract infection with contemporary external fixation: how much of a problem? Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 108 2003
Suk, SI Anterior-posterior surgery versus posterior closing wedge osteotomy in posttraumatic kyphosis with neurologic compromised osteoporotic fracture Spine 106 2003
Misra, A Complex proximal humeral fractures in adults - a systematic review of management Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured 106 2001
Bhandari, M A trial of wound irrigation in the initial management of open fracture wounds New England Journal of Medicine 104 2015
Aro, HT Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: a randomized trial in open tibial fractures treated with reamed nail fixation Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume 104 2011
Ferran, NA Locked intramedullary fixation vs plating for displaced and shortened mid-shaft clavicle fractures: a randomized clinical trial Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 104 2010
Rozbruch, SR Simultaneous treatment of tibial bone and soft-tissue defects with the ilizarov method Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 104 2006
Karunakar, MA Body mass index as a predictor of complications after operative treatment of acetabular fractures Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume 104 2005
Feldman, DS Correction of tibial malunion and nonunion with six-axis analysis deformity correction using the Taylor spatial frame Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 104 2003
Edlund, A Delirium before and after operation for femoral neck fracture Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 104 2001
Richards, JE Relationship of hyperglycemia and surgical-site infection in orthopaedic surgery Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume 102 2012
Gjertsen, JE More re-operations after uncemented than cemented hemiarthroplasty used in the treatment of displaced fractures of the femoral neck. An observational study of 11 116 hemiarthroplasties from a national register Bone & Joint Journal 101 2012
Nasell, H The impact of smoking on complications after operatively treated ankle fractures-a follow-Up study of 906 patients Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 100 2011
Lau, TW Wound complication of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in distal tibia fractures International Orthopaedics 100 2008
Fuchs, T The use of gentamicin-coated nails in the tibia: preliminary results of a prospective study Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 99 2011
Flynn, JM Management of pediatric femoral shaft fractures Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 99 2004
Malik, MHA Factors affecting rates of infection and nonunion in intramedullary nailing Bone & Joint Journal 99 2004
Collinge, C Anterior-inferior plate fixation of middle-third fractures and nonunions of the clavicle Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 98 2006
Mckee, MD A prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing an antibiotic-impregnated bioabsorbable bone substitute with standard antibiotic-impregnated cement beads in the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis and infected nonunion Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 97 2010

3.7. Trend Topics

Trend topics were identified by author keywords in Bibliometrix. Parameter values were set to a minimum number of keyword occurrences more than 20 times. The first keywords were presented until 2010, and 36 keywords met the threshold (Figure 7). The top three most frequently used keywords were “infection,” “fracture,” and “complications.” The earliest keywords were “external fixation,” “children,” and “humerus.” The keywords “fracture-related infection,” “diagnosis,” and “risk factor” were the top three latest emerging trend topics of FRI research.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Trend topics of FRI according to author keywords.

4. Discussion

The current bibliometric study comprised a comprehensive analysis of the scientific output related to FRI, exploring characteristics from publications, languages, countries, institutions, authors, journals, most cited articles, and trend topics. In the current report, we provide scholars with essential references and suggestions for further investigation on FRI.

4.1. Global Publishing Trends

Although some research papers evaluated orthopaedic-related infection using bibliometrics [24, 25], to the best of our knowledge, this is the first article to fully assess clinical research on FRI. Our analysis shows that the number of related publications exhibited a significant increasing trend from 2000 to 2020. Of all languages, English was the main international scholarly language in this field. In addition, 65% of studies in languages other than English was in German. Several bibliometric analyses of medicine-related research also noted that German was the most common second language following English [19, 26].

4.2. Country

Half of the top 10 contributing countries on FRI studies originated from Europe, with the remaining coming from Asia and North America. The UK had the highest number of publications and academic influence in Europe, China in Asia, and the USA in North America. The annual distribution of FRI research from the top 10 countries displayed the USA ranked first in the top 10 largest contribution countries annually between 2000 and 2019. Interestingly, the UK and Germany persistently remained at around second and third place from 2003 to 2012 (Figure 4). China was ranked second between 2013 and 2019 and first in 2020. This result may suggest a great potential for the development of FRI research in China.

In 72 of 89 countries involved in international collaborations, the USA had the highest number of research collaborations with other countries. Most of the international collaborations were between North America and European countries. A greater international collaboration should be widely established in the future.

4.3. Organizations and Authors

Among the institutions, four of the top five highest contributing countries originated from the USA. The University of California from the USA was the most productive institution globally in clinical studies focusing on FRI. Scholars from Europe and North America demonstrated a dominant position. The publications on the diagnosis and treatment principles of FRI also proved that most members of the FRI consensus group originated from Euro-American countries [27, 28]. In addition, half of the top 10 most productive authors on FRI were involved in the FRI consensus group [13]. Metsemakers WJ, from the University Hospitals Leuven, contributed most to clinic research of FRI. Regarding the top 10 author productions over time, most authors showed increased stability and persistence for a longer duration between 2016 and 2020. The list of top 10 most productive authors in FRI may provide a valuable reference for future scientific conference invitations for FRI experts.

4.4. Journals

Of the top 10 journals with the largest number of papers, Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured had the highest number of relevant publications, whereas Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma was the most academic influential journal on FRI. Compared with the bibliometric study, which excludes non-English literature [29, 30], the present bibliometric research also provides more valuable journal information to non-English speaking countries. Hence, scholars will most likely benefit from journal information to further subscribe or track the most relevant journal and also submit clinical research of FRI manuscripts as a reference. Figures on the first publications indicated that an increasing number of journals are interested in FRI research, with the highest values attained in 2008 and 2019.

4.5. Most Cited Documents

The number of citations is a traditional indicator for the assessment of the value of a certain study. Our study displays the top 100 most impactful studies on FRI and provides a resource for clinical scientists. Of all publications, the most cited research paper was published by Govender et al. [31]. The authors found that an implant containing 1.50 mg/mL of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in the treatment of open tibial fractures could reduce the incidence of postsurgical infections. The most cited review article was published by Trampuz and Zimmerli [32]. The authors summarized the pathogenesis, classification, diagnosis, and treatment of infections associated with fracture-fixation devices.

4.6. Trend Topics

Trend topics were identified from author keywords. In terms of the surgical site, scholars placed a greater interest in infection after humeral fractures, followed by the location of femur and tibia, with a current focus on ankle fractures [3339]. Furthermore, research topics and concepts also altered over the course of the years. With the introduction of the FRI consensus group, the term “fracture-related infection” became the standard, with more recent topics primarily focusing on risk factors and diagnostic criteria of FRI [15, 4043]. Prior to this, researchers focused on the treatment of FRI [4446], with a focus on debridement, bone transfer, and antibiotic treatment. In addition, with the publication of the consensus definition of FRI, this concept appears to be gradually gaining ground in the scientific literature.

4.7. Limitations

There are several limitations to the present study. First, only a single database was searched, with other databases and sources not included in the bibliometric analysis. Therefore, some potentially valuable information may have been missed [47]. Second, the FRI-related terms of the search strategy were based on the literature and personal experience; nonetheless, some literature may have been overlooked. Third, conference proceedings were also removed from this bibliometric analysis, due to the potential of being published on two occasions, as a conference abstract and also as a full journal article [48, 49]. Fourth, the number of citations is commonly used to assess the publication quality in bibliometric analysis. To discover high academic impact publications in the clinical research of FRI, we listed the top 100 most cited articles. However, self-citation, publication date, and controversial articles all likely had an impact on the number of citations [21].

5. Conclusions

The number of articles on FRI showed an increasing trend over the last 21 years. English was the primary language used for academic exchange on the topic of FRI, followed by German. In addition, the USA has the most number and impactful publications, as well as international collaborations. China has great development potential in this field. A broader international collaboration on FRI is required in the future. The most relevant and academic influential journals on FRI are the Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured and the Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, respectively. The definition of FRI will most likely become validated and widely available in clinical practice.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the support from the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the Open Access Publication Fund of Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin.

Abbreviations

FRI:

Fracture-related infection

USA:

United States of America

UK:

United Kingdom.

Data Availability

Data is available from the first author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors' Contributions

Cheng Li was responsible for conceptualization, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, writing the original draft, and visualization; Andrew L Foster and Nicholas Hang Bao Han were responsible for the methodology, investigation, resources, and visualization; Andrej Trampuz and Michael Schuetz edited and reviewed the manuscript. All authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper before submission.

References

  • 1.Perren S. M. Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures: the scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume (London) . 2002;84(8):1093–1110. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.84B8.0841093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Korim M. T., Payne R., Bhatia M. A case–control study of surgical site infection following operative fixation of fractures of the ankle in a large UK trauma unit. The bone & joint journal . 2014;96(5):636–640. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B5.33143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Parkkinen M., Madanat R., Lindahl J., Mäkinen T. J. Risk factors for deep infection following plate fixation of proximal tibial fractures. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American . 2016;98(15):1292–1297. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.00894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lu K., Zhang J., Cheng J., et al. Incidence and risk factors for surgical site infection after open reduction and internal fixation of intra-articular fractures of distal femur: a multicentre study. International Wound Journal . 2019;16(2):473–478. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Momaya A. M., Hlavacek J., Etier B., et al. Risk factors for infection after operative fixation of tibial plateau fractures. Injury . 2016;47(7):1501–1505. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fernandez F. F., Langendörfer M., Wirth T., Eberhardt O. Failures and complications in intramedullary nailing of children's forearm fractures. Journal of Children's Orthopaedics . 2010;4(2):159–167. doi: 10.1007/s11832-010-0245-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Li C., Renz N., Trampuz A., Ojeda-Thies C. The value of conventional radiographs for diagnosing internal fixation-associated infection. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders . 2021;22(1):p. 411. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04170-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Li C., Renz N., Trampuz A., Ojeda-Thies C. Twenty common errors in the diagnosis and treatment of periprosthetic joint infection. International Orthopaedics . 2020;44(1):3–14. doi: 10.1007/s00264-019-04426-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Metsemakers W.-J., Smeets B., Nijs S., Hoekstra H. Infection after fracture fixation of the tibia: analysis of healthcare utilization and related costs. Injury . 2017;48(6):1204–1210. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.03.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Czaja A. S., Rivara F. P., Wang J., et al. Late outcomes of trauma patients with infections during index hospitalization. The Journal of Trauma . 2009;67(4):805–814. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318185e1fb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Arens S., Hansis M., Schlegel U., et al. Infection after open reduction and internal fixation with dynamic compression plates--clinical and experimental data. Injury . 1996;27:p. S–C27. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(96)89029-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Metsemakers W. J., Kuehl R., Moriarty T. F., et al. Infection after fracture fixation: current surgical and microbiological concepts. Injury . 2018;49(3):511–522. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.09.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Metsemakers W. J., Morgenstern M., McNally M. A., et al. Fracture-related infection: a consensus on definition from an international expert group. Injury . 2018;49(3):505–510. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.08.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jiang N., Wang B.-W., Chai Y.-M., et al. Chinese expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of infection after fracture fixation. Injury . 2019;50(11):1952–1958. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Morgenstern M., Kühl R., Eckardt H., et al. Diagnostic challenges and future perspectives in fracture-related infection. Injury . 2018;49(Suppl 1):S83–S90. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(18)30310-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Stevenson M. C., Slater J. C., Sagi H. C., Palacio Bedoya F., Powers-Fletcher M. V. Diagnosing fracture related infections: where are we now? Journal of Clinical Microbiology . 2022;17(1) doi: 10.1128/JCM.02807-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kawuki J., Yu X., Musa T. H. Bibliometric analysis of Ebola research indexed in Web of Science and Scopus (2010-2020) BioMed Research International . 2020;2020:12. doi: 10.1155/2020/5476567.5476567 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Huang X., Bai J., Liu X., et al. Scientometric analysis of dental implant research over the past 10 years and future research trends. BioMed Research International . 2021;2021:13. doi: 10.1155/2021/6634055.6634055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Li C., Cheng Y., Li Z., Margaryan D., Perka C., Trampuz A. The pertinent literature of enhanced recovery after surgery programs: a bibliometric approach. Medicina . 2021;57(2) doi: 10.3390/medicina57020172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wu H., Li Y., Tong L., Wang Y., Sun Z. Worldwide research tendency and hotspots on hip fracture: a 20-year bibliometric analysis. Archives of Osteoporosis . 2021;16(1):p. 73. doi: 10.1007/s11657-021-00929-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Li C., Wang L., Perka C., Trampuz A. Clinical application of robotic orthopedic surgery: a bibliometric study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders . 2021;22(1):p. 968. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04714-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Aria M., Cuccurullo C. Bibliometrix_ : an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics . 2017;11(4):959–975. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wu H., Zhou Y., Xu L., et al. Mapping knowledge structure and research frontiers of ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening: a scientometric study. Frontiers in Neuroscience . 2021;15, article 706105 doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.706105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Li C., Ojeda-Thies C., Renz N., Margaryan D., Perka C., Trampuz A. The global state of clinical research and trends in periprosthetic joint infection: a bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Infectious Diseases . 2020;96:696–709. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Jiang Y., Hu R., Zhu G. Top 100 cited articles on infection in orthopaedics. Medicine . 2019;98(2, article e14067) doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sun X., Tang W., Ye T., Zhang Y., Wen B., Zhang L. Integrated care: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis and literature review. International Journal of Integrated Care . 2014;14, article e017 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Metsemakers W.-J., Morgenstern M., Senneville E., et al. General treatment principles for fracture-related infection: recommendations from an international expert group. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery . 2020;140(8):1013–1027. doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03287-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Depypere M., Kuehl R., Metsemakers W.-J., et al. Recommendations for systemic antimicrobial therapy in fracture-related infection: a consensus from an international expert group. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma . 2020;34(1):30–41. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Fusco F., Marsilio M., Guglielmetti C. Co-production in health policy and management: a comprehensive bibliometric review. BMC Health Services Research . 2020;20(1):p. 504. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05241-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhang H., Fan Y., Wang R., et al. Research trends and hotspots of high tibial osteotomy in two decades (from 2001 to 2020): a bibliometric analysis. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research . 2020;15(1):p. 512. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01991-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Govender S., Csimma C., Genant H. K., et al. Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 for treatment of open tibial fractures: a prospective, controlled, randomized study of four hundred and fifty patients. RECOMBINANT HUMAN BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEIN-2 FOR TREATMENT OF OPEN TIBIAL FRACTURES. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume . 2002;84(12):2123–2134. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200212000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Trampuz A., Zimmerli W. Diagnosis and treatment of infections associated with fracture-fixation devices. Injury . 2006;37(2):S59–S66. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Faraj D., Kooistra B. W., Vd Stappen W. A. H., Werre A. J. Results of 131 consecutive operated patients with a displaced proximal humerus fracture: an analysis with more than two years follow-up. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology . 2011;21(1):7–12. doi: 10.1007/s00590-010-0655-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kiran M., Jee R. Ilizarov's method for treatment of nonunion of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus. Indian journal of orthopaedics . 2010;44(4):444–447. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.69319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Arora S., Batra S., Gupta V., Goyal A. Distraction osteogenesis using a monolateral external fixator for infected non-union of the femur with bone loss. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery . 2012;20(2):185–190. doi: 10.1177/230949901202000210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Large T. M., Alton T. B., Patton D. J., Beingessner D. Does perioperative systemic infection or fever increase surgical infection risks after internal fixation of femur and tibia fractures in an intensive care polytrauma unit? Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery . 2013;75(4):664–668. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31829a0a94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Colman M., Wright A., Gruen G., Siska P., Pape H.-C., Tarkin I. Prolonged operative time increases infection rate in tibial plateau fractures. Injury . 2013;44(2):249–252. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.10.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Shao J., Zhang H., Yin B., Li J., Zhu Y., Zhang Y. Risk factors for surgical site infection following operative treatment of ankle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Surgery . 2018;56:124–132. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.06.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sun Y., Wang H., Tang Y., et al. Incidence and risk factors for surgical site infection after open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fracture. Medicine . 2018;97(7, article e9901) doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wang Z., Zheng C., Wen S., et al. Usefulness of serum D-dimer for preoperative diagnosis of infected nonunion after open reduction and internal fixation. Infection and Drug Resistance . 2019;12:1827–1831. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S213099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Whiting P. S., Galat D. D., Zirkle L. G., Shaw M. K., Galat J. D. Risk factors for infection after intramedullary nailing of open tibial shaft fractures in low- and middle-income countries. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma . 2019;33(6):e234–e239. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Warkentien T. E., Lewandowski L. R., Potter B. K., et al. Osteomyelitis risk factors related to combat trauma open upper extremity fractures: a case-control analysis. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma . 2019;33(12):e475–e483. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Morgenstern M., Athanasou N. A., Ferguson J. Y., Metsemakers W.-J., Atkins B. L., McNally M. A. The value of quantitative histology in the diagnosis of fracture-related infection. Bone Joint J . 2018;100(7):966–972. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B7.BJJ-2018-0052.R1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.McNally M., Ferguson J., Kugan R., Stubbs D. Ilizarov treatment protocols in the management of infected nonunion of the tibia. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma . 2017;31(5):S47–S54. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Nicolaides M., Vris A., Heidari N., Bates P., Pafitanis G. The effect of delayed surgical debridement in the management of open tibial fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diagnostics . 2021;11(6):p. 1017. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11061017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Reilly R. M., Robertson T., O’Toole R. V., Manson T. T. Are antibiotic nails effective in the treatment of infected tibial fractures? Injury . 2016;47(12):2809–2815. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Li C., Ojeda-Thies C., Xu C., Trampuz A. Meta-analysis in periprosthetic joint infection: a global bibliometric analysis. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research . 2020;15(1):p. 251. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01757-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Sweileh W. M., Al-Jabi S. W., Abu Taha A. S., Zyoud S. H., Anayah F. M. A., Sawalha A. F. Bibliometric analysis of worldwide scientific literature in mobile - health: 2006-2016. BMC medical informatics and decision making . 2017;17(1):p. 72. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0476-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sadler S., Cassidy S., Peterson B., Spink M., Chuter V. Gluteus medius muscle function in people with and without low back pain: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders . 2019;20(1):p. 463. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2833-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data is available from the first author upon request.


Articles from BioMed Research International are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES