Abstract
Purpose of Review
We review therapeutic approaches aimed at restoring function of the failing heart by targeting mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS), ion handling, and substrate utilization for adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production.
Recent Findings
Mitochondria-targeted therapies have been tested in animal models of and humans with heart failure (HF). Cardiac benefits of sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors might be partly explained by their effects on ion handling and metabolism of cardiac myocytes.
Summary
The large energy requirements of the heart are met by oxidative phosphorylation in mitochondria, which is tightly regulated by the turnover of ATP that fuels cardiac contraction and relaxation. In heart failure (HF), this mechano-energetic coupling is disrupted, leading to bioenergetic mismatch and production of ROS that drive the progression of cardiac dysfunction. Furthermore, HF is accompanied by changes in substrate uptake and oxidation that are considered detrimental for mitochondrial oxidative metabolism and negatively affect cardiac efficiency. Mitochondria lie at the crossroads of metabolic and energetic dysfunction in HF and represent ideal therapeutic targets.
Keywords: Mitochondria, Heart failure, Reactive oxygen species, MitoQ, Elamipretide, SGLT2 inhibitors, Cardiac metabolism
Introduction
Cardiac contraction and relaxation are fuelled by the incessant conversion of energy afforded by mitochondrial oxidative metabolism. A remarkable feature of cardiac metabolism is its ability to swiftly increase the rate of substrate oxidation and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) synthesis in response to sudden elevations of ATP demand, such as those occurring during a bout of physical exercise. This ability relies on the tight coupling between the processes of contraction and relaxation and ion handling occurring in the cytosol and those of oxidative metabolism, mostly taking place in the mitochondrial matrix; this feature is denoted as mechano-energetic coupling [1].
Elevations of cardiac workload are accompanied by an increased turnover of ATP to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) in the cytosol. The increase in ATP demand needs to be matched by an increase in ADP phosphorylation, which is supported by a concomitant acceleration of the oxidative reactions of the Krebs cycle. This parallel activation is achieved by the accumulation of calcium (Ca2+) in the mitochondrial matrix, which stimulates the activity of Krebs cycle dehydrogenases. Elevations of heart rate and contractility are accompanied by an increase in the amplitude of cytosolic Ca2+ transients. As a result, more Ca2+ is driven in the mitochondrial matrix, where it boosts oxidative metabolism (Fig. 1).
The Ca2+-mediated stimulation of oxidative metabolism is relevant not only for ATP production, but also for mitochondrial antioxidant systems. In fact, reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced by oxidative phosphorylation are detoxified by enzymatic systems that are maintained in their reduced (i.e., active) form by reducing equivalents derived from the Krebs cycle. Specifically, the highly reactive superoxide (O2−) radical is rapidly converted to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) by the manganese-dependent superoxide dismutase (Mn-SOD). In turn, H2O2 is reduced to H2O by peroxiredoxin (Prx) and glutathione peroxidases (Gpx), which are regenerated in their reduced (i.e., active) state by a cascade of redox reactions that ultimately require NADPH as a source of reducing equivalents (Fig. 1).
Alterations in cardiac energy metabolism and mechano-energetic coupling have been identified in virtually all stages and etiologies of heart failure (HF). In HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), derangements in cellular sodium (Na+) and Ca2+ handling impact both mitochondrial oxidative metabolism and ROS emission from the mitochondrial matrix [1]. In particular, reduction of sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca2+ load and elevation of cytosolic [Na+] in cardiac myocytes are hallmarks of HFrEF and conspire to hinder Ca2+ accumulation in the mitochondrial matrix. In fact, there is a close apposition between mitochondria and the SR, and the “privileged communication” between these two organelles enables efficient uptake of Ca2+ released from the SR inside the mitochondrial matrix via the mitochondrial Ca2+ uniporter (MCU) (Fig. 1). In HFrEF, decreased Ca2+ release from the SR hinders mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake [2••]. Furthermore, because Ca2+ is extruded from the mitochondrial matrix in exchange for Na+ imported from the cytosol, elevated [Na+] accelerates Ca2+ efflux from the mitochondrial matrix by increasing the driving force for Ca2+ extrusion [2••]. As a result, Ca2+ accumulation in the mitochondrial matrix is blunted in HFrEF, leading to insufficient regeneration of reduced NADH and NADPH required to support ATP production and H2O2 elimination, respectively [4.••••]. In addition, pathological elevations of workload deplete mitochondrial antioxidative capacity by regenerating reduced NADH from NADPH via the reverse-mode nicotinamide nucleotide transhydrogenase (NNT) reaction [5.••••]. Taken together, altered mechano-energetic coupling in HF compromises the regulation of mitochondrial oxidative metabolism, provoking an oxidation of the mitochondrial pyridine nucleotide pool that leads to bioenergetic mismatch and mitochondrial emission of ROS.
The therapeutic strategies based on our current understanding of mitochondrial dysfunction and mechano-energetic uncoupling in HFrEF, however, have not resulted in viable therapeutic options for HFrEF patients. In fact, antagonization of neuroendocrine activation remains the primary mode of action by which cardiac function, morbidity, and mortality can be improved in patients with HFrEF. Only recently, the clinical results of Na+/glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have buttressed the concept that targeting metabolism holds great therapeutic potential. In this review, we discuss therapeutic approaches aimed at restoring function of the failing heart by targeting mitochondrial ROS, ion handling, and substrate utilization for ATP production.
Targeting Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species
Targeting ROS in cardiovascular diseases has been considered a promising therapeutic approach for a long time, but treatment with unspecific and untargeted antioxidants such as vitamin E failed to provide the anticipated results [6]. One potential explanation for the lack of efficacy of antioxidant therapies is the cellular compartmentalization of ROS, with mitochondrial—rather than general cellular—ROS formation and elimination playing a dominant role in the pathophysiology of HF and other cardiovascular disorders [7]. Mitochondrial ROS can be targeted by either using antioxidants that selectively accumulate in the mitochondrial matrix, such as mitoquinone (MitoQ), or preventing ROS production by stabilizing cardiolipin with agents such as the small peptide elamipretide.
MitoQ
MitoQ consists of one ubiquinone moiety conjugated to the triphenylphosphonium cation, which drives its accumulation in the mitochondrial matrix [8, 9]. One caveat is that the antioxidative capacity of MitoQ is restored by electrons derived from the electron transport chain, and is therefore dependent on the Krebs cycle-mediated regeneration of reduced NADH; this might limit the antioxidative efficacy of MitoQ, and oxidized MitoQ has even been shown to possess pro-oxidative effects [10]. Preclinical studies demonstrated that ROS scavenging with MitoQ has cardioprotective effects in animal models of pressure overload–induced HF and ischemia–reperfusion injury [11, 12.•, 13, 14.•].
While MitoQ has not yet been tested in patients with HF, beneficial effects on vascular function were recently observed in humans. Dietary supplementation with MitoQ in healthy elderly improved endothelial function [15.•], and acute oral application had a positive impact on patients with peripheral artery disease, including improvement of flow-mediated vasodilation, walking capacity and time to claudication [16]. Oral treatment with MitoQ has also been clinically tested in other diseases associated with oxidative stress, such as chronic hepatitis C [17] or Parkinson’s disease [18].
Elamipretide
Elamipretide (also known as SS-31, MTP-131 or Bendavia) is a cell-permeable small peptide selectively targeting cardiolipin [19, 20]. Cardiolipin is a phospholipid that is exclusively found in mitochondria, where it plays an important role in the structural and functional organization of the macromolecular complexes embedded in the inner mitochondrial membrane. For instance, cardiolipin stabilizes the respiratory chain complexes into supercomplexes for optimal oxidative phosphorylation [21]. The interaction between cardiolipin and cytochrome c determines whether the latter functions as an electron carrier or a peroxidase [20]. By stabilizing cardiolipin, elamipretide inhibits the peroxidase activity of the cytochrome c-cardiolipin complex, thus protecting its electron-carrying function. This optimizes mitochondrial electron transport and ATP synthesis and prevents ROS production at the electron transport chain [20, 22].
Preclinical studies with elamipretide yielded promising results, showing reduced infarct size and improved left ventricular (LV) contractile function in animal models of myocardial infarction and ischemia–reperfusion injury [23, 24, 25.•]. While these studies were mostly limited to rats, similar results were seen in other animal models including sheep, guinea pig, and rabbit [26, 27]. Furthermore, chronic treatment with elamipretide improved cardiac function in rodent [5.••, 28.••, 29] and canine models [30.•] of chronic HF.
Based on these promising preclinical results, elamipretide was tested in humans. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction and successful revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), intravenous treatment with elamipretide was associated with a small (~ 3%), non-significant reduction in infarct size, and a trend to a lower incidence of new-onset HF within the first 24 h after revascularization [31].
In one single-center trial in patients with HFrEF, a single 4-h infusion of elamipretide led to a significant dose-dependent improvement in LV function; however, results were limited by confidence intervals and missing correspondent changes in cardiac biomarkers [32]. A subsequent double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial assessing 70 participants with “stable” HFrEF receiving 4 weeks of subcutaneous treatment with elamipretide in addition to optimal medical therapy did not show significant changes in LV end-systolic volume (primary endpoint) or secondary outcomes [38.•].
Safety and efficacy of elamipretide were also assessed in patients with Barth syndrome (BTHS). BTHS is a rare inherited disease, caused by mutations in the gene encoding the mitochondrial transacylase tafazzin, which results in defective cardiolipin remodeling and consequent cardiolipin depletion [33, 34]. BTHS is characterized by cardiomyopathy, skeletal myopathy, neutropenia, and growth retardation [35]. Although subcutaneous treatment with elamipretide for 4 weeks did not affect primary or secondary endpoints in a first double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study, in the 36-week open-label extension of the same trial, elamipretide significantly improved physical performance of BTHS patients [36.••].
In general, elamipretide was safe and well-tolerated in humans for intravenous [31, 32, 37] as well as subcutaneous application, the most common side effect being injection site reactions [36.••, 38.•, 39]. Assessment of elamipretide in clinical trials is still ongoing, also including patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). In addition, a significant increase in LV stroke volume was observed in subjects with BTHS, although ejection fraction was not reduced at baseline in these patients [36.••].
Studies in explanted failing human hearts observed a protective effect of elamipretide on mitochondrial respiration [40]. Furthermore, the compound prevents cell death by inhibiting mitochondrial membrane permeability [5.••, 19], protects cristae networks from fragmentation [41, 42] and affects expression of genes related to mitochondrial energy metabolism [29, 43].
Targeting Cellular Ca2+ Handling
Because mitochondrial antioxidant systems are supplied with reducing equivalents by NADPH derived from the oxidative reactions of the Krebs cycle, enhancing the Ca2+-mediated stimulation of the Krebs cycle dehydrogenases represents a viable strategy to prevent ROS emission from the mitochondrial matrix. In principle, this can be achieved by either augmenting mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake or by preventing Ca2+ extrusion via the mitochondrial Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (NCLX). While drugs that stimulate Ca2+ uptake via the MCU have not been tested in this context, preclinical studies showed that NCLX inhibition is an effective strategy to prevent oxidative damage.
CGP-37157
CGP-37157 is a selective inhibitor of the NCLX, without relevant effects on L-type Ca2+ channels, sarcolemmal Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (NCX), or sarcolemmal Na+/K+-ATPase in cardiac myocytes [44, 45] (Fig. 1). In a guinea pig model of HF, NCLX inhibition with CGP-37157 elevated mitochondrial matrix Ca2+, shifting the redox state of mitochondrial NAD(P)H toward reduction and thus protecting cardiac myocytes from oxidative stress [4.••]. In vivo, treatment with CGP-37157 prevented maladaptive cardiac remodeling, LV dysfunction, and arrhythmias [46.••]. In addition, CGP-37157 counteracted the arrhythmogenic effects of glycosides ex vivo and in vivo. In fact, cardiac glycosides such as digoxin accelerate Ca2+ efflux via the NCLX by increasing cytosolic Na+, thus oxidizing the mitochondrial NAD(P)H pool and favoring ROS emission from the matrix [47]. Thus far, CGP-37157 has not been tested in humans.
Cariporide
Because Ca2+ extrusion via the NCLX is driven by the Na+ gradient between the cytosol and the mitochondrial matrix, mitochondrial Ca2+ efflux can be counteracted by lowering cytosolic [Na+]. Cariporide reduces cytosolic [Na+] by selectively inhibiting the sarcolemmal sodium-hydrogen exchanger (NHE) type 1 (Fig. 1). NHE1 activation during myocardial ischemia leads to cytosolic Na+ and Ca2+ overload, consequently causing cardiac myocyte death. On these grounds, cariporide was clinically tested in the context of ischemia/reperfusion injury. Cariporide showed beneficial effects on systolic function and cardiac enzymes in a small pilot study conducted in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction (MI) undergoing PCI [48]. However, in the subsequent GUARDIAN trial, which included a cohort of 11,590 patients with high risk of myocardial necrosis (including patients with unstable angina pectoris, non-ST elevation MI, or patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous or surgical revascularization), cariporide reduced the risk of death or MI exclusively in the subpopulation of patients undergoing bypass surgery, but not in the total study population [49]. Furthermore, the EXPEDITION trial focused on the efficacy and safety of cariporide in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting; in this context, cariporide significantly reduced the risk of death or MI, but the effects resulted only from the decline in risk of MI, while mortality alone was slightly increased [50]. Therefore, although the largest clinical trial thus far demonstrated that treatment with cariporide is safe and well-tolerated [49], and despite proven benefits on myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury, the increased risk of mortality in the EXPEDITION trial prevented cariporide from further clinical testing in cardiovascular trials [50].
SGLT2 Inhibitors
The concept of targeting cytosolic Na+ has recently gained renewed interest in the light of the striking results of trials testing Na+/glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in patients with HF with and without diabetes. SGLT2i lower circulating glucose levels by inhibiting its renal reabsorption via SGLT2 in the early proximal tubule [51]. Although these agents were developed as antidiabetic drugs, the attention on SGLT2i as a potential HF therapy increased after four large clinical trials assessing the cardiovascular safety profiles of three different SGLT2i in patients with diabetes mellitus and high cardiovascular risk demonstrated a substantial reduction of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality and a reduction in major adverse cardiac events [52–56].
Subsequent clinical trials focusing on patients with HFrEF confirmed that treatment with SGLT2i on top of optimal medical HF therapy reduces risk of cardiovascular and all-cause death as well as hospitalisations for HF. Subsequent clinical trials focusing on patients with HFrEF confirmed that treatment with SGLT2i on top of optimal medical HF therapy reduces risk of cardiovascular and all-cause death as well as hospitalisations for HF [57, 58]. Importantly, these results were independent of baseline diabetes status and were consistent across the continuum of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, not differing between diabetes mellitus, prediabetes (HbA1c 5.7–6.4), or normoglycemia (< 5.7) [59.•, 60, 61]. Furthermore, in the EMPEROR-preserved trial, empagliflozin reduced the risk of hospitalization for HF in patients with HFpEF, regardless of the presence or absence of diabetes [60].
Since cardiac myocytes do not express SGLT2, and clinical trials used drug concentrations that do not inhibit SGLT1 [62], mechanisms of action explaining the cardioprotective effects of SGLT2i are currently under extensive investigation. Cardiac benefits might not be attributable to a single mechanism but rather result from several effects, including systemic ones such as natriuresis, lowering blood pressure, and preventing inflammation, as well as cardiac-specific effects including inhibition of NHE1 and changes in cardiac substrate preference.
A direct cardiac effect of empagliflozin was first proposed by the Baartscheer group, who observed that empagliflozin lowers cytosolic [Na+] by inhibiting the NHE1 in ventricular myocytes isolated from healthy rabbits and rats. The authors showed that, akin to the effect of cariproride, the Na+-lowering activity of empagliflozin results in reduced cytosolic [Ca2+] by favoring Ca2+ extrusion to the extracellular space via the NCX, and at the same time increases mitochondrial [Ca2+] by lowering the driving force for mitochondrial Ca2+ efflux via the NCLX [63.•]. The same group demonstrated that also canagliflozin and dapagliflozin inhibit NHE1 and reduce cytosolic [Na+] [64] (Fig. 1). NHE1 expression was confirmed in human atrial and ventricular tissue, and acute exposure to empagliflozin was able to significantly inhibit NHE1 activity in human atrial myocytes [62]. However, the concept of NHE1 inhibition has subsequently been challenged by Chung and colleagues, who could not reproduce the inhibitory effect of empagliflozin on NHE1, nor its Na+-lowering activity, by applying a variety of methods and a wide range of empagliflozin concentrations. The authors attributed the discrepancy to the unstable pH conditions of previous experiments. In addition, the general hypothesis of NHE1 inhibition was questioned, because NHE1 activity might be very low at physiological pH, in which case an inhibition would not result in any relevant effect [65.•].
NHE1 inhibition with SGLT2i is not limited to cardiac myocytes, but was also observed in human blood-derived myeloid angiogenetic cells and platelets (both cell types expressing NHE but not SGLT2). This might add to the systemic cardioprotective effects of SGLT2i by stabilizing atherosclerotic plaques and inhibiting thrombosis [66]. The precise interaction between SGLT2i and NHE1 is still unresolved. While a direct interaction of SGLT2i with the extracellular Na+-binding site of NHE was proposed [64], dapagliflozin was shown to enhance NHE1 gene expression by activating AMPK and increasing AMPK phosphorylation [67]. As discussed below, modulation of the AMPK pathway might also account for additional cardioprotective effects mediated by improvements in cellular and mitochondrial energetics.
In addition to their putative effects on NHE1, which are still controversial, SGLT2i were recently reported to inhibit the late sodium current (INa) (Fig. 1) [68.••]. In fact, INa has long been considered the main mechanism to increase cytosolic [Na+] in cardiac myocytes of patients with HF [69–71]. Ranolazine inhibits INa, and through lowering [Na+]i improves diastolic function and has anti-arrhythmic effects in vitro [72–74] and in patients with atrial fibrillation when combined with dronedarone [75]. SGLT2i bind to NaV1.5 channels and inhibit INa, and similar to tetrodotoxin, a classical NaV1.5 inhibitor, reduced inflammasome activation in an acute model of cardiac ischemia [68.••].
Targeting Cardiac Metabolism
Inhibitors of Fatty Acid Oxidation
Whereas the healthy heart predominantly oxidizes fatty acids and glucose for ATP production, HF is characterized by changes in substrate utilization that vary depending on the etiology and stage of the disease [76]. Metabolic abnormalities in HFrEF include a progressive decline in myocardial phosphocreatine and, ultimately, also ATP levels, lending support to the widely accepted view that the failing heart is “an engine out of fuel” [77]. Because ATP production from fatty acid oxidation requires more O2 for each ATP compared with glucose, pharmacological agents inhibiting fatty acid oxidation and favoring more “O2-efficient” oxidation of glucose have been tested in animal models and patients with HF. These include etomoxir, trimetazidine (TMZ), and malonyl-CoA decarboxylase inhibitors (Fig. 2).
Etomoxir is an inhibitor of the mitochondrial carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1 (CPT1), the rate-limiting enzyme of fatty acid β-oxidation. CPT1 inhibition shifts cellular substrate preference away from fatty acids toward glucose [78]. Etomoxir was initially developed for the use in diabetes, but was also tested in patients with HF. While one initial study observed significant improvements in LV ejection fraction and cardiac output during exercise in 10 patients [79], a subsequent clinical trial in a larger cohort of patients with congestive HF had to be stopped early because of hepatotoxicity, since a small number of participants in the treatment group exhibited an abnormal increase in circulating liver enzymes [78]. Consequently, therapeutic use was not further pursued, even though the general concept was suggested to be beneficial.
Trimetazidine (TMZ) inhibits β-oxidation of free long-chain fatty acids by competitive inhibition of the long-chain 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase [80.•, 81], thus promoting glucose utilization for ATP production. By virtue of its O2-sparing activity, TMZ relieves angina symptoms, and is recommended by the current European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines as a second-line treatment to reduce angina frequency in patients whose symptoms are not controlled with other antianginal medications [82]. However, in the large randomized controlled ATPCI trial, TMZ did not affect the recurrence of angina in patients who had either elective PCI for stable angina or urgent PCI for unstable angina or non-ST-segment elevation MI [83].
In patients with HF, treatment with TMZ increased the phosphocreatine/ATP ratio [84.••], which was associated with improvement of symptoms, exercise capacity, and overall quality of life. Furthermore, treatment with TMZ was shown to preserve LVEF and counteract maladaptive ventricular remodeling in HFrEF [84.••, 85–87] [reviewed in [86, 87] ]. While most of these studies focused on patients with ischemic HFrEF, TMZ improved physical exercise tolerance and cardiac function also in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy with and without diabetes [88, 89]. However, these studies were limited by the small study population and the observational design; the impact of TMZ on symptoms and cardiovascular outcomes in HF has not been conclusively demonstrated in randomized controlled trials thus far.
Malonyl-CoA levels dictate the rate of fatty acid oxidation in mitochondria by inhibiting the import of fatty acyl-CoA in the mitochondrial matrix. Malonyl-CoA is derived from carboxylation of acetyl-CoA, which becomes more abundant in states of energy repletion, and is degraded by the malonyl-CoA decarboxylase (Fig. 2). Pharmacological inhibitors of malonyl-CoA decarboxylase provide an alternative approach to modulate fatty acid oxidation and favor glucose utilization. Inhibition of malonyl-CoA decarboxylase in a rat model of MI decreased cardiac fatty acid oxidation rates and prevented HF development [90]. Malonyl-CoA decarboxylase inhibitors have not been tested in humans thus far.
Metabolic Effects of SGLT2 Inhibitors
The canonical mode of action of SGLT2-inhibitors (SGLT2i) is to inhibit glucose reabsorption in the proximal renal tubule, thereby inducing urinary glucose excretion. By lowering the total glucose pool, SGLT2i induce a fasting-like state characterized by increased lipolysis and ketogenesis [91], resulting in lower HbA1c levels and weight loss. Changes in systemic metabolism have an impact on myocardial substrate utilization and might contribute to the cardioprotective effect of SGLT2i by improving cardiac efficiency. It has been proposed that the increase in circulating ketone levels induced by SGLT2i is cardioprotective by providing the energy-starved failing heart with a “thrifty substrate” [92] (Fig. 2). In line with this hypothesis, SGLT2i ameliorated LV remodeling and enhanced cardiac efficiency in a swine model of MI. This was accompanied by a metabolic shift toward increased oxidation of ketones, fatty acids, and branched chain amino acids [93.••]. In a mouse model of HFpEF, SGLT2i increased cardiac ketones in a similar fashion as a ketone diet, attenuated NLPR3 inflammasome formation and antagonized proinflammatory cytokine-triggered mitochondrial dysfunction and fibrosis [94]. It is important to note that while SGLT2i increase circulating ketones in diabetic patients, their ketogenic effect is markedly lower in nondiabetic subjects [95, 96]. In addition, the failing heart exhibits an increased reliance on ketone oxidation for ATP production, and it is unclear whether further enhancing ketogenesis in HF has additional effects on this metabolic shift [97, 98].
Another intriguing hypothesis is that the fasting-like state induced by SGLT2i activates cellular sensors that respond to low-energy states, such as sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) and AMPK [99.•]. Both SIRT1 and AMPK are normally activated during nutrient deprivation and orchestrate cellular responses to starvation via post-translational modifications of proteins. Activation of SIRT1 and AMPK has pleiotropic effects that might explain the benefit of SGLT2i on cardiac and renal function; these include the activation of autophagy, i.e., the degradation of dysfunctional cellular components, including damaged mitochondria. This model is buttressed by numerous studies showing that autophagic removal of dysfunctional mitochondria is protective against cardiac stressors [100–102], but experimental evidence confirming that this process mediates the cardioprotective activity of SGLT2i is lacking.
Conclusions
Mitochondria lie at the crossroads of metabolic and energetic dysfunction in HF and represent ideal therapeutic targets. Mechano-energetic uncoupling, characterized by a mismatch of energy supply and demand, results in energy depletion and oxidative stress as a common mechanism in HFrEF. While antagonization of neuroendocrine activation remains the cornerstone of HFrEF treatment, the recent clinical results of SGLT2i suggest that targeting metabolism holds great therapeutic potential. In this context, the concept that targeting mitochondrial redox regulation and ion handling may impact on cardiac metabolism and remodeling is an emerging field, and more research is needed to translate the knowledge from preclinical models to the clinical situation.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. Dr Maack is/was supported by the Barth Syndrome Foundation, the German Research Foundation (DFG; Ma 2528/7- 1, SFB 894, TRR-219), and the German Federal Agency for Education and Research (BMBF; 01EO1504).
Declarations
Conflict of Interest
Dr Maack reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Berlin Chemie, Novartis, Amgen, Servier, and Novo Nordisk, outside the submitted work. Dr Schwemmlein and Dr Bertero declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Footnotes
Topical Collection on Translational Research in Heart Failure
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 1.Bertero E, Maack C. Calcium signaling and reactive oxygen species in mitochondria. Circ Res. 2018;122(10):1460–1478. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.310082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kohlhaas M, Maack C. Adverse bioenergetic consequences of Na+-Ca2+ exchanger-mediated Ca2+ influx in cardiac myocytes. Circulation. 2010;122(22):2273–2280. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.968057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.••.Maack C, Cortassa S, Aon MA, Ganesan AN, Liu T, O'Rourke B. Elevated cytosolic Na+ decreases mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake during excitation-contraction coupling and impairs energetic adaptation in cardiac myocytes. Circ Res. 2006;99(2):172–182. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000232546.92777.05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.••.Kohlhaas M, Liu T, Knopp A, Zeller T, Ong MF, Bohm M, et al. Elevated cytosolic Na+ increases mitochondrial formation of reactive oxygen species in failing cardiac myocytes. Circulation. 2010;121(14):1606–1613. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.914911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.••.Nickel AG, von Hardenberg A, Hohl M, Loffler JR, Kohlhaas M, Becker J, et al. Reversal of Mitochondrial transhydrogenase causes oxidative stress in heart failure. Cell Metab. 2015;22(3):472–484. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yusuf S, Dagenais G, Pogue J, Bosch J, Sleight P. Vitamin E supplementation and cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(3):154–160. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200001203420302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dietl A, Maack C. Targeting mitochondrial calcium handling and reactive oxygen species in heart failure. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2017;14(4):338–349. doi: 10.1007/s11897-017-0347-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kelso GF, Porteous CM, Coulter CV, Hughes G, Porteous WK, Ledgerwood EC, et al. Selective targeting of a redox-active ubiquinone to mitochondria within cells: antioxidant and antiapoptotic properties. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(7):4588–4596. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M009093200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ross MF, Kelso GF, Blaikie FH, James AM, Cochemé HM, Filipovska A, et al. Lipophilic triphenylphosphonium cations as tools in mitochondrial bioenergetics and free radical biology. Biochemistry (Mosc) 2005;70(2):222–230. doi: 10.1007/s10541-005-0104-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Doughan AK, Dikalov SI. Mitochondrial redox cycling of mitoquinone leads to superoxide production and cellular apoptosis. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2007;9(11):1825–1836. doi: 10.1089/ars.2007.1693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yancey DM, Guichard JL, Ahmed MI, Zhou L, Murphy MP, Johnson MS, et al. Cardiomyocyte mitochondrial oxidative stress and cytoskeletal breakdown in the heart with a primary volume overload. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2015;308(6):H651–H663. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00638.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.•.Ribeiro Junior RF, Dabkowski ER, Shekar KC, KA OC, Hecker PA, Murphy MP. MitoQ improves mitochondrial dysfunction in heart failure induced by pressure overload. Free Radic Biol Med. 2018;117:18-29. MitoQ preserves mitochondrial respiration, decreases H2O2 production, and prevents permeability transition in a rat model of pressure overload. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 13.Goh KY, He L, Song J, Jinno M, Rogers AJ, Sethu P, et al. Mitoquinone ameliorates pressure overload-induced cardiac fibrosis and left ventricular dysfunction in mice. Redox Biol. 2019;21:101100. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2019.101100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.•.Adlam VJ, Harrison JC, Porteous CM, James AM, Smith RA, Murphy MP, et al. Targeting an antioxidant to mitochondria decreases cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury. FASEB J. 2005;19(9):1088–1095. doi: 10.1096/fj.05-3718com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.•.Rossman MJ, Santos-Parker JR, Steward CAC, Bispham NZ, Cuevas LM, Rosenberg HL, et al. Chronic supplementation with a mitochondrial antioxidant (MitoQ) improves vascular function in healthy older adults. Hypertension. 2018;71(6):1056–1063. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Park SY, Pekas EJ, Headid RJ, 3rd, Son WM, Wooden TK, Song J, et al. Acute mitochondrial antioxidant intake improves endothelial function, antioxidant enzyme activity, and exercise tolerance in patients with peripheral artery disease. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2020;319(2):H456–H467. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00235.2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gane EJ, Weilert F, Orr DW, Keogh GF, Gibson M, Lockhart MM, et al. The mitochondria-targeted anti-oxidant mitoquinone decreases liver damage in a phase II study of hepatitis C patients. Liver Int. 2010;30(7):1019–1026. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2010.02250.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Snow BJ, Rolfe FL, Lockhart MM, Frampton CM, O'Sullivan JD, Fung V, et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the mitochondria-targeted antioxidant MitoQ as a disease-modifying therapy in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2010;25(11):1670–1674. doi: 10.1002/mds.23148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhao K, Zhao GM, Wu D, Soong Y, Birk AV, Schiller PW, et al. Cell-permeable peptide antioxidants targeted to inner mitochondrial membrane inhibit mitochondrial swelling, oxidative cell death, and reperfusion injury. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(33):34682–34690. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M402999200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Szeto HH. First-in-class cardiolipin-protective compound as a therapeutic agent to restore mitochondrial bioenergetics. Br J Pharmacol. 2014;171(8):2029–2050. doi: 10.1111/bph.12461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pfeiffer K, Gohil V, Stuart RA, Hunte C, Brandt U, Greenberg ML, et al. Cardiolipin stabilizes respiratory chain supercomplexes. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(52):52873–52880. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M308366200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Birk AV, Chao WM, Bracken C, Warren JD, Szeto HH. Targeting mitochondrial cardiolipin and the cytochrome c/cardiolipin complex to promote electron transport and optimize mitochondrial ATP synthesis. Br J Pharmacol. 2014;171(8):2017–2028. doi: 10.1111/bph.12468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Szeto HH. Mitochondria-targeted cytoprotective peptides for ischemia-reperfusion injury. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2008;10(3):601–619. doi: 10.1089/ars.2007.1892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cho J, Won K, Wu D, Soong Y, Liu S, Szeto HH, et al. Potent mitochondria-targeted peptides reduce myocardial infarction in rats. Coron Artery Dis. 2007;18(3):215–220. doi: 10.1097/01.mca.0000236285.71683.b6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.•.Dai W, Shi J, Gupta RC, Sabbah HN, Hale SL, Kloner RA. Bendavia, a mitochondria-targeting peptide, improves postinfarction cardiac function, prevents adverse left ventricular remodeling, and restores mitochondria-related gene expression in rats. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2014;64(6):543–553. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kloner RA, Hale SL, Dai W, Gorman RC, Shuto T, Koomalsingh KJ, et al. Reduction of ischemia/reperfusion injury with bendavia, a mitochondria-targeting cytoprotective Peptide. J Am Heart Assoc. 2012;1(3):e001644. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.001644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Brown DA, Hale SL, Baines CP, del Rio CL, Hamlin RL, Yueyama Y, et al. Reduction of early reperfusion injury with the mitochondria-targeting peptide bendavia. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2014;19(1):121–132. doi: 10.1177/1074248413508003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.••.Dai DF, Chen T, Szeto H, Nieves-Cintron M, Kutyavin V, Santana LF, et al. Mitochondrial targeted antioxidant peptide ameliorates hypertensive cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(1):73–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.12.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dai DF, Hsieh EJ, Chen T, Menendez LG, Basisty NB, Tsai L, et al. Global proteomics and pathway analysis of pressure-overload-induced heart failure and its attenuation by mitochondrial-targeted peptides. Circ Heart Fail. 2013;6(5):1067–1076. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.113.000406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.•.Sabbah HN, Gupta RC, Kohli S, Wang M, Hachem S, Zhang K. Chronic therapy with elamipretide (MTP-131), a novel mitochondria-targeting peptide, improves left ventricular and mitochondrial function in dogs with advanced heart failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2016;9(2):e002206. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gibson CM, Giugliano RP, Kloner RA, Bode C, Tendera M, Janosi A, et al. EMBRACE STEMI study: a phase 2a trial to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of intravenous MTP-131 on reperfusion injury in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(16):1296–1303. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Daubert MA, Yow E, Dunn G, Marchev S, Barnhart H, Douglas PS, et al. Novel mitochondria-targeting peptide in heart failure treatment: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of elamipretide. Circ Heart Fail. 2017;10(12). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 33.Bione S, D'Adamo P, Maestrini E, Gedeon AK, Bolhuis PA, Toniolo D. A novel X-linked gene, G4.5. is responsible for Barth syndrome. Nat Genet. 1996;12(4):385–9. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 34.Xu Y, Malhotra A, Ren M, Schlame M. The enzymatic function of tafazzin. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(51):39217–39224. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M606100200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Barth PG, Scholte HR, Berden JA, Van der Klei-Van Moorsel JM, Luyt-Houwen IE, Van 't Veer-Korthof ET, et al. An X-linked mitochondrial disease affecting cardiac muscle, skeletal muscle and neutrophil leucocytes. J Neurol Sci. 1983;62(1–3):327–55. doi: 10.1016/0022-510X(83)90209-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.••.Reid Thompson W, Hornby B, Manuel R, Bradley E, Laux J, Carr J, et al. A phase 2/3 randomized clinical trial followed by an open-label extension to evaluate the effectiveness of elamipretide in Barth syndrome, a genetic disorder of mitochondrial cardiolipin metabolism. Genet Med. 2021;23(3):471–478. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-01006-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Karaa A, Haas R, Goldstein A, Vockley J, Weaver WD, Cohen BH. Randomized dose-escalation trial of elamipretide in adults with primary mitochondrial myopathy. Neurology. 2018;90(14):e1212–e1221. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.•.Butler J, Khan MS, Anker SD, Fonarow GC, Kim RJ, Nodari S, et al. Effects of elamipretide on left ventricular function in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: the PROGRESS-HF phase 2 trial. J Card Fail. 2020;26(5):429–437. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2020.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Karaa A, Haas R, Goldstein A, Vockley J, Cohen BH. A randomized crossover trial of elamipretide in adults with primary mitochondrial myopathy. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020;11(4):909–918. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Chatfield KC, Sparagna GC, Chau S, Phillips EK, Ambardekar AV, Aftab M, et al. Elamipretide improves mitochondrial function in the failing human heart. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2019;4(2):147–157. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2018.12.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Allen ME, Pennington ER, Perry JB, Dadoo S, Makrecka-Kuka M, Dambrova M, et al. The cardiolipin-binding peptide elamipretide mitigates fragmentation of cristae networks following cardiac ischemia reperfusion in rats. Commun Biol. 2020;3(1):389. doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-1101-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Machiraju P, Wang X, Sabouny R, Huang J, Zhao T, Iqbal F, et al. SS-31 peptide reverses the mitochondrial fragmentation present in fibroblasts from patients with DCMA, a mitochondrial cardiomyopathy. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2019;6:167. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2019.00167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Shi J, Dai W, Hale SL, Brown DA, Wang M, Han X, et al. Bendavia restores mitochondrial energy metabolism gene expression and suppresses cardiac fibrosis in the border zone of the infarcted heart. Life Sci. 2015;141:170–178. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2015.09.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Cox DA, Conforti L, Sperelakis N, Matlib MA. Selectivity of inhibition of Na(+)-Ca2+ exchange of heart mitochondria by benzothiazepine CGP-37157. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1993;21(4):595–599. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199304000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Liu T, O'Rourke B. Enhancing mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake in myocytes from failing hearts restores energy supply and demand matching. Circ Res. 2008;103(3):279–288. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.175919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.••.Liu T, Takimoto E, Dimaano VL, DeMazumder D, Kettlewell S, Smith G, et al. Inhibiting mitochondrial Na+/Ca2+ exchange prevents sudden death in a guinea pig model of heart failure. Circ Res. 2014;115(1):44–54. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.303062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Liu T, Brown DA, O'Rourke B. Role of mitochondrial dysfunction in cardiac glycoside toxicity. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2010;49(5):728–736. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2010.06.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Rupprecht HJ, vom Dahl J, Terres W, Seyfarth KM, Richardt G, Schultheibeta HP, et al. Cardioprotective effects of the Na(+)/H(+) exchange inhibitor cariporide in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction undergoing direct PTCA. Circulation. 2000;101(25):2902–2908. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.101.25.2902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Théroux P, Chaitman BR, Danchin N, Erhardt L, Meinertz T, Schroeder JS, et al. Inhibition of the sodium-hydrogen exchanger with cariporide to prevent myocardial infarction in high-risk ischemic situations. Main results of the GUARDIAN trial. Guard during ischemia against necrosis (GUARDIAN) Investigators. Circulation. 2000;102(25):3032–8. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 50.Mentzer RM, Jr, Bartels C, Bolli R, Boyce S, Buckberg GD, Chaitman B, et al. Sodium-hydrogen exchange inhibition by cariporide to reduce the risk of ischemic cardiac events in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: results of the EXPEDITION study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85(4):1261–1270. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.10.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Vallon V, Thomson SC. Targeting renal glucose reabsorption to treat hyperglycaemia: the pleiotropic effects of SGLT2 inhibition. Diabetologia. 2017;60(2):215–225. doi: 10.1007/s00125-016-4157-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, Fitchett D, Bluhmki E, Hantel S, et al. Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(22):2117–2128. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Fitchett D, Inzucchi SE, Cannon CP, McGuire DK, Scirica BM, Johansen OE, et al. Empagliflozin reduced mortality and hospitalization for heart failure across the spectrum of cardiovascular risk in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial. Circulation. 2019;139(11):1384–1395. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.037778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Neal B, Perkovic V, Mahaffey KW, de Zeeuw D, Fulcher G, Erondu N, et al. Canagliflozin and cardiovascular and renal events in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(7):644–657. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Wiviott SD, Raz I, Bonaca MP, Mosenzon O, Kato ET, Cahn A, et al. Dapagliflozin and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(4):347–357. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1812389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Zelniker TA, Wiviott SD, Raz I, Im K, Goodrich EL, Bonaca MP, et al. SGLT2 inhibitors for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials. Lancet. 2019;393(10166):31–39. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32590-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Packer M, Anker SD, Butler J, Filippatos G, Pocock SJ, Carson P, et al. Cardiovascular and renal outcomes with empagliflozin in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(15):1413–1424. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2022190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.McMurray JJV, Solomon SD, Inzucchi SE, Køber L, Kosiborod MN, Martinez FA, et al. Dapagliflozin in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(21):1995–2008. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1911303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.•.Zannad F, Ferreira JP, Pocock SJ, Anker SD, Butler J, Filippatos G, et al. SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a meta-analysis of the EMPEROR-Reduced and DAPA-HF trials. Lancet. 2020;396(10254):819–829. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31824-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Anker SD, Butler J, Filippatos G, Khan MS, Marx N, Lam CSP, et al. Effect of empagliflozin on cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with heart failure by baseline diabetes status: results from the EMPEROR-Reduced trial. Circulation. 2021;143(4):337–349. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.051824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Petrie MC, Verma S, Docherty KF, Inzucchi SE, Anand I, Belohlávek J, et al. Effect of dapagliflozin on worsening heart failure and cardiovascular death in patients with heart failure with and without diabetes. JAMA. 2020;323(14):1353–1368. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Lopaschuk GD, Verma S. Mechanisms of cardiovascular benefits of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors: a state-of-the-art review. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2020;5(6):632–644. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2020.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.•.Baartscheer A, Schumacher CA, Wüst RC, Fiolet JW, Stienen GJ, Coronel R, et al. Empagliflozin decreases myocardial cytoplasmic Na(+) through inhibition of the cardiac Na(+)/H(+) exchanger in rats and rabbits. Diabetologia. 2017;60(3):568–573. doi: 10.1007/s00125-016-4134-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Uthman L, Baartscheer A, Bleijlevens B, Schumacher CA, Fiolet JWT, Koeman A, et al. Class effects of SGLT2 inhibitors in mouse cardiomyocytes and hearts: inhibition of Na(+)/H(+) exchanger, lowering of cytosolic Na(+) and vasodilation. Diabetologia. 2018;61(3):722–726. doi: 10.1007/s00125-017-4509-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.•.Chung YJ, Park KC, Tokar S, Eykyn TR, Fuller W, Pavlovic D, et al. Off-target effects of SGLT2 blockers: empagliflozin does not inhibit Na+/H+ exchanger-1 or lower [Na+]i in the heart. Cardiovasc Res. 2020. This study challenges the results of the work by Baartscheer and colleagues showing that empagliflozin inhibits the Na+/H+ exchanger.
- 66.Spigoni V, Fantuzzi F, Carubbi C, Pozzi G, Masselli E, Gobbi G, et al. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors antagonize lipotoxicity in human myeloid angiogenic cells and ADP-dependent activation in human platelets: potential relevance to prevention of cardiovascular events. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020;19(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01016-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Ye Y, Jia X, Bajaj M, Birnbaum Y. Dapagliflozin Attenuates Na(+)/H(+) Exchanger-1 in cardiofibroblasts via AMPK activation. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2018;32(6):553–558. doi: 10.1007/s10557-018-6837-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.••.Philippaert K, Kalyaanamoorthy S, Fatehi M, Long W, Soni S, Byrne NJ, et al. Cardiac late sodium channel current is a molecular target for the sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor empagliflozin. Circulation. 2021;143(22):2188–2204. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.053350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Bay J, Kohlhaas M, Maack C. Intracellular Na(+) and cardiac metabolism. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2013;61:20–27. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2013.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Clancy CE, Chen-Izu Y, Bers DM, Belardinelli L, Boyden PA, Csernoch L, et al. Deranged sodium to sudden death. J Physiol. 2015;593(6):1331–1345. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2014.281204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Despa S, Islam MA, Weber CR, Pogwizd SM, Bers DM. Intracellular Na(+) concentration is elevated in heart failure but Na/K pump function is unchanged. Circulation. 2002;105(21):2543–2548. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000016701.85760.97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Hartmann N, Mason FE, Braun I, Pabel S, Voigt N, Schotola H, et al. The combined effects of ranolazine and dronedarone on human atrial and ventricular electrophysiology. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2016;94:95–106. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2016.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Song Y, Shryock JC, Wagner S, Maier LS, Belardinelli L. Blocking late sodium current reduces hydrogen peroxide-induced arrhythmogenic activity and contractile dysfunction. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2006;318(1):214–222. doi: 10.1124/jpet.106.101832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Sossalla S, Kallmeyer B, Wagner S, Mazur M, Maurer U, Toischer K, et al. Altered Na(+) currents in atrial fibrillation effects of ranolazine on arrhythmias and contractility in human atrial myocardium. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(21):2330–2342. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.12.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Reiffel JA, Camm AJ, Belardinelli L, Zeng D, Karwatowska-Prokopczuk E, Olmsted A, et al. The HARMONY trial: combined ranolazine and dronedarone in the management of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: mechanistic and therapeutic synergism. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015;8(5):1048–1056. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.115.002856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Bertero E, Maack C. Metabolic remodelling in heart failure. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2018;15(8):457–470. doi: 10.1038/s41569-018-0044-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Neubauer S. The failing heart–an engine out of fuel. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(11):1140–1151. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra063052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Holubarsch CJ, Rohrbach M, Karrasch M, Boehm E, Polonski L, Ponikowski P, et al. A double-blind randomized multicentre clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two doses of etomoxir in comparison with placebo in patients with moderate congestive heart failure: the ERGO (etomoxir for the recovery of glucose oxidation) study. Clin Sci (Lond) 2007;113(4):205–212. doi: 10.1042/CS20060307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Schmidt-Schweda S, Holubarsch C. First clinical trial with etomoxir in patients with chronic congestive heart failure. Clin Sci (Lond) 2000;99(1):27–35. doi: 10.1042/CS19990235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.•.Kantor PF, Lucien A, Kozak R, Lopaschuk GD. The antianginal drug trimetazidine shifts cardiac energy metabolism from fatty acid oxidation to glucose oxidation by inhibiting mitochondrial long-chain 3-ketoacyl coenzyme A thiolase. Circ Res. 2000;86(5):580–588. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.86.5.580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Lopaschuk GD, Barr R, Thomas PD, Dyck JR. Beneficial effects of trimetazidine in ex vivo working ischemic hearts are due to a stimulation of glucose oxidation secondary to inhibition of long-chain 3-ketoacyl coenzyme a thiolase. Circ Res. 2003;93(3):e33–e37. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000086964.07404.A5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, Capodanno D, Barbato E, Funck-Brentano C, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(3):407–477. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Ferrari R, Ford I, Fox K, Challeton JP, Correges A, Tendera M, et al. Efficacy and safety of trimetazidine after percutaneous coronary intervention (ATPCI): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2020;396(10254):830–838. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31790-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.••.Fragasso G, Perseghin G, De Cobelli F, Esposito A, Palloshi A, Lattuada G, et al. Effects of metabolic modulation by trimetazidine on left ventricular function and phosphocreatine/adenosine triphosphate ratio in patients with heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(8):942–948. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Fragasso G, Palloshi A, Puccetti P, Silipigni C, Rossodivita A, Pala M, et al. A randomized clinical trial of trimetazidine, a partial free fatty acid oxidation inhibitor, in patients with heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48(5):992–998. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.03.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Marzilli M, Vinereanu D, Lopaschuk G, Chen Y, Dalal JJ, Danchin N, et al. Trimetazidine in cardiovascular medicine. Int J Cardiol. 2019;293:39–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.05.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Lopatin YM, Rosano GM, Fragasso G, Lopaschuk GD, Seferovic PM, Gowdak LH, et al. Rationale and benefits of trimetazidine by acting on cardiac metabolism in heart failure. Int J Cardiol. 2016;203:909–915. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.11.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Zhao P, Zhang J, Yin XG, Maharaj P, Narraindoo S, Cui LQ, et al. The effect of trimetazidine on cardiac function in diabetic patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Life Sci. 2013;92(11):633–638. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2012.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Tuunanen H, Engblom E, Naum A, Nagren K, Scheinin M, Hesse B, et al. Trimetazidine, a metabolic modulator, has cardiac and extracardiac benefits in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2008;118(12):1250–1258. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.778019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Wang W, Zhang L, Battiprolu PK, Fukushima A, Nguyen K, Milner K, et al. Malonyl CoA decarboxylase inhibition improves cardiac function post-myocardial infarction. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2019;4(3):385–400. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2019.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Osataphan S, Macchi C, Singhal G, Chimene-Weiss J, Sales V, Kozuka C, et al. SGLT2 inhibition reprograms systemic metabolism via FGF21-dependent and -independent mechanisms. JCI Insight. 2019;4(5). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 92.Ferrannini E, Mark M, Mayoux E. CV Protection in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial: a “thrifty substrate” hypothesis. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(7):1108–1114. doi: 10.2337/dc16-0330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.••.Santos-Gallego CG, Requena-Ibanez JA, San Antonio R, Ishikawa K, Watanabe S, Picatoste B, et al. Empagliflozin ameliorates adverse left ventricular remodeling in nondiabetic heart failure by enhancing myocardial energetics. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(15):1931–1944. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Deng Y, Xie M, Li Q, Xu X, Ou W, Zhang Y, et al. Targeting mitochondria-inflammation circuit by β-hydroxybutyrate mitigates HFpEF. Circ Res. 2021;128(2):232–245. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.317933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Al Jobori H, Daniele G, Adams J, Cersosimo E, Triplitt C, DeFronzo RA, et al. Determinants of the increase in ketone concentration during SGLT2 inhibition in NGT, IFG and T2DM patients. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19(6):809–813. doi: 10.1111/dom.12881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Ferrannini E, Baldi S, Frascerra S, Astiarraga B, Heise T, Bizzotto R, et al. Shift to fatty substrate utilization in response to sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition in subjects without diabetes and patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2016;65(5):1190–1195. doi: 10.2337/db15-1356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Bedi KC, Jr, Snyder NW, Brandimarto J, Aziz M, Mesaros C, Worth AJ, et al. Evidence for intramyocardial disruption of lipid metabolism and increased myocardial ketone utilization in advanced human heart failure. Circulation. 2016;133(8):706–716. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.017545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Aubert G, Martin OJ, Horton JL, Lai L, Vega RB, Leone TC, et al. The failing heart relies on ketone bodies as a fuel. Circulation. 2016;133(8):698–705. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.017355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.•.Packer M. Role of deranged energy deprivation signaling in the pathogenesis of cardiac and renal disease in states of perceived nutrient overabundance. Circulation. 2020;141(25):2095–2105. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.045561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Wang B, Nie J, Wu L, Hu Y, Wen Z, Dong L, et al. AMPKalpha2 protects against the development of heart failure by enhancing mitophagy via PINK1 phosphorylation. Circ Res. 2018;122(5):712–729. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.312317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Shirakabe A, Zhai P, Ikeda Y, Saito T, Maejima Y, Hsu CP, et al. Drp1-dependent mitochondrial autophagy plays a protective role against pressure overload-induced mitochondrial dysfunction and heart failure. Circulation. 2016;133(13):1249–1263. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.020502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Eisenberg T, Abdellatif M, Schroeder S, Primessnig U, Stekovic S, Pendl T, et al. Cardioprotection and lifespan extension by the natural polyamine spermidine. Nat Med. 2016;22(12):1428–1438. doi: 10.1038/nm.4222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]