Novel dual-resistor-diode limiter circuit structures for high-voltage reliable ultrasound receiver systems

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The limiters have been used to protect the ultrasound receivers because of the inherent characteristic of the transducers which are required to use the high voltage excitation to obtain the reasonable echo signal amplitudes.

OBJECTIVE:

Among the variety of the limiters, the performances of discharge voltage degradation from the limiters gradually deteriorate the whole ultrasound systems according to the applied voltages of the ultrasonic transducers. This could cause the ultrasound systems to be unreliable for the long-term operations, resulting in possibly breaking the receiver systems.

METHODS:

Designed limiters were evaluated with insertion loss, total harmonic distortion, and pulse-echo responses with the ultrasound transducer devices.

RESULTS:

Designed new dual-resistor-diode limiters exhibited greater and faster suppression of the pulse width (1.15 V and 6.1 $\mu$s) for high-voltage signals.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our proposed dual-resistor-diode limiter could be one of the potential candidates for reliable ultrasound receiver system.

1. Introduction

Recently, ultrasound systems are widely used to evaluate the performances such as pulse-echo responses and cell responses [1]. The systems are composed of the transmitter and receiver with transducers [2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. The transducers are one of the core devices [7, 8, 9, 10]. The performance of system mainly depends on the performance of the transducer [11, 12]. High voltage (normally higher than 5V${}_{\text{p-p}}$) is typically applied to achieve the detectable echo signals from the transducers [13]. However, the high voltage signals are applied to the transducers and receivers simultaneously because of sharing paths between the transducers and receivers so the limiter must be used to protect the receivers [14, 15]. The performances improvement of the limiter may help improve the reliability because the limiters caused by the high voltage signals could be one of the issues [16, 17, 18, 19]. Especially, due to large structure sizes and cooling fan, systems having array transducers are always suffered by the high voltage signals generated from the transmitter. This leads to unwanted heat, degraded system performance and reduced reliability [19, 20, 21].

The resistor-diode limiter which uses a 50$\mathrm{\Omega }$ resistor with a crossed-coupled diode parallel pair has been widely used [22, 23, 24]. Because the performance degradation in the high frequency operation is caused by resistor-diode limiter, other limiters such as diode-bridge or high voltage transistor switches have been alternatively used [25, 26]. However, resistor-diode limiters are simpler and more cost-effective architectures and they are more useful for the sensitive and noisy systems because other limiters are operated by power switches generating the additional noises to the transducers [27, 28]. Comparing to other limiters, our proposed limiter not only has a simple architecture but reasonably adequate performance. In addition, this new resistor-diode-limiter is aimed to improve the reliability of system. In this paper, the design and analysis of the proposed limiter were described. The experimental measurement was provided to evaluate the limiter’s capability.

2. Methods

2.1. Ultrasound system structure

Figure 1 illustrates the block diagram of a typical ultrasound systems with transducers [29, 30, 31]. The transmitter generates single or multi-cycle pulses to trigger the transducers via an expander which is composed of a single diode pairs and the echo signals obtained from the transducers through the limiter are processed by the receivers [32]. However, the receiver is connected and shared by the transducer and transmitter through the expander [14]. Therefore, the limiters need to block the unwanted high voltage signals from the transmitter to protect the receiver. Computer is used to control the excitation pulses and receiving echoes through the transmitter and receiver [33, 34].

Figure 1.

Block diagram of the ultrasound system.

2.2. Analysis of the limiters

In the resistor-diode limiter, a resistor with a parallel diode pair is used [35]. In the limiter, the dual-diode is used to increase blocking capability against the high voltage because the high voltage could produce the high echo signals and low discharge voltage. Using the dual-diode can largely improve the reliability. In Fig. 2, the resistors ($R_{L1}\sim R_{L4}$) and clamping diodes ($D_L$) are the components to construct the limiters. In the structure, multi-diode configuration might suppress further high voltage pulses.

Figure 2.

(a) Fabricated limiters; (b) resistor-diode limiter using a 50-$\mathrm{\Omega }$ ($R_{L1}$) resistor with a diode ($D_L$); (c) resistor-diode limiter using two 25-$\mathrm{\Omega }$ ($R_{L2}$) resistors with two parallel-diodes ($D_L$); (d) resistor-diode limiter using two 13-$\mathrm{\Omega }$ ($R_{L3}$) resistors and two 12-$\mathrm{\Omega }$ ($R_{L4}$) resistors with four parallel-diodes ($D_L$).

To analyze the mechanism of the small and high voltage signals for each limiter, we derived the small (Fig. 3a) and large signal (Fig. 3b) equivalent circuit models of the limiters [36, 37]. Compared to a single diode pair in the limiter, there are more single diode pairs in the limiter. However, the matching is also important so the impedances in the limiters might be desirable to be 50-$\mathrm{\Omega }$ because the limiter is connected to the 50-$\mathrm{\Omega }$ transducer and preamplifier. Thus, the insertion loss (IL) of the limiters should be comparable because the parasitic resistance ($g_m$) in the diode is very high. However, the parasitic capacitance ($C_L$) in the diode pairs decrease the cut-off frequencies ($f_{c1}$, $f_{c2}$, and $f_{c3}$) for three different limiters as shown in Eq. (2.2) [38, 39]. Thus, the diodes having low capacitances must be selected. In Eq. (2.2), three different limiters are supposed to have same IL and cut-off frequencies as 397.88 MHz enough for 1 MHz ultrasound signals.

Figure 3.

Equivalent circuit models and operating mechanism of the (a) small signal and (b) large signals: conventional resistor-diode limiter using a 50-$\mathrm{\Omega }$ ($R_{L1}$) resistor with a single parallel-diode pair ($D_L$); dual-resistor-diode limiter using two 25-$\mathrm{\Omega }$ ($R_{L2}$) resistors with two parallel-diode pairs ($D_L$); dual-resistor-diode limiter using two 13-$\mathrm{\Omega }$ ($R_{L3}$) resistors and two 12-$\mathrm{\Omega }$ ($R_{L4}$) resistors with four parallel-diode pairs ($D_L$).

$f_{c1}={[4\pi R_{L1}{C}_L]}^{-1},f_{c2}={[4\pi (R_{L1}+R_{L2})C_L]}^{-1},$

(1)

$f_{c3}={[4\pi (R_{L1}+R_{L2}+R_{L3}+R_{L4})C_L]}^{-1}$

In Fig. 3b, the high voltage pulse is the input of the limiter. Compared to a single diode pair in the limiter ($g_m$), there are more resistances ($g_m$ and $R_s$) and even resistances are lower [40, 41]. We expect that more high voltage signals could be suppressed for dual-resistor-diode limiters compared to resistor-diode limiter. However, the simulation data such as signal distortions in the high voltage operation are not quite accurate [36, 42, 43, 44].

3. Results and discussion

Figure 4 shows the IL vs. frequency of the limiters. Using Eq. (2), IL was calculated from the outputs with and without limiters [45]. Compared to the resistor-diode limiter, the dual-resistor-diode limiters also have same IL ($-$3.87 dB). Thus, proposed dual-resistor-diode limiters have desirable signal loss to be used in the receiver systems.

Figure 4.

(a) The IL of the resistor-diode limiters and dual-resistor-diode limiters vs. frequency. (b) The THD of the resistor-diode limiters and dual-resistor-diode limiters vs. frequency.

$IL(dB)=20{\text{𝐿𝑜𝑔}}_{10}(V_{\mathit{\text{with\_limiter}}}/V_{\mathit{\text{without\_limiter}}})$ (2)

where $V_{\mathit{\text{with\_limiter}}}$ and $V_{\mathit{\text{without\_limiter}}}$ are the measured peak-to-peak output voltage with and without limiters, respectively.

To estimate the distortions, we calculated the total harmonic distortion (THD). Equation (3) shows the equation of the THD of the limiters [40]. Low THD values indicates that the limiters have low signals distortions [36, 46, 47, 48, 49]. Compared to the THD of the resistor-diode limiter (0.31%), the dual-resistor-diode limiters have slightly lower THDs (0.29 and 0.28%)

$\text{𝑇𝐻𝐷}(\%)=({[{(V_2)}_{+}^2{(V_3)}_{+}^2{(V_4)}_{+\mathrm{\dots }+}^2{(V_n)}^2]}^{-1/2}/V_1)*100$ (3)

where $V_1$, $V_2$, $V_3$, $V_4$, and $V_n$ are the measured output voltage signal of the fundamental, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, nth harmonic frequencies in the spectrum.

For high voltage operations, a 5-cycle, 50 V${}_{p-p}$, and 1 MHz pulses amplified by the power amplifier was applied to the limiters and the outputs in Fig. 5a. The limiters are desirable to suppress high voltage pulse with high IL [40, 50]. Thus, suppressed pulse signals need to be measured because the function of the limiters is to isolate the high voltage pulses. Compared to the resistor-diode limiter (2.45 V), the dual-resistor-diode limiter have a little bit shorter pulse width for high voltage signals (1.15 and 0.82 V) as shown in Fig. 5b. The pulse widths of the pulses were measured because the pulses do not interfere with the echo. Compared to the resistor-diode limiter (6.2 $\mu$s), the dual-resistor-diode limiter have a little bit shorter pulse width (6.1 and 6.07 $\mu$s). Their data do not interfere with the pulse repetition period. Compared to the resistor-diode limiter, the dual-resistor-diode limiter have higher suppression and faster pulse width for high voltage signals while the limiters have similar IL for low voltage signals

Figure 5.

(a) The original signal and (b) suppressed pulses of the resistor-diode limiters and dual-resistor-diode limiters.

3.1. Pulse-echo measurement

The pulse-echo is typical evaluation method for the ultrasound components such as transducer or transceiver [17, 45]. Thus, we performed the measurement using a transducer (V303, Olympus Corp., Toyko, Japan) in Fig. 6a. Figure 6b shows the magnitude detected by the limiter and receiver. Figure 6c and d show the spectrum of the echo signals. Figure 6e–g show the pulse width, bandwidth and THD. The pulse widths when using proposed limiters (10.08 $\mu$s and 9.92 $\mu$s) are shorter compared to that of the transducers when using resistor-diode limiter (13.41 $\mu$s). The bandwidths when using proposed limiters (23.76 and 24.48%) are wider compared to those when using resistor-diode limiter (20.09%). The THDs when using proposed limiters (33.56 and 31.27%) are better compared to that when using resistor-diode limiter (35.11%).

Figure 6.

(a) Pulse-echo measurement setup. (b) Peak-to-peak voltage and (c) $-$6 dB bandwidth and center frequency of the echo signals using a dual-resistor-diode limiter-1, (d) Harmonic Distortions (HD2, HD3, HD4, and HD5) of the echo signals using a dual-resistor-diode limiter-1. (e) Comparison of Pulse width (PW), (f) $-$6 dB bandwidth, and (g) THD of the echo signals between the limiters.

4. Conclusion

A novel dual-resistor-diode limiter structure to increase reliability for high-voltage receivers is proposed and evaluated in this paper. Compared to resistor-diode limiter, the proposed limiter could further reduce unwanted high voltage discharged signals and shorter pulse widths, thus being more reliable for high-voltage receivers. Because discharge signals provide burden to the reliability of the systems. This proposed limiter is tested in the systems to confirm its capability. In the pulse echo measurement data, when using the proposed limiter, its pulse widths, $-$6 dB bandwidths, and THDs of the echo signals are shorter, wider and better compared to that of the transducers with a resistor-diode limiter. Thus, the proposed dual-resistor-diode limiter is one of the potential candidates for the high-performance receiver systems.

Conflict of interest

None to report.