Skip to main content
Life logoLink to Life
. 2022 Mar 30;12(4):506. doi: 10.3390/life12040506

Early Salivary miRNA Expression in Extreme Low Gestational Age Newborns

Roopa Siddaiah 1,*, Lucy Emery 2, Heather Stephens 1, Ann Donnelly 3, Jennifer Erkinger 3, Kimberly Wisecup 1, Steven D Hicks 1, Yuka Imamura Kawasawa 4, Christiana Oji-Mmuo 1, Shaili Amatya 1, Patricia Silveyra 5
Editors: Bijan K Dey, Sanjeev Gupta, Tao Huang
PMCID: PMC9029747  PMID: 35454997

Abstract

Background: MicroRNAs (miRNA) are small non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression playing a key role in organogenesis. MiRNAs are studied in tracheal aspirates (TA) of preterm infants. However; this is difficult to obtain in infants who are not intubated. This study examines early salivary miRNA expression as non-invasive early biomarkers in extremely low gestational age newborns (ELGANs). Methods: Saliva was collected using DNA-genotek swabs, miRNAs were analyzed using RNA seq and RT PCR arrays. Salivary miRNA expression was compared to TA using RNA seq at 3 days of age, and longitudinal changes at 28 days of age were analyzed using RT PCR arrays in ELGANs. Results: Approximately 822 ng of RNA was extracted from saliva of 7 ELGANs; Of the 757 miRNAs isolated, 161 miRNAs had significant correlation in saliva and TA at 3 days of age (r = 0.97). Longitudinal miRNA analysis showed 29 miRNAs downregulated and 394 miRNAs upregulated at 28 days compared to 3 days of age (adjusted p < 0.1). Bioinformatic analysis (Ingenuity Pathway Analysis) of differentially expressed miRNAs identified organismal injury and abnormalities and cellular development as the top physiological system development and cellular function. Conclusion: Salivary miRNA expression are source for early biomarkers of underlying pathophysiology in ELGANs.

Keywords: miRNA, BPD, tracheal aspirate, saliva sample, chronic lung disease

1. Introduction

MicroRNAs (MiRNAs) are small, highly conserved, non-coding RNAs which have complex roles in a variety of biochemical processes [1]. Although MiRNAs are non-coding they are known to regulate protein production through regulation of mRNA translation. MiRNAs act as negative regulators of gene expression by inhibiting the translation or promoting the degradation of target mRNAs. Additionally, an altered expression of a single miRNA can influence an entire gene network because a single miRNA can exert effects in multiple target genes [1]. It is therefore possible that dysregulation in miRNA profiles is responsible for various medical conditions. Therefore, studying MiRNAs may provide insight into the regulatory mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets for the treatment of disease.

Exosomes and exosomal miRNAs may also regulate cell differentiation and tissue and organ development [2]. Exosomes are lipid wrapped vesicles that transport proteins and genetic material between cells. Exosomes merge with and then release their contents into the receiving cell. This gives them an extremely important function in cell-to-cell communication [3]. Exosomes contain a wide variety of proteins, nucleic acids, and lipids, and they are present in many, if not all, bodily fluids including blood, saliva, urine, and cerebrospinal fluid. One of the contents of exosomes are miRNAs. These cell-secreted miRNAs are very stable and can be taken up by cells in the surrounding tissue, or if the vesicles enter circulation, they can reach more distant sites [1]. Recent literature has demonstrated that the molecular constituents of exosomes, especially exosomal proteins and miRNAs, have the potential to become novel biomarkers for clinical diagnosis.

Recent improvements in neonatal care have resulted in increased survival rates of very premature infants. As a result of increased survival rates, there is accompanied corresponding increase in the complications associated with preterm birth. Premature infants are at high risk for developing bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), a condition characterized by chronic inflammation and inhibition of lung development leading to incompetent gas exchange [4]. The pathogenesis of BPD is multifaceted involving environmental factors such as hyperoxia, ventilation-induced lung injury, and inflammatory responses [4]. Genetic influences also play a role affecting gene regulatory pathways involved in alveolar and vascular development [5]. Recent studies have suggested that circulating miRNAs, exosomal microRNAs, and exosomes may play a crucial role in this genetic regulation [2,6]. Hyperoxia related stress injury disrupts vascularization and alveolarization via miRNAs during lung development, contributing to the development of BPD and associated comorbidities [6].

Past studies assessing the roles of miRNAs in BPD have analyzed their content in tracheal aspirates (TAs) of newborns and infants [2,6,7,8]. Studies have found that TAs of extremely premature infants contain miRNA signatures associated with severe BPD 8. These may serve as potential biomarkers for disease severity in infants with BPD [7,8]. Additionally, specific mRNA-miRNA signatures in TAs may serve as indicators of mechanisms of BPD pathogenesis, a consequence of extreme prematurity 8. Despite strong evidence of the role of miRNAs in BPD development, there has not been research on salivary BPD miRNAs in the past, although recent studies using new technologies have validated a wide range of salivary biomarkers for other conditions and disease processes [9,10]. In fact, there have been so many advances in analytical techniques that a whole area of research coined “salivaomics” has been established. Salivaomics investigates the salivary proteome, transcriptome, miRNAs, metabolome, and microbiome [11,12]. Human saliva harbors coding and noncoding RNAs, including over 1000 miRNAs and more than 3000 species of mRNAs [10,11]. Past studies have focused on saliva biomarkers in association with oral disease [9,10]. However, newer research has shown that salivary biomarkers not only arise in correlation with oral diseases, but also disorders of distal tissues and organs, potentially including the lungs [11]. This suggests that saliva may represent information capable of communicating the presence of disease throughout the body [9,12].

Maron et al. has demonstrated saliva as a means for miRNA biomarker discovery could revolutionize care because its collection is fast, easy, inexpensive, and non-invasive [13,14]. Additionally, it would allow us to analyze miRNA and exosomal biomarkers in infants who are not intubated. The hypothesis of our study is that salivary samples can be easily obtained in ELGANs and miRNAs can be analyzed as early as within the first 3 days of life, and also can be tracked for longitudinal dynamic changes over time. As a secondary aim, we assessed the overlapping expression of the salivary miRNAs with simultaneously collected TAs from the same infant at the same timeframe. Using this information, we conducted bioinformatic analyses to identify putative target pathways associated with prematurity, BPD, and its associated sequelae.

2. Materials and Methods

We conducted a prospective observational study on extremely low gestational age newborns (ELGANs) (born at less than 28 weeks of gestation) admitted to neonatal intensive care unit at Penn State Health Children’s Hospital. This study was reviewed by the institutional review board and approved under study # STUDY00000482 for patient enrollment. We included infants born less than 28 weeks of gestation with no underlying chromosomal abnormalities or major congenital malformations such as cyanotic cardiac defects, omphalocele, Pierre Robin sequence, etc. Once subjects were identified, informed consent was obtained from the parents or legal guardians. We collected salivary samples from infants at 3 and 28 days of age using DNA genotek saliva collection swabs as described in previous studies [15,16]. The swab from the kit was placed in the oral cavity of the infants for 60 s. To prevent agitation or local irritation to the delicate mucus membrane the swab was placed in the mouth without any rubbing or movement for the 60 s. This method of sample collection was well tolerated even in infants including those who needed high frequency jet ventilation. There was no variation in heart rate, or oxygen saturation during the sample collection which would indicate a stress response to sample collection. We also simultaneously collected TAs in infants who were intubated at birth for mechanical ventilation during their routine care at 3 days of age as described before [8]. Collected samples were immediately stored at −80 °C until ready to be analyzed.

Initial sample analysis was conducted on saliva samples collected at 3 days of age using RNA seq. RNA was extracted using Quick-RNA Microprep purification kits (Zymo Research). RNA quality and quantity were determined by RNA Pico BioAnalyzer (Agilent technologies). RNA showed typical size distribution for the small RNA and quantities ranged between 33.90 and 922.50 ng for saliva and 13.14 and 283.50 ng for TA exosome samples, respectively. For RNA seq analysis, small RNA libraries were prepared from 5–250 ng total RNA using the QIAseq miRNA Library Kit (QIAGEN) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. This system offers a built-in Unique Molecular Identifier (UMI) application which we used to eliminate possible PCR duplicates in sequencing datasets and therefore facilitate unbiased gene expression profiling. The unique barcode sequences were then incorporated in the adaptors for multiplexed high-throughput sequencing. The final product was assessed for its size distribution and concentration using a BioAnalyzer High Sensitivity DNA Kit (Agilent Technologies). All RNA seq experiments were conducted at the Penn State College of Medicine Genome Sciences Core Facility.

The libraries were pooled and diluted to 3 nM using 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5 and denatured. The denatured libraries were then loaded onto an SP flow cell on an Illumina® NovaSeq 6000 instrument and run for 68 cycles according to the manufacturer’s instructions. De-multiplexed sequencing reads were generated using Illumina bcl2 fastq (released version 2.20.0.422), allowing no mismatches in the index read. The resulting multiplex high-throughput sequencing data was mapped, and UMI analysis was conducted via the GeneGlobe Data Analysis Center (QIAGEN) [17]. The detailed alignment workflow is available from QIAGEN (Ref.: https://ngsdataanalysis2.qiagen.com/handbooks/HB-2608-001_SP_Qseq_miRNA_Quantification_1118_WW_20181106_BA_12072018.pdf (accessed on 12 July 2021)) Similar technique was used to analyze TA samples after isolating exosomal RNA using the ExoQuick reagent (System Biosciences) and total RNAs with the Quick-RNA Microprep purification kit (Zymo Research). Alignment rate was 92% +/− 7% across all the the samples. We were unable to extract salivary exosomes from samples that were collected and stored using DNA genotek saliva collection kits. We believe the reason for not being able to extract the exosomes was due to the lytic nature of ORA-100 chemistry that disrupted the exosomes while still preserving its RNA content. The DESeq2 R package [18] was used to identify miRNA features with similar expression patterns between paired TA and saliva samples. Similarly expressed miRNAs were identified as those with adjusted p-value > 0.1 (calculated by the Benjamini-Hochberg method) [19] when comparing miRNAs from saliva vs. TA and absolute fold change <2. The list of similarly expressed small RNAs was subjected to Pearson’s correlation analysis.

To validate different techniques in miRNA isolation and quantification in ELGANs, we also analyzed the saliva samples collected at 3 and 28 days of age using RT PCR arrays. For this, RNA was extracted from saliva samples using the Norgen miRNA purification kit (Norgen Biotek Corp, Thorold, ON, Canada). The expression of 754 unique miRNAs was measured using TaqMan® Array Human MicroRNA Cards (Human A + B Card Set v3, Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) and Megaplex™ RT Primers (Thermo Fisher) in a QuantStudio 12 K Flex Real-Time PCR system, following the manufacturer’s protocol [20]. Cycle threshold (Ct) values were extracted and analyzed in the manufacturer’s online analysis software (Thermos Fisher cloud) using the Relative Quantification application module [21]. We processed the data by applying global mean normalization [22], setting mean Ct values < 32. We conducted statistical analyses for time point comparison of salivary miRNAs expression using t-tests, and we calculated adjusted p-values < 0.1 via Benjamini-Hochberg method to control the false discovery rate (FDR). All RT PCR array card experiments were conducted at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Biobehavioral Laboratory Core Facility.

3. Results

3.1. Patient Demographics

We enrolled 7 infants in our study. We obtained salivary samples at 3 days and at 28 days of age. We also obtained TAs by 3 days of age. The infant characteristics are shown in Table 1. The average gestational age was 25 4/9 weeks (ranging from 23 5/7 to 271/7) with an average birth weight of 617 g (ranging from 380–1010 g). All infants were intubated at birth hence we could obtain TAs within the first 3 days of age

Table 1.

Patient demographics (n = 7). AGA: appropriate for gestational age, SGA: small for gestational age.

Patient Demographics
Gestational Age 25 4/7 (23 5/7–28 3/7)
Birth weight in grams 617 (38–1010)
Gender M:F: 3:4
Race: n White: 3
Other: 3
Asian: 1
AGA: SGA 3:4
Mode of delivery C-section: Vaginal birth 6:1

3.2. Salivary and Tracheal Aspirate miRNA Expression at 3 Days of Age

RNA sequencing analysis of salivary samples at 3 days of age from 7 ELGANs detected 757 miRNAs that were expressed in all samples. These miRNAs were also detected in exosomal miRNA profile from TAs that were collected simultaneously (p > 0.1 calculated by Benjamini Hochberg method) and <2 fold change expression between biofluids. Pearson’s analysis showed significant correlation of these 161 miRNAs (Supplemental Table S1) (r = 0.97) as shown in Figure 1. Top 10 miRNAs that were similarly expressed in both saliva and TAs are shown in Table 2

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Correlation plot of 161 miRNAs with similar levels of expression in tracheal aspirate and saliva (r = 0.97).

Table 2.

Top 10 similarly expressed miRNAs in high intensity in salivary and tracheal aspirate samples at 3 days of age with significant FDR (adjusted p of <0.1).

miRNAs Fold Change Adjusted p Value Expression Intensity
has-miR-204 0.885151 0.080909 9254.185
hashsa-miR-21-3p −1.22323 0.063979 6147.197
hsa-miR-28-5p −0.67488 0.027228 1980.699
hsa-miR-218-2-3p −0.46345 0.055106 1350.412
hsa-miR-3 has5p −1.03647 0.003002 1326.227
hsa-mihas0 e-5p −1.52103 0.013793 1310.715
hsa-has-3679-5p −1.01302 0.001325 1219.705
has-miR-363-3p 0.840106 0.001739 1219.248
hsa-miR-3153 0.52835 0.010092 1030.863
hsa-miR-449 b-5p −1.15254 0.000161 974.736

3.3. Longitudinal, Dynamic Salivary miRNA Expression at 3 and 28 Days of Age

PCR array miRNA analysis performed at 3 and 28 days of age from 6 ELGANs detected expression of 758 miRNAs consistently in both time points. Analysis of miRNAs with at least 2-fold change log expression between the time points revealed 9 miRNAs to be down regulated and 219 miRNAs upregulated at 28 days when compared to 3 days of age (Supplemental Table S2) a volcano plot is shown in Figure 2. Top 10 differentially expressed miRNAs from 3 days of age to 28 days of age are shown in Table 3. Pathway analysis of similarly expressed miRNAs in saliva and tracheal aspirate at 3 days of age IPA analysis of similarly expressed miRNAs in both saliva and TA samples collected simultaneously at 3 days of age revealed molecular and cellular function and physiological system development and function pathways as the top associated networks. The top molecular and cellular functions included cellular movement, cellular response to therapeutics and cellular development. The top physiological system development and function pathways included organismal development, digestive system development and function and hepatic system development and function (Table 4). The molecular network showed top 5 predicted target genes AGO3, ALOX5, AGO2, ATM and CDKN2 A (Supplemental Table S3)

Figure 2.

Figure 2

At least 2-fold change log expression of differentially expressed salivary miRNAs from 3 and 28 days of age in extremely premature born infants (green dot = downregulated and red dot = upregulated).

Table 3.

Top 10 differentially expressed miRNAs with at least 2 log fold change from 3 days to 28 days of age in ELGANs.

miRNAs Fold Change Adjusted p Value Up Ohasown Regulated
hsa-miR-548a 16.236 0.076833 Up-regulated
hsa-miR-199a 6.245 0.076064 Up-regulated
hsa-miR-1224-3P 2.513 0.07549 Up-regulated
hsa-miR-1288 2.482 0.07549 Up-regulated
hsa-miR-337-3p 2.474 0.07549 Up-regulated
hsa-miR-182 2.437 0.07549 Up-regulated
hsa-miR-554 2.347 0.07549 Up-regulated
hsa-let-7c 2.333 0.07549 Up-regulated
hsa-let-7a 2.32 0.07549 Up-regulated
hsa-let-7b 2.32 0.07549 Up-regulated
hsa-let-7e 2.32 0.07549 Up-regulated

Table 4.

IPA analysis of miRNA expression similarly expressed in saliva and tracheal aspirate of extremely premature born infants at 3 days of age.

Top Molecular and Cellular Functions p Value Range
Cellular Development 4.83 × 10−2–2.39 × 10−8
Cellular Movement 3.77 × 10−2–2.74 × 10−7
Cellular Growth and Proliferation 4.83 × 10−2–9.35 × 10−7
Cell Cycle 4.83 × 10−2–1.24 × 10−5
Cell Death and Survival 4.72 × 10−2–1.06 × 10−4
Top Physiological System Development and Function p Value Range
Organismal development 4.58 × 10−2–3.96 × 10−6
Digestive System Development and Function 2.17 × 10−4–2.17 × 10−4
Hepatic System Development and Function 2.17 × 10−4–2.17 × 10−4
Organ Development 2.73 × 10−2–2.17 × 10−4
Embryonic Development 1.96 × 10−2–8.60 × 10−4

3.4. Pathway Analysis of Differentially Expressed miRNAs in Saliva at 3 and 28 Days of Age

Analysis of differentially expressed miRNAs in both saliva and tracheal aspirate samples collected simultaneously at 3 days of age revealed top molecular and cellular function, physiological system development and function pathways and top associated network functions. The top molecular and cellular functions included cellular movement, cellular response to therapeutics and cellular development. The top physiological system development and function included organismal development, digestive system development and function and hepatic system development and function (Table 5). The molecular network showed top 5 predicted target genes Akt, CG, Growth Hormone, Insulin and ERCC8 (Supplemental Table S4)

Table 5.

Ingenuity Pathway Analysis to identify target pathways of differential longitudinal miRNA expression in saliva at 3 and 28 days of age (>log2 fold change).

Top Molecular and Cellular Functions p Value Range
Cellular Movement 3.55 × 10−2–5.78 × 10−11
Cellular Development 4.90 × 10−2–7.99 × 10−11
Cellular growth and Proliferation 4.92 × 10−2–7.99 × 10−11
Cell Death and Survival 4.92 × 10−2–5.06 × 10−7
Top Physiological System Development and Function p Value Range
Embryonic Development 4.19 × 10−2–1.97 × 10−6
Organismal Development 4.50 × 10−2–2.38 × 10−6
Digestive System Development and Function 4.79 × 10−6–4.79 × 10−6
Hepatic System Development and Function 4.79 × 10−6–4.79 × 10−6
Organ Development 4.19 × 10−2–4.79 × 10−6

4. Discussion

There is increasing evidence of the role of miRNAs in cellular and organ development 21, and as potential biomarkers for disease severity and progression [22,23,24,25]. Despite strong evidence of the role of miRNAs in neonatal respiratory diseases such as BPD, no studies using salivary miRNAs as potential biomarkers and predictors of the disease pathogenesis have been conducted. In previous reports, we have successfully identified differentially expressed miRNAs in TAs of prematurely born vs. term infants, as well as infants with mild vs. severe BPD [7,8]. However, a consistent limitation of these studies was our inability to assess disease progression after extubation. In the present study, we overcame this challenge by not only assessing salivary miRNAs as a non-invasive, easily available sample, but we also conducted validation studies of saliva as a surrogate for TAs (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Flow chart illustrating miRNA analysis techniques and time points in saliva and tracheal aspirate samples from extreme low gestational age newborns.

The current study identified multiple miRNAs that were similarly highly expressed in both saliva and TA samples at 3 days of age, which we believe represent systemic expression (given their high expression in more than one biofluid). Of particular interest is the highly expressed miR-204-5p, which has been previously isolated from exosomes and revealed to not only contribute to signaling pathways of cell differentiation, but also shown to have therapeutic potential in cancer cells [26,27]. This miRNA has also been studied as a key player in developmental lymphangiogenesis via transcriptional factors [28]. Similarly, miRNAs miR-21-3p and miR-28-5p are highly expressed in exosomes [29,30,31,32] and play a key role in cell proliferation and migration [33,33]. While we were unable to isolate exosomes from saliva with our collection method, comparing to an exosomal miRNA profile from TA has helped us identify the key miRNAs that are transported in exosomes and potentially represent a systemic miRNA expression in the salivary samples in ELGANs. Moreover, the top miRNA predicted pathways from both sample types highlighted developmental processes in the ELGANs and reflect ongoing cellular development and growth that are key for organismal development and maturation.

The current analysis also identified differentially expressed miRNAs between sample types and among timepoints. Analysis of the top miRNAs differentially expressed longitudinally showed miR-548a to have the largest log2 fold change. This miRNA has been shown to modulate cellular proliferation in cancer pathology [34,35] along with miR-199a [36], miR01224-3p [37] and miR-1228 [38].

Our study has several limitations, the most important being its small sample size. In addition, while ideally we would have preferred to isolate exosomes from saliva for miRNA analysis, we were unable to isolate them using our collection method. However, the strength of our study lays in the innovation of analyzing a readily available, non-invasive biofluid in ELGANs through a safe non-stressful collection method. This is attractive for patient recruitment especially in very small vulnerable population such as the neonatal population. Our results show that we were able to isolate miRNAs using two different techniques and establish longitudinal dynamic changes in the miRNA expression. This is of great value for longitudinal studies to evaluate ongoing-evolving process complications of prematurity. Thus, future studies with a larger sample size and assessing different BPD phenotypes are warranted and will help in the development of more readily available biomarker tools for pediatric disease diagnosis and progression.

5. Conclusions

With the growing population of extreme preterm infants, their neonatal lung disease morbidity and associated complications are more prevalent. Non-invasive biomarkers such as miRNAs that regulate growth and maturation of organs are valuable tools. Although representing a small sample, our study identified over 700 miRNAs using different techniques from saliva of ELGANs as early as 3 days of age. We have also identified longitudinal dynamic changes of miRNAs that are predicted to regulate cell movement, cellular response to therapeutics and cellular development using bioinformatic tools. These miRNAs and associated pathways represent potential targets of interest in studying various complications preterm birth.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Penn State health BPD research team; Mary Lewis for data collection, Christine Anderson, Traci Jennings and Diane Kitch (Pediatric Pulmonary research coordinator) for assistance with patient recruitment and sample collection. We also thank Mathew Steadman and Chongben Zhang from the UNC BBL core facility for sample processing and analysis.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/life12040506/s1, Table S1: List of 161 miRNAs with significant correlation by Pearson’s analysis in miRNA expressed in both TAs and saliva samples at Day 3 of life; Table S2: List of miRNAs with at least 2 fold change from Day 3 to Day 28 of age in saliva samples; Table S3: List of Molecular network with top 5 predicted target genes from IPA analysis of miRNAs commonly expressed in TAs and saliva at day 3 of age; Table S4: List of Molecular network with top 5 predicted target gene from IPA analysis of differentially expressed miRNA from Day 3 to Day 28 days of age in saliva samples.

Author Contributions

R.S.: Principal investigator, Substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of samples, data analysis and interpretation of data; Drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and Final approval of the version submitted. L.E.: acquisition of data, drafting the article and revising it critically for important intellectual content; H.S., A.D., J.E., C.O.-M., S.A. and K.W.: acquisition of data, and drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version submitted. S.D.H., Y.I.K. and P.S.: Substantial contributions to conception and design, Sample analysis, data analysis and interpretation of data; Drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and final approval of the version submitted.All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Children’s Miracle Network and Pennsylvania Department of Health- TSF CURES fund.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Penn State Health College of Medicine Institutional Review Board (protocol STUDY00000482).

Informed Consent Statement

All study subjects were enrolled in this study following a consenting process which was approved by institutional review board.

Data Availability Statement

All the data will be uploaded to GEO online database and will be accessible upon request by the reviewers.

Conflicts of Interest

SDH is a consultant and scientific advisory board member for Quadrant Biosciences Inc., Syracuse, NY, USA.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Mohr A.M., Mott J.L. Overview of MicroRNA biology. Semin. Liver Dis. 2015;35:3–11. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1397344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lal C.V., Olave N., Travers C., Rezonzew G., Dolma K., Simpson A., Halloran B., Aghai Z., Das P., Sharma N., et al. Exosomal microRNA predicts and protects against severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia in extremely premature infants. JCI Insight. 2018;3:e93994. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.93994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Schneider A. Exosomes: Novel biomarkers for the clinical diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases. J. Neural. Transm. 2019;126:646. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Coalson J.J. Pathology of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Semin. Perinatol. 2006;30:179–184. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2006.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lal C.V., Ambalavanan N. Genetic predisposition to bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Semin. Perinatol. 2015;39:584–591. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2015.09.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shah D., Sandhu K., Das P., Aghai Z.H., Andersson S., Pryhuber G., Bhandari V. miR-184 mediates hyperoxia-induced injury by targeting cell death and angiogenesis signalling pathways in the developing lung (Retraction of 2020) Eur. Respir. J. 2021;58:1901789. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01789-2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Oji-Mmuo C.N., Siddaiah R., Montes D.T., Pham M.A., Spear D., Donnelly A., Fuentes N., Imamura-Kawasawa Y., Howrylak J.A., Thomas N.J., et al. Tracheal aspirate transcriptomic and miRNA signatures of extreme premature birth with bronchopulmonary dysplasia. J. Perinatol. 2021;41:551–561. doi: 10.1038/s41372-020-00868-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Siddaiah R., Oji-Mmuo C.N., Montes D.T., Fuentes N., Spear D., Donnelly A., Silveyra P. MicroRNA signatures associated with bronchopulmonary dysplasia severity in tracheal aspirates of preterm infants. Biomedicines. 2021;9:257. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9030257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kaczor-Urbanowicz K.E., Carreras-Presas C.M., Aro K., Tu M., Garcia-Godoy F., Wong D.T.W. Saliva diagnostics—Current views and directions. Exp. Biol. Med. 2017;242:459–472. doi: 10.1177/1535370216681550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Segal A., Wong D.T. Salivary diagnostics: Enhancing disease detection and making medicine better. Eur. J. Dent. Educ. 2008;12:22–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2007.00477.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Martina E., Campanati A., Diotallevi F., Offidani A. Saliva and oral diseases. J. Clin. Med. 2020;9:466. doi: 10.3390/jcm9020466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sripad S. Salivaomics in systemic disease: An evolving science- an interesting prospect for ’lab-on-chip’ diagnostics in coronary artery and other systemic diseases. Indian J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2018;34:95–97. doi: 10.1007/s12055-017-0597-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Maron J.L. Exploring the neonatal salivary transcriptome: Technical optimization and clinical applications. Clin. Biochem. 2011;44:467–468. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2011.03.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Romano-Keeler J., Wynn J.L., Maron J.L. Great expectorations: The potential of salivary ‘omic’ approaches in neonatal intensive care. J. Perinatol. 2014;34:169–173. doi: 10.1038/jp.2013.170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hicks S.D., Carpenter R.L., Wagner K.E., Pauley R., Barros M., Tierney-Aves C., Barns S., Greene C.D., Middleton F.A. Saliva microRNA differentiates children with autism from peers with typical and atypical development. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry. 2020;59:296–308. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.03.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hicks S.D., Onks C., Kim R.Y., Zhen K.J., Loeffert J., Loeffert A.C., Olympia R.P., Fedorchak G., DeVita S., Rangnekar A., et al. Diagnosing mild traumatic brain injury using saliva RNA compared to cognitive and balance testing. Clin. Transl. Med. 2020;10:e197. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Weaver K.R., Melkus G.D., Fletcher J., Henderson W.A. Relevance of sex and subtype in patients with IBS: An exploratory study of gene expression. Biol. Res. Nurs. 2020;22:13–23. doi: 10.1177/1099800419889189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wang L., Feng Z., Wang X., Wang X., Zhang X. DEGseq: An R package for identifying differentially expressed genes from RNA-seq data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:136–138. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Reiner A., Yekutieli D., Benjamini Y. Identifying differentially expressed genes using false discovery rate controlling procedures. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:368–375. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btf877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Abrahamsson A., Dabrosin C. Tissue specific expression of extracellular microRNA in human breast cancers and normal human breast tissue in vivo. Oncotarget. 2015;6:22959–22969. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ambroise J., Badir J., Nienhaus L., Robert A., Dekairelle A.F., Gala J.L. Using a constraint-based regression method for relative quantification of somatic mutations in pyrosequencing signals: A case for NRAS analysis. Algorithms Mol. Biol. 2016;11:24. doi: 10.1186/s13015-016-0086-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.D’Haene B., Mestdagh P., Hellemans J., Vandesompele J. miRNA expression profiling: From reference genes to global mean normalization. Methods Mol. Biol. 2012;822:261–272. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-427-8_18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhao Y., Srivastava D. A developmental view of microRNA function. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2007;32:189–197. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2007.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wang J., Yin J., Wang X., Liu H., Hu Y., Yan X., Zhuang B., Yu Z., Han S. Changing expression profiles of mRNA, lncRNA, circRNA, and miRNA in lung tissue reveal the pathophysiological of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in mouse model. J. Cell Biochem. 2019;120:9369–9380. doi: 10.1002/jcb.28212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yang Y., Qiu J., Kan Q., Zhou X.G., Zhou X.Y. MicroRNA expression profiling studies on bronchopulmonary dysplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Genet. Mol. Res. 2013;12:5195–5206. doi: 10.4238/2013.October.30.4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Naeem A., Ahmed I., Silveyra P. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia: An update on experimental therapeutics. Eur. Med. J. 2019;4:20–29. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rivera L., Siddaiah R., Oji-Mmuo C., Silveyra G.R., Silveyra P. Biomarkers for bronchopulmonary dysplasia in the preterm infant. Front. Pediatr. 2016;4:33. doi: 10.3389/fped.2016.00033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhou Y., Liu S., Wang W., Sun Q., Lv M., Yang S., Tong S., Guo S. The miR-204-5p/FOXC1/GDF7 axis regulates the osteogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells via the AKT and p38 signalling pathways. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2021;12:64. doi: 10.1186/s13287-020-02117-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yao S., Yin Y., Jin G., Li D., Li M., Hu Y., Feng Y., Liu Y., Bian Z., Wang X., et al. Exosome-mediated delivery of miR-204-5p inhibits tumor growth and chemoresistance. Cancer Med. 2020;9:5989–5998. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jung H.M., Hu C.T., Fister A.M., Davis A.E., Castranova D., Pham V.N., Price L.M., Weinstein B.M. MicroRNA-mediated control of developmental lymphangiogenesis. Elife. 2019;8:e46007. doi: 10.7554/eLife.46007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhu J., Liu B., Wang Z., Wang D., Ni H., Zhang L., Wang Y. Exosomes from nicotine-stimulated macrophages accelerate atherosclerosis through miR-21-3p/PTEN-mediated VSMC migration and proliferation. Theranostics. 2019;9:6901–6919. doi: 10.7150/thno.37357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Xu N., He D., Shao Y., Qu Y., Ye K., Memet O., Zhang L., Shen J. Lung-derived exosomes in phosgene-induced acute lung injury regulate the functions of mesenchymal stem cells partially via miR-28-5p. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020;121:109603. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Abdallah F., Henriet E., Suet A., Arar A., Clemençon R., Malinge J.M., Lecellier G., Baril P., Pichon C. miR-21-3p/IL-22 axes are major drivers of psoriasis pathogenesis by modulating keratinocytes proliferation-survival balance and inflammatory response. Cells. 2021;10:2547. doi: 10.3390/cells10102547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhao G., Wang T., Huang Q.K., Pu M., Sun W., Zhang Z.C., Ling R., Tao K.S. MicroRNA-548a-5p promotes proliferation and inhibits apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma cells by targeting Tg737. World J. Gastroenterol. 2016;22:5364–5373. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i23.5364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.He W., Pang L., Gong S., Wang X., Hou L. Nei Endonuclease VIII-like 2 gene rs8191670 polymorphism affects the sensitivity of non-small cell lung cancer to cisplatin by binding with MiR-548a. J. Cancer. 2020;11:4801–4809. doi: 10.7150/jca.47495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lou G., Chen L., Xia C., Wang W., Qi J., Li A., Zhao L., Chen Z., Zheng M., Liu Y. MiR-199a-modified exosomes from adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells improve hepatocellular carcinoma chemosensitivity through mTOR pathway. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020;39:4. doi: 10.1186/s13046-019-1512-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zuo Y., Shen W., Wang C., Niu N., Pu J. Circular RNA circ-ZNF609 promotes lung adenocarcinoma proliferation by modulating miR-1224-3p/ETV1 signaling. Cancer Manag. Res. 2020;12:2471–2479. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S232260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhang Y., Dai J., Deng H., Wan H., Liu M., Wang J., Li S., Li X., Tang H. miR-1228 promotes the proliferation and metastasis of hepatoma cells through a p53 forward feedback loop. Br. J. Cancer. 2015;112:365–374. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

All the data will be uploaded to GEO online database and will be accessible upon request by the reviewers.


Articles from Life are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES