Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2001 Feb;45(2):428–432. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.2.428-432.2001

Cross-Resistance between Triclosan and Antibiotics in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Is Mediated by Multidrug Efflux Pumps: Exposure of a Susceptible Mutant Strain to Triclosan Selects nfxB Mutants Overexpressing MexCD-OprJ

Rungtip Chuanchuen 1, Kerry Beinlich 1, Tung T Hoang 2, Anna Becher 1, RoxAnn R Karkhoff-Schweizer 1, Herbert P Schweizer 1,*
PMCID: PMC90308  PMID: 11158736

Abstract

Triclosan is an antiseptic frequently added to items as diverse as soaps, lotions, toothpaste, and many commonly used household fabrics and plastics. Although wild-type Pseudomonas aeruginosa expresses the triclosan target enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase, it is triclosan resistant due to expression of the MexAB-OprM efflux system. Exposure of a susceptible Δ(mexAB-oprM) strain to triclosan selected multidrug-resistant bacteria at high frequencies. These bacteria hyperexpressed the MexCD-OprJ efflux system due to mutations in its regulatory gene, nfxB. The MICs of several drugs for these mutants were increased up to 500-fold, including the MIC of ciprofloxacin, which was increased 94-fold. Whereas the MexEF-OprN efflux system also participated in triclosan efflux, this antimicrobial was not a substrate for MexXY-OprM.


Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a clinically significant pathogen, particularly in immunocompromised hosts (36). Infections caused by this bacterium are difficult to treat due to its many intrinsic and acquired antibiotic resistances. Intrinsic resistance is mostly attributable to the expression of several multidrug resistance (MDR) efflux systems. The P. aeruginosa genome (35) contains structural genes for at least 12 resistance nodulation type efflux systems, of which only 4, i.e., MexAB-OprM (27), MexCD-OprJ (26), MexEF-OprN (13), and MexXY (1, 21, 38), have been characterized. Exposure to selected substrates can select for their upregulated or constitutive expression (13, 14, 26, 38).

2-Hydroxyphenylethers are a class of compounds that exhibit broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity. Triclosan is the most potent and widely used member of this class (2, 5) and is used in hand soaps, lotions, toothpastes, and oral rinses, as well as in fabrics and plastics. It was long thought to act as a nonspecific “biocide” (29), but recent biochemical and genetic studies have shown that triclosan acts on a defined bacterial target in the fatty acid biosynthetic pathway, enoyl-acyl carrier protein (ACP) reductase (FabI) (7, 9, 10, 12, 18, 20) or its homolog InhA in mycobacteria (18). Some bacteria possess triclosan-resistant enoyl-ACP reductase homologs (FabK), and to date P. aeruginosa is unique among gram-negative bacteria in that it possesses both triclosan-sensitive and -resistant enzymes (8). Alterations in FabI active-site residues confer resistance to triclosan (9, 10, 20). Of particular concern is that such amino acid changes selected by exposure to triclosan lead to cross-resistance with other antimicrobial agents (9), including clinically used front-line drugs, since some mutations leading to triclosan resistance in Mycobacterium smegmatis also caused resistance to isoniazid (18). Moreover, triclosan is a substrate of a multidrug efflux pump in clinical and laboratory Escherichia coli strains (19). We have recently shown that P. aeruginosa strain PAO1 is intrinsically resistant to triclosan by virtue of expression of the MexAB-OprM efflux pump (32), and the same is true for all strains of this species tested to date (our unpublished results).

While the contribution of antibiotic exposure to development of MDR due to efflux pump expression has clearly been documented in vitro and in vivo, little is known about antiseptic resistance mechanisms (30) and their possible contribution to MDR. In this paper we present results that triclosan is a substrate for multiple P. aeruginosa efflux pumps and that it is capable of selecting not just for mutants resistant to this particular antiseptic but, perhaps more importantly, also for MDR bacteria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains, culture conditions, and molecular biology techniques.

The bacterial strains used in this study are shown in Table 1. Unless otherwise noted, bacteria were grown at 37°C in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium or on LB agar (31) or in Mueller-Hinton broth (MHB; Difco, Detroit, Mich.). For plasmid maintenance, P. aeruginosa media were supplemented with 200 μg of carbenicillin/ml. Unmarked efflux pump-negative mutants were derived using a previously described Flp/FRT recombinase technology (11). The sources for the mutant alleles were pPS952 for Δ(mexAB-oprM) (32), pPS1008 for Δ(mexCD-opJ) (derived by deletion of a 6,138-bp region encompassing three ClaI fragments from pKMJ002 [26]), and pPS1128 for Δ(mexXY) (derived by deletion of a 2,868-bp DNA fragment encompassing several SalI-XhoI fragments from pAMR-1 [38]). The chromosomal deletions were verified by PCR and genomic Southern analyses. Standard molecular biology methods were used (31). Plasmid pKMM128 is pAK1900 (28) expressing oprM (16).

TABLE 1.

Bacterial strains used in this study

Strain Relevant genotype or characteristic Source or reference
PAO1 Wild type; produces MexAB-OprM 37
PAO200 Δ(mexAB-oprM) 32
PAO200-2 PAO200 nfxB; overproduces MexCD-OprJ This study
PAO200-3 PAO200 nfxB; highly overproduces MexCD-OprJ This study
PAO200-4 PAO200 nfxB; highly overproduces MexCD-OprJ This study
KG3056 nfxB; overproduces MexCD-OprJ 6
KG2239 PAO1 with Δ(mexR-mexAB-oprM) 16
N103 KG2239 with Δ(mexXY) 16
PAO-7H Overproduces MexEF-OprN 13
PAO3579 PAO1 with ΔamrRmexZ)a 38
PAO238 PAO200 with Δ(mexCD-oprJ) This study
PAO253 PAO-7H with Δ(mexAB-oprM) This study
PAO255 PAO253 with Δ(mexEF-oprN) This study
PAO267 PAO3579 with Δ(mexAB-oprM) This study
PAO280 PAO267 with Δ(mexXY) This study
a

amrR is identical to mexZ (1). 

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

MICs were determined by the twofold broth microdilution technique according to National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards guidelines (22) or by the E-test system and the protocols provided by the supplier (AB Biodisk, Piscataway, N.J.) (ciprofloxacin and tetracycline only).

Selection and characterization of triclosan-resistant mutants.

For isolation of triclosan-resistant derivatives of Δ(mexAB-oprM) strain PAO200, cells were grown in LB medium to stationary phase (A540, ∼2.6). Dilutions of these cells were plated on Pseudomonas isolation agar (PIA; Difco) whose formulation contained 25 μg of triclosan/ml. After an overnight incubation at 37°C, the colonies growing on the PIA plates were counted. For PCR amplification of the nfxB coding region from genomic DNA templates, two primers were designed: nfxB-up (5′-ACAATCtAGAAAAACCAACCGGG), which contained a single base mismatch (lowercase t) and which introduced an XbaI site (underlined) 27 bp upstream of the nfxB start codon, and nfxB-down (5′-CCGGAATTCCTGGGGGAGGTG), which primes to a region centered 236 bp downstream of nfxB containing an EcoRI site (underlined). PCRs were performed using Taq DNA polymerase (Qiagen, Santa Clarita, Calif.). The 828-bp PCR fragments were cloned as XbaI-EcoRI fragments into pUCP21T (33). Nucleotide sequences were determined by automated sequencing in the University of Colorado at Boulder sequencing facility. Extensions were primed utilizing the commercially available 24-nucleotide pUC/M13 reverse and forward sequencing primers for sequencing the cloned PCR fragments and the nfxB-up primer for the direct sequencing of PCR fragments. Computer-assisted sequence analyses were performed utilizing the SeqEd (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.) program.

Detection of outer membrane proteins.

Cells of various P. aeruginosa strains were grown in LB medium to log phase (A540, ∼1.0). Samples of cells (1 ml) were harvested, centrifuged, and resuspended in the appropriate volumes of 2× sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) sample buffer (0.125 M Tris-HCl [pH 6.8], 4% SDS, 20% glycerol, 5% β-mercaptoethanol) to adjust for differences in cell densities. The resuspended cells were boiled for 4 min, and samples corresponding to ∼25 μg of protein were analyzed by electrophoresis on 0.1% SDS–10% PAGE gel (pH 9.2) (15). The electrophoretically separated proteins were electroblotted onto nitrocellulose membranes, and the blots were processed as previously described (34). Hybridizing antibodies were detected using an antimouse antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP), and bound HRP activity was detected by exposure to luminogen substrate and X-ray film, according to the manufacturer's (Amersham, Arlington Heights, Ill.) protocol.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Triclosan is a substrate for multiple MDR efflux pumps.

Our previous study (32) indicated that triclosan is a substrate for MexAB-OprM. Since MDR efflux systems export a variety of structurally unrelated substrates (23), we hypothesized that triclosan may be a substrate not only for MexAB-OprM but also for other P. aeruginosa efflux pumps. Defined mutants were obtained, and their triclosan susceptibilities were assessed by MIC determinations (Table 2). Triclosan was a substrate for all tripartite efflux pumps analyzed in this study, including MexAB-OprM, MexCD-OprJ, and MexEF-OprN. Deletion mutants defective in these pumps all became triclosan susceptible. Mutant strain PAO267, expressing only MexXY, was triclosan susceptible and behaved the same as a strain (PAO280) expressing neither of the hitherto-characterized efflux pumps.

TABLE 2.

Antimicrobial susceptibilities of P. aeruginosa strains used in this study

Strain (plasmid) Efflux protein(s) expressed MIC (μg/ml)a of:
TRI TET CIP TMP ERY GEN
PAO1 MexAB-OprM >128b 16 0.064 512 256 1.6
PAO200 Nonec 24e 0.5 0.008 32 8 0.2
PAO200-2 MexCD-OprJ >128 40 0.375 1,024 1,024 0.2
PAO200-3 MexCD-OprJ >128 >256 0.75 >1,024 >1,024 0.1
PAO200-4 MexCD-OprJ >128 >256 0.75 >1,024 >1,024 0.1
PAO238 None 20e 0.75 0.006 32 32 0.2
PAO253 MexEF-OprN >128 6 2 >1,024 16 0.2
PAO255 None 24e 0.5 0.012 16 16 0.2
PAO3579 MexXY >128 16 0.025 512 512 >3.2
PAO267 MexXY   32 0.5 0.016 16 32 0.2
PAO280 None   32 0.19 0.012 16 16 0.2
PAO267(pAK1900) MexXY   32 0.5 0.012 16 32 0.2
PAO267(pKMM128) MexXY-OprM   64 48 0.19 128 512 >3.2
PAO280(pAK1900) None   32 0.25 0.008 16 16 0.2
PAO280(pKMM129) OprM   64 0.5 0.012 16 32 0.2
KG2239(pAK1900) MexXYd   32 0.5 0.008 16 32 0.2
KG2239(pKMM128) MexXY-OprM   32 16 0.047 32 256 1.6
N103(pAK1900) None   32 0.25 0.008 16 16 0.2
N103(pKMM128) OprM   32 0.5 0.012 16 32 0.2
a

The MICs of triclosan (TRI), tetracycline (TET), ciprofloxacin (CIP), trimethoprim (TMP), erythromycin (ERY), and gentamicin (GEN) were determined by either the microdilution method (TRI, TMP, ERY, and GEN) or the E-test method (CIP and TET). Values shown represent the averages of at least two experiments. Cells containing pAK1900 and pKMM128 were pregrown in MHB medium with 200 μg of carbenicillin/ml; no carbenicillin was present during incubation with triclosan. 

b

Triclosan is insoluble in aqueous solutions at concentrations >128 μg/ml. 

c

None implies that neither of the hitherto-characterized efflux systems, i.e., MexAB-OprM, MexCD-OprJ, MexEF-OprN, or MexXY, is expressed. The expression status of any other chromosomally encoded efflux systems in these mutants is unknown. 

d

Recent data indicate that MexXY is not expressed at detectable levels unless cells are grown in the presence of certain antibiotics (16). 

e

When determined by the twofold serial dilution method, this value was 32 μg/ml; to obtain the indicated value, cells were grown in MHB containing triclosan increasing in 2-μg/ml increments, starting at 16 μg/ml. 

Since it has been proposed that MexXY requires OprM for function (1, 16, 21), we considered the possibility that strain PAO267 was not triclosan resistant because it lacks OprM. To test this hypothesis, we electroporated OprM-expressing pKMM128 and its vector control into PAO267 and its Δ(mexXY) derivative, PAO280. Only PAO267 containing pKMM128 effluxed tetracycline, gentamicin, erythromycin, trimethoprim, and ciprofloxacin (Table 2), indicating that it expressed a functional MexXY-OprM system. However, this strain did not efflux triclosan. The observed twofold increase in MIC from 32 μg/ml in the vector control to 64 μg/ml in the OprM-expressing strain was the same as the one observed in strain PAO280 harboring the same plasmids but lacking the MexXY system. We also tested KG2339/pKMM128, a strain known to express a functional MexXY-OprM system (16), and obtained similar results (Table 2). The MICs were slightly higher in the PAO267 background since MexXY expression is constitutive in this strain but inducible in KG2339 (16). These data conclusively demonstrated that triclosan was not a MexXY-OprM substrate.

Triclosan selects for multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa.

When susceptible cells of Δ(mexAB-oprM) strain PAO200 were exposed to triclosan, resistant mutants were readily obtained. To assess the frequency with which triclosan-resistant mutants were derived, we plated PAO200 cells on PIA medium and selected spontaneous triclosan-resistant mutants. Such mutants were obtained at a frequency of 10−6. Three randomly picked triclosan-resistant derivatives, PAO200-2 to PAO200-4, were further analyzed, and all of them exhibited an MDR phenotype (Table 2), including resistance to the clinically administered drug ciprofloxacin, whose MIC for two of the three mutants analyzed was increased 94-fold.

Probing whole-cell extracts with anti-OprJ- and anti-OprN-specific monoclonal antibodies revealed that all three triclosan-resistant derivatives of PAO200 hyperexpressed OprJ but not OprN, demonstrating that their MDR phenotype was due to expression of the MexCD-OprJ efflux system (Fig. 1A). Although reference strain KG3056 was previously described as an OprJ type B hyperproducer (6), OprJ production in this strain was only a fraction of its expression in the three triclosan-resistant strains (Fig. 1A).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1

Western blots of P. aeruginosa cell lysates and mutations causing triclosan resistance. (A) Standardized amounts of whole-cell lysates were separated on a 0.1% SDS–10% PAGE gel and electroblotted on nitrocellulose membranes, and the membranes were probed with monoclonal antibodies against OprJ and OprN. The strains analyzed were PAO1 OprM+; KG3056 OprJ+; PAO7H OprN+; PAO200, an OprM null PAO1 mutant (Δ[mexAB-oprM]); and PAO200-2, PAO200-3, and PAO200-4, spontaneous triclosan-resistant nfxB derivatives of PAO200. (B) Mutations leading to triclosan resistance. The nfxB genes from PAO200 and its three triclosan-resistant derivatives, PAO200-2, PAO200-3, and PAO200-4, were amplified by PCR from genomic DNA templates and sequenced. The nfxB sequence from each strain shown is the consensus obtained from six separate sequencing reactions; it was determined in duplicate from two separate clones, as well as in duplicate by directly sequencing the PCR products. Only portions of the nfxB sequence are shown, and codons are numbered as previously described (24). Arrows, changes from the PAO200 sequence. Amino acid residues constituting the putative helix-turn-helix DNA binding domain of NfxB are bracketed.

To genetically verify that the MexCD-OprJ efflux system was expressed in response to exposure of PAO200 to triclosan, we isolated two mexCD-oprJ deletion mutants, PAO238 and PAO239. These mutants no longer expressed OprJ (not shown), were triclosan susceptible, and lost their MDR phenotype (Table 2).

Triclosan selects for nfxB mutations.

Expression of multidrug efflux systems is the result of exposure to antibiotics in both laboratory (6, 13, 26, 28) and clinical settings (39). Exposure of P. aeruginosa to norfloxacin selects for mutants which express MexCD-OprJ due to mutations in regulatory gene nfxB (6, 24, 26). Nucleotide sequence analysis of the PCR-amplified nfxB gene from strain PAO200 and its triclosan-resistant derivatives demonstrated that expression of the MexCD-OprJ efflux system in the triclosan-resistant mutant strains was indeed due to nfxB mutations (Fig. 1B). One strain, PAO200-4, contained a mutation that affected the helix-turn-helix DNA binding domain of NfxB, and strain PAO200-2 contained a mutation elsewhere in nfxB. The third strain, PAO200-3, contained two mutations in the helix-turn-helix region, and one of them also caused a frameshift and early termination at codon 35 of nfxB. Some of the mutations previously isolated by exposure to norfloxacin affected similar regions of NfxB; an Arg-to-Gly change at amino acid residue 42 caused by norfloxacin (24) corresponded to an Arg-to-His change caused by triclosan. To confirm that triclosan resistance was solely caused by nfxB mutations, we transformed a plasmid expressing a wild-type nfxB gene into the three mutant strains. In all three transformed strains, the MICs were similar to the ones observed with strain PAO200 (data not shown).

Implications of efflux-mediated triclosan resistance.

Our results show that P. aeruginosa possesses multiple triclosan resistance mechanisms. These include efflux via the MexAB-OprM, MexCD-OprJ, and MexEF-OprN systems and probably FabI target mutations (12). However, in contrast to that in E. coli, where exposure to triclosan readily selects fabI mutants and overproduction of FabI leads to increased triclosan resistance (9, 10, 20), the first line of defense against triclosan in P. aeruginosa seems to be efflux and/or other hitherto-unknown resistance mechanisms, e.g., decreased outer membrane permeability (17). Whereas in P. aeruginosa overexpression of efflux pumps increased triclosan MICs by more than sixfold, overexpression of the AcrAB pump in E. coli increased the MIC only twofold (19). The MexXY system did not efflux triclosan, even in the presence of OprM.

Although possible links of cross-resistance between antiseptics and antibiotics due to efflux have been suggested before (19, 30), our studies demonstrate for the first time that exposure of a clinically significant bacterium to the antiseptic triclosan efficiently can select for MDR derivatives, including high-level resistance to an antipseudomonas drug. Exposures to antibiotics and triclosan select for similar regulatory mutations leading to expression of a multidrug efflux system. Although MexEF-OprN exports triclosan, we have not yet observed MexEF-OprN-expressing triclosan-resistant derivatives when plating either Δ(mexAB-oprM) strain PAO200 or Δ(mexAB-oprM) Δ(mexCD-OprJ) strain PAO238 on triclosan-containing medium. Since we have not systematically searched for MexEF-OprN-expressing derivatives of these strains, we cannot yet explain the apparent lack of such mutants. MDR P. aeruginosa is of foremost clinical importance since it is the leading cause of death in many hospital-acquired infections because of its intrinsic resistance to many antibiotics (36). Furthermore, most cystic fibrosis patients succumb to the debilitating effects of chronic P. aeruginosa infections due to eventual therapeutic failures caused by MDR-resistant bacteria (25). It has been well established that the massive prescription of antibiotics and their nonregulated and extensive usage are the main causes for the development of extensive antibiotic resistance in bacteria (3, 4). Since antimicrobial agents provide the selective pressure for the development of resistance, the control of antibiotic usage is essential to prevent the development of resistance to antibiotics. Our results raise the notion that widespread and unregulated use of triclosan may promote the selection of MDR bacteria and thus compound antibiotic resistance.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank N. Gotoh for providing pKMJ002 and the anti-OprJ and anti-OprN antibodies; N. Masuda for providing various strains, plasmids, and anti-MexX antibodies; and Keith Poole for various strains and plasmids. Triclosan was a gift from KCI Chemicals, Armonk, N.Y.

This study was supported in part by NIH grant GM56685 to H.P.S. R.C. is the recipient of a Royal Predoctoral Fellowship from the Government of Thailand.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Aires J R, Köhler T, Nikaido H, Plesiat P. Involvement of an active efflux system in the natural resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to aminoglycosides. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43:2624–2628. doi: 10.1128/aac.43.11.2624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bhargava H N, Leonard P A. Triclosan: applications and safety. Am J Infect Control. 1996;24:209–218. doi: 10.1016/s0196-6553(96)90017-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Davies J. Inactivation of antibiotics and the dissemination of resistance genes. Science. 1994;264:375–382. doi: 10.1126/science.8153624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Davies J. Origins and evolution of antibiotic resistance. Microbiologia. 1996;12:9–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Furia T E, Schenkel A G. New, broad spectrum bacteriostat. Soap Chem Spec. 1968;44:47–50. and 116–122. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gotoh N, Tsujimoto H, Tsuda M, Okamoto K, Nomura A, Wada T, Nakahashi M, Nishino T. Characterization of the MexC-MexD-OprJ multidrug efflux system in ΔmexA-mexB-oprM mutants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:1938–1943. doi: 10.1128/aac.42.8.1938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Heath R J, Li J, Roland G E, Rock C O. Inhibition of the Staphylococcus aureus NADPH-dependent enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase by triclosan and hexachlorophene. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:4654–4659. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.7.4654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Heath R J, Rock C O. A triclosan-resistant bacterial enzyme. Nature. 2000;406:145–146. doi: 10.1038/35018162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Heath R J, Rubin J R, Holland D R, Zhang E, Snow M E, Rock C O. Mechanism of triclosan inhibition of bacterial fatty acid synthesis. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:11110–11114. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.16.11110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Heath R J, Yu Y-T, Shapiro M A, Olson E, Rock C O. Broad spectrum antimicrobial biocides target the FabI component of fatty acid biosynthesis. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:30316–30320. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.46.30316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hoang T T, Karkhoff-Schweizer R R, Kutchma A J, Schweizer H P. A broad-host-range FIp-FRT recombination system for site-specific excision of chromosomally-located DNA sequences: application for isolation of unmarked Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutants. Gene. 1998;212:77–86. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(98)00130-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hoang T T, Schweizer H P. Characterization of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase: a target for triclosan and its role in acylated homoserine lactone synthesis. J Bacteriol. 1999;181:5489–5497. doi: 10.1128/jb.181.17.5489-5497.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Köhler T, Michea-Hamzehpour M, Henze U, Gotoh N, Curty L K, Pechere J C. Characterization of MexE-MexF-OprN, a positively regulated multidrug efflux system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol Microbiol. 1997;23:345–354. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.2281594.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Li X Z, Nikaido H, Poole K. Role of mexA-mexB-oprM in antibiotic efflux in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:1948–1953. doi: 10.1128/aac.39.9.1948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Makowski G S, Ramsby M L. pH modification to enhance the molecular sieving properties of sodium dodecyl sulfate-10% polyacrylamide gel. Anal Biochem. 1993;212:283–285. doi: 10.1006/abio.1993.1324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Masuda N, Sagagawa E, Ohya S, Gotoh N, Tsujimoto H, Nishino T. Contribution of the MexX-MexY-OprM efflux system to intrinsic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000;44:2242–2246. doi: 10.1128/aac.44.9.2242-2246.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.McDonnell G, Russell A D. Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity, action, and resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999;12:147–179. doi: 10.1128/cmr.12.1.147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.McMurry L M, McDermott P F, Levy S B. Genetic evidence that InhA of Mycobacterium smegmatis is a target for triclosan. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43:711–713. doi: 10.1128/aac.43.3.711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.McMurry L M, Oethinger M, Levy S B. Overexpression of marA, soxS, or acrAB produces resistance to triclosan in laboratory and clinical strains of Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1998;166:305–309. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1998.tb13905.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.McMurry L M, Oethinger M, Levy S B. Triclosan targets lipid synthesis. Nature. 1998;394:531–532. doi: 10.1038/28970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mine T, Morita Y, Kataoka A, Mizushima T, Tsuchiya T. Expression in Escherichia coli of a new multidrug efflux pump, MexXY, from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43:415–417. doi: 10.1128/aac.43.2.415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Eight informational supplement. Document M100–S8. Wayne, Pa: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nikaido H. Multidrug efflux pumps of gram-negative bacteria. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:5853–5859. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.20.5853-5859.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Okazaki T, Hirai K. Cloning and nucleotide sequence of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa nfxB gene, conferring resistance to new quinolones. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1992;97:197–202. doi: 10.1016/0378-1097(92)90386-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Pier G B. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a key problem in cystic fibrosis. ASM News. 1998;64:339–347. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Poole K, Gotoh N, Tsujimoto H, Zhao Q, Wada A, Yamasaki T, Neshat S, Yamagishi J, Li X Z, Nishino T. Overexpression of the mexC-mexD-oprJ efflux operon in nfxB-type multidrug resistant strains. Mol Microbiol. 1996;21:713–724. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1996.281397.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Poole K, Krebes K, McNally C, Neshat S. Multiple antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: evidence for involvement of an efflux operon. J Bacteriol. 1993;175:7363–7372. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.22.7363-7372.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Poole K, Tetro K, Zhao Q, Neshat S, Heinrichs D, Bianco N. Expression of the multidrug resistance operon mexA-mexB-oprM in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: mexR encodes a regulator of operon expression. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:2021–2028. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.9.2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Regos J, Hitz H R. Investigations on the mode of action of triclosan, a broad spectrum antimicrobial agent. Zentbl Bakteriol Hyg Abt 1 Orig A. 1974;226:390–401. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Russell A D. Bacterial resistance to disinfectants: present knowledge and future problems. J Hosp Infect. 1999;43:S57–S68. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(99)90066-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sambrook J, Fritsch E F, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1989. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Schweizer H P. Intrinsic resistance to inhibitors of fatty acid biosynthesis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is due to efflux: application of a novel technique for generation of unmarked chromosomal mutations for the study of efflux systems. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:394–398. doi: 10.1128/aac.42.2.394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Schweizer H P, Klassen T R, Hoang T. Improved methods for gene analysis and expression in Pseudomonas. In: Nakazawa T, Furukawa K, Haas D, Silver S, editors. Molecular biology of pseudomonads. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Microbiology; 1996. pp. 229–237. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Srikumar R, Kon T, Gotoh N, Poole K. Expression of Pseudomonas aeruginosa multidrug efflux pumps MexA-MexB-OprM and MexC-MexD-OprJ in a multidrug-sensitive Escherichia coli strain. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:65–71. doi: 10.1128/aac.42.1.65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Stover C K, Pham X-Q, Erwin A L, Mizoguchi S D, Warrener P, Hickey M J, Brinkman F S L, Hufnagle W O, Kowalik D J, Lagrou M, Garber R L, Goltry L, Tolentino E, Westbrock-Wadman S, Yuan Y, Brody L L, Coulter S N, Folger K R, Kas A, Larbig K, Lim R, Spencer D, Wong G K-S, Wu Z, Paulsen I T, Reizer J, Saier M H, Hancock R E W, Lory S, Olson M V. Complete genome sequence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, an opportunistic pathogen. Nature. 2000;406:959–964. doi: 10.1038/35023079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.van Delden C, Iglewski B H. Cell-to-cell signaling and Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Emerg Infect Dis. 1998;4:551–560. doi: 10.3201/eid0404.980405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Watson J M, Holloway B W. Chromosome mapping in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol. 1978;133:1113–1125. doi: 10.1128/jb.133.3.1113-1125.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Westbrock-Wadman S, Sherman D R, Hickey M J, Coulter S N, Zhu Y Q, Warrener P, Nguyen L Y, Shawar R M, Folger K R, Stover C K. Characterization of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa efflux pump contributing to aminoglycoside resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43:2975–2983. doi: 10.1128/aac.43.12.2975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ziha-Zafiri I, Llanes C, Köhler T, Pechere J-C, Plesiat P. In vivo emergence of multidrug-resistant mutants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa overexpressing the active efflux system MexA-MexB-OprM. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43:287–291. doi: 10.1128/aac.43.2.287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES