Skip to main content
Plants logoLink to Plants
. 2022 Apr 8;11(8):1015. doi: 10.3390/plants11081015

Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of XTH Gene Family during Flower-Opening Stages in Osmanthus fragrans

Yang Yang 1,2,3, Yunfeng Miao 1,3, Shiwei Zhong 1,3, Qiu Fang 1,3, Yiguang Wang 1,3, Bin Dong 1,2,3,*, Hongbo Zhao 1,2,3,*
Editors: Aiping Song, Yu Chen
PMCID: PMC9031776  PMID: 35448743

Abstract

Osmanthus fragrans is an aromatic plant which is widely used in landscaping and garden greening in China. However, the process of flower opening is significantly affected by ambient temperature changes. Cell expansion in petals is the primary factor responsible for flower opening. Xyloglucan endoglycolase/hydrolase (XTH) is a cell-wall-loosening protein involved in cell expansion or cell-wall weakening. Through whole-genome analysis, 38 OfXTH genes were identified in O. fragrans which belong to the four main phylogenetic groups. The gene structure, chromosomal location, synteny relationship, and cis-acting elements prediction and expression patterns were analyzed on a genome-wide scale. The expression patterns showed that most OfXTHs were closely associated with the flower-opening period of O. fragrans. At the early flower-opening stage (S1 and S2), transcriptome and qRT-PCR analysis revealed the expression of OfXTH24, 27, 32, 35, and 36 significantly increased under low ambient temperature (19 °C). It is speculated that the five genes might be involved in the regulation of flower opening by responding to ambient temperature changes. Our results provide solid foundation for the functional analysis of OfXTH genes and help to explore the mechanism of flower opening responding to ambient temperature in O. fragrans.

Keywords: Osmanthus fragrans, xyloglucan endoglycolase/hydrolase, flower opening, ambient temperature

1. Introduction

Xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase (XTH), a cell-wall-relaxation factor, modifies the cellulose–xylan complex structure through catalyzing the breaking and rejoining of xyloglucan molecules in the plant cell wall [1]. XTH belongs to the Glycoside Hydrolase Family 16 (GH16) of the Carbohydrate Active Enzyme Family Database (CAZy). XTH proteins contain a Glyco_hydro_16 protein domain and a XET_C domain [2,3]. Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that XTH proteins were related to the two kinks enzyme activity of xyloglucan transglycosylation (XET) and xyloglucan hydrolysis (XEH) [4]. In Arabidopsis thaliana, XTH gene family can be divided into four groups, and the different groups have different functions or enzyme activity. For instance, Group I/II and Group IIIB genes show XET activity, while Group IIIA genes show XEH activity [2,5].

Increasing reports showed that XTH family genes play important roles in many processes of plant growth and development. During root development stages, high expression of SlXTH1 can be increased by XET activity in the hypocotyl elongation zone and affect the hypocotyl growth and cell wall extensibility in tomato [6]. Similarly, AtXTH21 gene played a principal role in the growth of the primary roots by altering the deposition of cellulose and the elongation of the cell wall [7]. In addition, AtXTH9 was positively correlated with cell elongation of the inflorescence stem [8]. In flowering plants, flower opening is dependent on petal growth, which is closely related to the cell expansion. In Ipomoea nil, InXTH2, InXTH3, and InXTH4 were upregulated by dark period and their expression was positively correlated with the rate of flower opening [9]. EgXTH1 from Eustoma grandiflorum was involved in cell expansion, and the expression was increased with the flower-opening process compared with the control [10]. In Rosa hybrida, RhXTH1 were relevant to the typical growth in different part of petals, and also increased markedly during petal growth [11]. Conversely, if XTH genes are not expressed or inhibited, the petal growth will not continue, thereby effectively inhibiting flower opening [12]. Therefore, this evidence suggests that XTH genes are an important regulator, and significantly influence petal cell expansion during the flower-opening process of most species.

Osmanthus fragrans is one of the Chinese top ten traditional flowers, known for its strong fragrance, and is widely cultivated as a garden tree in most Asian countries due to its high ornamental value and aromatic scent. However, the changes in ambient temperature significantly affected the opening and longevity of the flower [13]. In our previous research, we found that the flower opening is significantly promoted by low ambient temperature 19 °C in O. fragrans, and the flower-opening process is accompanied by petal cells significant expansion [14,15]. To clarify whether OfXTH genes regulate flower opening in response to ambient temperature, the expression profiles of OfXTH genes were analyzed during flower-opening process under different temperature treatment. Our results could deepen understanding of the OfXTH gene family and help to explore the mechanism of O. fragrans petal expansion responding to ambient temperature changes.

2. Results

2.1. Identification of XTH Gene Family in O. fragrans

Through the HMM search with the XTH protein domains (PF00722 and PF06955) and BLASTp with 33 AtXTH proteins, a total of 38 OfXTH genes were identified from the O. fragrans genome. Then, the characteristics of OfXTH proteins were investigated, including protein length, molecular weight (MW), and theoretical isoelectric point (pI), by the online software Expasy. The signal peptide (SP) and subcellular localization were predicted by the online program SignalP 4.1 Service and Plant-mPLoc. The results showed that the length of amino acids was between 234 and 355, and the molecular weight of the proteins was between 26.8 and 40.4 kD (Table 1), corresponding with the protein length. The theoretical isoelectric point varied from 4.83 to 9.47; this is possibly due to the different polarities of the amino acids. In addition, a total of 29 OfXTH proteins were predicted to contain a signal peptide, while the other nine proteins had no signal peptide. Additionally, the subcellular localization prediction revealed that 32 OfXTH proteins were located in the cell wall, and six proteins were predicted to locate in the cell wall or cytoplasm (Table 1).

Table 1.

The characteristic of OfXTH genes in O. fragrans.

Gene Length MW PI SP Subcellular Localization
OfXTH1 298 34,863.67 4.83 28 cell wall
OfXTH2 298 34,958.87 5.03 28 cell wall
OfXTH3 298 33,595.75 5.57 29 cell wall
OfXTH4 289 32,550.53 8.85 32 cell wall
OfXTH5 305 34,591.01 6.51 26 cell wall
OfXTH6 338 39,335.44 9.05 cell wall
OfXTH7 255 29,221.92 9.43 20 cell wall
OfXTH8 260 29,772.14 8.24 cell wall
OfXTH9 355 40,429.32 8.84 20 cell wall
OfXTH10 294 34,293.78 8.08 23 cell wall
OfXTH11 294 34,213.84 8.84 25 cell wall/cytoplasm
OfXTH12 293 33,385.14 5.74 21 cell wall
OfXTH13 294 34,263.86 8.83 25 cell wall
OfXTH14 297 33,314.48 5.21 17 cell wall
OfXTH15 308 35,606.44 9.47 33 cell wall
OfXTH16 324 37,516.58 9.03 cell wall
OfXTH17 295 33,485.54 6.89 32 cell wall/cytoplasm
OfXTH18 270 30,312.99 5.23 23 cell wall
OfXTH19 324 37,516.58 9.03 cell wall
OfXTH20 295 33,463.49 6.43 32 cell wall/cytoplasm
OfXTH21 325 37,273.13 8.93 24 cell wall/cytoplasm
OfXTH22 282 31,918.7 8.69 cell wall
OfXTH23 234 26,856.03 8.79 cell wall
OfXTH24 295 34,651.93 5.14 26 cell wall
OfXTH25 321 37,347.8 8.96 26 cell wall
OfXTH26 261 30,242.91 5.98 cell wall
OfXTH27 250 28,403.93 9.1 cell wall
OfXTH28 302 35,166.08 5.7 20 cell wall
OfXTH29 295 33,937.19 6.75 18 cell wall
OfXTH30 339 38,895.06 6.4 31 cell wall
OfXTH31 298 34,746.73 5.02 28 cell wall
OfXTH32 289 32,124.53 5.1 23 cell wall/cytoplasm
OfXTH33 287 32,580.54 8.78 25 cell wall
OfXTH34 298 33,611.81 5.57 29 cell wall
OfXTH35 304 34,732.12 9.08 cell wall
OfXTH36 288 32,847.03 9.22 21 cell wall/cytoplasm
OfXTH37 293 33,556.83 6.31 30 cell wall
OfXTH38 294 34,368.01 8.69 25 cell wall

2.2. Phylogenetic Analysis of XTH Proteins

The phylogenetic tree was constructed using 38 OfXTHs from O. fragrans, 33 AtXTHs from A. thaliana, and 29 OsXTHs from Oryza sativa to analyze the evolutionary relationship (Figure 1). According to phylogenetic analysis, thirty-eight OfXTH proteins were classified into four groups in O. fragrans. Twenty-six OfXTHs belong to Group I/II. Group IIIA contained five OfXTH proteins. Group IIIB contained six OfXTH proteins. Only one protein, OfXTH28, belonged to Ancestral Group.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Phylogenetic analysis of XTH proteins from O. fragrans, A. thaliana, and O. sativa. Each subgroup is distinguished by a different color.

2.3. Gene Structure and Motif Analyses

Gene Structure Display Server (GSDS) was used to investigate the OfXTHs gene structure. The number of exons in thirty-seven OfXTHs ranged widely within 3–5 (Figure 2). Only OfXTH23 contained two exons. The conservative motif, ExDxE, was present in every OfXTH protein. Motifs 3, 5, 8, and 9 were highly conserved in all proteins. Group I/II genes contained common motifs 2–9, while OfXTH16 lacked motifs 4, 6, 7, and OfXTH34 lacked motif 7. In addition, motif 10 was only present in proteins of Group I/II. Motifs 1–5 and 7–9 were found in Group IIIA, and motifs 1–3, 5, 8 and 9 presented in Group IIIB. In Ancestral Group, OfXTH28 shared the same motif with other OfXTHs, except for motif 2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Gene structure and motif distribution of OfXTH proteins. (A) Gene structure, putative signal peptide sequences, and conservative motif sequence. Each subgroup is distinguished by a different color. White boxes and black lines represent exons and introns, respectively. The green and red strips indicate putative signal peptide sequences and conservative motif sequence, respectively. (B) The motif distribution. Motifs 1–10 in the OfXTH proteins are represented by different colored boxes.

2.4. Chromosomal Location and Synteny Analysis

As shown in Figure 3, 38 OfXTHs were distributed on the 17 chromosomes. Notably, seven genes, OfXTH1420, were densely located on the Chr08, which was the chromosome distributing with the largest number of OfXTH genes. No OfXTH gene located on Chr05, Chr07, Chr14, Chr17, and Chr21. In addition, the other chromosomes contained 1–4 OfXTH genes. The locations of OfXTH genes on the chromosomes are described in detail in the mentary Materials (Table S1). Duplication events are related to plant evolutionary patterns. In this study, thirty segmentally duplicated genes were identified, and no tandem duplicated gene was found (Figure 4). All the synteny gene pairs were in the same cluster group. The substitution rates of Ka (non-synonymous) and Ks (synonymous) were calculated to estimate the selection pressure and determine the divergence time of the duplicated events. A total of 20 segmentally duplicated gene pairs were identified from 38 OfXTHs (Table 2). Interestingly, the Ka/Ks ratios of these 20 OfXTHs segmentally duplicated gene pairs were less than 1, suggesting that all segmentally duplicated gene pairs were purified selected instead of positively selected. The divergence time of OfXTH genes suggested that the duplicated events dated back to 59.93 million years ago (Mya) and lasted up to 0.31 Mya, and most of the duplicated events occurred between 5 and 35 Mya (Table 2).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Chromosomal distribution of OfXTH genes.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Synteny analysis of 38 OfXTH genes in O. fragrans. Orange rectangles represent chromosomes of O. fragrans, and blue lines represent segment duplicate gene pairs.

Table 2.

Ka/Ks analysis and estimated divergence time of OfXTHs.

Duplicated Gene Pairs Ka Ks Ka/Ks Type of
Selection
Divergence Time (Mya)
OfXTH1-OfXTH24 0.118 0.987 0.119 Purifying 32.91
OfXTH1-OfXTH31 0.017 0.346 0.050 Purifying 11.55
OfXTH2-OfXTH31 0.023 0.355 0.065 Purifying 11.82
OfXTH4-OfXTH33 0.221 1.798 0.123 Purifying 59.93
OfXTH6-OfXTH35 0.083 0.394 0.212 Purifying 13.14
OfXTH7-OfXTH15 0.059 0.371 0.158 Purifying 12.36
OfXTH8-OfXTH12 0.121 0.666 0.181 Purifying 22.21
OfXTH8-OfXTH22 0.051 0.264 0.194 Purifying 8.82
OfXTH9-OfXTH23 0.262 0.568 0.461 Purifying 18.93
OfXTH10-OfXTH21 0.027 0.274 0.100 Purifying 9.13
OfXTH11-OfXTH13 0.003 0.011 0.267 Purifying 0.36
OfXTH11-OfXTH38 0.034 0.205 0.166 Purifying 6.84
OfXTH12-OfXTH22 0.130 0.806 0.161 Purifying 26.87
OfXTH13-OfXTH38 0.038 0.194 0.194 Purifying 6.48
OfXTH16-OfXTH19 0.000 0.009 0.000 Purifying 0.31
OfXTH18-OfXTH32 0.143 0.958 0.150 Purifying 31.92
OfXTH24-OfXTH31 0.123 1.094 0.112 Purifying 36.48
OfXTH25-OfXTH30 0.078 0.345 0.226 Purifying 11.49
OfXTH26-OfXTH37 0.171 0.526 0.326 Purifying 17.54
OfXTH27-OfXTH36 0.038 0.222 0.169 Purifying 7.40

2.5. Analysis of Cis-Acting Regulatory Elements in the Promoters of OfXTH Genes

For further understanding of the cis-acting regulatory elements in the promoter of OfXTHs, 2 kb upstream sequences of the transcription initiation site were subjected to PlantCARE. A large number of cis-acting elements in response to hormones were found in OfXTH promoter sequences (Figure 5), including ABA (abscisic acid), MeJA (methyl jasmonate), GA (gibberellin), SA (salicylic acid), and auxin-responsive elements. Except for OfXTH15 and OfXTH32, at least one ABA-responsive element was found in other OfXTH promoter sequences. Cis-acting regulatory elements involved in MeJA were presented in 29 OfXTHs. In addition, other cis-acting regulatory elements, including anaerobic induction, drought inducibility, low temperature, etc., were found in 33, 26, and 11 OfXTH promoters, respectively.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Prediction of cis-responsive elements in the OfXTH promoters. Different cis-responsive elements are represented by different colored boxes.

2.6. OfXTH Genes Expression Analysis during Flower-Opening Stages

To understand which OfXTH genes are involved in the regulation of the flowering processes, the quantitative real-time PCR was performed to detect OfXTH expression patterns during different flowering stages in O. fragrans. Flower bud phenotype at different stages are shown in Figure S1. According to the expression profiles, OfXTHs can be classified into three major groups (Figure 6). The first group, including four genes (OfXTH8, 12, 26, and 37), exhibited that these OfXTH genes were highly expressed in the S0 period and then decreased at other flowering stages (Figure 6A). Twenty-eight genes belong to the second group, including OfXTH17, 915, 17, 2124, 2732, 3436, and 38. The expression pattern analysis showed that these OfXTH genes significantly upregulated in the S1 and S2 period, or only expressed in the S2 period (Figure 6B). Finally, six OfXTH genes were categorized into the third group, including OfXTH16, 1820, 25, and 33. This group of genes have a high expression level in flowering periods S4 and S5 (Figure 6C).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Expression profiles of OfXTHs at different flowering stages. Significant differences are identified by SPSS (version 22) with Duncan’s test (p < 0.05) and are represented by different letters above the error bars. (A) OfXTH genes highly expressed in the S0 period. (B) OfXTH genes upregulated in the S1 and S2 period. (C) OfXTH genes upregulated in the S4 and S5 period.

2.7. Transcriptome Analysis of OfXTH Genes under Different Ambient Temperature Treatment

From our previous investigated results, ambient temperature of 19 °C significantly promoted the flower-opening process in O. fragrans, while ambient temperature of 23 °C inhibited the flowering process [15]. In our study, the flower buds were also treated under 19 °C and 23 °C conditions. In the 19 °C treatment for 2 and 5 days, the traits of flower buds were reached at S1 and S2 stage, respectively. However, the flower buds still remained in the S1 stage when treated at 23 °C for either 2 days or 5 days. Therefore, the flower buds were collected at the second and fifth day under 19 °C and 23 °C treatment for transcriptome sequencing, and then we explored which OfXTHs are involved in the regulation of flower-opening processes responding to ambient temperature changes. Based on log2(ratio of abundance) ≤−1 or ≥1 with FDR < 0.001, a total of 5702 and 8082 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified in 2 d, 19 °C vs. 2 d, 23 °C and 5 d, 19 °C vs. 5 d, 23 °C, respectively (Table S2). Among these obtained DEGs, five and sixteen differentially expressed OfXTH genes were identified at the second and fifth day under 19 °C treatment relative to the control 23 °C, respectively (Table 3). The differentially expressed OfXTH genes including OfXTH24, 27, 32, 35, and 36 were all induced by 19 °C at the second day. Compared with the control of 23 °C at the fifth day, fifteen upregulated OfXTH genes (OfXTH47, 12, 14, 2325, 27, 28, 3133, 35, and 36) were identified under 19 °C treatment. The expression of five OfXTH genes, including OfXTH24, 27, 32, 35, and 36, were significantly increased at the second and fifth day. Then, qRT-PCR was employed to validate the differentially expressed OfXTH genes. Consistent with the transcriptome profile, the expression of OfXTH24, 27, 32, 35, and 36 were strongly induced by 19 °C (Figure 7).

Table 3.

DEGs of OfXTHs treated at 19 °C and 23 °C for 2 and 5 days.

Gene 2 d, 19 °C FPKM 2 d, 23 °C FPKM 5 d, 19 °C FPKM 5 d, 23 °C FPKM Log2 (Ratio of Abundance)
2 d, 19 °C vs. 2 d, 23 °C FDR 5 d, 19 °C vs. 5 d, 23 °C FDR
OfXTH4 3.97 0.38 18.99 0.05 3.37 9.4 × 10−2 8.69 1.6 × 10−15
OfXTH5 1.36 2.00 15.91 1.92 −0.56 2.8 × 10−1 3.05 5.9 × 10−21
OfXTH6 0.02 0.05 2.75 0.10 −1.64 1.0 × 100 4.79 2.5 × 10−8
OfXTH7 1.90 1.47 3.10 0.18 0.38 3.8 × 10−5 4.09 4.9 × 10−8
OfXTH12 1.75 3.00 0.64 4.07 −0.78 1.5 × 10−2 −2.68 7.8 × 10−7
OfXTH14 1.98 0.85 88.96 1.97 1.22 7.9 × 10−1 5.50 3.6 × 10−16
OfXTH23 5.13 7.06 9.33 3.72 −0.46 2.4 × 10−1 1.33 7.6 × 10−6
OfXTH24 14.69 6.25 38.07 5.38 1.23 3.8 × 10−9 2.82 2.4 × 10−58
OfXTH25 3.22 3.90 19.84 3.93 −0.28 9.6 × 10−2 2.33 2.0 × 10−26
OfXTH27 58.21 6.08 87.85 5.47 3.26 3.1 × 10−34 4.01 3.1 × 10−109
OfXTH28 0.39 0.43 104.94 0.54 −0.15 8.0 × 10−1 7.60 4.0 × 10−47
OfXTH31 0.29 0.30 1.53 0.13 −0.06 8.9 × 10−1 3.55 1.7 × 10−4
OfXTH32 12.50 3.46 10.53 0.66 1.85 2.1 × 10−30 3.99 1.8 × 10−4
OfXTH33 0.31 0.04 1.71 0.02 2.83 4.5 × 10−1 6.21 1.8 × 10−5
OfXTH35 1.97 0.94 3.23 0.46 1.06 4.7 × 10−4 2.81 4.2 × 10−7
OfXTH36 23.03 2.76 70.54 2.32 3.06 3.1 × 10−19 4.93 2.3 × 10−134

Figure 7.

Figure 7

The qRT-PCR analysis of five differentially expressed OfXTH genes treated at 19 °C and 23 °C. Significant differences are identified by SPSS (version 22) with Duncan’s test (p < 0.05) and are represented by different letters above the error bars.

3. Discussion

3.1. The Characteristics of XTH Gene Family in O. fragrans

In this study, a total of 38 OfXTH genes were identified, and the corresponding proteins were analyzed for their physical–chemical properties in O. fragrans genome (Table 1). All of the OfXTH proteins were predicted to be located in the cell wall, which is consistent with the function where XTH proteins are involved in cell-wall reconstruction [5,16]. A signal peptide was shown in most OfXTH proteins. When the signaling peptide of DkXTH6 was absent, the subcellular localization of DkXTH6 protein was transformed from the cell wall to the whole cell [17]. It implied that a signal peptide played an important role in the transmembrane transport of XTH protein and guided the protein to the plant cell wall. All of the OfXTH genes were categorized into four subfamilies by polygenetic analysis (Figure 1). The number of 26, 5, and 6 XTHs were contained in Group I/II, IIIA, and IIIB, respectively, whereas only one XTH was contained in Ancestry Group. Compared with A. thaliana, the numbers of XTH proteins in Group I/II, Group IIIA, and Group IIIB were increased, while Ancestral Group was decreased in O. fragrans (Figure 1). This might be due to the gene duplication or loss during the evolution of the XTH gene family [18]. Most OfXTHs are involved in multiple segmental duplications, which might contribute to the expansion and evolution of the OfXTH gene family [19]. It might be the reason why the number of the XTH family members in O. fragrans exceeds other species, such as A. thaliana (33) [20], O. sativa (29) [21], and Hordeum vulgare (24) [22]. The Ka/Ks values of all duplicated OfXTH gene pairs were <1.00 (Table 2), suggesting that the evolution of duplicated OfXTH gene pairs occurred through purifying selection and evolved slowly in O. fragrans.

Cis-acting elements are specific DNA sequences connected in tandem with structural genes and are binding sites for transcription factors [23]. Through analysis of OfXTH promoters, we found that ABA and MeJA responsiveness elements presented in most OfXTH promoters (Figure 5), which suggested that OfXTH genes might be regulated by abscisic acid and jasmonic acid, similar to the XTH genes in sweet cherry [24]. Recent research showed that the expression of PavXTH15 was elevated by the phytohormone ABA and MeJA in sweet cherry [24]. Cis-acting elements involved in SA responsiveness were found in OfXTH promoters, indicating that the OfXTH gene might be the target gene of the SA signaling pathway. Similar findings reported previously showed that the accumulation of SA suppressed cell division and elongation through reducing AtXTH8 and AtXTH31 expression [25]. Besides responding to plant hormones, the promoters of OfXTHs also contain cis-acting regulatory elements involved in drought inducibility, low-temperature responsiveness, defense, and stress responsiveness. The result suggested that OfXTH may respond to environmental factors and be related to biotic and abiotic stress resistance. Similar results have been reported before. Overexpression of DkXTH1 enhances tolerance to abiotic stress salt and drought stresses in transgenic Arabidopsis plants with respect to root and leaf growth, and survival [26]. The XTH19 mutant showed reduced freezing tolerance after both cold and sub-zero acclimation [27].

3.2. OfXTHs Are Closely Associated with the Flower-Opening Period of O. fragrans

The flower-opening process is accompanied by the rapid expansion of petal cells. The size of the adaxial petal epidermal cells and the abaxial petal epidermal cells increased by 37.5% and 6.5% from S1 to S2, respectively [15]. Previous works have reported that XTHs participated in flower-opening processes in many species. DcXTH2 and DcXTH3 transcripts were markedly accumulated in Dianthus caryophyllus petals of opening flowers and showed high XET activity in petal claw, which is the main part of carnation petal elongation [28]. LhXTH1 transcript levels in the petals markedly increased during Lilium flower opening and were higher in adaxial epidermal cells contributing to petal expansion [29]. In addition, it is reported that XTH plays an important role in the rapid petal growth period of E. grandiflorum [10]. In our study, we focused on the OfXTH expression changes in the S1 and S2 periods. A total of 28 OfXTH genes were found and significantly upregulated in S1 and S2 periods relative to the S0 period (Figure 6B), implying that these genes might be involved in petal cell expansion and contribute to the regulation of flower opening in O. fragrans. In addition, it has been reported that the expression of RbXTH1 and RbXTH2 in Rosa bourboniana leads to petal abscission [30]. Overexpression of persimmon DkXTH8 causes cells to be easily destroyed and accelerates leaf senescence in transgenic plants [31]. Six OfXTH genes have high expression level in the flowering periods of S4 and S5 (Figure 6C); we hypothesized that these OfXTH genes may contribute to the cellular senescence.

3.3. OfXTHs Response to Ambient Temperature in Regulation of Flower Opening

Flowering in many species is influenced by ambient temperature. In Arabidopsis, the transition to flowering is delayed in low ambient temperatures [32]. Phased constant temperature treatment and a lower temperature could shorten the flower differentiation process and promote the flowering of Crocus sativus [33]. Similarly, the change in ambient temperature affected flower-opening processes significantly in O. fragrans. The flower opening is significantly promoted by low ambient temperature (19 °C) in O. fragrans, and the flower buds could not open until ambient temperature was below 23 °C [15]. However, there are fewer reports on the role of XTHs in responding to low ambient temperature; most studies focused on the high temperature regulating cell growth. For example, the expression of AtXTH9 and AtXTH11 was strongly increased by high temperature in stem and root, respectively, to accelerate cell elongation [8,34]. Through transcriptome analysis, we found that five and sixteen OfXTH genes were differentially expressed at the second and fifth day under 19 °C treatment compared with the control 23 °C, respectively (Table 3). Specifically, OfXTH24, 27, 32, 35, and 36 were significantly upregulated at both the second and fifth day after 19 °C treatment, which indicated that OfXTH24, 27, 32, 35, and 36 might respond to ambient temperature changes and contribute to the process of low ambient temperature accelerated flower opening of O. fragrans.

4. Conclusions

In this study, thirty-eight OfXTH genes were identified from the O. fragrans genome database. All of the OfXTH proteins were predicted to locate in the cell wall and were divided into four groups. Multiple segment duplication happened in the evolution of the OfXTH genes and contributed to the expansion of OfXTH gene family. The expression profiles showed that most OfXTHs are closely associated with the flower-opening processes in O. fragrans. Using transcriptome and qRT-PCR analysis, five OfXTH genes (OfXTH24, 27, 32, 35, and 36) were identified and significantly upregulated at the S1 and S2 stages under 19 °C treatment, indicating that these OfXTH genes might be key regulators responding to ambient temperature to modulate petal cell expansion during flower opening. In conclusion, the present research increased our knowledge of the role of the XTH gene family in flower-opening processes in O. fragrans.

5. Materials and Methods

5.1. Identification of XTH Gene Family in O. fragrans

The whole genome of O. fragrans was obtained from the website http://117.78.20.255/ [35] (accessed on 17 March 2022). The protein sequences of AtXTH (A. thaliana) and OsXTH (O. sativa) were downloaded from the Ensembl Plants database (http://plants.ensembl.org (accessed on 17 March 2022)). Two programs of TBtools1.6 [36], Simple HMM Search and BLASTp, were used to identify OfXTH family genes. To be specific, the Simple HMM Search program was used to search the two XTH protein domains, PF00722 (ID: Glyco_hydro_16) and PF06955 (ID: XET_C), from the database [37]. Thirty-three AtXTH proteins were used as queries to blast the O. fragrans genome database and identify XTH homologs in O. fragrans, with the parameters E-value < 10−15 and identity > 50%. Only protein sequences present in both outcomes were regarded as OfXTH proteins and used for further analysis. SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/ (accessed on 17 March 2022)) was used to check the conserved XTH domains Glyco_hydro_16 and XET_C with default parameters. The ProtParam tool of online software Expasy (http://web.expasy.org/protparam/ (accessed on 17 March 2022)) was used to determine the physicochemical parameters of OfXTHs protein sequence. SignalP 4.1 Service (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP-4.1/ (accessed on 17 March 2022)) was used to predict the signal peptide. Plant-mPLoc (http://www.csbio.sjtu.edu.cn/bioinf/plant-multi/ (accessed on 17 March 2022)) was used to predict the sub-cellular localizations.

5.2. Phylogenetic Analysis of XTH Proteins

The Clutsalx-v1.83 program was used to align the XTH sequences from O. fragrans, A. thaliana, and O. sativa. MEGA6.0 was then used for phylogenetic analysis via the neighbor-joining (NJ) method with 1000 bootstrap replicates. The online software ITOL (https://itol.embl.de/ (accessed on 17 March 2022)) was used to annotate the phylogenetic tree.

5.3. Motif Identification and Gene Structure Analysis

MEME Suite 5.3.0 (http://meme-suite.org/tools/meme (accessed on 17 March 2022)) was used to identify the motifs of OfXTH proteins, at a maximum motif number of 10, with a minimum and maximum width of six and 50, respectively. The online software GSDS (http://gsds.gao-lab.org/ (accessed on 17 March 2022)) was used to predict the gene structure of OfXTHs.

5.4. Chromosomal Location and Synteny Analysis

MapChart (version 2.32) was used to predict the distribution of OfXTH genes on chromosomes. Quick Run MCScanX Wrapper program in TBtools1.6 was used to assess gene duplication events of OfXTHs. The synonymous (Ka) and non-synonymous (Ks) substitution rate were calculated by the Simple Ka/Ks Calculator program of TBtools1.6. The divergence was calculated as follows: T = Ks/2λ, where λ = 1.5 × 10−8 s for dicots [38]. The selection mode was identified using Ka/Ks value (Ka/Ks ratio >1, <1, and =1 represented positive selection, negative selection, and neutral selection, respectively) [38].

5.5. Analysis of Cis-Acting Regulatory Elements in Promoter

The upstream sequences (2 kb) of the OfXTH-coding sequences were obtained from the genome database of O. fragrans [35]. PlantCARE (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/ (accessed on 17 March 2022)) was used to identify cis-acting regulatory elements in OfXTH genes promoter.

5.6. Plant Materials and Ambient Temperature Treatment

O. fragrans plants, cultivar “Yanhonggui”, were potted and grown in the Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University Osmanthus Resource Nursery. The flower buds at different stages were collected between 9.00–10.00 a.m. every day, including S0 (the outer bud scales unfurled and the inner bud scales still furled); S1 (the bud became globular-shaped and the inside bracts covering the inflorescence was visible); S2 (the inflorescence burst through bracts and the florets closely crowded); S3 (the florets are bud-shaped and the pedicels elongate); S4 (initial flowering stage); S5 (full flowering stage). The flower bud phenotype of O. fragrans at different stages are shown in Figure S1. In addition, the plants in S0 stage with similar size were selected and treated with different temperatures (19 °C and 23 °C) in a growth chamber. When treated at 19 °C for 2 days and 5 days, the flower buds reached S1 and S2 stages, respectively, while flower buds still remained in S1 stage when treated at 23 °C for 2 days and 5 days. The phenotype of flower buds in 19 °C and 23 °C are shown in Figure S2. The relative humidity was about 70% and the photoperiod was a 12 h light/12 h dark regime with illumination of 10,000 lux. Each treatment included three independent biological replications. Samples of each stage were collected and stored at −80 °C before total RNA extraction.

5.7. Total RNA Extraction and Transcriptome Sequencing

RNA was isolated from 300 mg of flower buds at S1 and S2 period under 19 °C and 23 °C treatment using the EasyPure Plant RNA Kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China). The quality of total RNA satisfied the standards 1.8 ≤ OD260/280 ≤ 2.2 and OD260/230 ≥ 1.8. Five μg of total RNA was employed for cDNA libraries preparation and RNA deep sequencing (6 G × 250 bp) by Novogene Biological Information Technology Company (Beijing, PR China). Three biological replications were performed for the transcriptome analysis. The FPKM (fragments per kilo base of exon per million fragments mapped) was used to estimate gene expression levels and identify differentially expressed genes among 2 d, 19 °C vs. 2 d, 23 °C, and 5 d, 19 °C vs. 5 d, 23 °C. The differentially expressed genes were analyzed according to the log2(ratio of abundance) threshold, the value ≥1.0 was defined as upregulation, and ≤−1.0 was defined as downregulation, along with FDR <0.001.

5.8. Real-Time Quantitative PCR

PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit (Takara, Dalian, China) was used for first-strand cDNA synthesis following the manufacturer’s instructions. LightCycler480II Real-Time PCR System was used for qRT-PCR analysis. The reaction mixture (10 μL total volume) consisted of 5 μL SYBR Premix Ex Taq (Takara, Dalian, China), 20 ng cDNA template, forward and reverse primers (10 microns/L) of 0.4 μL, was and filled with ddH2O to 10 μL. Three biological replications were performed for each treatment. The relative expression of the target gene was calculated using the 2ΔΔCT method. OfACT was used as a reference gene [39]. Primers of OfXTH genes used in RT-qPCR are shown in Table S3.

Abbreviations

XTH Xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase
XET Xyloglucan endotransglucosylase
XEH Xyloglucan hydrolase
MW Molecular weight
pI Theoretical isoelectric point
SP Signal peptide
Mya Million years ago
ABA Abscisic acid
MeJA Methyl jasmonate
GA Gibberellin
SA Salicylic acid
DEGs Differentially expressed genes

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants11081015/s1, Figure S1: Flower bud phenotype of O. fragrans at different stages; Figure S2: Flower bud phenotype under temperature treatment; Table S1: Chromosome location of OfXTH genes; Table S2: DEGs of 2d-19 °C vs 2d-23 °C; Table S3: Primers of OfXTH genes used in RT-qPCR; Table S4: The FPKM value of OfXTH genes in temperature treatment transcriptome; Table S5: The RT-qPCR raw data of OfXTH genes at different flowering stages; Table S6: The RT-qPCR raw data of five differential expressed OfXTH genes treated at 19 °C and 23 °C.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.Z.; methodology, Y.M.; software, Y.Y.; validation, Q.F. and Y.W.; investigation, Y.Y.; data curation, Y.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Y.; writing—review and editing, Y.M., S.Z. and B.D.; visualization, Y.Y.; supervision, B.D.; project administration, H.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 32072615 and 31902057), Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. LQ19C160012), and the key research and development program of Zhejiang Province (2019C02036).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Cosgrove D.J. Growth of the plant cell wall. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005;6:850–861. doi: 10.1038/nrm1746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Eklöf J.M., Brumer H. The XTH Gene Family: An Update on Enzyme Structure, Function, and Phylogeny in Xyloglucan Remodeling. Plant Physiol. 2010;153:456–466. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.156844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Behar H., Graham S.W., Brumer H. Comprehensive cross-genome survey and phylogeny of glycoside hydrolase family 16 members reveals the evolutionary origin of EG16 and XTH proteins in plant lineages. Plant J. 2018;95:1114–1128. doi: 10.1111/tpj.14004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rose J.K.C., Braam J., Fry S.C., Nishitani K. The XTH Family of Enzymes Involved in Xyloglucan Endotransglucosylation and Endohydrolysis: Current Perspectives and a New Unifying Nomenclature. Plant Cell Physiol. 2002;43:1421–1435. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcf171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Baumann M.J., Eklof J.M., Michel G., Kallas A.M., Teeri T.T., Czjzek M., Brumer H., III Structural Evidence for the Evolution of Xyloglucanase Activity from Xyloglucan Endo-Transglycosylases: Biological Implications for Cell Wall Metabolism. Plant Cell. 2007;19:1947–1963. doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.051391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Miedes E., Zarra I., Hoson T., Herbers K., Sonnewald U., Lorences E.P. Xyloglucan endotransglucosylase and cell wall extensibility. J. Plant Physiol. 2011;168:196–203. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2010.06.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Liu Y.-B., Lu S.-M., Zhang J.-F., Liu S., Lu Y.-T. A xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase involves in growth of primary root and alters the deposition of cellulose in Arabidopsis. Planta. 2007;226:1547–1560. doi: 10.1007/s00425-007-0591-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hyodo H., Yamakawa S., Takeda Y., Tsuduki M., Yokota A., Nishitani K., Kohchi T. Active gene expression of a xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase gene, XTH9, in inflorescence apices is related to cell elongation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol. Biol. 2003;52:473–482. doi: 10.1023/A:1023904217641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Shinozaki Y., Tanaka R., Ono H., Ogiwara I., Kanekatsu M., Van Doorn W.G., Yamada T. Length of the dark period affects flower opening and the expression of circadian-clock associated genes as well as xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase genes in petals of morning glory (Ipomoea nil) Plant Cell Rep. 2014;33:1121–1131. doi: 10.1007/s00299-014-1601-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ochiai M., Matsumoto S., Maesaka M., Yamada K. Expression of mRNAs and Proteins Associated with Cell-wall-loosening during Eustoma Flower Opening. J. Jpn. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2013;82:154–160. doi: 10.2503/jjshs1.82.154. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yamada K., Takahashi R., Fujitani C., Mishima K., Yoshida M., Joyce D.C., Yamaki S. Cell Wall Extensibility and Effect of Cell-Wall-Loosening Proteins during Rose Flower Opening. J. Jpn. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2009;78:242–251. doi: 10.2503/jjshs1.78.242. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Luo J., Ma N., Pei H., Chen J., Li J., Gao J. A DELLA gene, RhGAI1, is a direct target of EIN3 and mediates ethylene-regulated rose petal cell expansion via repressing the expression of RhCesA2. J. Exp. Bot. 2013;64:5075–5084. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Van Doorn W.G., van Meeteren U. Flower opening and closure: A review. J. Exp. Bot. 2003;54:1801–1812. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erg213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wang Y., Zhang C., Fu J., Zhao H. Progresses on flower bud differentiation and flower opening in Osmanthus fragrans. J. Zhejiang A F Univ. 2016;33:340–347. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fu J., Zhang C., Liu Y., Pang T., Dong B., Gao X., Zhu Y., Zhao H. Transcriptomic analysis of flower opening response to relatively low temperatures in Osmanthus fragrans. BMC Plant Biol. 2020;20:337. doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-02549-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Strohmeier M., Hrmova M., Fischer M., Harvey A.J., Fincher G.B., Pleiss J. Molecular modeling of family GH16 glycoside hydrolases: Potential roles for xyloglucan transglucosylases/hydrolases in cell wall modification in the poaceae. Protein Sci. 2004;13:3200–3213. doi: 10.1110/ps.04828404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Han Y., Ban Q., Hou Y., Meng K., Suo J., Rao J. Isolation and Characterization of Two Persimmon Xyloglucan Endotransglycosylase/Hydrolase (XTH) Genes That Have Divergent Functions in Cell Wall Modification and Fruit Postharvest Softening. Front. Plant Sci. 2016;7:624. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Li Y., Li L., Ding W., Li H., Shi T., Yang X., Wang L., Yue Y. Genome-wide identification of Osmanthus fragrans bHLH transcription factors and their expression analysis in response to abiotic stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2020;172:103990. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.103990. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cui L., Wall P.K., Leebens-Mack J.H., Lindsay B.G., Soltis D.E., Doyle J.J., Soltis P.S., Carlson J.E., Arumuganathan K., Barakat A., et al. Widespread genome duplications throughout the history of flowering plants. Genome Res. 2006;16:738–749. doi: 10.1101/gr.4825606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yokoyama R., Nishitani K. A Comprehensive Expression Analysis of all Members of a Gene Family Encoding Cell-Wall Enzymes Allowed us to Predict cis-Regulatory Regions Involved in Cell-Wall Construction in Specific Organs of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2001;42:1025–1033. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pce154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yokoyama R., Nishitani K. Genomic Basis for Cell-Wall Diversity in Plants. A Comparative Approach to Gene Families in Rice and Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2004;45:1111–1121. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pch151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fu M.-M., Liu C., Wu F. Genome-Wide Identification, Characterization and Expression Analysis of Xyloglucan Endotransglucosylase/Hydrolase Genes Family in Barley (Hordeum vulgare) Molecules. 2019;24:1935. doi: 10.3390/molecules24101935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wittkopp P.J., Kalay G. Cis-regulatory elements: Molecular mechanisms and evolutionary processes underlying divergence. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012;13:59–69. doi: 10.1038/nrg3095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhai Z., Feng C., Wang Y., Sun Y., Peng X., Xiao Y., Zhang X., Zhou X., Jiao J., Wang W., et al. Genome-Wide Identification of the Xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/Hydrolase (XTH) and Polygalacturonase (PG) Genes and Characterization of Their Role in Fruit Softening of Sweet Cherry. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:12331. doi: 10.3390/ijms222212331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Miura K., Lee J., Miura T., Hasegawa P.M. SIZ1 Controls Cell Growth and Plant Development in Arabidopsis Through Salicylic Acid. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009;51:103–113. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcp171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Han Y., Han S., Ban Q., He Y., Jin M., Rao J. Overexpression of persimmon DkXTH1 enhanced tolerance to abiotic stress and delayed fruit softening in transgenic plants. Plant Cell Rep. 2017;36:583–596. doi: 10.1007/s00299-017-2105-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Takahashi D., Johnson K.L., Hao P., Tuong T., Erban A., Sampathkumar A., Bacic A., Livingston D.P., Kopka J., Kuroha T., et al. Cell wall modification by the xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase XTH19 influences freezing tolerance after cold and sub-zero acclimation. Plant Cell Environ. 2020;44:915–930. doi: 10.1111/pce.13953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Harada T., Torii Y., Morita S., Onodera R., Hara Y., Yokoyama R., Nishitani K., Satoh S. Cloning, characterization, and expression of xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase and expansin genes associated with petal growth and development during carnation flower opening. J. Exp. Bot. 2010;62:815–823. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Watanabe Y., Niki T., Norikoshi R., Nakano M., Ichimura K. Soluble carbohydrate concentration and expression of expansin and xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase genes in epidermal and parenchyma cells during lily flower opening. J. Plant Physiol. 2022;270:153615. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2022.153615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Singh A.P., Tripathi S.K., Nath P., Sane A.P. Petal abscission in rose is associated with the differential expression of two ethylene-responsive xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase genes, RbXTH1 and RbXTH2. J. Exp. Bot. 2011;62:5091–5103. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Han Y., Ban Q., Li H., Hou Y., Jin M., Han S., Rao J. DkXTH8, a novel xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase in persimmon, alters cell wall structure and promotes leaf senescence and fruit postharvest softening. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:39155. doi: 10.1038/srep39155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Samach A., Wigge P.A. Ambient temperature perception in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2005;8:483–486. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2005.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wang Z., Li X., Xu J., Yang Z., Zhang Y. Effects of ambient temperature on flower initiation and flowering in saffron (Crocus sativus L.) Sci. Hortic. 2021;279:109859. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109859. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.De Caroli M., Manno E., Piro G., Lenucci M.S. Ride to cell wall: Arabidopsis XTH11, XTH29 and XTH33 exhibit different secretion pathways and responses to heat and drought stress. Plant J. 2021;107:448–466. doi: 10.1111/tpj.15301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Yang X., Yue Y., Li H., Ding W., Chen G., Shi T., Chen J., Park M.S., Chen F., Wang L. The chromosome-level quality genome provides insights into the evolution of the biosynthesis genes for aroma compounds of Osmanthus fragrans. Hortic. Res. 2018;5:72. doi: 10.1038/s41438-018-0108-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chen C., Chen H., Zhang Y., Thomas H.R., Frank M.H., He Y., Xia R. TBtools: An Integrative Toolkit Developed for Interactive Analyses of Big Biological Data. Mol. Plant. 2020;13:1194–1202. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2020.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wang M., Xu Z., Ding A., Kong Y. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Profiling Analysis of the Xyloglucan Endotransglucosylase/Hydrolase Gene Family in Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) Genes. 2018;9:273. doi: 10.3390/genes9060273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Blanc G., Wolfe K.H. Widespread Paleopolyploidy in Model Plant Species Inferred from Age Distributions of Duplicate Genes. Plant Cell. 2004;16:1667–1678. doi: 10.1105/tpc.021345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhang C., Fu J., Wang Y., Bao Z., Zhao H. Identification of Suitable Reference Genes for Gene Expression Normalization in the Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analysis of Sweet Osmanthus (Osmanthus fragrans Lour.) PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0136355. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.


Articles from Plants are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES