Abstract
Background
Tocilizumab is an interleukin-6 inhibitor that reduces mortality and the need for invasive mechanical ventilation, while increasing the possibility of successful hospital discharge for hyperinflammatory patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). No increase in adverse events or serious infections has been reported previously.
Aim
To describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients with severe COVID-19 in critical care who received tocilizumab, and to compare mortality and length of hospital stay for patients who received tocilizumab (N=41) with those who did not (N=33).
Methods
Retrospective review of data related to patients with COVID-19 who received tocilizumab in a critical care setting from 1st January to 31st December 2021.
Findings
Amongst COVID-19 survivors, those who had received tocilizumab had longer intensive care unit (ICU) stays (median length 21 vs 9 days) and hospital stays (45 vs 34 days) compared with those who had not received tocilizumab. Thirty-day mortality (29% vs 36%; P=0.5196) and 60-day mortality (37% and 42%; P=0.6138) were not significantly lower in patients who received tocilizumab. Serious bacterial and fungal infections occurred at higher frequency amongst patients who received tocilizumab [odds ratio (OR) 2.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04–6.86; P=0.042], and at significantly higher frequency than in non-COVID-19 ICU admissions (OR 5.26, 95% CI 3.08–9.00; P<0.0001).
Conclusions
In this single-centre study, patients in critical care with severe COVID-19 who received tocilizumab had a greater number of serious bacterial and fungal infections, but this may not have been a direct effect of tocilizumab treatment.
Keywords: COVID-19, Tocilizumab, COVID-19 secondary infections, COVID-19 mortality
Introduction
On 20th February 2020, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was added to the existing list of notifiable diseases in the Republic of Ireland [1], with the first case of the disease diagnosed less than 10 days later on 29th February 2020 [2]. To date, the epidemiology of COVID-19 in Ireland has been characterized by five waves of infection, with onsets in March 2020, August 2020, November 2020, June 2021 and December 2021 [3].
The third wave of COVID-19 in Ireland began in late November 2020, and peaked during the first week of January 2021. In that week alone, 45,726 cases were diagnosed nationally, with County Limerick reporting 2470 cases (5.4% of the national total), equating to an incidence of 1267.3 per 100,000 population, the fourth highest incidence of the disease in the country at that time [4].
In January 2021, the Health Service Executive published interim guidance on the use of tocilizumab in the management of hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 [5]. Tocilizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody against the interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor. Tocilizumab inhibits the binding of IL-6 to membrane and soluble IL-6 receptors, blocking IL-6 signalling and thus reducing inflammation [5]. Its use was to be considered, after multi-disciplinary team (MDT) discussion, for patients demonstrating an inadequate response to systemic corticosteroids, and who either: (i) required intensive care unit (ICU) admission with severe pneumonia necessitating organ support; or (ii) were non-ICU patients with COVID Respiratory Scale Category C1 (on high-flow nasal oxygen) or C2 [on non-invasive ventilation (NIV)] disease. An absolute contraindication to administration of tocilizumab was acute severe infection from sources other than severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) [5].
The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients with severe COVID-19 who received tocilizumab in critical care at the study institution. Furthermore, this study evaluated whether there were any differences in length of stay or mortality between those patients with severe COVID-19 who received tocilizumab and those who did not.
Methods
Study design, study site and population
This retrospective observational review was conducted at University Hospital Limerick (UHL), a 531-bed tertiary referral hospital in the Mid-West of Ireland which serves a population of approximately 473,000. UHL comprises part of the University of Limerick Hospitals Group (ULHG), which also includes three Level 2 hospitals (Ennis Hospital, Nenagh Hospital and St. John's Hospital, Limerick), one maternity hospital (University Maternity Hospital Limerick) and one orthopaedic hospital (Croom Orthopaedic Hospital). Critical care services for ULHG are centralized in UHL, with 12 beds in the ICU and 16 beds in the high-dependency unit. Hospital-acquired bacterial and fungal infections and their management at these facilities have been reported previously [[6], [7], [8]].
Patients included in this review were adults (age >18 years) admitted to critical care in UHL diagnosed with severe or critical COVID-19 who received tocilizumab between 1st January and 31st December 2021. Diagnosis was determined by detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA by nasopharyngeal swabs using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Guidance was provided on the staff app regarding the process for convening an urgent MDT when tocilizumab was being considered as a treatment modality. The Pharmacy Department only dispensed tocilizumab after confirmation of MDT approval.
Data collection and outcomes
The primary outcomes of interest were mortality and length of stay for patients with severe COVID-19 in critical care who received tocilizumab compared with those who did not receive tocilizumab. The secondary objective was to describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients with severe COVID-19 in critical care who received tocilizumab.
A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients who received tocilizumab. In addition, data were gathered from a number of additional sources. Radiology results were obtained from McKesson Radiology Manager at ULHG. Laboratory data (microbiology/serology/haematology and biochemistry results), in addition to notes from daily microbiology/critical care ward rounds, were extracted from the Laboratory Information Management System (iLab V6.1b06, Dedalus, Milan, Italy). Additional microbiology results, including SARS-CoV-2 PCR results from community test centres, were obtained from clinical surveillance software (ICNET, Baxter Healthcare, Deerfield, IL, USA). Data on respiratory requirements were obtained from ICU electronic records. Admission and discharge data, along with mortality data, were gathered from patient management software (iPM v5.0, CSC Technologies). Prescribing data were retrieved from pharmacy and chart review.
Selection criteria for tocilizumab
Only patients with severe COVID-19 infection who were in the ICU requiring organ support were included in this study. Before tocilizumab was administered, patients were assessed for evidence of severe sepsis, including measurement of serum procalcitonin (PCT); a PCT level >2 μg/L was a contraindication to administration of tocilizumab. Microbiology culture results were also examined for evidence of infection, and it was recommended that patients underwent hepatitis B and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) serological testing and interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) testing. As this was not a randomized controlled trial, membership of the MDT varied over the duration of the study, and there may have been differences in the assessment of eligibility for tocilizumab treatment, especially when it was an entirely unfamiliar treatment modality.
Data collection from the tocilizumab group
Demographic data included age, gender and co-morbidities. Times from symptom onset and COVID-19 diagnosis to administration of tocilizumab, from hospital admission to critical care admission, and from hospital admission to tocilizumab administration, were calculated. Data on ventilation requirements pre- and post-tocilizumab administration and on concomitant treatments (including remdesivir, dexamethasone, antibiotics and antifungals) were also collected. Laboratory data collected pre- and post-tocilizumab administration included leukocyte and lymphocyte levels, C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, d-dimer and IL-6 levels. Data on vaccination status were not collected as the national immunization programme for COVID-19 was still in its infancy.
Definitions of secondary infections
Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) was defined as pneumonia that occurred ≥48 h after admission to hospital that was not incubating on admission [9]. Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) was defined as HAP that occurred >48 h after endotracheal intubation [9]. In this study, no distinction was made between HAP and VAP. Pneumonia was defined as the presence of a new lung infiltrate on imaging, along with clinical evidence that would support an infectious aetiology such as new fever, purulent sputum, increasing respiratory requirements and a rising white cell count. This was correlated with microbiological findings which included sputum, tracheal aspirate and blood cultures.
Catheter-associated urinary tract infection was determined by laboratory detection of bacteriuria, in conjunction with clinical signs and symptoms suggestive of a urinary tract infection [10].
Invasive fungal infection was determined to be proven or probable based on the updated consensus definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium – specifically, the definitions that arose from the intensive care working group [11,12]. In the case of invasive aspergillosis, in addition to specified host factors, this included mycological evidence of Aspergillus spp., galactomannan antigen index >0.5 in plasma/serum and/or galactomannan antigen index >0.8 in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, in addition to clinical or radiological features consistent with an otherwise unexplained pulmonary infection.
Statistical analysis
Analyses were performed using Excel Version 15.22 (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA).
Results
Characteristics of patients receiving tocilizumab
Seventy-four patients were admitted to the ICU at UHL with COVID-19 during the study period, accounting for 18.2% of UHL ICU admissions in 2021. Of these, 41 patients received tocilizumab. The majority were male (63%), with a median age of 64 years (range 21–77 years). Seventy-one percent of patients had at least one co-morbidity, and the most common co-morbidities were obesity (44%), cardiovascular disease (42%) and respiratory disease (32%). Most obese patients (83%) had at least one other co-morbidity. Diabetes mellitus was reported in 17% of patients, and only one patient (2%) had a history of pre-existing renal disease (on haemodialysis). Seven patients were considered immunocompromised with medical conditions that included chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (N=2), systemic lupus erythematosus (N=2), rheumatoid arthritis (N=2) and sarcoidosis (N=1). No patients had a history of liver disease (Table I ).
Table I.
COVID-19 ICU patients |
General ICU patients |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Tocilizumab | No tocilizumab | |||
N | 41 | 33 | 332 | |
Age (years) | Median | 64 | 64 | 64 |
Range | 21–77 | 32–81 | 16–88 | |
Gender | % Male | 63 | 55 | 60 |
Co-morbidities (%) | Respiratory | 32 | 36 | - |
Cardiovascular | 42 | 42 | - | |
Diabetes mellitus | 17 | 39 | - | |
Renal disease | 2 | 15 | - | |
Liver disease | 0 | 6 | - | |
Haem/oncology | 5 | 12 | - | |
Immunosuppressed | 17 | 18 | - | |
Obesity | 44 | 21 | - | |
Length of ICU stay (days) | All patients | |||
Median | 18 | 9 | 4 | |
Range | 1–95 | 1–103 | 1–90 | |
Survivors | ||||
Median | 21 | 9 | 5 | |
Range | 3–95 | 2–103 | 1–74 | |
Length of hospital stay (days) | All patients | |||
Median | 23 | 23 | 15 | |
Range | 7–109 | 1–154 | 1–253 | |
Survivors | ||||
Median | 45 | 34 | 20 | |
Range | 9–109 | 6–154 | 1–253 |
COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019.
Date of symptom onset prior to hospital admission was known for 18 (44%) patients; of these, median time from symptom onset to hospital admission was 7 (range 2–15) days. Date of SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity was known for all patients, and the majority (71%) were diagnosed in the community prior to hospital admission. Median time from diagnosis to hospital admission was 4 (range 1–31) days. Median time from hospital admission to critical care admission was 1 day (range 1–10 days). Median time from hospital admission to tocilizumab administration was 2 (range 1–10) days.
Ninety-eight percent of patients who received tocilizumab also received dexamethasone, and 63% also received remdesivir. Empiric antibiotics and antifungals were prescribed in 100% and 34% of cases, respectively.
Respiratory requirements
Prior to tocilizumab administration, 27% of patients (N=11) required mechanical ventilation. Of the non-ventilated group, 20% required high-flow nasal oxygen/AIRVO and 80% were maintained on NIV. Post-tocilizumab administration, 18 further patients progressed to mechanical ventilation (71% total), and the remaining 12 patients (29%) did not. All patients had chest imaging consistent with COVID-19 pneumonitis.
Markers of systemic inflammation prior to tocilizumab administration
Almost all patients (98%) had an elevated CRP, with a median value of 96 (range 2–283) mg/L. A CRP value > 75 mg/L was observed in 61% of patients. Serum ferritin was elevated in 78% of cases, with a median of 843 (range 14–4745) ng/mL. D-dimer was elevated in the majority of cases (76%), with a median of 1.76 (range 0.4–>4) μg/mL; however, it was noted to be in the normal range in 24% of cases. Eighty-one percent of patients were noted to be lymphopenic, with a median of 0.53 (range 0.21–284) x 109/L. IL-6 was elevated in all but one patient prior to tocilizumab administration, with a median of 36 (range 3–3770) ng/L.
Evidence of severe infection other than SARS-CoV-2 infection prior to tocilizumab administration
No patient demonstrated microbiological evidence of either bacterial or fungal infection prior to administration of tocilizumab. Procalcitonin was measured in 90% of patients, and the median level was 0.26 (range <0.06–1.88) μg/L. Two patients had procalcitonin levels > 2 μg/L on ICU admission; both were treated with empiric antibiotics for 3–5 days prior to administration of tocilizumab, and neither exhibited any evidence of bloodstream, urinary tract or respiratory infection before receiving tocilizumab. Hepatitis B and HIV serological testing (all negative) was performed for 81% and 78% of patients, respectively. Only 32% underwent IGRA testing; of these, 46% were negative, 15% were indeterminate and 39% were unprocessed due to technical issues.
Characteristics of the non-tocilizumab group
Thirty-three patients with COVID-19 were admitted to the ICU and did not receive tocilizumab. The majority were male (58%), with a median age of 63 (range 32–81) years. The majority (85%) had at least one co-morbidity, with cardiovascular disease (42%), diabetes mellitus (39%) and respiratory disease (36%) being the most common co-morbidities. Of this cohort, 21% were obese (Table I). Three patients had newly diagnosed malignancies, four were receiving immunosuppressive therapies for inflammatory arthritis, and one had a history of renal transplant. Two patients were pregnant and one had a history of hepatitis B. The majority (58%) of cases were diagnosed in the community, 30% in the emergency department, and there were four cases (12%) of hospital-acquired COVID-19. Excluding the hospital-acquired cases, median time from PCR positivity to hospital admission was 4 (range 1–28) days, and median time from PCR positivity to ICU admission was 6 (range 1–39) days. Thirty-nine percent of patients were admitted to the ICU within 24 h of hospital admission. Three (9%) patients did not have radiological findings consistent with COVID-19 (one case of hospital-acquired COVID-19 with small bowel perforation and only mild respiratory symptoms, one case of Neisseria meningitidis sepsis, and one case of diabetic ketoacidosis with mild respiratory symptoms). Most patients (88%) received dexamethasone, 52% received remdesivir, and all received empiric antibiotics. Details of laboratory markers and respiratory requirements of these patients are shown in Table II, Table III , respectively.
Table II.
COVID-19-positive ICU patients |
||
---|---|---|
Tocilizumab | No tocilizumab | |
N | 41 | 33 |
CRP (mg/L) | ||
Median | 96 | 130 |
Range | 2–283 | 6–319 |
Ferritin (ng/mL) | ||
Median | 843 | 830 |
Range | 14–4745a | 54–2856b |
D-dimer (μg/mL) | ||
Median | 1.76 | 2.45 |
Range | 0.4–4.0 | 0.36–4.0c |
IL-6 (ng/L) | ||
Median | 36 | 67 |
Range | 3–3770 | 8–50,000 |
White cell count (x 109/L) | ||
Median | 9.66 | 9.25 |
Range | 2.57–327 | 2.77–33.04 |
Lymphocytes (x 109/L) | ||
Median | 0.53 | 0.68 |
Range | 0.21–284 | 0.32–5.9 |
Procalcitonin (μg/L) | ||
Median | 0.26 | 0.25 |
Range | 0.06–1.88d | 0.06–100e |
CRP, C-reactive protein; IL-6, interleukin-6.
Data from 35/41 patients.
Data from 31/33 patients.
Data from 32/33 patients.
Data from 37/41 patients.
Data from 30/33 patients.
Table III.
COVID-19-positive ICU patients |
|||
---|---|---|---|
Tocilizumab | No tocilizumab | ||
N | 41 | 33 | |
Remdesivir (%) | 63 | 52 | |
Dexamethasone (%) | 98 | 88 | |
Imaging consistent with COVID-19 infection (%) | 100 | 91 | |
Respiratory requirements on admission to ICU (%) | High flow/AIRVO | 15 | 36 |
NIV | 59 | 52 | |
Intubation | 27 | 12 | |
Progression to intubation | 71 | 67 |
ICU, intensive care unit; NIV, non-invasive ventilation.
Secondary infections
Twenty-six patients who received tocilizumab had a significant bacterial or fungal infection, compared with 13 patients who did not receive tocilizumab [odds ratio (OR) 2.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0373–6.8551; P=0.0417] (Table IV ).
Table IV.
COVID-19 ICU patients |
General ICU patients |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Tocilizumab | No tocilizumab | |||
N | 41 | 33 | 332 | |
Bacterial infection, % (N) | HAP | 59 (24) | 30 (10) | 8 (27) |
BSI | 46 (19) | 27 (9) | 5 (17) | |
CAUTI | 12 (5) | 12 (4) | 3 (9) | |
Clostridioides difficile | 0 (0) | 3 (1) | 1 (3) | |
SSTI | 2 (1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
Fungal infection, % (N) | IFD | 10 (4) | 3 (1) | 1 (2) |
Candidemia | 7 (3) | 0 (0) | 1 (3) | |
Time to detection of first bacterial infection (days) | From hospital admission | |||
Median | 14 | 22 | - | |
Range | 3–102 | 3–94 | - | |
From tozilizumab administration | ||||
Median | 13 | - | - | |
Range | 1–95 | - | - |
COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; HAP, hospital-acquired pneumonia; BSI, bloodstream infection; CAUTI, catheter-associated urinary tract infection; SSTI, skin and soft tissue infection; IFD, invasive fungal disease.
Overall, 38 patients (51%) with COVID-19 developed a bacterial infection post-ICU admission, compared with 36 patients (11%) from the general ICU population during the same period (OR 8.68, 95% CI 4.89–15.38; P<0.0001). Twenty-five (61%) patients who received tocilizumab developed a bacterial infection, with 16 (39%) having more than one bacterial infection. There were 24 cases of pneumonia, 19 bloodstream infections and five catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Median time from hospital admission to bacterial infection was 14 (range 3–102) days, and median time from administration of tocilizumab to bacterial infection was also 14 (range 1–95) days. Patients were predominantly male (72%), and median age was 65 (range 39–77) years. Eighty-one percent of patients had more than one co-morbidity, and 46% of these patients died.
Of the 33 patients who did not receive tocilizumab, 13 (39%) developed a bacterial infection during their ICU stay, with seven (21%) having more than one infection. There were 10 cases of pneumonia, nine bloodstream infections, four catheter-associated urinary tract infections and one Clostridioides difficile infection. Median time from hospital admission to bacterial infection was 22 days. There was a slight female predominance (54%), and median age was 63 (range 29–77) years. All patients had at least one co-morbidity, and 46% of these patients died.
Fungal infections
Fungal infections were more common in the tocilizumab cohort (seven cases) than in the non-tocilizumab cohort (one case) (OR 6.59, 95% CI 0.77–56.6; P=0.0857). Seventy-five percent of those with probable invasive fungal disease survived (N=3), while 67% of those with candidemia survived (N=2).
Length of stay and mortality
Amongst survivors, median length of stay in critical care was 21 (range 3–95) days for the tocilizumab group, compared with 9 (range 2–103) days for the non-tocilizumab group. Median length of hospital stay for survivors was 45 (range 9–109) days for the tocilizumab group compared with 34 (range 6–154) days for the non-tocilizumab group.
Thirty-day mortality was 29% for the tocilizumab group and 36% for the non-tocilizumab group (P=0.5196). Sixty-day mortality was 37% for the tocilizumab group and 42% for the non-tocilizumab group (P=0.6138).
Discussion
Tocilizumab is one of a limited number of treatment options available for COVID-19. It is a humanized monoclonal anti-IL-6 antibody that is licensed for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis and giant cell arteritis [13,14]. It acts by preventing IL-6 from binding to soluble and cell-associated IL-6 receptors, thereby inhibiting IL-6-mediated signalling. Studies have shown that IL-6 levels are elevated in patients with COVID-19 [15], and it is postulated that tocilizumab may be an effective therapy in COVID-19 due to its ability to dampen down the cytokine storm that accompanies severe COVID-19 [15].
Studies of tocilizumab in COVID-19 have given conflicting results, which may reflect lack of standard protocols for its use [[16], [17], [18], [19], [20]]. Initial trials demonstrated no clear benefit of tocilizumab monotherapy on survival, length of hospital stay, need for mechanical ventilation, disease progression or time to recovery [[21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26]]. The REMAP-CAP study was an open-label international randomized trial of 803 adult patients with severe COVID-19 in ICUs requiring either respiratory or cardiovascular support; patients were randomized to receive one of two IL-6 inhibitors – tocilizumab or sarilumab – compared with standard care within 24 h of ICU admission. More than 80% of patients also received glucocorticoids, and approximately one-third of patients (33%) received remdesivir. Both IL-6 inhibitors in this study were found to reduce 28-day in-hospital mortality compared with standard care, and tocilizumab was found to reduce both length of ICU stay and mortality, with the effect being greater in patients who also received steroids [27]. Subsequently, the RECOVERY trial showed that tocilizumab, administered together with corticosteroids, reduced the relative risk of death from COVID-19 at day 28 by 14%, and the absolute risk of mortality by 4% in an intention-to-treat analysis [28]. No mortality benefit was seen when tocilizumab was administered as monotherapy. A limitation of the RECOVERY trial is that 17% of patients randomized to receive tocilizumab did not receive it; an observation that the authors could not explain. The present study was not powered to assess outcomes, but contrary to the REMAP-CAP and RECOVERY trials, this study found an increased length of hospital stay in patients receiving tocilizumab. This may be because the groups were not balanced; for example, 27% of the tocilizumab group were intubated on ICU admission compared with 12% of the non-tocilizumab group.
Tocilizumab has been licenced for the use in the European Union since 2009 for adults with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis and children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. It is also used in patients with giant cell arteritis. Adverse events in this population have been well characterized. Serious and occasionally fatal infections can occur, and can include tuberculosis and viral reactivation [[29], [30], [31], [32], [33]]. Morel et al. [29] reported 4.7 serious infections (infections requiring hospitalization or intravenous antibiotics, or resulting in death) per 100 patient-years in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, with a mean time of 12.8 months from administration of tocilizumab to diagnosis of the first serious infection. Respiratory and skin/soft tissue infections were most common. There were three deaths due to septic shock secondary to pyelonephritis, Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia and Haemophilus influenzae pneumonia. All three patients had serious co-morbidities, were aged >65 years and were receiving concomitant methotrexate treatment. Genovese et al. [31] reported a similar rate of serious infections in five randomized controlled trials of patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis receiving tocilizumab of 4.5 per 100 patient-years. Again, respiratory and skin/soft tissue infections were most common. The nine serious infections mainly comprised invasive fungal infections; three patients with invasive candidiasis died. A further nine patients (0.1 per 100 patient-years) developed tuberculosis, only one of which was previously known to have latent tuberculosis. A higher rate of serious infection (5.74 per 100 patient years) was reported by Jones et al. [30].
A systematic review of tocilizumab in patients with COVID-19 reported no increased risk of infections in patients receiving tocilizumab [34]. Similarly, a meta-analysis of 10,930 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 from 27 randomized controlled trials found no association between IL-6 antagonists (including tocilizumab) and risk of 28-day infection [35]. This is in contrast to other reviews which have demonstrated mixed results with varying levels of significance with respect to risk of infection and use of tocilizumab [36]. This is in contrast to the authors' experience of a significant increase in infections in patients receiving tocilizumab, two of whom died from their secondary infections.
This study has several limitations as it was a small, single-centre retrospective observational study. It would seem that the tocilizumab group may have had more severe illness, which may account for the prolonged ICU stay. In turn, this may have increased the risk of ICU-acquired (particularly medical-device-related) infections that were not related to the effects of tocilizumab.
In conclusion, this study shows that, although large series have not shown increased risk of serious infections in COVID-19 cases receiving tocilizumab, it is important that individual centres are vigilant in monitoring patients for serious bacterial and fungal infections, because the cohort of patients treated may be at increased risk of infection for reasons other than a direct immunosuppressive effect of tocilizumab.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank the staff of the Microbiology, Serology and Molecular Laboratories, the Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, and the antimicrobial pharmacists at UHL, Limerick, Ireland.
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Funding sources
None.
References
- 1.Department of Health, Ireland . Department of Health, Ireland; Dublin: 2020. Press release: Minister for Health signs regulations to make COVID-19 a notifiable disease.https://www.gov.ie/en/press-release/290361-minister-for-health-signs-regulations-to-make-covid-19-a-notifiable-/# Available at: [last accessed November 2021] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Department of Health, Ireland . Department of Health, Ireland; Dublin: 2021. Press release: statement from the National Public Health Emergency Team – Saturday 29 February.https://www.gov.ie/en/press-release/2f75fd-statement-from-the-national-public-health-emergency-team-sat-29-feb/ Available at: [last accessed November 2021] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Health Protection Surveillance Centre, Ireland . Health Protection Surveillance Centre, Ireland; Dublin: 2022. Epidemiology of COVID-19 in Ireland: frequently asked questions.https://www.hpsc.ie/a-z/respiratory/coronavirus/novelcoronavirus/surveillance/epidemiologyfrequentlyaskedquestions/ Available at: [last accessed February 2022] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Health Protection Surveillance Centre . Health Protection Surveillance Centre, Ireland; Dublin: 2021. Weekly report on the epidemiology of COVID-19 in Ireland week 1.https://www.hpsc.ie/a-z/respiratory/coronavirus/novelcoronavirus/surveillance/epidemiologyofcovid-19inirelandweeklyreports/COVID-19%20Weekly%20Report_%20Week%201_%20Slidset_HPSC%20-%20Website.pdf Available at: [last accessed November 2021] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Health Service Executive . Health Service Executive; Dublin: 2021. HSE interim guidance for the use of tocilizumab in the management of hospitalised patients with severe COVID-19 disease.https://www.hse.ie/eng/about/who/acute-hospitals-division/drugs-management-programme/hse-interim-guidance-for-the-use-of-tocilizumab-in-the-management-of-hospitalised-patients-with-severe-covid-19-disease-v6.pdf Available at: [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ryan P., Motherway C., Powell J., Elsaka A., Sheikh A.A., Jahangir A., et al. Candidaemia in an Irish intensive care unit setting between 2004 and 2018 reflects increased incidence of Candida glabrata. J Hosp Infect. 2019;102:347–350. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2019.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.O'Connor C., Powell J., Finnegan C., O'Gorman A., Barrett S., Hopkins K.L., et al. Incidence, management and outcomes of the first cfr-mediated linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis outbreak in a tertiary referral centre in the Republic of Ireland. J Hosp Infect. 2015;90:316–321. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2014.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.O'Connor C., Cormican M., Boo T.W., McGrath E., Slevin B., O'Gorman A., et al. An Irish outbreak of New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM)-1 carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: increasing but unrecognized prevalence. J Hosp Infect. 2016;94:351–357. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2016.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kalil A.C., Metersky M.L., Klompas M., Muscedere J., Sweeney D.A., Paler L.B., et al. Management of adults with hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia: 2016 Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Thoracic Society. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63:e61–111. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Health Protection Surveillance Centre . Health Protection Surveillance Centre, Ireland; Dublin: 2011. Guidelines for the prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infection.https://www.hpsc.ie/a-z/microbiologyantimicrobialresistance/infectioncontrolandhai/guidelines/File,12913,en.pdf Available at: [last accessed March 2022] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Donnelly J.P., Chen S.C., Kauffmann C.A., Steinbach W.J., Baddley J.W., Verweij P.E., et al. Revision and update of the consensus definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71:1367–1376. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz1008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bassetti M., Azoulay E., Kullberg B.J., Ruhnke M., Shoham S., Vazquez J., et al. EORTC/MSGERC definitions of invasive fungal diseases: summary of activities of the Intensive Care Unit Working Group. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72:s121–s127. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.European Medicines Agency . European Medicines Agency; Amsterdam: 2021. RoActemra (tocilizumab). An overview of RoActemra and why it is authorised in the EU.https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/overview/roactemra-epar-medicines-overview_en.pdf Available at: [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kishimoto T., Kang S. IL-6 revisited: from rheumatoid arthritis to CAR T cell therapy and COVID-19. Annu Rev Immunol. 2022;40:323–348. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-101220-023458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Coomes E.A., Haghbayan H. Interleukin-6 in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Med Virol. 2020;30:1–9. doi: 10.1002/rmv.2141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Akleylek C., Gur S.G., Sever I.H., Demir S.K., Cevik E., Eken E., et al. What are the main factors affecting the outcome of tocilizumab therapy in COVID-19 induced cytokine release syndrome? Eur J Rheumatol. 2022 doi: 10.5152/eurjrheum.2022.21010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mohanty B., Sunder A., Satyanarayan B., Kumar M., Shukla R., Ahmed A. Success rate of remdesivir, convalescent plasma, and tocilizumbab in moderate to severe COVID-19 pneumonia: our experience in a tertiary care centre. J Family Med Prim Care. 2021;10:4236–4241. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_578_21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Boppana T.K., Mittal S., Madan K., Mohan A., Hadda V., Guleria R. Tocilizumab for COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2022;4 doi: 10.4081/monaldi.2022.2136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Peng J., She X., Mei H., Zheng H., Fu M., Liang G., et al. Association between tocilizumab treatment and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging. 2022;14:557–571. doi: 10.18632/aging.203834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mushtaq M.Z., Mahmood S.B.Z., Almas A., Wasti S.A., Ali S.A. Tocilizumab in critically ill COVID-19 patients: an observational study. Int Immunopharmacol. 2022;102:108384. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2021.108384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Veiga V.C., Prats J.A.G.G., Farias D.L.C., Rosa R.G., Dourado L.K., Zampieri F.G., et al. Effect of tocilizumab on clinical outcome at 15 days in patients with severe or critical coronavirus disease 2019: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2021;372:n84. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Stone J.H., Frigault M.J., Serling-Boyd N.J., Fernandes A.D., Harvey L., Foulkes A.S., et al. BACC Bay Tocilizumab Trial Investigators. Efficacy of tocilizumab in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:2333–2344. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2028836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hermine O., Mariette X., Tharaux P., Resche-Rigon M., Porcher R., Ravaund P., CORIMUNO19 Collaborative Group Effect of tocilizumab vs usual care in adults hospitalized with COVID-19 and moderate or severe pneumonia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181:32–40. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.6820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Perrone F., Piccirillo M.C., Ascierto P.A., Salvarani C., Parrella R., Marata A.M., et al. TOCIVID-19 Investigators. Tocilizumab for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. The single-arm TOCIVID-19 prospective trial. J Transl Med. 2020;18:405. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02573-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rosas I.O., Brau N., Waters M., Go R.C., Hunter B.D., Bhagani S., et al. Tocilizumab in hospitalised patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:1503–1516. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2028700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Salama C., Han J., Yau L., Reiss W.G., Kramer B., Neidhart J.D., et al. Tocilizumab in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:20–30. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2030340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.REMAP-CAP Investigators. Interleukin-6 receptor antagonists in critically ill patients with COVID-19. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:1491–1502. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2100433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.RECOVERY Collaborative Group Tocilizumab in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY); a randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial. Lancet. 2021;397:1637–1645. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00676-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Morel J., Constantin A., Baron G., Dernis E., Flipo R.M., Rist S., et al. Risk factors of serious infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tocilizumab in the French Regsistry REGATE. Rheumatology. 2017;56:1746–1754. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Jones G., Wallace T., McIntosh M.J., Brockwell L., Gomez-Reino J.J., Sebba A. Five-year efficacy and safety of tocilizumab monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who were methotrexate- and biologic-naïve or free of methotrexate for 6 months: the AMBITION study. J Rheumatol. 2017;44:142–146. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.160287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Genovese M.C., Rubbert-Roth A., Smolen J.S., Kremer J., Khraishi M., Gomez-Reino J., et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a cumulative analysis of up to 4.6 years of exposure. J Rheumatol. 2013;40:768–780. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.120687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kuo M.H., Tseng C.W., Lu M.C., Tung C.H., Tseng K.C., Huang K.Y., et al. Risk of hepatitis B virus reactivation in rheumatoid arthritis patients undergoing tocilizumab containing treatment. Dig Dis Sci. 2021;66:4026–4034. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06725-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Scott L.J. Tocilizumab: a review in rheumatoid arthritis. Drugs. 2017;77:1865–1879. doi: 10.1007/s40265-017-0829-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tleyjeh I.M., Kashour Z., Damlaj M., Riaz M., Tlayjekk H., Altannir Y., et al. Efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in COVID 10 patients: a living systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021;27:215–227. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.10.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.World Health Organization Rapid Evidence Appraisal for COVID-19 Therapies (REACT) Working Group. Association between administration of IL-6 antagonists and mortality among patients hospitalised for COVID-19: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2021;326:499–518. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.11330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Koritala T., Pattan V., Tirupathi R., Rabaan A.A., Al Mutair A., Alhumaid S., et al. Infection risk with the use of interleukin inhibitors in hospitalised patients with COVID-19: a narrative review. Infez Med. 2021;29:495–503. doi: 10.53854/liim-2904-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]