Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2001 Feb;45(2):627–629. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.2.627-629.2001

Two-Year Surveillance of Antibiotic Resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae in Four African Cities

Mohamed Benbachir 1,*, Saida Benredjeb 2, Cheick Saadbouh Boye 3, Mireille Dosso 4, Houria Belabbes 1, Aouatef Kamoun 2, Omar Kaire 3, Naima Elmdaghri 1
PMCID: PMC90341  PMID: 11158769

Abstract

Worldwide spread of antibiotic resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae is a major problem. However, data from West and North African countries are scarce. To study the level of resistance and compare the situations in different cities, a prospective study was conducted in Abidjan (Ivory Coast), Casablanca (Morocco), Dakar (Senegal), and Tunis (Tunisia), from 1996 to 1997. The resistances to eight antibiotics of 375 isolates were studied by E test, and the results were interpreted using the breakpoints recommended by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Overall, 30.4% of the isolates were nonsusceptible to penicillin G (25.6% were intermediate and 4.8% were resistant). Amoxicillin (96.3% were susceptible) and parenteral third-generation cephalosporins (92.7%) were highly active. Resistance to chloramphenicol was detected in 8.6% of the isolates. High levels of resistance were noted for erythromycin (28%), tetracycline (38.3%), and cotrimoxazole (36.4%). Resistance to rifampin was rare (2.1%). There were significant differences in resistance rates between individual countries. Multiple resistance was more frequent in penicillin-nonsusceptible isolates than in penicillin-susceptible isolates. Recommendations for treatment could be generated from these results in each participating country.


Streptococcus pneumoniae is responsible for a wide variety of infections, resulting in high rates of morbidity and mortality (19). Antibiotic resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae is now a worldwide problem (1) and has reached very high levels in certain countries (11, 15, 30). Penicillin-nonsusceptible isolates are also frequently resistant to other antibiotic classes (1, 9). Levels of penicillin resistance may increase very quickly (4). Furthermore, treatment regimens vary accordingly to penicillin G status and site of infection (13, 16). This situation justifies a continuous surveillance to provide appropriate recommendations for the treatment of pneumococcal infections.

There is a lack of data on antibiotic resistance from West and North Africa. In this study, we report on the levels of resistance to eight antibiotics of S. pneumoniae isolated in four African cities: Abidjan (Ivory Coast), Casablanca (Morocco), Dakar (Senegal), and Tunis (Tunisia).

From January 1996 to December 1997, 375 consecutive isolates of S. pneumoniae were collected in a prospective study conducted in these African cities as part of the Pan African Link through Microbiology (PALM), whose purpose is to conduct a multicentric surveillance of antibiotic resistance in nine African countries (Algeria, Cameroon, Ivory Coast, Kenya, Malta, Morocco, Nigeria, Senegal, and Tunisia). In all the cities except Abidjan, all the isolates came from one laboratory. Nearly half of the isolates came from cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) or blood (Table 1). The MICs of penicillin G, amoxicillin, erythromycin, rifampin, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, and cotrimoxazole were studied by the E test method (AB Biodisk Sweden). The resistance to parenteral third-generation cephalosporins was studied using cefotaxime or ceftriaxone. E-test strips and quality control isolates were provided by the study sponsor (SmithKline Beecham). The susceptibility testing was performed on Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with 5% sheep or horse blood and incubated for 18 to 24 h at 35°C. MICs were rounded up to the nearest doubling dilution when necessary. Quality control was implemented using S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619 according to National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards methodology. The breakpoints used for analysis were those recommended by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards in 1997 (20).

TABLE 1.

Origins of the 375 S. pneumoniae isolates

Source No. of isolates
Total % of all isolates
Ivory Coast Morocco Senegal Tunisia
Blood 20 11 12 17 60 16
CSF 31 41 38 15 125 33.3
ENTa 77 2 10 10 99 26.4
Pusb 9 10 6 4 29 7.7
Respiratoryc 1 34 15 12 62 16.5
Total 138 98 81 58 375 100
a

ENT, ear, nose, and throat. 

b

Sources of pus were ascitic, arthritis, ocular, and cutaneous fluids. 

c

Respiratory sources were sputum, pleural fluid, and bronchial aspirates. 

The overall percentages of resistance to penicillin G, erythromycin, tetracycline, and cotrimoxazole were high (Table 2). An important result is that, overall, 30.4% of the 375 isolates were nonsusceptible to penicillin G (penicillin G-nonsusceptible S. pneumoniae [PNSSP]), with the interesting feature that most (25.6% of the total) of these PNSSP isolates were in the intermediate range, whereas 4.8% were fully resistant. Amoxicillin (96.3% were susceptible), parenteral third-generation cephalosporins (92.7%), and rifampin (97.9%) were highly active. Resistance to chloramphenicol was detected in 8.6% of the isolates. These results confirm that antibiotic resistance in S. pneumoniae has spread to West and North Africa and correlate with previous reports from Central Africa (21), Egypt (23), Ghana (22), Kenya (24), and Rwanda (3). Nevertheless, for most antibiotics tested, the magnitude of the problem differs from one country to another: for instance, less than 10% of the isolates are penicillin nonsusceptible in Casablanca, whereas this rate exceeds 60% in Dakar. Considerable variations of the antibiotic resistance patterns observed in countries of the same region (1, 25, 27), between regions in the same country (2, 9), or even between hospitals within a region (8) have been reported previously, leading to very different guidelines. The sharp differences observed between countries have been linked to different antibiotic policies: in Germany (26) or Switzerland (32), the favorable situation may be explained by the restricted use of antibiotics. In Nairobi (24), the low rate of resistance to erythromycin may be explained by the fact that this antibiotic was rarely used. On the other hand, resistances to erythromycin in Belgium (31) and to cotrimoxazole in Sweden (14) have been correlated with sustained usage of these antibiotics. This study should be followed by a comparison of the antibiotic policies of the four cities in an attempt to explain the major differences observed.

TABLE 2.

Overall resistance of 375 isolates of S. pneumoniaea

Antibiotics % Resistant isolatesa
Ivory Coast (n = 138) Morocco (n = 98) Senegal (n = 81) Tunisia (n = 58) Total (n = 375)
Penicillin G
 Susceptible 77.5 90.8 38.3 58.6 69.6
 Intermediate 18.1 8.2 53.1 34.5 25.6
 Resistant 4.3 1 8.6 6.9 4.8
Amoxicillinb 3.6 1 3.7 8.6 3.7
Cefotaxime-ceftriaxonec 8.8 1 15 3.6 7.3
Chloramphenicol 11 2 14.8 5.2 8.6
Erythromycin 52.6 4.1 11.4 32.8 28
Tetracycline 67.5 12.2 29 34.5 38.3
Rifampin 5.8 0 0 0 2.1
Cotrimoxazole 60.5 14.8 29 19.4 36.4
a

Data include isolates intermediate and resistant to the antibiotic, except for penicillin G. 

b

Breakpoints were 0.5 and 2 μg/ml. 

c

Breakpoints were 0.5 and 2 μg/ml. 

Since the rates of antibiotic resistance in S. pneumoniae vary according to geographic location, time (4, 5), age (3, 9), and site of infection (2, 9), the surveillance must be continuous and the guidelines must be derived from the local epidemiology. Recommendations according to penicillin G status and site of infection have been published: penicillin G, penicillin G or amoxicillin, and amoxicillin have been the recommended treatments for septicemia (13, 16, 28), pneumonia (13, 16), and otitis media (10, 13, 16), respectively.

In this study, resistance to most other antibiotics (amoxicillin, cefotaxime-ceftriaxone, chloramphenicol, erythromycin, and cotrimoxazole) was more frequent in PNSSP isolates than in susceptible isolates. This finding is well documented (1, 9). Pneumococcal antibiotic resistance is even more worrisome in developing countries because PNSSP strains are often multiresistant and because alternative antibiotics (e.g., third-generation cephalosporins and vancomycin) are expensive. Thus, efforts should focus not only on antibiotic resistance surveillance and guideline formulation but also on appropriate use of antibiotics. Strategies have been proposed, which include restricting access, compliance promotion (7), and reduction in the overprescription and inappropriate use of antibiotics (6).

In the future, more centers from each country and more countries should be involved. Strains should be serotyped to verify that the most frequently encountered resistant serotypes are included in the 23-valent vaccine and in the protein-conjugated vaccine which is being formulated for children under 2 years of age. The knowledge of the serotypes to which the resistant isolates belong would allow an early selection of appropriate treatment as soon as such a strain is detected. For example, for a case of meningitis, the serotype of a culture can be obtained after 24 h of incubation or by immediate detection of pneumococcal antigens in the CSF. The most common resistant serotypes should be compared by molecular biology methods (restriction fragment length polymorphism, random amplified polymorphic DNA, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis) to detect any clone diffusion and to compare the African clones to those described previously (19).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Appelbaum P C. Epidemiology and in vitro susceptibility of drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1996;15:932–939. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199610000-00030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bédos J P, Chevret S, Chastang C, Geslin P, Régnier B the French Cooperative Pneumococcus Study Group. Epidemiological features of and risk factors for infection by Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates with diminished susceptibility to penicillin: findings of a French survey. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;22:63–72. doi: 10.1093/clinids/22.1.63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bogaerts J, Lepage P, Taelman H, Rouvroy D, Batungwanayo J, Kestelyn P, Hitunana G G, Van de Perre P, Vandepitte J, Verbist L, Verhaegen J. Antimicrobial susceptibility and serotype distribution of Streptococcus pneumoniae from Rwanda, 1984–1990. J Infect. 1993;27:157–168. doi: 10.1016/0163-4453(93)94728-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Borek A P, Dressel D C, Hussong J, Peterson L R. Evolving clinical problems with Streptococcus pneumoniae: increasing resistance to antimicrobial agents, and failure of traditional optochin identification in Chicago, Illinois, between 1993 and 1996. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1997;29:209–214. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(97)00141-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Butler J C, Hoffman J, Cetron M S, Elliot J A, Facklam R R the Pneumococcus Sentinel Surveillance Working Group. The continued emergence of drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States: an update from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's pneumococcal sentinel surveillance system. J Infect Dis. 1996;174:986–996. doi: 10.1093/infdis/174.5.986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Campbell G D, Silberman R. Drug resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26:1188–1195. doi: 10.1086/520286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Defining the public health impact of drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae: report of a working group. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1996;45(RR-01):1–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Geographic variation in penicillin resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae—selected sites, United States, 1997. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1999;48:656–661. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Doern G V, Brueggemann A, Preston Holley H, Jr, Rauch A M. Antimicrobial resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae recovered from outpatients in the United States during the winter months of 1994 to 1995: results of a 30-center national surveillance study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:1208–1213. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.5.1208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dowell S F, Butler J C, Giebnink G S, Jacobs M R, Jernigan D J, Musher D M, Rakowsky A, Schwartz B the Drug-Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae Therapeutic Working Group. Acute otitis media: management and surveillance in an era of pneumococcal resistance—a report from the Drug-Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae Therapeutic Group. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1999;18:1–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fenol A, Jado I, Vicioso D, Perez A, Casal J. Evolution of Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes and antibiotic resistance in Spain: update (1990–1996) J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:3447–3454. doi: 10.1128/jcm.36.12.3447-3454.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Geslin P, Cohen R, Poemaux A, Sissia G, Spicq C, Georges S. Données épidémiologiques de la résistance aux antibiotiques des pneumocoques isolés du LCR. Med Mal Infect. 1996;26(Special):995–1005. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Grimwood K, Collignon P J, Currie B J, Ferson M J, Gilbert G L, Hogg G G, Isaacs D, McIntyre P B. Antibiotic management of pneumococcal infections in an era of increased resistance. J Paediatr Child Health. 1997;33:287–295. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.1997.tb01602.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hedlund J, Svenson S B, Kalin M, Henrichsen J, Olsson-Liljquist B, Mollerberg G, Kallenius G. Incidence, capsular types, and antibiotic susceptibility of invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae in Sweden. Clin Infect Dis. 1995;21:948–953. doi: 10.1093/clinids/21.4.948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hsueh P R, Teng L J, Lee L N, Yang P C, Ho S W, Luh K T. Extremely high incidence of macrolide and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance among clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Taiwan. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:897–901. doi: 10.1128/jcm.37.4.897-901.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kaplan S L, Mason E O. Management of infections due to antibiotic-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998;11:628–644. doi: 10.1128/cmr.11.4.628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Koornhof H J, Wasas A, Klugman K. Antimicrobial resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae: a South African perspective. Clin Infect Dis. 1992;15:84–94. doi: 10.1093/clinids/15.1.84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Munoz R, Coffey T J, Daniels M, Dowson C G, Laible G, Casal J, et al. International spread of a multiresistant clone of serotype 23F Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Infect Dis. 1991;164:302–306. doi: 10.1093/infdis/164.2.302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Musher D M. Infections caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae: clinical spectrum, pathogenesis, immunity, and treatment. Clin Infect Dis. 1992;14:801–809. doi: 10.1093/clinids/14.4.801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility tests. NCCLS document M100–S7. Sixth informational supplement. Wayne, Pa: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ndoyo J, Siopathis R M, Klugman K P, Wasas A. Antibiotic resistance among nasopharyngeal isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae—Bangui, Central African Republic, 1995. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1997;24:62–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ohene A. Bacterial pathogens and their antimicrobial susceptibilities in Kumasi, Ghana. East Afr Med J. 1997;74:450–454. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ostroof S M, Harrison L H, Khallaf N, Assad M T, Guirguis N I, Harrington S, El-Alamy M the Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Study Group. Resistance patterns of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae isolates recovered in Egypt from children with pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;23:1069–1074. doi: 10.1093/clinids/23.5.1069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Paul J, Bates J P, Kimari J, Gilks C. Serotypes and antibiotic susceptibilities of Streptococous pneumoniae in Nairobi, Kenya. J Infect. 1996;32:139–142. doi: 10.1016/s0163-4453(96)91374-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Pradier C, Dunais B, Carsenty-Etesse H, Dellamonica P. Pneumococcal resistance patterns in Europe. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1997;16:644–647. doi: 10.1007/BF01708553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Reinert R R, Queck A, Kaufhold A, Kresken M, Lutticken R. Antimicrobial resistance and type distribution of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates causing systemic infections in Germany, 1992–1994. Clin Infect Dis. 1995;21:1398–1401. doi: 10.1093/clinids/21.6.1398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Schmitz F J, Verhoef J, Fluit A C the Sentry Participating Group. Comparative activity of 27 antimicrobial compounds against 698 Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates originating from 20 European university hospitals. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1999;8:450–453. doi: 10.1007/s100960050318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Silverstein, Bachur M R, Harper M B. Implications of penicillin and ceftriaxone resistance among children with pneumococcal bacteremia. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1999;18:35–41. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199901000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Societé Française de Pathologie Infectieuse. Texte long du consensus: le traitement des méningites purulentes de l'enfant et de l'adulte. Med Mal Infect. 1996;26(Special):952–973. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Song J H, Yang J W, Peck K R, Kim S, Lee N Y, Jacobs M R, Appelbaum P C, Pai C H. Spread of multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in South Korea. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;25:747–748. doi: 10.1086/516945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Verhagen J, Glupzinski Y, Verbist L, Blogie M, Verbiest N, Vandeven J, Yourassowsky E. Capsular types and antibiotic susceptibility of pneumococci isolated from patients in Belgium with serious infections, 1980–1993. Clin Infect Dis. 1995;20:1339–1345. doi: 10.1093/clinids/20.5.1339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wust J, Huef E, Kayser F. Antimicrobial susceptibilities and serotypes of invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae strains in Switzerland. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:3159–3163. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.12.3159-3163.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES