Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2001 Mar;45(3):723–726. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.3.723-726.2001

Incidence of Class 1 and 2 Integrases in Clinical and Commensal Bacteria from Livestock, Companion Animals, and Exotics

Cathy Goldstein 1, Margie D Lee 1, Susan Sanchez 1, Charlene Hudson 2, Brad Phillips 2, Brad Register 2, Michael Grady 1, Cynthia Liebert 3, Anne O Summers 3, David G White 4, John J Maurer 2,*
PMCID: PMC90363  PMID: 11181350

Abstract

Many pathogenic and commensal organisms are multidrug resistant due to exposure to various antibiotics. Often, this antimicrobial resistance is encoded by integrons that occur on plasmids or that are integrated into the bacterial chromosome. Integrons are commonly associated with bacterial genera in the family Enterobacteriaceae. We determined that class 1 integrases were present in approximately 46% of the isolates from the family Enterobacteriaceae; class 2 integrases were present only among Escherichia coli and Salmonella isolates. Seven percent of veterinary isolates were positive for class 3 integrase by DNA-DNA hybridization but could not be confirmed to be positive by PCR. None of the veterinary isolates possessed the class 4 integrase gene. The distribution of these integrase genes was variable within the members of the family Enterobacteriaceae when some or all integrase classes were absent from a particular genus. There was also considerable variability in the distribution of these integrases within a species, depending on the animal host. Unlike the class 1 integrases, the other integrase class, intI2, appears to be more restricted in its distribution among the members of the family Enterobacteriaceae. There is also considerable variability in the distribution of the class 1 integrases within E. coli strains isolated from different food animals. The class 1 integrases are the most widely disseminated of the four classes among the members of the family Enterobacteriaceae from both the clinical and normal flora of animals. This is the first report to closely examine the distribution of class 2 integrases in members of the family Enterobacteriaceae isolated in the United States.


Transfer of antibiotic resistance genes between different species of bacteria can be facilitated by mobile DNA elements, such as transposons and plasmids. Integrons have been identified on these mobile elements, and they often contain one or more genes that encode antibiotic resistance (29). Four classes of integrons have been described. The structure of the class 1 integron includes a 5′ and 3′ conserved segment (with respect to the antibiotic resistance cassette insertion point) and a variable region (15, 17, 21, 29). The 5′ conserved segment consists of the intI gene (integrase) and a promoter region expressing the inserted gene(s) (29). The 3′ conserved segment contains the defective quaternary ammonium resistance gene qacEΔ1 and the sul1 gene, which encodes resistance to sulfonamides (21, 29). The variable region, located between the two conserved segments, is the site for the insertion of antibiotic resistance gene cassettes and includes aatC (also known as the 59-base element), which participates in the recombination mechanism (7, 10, 30). Class 1 integrons have also been identified on transposable elements such as mercury resistance transposon Tn21 (8). Class 2 integrons are present on transposon Tn7 and contain a dihydrofolate reductase gene cassette (6, 29). Class 3 integrons have recently been characterized in Serratia marcescens, isolated in Japan, by the identification of the blaIMP gene, which encodes broad-spectrum β-lactam antibiotic resistance. The blaIMP gene is flanked by a 59-base element and an integrase-like gene and the aac(6′)-Ib gene, which encodes aminoglycoside resistance (1). Class 4 integrons have been characterized only in Vibrio cholerae to date. This novel class contains the intI4 gene, which encodes a new integrase which makes tandem arrays of V. cholerae repeated sequences similar to the arrays of antibiotic resistance gene cassettes found in class 1 integrons (18).

The family Enterobacteriaceae contains genera that inhabit the intestinal tracts of humans and animals. These include both nonpathogenic species (the commensals) and pathogenic species (11). Because many species of this family coexist in the intestinal tract and are frequently exposed to various antibiotics, there is potential for the dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes. Therefore, the presence of integrons in bacterial species that constitute the family Enterobacteriaceae is of interest with respect to the growing dilemma of antibiotic resistance. We examined the distribution of class 1 to 4 integrases among veterinary bacterial strains isolated from livestock, companion animals, and exotics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains.

The bacterial isolates used in the present study are members of various species of the following genera: Citrobacter, Edwardsiella, Enterobacter, Escherichia (the species Escherichia coli only), Hafnia, Klebsiella, Proteus, Salmonella, and Yersinia. Several isolates were obtained from archived diagnostic specimens cultured in the 1980s and 1990s. Edwardsiella tarda, Edwardsiella ictaluri, and Yersinia ruckerii were isolated from diseased fish. Avian E. coli isolates were isolated from the tracheas, lungs, air sacs, livers, and spleens of diseased chickens, quail, ostriches, and turkeys. Pathogenic E. coli strains were isolated from swine and cattle with clinical cases of infection; the strains had been submitted to the North Dakota State University diagnostic laboratory. Avian Salmonella strains were isolated from either carcass rinses or drag swabs of poultry houses in Georgia. Reptile Salmonella strains were acquired from captive reptiles at zoos in the southeastern United States.

Colony blots.

Probes for the genes of interest were created by PCR with digoxigenin-labeled nucleotides by the procedure of Bass et al. (2, 16, 33). The Molecular Genetics Instrumentation Facility at the University of Georgia synthesized the oligonucleotides (Table 1). The following bacterial strains served as positive controls and as templates for the generation of PCR probes for DNA-DNA hybridization: E. coli SK1593(pDU202), (intI1+) (32), E. coli J53.3::Tn7 (intI2+), S. marcescens AK9373 (intI3+) (1), and V. cholerae (intI4+) (18). The identity of the PCR product was confirmed by sequencing. All PCR amplification products had 99% identity to the target gene sequences that the primers were originally designed to amplify. DNA-DNA hybridizations were performed as described by Sambrook et al. (26), with hybridizations and washes done at 68°C for all probes with the exception of the intI2 probe, for which a temperature of (60°C) was used. Hybridization was detected with the antidigoxigenin antibody-alkaline phosphatase conjugate provided with the Genius System (Boehringer Mannheim).

TABLE 1.

PCR primers

Primer Sequencea Expected size (bp) PCR MgCl2 concn (mM) PCR annealing temp (°C) Reference
intI1 F: CCTCCCGCACGATGATC 280 2 55 13
R: TCCACGCATCGTCAGGC
intI2 F: TTATTGCTGGGATTAGGC 233 3 50 This study
R: ACGGCTACCCTCTGTTATC
intI3 F: AGTGGGTGGCGAATGAGTG 600 3 50 This study
R: TGTTCTTGTATCGGCAGGTG
intI4 F: CGGTATGTCTAATTGCTCTTG 696 3 50 This study
R: TGGCCACAAAGACTCAATCAC
a

F, forward; R, reverse. 

Antimicrobial susceptibility determination.

The antimicrobial MICs for the bacterial isolates tested were determined with the Sensititre automated antimicrobial susceptibility system (Trek Diagnostic Systems, Westlake, Ohio), and the results were interpreted according to National Committee Clinical Laboratory Standards guidelines for broth microdilution methods (19, 20). Sensititre susceptibility testing was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The following antimicrobials were assayed: ampicillin, chloramphenicol, gentamicin, kanamycin, streptomycin, sulfamethoxazole, and tetracycline.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

We examined the susceptibilities of veterinary isolates to a battery of antibiotics including ampicillin, chloramphenicol, gentamicin, kanamycin, streptomycin, sulfamethoxazole, and tetracycline. Veterinary E. coli isolates were generally resistant to five or more antibiotics, while other gram-negative enteric organisms varied in their patterns of susceptibility to these antibiotics (Table 2). Isolates belonging to the genus Hafnia were susceptible to all seven antibiotics tested. We had previously determined that multiple-drug resistance exhibited by avian E. coli isolates correlated with the incidence of class 1 integrons in this population (2). Could the differences in antibiotic susceptibilities observed among our veterinary isolates be due to the prevalence of integrons among the members of the family Enterobacteriaceae?

TABLE 2.

Antibiotic susceptibility patterns of veterinary and commensal gram-negative bacterial isolates

Organism and origin No. of resistant strains/total no. of strains (%)a
AMP CHL TET STR GEN KAN SUL Five or more antibiotics
Escherichia coli
 Avian 30/100 11/100 87/100 97/100 65/100 27/100 97/100 64/100 (64)
 Bovine 42/49 44/49 49/49 49/49 31/49 46/49 49/49 42/49 (86)
 Porcine 5/28 16/28 25/28 27/28 4/28 26/28 26/28 20/28 (71)
Salmonella sp.
 Avian (domestic) 3/15 1/15 9/15 7/15 2/15 1/15 6/15 0/15 (0)
 Avian (nondomestic) 4/22 2/22 4/22 4/22 0/22 2/22 7/22 3/22 (14)
Proteus sp. 5/19 2/19 5/19 0/19 0/19 0/19 7/19 0/19 (0)
Klebsiella sp. 5/7 2/7 2/7 3/7 1/7 2/7 3/7 2/7 (28)
Citrobacter sp. 2/11 0/11 4/11 1/11 0/11 0/11 3/11 0/11 (0)
a

Abbreviations: AMP, ampicillin; CHL, chloramphenicol; TET, tetracycline; STR, streptomycin; GEN, gentamicin; KAN, kanamycin; SUL, sulfamethoxazole. 

Five hundred eighty-eight organisms (representing nine bacterial genera) were screened for the presence of class 1 through 4 integrases. Two hundred ninety-four (52%) of the 555 Enterobacteriaceae isolates contained either class 1 or class 2 integrases (Table 3). Class 1 integrases were the dominant class identified, with 271 (92%) of these 294 integrase-positive isolates having intI1 (Table 3). Seventy-three and 61% of the E. coli and Salmonella isolates, respectively, contained class 1 integrases, while only 10 and 13% of Hafnia and Enterobacter isolates (two closely related commensal genera), respectively, were positive for intI1. Integrase genes were not identified in any of the aquatic pathogens (Table 3).

TABLE 3.

Presence of class 1 and 2 integrases in clinical veterinary isolates belonging to the Enterobacteriaceae family

Genus and species (host) No. of strains positive/total no. of strains (%)
intI1 intI2 intI1, intI2
Citrobacter (catfish, turtlesa) 6/12 (50) 0/12 (0) 0/12 (0)
Hafnia (exoticsa) 1/10 (10) 0/12 (0) 0/10 (0)
Klebsiella (horses, cattlea) 4/7 (57) 0/7 (0) 0/7 (0)
Proteus (exoticsa) 4/23 (17) 0/12 (0) 0/12 (0)
Enterobacter (multiple speciesab) 1/8 (12) 0/8 (0) 0/8 (0)
Escherichia coli
 Multiple speciesab 29/38 (76) 0/38 (0) 0/38 (0)
 Poultry 66/100 (66) 14/100 (14) 11/100 (11)
 Beef cattle 42/56 (75) 13/56 (23) 11/56 (20)
 Swine 25/29 (86) 0/29 (0) 0/29 (0)
 Total 162/223 (73) 27/223 (12) 22/223 (10)
Salmonella
 Wild or pet birdsc 9/22 (41)
 Poultryd 79/100 (79) 2/100 (2) 2/100 (2)
 Reptilesd 5/29 (17) 5/29 (17) 1/29 (3)
 Total 93/151 (62) 7/129 (5) 3/129 (2)
Edwardsiella spp. (fishae)
Edwardsiella ictaluri 0/11 (0) 0/11 (0) 0/11 (0)
Edwardsiella tarda 0/48 (0) 0/48 (0) 0/48 (0)
Total 0/59 (0) 0/59 (0) 0/59 (0)
Yersinia ruckerii (fishaf) 0/95 (0) 0/95 (0) 0/95 (0)
Total for Enterobacteriaceae 271/588 (46) 34/555 (6) 25/555 (5)
a

Isolates archived from 1980s. 

b

Isolates from companion animals and exotics. 

c

Isolates from birds with clinical cases of salmonellosis (8). 

d

Salmonella strains were isolated from the feces of either chickens or reptiles or they were acquired from drag swabs of poultry houses in north Georgia. 

e

Fish include Catfish, eel, trout, and salmon. 

f

Fish include trout and salmon. 

Forty (14%) of the 294 integrase-positive isolates of the family Enterobacteriaceae had the class 2 integrase. The class 2 integrases were restricted in their distributions, being identified only in E. coli and Salmonella isolates. Among the Salmonella isolates, the incidence of intI1 ranged from 17% (reptile) to 79% (poultry), depending on the source of the isolate. Class 2 integrases were also variable in their distributions among the Salmonella isolates, with 2% of poultry isolates and 17% of reptile isolates being positive for intI2. As for the Salmonella isolates, the distribution of the class 2 integrases was variable in E. coli, depending on the animal source of the isolate. E. coli strains isolated from swine and companion animals were negative for intI2, but this gene was present in 14 and 23% of the E. coli strains from poultry and beef cattle, respectively. None of the veterinary isolates tested contained the class 4 integrase gene (intI4). The PCR amplification products originally used as DNA probes for Southern were confirmed through DNA sequencing of these PCR amplicons. The DNA sequences of the intI2 PCR amplicons from three veterinary isolates, an avian E. coli isolate, a bovine E. coli isolate, and an avian Salmonella isolate, (Genbank accession nos. AF318070, AF318071, and AF318072, respectively), also had 99% identities to the sequence of the intI2 integrase present in Tn7.

Thirty-four (12%) of the 294-integrase positive Enterobacteriaceae isolates were found to be positive for intI3 by DNA-DNA hybridization. When several isolates, identified by DNA-DNA hybridization as having intI3, were screened by PCR with intI3-specific primers, only the control produced the expected 600-bp PCR amplicon. It is possible that a single mismatch involving the terminal 3′ nucleotide of either the forward or the reverse primer and its target might prohibit PCR detection of the intI3 genes in these isolates (5). This is especially relevant with the recent report of a hybrid class 2 integrase in Acinetobacter baumannii (24). We may also be dealing with a variant hybrid class 3 integrase. We are in the process of cloning and sequencing DNA fragments that hybridize with the intI3-specific probe to resolve the discrepancy in our results between the DNA-DNA hybridizations and PCR.

Several isolates possessed multiple integrase classes. Class 1 and 2 integrases were present together in E. coli (10%) and Salmonella (2%) isolates. Interestingly, class 1 and 2 integrases were most prevalent among veterinary E. coli isolates that displayed resistance to five or more antibiotics.

Class 1 integrons and integrases have been identified in a number of different bacterial genera and appear to be prevalent in nature (2, 3, 22, 28, 31, 34). We found that the same bacterial genera or species associated with the normal flora in animals contained the same class 1 integrase gene as their human counterpart bacteria (4, 9, 23, 25). Our isolates of Edwardsiella and Yersinia were negative for the class 1 integrase gene. This is in contrast to a study by Petersen et al. (22), who reported class 1 integrases among bacteria isolated from trout. The lack of integrases in these two fish pathogens may be due to differences in bacterial species, host species, geography, or fish management practices with regard to antibiotic usage. The dissemination of the class 1 integrons, in many instances, has been attributed to the spread of an integron-containing transposon, Tn21 (2, 34). We have recently found that class 1 integrons in avian E. coli strains contain a single antibiotic resistance gene, aadA1 (streptomycin-spectinomycin resistance), and that this integron is part of a Tn21-like element (2). However, there are clearly cases in which class 1 integrons contain other resistance genes (9, 14, 23, 27) and map to plasmids (25, 31) or transposons other than Tn21 (14). The nature of the class 1 integrons in many of these veterinary isolates is not known, but we do expect to find differences due to the dissimilarities in both the animal microflora and the therapeutic as well as prophylactic usage of antibiotics among these different animal species. It is interesting that several bacterial isolates from nondomestic, free-ranging animals contained integrases. We have observed similar results for Salmonella strains isolated from wild, nondomestic birds in the southeastern United States (12). Does the presence of these integrases and integrons represent the natural frequency of these mobile elements in nature, or does it signify human contamination of the environment?

The low incidence of intI2 in select veterinary isolates (6%) was similar to the distribution of the class 2 integron (Tn7) in human, urinary isolates of E. coli, Enterobacter spp., and Klebsiella spp. examined (3). The distribution of Tn7 in clinical isolates correlates with the frequency of trimethoprim resistance (3, 13). Trimethoprim resistance is due to the dihydrofolate reductase enzyme encoded by the dhfr gene in Tn7 (6). Differences in the frequency of intI2 among our veterinary isolates might be attributed to differences in the prevalence of Tn7 and usage of the antibiotic trimethoprim or the related veterinary analogue ormetoprim.

To the best of our knowledge this is the first study to look at the distributions of two new classes of integrases, class 3 and 4 integrases, in a large-scale study. None of the veterinary isolates assayed contained the class 4 integrase originally identified in V. cholerae (18). This integron therefore appears to be more limited in its distribution. The identification of three classes of integrases in multiple bacterial genera comprising both pathogenic and commensal organisms indicates that integrons have the capability to disseminate antimicrobial resistance genes within bacteria associated with diverse animal production environments. We are currently characterizing the integrons associated with both commensal and pathogenic bacteria such as Salmonella to determine whether the animal's microbiota can serve as a reservoir for antimicrobial resistance genes.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The National Science Foundation's Prokaryotic Diversity Research Training Grant at the University of Georgia made this work possible. The Wallace Research Foundation and the International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology support work in the laboratory of A.O.S. USDA NRICGP grant 99-35212-8680 supports work in the laboratory of J.J.M.

We thank Komanci Payne, Kathleen Keyes, and Amy Stallings for participation in the preparation of the PCR probes used in this study. We also thank Marie Maier for technical assistance.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Arakawa Y, Murakami M, Suzuki K, Ito H, Watcharotayan R, Ohsoka S, Kato N, Ohta M. A novel integron-like element carrying the metallo-β-lactamase gene blaIMP. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:1612–1615. doi: 10.1128/aac.39.7.1612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bass L, Liebert C A, Lee M D, Summers A O, White D G, Thayer S G, Maurer J J. Incidence and characterization of integrons, genetic elements mediating multiple-drug resistance, in avian Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43:2925–2929. doi: 10.1128/aac.43.12.2925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chang L L, Chang J C, Chang C Y, Wu W J. Genetic localization of the type I trimethoprim resistance gene and its dissemination in urinary tract isolates in Taiwan. Kao Hsiung I Hsueh Ko Hsueh Tsa Chih. 1997;13:525–533. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Daly M, Buckley J, Power E, O'Hare C, Cormican M, Cryan B, Wall P G, Fanning S. Molecular characterization of Irish Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium: detection of class I integrons and assessment of genetic relationships by DNA amplification fingerprinting. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66:614–619. doi: 10.1128/aem.66.2.614-619.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Diffenbach C W, Lowe T M J, Dveksler G. General concepts for PCR primer design. In: Diffenbach C W, Dveksler G S, editors. PCR primer: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1995. pp. 133–142. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fling M E, Richards C. The nucleotide sequence of the trimethoprim-resistant dihydrofolate reductase gene harbored by Tn7. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983;11:5147–5158. doi: 10.1093/nar/11.15.5147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gravel A, Fournier B, Roy P H. DNA complexes obtained with the integron integrase IntI1 at the attI1 site. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998;26:4347–4355. doi: 10.1093/nar/26.19.4347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Grinsted J, de la Cruz F, Schmitt R. The Tn21 subgroup of bacterial transposable elements. Plasmid. 1990;24:163–189. doi: 10.1016/0147-619x(90)90001-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Haanecart-Pokorni E, Depuydt F, De Wit L, Van Bossuyt E, Content J, Vanhoof R. Characterization of the 6′-N-aminoglycoside acetyltransferase gene aac(6′)-Il associated with a sulI-type integron. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:314–318. doi: 10.1128/aac.41.2.314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hansson K, Skold O, Sundstrom L. Non-palindromic att1 sites of integrons are capable of site-specific recombination with one another and with secondary targets. Mol Microbiol. 1997;26:441–453. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.5401964.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Howard B J, Klass II J, Rubin S J, Weissfeld A S, Tilton R C. Clinical and pathogenic microbiology. St. Louis, Mo: The C. V. Mosby Company; 1987. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hudson C R, Quist C, Lee M D, Keyes K, Dodson S V, Morales C, Sanchez S, White D G, Maurer J J. The genetic-relatedness of Salmonella from nondomestic birds in the southeastern United States. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:1860–1865. doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.5.1860-1865.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kraft C A, Timbury M C, Platt D J. Distribution and genetic location of Tn7 in trimethoprim-resistant Escherichia coli. J Med Microbiol. 1986;22:125–131. doi: 10.1099/00222615-22-2-125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Laraki N, Galleni M, Thamm I, Riccio M L, Amicosante G, Frere J, Rossolini G M. Structure of In31, a blaIMP-containing Pseudomonas aeruginosa integron phyletically related to In5, which carries an unusual array of gene cassettes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43:890–901. doi: 10.1128/aac.43.4.890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Levesque C, Piche L, Larose C, Roy P H. PCR mapping of integrons reveals several novel combinations of resistance genes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;39:185–191. doi: 10.1128/aac.39.1.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Levesque C, Roy P H. PCR analysis of integrons. In: Persing D H, Smith T F, Tenover F C, White T J, editors. Diagnostic molecular microbiology: principles and applications. Washington, D.C.: ASM Press; 1993. pp. 590–594. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Liebert C A, Hall R M, Summers A O. Transposon Tn21, flagship of the floating genome. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1999;63:507–522. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.63.3.507-522.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mazel D, Dychinco B, Webb V A, Davies J. A distinctive class of integron in the Vibrio cholerae genome. Science. 1998;280:605–608. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5363.605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. NCCLS document M7–A4. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. 4th ed. Approved standard. Wayne, Pa: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. NCCLS document M31-A. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals. Approved standard. Wayne, Pa: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Paulsen I T, Littlejohn T G, Radstrom P, Sundstrom L, Skold O, Swedberg G, Skurray R A. The 3′ conserved segment of integrons contains a gene associated with multidrug resistance to antiseptics and disinfectants. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993;37:761–768. doi: 10.1128/aac.37.4.761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Petersen A, Guardabassi L, Dalsgaard A, Olsen J E. Class I integrons containing a dhfrI trimethoprim resistance gene cassette in aquatic Acinetobacter spp. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2000;182:73–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb08876.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ploy M, Courvalin P, Lambert T. Characterization of In40 of Enterobacter aerogenes BM2688, a class 1 integron with two new gene cassettes, cmlA2 and qacF. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:2557–2563. doi: 10.1128/aac.42.10.2557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ploy M, Denis F, Courvalin P, Lambert T. Molecular characterization of integrons in Acinetobacter baumannii: description of a hybrid class 2 integron. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000;44:2684–2688. doi: 10.1128/aac.44.10.2684-2688.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Poirel L, Le Thomas I, Naas T, Karim A, Nordmann P. Biochemical sequence analyses of GES-1, a novel class A extended-spectrum β-lactamase, and the class 1 integron In52 from Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000;44:622–632. doi: 10.1128/aac.44.3.622-632.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sambrook J, Fritsch E F, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning: a laboratory Manual. 2nd ed. Vol. 1. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1989. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sandvang D. Novel streptomycin and spectinomycin resistance gene as a gene cassette within a class 1 integron isolated from Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43:3036–3038. doi: 10.1128/aac.43.12.3036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Schnabel E L, Jones A L. Distribution of tetracycline resistance genes and transposons among phylloplane bacteria in Michigan apple orchards. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65:4898–4907. doi: 10.1128/aem.65.11.4898-4907.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Stokes H W, Hall R M. A novel family of potentially mobile DNA elements encoding site-specific gene-integration functions: integrons. Mol Microbiol. 1989;3:1669–1683. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1989.tb00153.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Stokes H W, O'Gorman D B, Recchia G D, Parsekhian M, Hall R M. Structure and function of 59-base element recombination sites associated with mobile gene cassettes. Mol Microbiol. 1997;26:731–745. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.6091980.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sunde M, Sorum H. Characterization of integrons in Escherichia coli of the normal intestinal flora of swine. Microb Drug Resist. 1999;5:279–287. doi: 10.1089/mdr.1999.5.279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wireman J, Liebert C A, Smith C T, Summers A O. Association of mercury resistance and antibiotic resistance in the gram-negative fecal bacteria of primates. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997;63:4491–4503. doi: 10.1128/aem.63.11.4494-4503.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wittwer C T, Fillmore G C, Hillyard D R. Automated polymerase chain reaction capillary tubes with hot air. Nucleic Acid Res. 1989;17:4353–4357. doi: 10.1093/nar/17.11.4353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zuhlsdorf M T, Wiedmann B. Tn21-specific structures in gram-negative bacteria from clinical isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992;36:1915–1921. doi: 10.1128/aac.36.9.1915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES