Abstract
Introduction:
Activation of the locus coeruleus-noradrenergic (LC-NA) system during awakening is associated with an increase in plasma corticosterone and cardiovascular tone. These studies evaluate the role of the LC in this corticosterone and cardiovascular response.
Methods:
Male rats, on day 0, were treated IP with either DSP4 (50 mg/ kg body weight) (DSP), a LC-NA specific neurotoxin, or normal saline (SAL). On day 10, animals were surgically prepared with jugular vein [Hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis] or carotid artery (hemodynamics) catheters and experiments performed on day 14. HPA axis activity, diurnally (circadian) and after stress [transient hemorrhage (14 mL/kg body weight) or airpuff-startle], and basal and post-hemorrhage hemodynamics were evaluated. On day 16, brain regions from a subset of rats were dissected for norepinephrine and corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) assay.
Results:
In DSP rats compared to SAL rats: 1) regional brain norepinephrine was decreased but there was no change in median eminence or olfactory bulb CRF content; 2) during HPA axis acrophase, the plasma corticosterone response was blunted; 3) after hemorrhage and airpuff-startle, the plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone response was attenuated, whereas the corticosterone response was dependent on stressor category; 4) under basal conditions, hemodynamic measures exhibited altered blood flow dynamics and systemic vasodilation; and 5) after hemorrhage, hemodynamics exhibited asynchronous responses.
Conclusion:
LC-NA modulation of diurnal and stress-induced HPA axis reactivity occurs via distinct neurocircuits. The integrity of the LC-NA system is important to maintain blood flow dynamics. The importance of increases in plasma corticosterone at acrophase to maintain short- and long-term cardiovascular homeostasis is discussed.
Keywords: Cardiac output, corticolimbic, Liljestrand and Zander equation, sympathoadrenal, vascular tone
Graphical Abstract
LC-NA modulation of HPA axis and hemodynamics DOI: #################
Introduction
The locus coeruleus (LC), the A6 noradrenergic (NA) cell group, is located in the dorsal rostral part of the brain stem on the lateral floor of the fourth ventricle. It projects the full length of the neuroaxis with extensive projections to cortical regions and the spinal cord [1–3]. The LC neurons are organized along the rostral-ventral extent of the nucleus. Neurons in the rostral region projecting towards forebrain and those in the ventral regions projecting towards spinal cord [2, 4] impart a functional dichotomy of the LC-NA system [5]. As a major component of the reticular activating system, the LC modulates alertness, attention, arousal, sleep-wake cycle, and diurnal/circadian activity patterns [1, 6–7]. The sleep-to-wake transition is also accompanied by tandem increases in cardiovascular tone and plasma glucocorticoids, corticosterone (CORT) in rat and cortisol in humans [1, 8–9]. However, despite considerable importance, the specific role of the LC in the modulation of many neuronal and physiological functions remains to be elucidated [1].
The increase in the plasma CORT during the sleep-to-wake transition coincides with the acrophase of hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis activity. This increase in CORT is necessary for glucocorticoid type II receptor function, gene expression and protein synthesis necessary to cope with any ensuing challenges to physiological and behavioral homeostasis. The CORT rhythm is known to regulate cognition, feedback, gluconeogenesis, immune, inflammatory and vascular sympathetic tone, many of the same functions that the LC is known to modulate [8, 10–14]. Whereas adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) acts on the adrenal cortex to increase plasma CORT [15–16], at acrophase the increase is modulated by sympathoadrenal activity which primes adrenocortical sensitivity to ACTH and generates the surge in the plasma CORT [16–18]. This sympathetic innervation of the adrenals is predominantly from preganglionic fibers arising from spinal cord segments [19]. The paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVN), a brain region with second order projections to the adrenals [20], is considered important for sympathoadrenal activation at acrophase [11, 18]. However, PVN lesions do not abolish the surge in plasma CORT at acrophase [21–22].
During the transition state, signals for arousal arising from pacemaker cells in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the hypothalamus (SCN) communicate to the LC via the dorsomedial hypothalamic nucleus (DMH) [1, 3, 23]. Interestingly, DMH lesions suppress increases in plasma CORT at acrophase [24–25]. Because the DMH projection to the adrenals is third order and LC projection is second order [20], it was suggested that the LC may act as the relay between the DMH and the adrenals. However, the role of LC in the regulation of HPA axis activity and specifically, increases in plasma CORT at acrophase is not known.
LC-NA activity (as well as plasma ACTH and CORT) is also increased after somatic and visceral stressors including airpuff-startle and hemorrhage, and the LC is considered an integral part of the stress circuitry [3, 7, 26–30]. After hemorrhage, excitatory and inhibitory inputs to LC exhibit a spatial organization [29, 31] and such organization is considered important for functional heterogeneity within the LC [7, 10, 32]. It is also known that an increase in LC activity alters corticolimbic activity modifying PVN neuronal activity and HPA axis response [27]. However, little is known about the effect of corticolimbic circuitry in the modulation of HPA axis response after hemorrhage. Stress signals after hemorrhage are primarily conveyed to the PVN via medullary A2 noradrenergic neurons [28, 33]. However, an interaction, if any, between the medullary circuitry and the corticolimbic circuitry remains to be investigated. Corticolimbic circuitry is also known to modulate the HPA axis response to airpuff-startle [34]. However, the role of the LC in this regulation remains unknown.
The LC is also known to regulate sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activity and cardiovascular homeostasis [3, 14, 30]. While a hierarchical role for the PVN in the regulation of LC activity has been proposed [3], lesions of the region do not affect basal or post-stressor hemodynamic responses [35–37]. Yet, the specific role(s) of the LC in the modulation of cardiovascular homeostasis is not known.
Accordingly, the present studies were designed to evaluate the role of the LC-NA system in the regulation of: 1) HPA axis diurnal and stressor-induced (hemorrhage and airpuff-startle) responses, and 2) the basal and post-hemorrhage hemodynamic response in rats treated systemically with DSP4 (N-(2-chloroethyl)-N-ethyl-2-bromobenzylamine), a neurotoxin that denervates central LC-NA efferents [38–39].
DSP4 is a selective neurotoxin that denervates LC-NA efferents. Because it crosses the blood–brain barrier, DSP4 can be administered intraperitoneally [38–40] and does not require surgical manipulations. After administration, DSP4 cyclizes to form an aziridinium derivative, which is an irreversible inhibitor of the norepinephrine transporter and inhibits norepinephrine reuptake with long lasting degenerative effects on LC-NA efferents [38–40]. Thus, DSP4 eliminates the LC-NA spinal projection, but spares projections of the A5 and A7 noradrenergic cell groups [41]. Similarly, DSP4 spares A1 noradrenergic [42] and A2 noradrenergic [43] cell groups. Because of the specificity towards LC-NA efferents, the DSP4 treated rat model (DSP), was considered ideal for the present studies. Rats treated with normal saline (SAL), served as controls.
Materials and methods
Animals
Adult male Sprague–Dawley (SD) rats obtained from Harlan (<www.envigo.com>) were used. After arrival at the vivarium, they were housed, 3/cage, maintained under standard husbandry conditions with controlled humidity and temperature, on a 12:12 h light–dark cycle (lights ON at 0700 h), with food and water available ad libitum. The rats were used in the experimental studies after a one week acclimatization period (body weight: 230 – 290 g). Studies were conducted according to NIH Guidelines and protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees.
DSP4 (DSP-4) solution
The LC-NA specific neurotoxin, DSP4 [38–39] was obtained commercially (Sigma, <www.sigmaaldrich.com>). In the present study, 100 mg DSP4 HCl (≈ 88 mg DSP4 base) was dissolved in 1760 μL deionized water (5 mg DSP4 base per 100 μL). The solution was made fresh before use, kept protected from direct light, and administered intraperitoneally (IP) at a dose of 100 μL/ 100 g body weight (50 mg/ kg, body weight) [38–39].
Experimental groups
At the end of the acclimatization period, body weights were recorded and the rats were distributed into two groups, SAL and DSP, matched closely for body weight. This was followed by IP, 100 μL/ 100 g body weight normal saline and DSP4 solution, to SAL and DSP rats, respectively. Thereafter, the rats were individually housed and maintained under standard husbandry conditions.
Experimental design
The day of SAL or DSP4 administration was designated as day 0. Body weight was recorded every other day until day 10. On day 10, DSP rats with greater than 5% decrease in body weight relative to their initial body weight were excluded (n=4) from the study. Remaining rats underwent surgery for catheter implantation under anesthesia [44]. After recovery of ambulation, the rats were individually housed in experimental cages [28, 45].
During stress studies data was collected for a period of 30 min. At the termination of the experiment, the rats were euthanatized with Euthasol® (Henry Schein, <https://www.henryschein.com>) solution in water (1:4), administered (100 to 125 μL/100 g body weight) through the indwelling catheters. Independent cohorts of rats were used for the different stress studies. Rats used for diurnal studies and rats that lost patency of catheters (resistance to blood flow), were euthanatized on day 16 and brains were collected. During this session, each rat received a lower dose (50 μL/ 100g body weight) of the diluted euthanasia solution and was rapidly decapitated with a rodent guillotine. The brains were harvested and regions of interest dissected for the determination of tissue norepinephrine or CRF content.
Catheterization surgery
The rats were prepared with a right carotid artery catheter to evaluate hemodynamic response after hemorrhage or a right jugular vein catheter for blood sampling to evaluate HPA axis characteristics, diurnally and after stressors. The anesthetic and surgical techniques for the implantation were performed according to published protocols [44, 46–47] with the following modifications for carotid artery catheterization. In the construction of carotid artery catheter, the PE-50 tubing was pushed the full length of the silastic tubing (3.0 to 4.0 cm) and the tubing was cut even [46]. During implantation, the catheter was advanced to about 4.0 cm into the artery from the incision site and an extra suture was tied behind the silastic tubing overlap. The length of the tubing exiting from the nape of the neck was cut to 3.5 to 5.0 cm and obturated with 1.0-cm long 22-gauge stainless steel rod / stylet.
Stress category
Rats were exposed to two ethologically relevant categories of stressors, either the physical stressor of transient hemorrhage, or the psychological stressor of airpuff-startle. Transient hemorrhage is both hypovolemic and hypotensive with the stress signals reaching the PVN via circuitry involving vagal afferents [28, 31]. In contrast, airpuff-startle is euvolemic and hypertensive [48] with the stressor signals reaching the PVN via non-vagal afferents [28].
Hemorrhage was performed by withdrawing 14 mL/ kg body weight (≈20% blood volume) in a 5.0 mL syringe containing 100 μL of heparin sodium solution (1000 USP units/ mL) at a constant rate over 3 min [28]. Body weight on day 10 was used to calculate hemorrhage volume. The shed blood was kept warm and at the termination of the experiment retransfused to the rat.
Airpuff-startle was performed by applying one episode of three successive 1 s long air blasts over a 5 s period beginning at time 0 [28].
Experimental protocol
Except for the collection of brain tissue for norepinephrine and CRF assay, all other experiments were carried out on day 14, four days after catheter implantation surgery. In addition, except for the diurnal studies, all other experiments were carried out between 0900 and 1300 h. In studies designed to evaluate the HPA axis response, a blood sample (300 μL) for plasma ACTH and CORT assay was collected and the sample volume was immediately replaced with heparinized saline (20 USP units/mL). Other details are described below.
Evaluation of regional brain norepinephrine and CRF:
Depletion of brain norepinephrine, in proportion to LC-NA afferents in a region, is a major neurotoxic effect of DSP4 in rats [38–39]. Accordingly, studies were designed to evaluate norepinephrine in selected brain regions in SAL and DSP rats. In addition, the effect of DSP4 on tissue CRF content in selected brain regions was also investigated. The dissection of brain regions of interest is described below
After the brain was isolated from the skull, it was collected into ice cold saline in a beaker on ice and swirled gently. It was then placed on a lightly moistened paper towel over ice and the dura and surface blood vessels were removed. The brain was rolled gently over the paper towel to remove adhering moisture and placed on an inverted petri dish cover on ice. With dorsal side up, both olfactory bulbs with stalk/peduncle were dissected. The tip of the brain in front of the stalk was cut with the scalpel and designated as the cortex. With ventral side up, the optic chiasma along with optic nerves were removed followed by dissection of a 3 mm cube of hypothalamus with the PVN. From a separate rat brain, the median eminence, a small swelling surrounding the infundibulum, was dissected with curved iridectomy scissors. Again, with dorsal side up, the two brain halves were separated and stretched on the petri dish. Thereafter, hippocampi from each side were removed and pooled. The brain regions were snap frozen on dry ice and stored at −80°C. The elapsed time starting from opening the skull till the end of dissection was ≤ 3 min.
Evaluation of diurnal HPA axis response:
SAL and DSP rats with indwelling right jugular vein catheters were used in this study. Blood samples for plasma ACTH and CORT assay were collected 1 hr after lights “ON” (nadir, AM/trough) and 30 min before lights “OFF” (acrophase, PM/peak/zenith). Extension tubing was connected at the time of blood sampling with minimal disturbance of the rats.
Evaluation of HPA axis response after stress:
SAL and DSP rats with indwelling right jugular vein catheters were used in this study. After the catheters were connected to extension tubing, the rats were allowed to stabilize for 90 min before initiation of the experimental paradigm which lasted for 30 min. Soon after collection of the 0 min blood sample, the rats were subjected to either hemorrhage or airpuff-startle while residing in their home cages [28].During hemorrhage and airpuff-startle, timed (0, 6, 9, 18 and 30 min) blood samples were collected and processed for plasma ACTH and CORT assay.
Evaluation of hemodynamic response after hemorrhage:
SAL and DSP rats with indwelling right carotid artery catheters were used in this study. On the day of the experiment the rats were transferred to test chambers designed to monitor hemodynamic responses. The carotid artery catheter was connected through a rotating swivel and a three-way stopcock assembly to a calibrated pressure transducer (Statham P23ID; Gould, Cleveland, OH, USA), positioned outside the chamber at the level of the heart. The length of the connection tubing (PE-50) was the same for all rats. Thereafter, blood pressure (force of blood against artery walls) and heart rate (heartbeats per minute) responses were monitored continuously and the rats were allowed to stabilize for 90 min. The unit of blood pressure values is millimeters of mercury (mmHg) and that of heart rate is beats (pulse) per minute (bpm).
At the end of the stabilization period, basal/ control blood pressure and heart rate values were recorded. Thereafter, the carotid artery catheter was disconnected from the transducer and the rats were subjected to hemorrhage by withdrawing 14 mL/ kg body weight blood. The catheter was reconnected to the transducer, recalibrated and hemodynamic responses were monitored until the end of 30 min experimental paradigm.
Hemodynamic responses from four rats were collected simultaneously. For data collection, the phasic pressure outputs were fed to an amplifier-recorder (Model 8802; Gould) and to a computerized data acquisition system equipped with an analog-to-digital converter board that recorded hemodynamic indices. This included heart rate, diastolic blood pressure (diastolic = pressure against artery walls when the heart is at rest (the basal state) between beats and heart muscle relaxes allowing blood to fill the chambers), systolic blood pressure (systolic = pressure against artery walls at the cusp of the beat, when the heart muscle contracts and blood is ejected), and mean arterial pressure (MAP = average pressure in the artery throughout one cardiac cycle, systole to diastole). Other variables were calculated offline. Pulse pressure (mmHg), the net increase in the arterial pressure during one cardiac cycle, was calculated as the difference between systolic and diastolic.
The Liljestrand and Zander equation [49] was adapted to calculate stroke volume (volume of blood ejected during each beat) from systolic and diastolic values. Other hemodynamic indices, cardiac output and systemic vascular resistance (SVR: resistance to blood flow through vasculature) were calculated from heart rate, MAP and stroke volume using standard equations (Table 2).
Table 2.
Basal hemodynamic parameters in SAL and DSP rats.
Indices | Group | SAL vs. DSP | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||
SAL | DSP | t-value # | p-value | |
Heart rate (bpm) | 409±15.7 | 456±16.7 | 2.052 | 0.074 |
Pressure (mmHg): | ||||
Systolic | 137±5.1 | 122±6.5 | 1.809 | 0.108 |
Diastolic | 100±2.5 | 79±3.4 | 4.939 | 0.001 |
Mean arterial (MAP) | 112±3.5 | 94±3.6 | 3.488 | 0.008 |
Pulse | 37±2.7 | 43±5.7 | 0.957 | 0.367 |
Volume: | ||||
Stroke volume (mL) | 0.16±0.01 | 0.21±0.02 | 2.410 | 0.043 |
Cardiac output (mL/min) | 64±3.3 | 97±11.9 | 2.699 | 0.027 |
cardiac indexa | 20±1.1 | 36±4.0 | 3.758 | 0.006 |
SVR (unit) | 1.76±0.06 | 1.03±0.14 | 4.742 | 0.002 |
SVR indexb | 0.56±0.02 | 0.39±0.06 | 2.837 | 0.022 |
Values: mean ± SE, n = 5 rats/ group. Stroke volume = pulse pressure divided by (Systolic + Diastolic); cardiac output = stroke volume x Heart rate; SVR (systemic vascular resistance) = MAP divided by Cardiac output.
cardiac index = Cardiac output/ 100 g body weight.
SVR index = SVR/ 100 g body weight. unit = mmHg/mL/min;
= unpaired t-test
Blood samples
After collection, the blood samples were transferred into 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tubes containing 10 μL EDTA (100 mg/mL EDTA; tetra sodium salt; Sigma) on ice. At the end of the experiment, the blood samples were centrifuged at 12,000 g for 7 min at 4°C and the plasma samples were stored at −20°C until assay [28] for ACTH (Allegro HS-ACTH, Nichols Institute, San Juan Capistrano, CA) and CORT (ImmuChemE Double Antibody, ICN Bio- medicals, Costa Mesa, CA). The unit for ACTH and CORT values are pg/mL and ng/mL respectively.
Tissue analysis
Norepinephrine content was analyzed in cortex, hippocampus, hypothalamus and olfactory bulb. On the day of assay, a 5 mL polystyrene sonication tube containing 1.0 mL of 1.0 M perchloric acid was weighed (initial) and frozen tissue sample was added directly into the perchloric acid in the tube and reweighed (final). Thereafter the tube was placed in ice and homogenized by sonication for 25–30 sec. The difference in the final and initial weights was recorded in milligram as the tissue weight. The homogenate was centrifuged at 12,000 g for 10 min at 4°C. After centrifugation, the supernatant was filtered through 0.22 micron syringe filter and norepinephrine in the filtrate was determined by HPLC-EC [50]. The norepinephrine values are ng/g tissue.
CRF content was analyzed in the median eminence and olfactory bulbs as described previously [51] and expressed as pg/mg protein.
Data Analysis
Plasma ACTH and CORT, and hemodynamic responses between SAL and DSP rats were evaluated by repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) across time [52]. A value of 5 (reliable lower assay limit) was added to all ACTH and CORT numbers to correct for values below the assay detection limit. To evaluate reproducibility of stress response across studies, a priori, ANOVA was performed for each group independently along with post-hoc comparisons. Within a treatment group, when the overall response (main effect) was significant, post-hoc multi-comparisons were performed using Newman-Keuls’ procedure [52]. Between treatment groups, when the overall treatment effect and/or interaction was significant, the significance of differences between specific time points were tested by computing “F-values” for the simple main effects. The sum of changes over the basal values were treated as net response. Other statistical analyses, paired and unpaired (independent) samples t-tests, and bivariate (Pearson) correlation were performed using SPSS version 26.0 (IBM Corp., 2016) or StatView™II (Abacus Concepts, Inc.) statistical packages available for Macintosh computers (Apple Inc.). Unless otherwise indicated values are mean ± SE and values of p ≤ 0.05, 2-tailed, were treated as significant. Units of values are provided in the table and figures.
Results
Effects of LC-NA denervation on metabolic and neurochemical indices
After DSP4 administration, the rats lost body weight (Fig. 1) that was evident by day 2, whereas all SAL rats exhibited sustained growth (Fig.1). However, by day 6 the rats showed signs of recovery. Although body weight loss and recovery varied between rats, by day 10, DSP rats established a growth rate that was similar to that of SAL rats. Thus, body weight between day 0 and day 10 in SAL (r23 = 0.799, p < 0.001) and DSP (r23 = 0.708, p < 0.001) rats were positively correlated (Pearson). However, between SAL (309±2.7) and DSP (287±5.1) rats, body weight on day 10 were significantly different (Fig. 1, Table 1).
Fig. 1:
Body weight of rats treated on day 0 with either saline (SAL: control group) or the LC-NA denervating neurotoxin DSP4 (DSP: experimental group). Analysis of body weight between SAL and DSP rats by repeated measures ANOVA revealed a treatment effect (F1,48 = 1.917, p = 0.173) that was not significant, however the interaction (F5,240 = 44.09, p < 0.001) was significant. Values, mean ± SE, n = 25 rats/ group. § and §§ = p<0.05 and p<0.01 respectively, SAL vs. DSP rats.
Table 1.
Basal metabolic and neurochemical indices in SAL and DSP rats.
Indices | n | Group | SAL vs. DSP | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
||||
SAL | DSP | t-value # | p-value | ||
Body weight (g): | 25 | ||||
Day 0 | 257±3.8 | 265±3.0 | 1.604 | 0.115 | |
Day 10 | 309±2.7 | 287±5.1 | 3.833 | 0.0004 | |
Tissue norepinephrine (ng/g): | 3 | ||||
Cortex | 209±10.3 | 13.3±1.5 | 18.899 | 0.0001 | |
Olfactory bulb | 217±14 | 32.3±5.3 | 12.220 | 0.0003 | |
Hippocampus | 281±36 | 5.7±0.7 | 7.744 | 0.0015 | |
Hypothalamus | 3125±201 | 2030±138 | 4.486 | 0.0109 | |
HPA axis: | |||||
Plasma: | 19 | ||||
ACTH (pg/ml) | 30.3±3.3 | 27.7±2.9 | 0.569 | 0.573 | |
CORT (ng/ ml) | 34.4±5.3 | 25.0±2.1 | 1.642 | 0.109 | |
CRF (pg/mg protein): | 3 | ||||
Median eminence | 4282±655 | 3884±843 | 0.373 | 0.7281 | |
Olfactory bulb | 465±37 | 441±34 | 0.484 | 0.6537 |
Values, mean ± SE, based on n rats/ group. SAL and DSP, rats treated with saline and DSP4 respectively. Plasma ACTH and CORT values are average of 0 min values from hemorrhage and startle experiments, and nadir values from diurnal experiments.
= independent sample/unpaired t-test.
In DSP rats compared to SAL rats, norepinephrine content of cortex was 6%, hippocampus was 2% and that of olfactory bulb was 15%, and the differences were significant (Table 1). However, in DSP rats, norepinephrine content of hypothalamus, a brain region that receives only moderate LC-NA efferents [2] was 65% of that in SAL rats. Nevertheless, the differences were significant (t4 = 4.486, p < 0.011). Comparing SAL and DSP rats, CRF content in neither the median eminence nor the olfactory bulb were significantly different (Table 1). Furthermore, neither basal plasma ACTH nor CORT concentrations were different (Table 1).
Effect of LC-NA denervation on diurnal pattern of HPA axis response
Overall, for plasma ACTH (Fig. 2a), between SAL and DSP rats, by repeated measures ANOVA, treatment effect (F1,16 = 2.231, p = 0.155) and interaction (F1,16 = 0.122, p = 0.731) were not significant. Thus, the differences between SAL and DSP rats at nadir (t8 = 0.973, p = 0.359) or at acrophase (t8 = 1.139, p = 0.288) were not significant. As to be expected, for plasma ACTH, the differences between nadir (30.5±3.8) and acrophase (59±6.7) in DSP rats (t4 = 7.838, p < 0.002) and between nadir (38.3±7.1) and acrophase (72±8.8) in SAL rats (t4 = 15.06, p < 0.001) were significant.
Fig. 2:
Diurnal plasma ACTH (1a) and plasma CORT (1b) responses at nadir and acrophase of HPA axis activity after denervation of LC-NA efferents in DSP rats compared to intact SAL rats. The rats were maintained under 12:12 h light–dark cycle; lights ON at 0700 h. Blood samples were collected 60min after lights “ON,” (nadir) and again 30min before lights “OFF,” (acrophase). Values, mean ± SE, n = 5 rats/ group. ** = p<0.01 AM vs. PM, §§ = p<0.01 SAL vs. DSP rats.
Comparing plasma CORT (Fig. 2b), between SAL and DSP rats, by repeated measures ANOVA resulted in a treatment effect (F1,16 = 11.54, p < 0.004) and interaction (F1,16 = 15.21, p < 0.002) that were significant. Thus, the differences between SAL and DSP rats in the plasma CORT at nadir were not significant (t8 = 0.978, p = 0.357), but they were at acrophase (t8 = 3.775, p < 0.006). This suggested the diurnal rise in plasma CORT was significantly blunted in the DSP4 treated rats. In addition, for plasma CORT (Fig. 2b), the differences between nadir (24.2±3.3) and acrophase (56.9±11.2) in the DSP rats only approached significance (t4 = 2.657, p = 0.057), whereas that between nadir (20.9±0.9) and acrophase (105±5.9) in the SAL rats (t4 = 13.78, p < 0.001) were significant.
Effect of LC-NA denervation on plasma ACTH and CORT after hemorrhage
Plasma ACTH and CORT increased after hemorrhage and remained elevated even at 30 min when the experiment was terminated (Fig. 3). For plasma ACTH (Fig. 3a), the increases in SAL (F4,24 = 16.06, p < 0.001) and DSP (F4,24 = 9.332, p < 0.001) rats were significant (independent group ANOVA). Between groups, the treatment effect (F1,12 = 4.849, p = 0.048) was significant with DSP rats exhibiting an attenuated response. Plasma CORT (Fig. 3b) increases in response to hemorrhage were significant in both SAL (F4,24 = 52.35, p < 0.001) and DSP (F4,24 = 34.66, p < 0.001) rats (independent group ANOVA). Between groups, the interaction was significant with an exaggerated CORT response observed in DSP rats at 30 min.
Fig. 3:
Hemorrhage (HEM) induced plasma ACTH (2a) and plasma CORT (2b) responses after denervation of LC-NA efferents in DSP rats compared to intact SAL rats. Soon after min 0 blood sample, 20% calculated blood volume was withdrawn via indwelling jugular vein catheter in three-minute duration. Values, mean ± SE, n = 7 rats/group. * and ** = p<0.05 and p<0.01 respectively, vs. min 0 value (independent group ANOVA). § and §§ = p<0.05 and p<0.01 respectively, SAL vs. DSP rats.
Effect of LC-NA denervation on plasma ACTH and CORT after airpuff-startle
Plasma ACTH and CORT increased after airpuff-startle and returned towards 0 min values by the end of 30 min (Fig. 4). Plasma ACTH (Fig. 4a), responses were significant in both SAL (F4,24 = 4.361, p < 0.009) and DSP (F4,24 = 4.322, p = 0.009) rats (independent group ANOVA). Between SAL and DSP rats the interaction (F4,48 = 2.639, p = 0.045) was significant, and as with the hemorrhage stressor, there was an attenuation of the plasma ACTH response in DSP rats compared to SAL rats. Plasma CORT (Fig. 4b) increases in response to airpuff-startle were significant in both SAL (F4,24 = 10.73, p < 0.001) and DSP (F4,24 = 28.80, p < 0.001) rats (independent group ANOVA). The treatment effect between SAL and DSP groups was significant with an attenuated CORT response observed in DSP rats.
Fig. 4:
Airpuff-startle (APS) induced plasma ACTH (3a) and plasma CORT (3b) responses after denervation of LC-NA efferents in DSP rats compared to intact SAL rats. Soon after min 0 blood sample, the rats were subjected to a short episode airpuff-startle of 5s duration. Values, mean ± SE, n = 7 rats/ group. * and ** = p<0.05 and p<0.01 respectively, vs. min 0 value (independent group ANOVA). § and §§ = p<0.05 and p<0.01 respectively, SAL vs. DSP.
Effect of LC-NA denervation on hemodynamic plasticity
This was evaluated by monitoring hemodynamic indices after 20% hemorrhage in SAL and DSP rats (Fig. 5). Because cardiovascular homeostasis is regulated by long-(tonic) and short-term (reflex) mechanisms [53–54], the 0 min hemodynamic values recorded before the rats were subjected to hemorrhage were treated as the basal indices and were analyzed independently (Table 2).
Fig. 5:
Hemorrhage (HEM) induced hemodynamic responses after denervation of LC-NA efferents in DSP rats compared to intact SAL rats. Soon after min 0 blood sample, 20% calculated blood volume was withdrawn via indwelling carotid artery catheter in three-minute duration. Values, mean ± SE, n = 5 rats/ group. * and ** = p<0.05 and p<0.01 respectively, vs. min 0 (independent group ANOVA).
Hemodynamics basal:
Analysis of basal hemodynamic indices in SAL and DSP rats are presented in Table 2. In the DSP rats compared to SAL rats, heart rate exhibited a nonsignificant elevation (p = 0.074). Differences in systolic and pulse pressure were not significant, however differences in all other indices were significant (Table 2). In DSP rats the decreases in diastolic and MAP were accompanied by an increase in cardiac output and a decrease in SVR. This effect was not simply due to differences in body weight because between group differences in the cardiac index and SVR index were also significant (Table 2).
Hemodynamics after hemorrhage:
The effects of hemorrhage on the response of heart rate and blood pressure indices are shown in Figure 5. Immediately after hemorrhage (3 min), in both SAL and DSP rats, all hemodynamic indices decreased (Fig. 5). Although the basal values of blood pressure indices were low, in DSP rats the values at 3 min did not decrease below that of SAL rats. Accordingly, the decreases were smaller in DSP rats and larger in SAL rats. For heart rate, the basal values in DSP rats compared to SAL rats were moderately elevated (Fig. 5). However, the response after hemorrhage paralleled that of SAL rats and the net changes between groups were similar.
In SAL rats, the overall responses of heart rate (F5,20 = 3.111, p = 0.031), systolic (F5,20 = 9.834, p<0.001), diastolic (F5,20 = 5.262, p = 0.003) and MAP (F5,20 = 6.444, p = 0.001) were significantly different following hemorrhage (independent group ANOVA). In contrast, heart rate (F5,20 = 0.601, p = 0.700), systolic (F5,20 = 1.608, p = 0.204), diastolic (F5,20 = 1.690, p = 0.183) and MAP (F5,20 = 0.877, p = 0.514) responses to hemorrhage were not significantly different in DSP rats (Fig. 5) (independent group ANOVA). Comparing SAL and DSP rat responses, the interaction for systolic (F5,40 = 2.952, p = 0.023), diastolic (F5,40 = 3.103, p < 0.019) and MAP (F5,40 = 2.646, p = 0.037) were significantly different (Fig. 5). Pearson correlation (r) between heart rate and MAP was significant in SAL group (r28 = 0. 0.660, p < 0.001) but not in DSP group (r28 = 0. 046, p = 0.811). Accordingly, after hemorrhage the hemodynamic responses in SAL rats were synchronous, while those in DSP rats were asynchronous.
Discussion
DSP4 rat model
The results on body weight and tissue norepinephrine in DSP rats compared to SAL rats are consistent with those reported by other investigators [38–39]. Furthermore, in DSP rats, norepinephrine content of brain regions innervated densely by LC-NA efferents [1, 3] decreased to marginal levels (Table 1). Accordingly, DSP4 treatment significantly and reliably denervates LC-NA efferents. Our data demonstrate that DSP4 treatment does not meaningfully alter CRF in the median eminence [51].
LC-NA modulation of diurnal HPA axis response
Our study is the first to identify potential role of LC-NA neurons as a major neuroanatomical orchestrator of regulation of plasma CORT responses at acrophase. In DSP rats at acrophase, the plasma ACTH response was normal, whereas plasma CORT response was suppressed (Fig. 2). Accordingly, a potential role of LC-NA neurons in the control of splanchnic sympathetic nerve activity and adrenal cortical secretory function at acrophase is suggested. This is in sharp contrast to the response of plasma ACTH between SAL and DSP rats which did not differ at nadir or at acrophase.
Electrical and chemical stimulation of LC activates adrenal medullary secretory and SNS responses independent of forebrain projections [55–56]. LC-NA neuronal projections to the adrenals are second order [20] and the LC may transduce signals to the adrenals via cholinergic preganglionic sympathetic fibers arising from the spinal cord that are critical for adrenal cortical secretory responses at acrophase [16–18]. DSP4 treatment denervates LC-NA projections to the spinal cord [41] and suggests that the lack of central drive to the adrenals suppresses the increases in plasma CORT normally observed at acrophase.
Our results also suggest that the neurocircuitry modulating increases in plasma ACTH and CORT at acrophase is different from that after stress. In studies discussed above, plasma ACTH at acrophase was not different between SAL and DSP rats, but following either hemorrhage or airpuff-startle stressor (Fig. 3, 4) plasma ACTH response was decreased in DSP rats. Based on central components of arousal system [1, 23] and our data, a circuitry regulating of diurnal adrenocortical function is proposed (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6:
Schematic representation of potential neurocircuitry in the central control of HPA axis activity at diurnal acrophase. Broken arrow indicates the specific effect of the projection needs reevaluation or not clearly established; see text for details. ACTH: adrenocorticotropic hormone, Adr: adrenal gland, CORT: corticosterone, DMH: dorsomedial hypothalamus, LC: locus coeruleus, ME: median eminence, Pit: pituitary, PVN: paraventricular nucleus of hypothalamus, SC: spinal cord, SCN: Suprachiasmatic nucleus, ZT: zeitgebers.
The SCN-DMH-LC constitutes the primary arousal circuitry [1, 23]. The extant literature indicates that DMH lesions, but not PVN lesions, suppress plasma CORT responses [21–22, 24–25]. After PVN lesion, CRF content in the median eminence is decreased, whereas pituitary ACTH content is increased [57]. Chemical stimulation of the DMH increases plasma ACTH in conscious rats, whereas similar stimulation of PVN does not [58]. Electrophysiological studies have identified DMH neurons projecting either to LC or median eminence. A third group of neurons that send projections to both LC and median eminence have also been described [59]. Interestingly, at acrophase plasma ACTH response is uncoupled from CRF heteronuclear RNA expression in the PVN neurons [60]. In addition, the sparse LC-NA efferents to PVN [2] do not influence plasma CORT response at acrophase [61]. These observations along with the results of present study suggest a potential role for DMH in the regulation of plasma CORT at acrophase via LC-NA system, but, perhaps surprisingly, the role of the DMH in plasma ACTH responses at acrophase remains to be clarified.
LC-NA modulation of HPA axis response after stress
As indicated, after hemorrhage, medullary A2-noradrenergic neurons relay hemodynamic signals to the PVN in the activation of HPA axis [2, 28, 33, 62–63]. In the present study, after hemorrhage the DSP rats responded with increases in plasma ACTH and CORT, suggesting that DSP4 treatment spared the A2-noradrenergic neurons. However, in DSP rats, the ACTH response was attenuated and the net response in DSP rats was 73% of that in SAL rats. The results are comparable to the plasma ACTH response following restraint stress in rats with selective denervation of LC-NA efferents to the medial prefrontal cortex [27]. We observed that attenuation of the ACTH response was more pronounced following airpuff-startle and the net response in DSP rats was 48% of that in SAL rats. After airpuff-startle, corticolimbic circuitry participates in the modulation of plasma ACTH response [34]. Accordingly, the LC-NA system modulates plasma ACTH regardless of stressor category (physical/hemodynamic or psychological).
Radley et al. (2008), have suggested that an increase in LC-NA activity restrains gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) inhibitory tone on PVN-CRF neurons via a corticolimbic circuit [27]. However, direct application of norepinephrine locally into the PVN elicits increases in plasma ACTH [64]. It is likely that after stress the LC-NA-corticolimbic circuitry synergistically modulates CRF neuronal activity in the PVN. Moreover, it is well-established that the LC-NA system enhances the signal-to-noise ratio of incoming stimuli [1, 3].
In both SAL and DSP rats, plasma CORT increased after hemorrhage and airpuff-startle (Fig. 3b, 4b). This was in sharp contrast to the response of the DSP group at acrophase when plasma CORT responses were blunted (Fig. 2b). However, the net percentage increase in plasma CORT in DSP rats compared to SAL rats after hemorrhage or airpuff-startle was, respectively, 158% versus 62%. Accordingly, in DSP rats the pattern of response was dependent upon the stressor category. However, duration of the stressor and magnitude of increases in plasma ACTH also need to be taken into consideration.
Stressors increases the activity of baroreceptors that communicate with the medullary cardiovascular centers for appropriate vasomotor function, and to maintain cardiovascular homeostasis and sympathoadrenal activity [53–54, 65–67]. Increases in sympathoadrenal activity facilitate the release of vasodilatory factors that increase adrenal blood flow, ACTH presentation rate and plasma CORT [15, 68–69]. Both hemorrhage [70] and plasma ACTH [15] have been shown to increase adrenal blood flow. After hemorrhage, the increase in plasma ACTH was larger than that after airpuff-startle exposure (Fig. 3, 4). In addition, SVR was reduced in DSP rats (Table 2). Thus, in the DSP group, these factors might interact and contribute towards the large increase in plasma CORT after hemorrhage. At this time, a specific role for individual factors still needs to be systematically investigated. Regardless of the differences in the pattern of plasma CORT responses, our results suggest that adrenocortical activity after stress is modulated by neurocircuitry that is different from that at acrophase (Fig. 6). The rostral ventrolateral medulla, including the C1 adrenergic cell group is a major component of the baroreflex and after stress may serve as a potential neuroanatomical substrate in the modulation of sympathoadrenal activity [54, 65–67].
LC-NA modulation of hemodynamics
To our knowledge, this is the first study to calculate stroke volume for rats using the Liljestrand and Zander equation primarily derived for human subjects [49]. In human studies, the calculated values are multiplied by a constant [49]. In the present study, the calculated cardiac output values (stroke volume x heart rate) for SAL rats were comparable to that reported by other investigators using thermodilution technique [71], therefore a correction factor was not applied. However, when the values for cardiac output reported in the literature are different [70], the use of a correction factor of two, corrected the discrepancy. The application of this equation greatly helped in the calculation of the volume components of hemodynamic indices in freely moving rats.
Neuronal and humoral factors regulate hemodynamics and maintain cardiovascular homeostasis [53–54, 65–67]. Because, the major focus of this experiment was deciphering the role of LC-NA system in this process, the effect of denervation of LC-NA efferents on hemodynamic plasticity during long-term (basal) and short-term (hemorrhage), cardiovascular homeostasis is of interest. }. In the present study, the increase in plasma CORT after hemorrhage did not normalize cardiovascular indices comparable to that of SAL rats (Fig. 5). Accordingly, the effect of CORT in maintaining normal cardiovascular tone is unlikely to be mediated by non-genomic mechanisms [12–13].
Hemodynamic plasticity, basal (long-term):
Based on blood pressure and flow dynamics (Table 2) our data suggest that the DSP group exhibited systemic vasodilation. Thus, the increased cardiac output that accompanied low MAP (Table 2) was considered important to maintain tissue perfusion. However, this increased venous return activates the sinoatrial node (stretch receptors). This is known to inhibit vagal outflow and enhance sympathetic action on the sinoatrial node to increase heart rate [72–73] (Table 2). The scenario is similar to the Bainbridge reflex [72–73], therefore it is possible that in the DSP group this reflex function maintained cardiovascular homeostasis due to loss of modulatory LC-NA efferents.
The effect of DSP4 treatment (IP) on peripheral SNS activity is transient and by two weeks normal or increased catecholamine turnover is observed [74–75]. Accordingly, the vasodilatory condition may be due to a loss of vascular alpha1 adrenergic receptor function [76]. Because a normal glucocorticoid status is important in maintaining vascular smooth muscle tone [77], a role for CORT itself in the vasodilatory effect in the DSP group must be considered. Similar to our current observations, it has been reported that rats exhibit low MAP and increased heart rate after adrenalectomy [78–80].
Glucocorticoid type I and type II receptors and the two isoforms of the glucocorticoid regulatory enzyme, 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases (11beta-HSD), are present in endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cells [77, 81]. Activation of GR, upregulates alpha1 adrenergic receptor function and facilitates receptor-G protein coupling [78–79], whereas the glucocorticoid type II receptor antagonist, RU486, decreased blood pressure [82]. Additionally, local increases in glucocorticoid after inhibition of 11beta-HSD activity facilitate the vasoconstrictor actions of norepinephrine and angiotensin II [77, 81]. During diurnal rhythm, the concentration of plasma CORT required to bind and activate glucocorticoid type II receptors and regulation of gene transcription occurs only at acrophase. In the present study, such an increase in plasma CORT was suppressed in the DSP rats (Fig. 2). With special reference to cardiovascular homeostasis, perhaps the lack of a significant increase in plasma CORT affected glucocorticoid type II receptor dependent gene transcription, especially that of alpha1 adrenergic receptor number, with a resultant decrease in blood pressure [78, 80, 82]. Moreover, the reduced CORT concentration might allow the endothelial cells to increase production of the vasorelaxants prostacyclin and nitric oxide [77, 81]. Therefore, the LC may modulate long-term cardiovascular homeostasis by regulating diurnal acrophase CORT status.
Hemodynamic plasticity, after hemorrhage (short-term):
Immediately after hemorrhage the pattern of heart rate and blood pressure response in SAL and DSP groups were similar (Fig. 5, Table 2). It is known that hemorrhage activates baroreceptor and chemoreceptor reflexes and increases vasoconstrictor factors (norepinephrine, epinephrine, vasopressin and angiotensin) to maintain blood pressure in awake and anesthetized animal models [28–29, 36]. The increase in plasma vasopressin is most important for the vasoconstrictor function [82–83]. In patients with autonomic failure, an increase in plasma vasopressin increases blood pressure response, whereas a similar increase in normal subjects is without any effect [84–85]. It is possible that a similar mechanism maintained blood pressure in the DSP rats. Therefore, our data suggest that the underlying vasodilation affected the interaction between the multitude of factors controlling hemodynamics thereby affecting the stability of the hemodynamic measures in DSP rats. Regardless of the mechanisms, it seems unlikely that the LC-NA system modulates short-term cardiovascular homeostasis.
Conclusion
Regarding HPA axis reactivity, our results from the DSP group suggests that the LC-NA neuronal system is an integral part of neuroanatomical substrate modulating activity of PVN CRF neurons and sympathoadrenal activity via independent, non-overlapping neurocircuits. After stress, the LC-NA system modulated only the plasma ACTH response, whereas it did not modulate plasma CORT response. In addition, the modulatory effect of the LC-NA system on PVN CRF neurons appeared to be synergistic. In sharp contrast to that after stress, during diurnal acrophase the plasma ACTH response was maintained, whereas the plasma CORT response was blunted. Thus, at acrophase, the LC-NA system modulated only plasma CORT response and not plasma ACTH response. Thus, LC-NA neuronal modulation of HPA axis reactivity during the normal diurnal activity period and after stress appears to be dissociated. A potential neurocircuitry in the LC-NA activation sympathoadrenal function during acrophase is highlighted.
Regarding cardiovascular homeostasis, our results from DSP rats suggested that the LC-NA effect on hemodynamics is indirect. This is based upon our observation that in DSP rats the blunted plasma CORT response at acrophase was accompanied by a reduced basal SVR. Because a normal CORT status is important to maintain vascular sympathetic tone, the blunted plasma CORT response altered hemodynamics and blood flow dynamics that affected long-term and short-term maintenance of cardiovascular homeostasis.
Acknowledgements
Part of the studies were carried out at the Salk Institute and the results have been presented at the Endocrine Society 74th Annual Meeting San Antonio, Texas 1992 Abstract #1106. We thank Dr. David R. Goldsmith, MD for his critical suggestions.
Funding Sources
This work was supported by institutional funds and grants from National Institute of Mental Health (USA), RO1 DK33093 and MH50113 to PMP.
Footnotes
Statements
Statement of Ethics
Studies were conducted according to protocols approved by the Salk Institute for Biological Studies (1991), La Jolla, California, USA, and Emory University (1994), Atlanta, Georgia, USA, Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUC) in compliance with National Institutes of Health (NIH) guidelines.
Data Availability Statement
All datasets generated and analyzed supporting the findings of this study are available upon a reasonable request to the corresponding author.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare no direct or indirect affiliation and that no conflict of interest with organizations reported in this manuscript.
References
- 1.Poe GR, Foote S, Eschenko O, Johansen JP, Bouret S, Aston-Jones G, et al. Locus coeruleus: a new look at the blue spot. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2020. Nov;21(11):644–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sawchenko PE, Swanson LW. The organization of noradrenergic pathways from the brainstem to the paraventricular and supraoptic nuclei in the rat. Brain Res. 1982. Nov;257(3):275–325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Szabadi E. Functional neuroanatomy of the central noradrenergic system. J Psychopharmacol. 2013. Aug;27(8):659–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Li Y, Hickey L, Perrins R, Werlen E, Patel AA, Hirschberg S, et al. Retrograde optogenetic characterization of the pontospinal module of the locus coeruleus with a canine adenoviral vector. Brain Res. 2016. Jun 15;1641(Pt B):274–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hirschberg S, Li Y, Randall A, Kremer EJ, Pickering AE. Functional dichotomy in spinal- vs prefrontal-projecting locus coeruleus modules splits descending noradrenergic analgesia from ascending aversion and anxiety in rats. Elife. 2017. Oct 13;6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Benarroch EE. Brainstem integration of arousal, sleep, cardiovascular, and respiratory control. Neurology. 2018. Nov 20;91(21):958–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Totah NK, Neves RM, Panzeri S, Logothetis NK, Eschenko O. The Locus Coeruleus Is a Complex and Differentiated Neuromodulatory System. Neuron. 2018. Sep 5;99(5):1055–68 e6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mohd Azmi NAS, Juliana N, Azmani S, Mohd Effendy N, Abu IF, Mohd Fahmi Teng NI, et al. Cortisol on Circadian Rhythm and Its Effect on Cardiovascular System. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. Jan 14;18(2):676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Smolensky MH, Hermida RC, Portaluppi F. Circadian mechanisms of 24-hour blood pressure regulation and patterning. Sleep Med Rev. 2017. Jun;33:4–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Atzori M, Cuevas-Olguin R, Esquivel-Rendon E, Garcia-Oscos F, Salgado-Delgado RC, Saderi N, et al. Locus Ceruleus Norepinephrine Release: A Central Regulator of CNS Spatio-Temporal Activation? Front Synaptic Neurosci. 2016;8:25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Glucocorticoids Dickmeis T. and the circadian clock. J Endocrinol. 2009. Jan;200(1):3–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Oster H, Challet E, Ott V, Arvat E, de Kloet ER, Dijk DJ, et al. The Functional and Clinical Significance of the 24-Hour Rhythm of Circulating Glucocorticoids. Endocr Rev. 2017. Feb 1;38(1):3–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ramamoorthy S, Cidlowski JA. Corticosteroids: Mechanisms of Action in Health and Disease. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2016. Feb;42(1):15–31, vii. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wood SK, Valentino RJ. The brain norepinephrine system, stress and cardiovascular vulnerability. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017. Mar;74(Pt B):393–400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Shah AJ, Kriska T, Gauthier KM, Falck JR, Campbell WB. Effect of Angiotensin II and ACTH on Adrenal Blood Flow in the Male Rat Adrenal Gland In Vivo. Endocrinology. 2018. Jan 1;159(1):217–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ulrich-Lai YM, Arnhold MM, Engeland WC. Adrenal splanchnic innervation contributes to the diurnal rhythm of plasma corticosterone in rats by modulating adrenal sensitivity to ACTH. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2006. Apr;290(4):R1128–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bornstein SR, Engeland WC, Ehrhart-Bornstein M, Herman JP. Dissociation of ACTH and glucocorticoids. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2008. Jul;19(5):175–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Engeland WC, Arnhold MM. Neural circuitry in the regulation of adrenal corticosterone rhythmicity. Endocrine. 2005. Dec;28(3):325–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Parker TL, Kesse WK, Mohamed AA, Afework M. The innervation of the mammalian adrenal gland. J Anat. 1993. Oct;183 ( Pt 2):265–76. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Buijs RM, Wortel J, Van Heerikhuize JJ, Feenstra MG, Ter Horst GJ, Romijn HJ, et al. Anatomical and functional demonstration of a multisynaptic suprachiasmatic nucleus adrenal (cortex) pathway. Eur J Neurosci. 1999. May;11(5):1535–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ixart G, Alonso G, Szafarczyk A, Malaval F, Nouguier-Soule J, Assenmacher I. Adrenocorticotropic regulations after bilateral lesions of the paraventricular or supraoptic nuclei and in Brattleboro rats. Neuroendocrinology. 1982. Oct;35(4):270–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tokunaga K, Fukushima M, Kemnitz JW, Bray GA. Comparison of ventromedial and paraventricular lesions in rats that become obese. Am J Physiol. 1986. Dec;251(6 Pt 2):R1221–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gonzalez MM, Aston-Jones G. Circadian regulation of arousal: role of the noradrenergic locus coeruleus system and light exposure. Sleep. 2006. Oct;29(10):1327–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bernardis LL, Bellinger LL. The dorsomedial hypothalamic nucleus revisited: 1998 update. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1998. Sep;218(4):284–306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chou TC, Scammell TE, Gooley JJ, Gaus SE, Saper CB, Lu J. Critical role of dorsomedial hypothalamic nucleus in a wide range of behavioral circadian rhythms. J Neurosci. 2003. Nov 19;23(33):10691–702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hermans EJ, van Marle HJ, Ossewaarde L, Henckens MJ, Qin S, van Kesteren MT, et al. Stress-related noradrenergic activity prompts large-scale neural network reconfiguration. Science. 2011. Nov 25;334(6059):1151–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Radley JJ, Williams B, Sawchenko PE. Noradrenergic innervation of the dorsal medial prefrontal cortex modulates hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal responses to acute emotional stress. J Neurosci. 2008. May 28;28(22):5806–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Thrivikraman KV, Nemeroff CB, Plotsky PM. Sensitivity to glucocorticoid-mediated fast-feedback regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis is dependent upon stressor specific neurocircuitry. Brain Res. 2000. Jul 7;870(1–2):87–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Thrivikraman KV, Plotsky PM, Gann DS. Alterations of locus coeruleus noradrenergic activity in relation to pituitary secretion after hemorrhage in cats. Neurosci Lett. 1993. Oct 14;161(1):85–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ulrich-Lai YM, Herman JP. Neural regulation of endocrine and autonomic stress responses. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009. Jun;10(6):397–409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gann DS, Bereiter DA, Carlson DE, Thrivikraman KV. Neural interaction in control of adrenocorticotropin. Fed Proc. 1985. Jan;44(1 Pt 2):161–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Schwarz LA, Luo L. Organization of the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system. Curr Biol. 2015. Nov 2;25(21):R1051–R56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Marques SM, Naves LM, Silva TME, Cavalcante KVN, Alves JM, Ferreira-Neto ML, et al. Medullary Noradrenergic Neurons Mediate Hemodynamic Responses to Osmotic and Volume Challenges. Front Physiol. 2021;12:649535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Spencer SJ, Buller KM, Day TA. Medial prefrontal cortex control of the paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus response to psychological stress: possible role of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis. J Comp Neurol. 2005. Jan 24;481(4):363–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Blair ML, Want A, Olschowka JA, Piekut D. Role of paraventricular nucleus parvicellular neurons in the compensatory responses to graded hemorrhage. Am J Physiol. 1998. Jul;275(1):R278–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Darlington DN, Shinsako J, Dallman MF. Paraventricular lesions: hormonal and cardiovascular responses to hemorrhage. Brain Res. 1988. Jan 26;439(1–2):289–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Herzig TC, Buchholz RA, Haywood JR. Effects of paraventricular nucleus lesions on chronic renal hypertension. Am J Physiol. 1991. Sep;261(3 Pt 2):H860–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ross SB, Stenfors C. DSP4, a selective neurotoxin for the locus coeruleus noradrenergic system. A review of its mode of action. Neurotox Res. 2015. Jan;27(1):15–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Szot P, Miguelez C, White SS, Franklin A, Sikkema C, Wilkinson CW, et al. A comprehensive analysis of the effect of DSP4 on the locus coeruleus noradrenergic system in the rat. Neuroscience. 2010. Mar 10;166(1):279–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Bortel A. Nature of DSP-4-Induced Neurotoxicity. In: Kostrzewa RM, editor. Handbook of Neurotoxicity. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2014. p. 219–36. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lyons WE, Fritschy JM, Grzanna R. The noradrenergic neurotoxin DSP-4 eliminates the coeruleospinal projection but spares projections of the A5 and A7 groups to the ventral horn of the rat spinal cord. J Neurosci. 1989. May;9(5):1481–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bucher ES, Fox ME, Kim L, Kirkpatrick DC, Rodeberg NT, Belle AM, et al. Medullary norepinephrine neurons modulate local oxygen concentrations in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2014. Jul;34(7):1128–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Fox ME, Studebaker RI, Swofford NJ, Wightman RM. Stress and Drug Dependence Differentially Modulate Norepinephrine Signaling in Animals with Varied HPA Axis Function. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015. Jun;40(7):1752–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Welberg LA, Kinkead B, Thrivikraman K, Huerkamp MJ, Nemeroff CB, Plotsky PM. Ketamine-xylazine-acepromazine anesthesia and postoperative recovery in rats. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2006. Mar;45(2):13–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Thrivikraman KV, Zejnelovic F, Bonsall RW, Owens MJ. Neuroendocrine homeostasis after vagus nerve stimulation in rats. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013. Jul;38(7):1067–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Thrivikraman KV, Huot RL, Plotsky PM. Jugular vein catheterization for repeated blood sampling in the unrestrained conscious rat. Brain Res Brain Res Protoc. Oct;10(2):84–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Tsui BC, Mosher SJ, Yeung PK. A reliable technique for chronic carotid arterial catheterization in the rat. J Pharmacol Methods. 1991. Jul;25(4):343–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Furlong TM, McDowall LM, Horiuchi J, Polson JW, Dampney RA. The effect of air puff stress on c-Fos expression in rat hypothalamus and brainstem: central circuitry mediating sympathoexcitation and baroreflex resetting. Eur J Neurosci. 2014. May;39(9):1429–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Koenig J, Hill LK, Williams DP, Thayer JF. Estimating cardiac output from blood pressure and heart rate: the liljestrand & zander formula. Biomed Sci Instrum. 2015;51:85–90. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Toufexis DJ, Thrivikraman KV, Plotsky PM, Morilak DA, Huang N, Walker CD. Reduced noradrenergic tone to the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus contributes to the stress hyporesponsiveness of lactation. J Neuroendocrinol. 1998. Jun;10(6):417–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Plotsky PM, Thrivikraman KV, Watts AG, Hauger RL. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function in the Zucker obese rat. Endocrinology. 1992. Apr;130(4):1931–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Winer BJ, Brown DR, Michels KM. Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1991. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Dampney RA, Coleman MJ, Fontes MA, Hirooka Y, Horiuchi J, Li YW, et al. Central mechanisms underlying short- and long-term regulation of the cardiovascular system. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2002. Apr;29(4):261–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Salman IM. Major Autonomic Neuroregulatory Pathways Underlying Short- and Long-Term Control of Cardiovascular Function. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2016. Mar;18(3):18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Drolet G, Gauthier P. Peripheral and central mechanisms of the pressor response elicited by stimulation of the locus coeruleus in the rat. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1985. Jun;63(6):599–605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Goadsby PJ. Brainstem activation of the adrenal medulla in the cat. Brain Res. 1985. Feb 18;327(1–2):241–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Bruhn TO, Plotsky PM, Vale WW. Effect of paraventricular lesions on corticotrophin-releasing factor (CRF)-like immunoreactivity in the stalk-median eminence: studies on the adrenocorticotropin response to ether stress and exogenous CRF. Endocrinology. 1984. Jan;114(1):57–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Bailey TW, Dimicco JA. Chemical stimulation of the dorsomedial hypothalamus elevates plasma ACTH in conscious rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2001. Jan;280(1):R8–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Shirokawa T, Nakamura S. Antidromic activation of rat dorsomedial hypothalamic neurons from locus coeruleus and median eminence. Brain Res Bull. 1987. Mar;18(3):291–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Watts AG, Tanimura S, Sanchez-Watts G. Corticotropin-releasing hormone and arginine vasopressin gene transcription in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus of unstressed rats: daily rhythms and their interactions with corticosterone. Endocrinology. 2004. Feb;145(2):529–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Ritter S, Watts AG, Dinh TT, Sanchez-Watts G, Pedrow C. Immunotoxin lesion of hypothalamically projecting norepinephrine and epinephrine neurons differentially affects circadian and stressor-stimulated corticosterone secretion. Endocrinology. Apr;144(4):1357–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Cunningham ET Jr., Sawchenko PE. Anatomical specificity of noradrenergic inputs to the paraventricular and supraoptic nuclei of the rat hypothalamus. J Comp Neurol. 1988. Aug 1;274(1):60–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Rinaman L. Hindbrain noradrenergic A2 neurons: diverse roles in autonomic, endocrine, cognitive, and behavioral functions. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2011. Feb;300(2):R222–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Itoi K, Helmreich DL, Lopez-Figueroa MO, Watson SJ. Differential regulation of corticotropin-releasing hormone and vasopressin gene transcription in the hypothalamus by norepinephrine. J Neurosci. 1999. Jul 1;19(13):5464–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Guyenet PG. The sympathetic control of blood pressure. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006. May;7(5):335–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Leman S, Viltart O, Sequeira H. Expression of Fos protein in adrenal preganglionic neurons following chemical stimulation of the rostral ventrolateral medulla of the rat. Brain Res. 2000. Jan 31;854(1–2):189–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Mueller PJ, Mischel NA, Scislo TJ. Differential activation of adrenal, renal, and lumbar sympathetic nerves following stimulation of the rostral ventrolateral medulla of the rat. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2011. May;300(5):R1230–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Gomez-Sanchez CE. Regulation of adrenal arterial tone by adrenocorticotropin: the plot thickens. Endocrinology. 2007. Aug;148(8):3566–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Sunwoo SH, Lee JS, Bae S, Shin YJ, Kim CS, Joo SY, et al. Chronic and acute stress monitoring by electrophysiological signals from adrenal gland. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019. Jan 22;116(4):1146–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Darlington DN, Jones RO, Marzella L, Gann DS. Changes in regional vascular resistance and blood volume after hemorrhage in fed and fasted awake rats. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1995 Jun;78(6):2025–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Slama M, Susic D, Varagic J, Ahn J, Frohlich ED. Echocardiographic measurement of cardiac output in rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003. Feb;284(2):H691–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Crystal GJ, Salem MR. The Bainbridge and the “reverse” Bainbridge reflexes: history, physiology, and clinical relevance. Anesth Analg. 2012. Mar;114(3):520–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Jędrzejczak M, Mączewski M, Mackiewicz U, Petelczyc M, Matematyczne R. Bainbridge reflex in rats with post-myocardial infarction heart failure@ mathematical considerations. Post N Med. 2017;29(12B):4–8. [Google Scholar]
- 74.Bakke HK, Bogsnes A, Murison R. Studies on the interaction between ICV effects of CRF and CNS noradrenaline depletion. Physiol Behav. 1990. Jun;47(6):1253–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Barbeito L, Fernandez C, Silveira R, Dajas F. Evidences of a sympatho-adrenal dysfunction after lesion of the central noradrenergic pathways in rats. J Neural Transm. 1986;67(3–4):205–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Motiejunaite J, Amar L, Vidal-Petiot E. Adrenergic receptors and cardiovascular effects of catecholamines. Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 2021. Jun;82(3–4):193–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Yang S, Zhang L. Glucocorticoids and vascular reactivity. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. Jan;2(1):1–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Haigh RM, Jones CT. Effect of glucocorticoids on alpha 1-adrenergic receptor binding in rat vascular smooth muscle. J Mol Endocrinol. 1990. Aug;5(1):41–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Haigh RM, Jones CT, Milligan G. Glucocorticoids regulate the amount of G proteins in rat aorta. J Mol Endocrinol. 1990. Oct;5(2):185–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Stith RD, Bhaskar M, Reddy YS, Brackett DJ, Lerner MR, Wilson MF. Cardiovascular changes in chronically adrenalectomized conscious rats. Circ Shock. 1989. Aug;28(4):395–403. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Zhang DX, Gauthier KM, Falck JR, Siddam A, Campbell WB. Steroid-producing cells regulate arterial tone of adrenal cortical arteries. Endocrinology. 2007. Aug;148(8):3569–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Grunfeld JP, Eloy L. Glucocorticoids modulate vascular reactivity in the rat. Hypertension. 1987. Dec;10(6):608–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Fujisawa Y, Miyatake A, Hayashida Y, Aki Y, Kimura S, Tamaki T, et al. Role of vasopressin on cardiovascular changes during hemorrhage in conscious rats. Am J Physiol. 1994. Nov;267(5 Pt 2):H1713–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Treschan TA, Peters J. The vasopressin system: physiology and clinical strategies. Anesthesiology. 2006. Sep;105(3):599–612; quiz 39–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Williams TD, Da Costa D, Mathias CJ, Bannister R, Lightman SL. Pressor effect of arginine vasopressin in progressive autonomic failure. Clin Sci (Lond). 1986. Aug;71(2):173–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]