Abstract
In vivo pharmacodynamic parameters have been described for a variety of antibacterials. These parameters have been studied in correlation with in vivo outcomes in order to determine which dosing parameter is predictive of outcome and the magnitude of that parameter associated with efficacy. Very little is known about pharmacodynamics for antifungal agents. We utilized a neutropenic mouse model of disseminated candidiasis to correlate pharmacodynamic parameters (percent time above MIC [T > MIC], area under the concentration time curve [AUC]/MIC ratio, and peak serum level/MIC ratio) for amphotericin B in vivo with efficacy, as measured by organism number in homogenized kidney cultures after 72 h of therapy. Amphotericin B was administered by the intraperitoneal route. Drug kinetics for amphotericin B in infected mice were nonlinear. Serum half-lives ranged from 13 to 27 h. Infection was achieved by intravenous inoculation with 106 CFU of yeast cells per ml via the lateral tail vein of neutropenic mice. Groups of mice were treated with fourfold escalating total doses of amphotericin B ranging from 0.08 to 20 mg/kg of body weight divided into 1, 3, or 6 doses over 72 h. Increasing doses produced concentration-dependent killing, ranging from 0 to 2 log10 CFU/kidney compared to the organism number at the start of therapy. Amphotericin B also produced prolonged dose-dependent suppression of growth after serum levels had fallen below the MIC. Nonlinear regression analysis was used to determine which pharmacodynamic parameter best correlated with efficacy. Peak serum level in relation to the MIC (peak serum level/MIC ratio) was the parameter best predictive of outcome, while the AUC/MIC ratio and T > MIC were only slightly less predictive (peak serum level/MIC ratio, coefficient of determination [R2] = 90 to 93%; AUC/MIC ratio, R2 = 49 to 69%; T > MIC, R2 = 67 to 85%). The total amount of drug necessary to achieve various microbiological outcomes over the treatment period was 4.8- to 7.6-fold smaller when the dosing schedule called for large single doses than when the same amount of total drug was administered in 2 to 6 doses. Given the narrow therapeutic window of amphotericin B and frequent treatment failures, these results suggest the need for a reevaluation of current dosing regimens.
The incidence of nosocomial candida infections has risen sharply, representing nearly 10% of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections (4). Currently available therapies result in unacceptably high failure rates (25). In addition, available antifungal therapies often produce significant toxicities (12). Although the discovery of new antifungal agents is promising, approaches to optimize efficacy and limit toxicity of currently available agents through rational pharmacodynamic dosing may offer more immediate impact (9, 11).
Amphotericin B is an intravenously administered polyene antibiotic that has been available for clinical use for more than 40 years. Studies in both experimental infection models and clinical trials have demonstrated the potency of amphotericin B against a variety of yeasts (2, 3, 10, 12, 14, 17, 24). In a recent consensus publication on the therapy of candidemia, nearly all of the participants would include amphotericin B for therapy of candidemia for patients with life-threatening illness (10). Despite the potency of this drug, many clinicians have grown reluctant to use amphotericin B because of the relatively narrow therapeutic or toxic window (12).
Pharmacodynamic characterization of amphotericin B should maximize dosing efficacy and perhaps limit toxicity. In the present experiments we have characterized the pharmacodynamic parameter predictive of efficacy of amphotericin B monotherapy in a neutropenic mouse model of disseminated candidiasis.
(Part of this work was presented at the 39th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, San Francisco, Calif., 26 to 29 September 1999.)
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Organisms.
Three clinical isolates of Candida albicans (K-1, 98-17, and 98-234) and single clinical isolates of Candida krusei 5810 and Candida dubliniensis 3588 were used in the experiments. Each Candida strain was a bloodstream isolate, with the exception of C. dubliniensis, which was an oropharyngeal isolate. The organisms were maintained, grown, subcultured, and quantified on Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) slants (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.). Twenty-four hours prior to study, organisms were subcultured at 35°C.
Antifungal.
Amphotericin B desoxycholate was obtained as a powder from Bristol-Myers Squibb (Princeton, N.J.). The powder was stored at −70°C. Drug solutions were prepared on the day of study by dissolving the powder in sterile H2O. Subsequent drug dilutions were obtained with D5W.
In vitro susceptibility testing.
MICs were determined using a microbroth modification of the NCCLS M27-A method with both RPMI buffered with 0.165 M morpholine propanesulfonic acid and antibiotic medium 3 (16, 19). Determinations were performed in duplicate on at least two separate occasions. Final results are expressed as the geometric means of these results.
Animals.
Six-week-old ICR/Swiss specific-pathogen-free female mice weighing 23 to 27 g were used for all studies (Harlan Sprague Dawley, Madison, Wis.). All animal studies were approved by the Animal Research Committee of the William S. Middleton Memorial VA Hospital.
Infection model.
Mice were rendered neutropenic (<100 polymorphonuclear leukocytes per mm3) by injection with cyclophosphamide (Mead Johnson Pharmaceuticals, Evansville, Ind.) intraperitoneally 4 days (150 mg/kg of body weight) and 1 day (100 mg/kg) before infection.
Organisms were subcultured on SDA 24 h prior to infection. Inoculum was prepared by placing six colonies into 5 ml of sterile pyrogen-free 0.9% saline warmed to 35°C. Fungal counts of the inoculum determined by viable counts on SDA were 106 CFU/ml.
Disseminated infection with the Candida organisms was achieved by injection of 0.1 ml of inoculum via the lateral tail vein 2 h prior to the start of drug therapy. At the end of the study period, animals were sacrificed by CO2 asphyxiation. After sacrifice, the kidneys of each mouse were immediately removed and placed in sterile 0.9% saline at 4°C. The homogenate was then serially diluted 1:10, and aliquots were plated on SDA for viable fungal colony counts after incubation for 24 h at 35°C. The lower limit of detection was 100 CFU/ml. Results were expressed as the mean CFU per kidney for two mice (four kidneys).
Pharmacokinetics.
Single-dose pharmacokinetics of amphotericin B were determined in individual neutropenic-infected ICR/Swiss mice following intraperitoneal doses of 0.625, 2.5, 5.0, 10.0, and 20 mg/kg administered in 0.2-ml volumes. At each dose examined, groups of three mice under light halothane anesthesia were sampled three or four times by retro-orbital puncture. Samples were collected in heparinized capillary tubes (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, Pa.) at 5- to 18-h intervals. Tubes were centrifuged (model MB; International Equipment Co.) at 10,000 × g for 5 min. The serum was subsequently removed, and drug levels were determined by standard drug diffusion bioassay using Paecilomyces variotii as the assay organism in antibiotic medium 12 (20). Assays of serum samples and standard curves prepared for mouse serum were performed on the same day. Intraday coefficient of variation ranged from 2.3 to 9.6%. The lower level of detection for this assay was 0.15 mg/liter. Pharmacokinetic constants, including elimination half-life and the concentration of drug in serum at time zero (C0), were calculated via nonlinear least-squares techniques (MINSQ; MicroMath, Inc., Salt Lake City, Utah). The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) was calculated by the trapezoidal rule. For doses that had no kinetics determined, pharmacokinetic parameters were extrapolated from the values obtained in the actual studies.
In vivo PAE.
Infection in neutropenic mice was produced as described above. Two hours after infection with C. albicans K-1, mice were treated with single intraperitoneal doses of amphotericin B (0.25, 1.0, and 4.0 mg/kg). Groups of two treated and control mice were sacrificed at each sampling time interval, ranging from 2 to 12 h. Control growth was determined over 24 h at five sampling times. The treated groups were sampled six to eight times over 56 h. Kidneys were removed at each time point and processed immediately for CFU determination, as outlined above. The time that levels of amphotericin B in serum remained above the MIC (T > MIC) for the organism following the three doses was calculated from the pharmacokinetic data. The postantibiotic effect (PAE) was calculated by determining the time it took for controls to increase 1 log10 CFU/kidney (C) and subtracting this from the amount of time it took organisms from the treated animals to grow 1 log10 CFU/kidney (T) after serum levels fell below the MIC for the organism (PAE = T − C) (22).
Pharmacodynamic parameter determination.
Neutropenic mice were infected with each of the Candida species 2 h prior to the start of therapy. Fifteen dosing regimens were chosen to minimize the interdependence among the three pharmacodynamic parameters studied and also to describe the complete dose-response relationship. Groups of two mice were treated for 72 h with dosing regimens of amphotericin B using fourfold increasing total doses administered at 12-, 24-, or 72-h dosing intervals. Total doses ranged from 0.078 to 20 mg/kg/72 h. The drug was administered in 0.2-ml volumes. Mice were sacrificed after 72 h of therapy, and kidneys were removed for CFU determination as described above. Untreated control mice were sacrificed just before treatment and at the end of the experiment. Efficacy was defined as the change in log10 CFU/kidney over the 72-h treatment period and was calculated by subtracting the mean log10 CFU/kidney in untreated control mice after 72 h from the mean number of CFU from kidneys of two mice at the end of therapy.
Data analysis.
A sigmoid dose-effect model was used to measure the in vivo potency of amphotericin B. The model is derived from the Hill equation: E = (Emax × DN)/(ED50N + DN), where E is the observed effect (change in log10 CFU/kidney compared with untreated controls at 72 h), D is the cumulative 72-h dose, Emax is the maximum effect, ED50 is the dose required to achieve 50% of Emax, and N is the slope of the dose-effect relationship. The correlation between efficacy and each of the three parameters studied was determined by nonlinear least-squares multivariate regression analysis (Sigma Stat; Jandel Scientific Software, San Rafael, Calif.). The coefficient of determination (R2) was used to estimate the percent variance in the change of log10 CFU/kidney over the treatment period for the different dosing regimens that could be attributed to each of the pharmacodynamic parameters.
To allow a more meaningful comparison of potency among the dosing regimens studied, we calculated the dose required to produce a fungistatic dose or no net growth over 72 h and the dose required to achieve a 1 log10 reduction in colony counts compared to numbers at the start of therapy. If the doses needed to achieve these benchmarks increased significantly as the dosing interval was lengthened from every 12 h to every 72 h, T > MIC was the parameter predictive of efficacy. On the other hand, if the doses necessary to reach these outcomes decreased with the lengthening of the dosing interval, then the parameter associated with these outcomes would be the peak serum level. If the doses remained similar independent of changes in the dosing interval, then the AUC would be predictive of efficacy.
RESULTS
In vitro susceptibility testing.
There was no difference in MICs determined with both the accepted M27 methodology and antibiotic medium 3. MICs of amphotericin B for the Candida species were 0.25 mg/liter for each of the organisms tested, with the exception of C. dubliniensis, for which the MIC of amphotericin B was 0.5 mg/liter.
Pharmacokinetics.
The time courses of amphotericin B in serum of infected neutropenic mice following intraperitoneal doses of 0.625, 2.5, 5.0, 10.0, and 20 mg/kg are shown in Fig. 1. Peak serum levels and the AUC did not increase in a linear fashion with dose escalation. Peak levels were achieved within 6 h for each of the doses and ranged from 2.51 ± 0.40 to 0.28 ± 0.03 mg/liter. The elimination half-life ranged from 13.7 to 27 h, similar to that previously described in a murine model (13). The AUC, as determined by the trapezoidal rule, ranged from 10 to 83 mg · h/liter with the lowest and highest doses, respectively.
FIG. 1.
Concentrations of amphotericin B in serum after subcutaneous doses of 20, 10, 5, 2.5, and 0.625 mg/kg in neutropenic infected mice. Each symbol represents the geometric mean ± standard deviation of serum levels from three mice.
In vivo PAE.
Following tail vein inoculation of 106 CFU/ml, growth of Candida organisms in the kidneys of untreated mice increased (3.31 ± 0.20) log10 CFU/kidney over 24 h. Control growth of 1 log10 CFU/kidney in untreated mice was achieved in 5.2 h. No drug carryover was observed in treatment groups. Based upon the above pharmacokinetics, the three doses of amphotericin B studied (0.25, 1.0, and 4.0 mg/kg) would produce serum levels above the MIC for the Candida organism (0.25 mg/liter) for 0, 14, and 46 h, respectively. Only treatment with the highest single dose resulted in any significant reduction in colony counts compared with numbers at the start of therapy. Growth curves for both the control group and experimental groups following the single doses of amphotericin B are shown in Fig. 2. Amphotericin B suppressed regrowth of organisms at each of the three doses studied in a dose-dependent fashion. PAEs increased from 23 to 30 h with escalation of dosage from 0.25 to 1.0 mg/kg. We were unable to calculate a PAE for the highest dose studied, as organisms did not regrow during the period of study. The growth suppression due to the 0.25 mg/kg dose was due entirely to sub-MIC effects, as the peak concentration with this dose never reached the MIC of amphotericin B for the organism.
FIG. 2.
In vivo PAE of amphotericin B at doses of 4, 1, and 0.25 mg/kg against C. albicans in neutropenic mice. Each symbol represents the mean ± standard deviation from two mice (four kidneys).
Pharmacodynamic parameter determination.
At the start of therapy, each kidney had (3.81 ± 0.12) log10 CFU. After 72 h, the organisms grew (3.11 ± 0.39) log10 CFU/kidney in untreated mice and resulted in the death of each of the control mice. Drug carryover was not observed in any of the samples. Escalating doses of amphotericin B produced significant net killing compared to the inoculum in control animals at the start of therapy. Highest total doses for the different regimens resulted in a mean reduction in colony count compared with numbers at the start of therapy of (1.84 ± 0.26) log10 CFU/kidney for the 72-h dosing interval and (0.69 ± 0.84) log10 CFU/kidney with the shortest dosing interval (Fig. 3).
FIG. 3.
Relationship between the 24-h total dose for three lengthening dosing intervals and log10 CFU/kidney in a neutropenic mouse model of disseminated candidiasis. Each symbol represents data from two mice (four kidneys).
Examples of the relationship between microbiological effect and each of the pharmacodynamic parameters, including T > MIC, the AUC/MIC ratio, and the peak serum level/MIC ratio, are shown in Fig. 4. As shown in Table 1, the peak level in relation to the MIC had the strongest relationship with each of the organisms studied. T > MIC appeared more important than the AUC in relation to the MIC. That the time-dependent parameter was important in this model is likely a reflection of the prolonged dosing intervals. As dosing intervals are lengthened, T > MIC eventually becomes the most important parameter for any drug or drug class.
FIG. 4.
(A) Relationship between T > MIC and log10 CFU/kidney after 72 h of therapy. Each symbol represents data from two mice (four kidneys). (B) Relationship between the 72-h AUC/MIC ratio and log10 CFU/kidney after 72 h of therapy. Each symbol represents data from two mice (four kidneys). (C) Relationship between the peak serum level/MIC ratio and log10 CFU/kidney after 72 h of therapy. Each symbol represents data from two mice (four kidneys).
TABLE 1.
Relationship between the pharmacodynamic parameters and efficacy of amphotericin B against Candida organisms
Organism |
R2 (%)
|
||
---|---|---|---|
Peak serum level/MIC | AUC/MIC | T > MIC | |
C. albicans K-1 | 93 | 61 | 82 |
C. albicans 98-17 | 92 | 65 | 85 |
C. albicans 98-234 | 90 | 49 | 78 |
C. krusei 5810 | 90 | 69 | 67 |
C. dubliniensis 3588 | 93 | 67 | 69 |
The doses of amphotericin required to achieve a net fungistatic effect and a 1 log10 reduction in CFU/kidney compared to numbers at the start of therapy over the 72-h period with each of the three dosing intervals and the various organisms studied are shown in Table 2. The static dose increased 7.60-fold ± 5.65-fold (range, 2.4-fold to 16.6-fold) when the dosing interval was shortened from 72 to 12 h. Similarly, the dose required to produce a 1 log10 reduction in CFU/kidney increased 4.86-fold ± 2.33-fold (range, 3.3-fold to 7.1-fold).
TABLE 2.
Effect of amphotericin B dosing interval on treatment outcome
Organism | Dose (95% confidence interval)a
|
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
q72h
|
q24h
|
q12h
|
||||
FD | 1 log10 | FD | 1 log10 | FD | 1 log10 | |
C. albicans K-1 | 2.33 (1.63–3.03) | 6.11 (5.41–6.81) | 2.40 (2.01–2.79) | >20, SE 0.56 | >20, SE 0.05 | >20, SE 0.05 |
C. albicans 98-17 | 1.52 (1.51–1.53) | 2.32 (2.31–2.33) | 4.46 (3.56–5.36) | 10.3 (9.40–11.2) | 4.81 (4.71–4.91) | 16.9 (16.8–17.0) |
C. albicans 98-234 | 0.83 (0.77–0.89) | 1.57 (1.51–1.63) | 1.85 (1.68–1.98) | 2.71 (2.58–2.84) | 2.00 (1.90–2.10) | 3.11 (3.01–3.21) |
C. krusei 5810 | 0.47 (0.14–0.80) | 4.36 (4.03–4.69) | 1.94 (1.16–2.72) | 8.01 (7.23–8.32) | 3.32 (2.70–3.90) | >20, SE 0.30 |
C. dubliniensis 3588 | 1.18 (0.20–2.16) | 2.83 (1.85–3.81) | 3.60 (3.23–3.97) | >20, SE 0.80 | >20, SE 0.05 | >20, SE 0.05 |
q72h, every 72 h; FD, fungistatic dose (in milligrams per kilogram per 72 h); 1 log10, 1 log10 kill (in milligrams per kilogram per 72 h).
DISCUSSION
The time course of antimicrobial activity can be determined by two characteristics: the effect of increasing drug concentrations on the extent of organism killing and the presence or absence of antimicrobial effects which persist after serum levels have fallen below the MIC (9). For example, demonstration of concentration-dependent killing and prolonged PAE with the aminoglycoside class has provided the basis for once-daily dosing of these drugs (8, 9). This regimen optimizes the concentration-dependent parameters, the peak serum level/MIC and AUC/MIC ratios, which have been shown to predict efficacy, limit toxicity, and reduce the development of organism resistance (6, 15).
Previous in vitro time-kill and PAE studies with amphotericin B have demonstrated concentration-dependent activity and significant PAEs against a variety of yeasts (14, 21). The magnitude of the PAE in vitro was dependent upon the concentration of amphotericin B and the duration of exposure, ranging from 0.5 to 10 h (21). The PAEs we demonstrated in vivo were much longer than those found in vitro (8). This discrepancy in PAE duration is similar to that observed with several classes of antimicrobials (9). These in vivo studies are unable to determine what degree of growth suppression could be due to the antimicrobial effect of concentrations that are below the MIC with the two other doses. Previous studies have demonstrated a variety of sub-MIC effects on both C. albicans and Cryptococcus neoformans (1, 14, 18, 21). In addition, although serum drug concentrations have been shown to be a relatively good surrogate of tissue concentrations, the magnitude of the PAE in these experiments may have been different if we were able to accurately measure amphotericin B concentrations at the site of infection (the kidney). The duration of the PAE induced by amphotericin B may be related to the time necessary for yeast cell wall damage to be repaired and subsequent organism multiplication to resume.
Previous animal infection models have demonstrated the potency of amphotericin B against several Candida species (2, 3). In addition, several studies have demonstrated the concordance between in vitro susceptibility and in vivo endpoints (2, 17). These studies have, however, utilized only a single dosing interval, limiting one's ability to determine which pharmacodynamic parameter best predicts efficacy. With only a single dosing interval, escalating doses increase all three parameters. The interdependence between the parameters with single-dosing-interval studies is too great to determine if one is more important than another.
Our in vivo studies demonstrated concentration-dependent activity in neutropenic animals with doses that covered a 250-fold range in total doses and an effect that varied by more than 3 log10. These studies demonstrated that the peak serum level/MIC ratio was the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameter that most strongly correlated with the outcome of amphotericin B. When the same total amount of drug was given over the 72-h treatment period, less total drug was needed to achieve a given effect (static dose or 1 log10) when larger doses were administered infrequently, maximizing the concentration-dependent parameter, the peak serum level/MIC ratio. More than fivefold more drug was required to produce a net static effect when administered using the most frequent dosing in this model, compared to only a single dose during the 72-h study. Thus, these data suggest that high, infrequent doses of amphotericin B can be as effective as lower-dose, more frequently administered regimens of amphotericin B.
The most frequently recommended amphotericin B dosing, every 24 h at doses ranging from 0.5 to 1.0 mg/kg, often results in unacceptable toxicities. If one were able to administer the drug to maximize peak serum levels but decrease the frequency of administrations to every 48 or even 72 h, not only might the efficacy of the drug be equivalent or improved, but toxicities may also be less likely. Very few studies have compared the kinetics of amphotericin B in humans using varying dosing intervals. Bindschadler and Bennett (5) demonstrated that higher peak serum levels were achieved when twice the daily dose was administered every other day than when administered daily. This dosing schedule was often recommended in earlier antifungal dosing guidelines but has been replaced more recently by daily dosing. These studies would support clinical studies reexamining administration of larger doses given less frequently, perhaps only two or three times per week. Future in vivo studies and clinical trials should attempt to correlate these pharmacodynamic parameters with efficacy and toxicity.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We thank Jacque Meis for kindly providing the C. krusei and C. dubliniensis isolates.
REFERENCES
- 1.Al-Bassam T, Poulain D, Giummelly P, Lematre J, Bonaly R. Chemical and antigenic alterations of Candida albicans cell walls related to the action of amphotericin B sub-inhibitory doses. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1985;15:263–269. doi: 10.1093/jac/15.3.263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Anaissie E J, Karyotakis N C, Hachem R, Dignani M C, Rex J H, Paetznick V. Correlation between in vitro and in vivo activity of antifungal agents against Candida species. J Infect Dis. 1994;170:384–389. doi: 10.1093/infdis/170.2.384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Atkinson B A, Bouthet C, Bocanegra R, Correa A, Luther M F, Graybill J R. Comparison of fluconazole, amphotericin B and flucytosine in treatment of a murine model of disseminated infection with Candida glabrata in immunocompromised mice. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995;35:631–640. doi: 10.1093/jac/35.5.631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Banerjee S N, Emori T G, Culver D H, Gaynes R P, Jarvis W R, Horan T, Edwards J R, Tolson J S, Henderson T, Martone W J. Secular trends in nosocomial primary blood stream infections in the United States, 1980-1989. Am J Med. 1991;91(Suppl. 3B):86–89. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90349-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bindschadler D D, Bennett J E. A pharmacologic guide to the clinical use of amphotericin B. J Infect Dis. 1969;120:427–436. doi: 10.1093/infdis/120.4.427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Blaser J, Stone B B, Groner M C, Zinner S H. Comparative study with enoxacin and netilmicin, a pharmacodynamic model to determine importance of ratio of antibiotic peak concentration to MIC for bactericidal activity and emergence of resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987;31:1054–1060. doi: 10.1128/aac.31.7.1054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Craig W A, Gudmundsson S. Postantibiotic effect. In: Lorian V, editor. Antibiotics in laboratory medicine. 4th ed. Baltimore, Md: Williams and Wilkins; 1996. pp. 296–329. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Craig W A, Redington J, Ebert S C. Pharmacodynamics of amikacin in vitro and in mouse thigh and lung infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991;27(Suppl. C):29–40. doi: 10.1093/jac/27.suppl_c.29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Craig W A. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters: rationale for antibacterial dosing of mice and men. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26:1–12. doi: 10.1086/516284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Edwards J E, et al. International conference for the development of a consensus on the management and prevention of severe candida infections. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;25:43–59. doi: 10.1086/514504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Georgeopapadakou N H, Walsh T J. Antifungal agents: chemotherapeutic targets and immunologic strategies. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:279–291. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.2.279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Groll A H, Piscitelli S C, Walsh T J. Clinical pharmacology of systemic antifungal agents: a comprehensive review of agents in clinical use, current investigational compounds, and putative targets for antifungal drug development. Adv Pharmacol. 1998;44:343–500. doi: 10.1016/s1054-3589(08)60129-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kim H, Loebenberg D, Marco A, Symchowicz S, Lin C. Comparative pharmacokinetics of Sch 28191 and amphotericin B in mice, rats, dogs, and cynomologus monkeys. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984;26:446–449. doi: 10.1128/aac.26.4.446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Klepser M E, Wolfe E J, Jones R N, Nightingale C H, Pfaller M A. Antifungal pharmacodynamic characteristics of fluconazole and amphotericin B tested against Candida albicans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:1392–1395. doi: 10.1128/aac.41.6.1392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Moore R D, Lietman P S, Smith C R. Clinical response to aminoglycoside therapy: importance of the ratio of peak concentration to minimal inhibitory concentration. J Infect Dis. 1987;155:93–99. doi: 10.1093/infdis/155.1.93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing for yeast; approved standard M27-A. Wayne, Pa: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nguyen M H, Clancy C J, Yu V L, Yu Y C, Morris A J, Snydman D R, Sutton D A, Rinaldi M G. Do in vitro susceptibility data predict the microbiologic response to amphotericin B? Results of a prospective study of patients with Candida fungemia. J Infect Dis. 1998;177:425–430. doi: 10.1086/514193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Nosanchuk J D, Cleare W, Franzot S P, Casadevall A. Amphotericin B and fluconazole affect cellular charge, macrophage phagocytosis, and cellular morphology of Cryptococcus neoformans at subinhibitory concentrations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43:233–239. doi: 10.1128/aac.43.2.233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rex J H, Cooper C R, Merz W G, Galgiani J N, Anaissie E J. Detection of amphotericin B-resistant Candida isolates in a broth-based system. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:906–909. doi: 10.1128/aac.39.4.906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Shadomy S, Espinel-Ingroff A, Cartwright Y. Laboratory studies with antifungal agents: susceptibility tests and bioassays. In: Lennette E H, Balows A, Hausler W J, Shadomy S, editors. Manual of clinical microbiology. 4th ed. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Microbiology; 1985. pp. 991–999. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Turnidge J D, Gudmundsson S, Vogelman B, Craig W A. The postantibiotic effect of antifungal agents against common pathogenic yeasts. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1994;34:83–92. doi: 10.1093/jac/34.1.83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Vogelman B, Gudmundsson S, Turnidge J, Leggett J, Craig W A. In vivo postantibiotic effect in a thigh infection in neutropenic mice. J Infect Dis. 1988;157:287–298. doi: 10.1093/infdis/157.2.287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Vogelman B, Gudmundsson S, Leggett J, Turnidge J, Ebert S, Craig W A. Correlation of antimicrobial pharmacokinetic parameters with therapeutic efficacy in an animal model. J Infect Dis. 1988;158:831–847. doi: 10.1093/infdis/158.4.831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Walsh T J, Lee J W, Roilides E, Francis P, Bacher J, Lyman C A, Pizzo P A. Experimental antifungal chemotherapy in granulocytopenic animal models of disseminated candidiasis: approaches to understanding investigational antifungal compounds for patients with neoplastic diseases. Clin Infect Dis. 1992;14(Suppl. 1):139–147. doi: 10.1093/clinids/14.supplement_1.s139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wey S B, Mori M, Pfaller M A, Woolson R F, Wenzel R P. Hospital-acquired candidemia. The attributable mortality and excess length of stay. Arch Intern Med. 1988;148:2642–2645. doi: 10.1001/archinte.148.12.2642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]