Abstract
The MICs of evernimicin at which 90% of Borrelia burgdorferi patient isolates were inhibited ranged from 0.1 to 0.5 μg/ml. Evernimicin was as effective as ceftriaxone against B. burgdorferi in a murine model of experimental Lyme disease. As assessed by culturing the urinary bladders of infected C3H mice, no live Borrelia isolates were recoverable following antibiotic treatment.
Microculture techniques have recently been described and are especially useful for assessment of the growth of the Lyme disease spirochete in the presence of certain potentially inhibitory substances such as immune sera and antibiotics (1, 4–9). In this regard, our laboratory has previously reported results that have demonstrated the in vitro borreliacidal activities of penicillin-type and various cephalosporin-type antibiotics (6, 7), as well as of sera from Lyme disease patients (8). This report describes a follow-up study of the effects of a novel antibiotic, evernimicin, on the growth of a large number of North American isolates of Borrelia burgdorferi. Evernimicin is an oligosaccharide antimicrobial agent produced by Micromonospora carbonacea (11). It had recently been under renewed clinical investigation (2) due primarily to the general emergence of antibiotic-resistant, nonspirochetal microorganisms (3).
MICs and minimal bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) for 27 clinical isolates (12, 13) and 3 reference strains (strains B31, CA287, and 297) of B. burgdorferi were determined by a modified microplate dilution assay (12). Stock and maintenance cultures of all 30 isolates were obtained by growing organisms in Barbour-Stoenner-Kelly (BSK) medium. Triplicate wells contained 5 × 105 B. burgdorferi organisms in BSK medium with and without diluted evernimicin (Schering-Plough Research Institute, Kenilworth, N.J.), penicillin (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.), or ceftriaxone (Roche, Nutley, N.J.). After incubation for 24 to 48 h, the wells were examined by dark-field or phase-contrast microscopy, and the surviving Borrelia were enumerated as described previously (7, 8). The in vitro activity of evernimicin was nearly equivalent to that of ceftriaxone and was slightly superior to that of penicillin (Table 1). In addition, the selected B. burgdorferi isolates were uniformly susceptible to evernimicin. Along with a lack of motility, dying or nonviable organisms often appeared as very thin, delicate, and shortened degenerating forms, with some organisms having blebs, yet they still retained their characteristic spiral shape. Three isolates with antibiotic susceptibilities representative of the group were chosen for in vivo study.
TABLE 1.
Susceptibilities of 3 reference strains and 27 patient isolates of B. burgdorferia
Antibiotic | Range of MICs (μg/ml) for:
|
Range of MBCs (μg/ml) for:
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reference strains
|
Patient isolates
|
Reference strains | Patient isolates | |||
50% | 90% | 50% | 90% | |||
Penicillin | 0.2–0.4 | 0.5–2.0 | 0.2–0.4 | 0.5–2.0 | 2.0–4.0 | 1.0–4.0 |
Ceftriaxone | 0.05–0.08 | 0.1–0.25 | 0.05–0.08 | 0.1–0.25 | 0.2–0.5 | 0.2–0.5 |
Evernimicin | 0.05–0.08 | 0.1–0.25 | 0.05–0.10 | 0.1–0.50 | 0.2–0.5 | 0.2–0.5 |
The MICs were defined as the lowest concentrations of antibiotic causing either 50 or 90% growth inhibition. The MBCs were defined as the lowest concentration causing 100% killing of B. burgdorferi.
Separate groups of 4- to 5-week-old female C3H mice (Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, Mass.) were infected intradermally in the abdominal area with 0.1 ml of BSK medium containing 100,000 B. burgdorferi organisms with a tuberculin syringe. The inoculated organisms were obtained from diluted, low-passage cultures (<10 in vitro passages in BSK medium). Then, 7 to 10 days later, the mice were given a single daily dose of evernimicin (25 mg/kg of body weight), ceftriaxone (50 mg/kg of body weight) or the excipient diluent control (placebo) for 5 consecutive days. The evernimicin treatments were administered by the intramuscular (i.m.) route on days 1, 3, and 5 and by the intraperitoneal route on days 2 and 4. Ceftriaxone was injected via the i.m. route only. Two days after the last dose of antibiotic or placebo was given, the mice were killed and cultures of their urinary bladders were established in BSK medium (8). These were examined weekly for up to 6 weeks for motile spirochetes based on phase-contrast and fluorescence microscopy. As shown in Table 2, evernimicin was as effective as ceftriaxone in eliminating borrelial infection, based on the failure to culture live spirochetes from the urinary bladders of 100% of the mice treated with either antibiotic. Also absent, based on microscopic examination, from cultures of the bladders of antibiotic-treated mice, were any remnants of nonviable, disintegrating spirochetal forms.
TABLE 2.
Efficacy of evernimicin against B. burgdorferi infection in C3H mice
B. burgdorferi straina | No. of mice infected | No. of mice treated with:
|
No. of cured mice/no. of mice givenb:
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Evernimicin | Ceftriaxone | Placebo | Evernimicin | Ceftriaxone | Placebo | ||
B193 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3/3 | 3/3 | 0/3 |
B296 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3/3 | 3/3 | 0/3 |
B322 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3/3 | 3/3 | 0/3 |
Combined totals | 27 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9/9 | 9/9 | 0/9 |
Patient isolates (from erythema migrans rashes).
Based on cultured extracts of urinary bladder in BSK medium yielding live Borrelia.
In this study, it was shown that evernimicin possesses excellent in vitro and in vivo activities against a wide variety of borrelial isolates, and these results correlated well with the MIC and MBC results reported by others (1). However, our study may have examined the in vitro susceptibilities of the largest number of North American B. burgdorferi isolates to date; these isolates were derived mostly from the skin and blood of patients with early Lyme disease (12, 13). We also found that evernimicin's inhibitory effects were comparable to or slightly better than those attributable to two other antibiotics (penicillin and ceftriaxone) which are commonly used for the treatment of Lyme disease (14). The dosages of evernimicin studied in vivo were comparable to those successfully used to treat CD1 mice successfully against lethal pneumonia caused by a penicillin-resistant strain of Streptococcus pneumoniae (10). Important limitations of our in vivo studies were that the evaluation of drug efficacy was based solely on the ability to culture B. burgdorferi from the urinary bladder of infected mice and that evernimicin's effectiveness was tested against only three patient isolates.
Acknowledgments
We appreciate the expert technical assistance of Susan Bittker and Denise Cooper and the partial support provided by Schering Plough Research Institute.
REFERENCES
- 1.Dever L, Torigian C V, Barbour A G. In vitro activities of the everninomicin SCH 27899 and other new antimicrobial agents against Borrelia burgdorferi. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43:1773–1775. doi: 10.1128/aac.43.7.1773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Foster D R, Rubak M J. Pharmacologic and bacteriologic properties of SCH-27899 (Ziracin), an investigational antibiotic from the everninomicin family. Pharmacotherapy. 1999;19:1111–1117. doi: 10.1592/phco.19.15.1111.30576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gold H S, Moellering R C. Antimicrobial-drug resistance. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1445–1453. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199611073351907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Moody K D, Adams R L, Barthold S W. Effectiveness of antimicrobial treatment against Borrelia burgdorferi infection in mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:1567–1572. doi: 10.1128/aac.38.7.1567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nowakowski J, McKenna D, Nadelma R B, Cooper D, Bittker S, Holmgren D, Pavia C, Johnson R C, Wormser G P. Failure of treatment with cephelexin for Lyme disease. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:563–567. doi: 10.1001/archfami.9.6.563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pavia C S, Bittker S. Assessment of in vitro growth of Borrelia burgdorferi by tritiated adenine incorporation. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1988;539:410–414. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pavia C S, Kissel V, Bittker S, Cabello F, Levine S. Antiborrelial activity of serum from rats injected with the Lyme disease spirochete. J Infect Dis. 1991;163:656–659. doi: 10.1093/infdis/163.3.656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pavia C S, Wormser G P, Norman G L. Activity of sera from patients with Lyme disease against Borrelia burgdorferi. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;25(Suppl. 1):S25–S30. doi: 10.1086/516168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sadziene A, Wilske B, Ferdows M S, Barbour A G. In vitro inhibition of Borrelia burgdorferi growth by antibodies. J Infect Dis. 1993;167:165–172. doi: 10.1093/infdis/167.1.165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wang E, Simard M, Bergeron Y, Beauchamp D, Bergeron M G. In vivo activity and pharmacokinetics of ziracin ( SCH27899), a new long-acting everninomicin antibiotic, in a murine model of penicillin-susceptible or penicillin-resistant pneumoncoccal pneumonia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000;44:1010–1018. doi: 10.1128/aac.44.4.1010-1018.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Weinstein M J, Luedermann G M, Oden E M, Wagman G H. Everninomicin, a new antibiotic complex from Micromonospora carbonacea. 1964. pp. 24–32. . Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1963. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wormser G P, Bittker S, Cooper D, Nowakowski J, Nadelman R B, Pavia C S. Comparison of the yields of blood cultures using serum or plasma from patients with early Lyme disease. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:1648–1650. doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.4.1648-1650.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wormser G P, Nowakowski J, Nadelman R B, Bittker S, Cooper D, Pavia C. Improving the yield of blood cultures in early Lyme disease. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:296–298. doi: 10.1128/jcm.36.1.296-298.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wormser G P, Nadelman R B, Dattwyler R J, Dennis D T, Shapiro E D, Steere A C, Rush T J, Rahn D W, Coyle P K, Persing D H, Fish D, Luft B J. Practice guidelines for the treatment of Lyme disease. Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;31(Suppl: 1):1–14. doi: 10.1086/314053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]