Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
editorial
. 2001 Mar;45(3):994–995. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.3.994-995.2001

Polymyxin B-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical Isolate Susceptible to Recombinant BPI21 and Cecropin P1

Carl Urban 1,2,3,4,*, Noriel Mariano 1,2,3,4, James J Rahal 1,2,3,4, Emerald Tay 1,2,3,4, Conrado Ponio 1,2,3,4, Tomaz Koprivnjak 1,2,3,4, Jerrold Weiss 1,2,3,4
PMCID: PMC90414  PMID: 16557680

Many strains of Acinetobacter baumannii have become resistant to a variety of clinically available antibacterial agents by both intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms (4, 15). Several investigators have documented multidrug-resistant A. baumannii causing nosocomial infections and have demonstrated the in vitro and in vivo activities of imipenem, sulbactam, and the polymyxins (2, 9, 11, 14, 16). Increasing resistance to antibacterials, including sulbactam and the carbapenems, has prompted the use of polymyxin B and colistin as therapeutic agents, and within the last several years, the polymyxins have been used with increasing frequency to treat patients infected with multidrug-resistant, gram-negative bacteria, including Acinetobacter (9, 14, 16). Although the literature, both clinical and microbiological, has shown that A. baumannii has retained susceptibility to the polymyxins despite resistance to all other antibacterial agents (2, 15), we document the isolation of a polymyxin B-resistant strain of A. baumannii from a patient who was given polymyxin B for treatment of a multidrug-resistant, polymyxin-susceptible strain of A. baumannii. The minimal inhibitory concentrations for the polymyxin-resistant strain (L1) were 48 μg/ml (polymyxin B) and 128 μg/ml (colistin) as determined by E-test methodology (AB Biodisk North America Inc., Piscataway, N.J.). More importantly, we have found that this strain is susceptible in vitro to rBPI21 (Neuprex; XOMA Corporation, Berkeley, Calif.) (provided by S. Carroll), a recombinant form of the N-terminal domain of the human bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein (Table 1). This isolate was also susceptible to cecropin P1 (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.), an antibacterial peptide from pig intestine (3). The antibacterial effects of rBPI21 and cecropin P1 were manifest both in conventional MIC and minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) assays with Mueller-Hinton broth and in bactericidal assays with nutrient broth. In the later type of assay, the antibacterial potency of rBPI21, but not of cecropin P1, toward A. baumannii was further increased nearly 100-fold in the presence of sublethal amounts of serum (data not shown).

TABLE 1.

Polymyxin B-resistant isolate of Acinetobacter baumannii is sensitive to rBPI21 and to cecropin P1a

Antibacterial agent MIC and MBC (μM)
LD90 (μM)
L1 D41 L1 D41 A1
Polymyxin B >10 0.5 >10 0.1 0.1
rBPI21 3.0 1.0 0.3 0.3 0.2
Cecropin P1 2.0 1.0 0.5 0.3 NTb
a

The MIC and MBC of polymyxin B, rBPI21, and cecropin P1 for Acinetobacter baumannii were determined by incubation of bacteria (5 × 105 bacteria/ml) overnight at 37°C in Mueller-Hinton broth containing increasing concentrations of the antibacterial (poly)peptides. Under all conditions, the MIC and MBC were the same. The bactericidal activities of these agents for Acinetobacter baumannii were also measured by incubation with bacteria (106 bacteria/ml) in phosphate-buffered (pH 7.4) nutrient broth–0.9% sodium chloride for 2 h at 37°C. All results shown are the means of at least three independent determinations. LD90, 90% lethal dose. 

b

NT, not tested. 

The bactericidal and antiendotoxin properties of cationic membrane active (poly)peptides are well known (57, 10, 12, 13). The superior in vitro activity of rBPI21, the results of extensive preclinical testing in animal models, and the protein's apparent lack of immunogenicity and toxicity for human recipients have encouraged therapeutic trials in settings where conventional antibiotics are unable to control infection by gram-negative bacteria and/or proinflammatory effects of endotoxin (1, 6, 8, 10). Sublethal alterations of the gram-negative bacterial outer membrane in combination with the use of antibiotics that, because of resistance, are now ineffective alone may further extend therapeutic opportunities (1, 7, 8). The activity of rBPI21 toward gram-negative bacteria with high levels of resistance to polymyxin B, documented here for A. baumannii and previously observed experimentally with several other species of gram-negative bacteria (5, 7), illustrates additional important attributes that may support its use as a therapeutic agent. Investigations of the molecular bases of polymyxin B resistance in Acinetobacter and other gram-negative bacteria and the activities of BPI and its derivatives against these multidrug-resistant organisms are under way.

Acknowledgments

These studies were supported in part by the BMA Medical Foundation, the Beatrice Snyder Foundation, the Hugaton Foundation, and Public Health Service grant DK05472.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Ammons W S, Kohn F R, Kung A H C. Protective effects on an N-terminal fragment of bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein in rodent models of gram-negative sepsis: role of bactericidal properties. J Infect Dis. 1994;170:1473–1482. doi: 10.1093/infdis/170.6.1473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Appleman M D, Belzberg H, Citron D M, Heseltine P N R, Yellen A E, Murray J, Berne T V. In vitro activities of nontraditional antimicrobials against multiresistant Acinetobacter baumannii strains isolated in an intensive care unit outbreak. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000;44:1035–1040. doi: 10.1128/aac.44.4.1035-1040.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Boman H G, Agerberth B, Boman A. Mechanisms of action on Escherichia coli of cecropin P 1 and PR-39, two antibacterial peptides from pig intestine. Infect Immun. 1993;61:2978–2984. doi: 10.1128/iai.61.7.2978-2984.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Berezin-Bergogne E, Towner K J. Acinetobacter spp. as nosocomial pathogens: microbiological, clinical, and epidemiological features. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1996;9:148–165. doi: 10.1128/cmr.9.2.148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Capodici C, Chen S, Sidorczyk Z, Elsbach P, Weiss J. Effect of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) chain length on interactions of bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein and its bioactive 23-kilodalton NH2-terminal fragment with isolated LPS and intact Proteus mirabilis and Escherichia coli. Infect Immun. 1994;62:259–265. doi: 10.1128/iai.62.1.259-265.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Demetriades D, Smith S, Jacobson L E, Moncure M, Minei J, Nelson B J, Scannon P J. Bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein (rBPI21) in patients with hemorrhage due to trauma: results of a multicenter phase II clinical trial. rBPI21 Acute Hemorrhagic Trauma Study Group. Trauma. 1999;46:667–677. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199904000-00018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Elsbach P, Weiss J, Levy O. Oxygen-independent antimicrobial systems of phagocytes. In: Gallin J I, Snyderman R, editors. Inflammation: basic principles and clinical correlates. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999. pp. 801–817. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Elsbach P, Weiss J. Prospects for use of recombinant BPI in the treatment of gram-negative bacterial infections. Infect Agents Dis. 1995;4:102–109. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fernandez-Viladrich P, Corbella X, Corral L, Tubau F, Mateu A. Successful treatment of ventriculitis due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii with intraventricular colistin sulfomethate sodium. Clin Infect Dis. 1999;28:916–917. doi: 10.1086/517243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Giroir B, Quint P A, Barton P, Kirsch E A, Kitchen L, Goldstein B, Margraf D, Sastry S, Orlowski J P, Bradley J S, Nelson B J, Wedel N I, White M L, Bauer R J, Carrol S F, Scannon P J. Preliminary evaluation of recombinant amino-terminal fragment of human bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein in children with severe meningococcal sepsis. Lancet. 1997;360:1439–1443. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)06468-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Go E S, Urban C, Burns J, Kreiswirth B, Eisner W, Mariano N, Mosinka-Snipas K, Rahal J J. Clinical and molecular epidemiology of acinetobacter infections sensitive only to polymyxin B and sulbactam. Lancet. 1994;344:1329–1332. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90694-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gough M, Hancock R E W, Kelly N M. Antiendotoxin activity of cationic peptide antimicrobial agents. Infect Immun. 1996;64:4922–4927. doi: 10.1128/iai.64.12.4922-4927.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hancock R E W, Chapple D S. Peptide antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43:1317–1323. doi: 10.1128/aac.43.6.1317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Levin A S, Barone A A, Penco J, Santos M V, Marinho I S, Arruda E A G, Manrique E I, Costa S F. Intravenous colistin as therapy for nosocomial infections caused by multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii. Clin Infect Dis. 1999;28:1008–1011. doi: 10.1086/514732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rahal J J, Urban C. Acinetobacter. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;21:341–348. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-9858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wood C A, Reboli A C. Infections caused by imipenem-resistant A. calcoaceticus biotype anitratus. J Infect Dis. 1993;168:1602–1603. doi: 10.1093/infdis/168.6.1602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES