Abstract
Purpose:
The purpose of this study was to characterize the material, health (general and diabetes-specific), and social impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on Hispanic adults with type 2 diabetes who did not experience COVID-19 infection.
Methods:
This cross-sectional and longitudinal study used surveys within a clinical trial of 79 Hispanic adult clinic patients with type 2 diabetes. Cross-sectional measures included the Coronavirus Anxiety Scale, items from the Coronavirus Impact Scale, and the Pandemic Impacts Inventory. Longitudinal measures included the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care, health care utilization, and measures of diabetes self-efficacy, social support, and quality of life.
Results:
Participants were majority low income, Spanish-speaking females with poor diabetes control. Coronavirus anxiety was low despite majority of participants having an affected family member and frequent access barriers. More than half of participants reported moderate/severe pandemic impact on their income. Diabetes self-care behaviors did not change between pre- and pandemic measures. Diabetes self-efficacy and quality of life improved despite fewer diabetes-related health care visits.
Conclusions:
Despite high levels of access barriers, financial strain, and COVID-19 infection of family members, Hispanic adults with type 2 diabetes continued to prioritize their diabetes self-management and demonstrated substantial resilience by improving their self-efficacy and quality of life.
The inequitable impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in the United States (US) resulted in substantial loss of life in Hispanic communities. Life expectancy among U.S. Hispanics declined 3 years, the most of any race/ethnicity subgroup, from 2019 to 2020. While COVID-19 led to majority of this decline (90%), diabetes was noted as the third leading cause of increased deaths behind unintentional injuries.1 This combination of disproportionate deaths from COVID-19 and diabetes stem from long-standing racial/ethnic health and social inequities dating back centuries and driven by structural racism and discrimination.2–4 These health and social inequities produce barriers at multiple levels which contribute to increased death from both COVID-19 and diabetes in the Hispanic community.
At the system-level, Hispanics have the highest rates of un- and underinsurance of any racial/ethnic group in the U.S.. They often fear using health and social services due to their immigration status. Non-English language fluency creates further barriers to accessing medical care and can limit understanding of available educational materials. Hispanics have higher exposure to and infection with COVID-19 due to numerous factors including disproportionately low incomes, overcrowded living situations, disproportionate representation among homeless, detained, and incarcerated populations, and disproportionate employment in essential, frontline service jobs without work-from-home options.5,6 These system level factors also complicate diabetes management which is more difficult in low-income areas with barriers to accessing quality health care, adequate food, and challenges affording medication and diabetes supplies.7 This is even more difficult for groups with limited English proficiency and people who are not U.S. citizens.7,8 Ogunwole and Golden detailed how racism leads to discrimination which drives socioeconomic deprivation and residential segregation perpetuating diabetes-related health disparities.4 Furthermore, Hispanic adults are known to receive lower quality of diabetes health care compared to non-Hispanic Whites, for example with less frequent measurement of A1C.9 The compounding of societal influences and poor care quality likely drives higher rates of diabetes complications and diabetes-related deaths among Hispanic people compared to non-Hispanic Whites.10
At the individual level, biologic interactions between type 2 diabetes, obesity, and severe COVID-19 infection further contribute to disproportionate deaths among Hispanic communities.11,12 Both type 2 diabetes and obesity are more prevalent in the Hispanic community than the non-Hispanic White community.13–15 Diabetes increases the risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes likely due, in part, to exacerbation of underlying COVID-19-related hyperglycemia which worsens cardiovascular and thromboembolic complications.16 Furthermore, individual stress is associated with diabetes diagnosis17 as well as hyperglycemia.18 Such stress and related trauma increased during the COVID-19 pandemic.19 These individual factors combined with increased system-level barriers to mental health resources in Hispanic communities during the pandemic.20,21 The combination of these individual and system-level factors increased the odds of more severe COVID-19 infection.12
International studies also demonstrate mixed results about the impact of the pandemic on the diabetes self-management. Some studies reported worsening of glycemic control after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic often related to increasing body mass index (BMI).22–25 However, other studies found no difference in BMI or glycemic control during the pandemic.26,27 Several studies examined stress and wellbeing of people with diabetes during the pandemic: D’Onofrio et al. found that patients in Italy with increases in A1C and BMI during panemic-related lockdown were more likely to have lower scores on a Pscyhological General Well-Being Index.26 Ruissen et al. found that clinic patients with diabetes in the Netherlands with higher elevated generalized stress had poorer glycemic control; however, they found no connection between COVID-19-related anxiety and glycemic control.28 Several other studies focused on lifestyle behaviors among people with type 2 diabetes during the pandemic: Ruiz-Roso et al. found statistically significant increases in consumption of vegetables, sugary foods, and snacks among patients in Spain with well-controlled type 2 diabetes from one hospital in Madrid during the COVID-19 lockdown.29 Tao et al. found 74.5% of patients with type 2 diabetes in Wuhan, China had poor glycemic control during home quarantine. However, they found no differences between people with diabetes that was well versus poorly controlled in vegetable intake, exercise, sleep or anxiety.30 We found no studies focused on Hispanic adults living in the U.S.
Safety net clinic settings across the U.S. attempt to offer targeted support to Hispanic people living with type 2 diabetes to assist them to overcome barriers during the COVID-19 pandemic. For example, some clinics implemented outreach programs to ensure care continuity via telehealth.31,32 Such virtual care efforts have shown promise before the pandemic in the management of veterans with diabetes with improved A1C, prescription of appropriate medications, and completion of microalbuminuria testing.33 However, little is known about if/how such virtual support was able to overcome the pandemic-related challenges of Hispanic adults living with type 2 diabetes. Therefore, the objective of this study was to characterize the material, health, and social impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on a longitudinal cohort of Hispanic adults with type 2 diabetes using clinic services at two safety net health systems. Participants were enrolled in a longitudinal clinical trial which began before the pandemic. This study documents COVID-19 stress and general impact as well as changes between pre-pandemic and pandemic time points in diabetes self-management behaviors, diabetes self-efficacy, diabetes social support, diabetes-related quality of life, and diabetes-related health care utilization.
Methods
Research Design
This exploratory study embedded a cross-sectional survey about COVID-19 into an ongoing longitudinal randomized control trial. This involved collection of new, COVID-19-specific cross-sectional survey questions and analysis of previously planned longitudinal survey questions. The trial tests the impact on glycemic control (A1C) and diabetes self-care of a digital storytelling intervention for Hispanic adults with type 2 diabetes developed by a community-engaged research partnership using a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach.34–36
Setting and Participants
The setting of this study was safety net primary care clinics in one Southwest and one Midwest state. Participants were drawn from patient diabetes registries and invited to enroll at regularly scheduled clinic visits. Eligible participants included patients who 1) self-identified as Hispanic or Latino, 2) had age between 18 and 70 years, 3) received primary care at one of the participating clinical sites, 4) attended at least one office visit within the previous 12 months to the primary care site, 5) had a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes in the medical record, 6) had type 2 diabetes diagnosis for six months or longer, 7) had a most recent A1C≥8%, and 8) intended to continue to receive medical care at the recruitment clinic for the next six months. Patients who tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) were excluded. This aligned with the study objective to assess the impact of COVID-19 on diabetes management and to focus on socioeconomic and healthcare access/utilization impacts from the pandemic rather than medical/physiologic impact of COVID-19 itself. Eligible patients were stratified by site and sex. To document changes in diabetes management due to the COVID-19 pandemic, participants who completed the parent study were contacted.
Data Collection
The trial protocol included collection of longitudinal survey data from study participants at baseline (in-person), 6-weeks (by telephone), and 3 month (in-person). In-person data collection occurred before or after clinic visits whenever possible. COVID-19-related research restrictions required some conversion to telephone collection of survey data in 2020. Longitudinal data was collected from 2/13/2019 to 9/21/2020. Cross-sectional, COVID-19 survey data were added via an additional telephone survey conducted from 2/12/2021 to 4/9/2021.
Outcome Measures
The pre-pandemic time point included baseline data from trial enrollment, all conducted before 3/9/2020. The pandemic time point included data collected after 2/12/2021.
The following longitudinal trial survey measures were used: self-management behaviors as measured by the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities Measure,40 diabetes self-efficacy,41 diabetes social support,42 diabetes-related quality of life,43 and diabetes-related health care utilization (abstracted from electronic health records). All instruments have been previously developed and implemented in English and Spanish.
Modified survey instruments were used from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Repository of COVID-19 Research Tools to assess COVID-19 impact on material, health, and social factors relating to type 2 diabetes self-management. This included the Coronavirus Anxiety Scale,37 a 5 question instrument rating frequency of anxiety symptoms in the past 2 weeks with a sum score as previously reported in the literature.37 To minimize reporting burden, we chose a subset of the the material and social factors from the Coronavirus Impact Scale38 and the Pandemic Impacts Inventory39 authors deemed relevant to Hispanic adults. Chosen items assessed the pandemic’s impact on family income/employment, food access, medical care access using likert like scales, and infected family members using counts and severity ratings. An open-ended question asked participants to describe any other ways the pandemic has impacted their diabetes management.
Data Analysis
Cross sectional data were summarized using means and standard deviations for continuous variables and proportions for categorical variables. Differences between pre-pandemic and pandemic time points were compared using two-sided, two-sample t-tests for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables. As a sensitivity analysis, we completed longitudinal modeling using repeated measures mixed models using each subject’s baseline value as their own control value.
Results
We surveyed 79 Hispanic adults with type 2 diabetes; two were excluded after their free text responses confirmed they had tested positive for Sars-CoV-2. Our total sample was 77 participants: 55% from clinics in the Southwest US and 45% from clinics in the Midwest. At the Midwest site, we approached 58 people. Thirty-six (62%) completed the COVID-19 and related survey instruments; 3 (5%) declined explicitly; 10 (17%) were unable to be reached for a final participation decision; and 8 (14%) were ineligible as they reported positive SARS-CoV-2. These data were not collected at the Southwest site. At both sites, the majority of respondents were Spanish-speaking females with low income and some high school education. Table 1 summarizes the demographic characteristics of surveyed Hispanic adults with type 2 diabetes.
Table 1.
Respondents | Percentage total unless noted (N=77) |
---|---|
Control Group - Usual Clinical Care | 84.4% |
Intervention Group - Digital Storytelling Intervention | 15.6% |
Site | |
Midwest urban safety net hospital | 45.5% |
Southwest community health center | 54.5% |
Sex | |
Male | 29.9% |
Female | 70.1% |
Marital status * | |
Never married | 24.5% |
Married | 49.1% |
Separated/Divorced/Widowed | 26.4% |
Education * | |
8 grades or less | 45.3% |
Some high school | 28.3% |
High school graduate or GED | 11.3% |
Some college or technical school | 11.3% |
College graduate (bachelor’s degree) | 3.8% |
Average yearly family income † | |
$0 to $9,999 | 35.5% |
$10,000 to $19,999 | 30.3% |
$20,000 to $29,999 | 15.8% |
$30,000 to $39,999 | 11.8% |
$40,000 to $49,999 | 5.3% |
$50,000 to $74,999 | 1.3% |
Current employment † | |
Working 35 hours or more a week | 28.9% |
Working less than 35 hours a week | 26.3% |
Unemployed, Retired, or Disabled | 44.7% |
US born | |
Yes | 11.7% |
Preferred language | |
English | 7.8% |
Spanish | 92.2% |
Housing type | |
An apartment or mobile home/trailer | 44.2% |
A house/townhouse/condo | 53.2% |
Room/rented room | 1.3% |
Government housing (Military, etc.) | 1.3% |
Hemoglobin A1C | |
Mean (SD) | 9.0 (1.9) |
LDL Cholesterol | |
Mean (SD) | 95.6 (37.1) |
Systolic Blood Pressure | |
Mean (SD) | 127.7 (18.1) |
Diastolic Blood Pressure | |
Mean (SD) | 81.3 (13.9) |
BMI | |
Mean (SD) | 29.6 (5.4) |
24 respondents did not report this item. They were omitted from denominator for reported percentages.
1 respondent did not report this item. They were omitted from denominator for reported percentages.
Respondents demonstrated minimal COVID-19-related anxiety symptoms (e.g. dizziness, sleep troubles, low appetite). The mean score of 1.6 (SD 3.8, median 0.0) out of 20 possible points reflects low endorsement and low frequency of anxiety symptoms when thinking about COVID-19. However, majority of respondents had an immediate family member and even more members of their extended family who contracted COVID-19. Table 2 describes further COVID-19 related stress and general impact among Hispanic adults with diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Free text comments (n=32) to the open-ended question about other ways the pandemic has impacted diabetes management included frequent mention of the financial impact of the pandemic on respondents. They cited job loss, insurance loss (sometimes related to job loss), and subsequent difficulties affording food and medication. Respondents also shared anxiety and fear related to the pandemic overall and specifically about going to clinic appointments or the hospital. Mask-wearing, going to the store to buy food, and high rates of infection among co-workers also caused anxiety. Respondents shared isolation from family members but several also mentioned trying to stay positive.
Table 2.
Respondents | Percentage total, unless noted (N=77) |
---|---|
Coronavirus Anxiety Scale, summary score * | |
Mean (SD) | 1.6 (3.8) |
Median | 0.0 |
Range | 0–20 |
Coronavirus Impact Scale, select items | |
Impact of the pandemic on family income/employment | |
No change | 22.7% |
Mild (Small change, able to meet all needs and pay bills.) | 22.7% |
Moderate (Having to make cuts but able to meet basic needs and pay bills.) | 37.3% |
Severe (Unable to meet basic needs and/or pay bills.) | 17.3% |
Missing | 2 |
Impact of the pandemic on food access | |
No change | 53.3% |
Mild (Enough food but difficulty getting to stores and/or finding needed items.) | 21.3% |
Moderate (Occasionally without enough food and/or good quality (e.g., healthy) foods.) | 17.3% |
Severe (Frequently without enough food and/or good quality (e.g., healthy) foods.) | 8.0% |
Missing | 2 |
Impact of the pandemic on medical health care access | |
No change | 24.0% |
Mild (Appointments moved to telehealth.) | 38.7% |
Moderate (Delays or cancellations in appointments and/or delays in getting prescriptions; changes have had minimal impact on health.) | 29.3% |
Severe (Unable to access needed care resulting in moderate to severe impact on health.) | 8.0% |
Missing | 2 |
Number of immediate family members diagnosed with coronavirus | |
Mean (SD) | 0.5 (.8) |
Range | 0–4 |
Number of extended family members diagnosed with coronavirus | |
Mean (SD) | 1.7 (2.7) |
Range | 0–15 |
Most severe symptoms of affected family member† | |
Mild | 40.0% |
Moderate | 10.0% |
Severe | 26.0% |
Extended | 24.0% |
Missing | 27 |
3 respondents did not report this item.
27 respondents did not report this item. They were omitted from denominator for reported percentages.
The COVID-19 pandemic impacted numerous aspects of diabetes care for most survey respondents. Most commonly, participants reported less access to their diabetes health care providers, engaging in less physical activity, more overeating, and more frequent hyperglycemia. Some respondents also described difficulty getting diabetes pills, testing supplies, and insulin. Table 3 summarizes the reported impacts on diabetes of the COVID-19 pandemic among Hispanic adults. Free text comments (n=32) to the open-ended question reinforce these findings with respondents endorsing difficulty affording insulin and diabetes medications/supplies. They also noted stress-eating due to isolation and anxiety. Numerous participants described dislike of or difficulties using telehealth and accessing the pharmacy by phone. One told us simply “I want everything to be over so we could go back to regular doctor visits” and another, “I miss see[ing] my doctor.”
Table 3.
Changes since the pandemic | Reported change (affirmative response) N=77* |
---|---|
Got less medical care than usual | 45.3% |
More frequent hyperglycemia | 37.3% |
Less physical activity or exercise | 34.7% |
Overeating or eating more unhealthy/junk foods | 30.7% |
More sedentary time | 28.0% |
Unable to get diabetes medical care | 24.0% |
Unable to get testing supplies | 16.0% |
Unable to get diabetes pills | 14.7% |
Unable to get insulin* | 14.7% |
More frequent hypoglycemia | 10.7% |
Increase in health problems related to diabetes | 9.3% |
2 respondents did not report each of the items. They were omitted from denominator for reported percentages.
In contrast to these cross-sectional reports of negative pandemic impact on diabetes management, bivariate analyses of longitudinal data comparing pre-pandemic vs. pandemic time points on a variety of diabetes measures demonstrate varied differences that meet statistical significance. No significant change was seen in measured diabetes self-management behaviors. Diabetes social support also did not demonstrate significant change. However, diabetes self-efficacy improved significantly (+0.5, P=0.003) among respondents from pre-pandemic to pandemic time points. Diabetes-related quality of life overall also improved significantly (+0.5, P<0.001). This was driven by improvements in both physical (+0.5, P= 0.006) and emotional (+0.6, P= 0.006) well-being reported during the pandemic. Diabetes-related health care utilization of outpatient visits also demonstrated significant change confirming cross-sectional findings. Overall outpatient diabetes visits with all provider types decreased (−0.6 visits per in the past 12 mo. P=0.003) driven by significant reductions in the mean reported primary care (−0.2, P=0.003) and behavioral health (−0.1, P=0.01) care visits in the past 12 months. In spite of cross-sectional and free text reports about financial and logistical barriers, a single question 7-day adherence measure of diabetes medication adherence for pills and insulin did not change. Table 4 summarizes the data comparing change in diabetes measures among Hispanic adults before and after the COVID-19 pandemic.
Table 4.
Pre-COVID, Mean (SD) | COVID-19, Mean (SD) | P-value | |
---|---|---|---|
Diabetes Self Care Behaviors, days in the past 7 days with: | |||
Five or more servings of fruits, vegetables | 4.1 (2.4) | 3.9 (2.4) | 0.65 |
High fat foods like red meat, fried food, cheese | 3.0 (2.0) | 2.6 (1.7) | 0.12 |
30 minutes of continuous physical activity | 4.3 (2.6) | 3.6 (2.7) | 0.06 |
Test blood sugar† | 5.6 (2.5) | 5.0 (2.7) | 0.20 |
Diabetes medication adherence | 6.6 (1.3) | 6.5 (1.7) | 0.56 |
Diabetes self-efficacy | 7.5 (1.9)* | 8.0 (1.6) | 0.003 |
Diabetes social support | 2.7 (1.2) | 2.5 (1.4) | 0.34 |
Diabetes-related quality of life | 2.9 (1.0)* | 3.4 (0.8) | P < 0.001 |
Satisfaction with current diabetes treatment plan | 3.4 (1.0) | 3.6 (0.9) | 0.07 |
Physical well-being over the last week | 2.8 (1.2)* | 3.3 (1.1) | 0.006 |
Emotional well-being over the last week | 2.6 (1.5)* | 3.2 (1.2) | 0.006 |
Diabetes-related health care visits (outpatient) | |||
All providers‡ | 2.4 (1.2)* | 1.8 (1.4) | P < 0.001 |
Visits with primary care provider (MD, DO, NP, PA) | 1.0 (0.0)* | 0.8 (0.4) | P < 0.001 |
Visits with behavioral health provider | 0.3 (0.5)* | 0.2 (0.4) | 0.01 |
Smoked any cigarettes in the past 7 days, yes/no | 16.9% | 10.4% | 0.06 |
Indicates pairwise difference of p<0.05 between pre-COVID/COVID
This item was asked only to the 72 people who reported access to a glucometer.
All providers included: Primary care provider, Endocrinology provider, Dietician, Diabetes Educator, Diabetes Education Class, Behavioral Health, Clinical Pharmacy, Other diabetes-related visits. Only provider types with significant difference pre-COVID/COVID are reported.
Our sensitivity analysis from our longitudinal mixed model confirmed all of the original conclusions did not change after adjusting for confounding factors (Table 5).
Table 5.
COVID-19 Effect Estimate | P-value | |
---|---|---|
Diabetes Self Care Behaviors, days in the past 7 days with: | ||
Five or more servings of fruits, vegetables | −0.17 | 0.65 |
High fat foods like red meat, fried food, cheese | −0.40 | 0.12 |
30 minutes of continuous physical activity | −0.68 | 0.06 |
Test blood sugar† | −0.51 | 0.19 |
Diabetes medication adherence | −0.13 | 0.56 |
Diabetes self-efficacy | 0.62* | 0.003 |
Diabetes social support | −0.14 | 0.34 |
Diabetes-related quality of life | 0.46* | P < 0.001 |
Satisfaction with current diabetes treatment plan | 0.27 | 0.07 |
Physical well-being over the last week | 0.54* | 0.005 |
Emotional well-being over the last week | 0.59* | 0.006 |
Diabetes-related health care visits (outpatient) | ||
All providers‡ | −0.51* | P < 0.001 |
Visits with primary care provider (MD, DO, NP, PA) | −0.13* | 0.001 |
Visits with behavioral health provider | −0.13* | 0.01 |
Smoked any cigarettes in the past 7 days, yes/no | −0.07 | 0.06 |
Indicates pairwise difference of p<0.05 between pre-COVID/COVID
This item was asked only to the 72 people who reported access to a glucometer.
All providers included: Primary care provider, Endocrinology provider, Dietician, Diabetes Educator, Diabetes Education Class, Behavioral Health, Clinical Pharmacy, Other diabetes-related visits. Only provider types with significant difference pre-COVID/COVID are reported.
Discussion
Our longitudinal sample of Hispanic adults with type 2 diabetes representing two regions of the US uniquely describes the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on overall wellbeing and diabetes management. Despite high reports in our cross-sectional data of negative pandemic impacts on their families’ financial stability, food and health care access, as well as less physical activity, more hyperglycemia, and more overeating/eating junk food, longitudinal data do not show significant changes in diabetes self-care behaviors. Fruit/vegetable intake, eating high fat foods, and doing 30 min. of continuous physical activity did not demonstrate significant change from pre-pandemic measures. Reports of COVID-19-related anxiety were low, and no changes were seen in diabetes-related social spport. Improvements were observed in diabetes self efficacy and diabetes related quality of life. Hispanic adults with type 2 diabetes surveyed in this study demonstrated substantial resilience in their diabetes self-care and wellness despite facing numerous challenges during the pandemic.
These results reinforce many findings from the literature. Cross-sectional data demonstrating high rates of COVID-19 infection among immediate and extended family members reinforce epidemiologic studies documenting high rates of COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and death in the Hispanic community.44–46 Similar to studies of clinic patients in the Netherlands and Italy, the impact of the pandemic on diabetes self-management behaviors was minimal.26–28 This may be due to ongoing clinic support via phone or video, access to needed prescription and supply refills, support from family/household members, or other factors. Ruissen et al. note that majority of patients with type 2 diabetes deny increased levels of stress or anxiety (>50% report no change or less stress or anxiety) which aligns with our findings of improved emotional wellbeing.
This study underscores prior research by members of the study team about diabetes management among immigrants, specifically the Hispanic community. Njeru et al. previously documented that patients with diabetes using interpreter services were more likely to have A1C and LDL measured within 6 mo. but less likely to reach target management goals for these measures.47 This pattern is reinforced by study findings of high baseline A1C (Table 1) and consistent use of health care for diabetes management (Table 4) as well as free text responses expressing dismay of the interruption of the patient-provider relationship and decrease clinic access during the pandemic. Furthermore, diabetes social support remained steady before and during the pandemic which supports self-care behaviors and overall resilience (Table 4). Our results reinforce that Hipsanic adults with type 2 diabetes engaged in clinical care have high motivation and interest in maintaining good diabetes health. In spite of access barriers and substantial economic and family strain due to the pandemic, diabetes self-management behaviors and social support remained steady, health care seeking behaviors continued, and wellness overall improved.
This study was subject to a number of limitations. First, this clinic-connected sample is not generalizable to the entire Hispanic population as it does not include those with highest barriers to healthcare. We expect the overall experience of the Hispanic population to reflect more difficulties with diabetes self-management and health care access. Second, there was a relatively small sample of trial participants, leaving the study under-powered to detect subtle changes in self-reported measures. Third, due to conversion to remote study procedures during the pandemic without consistent measurement of height, weight, A1C, there was too much missing data to compare pre-pandemic to pandemic changes in these outcomes. Fourth, we enrolled a minority of patients who received the trial intervention (a digital storytelling support video) which may have influenced their diabetes care, although is unlikely to have impacted their experiences of COVID-19.35 Despite these limitations, this study presents important early data on the experience of Hispanic adults in the US with type 2 diabetes – a critically important population with substantial burden of COVID-19 and ongoing diabetes management risk.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this study is among the first to document the experience of Hispanic adults with diabetes in two US regions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite high levels of access barriers, financial strain, and infection of family members with COVID-19, survey respondents continued to prioritize their diabetes self-management and demonstrated substantial resilience by improving their self-efficacy and quality of life (both physical and emotional well-being).
Implications/Relevance for Diabetes Educators.
This study offers important conclusions for diabetes educators working with diverse populations. Despite substantial and disproportionate financial, social, and health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, Hispanic adults with type 2 diabetes who attended clinic maintained or imporved their diabetes self care, self-efficacy, and quality of life. This reinforces an asset-based approach familiar to diabetes educators that appreciates the resilience of their patients and families. In spite of this resilience, diabetes educators should assess and offer local resources to support the grief and healing of Spanish-speaking and other non-English-speaking families who have a higher likelihood of experiencing a COVID-19-related death in the family and/or financial strain related to the pandemic. Financial resources and support to reconnect with clinic, pharmacy, and diabetes supplies will be an important part of maintained diabetes wellness as the pandemic continues.
Acknowledgements:
This publication was supported by CTSA Grant No. UL1 TR000135 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) and by the National Institute Of Diabetes And Digestive And Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grant No. R01 DK113999–01A1. KD Vickery’s work on this project was supported by the National Institute Of Diabetes And Digestive And Kidney Diseases of the NIH under Award Number K23DK118117. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. The funding bodies had no role in study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the manuscript; and in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. We’d like to than the following individuals who assisted with data collection and participant follow-up: Crystal Gonzalez, Sandra Bahena,Elizabeth Hernandez, Breidy Garcia, and Adriana Jeffrey.
References
- 1.Arias E, Betzaida T-V, Ahmad F, Kochanek K. Provisional Life Expectancy Estimates for 2020. National Center for Health Statistics (U.S.); 2021. doi: 10.15620/cdc:107201 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bailey ZD, Krieger N, Agénor M, Graves J, Linos N, Bassett MT. Structural racism and health inequities in the USA: evidence and interventions. The Lancet. 2017;389(10077):1453–1463. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30569-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tai DBG, Shah A, Doubeni CA, Sia IG, Wieland ML. The Disproportionate Impact of COVID-19 on Racial and Ethnic Minorities in the United States. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72(4):703–706. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa815 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ogunwole SM, Golden SH. Social Determinants of Health and Structural Inequities—Root Causes of Diabetes Disparities. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(1):11–13. doi: 10.2337/dci20-0060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Macias Gil R, Marcelin JR, Zuniga-Blanco B, Marquez C, Mathew T, Piggott DA. COVID-19 Pandemic: Disparate Health Impact on the Hispanic/Latinx Population in the United States. J Infect Dis. 2020;222(10):1592–1595. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa474 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Baquero B, Gonzalez C, Ramirez M, Chavez Santos E, Ornelas IJ. Understanding and Addressing Latinx COVID-19 Disparities in Washington State. Health Educ Behav. 2020;47(6):845–849. doi: 10.1177/1090198120963099 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chan JCN, Lim L-L, Wareham NJ, et al. The Lancet Commission on diabetes: using data to transform diabetes care and patient lives. The Lancet. 2020;396(10267):2019–2082. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32374-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mendenhall E. Syndemic Suffering: Social Distress, Depression, and Diabetes among Mexican Immigrant Women. Reprint edition. Oxfordshire, England: Routledge; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 9.2019 National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Accessed May 3, 2021. http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/nhqrdr/nhqdr19/index.html [PubMed]
- 10.Spanakis EK, Golden SH. Race/Ethnic Difference in Diabetes and Diabetic Complications. Curr Diab Rep. 2013;13(6):814–823. doi: 10.1007/s11892-013-0421-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M, et al. Presenting Characteristics, Comorbidities, and Outcomes Among 5700 Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 in the New York City Area. JAMA. 2020;323(20):2052. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6775 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gregory JM, Slaughter JC, Duffus SH, et al. COVID-19 Severity Is Tripled in the Diabetes Community: A Prospective Analysis of the Pandemic’s Impact in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(2):526–532. doi: 10.2337/dc20-2260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hales CM, Carroll MD, Fryar CD, Ogden CL. Prevalence of Obesity Among Adults and Youth: United States, 2015–2016. NCHS data brief. 2017;(288):8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hypertension Arasteh K., diabetes and poverty among Latinx immigrants in New York City: implications for COVID-19. Int J Migr Health Soc Care. 2021;17(2):208–241. doi: 10.1108/IJMHSC-09-2020-0088 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Statistics Report, 2020. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services. Accessed June 10, 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/library/features/diabetes-stat-report.html. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lim S, Bae JH, Kwon H-S, Nauck MA. COVID-19 and diabetes mellitus: from pathophysiology to clinical management. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2021;17(1):11–30. doi: 10.1038/s41574-020-00435-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jiang L, Beals J, Whitesell NR, Roubideaux Y, Manson SM, AI-SUPERPFP Team. Stress Burden and Diabetes in Two American Indian Reservation Communities. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(3):427–429. doi: 10.2337/dc07-2044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bermúdez-Millán A, Wagner JA, Feinn RS, et al. Inflammation and Stress Biomarkers Mediate the Association between Household Food Insecurity and Insulin Resistance among Latinos with Type 2 Diabetes. J Nutr. 2019;149(6):982–988. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxz021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.McKnight-Eily LR, Okoro CA, Strine TW, et al. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Prevalence of Stress and Worry, Mental Health Conditions, and Increased Substance Use Among Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic — United States, April and May 2020. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70(5):162–166. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7005a3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kouyoumdjian H, Zamboanga BL, Hansen DJ. Barriers to Community Mental Health Services for Latinos: Treatment Considerations. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2003;10(4):394–422. doi: 10.1093/clipsy.bpg041 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ojha R, Syed S. Challenges faced by mental health providers and patients during the coronavirus 2019 pandemic due to technological barriers. Internet Interv. 2020;21:100330. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2020.100330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Xue T, Li Q, Zhang Q, et al. Blood glucose levels in elderly subjects with type 2 diabetes during COVID-19 outbreak: a retrospective study in a single center. medRxiv [preprint]. 2020. Accessed April 14, 2021. doi: 10.1101/2020.03.31.20048579 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Karatas S, Yesim T, Beysel S. Impact of lockdown COVID-19 on metabolic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus and healthy people. Prim Care Diabetes. 2021;15(3):424–427. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2021.01.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Biancalana E, Parolini F, Mengozzi A, Solini A. Short-term impact of COVID-19 lockdown on metabolic control of patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes: a single-centre observational study. Acta Diabetol. 2021;58(4):431–436. doi: 10.1007/s00592-020-01637-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Biamonte E, Pegoraro F, Carrone F, et al. Weight change and glycemic control in type 2 diabetes patients during COVID-19 pandemic: the lockdown effect. Endocrine. 2021;72(3):604–610. doi: 10.1007/s12020-021-02739-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.D’Onofrio L, Pieralice S, Maddaloni E, et al. Effects of the COVID-19 lockdown on glycaemic control in subjects with type 2 diabetes: the glycalock study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021;23(7):1624–1630. doi: 10.1111/dom.14380 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Falcetta P, Aragona M, Ciccarone A, et al. Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on glucose control of elderly people with type 2 diabetes in Italy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021;174:108750. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.108750 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ruissen MM, Regeer H, Landstra CP, et al. Increased stress, weight gain and less exercise in relation to glycemic control in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021;9(1):e002035. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-002035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ruiz-Roso MB, Knott-Torcal C, Matilla-Escalante DC, et al. COVID-19 Lockdown and Changes of the Dietary Pattern and Physical Activity Habits in a Cohort of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Nutrients. 2020;12(8):E2327. doi: 10.3390/nu12082327 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tao J, Gao L, Liu Q, et al. Factors contributing to glycemic control in diabetes mellitus patients complying with home quarantine during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020;170:108514. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108514 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Khoong EC, Butler BA, Mesina O, et al. Patient interest in and barriers to telemedicine video visits in a multilingual urban safety-net system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021;28(2):349–353. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa234 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.National Consortium of Telehealth Resource Centers. Hennepin Healthcare Focuses on Serving Most Vulnerable Patients. May 5, 2021. Accessed June 10, 2021. https://telehealthresourcecenter.org/resources/success-stories/hennepin-healthcare-focuses-on-serving-most-vulnerable-patients/.
- 33.Lu AD, Gunzburger E, Glorioso TJ, et al. Impact of Longitudinal Virtual Primary Care on Diabetes Quality of Care. J Gen Intern Med. 2021. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06547-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wieland ML, Njeru JW, Hanza MM, et al. Pilot Feasibility Study of a Digital Storytelling Intervention for Immigrant and Refugee Adults With Diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2017;43(4):349–359. doi: 10.1177/0145721717713317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Njeru JW, Patten CA, Hanza MMK, et al. Stories for change: development of a diabetes digital storytelling intervention for refugees and immigrants to minnesota using qualitative methods. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):1311. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2628-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wieland ML. Stories for Change: Digital Storytelling for Diabetes Self-Management Among Hispanic Adults. clinicaltrials.gov; 2021. Accessed August 12, 2021. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03766438
- 37.Lee SA. Coronavirus Anxiety Scale: A brief mental health screener for COVID-19 related anxiety. Death Stud. 2020;44(7):393–401. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2020.1748481 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Stoddard J, Reynolds EK, Paris R, et al. The Coronavirus Impact Scale: Construction, Validation, and Comparisons in Diverse Clinical Samples. PsyArXiv [preprint]. May 24, 2021. Accessed June 4, 2020. doi: 10.31234/osf.io/kz4pg [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Grasso DJ, Briggs-Gowan MJ, Ford JD, Carter AS. The Epidemic – Pandemic Impacts Inventory (EPII). 2020. Accessed June 4, 2020. https://osf.io/ng45c/.
- 40.Toobert DJ, Hampson SE, Glasgow RE. The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care. 2000;23(7):943–950. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.7.943 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lorig K, Stewart A, Ritter P, González V, Laurent D., Lynch J. Outcome Measures for Health Education and Other Health Care Interventions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1996. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Fitzgerald JT, Davis WK, Connell CM, Hess GE, Funnell MM, Hiss RG. Development and Validation of the Diabetes Care Profile. Eval Health Prof. 1996;19(2):208–230. doi: 10.1177/016327879601900205 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Burroughs TE, Desikan R, Waterman BM, Gilin D, McGill J. Development and Validation of the Diabetes Quality of Life Brief Clinical Inventory. Diabetes Spectr. 2004;17(1):41–49. doi: 10.2337/diaspect.17.1.41 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bassett MT, Chen JT, Krieger N. Variation in racial/ethnic disparities in COVID-19 mortality by age in the United States: A cross-sectional study. PLOS Med. 2020;17(10):e1003402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003402 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Vahidy FS, Nicolas JC, Meeks JR, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: analysis of a COVID-19 observational registry for a diverse US metropolitan population. BMJ Open. 2020;10(8):e039849. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039849 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Rozenfeld Y, Beam J, Maier H, et al. A model of disparities: risk factors associated with COVID-19 infection. Int J Equity Health. 2020;19(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01242-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Njeru JW, Boehm DH, Jacobson DJ, et al. Diabetes Outcome and Process Measures Among Patients Who Require Language Interpreter Services in Minnesota Primary Care Practices. J Community Health. 2017;42(4):819–825. doi: 10.1007/s10900-017-0323-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]