Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 17;11(8):1367. doi: 10.3390/cells11081367

Table 1.

Oxidative-stress-related blood AD biomarkers.

Ref Study Cohort and Design Plasma/Serum Measurement Methods Results Cohort of Variation Biomarker/s
Proposed
Han et al., 2021 [164] 1–42-treated PC12 cells, brain and hippocampus of APP/PS1 mouse, and the serum of AD patients Serum Probe 1 *, ELISA assay or LC–MS ↑ Hcy
↓ Cys and GSH
AD vs. HC Hcy, Cys, and GSH changes in the serum
Evlice et al., 2017 [165] 30 AD (15 females and 15 males) and 10 HC (7 males and 3 females) Serum Activity and quantitative G6PD kit ↑ serum G6PD AD vs. HC Serum G6PD levels
Peña-Bautista
et al., 2021 [166]
12 preclinical AD and 31 HC Plasma Chromatography and mass spectrometry ↓ lipid peroxidation
-15-F2t-IsoP correlates with p-tau
-15-F2t-IsoP correlates with t-tau
AD vs. HC (non-significant) Plasma isoprostanoids (combination of 10 biomarkers)
Zengi et al., 2012 [168] 21 AD (10 men and 11 women) and 20 HC (11 men and 9 women) Serum PON1 activity absorbance assay ↓ serum PON1 AD vs. HC Serum PON1 activity
López et al., 2013 [176] 36 AD, 18 MCI, and 33 aged HC Blood ↑ Copper and MDA AD and MCI vs. HC Blood copper, MDA, and SOD
Pradhan et al., 2022 [175] 47 AD, 43 MCI, and 48 HC Serum SPR and Western blot ↓ SIRT1, SIRT3, and SIRT6 AD vs. MCI and HC Serum SIRT1, SIRT3, and SIRT6 concentration
Cardoso et al., 2014 [170] 27 AD, 17 MCI, and 28 HC Plasma Hydride generation atomic absorption spectroscopy ↓ plasma Se
↓ erythrocyte Se
-AD vs. MCI and HC
-AD and MCI vs. HC
Plasma Se levels
García et al., 2021 [10] 20 MCI (13 males and 7 females), 20 AD (11 males and 9 females), and 15 PD (12 males and 3 females) and HC (age and sex matched). Plasma Electrochemical immunosensor ↑ Unfolded p53
↑ Unfolded p53
-MCI, AD, and PD vs. HC
-AD vs. MCI and PD
Plasma unfolded p53
Peña-Bautista
et al., 2021 [167]
6 AD and 13 MCI Plasma LC–MS ↑ dihomo-isoprostanes (17-epi-17-F2t-dihomo-IsoP, 17-F2t-dihomo-IsoP, Ent-7(RS)-7-F2t-dihomo-IsoP) and neuroprostanes (10-epi-10-F4t-NeuroP) AD vs. MCI Plasma isoprostanoids levels
Picco et al., 2014 [169] 23 SCI, 28 MCI, and 34 mild AD Plasma Spectrophotometric analysis ↓ eSOD activity
↓ CAT activity
= GPx activity
-AD vs. SCI
-AD vs. MCI and SCI
Plasma eSOD, CAT, and GPx activity combined with functional neuroimaging
Lin et al., 2021 [163] 49 MCI and 16 HC Plasma Commercially available assay kit ↓ plasma GSH MCI vs. HC Plasma GSH levels
Li et al., 2021 [173] 839 HC Serum ↑ Serum uric acid
= Serum uric acid in healthy individuals with or without tau pathology
Preclinical AD vs. HC Serum uric acid
Du et al., 2019 [172] 113 aMCI and 832 HC Serum Commercial ELISA kit ↑ Serum IMA and IMA/albumin aMCI vs. HC Serum IMA
Wu et al., 2021 [171] 88 HC, 201 with cognitive impairment and no dementia (CIND) and 207 with dementia (160 AD and 47 vascular dementia) Plasma LC–MS/MS ↓ plasma Dementia vs. CIND and HC Plasma ergothioneine levels

Abbreviations: AD, Alzheimer’s disease; aMCI, amnestic mild cognitive impairment; APP/PS1, double transgenic mouse model of AD; CAT, catalase; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; eSOD, extracellular superoxide dismutase; G6PD, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase; GPx, glutathione peroxidase; GSH, glutathione; HC, healthy controls; Hcy, homocysteine; IMA, ischemia-modified albumin; LC–MS, liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; MDA, malondialdehyde; PD, Parkinson’s disease; PON1, paraoxonase 1; SCI, subjective cognitive impairment; SEC–ICP–MS, size exclusion chromatography–inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry; SPR, surface plasmon resonance; * Probe 1, ethyl (E)-3-(9-chloro-11-oxo-2,3,6,7-tetrahydro-1H,5H,11H-pyrano [2,3-f] pyrido [3,2,1-ij] quinolin-10-yl)-2-cyanoacrylate; ↓, decrease; ↑, increase.