Skip to main content
PMC home page
Cell & Bioscience logoLink to Cell & Bioscience
. 2022 Apr 27;12:49. doi: 10.1186/s13578-022-00785-8

Histone methyltransferase KMT2D cooperates with MEF2A to promote the stem-like properties of oral squamous cell carcinoma

Xinmiao Wang 1,#, Rui Li 1,#, Luping Wu 1, Yang Chen 1, Shaopeng Liu 1, Hui Zhao 1, Yifan Wang 1, Lin Wang 3,4,5,✉, Zhe Shao 1,2,✉
PMCID: PMC9044881  PMID: 35477537

Abstract

Background

Epigenetic reprogramming is involved in multiple steps of human cancer evolution and is mediated by a variety of chromatin-modifying enzymes. Specifically, the histone lysine methyltransferase KMT2D is among the most frequently mutated genes in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). However, the mechanisms by which KMT2D affects the development of OSCC remain unclear.

Results

In the present study, we found that the expression of KMT2D was elevated in OSCC compared to paracancerous specimens and was correlated with a more advanced tumor grade. More importantly, knockdown of KMT2D impaired their reconstitution in patient-derived organoids and decreased the expression of CD133 and β-catenin in OSCC cells. In in vitro and in vivo models, knockdown of KMT2D reduced the colony formation, migration and invasion abilities of OSCC cells and delayed tumor growth. Mechanistically, the dual-luciferase reporter and co-immunoprecipitation assays in two individual OSCC cell lines indicated that KMT2D may cooperate with MEF2A to promote the transcription activity of CTNNB1, thereby enhancing WNT signaling.

Conclusion

The upregulation of KMT2D contributes to stem-like properties in OSCC cells by sustaining the MEF2A-mediated transcriptional activity of CTNNB1.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13578-022-00785-8.

Keywords: KMT2D, MEF2A, Stemness, OSCC, CTNNB1, Organoid

Background

Head and neck cancer, including oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), is the sixth-most common cancer worldwide. Due to the complexity of genetic and epigenetic variant burdens, only 40–50% of patients with OSCC survive for more than 5 years [1, 2]. A better understanding of the molecular landscape of OSCC may be beneficial for updating clinical treatments. Specifically, epigenetic reprogramming, including DNA methylation and various histone modifications, has been increasingly recognized as a novel hallmark of cancer [3]. Such activity is dynamically orchestrated by a large subset of chromatin-modifying enzymes, such as histone methyltransferase (HMT) and demethylase (HDM), which facilitate the addition or removal of methyl upon histone [3, 4]. It has been widely reported that the aberrant expression of several chromatin-modifying enzymes is closely correlated with tumor relapse, metastasis, and drug resistance, leading to the potential for targeting key epigenetic mediators in patients with cancer [3–7].

Of chromatin modifiers, histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2D (KMT2D) is among the most frequently mutated genes in multiple human cancers, including OSCC [8, 9]. The Cancer Genome Atlas Network (TCGA) revealed that the mutation frequency of KMT2D in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) was 18% among 279 HNSCC patients [10]. Additionally, through whole-exon sequencing of 86 OSCC tissue samples, we revealed that the mutation type of KMT2D in OSCC was mainly missense mutation [11]. Although loss-of-function mutations, such as truncation and missense mutations, account for certain types of mutated KMT2D, KMT2D also appears to play an oncogenic role in a context- or tissue-specific manner [8, 9]. In in vitro cell line experiments, knockdown of KMT2D reduced the proliferation and invasion of pancreatic and breast cancer cells [12, 13]. In breast cancer cell line-derived xenografts, deficiency of KMT2D was correlated with improved prognosis in model animals [12]. More importantly, KMT2D not only catalyzes the methylation of H3K4 and acetylation of H3K27 but also mediates the activation of oncogenic enhancer and superenhancer signatures [14, 15]. Given the role of KMT2D in tumor promotion and suppression, however, the mechanisms by which KMT2D affects the development of patients with OSCC remain exceedingly unclear.

Dysregulation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway represents a central signaling network that aggravates the stem-like properties of tumor cells [16–18]. In patient-derived organoids, a novel individual preclinical model that faithfully resembles the clinical features of parental tumors, the addition of Wnt signal-related agonists is essential for the establishment and long-term expansion of in vitro and in vivo organoid outgrowth [19–21]. As demonstrated by recent studies, oncogenic Wnt signal-related genes, particularly CTNNB1, are also mediated by epigenetic modulation [7]. For instance, a recent study revealed that the transcription of CTNNB1 in cancer cells was mediated by MEF2A, which can be occupied by KMT2D [14, 22]. Therefore, we aimed to determine whether KMT2D functions as a transcription coactivator of MEF2A to mediate stem-like properties in OSCC cells.

Results

Expression pattern of KMT2D in OSCC tumor specimens and cell lines

To profile the expression pattern of KMT2D in patients with OSCC, a panel of OSCC specimens (n = 96) and adjacent oral mucosa tissues (n = 16) were employed to conduct immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining for KMT2D (Fig. 1A). The results showed that the protein level of KMT2D was significantly elevated in OSCC specimens compared with oral mucosa tissues (Fig. 1B). To further confirm the role of KMT2D in the development of OSCC, we analyzed the staining intensity (i.e., histoscores) of KMT2D in OSCC specimens diagnosed with different tumor grades. The results demonstrated that the expression level of KMT2D gradually increased as the pathological grade of patients with OSCC increased (Fig. 1C, Additional file 1: Fig. S1A). However, there was no significant relationship between the expression level of KMT2D and tumor size (Fig. 1D). In line with these findings, analysis of the TCGA database confirmed that among 32 pairs of patient-derived samples, the expression of KMT2D at the mRNA level was stably upregulated in OSCC specimens compared with corresponding paracancerous tissues (Fig. 1E). Furthermore, the immunoblot results suggested that the expression of KMT2D in OSCC cell lines was significantly higher than that in HIOECs (Fig. 1F). Additionally, we extracted proteins from OSCC and normal tissues from four patients, and immunoblotting analysis showed that KMT2D expression was higher in OSCC than in normal tissue (Fig. 1G). Together, these results indicated that the expression of KMT2D may be correlated with the progression of OSCC.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Expression pattern of KMT2D in patients with OSCC. A Representative immunohistochemical staining of KMT2D in normal mucosa and primary OSCC tissue of KMT2D(+) and KMT2D(−). (scale bars = 100 μm). B Quantification analysis of immunohistochemical histoscore of KMT2D among normal mucosa and OSCC. C KMT2D expression levels in OSCC tissues from different pathological grades. D KMT2D expression levels in OSCC tissues from different tumor sizes. E KMT2D mRNA expression levels of paired normal mucosa and OSCC from TCGA datasets. F KMT2D protein expression levels in different cell lines. G KMT2D protein expression in human OSCC tissues and adjacent normal mucosa from the same patient. Results are representative of at least three independent experiments (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01). Data are presented as means ± SD. OSCC, oral squamous cell carcinoma; SD standard deviation, ns no significant, KMT2D(+) KMT2D positive, KMT2D(−) KMT2D negative

KMT2D sustains stem-like properties in patient-derived OSCC organoids

To study the mechanisms of KMT2D in mediating the cellular biology of OSCC, several OSCC specimens (n = 6) were processed into single cells to generate patient-derived organoids (PDOs) according to our prevously described protocol [23]. Notably, the results of the immunofluorescence assay validated that the staining frequency and intensity of KMT2D were elevated in PDOs generated from OSCC compared to those from paracancerous specimens (Fig. 2A), indicating that PDOs resembled the expression pattern of KMT2D in parental tissues. To further investigate the function of KMT2D, primary OSCC cells were transfected with a short hairpin RNA (shRNA) targeting the expression of KMT2D (Sh-KMT2D). Decreased expression of KMT2D was confirmed by immunoblotting assays (Additional file 1: Fig. S1B). The results of the organoid reconstitution assay based on two PDO lines revealed that tumor cells transfected with sh-KMT2D formed fewer and smaller organoids during serial passage (Fig. 2B, C), suggesting that the expression of KMT2D contributes to the stem-like properties of primary OSCC cells. Furthermore, the results of the immunofluorescence assays in PDOs demonstrated that the expression of cancer stem cell markers, such as CD133 and β-catenin, was decreased when cells were transfected with Sh-KMT2D (Fig. 2D, Additional file 1: Fig. S1C).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

KMT2D contributes to the self-renewal ability of primary OSCC cells. A Representative images showed the immunofluorescence staining of KMT2D in patient-derived organoids generated from OSCC and paracancerous specimens, as well as their parental tissues. (scale bars = 50 μm). B Representative images indicated the organoid reconstitution assay (i.e. organoid morphology and clone size) conducted for OSCC cells transfected with Sh-CON and Sh-KMT2D. C Quantificational analysis showed the organoid reconstitution assay (i.e. organoid forming efficiency) conducted for OSCC cells transfected with Sh-KMT2D and Sh-CON. Student's t-test. D Representative images showed the immunofluorescence staining of β-catenin and CD133 in patient-derived OSCC organoids transfected with Sh-CON and Sh-KMT2D. (scale bars = 50 μm) Results are representative of at least three independent experiments(*p < 0.05,**p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001). Data are presented as means ± SD. OSCC oral squamous cell carcinoma, SD standard deviation

Expression of KMT2D aggravates malignant behaviors of OSCC cells

To more systematically understand the role of KMT2D in tumor biology, several OSCC cell lines, including SCC4, SCC25, and Cal27, were transfected with Sh-KMT2D. Decreased expression of KMT2D, H3K4me1 and H3K27ac in OSCC cell lines was confirmed, indicating the role of KMT2D as an epigenetic mediator in these models (Fig. 3A, Additional file 1: Fig. S1D). Then, multiple in vitro experiments, such as 2D clonal formation, 3D sphere formation, wound healing, and matrigel invasion assays, were carried out in OSCC cells transfected with Sh-KMT2D. As shown in Fig. 3B–E, knockdown of KMT2D in OSCC cells resulted in decreased colony formation, sphere formation, cell migration, and invasion efficiency compared to the corresponding cells that were transfected with the control vector (Sh-CON). In addition, immunoblotting assays of cancer stem cell markers, including CD133, OCT4, and ALDH1A1, showed a decrease as KMT2D was knocked down (Additional file 2: Fig. S2A). Taken together, these results demonstrate that the expression of KMT2D aggregates the malignant behaviors of OSCC cells in vitro.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

Expression of KMT2D aggravates malignant behaviors of OSCC cells. A Immunoblotting of KMT2D in SCC4, SCC25, and CAL27 cells respectively transfected with Sh-CON and Sh-KMT2D. B Colony formation assays and quantification analysis generated from SCC4 and SCC25 cells transfected with Sh-CON and Sh-KMT2D. C Sphere formation assays and quantification analysis carried out from SCC4, SCC25, and CAL27 cells transfected with Sh-CON and Sh-KMT2D. (scale bars = 50 μm). D Wound healing assays and quantification analysis generated from SCC4, SCC25, and CAL27 cells transfected with Sh-CON and Sh-KMT2D. (scale bars = 50 μm). E Invasion assays and quantification analysis generated from SCC4, SCC25 cells transfected with Sh-CON and Sh-KMT2D. (scale bars = 50 μm). Results are representative of at least three independent experiments (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001). Data are presented as means ± SD; SD standard deviation

Knockdown of KMT2D impairs OSCC tumor growth in vivo

To further investigate the role of KMT2D in OSCC progression, SCC4 cells transfected with Sh-KMT2D and control vector (Sh-CON) were employed to conduct in vivo transplantation assays. The results showed that knockdown of KMT2D gave rise to delayed growth dynamics of SCC4-derived xenografts, as confirmed by the decreased tumor volume and weight of xenografts initiated by SCC4 cells transfected with Sh-KMT2D, which were recorded at each observation time point (Fig. 4A–D). Furthermore, the results of the immunohistochemistry analysis verified that the expression of cancer stem cell markers, including CD133 and β-catenin, was decreased in SCC4-derived xenografts when KMT2D was knocked down (Fig. 4E). Collectively, these results demonstrated that the expression of KMT2D is essential for OSCC tumor growth in vivo.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

Knockdown of KMT2D impairs OSCC tumor growth in vivo. A Images of BALB/c nude mice from the two groups. B Images of xenograft tumors excised from BALB/c nude mice. C Quantification analysis of volumes of the xenograft tumors measured every 7 days on BALB/c nude mice. n = 8. D Weights of xenograft tumors excised from the BALB/c nude mice were evaluated. n = 8. E Representative hematoxylin and eosin (HE) and immunohistochemical staining of KMT2D and CSC-related markers in xenograft tumors. (scale bars = 50 μm). Results are representative of at least three independent experiments (*p < 0.05). CS cancer stem cell

KMT2D cooperates with MEF2A to initiate CTNNB1 transcription

Others and our previous studies have reported that sustaining Wnt/β-catenin activity plays a vital role in the maintenance of an aggressive phenotype in OSCC cells [18, 24]. Consistent with this, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) of the TCGA datasets revealed that the global expression of genes related to the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway was positively correlated with the level of KMT2D (Additional file 2: Fig. S2B). Specifically, the results of Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) further indicated that the expression of KMT2D was positively correlated with β-catenin, the key Wnt signaling-related genes. (Fig. 5A). To confirm the role of KMT2D in mediating Wnt/β-catenin in OSCC cells, several experiments were conducted in our preclinical models. The results of the immunoblotting assays demonstrated that the expression of β-catenin, CyclinD1, and c-Myc was reduced in OSCC cells (e.g., SCC4 and SCC25) transfected with Sh-KMT2D (Fig. 5B, C). To verify the role of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in KMT2D regulation of OSCC stemness, the Wnt/β-catenin agonist 1 was added to SCC4 and SCC25 cells transfected with Sh-KMT2D. The results of the immunoblotting assays revealed that Wnt/β-catenin agonist 1 could alleviate the promotive effects of KMT2D on β-catenin and downstream indicators of stem-like properties (Fig. 5D). β-Catenin is the key component of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway [7]. Another study elucidated that MEF2A could directly upregulate CTNNB1 and enhance the activity of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in colorectal cancer [22]. Additionally, MEF2A has been revealed to function as a coregulatory transcription factor and be occupied by KMT2D, which binds to enhancers and promote transcription of downstream genes of MEF2A as a coactivator [14]. To elucidate the exact mechanism involved in the promotion of stem-like properties and activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling by KMT2D in OSCC, co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) was performed and demonstrated that when KMT2D was used as the IP target, MEF2A was pulled down (Fig. 5E), which confirmed that endogenous KMT2D could combine with MEF2A in OSCC cells. To verify whether MEF2A could directly regulate the transcriptional activity of CTNNB1, a dual-luciferase reporter assay was performed and showed significantly increased transcriptional activity in MEF2A-overexpressing cells (Fig. 5F), which indicated that MEF2A could regulate the transcription of CTNNB1 as a transcription factor. The results of the immunoblotting assay demonstrated that MEF2A overexpression upregulated the expression of β-catenin in SCC4 and SCC25 cells (Fig. 5G). Furthermore, to further evaluate the interaction between KMT2D and MEF2A and the effect of KMT2D on CTNNB1 transcriptional activity, a dual-luciferase reporter assay was performed in OSCC cells transfected with Sh-KMT2D. The result showed that transcription activity of CTNNB1 was downregulated when KMT2D was knockdown (Fig. 5H). Taken together, these data suggest that KMT2D acts coordinately with MEF2A in regulating CTNNB1 transcription.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Open in a new tab

KMT2D cooperates with MEF2A to initiate the transcription of CTNNB1. A Correlation analysis of expression of KMT2D and β-catenin generated from GEPIA. B Immunoblotting and quantification analysis of β-catenin and downstream of canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway in SCC4 and SCC25 cells transfected with Sh-CON and Sh-KMT2D. C Quantification analysis of immunoblotting of β-catenin and downstream of canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway in SCC4 and SCC25 cells transfected with Sh-CON and Sh-KMT2D. D Immunoblotting of β-catenin and downstream of canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway in SCC4 and SCC25 cells transfected with Sh-KMT2D treated with DMSO and Wnt/β-catenin agonist 1. E Co-IP experiments for KMT2D and MEF2A in SCC25 cells. F Relative transcriptional activity of CTNNB1 in SCC4 and SCC25 cells transfected MEF2A overexpression and control. G Immunoblotting of MEF2A, β-catenin, and CyclinD1 in SCC4 and SCC25 cells with MEF2A overexpression and control. H Relative transcriptional activity of CTNNB1 in SCC4 and SCC25 cells transfected with Sh-KMT2D and control. Data are presented as means ± SD. Results are representative of at least three independent experiments. GEPIA Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis, SD standard deviation

Discussion

In this study, OSCC tissue microarrays, patient-derived organoid platforms, and in vitro and in vivo cancer cell line experiments were integrated to systematically understand the biological scenario of KMT2D in tumor development. As a result, we found that the upregulation of KMT2D not only correlated with a more advanced pathologic tumor grade but also contributed to aggressive cancer cell behaviors, providing a novel rationale for targeting KMT2D function in patients with OSCC.

KMT2D is involved in the KMT2 family proteins that methylate lysine 4 on the histone H3 tail (H3K4) at important regulatory regions of the genome in eukaryotes, which contribute largely to the cellular transcription network by modulating chromatin structures and DNA accessibility [8]. As the largest H3K4 methyltransferase among them, KMT2D also represents the most frequently mutated gene in multiple human cancers, including OSCC [1, 2, 8]. Nonetheless, the role of KMT2D in tumor development remains largely controversial [8, 9]. Using a gene-editing mouse model, Dhar and Alam showed that tissue-specific ablation of Kmt2d in the brain and lung promoted tumorigenesis [25, 26]. On the other hand, Kim and Abudureheman revealed the tumor-promoting effects of KMT2D in cell lines and xenograft models [10, 27]. Here, we found that the expression of KMT2D was elevated in OSCC specimens compared to adjacent tissues and, more importantly, was associated with increased tumor grade. Using a patient-derived organoid model, which strongly resembled the expression pattern of KMT2D in parental OSCC specimens, we observed that knockdown of KMT2D impaired the self-renewal of primary OSCC cells. Further experiments on several OSCC cell lines, in which KMT2D functions as a regulator of H3K4me1 and H3K27ac levels, also confirmed that the expression of KMT2D contributed to the stem-like properties, metastatic potential, and in vivo tumor growth ability of OSCC cells. In conclusion, our data clearly illustrated the protumor effects of KMT2D in OSCC.

The WNT signal transduction landscape, particularly canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling, is a master regulator of individual cellular fate throughout human life [1]. In patients with cancer, extensive studies have reported that the dysregulation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling is not only a passive result of malignant mutations but also a mighty trigger of an aggressive phenotype in cancer cells [17, 18, 24]. In support of this, investigations by Xie and colleagues confirmed that SOX8-mediated Wnt/β-catenin pathways gave rise to stem-like properties, cisplatin resistance and an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition phenotype in tongue squamous cell carcinoma [18]. In a recent study by Xiao et al., MEF2A, as a member of the MEF2 family of transcription factors, was shown to directly bind to the promoter region to initiate the transcription of CTNNB1 and induce the activation of WNT/β-catenin signaling in colorectal cancer [22]. In addition, Liu and his colleagues confirmed that KMT2D functions as a coactivator of MEF2A to activate the transcription of myh7 in mice [14]. Here, we provide evidence, based on bioinformatics analysis and experimental validation, that KMT2D can bind to MEF2A to inhibit the transcription of CTNNB1 and enhance the activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in OSCC.

Our study has limitations. Considering the presence of KMT2D-mutated/deficient tumors [25], the role of mutated KMT2D in mediating Wnt/β-catenin pathways, as well as the role of KMT2D as a mediator of oncogenic enhancer and superenhancer signatures in OSCC, were not discussed in the current study and deserve further investigation [28–30]. Additionally, KMT2D has widespread functions as a histone methyltransferase, and other mechanisms that regulate the self-renewal of oral cancer stem cells and promote the progression of OSCC are imperative for further illuminated. However, we reported for the first time that in the patient-derived organoid platform, which was supposed to advance to precision medicine, the upregulation of KMT2D contributes to the stem-like properties of OSCC cells by sustaining Wnt/β-catenin activity. Overall, we provided a new window to more comprehensively determine the therapeutic potential of KMT2D function in patients with OSCC.

Conclusions

In this study, we found that upregulation of KMT2D aggravates malignant behaviors in a patient-derived organoid (PDO) platform and in in vitro and in vivo cancer cell lines by mediating the transcription of CTNNB1 in cooperation with MEF2A thus sustaining stem-like properties and Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Our studies provide a new molecular insight into the epigenetic regulation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway and malignant behaviors of OSCC.

Materials and methods

Cell lines and cultures

The OSCC cell lines CAL27, SCC25 and SCC4 were obtained from the China Center for Type Culture Collection (Shanghai, China). CAL27 was maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM)/High Glucose. SCC25 and SCC4 were cultivated in DMEM:F12 (1:1). Ten percent fetal bovine serum (FBS) was added to the medium for all cell lines.

Human tissue samples and tissue microarrays

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of School and Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. The chips used in this study included samples of 96 human OSCC tissues and 16 normal oral mucosa obtained from the School and Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University. None of the patients received preoperative treatment.

Collection of primary OSCC cells

Fresh specimens were broken into small sections with scissors. Small sections were all cultivated in serum‑free DMEM:F12 (1:1) containing 1.5 mg/ml collagenase IV (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific.), 20 μg/ml hyaluronidase (Sigma‑Aldrich.), and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 37 °C for 1 to 2 h. To exclude red blood cells, red blood cell lysis buffer was used for cells on ice for 10 min. Next, PBS was used to wash the cells twice. Single primary OSCC cells were applied in subsequent organoid cultures.

Lentiviral transfection

Cal-27, SCC-25, and SCC4 cells were transfected with KMT2D short hairpin RNA (shRNA) named Sh-KMT2D, and a scramble shRNA control vector was also used named Sh-CON. SCC-25 and SCC4 cells were transfected with recombinant lentiviruses to stably overexpress MEF2A. The lentivirus was purchased from GeneChem (Shanghai, China). Forty-eight hours after incubation with lentivirus, the cells could be observed for fluorescence. To identify stable KMT2D knockdown and MEF2A overexpression cell lines, the transfected cells were cultured with 2 μg/ml puromycin for 7 days. KMT2D knockdown expression and MEF2A overexpression were then evaluated with western blotting.

Organoid culture

Primary OSCC cells diluted to 5000 cells/30 µl were embedded in Matrigel (BD Biosciences) in 24-well plates. Organoid cultures were performed as previously described [23, 24]. Organoids > 50 μm were counted. Forming efficiency (%) = scored organoid number/total plated OSCC cells.

Sphere formation assay

One thousand cells were seeded in each well of 12-well plates pretreated with a poly HEMA solution (10 g/l in 95% ethanol; Millipore Sigma). Cells were cultivated in cancer stem cell medium: DMEM-F12 supplemented with 2% B27 supplement (Life Technologies, Waltham, MA, USA), 100 ng/ml streptomycin, 100 U/ml penicillin, 10 ng/ml human bFGF (PeproTech), and 20 ng/ml human EGF (PeproTech). Ten days later, the cells were photographed, and tumorspheres > 75 μm were counted.

Colony formation assay

One thousand cells were seeded in 6-well plates and cultivated in medium supplemented with 10% FBS. Ten days later, the cells were washed twice with PBS, 4% methanol was used to immobilize the cells, and crystal violet was applied to stain the colonies. Six-well plates were photographed under a light microscope after drying. The colonies consisting of more than 50 cells were counted.

Matrigel invasion assays

Transwell chambers with a polycarbonate membrane with 8 μm pores (Corning, USA) were coated with Matrigel basement membrane matrix (Corning, 356,237, USA). Then, 600 µl medium containing 10% FBS was placed into the lower chambers, and 2 × 105 cells suspended in FBS-free medium were seeded into the upper chambers. Forty-eight hours later, the medium was discarded, and the cells invading the lower chamber were stained and counted.

Antibodies, immunohistochemistry, and evaluation

Immunohistochemistry studies were conducted using the following antibodies. Anti-KMT2D antibody (dilution 1:100, #27,266, Proteintech); anti-β-catenin antibody (dilution 1:2000, #51,067, Proteintech); anti-CD133 antibody (dilution 1:1000, #18,470, Proteintech); anti-c-Myc antibody (dilution 1:100, ab32072, Abcam). Histologic sections on human tissue microarrays were cut at 5 μm. The immunochemical test kit was from MaiXin Ltd. (Fu Zhou, China). Peroxidase blocker and 5% goat serum were added in sequence to histologic sections, after which the primary antibody was incubated overnight at 4 °C. The corresponding secondary antibody and avidin–biotin-peroxidase were then added, and DAB and hematoxylin were employed for visualization. We used Aperio ImageScope software (Version 9.1; Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) for analysis.

Immunofluorescence assay and western blot analysis

Immunofluorescence and immunoblotting were performed as previously described [19]. The following antibodies were used for immunoblotting. Anti-KMT2D antibody (dilution 1:1000, #ABE1867, Sigma); anti-CD133 antibody (dilution 1:1000, #18,470, Proteintech); anti-ALDH1A1 antibody (dilution 1:2000, #15,910, Proteintech); anti-OCT4 antibody (dilution 1:1000, #11,263, Proteintech); anti-β-catenin antibody (dilution 1:2000, #51,067, Proteintech); anti-c-Myc antibody (dilution 1:100, #ab32072, Abcam); anti-Cyclin D1 antibody (dilution 1:1000, #26,939, Proteintech); anti-H3K4me1 antibody (dilution 1:500, #ab8895, Abcam); and anti-H3K27ac antibody (dilution 1:500, #ab4729, Abcam); anti-MEF2A antibody (dilution 1:500, #12,382, Proteintech). The following antibodies were used for immunofluorescence. Anti-KMT2D: antibody (dilution 1:100, #27,266, Proteintech); anti-CD133 antibody (dilution 1:200, #18,470, Proteintech); anti-β-catenin antibody (dilution 1:200, #51,067, Proteintech).

Animal experiments

All animal studies were approved by the Ethics Committee of Wuhan University. Eight BALB/c nude mice (4–6 weeks, 18–20 g) purchased from Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China) were separated into two groups (n = 4). SCC4 cells transfected with Sh-KMT2D and ShCON mixed in 50 µl PBS and 50 µl Matrigel were injected subcutaneously into both the left and right back of each mouse (5 × 105 cells per tumor). Tumor volumes were measured and calculated every 7 days using the formula (width2 × length)/2. After 28 days, the mice were euthanized, and the tumor load was removed and further analyzed.

Luciferase reporter assay

The pGL3-basic plasmid containing the CTNNB1 promoter, the pGL3-basic luciferase plasmid, and the Renilla luciferase plasmid were purchased from Miaolingbio (Wuhan, China). The pGL3-Basic plasmid inserted with the promoter sequence of CTNNB1 and pGL3-Basic plasmid were cotransfected with Renilla luciferase plasmid into SCC4 and SCC25. Forty-eight hours later, luciferase activity was measured by using a Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay Kit (Promega, Madison, MI, USA).

Co-immunoprecipitation

Universal Magnetic co-IP kits were purchased from Active Motif (54002, USA). Co-immunoprecipitation was performed following the manufacturer’s instructions. Five micrograms of anti-KMT2D antibody and anti-IgG antibody were added to each sample for protein pull-down. Immunoblotting was performed as previously described.

Statistical analysis

All the results were given in triplicate and repeated at least 3 times. All analyses were carried out using Student's t-tests by SPSS software (SPSS V.17.0, Chicago, Ill, USA) and GraphPad Prism software 8.3.0 (GraphPadSoftware, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.

Supplementary Information

13578_2022_785_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (179KB, pdf)

Additional file 1: Figure S1. A Representative immunohistochemical staining of KMT2D in primary OSCC tissues of various histological grades. B Immunoblotting of KMT2D in the primary OSCC cells transfected with Sh-CON and Sh-KMT2D. C Quantification analysis of immunofluorescence staining of β-catenin and CD133 in patient-derived OSCC organoids transfected with Sh-CON and Sh-KMT2D. D Immunoblotting and quantification analysis of H3K4me1 and H3K27ac in SCC4 and SCC25 cells transfected with Sh-CON and Sh-KMT2D. Results are representative of at least three independent experiments.

13578_2022_785_MOESM2_ESM.pptx (527.2KB, pptx)

Additional file 2: Figure S2. A Immunoblotting and quantification analysis of cancer stem cells markers including CD133, OCT4, ALDH1A1 in SCC4, SCC25, and CAL27 cells transfected with Sh-CON and Sh-KMT2D. B GSEA enrichment analysis of KMT2D on the TCGA datasets. Results are representative of at least three independent experiments. GSEA, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

OSCC

Oral squamous cell carcinoma

HMT

Histone methyltransferase

KDM

Histone lysine demethylases

KMT2D

Histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2D

DKK1

Dickkopf-related protein 1

IHC

Immunohistochemistry

TCGA

The cancer genome atlas

PDO

Patient-derived organoids

Sh-RNA

Short hairpin RNA

GSEA

Gene set enrichment analysis

GEPIA

Gene expression profiling interactive analysis

Co-IP

Co-immunoprecipitation

Author contributions

XW, RL, LW, SL, HZ, YW, LW and ZS contributed to conception, design, acquisition, drafted manuscript, critically revised manuscript, and gave final approval. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

Our research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81772897)

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Our research was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Hospital of Stomatology at Wuhan University.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Xinmiao Wang and Rui Li contributed equally to this work

Contributor Information

Lin Wang, Email: wanglin0823@whu.edu.cn.

Zhe Shao, Email: shaozhe@whu.edu.cn.

References

  • 1.Leemans CR, Snijders PJF, Brakenhoff RH. The molecular landscape of head and neck cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2018;18(5):269–282. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2018.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Leemans CR, Braakhuis BJ, Brakenhoff RH. The molecular biology of head and neck cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11(1):9–22. doi: 10.1038/nrc2982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zhao S, Allis CD, Wang GG. The language of chromatin modification in human cancers. Nat Rev Cancer. 2021;21(7):413–430. doi: 10.1038/s41568-021-00357-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tran TQ, Lowman XH, Kong M. Molecular pathways: metabolic control of histone methylation and gene expression in cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(15):4004–4009. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rheinbay E, Suvà ML, Gillespie SM, Wakimoto H, Patel AP, Shahid M, et al. An aberrant transcription factor network essential for Wnt signaling and stem cell maintenance in glioblastoma. Cell Rep. 2013;3(5):1567–1579. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.04.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jiang X, Tan J, Li J, Kivimäe S, Yang X, Zhuang L, et al. DACT3 is an epigenetic regulator of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in colorectal cancer and is a therapeutic target of histone modifications. Cancer Cell. 2008;13(6):529–541. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.04.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Toh TB, Lim JJ, Chow EK. Epigenetics in cancer stem cells. Mol Cancer. 2017;16(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12943-017-0596-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rao RC, Dou Y. Hijacked in cancer: the KMT2 (MLL) family of methyltransferases. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015;15(6):334–346. doi: 10.1038/nrc3929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dhar SS, Lee MG. Cancer-epigenetic function of the histone methyltransferase KMT2D and therapeutic opportunities for the treatment of KMT2D-deficient tumors. Oncotarget. 2021;12(13):1296–1308. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Network CGA. Comprehensive genomic characterization of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Nature. 2015;517(7536):576–582. doi: 10.1038/nature14129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wang L, Wang X, Jia Y, Guo F, Zhengjun S, Shao Z. Intratumoural heterogeneity and clone evolution of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Mol Carcinog. 2021;60(11):758–768. doi: 10.1002/mc.23341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kim JH, Sharma A, Dhar SS, Lee SH, Gu B, Chan CH, et al. UTX and MLL4 coordinately regulate transcriptional programs for cell proliferation and invasiveness in breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2014;74(6):1705–1717. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-1896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dawkins JB, Wang J, Maniati E, Heward JA, Koniali L,Kocher Hm, , et al. Reduced expression of histone methyltransferases KMT2C and KMT2D correlates with improved outcome in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res. 2016;76(16):4861–4871. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Liu L, Ding C, Fu T, Feng Z, Lee JE, Xiao L, et al. Histone methyltransferase MLL4 controls myofiber identity and muscle performance through MEF2 interaction. J Clin Invest. 2020;130(9):4710–4725. doi: 10.1172/JCI136155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lai B, Lee JE, Jang Y, Wang L, Peng W, Ge K. MLL3/MLL4 are required for CBP/p300 binding on enhancers and super-enhancer formation in brown adipogenesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(11):6388–6403. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nusse R, Clevers H. Wnt/β-Catenin signaling, disease, and emerging therapeutic modalities. Cell. 2017;169(6):985–999. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Vermeulen L, De Sousa E, Melo F, van der Heijden M, Cameron K, de Jong JH, Borovski T, et al. Wnt activity defines colon cancer stem cells and is regulated by the microenvironment. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12(5):468–476. doi: 10.1038/ncb2048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Xie SL, Fan S, Zhang SY, Chen WX, Li QX, Pan GK, et al. SOX8 regulates cancer stem-like properties and cisplatin-induced EMT in tongue squamous cell carcinoma by acting on the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Int J Cancer. 2018;142(6):1252–1265. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fujii M, Sato T. Somatic cell-derived organoids as prototypes of human epithelial tissues and diseases. Nat Mater. 2021;20(2):156–169. doi: 10.1038/s41563-020-0754-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Driehuis E, Kolders S, Spelier S, Lõhmussaar K, Willems SM, Devriese LA, et al. Oral mucosal organoids as a potential platform for personalized cancer therapy. Cancer Discov. 2019;9(7):852–871. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-1522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Shimokawa M, Ohta Y, Nishikori S, Matano M, Takano A, Fujii M, et al. Visualization and targeting of LGR5+ human colon cancer stem cells. Nature. 2017;545(7653):187–192. doi: 10.1038/nature22081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Xiao Q, Gan Y, Li Y, Fan L, Liu J, Lu P, et al. MEF2A transcriptionally upregulates the expression of ZEB2 and CTNNB1 in colorectal cancer to promote tumor progression. Oncogene. 2021;40(19):3364–3377. doi: 10.1038/s41388-021-01774-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhao H, Jiang E, Shang Z. 3D co-culture of cancer-associated fibroblast with oral cancer organoids. J Dent Res. 2021;100(2):201–208. doi: 10.1177/0022034520956614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhao H, Hu CY, Chen WM, Huang P. Lactate promotes cancer stem-like property of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Curr Med Sci. 2019;39(3):403–409. doi: 10.1007/s11596-019-2050-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Alam H, Tang M, Maitituoheti M, Dhar SS, Kumar M, Han CY, et al. KMT2D deficiency impairs super-enhancers to confer a glycolytic vulnerability in lung cancer. Cancer Cell. 2020;37(4):599–617e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Dhar SS, Zhao D, Lin T, Gu B, Pal K, Wu SJ, et al. MLL4 Is Required to maintain broad h3k4me3 peaks and super-enhancers at tumor suppressor genes. Mol Cell. 2018;70(5):825–841. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.04.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Abudureheman A, Ainiwaer J, Hou Z, Niyaz M, Turghun A, Hasim A, et al. High MLL2 expression predicts poor prognosis and promotes tumor progression by inducing EMT in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018;144(6):1025–1035. doi: 10.1007/s00432-018-2625-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Calo E, Wysocka J. Modification of enhancer chromatin: what, how, and why? Mol Cell. 2013;49(5):825–837. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Creyghton MP, Cheng AW, Welstead GG, Kooistra T, Carey BW, Steine EJ, et al. Histone H3K27ac separates active from poised enhancers and predicts developmental state. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(50):21931–21936. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1016071107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rada-Iglesias A, Bajpai R, Swigut T, Brugmann SA, Flynn RA, Wysocka J. A unique chromatin signature uncovers early developmental enhancers in humans. Nature. 2011;470(7333):279–283. doi: 10.1038/nature09692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

13578_2022_785_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (179KB, pdf)

Additional file 1: Figure S1. A Representative immunohistochemical staining of KMT2D in primary OSCC tissues of various histological grades. B Immunoblotting of KMT2D in the primary OSCC cells transfected with Sh-CON and Sh-KMT2D. C Quantification analysis of immunofluorescence staining of β-catenin and CD133 in patient-derived OSCC organoids transfected with Sh-CON and Sh-KMT2D. D Immunoblotting and quantification analysis of H3K4me1 and H3K27ac in SCC4 and SCC25 cells transfected with Sh-CON and Sh-KMT2D. Results are representative of at least three independent experiments.

13578_2022_785_MOESM2_ESM.pptx (527.2KB, pptx)

Additional file 2: Figure S2. A Immunoblotting and quantification analysis of cancer stem cells markers including CD133, OCT4, ALDH1A1 in SCC4, SCC25, and CAL27 cells transfected with Sh-CON and Sh-KMT2D. B GSEA enrichment analysis of KMT2D on the TCGA datasets. Results are representative of at least three independent experiments. GSEA, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Articles from Cell & Bioscience are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES