Error in Figure/Table
Error in Figures
In the original article, there were mistakes in Figures 2 and 4 as published. The DRA number for modern samples without periodontitis in Figures 2 and 4 was incorrect. The correct number is DRA008582. The corrected Figures 2 and 4 appear below. The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way.
Figure 2.
Evaluation of bacterial diversity of ancient Edo sample based on 16S rDNA sequences. (A) The number of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) and Shannon index of Edo samples. (B) Rarefaction curve of Edo samples. (C) The number of OTUs and Shannon index of modern samples. *P < 0.05.
Figure 4.
Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) was conducted for the dissimilarity matrix value of 1—Spearman’s coefficient. PCoA was used to evaluate bacterial similarity for comparison between Edo and modern microbiomes according to class.
Text Correction
In the original article, there was an error. The original article stated that “DRA012487” in the section of Data Availability Statement. This has been corrected to “DRA011882”. The corrected Data Availability Statement appears below.
The datasets generated for this study can be found in the DNA Data Bank of Japan (http://www.ddbj.nig.ac.jp/) with the following accession number: DRA011882.
The authors apologize for the error and state that it does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.