ABSTRACT
Helicobacter pylori is a human pathogen competent for natural transformation. Intrinsic and acquired antibiotic resistance contribute to the survival and multiplication of H. pylori under antibiotics. While drug-resistance dissemination by natural transformation (NT)-mediated horizontal gene transfer remains poorly understood in H. pylori. The purpose of the study was to investigate the role of H. pylori porins (HopA, HopB, HopC, HopD, and HopE) in the intrinsic antibiotic resistance and to preliminarily reveal the potential effect of HopE and HopD porins in streptomycin resistance acquisition after NT in the presence of antibiotics. Using traditional antibiotic susceptibility tests and growth curve analysis, we found the MIC values of metronidazole, clarithromycin, levofloxacin, tetracycline, rifampin, and streptomycin in mutants lacking HopE and/or HopD were significantly elevated compare to those in wild-type strain. The quantitative analysis of the tetramethyl rhodamine isothiocyanate (TRITC)-labeled streptomycin accumulation at the single-cell level showed reduced streptomycin intracellular fluorescence in ΔhopE and ΔhopD mutant cells. Furthermore, in the presence of translation-inhibiting antibiotic streptomycin, the resistance acquisition frequency was decreased in the wild-type strain, which could be reversed by mutants lacking HopE and HopD that restored relatively high resistance acquisition frequencies. By transforming a pUC19-rpsLmut-sfgfp linear plasmid carrying a streptomycin conferring mutation, we observed that the impaired ability of rpsLmut synthesis in the wild-type strain was restored in the ΔhopE and ΔhopD mutant transformants. Our study revealed that in the presence of streptomycin, resistance acquisition at least partially relied on the deletion of the hopE and hopD genes, because their loss reduced streptomycin concentration in the cell and thus restored the expression of the resistance-conferring gene, which was inhibited by streptomycin in wild-type strain. The loss of HopE and HopD influx activity may also preserve resistance acquisition by transformation in the presence of antibiotics with other modes of action.
IMPORTANCE Helicobacter pylori is constitutively competent for natural transformation (NT) and possesses an efficient system for homologous recombination, which could be utilized to study the NT-mediated horizontal gene transfer induced antibiotic resistance acquisition. Bacterial porins have drawn renewed attention because of their crucial role in antibiotic susceptibility. From the perspective of porin-mediated influx in H. pylori, our study preliminarily revealed the important role of HopE and HopD porins not only in preserving the intrinsic susceptibility to specific antibiotic but also in evading acquired antibiotic resistance by NT in the presence of translation-inhibiting antimicrobial. Therefore, the loss of HopE or HopD porin in H. pylori genomes, combined with the large number of secreted or cell-free genetic elements carrying mutations conferring antibiotic resistance, may raise the possibility that this mechanism plays a potential role in the propagation of antibiotic resistance within H. pylori communities.
KEYWORDS: H. pylori, HopE, HopD, porin, antibiotic resistance, natural transformation, Helicobacter pylori
INTRODUCTION
The survival and multiplication of bacteria under selective pressures of antibiotics rely on intrinsic and acquired antibiotic resistance (1, 2). In recent years, the emergence and dissemination of antibiotic resistance within pathogens has produced public apprehension, which has drawn much attention in microbiology research. Horizontal gene transfer (HGT)-induced antibiotic resistance gene (ARG) acquisition of bacteria is the main reason for the propagation of drug resistance, which includes three main mechanisms: conjugation, transduction, and natural transformation (3). Unlike conjugation and transduction, natural transformation (NT) is a pathway by which bacteria import DNA from the extracellular environment and internalize it into the cytoplasm, followed by either integration into the bacterial genome or recircularization (in the case of plasmid DNA) (3, 4). Although NT is relevantly less studied at present, it has potential that cannot be underestimated due to the ability of NT to transfer ARGs encoded by both plasmids and genomic DNA (3, 5). Moreover, in 2017, the World Health Organization (WHO) published a series of antibiotic-resistant pathogens in urgent need of effective antibiotics (6). We noticed that more than half of these pathogens are engaged in NT-mediated DNA intake, which underlined the importance of investigating multiple factors affecting HGT-induced propagation of antibiotic resistance.
The human pathogen Helicobacter pylori impacts more than half of the world’s population and is closely associated with multiple digestive system diseases such as gastritis, peptic ulcer, gastric cancer, and gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma (7, 8). However, H. pylori manifests increasing antibiotic resistance (AR) rates, which has weakened the eradication efficacy (9). Multiple lines have demonstrated that H. pylori is constitutively competent for NT and possesses a set of machinery proteins for efficient HGT and homologous recombination (10), which enables dissemination of antimicrobial resistance by NT in H. pylori. For example, there have been some reports showing coinfection with multiple H. pylori strains with different antibiotic resistance patterns in a single patient (11) and regions with both high H. pylori prevalence and high chance of multiple infection with different strains, especially developing countries (more than 20 to 35%) (12–15). Furthermore, resistance to metronidazole has been positively correlated with capacity for NT in H. pylori clinical isolates (16). In addition, NT enables H. pylori strains to transmit streptomycin resistance-conferring DNA fragment (10, 17, 18).
Bacterial porins have drawn renewed attention because of their crucial role in antibiotic susceptibility (19). Currently, in H. pylori, at least five β-barrel outer membrane proteins (HopA, HopB, HopC, HopD, and HopE) of Hop members have been characterized as porins, which have structural homology with the Escherichia coli outer membrane protein F (OmpF) porin (20), with the main candidate nonspecific HopE porin forming large channels (21). Importantly, porins are the preferred route for the entry of some antibiotics such as β-lactams and fluoroquinolones in Gram-negative pathogens (22). The clinical relevance of porin defects and/or multidrug efflux pump overexpression forming membrane-associated resistance mechanisms has been well established for these antibiotics (23). Many studies reported that a large number of pathogens developed antibiotic resistance through loss or modification of porins, and these bacteria were but not limited to E. coli, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterobacter aerogenes (24). Moreover, a previous study also reported that H. pylori HopE porin presented scarce gene presence and expression among clinical isolates (20). However, the role of porins in intrinsic and acquired resistance in H. pylori has yet to be described.
In this study, we preliminarily demonstrated that HopE and HopD porins performed influx of streptomycin, the defect of which enhanced the intrinsic antibiotic tolerance represented by increased MIC values and, in the presence of translation-inhibiting antibiotic streptomycin, had a restoring effect on the resistance phenotype conversion and expression of newly acquired resistance-conferring gene, which were inhibited in the wild-type strain after the plasmid naturally transformed.
RESULTS
The MICs of the porin-deleted H. pylori mutants.
The reference strain H. pylori 26695 (wild type) and five porin-deleted mutants (ΔhopA, ΔhopB, ΔhopC, ΔhopD, and ΔhopE) were tested for MICs against seven antibiotics: metronidazole, clarithromycin, levofloxacin, amoxicillin, tetracycline, rifampin, and streptomycin, using ETEST and/or agar dilution methods. There was no colony growth observed on the Mueller-Hinton (MH) plates tested for tolerance of wild-type (WT), ΔhopA, ΔhopB, and ΔhopC strains to all seven antibiotics (Fig. 1A). In the ETEST assessing the antibiotic tolerance of ΔhopD and ΔhopE mutants, all the plates manifested visible inhibition zones (Fig. 1A, ΔhopD and ΔhopE lanes). On the plates assessing ΔhopE tolerance to metronidazole, levofloxacin, and rifampin, the MIC ranges were 2 to 4, 0.08 to 0.16, and 0.125 to 0.25 µg/mL, respectively. On the plates assessing ΔhopD resistance to levofloxacin and rifampin, the MICs were 0.08 to 0.16 and 0.25 to 0.5 µg/mL, respectively. However, the remaining seven plates did not show inhibition zones intersecting with the corresponding strips. To obtain the specific MICs of each antibiotic on the porin-deleted mutants, the agar dilution method (0.001 to 32 µg/mL) was employed. The MICs of levofloxacin, tetracycline, and streptomycin on both ΔhopD (0.052 ± 0.018 µg/mL, P = 0.0097; 0.042 ± 0.018 µg/mL, P = 0.0303; and 5.333 ± 2.309 µg/mL, P = 0.0168) and ΔhopE (0.084 ± 0.036 µg/mL, P = 0.0173; 0.084 ± 0.016 µg/mL, P = 0.0201; and 6.667 ± 2.309 µg/mL, P = 0.0078) mutants were significantly higher than those on the WT strain (0.003 ± 0.001, 0.006 ± 0.003, and 0.062 ± 0.054 µg/mL), respectively (Fig. 1C, G, and H). Moreover, the MICs of metronidazole and clarithromycin on the ΔhopE mutant (3.333 ± 1.155 µg/mL, P = 0.0075; and 0.042 ± 0.018 µg/mL, P = 0.0312) were significantly higher than those on the WT strain (0.002 ± 0, 0.007 ± 0.002, and 0.003 ± 0.001 µg/mL), respectively (Fig. 1B and D). The MIC of rifampin on the ΔhopD mutant (0.583 ± 0.382 µg/mL, P = 0.0052) was significantly higher than that on the WT strain (0.003 ± 0.001 µg/mL) (Fig. 1F).
FIG 1.
MICs of antibiotics in five porin-deletion H. pylori mutants and growth of ΔhopD and ΔhopE mutants in the presence of indicated concentrations of antibiotics. (A) The wild-type (WT) strain H. pylori 26695 and ΔhopA, ΔhopB, ΔhopC, ΔhopD, and ΔhopE mutants were examined for MICs of metronidazole (MTZ), clarithromycin (CLR), levofloxacin (LEV), amoxicillin (AMX), tetracycline (Tet), rifampin (RIF), and chloramphenicol (CHL) by ETEST. The inhibition zones were observed at 72 h. The MIC values were defined by the point of intersection of the inhibition ellipse zone with the graded strips for the ETEST. (B to H) WT and five porin-deleted strains were examined for MICs of metronidazole, clarithromycin, levofloxacin, amoxicillin, tetracycline, rifampin and streptomycin by the agar dilution method. The values are shown as means ± standard deviation (SD) for two or three biologically independent experiments. *, significant (P < 0.05); **, very significant (P < 0.01); n.s., not significant. (I to W) Growth curves of WT, ΔhopD, and ΔhopE strains growing in Brucella broth in the absence or presence of metronidazole (1 and 4 µg/mL), amoxicillin (0.1 and 0.5 µg/mL), clarithromycin (0.05 and 0.5 µg/mL), levofloxacin (0.01 and 0.1 µg/mL), tetracycline (0.1 and 1 µg/mL), rifampin (0.1 and 1 µg/mL), and streptomycin (1 and 5 µg/mL). The values are shown as means ± SD for independent triplicates. The significance analysis results above the images were from ΔhopD versus WT and ΔhopE versus WT at 80 h, respectively. ****, highly significant (P < 0.0001); ***, highly significant (P < 0.001); **, very significant (P < 0.01); *, significant (P < 0.05); n.s., not significant. The source data for panels A to W are provided as a source data file. OD600, optical density at 600 nm.
HopD and HopE depletions significantly enhance the maximal growth of H. pylori in the presence of antibiotics.
We further determined the growth of ΔhopD and ΔhopE mutants in the presence of the indicated concentrations (Table S1) of antibiotics at 80 h of incubation. In the presence of metronidazole (1 µg/mL), levofloxacin (0.01 and 0.1 µg/mL), rifampin (0.1 µg/mL), and streptomycin (1 and 5 µg/mL), the growth biomasses of both ΔhopD (P = 0.0013, P < 0.0001, P = 0.0005, P = 0.0003, P = 0.0023, and P < 0.0001, respectively) and ΔhopE (P < 0.0001, P = 0.0002, P = 0.0009, P = 0.0002, P = 0.0011, and P < 0.0001, respectively) mutants were significantly higher than that of the WT strain (Fig. 1J, L, M, R, T, and U). In the presence of metronidazole (4 µg/mL), clarithromycin (0.05 µg/mL) and tetracycline (0.1 µg/mL), the growth biomasses of ΔhopE mutants (P = 0.0001, P = 0.0082, and P < 0.0001, respectively) were significantly higher than that of the WT strain (Fig. 1K, N, and V). These results implicated that HopD and HopE deletions contributed to a degree of intrinsic tolerance to subinhibitory concentrations of a range of antibiotics. Notably, among the six antibiotics tested, four (rifampin, clarithromycin, tetracycline, and streptomycin) are protein synthesis-inhibiting antibiotics.
HopE and HopD perform influx of streptomycin to affect the uptake of the antibiotic in H. pylori.
Since HopD and HopE are porins forming large channels across cell membranes (21), we hypothesized that the decreased antibacterial effect of antibiotics may be due to the reduced intake of the antibiotic. To test this, we detected the antibiotic uptake by WT, ΔhopA, ΔhopB, ΔhopC, ΔhopD, and ΔhopE strains when incubation was performed in the presence of tetramethyl rhodamine isothiocyanate (TRITC)-labeled streptomycin. The intracellular fluorescence of TRITC-labeled streptomycin in ΔhopA, ΔhopB, and ΔhopC mutants all showed unchanged levels compared with that in the WT strain (Fig. S1), while we observed that the intracellular fluorescence of TRITC-labeled streptomycin in ΔhopD (2.055 ± 0.397, P = 0.0019) and ΔhopE (1.715 ± 0.602, p < 0.0001) mutants was significantly lower than that in the WT strain (2.540 ± 0.597) (Fig. 2A and B), indicating that the two mutants took up significantly less antibiotic than WT strain. Taken together, these results showed that HopE and HopD were responsible for influx of streptomycin and facilitated the antibacterial effect of the antibiotic.
FIG 2.
HopD and HopE perform the uptake of streptomycin. (A) Representatives of red fluorescence detection after 1 h of incubation in the presence of tetramethyl rhodamine isothiocyanate (TRITC)-labeled streptomycin. An automatic red fluorescence channel and merged images of TRITC with differential interference contrast (DIC) are shown. The scale bars correspond to 2.5 and 1 µm, respectively. (B) Quantification of streptomycin (Strep) uptake by WT, ΔhopD, and ΔhopE strains. TRITC-labeled streptomycin allows for quantification of the amount of drug that penetrates the cells. Scatter-dot plots show the single-cell quantification of intracellular fluorescence (signal/noise ratio, SNR) in the population of cells after 1 h of incubation with streptomycin (5 µg/mL). The median, quartile 1, and quartile 3 are indicated by horizontal lines. Black dots above and below the maximum and minimum values correspond to outlier cells. Triangles indicate the presence of data points beyond the axis range. The number of cells analyzed (n) is also indicated. ****, highly significant (P < 0.0001); **, very significant (P < 0.01); *, significant (P < 0.05). The source data are provided as a source data file.
Natural transformation frequency and rpsLmut synthesis were inhibited by streptomycin after pUC19-rpsLmut-sfgfp linear plasmid acquisition in H. pylori 26695 strain.
Streptomycin is one of the translation-inhibiting antibiotics, which inhibits protein translation by targeting 30S ribosomal protein S12 (rpsL) gene. In order to investigate the effect of streptomycin on the antibiotic resistance acquisition by natural transformation in H. pylori, we conducted the transformation incubation of WT 26695 strain with StrepR total chromosomal DNA in the absence and presence of streptomycin. Compared to the transformation frequency in the absence of streptomycin (1.117 × 10−3 ± 5.455 × 10−4), the WT strain displayed more than 6-fold reduction in the yield of recombinant clones (1.691 × 10−4 ± 1.536 × 10−4) in the presence of streptomycin (5 µg/mL) (Fig. 3A). This result indicated that the ability of the WT strain to convert into resistant transformants was inhibited by the presence of streptomycin. Given that the phenotype conversion of antibiotic resistance requires the expression of resistance-conferring gene, we reasoned that such decreased transformation frequency could be due to the translation-inhibiting effect of streptomycin. To test this hypothesis, we constructed a pUC19-rpsLmut-sfgfp linear plasmid by ligating sfgfp gene with a rpsL gene carrying a streptomycin resistance-conferring A128G mutation through linker, which was used to incubate with WT recipient cells and monitor rpsLmut expression (Fig. 3C and D). We compared both the transformation frequency and the rpsLmut production levels. As expected, we observed significant reduction of StrepR colonies, yielding a recombination frequency of 6.205 × 10−6 in the presence of streptomycin, compared to the transformation frequency of 4.347 × 10−5 in the absence of streptomycin (Fig. 3B). To monitor rpsLmut protein production, we performed microscopy detection of sfGFP at 1, 2, 3, and 4 h after transformation incubation (Fig. 3E), and the intracellular green fluorescence was quantified in recipient and transformant cells. After 1 h, although very few cells expressed rpsLmut-sfGFP, the transformant cells incubated in the presence of streptomycin showed a decrease in fluorescence compared to that of transformants incubated in the absence of streptomycin (Fig. 3E and G). At 3 and 4 h after streptomycin-free incubation, the intracellular fluorescence signal of the transformant cells apparently increased, while only a slight increase of fluorescence signal was observed in transformants incubated with streptomycin (Fig. 3G). The negative control of bacteria incubation without the pUC19-rpsLmut-sfgfp linear plasmid was performed to show that the H. pylori chromosome genome per se does not contain the gfp gene and that the detected green fluorescent protein (GFP) is completely acquired by transforming (Fig. 3E). These results indicated that the synthesis of the rpsLmut protein after linear plasmid acquisition was inhibited by streptomycin, which failed to resist the antibacterial activity of the antibiotic.
FIG 3.
Recombination frequency and detection of rpsLmut production after the transformation of pUC19-rpsLmut-sfgfp linear plasmid in the absence and presence of streptomycin in WT, ΔhopD, and ΔhopE strains. (A, B) Frequency of natural transformation of StrepR total chromosomal DNA and rpsLmut-sfgfp linear plasmid (the frequency of recipient cells converted into streptomycin-resistant transformants) in WT, ΔhopD, and ΔhopE strains, estimated by plating assay 8 h after mixing the DNA with recipient cells, in the absence (Ø) and in the presence of streptomycin (5 µg/mL), with the mean and standard deviation calculated from at least four biological repeats (black dots). (C) Diagram of pUC19-rpsLmut-sfgfp plasmid and sequence of the linker region between rpsLmut and sfgfp genes. The sfgfp gene was in frame with rpsLmut sharing the start codon and stop codon. (D) Diagram of the pUC19-rpsLmut-sfgfp transformation experiment by homologous recombination. Bacteria were incubated with the rpsLmut-sfgfp linear fragment containing the flanking sequences. The production of rpsLmut could be then detected by expression of fluorescent sfGFP. (E) Representatives of microscope sfGFP detection in the WT strain at 1, 2, 3, and 4 h after incubation in the absence and presence of streptomycin. The negative control (NC) of bacteria incubation after 3 h without the pUC19-rpsLmut-sfgfp linear plasmid was also displayed. (F) Representatives of microscope sfGFP detection in ΔhopD and ΔhopE mutants 3 h after incubation in the absence and presence of streptomycin. Automatic green fluorescent protein (GFP) channel and merged images of GFP and DIC are shown. The scale bars correspond to 1.5 µm. (G) Scatterplots showing the single-cell quantification of intracellular fluorescence of sfGFP (SNR) in WT, ΔhopD, and ΔhopE strains at the indicated times after incubation of linear pUC19-rpsLmut-sfgfp with bacteria, in the absence (Ø) and presence (Strep) of streptomycin (5 µg/mL). The median, quartile 1, and quartile 3 are indicated by horizontal lines. Black dots above and below the maximum and minimum values correspond to outlier cells. Triangles indicate the presence of data points beyond the axis range. The numbers of cells analyzed (n) are also indicated. (A, B, and G). *, significant (P < 0.05); **, very significant (P < 0.01); ****, highly significant (P < 0.0001). The source data are provided as source data files. aa, amino acids.
HopE and HopD deletions restore the resistance acquisition and rpsLmut synthesis by pUC19-rpsLmut-sfgfp linear plasmid transformation in the presence of streptomycin.
The rpsLmut expression level observed after the acquisition of the plasmid appeared to be affected by the intracellular accumulation of the translation-inhibiting antibiotics. One of the important factors regulating the amount of intracellular antibiotics was the entry rate of antibiotic molecules into the recipient cells. Therefore, we assumed that HopE and HopD porins responsible for streptomycin influx may affect the rpsLmut expression and phenotypic transformation frequency. To determine the contribution of HopE- and HopD-mediated influx, respectively, we evaluated the transformation frequency and quantified the rpsLmut production after transfer of the linear plasmid in the absence and presence of streptomycin in ΔhopD and ΔhopE mutants. Interestingly, we found that, for the isogenic StrepR DNA transformation, the mutant recipient cells were still able to acquire a degree of resistance in the presence of streptomycin, yielding a resistance acquisition frequency of 6.560 × 10−4 (ΔhopD mutants) and 8.532 × 10−4 (ΔhopE mutants), respectively (Fig. 3A), which was significantly higher than that of the WT strain with the transformation frequency of 1.691 × 10−4 in the presence of streptomycin (ΔhopD mutants: P = 0.011; ΔhopE mutants: P = 0.003). Similarly, for the pUC19-rpsLmut-sfgfp linear plasmid transformation, the mutant recipient cells still managed to acquire resistance in the presence of streptomycin, yielding a recombination frequency of 2.457 × 10−5 (ΔhopD mutants) and 3.319 × 10−5 (ΔhopE mutants), respectively (Fig. 3B), which was significantly higher than that of the WT strain with the transformation frequency of 6.205 × 10−6 in the presence of streptomycin (ΔhopD mutants: P = 0.009; ΔhopE mutants: P = 0.007). To show specificity, three other porin-deleted mutants were also used to measure the transformation frequency, which showed that, in the presence of streptomycin, the ΔhopA, ΔhopB, and ΔhopC mutants all showed unchanged resistance acquisition compared with that in the WT strain when incubated with neither isogenic StrepR DNA nor pUC19-rpsLmut-sfgfp linear plasmid (Fig. S2). We also performed microscopy evaluation of rpsLmut production in ΔhopD and ΔhopE mutant transformants after transformation with the pUC19-rpsLmut-sfgfp linear plasmid (Fig. 3F and G). We observed that although the intracellular fluorescence signals in the two mutant transformants were affected by streptomycin treatment, both revealed apparently higher rpsLmut production levels (especially ΔhopE mutant transformants) compared to that of WT transformants in the presence of streptomycin (Fig. 3G) (both ΔhopD and ΔhopE mutant transformants: P < 0.0001). Thus, rpsLmut production was enhanced after plasmid acquisition in the presence of streptomycin when HopD and especially HopE porins were deleted, respectively. The ability of ΔhopE mutant to restore proteins despite the presence of streptomycin was further confirmed by monitoring the production of sfGFP after the acquisition of the pUC19-PureAsfgfp plasmid carrying the sfgfp gene under the control of the PureA (promoter of ureA gene) constitutive promoter (Fig. S3). The result showed that reduced sfGFP expression in the WT strain in streptomycin treatment was significantly restored in ΔhopE mutant (Fig. S3A and B). In addition, we excluded the effect of streptomycin treatment on the viability of the WT, ΔhopD, and ΔhopE strains during acquiring the linear plasmid by showing that transient exposure (up to 8 h) to streptomycin did not affect the survival of the strains measured by plating assays (Fig. S4).
HopE deletion alleviates the inhibition of protein synthesis by streptomycin.
To test whether HopE deletion could mitigate the inhibition effect of streptomycin on protein synthesis in terms of the whole proteome in H. pylori, we performed a reversed-phase liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (RPLC-MS) analysis of total proteins in WT and ΔhopE strains before and after streptomycin treatment. A total of 878 protein were detected in the WT strains, and we found that streptomycin treatment reduces the relative abundance of 7.97% (70 of 878) of the detected proteins in WT cells (Fig. 4A; Table S6). In ΔhopE mutants, this percentage significantly reduced to 3.14% (16 of 859, P < 0.0001) (Fig. 4B; Table S7), corroborating that HopE deletion attenuated the inhibition of protein synthesis in the presence of streptomycin.
FIG 4.
Proteomic analysis showing relative abundance alterations of proteins in WT and ΔhopE strains before and after streptomycin treatment. The volcano plots show the relative abundance alteration in WT and ΔhopE strains treated with streptomycin (5 µg/mL) compared to that in the two strains not treated with streptomycin. Fold change (FC) analysis and t tests were used to perform univariate statistical analysis on relative abundance of the proteins. Proteins with fold change greater than or less than 1.2 and significance analysis P value less than 0.05 were selected as significantly different proteins. Green spots were abundance-downregulated proteins, red spots were abundance-upregulated proteins, and gray spots were not significant proteins. (A) WT strains. (B) ΔhopE strains. The percentages of downregulated and upregulated proteins were annotated in the figure. ****, highly significant (P < 0.0001; chi-square test).
Resistance acquisition frequency of WT, ΔhopD, and ΔhopE strains after transformation in the presence of other antibiotics.
Finally, we tested the role of HopD and HopE deletions for the acquisition of streptomycin resistance in the presence of other three protein synthesis-inhibiting antibiotics clarithromycin, tetracycline, and rifampin and a DNA-damaging agent metronidazole. These experiments revealed that HopE deletion greatly contributed to the acquisition of streptomycin resistance in the presence of rifampin (inhibits transcription) and metronidazole (damages DNA) but showed no effect in the presence of clarithromycin (inhibits translation) and tetracycline (also inhibits translation). ΔhopD mutant retained a slight but not significant increase in the transformation frequencies compared to those of the WT strain in the presence of all four antibiotics (Fig. 5).
FIG 5.
Streptomycin resistance acquisition frequencies of WT, ΔhopD, and ΔhopE strains after transformation in the presence of other antibiotics. Frequency of natural transformation of StrepR total chromosomal DNA in WT, ΔhopD, and ΔhopE strains, estimated by plating assay 8 h after mixing the DNA with corresponding recipient cells, in the presence of clarithromycin (CLR, 0.5 µg/mL), tetracycline (Tc, 0.1 µg/mL), rifampin (RIF, 0.1 µg/mL), and metronidazole (MTZ, 4 µg/mL), respectively. Means and standard deviation were calculated from at least three biological repeats (black dots). *, significant (P < 0.05); ***, highly significant (P < 0.001). The source data are provided as source data files.
DISCUSSION
Antibiotic uptake and efflux by H. pylori are the basis for intrinsic susceptibility to antibiotics (25). The permeability barrier in Gram-negative pathogens, including porin-mediated passive uptake across the outer membrane and active efflux via efflux pumps in the inner membrane, contributes to the emergence of antibiotic resistance. Understanding porin-mediated entry of substrates is important owing to its key role in defining antibiotic pathways to their targets (26). From the perspective of porin-mediated influx in H. pylori, our study reveals the important role of HopE and HopD porins in not only preserving the intrinsic susceptibility to specific antibiotic but also evading acquired antibiotic resistance by NT in the presence of translation-inhibiting antimicrobial.
The MIC values of all tested antibiotics on the mutants lacking HopE were significantly increased, which was consistent with a previous study using model planar lipid membrane systems showing that HopE porin acts principally as a nonspecific channel (21). Dramatically, the mutant lacking HopD also showed increased MIC values to partial antibiotics, including tetracycline, streptomycin, and levofloxacin. Similarly, the subsequent growth curve experiment showed that the 80-h maximal growth of the ΔhopE and ΔhopD mutants was enhanced in the presence of subinhibitory concentrations of all or some of the antibiotics tested. Notably, when the environmental antibiotics were beyond the subinhibitory concentrations, the abilities of the two mutants to resist the antibacterial effect of the drugs were undermined and even destroyed. The observation may be the product of the continuing substantial drug penetration through a lipid-mediated pathway depending on the hydrophilic or hydrophobic property of the antibiotic molecules (26) rather than the general diffusion through porins and high drug concentrations beyond the upper limit of antibiotic efflux levels mediated by efflux pump. Moreover, it has been recently demonstrated that multiple intracellular activities regulate bacterial membrane permeability in response to external pressure (26). Therefore, further interpretation of the specific function and structure of effective porins related to substrate uptake would facilitate our understanding of the molecular basis of antibiotic uptake through porins, which takes a place in the complicated antibiotic resistance mechanism (27–30).
HGT is a main contributor to the spread of antibiotic resistance genes (3). Conversely, it was generally assumed that antibiotics can selectively drive the HGT of ARGs and form the promotive effects (31–34), which mainly focused on conjugation-induced horizontal acquisition of resistance due to its extensive prevalence. Existing research seemed to explain this conclusion from different perspectives. It was reported that application of antibiotics has likely influenced conjugation-induced HGT by exerting selection that increased the proportion of donor cells offering resistance coded by mobile genetic elements (MGEs) (35). In addition, bacteria with higher transfer efficiencies might be selected by antibiotic treatment, which potentially regulated the HGT rate (36). Another study showed that plasmid conjugation in E. coli was boosted with a combination of kanamycin and streptomycin (37). Nonetheless, reassessing these results indicated that it was the population expansion over time of the transconjugants that was reported rather than the proposed elevated conjugation efficiency (31). In addition, there was almost no difference in the conjugation results in the presence and absence of antibiotics in the first several hours of conjugation (31). In addition, this kind of HGT can be stimulated by antibiotics through inducting the bacterial DNA damage (SOS) response, a widespread system in bacteria that promotes cell survival by activating a set of coregulated genes in response to DNA damage (38). Beaber et al. (39) reported that the activated SOS DNA damage response in Vibrio cholerae donor cells was associated with higher transfer efficiency of resistance coded by a integrative conjugative element (ICE) by relieving the repression effect of a regulator SetR on the transfer ability of the ICE. This finding has implications for the use of antibiotics because many antibiotics at nonlethal concentrations can trigger the SOS response and enhance resistance dissemination. Moreover, in a convincing series of experiments, the transfer and integrase functions of an ICE were activated in E. coli and V. cholerae by two DNA-damaging antibiotics (mitomycin C and ciprofloxacin), which required the coprotease activity of RecA, a recombinase for DNA repair (39, 40). Similarly, some other studies have regarded increased frequency as a product of indirect induction of conjugation by antibiotics as well (37, 41, 42). However, as to H. pylori, it has been demonstrated that this pathogen was distinct in DNA damage response because it triggers both DNA uptake machinery and an enzyme that liberates DNA from neighboring cells rather than activating SOS DNA repair systems. This capacity for genetic exchange enhances recombination of exogenous DNA into the genome, thus contributing to the spread of antibiotic resistance (43). Similar views have also been drawn from several studies indicating that the very presence of antibiotics, especially those affecting DNA replication or causing DNA damage, may facilitate NT-induced HGT and the dissemination of resistance genes in certain bacteria by eliciting a stress response that enhances expression of competence genes or by increasing the fraction of competent cells in laboratory conditions (44–46). For instance, both the expressions of competence genes and transformation rates were significantly enhanced in Streptococcus after quinolones treatment (47). Moreover, replication stalling induced by stress in S. pneumoniae can lead to increased transcription of the competence gene cluster (46). However, other antibiotics did not have such an effect.
Instead of investigating the transformation efficiency affected by alterations of DNA uptake and integration caused by DNA-damaging antibiotic utilization through measuring the expression level of competence proteins in H. pylori, which were not within the scope of this study, we chose another perspective, focusing on the effect of cellular accumulation of antibiotics, especially protein synthesis-inhibiting antibiotics, controlled by putative porins, on resistance acquisition via directly detecting the NT frequency and acquired resistance gene expression. In this study, we differentially found that NT frequency of the WT strains displayed more than 6-fold reduction in the presence of streptomycin. Here, we speculated the possible explanation could be the inhibited expression of the transforming resistance gene by the translation-inhibiting effect of streptomycin, which was demonstrated in our consequent experiments. Several other studies on conjugation also showed results inconsistent with the previously established view that antibiotics promote HGT (32, 48, 49). Ciprofloxacin can prevent R-plasmid transfer by inhibiting conjugation in E. coli (50). Also, sub-MIC of mupirocin diminished the conjugative transfer of the gentamicin resistance plasmid pWG613 among Staphylococcus aureus strains by more than 1,000-fold. Most importantly, in 2019, Nolivos et al. (48) demonstrated that conjugation frequency was reduced to nearly 50% by translation-inhibiting antibiotics, while there was still a majority of transconjugants acquiring resistance, which was a benefit of the AcrAB TolC efflux activity alleviating the inhibitory effect of drugs on the reactions that are required for resistance establishment after plasmid transfer. This also did not completely coincide with our result that translation-inhibiting antibiotic treatment led to greater reduction in resistance acquisition in this study, and we speculated that the possible reason may be the inefficient efflux of streptomycin by the main AcrAB TolC efflux pump in H. pylori.
We attempted to investigate how the transformation frequency was inhibited. Taken together with our further evaluation of the synthesis of transformed resistance gene by constructing a pUC19-rpsLmut-sfgfp linear plasmid carrying a streptomycin resistance-conferring mutation, the results implicated that the declined resistance acquisition may be at least partially due to the inhibited rpsLmut synthesis by streptomycin. Therefore, it was likely that reduced expression of rpsL carrying a resistance-conferring mutation acquired by transformation in the presence of streptomycin incapacitated WT cells to produce rpsL protein with reduced binding affinity with streptomycin, thus leading to the failure of increasing the chance of evading streptomycin antibacterial activity, which eventually led to the death of cells. This likely negative feedback cycle also interestingly showed that the rpsL gene may be within the gene substrates whose expression can be regulated by rpsL itself. However, this effect mode could be reversed by HopE or HopD deletion in our study. By observing the reduced streptomycin accumulation in mutants lacking HopE or HopD, we assumed that HopE or HopD porin affected antibiotic acquisition via controlling antibiotic uptake, which influenced the resistance-conferring gene expression and thus inhibited that negative feedback in H. pylori. Further proteomic analysis also substantiated this view by revealing that HopE deletion attenuated the inhibition of chromosomal protein synthesis levels in the presence of streptomycin. Of note, among all the detected proteins, rpsL indeed downregulated but did not reach a significant decrease. This disparity could be likely explained by the primary limitations in label-free proteomics that it has difficulties in ensuring the quantification reproducibility and robustness and has obstacles to achieving its best sensitivity (51, 52). Moreover, compared with the high-throughput proteomics analysis technology, quantification of the expression specific to this protein seems more confirming.
To answer the question regarding whether streptomycin may inhibit the transforming DNA expression by regulating the NT machinery proteins, the explanation could be as followed: it seems not time-allowed for NT machinery proteins to make possible responses before transformation occurs. During the NT incubation of strains with transforming DNA, streptomycin was added at the same time with the transformation mix. However, all of the transformation steps from DNA seizing, recombination, and integration to expression, occur in less than 1 h, and the DNA is fully expressed in 2 to 3 h (10), relying on the exiting levels of NT machinery proteins regardless of whether streptomycin affected expression of these proteins because they also need time to respond and alter their expressions or not.
In the presence of the transcription-inhibiting antibiotic rifampin and the DNA-damaging agent metronidazole, the streptomycin resistance acquisition frequencies also maintained apparently higher levels in mutants lacking HopE but not HopD after StrepR DNA transformation compared to those in the WT strain, which showed that the loss of HopE plays a more important role in resistance dissemination in the presence of indicated concentrations of antibiotics. Metronidazole is one of the first-line antibiotics for H. pylori eradication with a low molecular weight of 171.2, whose metabolite can block bacterial nucleic acid synthesis (53). Hence, our results implied that HopE loss could also preserve resistance acquisition by transformation in the presence of antibiotics with other modes of action. As to StrepR DNA transformation in the presence of clarithromycin and tetracycline in our final experiment, which are classic translation-inhibiting antibiotics, we did not observe the significantly higher resistance acquisition in mutants compared to the same high levels of those in the WT strain. Taken together, our findings could be explained as follows. The acquired gene expression observed after transformation was bound to be affected by the intracellular accumulation of the translation- or transcription-inhibiting antibiotics such as streptomycin and rifampicin. Therefore, in the presence of these antibiotics, it is possible that sufficient drug accumulation in the WT strain and reduced drug concentration in mutant cells caused the significant difference in NT frequency (and protein expression). While in the presence of clarithromycin or tetracycline, the unobserved mechanism that hopE deletion did not significantly restore NT frequency was actually due to the same high level of NT frequency in the WT strain, which could be due to the insufficient drug accumulation in the WT strain. It is known that the intracellular levels of antibiotics are regulated by the balance of two main factors: porin-mediated influx and efflux pump-mediated efflux, which have their own substrates (54, 55). Therefore, it could be speculated that the sufficient accumulation of streptomycin and rifampicin in the WT strain may be due to the lack of efficient efflux of these antibiotics, and the insufficient accumulation of clarithromycin or tetracycline in the WT strain was probably due to the efficient efflux of the two antibiotics by efflux pump in H. pylori. Perhaps clarithromycin and tetracycline rather than rifampicin and metronidazole were within the substrates of the main efflux pump in H. pylori.
Conclusion.
Our study reveals the important role of HopE, and to a minor extent HopD porins, not only in preserving the intrinsic susceptibility to specific antibiotic but also in evading drug-specific resistance acquired by NT in the presence of bacterial inhibitors. The loss of HopE and/or HopD porins in H. pylori genomes, combined with the large number of secreted or cell-free genetic elements carrying single nucleotide mutations conferring H. pylori antibiotic resistance, increases the probability that this pattern serves as an important mechanism for the spread of drug resistance within bacterial communities.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
H. pylori culture conditions.
The cultures of H. pylori 26695 (wild-type [WT]) and mutants were grown under microaerophilic conditions (5% O2, 10% CO2, and 85% N2, using the MAC-MIC system from AES Chemunex or an airtight culture container with the Mitsubishi Gas Company anaeropack) at 37°C. Karmali (Oxoid) medium supplemented with 10% defibrinated horse blood was used for plate cultures. Liquid cultures were grown in Brucella broth (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD) supplemented with 10% decomplemented fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) with constant shaking (150 rpm). Antibiotic mix containing polymyxin B (0.155 mg/mL), vancomycin (6.25 mg/mL), trimethoprim (3.125 mg/mL), and amphotericin B (1.25 mg/mL) was added to both plate and liquid cultures. An UV spectrophotometer was used to detect bacterial concentration (1.0 A600 = 1 × 108 CFU/mL).
Construction of gene variants.
H. pylori 26695 was used as parental strain to generate all the gene variants. The gene sequences were obtained from the annotated complete genome sequence of H. pylori 26695 deposited at Pylori Gene World-Wide Web Server (http://genolist.pasteur.fr/PyloriGene/). For chromosomal integrations/replacements of gene variants, the specific flanking sequences (Table S2) wherever appropriate for hopA (556 bp for 5′ arm and 511 bp for 3′ arm), hopB (510 bp for 5′ arm and 567 bp for 3′ arm), hopC (532 bp for 5′ arm and 533 bp for 3′ arm), hopD (511 bp for 5′ arm and 510 bp for 3′ arm), and hopE (573 bp for 5′ arm and 578 bp for 3′ arm) gene regions were amplified from genomic DNA (gDNA) of the H. pylori 26695 strain using high-fidelity PCR enzyme and sequence-specific primers (Table S3), were combined by PCR with a kanamycin resistance cassette amplified from pEGFP-N1 or pET28a plasmid (using primers KnF and KnR; Table S3) in the middle, and were cloned to the pUCmT vector to separately generate the recombinant plasmids pUCmT-ΔhopA::Kn, pUCmT-ΔhopB::Kn, pUCmT-ΔhopC::Kn, pUCmT-ΔhopD::Kn, and pUCmT-ΔhopE::Kn (Table S4). All the plasmids harboring different gene constructs were introduced into H. pylori 26695 by electroporation transformation for allelic replacement of native hopA, hopB, hopC, hopD, and hopE locus, respectively. Transformants were selected by using plates containing kanamycin (20 μg/mL). Partial positive clones were inoculated into liquid cultures. The correct constructions were verified by PCR using 5′- and 3′-flanking sequence (homologous arms) primers and gene-specific primers (Table S3). The glycerol stocks of the H. pylori strains were prepared in Brucella broth media supplemented with 20% glycerol and stored in −80°C.
Determination of antibiotic susceptibility.
The antimicrobial resistance of H. pylori 26695 and mutants to metronidazole (MTZ), clarithromycin (CLR), levofloxacin (LEV), amoxicillin (AMX), and tetracycline (Tc) and rifampin (RIF) were determined by ETEST (Kangtai Biotechnology Co., Ltd.; Autobio, China) and by the agar dilution method. In the ETEST experiment, chloramphenicol not affected by all mutants was used to show specificity. The antibiotic susceptibility of H. pylori 26695 and mutants to streptomycin (Strep) was determined by an agar dilution method. All antimicrobials were purchased from Wako Pure Chemical Industry (Osaka, Japan). For the ETEST, the culture suspension turbidity of H. pylori was adjusted with saline to a McFarland opacity standard of 2.0, and the suspensions were inoculated onto an MH agar plate (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD) supplemented with 10% horse blood. The ETEST strips for the six drugs were inserted into the plate and incubated at 37°C for 3 to 5 days under microaerophilic conditions. The agar dilution tests were performed according to the protocols of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI, Wayne, PA). Briefly, each strain was suspended in sterile saline at a density equivalent to a McFarland opacity standard of 2.0 to 3.0, and each suspension (1 mL) was spotted onto MH agar plates supplemented with 5% sheep blood containing 2-fold serial dilutions (ranging from 0.001 to 32 µg/mL) of each antibiotic. An antibiotic-free plate was inoculated before and after each series of antibiotic plates to confirm viability of the inoculum and observe possible contamination. The plates were incubated under microaerobic conditions at 37°C for 3 days. The MIC was determined as the lowest concentration of antibiotic that apparently decreased the growth relative to the control. H. pylori ATCC 43504 was used as the quality control reference strain. The agar dilution tests were performed a minimum of three separate times.
Constructions of translational fusions.
Chemically synthetic 2,128-bp double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) containing hp1197 gene carrying A128G mutation and 500+-bp flanking sequences and a sfgfp-linker sequence (rpsLmut-sfgfp) (Table S5) was cloned into pUC19/SmaI vector to generate the pUC19-rpsLmut-sfgfp plasmid, which was transformed into E. coli TOP10. The plasmid was purified using UNlQ-500 column plasmid Max-Preps kit (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) and linearized by EcoRI (TaKaRa,15 U/μL), which was used as a substrate for the NT experiment.
Growth curves and spot assay.
Growth curves were performed automatically using TECAN Spark multimode plate reader. WT, ΔhopA, ΔhopB, ΔhopC, ΔhopD, and ΔhopE H. pylori cells were inoculated into Brucella broth (1:100) containing 10% decomplemented FBS in the presence or absence of Strep (1 and 5 µg/mL), MTZ (1 and 4 µg/mL), CLR (0.05 and 0.5 µg/mL), LEV (0.01 and 0.1 µg/mL), AMX (0.1 and 0.5 µg/mL), Tc (0.1 and 1 µg/mL), and RIF (0.1 and 1 µg/mL). Then transparent, flat-bottomed 96-well plates were loaded with 200 µl of the Brucella broth cultures and incubated under microaerophilic conditions at 35°C, with constant shaking and measuring optical density at 600 nm (OD600) every 5 h over 80 h. Mean growth curves with standard deviation were generated using GraphPad Prism. For transient exposure to streptomycin, WT, ΔhopD, and ΔhopE strains were inoculated (1:100) in Brucella broth containing 10% decomplemented FBS and were grown to an OD600 of 4.0. Streptomycin (5 µg/mL) was then added to the culture, which was then incubated under microaerobic conditions at 37°C with shaking. After 4 and 8 h, a sample of the culture was serial diluted, and 10 µl drops were deposited on Karmali plates. The sample was then cultured for 3 days. The plates were imaged using a Bio-Rad ChemiDoc MP system via a customization mode with white epi illumination.
Natural transformation assay.
To obtain the isogenic streptomycin resistance (StrepR) total chromosomal DNA, exponentially growing H. pylori 26695 cells from liquid cultures (OD600 of 4.0) were plated on streptomycin-containing (5 µg/mL) plates and incubated for 5 to 7 days. The frequency of StrepR colonies is on the order of 10−9. After three subcultures, the total genomic DNA of the StrepR cells was extracted using DNAzol (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) and kept at −80°C. All the procedures were performed following the manufacturer’s instructions. A total of 500 ng of this genomic DNA or rpsLmut-sfgfp linear plasmid DNA with 60 µl of exponentially growing H. pylori 26695 or mutant cells from liquid cultures resuspended in 1 mL Brucella broth containing 10% FBS were mixed into the wells of 24-well plates and incubated for 8 h at 37°C without shaking. The cells were washed by centrifugation (5,000 rpm/min); resuspended by peptone water; then vortexed, serial diluted, and plated on Karmali plates with or without streptomycin (5 μg/mL); and incubated for 4 to 5 days at 37°C. The transformation frequencies were calculated as the number of StrepR colonies/recipient CFU. When NT was done in the presence of antibiotics (Strep, MTZ, Tc, CLR, and Rif), supplements were added at the same time as the transformation mix and maintained all along the experiment.
Fluorescence microscopy experiments and image analysis.
To determine the in vivo rpsLmut-sfgfp expression level, 500 ng of the linear plasmid and 60 µl of exponentially growing cells from liquid cultures resuspended in 1 mL Brucella broth containing 10% FBS were mixed into wells of 24-well plates in the absence or in the presence of streptomycin (5 μg/mL) and incubated for 1, 2, 3, and 4 h or indicated time at 37°C without shaking. The cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and were resuspended in 500 µl of sterile saline and spotted on coated gelatin glass coverslips and fixed for 1 h with 4% formaldehyde. The slides were washed three times with PBS and mounted in a SlowFade diamond mountant (S36963, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Image acquisition was performed with a Leica TCS SP8 STED confocal microscope (Wetzlar, Germany) using a 100×/1.40 oil lens. Acquisition settings included an automatic GFP channel (488-nm absorption laser [10% transmission] and 498- to 577-nm emission laser) and a differential interference contrast (DIC) detector. The image processing was performed and the signal/noise ratio (SNR, a proxy for the relative concentration of fluorescence inside the cells) was determined manually using NIS-element software (Nikon Corp., Tokyo, Japan). SNR here corresponds to the ratio (intracellular signal/noise signal) at which the intracellular signal is the fluorescence signal per cell area and the noise is the signal measured outside the cells (due to the fluorescence emitted by the surrounding medium). For streptomycin accumulation analysis, exponentially growing cells from liquid cultures resuspended in 1 mL Brucella broth containing 10% FBS were incubated with 10 µg/mL TRITC-labeled streptomycin (Xi’an Qiyue Biotechnology Co., Ltd., China) for 1 h at 37°C without shaking. Cell wash and fix and image acquisition were as described above. Acquisition settings included an automatic red fluorescence channel and a DIC detector. Image processing and single-cell level SNR calculation were done manually the same as described above.
Reversed-phase liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (RPLC-MS) analysis.
The samples were analyzed in triplicate using a Dionex Ultimate 3000 RSLCnano (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA) with chromatographic column (75-µm inner diameter × 150-mm, packed with Acclaim PepMap RSLC C18, 2 µm, 100 Å, nanoViper) coupled on line with a Thermo Scientific Q Exactive PLUS mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA). We analyzed one quadruplex containing WT with no Strep, WT with Strep for 3 h, ΔhopE with no Strep, and ΔhopE with Strep for 3 h. The samples were centrifuged at 8,000 × g at 4°C and added 1 mL precold RIPA lysis solution containing 5 μL (0.5%) phosphatase inhibitor, 1 μL (0.1%) protease inhibitor, and 10 μL (1%) phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF, a protease inhibitor), which were subjected to sonication eight times (50W power) in protein dissolution buffer. The obtained proteins subsequently underwent quality inspection by quantification using a BCA quantitative kit (23275, Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA) and SDS-PAGE electrophoresis and then underwent protease digestion. The peptide fractions were dissolved in 20 μL solution (0.1% formic acid and 5% acetonitrile), fully oscillated, and centrifuged at 13,500 rpm at 4°C for 20 min. The supernatants were transferred to the loading tube, and 8 μL was absorbed for mass spectrometry identification. The parameter for mobile phase A was 0.1% formic acid (64186, Thermo Scientific), and that for mobile phase B was 0.1% formic acid and 80% ACN (A998-4, Thermo Fisher Scientific). The separated peptides directly entered the mass spectrometer Thermo Scientific Q Exactive Plus for online detection. Maxquant software (version 1.6.17.0) was used for peptide retrieval in the UniProt proteome database (UP000000429_20211001.fasta). Fold change (FC) analysis and t test were used to perform univariate statistical analysis on the proteins. Proteins with fold change greater than or less than 1.2 and with a significance analysis P value less than 0.05 were selected as proteins with significantly different abundance, and then the volcano plots were generated.
Statistical analysis.
Differences between groups were compared using the MWU Mann-Whitney U test, Student’s t test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and chi-square test according to the data type and the number of comparisons. When the results of one-way ANOVA tests showed a statistical difference, the intragroup pairwise comparison was performed using Dunnett’s test or Tukey’s test. The statistical analysis was performed via GraphPad Prism (version 8.0). A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Data availability.
The main data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary figures and tables. The source data for the figures are provided as a source data file.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by Shanghai Science and Technology Committee grants 18411960600, 16411968000, and 18411950800; National High Technology Research and Development Program of China grant 2015AA021107-019; Shanghai Shenkang Hospital Development Center New Frontier Technology Joint Research Project grant SHDC12015107; Shanghai Health and Family Planning Commission Youth Project of Scientific Research Subject grant 20184Y0032; funds from the Shanghai Rising Stars of Medical Talent Outstanding Youth Development Program of 2018; and Huadong Hospital Project grant 2019jc019.
Footnotes
Supplemental material is available online only.
Contributor Information
Yanmei Zhang, Email: 15618653286@163.com.
Hu Zhao, Email: ZH13701618011@163.com.
Beile Gao, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Santanu Chattopadhyay, Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology.
REFERENCES
- 1.Nadeem SF, Gohar UF, Tahir SF, Mukhtar H, Pornpukdeewattana S, Nukthamna P, Moula Ali AM, Bavisetty SCB, Massa S. 2020. Antimicrobial resistance: more than 70 years of war between humans and bacteria. Crit Rev Microbiol 46:578–599. doi: 10.1080/1040841X.2020.1813687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pruden A. 2014. Balancing water sustainability and public health goals in the face of growing concerns about antibiotic resistance. Environ Sci Technol 48:5–14. doi: 10.1021/es403883p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lerminiaux NA, Cameron ADS. 2019. Horizontal transfer of antibiotic resistance genes in clinical environments. Can J Microbiol 65:34–44. doi: 10.1139/cjm-2018-0275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.von Wintersdorff CJ, Penders J, van Niekerk JM, Mills ND, Majumder S, van Alphen LB, Savelkoul PH, Wolffs PF. 2016. Dissemination of antimicrobial resistance in microbial ecosystems through horizontal gene transfer. Front Microbiol 7:173. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Thomas CM, Nielsen KM. 2005. Mechanisms of, and barriers to, horizontal gene transfer between bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol 3:711–721. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tacconelli E, Carrara E, Savoldi A, Harbarth S, Mendelson M, Monnet DL, Pulcini C, Kahlmeter G, Kluytmans J, Carmeli Y, Ouellette M, Outterson K, Patel J, Cavaleri M, Cox EM, Houchens CR, Grayson ML, Hansen P, Singh N, Theuretzbacher U, Magrini N, WHO Pathogens Priority List Working Group. 2018. Discovery, research, and development of new antibiotics: the WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and tuberculosis. Lancet Infect Dis 18:318–327. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30753-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Backert S, Neddermann M, Maubach G, Naumann M. 2016. Pathogenesis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Helicobacter 21:19–25. doi: 10.1111/hel.12335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Suerbaum S, Michetti P. 2002. Helicobacter pylori infection. N Engl J Med 347:1175–1186. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra020542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Savoldi A, Carrara E, Graham DY, Conti M, Tacconelli E. 2018. Prevalence of antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori: a systematic review and meta-analysis in World Health Organization regions. Gastroenterology 155:1372–1382.e17. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.07.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Corbinais C, Mathieu A, Kortulewski T, Radicella JP, Marsin S. 2016. Following transforming DNA in Helicobacter pylori from uptake to expression. Mol Microbiol 101:1039–1053. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Seo JW, Park JY, Shin TS, Kim JG. 2019. The analysis of virulence factors and antibiotic resistance between Helicobacter pylori strains isolated from gastric antrum and body. BMC Gastroenterol 19:140. doi: 10.1186/s12876-019-1062-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Norazah A, Rasinah WZ, Zaili Z, Aminuddin A, Ramelah M. 2009. Analysis of PCR-RAPD DNA and antibiotic susceptibility profiles of antrum and corpus isolates of Helicobacter pylori from Malaysian patients. Malays J Pathol 31:29–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hua J, Ng HC, Yeoh KG, Ho B. 1999. Predominance of a single strain of Helicobacter pylori in gastric antrum. Helicobacter 4:28–32. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-5378.1999.09043.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Selgrad M, Tammer I, Langner C, Bornschein J, Meißle J, Kandulski A, Varbanova M, Wex T, Schlüter D, Malfertheiner P. 2014. Different antibiotic susceptibility between antrum and corpus of the stomach, a possible reason for treatment failure of Helicobacter pylori infection. World J Gastroenterol 20:16245–16251. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i43.16245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sheu SM, Sheu BS, Lu CC, Yang HB, Wu JJ. 2009. Mixed infections of Helicobacter pylori: tissue tropism and histological significance. Clin Microbiol Infect 15:253–259. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02666.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yeh YC, Chang KC, Yang JC, Fang CT, Wang JT. 2002. Association of metronidazole resistance and natural competence in Helicobacter pylori. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46:1564–1567. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.5.1564-1567.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Damke PP, Di Guilmi AM, Varela PF, Velours C, Marsin S, Veaute X, Machouri M, Gunjal GV, Rao DN, Charbonnier JB, Radicella JP. 2019. Identification of the periplasmic DNA receptor for natural transformation of Helicobacter pylori. Nat Commun 10:5357. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13352-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Corbinais C, Mathieu A, Damke PP, Kortulewski T, Busso D, Prado-Acosta M, Radicella JP, Marsin S. 2017. ComB proteins expression levels determine Helicobacter pylori competence capacity. Sci Rep 7:41495. doi: 10.1038/srep41495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Vergalli J, Bodrenko IV, Masi M, Moynie L, Acosta-Gutierrez S, Naismith JH, Davin-Regli A, Ceccarelli M, van den Berg B, Winterhalter M, Pages JM. 2020. Porins and small-molecule translocation across the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol 18:164–176. doi: 10.1038/s41579-019-0294-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lienlaf M, Morales JP, Diaz MI, Diaz R, Bruce E, Siegel F, Leon G, Harris PR, Venegas A. 2010. Helicobacter pylori HopE and HopV porins present scarce expression among clinical isolates. World J Gastroenterol 16:320–329. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i3.320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Doig P, Exner MM, Hancock RE, Trust TJ. 1995. Isolation and characterization of a conserved porin protein from Helicobacter pylori. J Bacteriol 177:5447–5452. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.19.5447-5452.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Dam S, Pages JM, Masi M. 2018. Stress responses, outer membrane permeability control and antimicrobial resistance in Enterobacteriaceae. Microbiology 164:260–267. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Masi M, Refregiers M, Pos KM, Pages JM. 2017. Mechanisms of envelope permeability and antibiotic influx and efflux in Gram-negative bacteria. Nat Microbiol 2:17001. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Delcour AH. 2009. Outer membrane permeability and antibiotic resistance. Biochim Biophys Acta 1794:808–816. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2008.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bina JE, Alm RA, Uria-Nickelsen M, Thomas SR, Trust TJ, Hancock RE. 2000. Helicobacter pylori uptake and efflux: basis for intrinsic susceptibility to antibiotics in vitro. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44:248–254. doi: 10.1128/AAC.44.2.248-254.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ghai I, Ghai S. 2018. Understanding antibiotic resistance via outer membrane permeability. Infect Drug Resist 11:523–530. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S156995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nikaido H. 2003. Molecular basis of bacterial outer membrane permeability revisited. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 67:593–656. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.67.4.593-656.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ghai I, Ghai S. 2017. Exploring bacterial outer membrane barrier to combat bad bugs. Infect Drug Resist 10:261–273. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S144299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Benz R. 1988. Structure and function of porins from gram-negative bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 42:359–393. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.42.100188.002043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Imai K, Hayat S, Sakiyama N, Fujita N, Tomii K, Elofsson A, Horton P. 2013. Localization prediction and structure-based in silico analysis of bacterial proteins: with emphasis on outer membrane proteins. Methods Mol Biol 939:115–140. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-107-3_10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lopatkin AJ, Sysoeva TA, You L. 2016. Dissecting the effects of antibiotics on horizontal gene transfer: analysis suggests a critical role of selection dynamics. Bioessays 38:1283–1292. doi: 10.1002/bies.201600133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lopatkin AJ, Huang S, Smith RP, Srimani JK, Sysoeva TA, Bewick S, Karig DK, You L. 2016. Antibiotics as a selective driver for conjugation dynamics. Nat Microbiol 1:16044. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Andersson DI, Hughes D. 2014. Microbiological effects of sublethal levels of antibiotics. Nat Rev Microbiol 12:465–478. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Schuurmans JM, van Hijum SA, Piet JR, Handel N, Smelt J, Brul S, ter Kuile BH. 2014. Effect of growth rate and selection pressure on rates of transfer of an antibiotic resistance plasmid between E. coli strains. Plasmid 72:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2014.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Baquero F, Tedim AP, Coque TM. 2013. Antibiotic resistance shaping multi-level population biology of bacteria. Front Microbiol 4:15. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Stokes HW, Gillings MR. 2011. Gene flow, mobile genetic elements and the recruitment of antibiotic resistance genes into Gram-negative pathogens. FEMS Microbiol Rev 35:790–819. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00273.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zhang PY, Xu PP, Xia ZJ, Wang J, Xiong J, Li YZ. 2013. Combined treatment with the antibiotics kanamycin and streptomycin promotes the conjugation of Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol Lett 348:149–156. doi: 10.1111/1574-6968.12282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Schlacher K, Goodman MF. 2007. Lessons from 50 years of SOS DNA-damage-induced mutagenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8:587–594. doi: 10.1038/nrm2198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Beaber JW, Hochhut B, Waldor MK. 2004. SOS response promotes horizontal dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes. Nature 427:72–74. doi: 10.1038/nature02241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hastings PJ, Rosenberg SM, Slack A. 2004. Antibiotic-induced lateral transfer of antibiotic resistance. Trends Microbiol 12:401–404. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2004.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Al-Masaudi SB, Day MJ, Russell AD. 1991. Effect of some antibiotics and biocides on plasmid transfer in Staphylococcus aureus. J Appl Bacteriol 71:239–243. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1991.tb04454.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Barr V, Barr K, Millar MR, Lacey RW. 1986. Beta-lactam antibiotics increase the frequency of plasmid transfer in Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother 17:409–413. doi: 10.1093/jac/17.4.409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Dorer MS, Fero J, Salama NR. 2010. DNA damage triggers genetic exchange in Helicobacter pylori. PLoS Pathog 6:e1001026. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Claverys JP, Prudhomme M, Martin B. 2006. Induction of competence regulons as a general response to stress in gram-positive bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 60:451–475. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.60.080805.142139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Charpentier X, Polard P, Claverys JP. 2012. Induction of competence for genetic transformation by antibiotics: convergent evolution of stress responses in distant bacterial species lacking SOS? Curr Opin Microbiol 15:570–576. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2012.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Slager J, Kjos M, Attaiech L, Veening JW. 2014. Antibiotic-induced replication stress triggers bacterial competence by increasing gene dosage near the origin. Cell 157:395–406. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Prudhomme M, Attaiech L, Sanchez G, Martin B, Claverys JP. 2006. Antibiotic stress induces genetic transformability in the human pathogen Streptococcus pneumoniae. Science 313:89–92. doi: 10.1126/science.1127912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Nolivos S, Cayron J, Dedieu A, Page A, Delolme F, Lesterlin C. 2019. Role of AcrAB-TolC multidrug efflux pump in drug-resistance acquisition by plasmid transfer. Science 364:778–782. doi: 10.1126/science.aav6390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Blazquez J, Couce A, Rodriguez-Beltran J, Rodriguez-Rojas A. 2012. Antimicrobials as promoters of genetic variation. Curr Opin Microbiol 15:561–569. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2012.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Weisser J, Wiedemann B. 1987. Inhibition of R-plasmid transfer in Escherichia coli by 4-quinolones. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 31:531–534. doi: 10.1128/AAC.31.4.531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zhang T, Gaffrey MJ, Monroe ME, Thomas DG, Weitz KK, Piehowski PD, Petyuk VA, Moore RJ, Thrall BD, Qian WJ. 2020. Block design with common reference samples enables robust large-scale label-free quantitative proteome profiling. J Proteome Res 19:2863–2872. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Klaene JJ, Flarakos C, Glick J, Barret JT, Zarbl H, Vouros P. 2016. Tracking matrix effects in the analysis of DNA adducts of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. J Chromatogr A 1439:112–123. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.10.057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Gong Y, Yuan Y. 2018. Resistance mechanisms of Helicobacter pylori and its dual target precise therapy. Crit Rev Microbiol 44:371–392. doi: 10.1080/1040841X.2017.1418285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Alba C, Blanco A, Alarcon T. 2017. Antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori. Curr Opin Infect Dis 30:489–497. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Tshibangu-Kabamba E, Yamaoka Y. 2021. Helicobacter pylori infection and antibiotic resistance - from biology to clinical implications. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 18:613–629. doi: 10.1038/s41575-021-00449-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplemental material. Download SPECTRUM01987-21_Supp_1_seq9.pdf, PDF file, 0.6 MB (651.1KB, pdf)
Supplemental material. Download SPECTRUM01987-21_Supp_2_seq10.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.02 MB (24.7KB, xlsx)
Supplemental material. Download SPECTRUM01987-21_Supp_3_seq11.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.01 MB (11.8KB, xlsx)
Supplemental material. Download SPECTRUM01987-21_Supp_4_seq12.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.02 MB (16.8KB, xlsx)
Supplemental material. Download SPECTRUM01987-21_Supp_5_seq13.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.01 MB (11KB, xlsx)
Supplemental material. Download SPECTRUM01987-21_Supp_6_seq14.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.9 MB (939.9KB, xlsx)
Supplemental material. Download SPECTRUM01987-21_Supp_7_seq15.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.9 MB (938.6KB, xlsx)
Supplemental material. Download SPECTRUM01987-21_Supp_8_seq16.xlsx, XLSX file, 1.3 MB (1.4MB, xlsx)
Data Availability Statement
The main data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary figures and tables. The source data for the figures are provided as a source data file.





