Skip to main content
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2022 Apr 27;13:2275. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29983-1

The initial charge separation step in oxygenic photosynthesis

Yusuke Yoneda 1,2,5, Eric A Arsenault 1,2,3, Shiun-Jr Yang 1,2, Kaydren Orcutt 1,2, Masakazu Iwai 2,4, Graham R Fleming 1,2,3,
PMCID: PMC9046298  PMID: 35477708

Abstract

Photosystem II is crucial for life on Earth as it provides oxygen as a result of photoinduced electron transfer and water splitting reactions. The excited state dynamics of the photosystem II-reaction center (PSII-RC) has been a matter of vivid debate because the absorption spectra of the embedded chromophores significantly overlap and hence it is extremely difficult to distinguish transients. Here, we report the two-dimensional electronic-vibrational spectroscopic study of the PSII-RC. The simultaneous resolution along both the visible excitation and infrared detection axis is crucial in allowing for the character of the excitonic states and interplay between them to be clearly distinguished. In particular, this work demonstrates that the mixed exciton-charge transfer state, previously proposed to be responsible for the far-red light operation of photosynthesis, is characterized by the ChlD1+Phe radical pair and can be directly prepared upon photoexcitation. Further, we find that the initial electron acceptor in the PSII-RC is Phe, rather than PD1, regardless of excitation wavelength.

Subject terms: Electron transfer, Photochemistry, Photosystem II


The photosystem II reaction center (PSII-RC) is a model system to understand the initial steps of photosynthesis, but its excited state dynamics is difficult to disentangle with most spectroscopic methods. Here the authors perform a two-dimensional electronic-vibrational spectroscopic study of PSII-RC, providing detailed insight into such dynamics and into the mechanism of charge separation.

Introduction

Photosynthesis, the green engine of life on Earth, produces molecular oxygen by using the light-driven water-plastoquinone oxidoreductase enzyme known as photosystem II13. The photosystem II-reaction center (PSII-RC) is one of the smallest photosynthetic components which can undergo charge separation (CS) and thus is an ideal model system to investigate the underlying mechanism of the initial light-energy conversion process of photosynthesis46. The PSII-RC consists of six pigments as central cofactors—two special pair chlorophylls (PD1 and PD2), two accessory chlorophylls (ChlD1 and ChlD2), and two pheophytins (PheD1 and PheD2)—arranged in a quasi-symmetric geometry (Fig. 1a)7,8. These six molecules are generally referred to as RC pigments. In addition, there are two peripheral antenna Chls which are denoted as ChlzD1 and ChlzD2. Despite the similarity of the pigment arrangement in the D1 and D2 branches, electron transfer only proceeds along the D1 pigments. The specifics of how CS proceeds in the PSII-RC is, however, a matter of vivid debate. In particular, there remains a long-standing discussion concerned with whether the initial electron acceptor is PD19,10 or PheD11113, i.e., whether the initial radical pair is (PD2+PD1) or (ChlD1+PheD1). The uncertainty here is a consequence of the many closely spaced excitonic states arising from pigment-pigment interactions in the PSII-RC such that no observable structure is present even in the electronic linear absorption spectrum at cryogenic temperatures1416.

Fig. 1. Structure and 2DEV spectrum of the PSII-RC.

Fig. 1

a Pigment arrangement of the PSII-RC depicted based on the crystal structure (3WU2) reported by Umena et al.8. b 2DEV spectrum of the PSII-RC at 180 fs. Positive contours (red/yellow) indicate ground state bleach (GSB) features and negative contours (blue) indicate photoinduced absorption (PIA) features. The vertical dotted lines show the zero phonon exciton transition energies based on the model by Novoderezhkin et al.34. Contour levels are drawn in 5% intervals. Colored squares on the top indicate the dominant pigments participating in each excitonic state as labeled in a.

To this end, the excited state dynamics of the PSII-RC has been the focus of extensive spectroscopic interest spanning over three decades. These works have included time-resolved fluorescence17,18, transient absorption9,10,13,1921, optical photon-echo12, visible pump-mid infrared (IR) probe11, and two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy14,2224 studies. While electronic spectroscopies acutely suffer from a lack of spectral resolution in regard to the PSII-RC, the implementation of mid-IR spectroscopy has proven to be highly advantageous in addressing issues related to spectral congestion2528. In particular, the keto and ester CO stretching modes of Chl and Phe show unique signatures in the mid-IR region depending on the local protein environment, electronic structure, and ionic states11,2933. Additionally, the amide I modes of the backbone protein can be used as sensitive reporters for the electron transfer11,31. This was notably demonstrated by Groot et al. in a visible pump-mid IR probe study of the PSII-RC where it was suggested that the initial electron acceptor was Phe based on its distinguishing vibrational structure11. However, spectral resolution only along the detection axis was not sufficient to disentangle the distinct excitonic contributions and dynamics or definitively assign the initial electron acceptor.

Many theoretical models have been developed in order to aid in experimental interpretation and to elucidate the nature of the electronic states at different absorption wavelengths3437. Particularly, Stark spectroscopy suggests that the absorption spectrum of PSII is not characterized by purely excitonic states, rather it is composed of mixed exciton-charge transfer (CT) states possibly including contributions from (ChlD1δ+PheD1δ−)* and (PD2δ+PD1δ)*38. In an attempt to model this, one of the most sophisticated exciton models of the PSII-RC takes into account eight pigments—the six RC and two peripheral pigments—and one CS state34. Even in this model, there was uncertainty as to the character of the initial CS state because both PD2+PD1 and ChlD1+PheD1 gave reasonable fits to the data with the former yielding slightly better agreement to experimental data considered. It is important to note here that the experimental data was, however, entirely from electronic spectroscopies.

While uncertainty surrounds the identity of the states involved in exciton-CT mixing in the PSII-RC, studies have suggested that the mixed CT states are responsible for the far-red excitation of PSII3941. Although the absorption of the PSII-RC and the required redox potential of water oxidation were believed to be located below 690 nm, it was demonstrated that PSII can be operated by the far-red light beyond 690 nm (exhibiting activities including oxygen evolution)39,42. Additionally, recent EPR experimental40 and QM/MM theoretical41 studies suggest that the far-red light excitation of PSII involves a lower-lying CT state with a hole localized on ChlD1 rather than PD2. However, just as spectral congestion obscures the assignment of the initial electron acceptor, the character of these mixed CT states remains undetermined.

Compared to the previously mentioned techniques, the emerging method of two-dimensional electronic-vibrational (2DEV) spectroscopy, which correlates electronic excitation and mid-IR detection4348, has the potential to overcome the challenges associated with congested electronic spectra. In particular, the simultaneous spectral resolution along both the visible excitation and IR detection axis has been shown to enable the clear assignment of transient species4448. In this study, we investigated the excited state dynamics of the PSII-RC via 2DEV spectroscopy. Both highly excitation frequency-dependent spectral structure and dynamics were clearly resolved. This allowed for a broad analysis of the excitonic composition of the PSII-RC and direct insight into the involvement of mixed exciton-CT states found to be directly prepared upon photoexcitation. Further, the spectra facilitated an assignment of the initial electron acceptor and enabled the excitation energy transfer (EET) and electron transfer pathways initiated by peripheral antenna excitation or RC pigments excitation to be disentangled.

Results and discussion

General insights from the 2DEV spectra and IR band assignments

Figure 1b shows the 2DEV spectrum of the PSII-RC 180 fs after photoexcitation. Of note is the significant excitation frequency (ωexc.)-dependence of the vibrationally resolved structure along the detection axis (ωdet.) which, as we will demonstrate, allows for an excitonic state-specific analysis of the spectra with high frequency resolution (i.e., vibrationally resolved excitonic structure). For example, absorption from newly formed species (photoinduced absorptions, PIA), spanning ωdet. = 1710–1760 cm−1 were seen to be more intense for the lower-lying excitonic states. Other strong indications of this ωexc.-dependent behavior were observed in the ground state bleach (GSB) region spanning ωdet. = 1680–1710 cm−1 and the PIAs at ωdet. = 1620–1670 cm−1. These three regions are of particular interest because, here, vibrational modes belonging to both the neutral and ionic forms of Chl and Phe can be clearly distinguished—thus serving as sensitive markers for the EET and CT steps leading to CS as well as the character of the excitonic states.

The vibrational structure of the PSII-RC is not only highly ωexc.-dependent, but also shows a significant time-dependence. Therefore, our assignments will be based on the vibrational structure at specific ωexc. corresponding to the energies of exciton 2 (14,690 cm−1) and exciton 8 (14,940 cm−1) in the model by Novoderezhkin et al.34, which covers the relevant pigments along the D1 branch, and at either early or later waiting times (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. Exciton-specific vibrational structure and IR assignments.

Fig. 2

Slices of 2DEV spectrum at ωexc. = 14,690 cm−1 and ωexc. = 14,940 cm−1, corresponding to the energies of exciton 2 and 8 at early (pink, 180 fs) and later (blue, 89 ps) waiting times. The difference absorption spectra of P+/P (dotted line) and Phe/Phe (solid line) are shown above for comparison (where the signs have been reversed to match the convention of the 2DEV data). Vertical dotted (solid) lines indicate band assignments corresponding P+/P (Phe/Phe) while dash-dotted lines distinguish more ambiguous assignments. The black arrow in exciton 2 marks the ChlD1+ mode at 1716 cm−1 and in exciton 8 marks the ChlzD1 ground state bleach. The P+/P and Phe/Phe spectra are reproduced from Refs. 30 and 29 with permission.

Generally, the GSB observed at ωdet. = 1680–1710 cm−1 is assigned to the keto CO stretching mode of Chl/Phe29,31,32. On the electronic ground state, the frequency of this keto mode depends on the polarity of the environment and the presence of hydrogen bonding from surrounding media (the larger the polarity, or the stronger the hydrogen bond, the lower the frequency of the keto mode). Thus, the GSB can be used to broadly distinguish pigment contributions (further discussed in the next section). For example, in Fig. 2, it is apparent at early waiting times that the GSB band of exciton 8 shows much more signal amplitude at 1680–1700 cm−1 compared to that of the exciton 2. This is in line with a light-induced FTIR difference spectroscopic study which reported that Chlz shows a GSB at 1684 cm−131, whereas P and Phe exhibit higher and lower frequency GSBs at 1704 cm−1 and 1677 cm−1, respectively29,31,32. In addition, the GSB frequency of triplet-carrying Chl, either ChlD1 or ChlD2, has been reported to be at 1670 cm−131,32.

On the electronically excited state, the keto modes of Chl and Phe exhibit redshifted absorption11,49. For example, in THF, the keto stretching mode in the previously measured Chl*/Chl difference spectrum was seen to shift from 1695 cm−1 to 1660 cm−111. Correspondingly, the negative signal at ωdet. = 1620–1670 cm−1 in both exciton 2 and 8 is broadly assigned to the excited state absorption (ESA) of the keto modes of Chl and Phe. At later waiting times, however, there is a notable evolution in the vibrational structure of this region (Fig. 2). A clear GSB peak at 1655 cm−1, overlapping with a broad ESA feature, appeared concomitantly with a new peak emerging at 1666 cm−1. Both the P+/P and Phe/Phe difference spectra exhibit GSB features in this region at frequencies of 1653–1655 cm−1 and 1659 cm−129,31,32, respectively. Resonance Raman spectroscopy of PSII-RC shows no signal at 1640–1660 cm−1, thus Groot et al. and Noguchi et al. suggest that the band at 1655 cm−1 is assigned to the amide CO mode reflecting the CS at the RC, rather than keto stretching mode of Chl or Phe11,31. The band at 1666 cm−1 is similar to both Phe/Phe and P+/P showing signals at 1662 cm−1 and 1663 cm−129,31,32, respectively, which has been suggested as a counterpart of the previously mentioned band31. A more definitive assignment is reserved for later discussion.

This leaves the remaining PIA region spanning 1710–1760 cm−1. While the ester modes Chl* and Phe* fall in this region11, they are known to be very weak and would be unlikely to account for the full intensity of the observed features. Further, assuming that this region is only composed of Chl* and Phe* ester modes would not account for the significant ωexc.-dependence clearly present in Fig. 1b. If this was the case, then this region should have a near-uniform intensity across excitons 3 through 7 which have similar pigment contributions and exciton transition dipole strengths34, but this is clearly not so (Fig. 1b). As a result, contributions from Chl* and Phe* ester modes are likely small, which should leave this a relatively clear spectral window, yet, strong features are apparent in the 2DEV spectra. The Phe/Phe difference spectrum measured in PSII, however, shows characteristic signatures in this region, still related to the ester mode of chromophore itself or surrounding amino acid residue, with strong absorptions at 1722 cm−1, 1730 cm−1, and 1739 cm−1 (Fig. 2)29,32. The corresponding peaks in the 2DEV spectrum (at 1722 cm−1, 1730 cm−1, and 1740 cm−1), apparent at early waiting times for exciton 2 and emerging later for exciton 8, are therefore assigned to Phe. It should be noted that exciton 8 does show a small negative signal around 1730 cm−1 and a positive band at 1740 cm−1 immediately after photoexcitation, despite being characterized by ChlzD1. We attribute these signals to either small contributions from the ester ESA or some degree of overlap between excitonic bands, as these slices only represent the calculated zero phonon transitions and the actual absorption has finite bandwidth.

Further characteristic of the Chl a cation is a significantly blueshifted keto stretch, to 1718 cm−1, (on the order of 25 cm−1) versus neutral Chl a in THF33. At early waiting times in exciton 2, for example, a peak is oberved at 1716 cm−1 which we assign to ChlD1+. However, at later waiting times, this peak noticeably redshifts to 1713 cm−1, toward agreement with the characteristic P+ absorption at 1711 cm−1. This dynamical behavior will be the focus of later discussion.

It should be noted that the steady state spectrum of PD2+PD1 is not measurable for a comparison because this species expected to be short-lived (if it indeed exists as an intermediate)21,41. We therefore estimate the characteristic bands of PD2+PD1 based on the assumption that cation and anion formation in PD2PD1 will exhibit similar spectral shifts to monomeric Chl because the charges should be localized on PD2 and PD1, respectively. The keto CO of the Chl generally red shifts compared to the ground state species50, however, this frequency falls in a congested region of the spectrum for the PSII-RC. On the other hand, the keto CO of monomeric Chl shows a ~25 cm−1 blue shift upon cation formation33. Given the main GSB peak of P is at 1701 cm−1, we can expect that the characteristic band of PD2+PD1 should appear at ~1726 cm−1. However, we only observe clear signatures of Phe bands (and associated GSBs) at 1730 cm−1 (and 1722 and 1740 cm−1) across the entire excitation axis.

To summarize, the significant markers tracking CS in this study are as follows (Table 1): Phe (1722 cm−1, 1730 cm−1, and 1740 cm−1), ChlD1+ (at early waiting times: 1716 cm−1), P+ (at later waiting times: 1713 cm−1), and the GSB of the amide CO bands at 1655 cm−1 and its up-shifted counterpart at 1666 cm−1. As the excitonic states of the PSII-RC are delocalized over several chromophores, we focus our discussion below on the CS markers rather than GSB and ESA features spanning 1680–1710 cm−1 and 1620–1670 cm−1, respectively, which reflect the relaxation of delocalized excitonic states.

Table 1.

IR frequency assignments of the PSII-RC.

Frequency (cm−1) Assignment
1655 GSB of amide CO11,31
1666 PIA of amide CO11,31
1677 GSB of Phe29,32
1682 GSB of P31,32
1705 GSB of P31,32
1713 PIA of P+31,32
1722 GSB of Phe or amide CO29,32
1730 PIA of Phe or amide CO29,32
1740 GSB of Phe or amide CO29,32

Excitonic composition and charge transfer character

Following the vibrational assignments, we focus on a comparison of the vibrational structure at specific excitonic energies based on the model by Novoderezhkin et al.34, in order to understand the character of the excitonic states and degree of CT mixing. Fig. 3a shows the vibrational structure corresponding to exciton 1, 2, 5, and 8 at an early waiting time. We note again that the exciton energies discussed thus far are zero phonon lines (shown in Fig. 1b). However, it has been reported that the actual absorption of the CT state shows a significant blue shift (~5 nm) as a result of coupling to low-frequency phonons in the environment, compared to other excitonic bands (1–2 nm)34. Thus, to investigate the CT state specifically, the 2DEV signal corresponding exciton 1 as shown in Fig. 3a was integrated in the range ωexc. = 14,500–14,650 cm−1.

Fig. 3. Assignment of excitonic composition and charge transfer character.

Fig. 3

a Slice along ωdet. of the 2DEV spectrum corresponding to exciton 1 (red, integrated at ωexc. = 14,500–14,650 cm−1), exciton 2 (yellow, ωexc. = 14,690 cm−1), exciton 5 (green, ωexc. = 14,850 cm−1), and exciton 8 (blue, ωexc. = 14,940 cm−1) at a waiting time of 60 fs. The vertical solid, dotted, and dash-dotted lines, as well as the black arrow follow the same convention as in Fig. 2. b Character of initial charge transfer state, exciton 1, along with the site contributions of excitons 2, 5, and 8 where the area of the shaded circles is proportional to the population of the corresponding sites based on the model of Novoderezhkin et al.34. For clarity, the slight, additional contributions from D1 pigments, nearly identical to the relative contributions of exciton 2, were omitted from exciton 1. Likewise, the charge transfer character present in excitons 2 and 5 was excluded for simplicity.

At early time, the exciton 1 signal, formed directly upon photoexcitation, shows clear structure corresponding to Phe (1722 cm−1, 1730 cm−1, and 1740 cm−1), ChlD1+ (1716 cm−1). In addition, the frequency of the GSB band around 1675 cm−1 for exciton 1 is lower than other excitonic states. This is in agreement with the previous reports that the GSB frequencies in this range of ChlD1 (1670 cm−1) and Phe (1677 cm−1) are redshifted compared to those of P (1682 cm−1) and Chlz (1684 cm−1)31,32. Furthermore, the amide CO bands reflecting CS at 1655 cm−1 and 1666 cm−1 show clear structure compared to the other excitonic states, highlighting the significant CT character of exciton 1 state. The characteristic P+ signal (1713 cm−1) appears at later waiting times and is accompanied by evolution at both of the aforementioned band positions (Fig. 4)—collectively indicating a conspicuous lack of initial contributions from PD2+ PD1.

Fig. 4. Dynamics of the PSII-RC.

Fig. 4

The time-dependent evolution of 2DEV spectra corresponding to excitons a 1, b 2, c 5, and d 8. The energy ranges for ωexc. are identical to those in Fig. 3. The waiting times are 60 fs (red), 850 fs (pink), 1.3 ps (yellow), 6.1 ps (light green), 39 ps (light blue), and 89 ps (blue). Bottom left and right panels show the range of ωdet. = 1665–1695 cm−1 and 1705–1725 cm−1, highlighting the shifting behavior of the GSB band of Chl and red-shifting behavior of the Chl+ band.

The lack of PD2+ PD1 is in contrast to several previous spectroscopic studies that suggested there are two CS pathways in the PSII-RC21,22,24,38. However, the resolution afforded by both the visible excitation and IR detection dimensions of the 2DEV spectrum lead in particular to the vibrational characterization of exciton 1—providing direct evidence that the initial CT state in the PSII-RC is characterized by ChlD1+Phe rather than PD2+ PD1 (Fig. 3b). Such a result is consistent with a recent QM/MM calculation, utilizing range-separated TD-DFT theory and the coupled-cluster theory with single and double excitations (CCSD), which proposed that the lowest CT state was ChlD1+Phe41. Recent theoretical studies suggest that the lowest CT state among the RC pigments is composed of P+Phe51,52 and that state, which has very low oscillator strength, can be directly excited by far-red light (in the red tail of, or beyond our laser spectrum)52. Our spectra show similar frequencies for ChlD1+ and P+, thus it is possible that there is a small contribution from P+ to the signal even at early time. It is clear, however, that the majority of the initial signal at 1716 cm−1 and 1677 cm−1 arises from ChlD1 because of the significant oscillator strength of ChlD1+Pheo transition52 in addition to indicating that the initial electron acceptor is Phe. A previous transient IR study also suggested that the initial electron acceptor is Phe11, however, this study relied on an extrinsic deconvolution of the vibrational spectrum as opposed to the intrinsic ability of 2DEV spectroscopy to separate excitonic and CT contributions along the ωexc. dimension. This advantage of 2DEV spectroscopy is particularly useful in the characterization of the CT state which is only weakly optically allowed and can therefore be easily obscured in other spectroscopic methods.

Considering the other states, an analysis of the GSB features of exciton 2 and 8 characterize these excitons as predominantly composed of RC pigments in the active (D1) branch and of the peripheral ChlzD1, respectively, which is consistent with the model put forth by Novoderezhkin et al. (Fig. 3b)34. These assignments also substantiate that Chl and Phe at different binding positions in the PSII-RC are indeed excited by different excitation frequencies—offering support for the importance of the protein environment in tuning the site energies of the embedded pigments41.

Exciton 2 also notably displays characteristic ChlD1+ and Phe signals at early waiting times (Fig. 3a). In comparison to exciton 5, which is mainly composed of RC pigments in addition to ChlzD2 (Fig. 3b), these CT signatures in exciton 2 are markedly more pronounced. Here, we have chosen exciton 5 as a representative for the energetically intermediate excitonic states, where there is congestion even in the 2DEV spectra. However, the vibrational structure is still telling in that the additional ChlzD2 contributions of exciton 5 should be similar to those of ChlzD1, which is indeed reflected in the fact that exciton 5 resembles a mixture of exciton 2 (mainly RC pigments) and exciton 8 (mainly composed of a peripheral pigment). This comparison highlights the enhanced CT character in exciton 2 versus exciton 5 at early waiting times which confirms the suggestion put forth in the model by Novoderezhkin et al.34 that exciton 2 is responsible for initiating primary charge separation. Further, in the model, exciton 1 was taken to be characterized by a CT state which borrowed intensity from the neighboring state, exciton 2. This is in agreement with the close resemblance between the GSB and ESA (particularly below 1650  cm−1 which is outside of the dominant window for the CS markers) structure of exciton 1 compared to that of exciton 2 (Fig. 3a) and signifies similar overall pigment contributions. This point is made even clearer by comparison of exciton 1 versus exciton 5 or 8 where there is little similarity in these regions. Correspondingly, this indicates that exciton 2 is characterized by a mixed exciton-CT state, rather than a purely excitonic state that rapidly evolves to the CT state. The mixed character between exciton 1 and 2 also offers a mechanism through which rapid charge separation can be initiated in the RC.

Charge separation dynamics

To elucidate the dynamics, a global analysis of the data with sequential modeling was performed. We note that while the time constants represent a convolution of various processes, this method is able to holistically capture the spectral evolution along both frequency dimensions. Therefore, the analysis captures the ωexc.-dependent spectra and dynamics, and the latter can be largely disentangled via vibrational signatures as we will show. The two-dimensional-evolution associated difference spectra (2D-EADS) analysis (Fig. S2), which can be thought as the two-dimensional analog of EADS53, required five components for a reasonable fit (35 fs, 1.3 ps, 6.3 ps, 41 ps, and a non-decaying offset component beyond 100 ps, the duration of the experiment). We note that the actual dynamics of the PSII-RC is not a simple sequential process as parallel and reversible processes are also expected11,13. Thus, we will discuss the dynamics based on the 2DEV slices rather than relying directly on the EADS.

Figure 4 contains exciton-specific slices through the actual 2DEV spectra along ωdet. at the earliest resolvable waiting time and at subsequent waiting times corresponding to each of the above mentioned time constants. The fastest component with a time constant of 35 fs is below the time resolution of our experimental system (~100 fs), and thus it can reflect a coherent artifact around time zero. Therefore, we will concentrate our discussion on the later time scales. Throughout, we focus our attention on excitons 2, 5, and 8 as these states have substantially more oscillator strength than exciton 1 and therefore will have a larger influence on the obtained time constants. The evolution associated with these time constants can be interpreted such that each spectrum (or slice) evolves into the next one with the associated time constant. For example, in exciton 2 (Fig. 4b), spectral evolution on the 1.3 ps timescale (comparison of the yellow and green slices in Fig. 4b), it exhibits growth at 1655 cm−1, 1666 cm−1, 1716, and 1730 cm−1 while a slight shoulder begins to emerge in 1655–1666 cm−1 region for exciton 5. This evolution is also accompanied by marked changes in the keto ESA structure. We assign the 1.3 ps timescale to progressive completion of CS, i.e., (ChlD1δ+Pheδ)* ChlD1+Phe (more pronounced for exciton 2), convoluted with EET within the excitonic manifold (more pronounced for exciton 5) and an environmental response. This timescale also agrees with previous works which suggested that initial CS occurs with 600–800 fs11 or 2–4 ps13, among others which have reported multiexponential CS dynamics21,24. The distinction here is that the vibrational structure allows for a targeted assessment of the dynamical components for each of the states.

On an 6.3 ps timescale, both the 1657 cm−1 and 1666 cm−1 CS markers exhibit further evolution along with a distinct, progressive redshift in the band at 1716 cm−1 to 1713 cm−1 for excitons 1, 2, and 5. This component is similar to the previously reported timescale for ChlD1+Phe P+Phe of 6 ps11. Additionally, in a previous light-induced FTIR difference spectroscopic study, it was proposed that the blue shift of the keto stretch of Chl cation is smaller for the charge delocalized dimeric Chl (~10 cm−1 in the case of P680+) compared to that of monomeric Chl (~30 cm−1)54. Both experimental54,55 and theoretical56,57 efforts further support that the P680 cation is partially delocalized over the PD1 and PD2 pigments. Thus, we assign the slight red shift as the hole migration towards a more delocalized cationic state, i.e., ChlD1+Phe (PD1PD2)+Phe (likely in addition to further environmental response to CS). Furthermore, the GSB band of exciton 1 and 2 exhibits blueshift from 1675 cm−1 to 1678 cm−1. This trend is consistent with the expectation that the lower frequency GSB of ChlD1 (1670 cm−1), overlapping with the Phe (1677 cm−1), is replaced by the higher frequency band of P (1682 cm−1) following hole migration. Considering that the mode at 1713 cm−1, the characteristic marker for P+, only appears on a 6.3 ps timescale, it is very unlikely that P+ contributes appreciably to the features at 1655 cm−1 and 1666 cm−1 at earlier waiting times. The evolution observed around 1655 cm−1 and 1666 cm−1 at later waiting times can therefore be understood as arising from both Phe and P+.

The final 41 ps component can be understood as predominantly reflecting CS limited by EET from peripheral Chlz to RC pigments as only significant evolution at the CS markers is observed on this timescale for exciton 8 (Fig. 4d). This timescale is also captured by the zero node line slope (ZNLS) present at ωdet. = 1670 cm−1 (Fig. 5a, dotted line) in the spectra which decays with time constants (and amplitude) of 3.8 ± 0.9 ps (0.37) and 33 ± 9 ps (0.63) (Fig. 5b) and grossly indicates equilibration within the excitonic manifold. We note that while the ZNLS trends toward zero, a non-decaying component beyond the duration of the experiment (>100 ps) suggests the presence of inhomogeneous CS due to the different conformational distributions of the proteins on the ground state21. This timescale also falls within the previously established range (14 ps to 37 ps determined at temperatures of 77 K and 277 K, respectively) for EET from peripheral Chlz to RC pigments13,19.

Fig. 5. 2DEV spectral evolution and ZNLS dynamics of the PSII-RC.

Fig. 5

a 2DEV spectra of the PSII-RC at different waiting times. Zero node line slope (ZNLS), obtained by a linear fit of the zero signal intensity distribution along the excitation axis, is depicted in the spectra as a dotted line. Contour levels are drawn in 5% intervals. b ZNLS dynamics of the PSII-RC. Red dots indicate the ZNLS value at each waiting time and the black curve shows the fit result of double exponential functions (and an offset) with time constants of 3.8 ± 0.9 and 33 ± 9 ps.

In summary, our results demonstrate that the CT state can be prepared directly upon photoexcitation, which is characterized by ChlD1δ’+Pheδ’ (δ’ > δ), and indicate that CS is facilitated by exciton-CT mixing with a contribution from (ChlD1δ+Pheδ)* throughout the excitonic manifold. The data further establish that there is no appreciable competition from PD1—independent of excitation wavelength—indicating that the initial electron acceptor is Phe as supported by the observed vibrational structure at early waiting times. These results are entirely in agreement with the recent theoretical work of Sirohiwal et al. where the ChlD1+Phe CT state was found to be the lowest energy excitation within the PSII-RC with reasonable oscillator strength41,52. Further, no similarly low energy CT states involving PD1PD2 were found41, thus theoretically excluding the special pair as a candidate for initial CS as our experimental data support. The dynamics indicate hole transfer occurs from ChlD1+ to (PD1PD2)+ on a 6.3 ps timescale as supported by the evolution of two distinct vibrational markers in order to minimize the potential influence from neighboring features. This is notably distinct from the bacterial RC where CS is largely initiated at the special pair (P) with the A branch bacteriochlorophyll acting as the primary acceptor. The distinct excitation asymmetry in the PSII-RC has been rationalized as a direct consequence of the electrostatic effect of the protein environment which likely arose as an evolutionary accommodation of water splitting in oxygenic photosynthetic systems (particularly its operation in the far-red)3941. However, this remains an open question as the initial CS step itself in the PSII-RC has long evaded clear characterization.

Methods

Two-dimensional electronic-vibrational spectroscopy

A detailed description of the experimental setup of 2DEV spectroscopy can be found elsewhere43,48. Briefly, the output of a Ti:sapphire oscillator (Vitara-S, Coherent) was regeneratively amplified with a 1 kHz repetition rate (Legend Elite, Coherent), an energy of 1 mJ/pulse, and a pulse duration of 40 fs. The amplified pulse was divided into two and one was used to pump a home-built visible non-collinear optical parametric amplifier (NOPA). The other pulse was used to generate a mid-IR probe pulse (centered at 5.9 μm) by difference frequency generation with signal and idler pulses from a near-IR collinear OPA. The output of the NOPA (centered at 675 nm, 60 nm fwhm) was compressed to 20 fs at the sample position using a pair of prisms and an acousto-optic dispersive programmable filter (AODPF, Dazzler, Fastlite). The pulse pair was introduced to a retroreflector on a motorized translation stage to control the waiting time, T, between the pump and probe pulses. The total power of the pump pulses was set at 80 nJ and the pulses were focused into the sample with spot size of 250 μm. The mid-IR pulse was divided by a 50:50 beam splitter to form probe and reference beams. The probe and reference beams were dispersed by a spectrometer (Horiba, Triax 180) and detected by a 64-pixel HgCdTe dual array (Infrared Systems Development). The cross-correlation between visible and mid-IR pulses was estimated to be 90 fs by a step-like transient IR response of a 50 μm Ge plate.

For each waiting time, a 2DEV spectrum was acquired by using the AODPF to scan the t1 delay over 0–100 fs with 2.5 fs steps. For each t1 delay, the signal was acquired with the relative phase between the pump pulses φ12 set by 0, 2π/3, and 4π/3, and the desired signal was isolated by a 3 × 1 × 1 phase cycling scheme58,59. The excitation axis was obtained by a Fourier transformation over t1. The signal was collected in the fully rotated frame with respect to t1. For 2D-EADS analysis, the detection range was selected to be ωdet. = 1620–1740 cm−1 because the dynamics in this range most fully reflect CS.

Sample preparation

All procedures for sample preparation were performed in the dark to minimize exposure to light as much as possible. We first isolated PSII-enriched membranes according to the previous literature with some modifications as follows60,61. We obtained spinach leaves (Spinacia oleracea) from a local store and kept in the dark overnight at 4 °C. The spinach leaves were briefly ground using a Waring blender in a buffer containing 50 mM MES-NaOH (pH 6.0), 400 mM NaCl, and 2 mM MgCl2 at 4 °C. The ground tissues were filtered through four layers of Miracloth (Millipore), and the filtered homogenate was centrifuged at 1400 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. The pellet was resuspended with a buffer containing 50 mM MES-NaOH (pH 6.0), 150 mM NaCl, and 5 mM MgCl2, and resuspension was centrifuged at 4000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. The pellet was then resuspended with a buffer containing 50 mM MES-NaOH (pH 6.0), 15 mM NaCl, and 5 mM MgCl2, and resuspension was centrifuged at 6000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. The pelleted thylakoid membranes were resuspended with the same buffer, and the concentration of chlorophylls was quantified by using 80% (v/v) acetone as described previously62. The thylakoid membranes (2.1 mg Chl/mL) were solubilized with 3.75% (w/v) Triton X-100 for 20 min on ice. The solution was centrifuged at 3500 × g for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected and further centrifuged at 40,000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C. The pelleted PSII-enriched membranes were washed with the same buffer and centrifuged again at 40,000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C. The PSII-enriched membranes were resuspended with a buffer containing 50 mM MES-NaOH (pH 6.0), 15 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, and 400 mM sucrose, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C until the following isolation procedures.

We isolated PSII-RC according to the previous literature with some modifications as follows6365. The PSII-enriched membranes (1 mg Chl/mL) were solubilized with 4% (w/v) Triton X-100 in a buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.2) for 1 h on ice with gentle stirring. The solution was centrifuged at 33,000 × g for 1 h at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected and loaded onto an anion exchange column (Toyopearl DEAE-650S resin) which was equilibrated with a buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.2), 30 mM NaCl, and 0.05% (w/v) Triton X-100 at 4 °C. The column was washed with the same buffer at a flow rate of 2.6 mL/min until the eluate showed the 417:435 nm ratio of about 1.16. Then, the column was subjected to a NaCl linear gradient from 30 to 200 mM at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The green fraction eluted at 90–120 mM NaCl was collected. Then, the eluate was concentrated using Amicon centrifugal filters (10 K MWCO), spinning at 3200 × g and 4 °C. The concentrated sample was diluted and re-concentrated with the buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.2), 0.4 M sucrose, 0.1% (w/v) n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside (Anatrace) prepared with D2O. The PSII-RC was flash-frozen and stored at −80 °C until 2DEV measurements.

For the spectroscopic experiments, the PSII-RC sample was mixed with glycerol-d8 in a 80:20 (v/v) glycerol:PSII-RC ratio. The sample cell was constructed from two CaF2 plates with a kapton spacer. The maximum optical density of the PSII-RC sample in the investigated visible range was set at ~1.0 with a path length of 200 μm. The sample was placed in an optical cryostat (OptistatDN2, Oxford Instruments) at 77 K.

Supplementary information

Peer Review File (461.7KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

We thank Rafael Picorel for advice regarding isolation of the PSII-RC and Dr. Addison Schile for helpful comments on the manuscript. This research was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences Division. Y.Y. appreciates the support of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Postdoctoral Fellowship for Research Abroad. E.A.A. acknowledges the support of the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (Grant No. DGE 1752814).

Author contributions

Y.Y. and G.R.F. conceived the research. Y.Y., E.A.A., S.-J.Y., and K.O. performed the 2DEV experiments. Y.Y. analyzed the experimental data. M.I. prepared the sample. Y.Y., E.A.A., and G.R.F. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the manuscript.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Fei Ma, Elisabet Romero and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Data availability

The data presented in this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-022-29983-1.

References

  • 1.Nelson, N. & Yocum, C. F. Photosystem II: The Light-Driven Water: Plastoquinone Oxidoreductase. Annual Review of Plant Biology 57, (Springer Netherlands, 2006).
  • 2.Blankenship, R. E. Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis, 2nd Edition. (Wiley, 2014).
  • 3.Shen J-R. The structure of photosystem II and the mechanism of water oxidation in photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2015;66:23–48. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Renger G, Renger T. Photosystem II: the machinery of photosynthetic water splitting. Photosynth. Res. 2008;98:53–80. doi: 10.1007/s11120-008-9345-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Croce R, Van Amerongen H. Light-harvesting and structural organization of photosystem II: from individual complexes to thylakoid membrane. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2011;104:142–153. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2011.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Romero E, Novoderezhkin VI, Van Grondelle R. Quantum design of photosynthesis for bio-inspired solar-energy conversion. Nature. 2017;543:355–365. doi: 10.1038/nature22012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Loll B, Kern J, Saenger W, Zouni A, Biesiadka J. Towards complete cofactor arrangement in the 3.0 Å resolution structure of photosystem II. Nature. 2005;438:1040–1044. doi: 10.1038/nature04224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Umena Y, Kawakami K, Shen J-RR, Kamiya N. Crystal structure of oxygen-evolving photosystem II at a resolution of 1.9 Å. Nature. 2011;473:55–60. doi: 10.1038/nature09913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Shelaev IV, et al. Primary light-energy conversion in tetrameric chlorophyll structure of photosystem II and bacterial reaction centers: II. Femto- and picosecond charge separation in PSII D1/D2/Cyt b559 complex. Photosynth. Res. 2008;98:95–103. doi: 10.1007/s11120-008-9371-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nadtochenko VA, Semenov AY, Shuvalov VA. Formation and decay of P680 (PD1-PD2) +PheoD1- radical ion pair in photosystem II core complexes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Bioenerg. 2014;1837:1384–1388. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2014.01.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Groot ML, et al. Initial electron donor and acceptor in isolated Photosystem II reaction centers identified with femtosecond mid-IR spectroscopy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 2005;102:13087–13092. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0503483102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Prokhorenko VI, Holzwarth AR. Primary processes and structure of the photosystem II reaction center: a photon echo study. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2000;104:11563–11578. doi: 10.1021/jp002323n. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Holzwarth AR, et al. Kinetics and mechanism of electron transfer in intact photosystem II and in the isolated reaction center: pheophytin is the primary electron acceptor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 2006;103:6895–6900. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0505371103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Myers JA, et al. Two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy of the D1-D2-cyt b559 photosystem II. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010;1:2774–2780. doi: 10.1021/jz100972z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Durrant JR, et al. A multimer model for P680, the primary electron donor of photosystem II. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1995;92:4798–4802. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.11.4798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Raszewski G, Diner BA, Schlodder E, Renger T. Spectroscopic properties of reaction center pigments in photosystem II core complexes: revision of the multimer model. Biophys. J. 2008;95:105–119. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.123935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Crystall B, et al. Observation of multiple radical pair states in photosystem 2 reaction centers. Biochemistry. 1991;30:7573–7586. doi: 10.1021/bi00244a029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Konermann L, Gatzen G, Holzwarth AR. Primary processes and structure of the photosystem II reaction center. 5. Modeling of the fluorescence kinetics of the D1-D2-cyt-b559 complex at 77 K. J. Phys. Chem. B. 1997;101:2933–2944. doi: 10.1021/jp9606671. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Visser HM, et al. Subpicosecond transient absorption difference spectroscopy on the reaction center of photosystem II: radical pair formation at 77 K. J. Phys. Chem. 1995;99:15304–15309. doi: 10.1021/j100041a055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Groot ML, et al. Charge separation in the reaction center of photosystem II studied as a function of temperature. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1997;94:4389–4394. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.9.4389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Romero E, Van Stokkum IHM, Novoderezhkin VI, Dekker JP, Van Grondelle R. Two different charge separation pathways in photosystem II. Biochemistry. 2010;49:4300–4307. doi: 10.1021/bi1003926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Romero E, et al. Quantum coherence in photosynthesis for efficient solar-energy conversion. Nat. Phys. 2014;10:676–682. doi: 10.1038/nphys3017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fuller FD, et al. Vibronic coherence in oxygenic photosynthesis. Nat. Chem. 2014;6:706–711. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Duan H-G, et al. Primary charge separation in the photosystem II reaction center revealed by a global analysis of the two-dimensional electronic spectra. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:12347. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12564-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Groot ML, Van Wilderen LJGW, Di Donato M. Time-resolved methods in biophysics. 5. Femtosecond time-resolved and dispersed infrared spectroscopy on proteins. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2007;6:501–507. doi: 10.1039/b613023b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Di Donato M, Groot ML. Ultrafast infrared spectroscopy in photosynthesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Bioenerg. 2015;1847:2–11. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2014.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Breton J. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy of primary electron donors in type I photosynthetic reaction centers. Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Bioenerg. 2001;1507:180–193. doi: 10.1016/S0005-2728(01)00206-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Noguchi, T. & Berthomieu, C. Molecular Analysis by Vibrational Spectroscopy. in Photosystem II: The Light-Driven Water:Plastoquinone Oxidoreductase (eds. Wydrzynski, T. J., Satoh, K. & Freeman, J. A.) 367–387 (Springer Netherlands, 2005). 10.1007/1-4020-4254-X_17
  • 29.Nabedryk E, et al. Characterization of bonding interactions of the intermediary electron acceptor in the reaction center of Photosystem II by FTIR spectroscopy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Bioenerg. 1990;1016:49–54. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(90)90005-O. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Breton, J., Hienerwadel, R. & Nabedryk, E. FTIR Difference Spectrum of the Photooxidation of the Primary Electron Donor of Photosystem II. in Spectroscopy of Biological Molecules: Modern Trends 101–102 (Springer Netherlands, 1997). 10.1007/978-94-011-5622-6_44
  • 31.Noguchi T, Tomo T, Inoue Y. Fourier transform infrared study of the cation radical of P680 in the photosystem II reaction center: evidence for charge delocalization on the chlorophyll dimer. Biochemistry. 1998;37:13614–13625. doi: 10.1021/bi9812975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Noguchi T, Tomo T, Kato C. Triplet formation on a monomeric chlorophyll in the photosystem II reaction center as studied by time-resolved infrared spectroscopy. Biochemistry. 2001;40:2176–2185. doi: 10.1021/bi0019848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nabedryk E, Leonhard M, Mäntele W, Breton J. Fourier transform infrared difference spectroscopy shows no evidence for an enolization of chlorophyll a upon cation formation either in vitro or during P700 photooxidation. Biochemistry. 1990;29:3242–3247. doi: 10.1021/bi00465a015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Novoderezhkin VI, Dekker JP, van Grondelle R. Mixing of exciton and charge-transfer states in photosystem ii reaction centers: modeling of stark spectra with modified redfield theory. Biophys. J. 2007;93:1293–1311. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.096867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Novoderezhkin VI, Romero E, Dekker JP, Van Grondelle R. Multiple charge-separation pathways in photosystem II: modeling of transient absorption kinetics. ChemPhysChem. 2011;12:681–688. doi: 10.1002/cphc.201000830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Novoderezhkin VI, Romero E, Van Grondelle R. How exciton-vibrational coherences control charge separation in the photosystem II reaction center. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015;17:30828–30841. doi: 10.1039/C5CP00582E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Novoderezhkin VI, Romero E, Prior J, Van Grondelle R. Exciton-vibrational resonance and dynamics of charge separation in the photosystem II reaction center. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017;19:5195–5208. doi: 10.1039/C6CP07308E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Romero E, et al. Mixed exciton-charge-transfer states in photosystem II: Stark spectroscopy on site-directed mutants. Biophys. J. 2012;103:185–194. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.06.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Thapper A, Mamedov F, Mokvist F, Hammarström L, Styring S. Defining the far-red limit of photosystem II in Spinach. Plant Cell. 2009;21:2391–2401. doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.064154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Pavlou A, Jacques J, Ahmadova N, Mamedov F, Styring S. The wavelength of the incident light determines the primary charge separation pathway in Photosystem II. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21101-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sirohiwal A, Neese F, Pantazis DA. Protein matrix control of reaction center excitation in photosystem II. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020;142:18174–18190. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c08526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Pettai H, Oja V, Freiberg A, Laisk A. Photosynthetic activity of far-red light in green plants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta—Bioenerg. 2005;1708:311–321. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2005.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Oliver TAA, Lewis NHC, Fleming GR. Correlating the motion of electrons and nuclei with two-dimensional electronic-vibrational spectroscopy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 2014;111:10061–10066. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1409207111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lewis NHC, et al. Observation of electronic excitation transfer through light harvesting complex II using two-dimensional electronic–vibrational spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016;7:4197–4206. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b02280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Arsenault EA, et al. Vibronic mixing enables ultrafast energy flow in light-harvesting complex II. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:1460. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14970-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Arsenault EA, Yoneda Y, Iwai M, Niyogi KK, Fleming GR. The role of mixed vibronic Qy-Qx states in green light absorption of light-harvesting complex II. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:6011. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19800-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Yoneda Y, et al. Electron-nuclear dynamics accompanying proton-coupled electron transfer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021;143:3104–3112. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c10626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Arsenault EA, Bhattacharyya P, Yoneda Y, Fleming GR. Two-dimensional electronic-vibrational spectroscopy: exploring the interplay of electrons and nuclei in excited state molecular dynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 2021;155:020901. doi: 10.1063/5.0053042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Groot ML, Breton J, Van Wilderen LJGW, Dekker JP, Van Grondelle R. Femtosecond visible/visible and visible/mid-IR pump-probe study of the photosystem II core antenna complex CP47. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2004;108:8001–8006. doi: 10.1021/jp037966s. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Mantele W, et al. Fourier transform infrared spectroelectrochemistry of the bacteriochlorophyll a anion radical. Photochem. Photobiol. 1988;47:451–455. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1988.tb02750.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Tamura H, Saito K, Ishikita H. The origin of unidirectional charge separation in photosynthetic reaction centers: nonadiabatic quantum dynamics of exciton and charge in pigment-protein complexes. Chem. Sci. 2021;12:8131–8140. doi: 10.1039/D1SC01497H. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sirohiwal A, Pantazis DA. The electronic origin of far‐red‐light‐driven oxygenic photosynthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022;202200356:1–6. doi: 10.1002/anie.202200356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Van Stokkum IHM, Larsen DS, Van Grondelle R. Global and target analysis of time-resolved spectra. Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Bioenerg. 2004;1657:82–104. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2004.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Okubo T, Tomo T, Sugiura M, Noguchi T. Perturbation of the structure of P680 and the charge distribution on its radical cation in isolated reaction center complexes of photosystem II as revealed by fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Biochemistry. 2007;46:4390–4397. doi: 10.1021/bi700157n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Diner BA, et al. Site-directed mutations at D1-His198 and D2-His197 of photosystem II in Synechocystis PCC 6803: Sites of primary charge separation and cation and triplet stabilization. Biochemistry. 2001;40:9265–9281. doi: 10.1021/bi010121r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Saito K, et al. Distribution of the cationic state over the chlorophyll pair of the photosystem II reaction center. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:14379–14388. doi: 10.1021/ja203947k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Narzi D, Bovi D, De Gaetano P, Guidoni L. Dynamics of the special pair of chlorophylls of photosystem II. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016;138:257–264. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b10523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Zhang Z, Wells KL, Hyland EWJ, Tan HS. Phase-cycling schemes for pump-probe beam geometry two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2012;550:156–161. doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2012.08.037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Fleming, G. R., Lewis, N. H. C., Arsenault, E. A., Wu, E. C. & Oldemeyer, S. Two-Dimensional Electronic Vibrational Spectroscopy. in Coherent Multidimensional Spectroscopy (ed. Cho, M.) 35–49 (Springer Singapore, 2019). 10.1007/978-981-13-9753-0_2
  • 60.Berthold DA, Babcock GT, Yocum CF. A highly resolved, oxygen-evolving photosystem II preparation from spinach thylakoid membranes. EPR and electron-transport properties. FEBS Lett. 1981;134:231–234. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(81)80608-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Caffarri S, Kouřil R, Kereïche S, Boekema EJ, Croce R. Functional architecture of higher plant photosystem II supercomplexes. EMBO J. 2009;28:3052–3063. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2009.232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Porra RJ, Thompson WA, Kriedemann PE. Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophylls a and b extracted with four different solvents: verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Bioenerg. 1989;975:384–394. doi: 10.1016/S0005-2728(89)80347-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Nanba O, Satoh K. Isolation of a photosystem II reaction center consisting of D-1 and D-2 polypeptides and cytochrome b-559. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 1987;84:109–112. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.1.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.McTavish H, Picorel R, Seibert M. Stabilization of isolated photosystem II reaction center complex in the dark and in the light using polyethylene glycol and an oxygen-scrubbing system. Plant Physiol. 1989;89:452–456. doi: 10.1104/pp.89.2.452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Seibert, M. & Picorel, R. Isolation of Photosystem II Reaction Center Complexes from Plants. in Photosynthesis Research Protocols (ed. Carpentier, R.) 17–27 (Humana Press, 2011). 10.1007/978-1-60761-925-3_3 [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Peer Review File (461.7KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.


Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES