Skip to main content
Journal of AOAC International logoLink to Journal of AOAC International
. 2021 Oct 22;105(3):876–888. doi: 10.1093/jaoacint/qsab136

Validation of the 3M™ Environmental Scrub Sampler with Wide-Spectrum Neutralizer: AOAC Performance Tested MethodSM 022104

Micki L Rosauer 1,, Karen M Silbernagel 2, Wesley Thompson 3
PMCID: PMC9046969  PMID: 34677576

Abstract

Background

The 3M™ Environmental Scrub Sampler with 10 mL Wide Spectrum Neutralizer is a nonspecific sampling device intended for use for environmental monitoring surface sampling.

Objective

The aim was to evaluate 3M Wide Spectrum Neutralizer using the 3M Environmental Scrub Sampler for AOAC® Performance Tested MethodsSM (PTM) certification.

Methods

Matrix studies, inclusivity/exclusivity, product consistency/stability, neutralization, and robustness testing were conducted for Salmonella and Listeria species. Stainless steel, sealed concrete, and plastic environmental surfaces were evaluated in the matrix study comparing the performance of the 3M™ method for sample collection to that of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) reference methods. Four classes of sanitizers, namely quaternary ammonium, high acid, hydrogen/peroxyacetic acid and chlorine/bleach-based, were assessed in the neutralization study following ASTM E1054 - 08, Standard Test Methods for Evaluation of Inactivators of Antimicrobial Agents. The other testing parameters followed typical PTM study design.

Results

In matrix studies the 3M sampling device demonstrated no significant differences between candidate and reference sampling method results. All inclusivity organisms were detected, and all exclusivity organisms were excluded, for both Salmonella and Listeria strains when tested by the appropriate FDA BAM detection method. Robustness, product consistency, and stability studies showed that the sampling device is not affected by lot or testing parameter differences. The Wide Spectrum Neutralizer was proven to effectively neutralize sanitizers at the concentrations tested and was itself shown to be nontoxic and did not affect target microorganism recovery.

Conclusions

The 3M Environmental Scrub Sampler with 10 mL Wide Spectrum Neutralizer is an effective, stable, robust sampling device for the recovery of Salmonella spp. and Listeria spp.

Highlight

The 3M Environmental Scrub Sampler with 10 mL Wide Spectrum Neutralizer is an acceptable sampling device for use in FDA BAM Salmonella and Listeria reference methods.

General Information

Listeria spp. are Gram-positive, rod-shaped bacteria that are ubiquitous in soil, in water, and in several animal species intended for consumption. Listeria monocytogenes is of particular concern as the causative agent of listeriosis. Listeriosis is usually caused by eating food that has been contaminated with L. monocytogenes. It is estimated that 1600 people get listeriosis in the United States each year, resulting in about 260 deaths (1).

Salmonella is a motile, non-spore-forming, Gram-negative, rod-shaped bacterium in the family Enterobacteriaceae. Non-motile variants include S. Gallinarum and S. Pullorum. The genus Salmonella is divided into two species that can cause illness in humans, Salmonella bongori and Salmonella enterica, the latter being characterized as being the greatest public health concern. Every year, Salmonella is estimated to cause approximately 1.35 million illnesses in the United States. Of the food source cases 26 500 require hospitalization, and 420 cases lead to death (2).

Most Salmonella and Listeria infections in humans occur after consuming food that has been contaminated by fecal matter, or ingesting fluids containing Salmonella or Listeria. Contamination of food products can easily occur during the manufacturing and packaging process. Listeria spp. can grow at wide temperature and pH ranges and can tolerate high concentrations of sodium chloride, thereby allowing for a greater ability to contaminate food during processing. Monitoring and screening environmental surfaces within food production facilities allows for detection of possible contamination risks. Having a proper environmental monitoring plan in place allows for the ability to prevent contaminated food products from even reaching consumers (3).

A critical aspect of an environmental monitoring plan is the integrity of environmental samples tested as part of the plan. Due to required sanitization procedures for surfaces in food production facilities, sampling solutions used with environmental sampling devices must fully neutralize any residual sanitizers present in the sample so that the growth and subsequent detection of organisms collected, such as Listeria and Salmonella, are not compromised. Additionally, as the range of sanitizers available for food production facilities has expanded, neutralization of a wide range of sanitizers and compatibility with downstream diagnostic tests will greatly enhance the usefulness of the environmental sampling device as part of a successful environmental monitoring program.

Principle

The 3M Environmental Scrub Sampler Stick with 10 mL Wide Spectrum Neutralizer (3M Company, St. Paul, MN, USA) is intended for collecting environmental monitoring surface samples in food production facilities. Prehydrated sampling devices are packaged in bags with a broad-spectrum neutralizing buffer. The 3M Environmental Scrub Sampler Stick with 10 mL Wide Spectrum Neutralizer is intended for use in production and laboratory environments by professionals trained in sample collection and laboratory techniques.

The 3M Environmental Scrub Sampler Stick with 10 mL Wide Spectrum Neutralizer is a non-specific collection method and not a stand-alone detection method. The performance of the device was evaluated by comparing the recovery of target microorganisms from select environmental surfaces to that of the appropriate reference method collection method. Two microorganisms of interest in food production facilities, Salmonella and Listeria species, were tested on three environmental surfaces: stainless steel, plastic, and sealed concrete.

Scope of Method

  1. Target organisms.—Salmonella spp. and Listeria spp.

  2. Matrixes.—Stainless steel, sealed concrete, and plastic.

  3. Summary of validated performance claims.—Performance comparable to that of Dey–Engley (D/E) Neutralizing Buffer with Cellulose Sponge as outlined in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) Chapter 5, detection method for Salmonella (2020) (4) and Chapter 10, “Detection of Listeria monocytogenes in Foods and Environmental Samples, and Enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes  in Foods” (2017) (5). In addition, as demonstrated according to ASTM E1054 - 08, Standard Test Methods for Evaluation of Inactivators of Antimicrobial Agents (6), the product effectively neutralizes quaternary ammonium, high acid, hydrogen/peroxyacetic acid and chlorine/bleach-based sanitizers at the concentrations tested, while being nontoxic to Salmonella and/or Listeria species.

Definitions

  1. Probability of detection (POD).—The proportion of positive analytical outcomes for a qualitative method for a given matrix at a given analyte level or concentration. POD is concentration dependent. Several POD measures can be calculated: PODR (reference method POD), PODC (confirmed candidate method POD), PODCP (candidate method presumptive result POD), and PODCC (candidate method confirmation result POD) (7).

  2. (b)Difference of probabilities of detection (dPOD).— The difference between any two POD values. If the confidence interval of a dPOD does not contain zero, then the difference is statistically significant at the 5% level.

Materials and Methods

Product Information

  1. Product name.—3M Environmental Scrub Sampler with 10 mL Wide Spectrum Neutralizer and Gloves, and 3M Environmental Scrub Sampler Stick with 10 mL Wide Spectrum Neutralizer.

  2. Cat. Nos.—HES10WSN2G and ESS10WSN.

  3. Ordering information.— https://www.3m.com/

Product Components

  1. 3M Environmental Scrub Sampler with 10 mL Wide Spectrum Neutralizer and gloves.—One Scrub Sampler with 10 mL neutralizer and gloves.

  2. 3M Environmental Scrub Sampler Stick with 10 mL Wide Spectrum Neutralizer.—One Scrub Sampler with 10 mL neutralizer.

Safety Precautions

The user must train its personnel in current proper methods for testing and surface sampling techniques, for example Good Laboratory Practices (GLP) (8), ISO/IEC 17025 (9), or ISO 18583:2018 (10).

To reduce the risks associated with environmental contamination:

  1. The 3M Environmental Scrub Sampler products are intended to be used for testing for microorganisms on surfaces. Surfaces may potentially contain pathogenic organisms, such as L.monocytogenes or Salmonella.

  2. Individuals should be trained in accordance with applicable regulatory and company/institution requirements before working with potentially infectious materials.

  3. All enrichment broths should be sterilized following any culture-based confirmatory steps.

  4. Strict compliance with BSL-2 (Biosafety Level 2) practices and current industry standards/local and federal regulations for disposal of contaminated waste should be followed.

To reduce the risks associated with exposure to chemicals and biohazards:

  1. Dispose of samples according to all applicable government regulations and applicable laboratory procedures. Strict compliance with BSL-2 practices should be followed.

  2. Always follow standard laboratory safety practices such as GLP (8) or ISO 17025 (9), including proper containment procedures and wearing appropriate protective apparel, disposable gloves, and eye protection while handling reagents and contaminated samples.

  3. Dispose of enriched samples and associated contaminated waste according to current industry standards/local and federal regulations for disposal of contaminated waste.

To reduce the risk associated with false-negative results resulting in the use of contaminated environmental surfaces for food or beverage products:

  1. Always reference the package label for storage instruction and expiration date.

  2. Always reference the product instruction for usage.

To reduce the risk of false-positive results due to cross-contaminated environmental surfaces for food or beverage products that may result in retesting or rejection of the food or beverage product:

  1. Do not touch the Scrub Sampler device to any unintended surface.

  2. Do not break the Scrub Sampler device while sampling.

  3. Do not reach into the Scrub Sampler device bag.

To reduce the risk of cross-contamination from reuse of the Scrub Sampler device:

  1. Do not use the same Scrub Sampler device more than once.

  2. Do not use the same Scrub Sampler device for sampling more than one surface area.

  3. Review that the bag does not have any defect that can compromise the aseptic conditions of the Scrub Sampler device.

The colors of the Scrub Sampler and stick are designed to be noticeable in case of dropping in the food production area. Consult the product Safety Data Sheet for additional information.

Sample Preparation

  1. Wearing gloves, tear off the top of the bag along the perforations.

  2. Aseptically open the bag by using the red tabs on either side of the bag. Be sure not to touch the inside or edges of the bag.

  3. Squeeze out excess solution so the device is moist but not dripping.

  4. Working from the outside of the bag, move the device up allowing the stick to protrude from the bag.

  5. Aseptically, using one hand, grasp the stick above the thumb stop and remove the device from the bag, being sure not touch the scrub sampler on the outside part of the bag.

  6. Practicing aseptic technique, press the scrub sampler device down firmly and flex the stick to ensure full contact with the sampling surface. Scour vigorously in a zigzag motion in one direction across the entire sampling surface to disrupt and/or dislodge build-up.

  7. Turn the device over to the other side, change the sampling direction by 90° and repeat the swabbing procedure in the same sampling site. Swab an area from 10 cm ×10 cm (4 inches × 4 inches) to 30 × 30 cm (12 inches ×12 inches) in size, following appropriate standards or regulatory guidance.

  8. Return the scrub sampler device back into the bag, without going beyond the thumb stop, and hold the device with one hand from the outside of the bag.

  9. Using the other hand twist the stick to separate it from the device. Allow the scrub sampler device to drop in bag. Discard the stick.

  10. Close the bag by rolling the blue wires down and folding in the ends of the wires.

  11. Following established procedures, remove any remaining neutralizing solution residue from the sampled surface.

Sample Analysis

Follow sample analysis (Enumeration or Enrichment, Detection, and Confirmation) following the detection method being used.

Validation Study

The complete validation study was conducted independently by Q Laboratories, Inc. (Cincinnati, OH) following the AOAC Official Methods of AnalysisSM Manual Appendix J, Microbiology Guidelines for Methods Validation (11).

The inclusivity/exclusivity study evaluated 25 Listeria strains and 15 non-Listeria strains with detection per the FDA BAM Chapter 10 reference method, and 50 Salmonella strains and 15 non-Salmonella strains with detection per the FDA BAM Chapter 5 reference method. For the environmental surfaces, the 3M™ Environmental Scrub Sampler Stick with 10 mL Wide Spectrum Neutralizer was evaluated following each of these detection reference methods. The neutralization study examined the neutralizing effects of the Wide Spectrum Neutralizer on four different classes of sanitizers: quaternary ammonium (e.g., Ecolab® Whisper™ V, at 800 ppm), high acid (e.g., Five Star Chemicals Star San, at 400 ppm), hydrogen/peroxyacetic acid (e.g., Ecolab® Vortexx™, at 2000 ppm), and chlorine/bleach-based (e.g., household bleach, at 100 ppm). The product consistency and stability study evaluated three lots in an accelerated stability study design using a stainless steel surface for the recovery of the target organisms Salmonella and Listeria. To evaluate the sampling device for robustness two parameters were changed: neutralizing buffer volume and hold time after sampling to evaluate the sampling device.

Inclusivity/Exclusivity

For the inclusivity/exclusivity study, all strains were pre-enriched in an appropriate broth medium. For the inclusivity evaluation, 50 Salmonella strains were cultured in lactose broth for 24 ± 2 h at 35°C. For Listeria, 15 strains were cultured in buffered Listeria enrichment broth with pyruvate (BLEB+p) for 4 h at 30°C. Filter sterilized selective agents were added to achieve final concentrations of 10 mg/L (acriflavine), 40 mg/L (cycloheximide), and 50 mg/L (nalidixic acid sodium salt) in the BLEB with pyruvate pre-enrichments. Incubation continued at 30°C until 24 h total enrichment time. Each inclusive pre-enrichment culture was diluted to 102–103 CFU/mL. For the exclusivity evaluation 15 non-Salmonella strains and 15 non-Listeria strains were cultured in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth for 24 ± 2 h at 35°C. Exclusivity strains were not diluted after incubation.

Next, 100 µL diluted inclusive pre-enrichment culture or nondiluted exclusive pre-enrichment culture was used to inoculate the 3M Environmental Scrub Sampler Stick with 10 mL Wide Spectrum Neutralizer (one device per strain). Inoculated devices were held for 2 h at room temperature (20 ± 2°C). For Salmonella inclusive and exclusive strains, 90 mL lactose broth was added to each device, and then incubated for 24 ± 2 h at 35°C. For Listeria inclusive and exclusive strains, 90 mL BLEB+p was added to each device, and then incubated for 4 h at 30°C. Selective agents were added and incubation was continued at 30°C for a total of 24–48 h.

All Salmonella inclusivity/exclusivity strain enrichments were struck to xylose lysine desoxycholate agar (XLD) and incubated for 24 ± 2 h at 35°C. All Listeria inclusivity/exclusivity strain enrichments were struck to modified Oxford agar (MOX) and incubated for 24 h at 30°C. The inclusivity and exclusivity cultures were randomized, blind-coded and then evaluated. Results are presented in Tables  1–4.

Table 1.

Inclusivity testing results for Listeria species using 3M™ Wide Spectrum Neutralizer with 3M™ Environmental Scrub Samplera

Number Strain source Strain ID Genus Species Serotype Isolation source Listeria results
1 ATCCb 51782 Listeria monocytogenes 3a Cheese Positive
2 CWDc 1600 Listeria monocytogenes 3b Not available Positive
3 FSLd J1-049 Listeria monocytogenes 3c Not available Positive
4 FSL J1-129 Listeria monocytogenes 4ab Not available Positive
5 ATCCC 19114 Listeria monocytogenes 4a Animal tissue Positive
6 CWD 1563 Listeria monocytogenes 4b Lausanne, 1987 Positive
7 ATCC 19116 Listeria monocytogenes 4c Chicken Positive
8 ATCC 19117 Listeria monocytogenes 4d Sheep Positive
9 ATCC 19118 Listeria monocytogenes 4e Chicken Positive
10 CWD 1554 Listeria monocytogenes 1/2a Carlisle, 1981 Positive
11 ATCC 51780 Listeria monocytogenes 1/2b Dairy products Positive
12 ATCC 7644 Listeria monocytogenes 1/2c Human isolate Positive
13 NCTCe 10890 Listeria monocytogenes 7 Human feces Positive
14 NCTC 19120a Listeria grayi f Animal feces Positive
15 ATCC 25401b Listeria grayi Corn stalks Positive
16 CWD 167 Listeria innocua Not available Positive
17 CWD 217 Listeria innocua Not available Positive
18 ATCC 19119 Listeria ivanovii Sheep Positive
19 ATCC 49954 Listeria ivanovii Food, France Positive
20 ATCC 11289 Listeria seeligeri Human feces Positive
21 NCTC 11856 Listeria seeligeri Not available Positive
22 ATCC 51334 Listeria seeligeri Intestinal content Positive
23 ATCC 35897 Listeria welshimeri Not available Positive
24 ATCC 43549 Listeria welshimeri Soil Positive
25 ATCC 43550 Listeria welshimeri Human feces Positive
a

Detection method = U.S. FDA-BAM, Chapter 10, “Detection of Listeria monocytogenes in Foods and Environmental Samples, and Enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes in Foods” (Revised March 2017).

b

ATCC = American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA.

c

CWD =University of Vermont Culture Collection, Burlington, VT.

d

FSL = Food Safety Laboratory; Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.

e

NCTC = National Collection of Type Cultures, Salisbury, United Kingdom.

f— = Denotes no serotype information available.

Table 2.

Exclusivity testing results for Listeria species using 3M™ Wide Spectrum Neutralizer with 3M™ Environmental Scrub Samplera

Number Source Strain ID Genus Species Isolation source Listeria results
1 ATCCb 7050 Bacillus coagulans Evaporated milk Negative
2 ATCC 8043 Enterococcus hirae Not available Negative
3 ATCC 19434 Enterococcus faecium Not available Negative
4 ATCC 19432 Enterococcus durans Not available Negative
5 ATCC 29212 Enterococcus faecalis Human cerebrospinal fluid Negative
6 ATCC 6462 Bacillus mycoides Soil Negative
7 ATCC 11509 Brochothrix thermosphacta Pork sausage Negative
8 ATCC 7468 Micrococcus luteus Not available Negative
9 ATCC 6939 Rhodococcus equi Not available Negative
10 ATCC 29885 Staphylococcus warneri Not available Negative
11 ATCC 9341 Kocuria rhizophila Not available Negative
12 ATCC 43195 Kurthia gibsonii Not available Negative
13 ATCC 29247 Staphylococcus aureus Not available Negative
14 ATCC 12228 Staphylococcus epidermidis Not available Negative
15 ATCC 19615 Streptococcus pyogenes Pharynx of child Negative
a

Detection method = U.S. FDA-BAM, Chapter 10, “Detection of L. monocytogenes in Foods and Environmental Samples, and Enumeration of L. monocytogenes in Foods” (Revised March 2017).

b

ATCC = American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA.

Table 3.

Inclusivity testing results for Salmonella species using 3M™ Wide Spectrum Neutralizer with 3M™ Environmental Scrub Samplera

Number Strain Source Strain ID Genus Species Subspecies Serotype Isolation source Salmonella result
1 NCTCb 12419 Salmonella bongori Not available Positive
2 NCTC 10946 Salmonella bongori Brookfield Not available Positive
3 ATCCc 43975 Salmonella bongori g Not available Positive
4 ATCC 13314 Salmonella enterica arizonae Not available Positive
5 ATCC BAA-1577 Salmonella enterica arizonae Not available Positive
6 QLd 11007–4 Salmonella enterica arizonae Veterinary isolate Positive
7 QL 011414.2 Salmonella enterica arizonae Environmental isolate Positive
8 QL 024.114 Salmonella enterica arizonae Pet food Positive
9 ATCC BAA-1579 Salmonella enterica diarizonae Not available Positive
10 ATCC BAA-216 Salmonella enterica diarizonae Human blood Positive
11 ATCC BAA-639 Salmonella enterica diarizonae Human feces Positive
12 QL 024.516 Salmonella enterica diarizonae Pet food Positive
13 QL 011414.1 Salmonella enterica diarizonae Environmental isolate Positive
14 ATCC 35640 Salmonella enterica enterica Abaetetuba Creek water Positive
15 FDAe 9842 Salmonella enterica enterica Abortusequi Not available Positive
16 NCTC 10241 Salmonella enterica enterica Abortusovis Not available Positive
17 NCTC 6017 Salmonella enterica enterica Abony Not available Positive
18 STsf 2 Salmonella enterica enterica Adelaide Not available Positive
19 ATCC 51957 Salmonella enterica enterica Agona Not available Positive
20 STs 3 Salmonella enterica enterica Agama Not available Positive
21 STs 5 Salmonella enterica enterica Agoueve Not available Positive
22 STs 6 Salmonella enterica enterica Alachua Not available Positive
23 STs 7 Salmonella enterica enterica Albany Not available Positive
24 ATCC 9270 Salmonella enterica enterica Anatum Pork liver Positive
25 STs 11 Salmonella enterica enterica Arkansas Not available Positive
26 FDA 1206H Salmonella enterica enterica Bareilly Not available Positive
27 STs 13 Salmonella enterica enterica Berta Not available Positive
28 STs 14 Salmonella enterica enterica Binza Not available Positive
29 STs 16 Salmonella enterica enterica Bovismorbificans Not available Positive
30 STs 18 Salmonella enterica enterica Brandenburg Not available Positive
31 NCTC 5731 Salmonella enterica enterica Bredeney Not available Positive
32 NCTC 6018 Salmonella enterica enterica California Not available Positive
33 STs 22 Salmonella enterica enterica Cerro Not available Positive
34 ATCC 10708 Salmonella enterica enterica Choleraesuis Equine isolate Positive
35 ATCC 12011 Salmonella enterica enterica Choleraesuis var Kunzendorf Not available Positive
36 STs 24 Salmonella enterica enterica Cubana Not available Positive
37 NCTC 5721 Salmonella enterica enterica Derby Not available Positive
38 STs 26 Salmonella enterica enterica Drypool Not available Positive
39 STs 27 Salmonella enterica enterica Dublin Not available Positive
40 FDA 4017H Salmonella enterica enterica Eastbourne Not available Positive
41 ATCC 13076 Salmonella enterica enterica Enteritidis Not available Positive
42 QL 024.2 Salmonella enterica enterica Galiema Environmental isolate Positive
43 STs 42 Salmonella enterica enterica Give Not available Positive
44 STs 44 Salmonella enterica enterica Haardt Not available Positive
45 ATCC 51956 Salmonella enterica enterica Hadar Not available Positive
46 STs 47 Salmonella enterica enterica Havana Not available Positive
47 ATCC 8326 Salmonella enterica enterica Heidelberg Not available Positive
48 NCTC 11304 Salmonella enterica enterica Indiana Turkey Positive
49 ATCC 51741 Salmonella enterica enterica Infantis Pasta Positive
50 ATCC 10721 Salmonella enterica enterica Javiana Not available Positive
a

Detection method = U.S. FDA-BAM, Chapter 5, “Salmonella.”

b

NCTC = National Collection of Type Cultures, Salisbury, United Kingdom.

c

ATCC = American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA.

d

QL = Q Laboratories, Cincinnati, OH.

e

FDA = Food and Drug Administration Culture Collection—Silver Spring, MD.

f

STs = University of Pennsylvania—Philadelphia, PA.

g

— = Denotes no serotype information available.

Table 4.

Exclusivity testing results for Salmonella species using 3M™ Wide Spectrum Neutralizer with 3M™ Environmental Scrub Sampler a

Number Source Strain ID Genus Species Isolation source Salmonella result
1 ATCCb 14579 Bacillus cereus Not available Negative
2 ATCC 6051 Bacillus subtilis Not available Negative
3 ATCC 51112 Citrobacter farmeri Human feces Negative
4 ATCC 8090 Citrobacter freundii Not available Negative
5 ATCC 15947 Edwardsiella tarda Human feces Negative
6 ATCC 13048 Klebsiella (Enterobacter) aerogenes Sputum Negative
7 ATCC 23355 Enterobacter cloacae Not available Negative
8 ATCC 29212 Enterococcus faecalis Human cerebrospinal fluid Negative
9 ATCC 25922 Escherichia coli Feces Negative
10 ATCC 51813 Hafnia alvei Milk Negative
11 ATCC 13883 Klebsiella pneumoniae Not available Negative
12 ATCC 25829 Morganella morganii Human Negative
13 ATCC 7002 Proteus mirabilis Urine Negative
14 ATCC 27853 Pseudomonas aeruginosa Clinical isolate Negative
15 ATCC 29930 Shigella sonnei Not available Negative
a

Detection method = U.S. FDA-BAM, Chapter 5, Salmonella.

b

ATCC = American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA.

Matrix Study

The 3M Environmental Scrub Sampler Stick with 10 mL Wide Spectrum Neutralizer was evaluated following the FDA BAM Chapter 5 reference method for Salmonella and FDA BAM Chapter 10 for Listeria. The matrix study consisted of evaluating a total of 30 unpaired 4 inch × 4 inch sample replicates for each method. Within each sample set, there were 5 uninoculated samples (0 CFU/test area), 20 low-level inoculated samples (0.2–2 CFU/test area), and 5 high-level inoculated samples (2–10 CFU/test area). All samples were confirmed following either the FDA BAM Chapter 5 or Chapter 10 reference method as appropriate. Final confirmation was obtained using the Bruker MALDI Biotyper Method following AOAC Official MethodSM  2017.09 (12) or 2017.10 (13).

Sample Preparation

For environmental surface inoculation, a liquid culture of the target organisms was used that was specific for each surface. For plastic (polystyrene), Salmonella Dublin University of Pennsylvania (STs) 27 (Philadelphia, PA) was evaluated. For sealed concrete, Listeria innocua University of Vermont Culture Collection (CDW) 167 (Burlington, VT) was evaluated. For stainless steel, Salmonella Typhimurium American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) 14028 (Manassas, VA) with competitor organism Citrobacter freundii ATCC 8090, and L. monocytogenes 4a ATCC 19114 along with competitor organism Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 were evaluated. All cultures were propagated on tryptic soy agar (TSA) with 5% sheep blood (SBA) from a stock culture stored at –70°C. The SBA plates were incubated for 24 ± 2 h at 35 ± 1°C. A single colony was then transferred to BHI broth and incubated for 24 ± 2 h at 35 ± 1°C. The Salmonella and Listeria target cultures were then diluted in BHI broth to a low level expected to yield fractional results and a high level expected to yield all positive results. The Citrobacter and Enterococcus isolates were diluted in BHI broth and the stainless steel surface was inoculated at approximately 10 times the concentration of Salmonella and Listeria.

All environmental surfaces (4 inch × 4 inch test areas) were inoculated with 0.25 mL diluted inoculum and allowed to dry for 16–24 h at room temperature (20–25°C) prior to sampling. For the stainless steel surface for Listeria, 320 µL of Whisper V sanitizer was applied after room temperature incubation and allowed to dry for 6 h prior to sampling. For the uninoculated test portions, sterile BHI broth was used. The surfaces were sampled by using a 3M™ Scrub Sampler Stick with 10 mL Wide Spectrum Neutralizer. The surfaces were swabbed in an “N”- or “S”-shaped pattern, in four directions. To determine the inoculation level of the environmental surfaces, aliquots of each inoculum were plated onto TSA and incubated for 24 ± 2 h at 35 ± 1°C.

FDA BAM Chapter 5 Salmonella

Sponge samplers were premoistened in 10 mL D/E neutralizing broth. The surfaces were sampled by pressing one side of the sampler firmly on the surface and scoured vigorously in a zigzag pattern across the entire sampling surface. The sampler was then flipped, the direction was changed 90°, and the sampling was repeated. The sponge was then placed back in the container and submerged in the D/E broth before being stored at room temperature (20–25°C) for 2 h ± 15 min. All samples were enriched with 225 mL lactose broth, homogenized by hand massaging, and allowed to stand at room temperature (20–25°C) for 60 ± 5 min. As per the method, the pH of the enrichments was measured; all were within 6.8 ± 0.2 so no pH adjustment was necessary. Subsequently, all enrichments were incubated at 35 ± 2 °C for 24 ± 2 h.

Following incubation, 0.1 mL primary enrichment was transferred into 10 mL Rappaport Vassiliadis (RV) broth, and 1.0 mL was transferred into 10 mL tetrathionate (TT) broth. RV tubes were incubated at 42 ± 0.2 °C for 24 ± 2 h. The TT tubes were incubated at 35 ± 2 °C for 24 ± 2 h. Following incubation, a loopful of the secondary enrichments was streaked to bismuth sulfite (BS) agar, Hektoen enteric agar, and XLD, and incubated at 35 ± 2 °C for 24 ± 2 h. If no visible colonies were present after 24 h of incubation on the BS plates, they were reincubated for an additional 24 ± 2 h at 35 ± 2 °C. A minimum of two suspect colonies from each selective agar were transferred to triple sugar iron agar (TSI) and lysine iron agar (LIA) slants and incubated at 35 ± 2°C for 24 ± 2 h. Following incubation, the TSI and LIA slants were examined for typical reactions. Slants producing typical reactions were streaked to TSA and incubated for 35 ± 2°C for 18–24 h. Following incubation, isolates were serologically tested for both somatic O and flagellar H agglutination. Additionally, purified TSA isolates were identified using the Bruker MALDI Biotyper following AOAC Official MethodSM  2017.09 (12).

FDA BAM Chapter 10 Detection of Listeria monocytogenes in Foods and Environmental Samples, and Enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes in Foods

Sponge samplers were premoistened in 10 mL D/E neutralizing broth. The surfaces were swabbed vertically approximately 10 times, and then the sampler was turned over and the other side was used to swab horizontally approximately 10 times and diagonally approximately 10 times. The swab was then placed back in the container and submerged in the D/E broth before being stored at room temperature (20–25°C) for 2 h ± 15 min. All samples were enriched in 225 mL ± 5 mL BLEB+p, homogenized for 2 min and incubated at 30 ± 1°C for 4 h ± 30 min. Following 4 h of incubation, selective supplements acriflavine (10 mg/L), sodium nalidixic acid (50 mg/L), and cycloheximide (40 mg/L) were added to each test portion, mixed, and incubated for the remainder of the 24 h enrichment period.

After 24 h of total incubation, the enriched samples were streaked to MOX and Brilliance™ Listeria agar (BLA) and incubated at 35 ± 1°C for 24–48 h. The enriched samples were reincubated for an additional 24 h at 30 ± 1°C and then streaked to a second MOX agar and BLA plate, which was incubated for 24–48 h at 35 ± 1°C. All agar plates were examined for suspect colonies, and if present, at least five colonies were streaked to TSA containing 0.6% yeast extract (TSA/YE). The TSA/YE plates were incubated at 30 ± 1°C for 24–48 h and then examined for purity. Pure colonies were tested for catalase reactivity and a Gram stain was conducted. A pure Listeria colony was transferred to trypticase soy broth with 0.6% yeast extract (TSBYE). The TSBYE cultures were incubated at 25 ± 1°C overnight, or until the broth was turbid, indicating sufficient growth. Catalase-positive organisms were stabbed into plates of SBA and incubated at 35 ± 1°C for 24–48 h. The TSBYE tubes incubated at 25 ± 1°C were used to prepare a wet mount slide to determine the motility pattern. After incubation, the SBA plates were examined for b-hemolysis. Final confirmation was conducted using the Bruker MALDI Biotyper following AOAC Official MethodSM  2017.10.

3M Environmental Scrub Sampler Stick with 10 mL Wide Spectrum Neutralizer

All test portions were prepared according to the protocol described previously in the Matrix Study, Sample Preparation subsection. All surfaces were sampled using the 3M Environmental Scrub Sampler Stick with 10 mL Wide Spectrum Neutralizer, and then were enriched and analyzed using either the FDA BAM Chapter 5 or Chapter 10 reference method as appropriate. All samples, regardless of presumptive results, were confirmed using the FDA BAM Chapter 5 or Chapter 10 reference method as appropriate, with final confirmation by Bruker MALDI Biotyper following AOAC Official MethodSM  2017.09 (12) and Official MethodSM  2017.10 (13).

The POD statistical analysis was used to evaluate the 3M Environmental Scrub Sampler Stick with 10 mL Wide Spectrum Neutralizer performance versus the reference method. The POD was calculated as the number of positive outcomes divided by the total number of trials. A summary of POD analyses is presented in Table  5.

Table 5.

3M™ Wide Spectrum Neutralizer with 3M™ Environmental Scrub Sampler, candidate versus reference—POD results

Matrix Strain CFUa/test area N b Candidate method results
Reference method resultsf
dPODCPg 95% CIh
x c PODCPd 95% CI x PODCCe 95% CI
Stainless steel (4 inch × 4 inch) S. Typhimurium ATCCi 14028 & 10X C. freundii ATCC 8090 NAj 5 0 0.00 0.00, 0.43 0 0.00 0.00, 0.43 0.00 –0.43, 0.43
56 20 10 0.50 0.30, 0.70 8 0.40 0.22, 0.61 0.10 –0.19, 0.37
230 5 5 1.00 0.57, 1.00 5 1.00 0.57, 1.00 0.00 –0.43, 0.43
Stainless steel with sanitizer (4 inch × 4 inch) L. monocytogenes 4a ATCC 19114 & 10X E. faecalis ATCC 29212 NA 5 0 0.00 0.00, 0.43 0 0.00 0.00, 0.43 0.00 –0.43, 0.43
75 20 8 0.40 0.22, 0.61 6 0.30 0.15, 0.52 0.10 –0.18, 0.36
260 5 5 1.00 0.57, 1.00 5 1.00 0.57, 1.00 0.00 –0.43, 0.43
Plastic (polystyrene) (4 inch × 4 inch) Salmonella Dublin STsk 27
NA 5 0 0.00 0.00, 0.43 0 0.00 0.00, 0.43 0.00 –0.43, 0.43
60 20 12 0.60 0.39, 0.78 10 0.50 0.30, 0.70 0.10 –0.19, 0.37
240 5 5 1.00 0.57, 1.00 5 1.00 0.57, 1.00 0.00 –0.43, 0.43
Sealed concrete (4 inch × 4 inch) Listeria innocua CWDl 167 NA 5 0 0.00 0.00, 0.43 0 0.00 0.00, 0.43 0.00 –0.43, 0.43
76 20 11 0.55 0.34, 0.74 10 0.50 0.30, 0.70 0.05 –0.24, 0.33
280 5 5 1.00 0.57, 1.00 5 1.00 0.57, 1.00 0.00 –0.43, 0.43
a

CFU/test area = Results of the CFU/test area were determined by plating the inoculum for the matrix in triplicate.

b

N = Number of test portions.

c

x = Number of positive test portions.

d

PODC = Candidate method confirmed positive outcomes divided by the total number of trials.

e

PODR = Reference method confirmed positive outcomes divided by the total number of trials.

f

Dey–Engley neutralizing broth with cellulose sponge.

g

dPODC= Difference between the confirmed candidate method result and reference method confirmed result POD values.

h

95% CI = If the confidence interval of a dPOD does not contain zero, then the difference is statistically significant at the 5% level.

i

ATCC = American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA.

j

NA = Not applicable.

k

STs = University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

l

CWD = University of Vermont Culture Collection, Burlington, VT.

Neutralization

The neutralizing capacity of the 3M Scrub Sampler Stick with 10 mL Wide Spectrum Neutralizer was evaluated against four different classes of sanitizers: quaternary ammonium (e.g., Ecolab Whisper V 800 ppm), high acid (e.g., Five Star San 400 ppm), hydrogen/peroxyacetic acid (e.g., Ecolab Vortexx 2000 ppm), and chlorine/bleach-based (e.g., household bleach 100 ppm). The neutralizer effectiveness and toxicity were evaluated according to ASTM E1054 - 08, Standard Test Methods for Evaluation of Inactivators of Antimicrobial Agents, using S. Senftenberg ATCC 43845 and L. monocytogenes (1/2a) CWD 1554. S. Senftenberg was cultured in lactose broth at 35 ± 1°C for 24 ± 2 h and diluted to approximately 104 CFU/mL. L. monocytogenes was cultured in BLEB+p at 30 ± 1°C for 24–48 h and diluted to approximately 104 CFU/mL.

Neutralizer effectiveness was evaluated by adding 100 µL of each strain diluted to 104 CFU/mL (final concentration 30–100 CFU/plate) to a 3M Environmental Scrub Sampler Stick with 10 mL Wide Spectrum Neutralizer. A 1 mL volume of a 1:50 dilution of sanitizer was added and massaged by hand. An initial enumeration, within 1 min, was conducted, with another enumeration after a 10 min hold. Each enumeration consisted of three replicates.

Neutralizer toxicity was evaluated by adding 100 µL of each strain to a 3M Environmental Scrub Sampler Stick with 10 mL Wide Spectrum Neutralizer. A 1 mL volume of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was added and massaged by hand. An initial enumeration, within 1 min, was conducted, with another enumeration after a 10 min hold. Each enumeration consisted of three replicates.

An organism viability and test material control were conducted alongside the neutralization study. For the organism viability control, each organism was diluted to approximately 102 CFU/mL and 1 mL transferred to 9 mL PBS. An initial enumeration, within 1 min, was conducted, with another enumeration after a 10 min hold. For the test material control each organism was diluted with the sanitizer product to approximately 102 CFU/mL and allowed to sit for a 10 min hold time. Each control consisted of three replicates. The test material control replicates for each sanitizer did not produce any growth. The neutralization data and the analysis of variance (ANOVA) statistical analysis for each sanitizer are presented in Tables  6–9.

Table 6.

Sanitizer Neutralization per ASTM E1054 - 08 using 3M™ Wide Spectrum Neutralizer with 3M™ Environmental Scrub Sampler: bleach

Listeria monocytogenes (1/2a)
Listeria monocytogenes
Salmonella Senftenberg
Salmonella Senftenberg
CWDa 1554
(1/2a), CWD 1554
ATCCb 43845
ATCC 43845
Initial time point
Post 10 min hold
Initial time point
Post 10 min hold
Replicate
Replicate
Replicate
Replicate
A B C A B C A B C A B C
Test organism viability, mean CFU/mLc 37 39 42 32 35 38 51 49 54 46 50 47
Neutralizer effectiveness, mean CFU/mLd 34 40 38 35 36 41 40 46 45 43 51 56
Neutralizer effectiveness determination Effective Effective Effective Effective
Neutralizer effectiveness P-valuee 0.91 0.30
Neutralizer toxicity, mean CFU/mLf 37 38 43 37 39 37 47 45 51 50 55 54
Neutralizer toxicity determination Nontoxic Nontoxic Nontoxic Nontoxic
Neutralizer toxicity P-value 0.68 0.70
Suitability test result (CFU/mL) Pass Pass Pass Pass
a

CWD = University of Vermont Culture Collection, Burlington, VT.

b

ATCC = American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA.

c

Referred to as Test C in ASTM E1054 - 08, Standard Test Methods for Evaluation of Antimicrobial Agents.

d

Referred to as Test A in ASTM E1054 - 08, Standard Test Methods for Evaluation of Antimicrobial Agents.

e

A t-test indicated no statistical significance (P > 0.05).

f

Referred to as Test B in ASTM E1054 - 08, Standard Test Methods for Evaluation of Antimicrobial Agents.

Table 7.

Sanitizer Neutralization per ASTM E1054 - 08 using 3M™ Wide Spectrum Neutralizer with 3M™ Environmental Scrub Sampler: Star San

Listeria monocytogenes (1/2a)
Listeria monocytogenes
Salmonella Senftenberg
Salmonella Senftenberg
CWDa 1554
(1/2a), CWD 1554
ATCCb 43845
ATCC 43845
Initial time point
Post 10 min hold
Initial time point
Post 10 min hold
Replicate
Replicate
Replicate
Replicate
A B C A B C A B C A B C
Test organism viability, mean CFU/mLc 37 39 42 32 35 38 51 49 54 46 50 47
Neutralizer effectiveness, mean CFU/mLd 33 34 38 33 35 37 44 48 51 44 53 49
Neutralizer effectiveness determination Effective Effective Effective Effective
Neutralizer effectiveness P- valuee 0.23 0.49
Neutralizer toxicity, mean CFU/mLf 37 38 43 37 39 37 47 45 51 50 55 54
Neutralizer toxicity determination Nontoxic Nontoxic Nontoxic Nontoxic
Neutralizer toxicity P-value 0.68 0.70
Suitability test result (CFU/mL) Pass Pass Pass Pass
a

CWD = University of Vermont Culture Collection, Burlington, VT.

b

ATCC = American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA.

c

Referred to as Test C in ASTM E1054 - 08, Standard Test Methods for Evaluation of Antimicrobial Agents.

d

Referred to as Test A in ASTM E1054 - 08, Standard Test Methods for Evaluation of Antimicrobial Agents.

e

A t-test indicated no statistical significance (P > 0.05).

f

Referred to as Test B in ASTM E1054 - 08, Standard Test Methods for Evaluation of Antimicrobial Agents.

Table 8.

Sanitizer Neutralization per ASTM E1054 - 08 using 3M™ Wide Spectrum Neutralizer with 3M™ Environmental Scrub Sampler: Vortexx

Listeria monocytogenes (1/2a)
Listeria monocytogenes
Salmonella Senftenberg
Salmonella Senftenberg
CWDa 1554
(1/2a), CWD 1554
ATCCb 43845
ATCC 43845
Initial time point
Post 10 min hold
Initial time point
Post 10 min hold
Replicate
Replicate
Replicate
Replicate
A B C A B C A B C A B C
Test organism viability, mean CFU/mLc 37 39 42 32 35 38 51 49 54 46 50 47
Neutralizer effectiveness, mean CFU/mLd 33 35 39 35 32 41 46 53 49 43 49 52
Neutralizer effectiveness determination Effective Effective Effective Effective
Neutralizer effectiveness P- valuee 0.52 0.66
Neutralizer toxicity, mean CFU/mLf 37 38 43 37 39 37 47 45 51 50 55 54
Neutralizer toxicity determination Nontoxic Nontoxic Nontoxic Nontoxic
Neutralizer toxicity P-value 0.68 0.70
Suitability test result (CFU/mL) Pass Pass Pass Pass
a

CWD = University of Vermont Culture Collection, Burlington, VT.

b

ATCC = American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA.

c

Referred to as Test C in ASTM E1054 - 08, Standard Test Methods for Evaluation of Antimicrobial Agents.

d

Referred to as Test A in ASTM E1054 - 08, Standard Test Methods for Evaluation of Antimicrobial Agents.

e

A t-test indicated no statistical significance (P > 0.05).

f

Referred to as Test B in ASTM E1054 - 08, Standard Test Methods for Evaluation of Antimicrobial Agents.

Table 9.

Sanitizer Neutralization per ASTM E1054 - 08 using 3M™ Wide Spectrum Neutralizer with 3M™ Environmental Scrub Sampler: Whisper V

Listeria monocytogenes (1/2a)
Listeria monocytogenes
Salmonella Senftenberg
Salmonella Senftenberg
CWDa 1554
(1/2a), CWD 1554
ATCCb 43845
ATCC 43845
Initial time point
Post 10 min hold
Initial time point
Post 10 min hold
Replicate
Replicate
Replicate
Replicate
A B C A B C A B C A B C
Test organism viability, mean CFU/mLc 37 39 42 32 35 38 51 49 54 46 50 47
Neutralizer effectiveness, mean Cfu/mLd 40 43 48 36 41 40 50 47 54 46 53 59
Neutralizer effectiveness determination Effective Effective Effective Effective
Neutralizer effectiveness P-valuee 0.08 0.42
Neutralizer toxicity, mean CFU/mLf 37 38 43 37 39 37 47 45 51 50 55 54
Neutralizer toxicity determination Nontoxic Nontoxic Nontoxic Nontoxic
Neutralizer toxicity P-value 0.68 0.70
Suitability test result (CFU/ml) Pass Pass Pass Pass
a

CWD = University of Vermont Culture Collection, Burlington, VT.

b

ATCC = American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA.

c

Referred to as Test C in ASTM E1054 - 08, Standard Test Methods for Evaluation of Antimicrobial Agents.

d

Referred to as Test A in ASTM E1054 - 08, Standard Test Methods for Evaluation of Antimicrobial Agents.

e

A t-test indicated no statistical significance (P  > 0.05).

f

Referred to as Test B in ASTM E1054- 08, Standard Test Methods for Evaluation of Antimicrobial Agents.

Product Consistency and Stability Study

For product stability and lot-to-lot consistency, an accelerated stability of the shelf life was conducted as kits could not be selected from different time points in the real-time shelf life. S. Newport ATCC 6962 was cultured in lactose broth at 35 ± 1°C for 24 ± 2 h and diluted in 0.1% peptone water so that the target strain was at a level to yield fractional positives. Ten 4 inch × 4 inch stainless steel test areas were inoculated per lot. C. freundii ATCC 8090, a closely related non-Salmonella strain, was cultured in BHI for 24 h at 37°C and not diluted before testing. Ten 4 inch × 4 inch stainless steel test areas were inoculated per lot. After sampling with the 3M™ Environmental Scrub Sampler Stick with 10 mL Wide Spectrum Neutralizer, all samples were evaluated using the FDA BAM Chapter 5 detection method. L. monocytogenes (1/2 b) ATCC 51780 was cultured in BLEB+p at 30°C for 24–48 h and diluted in 0.1% peptone water so that the target strain was at a level to yield fractional positives. Ten 4 inch × 4 inch stainless steel test areas were inoculated per lot. E. faecalis ATCC 29212 a closely related non-Listeria strain was cultured in BHI for 24 h at 37°C and not diluted before testing. Ten 4 inch ×4 inch stainless steel test areas were inoculated per lot. After sampling with the 3M Environmental Scrub Sampler Stick with 10 mL Wide Spectrum Neutralizer, all samples were evaluated using the FDA BAM Chapter 10 detection method. A summary of the study outline and product information are displayed in Table  10 for the stability evaluation. A detailed summary of results and the POD analyses are displayed in Table  11. Overall, there was no significant difference in the results.

Table 10.

3M™ Wide Spectrum Neutralizer with 3M™ Environmental Scrub Sampler: product stability and lot-to-lot outline and information

Storage type Storage temperature
Time points
(from date of production)
Accelerated Variable; 2–8°C, 25 + 1 °C, 45 + 1 °C 0 months, 6 months, 12 days
Lot information
Lot 1 WSN HS01 Lot 323 42–0029-9161–2
Lot 2 WSN HS01 Lot 324 42–0029-9162–0
Lot 3 WSN HS01 Lot 510 42–0029-9163–8

Table 11.

3M™ Wide Spectrum Neutralizer with 3M™ Environmental Scrub Sampler: stability and lot-to-lot inoculated test portions—POD results

Time point, months Target N x POD 95% CI
0 Listeria monocytogenes (1/2b) ATCCa 51780 10 7 0.70 0.40, 0.89
Salmonella Newport ATCC 6962 10 6 0.60 0.31, 0.83
6 Listeria monocytogenes (1/2b) ATCC 51780 10 6 0.60 0.31, 0.83
Salmonella Newport ATCC 6962 10 7 0.70 0.40, 0.89
12 Listeria monocytogenes (1/2b) ATCC 51780 10 6 0.60 0.31, 0.83
Salmonella Newport ATCC 6962 10 5 0.50 0.24, 0.76
a

ATCC = American Type Culture Collection—Manassas, VA.

Robustness

For the robustness study, two testing parameters were changed to evaluate a total of seven testing combinations, with the seventh combination being the nominal conditions following the product instructions. The two testing parameters that were changed included the hold time after sampling prior to enrichment (0, 48, and 96 h), and neutralizing buffer volume (9, 10, and 11 mL). Ten replicates of each testing combination were evaluated.

S. Enteritidis ATCC 13076 was cultured in lactose broth at 35 ± 1°C for 24 ± 2 h and diluted to approximately 104 CFU/mL. Next, 100 µL diluted pre-enrichment culture was used to inoculate the 3M Environmental Scrub Sampler Stick with 10 mL Wide Spectrum Neutralizer. Inoculated devices were held for 2 h at room temperature (20 ± 2°C). After each combination’s required hold time 1 mL buffer was spread-plated onto XLD agar and incubated for 24 h at 35°C and the colonies were counted and recorded.

L. monocytogenes (4 b) CWD 1563 was cultured in BLEB+p at 30°C for 24–48 h and diluted to approximately 104 CFU/mL. Next, 100 µL diluted pre-enrichment culture was used to inoculate the 3M Environmental Scrub Sampler Stick with 10 mL Wide Spectrum Neutralizer. Inoculated devices were held for 2 h at room temperature (20 ± 2°C). After each combination’s required hold time 1 mL buffer was spread-plated onto MOX agar and incubated for 24 h at 35°C and the colonies were counted and recorded.

After counting, samples were decoded, and the mean and standard deviation for each combination was calculated. An ANOVA was carried out to determine if the means were significantly different between the combinations separately for each target strain. Data demonstrated that small changes in testing parameters did not impact the performance of the sampling device. The study parameters, data summary, and ANOVA results for each target analyte and treatment combination are presented in Tables  12–16.

Table 12.

3M™ Wide Spectrum Neutralizer with 3M™ Environmental Scrub Sampler: robustness experimental design

Treatment combination Hold time, h Neutralizing buffer vol., mL
1 0 9
2 0 11
3 48 9
4 48 11
5 96 9
6 96 11
7 (normal condition) 0 10

Table 13.

3M™ Wide Spectrum Neutralizer with 3M™ Environmental Scrub Sampler: robustness Listeria data

Combination Replicates, CFU/mL
A B C D E F G H I J
1 82 90 94 86 84 91 85 93 90 94
2 85 93 94 87 86 87 89 92 88 90
3 84 78 89 92 93 87 88 81 82 86
4 88 89 94 82 86 85 84 93 91 87
5 91 90 90 87 93 89 91 88 95 87
6 87 98 90 88 86 91 87 89 92 92
7 93 88 94 84 87 94 88 87 86 89

Table 14.

3M™ Wide Spectrum Neutralizer with 3M™ Environmental Scrub Sampler: robustness test portions—Listeria ANOVA resultsa

Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Row 1 10 889 88.9 18.98889
Row 2 10 891 89.1 9.433333
Row 3 10 860 86 23.11111
Row 4 10 879 87.9 15.21111
Row 5 10 901 90.1 6.544444
Row 6 10 900 90 12.44444
Row 7 10 890 89 12.22222
Source of variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Between groups 118.6857 6 19.78095 1.413566 0.223507 2.246408
Within groups 881.6 63 13.99365 b
Total 1000.286 69
a

Single factor ANOVA.

b

— = Not applicable.

Table 15.

3M™ Wide Spectrum Neutralizer with 3M™ Environmental Scrub Sampler: robustness Salmonella data

Combination Replicates, CFU/mL
A B C D E F G H I J
1 84 82 86 81 86 88 86 84 82 80
2 85 78 83 84 81 78 80 83 81 86
3 84 86 88 86 83 84 78 82 81 85
4 85 87 81 78 83 84 86 79 84 86
5 86 81 89 85 76 84 89 90 88 85
6 81 84 84 89 86 81 90 88 92 94
7 85 86 82 80 89 83 88 87 82 94

Table 16.

3M™ Wide Spectrum Neutralizer with 3M™ Environmental Scrub Sampler: robustness test portions—Salmonella ANOVA resultsa

Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Row 1 10 839 83.9 6.766667
Row 2 10 819 81.9 7.655556
Row 3 10 837 83.7 8.233333
Row 4 10 833 83.3 9.344444
Row 5 10 853 85.3 18.23333
Row 6 10 869 86.9 19.87778
Row 7 10 856 85.6 17.15556
Source of variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Between groups 166.9429 6 27.82381 2.231856 0.051372 2.246408
Within groups 785.4 63 12.46667 b
Total 952.3429 69
a

Single-factor ANOVA.

b

— = Not applicable.

Results

As per criteria outlined in Appendix J of the Official Methods of AnalysisSM Manual, fractional positive results were obtained in the matrix study for all surfaces using the 3M Scrub Sampler Stick with 10 mL Wide Spectrum Neutralizer.

For the inclusivity study, all 25 Listeria strains and 50 Salmonella strains tested were recovered. For the exclusivity study, all 15 Listeria exclusivity strains and 15 Salmonella exclusivity strains were correctly excluded. The neutralization study show that the Wide Spectrum Neutralizer is a nontoxic and effective neutralizer. The product consistency and stability study proved the 3M Environmental Scrub Sampler Stick with 10 mL Wide Spectrum Neutralizer is a stable sampling device. The robustness study showed the 3M Scrub Sampler Stick with 10 mL Wide Spectrum Neutralizer is a robust sampling device and that variations of buffer volume and hold time have no effect on level of recovery.

The POD analysis between the 3M Scrub Sampler Stick with 10 mL Wide Spectrum Neutralizer and the reference sampling method in the matrix study indicated that there was no significant difference at the 5% level between the number of positive results by the methods. The POD analysis between 3M Scrub Sampler Stick with 10 mL Wide Spectrum Neutralizer presumptive and confirmed results indicated that there was no significant difference at the 5% level for the confirmation procedure.

Discussion

The 3M Environmental Scrub Sampler Stick with 10 mL Wide Spectrum Neutralizer recovered all inclusivity organisms for both Salmonella and Listeria. The 3M Environmental Scrub Sampler Stick with 10 mL Wide Spectrum Neutralizer was able to recover Salmonella spp. and Listeria spp. from several different environmental surfaces, namely stainless steel, plastic (polystyrene), and sealed concrete. Using POD analysis, no statistically significant differences were observed between the number of positive samples detected by the candidate sampling method and the reference sampling method for all samples tested. The Wide Spectrum Neutralizer successfully neutralized a range of sanitizers, namely quaternary ammonium, high acid, hydrogen peroxide/peroxyacetic acid, and chlorine/bleach, and was found to be nontoxic to the target organisms. The 3M Scrub Sampler Stick with 10 mL Wide Spectrum Neutralizer was found to be a robust and stable sampling device through robustness and product consistency testing.

Conclusions

The data from these studies, within their statistical uncertainty, support the product claims of the 3M Scrub Sampler Stick with 10 mL Wide Spectrum Neutralizer for stainless steel, plastic (polystyrene), and sealed concrete environmental surfaces. Also, the data support the product claims of ability to neutralize a wide range of sanitizers. The results obtained by the POD analysis of the environmental surfaces study demonstrated that there were no statistically significant differences between the number of positive samples detected by the candidate and the reference sampling methods for all samples tested for all matrixed evaluated.

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

Submitting Company

3M Company, Food Safety Department

2501 Hudson Road

St. Paul, MN, 55144–1000

Independent Laboratory

Benjamin Bastin, M. Joseph Benzinger, Jr., and James Agin

Q Laboratories

1930 Radcliff Drive

Cincinnati, OH 45204

Reviewers

Thomas Hammack

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD 20740

Michael Brodsky

Brodsky Consultants, Ontario, Canada

Maria Cristina Fernandez

Independent Consultant, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Contributor Information

Micki L Rosauer, 3M Company, Food Safety Department, St. Paul, MN 55144-1000, USA.

Karen M Silbernagel, 3M Company, Food Safety Department, St. Paul, MN 55144-1000, USA.

Wesley Thompson, Microbiology Research and Development, Q Laboratories, 1930 Radcliff Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45204, USA.

References


Articles from Journal of AOAC International are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES