This cohort study evaluates the association between residential green space and cognitive function in middle-aged women using data from the Nurses’ Health Study II.
Key Points
Question
Is there an association between exposure to green space and cognitive function throughout middle age?
Findings
In this cohort study that included 13 594 women, increasing green space was associated with higher scores of overall cognition and psychomotor speed/attention. In contrast, there was no association between green space and learning/working memory.
Meaning
These findings suggest that green space exposure should be investigated as a potential population-level approach to improve cognitive function.
Abstract
Importance
Green space can decelerate cognitive decline by supporting physical activity, psychological restoration, or reducing exposure to air pollution. However, existing studies on the association of green space with cognitive decline are limited.
Objective
To examine whether residential green space was associated with cognitive function in middle-aged women.
Design, Setting, and Participants
Starting in 1989, the Nurses’ Health Study II enrolled 116 429 female nurses aged 25 to 42 years residing in the US. In 2014 to 2016, 40 082 women were invited to complete an online cognitive battery. This cohort study analyzed women who had data on both green space exposure and cognitive measures. Data analysis was conducted from June to October 2021.
Exposures
Residential exposure to green space was assessed using the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, a satellite-derived indicator of the quantity of ground vegetation. Landsat satellite data at 270-m and 1230-m buffers around each participants’ residential addresses in 2013 were used.
Main Outcomes and Measures
In 2014 to 2016, cognitive function was measured using a self-administered online battery, the Cogstate Brief Battery, consisting of 4 tasks measuring psychomotor speed, attention, learning, and working memory; 3 composite scores, averaging together all tasks, psychomotor speed/attention, and learning/working memory, were created. In addition, the study evaluated potential mediators, including air pollution, depression, and physical activity.
Results
The analytical sample included 13 594 women, of whom 13 293 (98%) were White. Mean (SD) age was 61.2 (4.6) years. In models adjusted for age at assessment, race, childhood, adulthood, and neighborhood socioeconomic status, green space was associated with higher scores on the global Cogstate composite (mean difference per IQR in green space, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.07), and psychomotor speed/attention (mean difference in score, 0.05 standard units; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.08). This difference in scores is similar to the difference observed in women 1 year apart in age in the data. By contrast, there was no association between green space and learning/working memory (mean difference, 0.0300; 95% CI, −0.0003 to 0.0500).
Conclusions and Relevance
These findings suggest that increasing residential green space may be associated with modest benefits in cognition in middle-aged women.
Introduction
The rising prevalence of Alzheimer Disease and related dementias calls for novel prevention strategies. Cognitive function at middle age is associated with subsequent dementia1,2,3 and is considered a risk factor for decline in physical functioning4 and mortality.5 Recent studies6,7 show that higher residential surrounding green space is associated with improved cognitive function in older adults. However, existing studies on the association of green space and cognitive function are still scarce.
Exposure to green space may be associated with cognitive function through increasing opportunities for physical activity, social engagement, psychological restoration, improving cognitive capacity, and mitigating the negative consequences of noise and air pollution.8,9,10 Although physical activity has been shown to decrease dementia risk,11 poor social engagement has been associated with increased dementia risk.12 The association between psychological restoration and dementia has been documented across population-based studies.13,14 In this research, the attention restoration theory states that people can recover from stress and mental fatigue and can concentrate better after spending time in or even looking at green space.15 Finally, there is increasing evidence that higher exposure to air pollution and noise are associated with faster cognitive decline16,17,18,19,20 and higher dementia prevalence.21
We used data from a nationwide prospective cohort study of women to investigate the associations between residential green space and cognitive function. Our green space exposure temporally preceded the cognitive function measures, and we evaluated potential mediators that also temporally preceded cognitive function measurement, which provide a step forward to advancing this area of research.22 We assessed effect modification by measures of neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) and urbanicity.23 We hypothesized that green space exposure was positively associated with cognitive function in a nationwide prospective cohort study of women. Additionally, we hypothesized that this association would be most visible among women with lower neighborhood SES, and that the association would be mediated by depression, air pollution, and physical activity.
Methods
Participants
Starting in 1989, the Nurses’ Health Study II enrolled 116 429 female nurses aged 25 to 42 years residing in the US.24 Women complete mailed or online questionnaires biennially and follow-up is ongoing.25 Participants’ residential addresses throughout follow-up have been geocoded to obtain latitude and longitude. Between 2014 to 2016, 40 082 women who had completed a supplemental violence questionnaire, and with known email addresses, were invited to complete an online cognitive battery.26 Of those, 14 151 women completed the Cogstate Brief Battery,27 a self-administered computerized cognitive assessment, and 13 994 had complete data for all Cogstate scores. Responders to the invitation to complete the Cognitive Study were comparable to the nonresponders in terms of sociodemographics, depression, health behaviors, and medical conditions potentially relevant to cognitive function.28 The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of the Brigham and Women’s Hospital. Return of the questionnaires and Cogstate completion constituted consent. We included data from women who had data on both green space and cognitive measures. This study follows the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline.29
Measures
Green Space
Exposure to green space around participants’ home addresses in 2013 was estimated using the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), a satellite image–based metric (further details in the eAppendix in the Supplement). Briefly, NDVI ranges between −1 and 1, where negative values correspond to water, values around 0 correspond to barren areas of rock or sand, and positive values represent grassland. We examined the average NDVI in 270-m and 1230-m buffers around each geocoded address to evaluate both the immediate area around residences and the walkable area as potential relevant geographic contexts.30 NDVI was assessed as a continuous variable defined by the IQR for analysis. Negative and missing NDVI values (400 missing [2.9%]) were set to 0 using the rationale that green space is only captured on the positive scale.
Cognitive Function
The Cogstate Battery has 4 tasks: Detection, Identification, One Card Learning, and One Back.27,31 A detailed description of each task can be found in the eAppendix in the Supplement. The validity of Cogstate has been established in previous studies27,32,33 and has been shown to be a sensitive indicator of early cognitive deficits32 and Alzheimer dementia.34,35 On the basis of previous research,28,36 we created 3 composite scores: (1) a psychomotor speed/attention composite (created by averaging z scores of Detection and Identification, with a possible range of −6.9 to 3.4), (2) a learning/working memory composite (averaging z scores from One Card Learning and One Back, with a possible range of −5.9 to 3.8), and (3) an overall cognition composite (averaging z scores from all 4 tasks, with a possible range of −6.4 to 4.0).31 The 3 composite scores were standardized to have a mean of 0 and an SD of 1; all composite scores have had high test-retest reliability and clinical utility in identifying cognitive impairment.34 Higher scores indicate better cognitive performance.
Covariates
We selected covariates that are associated with green space and have been associated with cognitive function, but that were unlikely to result from either,37 including age at cognitive assessment and self-identified race (White, Black, or Asian). We adjusted for race to capture the outcomes of perceived race, along with various other factors such as quality of schools that are associated with skin color, genetic background, and cultural context.38 Additional covariates assessed in 2005 measuring childhood SES included maternal and paternal education level (percentage with less than a high school education), parents’ occupation (percentage who were unskilled laborers), and parents’ home ownership (yes/no). Covariates measured during participant’s adulthood, closest to the cognitive assessment, included individual and neighborhood SES. Individual SES was measured using 2 variables: husband’s education assessed in 1999 (less than high school, high school, 2 years of college, 4 years of college, or graduate school), and marital status (yes/no) assessed in 2013. Neighborhood SES was assessed by 2 variables: 2010 US Census tract median income and median home value based on the US Census tract of residence in 2013.
Effect Modifiers
On the basis of previous research, US Census tract median income and urbanicity were used as stratifiying variables.23 Urbanicity was measured as the US Census tract population density (number per square kilometers).
Mediators
Green space has been associated with decreased levels of air pollution,39,40 lower risk of depression, and increased physical activity,40 which, in turn, could improve cognitive function.16,41,42,43 Thus, we used mediation analysis44,45,46 to evaluate whether the association between green space and cognition is mediated through these variables of interest (eFigure 1 in the Supplement). We used spatiotemporal smoothing models to estimate exposures to particulate matter with a diameter less than 2.5 μm (eAppendix in the Supplement).47 Depressive symptoms were assessed in 2013 with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale and modeled as a continuous variable. Finally, physical activity was calculated from self-reported time spent per week (<3, 3 to <9, 9 to <18, 18 to <27, or ≥27 metabolic equivalent hours per week) in 2013.
Statistical Analysis
We used multivariable linear regression to estimate differences in cognitive function across levels of green space exposure. Separate models were conducted for each cognitive composite score. We estimated mean differences (and 95% CIs) in cognitive composites corresponding to a 1-IQR increment in average NDVI in the 270-m buffer for our main results, and in the 1230-m buffer for sensitivity analyses. For each cognitive composite, we initially adjusted for age and race (model 1). Model 2 further adjusted for maternal and paternal education level, parents’ occupation, and parents’ home ownership. Model 3 further adjusted for husband’s education and marital status. Model 4 further adjusted for US Census tract median income and median home value. Natural splines were used to examine nonlinear associations of green space with cognitive function. To assess deviations from linearity for associations with all cognition measurements, we fit generalized additive models for continuous exposures and natural splines with 3 to 4 knots based on Akaike Information Criterion.
We assessed effect modification of associations of green space with cognitive function by Census tract median household income, and urbanicity using stratified analysis, multiplicative interaction terms and likelihood ratio tests to assess significance. We used mediation analysis44,45,46 to evaluate whether the outcome associated with green space is mediated through air pollution, depression, and physical activity, on each of the cognitive composites (eAppendix in the Supplement). Finally, as a sensitivity analysis, to address the fact that the mediators of interest could also be confounders, we further adjusted model 4 for air pollution, depression, and physical activity. Data analysis was conducted in SAS statistical software version 9.4 (SAS Institute) from June to October 2021. A 2-tailed t-test was used to calculate P values, and < .05 was considered significant.
Results
Of 13 594 total participants (mean [SD] age of 61.2 [4.6] years), virtually all were White (13 293 participants [98%]). Women who lived in areas with higher levels of green space were less likely to be African American, more likely to have parents who had owned their home, and more likely to be married (Table 1). Areas with higher levels of green space were less likely to be densely populated (Table 1).
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics by Increasing Quintiles of Green Space in 2013 (270-m Buffer), Nurses’ Health Study II.
Characteristic | Participants, No. (%) (N = 13 594) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quintile 1: <0.34 (n = 2716) | Quintile 2: 0.34-0.46 (n = 2718) | Quintile 3: 0.47-0.54 (n = 2720) | Quintile 4: 0.55-0.62 (n = 2721) | Quintile 5: >0.62 (n = 2719) | |
Age at cognitive assessment, mean (SD), y | 61.7 (4.4) | 61.3 (4.6) | 61.1 (4.6) | 60.9 (4.7) | 60.9 (4.6) |
Race | |||||
African American | 26 (1.0) | 18 (0.7) | 17 (0.6) | 10 (0.4) | 8 (0.3) |
White | 2590 (95.4) | 2646 (97.4) | 2681 (98.6) | 2693 (99.0) | 2683 (98.7) |
Parental education | |||||
Mother, less than high school | 463 (17.0) | 442 (16.3) | 488 (17.9) | 491 (18.0) | 504 (18.5) |
Father, less than high school | 630 (23.2) | 659 (24.2) | 675 (24.8) | 653 (24.0) | 711 (26.1) |
Parental occupation, unskilled laborer | 232 (8.5) | 267 (9.8) | 285 (10.5) | 321 (11.8) | 343 (12.6) |
Parents owned home | 1344 (49.5) | 1339 (49.3) | 1368 (50.3) | 1398 (51.4) | 1417 (52.1) |
Husband’s education, <4 y college, 1999 | 718 (26.4) | 749 (27.6) | 826 (30.4) | 901 (33.1) | 989 (36.4) |
Currently married, 2013 | 1884 (69.4) | 2037 (74.9) | 2082 (76.5) | 2212 (81.3) | 2310 (85.0) |
Neighborhood median income (2010 US Census) in 2013, mean (SD), $ | 89 377 (34 615.1) | 85 479.3 (34 109.1) | 80 912.9 (29 795.6) | 81 484.8 (29 010.6) | 80 706.4 (30 387.3) |
Neighborhood median home value (2010 US Census) in 2013, mean (SD), $ | 439 127.5 (254 109.9) | 293 213.2 (220 267.7) | 227 986.3 (152 116.5) | 224 769.2 (141 436) | 236 081.9 (155 451.6) |
Population density, (2010 US Census) in 2013, mean (SD), No. of individuals/km2 | 2735.8 (5792.5) | 1234.2 (1955.8) | 813.1 (779.4) | 546.7 (555.1) | 235.5 (322.6) |
Air pollution PM2.5, 2013, mean (SD), μg/m3 | 11.2 (3) | 11.1 (2.3) | 11.8 (2.1) | 11.6 (2.1) | 10.6 (2.2) |
Depression score (CESD) in 2013, mean (SD) | 6.0 (4.9) | 5.8 (4.9) | 5.8 (4.9) | 5.7 (4.8) | 5.5 (4.6) |
Physical activity, 2013, metabolic equivalent hours/wk | |||||
<3 | 274 (10.1) | 263 (9.7) | 281 (10.3) | 286 (10.5) | 261 (9.6) |
3-8.9 | 409 (15.1) | 430 (15.8) | 422 (15.5) | 420 (15.4) | 415 (15.3) |
9-17.9 | 476 (17.5) | 561 (20.6) | 552 (20.3) | 544 (20.0) | 518 (19.1) |
18-26.9 | 408 (15.0) | 344 (12.7) | 390 (14.3) | 394 (14.5) | 385 (14.2) |
Learning/working memory z score, mean (SD) | −0.03 (1.0) | −0.02 (1.0) | −0.01 (1.0) | 0.03 (1.0) | 0.04 (1.0) |
Psychomotor speed/attention z score, mean (SD) | −0.08 (1.0) | −0.01 (1.0) | −0.002 (1.0) | 0.04 (1.0) | 0.05 (0.9) |
Global Cogstate z score, mean (SD) | −0.07 (1.0) | −0.02 (1.0) | −0.01 (1.0) | 0.04 (1.0) | 0.06 (0.9) |
Abbreviations: CESD, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale; PM2.5, fine particulate matter.
In models adjusted for age and race, 1 IQR higher green space exposure in a 270-m buffer was associated with higher scores on the psychomotor speed/attention composite (β, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.07) (Table 2) and on overall cognition (β, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.06) (Table 2). Further adjustment for individual childhood and adulthood SES (β, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.08) and neighborhood SES (β, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.07) did not attenuate these associations, and the results remained virtually unchanged. Similarly, in sensitivity analyses using the 1230-m buffer, in fully adjusted models, 1 IQR higher of green space exposure was associated with higher scores on the psychomotor speed/attention composite (β, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.07) (eTable 1 in the Supplement) and on overall cognition (β, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.06) (eTable 1 in the Supplement). In the main analyses within a 270-m buffer and in sensistivity analyses within a 1230-m buffer, green space exposure was not associated with higher scores on the learning/working memory composite (fully adjusted within 270-m buffer: β, 0.03; 95% CI, −0.000 to 0.05; 1230-m buffer: β, 0.02; 95% CI, −0.01 to 0.04). The estimate of the association between green space and processing speed and attention was equivalent to the estimate of being 1.2 years younger in our data.
Table 2. Association Between Green Space (per IQR, 270-m Buffer) and Cogstate z Scores, Nurses’ Health Study II.
Measure | Green space exposure, β (95% CI) (N = 13 573)a | P value |
---|---|---|
Learning/working memory | ||
Age and race (basic) | 0.02 (−0.01 to 0.04) | .14 |
Plus childhood factors | 0.02 (−0.004 to 0.05) | .10 |
Plus adulthood socioeconomic indicators | 0.02 (−0.004 to 0.05) | .09 |
Plus neighborhood socioeconomic status | 0.03 (−0.0003 to 0.05) | .05 |
Psychomotor speed/attention | ||
Age and race (basic) | 0.04 (0.02 to 0.07) | <.001 |
Plus childhood factors | 0.04 (0.02 to 0.07) | <.001 |
Plus adulthood socioeconomic indicators | 0.04 (0.02 to 0.07) | <.001 |
Plus neighborhood socioeconomic status | 0.05 (0.02 to 0.08) | <.001 |
Global Cogstate | ||
Age and race (basic) | 0.04 (0.01 to 0.06) | .002 |
Plus childhood factors | 0.04 (0.02 to 0.06) | .001 |
Plus adulthood socioeconomic indicators | 0.04 (0.02 to 0.07) | .001 |
Plus neighborhood socioeconomic status | 0.05 (0.02 to 0.07) | <.001 |
Higher scores indicate better cognitive performance.
We observed positive nonlinear associations between green space and the psychomotor speed/attention composite as well as the global score, whereas a U-shaped association was observed for the learning/working memory composite, after accounting for further confounders (eFigure 2 in the Supplement). Increasing green space was associated with higher scores on the psychomotor speed/attention composite, although the evidence of consistent improvement at levels of green space above 0.8 NDVI was not clear (eFigure 2 in the Supplement). Although the test for deviations from linearity for green space was significant for both psychomotor speed/attention composite and the global Cogstate score, the associations were visually monotonic and, thus, we report the IQR results as the main findings. Moreover, the distribution of the residuals of the main models did not suggest deviation from normality.
Stratified Analyses
We did not observe an association between green space and the learning/working memory composite among the different quartiles of Census tract median income and there was no statistical evidence of a difference in associations (P for interaction = .65). In contrast, we observed associations between green space and the psychomotor speed/attention composite (β, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.03-0.13) and the global score (β, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.01-0.11) among participants with higher Census tract median income (Table 3). We also observed variability in the psychomotor speed/attention composite across levels of population density, although there was no evidence of a significant difference (P for interaction = .51).
Table 3. Association Between Green Space (IQR, 270-m Buffer) and Cogstate z Scores Stratified by US Census Tract Median Income and Population Density.
Variable | β (95% CI)a | P value for interaction | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
First quartile:<$60 781 | Second quartile: $60 784-$77 386 | Third quartile: $77 391-$99 427 | Fourth quartile: $99 444-$250 000 | |||
Census-tract median income, USDb | ||||||
No. | 3332 | 3406 | 3417 | 3429 | ||
Learning/working memory | 0.05 (−0.001 to 0.10) | 0.03 (−0.03 to 0.08) | −0.004 (−0.05 to 0.05) | 0.01 (−0.04 to 0.06) | .65 | |
Psychomotor speed/attention | 0.03 (−0.02 to 0.08) | 0.06 (0.01 to 0.11) | 0.01 (−0.04 to 0.06) | 0.08 (0.03 to 0.13) | .50 | |
Global Cogstate | 0.04 (−0.006 to 0.09) | 0.06 (0.002 to 0.11) | 0.002 (−0.05 to 0.05) | 0.06 (0.01 to 0.11) | .83 | |
Population density, people/sq kmc | First quartile: <110 | Second quartile: 111-522 | Third quartile: 523-1245 | Fourth quartile: 1246-69 555 | ||
No. | 3317 | 3396 | 3424 | 3447 | ||
Learning/working memory | 0.002 (−0.05 to 0.06) | 0.06 (0.01 to 0.12) | 0.04 (−0.01 to 0.10) | −0.02 (−0.07 to 0.04) | .52 | |
Psychomotor speed/attention | 0.02 (−0.04 to 0.07) | 0.02 (−0.03 to 0.08) | 0.09 (0.03 to 0.15) | 0.05 (−0.01 to 0.10) | .51 | |
Global Cogstate | 0.01 (−0.04 to 0.07) | 0.05 (−0.01 to 0.10) | 0.08 (0.02 to 0.14) | 0.02 (−0.04 to 0.08) | .43 |
Higher scores indicate better cognitive performance.
Models were adjusted for age, race, childhood factors, adulthood socioeconomic factors, and depression.
Models were adjusted for age, race, childhood factors, adulthood socioeconomic factors, neighborhood socioeconomic status, and depression.
Mediation
Estimates of the proportion of the association between green space and cognitive function that might be mediated by other factors (assuming that underlying assumptions of the mediation analyses hold) were significant for depression (Table 4). Depression was estimated to explain 3.95% (95% CI, 0.35%-7.55%) of the association between green space and psychomotor speed/attention and 6.30% (95% CI, 0.77%-11.81%) of the association between green space and overall cognition. The results did not suggest mediation of the association between green space and cognition by any other of the investigated mediators.
Table 4. Estimated Proportion of Association Between Green Space (IQR; 270-m buffer) and Cognition Explained by Air Pollution, Depression, and Physical Activity.
Mediators at early childhooda,b | Estimate (95% CI) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Learning/working memory | Psychomotor speed/attention | Global Cogstate | |
Air pollution (n = 13 573) | |||
Indirect effect | 0.001 (−0.002 to 0.004) | −0.0001 (−0.003 to 0.003) | 0.001 (−0.002 to 0.003) |
Direct effect | 0.02 (−0.004 to 0.05) | 0.05 (0.02 to 0.08) | 0.04 (0.02 to 0.07) |
Total effect | 0.02 (−0.002 to 0.05) | 0.05 (0.02 to 0.08) | 0.05 (0.02 to 0.07) |
Percentage mediated | 4.58 (−7.91 to 17.07) | −0.01 (−5.69 to 5.66) | 1.29 (−4.82 to 7.40) |
Depression (n = 13 584) | |||
Indirect effect | 0.003 (0.001 to 0.005) | 0.002 (0.0005 to 0.003) | 0.003 (0.001 to 0.005) |
Direct effect | 0.02 (−0.005 to 0.05) | 0.05 (0.02 to 0.07) | 0.04 (0.02 to 0.07) |
Total effect | 0.02 (−0.002 to 0.05) | 0.05 (0.02 to 0.07) | 0.05 (0.02 to 0.07) |
Percentage mediated | 11.94 (−2.72 to 26.59) | 3.95 (0.35 to 7.55) | 6.30 (0.77 to 11.81) |
Physical Activity (n = 13 584) | |||
Indirect effect | 0.001 (−0.00004 to 0.002) | 0.001 (−0.0001 to 0.002) | 0.001 (0.00001 to 0.002) |
Direct effect | 0.02 (−0.002 to 0.05) | 0.05 (0.02 to 0.07) | 0.04 (0.02 to 0.07) |
Total effect | 0.02 (−0.002 to 0.05) | 0.05 (0.02 to 0.07) | 0.05 (0.02 to 0.07) |
Percentage mediated | 3.50 (−1.69 to 8.69) | 1.51 (−0.47 to 3.49) | 2.09 (−0.30 to 4.48) |
Mediation analyses assume that there is no unmeasured exposure-outcome confounding, no unmeasured mediator-outcome confounding, no unmeasured exposure-mediator confounding, and no mediator-outcome confounder affected by exposure.
Analytical sample for mediation analysis excluded participants with missing data on any of the mediators of interest.
In sensitivity analyses, where we address the fact that the mediators of interest could also be confounders, we observed that adjustment for depression, air pollution, and physical activity in the main models did not change the association between green space and cognition (eTable 2 in the Supplement).
Discussion
This nationwide cohort study of adult women investigated the association of residential surrounding green space in 270-m and 1230-m buffers with cognitive function. Our study found that higher levels of residential green space were associated with higher scores on processing speed and attention and on overall cognition, after adjusting for age, race, individual childhood and adulthood SES, and neighborhood SES. The estimate of the association between green space and processing speed and attention was equivalent to the estimate of being 1.2 years younger, in our data. We also found that higher levels of residential green space were not associated with learning/working memory battery scores. Our estimates were robust to a wide range of sensitivity analyses.
Our results were similar to those of a 10-year longitudinal study6 of British civil servants from the Whitehall cohort that found that an IQR increase in NDVI was associated with a difference in the global cognition z score (0.02; 95% CI, 0.003-0.037) in the 500-m buffer. Our results were also consistent with a recent analysis48 of US Medicare beneficiaries aged less than 65 years that suggested that higher green space was associated with reduced risk of Alzheimer Disease, after adjustment for individual and neighborhood sociodemographics.
The associations with psychomotor speed/attention were greater among participants living in neighborhoods with higher SES. This contrasted with the Whitehall study,6 which found no clear trends in the associations with cognitive function across strata of neighborhood SES. This difference might be due to different distributions and variation of neighborhood SES among the US and the English populations. A recent article49 reported that the economic inequalities in the UK are substantially lower compared with inequality in the USA. Our results also contrast with those by Cherrie et al,7 who found an association between green space and cognition among lower SES groups. However, the latter study used parental occupational social class as a measure of SES from childhood, whereas we used neighborhood SES. All our participants were nurses at baseline so there was likely less variation in SES, which might explain the difference in our results.
The null asociations between green space and learning and working memory are in accordance with a recent study50 that examined the association between green space and brain-based magnetic resonance imaging measures in older adults. The authors50 found that living in neighborhoods with more green space was not associated with left or right hippocampal volume, which is responsible for memory and learning. In line with previous research, this study suggests differing associations between green space and cognition based on the cognitive domain examined.51,52
Previous research on green space and cognition has reported greater associations for women compared with men,6,7 which may explain the robust associations found in our study, despite the fact that the women in our study were younger than those in previous studies, which might be expected to reduce our ability to detect associations. However, this may also signal the public health importance of green space, if associations were detected in these young-older women. Furthermore, subtle alterations in continuous measures of cognition have important clinical implications at the population level.53
We evaluated several potential mediatiors on the association between green space and cognitive function. Higher green space exposure has been associated with lower exposure to air pollution, lower risk of depression, and increased opportunities for physical activity,40,54 which, in turn, could improve cognition. However, in our study we did not find evidence that the association between green space and cognitive function could be explained by air pollution or physical activity. Our results on physical activity and air pollution are in agreement with a previous study6 that evaluated these as potential mediators between green space and cognitive decline. Our mediation analysis did suggest that green space may be associated with cognitive function through depression. There is a foundation for this mechanism in the literature. Higher exposure to green space has been consistently linked to lower levels of depression.55,56 In addition, depression has been documented to be an important factor associated with risk for dementia.41,57 These findings highlight the relevance of green space as a potential factor to reduce depressive episodes and thus subsequent dementia.
Limitations and Strengths
Potential limitations of this study include the outcome measurement at a single time point, which did not allow us to examine causal associations or temporality of associations. However, the Cogstate battery was administered at least 1 year after the green space exposure measure. Further longitudinal studies that examine associations between exposure to green space and cognitive decline would be informative. Second, our study population was predominantly White women with high education levels. This limits examination of racial disparities, effect modification by SES, or generalizability to populations with substantially different distributions of green space. In addition, the most appropriate buffer within which to measure green space is not clear.58 We examined buffers around the immediate area of residences (270 m) and walkable area (1230 m) as potential relevant geographic contexts. In both analyses, we observed similar results, but it is unclear whether these associations would remain if other buffer sizes were examined or if we were able to incorporate information about where participants spent their time when not at home.59 Third, NDVI does not measure the quality of green space or green space features as individuals experience them. Future studies should look into green space quality and ground-level metrics that can capture how individuals experience their environment, including street-view imagery or smartphone Global Positioning System data. Fourth, the assumption of temporal ordering of exposure, mediators, and outcome may not be satisfied, nor would the no unmeasured confounding assumption, particularly for the exposure-mediator as they were both measured at the same time.
Our study also has important strengths. We accounted for multiple individual childhood and adulthood socioeconomic factors and neighborhood SES as potential confounders. In addition, we evaluated several domains of cognition through the Cogstate battery, which is an objective measure of cognitive function and has been shown to be a sensitive indicator of early cognitive deficits.32 This is among the first examinations to study the association between green space exposure and cognitive function across the entire US. Finally, measurements of important environmental exposures, mental health, and behaviors enabled us to examine potential mechanisms through which green space is associated with cognitive function.
Conclusions
We observed that higher residential surrounding green space was associated with better processing speed and attention, as well as overall cognition among participants in the Nurses’ Health Study II. The worldwide aging population and the rapid increase of dementia calls for novel prevention strategies. Our results suggest that green space exposure should be investigated as a potential population-level approach to improve cognitive function.
eAppendix. Supplemental Methods
eTable 1. Association of Green Space Exposure (per IQR) in the 1230m Buffer Surrounding Each Address With Cogstate Z-scores in Middle Age, Nurses' Health Study II, 2014-2016
eFigure 1. Direct and Indirect Associations Between Green Space and Cognitive Decline
eFigure 2. Nonlinear Associations Between Green Space in the 270m Buffer Surrounding Each Address and (A) Learning/Working Memory, (B) Psychomotor Speed/Attention, and (C) Global Cogstate in Middle Age, Nurses' Health Study II, 2014-2016
eTable 2. Association of Green Space Exposure in a 270m Buffer Around Each Address (per IQR) With Cogstate Z-Scores in Middle Age, Nurses' Health Study II, 2014-2016, Further Adjusted for Air Pollution, Depression, and Physical Activity
eReferences
References
- 1.Crooks VC, Lubben J, Petitti DB, Little D, Chiu V. Social network, cognitive function, and dementia incidence among elderly women. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(7):1221-1227. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.115923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Elias MF, Beiser A, Wolf PA, Au R, White RF, D’Agostino RB. The preclinical phase of Alzheimer disease: A 22-year prospective study of the Framingham Cohort. Arch Neurol. 2000;57(6):808-813. doi: 10.1001/archneur.57.6.808 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tierney MC, Yao C, Kiss A, McDowell I. Neuropsychological tests accurately predict incident Alzheimer disease after 5 and 10 years. Neurology. 2005;64(11):1853-1859. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000163773.21794.0B [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Elovainio M, Kivimäki M, Ferrie JE, et al. Physical and cognitive function in midlife: reciprocal effects? a 5-year follow-up of the Whitehall II study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009;63(6):468-473. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.081505 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sabia S, Guéguen A, Marmot MG, Shipley MJ, Ankri J, Singh-Manoux A. Does cognition predict mortality in midlife? results from the Whitehall II cohort study. Neurobiol Aging. 2010;31(4):688-695. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.05.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.de Keijzer C, Tonne C, Basagaña X, et al. Residential surrounding greenness and cognitive decline: a 10-year follow-up of the Whitehall II cohort. Environ Health Perspect. 2018;126(7):077003. doi: 10.1289/EHP2875 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cherrie MPC, Shortt NK, Mitchell RJ, et al. Green space and cognitive ageing: a retrospective life course analysis in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936. Soc Sci Med. 2018;196:56-65. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.10.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hartig T, Mitchell R, de Vries S, Frumkin H. Nature and health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:207-228. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182443 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Abhijith KV, Kumar P, Gallagher J, et al. Air pollution abatement performances of green infrastructure in open road and built-up street canyon environments—a review. Atmos Environ. 2017;162:71-86. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.05.014 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Markevych I, Schoierer J, Hartig T, et al. Exploring pathways linking greenspace to health: theoretical and methodological guidance. Environ Res. 2017;158:301-317. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.06.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hamer M, Chida Y. Physical activity and risk of neurodegenerative disease: a systematic review of prospective evidence. Psychol Med. 2009;39(1):3-11. doi: 10.1017/S0033291708003681 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Penninkilampi R, Casey AN, Singh MF, Brodaty H. The association between social engagement, loneliness, and risk of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;66(4):1619-1633. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180439 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gradus JL, Horváth-Puhó E, Lash TL, et al. Stress disorders and dementia in the danish population. Am J Epidemiol. 2019;188(3):493-499. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwy269 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Flatt JD, Gilsanz P, Quesenberry CP Jr, Albers KB, Whitmer RA. Post-traumatic stress disorder and risk of dementia among members of a health care delivery system. Alzheimers Dement. 2018;14(1):28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2017.04.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kaplan S. The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework. J Environ Psychol. 1995;15(3):169-182. doi: 10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Weuve J, Puett RC, Schwartz J, Yanosky JD, Laden F, Grodstein F. Exposure to particulate air pollution and cognitive decline in older women. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(3):219-227. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.683 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Paul KC, Haan M, Mayeda ER, Ritz BR. Ambient air pollution, noise, and late-life cognitive decline and dementia risk. Annu Rev Public Health. 2019;40:203-220. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040218-044058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Weuve J, Bennett EE, Ranker L, et al. Exposure to air pollution in relation to risk of dementia and related outcomes: an updated systematic review of the epidemiological literature. Environ Health Perspect. 2021;129(9):96001. doi: 10.1289/EHP8716 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dadvand P, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Esnaola M, et al. Green spaces and cognitive development in primary schoolchildren. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(26):7937-7942. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1503402112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tzivian L, Winkler A, Dlugaj M, et al. Effect of long-term outdoor air pollution and noise on cognitive and psychological functions in adults. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2015;218(1):1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2014.08.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Weuve J, D’Souza J, Beck T, et al. Long-term community noise exposure in relation to dementia, cognition, and cognitive decline in older adults. Alzheimers Dement. 2021;17(3):525-533. doi: 10.1002/alz.12191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Besser L. Outdoor green space exposure and brain health measures related to Alzheimer’s disease: a rapid review. BMJ Open. 2021;11(5):e043456. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043456 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.James P, Hart JE, Banay RF, Laden F. Exposure to greenness and mortality in a nationwide prospective cohort study of women. Environ Health Perspect. 2016;124(9):1344-1352. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1510363 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bao Y, Bertoia ML, Lenart EB, et al. Origin, methods, and evolution of the three Nurses’ Health Studies. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(9):1573-1581. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303338 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Morabia A. 120 000 nurses who shook public health. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(9):1528-1529. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303345 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Roberts AL, Sumner JA, Koenen KC, et al. Childhood abuse and cognitive function in a large cohort of middle-aged women. Child Maltreat. 2020;27(1):100-113. doi: 10.1177/1077559520970647 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fredrickson J, Maruff P, Woodward M, et al. Evaluation of the usability of a brief computerized cognitive screening test in older people for epidemiological studies. Neuroepidemiology. 2010;34(2):65-75. doi: 10.1159/000264823 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sumner JA, Hagan K, Grodstein F, Roberts AL, Harel B, Koenen KC. Posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and cognitive function in a large cohort of middle-aged women. Depress Anxiety. 2017;34(4):356-366. doi: 10.1002/da.22600 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative . The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85(11):867-872. doi: 10.2471/BLT.07.045120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kwan MP. The uncertain geographic context problem. Ann Assoc Am Geogr. 2012;102(5):958-968. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2012.687349 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Koyama AK, Hagan KA, Okereke OI, Weisskopf MG, Rosner B, Grodstein F. Evaluation of a self-administered computerized cognitive battery in an older population. Neuroepidemiology. 2015;45(4):264-272. doi: 10.1159/000439592 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Maruff P, Thomas E, Cysique L, et al. Validity of the CogState brief battery: relationship to standardized tests and sensitivity to cognitive impairment in mild traumatic brain injury, schizophrenia, and AIDS dementia complex. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2009;24(2):165-178. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acp010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Maruff P, Collie A, Darby D, Weaver-Cargin J, Masters C, Currie J. Subtle memory decline over 12 months in mild cognitive impairment. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2004;18(3-4):342-348. doi: 10.1159/000080229 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Maruff P, Lim YY, Darby D, et al. ; AIBL Research Group . Clinical utility of the cogstate brief battery in identifying cognitive impairment in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. BMC Psychol. 2013;1(1):30. doi: 10.1186/2050-7283-1-30 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lim YY, Ellis KA, Harrington K, et al. ; The AIBL Research Group . Use of the CogState Brief Battery in the assessment of Alzheimer’s disease related cognitive impairment in the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2012;34(4):345-358. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2011.643227 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hammers D, Spurgeon E, Ryan K, et al. Validity of a brief computerized cognitive screening test in dementia. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2012;25(2):89-99. doi: 10.1177/0891988712447894 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hernán MA, Hernández-Díaz S, Werler MM, Mitchell AA. Causal knowledge as a prerequisite for confounding evaluation: an application to birth defects epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155(2):176-184. doi: 10.1093/aje/155.2.176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.VanderWeele TJ, Robinson WR. On the causal interpretation of race in regressions adjusting for confounding and mediating variables. Epidemiology. 2014;25(4):473-484. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.James P, Banay RF, Hart JE, Laden F. A review of the health benefits of greenness. Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2015;2(2):131-142. doi: 10.1007/s40471-015-0043-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Fong KC, Hart JE, James P. A review of epidemiologic studies on greenness and health: updated literature through 2017. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2018;5(1):77-87. doi: 10.1007/s40572-018-0179-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bennett S, Thomas AJ. Depression and dementia: cause, consequence or coincidence? Maturitas. 2014;79(2):184-190. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.05.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Arvanitakis Z, Wilson RS, Bienias JL, Evans DA, Bennett DA. Diabetes mellitus and risk of Alzheimer disease and decline in cognitive function. Arch Neurol. 2004;61(5):661-666. doi: 10.1001/archneur.61.5.661 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Brasure M, Desai P, Davila H, et al. Physical activity interventions in preventing cognitive decline and Alzheimer-type dementia: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2018;168(1):30-38. doi: 10.7326/M17-1528 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Pearl J. Causal diagrams for empirical research. Biometrika. 1995;82(4):669-688. doi: 10.1093/biomet/82.4.669 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Pearl J. Direct and indirect effects. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Uncertainy in Artificial Intelligence; 2001:411-420. Accessed June 1, 2021. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2074022.2074073
- 46.Robins JM, Greenland S. Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology. 1992;3(2):143-155. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199203000-00013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Yanosky JD, Paciorek CJ, Laden F, et al. Spatio-temporal modeling of particulate air pollution in the conterminous United States using geographic and meteorological predictors. Environ Health. 2014;13(1):63. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-13-63 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Aitken WW, Lombard J, Wang K, et al. Relationship of neighborhood greenness to Alzheimer’s disease and non-Alzheimer’s dementia among 249 405 U.S. Medicare beneficiaries. J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;81(2):597-606. doi: 10.3233/JAD-201179 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Dorling D. Income inequality in the UK: comparisons with five large Western European countries and the USA. Appl Geogr. 2015;61:24-34. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.02.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Besser LM, Lovasi GS, Michael YL, et al. Associations between neighborhood greenspace and brain imaging measures in non-demented older adults: the Cardiovascular Health Study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2021;56(9):1575-1585. doi: 10.1007/s00127-020-02000-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Besser LM, Rodriguez DA, McDonald N, et al. Neighborhood built environment and cognition in non-demented older adults: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Soc Sci Med. 2018;200:27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.01.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Besser L, Galvin JE, Rodriguez D, et al. Associations between neighborhood built environment and cognition vary by apolipoprotein E genotype: Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Health Place. 2019;60:102188. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102188 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Bellinger DC. What is an adverse effect? a possible resolution of clinical and epidemiological perspectives on neurobehavioral toxicity. Environ Res. 2004;95(3):394-405. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2003.07.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Jimenez MP, DeVille NV, Elliott EG, et al. Associations between nature exposure and health: a review of the evidence. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(9):4790. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094790 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Beyer KM, Kaltenbach A, Szabo A, Bogar S, Nieto FJ, Malecki KM. Exposure to neighborhood green space and mental health: evidence from the survey of the health of Wisconsin. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11(3):3453-3472. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110303453 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Gascon M, Sánchez-Benavides G, Dadvand P, et al. Long-term exposure to residential green and blue spaces and anxiety and depression in adults: a cross-sectional study. Environ Res. 2018;162:231-239. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.01.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Norton S, Matthews FE, Barnes DE, Yaffe K, Brayne C. Potential for primary prevention of Alzheimer’s disease: an analysis of population-based data. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(8):788-794. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70136-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Mitchell R, Astell-Burt T, Richardson EA. A comparison of green space indicators for epidemiological research. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011;65(10):853-858. doi: 10.1136/jech.2010.119172 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.James P, Berrigan D, Hart JE, et al. Effects of buffer size and shape on associations between the built environment and energy balance. Health Place. 2014;27:162-170. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.02.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
eAppendix. Supplemental Methods
eTable 1. Association of Green Space Exposure (per IQR) in the 1230m Buffer Surrounding Each Address With Cogstate Z-scores in Middle Age, Nurses' Health Study II, 2014-2016
eFigure 1. Direct and Indirect Associations Between Green Space and Cognitive Decline
eFigure 2. Nonlinear Associations Between Green Space in the 270m Buffer Surrounding Each Address and (A) Learning/Working Memory, (B) Psychomotor Speed/Attention, and (C) Global Cogstate in Middle Age, Nurses' Health Study II, 2014-2016
eTable 2. Association of Green Space Exposure in a 270m Buffer Around Each Address (per IQR) With Cogstate Z-Scores in Middle Age, Nurses' Health Study II, 2014-2016, Further Adjusted for Air Pollution, Depression, and Physical Activity
eReferences