1.
In the article of Hoorelbeke, Sun, Koster, and Dai (2021), published in Stress & Health, there is an error in Figure 3, ranking the nodes in terms of Bridge Expected Influence. This is due to a bug in the version of the R‐package network tools used in this manuscript. This bug affected users who specified communities as a list() object rather than a vector() object, and when that list() object consisted of items belonging to communities in a non‐sequential manner.
FIGURE 3.
Bridge Expected Influence of PTSD symptoms in healthcare workers during COVID‐19
As a result, in the manuscript for the community consisting of symptoms of Emotional numbing and Dysphoric arousal, ‘Feeling detached (N3)’ is incorrectly referred to as being ranked first on bridge expected influence, whereas this should be “Loss of Interest (N2)”.
*Correction in Figures: Figure 3 should instead be:
*Correction in the abstract:
‘Respectively, startle, avoidance of reminders, and loss of interest emerged as bridging nodes in these communities.’
*Correction in Section 3.3 (Results):
‘A second community consisted of symptoms of dysphoric arousal (DA1:DA3) and emotional numbing (N2:N5). Within this community N2 (Loss of interest) scored highest on bridge expected influence.’
*Correction in Section 4 (Discussion):
‘Similarly, within the cluster of dysphoria symptoms, as referred to by Simms and colleagues (2002), indicators of emotional numbing, such as loss of interest (N2) scored highest in terms of bridge expected influence, […]’
We apologize for this error and have reported this problem to the author of the R‐package, which updated the package (for the corresponding patch note, see https://cran.r‐project.org/web/packages/networktools/news/news.html, networktools 1.3.0).