ABSTRACT
Background
Studies examining associations between metabolic acidosis and cardiovascular events in chronic kidney disease (CKD) have shown conflicting results and have not differentiated between normal anion gap (hyperchloremic) acidosis and high anion gap acidosis. We aimed to examine the impact of normal and high anion gap acidosis, separately, on the risk of cardiovascular events among patients with CKD.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study included 1168 patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 10–60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and available data on anion gap. We analyzed the association of time-updated high anion gap (anion gap ≥9.2) with the rate of cardiovascular events using marginal structural models (MSMs) to account for time-dependent confounding. We also analyzed the association between time-updated normal anion gap acidosis (anion-gap-adjusted bicarbonate level ≤22.8 mEq/L) and cardiovascular events.
Results
The mean baseline eGFR of the cohort was 28 mL/min/1.73 m2. The prevalence rates of high anion gap in CKD stages G3a, G3b, G4 and G5 were 20%, 16%, 27% and 46%, respectively. During a median follow-up period of 2.9 years, 132 patients developed cardiovascular events (3.3/100 patient-years). In MSMs, high anion gap was associated with a higher rate of cardiovascular events [hazard ratio (HR) 1.87; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.13‒3.09; P = 0.02] and the composite of cardiovascular events or all-cause death (HR 3.28; 95% CI 2.19‒4.91; P < 0.001). Normal anion gap acidosis was not associated with cardiovascular events (HR 0.74; 95% CI, 0.47‒1.17; P = 0.2).
Conclusions
Among patients with advanced CKD, high anion gap was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events.
Keywords: anion gap, cardiovascular events, chronic kidney disease, marginal structural model, metabolic acidosis
INTRODUCTION
The kidney has a predominant role in the maintenance of acid–base homeostasis. As kidney function deteriorates, metabolic acidosis occurs primarily because of diminished ammoniagenesis in the proximal tubules [1]. Metabolic acidosis leads to various pathological conditions in chronic kidney disease (CKD), such as skeletal muscle catabolism [2], decreased bone mass [3], functional impairment [4] and progression of kidney diseases [5–9]. Additionally, metabolic acidosis may contribute to an excess cardiovascular risk among patients with CKD. Acidemia may promote atherosclerosis through the inflammation of endothelial cells [10], oxidation of low-density lipoprotein [11] and upregulation of angiotensin II [12]. In a cross-sectional study of patients with CKD, an inverse correlation between serum bicarbonate levels and brachial-to-ankle pulse wave velocity was reported [13]. Furthermore, a randomized trial of patients with CKD stages G3b and G4 showed that oral sodium bicarbonate improved vascular endothelial function [14].
Nevertheless, previous cohort studies examining the association between serum bicarbonate levels and the risk of cardiovascular events have shown inconsistent results [7, 15–18] and suffered from two important limitations. First, bicarbonate levels were measured only at baseline, thus their time-series alterations typically seen during CKD progression were not considered. Second, the subtypes of metabolic acidosis, that is, normal anion gap (hyperchloremic) acidosis and high anion gap acidosis, were not distinguished. These two types of acidosis may lead to different clinical consequences because the accumulated acids are completely disparate. In particular, anion gap consists of various uremic acids that can induce peculiar cardiovascular toxicities [19]. Importantly, the treatment approach is also different for these two types of acidosis as oral sodium bicarbonate is expected to be ineffective for reducing anion gap.
Although we recently reported that time-updated high anion gap was significantly associated with an increased risk of CKD progression [20], it is currently unknown whether this is also true for the risk of cardiovascular events. In this study, we analyzed the association of the two types of metabolic acidosis with cardiovascular outcomes among patients with advanced CKD. Marginal structural models (MSMs) were used to estimate the impact of time-updated exposures on the outcomes to account for time-dependent confounders [21, 22].
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study population
The details of the study design have been described elsewhere [20, 23]. This was a retrospective cohort study of individuals who visited the Department of Nephrology at Osaka University Hospital as outpatients between January 2009 and December 2018. We enrolled patients (i) aged 20 years or older; (ii) whose estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 10–60 mL/min/1.73 m2; and (iii) who had no history of renal replacement therapy (RRT). In addition, patients were required to have simultaneously measured data on venous bicarbonate, serum sodium and serum chloride, which are necessary to calculate anion gap. Patients were followed up from the date of the first measurement of anion gap until the date of RRT initiation, death, the last visit to our hospital or the end of the study period (31 May 2019).
The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of Osaka University Hospital (approval number 20274). The informed consent was waived because of the retrospective nature of the study design.
Study outcomes
The primary outcome was the first occurrence of one of the following cardiovascular events: coronary artery disease (angina pectoris or myocardial infarction) requiring percutaneous coronary intervention and/or coronary artery bypass graft; stroke (cerebral infarction and intracranial hemorrhage); hospitalization for decompensated heart failure; or cardiovascular death. Additionally, we analyzed the composite of cardiovascular events and all-cause death. Detailed information about the outcome data were obtained from a chart review of the hospital records and carefully ascertained by nephrologists.
Exposure
The main exposure was the time-updated high anion gap, which was obtained every 3 months throughout the study period. The anion gap was calculated using the following formula: anion gap = sodium (mEq/L) – chloride (mEq/L) – bicarbonate (mEq/L).
A high anion gap was defined as an anion gap ≥9.2. This cut-off point was determined based on the top 25th percentile of our cohort because the cut-off point of the anion gap is not formally determined but is laboratory specific.
Another exposure was time-updated normal anion gap (hyperchloremic) acidosis, which was also obtained every 3 months. To define normal anion gap acidosis, we first calculated the anion-gap-adjusted bicarbonate level: anion-gap-adjusted bicarbonate = bicarbonate (mEq/L) + anion gap − 9.2 (if the anion gap was ≥9.2).
Normal anion gap acidosis was defined as an anion-gap-adjusted bicarbonate level ≤22.8 mEq/L. This cut-off point was based on the 25th percentile of our cohort as well.
Covariates
The following baseline data were extracted from the medical records: age, sex, body mass index, smoking history, blood pressure, cardiothoracic ratio (CTR), diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular comorbidities (coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, stroke, aortic disease and valvular heart disease). CTR was measured using chest radiographs.
Laboratory and prescription data were collected every 3 months during the study period using an automated data extraction system. If there were multiple data within a 3-month interval, then a datum measured on the day nearest to each of the 3-month time points was adopted. Laboratory data included serum albumin, creatinine, sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, phosphate, uric acid, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, C-reactive protein (CRP), hemoglobin, urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) and venous blood gas (pH, bicarbonate and PCO2). Prescription data included loop diuretics, thiazide diuretics, spironolactone, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, beta-blockers, statins and sodium bicarbonate.
The eGFR was calculated using the following formula for the Japanese population [24]: eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) = 194 × serum creatinine–1.094 × age–0.287 (×0.739 if female).
Serum calcium levels were corrected as follows using serum albumin levels if the serum albumin level was <4.0 g/dL [25]: adjusted calcium (mg/dL) = serum calcium (mg/dL) + 0.8 × 4 − serum albumin (g/dL).
Venous bicarbonate levels and pH were measured using blood gas analyzers. Blood gas measurement was performed by trained medical technicians in the central laboratory of our hospital under rigorous quality control standards [22].
Statistical analysis
Marginal structural models
The MSMs were used to analyze the association between time-updated exposures and outcomes. An MSM is a statistical method of estimating the effects of time-varying exposures on outcomes in the presence of time-varying confounders [26, 27]. In this study, eGFR was considered the main time-dependent confounder because eGFR affects both the exposures (anion gap and bicarbonate level) and outcomes (cardiovascular events), whereas eGFR might be influenced by previous exposures (anion gap and bicarbonate level). The detailed method of MSM is described in Supplementary data, Statistical analyses.
Imputation for missing data
All missing data at baseline were imputed by multiple imputation by chained equation (MICE) using all baseline covariates. Linear regression imputation was used for continuous variables with missing data (body mass index, systolic blood pressure, hemoglobin, potassium, calcium, phosphate, albumin, CRP, UPCR and CTR). Logistic regression imputation was used as a dichotomous variable with missing data (smoking). We created five imputed datasets that were analyzed separately and combined using Rubin's rules. Missing data during follow-up were imputed by the last observation carried forward method.
Sensitivity analyses
We conducted the following two additional analyses.
First, we repeated the same analyses with different cut-off values for the high anion gap (≥10) [27].
Second, anion gap was adjusted for albumin [Equation (1)] and for potassium, albumin, phosphate and pH [Equation (2)] [28]. The cut-off points of these adjusted anion gap were determined based on the top 25th percentile of our cohort.
Equation (1): Albumin-adjusted anion gap = sodium (mEq/L) − chloride (mEq/L) − bicarbonate (mEq/L) + 2.5 × 4 − albumin (g/dL) if albumin <4.0 g/dL [28]. A high albumin-adjusted anion gap was defined as an albumin-adjusted anion gap ≥10.4.
Equation (2): Fully adjusted anion gap = sodium (mEq/L) + potassium (mEq/L) − chloride (mEq/L) − bicarbonate (mEq/L) − 10 × albumin (g/dL) × (0.123 × pH 0.631) − phosphate (mEq/L) × (0.309 × pH 0.469) [29]. A high fully adjusted anion gap was defined as a fully adjusted anion gap ≥1.9.
Statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 16.1 (STATA Corporation, College Station, TX, USA).
RESULTS
Study patients
Among 3161 patients whose baseline eGFR was 10‒59.9 mL/min/1.73 m2, 1168 (37%) with available anion gap data were included in the subsequent analysis. Baseline data except for eGFR were similar among those with and without anion gap data; eGFR was slightly lower for those with anion gap data (Supplementary data, Table S1).
Baseline characteristics
The mean baseline eGFR of the 1168 study patients was 28 mL/min/1.73 m2, standard deviation (SD) 13 mL/min/1.73 m2. The prevalence rates of CKD stages G3a, G3b, G4 and G5 were 14%, 27%, 42% and 17%, respectively.
The baseline characteristics according to anion gap at baseline are shown in Table 1. Patients with high anion gap had lower bicarbonate levels and eGFR and higher phosphate and uric acid levels compared with those without high anion gap. The pH levels were similar between the groups.
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics of the study participants
High anion gap | Normal anion gap acidosis | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | No | Yes | No | Yes | ||
n (%) of missing values | n = 1168 | n = 861 | n = 307 | n = 853 | n = 315 | |
Demographics | ||||||
Age, years | 0 (0) | 65 (15) | 66 (14) | 63 (15) | 65 (14) | 64 (15) |
Male, n (%) | 0 (0) | 780 (67) | 598 (70) | 182 (59) | 580 (68) | 200 (63) |
Body mass index, kg/m2 | 75 (6) | 23.1 (4.4) | 23.0(4.2) | 23.4 (4.9) | 23.1 (4.2) | 23.0 (4.9) |
Systolic blood pressure, mmHg | 66 (6) | 131 (21) | 132 (20) | 130 (21) | 131 (21) | 132 (20) |
Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg | 66 (6) | 74 (14) | 74 (14) | 75 (15) | 74 (14) | 75 (13) |
Diabetes mellitus, n (%) | 0 (0) | 573 (49) | 412 (48) | 161 (52) | 425 (50) | 148 (47) |
Smoking history, n (%) | 151 (13) | 451 (44) | 336 (46) | 115 (41) | 321 (44) | 130 (46) |
Cardiovascular comorbidities, n (%) | 0 (0) | 276 (24) | 209 (24) | 67 (22) | 214 (25) | 62 (20) |
Cardiothoracic ratio, % | 99 (8) | 49 (7) | 48 (6) | 49 (7) | 49 (7) | 49 (7) |
Laboratory data | ||||||
pH | 0 (0) | 7.34 (0.05) | 7.34 (0.05) | 7.35 (0.07) | 7.35 (0.05) | 7.32 (0.06) |
PCO2, mmHg | 0 (0) | 46.4 (7.7) | 48.0 (7.1) | 41.8 (7.2) | 48.8 (6.6) | 39.7 (6.3) |
HCO3, mEq/L | 0 (0) | 24.5 (4.0) | 25.3 (3.7) | 22.4 (4.3) | 26.3 (2.8) | 19.7 (2.5) |
Albumin, g/DL | 83 (7) | 3.6 (0.7) | 3.6 (0.7) | 3.7 (0.7) | 3.7 (0.7) | 3.5 (0.7) |
Creatinine, mg/DL | 0 (0) | 2.2 (1.0) | 2.0 (0.9) | 2.5 (1.1) | 2.0 (0.9) | 2.7 (1.0) |
eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2 | 0 (0) | 28 (13) | 30 (13) | 24 (13) | 31 (13) | 21 (9) |
Hemoglobin, g/DL | 45 (4) | 11.5 (2.1) | 11.6 (2.1) | 11.3 (2.1) | 11.8 (2.1) | 10.7 (1.7) |
Sodium, mEq/L | 0 (0) | 139 (4) | 139 (3) | 139 (5) | 139 (3) | 138 (4) |
Chloride, mEq/L | 0 (0) | 106 (5) | 107 (4) | 105 (6) | 105 (5) | 110 (5) |
Potassium, mEq/L | 1 (<1) | 4.6 (0.7) | 4.6 (0.6) | 4.4 (0.8) | 4.5 (0.6) | 4.8 (0.7) |
Adjusted calcium, mg/dL | 109 (9) | 9.1 (0.6) | 9.2 (0.5) | 9.1 (0.7) | 9.2 (0.6) | 9.0 (0.6) |
Phosphate, mg/dL | 155 (13) | 3.7 (0.7) | 3.6 (0.7) | 3.9 (0.9) | 3.6 (0.7) | 3.9 (0.9) |
Uric acid, mg/dL | 91 (8) | 7.0 (1.8) | 6.9 (1.7) | 7.4 (2.2) | 7.0 (1.7) | 7.4 (2.0) |
LDL-C, mg/dL | 241 (21) | 107 (37) | 107 (37) | 107 (37) | 109 (37) | 99 (36) |
HDL-C, mg/dL | 352 (30) | 51 (18) | 51 (18) | 50 (20) | 52 (18) | 47 (18) |
C-reactive protein, mg/dL | 204 (17) | 0.1 (0, 0.4) | 0.1 (0, 0.3) | 0.2 (0, 0.8) | 0.1 (0, 0.4) | 0.1 (0, 0.6) |
UPCR, g/gCre | 441 (38) | 0.7 (0.2, 2.4) | 0.7 (0.2, 2.3) | 0.7 (0.2, 2.8) | 0.6 (0.1, 2.1) | 0.9 (0.3, 3.2) |
Medications | ||||||
Sodium bicarbonate, n (%) | 0 (0) | 162 (14) | 126 (15) | 36 (12) | 102 (12) | 60 (19) |
ACEIs/ARBs, n (%) | 0 (0) | 583 (50) | 446 (52) | 137 (45) | 418 (49) | 165 (52) |
Beta-blockers, n (%) | 0 (0) | 282 (24) | 209 (24) | 73 (24) | 215 (25) | 67 (21) |
Loop diuretics, n (%) | 0 (0) | 385 (33) | 286 (33) | 99 (32) | 286 (34) | 99 (31) |
Thiazide diuretics, n (%) | 0 (0) | 199 (17) | 128 (15) | 71 (23) | 148 (17) | 51 (16) |
Spironolactone, n (%) | 0 (0) | 169 (14) | 138 (16) | 31 (10) | 130 (15) | 39 (12) |
Statins, n (%) | 0 (0) | 353 (30) | 260 (30) | 93 (30) | 269 (32) | 84 (27) |
A high anion gap is defined as an anion gap ≥9.2.
Normal anion gap acidosis is defined as an adjusted bicarbonate level ≤22.8 mEq/L.
Data are expressed as mean (standard deviation) or median (interquartile range) for continuous variables and as number (%) for categorical variables.
LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; ACEI, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin II receptor blocker.
Compared with patients without normal anion gap (hyperchloremic) acidosis, patients with normal anion gap acidosis had lower bicarbonate, pH and eGFR and higher chloride, phosphate, uric acid and UPCR (Table 1).
Anion gap
The mean anion gap at baseline was 7.9 (SD 2.4). High anion gap (anion gap ≥9.2) was observed in 307 patients (26%). The prevalence rates of high anion gap were 20%, 16%, 27% and 46% in CKD stages G3a, G3b, G4 and G5, respectively.
During the median follow-up of 2.9 years (quartile 1‒quartile 3, 1.1‒5.2 years), anion gap was measured at an average of 5.3 times (SD 7.1 times). Among 861 patients without high anion gap at baseline, 545 (63%) developed high anion gap during follow-up.
Normal anion gap (hyperchloremic) acidosis
The mean anion-gap-adjusted bicarbonate level was 24.9 mEq/L (SD 3.8 mEq/L). Normal anion gap acidosis (anion-gap-adjusted bicarbonate level ≤22.8 mEq/L) was found in 315 (27%) patients at baseline; the prevalence rates were 5%, 14%, 32% and 53% in CKD stages G3a, G3b, G4 and G5, respectively. Among 853 patients without normal anion gap acidosis at baseline, 192 (23%) developed normal anion gap acidosis during follow-up.
Marginal structural model
Overall, 132 patients (11%) developed cardiovascular events (3.3/100 patient-years) (19 coronary artery events, 35 strokes, 57 hospitalization for decompensated heart failure and 21 cardiovascular causes). There were 127 all-cause deaths (11%) (3.2/100 patient-years). Additionally, 293 (25%) patients started renal replacement therapy and 239 (20%) were lost to follow-up.
In the MSMs, high anion gap (anion gap ≥9.2) was associated with a 1.87-fold higher rate of cardiovascular events compared with normal anion gap (anion gap <9.2) [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.13‒3.09; P = 0.02] (Figure 1, Table 2). High anion gap was also associated with a higher rate of composite of cardiovascular events and all-cause death [hazard ratio (HR) 3.28; 95% CI 2.19–4.91; P < 0.001]. There were no significant interactions between anion gap and pre-specified baseline covariates (age, sex, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular comorbidities, UPCR and eGFR).
FIGURE 1:
Hazard ratios for (a) cardiovascular events and (b) composite of cardiovascular events or all-cause death in marginal structural models. The dots represent hazard ratios and the solid lines represent 95% confidence intervals. Albumin-adjusted anion gap = sodium (mEq/L) − chloride (mEq/L) − bicarbonate (mEq/L) + 2.5 × 4 − albumin (g/dL) (if albumin <4 g/dL). Fully adjusted anion gap = sodium (mEq/L) + potassium (mEq/L) − chloride (mEq/L) − bicarbonate (mEq/L) − 10 × albumin (g/dL) × (0.123 × pH 0.631) − phosphate (mEq/L) × (0.309 × pH 0.469). Adjusted bicarbonate = bicarbonate (mEq/L) (+ anion gap − 9.2, if the anion gap was ≥9.2). Normal anion gap acidosis is defined as an adjusted bicarbonate level ≤22.8 mEq/L. AG, anion gap.
Table 2.
Associations between high anion gap and cardiovascular outcomes in marginal structural models
Outcomes | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cardiovascular events | Cardiovascular events and all-cause death | |||||
HR | 95% CI | P-value | HR | 95% CI | P-value | |
Normal anion gap | Ref. | – | – | Ref. | – | – |
High anion gap (anion gap ≥9.2) | 1.87 | 1.13‒3.09 | 0.02 | 3.28 | 2.19‒4.91 | <0.001 |
Normal anion gap | Ref. | – | – | Ref. | – | – |
High anion gap (anion gap ≥10) | 1.89 | 1.12‒3.18 | 0.02 | 3.23 | 2.15‒4.85 | <0.001 |
Normal albumin-adjusted anion gapa | Ref. | – | – | Ref. | – | – |
High albumin-adjusted anion gap | 2.13 | 1.25‒3.63 | 0.005 | 3.70 | 2.47‒5.54 | <0.001 |
Normal fully adjusted anion gapb | Ref. | – | – | Ref. | – | – |
High fully adjusted anion gap | 2.06 | 1.19‒3.57 | 0.01 | 3.60 | 2.36‒5.50 | <0.001 |
aAlbumin-adjusted anion gap = sodium (mEq/L) − chloride (mEq/L) − bicarbonate (mEq/L) + 2.5 × 4 − albumin (g/dL) (if albumin <4 g/dL). A high albumin-adjusted anion gap is defined as an albumin-adjusted anion gap ≥10.4.
bFully adjusted anion gap = sodium (mEq/L) + potassium (mEq/L) − chloride (mEq/L) − bicarbonate (mEq/L) − 10 × albumin (g/dL) × (0.123 × pH 0.631) − phosphate (mEq/L) × (0.309 × pH 0.469). A high fully adjusted anion gap is defined as a fully adjusted anion gap ≥1.9.
Models are adjusted for (i) baseline covariates including age, sex, body mass index, smoking history, systolic blood pressure, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular comorbidities, cardiothoracic ratio, albumin, eGFR, hemoglobin, sodium, potassium, calcium, phosphate, uric acid, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, UPCR, C-reactive protein, bicarbonate, loop diuretics, thiazide diuretics, spironolactone, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, beta-blockers, statins and sodium bicarbonate, and (ii) time-dependent covariates including albumin, eGFR, hemoglobin, sodium, potassium, calcium, phosphate, uric acid, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, UPCR, C-reactive protein, bicarbonate, loop diuretics, thiazide diuretics, spironolactone, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, beta-blockers, statins and sodium bicarbonate.
Ref., reference.
In contrast, normal anion gap acidosis (anion-gap-adjusted bicarbonate level ≤22.8 mEq/L) was not associated with cardiovascular events (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.47‒1.17; P = 0.2) or the composite of cardiovascular events and all-cause death (HR 1.11; 95% CI 0.80‒1.54; P = 0.5) (Table 3).
Table 3.
Associations between normal anion gap (hyperchloremic) acidosis and cardiovascular outcomes in marginal structural models
Outcome | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cardiovascular events | Cardiovascular events and all-cause death | |||||
HR | 95% CI | P-value | HR | 95% CI | P-value | |
Without normal anion gap acidosis | Ref. | – | – | Ref. | – | – |
Normal anion gap acidosis | 0.74 | 0.47‒1.17 | 0.2 | 1.11 | 0.80‒1.54 | 0.5 |
Normal anion gap acidosis is defined as an adjusted bicarbonate level ≤22.8 mEq/L.
Models were adjusted for (i) baseline covariates including age, sex, body mass index, smoking history, systolic blood pressure, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular comorbidities, cardiothoracic ratio, albumin, eGFR, hemoglobin, sodium, potassium, calcium, phosphate, uric acid, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, UPCR, C-reactive protein, loop diuretics, thiazide diuretics, spironolactone, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, beta-blockers, statins and sodium bicarbonate, and (ii) time-dependent covariates including albumin, eGFR, hemoglobin, sodium, potassium, calcium, phosphate, uric acid, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, UPCR, C-reactive protein, loop diuretics, thiazide diuretics, spironolactone, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, beta-blockers, statins and sodium bicarbonate.
Ref., reference.
Sensitivity analyses
When a different cut-off value (≥10) was used for high anion gap, high anion gap was still significantly associated with higher rates of cardiovascular events and the composite of cardiovascular events and all-cause death (Table 2).
Both albumin-adjusted and fully adjusted anion gap were significantly associated with higher rates of cardiovascular events and the composite of cardiovascular events and all-cause death (Table 2).
DISCUSSION
In this retrospective cohort study, we found for the first time that high anion gap was significantly associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events among patients with CKD stages G3‒G5. This association was independent of various relevant clinical factors including time-updated eGFR and consistent when anion gap was corrected for albumin, potassium, phosphate and pH. High anion gap was also associated with an increased risk of the composite of cardiovascular events and all-cause death, although the association between anion gap and mortality has been reported previously [30]. On the other hand, normal anion gap (hyperchloremic) acidosis was not associated with cardiovascular outcomes. Our findings suggest the clinical importance of high anion gap in terms of the excess cardiovascular burden in patients with advanced CKD.
Anion gap in patients with CKD consists of a wide array of anionic substances. Among them, phosphate is likely to be involved in our findings because the accumulation of phosphate may promote atherogenesis as well as vascular calcification, thus contributing to high cardiovascular risks [31–33]. However, we showed that the association between anion gap and cardiovascular risk was independent of time-updated serum phosphate levels and was maintained when anion gap was corrected for serum phosphate levels. This indicates that anions other than phosphate may also have been involved in our findings. Gut-derived uremic anions such as indoxyl sulfate, indole-3 acetic acid, p-cresyl sulfate and trimethylamine N-oxide are known to induce endothelial inflammation and oxidative stress [34], arteriosclerosis [35, 36], vascular calcification [37, 38], cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis [39, 40]. Cohort studies have reported a significant association between these uremic anions and cardiovascular events in patients with CKD [41–43]. It is important to note, however, that these substances represent only a fraction of the entire uremic solute [44, 45]. Therefore, many other accumulated anions in CKD patients may also contribute to cardiovascular risks. More detailed and comprehensive studies are necessary to identify the exact role of uremic anions as cardiovascular toxins.
In our study, the association between anion gap and cardiovascular events was independent of bicarbonate levels. This suggests that the correction of acidemia using oral alkaline therapy is not sufficient to alleviate the detrimental cardiovascular effects induced by high anion gap. To date, interventions that can decrease anion gap in CKD have not been established. Because gut dysbiosis and intestinal barrier disruption may increase the production and absorption of gut-derived uremic toxins [46], modification of the microbiome might help decrease anion gap. Animal studies have shown that prebiotics prevent endothelial dysfunction [47] and left ventricular hypertrophy [48]; however, their direct effects on anion gap are currently unknown. The development of anion gap-lowering therapy is desired to test the cardiovascular impact of high anion gap.
We did not observe a significant association between normal anion gap (hyperchrolemic) acidosis and cardiovascular events. This might be in contrast to the study by Dobre et al., who have reported a significant association between lower serum bicarbonate levels and increased cardiovascular risk [18]. Although they did not differentiate high and normal anion gap acidosis, their study patients had relatively preserved kidney function (mean eGFR, 72.4 mL/min/1.73 m2), therefore their low bicarbonate levels are expected to be attributable to normal anion gap acidosis. This discrepancy may be explained by the different patient populations comprising the two cohorts, particularly in terms of kidney function. Additionally, the study by Dobre et al. involved a highly selected patient population recruited from a randomized controlled trial; they excluded patients with diabetes mellitus, history of stroke or urinary protein ≥1 g/day [18]. In contrast, our study was based on real-world data of a population with advanced CKD. Moreover, we analyzed the impact of time-updated exposures with appropriate adjustments for time-updated eGFR using MSMs. This may be critical because there is a strong association between metabolic acidosis and kidney function. On the other hand, some of our patients received sodium bicarbonate for hypobicarbonatemia, which might have weakened the effect of normal anion gap acidosis. Future studies are required to confirm our data regarding the null association between normal anion gap acidosis and the risk of cardiovascular events.
Our study had several strengths. The majority of our patients had advanced CKD, thus more than half of them were exposed to high anion gap during the study period. Our dataset contained time-updated anion gap, which allowed us to capture time-series alterations of anion gap during CKD progression. We assessed clinically meaningful outcomes (cardiovascular events) that were carefully ascertained according to hospital medical records. We used MSMs to account for several time-dependent confounders. Sensitivity analyses using different definition and formulas for anion gap yielded consistent results.
Our study also had some limitations. Because of the observational study design, causality between high anion gap and the incidence of cardiovascular events cannot be proven. Residual confounding was possible despite the extensive adjustment for measured confounders. Incident rates of cardiovascular events are generally much lower among CKD patients in Japan than those in Western countries [49]. Therefore, a null association between normal anion gap acidosis and cardiovascular events may have been only attributable to the limited statistical power. Because of racial differences, it is unknown whether our findings are applicable to different populations. Furthermore, there was selection bias toward patients with lower eGFR due to the availability of blood gas data. This bias was largely because of the Japanese clinical practice guideline for CKD, which recommends venous blood gas measurement for patients with CKD stages G4 and G5.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, we found an association between high anion gap and increased risk of cardiovascular events among patients with advanced CKD by using MSMs to account for various time-dependent confounders. Our findings suggest the clinical relevance of high anion gap in terms of the excess cardiovascular burden among patients with CKD. In contrast, normal anion gap acidosis was not associated with cardiovascular events. Because of the selection bias among the study patients, our findings should be verified by future studies involving different patient populations. Differentiation of high and normal anion gap acidosis may advance the clinical management of metabolic acidosis in patients with CKD.
Supplementary Material
Contributor Information
Yuta Asahina, Department of Nephrology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Yusuke Sakaguchi, Department of Inter-Organ Communication Research in Kidney Diseases, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Sachio Kajimoto, Department of Nephrology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Koki Hattori, Department of Nephrology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Yohei Doi, Department of Nephrology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Tatsufumi Oka, Department of Nephrology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Jun-Ya Kaimori, Department of Inter-Organ Communication Research in Kidney Diseases, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Yoshitaka Isaka, Department of Nephrology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS
Y.A. and Y.S. contributed in conception or design or analysis and interpretation of data or both. Y.A., Y.S., S.K., K.H., Y.D. and T.O. were involved in drafting the article or revising it. J.-Y.K. and Y.I. contributed in providing intellectual content of critical importance to the work described. All authors gave final approval of the version to be published.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The data underlying this article cannot be shared publicly due to the privacy of individuals who participated in the study. The data will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
Nothing to disclose. Results presented in this paper have not been published previously in whole or part, except in abstract format.
REFERENCES
- 1. Kraut JA, Madias NE.. Metabolic acidosis of CKD: an update. Am J Kidney Dis 2016; 67: 307–317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Bailey JL, Wang X, England BKet al. The acidosis of chronic renal failure activates muscle proteolysis in rats by augmenting transcription of genes encoding proteins of the ATP-dependent ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. J Clin Invest 1996; 97: 1447–1453 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Bushinsky DA, Chabala JM, Gavrilov KLet al. Effects of in vivo metabolic acidosis on midcortical bone ion composition. Am J Physiol 1999; 277: F813–F819 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Yenchek R, Ix JH, Rifkin DEet al. Health, aging, and body composition study. Association of serum bicarbonate with incident functional limitation in older adults. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2014; 9: 2111–2116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Menon V, Tighiouart H, Vaughn NSet al. Serum bicarbonate and long-term outcomes in CKD. Am J Kidney Dis 2010; 56: 907–914 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Raphael KL, Wei G, Baird BCet al. Higher serum bicarbonate levels within the normal range are associated with better survival and renal outcomes in African Americans. Kidney Int 2011; 79: 356–362 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Dobre M, Yang W, Chen Jet al. ; CRIC Investigators . Association of serum bicarbonate with risk of renal and cardiovascular outcomes in CKD: a report from the chronic renal insufficiency cohort (CRIC) study. Am J Kidney Dis 2013; 62: 670–678 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Harambat J, Kunzmann K, Azukaitis Ket al. ; 4C Study Consortium . Metabolic acidosis is common and associates with disease progression in children with chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int 2017; 92: 1507–1514 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Krupp D, Shi L, Remer T.. Longitudinal relationships between diet-dependent renal acid load and blood pressure development in healthy children. Kidney Int 2014; 85: 204–210 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Dong L, Li Z, Leffler NRet al. Acidosis activation of the proton-sensing GPR4 receptor stimulates vascular endothelial cell inflammatory responses revealed by transcriptome analysis. PLoS One 2013; 8:e61991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Morgan J, Leake DS.. Oxidation of low density lipoprotein by iron or copper at acidic pH. J Lipid Res 1995; 36: 2504–2512 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Wesson DE, Jo CH, Simoni J.. Angiotensin II-mediated GFR decline in subtotal nephrectomy is due to acid retention associated with reduced GFR. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2015; 30: 762–770 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Kim HJ, Kang E, Ryu Het al. Metabolic acidosis is associated with pulse wave velocity in chronic kidney disease: results from the KNOW-CKD study. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 16139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Kendrick J, Shah P, Andrews Eet al. Effect of treatment of metabolic acidosis on vascular endothelial function in patients with CKD: a pilot randomized cross-over study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2018; 13: 1463–1470 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Dobre M, Yang W, Pan Qet al. Persistent high serum bicarbonate and the risk of heart failure in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD): a report from the chronic renal insufficiency cohort (CRIC) study. J Am Heart Assoc 2015; 4: e001599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Schutte E, Lambers Heerspink HJ, Lutgers HLet al. Serum bicarbonate and kidney disease progression and cardiovascular outcome in patients with diabetic nephropathy: a post hoc analysis of the RENAAL (Reduction of End Points in Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan) study and IDNT (Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial). Am J Kidney Dis 2015; 66: 450–458 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Djamali A, Singh T, Melamed MLet al. Metabolic acidosis 1 year following kidney transplantation and subsequent cardiovascular events and mortality: an observational cohort study. Am J Kidney Dis 2019; 73: 476–485 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Dobre M, Pajewski NM, Beddhu Set al. Serum bicarbonate and cardiovascular events in hypertensive adults: results from the systolic blood pressure intervention trial. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2020; 35: 1377–1384 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Falconi CA, Junho CVDC, Fogaça-Ruiz Fet al. Uremic toxins: an alarming danger concerning the cardiovascular system. Front Physiol 2021; 12: 686249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Asahina Y, Sakaguchi Y, Kajimoto Set al. Association of time-updated anion gap with risk of kidney failure in advanced CKD: a cohort study. Am J Kidney Dis 2021. Online ahead of print [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Mansournia MA, Etminan M, Danaei Get al. Handling time varying confounding in observational research. BMJ 2017; 359: j4587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Naimi AI, Cole SR, Kennedy EH.. An introduction to g methods. Int J Epidemiol 2017; 46: 756–762 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Kajimoto S, Sakaguchi Y, Asahina Yet al. Modulation of the association of hypobicarbonatemia and incident kidney failure with replacement therapy by venous pH: a cohort study. Am J Kidney Dis 2021; 77: 35–43 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Matsuo S, Imai E, Horio Met al. Revised equations for estimated GFR from serum creatinine in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis 2009; 53: 982–992 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Payne RB, Little AJ, Williams RBet al. Interpretation of serum calcium in patients with abnormal serum proteins. Br Med J 1973; 4: 643–646 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Fewell Z, Hernán MA, Wolfe Fet al. Controlling for time-dependent confounding using marginal structural models. Stata J 2004; 4: 402–420 [Google Scholar]
- 27. Xie D, Yang W, Jepson Cet al. ; Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study Investigators . Statistical methods for modeling time-updated exposures in cohort studies of chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2017; 12: 1892–1899 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Kraut JA, Madias NE.. Serum anion gap: its uses and limitations in clinical medicine. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2007; 2: 162–174 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Corey HE. Stewart and beyond: new models of acid–base balance. Kidney Int 2003; 64: 777–787 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Abramowitz MK, Hostetter TH, Melamed ML. The serum anion gap is altered in early kidney disease and associates with mortality. Kidney Int 2012; 82: 701–709 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Zhou C, He Q, Gan Het al. Hyperphosphatemia in chronic kidney disease exacerbates atherosclerosis via a mannosidases-mediated complex-type conversion of SCAP N-glycans. Kidney Int 2021; 99: 1342–1353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Bundy JD, Chen J, Yang Wet al. ; CRIC Study Investigators . Risk factors for progression of coronary artery calcification in patients with chronic kidney disease: the CRIC study. Atherosclerosis 2018; 271: 53–60 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Palmer SC, Hayen A, Macaskill Pet al. Serum levels of phosphorus, parathyroid hormone, and calcium and risks of death and cardiovascular disease in individuals with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2011; 305: 1119–1127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Dou L, Sallée M, Cerini Cet al. The cardiovascular effect of the uremic solute indole-3 acetic acid. J Am Soc Nephrol 2015; 26: 876–887 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Nakano T, Katsuki S, Chen Met al. Uremic toxin indoxyl sulfate promotes proinflammatory macrophage activation via the interplay of OATP2B1 and DLL4-notch signaling. Circulation 2019; 139: 78–96 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Koeth RA, Wang Z, Levison BSet al. Intestinal microbiota metabolism of L-carnitine, a nutrient in red meat, promotes atherosclerosis. Nat Med 2013; 19: 576–585 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Opdebeeck B, Maudsley S, Azmi Aet al. Indoxyl sulfate and p-cresyl sulfate promote vascular calcification and associate with glucose intolerance. J Am Soc Nephrol 2019; 30: 751–766 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Zhang X, Li Y, Yang Pet al. Trimethylamine-N-Oxide promotes vascular calcification through activation of NLRP3 (nucleotide-binding domain, leucine-rich-containing family, pyrin domain-containing-3) inflammasome and NF-kappaB (nuclear factor kappaB) signals. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2020; 40: 751–765 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Lekawanvijit S, Adrahtas A, Kelly DJet al. Does indoxyl sulfate, a uraemic toxin, have direct effects on cardiac fibroblasts and myocytes? Eur Heart J 2010; 31: 1771–1779 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Li Z, Wu Z, Yan Jet al. Gut microbe-derived metabolite trimethylamine N-oxide induces cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis. Lab Invest 2019; 99: 346–357 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Barreto FC, Barreto DV, Liabeuf Set al. ; European UTWGEUT . Serum indoxyl sulfate is associated with vascular disease and mortality in chronic kidney disease patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 4: 1551–1558 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Kim RB, Morse BL, Djurdjev Oet al. Advanced chronic kidney disease populations have elevated trimethylamine N-oxide levels associated with increased cardiovascular events. Kidney Int 2016; 89: 1144–1452 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Glorieux G, Vanholder R, Van Biesen Wet al. Free p-cresyl sulfate shows the highest association with cardiovascular outcome in chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2021; 36: 998–1005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Duranton F, Cohen G, De Smet Ret al. ; European Uremic Toxin Work Group . Normal and pathologic concentrations of uremic toxins. J Am Soc Nephrol 2012; 23: 1258–1270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Wang X, Yang S, Li Set al. Aberrant gut microbiota alters host metabolome and impacts renal failure in humans and rodents. Gut 2020; 69: 2131–2142 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Jovanovich A, Isakova T, Stubbs J.. Microbiome and cardiovascular disease in CKD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2018; 13: 1598–1604 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Catry E, Bindels LB, Tailleux Aet al. Targeting the gut microbiota with inulin-type fructans: preclinical demonstration of a novel approach in the management of endothelial dysfunction. Gut 2018; 67: 271–283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Marques FZ, Nelson E, Chu PYet al. High-fiber diet and acetate supplementation change the gut microbiota and prevent the development of hypertension and heart failure in hypertensive mice. Circulation 2017; 135: 964–977 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Tanaka K, Watanabe T, Takeuchi Aet al. Cardiovascular events and death in Japanese patients with chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int 2017; 91: 227–234 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data underlying this article cannot be shared publicly due to the privacy of individuals who participated in the study. The data will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.