Abstract
Introduction:
Vitamin E is a popular antioxidant suggested to affect bone turnover. However, the effects of a vitamin E enriched diet on the rate of tooth movement are unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate tooth movement in rats receiving a vitamin E enriched diet. In addition, we examined bone remodeling in experimental and control rats.
Methods:
Thirty-two 6-week-old male rats were divided into 4 groups: (1) group 1 (n = 8): orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) for 4 days + regular diet; (2) group 2 (n = 8): OTM for 14 days + regular diet; (3) group 3 (n = 8): OTM for 4 days + vitamin E diet; and (4) group 4 (n = 8) - OTM for 14 days + vitamin E diet. Maxillary alveolar bones and femurs of rats were analyzed by microcomputed tomography and histology.
Results:
Rats fed a vitamin E diet presented an increased OTM rate at days 4 and 14. We found an increased number of osteoclasts and decreased bone volume in the vitamin E diet group at day 14 of OTM. In addition, there was increased expression of the microphthalmia-associated transcription factor in the alveolar bone of the vitamin E diet group. In contrast, there was no difference in bone remodeling in femurs or alveolar bone at the control side.
Conclusions:
We found that an enriched vitamin E diet increases the rate of OTM in rats, suggesting that vitamin E may be useful as an avenue to accelerate OTM.
Vitamin E is a potent lipid-soluble antioxidant that prevents damage to cells by scavenging reactive oxygen species.1 Vitamin E is also known for its anti-inflammatory effect, inhibition of platelet aggregation, and immune enhancement.2 The recommended daily intake for adults aged >14 years is 15 mg (or 22.5 IU). Because of its antioxidant properties, 14.7%–22.9% of the United States population takes vitamin E supplements, and 1 in 9 adults takes more than 267 mg/d (or 400.5 IU).3,4
Oxidative stress has been related to aging, and previous studies showed that this event increases osteoclastic activities and prevents osteoblastic bone formation. Therefore, vitamin E as an antioxidant may be beneficial to maintaining bone health. To find the role of vitamin E on bone health in humans, epidemiologic studies have been carried out.5–8 Mata-Granados et al5 and Shi et al6 found that greater dietary intake of vitamin E and increased serum concentration of α-tocopherol (the predominant form of vitamin E absorbed9) are associated with greater bone mineral density (BMD). In contrast, Hamidi et al7 and Zhang et al8 found a negative correlation between serum vitamin E levels, bone turnover markers, and BMD. In summary, human studies with vitamin E showed inconsistent effects on BMD and bone turnover.
Similarly, the results of animal studies were inconclusive. Fujita et al10 found that rats fed with high vitamin E diet (600 IU/kg) for 8 weeks had decreased bone mass. This study determined that serum α-tocopherol affects bone mass by regulating osteoclastic fusion, independent of its antioxidant activity. In contrast, Kasai et al11 fed rats with different doses of vitamin E diet (0 IU/kg diet for control, 30 IU/kg, 120 IU/kg, and 600 IU/kg) for 8 weeks and found that vitamin E consumption did not cause bone loss nor induced a reduction in bone density. Instead, they observed a tendency for an osteogenesis dominant bone mass increase in cancellous bones in the vertebral body, which may indicate beneficial effects on bone health. In summary, human and animal studies showed indeterminant effects of vitamin E on bone turnover and bone density.
Orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) involves bone resorption and formation. When force is applied to the tooth, the periodontal ligament (PDL) is compressed on the pressure side and stretched on the tension side. Compression of the PDL is associated with osteoclastic activity, whereas stretching of PDL is associated with osteoblastogenesis, causing bone resorption and bone formation, respectively.12,13 Osteoclast activity and bone resorption are considered to be the rate-limiting factors in OTM.14 Numerous pharmacologic interventions, as well as invasive and noninvasive surgical techniques, have been tried on animals and humans to alter the limiting step of bone resorption to accelerate the OTM.15–18
Vitamin E seems to affect bone modeling and remodeling; however, the effects of a high vitamin E diet on the rate of OTM are unknown. Furthermore, the effect of high vitamin E diet on the alveolar bone modeling and remodeling under constant mechanical load has not been studied. However, if a diet enriched in vitamin E increases osteoclastic activity, it could shorten orthodontic treatment time. In contrast, if high vitamin E increases osteoblastic activities and stimulates bone formation, it might help prevent relapse by maintaining the correct position of teeth after removal of braces. Our null hypothesis is that there will be no difference in the rate of OTM and alveolar bone modeling between the group fed with regular or enriched vitamin E diets. The aims of this study were (1) to evaluate the rate of tooth movement in rats receiving an enriched vitamin E diet and (2) to evaluate alveolar bone modeling and osteoclastic activity in rats receiving an enriched vitamin E diet.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The Institutional Animal Care Committee approved the procedures proposed in this study. Third-two 6-week-old male Wistar rats (Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, Mass) were divided into 4 groups: (1) group 1 (n = 8): OTM for 4 days + regular diet; (2) group 2 (n = 8): OTM for 14 days + regular diet; (3) group 3 (n = 8): OTM for 4 days + vitamin E diet; and (4) group 4 (n = 8): OTM for 14 days + vitamin E diet.
Groups 1 and 2 were fed a standard rodent diet of hard pellets. Groups 3 and 4 were fed a custom rodent diet supplemented with 600 IU/kg of vitamin E (Envigo Teklad Diets, Madison, Wis), the exact dosage described in Fujita et al.10 Rats were fed with the standard or supplemented vitamin E diet for 4 weeks before placing orthodontic springs. After the placement of the appliances, both groups were given crushed pellets to avoid the breakage of the appliance. We crushed the same type of food for each group of rats before placing the appliance.
Vitamin E comprises a group of 8 fat-soluble compounds, including 4 tocopherols and 4 tocotrienols.19 Alpha-tocopherol is the predominant form of vitamin E absorbed and accumulated in tissues.9,19,20 We measured the serum level of α-tocopherol in rats that received a supplemented vitamin E or regular diet for 4 weeks. Rats from both control and experimental groups were anesthetized with isoflurane (1%−4%), and blood was collected from the saphenous vein using a sterile needle. Serum α-tocopherol was measured using high-performance liquid chromatography.
Experimental OTM was carried out 4 weeks after the feeding period. The 10-week-old rats were placed under general anesthesia with xylazine (13 mg/kg) and ketamine (87 mg/kg). A custom mouth-prop was fabricated from 0.036-in stainless steel wire and placed between the maxillary and mandibular incisors to hold the mouth open. A 0.008-in stainless steel ligature wire was passed beneath the contact between the maxillary left first and second molars and threaded to the maxillary left first molar (Fig 1). A low force/deflection rate nickel-titanium coil spring (Ultimate Wireforms, Bristol, Conn) delivering 10 g of force was attached to the 0.008-in stainless steel ligature around the left first molar, and the other end of the spring was attached to the incisors with 0.008-in stainless steel wire. The force/deflection rate for the spring was determined to calibrate the amount of force produced by activation of the nickel-titanium coil spring. In addition, grooves of 0.5 mm from the gingival margin were prepared on the facial, mesial, and distal surfaces of the maxillary central incisors to prevent the ligatures from dislodging from the incisor because of their lingual curvature and eruption pattern. Self-etching primer and light-cured adhesive resin cement (Transbond Plus; 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) were applied to the lingual surfaces of the maxillary left first molars and incisors to secure the ligature wire. Moreover, to minimize the distal movement of the right incisor and to reinforce the anterior anchorage, the right and left incisors were joined together to act as a unit (Fig 1). No force was applied on the right molars, which served as a control side. The appliances were checked every other day, and additional light-cured bonding material was added if necessary.
Fig 1.

Representation of experimental tooth movement in adult rats. The maxillary first left molar was protracted using a nickel-titanium coil spring attached to the first molar and both incisors as a unit. M1, first molar; M2, second molar; M3, third molar.
Rats were monitored for pain and discomfort during the experimental period. Animals were weighed twice a week, and any rat losing more than 20% of its initial body weight was excluded from the study. Similarly, nickel-titanium coil springs were checked twice a week, and animals were excluded if the springs were debonded.
Rats were killed by inhalation of carbon dioxide followed by cervical dislocation either 4 or 14 days after applying orthodontic force. The maxilla and femurs from each animal were dissected and fixed in 10% formalin for 5 days.
Microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) analysis was performed by the micro-CT facility at the University of Connecticut Health. Bones were dehydrated with a series of alcohol changes and submitted for micro-CT analysis. Bone volume fraction (BVF) tissue density and intermolar distance (IMD) were analyzed. Micro-CT imaging was performed at 55 kV and 145 mA, collecting 1000 projections per rotation at 300 ms. Serial images were used to quantitatively analyze alveolar bone changes in the region of interest (ROI) on the maxillary first molar (Fig 4). The ROI was defined vertically as the most occlusal point of the furcation to the apex of the maxillary roots. Transversely, it forms a polygonal confirmation, which includes the points on the most distal part of the distobuccal root and distopalatal root and the other sides extending to the points of the most distal parts of the mesiobuccal and mesiopalatal roots. The right side of the maxilla served as the control side. IMD was measured in the sagittal plane, locating the image plane with the most root structure. The original 2-dimensional image was then magnified 10× for more precise line drawings, made at the closest proximity of the 2 convex molar crown surfaces. Measurement error was estimated to be ± 20 μm on the basis of nominal scan resolution.
Fig 4.

Decreased alveolar bone volume in rats receiving vitamin E enriched diet combined with OTM 14 d after placement of orthodontic springs. ROI in which BVF was measured by micro-CT analysis. (A) Quantification of bone volume after 4 d of active orthodontic movement. (B) Quantification of bone volume of control side (no spring) after 4 d of orthodontic movement. (C) Quantification of bone volume after 14 d of active orthodontic movement. (D) Quantification of bone volume of control side (no spring) after 14 d of orthodontic movement. CTRL, control. *P = 0.03.
After micro-CT analysis, samples were rehydrated and decalcified using 14% ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid for 4 weeks at 4°C. Subsequently, samples were processed for paraffin embedding, and serial sagittal sections (5–7 μm in thickness) were obtained. Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining was performed using a leukocyte acid phosphatase (TRAP) kit (386–1 KT; Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, Mo) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In addition, immunofluorescence for microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) (ab12039, Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom) and ligand receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B (RANKL) (LS-B1425; LifeSpan BioSciences Inc, Seattle, Wash) were performed.
Active osteoclasts were identified as TRAP-positive, multinucleated cells (>2 nuclei) that were in contact with the bone surface. The ROI selected for histomorphometry and osteoclast quantification in the maxilla included the alveolar bone in the furcation area of the maxillary first molar that extended from the most occlusal point of the furcation to the apex of the distobuccal root. A rectangular box was placed on the compression side (mesial side of the distobuccal root), extending 200 μm mesially into the alveolar bone. The ROI for the femur was defined as 250 μm away from the most proximal part of the growth plate and included trabecular bone from both (left and right) cortical edges. The ROI was extended 500 μm toward the diaphysis. The number of osteoclasts was defined as the number of osteoclasts divided by total bone perimeter in the defined ROI. Osteoclast surface was defined as the total surface of active osteoclasts divided by total bone surface in the defined ROI. Histomorphometric analyses were carried out using Osteomeasure Software (OsteoMetrics Inc, Decatur, Ga). Quantitative data were taken from 4 different sections per animal and analyzed statistically.
Statistical analysis
Descriptive analysis was used to summarize the data. The outcome variables examined were intermolar distance, BVF, tissue density, number of osteoclasts, and osteoclast surface. Mean, standard deviation, percentile distribution, and confidence interval was computed for all variables. The number of osteoclast and osteoclast surface were not normally distributed, and Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare them. Because of the sample size, nonparametric tests were used to examine the outcome variables. Statistical significance of differences among means was determined using independent t tests (GraphPad Software, Inc, La Jolla, Calif). The level of significance was set as P <0.05.
RESULTS
Rats from both groups had comparable weight when orthodontic springs were placed, which means the vitamin E enriched diet did not affect rats’ normal overall growth during the 4 weeks of feeding. The average weight for the regular diet group was 456.7 g, whereas the average weight for the vitamin E enriched diet group was 469.1 g (P = 0.86). A supplementary statistical graph was added comparing rat weight from both groups (Supplementary Fig 1).
All rats in the study remained healthy, and no rat lost more than 20% of its initial weight during experimental tooth movement. The average body weight loss for the regular diet group was 5.35% for 4 days of OTM and 6.67% for 14 days of OTM. Similarly, the average weight loss for the vitamin E group was 6.14% for 4 days of OTM and 8.67% for 14 days of OTM. There was no difference in the percentage of body weight lost between 2 groups (P = 0.22).
One rat from group 4 (OTM for 14 days + vitamin E diet) was excluded from the study because the bonding of the spring failed.
Rats were fed with either high vitamin E diet (600 IU/kg) or a regular diet for 28 days, and blood was collected on days 0 and 28. The serum α-tocopherol level of the vitamin E fed group was significantly increased (4 times) compared with the regular diet group at day 28 (2422 ng/mL for regular diet group vs 10,243 ng/mL for vitamin E group; Fig 2).
Fig 2.

Significant differences in α-tocopherol serum concentration in regular and vitamin E enriched diet groups after 4 weeks of feeding. *P = 0.00001.
Vitamin E enriched diet significantly increased the rate of OTM in rats on days 4 and 14 (Fig 3). The average IMD (tooth movement) in the vitamin E enriched diet group after 4 days of tooth movement was 0.09 mm, whereas in the regular diet group IMD was 0.04 mm, with a statistically significant difference between groups (P = 0.0256; Fig 3, B). Similarly, for 14 days of tooth movements, the IMD in the regular diet group was 0.072 mm, whereas IMD in the vitamin E enriched group was 0.24 mm. This difference was also statistically significant (P = 0.0058; Fig 3, D).
Fig 3.

Increased rate of tooth movement in rats receiving vitamin E enriched diet. Reconstructed micro-CT images at the sagittal orientation showing the intermolar distance between M1 and M2 after 4 d (A) and 14 d (C) of experimental tooth movement. Quantification of distance between M1 and M2 after 4 d (B) and 14 d (D) of tooth movement. M1, first molar; M2, second molar. *P = 0.0256; **P = 0.0058.
Micro-CT analysis revealed no significant difference in alveolar bone BVF between regular diet and vitamin E enriched diet groups (P >0.05) with 4 days of constant orthodontic force (mechanical loading) (Fig 4, A) or in the control side (right side of the maxilla that received no mechanical loading) for both time points (Figs 4, B and D). However, we observed a significant reduction in BVF with 14 days of constant orthodontic force (mechanical loading) for the vitamin E enriched diet group compared with regular diet (P = 0.03; Fig 4, C).
When bone volume changes between day 4 and 14 within groups were compared, we observed that BVF of the regular diet group decreased slightly from days 4 to 14, but this difference was not statistically significant (70.5% at day 4 and 68.8% at day 14; p > 0.05). For the vitamin E group, the alveolar BVF decreased significantly from day 4 to 14 (71.4% at day 4 and 63.9% at day 14; P = 0.01).
The increased rate of tooth movement and decreased alveolar BVF because of the enriched vitamin E diet associated with orthodontic force prompted us to investigate the osteoclastic activity. TRAP staining has shown a robust activity of osteoclasts in the mesial aspect of the distal root of the first molar (pressure site) in both vitamin E and regular diet groups 4 days after applying orthodontic force (Fig 5, A). Histomorphometry quantification revealed no statistical difference in the number of osteoclasts (Fig 5, B) or osteoclast surface (Fig 5, C) between different diet groups. Interestingly, osteoclastic activity at day 14 was only sustained in the vitamin E enriched diet group, whereas a substantial decrease in osteoclasts was observed in the regular diet group from day 4 to 14 (Fig 5, D). Histomorphometry data showed significantly increased numbers of osteoclasts (Fig 5, E) and osteoclast surface (Fig 5, F) in the vitamin E group at day 14, suggesting increased vitamin E level along with orthodontic force/mechanical loading was associated with longer recruitment/differentiation of osteoclasts at the site of tooth movement.
Fig 5.

Increased osteoclast numbers in alveolar bone of rats receiving vitamin E enriched diet combined with OTM 14 d after placement of orthodontic springs. TRAP staining in sagittal sections of the first molar of rats receiving regular and vitamin E diet after 4 d (A) and 14 d (D) of OTM. Histomorphometry of osteoclast numbers per bone perimeter (N.Oc./B.Pm) after 4 d (B) and 14 d (E) of tooth movement. Histomorphometry of osteoclast surface per bone surface (Oc.S./B.S.) after 4 d (C) and 14 d (F) of tooth movement. B, alveolar bone. *P = 0.01. Scale bar = 500 μm.
Next, we evaluated the expression of factors correlated with osteoclastogenesis, such as RANKL and MITF. We first performed immunofluorescence for receptor activator of nuclear factor κ-B ligand (RANKL), a widely accepted essential factor for osteoclast differentiation and OTM.21–23 We observed an expressive activity of RANKL all over the periodontal ligament of rats receiving orthodontic force 4 days after placement of orthodontic springs for both diet groups (Fig 6, A). The expression of RANKL decreased for the regular diet group on day 14 but was still prominent for the vitamin E diet group, with a significant difference between groups (Figure 6, B). However, we found no difference between groups in RANKL expression at the periodontal ligament of the control side, contralateral side not receiving OTM (Supplementary Fig 2, A). We then examined the protein expression of MITF, a critical transcription factor for osteoclast development and function24–26 that has been associated with increased osteoclastogenesis as a result of a vitamin E enriched diet.10 Our immunofluorescence revealed a substantial expression of MITF in the vitamin E groups after 4 and 14 days of mechanical loading, whereas MITF expression was minimal in the regular diet groups for both time points (Figs 6, C and D), suggesting that MITF might be involved in the sustained osteoclastogenesis until day 14 observed in the vitamin E diet group. Regarding the contralateral control side, we found no appreciative difference in MITF expression between regular and vitamin E enriched diets when the PDL was not loaded (Supplementary Fig 2, B).
Fig 6.

Increased MITF and RANKL expression in the periodontal ligament of rats receiving vitamin E enriched diet combined with OTM. Immunofluorescence for RANKL in sagittal sections of the first molar of rats receiving regular and vitamin E diet after 4 d (A) and 14 d (B) of OTM. RANKL expression was similar for both diet groups at d 4 (A). However, there was an increase in RANKL for the vitamin E enriched diet at d 14 (B). Immunofluorescence for MITF in sagittal sections of the first molar of rats receiving regular and vitamin E diet after 4 d (C) and 14 d (D) of OTM. MITF expression was substantially increased in the vitamin E enriched diet group compared with the regular diet after 4 d (C) and 14 d (D) of tooth movement. Scale bar = 500 μm.
Our data show that there was a trend for a decrease in femur bone volume in the vitamin E group (Figs 7, A and B); however, the difference between the 2 groups was not statistically significant (P >0.05). There was also no difference in femur bone density between the groups (P >0.05, Fig 7, C). Moreover, our TRAP staining and histomorphometry quantification did not identify a significant difference in osteoclast numbers in the femurs of rats receiving high vitamin E or regular diets (Figs 7, D–F). Moreover, there was no difference in RANKL or MITF expression between femurs of rats receiving vitamin E enriched or regular diet (Supplementary Fig 3).
Fig 7.

No difference in bone volume and density and osteoclast numbers in femurs of rats receiving vitamin E enriched or regular diet. (A) Micro-CT reconstructed images of trabecular and cortical bone of femurs of rats from regular or vitamin E enriched diet groups. Quantification of bone volume (B) and density (C) in femurs of rats receiving regular or vitamin E enriched diet. (D) TRAP staining in sections through the growth plate of femurs of experimental rats. Histomorphometry of osteoclast numbers per bone perimeter (N.Oc./B.Pm) (E) and osteoclast surface per bone surface (Oc.S./B.S.) (F) of rats receiving regular or vitamin E enriched diet.
DISCUSSION
Vitamin E is a known antioxidant, and it is one of the most popular supplements in the United States. It has been suggested that vitamin E may affect bone metabolism. We found that rats fed with a high vitamin E diet presented with a significantly increased OTM rate than rats fed with a regular diet on both days 4 and 14.
Osteoclastogenesis is the rate-liming factor in OTM.12 Fujita et al10 have shown that a vitamin E enriched diet causes bone loss by increasing osteoclast activity. In contrast, Kasai et al11 found that instead of causing bone loss, a vitamin E enriched diet increases the number of osteoblasts and promotes a beneficial effect on bone metabolism. Our histologic analysis revealed a sustained increased number of osteoclasts and reduced alveolar BVF in the vitamin E enriched diet group at day 14 of experimental tooth movement, agreeing with vitamin E being associated with bone loss. However, this effect was only observed when active bone remodeling was induced as a result of orthodontic force/mechanical load, so our results partially match the findings by Fujita et al.10 However, although we found increased tooth movement at 4 days in addition to day 14, we did not observe a significant difference in alveolar BVF or number of osteoclasts at this timepoint. Osteoclast numbers showed a trending increase in the vitamin E enriched group, a difference that was not statistically different yet at 4 days of tooth movement. Regarding bone volume, the lack of difference could be because the area analyzed comprises a larger area adjacent to the resorbing pressure zone, and 4 days of increased osteoclastic activity could not have been enough to affect the whole region.
The positive relationship between vitamin E and osteoclastogenesis has resulted from increased preosteoclast fusion and increased expression of MITF.10 Rodents with a mutation in MITF present with osteopetrosis caused by dysfunctional and immature osteoclasts with reduced levels of TRAP.27–29 We found increased levels of MITF in the PDL of rats that were fed with vitamin E enriched diet in combination with mechanical loading at both days 4 and 14, suggesting MITF signaling is involved in the sustained osteoclastogenesis that resulted in an increased rate of tooth movement in rats receiving vitamin E enriched diet.
Our data demonstrated that a vitamin E enriched diet did not affect the alveolar BVF of rats who were not mechanically loaded. Regarding the effects in long bones, there was a trend for a decrease in femur bone volume after the vitamin E diet feeding period. Nonetheless, the difference between 2 groups was not statistically significant. There was also no difference in femur bone density between the groups. Fujita et al10 found that rats fed with vitamin E enriched (a-tocopherol) diet (600 IU/kg) for 8 weeks presented with decreased bone mass in femurs and vertebral body. In contrast, Kasai et al11 fed rats with different doses of vitamin E diets for 8 weeks and found that vitamin E consumption did not cause bone loss nor induced a reduction in the femur or vertebral bone density. The lack of a conclusive long bone phenotype in our study could be explained by a shorter feeding period than Fujita et al10 and Kasai et al11 (4 weeks vs 8 weeks) and the absence of external mechanical loading.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that evaluated the effect of vitamin E on OTM. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, thyroid hormones, and bisphosphate are known to affect OTM.30 Vitamin D also has been proposed to increase the rate of tooth movement.31,32 Collins et al31 performed 21 days of canine retraction with injections of vitamin D found it increased the number of osteoclasts and bone resorption. In the present study, we found that rats fed high vitamin E diet increased the number of osteoclasts and stimulated tooth movement.
We observed an intermolar distance of 0.24 mm after 14 days of experimental tooth movement in rats receiving a vitamin E enriched diet, whereas rats in a regular diet demonstrated a 0.072 mm movement. We analyzed how our results compared with similar animal studies in the literature and concluded there is a wide variation in tooth movement. Studies using experimental OTM in rats demonstrate around 0.10–0.65 mm of OTM at day 14 (when a regular diet was only used). Direct comparison is certainly challenging because different rat strains, ages, spring forces, and personnel placing the springs may induce different results. In our study, a single researcher placed the orthodontic springs with a consistent amount of force for all groups.
Recent orthodontic research has been focused on increasing the rate of tooth movement rate because of high demands from parents and patients for reduced treatment time. The average orthodontic treatment takes approximately 2 years; however, parents and patients have a desire for treatment to be completed in 12–18 months.33 There are currently various products and procedures being claimed to accelerate orthodontic treatment that has yet to be proven as effective or shown to have long-term benefits.18,34,35 The results of our study suggest that vitamin E, a common antioxidant widely used by the population, needs to be further investigated as an avenue to accelerate OTM.
There are limitations to the current study. Vitamin E was administered in a systemic approach rather than a localized manner. Although we did not identify a systemic effect on bone remodeling, long-term high vitamin E administration during the entire orthodontic treatment could cause undesirable side effects. In addition, this study only examined the catabolic mechanisms of bone remodeling. The effect of vitamin E on osteoblastic activity is still unclear, as the current evidence presents conflicting ideas on the total anabolic or catabolic effects. We also plan to increase the feeding period to confirm changes observed in femurs and the effects in other tissues with endochondral ossification, such as the mandibular condyle.
In conclusion, we found that an enriched vitamin E diet accelerates the rate of OTM in rats, decreasing alveolar bone volume and increasing osteoclast activity as a result of experimental tooth movement without affecting contralateral alveolar bone and long bone volume.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We would like to thank Renata Rydzik and the micro-CT facility at the University of Connecticut Health for the micro-CT measurements and expertise The research reported in this publication was supported by NIDCR-NIH under the award number K01DE029528 and by the American Association of Orthodontists Foundation (AAOF) to EHD.
Footnotes
All authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest, and none were reported.
AUTHOR CREDIT STATEMENT
Christina Seong contributed to conceptualization, methodology, investigation, validation, original draft preparation, visualization, and project administration; Po-Jung Chen contributed to methodology, investigation, validation, and manuscript review and editing; Zana Kalajzic contributed to investigation, validation, and manuscript review and editing; Shivam Mehta contributed to investigation, validation, and manuscript review and editing; Ambika Sharma contributed to investigation and manuscript review and editing; Ravindra Nanda contributed to methodology and manuscript review and editing; Sumit Yadav contributed to conceptualization, methodology, and manuscript review and editing; Eliane H. Dutra contributed to conceptualization, methodology, investigation, validation, original draft preparation, supervision, and project administration.
SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.10.033.
REFERENCES
- 1.Song L-S, Zhang Z-X, Wang Y, Liu Y, Zhang R, Lu L-j. Effects of nano-emulsion preparations of tocopherols and tocotrienols on oxidative stress and osteoblast differentiation. Arch biol sci (Beogr) 2017;69:149–56. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Singh U, Devaraj S, Jialal I. Vitamin E, oxidative stress, and inflammation. Annu Rev Nutr 2005;25:151–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Millen AE, Dodd KW, Subar AF. Use of vitamin, mineral, nonvitamin, and nonmineral supplements in the United States: the 1987, 1992, and 2000 National Health Interview Survey results. J Am Diet Assoc 2004;104:942–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ford ES, Ajani UA, Mokdad AH. Brief communication: the prevalence of high intake of vitamin E from the use of supplements among US adults. Ann Intern Med 2005;143:116–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mata-Granados JM, Cuenca-Acebedo R, Luque de Castro MD, Quesada Gomez JM. Lower vitamin E serum levels are associated with osteoporosis in early postmenopausal women: a cross-sectional study. J Bone Miner Metab 2013;31:455–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shi WQ, Liu J, Cao Y, Zhu YY, Guan K, Chen YM. Association of dietary and serum vitamin E with bone mineral density in middle-aged and elderly Chinese adults: a cross-sectional study. Br J Nutr 2016;115:113–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hamidi MS, Corey PN, Cheung AM. Effects of vitamin E on bone turnover markers among US postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res 2012;27:1368–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zhang J, Hu X, Zhang J. Associations between serum vitamin E concentration and bone mineral density in the US elderly population. Osteoporos Int 2017;28:1245–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rigotti A. Absorption, transport, and tissue delivery of vitamin E. Mol Aspects Med 2007;28:423–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fujita K, Iwasaki M, Ochi H, Fukuda T, Ma C, Miyamoto T, et al. Vitamin E decreases bone mass by stimulating osteoclast fusion. Nat Med 2012;18:589–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kasai S, Ito A, Shindo K, Toyoshi T, Bando M. High-dose alpha-tocopherol supplementation does not induce bone loss in normal rats. PLoS One 2015;10:e0132059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Verna C, Zaffe D, Siciliani G. Histomorphometric study of bone reactions during orthodontic tooth movement in rats. Bone 1999; 24:371–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Masella RS, Meister M. Current concepts in the biology of orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 129:458–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Krishnan V, Davidovitch Z. Cellular, molecular, and tissue-level reactions to orthodontic force. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:469.e1–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chen YW, Wang HC, Gao LH, Liu C, Jiang YX, Qu H, et al. Osteoclastogenesis in local alveolar bone in early decortication-facilitated orthodontic tooth movement. PLoS One 2016;11:e0153937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chang JH, Chen PJ, Arul MR, Dutra EH, Nanda R, Kumbar SG, et al. Injectable RANKL sustained release formulations to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement. Eur J Orthod 2020;42:317–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Eltimamy A, El-Sharaby FA, Eid FH, El-Dakrory AE. The effect of local pharmacological agents in acceleration of orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2019;7:882–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Alikhani M, Raptis M, Zoldan B, Sangsuwon C, Lee YB, Alyami B, et al. Effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;144:639–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Xu Z, Harvey KA, Pavlina TM, Zaloga GP, Siddiqui RA. Tocopherol and tocotrienol homologs in parenteral lipid emulsions. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol 2015;117:15–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chow CK. Distribution of tocopherols in human plasma and red blood cells. Am J Clin Nutr 1975;28:756–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yamaguchi M. RANK/RANKL/OPG during orthodontic tooth movement. Orthod Craniofac Res 2009;12:113–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Shoji-Matsunaga A, Ono T, Hayashi M, Takayanagi H, Moriyama K, Nakashima T. Osteocyte regulation of orthodontic force-mediated tooth movement via RANKL expression. Sci Rep 2017;7:8753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Boyce BF, Xing L. Functions of RANKL/RANK/OPG in bone modeling and remodeling. Arch Biochem Biophys 2008;473: 139–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hershey CL, Fisher DE. Mitf and Tfe3: members of a b-HLH-ZIP transcription factor family essential for osteoclast development and function. Bone 2004;34:689–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Weilbaecher KN, Motyckova G, Huber WE, Takemoto CM, Hemesath TJ, Xu Y, et al. Linkage of M-CSF signaling to Mitf, TFE3, and the osteoclast defect in Mitf(mi/mi) mice. Mol Cell 2001;8:749–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lu SY, Li M, Lin YL. Mitf induction by RANKL is critical for osteoclastogenesis. Mol Biol Cell 2010;21:1763–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sharma SM, Bronisz A, Hu R, Patel K, Mansky KC, Sif S, et al. MITF and PU.1 recruit p38 MAPK and NFATc1 to target genes during osteoclast differentiation. J Biol Chem 2007;282:15921–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Luchin A, Purdom G, Murphy K, Clark MY, Angel N, Cassady AI, et al. The microphthalmia transcription factor regulates expression of the tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase gene during terminal differentiation of osteoclasts. J Bone Miner Res 2000;15:451–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cielinski MJ, Marks SC Jr. Neonatal reductions in osteoclast number and function account for the transient nature of osteopetrosis in the rat mutation microphthalmia blanc (mib). Bone 1994;15: 707–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bartzela T, Türp JC, Motschall E, Maltha JC. Medication effects on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic literature review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 135:16–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Collins MK, Sinclair PM. The local use of vitamin D to increase the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;94:278–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kale S, Kocadereli I, Atilla P, Aşan E. Comparison of the effects of 1,25 dihydroxycholecalciferol and prostaglandin E2 on orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125: 607–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Uribe F, Padala S, Allareddy V, Nanda R. Patients’, parents’, and orthodontists’ perceptions of the need for and costs of additional procedures to reduce treatment time. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014;145(Suppl):S65–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Fleming PS, Fedorowicz Z, Johal A, El-Angbawi A, Pandis N. Surgical adjunctive procedures for accelerating orthodontic treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;(6):CD010572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.El-Angbawi A, McIntyre GT, Fleming PS, Bearn DR. Non-surgical adjunctive interventions for accelerating tooth movement in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;(11):CD010887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
