Skip to main content
Nano-Micro Letters logoLink to Nano-Micro Letters
. 2022 Apr 28;14:113. doi: 10.1007/s40820-022-00855-z

Porous Microspheres Comprising CoSe2 Nanorods Coated with N-Doped Graphitic C and Polydopamine-Derived C as Anodes for Long-Lived Na-Ion Batteries

Jae Seob Lee 1, Rakesh Saroha 1, Jung Sang Cho 1,
PMCID: PMC9050979  PMID: 35482108

Highlights

  • One-dimensional CoSe2 nanorods supported on three-dimensional microspheres were prepared via spray pyrolysis.

  • Nanorods were coated by N-doped graphitic C and polydopamine-derived C.

  • The unique nanostructure exhibits exceptional cycling stability (5000 cycles at 2.0 A g−1).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40820-022-00855-z.

Keywords: Spray pyrolysis, Sodium-ion batteries, Cobalt selenide nanorods, Porous microspheres, Dual carbon coating

Abstract

Metal–organic framework-templated nitrogen-doped graphitic carbon (NGC) and polydopamine-derived carbon (PDA-derived C)-double coated one-dimensional CoSe2 nanorods supported highly porous three-dimensional microspheres are introduced as anodes for excellent Na-ion batteries, particularly with long-lived cycle under carbonate-based electrolyte system. The microspheres uniformly composed of ZIF-67 polyhedrons and polystyrene nanobeads (ϕ = 40 nm) are synthesized using the facile spray pyrolysis technique, followed by the selenization process (P-CoSe2@NGC NR). Further, the PDA-derived C-coated microspheres are obtained using a solution-based coating approach and the subsequent carbonization process (P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR). The rational synthesis approach benefited from the synergistic effects of dual carbon coating, resulting in a highly conductive and porous nanostructure that could facilitate rapid diffusion of charge species along with efficient electrolyte infiltration and effectively channelize the volume stress. Consequently, the prepared nanostructure exhibits extraordinary electrochemical performance, particularly the ultra-long cycle life stability. For instance, the advanced anode has a discharge capacity of 291 (1000th cycle, average capacity decay of 0.017%) and 142 mAh g−1 (5000th cycle, average capacity decay of 0.011%) at a current density of 0.5 and 2.0 A g−1, respectively. graphic file with name 40820_2022_855_Figa_HTML.jpg

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40820-022-00855-z.

Introduction

Recently, Na-ion batteries (NIBs) have drawn increasing attention as a feasible alternative to commercial Li-ion batteries (LIBs) in the energy storage field because Na has a rechargeable electrochemical reaction similar to Li of LIBs and is more widespread and abundant than lithium [16]. Accordingly, transitional metal selenides (TMSs) as promising anodes for NIBs have also been intensively investigated in recent times [18]. In general, TMSs show superior Na-ion storage capability than other transitional metal oxides and sulfides [3, 9]. Furthermore, TMSs have increased bond lengths and correspondingly weaker binding energies, which reduces the energy consumption of the sodiation/desodiation reaction [9, 10]. However, the practical applications of TMSs for NIBs are hampered by a large volume variation during cycling, which causes mechanical fracture and electrical contact loss, leading to poor cell cyclability [3, 5, 6, 11]. In particular, the capacity decay of cells for NIBs with TMS anodes is seriously induced under the carbonate-based electrolyte system, which has high activation-energy barrier for Na-ion diffusion on the structure and low stability during repeated cycles [12, 13]. Moreover, the low electrical conductivity of TMSs instigates high cell resistance, resulting in low specific capacities of cell [46]. Thus, to solve the problems of TMSs, particularly for poor cycle stability of NIBs under practically profitable carbonate-based electrolyte system, the structural design of TMSs electrode materials is essential and has been proved to be an effective strategy over the past decade [4, 5].

Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) consisting of metal ion nodes and organic linkers have received much attention as precursors to prepare nanostructured TMSs/carbon composite with a high surface area and numerous pores [12, 14, 15]. Additionally, MOFs are a new class of porous material that offer advantages, such as adjustable pore sizes and controllable architectures [15, 16]. Because of these unique characteristics of MOFs, many studies employing MOFs as a precursor have been suggested as anode materials for NIBs recently [1719]. As one of the MOFs, zeolitic imidazolate framework-67 (ZIF-67) composed of Co ions as metallic nodes and 2-methylimidazole (2-mIM) as an organic linker has also gained recognition as electrode materials [17, 20, 21]. Jiang et al. prepared nitrogen-doped carbon-coated Co3S4 nanocrystals through continuous carbonization and sulfidation processes using ZIF-67 as a precursor. The composite showed ultrafine nanocrystals with a diameter of approximately 5 nm. When utilized as the anode for NIBs, the composite demonstrated a specific capacity of 421 mAh g−1 at a current density of 0.1 A g−1 after 100 cycles [20]. Zhao et al. also prepared an architecture based on CoSe2 nanoparticles embedded in a carbon matrix with a conformal TiO2 film by coating TiO2 on ZIF-67 via sol-gel process. The as-prepared composite particles had a reversible Na storage capacity of 520 mAh g−1 at 0.1 A g−1, with a capacity retention of 78% after 200 cycles [21]. Even though most studies using ZIF-67 as precursors for enhanced electrode materials have been carried out, but the intrinsic low electrical conductivity of the TMS/carbon derived from MOFs and their poor structure integrity during repeated cycles are the major problem, which limited their practical application as anodes for NIBs with long cycle life [22, 23].

Hence, in this study, we introduce a synthetic strategy using the spray pyrolysis process to solve these limitations. Spray pyrolysis is an aerosol-assisted process and has recently gained prominence because it is a facile, cost-effective, and continuous process and thus is commercially available [24, 25]. The highly conductive and porous microspheres uniformly comprised of one-dimensional (1D) CoSe2 nanorods as building blocks, which are double-coated with ZIF-67-templated nitrogen-doped graphitic carbon (NGC) and polydopamine-derived carbon (PDA-derived C) were developed for the first time using a scalable spray pyrolysis process. The NGC layer surrounding the 1D CoSe2 nanorods are anticipated to act as primary transport pathways for direct electron transfer from the active materials, thereby supporting the rapid redox processes during the electrochemical process. Moreover, the additional double-coated PDA-derived N-doped C acts as secondary transport pathways to further support the electron transfer to the copper substrate and primary conductive pathways formed by NGC, along with the reinforcement to strengthen the anode structural integrity. Additionally, we introduce the porous channels in the TMS/C composite, allowing efficient wetting of the electrode and thereby promoting fast redox processes during the electrochemical testing. The synergetic effects of the rational synthesis approach, which enables dual C coating and porous channel, can be beneficial to overcome the intrinsic limitation of the MOF structure to achieve the anodes with extraordinary electrochemical performance for NIBs under practically profitable carbonate-based electrolyte system, particularly the ultra-long cycle life stability.

In this study, the formation mechanisms of the unique porous TMS/C composite microspheres using spray pyrolysis were comprehensively investigated by tracing the morphological and phasic features of the structure. We believe that the structural advancements presented in this study will benefit the research community in visualizing highly conductive and porous nanostructures for long-lived electrodes in various energy storage applications.

Experimental

Sample Preparation

Preparation of ZIF-67 Polyhedrons

The ZIF-67 polyhedrons were prepared by a facile solution-based precipitation method. Briefly, 50 mL aqueous solution of 0.05 M Co(NO3)2∙6H2O (Junsei Chemical Co., Ltd., 98%, Mw: 291.02) was added to 50 mL of another aqueous solution containing 0.4 M 2-methylimidazole (Acros Organics, 99%, Mw: 82.10) and 6 mL of triethylamine (Alfa Aesar, 99%, Mw: 101.19) to form a purple colloidal solution. The resultant suspension was stirred for 1 h to obtain a homogeneous dispersion. Subsequently, the solution was left undisturbed at ambient conditions for 24 h and allowed to settle down. The resulting purple precipitate was collected by centrifugation at 9000 rpm and washed several times with distilled water and ethanol. Finally, the as-prepared ZIF-67 polyhedrons were obtained by drying the sample overnight in a vacuum oven at 100 °C.

Preparation of P-CoSe2@NGC NR Microspheres

Hierarchically porous P-CoSe2@NGC NR microspheres were prepared using a scalable spray pyrolysis technique. Firstly, 1.5 g of PVP (Daejung Chemicals and Metals Co., Ltd., Mw: 40,000) was dissolved in 100 mL of distilled water by stirring for 1 h. Subsequently, 3.0 g of ZIF-67 polyhedrons and 50 mL of PS nanobeads (ϕ = 40 nm, concentration = 0.1 g mL−1) suspension were added to the obtained solution and vigorously stirred for 2 h to prepare a final spray solution. The preparation method of PS nanobeads suspension has been described in our previous report [26]. The ZIF-67/PS/PVP spray solution was then transferred to an ultrasonic nebulizer connected to a vertical quartz reactor. The droplets generated by the nebulizer were fed through a quartz reactor fixed at 400 °C in an N2 atmosphere (10 L min−1). The schematic representation of the spray pyrolysis arrangement is illustrated in Scheme S1. The ZIF67/PS/PVP composite microspheres obtained after the spray pyrolysis process were transferred to a crucible together with a small alumina bottle containing Se powder and selenized for 4 h at 350 °C under Ar/H2 (vol = 95:5%) atmosphere to obtain P-CoSe2@NGC NR microspheres. The weight ratio of Se powder and the sample of ZIF67/PS/PVP was maintained at 3:1.

Preparation of P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR Microspheres

The as-prepared P-CoSe2@NGC NR microspheres (0.1 g) were dispersed in 100 mL of tris buffer solution (0.01 M, pH: 8.7) to prepare the PDA-derived C-coated P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR microspheres. Subsequently, dopamine hydrochloride (Alfa Aesar, 99%, Mw: 189.64, 0.01 g) was added to the above solution and stirred for 12 h under ambient conditions. The PDA-coated P-CoSe2@NGC NR microspheres were then washed several times with distilled water, collected by centrifugation, and subsequently dried in an oven at 100 °C. Finally, P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR microspheres were obtained by heat treatment for 3 h at 400 °C in N2 atmosphere.

Preparation of Bare CoSe2 Hollow Microspheres

For better comparison, bare CoSe2 hollow microspheres (without PVP and PS nanobeads) were also prepared through an identical spray pyrolysis and subsequent heat treatment processes. The spray solution was obtained by adding 0.15 mol of Co (NO3)2·6H2O to 300 mL of distilled water and stirring for 1 h. The temperature of the thermal reactor was maintained at 400 °C, and the flow rate of the carrier gas (air) was 10 L min−1. The as-prepared powder obtained by spray pyrolysis was selenized using Se powder at 400 °C for 6 h under Ar/H2 (vol = 95:5%) atmosphere to obtain bare CoSe2 hollow microspheres.

Characterization Techniques

The morphology of the samples was examined through FE-SEM (Ultra Plus, Zeiss) and FE-TEM (JEM-2100F, JEOL). The phase and crystal structure of the samples were analyzed by XRD (D8 Discover with GADDS, Bruker) using Cu Κα radiation (I = 1.5418 Å). The chemical environment of elements in the samples was determined by XPS (K-Alpha, Thermo Fisher Scientific) using a monochromatic Al Κα radiation at 12 kV and 20 mA. The crystallinity of the carbonaceous materials in the prepared samples was investigated through Raman spectroscopy (Horiba Jobin–Yvon, HR800, LabRam). The surface area of the samples was measured by the BET method, where N2 was used as the adsorbate gas. The carbon content was quantified by TGA (Pyris 1, PerkinElmer) in an air atmosphere from 30 to 600 °C at a ramp rate of 10 °C min−1. The inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES) analysis was performed to determine the elemental composition using Perkin Elmer OPTIMA 7300 DV. Elemental analysis (EA) technique based on high temperature (1200 ~ 1400 °C) combustion method was employed for quantitative analysis of C and N elements in the prepared samples (vario MICRO cube, Elementar). The amount of sample used for the analysis was 2.5 mg.

Electrochemical Measurements

The electrochemical properties of the samples were measured using 2032-type coin cells. The working electrodes composed of active material, conductive carbon (Super-P), and sodium carboxymethyl cellulose as a binder in a mass ratio of 7:2:1 was prepared using a slurry casting method on a copper foil, which were subsequently dried overnight at 60 °C in a hot air oven. The circular electrodes (ϕ = 14 mm) with a mass loading of ~ 1.0 mg cm−2 (active material mass = 1.54 mg) were punched and transferred inside the glovebox. The Na metal and microporous polypropylene film were used as the counter electrode and separator, respectively. The electrolyte used was 1.0 M NaClO4 in a mixture of ethylene carbonate and dimethyl carbonate with a volume ratio of 1:1 with 5 wt% fluoroethylene carbonates. The coin cell was assembled at room temperature (22–28 °C) in an Ar-filled glove box. The electrochemical performances of the samples were evaluated using CV, charge–discharge testing, and EIS. The voltage window throughout the electrochemical tests was fixed at 0.001–3 V. The CV measurements of the samples were performed at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1. The charge–discharge testing of the samples was conducted at various current densities from 0.1 to 5.0 A g−1. The EIS data of the samples were collected in the frequency range of 100 kHz–0.01 Hz using the signal amplitude of 10 mV.

Results and Discussion

Physical Characterization Results

The spray pyrolysis and subsequent multi-steps prepared three-dimensional (3D) porous microspheres containing ZIF-67-templated NGC and PDA-derived C-coated randomly oriented 1D CoSe2 nanorods. A detailed synthesis mechanism for the unique porous microspheres is systematically illustrated in Scheme 1. The ultrasonic nebulizer generated aqueous droplets uniformly composed of ZIF-67 polyhedrons, polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), and polystyrene (PS) nanobeads (ϕ = 40 nm, Fig. S1) as a Co precursor, carbon source, and pore-forming agent, respectively (Scheme 1-①). Before this, the ZIF-67 polyhedrons were synthesized via a facile solution-based method using 2-mIM and Co salt as starting materials with triethylamine (TEA) as an additive. The TEA amount was adjusted during the synthesis process to optimize the size of ZIF-67 polyhedrons (Fig. S2). ZIF-67 polyhedrons obtained without TEA form a flat-leaf structure due to the two-dimensional (2D) networking between the Co2+ ions and 2-mIM organic linker (Fig. S2a) [27]. However, an increase in the pH owing to the addition of TEA induce the acceleration of the nucleation rate of crystal, resulting in a decrease in the crystal size (Fig. S2b-c) [28]. Therefore, in this study, the ZIF-67 with a size of 70 nm obtained with 6 mL TEA was selected to be composited effectively in the microsphere structure during spray pyrolysis. The droplets generated by the nebulizer were dried and pyrolyzed through a vertical quartz reactor tube maintained at 400 °C, forming ZIF-67/PS/PVP composite microspheres (Scheme 1-②). Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed in an N2 atmosphere to confirm the thermal stability of PVP and PS nanobeads within the microspheres (Fig. S3). The TG curve (Fig. S3a) suggested that PVP remained thermally stable until 400 °C and then decomposed rapidly to form amorphous carbon (AC). Similarly, the TG curve (Fig. S3b) of PS implies complete decomposition to gaseous products at approximately 400 °C. However, it should be noted that the PS nanobeads remain inside the microspheres (as discussed later) during the spray pyrolysis due to the short residence time of droplets inside the quartz reactor (~ 6.3 s). Furthermore, the as-sprayed ZIF-67/PS/PVP composite precursor microspheres were selenized using Se powder at 350 °C for 4 h in the Ar/H2 (vol = 95:5%) atmosphere. During the selenization, ZIF-67 acted as a source for metallic-Co nuclei, which reacted with the H2Se gas formed due to the combination of Ar/H2 with Se to produce CoSe2 crystals nuclei. Due to high surface energy, the CoSe2 nuclei aggregated rapidly and lower down their surface energy via intrinsic crystal orientation [12, 29]. Finally, this directional crystallization resulted in the growth of CoSe2 crystals nuclei into randomly oriented 1D CoSe2 nanorods as building blocks (Scheme 1-③). Moreover, the nitrogen-rich organic ligands in the ZIF-67 polyhedrons converted to NGC well coated surrounding the CoSe2 nanorods. Similarly, the nitrogen-rich species in PVP were first carbonized to AC and subsequently transformed to NGC due to the catalytic effect of the Co nuclei present in ZIF-67 polyhedrons. The presence of an NGC layer acted as a primary conductive path for a rapid electron transfer. Moreover, the complete decomposition of PS nanobeads to gaseous products left numerous pores in the composite, which facilitated the homogeneous formation of non-agglomerated CoSe2 nanorods over the nanostructure through effective penetration of H2Se gas and guaranteed the enough space between nanorods to prevent agglomeration during the selenization process. The detailed explanation for explicit role of PS nanobeads is included in the supporting information file along with the relevant figure (Fig. S4). The entire selenization process produced 3D porous microspheres well supported by the MOF-templated NGC-coated 1D CoSe2 nanorods (denoted as P-CoSe2@NGC NRs) (Scheme 1-③). In the final step, the PDA-derived C layer as a secondary conductive path was coated onto the P-CoSe2@NGC NRs composite microspheres via the facile solution-based coating process. Further, the PDA-derived C-treated composite microspheres were carbonized at 400 °C in the N2 atmosphere for 3 h (Scheme 1-④). The overall synthesis process generated highly conductive 3D porous microspheres containing NGC-coated 1D CoSe2 nanorods surrounded by a highly conductive PDA-derived C layer as a secondary transport path for the fast charge transfer (denoted as P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR). The double-coated C layer increased the integrity of the prepared nanostructure and served as primary and secondary transport pathways for rapid electron transfer that supported the exceptional electrochemical performance such as the ultra-long cycling stability.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Schematic representation of formation mechanism (①–④) of the CoSe2 nanorods@PDA-derived C composite porous microspheres

A comprehensive morphological and crystal structure analysis of the prepared nanostructures was performed after each step of the synthesis to elucidate the formation mechanism. Figure 1 shows the microstructural and phase analysis results of the as-prepared ZIF-67/PVP/PS composite microspheres obtained after spray pyrolysis. The field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) image (Fig. 1a) illustrates the formation of well-dispersed and non-aggregated microspheres with an average diameter of 1.5 µm. In addition, a slightly rough surface of the microsphere was evident (Fig. 1b) due to the ZIF-67 polyhedrons and PS nanobeads within the structure. The TEM image in Fig. 1c firmly supports the presence of ZIF-67 particles (black spots) with polyhedron-type morphology in the microsphere. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of the as-sprayed composite microspheres (Fig. 1d) indicated well-resolved sharp diffraction peaks primarily due to the diffraction peaks of ZIF-67 polyhedrons within the structure, which is also confirmed in Fig. S2d. However, a close examination showed a broad diffraction peak at 2θ = 19°, suggesting that the as-sprayed composites were in amorphous-like phase. The amorphous nature of the composite microspheres was attributed to the thermal decomposition of PVP in the structure to AC. The elemental mapping images in Fig. 1e suggest that Co, C, and N from ZIF-67 polyhedrons and PVP constitutes the microspheres.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

a, b FE-SEM images, c TEM image, d XRD pattern, and e elemental mapping images of the ZIF-67/PS/PVP composite microspheres obtained after spray pyrolysis at 400 °C

The 3D porous microspheres comprising ZIF-67 templated NGC-coated randomly oriented 1D CoSe2 nanorods as building blocks (denoted as P-CoSe2@NGC NRs) were obtained after the selenization process of the as-sprayed ZIF-67/PS/PVP composite microspheres at 350 °C for 4 h under Ar/H2 (vol = 95:5%) gas mixture. Selenium powder was used as a precursor to combine with H2 to form H2Se gas. It should be noted that the pores generated due to the decomposition of homogeneously distributed PS nanobeads in the composite structure regulates the efficient penetration of the H2Se gas and prevents the aggregation of adjacent CoSe2 nanorods. The composite microspheres without PS nanobeads did not form the uniform nanorods-type morphology of CoSe2 due to insufficient H2Se gas penetration inside of the structure (Fig. S5 and the corresponding discussion). Figure 2 illustrates the resulting nanostructure morphology of P-CoSe2@NGC NR after the selenization process. The low-magnification FE-SEM image (Fig. 2a) revealed that the obtained P-CoSe2@NGC NR microspheres maintained their spherical shape (mean diameter of approximately 1.0 µm) with a uniform distribution of randomly oriented rod-shaped nanocrystals throughout the external and internal structures (Fig. 2b, c). Moreover, the heating process resulted in the complete thermal decomposition of various organic ligands constituting the ZIF-67 polyhedrons, PS nanobeads, and PVP, thereby shrinking the microspheres. The TEM image (Fig. 2d, e) demonstrated the formation of spherical microspheres with numerous pores in the structure. The randomly oriented 1D nanorods that supported uniformly throughout the internal and external structure was also evident (Fig. 2e). In addition, the TEM image (Fig. 2f) showed that the rod-shaped nanocrystals (length = 32 nm and diameter = 7 nm) constituting the microsphere were surrounded by an NGC layer with a thickness of approximately 1.1 nm and well-resolved lattice fringe distance of 0.34 nm, which corresponds to the (002) plane of the GC. Several nitrogen-rich organic units in PVP and ZIF-67 polyhedrons acted as the nitrogen-source during the heat treatment process. Similarly, the AC produced from the carbonization of PVP converted to NGC due to the catalytic nature of the metallic-Co nuclei present in the ZIF-67. The NGC layer surrounding the 1D CoSe2 nanorods enhanced the overall electrical conductivity of the microspheres due to the high electronegativity of the nitrogen atom compared to that of the carbon atom [8, 30]. Moreover, the NGC-coated layer acted as a primary transport pathway for the rapid electron transfer, thereby supporting the rapid redox processes during the electrochemical process. The high-resolution TEM (HR-TEM) image in Fig. 2g suggests a bi-phasic crystal structure with well-resolved lattice fringes of separation of 0.31 and 0.24 nm, corresponding to the (011) and (211) crystal planes of the orthorhombic CoSe2 (o-CoSe2) and cubic CoSe2 (c-CoSe2), respectively. The selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern (Fig. 2h) firmly supported the above results with well-resolved diffraction rings corresponding to the bi-phasic crystal lattices of o-CoSe2 and c-CoSe2, along with the NGC phases. The XRD pattern in Fig. 2i also indicates sharp peaks primarily associated with the mixed phases of nanocrystalline o-CoSe2 and c-CoSe2 crystal structures and is consistent with the HR-TEM/SAED results. Notably, the diffraction peaks associated with o-CoSe2 were more prominent than the diffraction peaks associated with c-CoSe2. Additionally, the mean crystallite size of CoSe2 in P-CoSe2@NGC NR microspheres was 16 nm, which was calculated using the Scherrer formula by considering the highly intense (111) diffraction peak in the XRD pattern. The elemental mapping results in Fig. 2j show the homogeneous distribution of Co, Se, C, and N elements in the P-CoSe2@NGC NR microspheres, indicating the uniform composition of numerous CoSe2 nanorods with NGC. Moreover, ICP-OES analysis was carried out to quantitatively analyze the ratio of Co and Se elements in the P-CoSe2@NGC NR microspheres. The contents of Co and Se elements were 20.4 and 57.6 wt%, respectively, which corresponds to a molar ratio of 1: 2.1 (Table S1).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Morphologies, SAED, XRD patterns, and elemental mapping images of the P-CoSe2 @NGC NR microspheres by spray pyrolysis and subsequent selenization at 350 °C: a, b FE-SEM images, c fractured sphere’s FE-SEM image, d-f TEM images, g HR-TEM image, h SAED pattern, i XRD pattern, and j elemental mapping images

To achieve exceptional Na-ion storage performance of the cell with ultra-long cycling stability, the PDA-derived N-doped C was coated onto the P-CoSe2@NGC NRs precursor microspheres by a facile solution-based coating method and subsequent carbonization at 400 °C for 3 h in the N2 atmosphere. Figure 3 shows the resulting nanostructure, PDA-derived C-coated composite microspheres comprising ZIF-67 templated NGC-coated 1D CoSe2 nanorods (P-CoSe2@PDA-C NRs). The low-magnification FE-SEM image (Fig. 3a) shows the morphology of the P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR that is intact with an average diameter of approximately 1.0 μm. Further, the high-magnification FE-SEM images in Fig. 3b, c suggests that the entire coating and subsequent heat treatment process has marginal effect on the external and internal surfaces of the composite microspheres. In particular, the randomly oriented 1D CoSe2 nanorods becomes slightly shorter and broader. Additionally, the TEM images (Fig. 3d, e) confirmed the FE-SEM results with 3D porous microspheres supported by 1D CoSe2 nanorods and numerous pores throughout the structure as dark and bright regions, respectively. The high-magnification TEM image in Fig. 3f indicates that the coating process forms a uniform carbon layer with a coating thickness of ca. 3.4 nm surrounding the 1D rod-shaped nanocrystals. Furthermore, the HR-TEM image (Fig. 3g) suggested that the coating process did not alter the bi-phasic crystal structure of the composite microspheres with well-resolved lattice fringes of separation of 0.37 and 0.24 nm, corresponding to the (110) and (211) crystal planes of the o-CoSe2 and c-CoSe2 phases, respectively. The SAED pattern (Fig. 3h) also demonstrated well-resolved diffraction rings corresponding to the o-CoSe2, c-CoSe2, and NGC phases. These results further confirmed that the CoSe2 crystal phase was maintained even after the additional heat treatment, and a thin carbon coating layer from the PDA-derived carbon was uniformly coated along with the NGC. In particular, the PDA-derived C coating layer acted as secondary transport pathways to further support the fast electron transfer and primary conductive pathways formed by NGC. This dual carbon coating strategy envisages exceptional electrochemical properties due to the rapid redox process in addition to increasing the mechanical integrity of the prepared composite nanostructure. Furthermore, the XRD pattern in Fig. 3i is in good accordance with the above results, indicating the evident coexistence of sharp diffraction peaks mainly related to the nanocrystalline o-CoSe2 crystal structure with a small fraction of c-CoSe2 crystal phase. The average crystallite size of CoSe2 in P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR microspheres was 15 nm, which was calculated using the Scherrer formula from the highly intense (111) peak in the XRD pattern. The average size of the CoSe2 nanocrystals was similar even after the additional heat treatment, suggesting adequate suppression of the crystal growth by the carbon layer surrounding the CoSe2 crystallites. The elemental mapping results in Fig. 3j show the homogeneous dispersion of Co, Se, C, and N elements in the P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR composite microspheres. Overall, the above results suggest that the PDA-derived C and NGC were successfully coated onto the 1D CoSe2 nanorods, producing synergetic effects to support the kinetically favored redox processes and further enhance the overall electrochemical performance.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Morphologies, SAED, XRD patterns, and elemental mapping images of the P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR microspheres: a, b FE-SEM images, c fractured sphere’s FE-SEM image, df TEM images, g HR-TEM image, h SAED pattern, i XRD pattern, and j elemental mapping images

The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) further determined the chemical and bonding environment of various elements in the P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR microspheres. Figure 4a shows the XPS survey spectrum, consisting of photoelectronic signals corresponding to Co 2p, Se 3d, C 1s, and N 1s [12, 31]. The Co 2p spectrum in Fig. 4b demonstrates well-defined peaks corresponding to the two spin-orbital doublets, Co 2p3/2 and Co 2p1/2, along with the two shake-up satellite peaks for Co (labeled “Sat”). The deconvoluted spectrum exhibited well-resolved peaks at binding energies of 780.9 eV (Co 2p3/2) and 796.9 eV (Co 2p1/2) assigned to the Co2+ species in the CoSe2 [12, 31]. The additional peaks at 778.5 eV and 793.5 eV for Co 2p3/2 and Co 2p1/2, respectively, were attributed to the partial surface oxidation of the composites in air [12]. Furthermore, the two shake-up satellite peaks for Co 2p signal corresponded to the antibonding orbitals between Se and Co atoms [12]. The deconvoluted Se 3d spectrum (Fig. 4c) demonstrated two well-fitted peaks for Se 3d5/2 (54.9 eV) and Se 3d3/2 (55.9 eV), which were attributed to the interaction of Se with metallic-Co in CoSe2 [32, 33]. Moreover, the peaks in the range of 58–60 eV corresponded to Co 3p on the surface of the composites [12]. The additional peak at 60.7 eV was attributed to the Se-O bond formed due to the surface oxidation of Se under atmospheric conditions [12]. The C 1s spectrum in Fig. 4d is deconvoluted into five distinct peaks at binding energies of 284.8, 285.6, 286.9, 288.2, and 289.4 eV, corresponding to the C–C(sp2), C–C/C–N, C–O, C=O, and C–O=O species, respectively [12, 30, 34]. The highest intensity of the C = C peak indicated the graphitic carbon formation during the selenization process [35]. In addition, the presence of C–N/C–C peaks suggested the presence of an N-doped C [8, 12]. The N doping improved the overall electrical conductivity due to the high electronegativity of the nitrogen atom compared to the carbon atom. The high-resolution N 1s spectrum in Fig. 4e showed four types of N species: pyridinic N (398.7 eV), pyrrolic N (400.3 eV), graphitic N (401.3 eV), and oxidized N (404.5 eV), confirming the N doping in the coated carbon [30, 36]. Further, Raman spectroscopy was employed to analyze the crystalline properties of the carbonaceous products in P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR microspheres (Fig. 4f). The established signatures of D- and G-bands were identified at 1344 and 1593 cm−1, respectively [31, 37, 38]. Moreover, the relative intensity ratio of the D- and G-band (ID/IG) measured the crystallinity of the carbonaceous material [37, 38]. The ID/IG value of 0.65 for P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR microspheres suggested the highly crystalline nature of the carbon. However, the non-coated P-CoSe2@NGC NR microsphere exhibited a lower ID/IG value of 0.46 (Fig. S6), suggesting that the introduction of the PDA-derived C layer increased the non-sp3 carbon content or disordered carbon in the nanostructure. The increase in the disorderedness was attributed to the molecular structure of PDA (Fig. S7). The result indicated that the carbon derived from PDA had abundant N element that introduced defects, thereby increasing the D-band and decreasing the crystallinity. These observations are in good agreement with the elemental analysis (EA) results obtained for the composite microspheres before and after the PDA treatment (Table S2). The N wt% for P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR and P-CoSe2@NGC NR microspheres were approximately 4 and 2 wt%, respectively, which firmly supported the above discussion. Consequently, an arrangement of the dual carbon coating composed of NGC and N-doped carbon resulted in an overall high electrical conductivity for P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR microspheres. Moreover, the Raman spectrum demonstrated well-resolved peaks at 192 and 676 cm−1, corresponding to the Co–Se bonds [31, 39]. Furthermore, the slightly lower intensity peaks assigned to the trace amounts of Co–O bonds generated by surface oxidation were observed at 471, 512, and 608 cm−1 [31, 40]. The N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR microspheres are obtained to validate the Raman results, as shown in Fig. S8a. The isotherms suggested a high volume of gas adsorption, which was primarily attributed to the micropores and mesopores present throughout the structure that subsequently resulted in a high Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area of 164 m2 g−1. The surface defects present in the PDA-derived carbon-coating layer formed the micropores and mainly induced by the N-species present in the structure. The mesopores were attributed to the thermal decomposition of the PS nanobeads (40 nm). Furthermore, the ZIF-67-derived carbon skeleton contributed to the sample mesoporosity. In contrast, the P-CoSe2@NGC NR microspheres before the PDA treatment showed a relatively low BET surface area of 34 m2 g−1 (Fig. S8b) mainly due to the absence of numerous surface defects, which was evident from the low volume of the adsorbed N2. These results are consistent with the Barrett-Joyner-Halenda pore-size distribution curve, indicating a slightly low average pore diameter (approximately 30 nm) for P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR (Fig. S8c) compared to that of the P-CoSe2@NGC NR (approximately 40 nm, Fig. S8d). The narrow peak at ca. 4 nm as attributed to the tensile-strength effect [41]. Furthermore, the carbon content in the P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR microspheres is quantified using the TG curve in Fig. S8e. The result suggested a sharp weight loss from 360 °C due to the concomitant conversion of CoSe2 to CoSeO4 and SeO2 and then to Co3O4, along with the decomposition of AC and carbon-coated layers derived from PDA and NGC to gaseous products [42]. Therefore, the estimated C content in the P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR microspheres using TG analysis was 33 wt% and consistent with the EA results (Table S2). Similarly, the C content in P-CoSe2@NGC NR microspheres obtained through the TG (Fig. S8f) and EA results was ca. 16 wt%. Overall, the above discussion suggests that the coating process forms a highly conductive coating layer that facilitates the enhanced diffusion of charge species along with the insertion of more Na-ions owing to the numerous defects induced by the N-species in the PDA-derived C [43, 44]. These synergetic effects consequently envisage superior electrochemical performance such as long-term cycling stability.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

XPS survey spectrum, core-level XPS spectra, and Raman spectrum: a XPS survey spectrum, b Co 2p, c Se 3d, d C 1s, e N 1s, and f Raman spectrum of the P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR microspheres

Bare CoSe2 hollow microspheres without PVP and PS nanobeads were prepared as one of the comparison samples to prove the structural advantages of the P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR microspheres. The morphology and crystal structure of the precursor powder obtained immediately after spray pyrolysis in an air atmosphere are shown in Fig. S9. The FE-SEM micrographs (Fig. S9a) exhibited the formation of irregular-sized hollow microspheres primarily due to the Ostwald ripening. The surface of the hollow microsphere (Fig. S9b, c) demonstrated highly agglomerated and diffused grains, which was evident due to the absence of carbon for restricting the crystal growth. The XRD pattern (Fig. S9d) indicated a distinct nanocrystalline Co3O4 phase without impurity. The obtained bare Co3O4 hollow microspheres further underwent selenization at 400 °C to form pristine CoSe2 hollow microspheres (Fig. S10). The FE-SEM micrograph in Fig. S10a reveals a spherical-shaped morphology with an average diameter of 1.0 μm. The surface of hollow microspheres comprises closely packed large-sized grains, as evident from Fig. S10b, c. These grains were considered CoSe2 crystals that were formed during the selenization process, which became uncontrollable due to the absence of carbon for restricting the crystal growth. The TGA curve in Fig. S10d indicates negligible traces of carbon in the bare CoSe2 hollow microspheres. The XRD pattern (Fig. S10e) pattern further proved the total phase conversion from the Co3O4 crystal phase to the c-CoSe2 phase during the selenization process. Additionally, a large crystallite size of ca. 41.3 nm for pristine CoSe2 hollow microspheres using the Scherrer formula further validated the FE-SEM results. Moreover, the low BET surface area (0.86 m2 g−1; Fig. S10f) and the pore size distribution curve (Fig. S10g) suggests the complete absence of the pores for the bare CoSe2 hollow microspheres.

Electrochemical Results

The as-prepared well-designed P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR microspheres were further subjected to the Na-ion storage performance and compared with P-CoSe2@NGC NR and bare CoSe2 hollow microspheres to validate the structural advantages, as shown in Fig. 5. A carbonate-based electrolyte was used in this study although it could react with an anionic group, leading to poor cycle stability of the cell in NIBs. Nevertheless, the carbonate-based electrolyte system has low cost, simple preparation, low toxicity, environmental friendliness, and operates for a wide window range (0.001–3.0 V). The system exhibits a high-capacity utilization compared to the ether-based system, thereby making NIBs more profitable commercially [45, 46]. The cyclic voltammetry (CV) results for P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR microspheres over the first five cycles at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1 in the voltage window of 0.001–3.0 V are presented in Fig. 5a. In the first cathodic scan, the weak and broad region located at 1.16 V corresponded to the formation of NaxCoSe2 as an intermediate with the insertion of Na-ions into CoSe2 [47, 48]. Additionally, the sharp and weak broad peak at 0.79 and 0.38 V indicated the conversion reaction of NaxCoSe2 to metallic-Co and Na2Se accompanied by the decomposition of the electrolyte and formation of a stable solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) film [4749]. Furthermore, the sharp cathodic peak centered at 0.001 V suggested the insertion of Na-ions into the carbon [50, 51]. During the first anodic scan, peaks at 0.10, 1.84, and 1.95 V suggest desodiation from carbon, formation of NaxCoSe2 intermediate from metallic-Co and Na2Se, and CoSe2 and Na-ion formation from NaxCoSe2 intermediates, respectively [13, 31, 52]. However, the slightly different redox processes from the second cycle were observed due to the formation of ultrafine CoSe2 crystals, which is a well-known phenomenon in transition metal chalcogenide anode materials [7, 5355]. For instance, three reduction peaks at 1.35, 1.09, and 0.64 V were surfaced, while the two oxidation peaks previously located at 1.84 and 1.95 V merged into a single peak centered at 1.91 V [47, 48]. In contrast, the peak initially centered at 0.10 V remained intact. The first reduction peak at 1.35 V corresponded to the intercalation of Na-ions, whereas the two reduction peaks at 1.09 and 0.64 V represented the two conversion reactions that formed CoSe/Na2Se and Co/Na2Se, respectively [4749]. The single oxidation peak centered at 1.91 V corresponds to the formation of CoSe2 from metallic-Co and Na2Se as the reaction kinetics is improved by the formation of ultrafine crystal that resulted in instant formation and desodiation of the NaxCoSe2 intermediate form [47, 56, 57]. From the second scan, the exactly overlapping CV profiles indicated highly reversible redox reactions inside the cell. The CV curves of P-CoSe2@NGC NR in Fig. S11a show similar CV characteristics with few exceptions, mainly during the first cathodic process. For instance, the cell exhibited a high-intensity cathodic peak at a lower voltage side (0.50 V), which was accompanied by a shoulder peak at 0.72 V, although the involved redox reactions were similar to those observed in the P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR microspheres. A slight shift in the voltage could be attributed to the difference in the conductivity of the two samples that consequently affected the involved redox processes. However, with the second CV cycle, the cathodic/anodic profiles analogous to P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR microspheres implied similarly involved reaction kinetics. In contrast, the bare CoSe2 hollow microspheres in Fig. S11b demonstrate high-intensity cathodic/anodic peaks primarily caused by the crystalline nature of the prepared sample. In addition, the low voltage hysteresis between the cathodic and anodic scan suggested that the kinetics involved were mainly diffusion-controlled compared to P-CoSe2@PDA-C and P-CoSe2@NGC NR, where the redox processes were primarily surface or capacitive-controlled. The complete reaction mechanism involved during the discharge and charge processes is summarized below:

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Electrochemical properties of the P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR, P-CoSe2 @NGC NR, bare CoSe2 hollow microspheres: a CV curves of the P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR microspheres, b initial discharge/charge curves at a constant current density of 0.5 A g−1, c cycle performances at current density of 0.5 A g−1, d cycle performances at current density of 2.0 A g−1, and e rate performances

For the discharge process:

CoSe2+xNa++xe-NaxCoSe2 1
NaxCoSe2+2-xNa++(2-x)e-CoSe+Na2Se 2
CoSe+2Na++2e-Co+Na2Se 3

For the charge process:

Co+2Na2SeCoSe2+4Na++4e- 4

The assembled cells were subjected to the galvanostatic discharge/charge process for structural merits evaluation. The initial discharge/charge profiles of the as-prepared composite microspheres at a current density of 0.5 A g−1 are shown in Fig. 5b. The obtained potential profiles were consistent with the CV results, with well-resolved discharge and charge plateaus at 0.83 and 1.98 V, respectively. The bare CoSe2 hollow microspheres exhibited an indistinct discharge/charge profile due to the extreme polarization (the voltage difference, that is, ΔV between the charge and discharge voltage profile, which primarily arose due to the slow diffusion of the charge species during the redox processes) at a high current density of 0.5 A g−1. Therefore, the initial discharge/charge profile of the bare CoSe2 hollow microspheres was also obtained at a low current density of 0.1 A g−1 to obtain more accurate discharge and charge plateaus (Fig. S12). Furthermore, the initial discharge capacities of the P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR, P-CoSe2@NGC NR, and bare CoSe2 hollow microspheres were 673, 640, and 197 mAh g−1, respectively, with a corresponding Coulombic efficiency (CE) value of 48%, 52%, and 77%, respectively. The slightly lower CE for P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR was attributed to the higher carbon content than other structures (Table S2), resulting high initial irreversible capacity loss. The magnified discharge/charge profiles for all composite microspheres in Fig. S13 suggests that the P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR exhibits the lowest polarization potential (ΔV = 1.14 V) than P-CoSe2@NGC NR (ΔV = 1.27 V) and bare CoSe2 hollow microspheres (ΔV = 1.98 V), implying the fast redox kinetics primarily due to the improved electronic and ionic conductivity of P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR. The synergetic effects of the dual coating with NGC and PDA-derived C coating as primary transport and secondary conductive pathways, respectively, improved the overall electronic/ionic conductivities and ensured a rapid charge transfer during the redox processes. Moreover, the numerous pores confirmed the superior electrolyte penetration that reduced the effective charge transport lengths by allowing fast diffusion of the charge species in the P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR microspheres.

The prepared composite microspheres are tested for their cycling stability performance at current densities of 0.5 and 2.0 A g−1, as shown in Fig. 5c, d. The as-prepared P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR demonstrated superior cycling stability performance over 1000 cycles at 0.5 A g−1 than the P-CoSe2@NGC NR and bare CoSe2 hollow microspheres (Fig. 5c). The P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR exhibited an initial discharge capacity of 673 mAh g−1 with a CE of 48% compared to 640 and 197 mAh g−1 of P-CoSe2@NGC NR and bare CoSe2 hollow microspheres, respectively. In addition, the cells featuring P-CoSe2@NGC NR and bare CoSe2 hollow microspheres exhibited an initial CE of 52% and 77%, respectively. During the few initial cycles, P-CoSe2@PDA-C NRs demonstrated an increase in the capacity mainly due to the formation of polymeric gel-like films on the microsphere surface, as reported previously [35, 58, 59]. However, as cycling proceeded, the P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR had much stable discharge capacities even after prolonged cycling than the P-CoSe2@NGC NR and bare CoSe2 hollow microspheres, which exhibited constant capacity fading. For instance, after 1000 consecutive discharge/charge cycles, the P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR had a discharge capacity of 291 mAh g−1 with an average capacity decay rate of only 0.017% (considered after the second cycle). In contrast, the P-CoSe2@NGC NR and bare CoSe2 hollow microspheres had a discharge capacity of 90 and 26 mAh g−1, respectively, at the end of the 1000th cycle, with much higher average capacity decay rate of 0.077% and 0.085%. Similar capacity trends are observed for the prepared composite microspheres when cycled at a higher current density of 2.0 A g−1 for ultra-long cycling life (5000 cycles) in Fig. 5d. As observed, the P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR microspheres exhibits initial capacity decrease till 150 cycles which was mainly induced by the transformation of the crystalline structure to a stable amorphous-like structure during the cycling [60, 61]. The P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR composite had a highly stable discharge capacity of 142 mAh g−1 at the end of the 5000th cycle (average capacity decay rate of 0.011% only). However, the P-CoSe2@NGC NR and bare CoSe2 hollow microspheres exhibited poor capacity retention during the initial 70 cycles. In particular, the bare CoSe2 exhibits high initial CE (~ 74%) compared to the P-CoSe2@NGC NR (~ 35%), which was due to its high crystalline nature with almost no carbon content. As a result, a sharp capacity decrease of P-CoSe2@NGC NR compared to bare CoSe2 was observed during the initial several cycling. However, the non-porous and non-conductive structure of bare CoSe2 consequently resulted in poor capacity retention and inferior cycling performance. These observations are more pronounced from the fact that the capacity retention reduced to 31 mAh g−1 at the end of the 5000th cycle for the P-CoSe2@NGC NR composite microspheres, whereas the cell featuring bare CoSe2 hollow microspheres stopped working after 2900 cycles. The overwhelming cycling stability of the P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR composite microspheres could be attributed to the following structural benefits: (1) The porous structure accommodated large volumetric deformations during the extended cycling, allowing smooth Na-ion diffusion due to the enhanced electrode wetting or electrolyte penetration; (2) The PDA-derived conductive C and NGC coated layer surrounding the active material facilitated the rapid charge transfer during the redox processes by enhancing the overall electrical conductivity. Similarly, the relatively better cycling performance of P-CoSe2@NGC NR than the bare CoSe2 hollow microspheres was attributed to the porous structure and thin NGC-coated layer surrounding the nanorods. However, P-CoSe2@NGC NR could not withstand the extreme stress caused by the large volume change of the active material during the long-term cycling, and eventually showed a steady decrease in capacity. In contrast, the bare CoSe2 hollow microspheres with a large crystallite size and no carbon layer did not accommodate the large volume change during the repeated Na-ion insertion process that consequently resulted in structural destruction and drastic capacity fading. Furthermore, the cycling performance using high-loading electrodes (1.5 mg cm−2) was also evaluated for P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR microspheres at a current density of 0.5 A g−1, as shown in Fig. S14. As observed, even with high loading electrodes, the sample display satisfactory cycling results. For instance, at 1.5 mg cm−2 loading, the discharge capacities were ca. 306 mAh g−1, respectively, at the end of 100th cycle, suggesting its practical applicability.

Further, to analyze the effect of PDA-derived carbon content and coating on the performance of P-CoSe2@PDA-C NRs, we performed the cycling stability tests (0.5 A g−1) for PDA amounts of 5 mg and 50 mg during the coating process. Prior to this, the coated samples with different PDA amounts (5, 10, and 50 mg) were analyzed. The HR-TEM images in Fig. S15a, c clearly indicates that with increase in PDA amount, the coating thickness increases concomitantly. For instance, with 5 mg PDA amount, the carbon layer thickness was 1.6 nm which increases to 8.1 nm when PDA amount was increased to 50 mg. The cycling performance results for different coating thickness samples are shown in Fig. S15d. The P-CoSe2@PDA-C NRs treated with a low PDA amount (5 mg) initially had the highest discharge capacity up to 50 cycles, which then continuously decreased and became unstable at high cycle numbers. This observation was attributed to the thin carbon coating layer that did not withstand the severe volume variation during the prolonged cycling. Similarly, the P-CoSe2@PDA-C NRs treated with a high PDA amount (50 mg) demonstrated stable cycling performance. However, the discharge capacity values were the lowest due to the high carbon content and coating that increased the effective diffusion lengths. These results firmly suggest that an optimized amount of PDA for carbon coating is crucial parameter for obtaining ultra-long-cycle stability performance and high reversible capacity.

The rate performance at various current densities ranging from 0.1 to 5.0 A g−1 was evaluated to examine the rate-capability tests of the prepared composite microspheres (Fig. 5e). The discharge capacities of P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR microspheres at current densities of 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 0.7, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, and 5.0 A g−1 were 380, 354, 303, 284, 261, 234, 212, 183, 156 and 133 mAh g−1, respectively, at the end of 10th cycle. A discharge capacity of 367 mAh g−1 (approximately 97% of the initial capacity) was recovered when the current density was reversed to 0.1 A g−1, suggesting excellent capacity retention and rate capability of P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR. In contrast, the discharge capacities of the P-CoSe2@NGC NR and bare CoSe2 hollow microspheres were 404/463, 367/358, 306/247, 277/169, 248/104, 215/52, 185/24, 141/9, 103/3, and 75/2 mAh g−1, respectively, at the identical current densities. The P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR microspheres had relatively low capacities due to the high carbon content for current densities below 0.5 A g−1 compared to other composites. However, the high-rate performance of the P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR validated its structural superiority as an advanced anode for NIBs compared with the P-CoSe2@NGC NR and bare CoSe2 hollow microspheres. The numerous porous channels in the nanostructure allow efficient electrode wetting, which promoted the fast redox processes during the electrochemical testing. Additionally, the synergetic effects of the NGC and PDA-derived C-coated conductive carbon enhanced the overall electrical conductivity of the electrode, which facilitated the rapid transfer of charge species by improving the electrical contact between the active sites of the CoSe2 nanorods constituting the P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR microspheres and the electrode. Table S3 compares the obtained electrochemical performance of the P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR microspheres in the present study with other reported cobalt-selenide nanostructures with various morphologies under the carbonate-based electrolyte system. From these observations, the P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR microspheres exhibited superior ultra-long cycling performance, suggesting long-lived advanced anodes for efficient Na-ion storage.

Furthermore, the capacity contribution of the carbon in the total capacity of P-CoSe2@NGC NR microspheres was quantified. The composite powders were soaked in highly concentrated (6.0 M) hydrochloric acid for 3 days to etch the Co and Se species, followed by repeated washing with distilled water and subsequent overnight drying at 100 °C in air. The physical and electrochemical results of the pure carbon microspheres without CoSe2 obtained after etching are summarized in Fig. S16. The FE-SEM micrographs (Fig. S16a) showed that the sample morphology was intact even after the etching process. Moreover, the CV curves obtained at 0.1 mV s−1 (Fig. S16b) confirmed the redox processes for carbon only, with a single sharp cathodic peak at 0.001 V corresponding to the Na intercalation in the carbon [50, 51]. The initial charge/discharge (Fig. S16c) and cycling performance (Fig. S16d) obtained at 0.5 A g−1 further supported these results. The cycling performance suggested that the pure carbon had a low discharge capacity of approximately 52 mAh g−1 at the 100th cycle, approximately 15% of the P-CoSe2@NGC NR microspheres at the identical current density and cycle number (Fig. 5c). Similarly, the pure carbon had a discharge capacity of 22 mAh g−1 after the 100th cycle at a current density of 2.0 A g−1 (Fig. S16e), indicating a capacity contribution of ca.11%. Therefore, the above results confirm that carbon only acts as a conductive scaffold for the rapid charge transfer during the electrochemical process.

To better understand the electrochemical kinetics inside the cell, the CV curves are plotted for P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR microspheres in the voltage window of 0.001–3.0 V at different scan rates, as shown in Fig. 6a. Subsequently, the graphs were plotted between the peak current (i) during reduction/oxidation and the scan rates (v) according to the following power law relation to differentiate between the capacitive- and diffusion-controlled processes in the CV curves [62, 63]:

i=avb 5
logi=blogv+loga 6

here, variables a and b determined whether the process was diffusion- or capacitive-controlled. The redox process was capacitive when b approached 1.0 and diffusion-controlled when b approached 0.5 [62, 63]. The b values were determined using the slope of the log(i) vs. log(v) plots for different cathodic and anodic peaks. The calculated b values at different redox peaks for the samples are shown in Figs. 6b and S14. The b-values for the five different redox peaks in the P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR microspheres were 0.73, 0.93, 0.88, 0.90, and 0.80, indicating a capacitive-dominant process. In contrast, the reaction dynamics for the P-CoSe2@NGC NR microspheres shown in Fig. S17a, b demonstrate lower b values, suggesting a marginally lower capacitive-controlled redox process. Similarly, in Fig. S17c, d, the bare CoSe2 hollow microspheres exhibit the lowest b values among the samples, indicating that a capacitive process continued to govern the redox processes only to a lower extent. Generally, the capacitive effect of the electrode material is closely related to the reaction kinetics, implying that the transport kinetics is enhanced when the percentage of the capacitive-controlled process is higher. Therefore, the total stored charge in the electrode material was separated into capacitive- and diffusion-controlled processes for the quantitative analysis of the capacity contribution to the current response using the following equation [64, 65]:

i=k1v+k2v1/2 7

where k1v and k2v1/2 are the capacitive and diffusion contributions, respectively, while k1 and k2 are the constants obtained from the slope and intercept of the i(V)/v1/2 versus v1/2 plot, respectively [64, 65]. As shown in Fig. 6c, the capacitive contribution factor (k1v) for the P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR microspheres, highlighted by the red region, is 88% at a scan rate of 2.0 mV s−1. A relatively high capacitive contribution was observed for the P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR microspheres at all scan rates, excluding 2.0 mV s−1 (Fig. 6d). In contrast, the surface-controlled reaction contributions in P-CoSe2@NGC NRs (Fig. 6e, f) had a lower percentage of the capacitive process even at a high scan rate of 2.0 mV s−1 (76%). Similarly, the bare CoSe2 hollow microspheres in Fig. 6g, h demonstrates similar results with low capacitive processes at high and low scan rates. These results confirm the kinetically favored rapid Na-ion transport for P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR microspheres owing to the better electrolyte percolation through the porous structure, efficient mitigation of volume variation during cycling, and synergetic effects of two highly conductive carbon-coated layers that facilitate rapid charge transfer.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Electrochemical reaction dynamics analysis of ad the P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR, e, f P-CoSe2 @NGC NR, and g, h bare CoSe2 hollow microspheres: a CV curves obtained at various scan rates, b current response (i) versus scan rate (n) at each redox peak, c, e, g CV curves with the capacitive fraction shown by the red region at a scan rate of 2.0 mV s−1, and d, f, h bar charts showing the percentage of the capacitive contribution at different scan rates

EIS measurements were carried out using the deconvolution Randle-type equivalent-circuit model of the cell shown in Fig. S18, and the fitted values of the three prepared structures are summarized in Table S4. The Nyquist plots for the fresh cells (Fig. 7a) had marginally different electrolyte resistance (Re) values (30–35 Ω), indicating slightly different electrode–electrolyte interface reactions. Furthermore, the charge transfer resistance (Rct) values of the P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR, P-CoSe2@NGC NR, and bare CoSe2 hollow microspheres were 362, 755, and 1463 Ω, respectively (Fig. 7a). The large crystallite size of the bare CoSe2 hollow microspheres results in an ultra-high Rct value of the cell. However, a substantial decrease in the Rct (P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR: 81 Ω, P-CoSe2@NGC NR: 88 Ω, and bare CoSe2 hollow microspheres: 83 Ω) was observed for all samples after five cycles due to the formation of ultrafine CoSe2 nanocrystals in the structure after the first cycle (Fig. 7b) [6668]. After the 300th cycle (Fig. 7c), the P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR had the lowest Rct value of 76 Ω than the P-CoSe2@NGC NR (152 Ω) and bare CoSe2 hollow microspheres (168 Ω), suggesting fast redox kinetics and superior electrode integrity of the P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR microspheres. To further analyze the Nyquist plots, Zre as a function of ω−1/2 (ω = 2πf is the angular frequency) is plotted for the low-frequency region, as shown in Fig. 7d. The less steep slope at low frequencies for the P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR microspheres indicated higher Na-ion diffusivity in the structure than the P-CoSe2@NGC NR and bare CoSe2 hollow microspheres, thus confirming the electrochemical results. Furthermore, the Na-ion diffusion coefficient (DNa+) values were calculated from Fig. 7d using the following equation [35, 69, 70]:

DNa+=0.5R2T2A2F4C2σW2 8

where DNa+ is the Na-ion diffusion coefficient, R is the gas constant, T is the temperature, A is the electrode area, C is the Na-ion concentration, F is the Faraday constant, and σW is the Warburg impedance factor. The DNa+ values for the P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR, P-CoSe2@NGC NR, and bare CoSe2 hollow microspheres were 4.61 × 10−14, 0.79 × 10−15, and 1.07 × 10−15 cm2 s−1, respectively. Thus, the DNa+ value of the P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR microspheres was one order of magnitude higher than that of the other microsphere, indicating much faster Na-ion diffusion and thereby superior redox reaction kinetics during the charge–discharge process. The higher diffusion values for P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR microspheres confirmed the structural robustness of the prepared sample that could withstand the ultra-long cycling life and maintain the mechanical integrity of the electrode. Besides, the marginally better DNa+ for bare CoSe2 compared to the P-CoSe2@NGC NR sample was due to its high crystalline nature. However, the DNa+ coefficient was also calculated using the EIS data at the end of 300th cycle. The diffusion coefficient values for the P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR, P-CoSe2@NGC NR, and bare CoSe2 hollow microspheres comes out to be 4.72 × 10−14, 2.46 × 10−14, and 9.78 × 10−15 cm2 s−1 (Fig. S19). Therefore, the DNa+ values are one order higher for P-CoSe2@NGC NR compared to the bare CoSe2 hollow microspheres. This result again confirms that the inferior cycling performance of bare CoSe2 is mainly due to poor Na-ion diffusion. The morphologies of all the cycled electrodes obtained after the 300th cycle (0.5 A g−1) are shown in Fig. 7e–g to confirm the structural integrity of the P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR. The FE-SEM images of the P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR (Fig. 7e) after cycling indicated that the microspheres maintained a spherical morphology, implying the high structural integrity of the prepared microspheres. Furthermore, the formation of SEI film on the surface was confirmed through XPS analysis of P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR microspheres after 300th cycling (Fig. S20 and the corresponding discussion). The spherical morphology of the P-CoSe2@NGC NR microspheres (Fig. 7f) began to collapse owing to their inability to accommodate the volume change fully during the prolonged cycling. Similarly, the bare CoSe2 hollow microspheres (Fig. 7g) revealed the complete degradation of the structure into a highly aggregated powder-type morphology due to their non-porous structure. These results suggest that the structural advantages in P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR microspheres driven by a highly porous structure and the synergetic effects of NGC and PDA-derived C-coated layer provide exceptional mechanical integrity to the electrode that subsequently resulted in overwhelming electrochemical performance. Overall, we believe that the synthesis of porous microspheres with two kinds of carbon-coated layers as a highly stable and conductive scaffold resulted in high structural stability that can tolerate the severe volume variation during the repeated cycling and provide conductive pathways for faster Na-ion transfer, leading to superior electrochemical performance.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

ad Nyquist impedance plots and eg FE-SEM images of the P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR, P-CoSe2 @NGC NR, bare CoSe2 hollow microspheres obtained after 300th cycles at 0.5 A g−1: a before cycling, b after 5th cycle, c after 300th cycle, d relationships between the real part of the impedance (Zre) and ω−1/2 of the samples before cycling, e the P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR, f P-CoSe2 @NGC NR, and g bare CoSe2 hollow microspheres

Conclusion

In summary, we developed highly conductive and porous 3D microspheres uniformly deposited by the MOF-templated NGC and PDA-derived C-coated 1D CoSe2 nanorods (P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR microspheres) as building blocks using scalable spray-drying process, followed by the post-heat-treatment and facile coating techniques. The porous structure derived by the PS nanobead suspension provides enormous space to channel the extreme volume variations and efficient electrolyte filtration that guarantees fast diffusion of charge species. Moreover, the synergetic effects of dual carbon coating arrangement, NGC and PDA-derived C-coating, provide numerous conductive primary and secondary transport pathways that allow the rapid transfer of charge species to support the fast redox processes. Benefitted from the structural merits, the P-CoSe2@PDA-C NR microspheres exhibit exceptional ultra-long cycling stability and reasonable rate capability. Therefore, we believe that the structural advancements presented in this study can benefit the research community in visualizing highly conductive and porous nanostructures for long-lived electrodes in various energy storage applications.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIP) (NRF-2021R1A4A2001687, and NRF-2021R1I1A3057700).

Funding

Open access funding provided by Shanghai Jiao Tong University.

References

  • 1.Li F, Zhou Z. Micro/nanostructured materials for sodium ion batteries and capacitors. Small. 2018;14(6):1702961. doi: 10.1002/smll.201702961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yang SH, Park SK, Kim JK, Kang YC. A MOF-mediated strategy for constructing human backbone-like CoMoS3@N-doped carbon nanostructures with multiple voids as a superior anode for sodium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2019;7(22):13751–13761. doi: 10.1039/c9ta03873f. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Park SK, Kim JK, Kang YC. Excellent sodium-ion storage performances of CoSe2 nanoparticles embedded within N-doped porous graphitic carbon nanocube/carbon nanotube composite. Chem. Eng. J. 2017;328(1):546–555. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.07.079. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Guo H, Liu G, Wang M, Zhang Y, Li W, et al. In-situ fabrication of bone-like CoSe2 nano-thorn loaded on porous carbon cloth as a flexible electrode for Na-ion storage. Chem. Asian J. 2020;15(9):1493–1499. doi: 10.1002/asia.202000189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yousaf M, Chen Y, Tabassum H, Wang Z, Wang Y, et al. A dual protection system for heterostructured 3D CNT/CoSe2/C as high areal capacity anode for sodium storage. Adv. Sci. 2020;7(5):1902907. doi: 10.1002/advs.201902907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ali Z, Asif M, Huang X, Tang T, Hou Y. Hierarchically porous Fe2CoSe4 binary-metal selenide for extraordinary rate performance and durable anode of sodium-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 2018;30(36):1802745. doi: 10.1002/adma.201802745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jo MS, Lee JS, Jeong SY, Kim JK, Kang YC, et al. Golden bristlegrass-like hierarchical graphene nanofibers entangled with N-doped CNTs containing CoSe2 nanocrystals at each node as anodes for high-rate sodium-ion batteries. Small. 2020;16(38):2003391. doi: 10.1002/smll.202003391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Xia L, Yang Z, Tang B, Li F, Wei J, et al. Carbon nanofibers with embedded Sb2Se3 nanoparticles as highly reversible anodes for Na-ion batteries. Small. 2021;17(4):2006016. doi: 10.1002/smll.202006016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lu T, Dong S, Zhang C, Zhang L, Cui G. Fabrication of transition metal selenides and their applications in energy storage. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2017;332(1):75–99. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2016.11.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wang T, Legut D, Fan Y, Qin J, Li X, et al. Building fast diffusion channel by constructing metal sulfide/metal selenide heterostructures for high-performance sodium ion batteries anode. Nano Lett. 2020;20(8):6199–6205. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c02595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Xu E, Li P, Quan J, Zhu H, Wang L, et al. Dimensional gradient structure of CoSe2@CNTs-MXene anode assisted by ether for high-capacity, stable sodium storage. Nano-Micro Lett. 2021;13:40. doi: 10.1007/s40820-020-00562-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Park SK, Kang YC. MOF-templated N-doped carbon-coated CoSe2 nanorods supported on porous CNT microspheres with excellent sodium-ion storage and electrocatalytic properties. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018;10(20):17203–17213. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b03607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhang K, Park M, Zhou L, Lee GH, Li W, et al. Urchin-like CoSe2 as a high-performance anode material for sodium-ion batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016;26(37):6728–6735. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201602608. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhang G, Shu J, Xu L, Cai X, Zou W, et al. Pancake-like MOF solid-state electrolytes with fast ion migration for high-performance sodium battery. Nano-Micro Lett. 2021;13:105. doi: 10.1007/s40820-021-00628-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jomekian A, Behbahani RM, Mohammadi T, Kargari A. High speed spin coating in fabrication of Pebax 1657 based mixed matrix membrane filled with ultra-porous ZIF-8 particles for Co2/CH4 separation. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2016;34(2):440–453. doi: 10.1007/s11814-016-0269-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Xu L, Qin Y, Liu L, Xiao J, Ding Z. Fabrication of hydrophobic ZIFs based composite membrane with high CO2 absorption performance. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2021;38(5):1032–1042. doi: 10.1007/s11814-021-0762-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yang J, Gao H, Men S, Shi Z, Lin Z, et al. CoSe2 nanoparticles encapsulated by N-doped carbon framework intertwined with carbon nanotubes: high-performance dual-role anode materials for both Li- and Na-ion batteries. Adv. Sci. 2018;5(12):1800763. doi: 10.1002/advs.201800763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yang SH, Park SK, Kang YC. MOF-derived CoSe2@N-doped carbon matrix confined in hollow mesoporous carbon nanospheres as high-performance anodes for potassium-ion batteries. Nano-Micro Lett. 2020;13:9. doi: 10.1007/s40820-020-00539-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ye Z, Jiang Y, Li L, Wu F, Chen R. Rational design of MOF-based materials for next-generation rechargeable batteries. Nano-Micro Lett. 2021;13:203. doi: 10.1007/s40820-021-00726-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jiang Y, Zou G, Hong W, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, et al. N-rich carbon-coated Co3S4 ultrafine nanocrystals derived from ZIF-67 as an advanced anode for sodium-ion batteries. Nanoscale. 2018;10(39):18786–18794. doi: 10.1039/c8nr05652h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhao B, Liu Q, Wei G, Wang J, Yu XY, et al. Synthesis of CoSe2 nanoparticles embedded in N-doped carbon with conformal TiO2 shell for sodium-ion batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2019;378(1):122206. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.122206. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Guo S, Zhang P, Feng Y, Wang Z, Li X, et al. Rational design of interlaced Co9S8/carbon composites from ZIF-67/cellulose nanofibers for enhanced lithium storage. J. Alloys Compd. 2020;818(1):152911. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.152911. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Li Z, Huang X, Sun C, Chen X, Hu J, et al. Thin-film electrode based on zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIF-8 and ZIF-67) with ultra-stable performance as a lithium-ion battery anode. J. Mater. Sci. 2016;52(7):3979–3991. doi: 10.1007/s10853-016-0660-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Choi J, Yoo KS, Kim J. Spray pyrolysis synthesis of mesoporous TiO2 microspheres and their post modification for improved photocatalytic activity. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2018;35(12):2480–2486. doi: 10.1007/s11814-018-0176-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Vo TK, Kim J. Facile synthesis of mesoporous Cr2O3 microspheres by spray pyrolysis and their photocatalytic activity: effects of surfactant and pyrolysis temperature. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2020;37(3):571–575. doi: 10.1007/s11814-020-0475-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jeong SY, Park SK, Kang YC, Cho JS. One-dimensional nanostructure comprising MoSe2 nanosheets and carbon with uniformly defined nanovoids as an anode for high-performance sodium-ion batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2018;351(1):559–568. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.06.130. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jang JS, Koo WT, Kim DH, Kim ID. In situ coupling of multidimensional MOFs for heterogeneous metal-oxide architectures: toward sensitive chemiresistors. ACS Cent. Sci. 2018;4(7):929–937. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.8b00359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wang F, Guo H, Chai Y, Li Y, Liu C. The controlled regulation of morphology and size of HKUST-1 by “coordination modulation method”. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2013;173(1):181–188. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2013.02.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Fan H, Yu H, Zhang Y, Guo J, Wang Z, et al. 1D to 3D hierarchical iron selenide hollow nanocubes assembled from FeSe2@C core-shell nanorods for advanced sodium ion batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2018;10(1):48–55. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2017.08.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lee JS, Jo MS, Saroha R, Jung DS, Seon YH, et al. Hierarchically well-developed porous graphene nanofibers comprising N-doped graphitic C-coated cobalt oxide hollow nanospheres as anodes for high-rate Li-ion batteries. Small. 2020;16(32):2002213. doi: 10.1002/smll.202002213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tang Y, Zhao Z, Hao X, Wang Y, Liu Y, et al. Engineering hollow polyhedrons structured from carbon-coated CoSe2 nanospheres bridged by CNTs with boosted sodium storage performance. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2017;5(26):13591–13600. doi: 10.1039/c7ta02665j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Xia C, Jiang Q, Zhao C, Hedhili MN, Alshareef HN. Selenide-based electrocatalysts and scaffolds for water oxidation applications. Adv. Mater. 2016;28(1):77–85. doi: 10.1002/adma.201503906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zhou K, He J, Wang X, Lin J, Jing Y, et al. Self-assembled CoSe2 nanocrystals embedded into carbon nanowires as highly efficient catalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction. Electrochim. Acta. 2017;231(1):626–631. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.02.089. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Park SK, Jin A, Yu SH, Ha J, Jang B, et al. In situ hydrothermal synthesis of Mn3O4 nanoparticles on nitrogen-doped graphene as high-performance anode materials for lithium ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta. 2014;120(1):452–459. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.12.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lee JS, Saroha R, Oh SH, Shin DH, Jeong SM, et al. Rational design of perforated bimetallic (Ni, Mo) sulfides/N-doped graphitic carbon composite microspheres as anode materials for superior Na-ion batteries. Small Methods. 2021;5(9):2100195. doi: 10.1002/smtd.202100195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zhang YC, You Y, Xin S, Yin YX, Zhang J, et al. Rice husk-derived hierarchical silicon/nitrogen-doped carbon/carbon nanotube spheres as low-cost and high-capacity anodes for lithium-ion batteries. Nano Energy. 2016;25(1):120–127. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.04.043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gendensuren B, He C, Oh ES. Preparation of pectin-based dual-crosslinked network as a binder for high performance Si/C anode for LIBs. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2020;37(2):366–373. doi: 10.1007/s11814-019-0438-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Liu L, Yin YX, Li JY, Wang SH, Guo YG, et al. Uniform lithium nucleation/growth induced by lightweight nitrogen-doped graphitic carbon foams for high-performance lithium metal anodes. Adv. Mater. 2018;30(10):1706216. doi: 10.1002/adma.201706216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Li H, Gao D, Cheng X. Simple microwave preparation of high activity Se-rich CoSe2/C for oxygen reduction reaction. Electrochim. Acta. 2014;138(1):232–239. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.06.065. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Campos CEM, Lima JC, Grandi TA, Machado KD, Drago V, et al. Hexagonal CoSe formation in mechanical alloyed Co75Se25 mixture. Solid State Commun. 2004;131(3–4):265–270. doi: 10.1016/j.ssc.2004.03.044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Groen JC, Peffer LAA, Pérez-Ramírez J. Pore size determination in modified micro- and mesoporous materials. Pitfalls and limitations in gas adsorption data analysis. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2003;60(1–3):1–17. doi: 10.1016/s1387-1811(03)00339-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kim JK, Park GD, Kim JH, Park SK, Kang YC. Rational design and synthesis of extremely efficient macroporous CoSe2-CNT composite microspheres for hydrogen evolution reaction. Small. 2017;13(27):1700068. doi: 10.1002/smll.201700068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lu Y, Li D, Lyu C, Liu H, Liu B, et al. High nitrogen doped carbon nanofiber aerogels for sodium ion batteries: synergy of vacancy defects to boost sodium ion storage. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019;496(1):143717. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.143717. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Niu F, Yang J, Wang N, Zhang D, Fan W, et al. MoSe2-covered N, P-doped carbon nanosheets as a long-life and high-rate anode material for sodium-ion batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017;27(23):1700522. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201700522. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lin Z, Xia Q, Wang W, Li W, Chou S. Recent research progresses in ether- and ester-based electrolytes for sodium-ion batteries. InfoMat. 2019;1(3):376–389. doi: 10.1002/inf2.12023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Eftekhari A, Kim DW. Sodium-ion batteries: new opportunities beyond energy storage by lithium. J. Power Sources. 2018;395(1):336–348. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.05.089. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Li F, Li L, Yao T, Liu T, Zhu L, et al. Electrospinning synthesis of porous carbon nanofiber supported CoSe2 nanoparticles towards enhanced sodium ion storage. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2021;262(1):124314. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.124314. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Liang H, Li X, Liu X, Sun R, Qin Z, et al. Epitaxial growth induced multilayer yolk-shell structured CoSe2 with promoting transport kinetics of sodium ion half/full batteries. J. Power Sources. 2022;517(1):230729. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230729. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kong F, Wang J, Chen J, Tao S, Qian B, et al. MOF-derived ultrasmall CoSe2 nanoparticles encapsulated by an N-doped carbon matrix and their superior lithium/sodium storage properties. Chem. Commun. 2020;56(64):9218–9221. doi: 10.1039/d0cc03113e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Cao Y, Xiao L, Sushko ML, Wang W, Schwenzer B, et al. Sodium ion insertion in hollow carbon nanowires for battery applications. Nano Lett. 2012;12(7):3783–3787. doi: 10.1021/nl3016957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wang HG, Wu Z, Meng FL, Ma DL, Huang XL, et al. Nitrogen-doped porous carbon nanosheets as low-cost, high-performance anode material for sodium-ion batteries. Chemsuschem. 2013;6(1):56–60. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201200680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Gu P, Hou H, Li S, Huang L, Ji X. Three-dimensional hierarchical framework assembled by cobblestone-like CoSe2@C nanospheres for ultrastable sodium-ion storage. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018;10(17):14716–14726. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b01888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Liu S, Li D, Zhang G, Sun D, Zhou J, et al. Two-dimensional NiSe2/N-rich carbon nanocomposites derived from Ni-hexamine frameworks for superb Na-ion storage. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018;10(40):34193–34201. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b10635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Cho JS, Lee JK, Kang YC. Graphitic carbon-coated FeSe2 hollow nanosphere-decorated reduced graphene oxide hybrid nanofibers as an efficient anode material for sodium ion batteries. Sci. Rep. 2016;6(1):23699. doi: 10.1038/srep23699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Xiang Y, Li Q, Wei X, Li X, Zheng Q, et al. Constructing NiS2/NiSe2 heteroboxes with phase boundaries for Sodium-ion batteries. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022;607(1):752–759. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Zhang G, Liu K, Liu S, Song H, Zhou J. Flexible Co0.85Se nanosheets/graphene composite film as binder-free anode with high Li-and Na-ion storage performance. J. Alloys Compd. 2018;731(1):714–722. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.10.094. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Li B, Liu Y, Jin X, Jiao S, Wang G, et al. Designed formation of hybrid nanobox composed of carbon sheathed CoSe2 anchored on nitrogen-doped carbon skeleton as ultrastable anode for sodium-ion batteries. Small. 2016;15(42):1902881. doi: 10.1002/smll.201902881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Wu ZS, Ren W, Wen L, Gao L, Zhao J, et al. Graphene anchored with Co3O4 nanoparticles as anode of lithium ion batteries with enhanced reversible capacity and cyclic performance. ACS Nano. 2010;4(6):3187–3194. doi: 10.1021/nn100740x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Zhou G, Wang DW, Li F, Zhang L, Li N, et al. Graphene-wrapped Fe3O4 anode material with improved reversible capacity and cyclic stability for lithium ion batteries. Chem. Mater. 2010;22(18):5306–5313. doi: 10.1021/cm101532x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Choi SH, Kang YC. Fe3O4-decorated hollow graphene balls prepared by spray pyrolysis process for ultrafast and long cycle-life lithium ion batteries. Carbon. 2014;79(1):58–66. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.07.042. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Lin J, Raji ARO, Nan K, Peng Z, Yan Z, et al. Iron oxide nanoparticle and graphene nanoribbon composite as an anode material for high-performance Li-ion batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014;24(14):2044–2048. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201303023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Seon YH, Kang YC, Cho JS. One-dimensional porous nanostructure composed of few-layered MoSe2 nanosheets and highly densified-entangled-N-doped CNTs as anodes for Na ion batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2021;425(1):129051. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.129051. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Kim H, Lim K, Yoon G, Park JH, Ku K, et al. Exploiting lithium-ether co-intercalation in graphite for high-power lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017;7(19):1700418. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201700418. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Ge P, Zhang L, Yang Y, Sun W, Hu Y, et al. Advanced MoSe2/carbon electrodes in Li/Na-ions batteries. Adv. Mater. Interfaces. 2019;7(2):1901651. doi: 10.1002/admi.201901651. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Yang J, Zhu J, Xu J, Zhang C, Liu T. MoSe2 nanosheet array with layered MoS2 heterostructures for superior hydrogen evolution and lithium storage performance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017;9(51):44550–44559. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b15854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Jo MS, Ghosh S, Jeong SM, Kang YC, Cho JS. Coral-like yolk-shell-structured nickel oxide/carbon composite microspheres for high-performance Li-ion storage anodes. Nano-Micro Lett. 2019;11:3. doi: 10.1007/s40820-018-0234-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Lee JH, Oh SH, Jeong SY, Kang YC, Cho JS. Rattle-type porous Sn/C composite fibers with uniformly distributed nanovoids containing metallic Sn nanoparticles for high-performance anode materials in lithium-ion batteries. Nanoscale. 2018;10(45):21483–21491. doi: 10.1039/c8nr06075d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Oh SH, Park SM, Kang DW, Kang YC, Cho JS. Fibrous network of highly integrated carbon nanotubes/MoO3 composite bundles anchored with MoO3 nanoplates for superior lithium ion battery anodes. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2020;83(1):438–448. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2019.12.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Cao Y, Liu Y, Zhao D, Zhang J, Xia X, et al. K-doped Na3Fe2(PO4)3 cathode materials with high-stable structure for sodium-ion stored energy battery. J. Alloys Compd. 2019;784(1):939–946. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.01.125. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Tang LB, Zhang B, An CS, Li H, Xiao B, et al. Ultrahigh-rate behavior anode materials of MoSe2 nanosheets anchored on dual-heteroatoms functionalized graphene for sodium-ion batteries. Inorg. Chem. 2019;58(12):8169–8178. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b00971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Nano-Micro Letters are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES