Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2022 Apr 28;12:6973. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10977-4

Impact of temperature on dengue and chikungunya transmission by the mosquito Aedes albopictus

Aurélien Mercier 1,7, Thomas Obadia 2,3, Davide Carraretto 4, Enkelejda Velo 5, Gaelle Gabiane 6, Silvia Bino 5, Marie Vazeille 6, Giuliano Gasperi 4, Catherine Dauga 6, Anna R Malacrida 4, Paul Reiter 1, Anna-Bella Failloux 6,✉
PMCID: PMC9051100  PMID: 35484193

Abstract

The mosquito Aedes albopictus is an invasive species first detected in Europe in Albania in 1979, and now established in 28 European countries. Temperature is a limiting factor in mosquito activities and in the transmission of associated arboviruses namely chikungunya (CHIKV) and dengue (DENV). Since 2007, local transmissions of CHIKV and DENV have been reported in mainland Europe, mainly in South Europe. Thus, the critical question is how far north transmission could occur. In this context, the Albanian infestation by Ae. albopictus is of interest because the species is present up to 1200 m of altitude; this allows using altitude as a proxy for latitude. Here we show that Ae. albopictus can transmit CHIKV at 28 °C as well as 20 °C, however, the transmission of DENV is only observed at 28 °C. We conclude that if temperature is the key environmental factor limiting transmission, then transmission of CHIKV, but not DENV is feasible in much of Europe.

Subject terms: Entomology, Dengue virus, Alphaviruses

Introduction

Numerous arboviruses affecting humans are already endemic in continental Europe where they cause sporadic cases during a limited time window fitting with vectors activity; those are West Nile virus, Usutu virus, Tick-borne encephalitis virus, Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus, and several phleboviruses including Toscana virus1. In the last decades, new arboviruses have been introduced in Europe where invasive mosquito species are well established2. Among them, five Aedes species are described including Aedes albopictus. This mosquito has been first detected in Europe, Albania in 19793 and is now present in 28 European countries from Spain to Romania through Germany4. Originally from Asia, its high ecological plasticity (i.e. colonizing artificial as well as natural breeding sites) and physiological characteristics (i.e. eggs able to resist to desiccation and freezing) allow this species to spread and successfully establish in both tropical and temperate regions4. As expected, Ae. albopictus-associated arboviruses were soon after detected in Europe: chikungunya in 2007 in Italy5, dengue in 2010 in France6 and lastly, Zika in 2019 in France7.

Chikungunya hit Italy in 2007 causing more than 200 laboratory-confirmed human cases in Ravenna province from July to September8. An East-Central-South-African genotype of chikungunya virus (CHIKV; Alphavirus, Togaviridae) was introduced by a traveler coming back from Kerala, India. The virus had the substitution A- > V at the position 226 in the E1 glycoprotein conferring an enhanced replication and transmission by Ae. albopictus9,10. Besides, dengue was not an unknown disease in Europe. The last documented outbreak happened in 1927–1928 in Greece causing ~ 1 million cases and ~ 1,000 deaths11 with Aedes aegypti as the main vector. Dengue virus (DENV; Flavivirus, Flaviviridae) disappeared from continental Europe following the successful control of Ae. aegypti in 195312. However, this species has been detected again around the Mediterranean and Black Sea13. While it is described as a bad dengue vector, Ae. albopictus can sustain an outbreak in the absence of Ae. aegypti; it was involved in the first local cases of dengue in 2010, in France6 and Croatia14. Since 2010, autochthonous cases of chikungunya and dengue are repeatedly reported in mainland Europe: for dengue, 2013–201515–17, 2018–202018,19 in France, and for chikungunya, 201420, 201721 in France, and 2017 in Italy22. These European transmission episodes are usually initiated by imported cases returning from tropical regions during the summer season23.

In Europe, the epidemiological landscape of mosquito-borne diseases has drastically changed these last decades mainly as a consequence of the establishment of Ae. albopictus in part of Europe in addition to the growing number of people travelling between arbovirus-endemic countries and Europe, and suitable climate conditions conducive to Ae. albopictus expansion and proliferation1. The first record of Ae. albopictus in Europe was reported in Albania in 1979 probably introduced from China3. In Albania, the species is commonly found everywhere and even succeeded in reaching high altitudes up to 1200 m24. Altitude can be a proxy for temperature which is a critical driver of mosquito activities requiring genetic selection and physiological adaptation of mosquitoes to the cold. Temperature determines mosquito biology, ecology, behavior, and more notably, transmission of arboviruses25. In particular, temperature influences significantly adult size26 and mosquito females can be larger at high altitudes27. Larger females absorb more blood than smaller females28, thus potentially increasing the quantity of viral particles ingested by mosquitoes and consequently, the vector competence29,30. Alterations in mosquito gene expression and physiology could be observed between small and large mosquitoes31. Thus, as mosquitoes may extend their distribution northward, arboviral diseases are expected to emerge in much more of Europe32. The critical question is how far north transmission could occur?

In this context, the Albanian Ae. albopictus populations are of interest as they colonize high altitudes. These altitude-adapted populations could be a good indicator of latitude-adapted mosquito populations as this invasive species moves northwards into northern Europe. Here we study the effect of temperature on transmission of CHIKV and DENV by Ae. albopictus collected at different altitudes in Dajti mountain in Central Albania. We showed that Ae. albopictus can transmit CHIKV with similar viral loads in mosquito saliva independently of the incubation temperature tested. In contrast, the transmission of DENV is only observed at 28 °C. Altogether, our study shows that CHIKV transmission can occur at 20 °C (tested as a proxy of high altitudes) increasing the risk of epidemics beyond its current range.

Results

Aedes albopictus samples collected at high altitudes are genetically different from populations at low altitudes

The 11 SSR used to genotype the four populations of mosquitoes originating from different altitudes of Tirana and the Dajti mountain did not display signs of linkage disequilibrium between any pairs, suggesting that populations were independent, and their variability might well reflect genome-wide patterns. Across these loci, mosquito samples displayed similar levels of variability (Table S1) suggesting no recent bottleneck effect. However, a certain degree of inter-population differentiation was detected which increased along with altitude. Indeed, high FSTP values (0·107, 0·122 and 0·134) were estimated between the population of Tirana at 149 m and the others (542 m, 762 m and 1209 m, respectively; Table S2). The two populations at the highest altitudes (762 m and 1209 m) were more genetically similar to each other (FSTP value of 0·022) than with others. This differentiation pattern was confirmed from the PCoA (Fig. 1a) which separated the population 149 m from the two populations 762 m and 1209 m along the first axis (representative for 58·4% of variance). The population 542 m was at an intermediate position on the second axis (depictive for 34·3% of variance).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

PCoA plot obtained from the FSTP matrix using GenAlEx (a) and graphical representation of the co-ancestry percentages obtained with Distruct 1.1. (b). In panel (a), highlighted populations are those showing a higher genetic correlation. In panel (b), each cluster is represented by a specific color and each bar represents a specific individual and its percentage of identity to the two clusters (K1 and K2).

The Bayesian clustering analysis implemented in STRUCTURE, based on Evanno’s method, indicated that two lineages (K1 and K2, Fig. 1b) represented the most parsimonious partitioning of the ancestry among individuals from the four populations (Table S3). The population 149 m was mainly structured in K1 (0·972%); starting from this altitude, we observed a gradual transitioning in genetic composition towards the second lineage or K2. Indeed, the population 542 m displayed an ancestry profile structured for 0·799% in K1 and 0·201% in K2. At higher altitudes, the populations 762 m and 1209 m presented the highest membership in K2 (0·895% and 0·910% respectively, Fig. 1b). When comparing with other neighbouring populations in Europe, the four Albanian populations were genetically different from the other populations (Fig. S1). The population from Tirana was genetically related to mosquitoes from China while mosquitoes from Brescia in the region of Lombardy in Northern Italy were genetically close to mosquitoes from La Reunion. Surprisingly, the population from Cesena in the Emilia-Romagna region in Italy was a mix of mosquitoes from Tirana and La Reunion. Mosquitoes from Greece were genetically distinct from the other populations (Fig. S1).

Ae. albopictus mosquitoes from high altitudes disseminate and transmit CHIKV

To examine whether viral dissemination and transmission varied according to the incubation temperature and the day post-infection (dpi), dissemination efficiency (DE) and transmission efficiency (TE) were estimated for each population infected with CHIKV (Fig. 2a,b; Table S4).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Dissemination and transmission efficiencies of Ae. albopictus populations infected with CHIKV examined at different days (3, 7, 10, 14, and 21) after incubation at different temperatures (20 °C, 20 °C variable, 28 °C). After infection, mosquito heads and saliva were titrated. (a) Dissemination efficiency corresponds to the proportion of mosquitoes with infected heads. (b) Transmission efficiency refers to the proportion of mosquitoes with infectious saliva. Error bars show the exact Binomial confidence interval (95%).

When considering DE, most populations started viral dissemination at 3 dpi though with overall low success rates except when mosquitoes were incubated at 28 °C (Fig. 2a). DEs were high whatever the population, reaching 83.33% for 149 m (7 dpi, 28 °C), 90% for 542 m (21 dpi, 20 °C or 28 °C), 100% for 762 m (21 dpi, 20 °C variable), and 95% for 1209 m (21 dpi, 20 °C or 28 °C) (Table S4). When comparing DEs obtained at the three incubation temperatures for each dpi and each population, only one comparison (population 762 m, 3 dpi; DE: 0% at 20 °C, 5.26% at 20 °C Var, and 57.89% at 28 °C) among 20 was statistically significant (after Bonferroni correction) (Fisher’s exact test: p < 0·05).

For TE, most populations started viral transmission from 3 dpi when incubated at 28 °C, and 7 dpi at 20 °C variable and 20 °C (except population 542 m at 3 dpi) (Fig. 2b). TEs were lower reaching 66.66% for 149 m (7 dpi, 28 °C), 61.90% for 542 m (14 dpi, 20 °C variable), 72.22% for 762 m (7 dpi, 28 °C), and 86.67% for 1209 m (10 dpi, 20 °C) (Table S4). When comparing TEs at the three incubation temperatures for each dpi and each population, two comparisons among 20 were significant (after Bonferroni correction) (Fisher’s exact test: p < 0·05): populations 149 m at 7 dpi and 762 m at 3 dpi. The efficiency of the salivary glands as barrier to viral transmission can be measured by estimating the transmission rate (TR). For each population, TRs were comparable whatever the dpi and the incubation temperature (Fisher’s exact test: p > 0·05) with TR reaching 80.0% for 149 m (7 dpi, 28 °C), 66.7% for 542 m (21 dpi, 20 °C), 81.2% for 762 m (7 dpi, 28 °C), and 92.9% for 1209 m (10 dpi, 20 °C) (Table S5). When examining the extrinsic incubation period (EIP), all four populations were able to transmit from 3 dpi when incubated at 28 °C and only one population (542 m) from 3 dpi at 20 °C and 20 °C Variable.

In Fig. 2a, a sharp difference could be observed between the magnitudes of DE at 28 °C compared to that at lower temperatures, especially in the early dpi. This trend can be captured statistically by including interaction terms to the regression models, allowing the effect of incubation temperatures to vary according to mosquito populations. Figure 3 shows the predicted value of the outcome (Fig. 3a: DE; Fig. 3b: TE) on the logit scale according to dpi for the four populations. DE was favoured for populations at higher altitudes and an altitude cut-off was observed between populations 542 m and 762 m while no significant difference was identified between the two populations at highest altitudes and the two populations at lowest altitudes. The rate at which DE increased according to dpi was lower at 28 °C, reaching high values earlier after infection. For TE however, this cut-off was not found.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Predicted value of Dissemination Efficiency (DE, panel a) and Transmission Efficiency (TE, panel b) according to days-post infection, modeled using logistic regression. In both panels, graphs show the expected marginal means (dots) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (bars) on the logit scale, highlighting the interacting effect of temperature on days post-infection.

No significantly different CHIKV loads in Ae. albopictus saliva

To test whether the number of viral particles delivered by mosquitoes varied according to the incubation temperature and the dpi, saliva collected from each mosquito was titrated. When examining the four populations at a given dpi and incubation temperature, no significant difference of saliva viral titers was detected (Kruskal–Wallis test: p > 0·05; Fig. 4a-o). Likewise, no significant difference was detected according to the dpi when considering each population at a given incubation temperature (Table S6). The highest mean number of viral particles was detected in two mosquito saliva of the population 762 m incubated for 3 days at 28 °C: 103.18±3.32 (1504 ± 2116) infectious particles.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Viral titers in saliva of Ae. albopictus infected with CHIKV and examined at different days (3 (a,f,k), 7 (b,g,l), 10 (c,h,m), 14 (d,l,n), and 21(e,j,o)) after incubation at different temperatures (20 °C, 20 °C variable, 28 °C). Saliva was collected from individual females using the forced salivation technique and titrated on C6/36 Ae. albopictus cells. Bars indicate the mean.

Ae. albopictus only disseminates and transmits DENV at 28 °C

To measure the vector competence of Ae. albopictus to DENV, viral dissemination and transmission were estimated according to the incubation temperature and the dpi (Fig. 5a; Table S4). Viral dissemination was mainly detected at 28 °C, with DE starting from 7 dpi and increasing significantly along with dpi (Fisher’s exact test: p < 0·05) (Fig. 5a). DE reached the highest values at 21 dpi (85% for 149 m, 80% for 542 m, 94.73% for 762 m, and 65% for 1209 m). When comparing DEs obtained at the three incubation temperatures for each dpi and each population, 10 comparisons among 16 were statistically significant (after Bonferroni correction) (Fisher’s exact test: p < 0·05) with a viral dissemination mainly observed at 28 °C (Table S4). Consequently, viral transmission was only detected at 28 °C reaching highest TEs at 21 dpi (33.33% for 149 m, 15% for 542 m, 42.10% for 762 m) (Fig. 5b). No transmission was observed for population 1209 m at 21 dpi whatever the incubation temperature (Table S4). When comparing TE at the three incubation temperatures for each dpi and each population, only one among 8 comparisons was significantly different (after Bonferroni correction) (Fisher’s exact test: p < 0·05): population 762 m at 21 dpi (Table S4). When examining TR, values were low with a maximum of 42·10% for population 762 m (21 dpi, 28 °C), meaning that more than half of mosquitoes with disseminated infection were not able to transmit DENV (Table S5). When examining the EIP, all four populations only transmitted at 28 °C: 149 m from 14 dpi, 542 m from 10 dpi, 762 m from 7 dpi, and 1209 m at 10 dpi (Fig. S2). The highest mean number of viral particles detected in mosquito saliva was 102.04 (110) infectious particles for one mosquito of the population 1209 m (10 dpi, 28 °C) (Table S6).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Dissemination and transmission efficiencies of Ae. albopictus populations infected with DENV examined at different days (3, 7, 10, 14, and 21) after incubation at different temperatures (20 °C, 20 °C variable, 28 °C). After infection, mosquito heads and saliva were titrated. (a) Dissemination efficiency corresponds to the proportion of mosquitoes with infected heads. (b) Transmission efficiency refers to the proportion of mosquitoes with infectious saliva. Error bars show the exact Binomial confidence interval (95%).

Discussion

In this study, we showed that the four Ae. albopictus populations collected at 149 m, 542 m, 762 m, and 1209 m were able to transmit CHIKV at 20 °C as at 28 °C. Contrariwise, DENV transmission only occurs at 28 °C; we observed that transmission is less likely for the population at 1209 m altitude. These results indicate that CHIKV transmission may occur at high altitudes. So as the distribution of Ae. albopictus is expanding, the risk of CHIKV outbreaks can extend beyond South Europe and reach northern European countries.

Two waves of introduction of Ae. albopictus in Europe are mainly described: from China to Tirana in Albania in 197933, and from Japan via the United States and La Reunion Island in Italy34. We showed that the two Ae. albopictus samples collected at high altitudes (762 m and 1209 m) in Dajti mountain in Central Albania were genetically different from the two populations at low altitudes (149 m and 542 m) and all four populations from Dajti mountain are genetically distinct from the population of Tirana3. It is believed that Ae. albopictus from Tirana experienced a different colonization dynamic than those from Italy, partly related to strong bottlenecks and/or differences of populations in the ability to adapt to local environmental conditions35; while the species spread rapidly and widely in Italy after its first detection in 1990, Ae. albopictus remains confined to Albania after its introduction in 1979.

The genetic variability of founder populations is expected to be extremely low as usually, only few individuals are introduced and among them, few survive33; this hypothesis could be raised to explain the significant genetic divergence between populations 149 m and 542 m with populations 762 m and 1209 m. The ability of Ae. albopictus to colonize high altitudes is presumably related to the cold hardiness of eggs. This phenotypic trait results in a modification of the egg endochorion36; a physical change in the chorion structure (more compact wax layers or additional inter-membrane space between different layers) protects the embryo against freezing. Epigenetic control of the expression of these genes may allow rapid adaptation to cold; small RNAs and histone modifications are involved in diapause mechanisms36–38. To note, we used the generation F6 for genotyping which could introduce some distortions in the genetic analysis.

Vector competence data is a reliable predictor for emergence of arboviral diseases as it has been demonstrated with Ae. albopictus populations from southern Europe39. As each pairing vector and virus genotypes lead to a specific outcome of infection which is also modulated by the temperature, all described as genotype-by-genotype-by-environment (G x G x E) interactions40, our study will feed a risk map of CHIKV outbreaks in Europe associated with Ae. albopictus. We show that all four Ae. albopictus populations transmit CHIKV at 20 °C and 28 °C and DENV only at 28 °C; these temperatures could serve as a proxy for the transmission of CHIKV and DENV at higher latitudes in Europe. To obtain adult mosquitoes of same age and size, immature stages and adults were exposed to a controlled temperature of 24 ± 1 °C before experimental infections. Lower temperature may generate small mosquitoes ingesting a lower amount of blood and then lower number of viral particles with subsequent effects on mosquito susceptibility to virus infection41. The different mosquito genetic backgrounds may have impacted competence for arboviruses33. Mosquitoes may regulate gene expression to adapt their phenotypes and maintain fitness in response to stressors such as temperature changes42,43. Temperature may alter mosquito gene expression including genes related to mosquito antiviral responses such as RNA interference44. RNA interference can be disrupted when mosquitoes are exposed to cooler temperatures45. Impairment of immune barriers may affect susceptibility to arboviruses including CHIKV45,46. Moreover, temperature may also affect mosquito microbial communities (protozoans, fungi, bacteria and viruses) which intervene in protection against pathogens25. Mosquito microbiota plays an important role in defining differences in vector competence47. At 20 °C, some commensal bacteria may promote arboviral infection by facilitating virus entry in the mosquito gut epithelium48.

As the main vector is Ae. albopictus, control strategies in Europe should be more feasible than in endemic regions where multiple genotypes and vectors are involved. Likewise, innovative mosquito control strategies can also be explored such as the use of trans-infected endosymbiotic Wolbachia bacteria49 and possibly lead to a successful control of Ae. albopictus as it has happened in the past for Ae. aegypti. Nevertheless, as temperature on the field may alter microbiota composition and mosquito immune responses during viral infections, the relevance and robustness of such method should be evaluating considering the different environmental temperatures50. Thus, the Albanian experience teaches us that chikungunya is no longer a tropical disease and its expansion will follow that of its vector. Active cooperation between European countries is critical in succeeding to control Ae. albopictus which does not recognize borders.

Materials and methods

Ethic statements

Animals (mice as blood source for mosquito rearing and rabbit for blood in mosquito experimental infections) were housed in the Institut Pasteur animal facilities (Paris) accredited by the French Ministry of Agriculture for performing experiments on live rodents. Work on animals was performed in compliance with French and European regulations on care and protection of laboratory animals (EC Directive 2010/63, French Law 2013-118, February 6th, 2013). All experiments were approved by the Ethics Committee #89 and registered under the reference APAFIS (Autorisation de Projet utilisant des Animaux à des FIns Scientifiques)#6573-201606l412077987 v2. The study was carried out in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines.

Mosquito rearing

Aedes albopictus eggs were collected in Central Albania at Dajti mountain located a few kilometers from Tirana, the capital city of Albania. Ovitraps were placed at four altitudes (149 m, 542 m, 762 m, and 1209 m) (Fig. 6) and eggs were weekly collected in 2015 during the period of optimal activities of Ae. albopictus27, from June to mid-August. Batches of eggs were sent to the Institut Pasteur and rearing was carried out in controlled conditions (24 ± 1 °C, 70% relative humidity, a 12:12 h (Light:Dark) photoperiod). Larvae were distributed in pans (200 larvae/pan) containing 1.5 L of dechlorinated tap water supplemented with yeast tablets. Obtained adults were placed in cages and daily provided with 10% sucrose solution. Generations F4/F5 mosquitoes were used for experimental infections and F6 for genotyping.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Aedes albopictus populations collected in Albania. Mosquitoes were processed for genotyping with microsatellites and vector competence studies to DENV and CHIKV. The figure was prepared by Eng. Migel Ali, GIS expert at the Company Geo Consulting Albania (https://gc-al.com/en/staff_mali.php).

Microsatellite genotyping of Ae. albopictus populations sampled at different altitudes

Genomic DNA was individually extracted from 120 mosquitoes (15 males and 15 females for each population) and genotyped at 11 polymorphic simple sequence repeats (SSR) loci: Aealbmic1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 9, 11, 14, 15, 16 and 17 as described in51. PCR amplifications and fragment identifications were performed as described in52. Each PCR product was then diluted 1:10 in ddH2O water and 2 μL of this dilution was added to 10 μL of a mixture of deionized formamide and GeneScan-500 ROX size standard (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA). Genotyping was processed in an ABI3730XL sequence analyser (Applied Biosystems) and data analysed using GeneScan and Genemapper software. The first step of the genetic analysis was to bin the genotyped raw data using TANDEM V. 1.0953; this program helps to overcome problems related with genotyping errors. When microsatellite amplification was not successful or scoring was uncertain, re-extraction of DNA was performed.

Variability of mosquito populations and genetic structure analyses

The genetic variability of the four sampled populations was estimated in terms of mean number of alleles (Na), mean number of effective alleles (Ne), observed and expected heterozygosity (Ho and He), unbiased expected heterozygosity (uHe), inbreeding coefficient (F) and pairwise FST (FSTP) using GenAlEx 6.5154. The statistical significance of each FSTP value was assessed by comparison of the observed value with the values obtained in 10,000 matrix permutations. Linkage disequilibrium between pairs of loci in each sample and deviations from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) at each locus/sample combination were examined with GENEPOP V.4.7.555,56 and the statistical significance was assessed following Bonferroni corrections. The relationships among populations were appraised using Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) in GenAlEx54.

Genetic population structure was assessed using Bayesian clustering method proposed in the software STRUCTURE v.2.3.457, using the admixture model and assuming independent allele frequencies. The burn-in was set to 500,000 steps and was followed by 1,000,000 Markov Chain Monte Carlo replications. All runs were repeated 20 times for each number of possible clusters (K), set between 1 to 8 (i.e. twice the number of populations). The proper number of genetic clusters was determined by plotting the log probability (L(K)) and ΔK across multiple runs as implemented in STRUCTURE HARVESTER (http://taylor0.biology.ucla.edu/structureHarvester/). The Greedy algorithm in CLUMPP V.1.1.258 was used to merge the 20 independent runs and the graphical representation of the co-ancestry percentages obtained was plotted using DISTRUCT 1.159. The four populations studied were compared to populations from neighbouring countries in Europe (Italy and Greece) and from China and La Reunion, both locations being the source of colonisation of Albania and Italy by Ae. albopictus, respectively33.

Viral strains and mosquito experimental infections

Mosquito experimental infections used CHIKV 06.21 and DENV-2 strains. CHIKV 06.21 (accession number AM258992) isolated in 2005 from a patient on La Reunion belongs to the East-Central-South African (ECSA) lineage and contains the E1-A226V mutation60. DENV-2 strain (accession number: MK268692) was isolated in 1974 from a patient in Bangkok (Thailand)61. Both strains are our references for each virus. Viral stocks were produced after passages on C6/36 cells.

Batches of 6/10-day-old females were fed for 15 min through a pig intestine membrane covering the base of a feeder (Hemotek® membrane feeding system, UK) containing 1·4 mL of washed rabbit erythrocytes, 0·7 mL of viral suspension, and 10 mM of ATP. The titer of the blood-meal was 107 FFU/mL for both viruses. Engorged females were transferred in cardboard containers and maintained with 10% sucrose in climatic chambers (KB 53, Binder, Tuttlingen, Germany) under three different incubation temperatures: (i) a constant temperature of 28 °C ± 0·1 °C, (ii) a constant temperature of 20 °C ± 0·1 °C or (iii) at temperatures displaying daily fluctuations between 17 °C ± 0·1 °C and 23 °C ± 0·1 °C (average: 20 °C ± 0·1 °C). The temperature of 28 °C represents a mean temperature in tropical regions and 20 °C, a mean temperature in France during the 2010 CHIKV outbreak40. These temperatures correspond to those recorded during the period of the year when mosquitoes laid the most eggs in ovitraps (Fig. S3). To limit confounding factors, mosquitoes (immature stages and adults) were reared at 24 ± 1 °C before experimental infections; adult females reared at 32 °C are larger and better transmit CHIKV than females at 18 °C29.

Analysis of mosquito susceptibility

Batches of 20 females were analysed at 3, 7, 10, 14, 21 day post-infection (dpi). After cold anaesthesia, wings and legs of each mosquito were removed and the proboscis was inserted into 20 µL tip filled with 5 µL of Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) for saliva collection62. After 30–45 min, medium containing saliva was expelled into 1.5 mL tube containing 45 µL of Leibovitz L15 medium (Invitrogen, CA, USA). Head and body were separated from each mosquito and ground individually in 300 µL of L15 medium supplemented with 3% FBS.

For saliva and head samples, infectious particles were detected using focus fluorescent assay on C6/36 Ae. albopictus cells. Samples were inoculated onto monolayers of C6/36 Ae. albopictus cell culture in 96-well plates. After incubation at 28 °C for 3 and 5 days for CHIKV and DENV respectively, plates were fixed with 10% formaldehyde, washed and stained using hyper-immune ascetic fluid as primary antibody and Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse IgG as the second antibody (Life technologies, CA, USA).

Two parameters were used to describe the viral dissemination and transmission. Dissemination efficiency (DE;63) gives the proportion of mosquitoes with infected head (i.e. mosquitoes able to disseminate the virus from the midgut into the mosquito general cavity). Transmission efficiency (TE;63) refers to the proportion of mosquitoes with infectious saliva (i.e. mosquitoes with virus having succeeded in replicating in salivary glands and released with saliva during mosquito blood feeding). Viral loads in mosquito saliva were estimated. To measure whether the salivary glands can act as a barrier to the release of viral particles in saliva, the transmission rate (TR) was also calculated, which corresponds to the proportion of mosquitoes with virus detected in saliva among mosquitoes with disseminated virus in head. Moreover, the extrinsic incubation period (EIP) was calculated, which refers to the time from ingestion of an infectious blood meal to transmission of virus.

Statistical analysis

Logistic regressions were used to model DE and TE according to mosquito populations, incubation temperatures, and dpi. All three covariates (mosquito population, temperature, and dpi) were coded as categorical and for each, the lowest value served as reference level (i.e. 20 °C constant, 149 m and 3 dpi). Akaike Information Criterion was used as a guide for model selection, investigating combinations of fixed effects and interactions between the three covariates of interest. The low dimensionality of the data also allowed for conveniently visualizing the possible interactions of covariates over two-dimensions graphics (outcome according to dpi) stratified over incubation temperatures and mosquito populations.

Statistical tests were conducted using the STATA software (StataCorp LP, Texas, USA) and R 4.0.3. P-values above 0·05 were considered non-significant. If necessary, the significance level of each test was adjusted based on the number of tests run, according to the sequential method of Bonferroni64 or using Tukey’s range test for multiple comparisons in generalized linear models (R package emmeans 1.5.2–1;65).

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information. (924.5KB, doc)

Acknowledgements

We thank Charlotte Balière and Valérie Caro for technical assistance in mosquito genotyping. We also thank Perparim Kadriaj and Erjon Muhaxhiri for their contribution in collecting mosquito eggs. This work was supported by the French Government’s Investissement d’Avenir program, Laboratoire d’Excellence Integrative Biology of Emerging Infectious Diseases (grant ANR-10-LABX-62-IBEID and the European Commission under the 7th Framework under DengueTools Grant Agreement no. 282589.

Author contributions

A.M. performed mosquito infection experiments, analyzed the data, and participated in the interpretation of the results. T.O. did statistical analyses. D.C., G.G.A. and A.R.M. did population genetic analyses. E.V. and S.B. collected mosquito samples. C.D. did phylogenetic analyses. G.G. performed mosquito genotyping. M.V. provided technical help. PR conceptualized the study, provided resources and edited the manuscript. ABF analyzed, visualized the data, wrote the first draft and edited the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors jointly supervised this work: Paul Reiter and Anna-Bella Failloux.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-022-10977-4.

References

  • 1.Barzon L. Ongoing and emerging arbovirus threats in Europe. J. Clin. Virol. 2018;107:38–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2018.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Papa A. Emerging arboviruses of medical importance in the Mediterranean region. J. Clin. Virol. 2019;115:5–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2019.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Adhami J, Reiter P. Introduction and establishment of Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus skuse (Diptera: Culicidae) in Albania. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 1998;14:340–343. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bonizzoni M, Gasperi G, Chen X, James AA. The invasive mosquito species Aedes albopictus: Current knowledge and future perspectives. Trends Parasitol. 2013;29:460–468. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2013.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rezza G, et al. Infection with chikungunya virus in Italy: An outbreak in a temperate region. Lancet. 2007;370:1840–1846. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61779-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.La Ruche G, et al. First two autochthonous dengue virus infections in metropolitan France, September 2010. Euro Surveill. 2010;15:19676. doi: 10.2807/ese.15.39.19676-en. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Giron S, et al. Vector-borne transmission of Zika virus in Europe, southern France, August 2019. Euro Surveill. 2019 doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.45.1900655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Angelini R, et al. An outbreak of chikungunya fever in the province of Ravenna, Italy. Euro Surveill. 2007;12:E070906. doi: 10.2807/esw.12.36.03260-en. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tsetsarkin KA, Vanlandingham DL, McGee CE, Higgs S. A single mutation in chikungunya virus affects vector specificity and epidemic potential. PLoS Pathog. 2007;3:e201. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Vazeille M, et al. Two Chikungunya isolates from the outbreak of La Reunion (Indian Ocean) exhibit different patterns of infection in the mosquito Aedes albopictus. PLoS ONE. 2007;2:e1168. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Anon The dengue epidemic in Greece. League Nations Monthly Epidemiol. Rep. 1928;7:334. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Curtin TJ. Status of Aedes aegypti in the Eastern Mediterranean. J. Med. Entomol. 1967;4:48–50. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/4.1.48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kotsakiozi P, Gloria-Soria A, Schaffner F, Robert V, Powell JR. Aedes aegypti in the Black Sea: Recent introduction or ancient remnant? Parasit. Vectors. 2018;11:396. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-2933-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gjenero-Margan I, et al. Autochthonous dengue fever in Croatia, August-September 2010. Euro Surveill. 2011;16:19805. doi: 10.2807/ese.16.09.19805-en. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Marchand E, et al. Autochthonous case of dengue in France, October 2013. Euro Surveill. 2013;18:20661. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES2013.18.50.20661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Giron S, et al. Nouvelles apparitions de cas autochtones de dengue en région Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur, France, août-septembre 2014. Bull. Epidémiol. Hebd. 2015;13–14:217–225. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Succo T, et al. Autochthonous dengue outbreak in Nimes, South of France, July to September 2015. Euro Surveill. 2016;21:5–11. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.21.30240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Terrien E, et al. Surveillance du chikungunya, de la dengue et du virus Zika en France métropolitaine, 2018. Bull. Epidémiol. Hebd. 2019;19–20:363–373. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Santé Publique France. Chikungunya, dengue et zika - Données de la surveillance renforcée en France métropolitaine en 2020. (2020). <https://www.santepubliquefrance.fr/maladies-et-traumatismes/maladies-a-transmission-vectorielle/chikungunya/articles/donnees-en-france-metropolitaine/chikungunya-dengue-et-zika-donnees-de-la-surveillance-renforcee-en-france-metropolitaine-en-2019>.
  • 20.Delisle E, et al. Chikungunya outbreak in Montpellier, France, September to October 2014. Euro Surveill. 2015;20:2. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES2015.20.17.21108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Calba C, et al. Preliminary report of an autochthonous chikungunya outbreak in France, July to September 2017. Euro Surveill. 2017 doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2017.22.39.17-00647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Venturi G, et al. Detection of a chikungunya outbreak in Central Italy, August to September 2017. Euro Surveill. 2017 doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2017.22.39.17-00646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jourdain F, et al. From importation to autochthonous transmission: Drivers of chikungunya and dengue emergence in a temperate area. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2020;14:e0008320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tisseuil C, et al. Forecasting the spatial and seasonal dynamic of Aedes albopictus oviposition activity in Albania and Balkan countries. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2018;12:e0006236. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bellone R, Failloux AB. The role of temperature in shaping mosquito-borne viruses transmission. Front. Microbiol. 2020;11:584846. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.584846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mohammed A, Chadee DD. Effects of different temperature regimens on the development of Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae) mosquitoes. Acta Trop. 2011;119:38–43. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2011.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Prudhomme J, et al. The native European Aedes geniculatus mosquito species can transmit chikungunya virus. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2019;8:962–972. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2019.1634489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Briegel H. Fecundity, metabolism, and body size in Anopheles (Diptera: Culicidae), vectors of malaria. J. Med. Entomol. 1990;27:839–850. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/27.5.839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Westbrook CJ, Reiskind MH, Pesko KN, Greene KE, Lounibos LP. Larval environmental temperature and the susceptibility of Aedes albopictus Skuse (Diptera: Culicidae) to Chikungunya virus. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2010;10:241–247. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2009.0035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Alto BW, Reiskind MH, Lounibos LP. Size alters susceptibility of vectors to dengue virus infection and dissemination. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2008;79:688–695. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2008.79.688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Price DP, Schilkey FD, Ulanov A, Hansen IA. Small mosquitoes, large implications: crowding and starvation affects gene expression and nutrient accumulation in Aedes aegypti. Parasit. Vectors. 2015;8:252. doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-0863-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Liu-Helmersson J, et al. Climate change and aedes vectors: 21st century projections for dengue transmission in Europe. EBioMedicine. 2016;7:267–277. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.03.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Vega-Rua A, et al. Vector competence of Aedes albopictus populations for chikungunya virus is shaped by their demographic history. Commun. Biol. 2020;3:326. doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-1046-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Manni M, et al. Genetic evidence for a worldwide chaotic dispersion pattern of the arbovirus vector Aedes albopictus. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11:e0005332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pichler V, et al. Complex interplay of evolutionary forces shaping population genomic structure of invasive Aedes albopictus in southern Europe. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2019;13:e0007554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kress A, Kuch U, Oehlmann J, Muller R. Effects of diapause and cold acclimation on egg ultrastructure: new insights into the cold hardiness mechanisms of the Asian tiger mosquito Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus. J. Vector Ecol. 2016;41:142–150. doi: 10.1111/jvec.12206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Reynolds JA, Bautista-Jimenez R, Denlinger DL. Changes in histone acetylation as potential mediators of pupal diapause in the flesh fly Sarcophaga bullata. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2016;76:29–37. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2016.06.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Poupardin R, et al. Early transcriptional events linked to induction of diapause revealed by RNAseq in larvae of drosophilid fly Chymomyza costata. BMC Genom. 2015;16:720. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1907-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Mariconti M, et al. Estimating the risk of arbovirus transmission in Southern Europe using vector competence data. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:17852. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54395-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zouache K, et al. Three-way interactions between mosquito population, viral strain and temperature underlying chikungunya virus transmission potential. Proc. Biol. Sci. R. Soc. 2014 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Alto BW, Bettinardi D. Temperature and dengue virus infection in mosquitoes: Independent effects on the immature and adult stages. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2013;88:497–505. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.12-0421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Pigllucci M. How organisms respond to environmental changes: From phenotypes to molecules (and vice versa) Trends Ecol. Evol. 1996;11:168–173. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(96)10008-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sorensen JG, et al. Pronounced plastic and evolutionary responses to unpredictable thermal fluctuations in drosophila simulans. Front. Genet. 2020;11:555843. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.555843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Blair CD, Olson KE. The role of RNA interference (RNAi) in arbovirus-vector interactions. Viruses. 2015;7:820–843. doi: 10.3390/v7020820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Adelman ZN, et al. Cooler temperatures destabilize RNA interference and increase susceptibility of disease vector mosquitoes to viral infection. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2013;7:e2239. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kay BH, Jennings CD. Enhancement or modulation of the vector competence of Ochlerotatus vigilax (Diptera: Culicidae) for ross river virus by temperature. J. Med. Entomol. 2002;39:99–105. doi: 10.1603/0022-2585-39.1.99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Cirimotich CM, Ramirez JL, Dimopoulos G. Native microbiota shape insect vector competence for human pathogens. Cell Host Microbe. 2011;10:307–310. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2011.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wu P, et al. A gut commensal bacterium promotes mosquito permissiveness to arboviruses. Cell Host Microbe. 2019;25:101–112. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2018.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Moretti R, et al. Combining Wolbachia-induced sterility and virus protection to fight Aedes albopictus-borne viruses. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2018;12:e0006626. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zouache K, Michelland RJ, Failloux AB, Grundmann GL, Mavingui P. Chikungunya virus impacts the diversity of symbiotic bacteria in mosquito vector. Mol. Ecol. 2012;21:2297–2309. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05526.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Houe V, Bonizzoni M, Failloux AB. Endogenous non-retroviral elements in genomes of Aedes mosquitoes and vector competence. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2019;8:542–555. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2019.1599302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Manni M, et al. Molecular markers for analyses of intraspecific genetic diversity in the Asian Tiger mosquito Aedes albopictus. Parasit. Vectors. 2015;8:188. doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-0794-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Matschiner M, Salzburger W. TANDEM: Integrating automated allele binning into genetics and genomics workflows. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1982–1983. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Peakall R, Smouse PE. GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—an update. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:2537–2539. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Raymond M, Rousset F. GENEPOP (Version 1.2): Population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J. Hered. 1995;86:248–249. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111573. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Rousset F. genepop'007: A complete re-implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2008;8:103–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01931.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000;155:945–959. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.2.945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Jakobsson M, Rosenberg NA. CLUMPP: A cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:1801–1806. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Rosenberg N. DISTRUCT: A program for the graphical display of population structure. Mol. Ecol. Notes. 2004;4:137–138. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-8286.2003.00566.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Schuffenecker I, et al. Genome microevolution of chikungunya viruses causing the Indian Ocean outbreak. PLoS Med. 2006;3:e263. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Vazeille-Falcoz M, Mousson L, Rodhain F, Chungue E, Failloux A-B. Variation in oral susceptibility to dengue type 2 virus of populations of Aedes aegypti from the islands of Tahiti and Moorea, French Polynesia. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1999;60:292–299. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1999.60.292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Dubrulle M, Mousson L, Moutailler S, Vazeille M, Failloux A-B. Chikungunya virus and Aedes mosquitoes: Saliva is infectious as soon as two days after oral infection. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e5895. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Vega-Rua A, Zouache K, Girod R, Failloux AB, Lourenco-de-Oliveira R. High level of vector competence of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus from ten American countries as a crucial factor in the spread of Chikungunya virus. J Virol. 2014;88:6294–6306. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00370-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Stat. 1979;6:65–70. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. R package version 1.5.2–1. (2020).

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information. (924.5KB, doc)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES