Abstract
Four synthetic peptides (Peptidyl MIMs; Demeter Biotechnologies, Inc.) were evaluated for their in vitro activity against Acholeplasma laidlawii. Fifty percent effective concentration values ranged from 1 to 15 μM. Three of these compounds are more lethal than cecropin B against A. laidlawii.
Lytic polypeptides with antimicrobial activity have been isolated from insect hemolymph, amphibians, and mammals (3). Encoded by single genes, these short peptides have potent antimicrobial activity against a wide spectrum of microorganisms, including bacteria and fungi, yet have very low toxicities to higher organisms. Biologically active synthetic peptides have been produced, and gene constructs coding for lytic polypeptides have been introduced into a number of higher plants for the control of bacterial and fungal phytopathogens (1, 2, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 17, 18, 19). We have evaluated the activity of four synthetic cecropin analogs for their antimicrobial activities against the mollicute Acholeplasma laidlawii. These analogs were designed for enhanced membrane lysis activity, and each possesses features characteristic of cecropin-like lytic polypeptides (6). Specifically, these peptides each are strongly basic polar molecules which are predicted to form hydrophilic amphipathic α-helices in their N-terminal regions and more hydophobic α-helices in their C-terminal regions.
A. laidlawii strain PG-8 (ATCC 23206) was grown in liquid SP-4 medium (22) at 37°C. To assess the lytic activity of each peptide, early-log-phase cultures were exposed to six concentrations of four synthetic Peptidyl Membrane Interactive Molecules (Peptidyl MIMs; Demeter Biotechnologies Inc., Triangle Park, N.C.). The amino acid sequences of these peptides and cecropin B are as follows: 6M1, FKLRAKIKVRLRAKIKL; 2M5, KRKRAVKRVGRRLKKLARKIARLGVAKLAGLRAVKLF; 2M2, KRKRAVKRVGRRLKKLARKIARLGVAF; 2L2, FAKKFAKKFKKFAKKFAKFAFAF; cecropin B, KWKVFKKIEKMGRNIRNGIVKAGPAIAVLGEAKAL.
To each of seven 270-μl aliquots of early-log-phase A. laidlawii (107 to 108 CFU/ml) was added 30 μl of dilutions of each Peptidyl MIM. Solutions and cells were incubated at 37°C for 60 min, and three 20-μl aliquots of each dilution were plated and allowed to dry, without spreading, onto SP-4 medium solidified with 12% Noble agar. Plates were incubated at 37°C for 2 to 3 days in a humidified chamber, and CFUs were counted after staining in Diene's stain. All treatments with each Peptidyl MIM were replicated three times. Mean viable CFU/ml values were calculated from each replicated dilution plating. Percent survival for each Peptidyl MIM at each peptide concentration was calculated based upon the CFU/ml from each dilution plating divided by the CFU/ml of the water control. EC50s (estimated concentrations resulting in 50% survival) were calculated for each compound by regressing the percent survival against the natural logarithm of the compound concentration. The resulting regression equation was used to calculate the concentration of compound that would result in 50% survival. Paired t tests were used to compare mean EC50s for significant differences.
Of the four Peptidyl MIMs tested, peptides 6M1 (mean EC50 for three replicates, 1.1 μM) and 2M5 (mean EC50 for three replicates, 0.8 μM) were the most lethal to A. laidlawii, with EC50s of about 1 μM. Peptide 2L2 (mean EC50 for three replicates, 1.5 μM) was moderately effective, while peptide 2M2 (mean EC50 for two replicates, 16.3 μM) was the least toxic of those tested (Fig. 1). The EC50 values, with the exception of those for peptide 2M2, were 5 to 15 times lower than that of purified cecropin B, which had EC50 values of about 15 μM (data not shown) (mean values for 2M5 and 6M1 were not significantly different from each other but were significantly different from mean values for 2L2 and 2M2; mean values for 2M2 and 2L2 were significantly different from each other [P < 0.05]). These effective concentrations are of the same magnitude as those reported for other synthetic lytic peptides derived from cecropin B against a variety of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria (4, 5, 6, 11, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 20, 21).
FIG. 1.
Survival of A. laidlawii after 1-h exposures to dilutions of four synthetic cecropins. Data points are mean values. Symbols: ■, 2M2; □, 2M5; ⧫, 6M1; ○, 2L2; ●, cecropin B.
Interestingly, the activity of peptide 2M5 is much greater than that of peptide 2M2, even though peptide 2M2 is a truncated form of peptide 2M5. Peptide 2M5 contains 10 additional C-terminal amino acid residues that are not present in peptide 2M2 and which extend the hydrophobic α-helix at the C terminus of the molecule. This extended hydrophobic tail may facilitate the embedding of the molecule in the cell membrane of mollicutes, which may lead to the destabilization or dissolution of the membrane.
Peptide 6M1 was also very effective against A. laidlawii; however, this compound does not share the same overall structural similarities as the other peptides tested. Although it is composed of mostly basic peptide residues that form amphipathic α-helices, it does not have the strongly hydrophilic N terminus and hydrophobic C terminus that the other peptides have in common with cecropin B. Its antimicrobial activity, however, is comparable to that of peptide 2M5, the most effective compound used in this study. Peptide 6M1 is predicted to form amphipathic α-helices at its N and C termini that are connected by a short, rather flexible, intervening segment. A similar conformation has been shown for the cecropins, and it has been proposed that this general structure is integral to their mode of action (6). However, the other peptides used in this study are predicted to exist along their entire lengths as amphipathic α-helices without any intervening flexible region. Therefore, although peptide 6M1 contains a linker segment and has relatively high lytic activity, the presence of such a segment linking the N- and C-terminal α-helices seems to not be required for lytic activity of these compounds against A. laidlawii.
An interesting effect of Peptidyl MIM 2L2 was the 20 to 30% increase in cell titers of A. laidlawii at concentrations of less than 1 μM. Such stimulation of cell growth by low concentrations of lytic peptides has also been reported in other systems (12). This effect was reproducible and may reflect alterations to the membrane structure that result in increased cell metabolism or reproduction of mollicutes.
The results presented here demonstrate that these cecropin-like analogs have powerful antimicrobial effects on A. laidlawii growth in vitro. A. laidlawii is closely related to unculturable phytoplasmas based on 16S ribosomal DNA sequences (8, 16). Although such sequence homology provides only taxonomic placement and does not necessarily reflect similar physiological characteristics, it is possible that these cecropin analogs may have similar effects on phytoplasmas, which also are prokaryotes devoid of cell walls. Therefore, these analogs may prove useful in the development of transgenic plants with high resistance to phytoplasmas.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by a grant from the USDA Special Grants Program for Tropical and Subtropical Agriculture Research to J. Hu, D. Ullman, and V. Jones (#93-34135-8809).
We thank Demeter Biotechnologies Inc. for the synthetic peptides used in this study and J. M. Jaynes for helpful suggestions on testing protocols.
Footnotes
Journal series 4548 of the College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources.
REFERENCES
- 1.Allefs S, Florack D E A, Hoogendoorn C, Stiekema W J. Erwinia soft rot resistance of potato cultivars transformed with a gene construct coding for antimicrobial peptide cecropin B is not altered. Am Potato J. 1995;72:437–445. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Belknap W R, Corsini D, Pavek J J, Snyder G W, Rockhold D R, Vayda M E. Field performance of transgenic Russet Burbank and Lemhi Russet potatoes. Am Potato J. 1994;71:285–296. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bowman H G. Antibacterial peptides: key components needed in immunity. Cell. 1991;65:205–207. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90154-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bowman H G, Faye I, Gudmundsson G H, Lee J-Y, Lidholm D-A. Cell-free immunity in Cecropia. Eur J Biochem. 1991;201:23–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1991.tb16252.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Destefano-Beltran L, Nagpala P G, Cetiner M S, Dodds J H, Jaynes J M. Enhancing bacterial and fungal disease resistance in plants: application to potato. In: Vayda M E, Park W D, editors. The molecular and cellular biology of the potato. Biotechnology in agriculture no. 3. Wallingford, United Kingdom: CAB International; 1990. pp. 205–221. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fink J, Bowman A, Bowman H G, Merrifield R B. Design, synthesis and antibacterial activity of cecropin-like model peptides. Int J Peptide Res. 1989;33:412–421. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3011.1989.tb00217.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Florack D, Allefs S, Bollen R, Bosch D, Visser B, Stiekema W. Expression of giant silkmoth cecropin B genes in tobacco. Transgenic Res. 1995;4:132–141. doi: 10.1007/BF01969415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gundersen D E, Lee I-M, Rehner S A, Davis R E, Kingsbury D T. Phylogeny of mycoplasmalike organisms (phytoplasmas): a basis for their classification. J Bacteriol. 1994;176:5244–5254. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.17.5244-5254.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hassan M, Sinden S L, Kobayashi R S, Nordeen R O, Owens L D. Transformation of potato (Solanum tuberosum) with a gene for an antibacterial protein, cecropin. Acta Hortic. 1993;336:127–131. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Huang Y, Nordeen R O, Di M, Owens L D, McBeath J H. Expression of an engineered cecropin gene cassette in transgenic tobacco plants confers disease resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tabaci. Phytopathology. 1997;87:494–499. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.1997.87.5.494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hultmark D, Engstrom A, Bennich H, Kapur R, Bowman H G. Insect immunity: isolation and structure of cecropin D and four minor antibacterial components from Cecropia pupae. Eur J Biochem. 1982;127:207–217. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1982.tb06857.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jaynes J M. Use of genes encoding novel lytic peptides and proteins that enhance microbial disease resistance in plants. Acta Hortic. 1993;336:33–39. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jaynes J M, Nagpala P, Destefano-Beltran L, Huang J H, Kim J, Denny T, Cetiner S. Expression of a cecropin B lytic peptide analog in transgenic tobacco confers enhanced resistance to bacterial wilt caused by Pseudomonas solanacearum. Plant Sci (Shannon) 1993;89:43–53. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Jaynes J M, Xanthopoulos K G, Destefano-Beltran L, Dodds J H. Increasing bacterial disease resistance in plants utilizing antibacterial genes from insects. Bioessays. 1987;6:263–270. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kadono-Okuda K, Taniai K, Kato Y, Kotani E, Yamakawa M. Effects of synthetic Bobmyx mori cecropin B on the growth of plant pathogenic bacteria. J Invertebr Pathol. 1994;65:309–310. doi: 10.1006/jipa.1995.1047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kirkpatrick B C, Smart C D. Phytoplasmas: can phylogeny provide the means to understand pathogenicity? Adv Bot Res. 1995;21:187–212. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mills D, Hammerschlag F A. Effect of cecropin B on peach pathogens, protoplasts, and cells. Plant Sci. 1993;93:143–150. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Nordeen R O, Sinden S L, Jaynes J M, Owens L D. Activity of cecropin SB37 against protoplasts from several plant species and their bacterial pathogens. Plant Sci (Shannon) 1992;82:101–107. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Norelli J, Aldwinckle H, Destefano-Beltran L, Jaynes J M. Increasing the fire blight resistance of apple by transformation with genes encoding antibacterial proteins. Acta Hortic. 1993;338:385–386. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Qul X-M, Steiner H, Engstrom A, Bennich H, Bowman H G. Insect immunity: isolation and structure of cecropins B and D from pupae of the chinese oak silk moth, Anatheraea pernyi. Eur J Biochem. 1982;127:219–224. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1982.tb06858.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wade D, Bowman A, Wahlin B, Drain C M, Andreu D, Bowman H G, Merrifield R B. All-D amino acid-containing channel-forming antibiotic polypeptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990;87:4761–4765. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.12.4761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Whitcomb R F. Culture media for spiroplasmas. Methods Mycoplasmol. 1983;1:147–158. [Google Scholar]

