Abstract
This study proposes a low-cost, portable, eight-channel electrical impedance tomograph based on the AD5933 impedance converter. The patterns for current injection and voltage measurement are managed by an Arduino Mega 2560 board and four 74HC4067 Texas Instruments multiplexers. Regarding the experimental results, the errors in the impedance estimates of an electrical circuit that represents a Cole model were less than 1.14% for the magnitude and 4.15% for the phase. Furthermore, the signal-to-noise ratio measured in a resistive phantom was 55.23 dB. Additional experiments consisted of placing five spheres of different size and conductivity in a saline tank, measuring their impedance through eight electrodes, and then generating impedance maps using the Electrical Impedance Tomography and Diffuse Optical Tomography Reconstruction Software (EIDORS). These maps were different for each sphere, suggesting the proposed prototype as a promising alternative for medical applications.
Keywords: Impedance distribution, Image reconstruction, Impedance measurement, Electrical bioimpedance
Specifications table
| Hardware name | System of estimation 2D of bioimpedance distribution (SE2DoBID) |
| Subject area | Engineering and Material Science |
| Hardware type | Measurement bioimpedance system |
| Open-source license | CC BY 4.0 |
| Cost of hardware | $80.5 USD |
| Source File Repository | https://doi.org/10.17632/27m65n9mk7.1 |
Hardware in context
Bioimpedance measurement (BIM) is a non-invasive, radiation-free technique for studying biological tissues [1]. BIM is based on the injection of an alternating current and the measurement of the resulting voltages [1]. The injection of current and the measurement of voltages is carried through an arrangement of electrodes located on the surface of the object under study. For BIM, there are two main approaches. The first uses Ohm's Law to relate the injected current and the measured voltages to provide information about the internal composition of biological tissues [2]. The second approach is electrical impedance tomography (EIT), which provides maps of the spatial distribution of electrical conductivity [1], [3], [4], [5].
BIM has been used successfully in the assessment of knee joint injury [1], respiratory monitoring [6], diagnosis of lung injury [2], [7], detection of cancerous tissue [8], pneumothorax [9], evaluation of soft tissue hydration [10], intracranial hemorrhage detection [11], bladder filling monitoring [12], body composition assessment [13], skeletal muscle mass estimation [14], evaluation of edema [15]. In addition, BIM and myographic signals have been combined to assess chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [16]. BIM has also been used to recognize wrist hand gestures [17], [18], [19], [20]. These applications show the potential of EIT in medical applications.
The hardware for EIT is evaluated in terms of spatial and temporal resolution. Spatial resolution depends on signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and on the number of electrodes, while temporal resolution refers to the number of frames per second that the EIT device acquires [4]. Fig. 1 shows the hardware architecture for a two-dimensional (2D) EIT system [5], [21].
Fig. 1.

General scheme of a BIM system.
In the EIT literature, the authors use sinusoidal currents with different amplitudes and frequencies. For example, in [18], a 300 uA sinusoidal current at a frequency of 40 kHz was used; while in [17], [20], frequencies were 200 kHz and 40 kHz, respectively. In [22], [23], a 4 mA current signal with a frequency of 125 kHz was used. In [24], the amplitude of the sinusoidal current was 3 mA and the frequency took the values 50 kHz, 100 kHz, 250 kHz, 500 kHz and 1 MHz [25] shows that the BIM system based on the AD5933 achieves the best performance for a current of 1 mA at a frequency of 50 kHz. As a result, the present study, also based on the AD5933, will use these two parameters to generate impedance distribution images.
The proposed EIT system has design and sampling rate advantages compared to previously developed prototypes. In terms of design, the core of our BIM system is the AD5933 impedance converter, which includes a sinusoidal signal generator, a digital signal processor (DSP), and an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) on a single chip. In the devices presented in [26], [27], the DSP and the ADC are separated, which increases the sensitivity to noise and the probability of failure. Another advantage of our prototype is that, unlike the original configuration of the AD5933, it does not require an additional circuit to measure impedance less than 1 kΩ. Regarding sampling frequency, the proposed EIT system acquires 100 frames per second, being faster than the EIT prototype presented in [20].
Hardware description
The proposed EIT system comprises the following elements: i) one AD5933 impedance converter that generates an alternating voltage signal (Vout), which passes through a high pass filter (HPF) to remove DC components; ii) a voltage-controlled current source that converts the voltage signal generated by the AD5933 into a 1-mA alternating current; iii) four Texas Instruments 74HC4067 multiplexers to generate injection and measurement patterns; iv) an instrumentation amplifier that measures voltage differences between pairs of electrodes; v) one DSP that calculates the real and imaginary parts of the load impedance; vi) one Arduino Mega 2560 board, which defines the frequency of the signal to be generated by the AD5933, manages the multiplexers, and transmits the estimated impedance to a personal computer through a Bluetooth module (Fig. 2). The EIT system includes a resistive-capacitive protection network connected in series to each multiplexer channel. This network filters the DC components of the current signals to comply with the IEC60601 safety standard for medical equipment [28].
Fig. 2.
Scheme of the proposed EIT system.
Impedance converter AD5933
The AD5933 is an impedance converter comprising a 27-bit resolution sinusoidal signal generator, an internal oscillator operating at 16 MHz maximum clock frequency (MCLK), a 12-bit ADC with a sampling rate of 1 megasample per second and a DSP. The frequency of the signal generator ranges from 1 to 100 kHz, with a resolution of 0.1 Hz. The AD5933 measures impedances from 1 kΩ to 10 MΩ [25], [29]. The AD5933 was selected for our prototype because impedances are estimated using Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) rather than in-phase and quadrature demodulation, which is known to be sensitive to deviations from the sinusoidality assumption in the signal to be measured. The AD5933 applies a sinusoidal signal to the object under study and measures the resulting voltage across a shunt resistor. The real and imaginary parts of the first harmonic of this voltage are obtained through DFT. Hence, the high order harmonics, created by nonlinearities in the load impedance, are not considered for the impedance estimation.
Alternating signal generation and impedance measurement
The internal clock of the AD5933 is configured to work at the MCLK frequency. In addition, the peak-to-peak amplitude of Vout (Fig. 2) is configured to one volt by setting to one the bits 1 and 2 of the register 0x80 of the AD5933 (Table 1). The frequency of the signal Vout is programmed using Eq. (1).
| (1) |
Table 1.
Configuration of the control register 0x80 of the AD5933.
| Bit 7 | Bit 6 | Bit 5 | Bit 4 | Bit 4 | Bit 2 | Bit 1 | Bit 0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | X | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Frequency generation in repetition mode | This bit is not used | The peak-to-peak amplitude of | Gain of the PGA | ||||
To apply Eq. (1), both Fr and MCLK should be in Hz. For Fr = 50E3 Hz and MCLK = 16E6 Hz, the resulting decimal value for FS is 1677721, which is equivalent to the hexadecimal number 0 × 199999. The 8-bit numbers 0 × 19, 0 × 99, and 0 × 99 are written to the register addresses 0 × 82, 0 × 83, and 0 × 84, respectively. Since the proposed system operates at a single frequency of 50 kHz, it is necessary to activate the frequency repetition mode of the AD5933. This is done by assigning 0, 1, 0, and 0 to bits 7, 6, 5, and 4 of register 0 × 80 (Table 1). The AD5933 programmable gain amplifier (PGA) can be configured to multiply the ADC input signal by five or by one. In the latter case, bit 0 of register 0 × 80 is set to one, and otherwise, to zero. In our prototype, register 0 × 80 is configured, as indicated in Table 1.
The DSP applies the DFT to the ADC input, generating the real (R) and imaginary (I) parts of the measured impedance [29]. The real part is stored in registers 0 × 94 and 0 × 95, whereas the imaginary part is stored in registers 0 × 96 and 0 × 97 [29]. This study proposes an analog front end, which is included in our prototype to solve the two main limitations of the AD5933: (i) the AD5933 measures impedance ranging from 1 kΩ to 10 MΩ [25], [29], but most biological tissues are below 1 kΩ [30], and (ii) the AD5933 uses voltages instead of currents, which is considered potentially dangerous in medical applications as the resulting current may be greater than the limits defined by IEC60601 [31].
Analog front end
The proposed analog front-end for the AD5933 comprises a high-pass filter (HPF) (Fig. 2), a voltage-to-current converter (VCCS) (Fig. 3a), and an instrumentation amplifier (Fig. 3b). The HPF is a first order system composed by a 100 kΩ resistor and a 10 nF capacitor to remove the DC components of Vout. The HPF output is connected to VCCS [25], which consists of a TL084 operational amplifier and two resistors (R1 = 1 kΩ; Rg = 10 kΩ). The integrated TL084 is chosen for its fast response, low power consumption and low sensitivity to noise [32]. Because the impedance is supposed to vary from tens to hundreds of ohms [30], Rg = 10 kΩ ensures that current I1 (Fig. 4) flows mainly through ZL, which is connected in parallel to Rg (Fig. 4). The unity gain instrumentation amplifier is implemented by a TL084, which receives, through its non-inverting input, the voltages on the electrodes connected to ZL. Since the ADC converter of the AD5933 is unipolar, a potential (VDD/2) is added to the voltage V0 (Fig. 4). The DSP of the AD5933 calculates the real and imaginary parts of ZL, which are read by an Arduino Mega 2560 board through an inter-integrated circuit (I2C) protocol and sent to a personal computer using a Bluetooth module HC-05. The Arduino Mega 2560 board was selected because its high data acquisition rate and because it has enough digital pins to manage the four 74HC4067 multiplexers.
Fig. 3.
a) Voltage-to-current converter; b) Instrumentation amplifier.
Fig. 4.
Simplified diagram of an electrical impedance tomography (EIT) system.
Impedance estimation by EIT system
Fig. 4 shows a simplified diagram of the proposed EIT system.
When is significantly less than kΩ, . In such a case, voltages across and are given by Eqs. (2), (3), respectively.
| (2) |
| (3) |
The currents and are obtained by applying Ohḿs law to the resistors and :
| (4) |
| (5) |
The equation for is rewritten by replacing Eqs. (2), (3) in Eq. (4):
| (6) |
The voltage , read by the AD5933, can be related to the load impedance by knowing that . Hence, from Eqs. (5), (6) and considering that kΩ and kΩ
| (7) |
Solving for
| (8) |
When the AD5933 is used without the front-end described in Fig. 4, the impedance is estimated as follows [29]:
| (9) |
where . The and integers are the values of the registers that contain the real and imaginary parts of the first harmonic of the voltage VF (Fig. 4). is a gain factor calculated from a test performed on a of known value [29]. A limitation of the AD5933 in its original configuration is that when the load is less than kΩ, it requires an additional buffer circuit [29]. On the contrary, the proposed prototype does not suffer from this limitation and, therefore, Eq. (8) is also valid for low impedances. Another advantage of our prototype is that the estimated impedance is proportional to VF (Eq. (8)), while in Eq. (9) this relationship is nonlinear.
Injection and measurement patterns
Current injection and voltage measurement is done using an adjacent pattern, which is based on the four-electrode method, which basically consists of injecting current through one pair of electrodes and measuring the voltage through another pair of electrodes [33]. The use of four 74HC4067 multiplexers is essential since they allow selecting the pairs of current injection electrodes and voltage measurement until completing the adjacent pattern presented in Fig. 5 [33]. The 74HC4067 multiplexer was chosen for its high speed switching and low sensitivity to noise [34]. An Arduino Mega 2560 board manages the selection of the channels of each multiplexer. Fig. 6 shows the connection between the multiplexers, the VCCS converter and the instrumentation amplifier.
Fig. 5.
Injection and measurement pattern.
Fig. 6.
Connection of multiplexing module.
Polarization of the EIT system
The AD5933 impedance converter and the HC-05 Bluetooth module must be powered at 3.3 V and 5 V, respectively, through the Arduino Mega 2560 board; similarly, the SCL and SDA ports of the AD5933 are biased to 3.3 V using a pair of 10 kΩ resistors. Subsequently, a 7.4 V lithium battery is connected to the Arduino and to a DCWN03E-05 dual source module. Dual source energize to the multiplexers, the VCCS and the instrumentation amplifier (Fig. 7).
Fig. 7.
BIM system polarization.
Wireless communication and data acquisition
In biomedical applications, the object under study should be at a distance greater than 1 m from computers to avoid Radio-Frequency interference. This recommendation can be achieved through the use of wired or wireless data transmission between the data collecting device and the computer used to process information. In the present prototype, the communication between the Arduino board and the computer could have been implemented through Universal Serial Bus communication, which is simpler and more reliable than the wireless option. Nevertheless, the proposed prototype uses Bluetooth communication to guarantee complete electrical isolation from the power grid (Fig. 2). On the other hand, the connection between the electrodes and the Arduino board is wired as it is the case of most bioimpedance measurement prototypes [1], [2], [3], [5], and [35].
The computer used for the experiments described below runs a LabVIEW application that stores the data sent by the Arduino board in text files. These text files are post-processed using EIDORS, which is open source and implements various image reconstruction algorithms. In future prototypes, a Secure Digital (SD) memory card will be added to the Arduino board to prevent data loss in the event of a wireless communication failure. A bioimpedance measurement system using an SD card for data storage is described in [36].
Design files
The following table shows the figures that correspond to the design of the proposed BIM system.
| Design file name | File type | Open source license | Location of the file |
|---|---|---|---|
| General scheme of a BIM system | Figure (PNG) | CC BY 4.0 | Included in the article (Fig. 1) |
| Scheme of the proposed BIM system | Figure (PNG) | CC BY 4.0 | Included in the article (Fig. 2) |
| Voltage-to-current converter | Figure (PNG) | CC BY 4.0 | Included in the article (Fig. 3a) |
| Instrumentation amplifier | Figure (PNG) | CC BY 4.0 | Included in the article (Fig. 3b) |
| Simplified diagram of an electrical impedance tomography (EIT) system | Figure (PNG) | CC BY 4.0 | Included in the article (Fig. 4) |
| Injection and measurement pattern | Figure (PNG) | CC BY 4.0 | Included in the article (Fig. 5) |
| Connection of multiplexing module | Figure (PNG) | CC BY 4.0 | Included in the article (Fig. 6) |
| BIM system polarization | Figure (PNG) | CC BY 4.0 | Included in the article (Fig. 7) |
| BIM system diagram in Eagle | Figure (PNG) | CC BY 4.0 | Included in the article (Fig. 8a) |
| BIM system PCB in Eagle | Figure (PNG) | CC BY 4.0 | Included in the article (Fig. 8b) |
| BIM system | Figure (PNG) | CC BY 4.0 | Included in the article (Fig. 8c) |
| Impedance measurement | Figure (PNG) | CC BY 4.0 | Included in the article (Fig. 9) |
Files corresponding to the design and programming of the BIM system are in the System BIM folder of the repository https://doi.org/10.17632/27m65n9mk7.1
-
•
BIM_System_Design: This folder contains files corresponding to the design of the BIM system and their respective modules.
-
•
Matlab_Script: This folder contains files corresponding to Matlab scripts used for calculating the SNR (file SNR.m) and global impedance (file impedance_measurement.m).
-
•
Octave_Files: The Octave script that contains the (EIDORS) algorithm used for reconstructing impedance images (eidors.m).
-
•
PCB_files: This folder contains the EAGLE design files of the PCB (pcb2.BRD and pcb2.SCH files).
-
•
Arduino_Files: This folder contains the Arduino sketch for operating the BIM system (file BIM_AD5933.ino).
-
•
LabVIEW_Files: This contains the LabVIEW application for storing impedance measurements (file BIM_AD5933.vi).
Bill of materials
The list of materials used in the design of the BIM system are presented in the following table.
| Designator | Component | Number | Cost per unit -currency | Total cost -currency | Source of materials | Material type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Impedance converter | AD5933, 1MSPS, 12 bits | 1 | $35.96 USD | $35.96 USD | digikey | Other |
| Operational amplifier | TL084 JFET-Input | 1 | $0.64 USD | $0.64 USD | sigmaelectronica | Other |
| Multiplexer | 74HC4067, High-Speed CMOS Logic 16 Channel Analog Multiplexer-Demultiplexer | 4 | $2.68 USD | $10.72 USD | mercadolibre | Other |
| Arduino | Arduino Mega 2560, 16 MHz crystal oscillator | 1 | $12.07 USD | $12.07 USD | electrotekmega | Other |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth HC-05 v2.0 | 1 | $4.83 USD | $4.83 USD | electrotekmega | Other |
| Resistor | 1 KΩ, ¼ w | 6 | $0.0089 USD | $0.054 USD | mercadolibre | Other |
| Resistor | 10 KΩ, ¼ w | 2 | $0.0089 USD | $0.017 USD | mercadolibre | Other |
| Resistor | 100 KΩ, ¼ w | 1 | $0.0089 USD | $0.0089 USD | mercadolibre | Other |
| Resistor | 27 KΩ, ¼ w | 2 | $0.0089 USD | $0.017 USD | mercadolibre | Other |
| Resistor | 61 KΩ, ¼ w | 4 | $0.0089 USD | $0.035 USD | mercadolibre | Other |
| Resistor | 1 MΩ, ¼ w | 17 | $0.0089 USD | $0.15 USD | mercadolibre | Other |
| Capacitor | 10 nF | 1 | $0.027 USD | $0.027 USD | mercadolibre | Ceramic |
| Capacitor | 100 nF | 16 | $0.027 USD | $0.43 USD | mercadolibre | Ceramic |
| Lithium Battery | LiPo Turnigy Battery Nano-Tech 7.4 V (2S) 300 mAh 35-70C | 1 | $9.12 USD | $9.12 USD | demosspro | Compound |
Build instructions
The correct operation of the BIM system requires the following operations before using the device (Fig. 7):
-
•
With 3.3 V (VDD), polarize the impedance converter AD5933 and its ports SCL-SDA (I2C interface) using the Arduino Mega 2560 board.
-
•
Polarize the HC-05 Bluetooth module with 5 V via Arduino Mega 2560 board for wireless communication.
-
•
Power the dual-source module with a 7.4-V Li-Po battery.
-
•
Energize the current source, instrumentation amplifier, and multiplexers with ±5 V, supplied by the dual-source module. In this step, it is recommended to identify the positive and negative voltages of the system to make a correct connection of the modules, thereby avoiding irreversible damage to the BIM prototype.
Fig. 8 shows the circuit diagram, the PCB layout, and the BIM system implementation.
Fig. 8.
a) BIM system diagram in Eagle, b) BIM system PCB in Eagle, c) BIM system (1: AD5933; 2: Current source + Amp. Instrumentation; 3: Multiplexers; 4: Protection network + Electrodes; 5: Bluetooth).
Operation instructions
Once the BIM system has been configured and energized (Section 5), measurements are obtained by following the procedure described below (Fig. 9):
-
•
Connect the electrodes around the object under study.
-
•
Load the file located in the Arduino_Files folder to the Arduino board.
-
•
Execute the LabVIEW application for the acquisition and storage of the impedance measurements. This software is included in the LabVIEW_Files folder.
-
•
Execute the Matlab script located in the Matlab_Script folder to calculate the global impedance index.
-
•
Execute the Octave script located in the Octave_Files folder to obtain the impedance distribution using EIDORS.
Fig. 9.
Impedance measurement.
After the measurements are completed, the 7.4 V lithium battery is disconnected and then the electrodes attached around the object under study are removed.
Validation and characterization
BIM system calibration
The AD5933 is calibrated using the procedure proposed by the manufacturer [29]. The first step is to connect ports 0, 2, 4, and 6 to one terminal of a 986-Ω resistance and ports 1, 3, 5, and 7 to the other terminal (Fig. 10). Subsequently, average 50 measurements. In our experiments, the average impedance was 992 Ω, presenting a relative error of 0.8%.
Fig. 10.

Electrode arrangement for calibration.
Signal-to-noise ratio
Resistive phantoms (Fig. 11) are used to evaluate the performance of BIM systems in terms of SNR and precision. This is because they provide predictable, stable and reproducible signals [37], [38]. These phantoms are interconnections of resistances of known value that form a specific topology and have the ability to generate localized conductivity disturbances [37].
Fig. 11.

Resistive phantom.
In the present work, current is initially injected through electrodes 1 and 2, and voltages are measured at the following five pairs of electrodes: (3,4), (4,5), (5,6), (6,7), and (7,8). Since there are eight possibilities to select the electrode 1, a frame is a set of 40 measurements (Fig. 5). The sampling rate, measured in frames per second, indicates the number of frames obtained in one second by the BIM system. The SNR was calculated using 50 measurements obtained from a resistive phantom (Fig. 11) using Eq. (10) [37]. In such an equation, and represent the mean and standard deviation of the impedance between each pair of electrodes, respectively. The number of frames per second were modified to determine the best SNR. Table 2 shows the results of this experiment.
| (10) |
Table 2.
SNR on a resistive phantom.
| Frames per second | SNR (dB) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Min | Max | Mean | |
| 1000 | 12.08 | 26.31 | 16.90 |
| 200 | 23.01 | 37.53 | 27.70 |
| 100 | 50.90 | 59.97 | 55.23 |
| 50 | 28.31 | 52.47 | 38.12 |
| 33 | 28.56 | 52.62 | 38.18 |
| 25 | 28.08 | 51.13 | 37.92 |
| 20 | 28.41 | 52.71 | 38.18 |
According to Table 2, the highest SNR (55.23 dB) is obtained at a sample rate of 100 frames per second. Therefore, to obtain the best contrast in the impedance distribution maps, this frequency will be used in the experiments presented in the subsequent sections. In future studies, electrodes with low noise sensitivity [39] will be used to increase the SNR above 55.23 dB.
Phase and magnitude measurement on Cole’s model
Cole's simple dispersion model (Fig. 12) comprises two resistors and a fractional order capacitor [40]. These three elements represent the conductivity and permittivity of a biological tissue [41], [42], [43]. In this work, the BIM prototype was validated by comparing the theoretical and estimated magnitude and phase of four Cole circuits. For all of them, R2 and C were set to 196 Ω and 100 nF, respectively, while R1 was different for each circuit (146 Ω, 461 Ω, 909 Ω, and 986 Ω). R2 and C were selected to keep the total impedance below 1 kΩ at the operating frequency of the BIM prototype (50 kHz).
Fig. 12.

Cole’s model.
In Table 3 and Table 4, the percentage of error is defined as the difference between the theoretical and estimated values of a variable, divided by its theoretical value. For each Cole circuit, the magnitude and phase were measured 50 times. The interquartile range for each data set was calculated as the difference between the thresholds that define the quartils three (Q3) and one (Q1) (Eq. (11)). Q3 is the lowest value that exceeds 75% of the items in a data set, and Q1 is the lowest value that exceeds 25% of those items.
| (11) |
Table 3.
Theoretical and measured magnitudes of Cole’s model at 50 kHz by averaging 50 frames.
| R1 (Ω) | Theoretical Magnitude (Ω) of Cole’s circuit | Measured magnitude (Ω) |
Relative error (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Interquartile range | |||
| 146 | 154 | 155 | 5.5 | 0.65 |
| 461 | 467 | 462 | 58.2 | 1.07 |
| 909 | 914 | 912 | 13.4 | 0.22 |
| 986 | 991 | 977 | 34.7 | 1.41 |
Table 4.
Theoretical and measured phase of Cole’s model at 50 kHz by averaging 50 frames.
| R1 (Ω) | Theoretical Phase (°) of Cole’s circuit (degrees) | Measured phase (°) |
Relative error (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Interquartile range | |||
| 146 | −11.60 | −11.52 | 0.29 | 0.75 |
| 461 | −3.81 | −3.78 | 0.17 | 0.67 |
| 909 | −1.94 | −1.95 | 0.11 | 0.25 |
| 986 | −1.79 | −1.72 | 0.34 | 4.10 |
On the other hand, the percentage relative error is calculated by Eq. (12);
| (12) |
where Ir is the actual or theoretical value and Im the measured value, impedance and phase.
Table 3 and Table 4 show that the percentage errors for magnitudes and phases are lower than 2% and 5%, respectively. The small interquartile ranges in both tables indicate low noise sensitivity.
Image reconstruction of impedance distribution
In general, phantoms are designed with materials that replicate the electrical properties of biological tissues [44], [45], [46]. The simplest phatoms are saline tanks, in which conductive and nonconductive objects are placed to test EIT prototypes [47], [48]. In this work, experiments were performed using a cylindrical tank of 7.5 cm in radius and 30 cm in height filled with saline solution (4 gr/L), three steel spheres with diameters of 15.7, 19.8, and 21.5 cm, and two plastic spheres with diameters of 12.5 and 25.8 cm. These five spheres were introduced one by one in the tank, and then an impedance distribution image was obtained for each sphere using EIDORS. In EIDORS, the impedance maps were obtained by applying the Gauss-Newton algorithm to a finite element model with 1600 nodes. The Noser algorithm was used as a regularization method to improve the quality of the maps.
The saline tank with no spheres was used to obtain the homogeneous measurements. Subsequently, the spheres were placed one at a time in the tank, to obtain the non-homogeneous measurements. The homogeneous and non-homogeneous measurements are used to determine the ability of the BIM system to detect variations in the impedance and size of the spheres. Fig. 13 depicts the location of the spheres in the saline tank.
Fig. 13.

Location of spheres in a saline tank to obtain impedance distribution maps. The yellow sphere is nonconducting, whereas the gray sphere is made of stainless steel. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 14 and Fig. 15 show impedance distributions for the conductive and nonconductive spheres. Both figures show that the proposed system differentiates objects with impedances greater or less than the saline solution. Furthermore, based on impedance distributions, the location of the spheres is estimated. Fig. 16 indicates the impedance distribution when one conductive and nonconductive sphere are simultaneously introduced into the tank. Fig. 14, Fig. 15, Fig. 16 shows the ability of the proposed system to differentiate objects with different conductivity
Fig. 14.
EIT image reconstruction of steel spheres: small on the left, median in the center, and big on the right.
Fig. 15.
EIT image reconstruction of plastic spheres: small on the left and big on the right.
Fig. 16.

EIT image reconstruction of conductive (dot circle white) and nonconductive (dot circle green) spheres. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
The conductivity of a stainless-steel sphere is approximately 1.45E6 S/m and that of a plastic sphere is approximately 10E-14 S/m.
Conclusions
The proposed low-cost BIM system estimates the magnitude and phase of electrical impedances with errors less than 2% and 5%, respectively. The small interquartile ranges presented in Table 3 and Table 4 highlight the low sensitivity to noise of the prototype. Regarding experiments with the saline tank, the Gauss-Newton and Noser algorithms lead to impedance distribution maps where differences in size and conductivity can be easily detected. The prototype is effective to differentiate objects with conductivities ranging from 1E to 13 S/m to 1.45E6 S/m. Furthermore, the BIM system presents the highest SNR (55.23 dB) at 100 frames per second. In this sense, the BIM system is a promising alternative particularly in medical applications where precision and high data acquisition rates are required to determine impedance distributions of human tissues and fluids.
The use of eight electrodes in the proposed BIM system limits the spatial resolution; therefore, future work will focus on the design of BIM systems comprising 16 electrodes with low sensitivity to noise electrodes [39], to improve the estimation of impedance maps. To increase the portability of the prototype, the LabVIEW application will be replaced by another that runs on widescreen Android devices.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
Acknowledgements
The BIM prototype proposed in this work was funded by the University of Cauca and by the internal resources of the Automation of University of Cauca (501100005682). The authors would like to thank Enago (www.enago.com) for the English language review.
This work has no affiliations with any organization or entity with financial interest that may have influenced the report in this paper.
Contributor Information
Juan D. Muñoz, Email: juand@unicauca.edu.co.
Víctor H. Mosquera, Email: mosquera@unicauca.edu.co.
Carlos F. Rengifo, Email: caferen@unicauca.edu.co.
References
- 1.Hersek S., Toreyin H., Teague C.N., Millard-Stafford M.L., Jeong H.-K., Bavare M.M., Wolkoff P., Sawka M.N., Inan O.T. Wearable vector electrical bioimpedance system to assess knee joint health. IEEE Trans. Bio Med. Eng. 2017;64(10):2353–2360. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2016.2641958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pino E.J., Gómez B., Monsalve E., Aqueveque P. 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) 2019. Wireless Low-Cost Bioimpedance Measurement Device for Lung Capacity Screening; pp. 1187–1190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tan C., Liu S., Jia J., Dong F. A wideband electrical impedance tomography system based on sensitive bioimpedance spectrum bandwidth. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2020;69(1):144–154. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Costa E.L.V., Gonzalez Lima R., Amato M.B.P. In: Yearbook of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine. Vincent J.-L., editor. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; Berlin, Heidelberg: 2009. Electrical impedance tomography; pp. 394–404. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pitaloka B., Zarkasi A., R Santoso D. Development of low cost EIT equipment for educational purposes. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2019;1153:012041. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1153/1/012041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Blanco-Almazan D., Groenendaal W., Catthoor F., Jane R. Wearable bioimpedance measurement for respiratory monitoring during inspiratory loading. IEEE Access. 2019;7:89487–89496. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mauri T., Eronia N., Turrini C., Battistini M., Grasselli G., Rona R., Volta C.A., Bellani G., Pesenti A. Bedside assessment of the effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on lung inflation and recruitment by the helium dilution technique and electrical impedance tomography. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(10):1576–1587. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4467-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Moqadam S.M., Grewal P.K., Haeri Z., Ingledew P.A., Kohli K., Golnaraghi F. Cancer detection based on electrical impedance spectroscopy: a clinical study. J. Electr. Bioimpedance. 2018;9(1):17–23. doi: 10.2478/joeb-2018-0004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cambiaghi B., Moerer O., Kunze-Szikszay N., Mauri T., Just A., Dittmar J., Hahn G. A spiky pattern in the course of electrical thoracic impedance as a very early sign of a developing pneumothorax. Clin. Physiol. Funct. Imaging. 2018;38(1):158–162. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nescolarde L., Lukaski H., De Lorenzo A., de-Mateo-Silleras B., Redondo-del-Río M.P., Camina-Martín M.A. Different displacement of bioimpedance vector due to Ag/AgCl electrode effect. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016;70(12):1401–1407. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2016.121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dai M., Liu X.-C., Li H.-T., Xu C.-H., Yang B., Wang H., Shi X.-T., Dong X.-Z., Fu F. EIT imaging of intracranial hemorrhage in rabbit models is influenced by the intactness of cranium. Biomed Res. Int. 2018;2018:1–10. doi: 10.1155/2018/1321862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.M. Reichmuth, S. Schürle, M. Magno, A Non-Invasive Wearable Bioimpedance System to Wirelessly Monitor Bladder Filling, in: 2020 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition, (2019) 338-341.
- 13.Campa F., Toselli S., Mazzilli M., Gobbo L. Assessment of body composition in athletes: a narrative review of available methods with special reference to quantitative and qualitative bioimpedance analysis. Nutrients. 2021;13(1620):1–25. doi: 10.3390/nu13051620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Xu H., Liu J., Zhang X., Xue Y., Shi J., Chen W., Zheng X. Estimation of skeletal muscle mass by bioimpedance and differences among skeletal muscle mass indices for assessing sarcopenia. Clin. Nutr. 2020:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.10.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.M. Reichmuth, S. Schürle, M. Magno, A Non-Invasive Wearable Bioimpedance System to Wirelessly Monitor Bladder Filling, in: 2020 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition, (2019) 338-341.
- 16.Almazan D., Groenendaal W., García M., Petrocelli L., Lijnen L., Smeets C., Ruttens D., Catthoor F., Jané R. Combining bioimpedance and myographic signals for the assessment of COPD during loaded breathing. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2020:1–8. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2020.2998009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wu Y., Jiang D., Duan J., Liu X., Bayford R., Demosthenous A. IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS) 2018. Towards a High Accuracy Wearable Hand Gesture Recognition System using EIT; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhang C.H.Y., Xiao R., Harrison C. Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology. 2016. Advancing Hand Gesture Recognition with High Resolution Electrical Impedance Tomography; pp. 843–850. [Google Scholar]
- 19.D. J. Matthies, S. T. Perrault, B. Urban, S. Zhao, Botential: Localizing On-Body Gestures by Measuring Electrical Signatures on the Human Skin, in: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM, (2015) 207-216.
- 20.Y. Zhang, C. Harrison, Tomo: Wearable, Low-Cost, Electrical Impedance Tomography for Hand Gesture Recognition, UIST, (2015) 167-173.
- 21.Al-Ali A.A., Elwakil A.S., Maundy B.J., Freeborn T.J. Extraction of phase information from magnitude-only bio-impedance measurements using a modified Kramers-Kronig Transform. Circ. Syst. Signal Process. 2018;37(8):3635–3650. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jiang D., Wu Y., Demosthenous A. Hand Gesture Recognition Using ThreeDimensional Electrical Impedance Tomography. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II Express Briefs. 2020:1–5. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wu Y., Jiang D., Neshatvar N., Hanzaee F., Demosthenous A. IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS) 2020. Towards a Universal Methodology for Performance Evaluation of Electrical Impedance Tomography Systems Using Full Reference SNR; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Xu Y., Yan Z., Han B., Dong F. An FPGA-based multifrequency EIT system with reference signal measurement. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2021;70:1–10. [Google Scholar]
- 25.F. Noveletto, P. Bertemes-Filho, D. Dutra, Analog Front-End for the Integrated Circuit AD5933 Used in Electrical Bioimpedance Measurements, II Latin American Conference on Bioimpedance, 54, (2016) 48-51.
- 26.Zlochiver S., Arad M., Radai M.M., Barak-Shinar D., Krief H., Engelman T., Ben-Yehuda R., Adunsky A., Abboud S. A portable bio-impedance system for monitoring lung resistivity. Med. Eng. Phys. 2007;29(1):93–100. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2006.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.singh G., Anand S., Lall B., Srivastava A., Singh V. A low-cost portable wireless multi-frequency electrical impedance tomography system. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2019;44(3):2305–2320. [Google Scholar]
- 28.IEC60601. https://www.iec.ch/homepage. [En línea]
- 29.Devices, Analog. Impedance Converter. [En línea]
- 30.Lymperopoulos G., Lymperopoulos P., Alikari V., Dafogianni C., Zyga S., Margari N. Applications for Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) and Electrical Properties of the Human Body. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2016:1–9. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-57348-9_9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Seoane F., Ferreira J., Sanchéz J.J., Bragós R. An analog front-end enables electrical impedance spectroscopy system on-chip for biomedical applications. Physiol. Meas. 2008;29(6):S267–S278. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/29/6/S23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.TL084. https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/tl082h.pdf?ts=1636645109845&ref_url=https%253A%252F%252Fwww.google.com%252F. [En línea]
- 33.Bera T. Applications of Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT): A Short Review. IOP Conf. Series Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018;331:1–9. [Google Scholar]
- 34.74HC4067. https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/cd74hc4067.pdf. [En línea]
- 35.Fu B.o., Freeborn T.J. Cole-impedance parameters representing biceps tissue bioimpedance in healthy adults and their alterations following eccentric exercise. J. Adv. Res. 2020;25:285–293. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2020.05.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Critcher S., Freeborn T.J. Flexible PCB Failures From Dynamic Activity and Their Impacts on Bioimpedance Measurements: A Wearable Case Study. IEEE Open J. Circ. Syst. 2021;2:732–742. doi: 10.1109/OJCAS.2021.3122369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gagnon H., Cousineau M., Adler A., Hartinger A.E. A resistive mesh phantom for assessing the performance of EIT systems. IEEE Trans Bio Med Eng. 2010;57(9):2257–2266. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2010.2052618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zarafshani A., Qureshi T., Bach T., Chatwin C.R., Soleimani M. IEEE International Conference on Electro Information Technology (EIT) 2016. A 3D Multi-frequency response electrical mesh phantom for validation of the planar structure EIT system performance; pp. 0600–0604. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Fortune B.C., Pretty C.G., Chatfield L.T., McKenzie L.R., Hayes M.P. Low-cost active electromyography. HardwareX. 2019;6:1–13. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Trujillo V., Rengifo C.F., Bravo D.A. Sinusoidal current source for bioimpedance applications based on a nonlinear discrete time closed loop control algorithm. Ciencia en Desarrollo. 2019;10(2):137–149. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kapoulea S., Psychalinos C., Elwakil A.S. 2nd Novel Intelligent and Leading Emerging Sciences Conference. 2020. Simple Implementations of the Cole-Cole Models; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kumar R., Perumalla S., Vista J., Ranjan A. 1st International Conference on Electronics, Materials Engineering and Nano-Technology (IEMENTech) 2017. Realization of single and double cole tissue models using higher order approximation; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- 43.A. Boyle, Transient Circuit Simulation of (Cole-Cole) Fractional-Order Models for Biomedical Instrumentation, in: 20th International Conference on Biomedical Applications of Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT), (2019) 1-1.
- 44.Anand G., Lowe A., Al-Jumaily A. Tissue phantoms to mimic the dielectric properties of human forearm section for multi-frequency bioimpedance analysis at low frequencies. Mater. Sci. Eng., C. 2019;96:496–508. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.11.080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kim D.-H., Chauhan M., Kim M.-O., Jeong W.C., Kim H.J., Sersa I., Kwon O.I., Woo E.J. Frequency-dependent conductivity contrast for tissue characterization using a dual-frequency range conductivity mapping magnetic resonance method. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 2015;34(2):507–513. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2014.2361689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ianniello C., de Zwart J.A., Duan Q.i., Deniz C.M., Alon L., Lee J.-S., Lattanzi R., Brown R. Synthesized tissue-equivalent dielectric phantoms using salt and polyvinylpyrrolidone solutions. Magn. Reson. Med. 2018;80(1):413–419. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Bera T.K., Nagaraju J., Lubineau G. Electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS)-based evaluation of biological tissue phantoms to study multifrequency electrical impedance tomography (Mf-EIT) systems. J. Vis. 2016;19(4):691–713. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Sirtoli V.G., Morcelles K., Bertemes-Filho P. 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) 2017. Electrical Properties of Phantoms for Mimicking Breast Tissue; pp. 157–160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]










