Skip to main content
RSC Advances logoLink to RSC Advances
. 2019 Jan 11;9(3):1278–1283. doi: 10.1039/c8ra09203f

Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii): a bio-based and magnetically recoverable nano-catalyst for the synthesis of 4H-pyrimido[2,1-b]benzothiazole derivatives

Nasrin Safajoo 1, Bi Bi Fatemah Mirjalili 1,, Abdolhamid Bamoniri 2
PMCID: PMC9059560  PMID: 35518002

Abstract

Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii) as a green bio-based magnetic catalyst was prepared through in situ co-precipitation of Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions in an aqueous suspension of nano-cellulose. The mentioned magnetically heterogeneous catalyst was characterized by FT-IR, XRD, VSM, FESEM, TEM, XRF, EDS and TGA. In this research, the synthesis of 4H-pyrimido[2,1-b]benzothiazole derivatives was developed via a three component reaction of aromatic aldehyde, 2-aminobenzothiazole and ethyl acetoacetate using Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii) under solvent-free condition at 80 °C. Some advantages of this protocol are good yields, environmentally benign, easy work-up and moderate reusability of the catalyst. The product structures were confirmed by FT-IR, 1H NMR, and 13C NMR spectra.


Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii) as a green bio-based magnetic catalyst are prepared, characterized and applied for synthesis of 4H-pyrimido[2,1-b]benzothiazoles with good to excellent yields.graphic file with name c8ra09203f-ga.jpg

Introduction

Fused heterocyclic compounds containing nitrogen and sulfur are important compounds because of their pharmacological properties.1 Among these compounds benzothiazoles and pyrimido[2,1-b]benzothiazoles have attracted considerable interest. Some of these compounds have various biological activities such as antiviral,2,3 antitumor,4–6 antiinflammatory,7,8 antiallergic,9 antimicrobial,10,11 anticonvulsant,12 antiproliferative13 and antifungal activities.14 Pyrimido[2,1-b]benzothiazole derivatives were synthesized through multicomponent reaction between 2-amino benzothiazole, aromatic aldehydes and β-ketoesters.15–18 Previously, this protocol has been catalyzed by iron fluoride,19 pyridine,11 acetic acid,20 1,1,3,3-N,N,N′,N′-tetramethylguanidinium trifluoroacetate (TMGT),16 tetrabutylammonium hydrogen sulfate (TBAHS),17N-sulfonic acid modified poly(styrene-maleic anhydride) (SMI-SO3H),21 chitosan,18 aluminum trichloride22 and Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/TiCl.23 Some of the reported protocols have harsh conditions and long reaction times. Thus, in this work, a new simple protocol for the synthesis of these compounds is reported.

Biopolymers, especially cellulose and its derivatives, have some unparalleled properties, which make them attractive alternatives for ordinary organic or inorganic supports for catalytic applications.24 Cellulose is the most abundant natural material in the world and it can play an important role as a biocompatible, renewable resource and biodegradable polymer containing OH groups.25 Cotton is a natural, cheap, and readily available source of cellulose. Fe3O4 nanoparticles are coated with various materials such as surfactants,26 polymers,27,28 silica,29 cellulose23 and carbon30 to form core–shell structures. Magnetic nanoparticles as heterogeneous supports have many advantages such as high dispersion in reaction media and easy recovery by an external magnet.31–38 Cu(ii) as a safe and ecofriendly cation is a good Lewis acid and can activate the carbonyl group for nucleophilic addition reactions. Thus, the main purpose of the present work is the preparation of Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii) as a new and bio-based magnetic nanocatalyst for one-pot synthesis of pyrimido[2,1-b]benzothiazoles via condensation of aromatic aldehydes, ethyl acetoacetate and 2-aminobenzothiazole.

Results and discussion

Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii) was prepared in a two-step process. First, Fe3O4@nano-cellulose was synthesized by co-precipitation of Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions in the presence of nano-cellulose and then it was used as a magnetic support for loading CuCl2 onto the cellulose section of it (Scheme 1). The magnetically heterogeneous catalyst named Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii), is characterized by Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD), vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray fluorescence (XRF), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and thermo-gravimetric analysis (TGA).

Scheme 1. Synthesis protocol for Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii).

Scheme 1

The FT-IR spectra of nano-cellulose, Fe3O4@nano-cellulose and Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii) are shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. FT-IR spectra of (a) nano-cellulose, (b) Fe3O4 @ nano-cellulose and (c) Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii).

Fig. 1

The FT-IR spectrum of nano-cellulose has shown a broad band at 3338 cm−1 which corresponds to the stretching vibrations of OH groups. The absorption bands at1058 and 1108 cm−1 display the stretching vibrations of the C–O bonds. For Fe3O4@nano-cellulose, in addition to the cellulose absorptions bands, stretching vibrations of Fe/O groups at 586 and 634 cm−1 are appeared which is indicated that the magnetic Fe3O4 nano particles are coated by nano-cellulose. The FT-IR spectrum of Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii) has shown a characteristic absorption band under 500 cm−1 that may be attributed to Cu–O band for Cu bonded to cellulose. X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii) is shown in Fig. 2. Fe3O4 has shown diffraction peaks at 2θ = 35.79°, 43.42°, 53.94°, 57.51° and 63.08° with FWHM equal to 0.39, 0.78, 0.94, 0.31 and 0.96 respectively, which are quite matched with the cubic spinel structure of pure Fe3O4. A diffraction peaks at 2θ = 16.45° and 22.18° with FWHM equal to 0.23 and 0.47, respectively, has shown the existence of cellulose. Other signals in 2θ = 13.68, 29.10, 32.01, 34.25 and 45.71 probably reveal the existence of cellulose and bonding of Cu(ii) to cellulosic shell (Table 1).

Fig. 2. XRD pattern of Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii).

Fig. 2

Results of XRD analysis of Fe3O4@nano cellulose/Cu(ii).

No. 1 2 3 4 5 6
Pos. [°2θ] 13.6815 16.4566 22.1853 29.1068 32.0094 34.2572
FWHM [°2θ] 0.6298 0.4723 0.2362 0.2362 0.3149 0.3149
No. 7 8 9 10 11 12
Pos. [°2θ] 35.7935 43.4246 45.7114 53.9425 57.5101 63.0810
FWHM [°2θ] 0.3936 0.7872 0.3149 0.9446 0.3149 0.9600

The magnetic properties of Fe3O4 and Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii) were characterized at RT (300 K) by a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) and their hysteresis curves are presented in Fig. 3. The zero coercivity and remanence of the hysteresis loops of these magnetic nanoparticles confirm superparamagnetic property of them at room temperature. The amount of specific saturation magnetization (Ms) for Fe3O4 nanoparticles was about 50 emu g−1, which decreased to 25 emu g−1 after the bonding of Cu(ii) on the surface of Fe3O4@nano-cellulose. Despite this significant decrease, the saturated magnetization of these magnetic nanoparticles is sufficient for magnetic separation.

Fig. 3. Magnetization loop of (a) Fe3O4 and (b) Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii).

Fig. 3

The particles size of Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii) were investigated by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) in which the dimensions of them were achieved below 70 nm (Fig. 4). The chemical composition of catalyst has been measured using X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis (Table 2). In order to obtain the Cu : Cl ratio in Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii) by XRF analysis, Kilo Counts Per Seconds (KCPS) values of elements in catalyst were compared with KCPS values of the same elements in pure samples, NaCl and CuSO4. By this comparison, the amount of Cu and Cl were obtained 1.38 g (0.02 mol) and 0.12 g (0.003 mol), respectively. Thus, the ratio of Cu : Cl in catalyst is approximately 6 : 1.

Fig. 4. (a) FESEM image of Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii) and (b) TEM of Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii).

Fig. 4

Results of XRF analysis of catalyst, pure NaCl and CuSO4.

Elemental component Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii) CuSO4 NaCl
KCPS wt% KCPS wt% KCPS wt%
CO2 1.5 74.8 0.2 13.3
Fe2O3 1118.9 21.7 0.6 0.0174
CuO 19.5 1.45 563.9 41.2
SiO2 2.8 0.796 0.1 0.0403
Na2O 0.9 0.573 0.2 0.218
CaO 4.3 0.190 0.2 0.00479
I 2.0 0.0799 1.2 0.145
Cl 1.0 0.0681 516.5 62
Sb2O3 1.7 0.0606 0.7 0.0746
Al2O3 0.2 0.0565
SO3 0.4 0.0523 184.8 43.7
MnO 2.2 0.0482
MgO 0.2 0.0432 2.2 1.02
SnO2 1.2 0.0340 0.7 0.0546
Re 0.7 0.0333 0.5 0.0585
CoO 2.2 0.0285
Cr2O3 0.4 0.0100
Pd 0.1 0.00860
TiO2 0.3 0.00860
Rh 0.1 0.00747
K2O 0.2 0.00734
SrO 0.5 0.00340
Ho2O3 0.4 0.0446
HfO2 1.8 0.0381
P2O5 0.1 0.0346
Rh 0.1 0.0213
Total 100 100

And so, existence of Cu and Cl in catalyst was confirmed by EDS analysis data (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5. EDS (EDX) spectra of Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii).

Fig. 5

The thermal stability of Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii) was investigated by thermo-gravimetric analysis (TGA) in the temperature range of 30–800 °C (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6. Thermal gravimetric analysis pattern of Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii).

Fig. 6

The TGA curve illustrates four mass-loss steps. Firstly, a very small weight loss (2.53%) from 50 to 100 °C is corresponded to remove of catalyst moisture. Subsequently, the main weight loss step in the temperature ranges 200–370 °C (33%) is attributed to the decomposition of cellulose units through the formation of levoglucosan and other volatile compounds. Finally, there are two weight loss steps in the temperature ranges 400–600 and 650–690 °C (5 and 16%, respectively). According to the TG–DTA diagram of Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii), it was revealed that this catalyst is suitable for the promotion of organic reactions below 200 °C.

Catalyst efficiency for synthesis of 4H-pyrimido[2,1-b]benzothiazole derivatives

After characterization of Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii), the activity of catalyst was evaluated for the synthesis of 4H-pyrimido[2,1-b]benzothiazole derivatives.

For optimization of the reaction conditions, the reaction of 2-aminobenzothiazole, 4-nitrobenzaldehyde and ethyl acetoacetate as a model reaction was investigated (Table 3). As shown in Table 3, entry 14, it was found that 0.03 g of Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii) under solvent-free condition at 80 °C is the best reaction condition. In order to compare the efficiency of present nano-catalyst with other catalysts, the model reaction was also performed using the reported catalysts for the synthesis of 4H-pyrimido[2,1-b]benzothiazole derivatives. As Table 4 indicates, in comparison with other reported catalysts, we have found that Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii) promoted reaction has shorter reaction time, higher yields of products, green reaction conditions and simpler workup. Finally, the above optimized reaction conditions were explored for the synthesis of 4H-pyrimido[2,1-b]benzothiazole derivatives and the results are summarized in Table 5. The reusability of the catalyst was also investigated on the model reaction. The magnetic nature of the catalyst allowed its facile recovery by simple separation by an external magnet, washing with ethanol and drying at room temperature to provide an opportunity for recycling experiments. The separated nano-catalyst was reused in the above-mentioned reaction for the synthesis of IVb for four times without considerable loss of its catalytic activity (Table 3). Partial loss of activity may be due to blockage of catalyst active sites and/or partial leaching of Cu from the catalyst.

The reaction of 2-aminobenzothiazole, 4-nitrobenzaldehyde, and ethyl acetoacetate in the presence of Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii) under various conditionsa.

graphic file with name c8ra09203f-u1.jpg
Entry Solvent Catalyst (g) Condition Time (h) Yieldb (%)
1 80 °C 7 h 30
2 CuCl2 80 °C 3h 69
3 Fe3O4 70 °C 3h 37
4 Fe3O4@nano-cellulose 80 °C 4 h 41
5 C2H5OH R. T 7 h
6 C2H5OH Catalyst (0.04)c R. T 3 h 35
7 C2H5OH Catalyst (0.04)c Reflux 3 h 57
8 H2O Catalyst (0.04)c Reflux 3 h 42
9 CH3OH Catalyst (0.04)c Reflux 3 h 51
10 Catalyst (0.04)c R. T 3 h 43
11 Catalyst (0.04)c 70 °C 1 h 85
12 Catalyst (0.05)c 80 °C 0.5 93
13 Catalyst (0.04)c 80 °C 0.5 97
14 Catalyst (0.03)c 80 °C 0.5 97
15 Catalyst (0.02)c 80 °C 0.5 84
16 Catalyst (0.03), 2thrunc 80 °C 0.5 93
17 Catalyst (0.03), 3rdrunc 80 °C 0.5 88
18 Catalyst (0.03), 4thrunc 80 °C 0.5 83
a

The amount ratio of 2-aminobenzothiazole (mmol), 4-nitrobenzaldehyde (mmol) and ethyl acetoacetate (mmol) are equal to 1 : 1 : 1.

b

Isolated yield.

c

Fe3O4@ nano-cellulose/Cu(ii).

Comparative study of the present method and some other reported methods for synthesis of 4H-pyrimido[2,1-b]benzothiazole derivatives.

Ent. Solvent Catal. Tem. (°C) Time (h) Yielda (%) Ref.
1 CH3OH Acetic acid (20 mol%) 65 18 62 20
2 EG TBAHS (30 mol%)b 120 2 72 17
3 HOAc Chitosan (0.080 g) 70 1.6 93 18
4 TMGT (0.080 g)c 100 5 53 16
5 AlCl3 (10 mol%) 65 1.2 97 22
6 Fe3O4@NCs/TiCl (0.03 g) 70 0.6 96 23
7 Fe3O4@ nano-cellulose/Cu(ii) (0.03 g) 80 0.5 97 This work
a

Isolated yield.

b

Tetrabutylammonium hydrogen sulfate.

c

1,1,3,3-N,N,N′,N′-Tetramethylguanidinium trifluoroacetate.

Synthesis of 4H-pyrimido[2,1-b]benzothiazole derivatives (IVa–m) in the presence of Fe3O4@ nano-cellulose/Cu(ii) under solvent-free condition at 80 °Ca appear here with headings as appropriate.

graphic file with name c8ra09203f-u2.jpg
Ent. R Prod. Time (min) Yieldb (%) M. P. Ref.
Found Report
1 H– IVa 45 84 178–180 177–179 17
2 4-NO2 IVb 30 97 171–173 170–172 22
3 4-Cl– IVc 30 95 87–89 86–88 21
4 4-Br– IVd 30 97 110–114 110–114 16
5 4-OH– IVe 60 82 210–212 210–212 22
6 2-NO2 IVf 45 88 122–125 122–125 23
7 2-Cl– IVg 40 87 124–126 125–127 17
8 2-EtO– IVh 60 75 171–175 171–175 23
9 3-NO2 IVi 35 93 222–224 222–224 21
10 3-OH– IVj 65 79 260–263 260–263 23
11 2,4-(Cl)2 IVk 45 85 133–135 133–135 17
12 2,4-(MeO)2 IVl 75 74 164–166 164–166 23
13 3,4-(OH)2 IVm 70 71 225–227 225–227 23
a

I (mmol) : II (mmol) : III (mmol) : Fe3O4@ nano-cellulose/Cu(ii) (g) is equal to 1 : 1 : 1 : 0.03.

b

Isolated yield.

Substituents on the aldehyde showed a significant effect in terms of the yield and reaction time under the optimized reaction conditions. The electron-withdrawing groups increase rate and yields of reaction compared to electron-donating groups. Suggested mechanism for the synthesis of 4H-pyrimido[2,1-b]benzothiazole (IV) in presence of Fe3O4@ nano-cellulose/Cu(ii) was shown in Scheme 2. Cu(ii) activate the carbonyl group of benzaldehyde (II) for Knoevenagel reaction with β-ketoesters (III) to production of intermediate (I). Meanwhile, Cu(ii) activate the carbonyl group in intermediate (I) for Michael addition with 2-aminobenzothiazole and then interamolecular cyclization to production of product (IV).

Scheme 2. Proposed mechanism for the synthesis of 4H-pyrimido [2,1-b]benzothiazole derivatives IVa–m.

Scheme 2

The structures of the products IVa–m were studied by their melting point, IR and 1H NMR spectra. In the FTIR spectra of products, the ester C Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 O stretching vibration band is appeared at 1690 cm−1 due to conjugation.

Conclusions

We have demonstrated the preparation and characterization of Fe3O4@ nano-cellulose/Cu(ii) as a novel magnetite recoverable, eco-friendly, inexpensive and efficient nanocatalyst. The catalytic activity of the prepared catalyst was investigated in the synthesis of 4H-pyrimido[2,1-b] benzothiazole derivatives through one-pot three-component reaction of aldehydes, ethyl acetoacetate, and 2-aminobenzothiazole under solvent-free condition at 80 °C. This protocol includes some important advantages such as mild reaction conditions, short reaction time, excellent yields, easy work-up, high purity of products. And so, magnetic separation and reusability of nanocatalyst is other advantages of this protocol.

Experimental

General remarks

All compounds were purchased from Aldrich, Merck, and Fluka chemical companies. Nano-cellulose and Fe3O4@nano-cellulose were synthesized via our previously reported methods.23 FT-IR spectra were run on a Bruker, Equinox 55 spectrometer. A Bruker (DRX-400 Avance) NMR was used to record the 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern was obtained by a Philips Xpert MPD diffractometer equipped with a Cu Kα anode (k = 1.54 A°) in the 2θ range from 10 to 80°. XRF analysis was done with Bruker, S4 Explorer instrument. VSM measurements were performed by using a vibrating sample magnetometer (Meghnatis Daghigh Kavir Co. Kashan, Iran). Melting points were determined by a Buchi melting point B-540 B.V.CHI apparatus. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) image was obtained on a Mira 3-XMU. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image was obtained using a Philips CM120 with a LaB6 cathode and accelerating voltage of 120 kV. energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) of Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii) was measured by an EDS instrument and Phenom pro X. Thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) was conducted using “STA 504” instrument.

Preparation of Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii)

In a flask containing 50 ml of 0.5 M NaOH, Fe3O4@nano-cellulose (0.5 g) was added with stirring. Then, 75 ml of CuCl2 aqueous solution, 0.04 M, was added. A dark blue solution was obtained immediately that was stirred at room temperature. After 6 h, the magnetically heterogeneous catalyst, Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii), removed from solution by an external magnet. The catalyst washed with ethanol and water two times and dried at an oven at 80 °C.

General procedure for synthesis of 4H-pyrimido[2,1-b]benzothiazole derivatives

A mixture of 2-aminobenzothiazole (1 mmol), aldehyde (1 mmol), ethyl acetoacetate (1 mmol) and Fe3O4@nano-cellulose/Cu(ii) (0.03 g) was heated at 80 °C. After completion of the reaction (monitored by TLC), the reaction mixture was dissolved in hot ethanol (3 ml) and the catalyst was separated by using an external magnet. Subsequently by adding water to the decanted solution, the product was appeared as a pure solid in high yields. The recovered catalyst was washed 3 times with ethanol, dried and reused for subsequent runs under the same reaction conditions.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Supplementary Material

RA-009-C8RA09203F-s001

Acknowledgments

The Research Council of Yazd University is gratefully acknowledged for the financial support for this work.

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c8ra09203f

Notes and references

  1. Ellis G. P., Chemistry of heterocyclic compounds: synthesis of fused heterocycles, Wiley, New York, vol. 47, 2009 [Google Scholar]
  2. Borthwick A. D. Davies D. E. Ertl P. F. Exall A. M. Haley T. M. Hart G. J. Jackson D. L. Parry N. R. Patikis A. Trivedi N. Weingarten G. G. Woolven J. M. J. Med. Chem. 2003;46:4428–4449. doi: 10.1021/jm030810w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. El-Sherbeny M. A. Arzneim.-Forsch./Drug Res. 2000;50:848–853. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1300300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Youssef A. M. Noaman E. Arzneim.-Forsch./Drug Res. 2007;57:547–553. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1296647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hassan A. Y. Phosphorus, Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. 2009;184:2856–2869. doi: 10.1080/10426500802590244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gabr M. T. El-Gohary N. S. El-Bendary E. R. El-Kerdawy M. M. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2014;85:576–592. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.07.097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Deshmukh V. K. Raviprasad P. Kulkarni P. A. Kuberkar S. V. Int. J. Chem. Tech. Res. 2011;3:136–142. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kashinath D. V. Rajmani Y. M. Ravindra C. S. J. Pharm. Res. 2013;6:574–578. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bartovič A. Ilavský D. Šimo O. Zalibera L. Belicová A. Seman M. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 1995;60:583–593. doi: 10.1135/cccc19950583. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lanjewar K. R. Rahatgaonkar A. M. Chorghade M. S. Saraf B. D. Indian. J. Chem., Sec. B. 2009;48:1732–1737. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sahu P. K. Sahu P. K. Gupta S. K. Thavaselvamd D. Agarwal D. D. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2012;54:366–378. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2012.05.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gineinah M. M. M. Sci. Pharm. 2001;69:53–61. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ćaleta I. Grdiša M. Mrvoš-Sermek D. Cetina M. Tralić-Kulenović V. Pavelić K. Karminski-Zamola G. Il Farmaco. 2004;59:297–305. doi: 10.1016/j.farmac.2004.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Maddila S. Gorle S. Seshadri N. Lavanya P. Jonnalagadda S. B. Arabian J. Chem. 2016;9:681–687. doi: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.04.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pavlenko A. A. Shikhaliev K. S. Potapov A. Y. Krylsky D. V. Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. 2005;41:796–797. doi: 10.1007/s10593-005-0206-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Shaabani A. Rahmati A. Naderi S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005;15:5553–5557. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.08.101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Nagarapu L. Gaikwad H. K. Palem J. D. Venkatesh R. Bantu R. Sridhar B. Synth. Commun. 2013;43:93–104. doi: 10.1080/00397911.2011.592624. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sahu P. K. Sahu P. K. Gupta S. K. Agarwal D. D. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014;53:2085–2091. doi: 10.1021/ie402037d. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Atar A. B. Jeong Y. S. Jeong Y. T. Tetrahedron. 2014;70:5207–5213. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2014.05.094. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sahu P. K. Sahu P. K. Sharma Y. Agarwal D. D. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2014;51:1193–1198. doi: 10.1002/jhet.1572. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Heravi M. M. Hashemi E. Beheshtiha Y. S. Kamjou K. Toolabi M. Hosseintash N. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2014;392:173–202. doi: 10.1016/j.molcata.2014.04.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sahu P. K. Sahu P. K. Lal J. Thavaselvam D. Agarwal D. D. Med. Chem. Res. 2012;21:3826–3834. doi: 10.1007/s00044-011-9908-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Azad S. Mirjalili B. B. F. RSC Adv. 2016;6:96928–96934. doi: 10.1039/C6RA13566H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Klemm D. Heublein B. Fink H. P. Bohn A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005;44:3358–3393. doi: 10.1002/anie.200460587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Shaabani A. Maleki A. Appl. Catal., A. 2007;331:149–151. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2007.07.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lu Y. Lu X. Mayers B. T. Herricks T. Xia Y. J. Solid State Chem. 2008;181:1530–1538. doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2008.02.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rase H. F., Handbook of Commercial Catalysts: Heterogeneous Catalysts, CRC Press, New York, 2000 [Google Scholar]
  28. El Harrak A. Carrot G. Oberdisse J. Eychenne-Baron C. Boué F. Macromolecules. 2004;37:6376–6384. doi: 10.1021/ma035959w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Tartaj P. Serna C. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125:15754–15755. doi: 10.1021/ja0380594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhang Z. Duan H. Li S. Lin Y. Langmuir. 2010;26:6676–6680. doi: 10.1021/la904010y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Rác B. Molnar A. Forgo P. Mohai M. Bertóti I. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2006;244:46–57. doi: 10.1016/j.molcata.2005.08.043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Shen Y. Tang J. Nie Z. Wang Y. Ren Y. Zuo L. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2009;68:312–319. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2009.05.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Movassagh B. Takallou A. Mobaraki A. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2015;401:55–76. doi: 10.1016/j.molcata.2015.03.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Zeng T. Chen W. W. Cirtiu C. M. Moores A. Song G. Li C. J. Green Chem. 2010;12:570–573. doi: 10.1039/B920000B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zolfigol M. A. Moosavi-Zare A. R. Moosavi P. Khakyzadeh V. Zare A. C. R. Chim. 2013;16:962–966. doi: 10.1016/j.crci.2013.05.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Zolfigol M. A. Khakyzadeh V. Moosavi-Zare A. R. Rostami A. Zare A. Iranpoor N. Beyzavi M. H. Luque R. Green Chem. 2013;15:2132–2151. doi: 10.1039/C3GC40421H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Khazaei A. Gholami F. Khakyzadeh V. Moosavi-Zare A. R. Afsar J. RSC Adv. 2015;5:14305–14310. doi: 10.1039/C4RA16300A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Khazaei A. Moosavi-Zare A. R. Gholami F. Khakyzadeh V. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2016;30:691–694. doi: 10.1002/aoc.3491. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

RA-009-C8RA09203F-s001

Articles from RSC Advances are provided here courtesy of Royal Society of Chemistry

RESOURCES