Skip to main content
BioMed Research International logoLink to BioMed Research International
. 2022 Apr 25;2022:9097379. doi: 10.1155/2022/9097379

Achievements and Visibility of Scientific Publications of All Peruvian Medical Schools: A 5-Year Scientometric Analyses

Frank Mayta-Tovalino 1,, Josmel Pacheco-Mendoza 2, Jesus Bardales-Garcia 3, Juan Alvitez 4, Abigail Temoche 4, Roman Mendoza 5, Arnaldo Munive-Degregori 6
PMCID: PMC9061002  PMID: 35509715

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the bibliometric profile of the national academic production of public and private medical schools in Scopus after the publication of a new university law (2015–2020).

Methods

A descriptive bibliometric study was conducted. The secondary data corresponding to the 42 Peruvian medical schools that had scientific publications in Scopus from 2015 to 2020 were evaluated, and the Affiliation ID of each Peruvian institution was considered. Data were analysed using SciVal.

Results

The total production of the Peruvian medical schools was 5406 manuscripts (100%), of which 3018 (56%) were included in the ‘clinical medicine' category. The total production of publications in Peru from 2015 to 2020 was 21597 manuscripts, of which medical publications accounted for 7950, with only 5406 manuscripts belonging to the Faculties of Medicine of Peru. The Peruvian Journal of Experimental Medicine and Public Health had published the highest number of manuscripts (500 articles), with an approximate publication citation of two.

Conclusion

There was a constant increase in the scientific production of Peruvian medical schools from 2015 to 2020. Additionally, it was found that medical publications contribute the most to the total scientific production of Peru.

1. Introduction

Scientometrics consists of the application of different statistical methods to analyse results of scientific research indexed in databases such as Embase, Scopus, Medline, and Web of Science. This area measures the scientific productivity of institutions, especially in the field of medicine [1].

Bibliometric studies generally analyse the quantitative characteristics of scientific publications to obtain findings in relation to scientific communication. This type of research enables drawing contrasts between countries, affiliations, and/or authors. Consequently, bibliometrics is the numerical analysis of scientific publications in a certain period, field, or institution, and the collaborations between them [2].

Scientometrics analyses study the impact of scientific production in an area of knowledge, such as collaborative networks that help identify dynamics between authors, countries, and institutions [3, 4]. In this sense, it is important to know the activities related to scientific publication in the faculty of human medicine and quantify their impact based on number of citations. Medical schools play an important role in the creation of knowledge based on scientific evidence, especially for optimal decision-making [5].

However, a lack of methodological uniformity can be observed in the evaluation of scientific production by medical schools, which may directly impact their reputation. For example, when evaluating the scientific production of medical schools in Europe, different bibliometric data have been used to track the amount of international collaboration, volume, and increases in research production, integrating different bibliometric techniques that could provide a more nuanced and accurate interpretation of the research output of medical schools [6].

Thus, this research was aimed at determining the scientometric profile of the national academic production of all Peruvian medical schools in Scopus.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Design

This scientometric study was of retrospective, descriptive, and observational design. All medical schools in Peru that had a Scopus ID were evaluated, which corresponded to 42 faculties. The scientific production of these faculties was evaluated between 2015 and 2020 (Table 1)

Table 1.

All faculties of health of sciences or medicine in Peru.

N ° Scopus ID University N ° Scopus ID University
1 60071237 Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia 22 60105266 Universidad Nacional San Luis Gonzaga de Ica
2 60071231 Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos 23 60113141 Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista
3 60103706 Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas 24 60109730 Universidad Católica Los Ángeles de Chimbote
4 60089535 Universidad Nacional San Agustín de Arequipa 25 60105265 Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas
5 60078122 Universidad Científica del Sur 26 60105267 Universidad Nacional Micaela Bastidas de Apurímac
6 60104616 Universidad de San Martín de Porres 27 60105305 Universidad Peruana Unión
7 60104719 Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola 28 60105284 Universidad Nacional Hermilio Valdizán
8 60071256 Universidad Nacional San Antonio Abad del Cusco 29 60112059 Universidad Norbert Wiener
9 60108878 Universidad Continental 30 60105109 Universidad Nacional San Cristóbal de Huamanga
10 60071251 Universidad Nacional de Trujillo 31 60110655 Universidad Nacional de Tumbes
11 60078117 Universidad Privada del Norte 32 60071259 Universidad Nacional de Cajamarca
12 60105261 Universidad Ricardo Palma 33 60109322 Universidad Católica Santo Toribio de Mogrovejo
13 60071261 Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal 34 60105303 Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann
14 60105306 Universidad César Vallejo 35 60089536 Universidad Nacional Santiago Antúnez de Mayolo
15 60105309 Universidad Católica de Santa María 36 60105304 Universidad Peruana los Andes
16 60105301 Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego 37 60112678 Universidad Privada de Tacna
17 60071253 Universidad Nacional de la Amazonía Peruana 38 60105286 Universidad Nacional Amazónica de Madre de Dios
18 60071260 Universidad Nacional del Altiplano de Puno 39 60105328 Universidad Nacional José Faustino Sánchez Carrión
19 60105110 Universidad Nacional del Centro del Perú 40 60105262 Universidad Nacional del Santa
20 60105282 Universidad Nacional Pedro Ruiz Gallo 41 60105285 Universidad Nacional Daniel Alcides Carrión
21 60104034 Universidad Nacional de Piura 42 60120619 Universidad San Pedro

2.2. Search Strategy

The search strategy was developed based on the institutional profiles (Affiliation ID) of Peruvian universities that had a school of human medicine. Afterwards, the profiles found in the Scopus database were exported to a CSV file, which was then imported into the SciVal tool to proceed with the bibliometric analysis. This analysis included indicators such as scientific production by sub-subject area, total scientific production, type of collaboration, scientific production by university, and indexed journals with the highest publication of Peruvian medical manuscripts.

2.3. Medicine School Selection

All Peruvian colleges were evaluated according to the licensing pattern issued by the regulatory entity SUNEDU (National Superintendency of Higher Education). The following selection criteria were applied:

Inclusion criteria are as follows:

  1. public Peruvian medicine schools

  2. private Peruvian medicine schools

  3. public and private Peruvian medicine schools with institutional licensing by SUNEDU

Exclusion criteria are as follows:

  1. Peruvian medicine schools that do not have Scopus registration

2.4. Statistical Data Analysis

A descriptive statistic of the scientific production of all the evaluated medical schools was obtained and tabulated in Excel. Bibliometric analysis was performed using the SciVal tool from Scopus.

3. Results

3.1. Scholarly Output of Peruvian Medical Schools

The total production of the Peruvian medical schools was 5406 manuscripts (100%), of which 3018 (56%) were included in the “clinical medicine” category. In contrast, the “basic medicine” and “health sciences” categories were represented by 36% and 34%, respectively. Finally, only 1% of the investigations were in the “medical biotechnology” category (Table 2).

Table 2.

Scientific production of the Peruvian Medicine Faculties by sub-subject area.

Subcategory Scholarly output % Citations Authors Citations per publication Field-weighted citation impact
Faculties of Medicine in Peru 5406 100 43249 5983 8 1.1
Clinical medicine 3018 56 23332 3388 7.7 1.0
Basic medicine 1927 36 22103 2682 11.5 1.4
Health sciences 1861 34 8506 2709 4.6 0.8
Other medical science 802 15 13315 1311 16.6 2.2
Medical biotechnology 61 1 131 147 2.1 0.3

3.2. Scientific Production of All Medical Schools in Peru

Of the 42 Peruvian universities with a faculty of medicine, the leading institutions were Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, and Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, with 2172, 975, and 705 manuscripts, respectively. In relation to other institutions, a progressive increase was observed from 2015 to 2020 (Table 3).

Table 3.

Scientific production of all medical faculties in Peru.

Peruvian medical schools 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Overall
Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia 304 343 349 338 373 465 2172
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos 103 110 149 163 165 285 975
Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas 114 131 99 126 136 99 705
Universidad de San Martín de Porres 40 83 76 92 92 124 507
Universidad Científica del Sur 35 46 24 52 97 227 481
Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola 1 4 17 34 90 148 294
Universidad Continental 3 11 24 37 54 77 206
Universidad Ricardo Palma 6 28 13 25 31 44 147
Universidad Nacional de Trujillo 7 22 19 19 33 42 142
Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego 10 27 35 20 18 29 139
Universidad Nacional San Agustín de Arequipa 5 8 16 21 35 41 126
Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal 6 8 13 16 20 50 113
Universidad Privada del Norte 0 6 25 25 17 34 107
Universidad Nacional San Antonio Abad del Cusco 5 16 13 20 21 22 97
Universidad Nacional “San Luis Gonzaga” de Ica 4 21 21 12 17 13 88
Universidad Católica Los Ángeles de Chimbote 0 12 13 6 16 33 80
Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista 0 5 7 8 20 33 73
Universidad Católica De Santa María 9 8 8 8 12 24 69
Universidad César Vallejo 3 5 7 7 12 30 64
Universidad Nacional de la Amazonía Peruana 8 10 4 13 10 17 62
Universidad Nacional de Piura 7 9 11 7 7 10 51
Universidad Nacional Pedro Ruiz Gallo 6 9 6 7 10 13 51
Universidad Norbert Wiener-UNW 1 2 2 3 11 31 50
Universidad Nacional del Altiplano de Puno 3 4 9 6 11 13 46
Universidad Católica Santo Toribio de Mogrovejo 2 8 9 6 5 14 44
Universidad Nacional Hermilio Valdizán 1 2 1 4 6 29 43
Universidad Peruana Unión 1 1 0 2 10 25 39
Universidad Nacional del Centro del Perú 0 1 3 5 11 17 37
Universidad Peruana los Andes 0 6 1 2 6 19 34
Universidad Nacional de San Cristóbal de Huamanga 2 1 3 3 13 11 33
Universidad Nacional de Cajamarca 2 5 2 2 7 3 21
Universidad Privada de Tacna 0 1 2 6 5 5 19
Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas 0 0 0 0 4 12 16
Universidad Nacional de Tumbes 1 0 2 1 8 3 15
Universidad Nacional Santiago Antúnez de Mayolo 0 0 3 3 3 3 12
Universidad Nacional José Faustino Sánchez Carrión 0 1 2 1 3 2 9
Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann 0 1 0 1 3 2 7
Universidad Nacional Micaela Bastidas de Apurímac 1 0 3 2 0 0 6
Universidad Nacional Amazónica de Madre de Dios 0 1 0 1 0 2 4
Universidad Nacional Daniel Alcides Carrión 0 2 0 0 1 1 4
Universidad Nacional del Santa 0 0 0 1 1 2 4
Universidad San Pedro 0 1 0 1 0 0 2
Total 944 1085 1184 1267 1431 2039 7950

3.3. Top 10 Scientific Journals which Publish Manuscripts from the Medical Schools of Peru

The Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Publica had the highest number of manuscripts at 500, with an approximate publication citation of two. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene was in the second place with a total of 130 published manuscripts and a higher average publication citation of 7.2. The Revista de Gastroenterología del Peru was in the third place with 115 published manuscripts, although its average publication citation (0.7) was one of the lowest (Table 4).

Table 4.

Top 10 scientific journals of the scientific production of the medical schools of Peru.

Scopus source Publications Citations Authors Citations per publication CiteScore 2019 SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)
Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Publica 500 1017 997 2.0 1.1 0.2
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 130 931 305 7.2 4.0 1.1
Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú 115 83 278 0.7 0.4 0.1
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 82 1063 188 13.0 7.6 2.1
Medwave 75 81 197 1.1 0.6 0.1
Journal of Oral Research 63 31 101 0.5 0.5 0.1
Revista Medica de Chile 41 37 67 0.9 0.9 0.2
Salud Publica de Mexico 39 46 73 1.2 2.3 0.6
Revista Habanera de Ciencias Medicas 39 15 105 0.4 0.3 0.1
Revista Chilena de Infectología 34 44 80 1.3 0.7 0.2

3.4. Top 10 Authors Who Published Manuscripts from the Medical Schools of Peru

The most productive authors that exceeded 100 publications in this category were Miranda, Juan Jaime; Bernabe-Ortiz, A; and Mejia, Christian R, from the Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia and Universidad Continental, with 213, 126, and 110 published manuscripts, respectively. The first two authors had an average of 44 and 56.8 citations per publication, while the third author had 2.6. Finally, the authors with the best h-index were Gilman, Ribert Hugh; Gotuzzo, Eduardo H.; García, Héctor Hugo; and Hernandez, Adrian V., with an h-index of 55, 49, and 48, respectively (Table 5).

Table 5.

Top 10 most productive authors in Peruvian medicine.

Name Affiliation Scholarly output Citations Citations per publication Field-weighted citation impact h-index
Miranda, Juan Jaime Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia 213 9363 44.0 5.5 41
Bernabe-Ortiz, A. Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia 126 7159 56.8 7.1 27
Mejia, Christian R. Universidad Continental 110 283 2.6 0.4 12
Gilman, Robert Hugh Johns Hopkins University 94 985 10.5 1.0 80
García, Héctor Hugo Georgetown University 93 1066 11.5 1.0 49
Hernandez, Adrian V. Duke University 86 2632 30.6 2.8 48
Dominguez-Lara, Sergio Alexis Universidad San Martin de Porres 81 203 2.5 1.8 9
Taype-Rondán, Álvaro Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia 79 221 2.8 0.7 9
Gotuzzo, Eduardo H. Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia 71 774 10.9 0.9 55
Carrillo-Larco, Rodrigo M. Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia 63 1279 20.3 2.9 15

4. Discussion

Scientometric analysis is a conglomeration of statistical methods used to quantify scientific production. Bibliometric mapping provides an excellent method for visualizing publication and citation information. This allows information to be represented in ways that make relationships objective and easy to understand [7].

Citation analysis of scientific articles is a method used to evaluate the quality of published scientific articles. The number of citations is generally correlated with the quality of the research. Citation analysis matches well with other indices of scientific recognition; therefore, it is frequently used to evaluate the academic production of a certain subject, author, or institution. Therefore, this bibliometric study can help researchers understand published scientific information and help doctors make decisions [812]. The present study used different bibliometric methods to measure factors such as scientific production, collaboration, and citations. However, it may include undue biases since it uses secondary data published in databases.

Another study reported that health science research has increased in recent years. For instance, Saudi Arabia currently leads the Arab world in medical education and research. According to a bibliometric study conducted in Jordan, an increase in the number of research articles and international collaborations was reported from years 2008 to 2017 [13]. An analysis of the distribution by subject area reveals that the area of medicine has the highest number of publications compared to other areas in the health sciences. This implies that these other areas need more attention from politicians and researchers to achieve a global research approach [13].

This study only analysed the number of manuscripts, quality, and impact of publication citations. Furthermore, it was limited to scientific databases such as Scopus. Future research should compare the productivity of health research with other high-income, scientifically advanced countries [812].

For example, in Peru, there are a few studies that measure the thesis rate of medical postgraduate students in the Doctorate program for Health Sciences in Lima. A study by Fernandez-Giusti et al. mentioned that the highest thesis defense production took place between 2014 and 2020. Additionally, there was an enhanced relationship between the students' doctoral thesis defense and their career doctorate [14]. Other studies have shown that the academic production of public and private Peruvian colleges has increased notably, especially since 2014. This could be a result of greater investment, further incentives, improvement of laboratories, and hiring of researchers with extensive experience, among other reasons [15].

the vice-chancellors of four universities (14.2%) had published at least one article in Scopus. Therefore, the scientific production of the research vice-rectors of the universities that were evaluated was deficient. This can be identified using bibliometrics [16]. Therefore, it is also important to mention that the licensing process that the human medicine schools in Peru have to follow drives the current and constant increase in scientific publications. Similarly, interinstitutional collaboration with other national and foreign universities produces quality information [17].

The main limitation to the present study was that it was only possible to show the scholarly output of the Peruvian medical schools in the Scopus database, although future studies could be carried out to evaluate other databases such as Web of Science, Medline, and Embase. Another limitation was that only a specific period (2015–2020) was evaluated, although it is predicted that the highest production peak is expected in the years following 2020.

This research will help determine the scientometric profile of the academic production of all Peruvian medical schools in Scopus. It will also help in the choice of journals, research fields, and topics. Because the main strength of a scientometric study is to provide a statistical analysis of the scientific publications of the Peruvian medical schools.

5. Conclusions

There has been a notable and constant increase in the scholarly output of the Peruvian medical schools from 2015 to 2020. Additionally, it was found that medical publications contribute the most to the total scientific production of Peru. This coincides with the enactment of a new university law that, among other aspects, encourages research in Peru.

Data Availability

The data used in this bibliometric study will be available upon authorization of the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Zoukal S., Ben Abdelaziz A., Tahiri Jouti N., Lakhdar A., Bousfiha A. A., Hassoune S. Bibliometric profil of medical publication at Faculty of Medicine of Casablanca (2008-2017) La Tunisie Médicale . 2019;97(5):613–618. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Demir E., Yasar E., Özkoçak V., Yıldırım E. The evolution of the field of legal medicine: a holistic investigation of global outputs with bibliometric analysis. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine . 2020;69, article 101885 doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2019.101885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Angulo-Bazán Y. Indicadores bibliométricos de la producción científica peruana en plantas medicinales. Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública . 2020;37(3):495–503. doi: 10.17843/rpmesp.2020.373.5234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Madden C., O'Malley R., O'Connor P., O'Dowd E., Byrne D., Lydon S. Gender in authorship and editorship in medical education journals: a bibliometric review. Medical Education . 2021;55(6):678–688. doi: 10.1111/medu.14427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Liaw W., Petterson S., Jiang V., et al. The scholarly output of faculty in family medicine departments. Family Medicine . 2019;51(2):103–111. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2019.536135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hendrix D. An analysis of bibliometric indicators, National Institutes of Health funding, and faculty size at Association of American Medical Colleges medical schools, 1997-2007. Journal of the Medical Library Association . 2008;96(4):324–334. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.96.4.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bazm S., Kalantar S. M., Mirzaei M. Bibliometric mapping and clustering analysis of Iranian papers on reproductive medicine in Scopus database (2010-2014) International Journal of Reproductive Biomedicine . 2016;14(6):371–382. doi: 10.29252/ijrm.14.6.371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ahmad P., Asif J. A., Alam M. K., Slots J. A bibliometric analysis of periodontology 2000. Periodontology . 2020;82(1):286–297. doi: 10.1111/prd.12328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bonaccorsi A., Belingheri P., Secondi L. The research productivity of universities. A multilevel and multidisciplinary analysis on European institutions. Journal of Infometrics . 2021;15(2, article 101129) doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2020.101129. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Haddow G. G., Genoni P. Citation analysis and peer ranking of Australian social science journals. Scientometrics . 2010;85(2):471–487. doi: 10.1007/s11192-010-0198-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Parker J. N., Allesina S., Lortie C. J. Characterizing a scientific elite (B): publication and citation patterns of the most highly cited scientists in environmental science and ecology. Scientometrics . 2013;94(2):469–480. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0859-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ghani M., Hurrell R., Verceles A. C., McCurdy M. T., Papali A. Geographic, subject, and authorship trends among LMIC-based scientific publications in high-impact global health and general medicine journals: a 30-month bibliometric analysis. Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health . 2021;11(1):92–97. doi: 10.2991/jegh.k.200325.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ul Haq I., Ur Rehman S., Al-Kadri H. M., Farooq R. K. Research productivity in the health sciences in Saudi Arabia: 2008-2017. Annals of Saudi Medicine . 2020;40(2):147–154. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2020.147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fernández-Giusti A., Ronceros G., Matzumura-Kasano J., Podestá L., Canchis-Aremburgo J., Mayta-Tovalino F. Productivity characteristics of the thesis rate of PhD students in biomedical areas of the different doctoral programs in Lima, Peru: a 20-year retrospective study. Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry . 2021;30:19–25. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_332_20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mayta-Tovalino F., Pacheco-Mendoza J., Diaz-Soriano A., Perez-Vargas F., Munive-Degregori A., Luza S. Bibliometric study of the national scientific production of all peruvian schools of dentistry in Scopus. International Journal of Dentistry . 2021;2021:8. doi: 10.1155/2021/5510209.5510209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Herrera-Añazco P., Valenzuela-Rodríguez G., Pacheco-Mendoza J., Málaga G. Scientific production of vice chancellors for research in Peruvian universities with a medical school. Medwave . 2017;17(8, article e7074) doi: 10.5867/medwave.2017.08.7074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mayta-Tristán P., Toro-Huamanchumo C. J., Alhuay-Quispe J., Pacheco-Mendoza J. Producción científica y licenciamiento de escuelas de medicina en el Perú. Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública . 2019;36(1):106–115. doi: 10.17843/rpmesp.2019.361.4315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data used in this bibliometric study will be available upon authorization of the corresponding author.


Articles from BioMed Research International are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES