Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2022 Apr 21;16(4):e0010382. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010382

Pathological and immunological evaluation of different regimens of praziquantel treatment in a mouse model of Schistosoma mansoni infection

Ulrich Membe Femoe 1,2,3, Hermine Boukeng Jatsa 1,3,*, Valentin Greigert 2, Julie Brunet 2, Catherine Cannet 4, Mérimé Christian Kenfack 1,3, Nestor Gipwe Feussom 1,3, Joseph Bertin Kadji Fassi 1,3, Emilenne Tienga Nkondo 1,3, Ahmed Abou-Bacar 2, Alexander Wilhelm Pfaff 2, Théophile Dimo 1, Pierre Kamtchouing 1, Louis-Albert Tchuem Tchuenté 5,3
Editor: John Pius Dalton6
PMCID: PMC9064093  PMID: 35446855

Abstract

Background

One of the considerable challenges of schistosomiasis chemotherapy is the inefficacy of praziquantel (PZQ) at the initial phase of the infection. Immature schistosomes are not susceptible to PZQ at the curative dose. Here, we investigated the efficacy of different PZQ regimens administered during the initial stage of Schistosoma mansoni infection in mice.

Methodology/Principal findings

Two months-old mice were individually infected with 80 S. mansoni cercariae and divided into one infected-untreated control group (IC) and four PZQ-treated groups: PZQ at 100 mg/kg/day for five consecutive days (group PZQ1), PZQ at 100 mg/kg/day for 28 days (group PZQ2), PZQ at 18 mg/kg/day for 28 days (group PZQ3) and a single dose of PZQ at 500 mg/kg (group PZQ4). The treatment started on day one post-infection (p.i), and each group of mice was divided into two subgroups euthanized on day 36 or 56 p.i, respectively. We determined the mortality rate, the parasitological burden, the hepatic and intestinal granulomas, the serum levels of Th-1, Th-2, and Th-17 cytokines, and gene expression. The treatment led to a significant (p < 0.001) reduction of worm burden and egg counts in the intestine and liver in groups PZQ2 and PZQ3. On 56th day p.i, there was a significant reduction (p < 0.001) of the number and volume of the hepatic granulomas in groups PZQ2 and PZQ3 compared to group PZQ1 or PZQ4. Moreover, in group PZQ3, the serum levels of IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-13, and IL-17 and their liver mRNA expressions were significantly reduced while IL-10 and TGF-β gene expression significantly increased. The highest mortality rate (81.25%) was recorded in group PZQ2.

Conclusion/Significance

This study revealed that the administration of PZQ at 18 mg/kg/day for 28 consecutive days was the optimal effective posology for treating S. mansoni infection at the initial stage in a murine model.

Author summary

According to WHO, more than 290.8 million people required preventive treatment against schistosomiasis in 2018. The pathology caused by the tissue-embolized eggs laid by adult worms is associated with symptoms such as anemia, tissue injuries, and severe fibrosis. Despite efforts to control this disease, it remains a public health problem in many tropical countries. One of the main challenges for managing this disease is to set up an efficient treatment at the early stage of the infection. Unfortunately, there is no appropriate therapeutic regimen for this purpose to the best of our knowledge. In this study, we propose an efficient praziquantel-based regimen that prevents the installation of the pathology in a mouse model of schistosomiasis. We found that praziquantel administration at the early stage of the infection prevents Schistosoma mansoni-infected mice from liver and intestine injuries, anemia, chronic inflammation, and severe fibrosis by reducing parasitic burden. Firstly, this study offers a reference treatment for further experimental investigations. Secondly, it could be a starting point for developing new protocols for preventive chemotherapy in endemic areas.

Introduction

Schistosomiasis is an acute and chronic parasitic disease caused by Schistosoma blood flukes. Schistosoma mansoni, S. japonicum, S. haematobium, S. intercalatum, S. guineensis, and S. mekongi are the primary species that infect humans. Estimates show that at least 290.8 million people required preventive treatment in 2018, and about 700 million persons are at risk of infection in 78 countries where schistosomiasis is endemic [1]. In the course of schistosomiasis infection, the immune response progresses through at least three phases. In the first 3–5 weeks, during which the host is exposed to migrating immature parasites, the dominant response is T helper 1 (Th1)-like. As the parasites mature, mate and begin to produce eggs at weeks 5–6, the response alters markedly; the Th1 component decreases and is associated with the emergence of a strong Th2 response. This response is induced primarily by egg antigens and is characterized by tissues fibrosis around granulomatous response. Finally, during the chronic phase of the infection, the Th2 response is modulated, and granulomas that form around newly deposited eggs are smaller than at earlier times during infection [24].

After more than 40 years of use, praziquantel (PZQ) remains the drug of choice for the treatment of schistosomiasis. Its good levels of tolerance and safety, excellent acceptability by patients, easy administration, good efficacy profile against adult worms of all human Schistosoma species, and low cost led to its widespread use [57]. Despite the global efforts to control this disease, its morbidity and mortality are still significant in tropical and subtropical regions, with more than 300 000 deaths per year. One of the main challenges of schistosomiasis chemotherapy is its efficacy at the initial phase of the infection [8].

Several authors have already demonstrated that immature S. mansoni worms are less susceptible to chemotherapeutic action at the initial stage of development, including oxamniquine and PZQ [914]. Sabah et al. [10] demonstrated that S. mansoni immature worm is less susceptible to at least six antischistosomal drugs used at curative doses against adult worms: hycanthone, oxamniquine, niridazol, amoscanate, antimonium-potassium artesunate, and PZQ. Treatment of infection at the initial stages would bring an excellent advantage for vertebrate hosts since it would avoid the production of eggs and, consequently, the formation of granulomas, which are the fundamental elements of the pathology of the disease [8,15,16]. Since the mouse model of schistosomiasis mansoni is the most used model for evaluating antischistosomal potencies of molecules, this study was conducted to determine the optimal posology of PZQ for the early stages treatment of schistosomiasis in a murine model. In addition to the parasitological burden, we evaluated the Th1/Th2 and Th17 mediated response in S. mansoni-infected mice treated with PZQ. For studies on the murine model of schistosomiasis, two curative regimens are recommended: a single oral dose of 500 mg/kg [17] or a dose of 100 mg/kg orally administered for 5 consecutive days [18].

Methods

Ethics statement

In this study, all procedures performed on mice followed the internationally accepted principles for laboratory animal use and care of the European Community guidelines (EEC Directive of 1986; 86/609/EEC). The protocol was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Laboratory of Animal Physiology of the Faculty of Sciences, University of Yaoundé I–Cameroon.

Animals

This study used two months old male BALB/c mice from the animal house of the Centre for Schistosomiasis and Parasitology (Yaoundé, Cameroon), weighing 22–27g. They were housed in polypropylene cages with free access to rodent diet and water and maintained under controlled conditions (temperature between 22 and 25°C; 12-hour light and dark cycle). After that, 80 mice were individually infected with 80 S. mansoni cercariae using the method of tail and legs immersion as previously described [19]. Cercariae were harvested from naturally infected snail intermediate hosts Biomphalaria pfeifferi, collected at the river "Mock" (Makenene, Cameroon), by exposure to light for 3 hours.

After infection, mice were randomly divided into two batches. Each batch comprising forty mice was divided into five groups with eight mice each:

  • IC: Infected-untreated mice receiving distilled water at the dose of 10 mL/kg;

  • PZQ1: Infected mice treated with PZQ at 100 mg/kg/day from the 1st day post-infection (p.i) for 5 consecutive days [18];

  • PZQ2: Infected mice treated with PZQ at 100 mg/kg/day from the 1st-day p.i for 28 days;

  • PZQ3: Infected mice treated with PZQ at 18 mg/kg/day from the 1st-day p.i for 28 days. This daily dose was obtained by dividing 500 mg/kg by 28 days;

  • PZQ4: Infected mice treated with a single oral dose of PZQ at 500 mg/kg on the 1st-day p.i [5,17].

A group of 6 uninfected-untreated named HC mice were added to each batch and used as a control.

PZQ was administered by gavage, as Cesol tablets (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), ground into powder, and dissolved in distilled water. The mice of the first batch were sacrificed by cervical dislocation on the 36th-day p.i to evaluate the efficacy of PZQ during the acute phase of infection. Mice of the second batch were sacrificed on the 56th-day p.i to appreciate the protective effect of PZQ on the granulomatous stage of infection.

Measurement of the body and organs indices

Each mouse was weighed weekly during the experiment to assess the body weight variation. After sacrifice, we removed the liver, spleen, thymus, and intestine from each mouse, weighed them and calculated their relative weights (g of organ /100 g of body weight).

Harvesting of adult worms from the portal system

To assess the parasite burden, we recovered worms from each infected mouse using the perfusion technique described by Duvall and Dewitt [20]. After that, we counted them under a stereo-microscope. Finally, we calculated the percentage of reduction of worm number as follows:

P=(CVC)*100

P = percentage of reduction; C = mean number of worms recovered from infected-untreated mice; V = mean number of worms recovered from infected-treated mice.

Egg count in the feces, the liver, and the intestine

Feces from each infected mouse were collected before each sacrifice and weighed. After homogenization in 10% buffered formaldehyde, the mixture was stored at room temperature, and two aliquots of 100 μL each were counted on a light microscope. After sacrifice, the liver’s left lobe and intestine were removed, weighed, and digested separately in 4% KOH as described in our previous study [19]. Using a light microscope, the number of eggs in each sample was determined in two aliquots of 100 μL each. Results were expressed as the mean number of eggs per gram of feces or tissue for the liver and intestine. The egg retention in tissues was the number of eggs trapped in the liver and the intestine and expressed as eggs per gram.

Hematological analysis

Before sacrifice, we collected the blood of each mouse from retro-orbital plexus into EDTA tubes for the hematological analysis conducted with a Sysmex XP-3000 Hematology Analyzer (Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan).

Evaluation of some liver function biomarkers

A part of the blood was also collected in dry tubes and centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 15 min at 4°C. The serum obtained was stored at -70°C and used for the measurement of some parameters of the liver function. First, we determined the total proteins level using the method of Biuret [21], and the amount of protein was calculated from a standard curve using serial concentrations of bovine serum albumin. We also assessed alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) activities using Biolabo kits (Maizy, France) and according to the method described by Reitman and Frankel [22]. In addition, we measured alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and gamma-glutamyl transferase (γ-GT) activities using Biolabo kits (Maizy, France) and according to the method of Wu [23]. Finally, we assayed total bilirubin according to the protocol described in the Inmesco kit (Wied, Germany) and read the red color developed after bilirubin’s reaction with sulfanilic acid at 546 nm against a blank.

Evaluation of some oxidative stress biomarkers

The effect of PZQ treatment on the hepatic and splenic oxidative stress was evaluated as follows: after sacrifice, 0.4 g of the right lobe of the liver was homogenized in 2 mL of a Tris-HCl 50 mM buffer, pH 7.4, while 0.2 g of the spleen was homogenized in 400 μL of the same buffer. The homogenates (20% for liver and 50% for spleen w/v) were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 25 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was collected and stored at -70°C until assayed.

We first measured the lipid peroxides as thiobarbituric acid reactive substances. The product of the reaction between malondialdehyde (MDA) and thiobarbituric acid was estimated as described by Wilbur et al. [24]. The concentration of MDA was calculated using a molar extinction coefficient of 1.56 × 10−5 mmol-1cm-1, and results were expressed as nmol/g of the liver. In addition, we determined nitrite concentration using the Griess reagent (1% N-1-naphtylethylene diamine + 1% sulfanilamide in 2.5% phosphoric acid) as described by Hibbs et al.[25]. Nitrite levels were calculated from a standard curve using serial concentrations of sodium nitrite (1 mM) and expressed as μmol/g of the liver. We also estimated superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity according to the protocol described by Misra et Fridovish [26]. SOD activity was expressed as SOD units/g of the liver, and one unit of SOD is defined as the enzyme activity that inhibits 50% adrenaline oxidation to adrenochrome. Moreover, we used the Ellman reagent (5 mg of 2, 2-dithio-5, 5-nitrobenzoic acid + 250 mL phosphate buffer) to measure the concentration of reduced glutathione [27]. We finally determined catalase activity from a standard curve as described by Sinha [28] and expressed it as mol/min/g of the liver.

Histology and morphometric analysis of the liver and intestinal inflammatory granulomas

A portion of each animal’s right liver lobe and ileum was immersed in 10% formaldehyde prepared in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). After dehydration in successive ethanol baths (50°C to 100°C) and xylene, tissue samples were paraffin-embedded. Five micrometer thick sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) for qualitative analysis of the liver and the granulomatous inflammatory reaction evaluation. The second set of slides was stained with picrosirius (PS) to highlight liver and ileal fibrosis characterized by collagen deposition around granuloma. Images were acquired at x10 and x20 using CMOS Digital Camera (IDS, Germany) connected to an optical microscope (Axiophot, Zeiss, Germany) and analyzed by PathScan Touch software (Excilone, France). For quantitative measurement of liver and intestine granulomas, images were captured with an x10 objective at an x10 ocular magnification with a digital camera AmScope MD 500 (AmScope, USA) connected to a wild-type optical microscope and analyzed with ImageJ 1.32 software (NIH, USA). All granulomas containing a single central egg with miracidia were selected for each mouse. Granulomas in which it was possible to observe more than one egg or granulomas in which the egg was not visible or destroyed were excluded from the analysis. The number of granulomas, as well as their volume, were determined. All granulomas per mouse were measured using the largest diameter and perpendicular diameter. The volume of each granuloma was calculated assuming a spherical shape using the following formula:

V=4(π*R3)3

The radius R was obtained by dividing the main diameter of the lesion by two. The mean granuloma volume for each group was calculated [29,30].

Serum levels of cytokines

According to the manufacturer’s recommendations, we used the mouse ProtocartaPlex 10-plex immunoassay kit (Thermofisher Scientific, Vienna, Austria) to measure cytokine levels in serum samples. We classified the immune mediators into five categories: proinflammatory mediator (Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein [MCP]–1), type 1 cytokines (IL-2, interferon [IFN]- γ, and tumor necrosis factor [TNF]–α), type 2 cytokines (IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, and IL-13), a T helper 17 cytokine (IL-17), and a regulatory cytokine (Transforming Growth Factor [TGF]-β1). Data were acquired on the MAGPIX-Luminex XMAP technology (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) using the Luminex XPONENT software solutions. The concentration (pg/mL) of each cytokine was obtained by interpolating MFI (median fluorescent intensity) of a dilution standard curve over seven dilution points supplied with the kit and calculated by the ProtocartaPlex Analyst 1.0 software (eBioscience, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA).

Real-time quantitative PCR analysis

According to the manufacturer’s instructions, we extracted the total RNA from 10 mg of liver tissue using NucleoZOL reagent (Macherey-Nagel GmbH & Co. KG, Germany). After that, we determined the RNA concentration using the NanoDrop 2000c spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA). Then, each RNA sample was reversely transcribed into cDNA (qScript cDNA Synthesis kit, Quanta Biosciences, Inc, USA). Next, we mixed the obtained cDNA with SsoAdvanced Universal SYBR Supermix kit (Bio-Rad, USA). We then amplified it using CFX Connect Real-Time System (Bio-Rad, USA), with glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) as a reference gene. Finally, we calculated the expression of each cDNA using a standard curve, and the relative expression of mRNA in each sample was expressed as the GAPDH ratio. Primers purchased from Eurofins Genomics (Nantes, France) and used for RT-qPCR are shown in Table 1. All these primers were synthetized according to the PrimerBank online database (https://pga.mgh.harvard.edu/primerbank/citation.html).

Table 1. Mice primers used for RT-qPCR.

mRNA Forward Primer (5’→ 3’) Reverse primer (5’→ 3’) Amplicon size
GAPDH AGGTCGGTGTGAACGGATTTG TGTAGACCATGTAGTTGAGGTCA 123
CXCL-10 (IP10) CCAAGTGCTGCCGTCATTTTC TCCCTATGGCCCTCATTCTCA 133
MCP-1 (CCL2) TTAAAAACCTGGATCGGAACCAA GCATTAGCTTCAGATTTACGGGT 121
MIP-1α (CCL3) TTCTCTGTACCATGACACTCTGC CGTGGAATCTTCCGGCTGTAG 100
RANTES (CCL5) GCTGCTTTGCCTACCTCTCC TCGAGTGACAAACACGACTGC 104
IFN-γ ACAGCAAGGCGAAAAAGGATG TGGTGGACCACTCGGATGA 106
IL-10 GCTCTTACTGACTGGCATGAG CGCAGCTCTAGGAGCATGTG 105
IL-13 CCTGGCTCTTGCTTGCCTT GGTCTTGTGTGATGTTGCTCA 116
FGF1 CCCTGACCGAGAGGTTCAAC GTCCCTTGTCCCATCCACG 122
TGF-β1 CTCCCGTGGCTTCTAGTGC GCCTTAGTTTGGACAGGATCTG 133

Statistical analysis

Results are expressed as means ± SEM. Statistical differences between groups were evaluated with a Student t-test or one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey multiple comparison post-test. Analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 8.0.1 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Mice survival rate after early administration praziquantel regimens to Schistosoma mansoni-infected mice

During the experimentation, we recorded no death in uninfected mice (HC), infected-untreated mice (IC), infected-treated mice with 18 mg/kg of PZQ for 28 days (PZQ3), and a single dose of 500 mg/ kg of PZQ (PZQ4) (Fig 1). We recorded the highest death rate in the group of mice treated with 100 mg/kg of PZQ for 28 days (PZQ2), where survival rates were 85.71%, 42.86%, and 18.75% at 6, 7, and 8 weeks respectively. The survival rate was 53.57% in the group of mice treated with PZQ 100 mg/kg for 5 days (PZQ1).

Fig 1. Survival curve of mice infected with Schistosoma mansoni and treated with different praziquantel regimens.

Fig 1

HC: Uninfected-untreated mice, IC: Infected-untreated mice, PZQ1: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 100 mg/kg for 5 consecutive days, PZQ2: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 100 mg/kg for 28 consecutive days, PZQ3: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 18 mg/kg for 28 consecutive days, PZQ4: Infected mice treated with a single dose of praziquantel at 500 mg/kg. ANOVA followed by Tukey multiple comparison test was also used for statistical analysis. ##p < 0.01: values are significantly different from those of uninfected mice (group HC). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01: values are significantly different from those of infected-untreated mice (group IC). ααp < 0.01: values are significantly different from those of infected mice treated with PZQ3 posology (group PZQ3).

Praziquantel regimens limit the body weight loss in Schistosoma mansoni-infected mice

At the end of the acute phase of infection, no significant difference was observed in the body weight variation of uninfected mice (HC), infected-untreated mice (IC), and PZQ-treated mice (Fig 2A). In contrast, during the granulomatous phase from day 48 to day 56 post-infection, infected-untreated mice and PZQ-treated mice of groups PZQ1, PZQ2, and PZQ4 gradually lost body weight. Only mice from group PZQ3 treated with 18 mg/kg of PZQ for 28 days gained weight. Body weight decreased significantly (p < 0.001) in groups IC, PZQ1, and PZQ4 compared to PZQ3. No statistical difference was recorded between the weight gain of PZQ3 mice and that of uninfected mice (HC) (Fig 2B).

Fig 2. Effect of praziquantel treatment on the body weight during acute (A) and granulomatous (B) stages of Schistosoma mansoni infection in mice.

Fig 2

HC: Uninfected mice, IC: Infected-untreated mice, PZQ1: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 100 mg/kg for 5 consecutive days, PZQ2: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 100 mg/kg for 28 consecutive days, PZQ3: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 18 mg/kg for 28 consecutive days, PZQ4: Infected mice treated with a single dose of praziquantel at 500 mg/kg. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6). ANOVA followed by Tukey multiple comparison test was also used for statistical analysis. #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001: values are significantly different from those of uninfected mice (group HC). ***p < 0.001: values are significantly different from those of infected-untreated mice (group IC). αααp < 0.001: values are significantly different from those of infected mice treated with PZQ3 posology (group PZQ3).

Praziquantel regimens limit the enlargement of organs in Schistosoma mansoni-infected mice

During the acute phase of the infection, the spleen was the only organ showing a size increase with an index significantly increased by 47.52% in IC mice compared to HC mice. In contrast, no statistical difference was recorded between IC and HC mice or between the different PZQ treated groups. Notably, among PZQ-treated groups, when compared to IC mice, a significant decrease of the spleen index in PZQ2 (p < 0.05), PZQ3 (p < 0.001), and PZQ4 (p < 0.05) was observed. At the granulomatous stage of the infection (from day 36th to day 56th post-infection), the body weight loss of IC mice was associated with a significant increase of the liver, intestine, spleen, and thymus indices by 56.80%, 88.49%, 64.25%, and 68.57%, respectively in comparison to HC mice. In contrast, PZQ treatment at an 18 mg/kg dose for 28 days (PZQ3) almost wholly reversed this infection-induced increase. Moreover, there was no statistical difference in the liver and thymus indices of PZQ1, PZQ2, and PZQ4 mice compared to IC mice. Regarding the spleen index, its level was still increased in mice of PZQ1 (59.34%), PZQ2 (45.18%), and PZQ4 (38.84%) groups in comparison to that PZQ3 group. Results were similar regarding the thymus, which was significantly increased in PZQ1 (p < 0.05) and PZQ4 (p < 0.01) mice groups (Table 2).

Table 2. Effect of praziquantel treatment on the relative organ weight (g/100g body weight) of Schistosoma mansoni-infected mice.

Groups Liver Intestine Spleen Thymus
Acute phase
HC 5.55 ± 0.25 5.25 ± 0.29 0.53 ± 0.04 0.23 ± 0.02
IC 5.02 ± 0.33 5.99 ± 0.27 1.01 ± 0.12## 0.24 ± 0.02
PZQ1 5.46 ± 0.39 4.83 ± 0.13 0.83 ± 0.08 0.23 ± 0.02
PZQ2 5.65 ± 0.28 5.70 ± 0.31 0.68 ± 0.07* 0.23 ± 0.02
PZQ3 5.41 ± 0.20 6.32 ± 0.39 0.57 ± 0.04*** 0.25 ± 0.02
PZQ4 5.19 ± 0.21 5.00 ± 0.17 0.70 ± 0.05* 0.34 ± 0.02α
Granulomatous phase
HC 5.30 ± 0.33 4.56 ± 0.29 0.59 ± 0.05 0.11 ± 0.01
IC 12.27 ± 0.64### 13.56 ± 0.61### 1.65 ± 0.13### 0.35 ± 0.03##
PZQ1 10.08 ± 0.48 16.01 ± 0.87ααα 1.82 ± 0.08ααα 0.36 ± 0.02 α
PZQ2 10.58 ± 1.42 10.10 ± 0.93*, ααα 1.35 ± 0.18α 0.30 ± 0.06
PZQ3 7.77 ± 0.60** 4.43 ± 0.40*** 0.74 ± 0.06*** 0.17 ± 0.01*
PZQ4 10.67 ± 0.93 10.84 ± 0.77*, ααα 1.21 ± 0.12*, α 0.36 ± 0.05αα

Acute phase: mice euthanization at the 36th day post-infection

Granulomatous satge: mice euthanization at the 56th day post-infection

HC: Uninfected mice, IC: Infected-untreated mice, PZQ1: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 100 mg/kg for 5 consecutive days, PZQ2: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 100 mg/kg for 28 consecutive days, PZQ3: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 18 mg/kg for 28 consecutive days, PZQ4: Infected mice treated with a single dose of praziquantel at 500 mg/kg. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6). ANOVA followed by Tukey multiple comparison test was also used for statistical analysis. ##p < 0.01

###p < 0.001: values are significantly different from those uninfected mice (group HC).

*p < 0.05

**p < 0.01

***p < 0.001: values are significantly different from those of infected-untreated mice (group IC).

αp < 0.05

ααp < 0.01

αααp < 0.001: values are significantly different from those of infected mice treated with PZQ3 posology (group PZQ3).

Praziquantel regimens reduce Schistosoma mansoni adult worms and egg production in mice

Worm burdens and egg loads in the liver, intestine, and feces are shown in Fig 3. The number of worms recovered from infected-untreated mice at the end of the acute phase of infection was 42.14 ± 2.87 and 45.62 ± 3.56 at the end of the granulomatous phase. In the acute phase of the disease, treatment with PZQ leads to a significant reduction (p < 0.001) of worm burden in groups PZQ2 (97.65%) and PZQ3 (97.29%) compared to group IC. This reduction was 71.50% in PZQ2 and 84.04% in PZQ3 groups during the granulomatous phase. No significant statistical difference was observed between PZQ1 and IC mice during both stages of infection, while a significant difference (p < 0.01) was found between PZQ4 and IC mice during the granulomatous phase (Fig 3IA and 3IIA). In addition, in both phases of infection, the egg burden was significantly lower (p < 0.001) in the liver and intestine of PZQ2 and PZQ3 mice compared to IC mice (Fig 3IB, 3IC, 3IIB and 3IIC).

Fig 3. Effect of praziquantel treatment on the worm burden (A) and the hepatic (B), intestinal (C), and fecal (D) egg loads on Schistosoma mansoni acute (I) and granulomatous (II) phase of infection in mice.

Fig 3

IC: Infected-untreated mice, PZQ1: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 100 mg/kg for 5 consecutive days, PZQ2: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 100 mg/kg for 28 consecutive days, PZQ3: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 18 mg/kg for 28 consecutive days, PZQ4: Infected mice treated with a single dose of praziquantel at 500 mg/kg. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6). ANOVA followed by Tukey multiple comparison test was also used for statistical analysis. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001: values are significantly different from those of infected-untreated mice (group IC). αp < 0.05, ααp < 0.01, αααp < 0.001: values are significantly different from those of infected mice treated with PZQ3 posology (group PZQ3).

Regarding egg retention in tissues, we recorded a significant reduction in PZQ2 (p < 0.05) and PZQ3 (p < 0.01) groups compared to the IC group during the acute phase of infection. During the granulomatous phase, this burden decreases in groups PZQ 1 (p < 0.05), PZQ2 (p < 0.001) and PZQ3 (p < 0.001) compared to IC group. However, this reduction was more important in PZQ3 than in PZQ1 (p < 0.001). The reduction of the egg retention in tissues was more relevant in PZQ3 than PZQ2 (99.82% vs. 42.29%) (Table 3).

Table 3. Effect of praziquantel treatment on egg retention in tissue in Schistosoma mansoni-infected in mice.

Groups
Infection stage IC PZQ1 PZQ2 PZQ3 PZQ4
Acute 8021.22 ± 2318.80 5044.36 ± 1448.29 217.13 ± 27.95* 34.61 ± 7.65** 7445.71± 2042.20α
Granulomatous 44002.13 ± 4573.33 25390.37 ± 2208.54*,ααα 10293.65 ± 3583.43*** 76.84 ± 26.83*** 32989.85 ± 3946.36ααα

IC: Infected-untreated mice, PZQ1: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 100 mg/kg for 5 consecutive days, PZQ2: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 100 mg/kg for 28 consecutive days, PZQ3: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 18 mg/kg for 28 consecutive days, PZQ4: Infected mice treated with a single dose of praziquantel at 500 mg/kg. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6). ANOVA followed by Tukey multiple comparison test was also used for statistical analysis.

*p < 0.05

**p < 0.01

***p < 0.001: values are significantly different from those of infected-untreated mice (group IC).

αp < 0.05

αααp < 0.001: values are significantly different from those of infected mice treated with PZQ3 posology (group PZQ3).

Egg excretion in the feces after PZQ treatment was only significantly different between groups during the granulomatous phase of infection. Compared to infected-untreated mice (group IC), a reduction of 99.06% and 87.83% was recorded in PZQ2 mice (p < 0.01) and PZQ3 mice (p < 0.05) respectively. These results also show that the reduction of worm burden and egg load in the liver and intestine of mice belonging to the PZQ3 group was lowered (p < 0.001) when compared to those of PZQ1 and PZQ4 mice (Fig 3IID).

Praziquantel regimens protect against Schistosoma-induced anemia and leukocytes production in mice

S. mansoni acute infection induced a significant reduction of the level of red blood cells (p < 0.001), hemoglobin (p < 0.05), hematocrit (p < 0.001) and platelets (p < 0.001) in infected-untreated mice (IC) compared to uninfected ones (HC). Regarding the leucogram, a significant increase of the level of total white blood cells (p < 0.01) and granulocytes percentage (p < 0.001), but a decrease (p < 0.001) of lymphocytes percentage was recorded. These variations were more pronounced during the granulomatous stage of the infection. These changes were completely reversed in the PZQ3 group since there was no statistical difference between PZQ3 and HC groups. In contrast, treatment regimens of PZQ1 and PZQ4 groups did not restore erythrogram, leucogram, and platelet count similar to those of the HC group. The efficacy of the PZQ2 scheme of treatment was observed in the granulomatous phase only (Table 4).

Table 4. Effect of praziquantel treatment on the hematological parameters on Schistosoma mansoni-infected mice.

Groups RBC (106/mm3) Hemoglobin (g/dL) Hematocrit (%) Platelets (103/mm3) WBC (103/mm3) Lymphocyte (%) Monocyte (%) Granulocyte (%)
Acute phase
HC 8.62 ± 0.39 14.03 ± 0.53 49.70 ± 1.67 525.67 ± 29.14 4.71 ± 0.36 72.53 ± 2.48 8.25 ± 0.24 19.21 ± 2.31
IC 4.56 ± 0.51### 9.33 ± 0.76# 28.38 ± 2.04### 264.14 ± 25.10### 10.33 ± 1.01## 44.91 ± 4.72### 10.60 ± 1.71 44.48 ± 4.64###
PZQ1 4.01 ± 0.51αα 9.80 ± 1.42 31.60 ± 4.53 278.14 ± 31.61ααα 10.01 ± 0.62 46.37 ± 2.99ααα 10.44 ± 1.59 42.98 ± 1.62ααα
PZQ2 4.02 ± 0.50###,αα 10.01 ± 1.16 32.77 ± 3.58 255.86 ± 18.65###, ααα 11.78 ± 1.92##,αα 44.93 ± 3.01###,ααα 8.33 ± 0.94 46.34 ± 3.76###,ααα
PZQ3 7.19 ± 0.88* 10.66 ± 0.65 37.61 ± 2.94 486.28 ± 11.19*** 5.94 ± 0.37* 67.82 ± 2.29*** 11.65 ± 1.77 20.51 ± 0.62***
PZQ4 5.34 ± 0.41 10.57 ± 0.80 30.08 ± 2.49 214.89 ± 23.07ααα 10.16 ± 0.68αα 42.15 ± 2.26ααα 6.20 ± 0.46 51.74 ± 1.77ααα
Granulomatous phase
HC 9.77 ± 0.56 12.73 ± 0.93 55.51 ± 0.78 521.50 ± 16.78 4.45 ± 0.47 72.73 ± 0.96 10.26 ± 0.78 17.25 ± 1.52
IC 5.13 ± 0.33### 10.03 ± 0.36 39.78 ± 2.12### 233.50 ± 14.26### 11.00 ± 0.58### 32.42 ± 3.14### 13.72 ± 1.30 53.85 ± 4.08###
PZQ1 6.17 ± 0.39***,α 9.48 ± 0.42 47.86 ± 2.34 280.00 ± 22.91ααα 10.54 ± 0.73αα 39.74 ± 0.62ααα 13.90 ± 1.02 46.36 ± 0.85ααα
PZQ2 9.99 ± 0.86*** 13.83 ± 1.33 53.00 ± 7.25* 414.67 ± 22.67* 11.50 ± 0.70αα 68.76 ± 3.44*** 15.23 ± 1.03 16.00 ± 4.14***
PZQ3 8.20 ± 0.43*** 10.52 ± 0.67 50.18 ± 1.62* 526.14 ± 50.04*** 5.32 ± 0.82*** 73.07 ± 5.03*** 16.18 ± 3.21 10.75 ± 2.00***
PZQ4 4.43 ± 0.30ααα 10.58 ± 0.80 34.90 ± 2.48ααα 272.10 ± 31.23ααα 9.57 ± 0.77ααα 28.65 ± 2.86ααα 10.57 ± 1.04 60.78 ± 3.70ααα

HC: Uninfected mice, IC: Infected-untreated mice, PZQ1: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 100 mg/kg for 5 consecutive days, PZQ2: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 100 mg/kg for 28 consecutive days, PZQ3: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 18 mg/kg for 28 consecutive days, PZQ4: Infected mice treated with a single dose of praziquantel at 500 mg/kg. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6). ANOVA followed by Tukey multiple comparison test was also used for statistical analysis.

#p < 0.05

##p < 0.01

###p < 0.001: values are significantly different from those uninfected mice (group HC).

*p < 0.05

***p < 0.001: values are significantly different from those of infected-untreated mice (group IC).

αp < 0.05

ααp < 0.01

αααp < 0.001: values are significantly different from those of infected mice treated with PZQ3 posology (group PZQ3).

Praziquantel regimens prevent liver injuries induced by Schistosoma mansoni infection in mice

To determine the impact of different protocols of PZQ treatment on S. mansoni infection-induced liver pathology, the activities of transaminases (ALT and AST), ALP, Ɣ-GT, and total protein and total bilirubin concentrations, were measured in the serum. Results are shown in Table 5. During the acute stage of the infection (up to day 36th post-infection), the ALT (p < 0.001), AST (p < 0.001), and γ-GT (p < 0.01) activities in the infected control (IC) group were significantly increased, compared to those of the healthy control group (HC). PZQ treatment significantly decreased the activity of ALT in all treatment regimens (p < 0.001), while only the PZQ3 regimen led to a significant decrease (p < 0.05) of AST activity, as compared to IC mice. There was no statistical difference in the activity of ALP and the concentrations of total proteins and total bilirubin between any groups. At the granulomatous stage of the infection, infected-untreated mice (IC) had elevated activities of ALT (69.84%, p < 0.001), AST (75.90%, p < 0.001), ALP (46.45%, p < 0.01) and total bilirubin concentration (65.59%, p < 0.001) and decreased activities of γ-GT (62.71%, p < 0.01) and total protein concentration (53.36%, p < 0.001), compared to uninfected mice (HC). Treatment of infected mice with PZQ at the 18 mg/kg dose for 28 consecutive days (PZQ3) restored the transaminases (ALT and AST), ALP and γ-GT activities, and total protein, and total bilirubin concentrations in the serum at near-normal levels. In detail, ALT activity decreased by 39.98% (p < 0.001), ALP activity by 46.01% (p < 0.05) and total bilirubin level by 62.15% (p < 0.001), while γ-GT activity increased by 56.73% in the PZQ3 group compared to IC group. PZQ3 regimen was the most effective one since the other regimens did not show these beneficial effects on hepatic biomarker levels. Mice subjected to the PZQ2 regimen even showed the most elevated transaminases (ALT and AST) activities that were drastically higher than that of uninfected mice (HC) (p < 0.001).

Table 5. Effect of praziquantel treatment on the liver function of Schistosoma mansoni-infected mice.

Groups ALT (UI/L) AST (UI/L) ALP (UI/L) γ-GT (UI/L) Total bilirubin (μmol/L) Total protein (μg/mL)
Acute phase
HC 549.43 ± 60.45 329.21 ± 61.39 282.49 ± 69.73 144.93 ± 16.97 241.83 ± 16.97 2.07 ± 0.23
IC 1485.36 ± 117.83### 1367.26 ± 96.26### 246.80 ± 58.45 64.39 ± 4.97## 349.55 ± 43.40 1.22 ± 0.14
PZQ1 933.25 ± 39.42*** 1057.23 ± 39.57 211.77 ± 27.00 93.93 ± 15.85 296.23 ± 39.30 0.98 ± 0.11
PZQ2 1045.89 ± 98.44** 1221.43 ± 109.09 214.88 ± 32.15 109.08 ± 15.90 366.85 ± 28.82 1.67 ± 0.24
PZQ3 739.52 ± 20.13*** 977.51 ± 97.98* 161.16 ± 34.89 122.71 ± 12.27 277.09 ± 15.14 1.75 ± 0.23
PZQ4 887.05 ± 76.07*** 1119.23 ± 71.05 224.66 ± 59.66 101.92 ± 14.86 292.69 ± 19.42 1.35 ± 0.17
Granulomatous phase
HC 461.89 ± 58.47 421.95 ± 32.95 278.01 ± 55.32 159.96 ± 16.84 270.56 ± 41.09 2.23 ± 0.17
IC 1429.80 ± 51.42### 1142.64 ± 76.61### 519.11 ± 60.01## 59.65 ± 11.05## 786.19 ± 84.23### 1.04 ± 0.13###
PZQ1 1430.08 ± 72.90 ααα 1415.96 ± 147.20 464.61 ± 59.34 97.56 ± 18.56 665.49 ± 68.80αα 0.83 ± 0.89
PZQ2 1730.68 ± 114.65ααα 1735.48 ± 361.40*, αα 512.30 ± 147.48 86.61 ± 1.76 388.11 ± 34.59** 0.93 ± 0.13
PZQ3 858.12 ± 127.86*** 912.96 ± 72.59 280.28 ± 81.37* 137.86 ± 25.84* 295.67 ± 37.24*** 1.31 ± 0.13
PZQ4 1471.27 ± 51.50ααα 1183.78 ± 99.23 485.05 ± 38.81α 65.75 ± 8.18αα 620.23 ± 37.98αα 1.16 ± 0.21

HC: Uninfected mice, IC: Infected-untreated mice, PZQ1: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 100 mg/kg for 5 consecutive days, PZQ2: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 100 mg/kg for 28 consecutive days, PZQ3: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 18 mg/kg for 28 consecutive days, PZQ4: Infected mice treated with a single dose of praziquantel at 500 mg/kg. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6). ANOVA followed by Tukey multiple comparison test was also used for statistical analysis.

##p < 0.01

###p < 0.001: values are significantly different from those of uninfected mice (group HC).

*p < 0.05

**p < 0.001

***p < 0.001: values are significantly different from those of infected-untreated mice (group IC).

αp < 0.05

ααp < 0.01

αααp < 0.001: values are significantly different from those of infected mice treated with PZQ3 posology (group PZQ3).

Praziquantel treatment preserves the hepatic and spleen oxidative balance in Schistosoma mansoni-infected mice

At the acute phase of the infection, there was no significant difference in the liver oxidative stress parameters between infected-untreated mice (IC) and uninfected ones (HC), except the MDA concentration, where a 79.08% increase (p < 0.01) was recorded (Fig 4). In the PZQ3 group, we noted a decrease of 57.29% compared to the IC group. In contrast, the MDA concentration drastically increased in PZQ2 and PZQ4 groups and was 5-fold higher than in the HC group (p < 0.01).

Fig 4. Effect of praziquantel treatment on the liver oxidative status during the acute phase in Schistosoma mansoni-infected mice.

Fig 4

(A) malondialdehyde, (B) nitrites, (C) superoxide dismutase, (D) catalase, and (E) Reduced glutathione. HC: Uninfected mice, IC: Infected-untreated mice, PZQ1: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 100 mg/kg for 5 consecutive days, PZQ2: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 100 mg/kg for 28 consecutive days, PZQ3: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 18 mg/kg for 28 consecutive days, PZQ4: Infected mice treated with a single dose of praziquantel at 500 mg/kg. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6). ANOVA followed by Tukey multiple comparison test was also used for statistical analysis. ##p < 0.01: values are significantly different from those uninfected mice (group HC). αp < 0.05, αααp < 0.001: values are significantly different from those of infected mice treated with PZQ3 posology (group PZQ3).

In the granulomatous stage of the infection (Fig 5), the hepatic MDA concentration was 16-fold higher than that of uninfected mice (p < 0.001). In contrast, nitrite level, SOD and catalase activities were decreased by 78.21% (p < 0.001), 50.48% (p < 0.01) and 49.36% (p < 0.01), respectively. Among the four PZQ treatment schemes, only the PZQ3 regimen significantly improved the levels of these biomarkers. We observed a decrease of MDA concentration by 71.98% and an increase of nitrite level, SOD, and catalase activities by 70.23%, 46.75%, and 42.33%, respectively, compared to the IC group. Regarding the GSH concentration, we recorded no significant variation between groups.

Fig 5. Effect of praziquantel treatment on the liver oxidative status during the granulomatous phase in Schistosoma mansoni-infected mice.

Fig 5

(A) malondialdehyde, (B) nitrites, (C) superoxide dismutase, (D) catalase, and (E) Reduced glutathione. HC: Uninfected mice, IC: Infected-untreated mice, PZQ1: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 100 mg/kg for 5 consecutive days, PZQ2: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 100 mg/kg for 28 consecutive days, PZQ3: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 18 mg/kg for 28 consecutive days, PZQ4: Infected mice treated with a single dose of praziquantel at 500 mg/kg. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6). ANOVA followed by Tukey multiple comparison test was also used for statistical analysis. #p < 0.05, ###p < 0.001: values are significantly different from those uninfected mice (group HC). *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001: values are significantly different from those of infected-untreated mice (group IC). αp < 0.05, ααp < 0.01, αααp < 0.001: values are significantly different from those of infected mice treated with PZQ3 posology (group PZQ3).

In the spleen, the acute infection produced no change in the oxidative status, except significantly decreased nitrite concentrations (p < 0.05). PZQ3 treatment restored the nitrite level, increasing it by 68.05% (p < 0.01) in mice of this group, compared to the IC group (Fig 6).

Fig 6. Effect of praziquantel treatment on the spleen oxidative status during the acute phase in Schistosoma mansoni-infected mice.

Fig 6

(A) malondialdehyde, (B) nitrites, (C) superoxide dismutase, (D) catalase, and (E) Reduced glutathione. HC: Uninfected mice, IC: Infected-untreated mice, PZQ1: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 100 mg/kg for 5 consecutive days, PZQ2: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 100 mg/kg for 28 consecutive days, PZQ3: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 18 mg/kg for 28 consecutive days, PZQ4: Infected mice treated with a single dose of praziquantel at 500 mg/kg. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6). ANOVA followed by Tukey multiple comparison test was also used for statistical analysis. ##p < 0.01: values are significantly different from those uninfected mice (group HC). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01: values are significantly different from those of infected-untreated mice (group IC). ααp < 0.01: values are significantly different from those of infected mice treated with PZQ3 posology (group PZQ3).

In the granulomatous stage (Fig 7), S. mansoni infection led to an 8-fold higher splenic MDA concentration compared to uninfected mice (p < 0.001). Moreover, the level of nitrites was significantly reduced by 70.06% (p < 0.001). Concomitantly, the antioxidant capacity of infected-untreated mice (IC) was altered as significant reductions (p < 0.001) of SOD, catalase, and GSH levels by 39.33%, 69.51%, and 77.34%, respectively, were recorded. The oxidative status significantly improved after treatment of mice with PZQ at 18 mg/kg/day for 28 consecutive days (PZQ3). A significant decrease of MDA concentration by 47.67% (p < 0.05), as well as an increase of nitrites concentration by 56.12% (p < 0.01) compared to infected-untreated mice, was recorded. Moreover, PZQ3 posology suppressed the S. mansoni-induced depletion of antioxidant capacity in the spleen by significantly increasing the SOD (25.18%) and catalase (53.27%) activities as well as GSH concentration (63.49%), compared to the IC group of mice (Fig 7).

Fig 7. Effect of praziquantel treatment on the splenic oxidative status during the granulomatous phase in Schistosoma mansoni-infected mice.

Fig 7

(A) malondialdehyde, (B) nitrites, (C) superoxide dismutase, (D) catalase, and (E) Reduced glutathione. HC: Uninfected mice, IC: Infected-untreated mice, PZQ1: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 100 mg/kg for 5 consecutive days, PZQ2: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 100 mg/kg for 28 consecutive days, PZQ3: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 18 mg/kg for 28 consecutive days, PZQ4: Infected mice treated with a single dose of praziquantel at 500 mg/kg. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6). ANOVA followed by Tukey multiple comparison test was also used for statistical analysis. ###p < 0.001: values are significantly different from those uninfected mice (group HC). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001: values are significantly different from those of infected-untreated mice (group IC). αp < 0.05, ααp < 0.01, αααp < 0.001: values are significantly different from those of infected mice treated with PZQ3 posology (group PZQ3).

Taken together, these results of the hepatic and splenic oxidative status parameters demonstrate a superior efficiency of the PZQ3 treatment regimen over the others (Figs 4, 5, 6 and 7).

Praziquantel treatment lessens Schistosoma mansoni-induced histopathological changes in the mouse liver and intestine

Histological examination of liver and ileum sections of uninfected mice showed typical structures (Fig 8I and 8II). Eight weeks after S. mansoni infection, granulomas were abundantly present around entrapped eggs in the liver and the mucosa and sub-mucosa of the ileum of IC mice. These granulomas were composed of central ova surrounded by laminated collagen fibers associated with inflammatory cells at the periphery. Compared to uninfected mice, we noticed a thickening of the muscularis propria of the ileum in all IC mice. Among PZQ-treated mice, the liver and ileum sections of PZQ1 and PZQ4 groups were similar to those of IC mice. In contrast, the liver of infected mice treated with either PZQ2 or PZQ3 regimens contained few and small granulomas. Some of them were scarred. The ileum sections were nearly free of granuloma, fibrotic tissue, and few inflammatory cells were detected.

Fig 8. Effect of praziquantel treatment on the liver (I) and the ileum (II) histology of Schistosoma mansoni-infected mice stained with hematoxylin and eosin (A) and picrosirius (B).

Fig 8

HC: Uninfected mice, IC: Infected-untreated mice, PZQ1: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 100 mg/kg for 5 consecutive days, PZQ2: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 100 mg/kg for 28 consecutive days, PZQ3: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 18 mg/kg for 28 consecutive days, PZQ4: Infected mice treated with a single dose of praziquantel at 500 mg/kg. Simple arrows indicate Schistosoma mansoni egg; F-Gr: fibrotic granuloma; Gr: granuloma; bidirectional arrow indicates the height of the muscularis propria (Mp).

Morphometric analysis showed that the granulomas number in the liver and the ileum of infected-untreated mice (IC) was 25.34 ± 4.77 and 21.18 ± 3.09, respectively (Fig 9A and 9B). PZQ3 regimen significantly reduced the granuloma number in the liver by 93.21% (1.72 ± 0.60 vs. 25.34 ± 4.77) and in the ileum by 54.25% (9.69 ± 2.09 vs. 21.18 ± 3.09). The PZQ2 regimen also effectively reduced the number of granulomas by 90.68% and 80.35% in the liver and ileum, respectively. The number of hepatic and ileal granulomas in PZQ1 and PZQ4 treated mice was nearly similar to that in IC mice. Moreover, the granuloma volume regressed by 87.10% (p < 0.001) in the liver of PZQ3 mice (Fig 9C). PZQ2 treatment also decreased the hepatic granuloma volume (72.68%, p < 0.001), while the other regimens had no significant effect. Accordingly, the ileal granuloma volume (Fig 9D) was most markedly reduced after the PZQ3 regimen (89.59% reduction, p < 0.001). PZQ1 and PZQ2 regimens reduced ileal granuloma volumes by 75.59 and 81.59% (p < 0.05), respectively, while no significant difference was observed in the PZQ4 group. The thickness of the muscular layer of the ileum was also measured (Fig 9E). In both IC and PZQ-treated groups, the ileal muscular layer was significantly enlarged (p < 0.001) compared to the HC group. PZQ1, PZQ2 and PZQ3 regimens successfully reduced the thickness of the muscular layer by 13.85% (p < 0.05), 35.98% (p < 0.001) and 61.86% (p < 0.001), respectively, compared to that of IC mice. Due to the absence of granuloma at the acute stage of the infection, histopathological analysis and morphometry were not performed on the liver and the ileum of mice.

Fig 9. Effect of praziquantel treatment on the morphometry of the liver and the ileum of Schistosoma mansoni-infected mice.

Fig 9

(A) number of liver’s granulomas; (B) number of ileal granulomas; (C) volume of hepatic granulomas; (D) volume of ileal granulomas; (E) muscular layer thickness of the ileum. HC: Uninfected mice, IC: Infected-untreated mice, PZQ1: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 100 mg/kg for 5 consecutive days, PZQ2: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 100 mg/kg for 28 consecutive days, PZQ3: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 18 mg/kg for 28 consecutive days, PZQ4: Infected mice treated with a single dose of praziquantel at 500 mg/kg. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6). ANOVA followed by Tukey multiple comparison test was also used for statistical analysis. ###p < 0.001: values are significantly different from those uninfected mice (group HC). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001: values are significantly different from those of infected-untreated mice (group IC). αp < 0.05, ααp < 0.01, αααp < 0.001: values are significantly different from those of infected mice treated with PZQ3 posology (group PZQ3).

Protection induced by praziquantel early treatment leads to the modulation of the immune response in Schistosoma mansoni-infected mice

The level of selected Th-1, Th-2, and Th-17 cytokines was measured in mice’s sera after 5 (acute stage) and 8 weeks (granulomatous stage) p.i.

At 5 weeks p.i., infected-untreated mice showed significant high levels of IFN-γ (p < 0.05), TNF-α (p < 0.01), IL-5 (p < 0.05) and IL-17 (p < 0.05), while the level of the regulatory cytokine TGF-β was diminished (p < 0.05), compared to HC mice. The MCP-1 and IL-4 were increased by 11.04% and 51.76% in IC mice, but these differences were not statistically significant. Among PZQ-treated groups at this infectious stage, there was a significant reduction (p < 0.05) of IFN-γ and TNF-α levels in the PZQ2 and PZQ3 groups compared to those of the IC group. IL-17 level was also markedly reduced. No differences were observed in PZQ1 and PZQ4-treated mice compared to IC mice. Interestingly, no IL-13 was detected in the serum of any mouse at this stage (Fig 10).

Fig 10. Effect of praziquantel treatment on the serum cytokine levels during the acute stage of Schistosoma mansoni infection in mice.

Fig 10

HC: Uninfected mice, IC: Infected-untreated mice, PZQ1: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 100 mg/kg for 5 consecutive days, PZQ2: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 100 mg/kg for 28 consecutive days, PZQ3: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 18 mg/kg for 28 consecutive days, PZQ4: Infected mice treated with a single dose of praziquantel at 500 mg/kg. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6). ANOVA followed by Tukey multiple comparison test was also used for statistical analysis. #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01: values are significantly different from those uninfected mice (group HC). *p < 0.05: values are significantly different from those of infected-untreated mice (group IC). αp < 0.05: values are significantly different from those of infected mice treated with PZQ3 posology (group PZQ3).

At 8 weeks p.i., MCP-1, IFN- γ, TNF-α, IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, and IL-17 levels were significantly (p < 0.01) increased in IC mice, compared to HC mice, while the TGF-β level was significantly (p < 0.01) decreased. Regarding the treatment groups, PZQ3 regimen was the most efficient as it reduces the MCP-1 (p < 0.01), Th-1 (p < 0.05), Th-2 (p < 0.01) and Th17 cytokines (p < 0.05) levels and increases the level of TGF-β (p < 0.01). Regarding the other PZQ treatment regimens, PZQ1 and PZQ4 modified the levels of IL-17 and TGF-β; but also of IL-13 for PZQ1. Except for the IL-5 level, no statistical difference was recorded between PZQ2 and IC groups (Fig 11).

Fig 11. Effect of praziquantel treatment on the serum cytokines levels during the granulomatous stage of Schistosoma mansoni infection in mice.

Fig 11

HC: Uninfected mice, IC: Infected-untreated mice, PZQ1: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 100 mg/kg for 5 consecutive days, PZQ2: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 100 mg/kg for 28 consecutive days, PZQ3: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 18 mg/kg for 28 consecutive days, PZQ4: Infected mice treated with a single dose of praziquantel at 500 mg/kg. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6). ANOVA followed by Tukey multiple comparison test was also used for statistical analysis. ##p < 0.01: values are significantly different from those uninfected mice (group HC). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.001: values are significantly different from those of infected-untreated mice (group IC). αp < 0.05, ααp < 0.01: values are significantly different from those of infected mice treated with PZQ3 posology (group PZQ3).

The gene expression of cytokines and chemokines involved in the immune response against schistosomiasis was evaluated in infected mice’s livers.

After 5 weeks of infection, the only significant difference was observed for MIP-1α, where infection led to a marked increase in mRNA levels, essentially reversed by PZQ3 treatment. Of note, the gene expression of IFN-γ increased by 90.60% in the liver of infected mice (IC) compared to that of uninfected mice (HC) and was nearly absent in PZQ3 treated mice (Fig 12).

Fig 12. Effect of praziquantel treatment on the liver mRNA expression of cytokines and chemokines during the acute stage of Schistosoma mansoni infection in mice.

Fig 12

HC: Uninfected mice, IC: Infected-untreated mice, PZQ1: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 100 mg/kg for 5 consecutive days, PZQ2: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 100 mg/kg for 28 consecutive days, PZQ3: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 18 mg/kg for 28 consecutive days, PZQ4: Infected mice treated with a single dose of praziquantel at 500 mg/kg. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6). ANOVA followed by Tukey multiple comparison test was also used for statistical analysis. #p < 0.05: values are significantly different from those uninfected mice (group HC). *p < 0.05: values are significantly different from those of infected-untreated mice (group IC).

At the granulomatous phase of the infection (8 weeks p.i), S. mansoni induced a significant increase of gene expression of IFN-γ (p <0.05), MIP-1α (p <0.01), and MCP-1 (p <0.01) in the liver of IC mice, in comparison to HC group. An increase by 99.56% of the expression of IP-10 in IC mice was noted despite the no statistical significance. The profibrotic genes (IL-13 and FGF-1) were also significantly expressed, while the regulatory genes (IL-10, TGF- β, and RANTES) were unexpressed in the liver of infected mice. In contrast, FGF-1 and IL-13 mRNA levels were significantly higher (p <0.01) by 87.06% and 90.67%, respectively, in infected mice’s liver than in uninfected ones. In PZQ2, PZQ3, and PZQ4 regimens, the gene expression of INF-γ, IP-10, MIP-1α, IL-13, and FGF-1 was restored to near-normal levels. Interestingly, immune regulators genes were more expressed in PZQ3-treated mice than IC mice. A significant increase in the gene expression of IL-10 (95.57%), RANTES (92.58%), and TGF-β1 (91.11%) was observed in the liver of PZQ3 mice in comparison to that of IC mice (Fig 13).

Fig 13. Effect of praziquantel treatment on the liver mRNA expression of cytokines and chemokines during the granulomatous stage of Schistosoma mansoni infection in mice.

Fig 13

HC: Uninfected mice, IC: Infected-untreated mice, PZQ1: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 100 mg/kg for 5 consecutive days, PZQ2: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 100 mg/kg for 28 consecutive days, PZQ3: Infected mice treated with praziquantel at 18 mg/kg for 28 consecutive days, PZQ4: Infected mice treated with a single dose of praziquantel at 500 mg/kg. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6). ANOVA followed by Tukey multiple comparison test was also used for statistical analysis. #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01: values are significantly different from those uninfected mice (group HC). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.001, ***p < 0.001: values are significantly different from those of infected-untreated mice (group IC). αp < 0.05, ααp < 0.01: values are significantly different from those of infected mice treated with PZQ3 posology (group PZQ3).

Considering these results, infection led to a considerable increase of most immune factors, more markedly so in the granulomatous stage, especially for Th2 cytokines. Notably, the regulatory cytokines were less visible in infected mice, indicating a pathological inflammatory reaction. Among the treatment regimens, PQZ3 was the most efficient in reversing this unbalanced inflammatory reaction.

Discussion

Schistosoma mansoni infection is relatively insidious until eggs released by females and destined to be excreted via the intestine become trapped in the liver and gastrointestinal tract tissues. Eggs induce potent inflammatory responses in these organs, leading to severe granulomatous inflammation and fibrosis. The pathology is associated with anemia, abdominal pain, diarrhea, and growth and cognitive impairments [31,32]. PZQ is the only drug readily available for the treatment of schistosomiasis. Because of its low cost, safety, and efficacy, mass PZQ administration has been the key intervention for schistosomiasis control programs [1,18]. One of the main challenges in schistosomiasis treatment is to avoid eggs production in the vertebrate host by administrating the appropriate PZQ posology at the initial stage of the infection. In the present study, we found that, depending on the regimen administered, PZQ can be effective during the migratory phase of S. mansoni. Our results show that PZQ kills immature forms of schistosomes, in vivo, after an oral administration of 18 mg/kg/day or 100 mg/kg/day for 28 consecutive days to mice. Interestingly, the herein reported PZQ regimens promoted a significant and high decrease of hepatic, intestinal, and fecal eggs load. These results attest that these two treatment regimens could considerably decrease the worm fecundity of surviving worms. Similar results had been obtained by Hoekstra et al.[33] in S. mansoni-infected children after treatment with four repeated doses of 40mg/kg of PZQ at two weeks intervals for six weeks.

Several authors have reported a body loss or low body weight gain associated with hepatosplenomegaly and high intestine index during experimental schistosomiasis mansoni in mice [19,34,35]. Results from our study revealed that S. mansoni-infected mice exhibited significant body weight loss, hepatosplenomegaly, and high intestine and thymus indices after 56 days of infection. Enlargement of the liver and the intestine could be due to S. mansoni eggs deposition in these tissues. Spleen and thymus weight gain could result from a high activation of these organs during the immune response against the parasite. In this study, oral administration of PZQ at 18mg/kg/day for 28 consecutive days to S. mansoni-infected mice prevents weight loss and hepatosplenomegaly and the high intestine thymus indices. The reduction of the liver, spleen, intestine, and thymus indices could be the consequence of the reducing number of eggs trapped in organs consecutively to the schistosomicidal activity of PZQ at these two treatments schemes.

S. mansoni infection is classically responsible for multi-cellular granulomatous inflammation surrounding eggs trapped in various tissues [3]. S. mansoni infection is responsible for developing fibrosis around eggs granuloma within the portal tract. This fibrosis is a complex process subsequent to increased synthesis and deposition of extracellular matrix components [3]. S. mansoni-induced pathology results from egg embolization in host tissues, particularly the liver and intestine. Therefore, granuloma primarily forms around those eggs lodged in the presinusoidal capillary venules of the liver. These granulomas sometimes give rise to severe fibrosis, disrupting blood flow through the liver, causing portal hypertension and portocaval shunting. The intestinal form of the disease is characterized by a mucosal granulomatous response that leads to pseudo polyposis, micro-ulceration, and superficial bleeding [3,36]. In tissues, parasite egg antigens induce granulomatous inflammatory reactions involving macrophages, eosinophils, lymphocytes, and hepatic stellate cells. Activated hepatic stellate cells synthesize collagen I and III and alpha-smooth muscle, contributing to the scar tissue constituting liver fibrosis [3739]. Pearce and McDonald [2] stated that granuloma formation requires the recruitment of inflammatory cells from the bloodstream via up-regulation of adhesion molecules on activated vascular endothelial cells, induced by cytokines and chemokines released at the site of inflammation. In the present work, early treatment with 18 mg/kg/day or 100 mg/kg/day of PZQ for 28 days induced a noticeable degree of protection corresponding to less severe pathological changes in the liver and intestine of infected mice, particularly the reduction of the inflammatory reaction and the granuloma number and size. The significant reduction of the number and the size of fibrotic granulomas in the liver and the intestine and the reduction of the ileal muscular thickness was correlated to the decreased hepatic and intestinal egg loads consecutive the reduction of worm burden in PZQ treated mice [34,35]. Moreover, Nono et al. [40] demonstrated that PZQ prevents the onset of fibrosis process before it is established.

Schistosome eggs induce liver fibrosis, a typical pathological process that can lead to irreversible cirrhosis and the inability of the liver to perform its biochemical function [38,39]. Previous studies have shown that liver pathology during acute schistosomiasis in mice (5 to 6 weeks p.i) is associated with liver function impairment and oxidative stress disbalance and is exacerbated with the progression of the infection (8 to 12 weeks p.i) [4143]. It has been demonstrated that in S. mansoni-infected mice, schistosome eggs deposition in the liver induces granulomatous reaction, leading to the release of transaminases from the injured hepatic cells to the bloodstream [19,29,35,4446]. In agreement with the reports of Jatsa et al. [34,35], the increment of such enzymes in serum is probably due to the destruction of hepatocytes by the action of parasite eggs-releasing toxins. In addition, Fahmy et al. [46] reported that hepatocyte membrane damage seems to be the prime culprit for the marked increase in the serum marker enzymes, AST, ALT, and ALP following Schistosoma infection. In conjunction with the report of Fahmy et al. [46], data from the present study showed that treatment of infected mice with 18 mg/kg/day of PZQ for 28 days during the larval and juvenile stages of the parasite significantly decreases the serum activities of ALT, AST, ALP, and total bilirubin concentration and increased γ-GT activity. Moreover, the primary cause of the metabolic dysfunction in schistosomiasis is the site-specific oxidative damage of some of the susceptible amino acids of protein [47,48]. Following the studies of Jatsa et al. [19,34,35], the present study shows that S. mansoni infection in mice induces a significant decrease in the serum total proteins concentration. Similar to what Fahmy et al. [45] reported, data from the present study shows that treatment with PZQ at the early stage of infection significantly increases the concentration of serum total proteins in infected-treated groups.

The infection with S. mansoni is responsible for the early production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), inducing oxidative stress in the liver [19,34,35,44,49] and the spleen[50]. In the present work, S. mansoni impaired the antioxidant defense since the levels of some endogenous antioxidants were depleted. Moreover, MDA, a lipid peroxidation product, was overproduced. Lipid peroxidation has been recognized as a significant consequence of oxidative damage in schistosomiasis [43]. The marked depletion of GSH level, SOD and catalase activities, keys endogenous antioxidants, in infected untreated mice reflects hepatic and spleen cells damage. This depletion could be linked to the increased oxidative stress and the cytotoxicity activity of H2O2, which is produced due to inhibition of glutathione reductase activity [41]. Since PZQ administration at 18 mg/kg/day for 28 days increases the levels of GSH and MDA, as well as SOD and catalase activities, it appears that this treatment prevents oxidative stress and preserves the antioxidant capacity of the liver and spleen cells. This effect might be correlated to the ability of PZQ to kill immature worms and avoid eggs deposition in organs.

Several authors have reported anemia during acute and chronic stages of schistosomiasis. In fact, schistosomiasis is associated with a decrease in red blood cells (RBC) and hemoglobin levels, as well as hematocrit percentage [51,52]. Data obtained in the present work revealed significant decrements in the mean RBC count, hemoglobin level, and hematocrit percentage in infected mice after 56 days. Anemia induced by S. mansoni infection could be explained by the bleedings caused by S. mansoni ova extrusion through the blood vessels and the intestinal wall [41] or by consuming RBC and hemoglobin by schistosome adult worms [7]. The schistosome’s blood-feeding allows them to acquire amino acids to grow, develop, and reproduce [7]. Hemoglobin is then released into the cecum of schistosomes, where it is degraded in amino acids necessary for parasite proteins synthesis. Moreover, hemoglobin is likely the only protein of the host that can supply schistosomes with amino acids [7,51]. In our study, infected mice treated with PZQ improved RBC count, hemoglobin, and hematocrit contents. By reducing the parasite burden, treatment with 18 mg/kg/day or 100 mg/kg/day of PZQ for 28 days at the early stage of infection limited intestinal bleedings and schistosome feeding on host RBC. Our study also exhibited a significant increment in total leukocytes and granulocytes counts in S. mansoni-infected untreated mice compared to uninfected mice.

Interestingly, infected mice presented high peripheral blood granulocytes at 5 and 8 weeks of infection. Blood granulocytes are critical in host defense mechanisms against invading pathogens as they are rapidly recruited to the infection site [53]. In addition, these cell types are present at the initiation and maintenance of chronic allergic inflammation and could play a protective role in the immune response against S. mansoni [5457]. Total leukocytes and granulocytes reached near-normal levels when infected mice were treated with 18 mg/kg/day of PZQ for 28 days. This restoration could be attributed to PZQ’s ability to kill parasites and limit worms’ immunogenic properties and intratissular eggs [48]. The thrombocytopenia recorded in S. mansoni infected-untreated mice in this study is in conjunction with several authors who demonstrated that a low blood platelet count is associated with Schistosoma infection in mice [5860] or humans [61,62]. Stanley et al. [60] reported that thrombocytopenia occurs in S. mansoni-infected mice just a few days after penetration of the parasite larvae in the bloodstream. In addition, Petroianu et al. [63] demonstrated that thrombocytopenia is also associated with splenomegaly and liver fibrosis during the hepatosplenic stage of schistosomiasis. Two ways can explain this thrombocytopenia. First, schistosomes worms interfere with primary hemostasis by inhibiting the ADP-mediated platelets activation and aggregation. In fact, the schistosome tegument contains several enzymatic activities that could lead to the degradation of extracellular ATP or ADP. In this manner, the enzyme expressed at the tegumental surface helps limit blood clot formation around the worms by acting as an anticoagulant and permitting the parasites free movement within the vasculature [59,60,64]. Secondly, platelets are sequestrated in the spleen of infected mice, leading to splenomegaly observed in hepatosplenic schistosomiasis [63,65]. In the present study, the treatment of infected mice with PZQ at 18 mg/kg/day for 28 consecutive days prevented thrombocytopenia. This result could be the consequence of the low parasitic burden that limits the sequestration of platelets in the spleen, as confirm by the average spleen index.

Experimental models of hepatosplenic schistosomiasis are used to appreciate the involvement of a CD4+ T helper (Th) cell response in the progression of the disease. A Th1 response is initiated at the early acute stage of infection and is directed against the migrating schistosomula and immature adult worms [2,66,67]. This response is characterized by increased expression of the Th1 proinflammatory cytokines IL-1, IL-12, TNF-α, and IFN- γ. The immune response switches to a pronounced Th2 response at 6 to 8 weeks p.i following the onset of egg deposition. This Th2 response is characterized by the production of high levels of Th2 cytokines such as IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, and IL-13 [4,68]. As the infection progresses to a more chronic stage in the moderate or controlled disease, general down-modulation of the Th2 response is observed [4,67,69]. This immunomodulation might be driven by IL-10 and TGF-β, which induce T regulatory cells (Tregs) that regulate the balance of Th1/Th2 response [2,4]. At the acute stage of the infection, we noticed a predominantly Th1 immune response characterized by a high level of serum IFN- γ, TNF-α, and IL-17 and the increased gene expression of IFN- γ, MIP-1α and IP-10 in the liver of infected-untreated mice. In infected-untreated mice, hyperpolarized Th2 and Th17 immune responses were observed at the granulomatous stage. They expressed higher serum levels of IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 and the hepatic mRNA of IL-13, FGF-1, MCP-1, and MIP-1α than those of uninfected mice. In addition, IL-17 was hardly detected at any infectious stage and indicated a chronic inflammatory process associated with severe liver pathology [67,70,71].

Moreover, decreased serum levels of immunomodulators (IL-10 and TGF-β) and their liver gene expression associated with a low expression of the RANTES gene were recorded in infected-untreated mice. According to Burke et al. [4], during the first 4–6 weeks of infection in the mouse, a moderate Th1 response is generated against migrating schistosomula and immature adult worms. This response is characterized by increased circulating proinflammatory cytokines [4,67]. Elevated levels of these cytokines have also been associated with the development symptoms of acute infection in humans [2,72]. Th17 response has been linked with severe hepatic inflammation in schistosomiasis [67,71]. However, the exact role of Th17 cells in regulating granulomatous pathology remains unclear. Still, Chen et al. [73] reported the detection of Th17 cells in S. japonicum-infected liver, suggesting that the increased levels of Th17 cell populations are correlated with more severe pathology. These results corroborated our findings on IL-17 production with S. mansoni-infected mice. In fact, several authors have demonstrated that the exacerbation of granulomatous lesions in S. mansoni-infected mice was directed by a Th17 response [4,36,73,74]. In addition, IL-17 neutralization reduced granulomatous inflammation and the expression of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines in S. mansoni-infected mice [67,75]. Similarly, the highest level of MIP1-α recorded in our study can be correlated to severe schistosomiasis pathology. The findings of Souza et al. [76] revealed elevated MIP-1α levels in the plasma of patients with chronic schistosomiasis and decreased liver granuloma size, liver eosinophil peroxidase activity, and collagen content in S. mansoni infected-MIP-1α-deficient mice. Moreover, Falcao et al. [77] reported that the neutralization of MIP-1α decreased the size of S. mansoni pulmonary granuloma.

Interestingly, we also found that treatment with 18 mg/kg/day of PZQ for 28 consecutive days led to significant modulation of the Th1, Th2, and Th17 responses at the granulomatous stage of S. mansoni infection. Mice submitted to this regimen exhibited a low level of Th1, Th2 and Th17 mediated cytokines and their gene expression in the liver. In addition, high serum levels and liver gene expression of IL-10 and TGF-β, as well as an increased expression of RANTES, were also recorded. These results indicate a modulation of the immune response by this PZQ regimen. The immunoregulation by PZQ at 18mg/kg/day for 28 consecutive days is consecutive to the low granulomatous response following the reduction of adult schistosomes and tissue eggs deposition. The modulation of the immune response that is essential to promote host survival during schistosome infection can be achieved by multiple mechanisms involving IL-10. CD4+CD25+ Tregs and B cells are sources of IL-10. Studies with IL-10-deficient mice indicate that IL-10-producing Tregs regulate pathology by controlling both Th1 and Th2 cytokines production during S. mansoni infection [67,74]. Regarding the modulatory activity of RANTES, several authors reported its elevated plasma levels in patients with chronic schistosomiasis. It negatively regulates the granulomatous response and controls disease severity in S. mansoni-infected mice [4,67,74,76]. In addition, Huang et al. [78] demonstrated that TGF-β1 attenuates hepatic fibrosis by inhibiting the activation of PI3/Akt signaling pathways. This leads to the inactivation of the proliferation and migration of hepatic stellate cells, thus inhibiting the production of ECM components in the liver of S. japonicum-infected mice.

Regarding the overall results of our study, among PZQ-treated groups, the treatment regimens of 100 mg/kg/day for 5 days (PZQ1) and the single dose of 500 mg/kg (PZQ4) when administered at the early stage of the infection were ineffective on S. mansoni pathology. On the other hand, the posologies of 100 mg/kg/day for 28 days (PZQ2) and 18 mg/kg/day for 28 days (PZQ3) were effective on the experimental mouse model of schistosomiasis. The treatment schemes mentioned above showed the best efficacy in reducing the parasitological burdens. However, critical differences were recorded between the two treatment schemes. In fact, in the PZQ3 group, the body weight, the organ indices, the hematological profile, the liver function, and the liver and spleen oxidative status were globally near-normal levels. On the contrary, despite its good schistosomicidal activity, the PZQ2 treatment scheme was ineffective on S.mansoni-induced liver impairment. In addition, body weight loss, anemia, and thrombocytopenia were also noticed. More importantly, the PZQ2 group presented a mortality rate of 81.25%. In this regard, the PZQ posology of 100 mg/kg/day for 28 consecutive days seems toxic for mice.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates that early treatment with PZQ at the dose of 18 mg/kg/day for 28 consecutive days exhibited the best antischistosomal activity. This posology considerably prevented mice against S. mansoni induced-pathology by reducing the parasitological burden and the hepatosplenomegaly. It also prevents hepatic and intestinal severe granulomatous reaction and fibrosis, hepatic and splenic oxidative stress, and regulates the Th1, Th2, and Th17 immune response induced by S. mansoni infection in mice. Therefore, we can recommend this PZQ regimen as a reference for further studies related to the antischistosomal potency of natural products or compounds in the early stage of a murine model of schistosomiasis. Upcoming studies associated with the mechanism of action will be conducted on PBMC, spleen cells and CD4 T cells harvested from S. mansoni-infected mice treated with PZQ at 18 mg/kg/day for 28 days to evaluate the Th1, Th2, and Th17 responses at different stages of the infection.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the association "Pathologie, Cytologie et Développement" (PCD), which kindly donated equipment and reagents for histological study. We also thank Ms. Laetitia Béal and Ms. Chloé Gommenginger for their technical assistance in realizing multiplex assays.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript.

Funding Statement

A part of this work has been conducted under the financial supports of the France Government by the Cooperative and Cultural Action Service (SCAC) scholarship 959139G and the Strasbourg Institute of Parasitology and Tropical Diseases (IPPTS) to Ulrich Membe Femoe. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.WHO. Schistosomiasis. 2020 [cited 25 Apr 2021]. Available: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/schistosomiasis
  • 2.Pearce EJ, MacDonald AS. The immunobiology of schistosomiasis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2: 499–511. doi: 10.1038/nri843 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hams E, Aviello G, Fallon PG. The Schistosoma granuloma: friend or foe? Front Immunol. 2013;4: 1–8. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Burke ML, Jones MK, Gobert GN, Li YS, Ellis MK, McManus DP. Immunopathogenesis of human schistosomiasis. Parasite Immunol. 2009;31: 163–176. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2009.01098.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Abdel L, Hegazy M, Hussein M, Motiam AL, Abd NF. Evaluation of artesunate and praziquantel combination therapy in murine schistosomiasis mansoni. 2018;13: 193–203. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Xiao SH, Sun J, Chen MG. Pharmacological and immunological effects of praziquantel against Schistosoma japonicum: a scoping review of experimental studies. Infect Dis Poverty. 2018;7: 1–15. doi: 10.1186/s40249-017-0384-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Thétiot-Laurent SAL, Boissier J, Robert A, Meunier B. Schistosomiasis chemotherapy. Angew Chemie—Int Ed. 2013;52: 7936–7956. doi: 10.1002/anie.201208390 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Vimieiro ACS, Araújo N, Katz N, Kusel JR, Coelho PMZ. Schistogram changes after administration of antischistosomal drugs in mice at the early phase of Schistosoma mansoni infection. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2013;108: 881–886. doi: 10.1590/0074-0276130135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Xiao SH, Catto BA, Webster LT. Effects of praziquantel on different developmental stages of Schistosoma mansoni in vitro and in vivo. J Infect Dis. 1985;151: 1130–1137. doi: 10.1093/infdis/151.6.1130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sabah AA, Fletcher C, Webbe G, Doenhoff MJ. Schistosoma mansoni: chemotherapy of infections of different ages. Exp Parasitol. 1986;61: 294–303. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(86)90184-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Silva LM, Menezes RMC, De Oliveira SA, Andrade ZA. Chemotherapeutic effects on larval stages of Schistosoma mansoni during infection and re-infection of mice. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2003;36: 335–341. doi: 10.1590/s0037-86822003000300004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pica-Mattoccia L, Cioli D. Sex- and stage-related sensitivity of Schistosoma mansoni to in vivo and in vitro praziquantel treatment. Int J Parasitol. 2004;34: 527–533. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2003.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Botros S, Pica-Mattoccia L, William S, El-Lakkani N, Cioli D. Effect of praziquantel on the immature stages of Schistosoma haematobium. Int J Parasitol. 2005;35: 1453–1457. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.05.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Grandière-Pérez L, Ansart S, Paris L, Faussart A, Jaureguiberry S, Grivois JP, et al. Efficacy of praziquantel during the incubation and invasive phase of Schistosoma haematobium schistosomiasis in 18 travelers. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;74: 814–818. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2006.74.814 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Enk MJ, Katz N, Coelho PMZ. A case of Schistosoma mansoni infection treated during the prepatent period. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;5: 112–115. doi: 10.1038/ncpgasthep1037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Coelho PMZ, Enk MJ, Katz N. Treatment of clinical schistosomiasis at the prepatent phase: an option? Trends Parasitol. 2009;25: 299–300. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2009.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ribeiro F, De Mello RT, Tavares CAP, Kusel JR, Coelho PMZ. Synergistic action of praziquantel and host specific immune response against Schistosoma mansoni at different phases of infection. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2004;46: 231–233. doi: 10.1590/s0036-46652004000400010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cioli D, Botros SS, Wheatcroft-Francklow K, Mbaye A, Southgate V, Tchuenté LAT, et al. Determination of ED50 values for praziquantel in praziquantel-resistant and -susceptible Schistosoma mansoni isolates. Int J Parasitol. 2004;34: 979–987. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2004.05.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jatsa HB, Kenfack CM, Simo DN, Feussom NG, Nkondo ET, Tchuem Tchuente LA, et al. Schistosomicidal, hepatoprotective and antioxidant activities of the methanolic fraction from Clerodendrum umbellatum Poir leaves aqueous extract in Schistosoma mansoni infection in mice. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2015;15: 1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12906-015-0520-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Duvall RH, DeWitt WB. An improved perfusion technique for recovering adult schistosomes from laboratory animals. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1967;16: 483–486. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1967.16.483 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gornall G, Bardawill CJ, David MM. Determination of serum proteins by means of the biuret reaction. J Biol Chem. 1949;177: 751–766. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Reitman S, Fankel S. A colorimetric method for the determination of serum glutamic oxalacetic and glutamic pyruvic transaminases. Am J Clin Pathol. 1957;28: 56–63. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/28.1.56 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wu AHB. Tietz Clinical Guide to Laboratory Tests. 4th ed. Elsevier S, editor. St Louis, Missouri, USA: Saunders Elsevier; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wilbur KM, Bernheim F, Shapiro OW. The thiobarbituric acid reagent as a test for the oxidation of unsaturated fatty acids by various agents. Arch Biochem. 1949;24: 305–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hibbs JB, Taintor RR, Vavrin Z, Rachlin EM. Nitric oxide: A cytotoxic activated macrophage effector molecule. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1988;157: 87–94. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(88)80015-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Misra HP, Fridovich I. The role of superoxide anion in the autoxidation of epinephrine and a simple assay for superoxide dismutase. J Biol Chem. 1972;247: 3170–3175. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ellman GL. Tissue sulfhydryl groups. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1959;82: 70–77. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(59)90090-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sinha AK. Colorimetric assay of catalase. Anal Biochem. 1972;47: 389–394. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(72)90132-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Allam G. Immunomodulatory effects of curcumin treatment on murine schistosomiasis mansoni. Immunobiology. 2009;214: 712–727. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2008.11.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Souza ALS, Souza PRS, Pereira CA, Fernandes A, Guabiraba R, Russo RC, et al. Experimental infection with Schistosoma mansoni in CCR5-deficient mice is associated with increased disease severity, as CCR5 plays a role in controlling granulomatous inflammation. Infect Immun. 2011;79: 1741–1749. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00502-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tallima H, Dvořák J, Kareem S, Abou El Dahab M, Abdel Aziz N, Dalton JP, et al. Protective immune responses against Schistosoma mansoni infection by immunization with functionally active gut-derived cysteine peptidases alone and in combination with glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005443 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Elbaz T, Esmat G. Hepatic and intestinal schistosomiasis: review. J Adv Res. 2013;4: 445–452. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2012.12.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hoekstra PT, Casacuberta-Partal M, van Lieshout L, Corstjens PLAM, Tsonaka R, Assaré RK, et al. Efficacy of single versus four repeated doses of praziquantel against Schistosoma mansoni infection in school-aged children from côte d’ivoire based on kato-katz and POC-CCA: An open-label, randomised controlled trial (REPST). PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14: e0008189. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008189 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Jatsa HB, Femoe UM, Njiaza J, Tombe Tombe DS, Mbolang LN, Nkondo ET, et al. Efficacy of Sida pilosa Retz aqueous extract against Schistosoma mansoni—induced granulomatous inflammation in the liver and the intestine of mice: histomorphometry and gastrointestinal motility evaluation. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2018;18: 1–15. doi: 10.1186/s12906-017-2057-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Jatsa HB, Feussom NG, Femoe UM, Kenfack MC, Nkondo ET, Kadji Fassi JB, et al. Evaluation of the schistosomicidal, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of the ethyl acetate fraction from Ozoroa pulcherrima Schweinf. Roots on Schistosoma mansoni-induced liver pathology in mice and its phytochemical characterization. J Ethnopharmacol. 2019;238: 111883. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2019.111883 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kamdem SD, Moyou-Somo R, Brombacher F, Nono JK. Host regulators of liver fibrosis during human schistosomiasis. Front Immunol. 2018;9: 2781. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02781 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sheir SK, Omayma, Maghraby AM, Mohamed AH, Osman G, Al-Qormuti SA. Immunomodulatory and ameliorative role of Nigella sativa oil Schistosoma mansoni infected mice. Can J Pure Appl Sci. 2015;9: 3345–3355. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.El-Lakkany NM, Hammam OA, El-Maadawy WH, Badawy AA, Ain-Shoka AA, Ebeid FA. Anti-inflammatory/anti-fibrotic effects of the hepatoprotective silymarin and the schistosomicide praziquantel against Schistosoma mansoni-induced liver fibrosis. Parasites and Vectors. 2012;5: 1–14. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-5-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Abdel-Hafeez EH, Ahmad AK, Abdulla AM, Aabdel-Wahab S, Mosalem FA. Therapeutic effect of alpha lipoic acid combined with praziquantel on liver fibrosis induced by Schistosoma mansoni challenged mice. Parasitol Res. 2012;111: 577–586. doi: 10.1007/s00436-012-2871-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Nono JK, Fu K, Mpotje T, Varrone G, Aziz NA, Mosala P, et al. Investigating the antifibrotic effect of the antiparasitic drug Praziquantel in in vitro and in vivo preclinical models. Sci Rep. 2020;10. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56089-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Rizk M, Ibrahim N, El-Rigal N. Comparative in vivo antioxidant levels in Schistosoma mansoni infected mice treated with Praziquantel or the essential oil of Melaleuca armillaris leaves. Pakistan J Biol Sci. 2012;15: 971–978. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2012.971.978 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Manivannan B, Rawson P, Jordan TW, Secor WE, La Flamme AC. Differential patterns of liver proteins in experimental murine hepatosplenic schistosomiasis. Infect Immun. 2010;78: 618–628. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00647-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Amina I, Abdel-Tawab H, Taghreed H. Pentoxifylline and/or praziquantel reduce murine schistosomiasis mansoni histopathology via amelioration of liver functions. Egypt J Aquat Biol Fish. 2019;23: 121–133. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Jatsa HB, Russo RC, Pereira CADJ, Aguilar EC, Garcia CC, Araújo ES, et al. Improvement of the liver pathology by the aqueous extract and the n-butanol fraction of Sida pilosa Retz in Schistosoma mansoni-infected mice. J Ethnopharmacol. 2016;180: 114–123. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2016.01.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Aly HF, Mantawy MM, Fahamy ZH, Rizk MZ. Effect of Zingiber officinal (ginger) and Glycyrrhiza uralensis (licorice) on experimental S. mansoni life cycle and investing the composition (metabolites) changes in different tissues. J Med Plants Res. 2013;7: 1481–1493. doi: 10.5897/JMPR12.1085 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Fahmy SR, Rabia I, Mansour EM. The potential role of mefloquine against Schistosoma mansoni infection by prohibition of hepatic oxidative stress in mice. J Basic Appl Zool. 2014;67: 40–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jobaz.2014.09.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Tawfeek GM, Abdelbaki MH, Ibrahim AN, Hanafy MA, Fathy MM, Diab MSM. Praziquantel—chitosan nanoformulation against murine Schistosoma mansoni infection. Int J Med. 2020;113. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcaa060.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.El Shenawy NS, Soliman MFM, Reyad SI. The effect of antioxidant properties of aqueous garlic extract and Nigella sativa as anti-schistosomiasis agents in mice. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2008;50: 29–36. doi: 10.1590/s0036-46652008000100007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Dkhil MA. Role of berberine in ameliorating Schistosoma mansoni-induced hepatic injury in mice. Biol Res. 2014;47: 1–7. doi: 10.1186/0717-6287-47-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Al-Quraishy S, Al-Khalifa MS, Dkhil MA. Role of berberine on schistosomiasis-inducted oxidative stress and damage in spleen of mice. Life Sci J. 2013;10: 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Al-kazzaz MA, Adel Aziz AR, Elmahalawy EK, Hassan AA. Hematological profile in Schistosoma mansoni infected mice treated with Commiphora molmol extract compared with praziquantel. PSM Biol Res. 2018;3: 77–84. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sorgho H, Da O, Rouamba T, Savadogo B, Tinto H, Ouedraogo J-B. Schistosoma mansoni infection and hematological profile in an endemic foci in Western Burkina Faso. African J Parasitol Res. 2017;4: 264–270. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Sorci G, Cornet S, Faivre B. Immune evasion, immunopathology and the regulation of the immune system. Pathogens. 2013;2: 71–91. doi: 10.3390/pathogens2010071 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Soliman E, Maha F, Nahla S, El-Shenawy. Evaluation of the protective effect of two Antioxidative agents in mice experimentally infected with Schistosoma mansoni: haematological and histopathological aspects. Pakistan J Biol Sci. 2003;6: 887–897. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2003.887.897 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Mohammed EHA, Eltayeb M, Ibrahim H. Haematological and biochemical morbidity of Schistosoma haematobium in school children in Sudan. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2006;6: 59–64. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Mahmoud EA, Elbessoumy AA. Hematological and biochemical effects of Curcumin in Schistosoma mansoni infested mice. Assiut Vet Med J. 2014;60: 184–195. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Pérez del Villar L, Vicente B, Galindo-Villardón P, Castellanos A, Pérez-Losada J, Muro A. Schistosoma mansoni experimental infection in Mus spretus (SPRET/EiJ strain) mice. Parasite. 2013;20: 27. doi: 10.1051/parasite/2013027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ngaiza JR, Doenhoff MJ. Schistosoma mansoni-induced thrombocytopenia in mice. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1987;81: 655–656. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(87)90444-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Stanley RG, Ngaiza JR, Atieno E, Jell G, Francklow K, Jackson CL, et al. Immune-dependent thrombocytopaenia in mice infected with Schistosoma mansoni. Parasitology. 2003;126: 225–229. doi: 10.1017/s0031182002002858 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Stanley RG, Ngaiza JR, Wambayi E, Lewis J, Doenhoff MJ. Platelets as an innate defence mechanism against Schistosoma mansoni infections in mice. Parasite Immunol. 2003;25: 467–473. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2003.00656.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Drummond SC, Pereira PN, Otoni A, Chaves BA, Antunes CM, Lambertucci JR. Thrombocytopenia as a surrogate marker of hepatosplenic schistosomiasis in endemic areas for Schistosomiasis mansoni. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2014;47: 218–222. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0020-2014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Eyayu T, Zeleke AJ, Seyoum M, Worku L. Basic coagulation profiles and platelet count among Schistosoma mansoni-infected adults attending Sanja primary hospital, northwest Ethiopia. Res Rep Trop Med. 2020;11: 27–36. doi: 10.2147/RRTM.S244912 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Petroianu A, De Oliveira AE, Alberti LR. Hypersplenism in Schistosomatic Portal Hypertension. Arch Med Res. 2005;36: 496–501. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2005.04.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Mebius MM, van Genderen PJJ, Urbanus RT, Tielens AGM, de Groot PG, van Hellemond JJ. Interference with the host haemostatic system by schistosomes. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9: 1–8. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003781 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Leite LAC, Domingues ALC, Lopes EP, Ferreira R de C dos S, Pimenta Filho A de A, da Fonseca CSM, et al. Relationship between splenomegaly and hematologic findings in patients with hepatosplenic schistosomiasis. Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter. 2013;35: 332–336. doi: 10.5581/1516-8484.20130098 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Wilson MS, Mentink-Kane MM, Pesce JT, Ramalingam TR, Thompson R, Wynn TA. Immunopathology of schistosomiasis. Immunol Cell Biol. 2007;85: 148–154. doi: 10.1038/sj.icb.7100014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Chuah C, Jones MK, Burke ML, McManus DP, Gobert GN. Cellular and chemokine-mediated regulation in schistosome-induced hepatic pathology. Trends Parasitol. 2014;30: 141–150. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2013.12.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Montenegro SML, Miranda P, Mahanty S, Abath FGC, Teixeira KM, Coutinho EM, et al. Cytokine Production in Acute versus Chronic Human Schistosomiasis Mansoni: The Cross-Regulatory Role of Interferon-γ and Interleukin-10 in the Responses of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells and Splenocytes to Parasite Antigens. J Infect Dis. 1999;179: 1502–1514. doi: 10.1086/314748 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Allam G, Abuelsaad ASA, Alblihed MA, Alsulaimani AA. Ellagic acid reduces murine schistosomiasis mansoni immunopathology via up-regulation of IL-10 and down-modulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines production. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2016;38: 286–297. doi: 10.1080/08923973.2016.1189561 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Hoffmann KF, Caspar P, Cheever AW, Wynn TA. IFN-gamma, IL-12, and TNF-alpha are required to maintain reduced liver pathology in mice vaccinated with Schistosoma mansoni eggs and IL-12. J Immunol. 1998;161: 4201–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Mitchell KM, Mutapi F, Savill NJ, Woolhouse MEJ. Protective immunity to Schistosoma haematobium infection is primarily an anti-fecundity response stimulated by the death of adult worms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109: 13347–13352. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1121051109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Barsoum RS. Human schistosomiasis: clinical perspective: review. J Adv Res. 2013;4: 433–444. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2013.01.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Chen S, Gao Y, Liang Y, Hu L, Liu J, Peng L, et al. Imbalance of Th1/Th2 and Th17/Treg promoting schistosome egg granuloma formation. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2017;10: 14290–14300. [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Burke ML, McManus DP, Ramm GA, Duke M, Li Y, Jones MK, et al. Temporal expression of chemokines dictates the hepatic inflammatory infiltrate in a murine model of schistosomiasis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4: 598–610. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000598 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Zhu J, Zhang W, Zhang L, Xu L, Chen X, Zhou S, et al. IL-7 suppresses macrophage autophagy and promotes liver pathology in Schistosoma japonicum-infected mice. J Cell Mol Med. 2018;22: 3353–3363. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.13610 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Souza PRS, Souza ALS, Negrão-Correa D, Teixeira AL, Teixeira MM. The role of chemokines in controlling granulomatous inflammation in Schistosoma mansoni infection. Acta Trop. 2008;108: 135–138. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2008.04.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Falcão PL, Correa-Oliveira R, Fraga LAO, Talvani A, Proudfoot AEI, Wells TNC, et al. Plasma concentrations and role of macrophage inflammatory protein-1α during chronic Schistosoma mansoni infection in humans. J Infect Dis. 2002;186: 1696–1700. doi: 10.1086/345370 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Huang P, Zhou M, Cheng S, Hu Y, Gao M, Ma Y, et al. Myricetin possesses anthelmintic activity and attenuates hepatic fibrosis via modulating TGFβ1 and Akt signaling and shifting Th1/Th2 balance in Schistosoma japonicum-infected mice. Front Immunol. 2020;11: 593. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00593 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010382.r001

Decision Letter 0

John Pius Dalton, Sergio C Oliveira

3 Mar 2022

Dear Dr. Boukeng Jatsa,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Pathological and immunological evaluation of different regimens of praziquantel treatment in a mouse model of Schistosoma mansoni infection" for consideration at PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important topic. Based on the two reviews, we are likely to accept this manuscript for publication, providing that you modify the manuscript according to the reviewer's comments.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 30 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to all review comments, and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Thank you again for your submission to our journal. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

John Pius Dalton, PhD

Associate Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Sergio Oliveira

Deputy Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: I would prefer a replicated study design for any study of drug effects. However, given the complexity of the current report, I will not insist on it. I am concerned that pretesting of the dose regimens was not performed prior to treatment, as extended administration of 100 mg/kg PZQ is clearly toxic; these regimens should not have been included in experiments with infected animals. I have not checked, but surely some data on toxicology were available; the package submitted for approval would have included results from chronic testing and should be available from WHO, if not other sources. The authors should discuss this shortcoming. Is it possible that infection exacerbated the toxicity of PZQ? In addition, the authors should have included a group treated with the standard regimen of PZQ in their model. Some authors treat with a single dose of up to 500 mg/kg at 28 days, others at 42 days.

--------------------

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: No concerns about this aspect of the manuscript

--------------------

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

--------------------

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

--------------------

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: This was an interesting study of the effects of praziquantel on both the schistosome parasites and the host. The work is comprehensive and well performed. The manuscript is very easy to real and all of the figures of a high standard. There is a huge amount of data presented. While this makes the study very comprehensive, it does make the publication unwieldly as a whole.

Line 107 please state the sex of the animals used.

I would be useful in groups could be named better ie HC, IC PZQ1-4 etc at the beginning of the line in the methods section.

The use of PZQ dissolved in distilled water is a concern, do the drugs solubility. The FDA states it is “and very slightly soluble in water”, https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2014/018714s013lbl.pdf

Just to confirm the third group received 100mg/kg/day x 28 days, that contrasts to the other groups that in total received 500mg/kg, that 3rd group received 5 times the dosage of the others. I am not sure how that was justified, especially in the light of the very low survival rate.

In Table 2 define what the acute and granulomatous phases are.

Similarly in line 387 the terms acute stage is used but not defined until line 532. Same with granulomatous stage on line 291.

Table 1 please add references for the primers used if possible. Tables 3-5 were cut off on the right in the pdf I reviewed. I could not review these properly. I am not sure why this was not identified during the submission process. From what I can is that AST levels were elevated for the PZQ3 group? Since there were no groups where uninfected mince were given the PZQ regimes tested, there is no way to demonstrated the cytotoxic effects for the drug on the animal. But I acknowledge that the group PZQ 3 parameters are less than IC. The long term (28 days) exposure of cell lines to PZQ could have been informative.

The efficacy of a low dosage for a long period of time is clear in the many metrics provided, but what is the potential for drug resistance to develop in field settings? Drug resistance in general is not discussed.

While the results are very robust, it is not clear to me if the authors are saying if PZQ is having an effect on the host, independent to its direct antischistosomal activity. There have been some reports on the therapeutic effect of PZQ (PMID: 32606340).

I would recommend these papers be considered for your manuscript. PMID:34736899, PMID:34796025, PMID:34702326, PMID:34273315, PMID:34280206, PMID: 32741402, PMID:23555262.

Reviewer #2: The authors should discuss the possibility that PZQ bioaccumulates in chronic treatment, so that its normally short t-1/2 is extended after 28 days of dosing, especially if liver damage is present. Efficacy of 28-day regimens could be due to sufficient presence of the drug to affect worms of sufficient maturity at day 28 to be susceptible, or to previously unknown effects of prolonged duration of exposure to PZQ on immature worms. Without data on plasma levels at day 28/29, these possibilities cannot be rigorously excluded. Also, while it is true that it is desirable to prevent egg deposition in the host, daily dosing is incompatible with current control programs in the field; to prevent the development of adult parasites, people would have to receive a month of treatment every other month. It is possible that expatriates or tourists could be given a month-ling regimen of PZQ (assuming these results are relevant for humans), but it is also possible to take a normal regimen 6 weeks after leaving an endemic area to prevent pathology. The results are interesting and should be published, as they indicate that an extended duration of exposure, independent of the dose (and thus plasma levels) may be deleterious to immature schistosomes. That, I believe, is new.

--------------------

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

References

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article's retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010382.r003

Decision Letter 1

John Pius Dalton, Sergio C Oliveira

1 Apr 2022

Dear DR. Boukeng Jatsa,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Pathological and immunological evaluation of different regimens of praziquantel treatment in a mouse model of Schistosoma mansoni infection' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

John Pius Dalton, PhD

Associate Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Sergio Oliveira

Deputy Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************************************************

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010382.r004

Acceptance letter

John Pius Dalton, Sergio C Oliveira

15 Apr 2022

Dear Pr Boukeng Jatsa,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Pathological and immunological evaluation of different regimens of praziquantel treatment in a mouse model of Schistosoma mansoni infection," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Editorial, Viewpoint, Symposium, Review, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript will be published online unless you opted out of this process. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Shaden Kamhawi

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Paul Brindley

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Responses to reviewers_PNTD-D-22-00124.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript.


    Articles from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES