Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Crit Care. 2022 Feb 10;69:153995. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2022.153995

Midodrine to liberate ICU patients from intravenous vasopressors: another negative fixed-dose trial

Richard R Riker 1, David J Gagnon 2
PMCID: PMC9064955  NIHMSID: NIHMS1784949  PMID: 35152142

Dear Editor,

We read with interest the two-center, open-label, feasibility randomized-controlled trial of fixed-dose midodrine administration to hasten weaning from low-dose vasopressor infusions by Costa-Pinto and colleagues [1]. Their cohort of 62 mostly post-operative and septic subjects was enrolled over 22 months, but the study was terminated early due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The investigators concluded midodrine administration (10 mg every 8 hours) was not associated with a shorter time to cessation of vasopressor infusions compared to usual care (16.5 vs. 19 hours; p=0.32). We thank them for this pragmatic trial, but had several concerns regarding their intervention.

We are aware of seven published reports, including 1,572 subjects, in which midodrine was administered to facilitate weaning of vasopressor infusions in critically ill patients (Table 1) [17]. All four studies incorporating dose titration of midodrine concluded it was effective, while three studies employing a fixed-dose strategy, including the trial by Costa-Pinto, concluded midodrine was ineffective. Three of the four dose titration studies were retrospective, compared to one of the three fixed-dose studies, limiting the strength of those conclusions.

Table 1:

Studies describing midodrine administration to wean vasopressors in ICU patients arranged by dosing strategy

Author, Year Design Setting, Sample Size Midodrine Dose, Duration Multiple Vasopressorsa % with Bradycardia, Definition Results
Titration Studies
Levine 20132 Prospective, observational Paired before-after analysis SICU
n=20
5-20 mg TID

4 (3-7) days
Not reported None Reported Greater decline in vasopressor weaning rate. (−0.62 vs. −2.2 mcg/min/hr; p=0.012)
Whitson 20163 Retrospective, observational, controlled MICU
n=135
10-40 mg q8h

6.2 days
Not reported 0.7% Not defined Shorter duration of vasopressors (3.8 vs. 2.9 days; p<0.001)
Poveromo 20174 Retrospective, observational controlled CICU, SICU, MICU, NICU
n=94
2.5-10 mg 2-6x daily

4.4 (3-8) days
59.6% 12.8% Not Defined Vasopressors discontinued in 1.2 (0.5-2.8) days. Pressor rate decreased 97.3% at 24 hours
Rizvi 20185 Retrospective, observational, uncontrolled CTICU, SICU, MICU, NICU
n=1,119
5-30 mg q8h

11.8 (21) daysb
Not reported 15% HR <50 BPM 48% weaned off vasopressors at 24 hours (p<0.001)
Fixed-dose Studies
Santer 20207 Randomized, placebo controlled MICU, SICU
n=68
20 mg q8h

1.8 (1.0-3.0) days
0% 7.6% HR <40 BPM or 20% decrease No difference in time to vasopressor discontinuation (23.5 vs. 22.5 hours; p=0.62)
Tremblay 20206 Retrospective, observational, Propensity matched CTICU
n=74
10 mg TID

1.7 (1.0-3.0) days
15% NR No difference in duration of vasopressors (63 vs. 44 hours; p=0.052)
Costa-Pinto 20221 Randomized, open-label, controlled MICU, SICU
n=62
10 mg q8h Not reported 31.2% HR ≤50 BPM No difference in duration of vasopressors (16.5 vs. 19 hours; p=0.32)
a

– percentage of patients treated with two or more vasopressors at time of midodrine initiation

b

– duration data taken from a follow-up report from this same study [8]

BPM = beats per minute; CICU = cardiac intensive care unit; CTICU = cardiothoracic intensive care unit; HR = heart rate; MICU = medical intensive care unit; NE-E = norepinephrine equivalents; NICU = neurological intensive care unit; RCT = randomized-controlled trial; SICU = surgical intensive care unit

The dose-response of midodrine for increasing blood pressure was confirmed in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial conducted by Wright and colleagues in 25 subjects with neurogenic orthostatic hypotension [8]. It is possible the fixed-dose strategy employed by Costa-Pinto and colleagues limited the therapeutic benefit of midodrine akin to administering norepinephrine at a low, fixed-dose, rather than titrating to a clinical endpoint. Additionally, because their trial was stopped early, it is probable they were underpowered to identify significant differences in their outcomes.

Midodrine is a prodrug that is metabolized to its active moiety desglymidodrine which has a half-life of three to four hours [9]. Although the dosing frequency for midodrine is often every eight hours, the prescribing information describes daytime dosing every three to four hours [9]. A recent retrospective study administered midodrine every six hours, with doses ranging from 5-20 mg; this approach reduced norepinephrine-equivalent doses by 50% within 24 hours [10]. The every eight hour interval used by Costa-Pinto and colleagues may also have contributed to their negative results.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Costa-Pinto and colleagues for their trial, but wonder if their results may alternatively be stated as, “midodrine administration at a low, fixed-dose every eight hours was not associated with a hastening of intravenous vasopressor discontinuation.” Additional studies are required to answer these important questions regarding appropriate dosing strategies and intervals. Until these can be addressed, providers should keep in mind that multiple studies using dose titration have suggested that midodrine administration can hasten pressor weaning.

Footnotes

Declarations of interest: none

References

  • 1.Costa-Pinto R, Yong ZT, Yanase F, et al. A pilot, feasibility, randomised controlled trial of midodrine as adjunctive vasopressor for low-dose vasopressor-dependent hypotension in intensive care patients: The MAVERIC study. J Crit Care. 2022;67:166–71. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Levine AR, Meyer MJ, Bittner EA, et al. Oral midodrine treatment accelerates the liberation of intensive care unit patients from intravenous vasopressor infusions. J Crit Care. 2013;28:756–2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.05.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Whitson MR, Mo E, Nabi T, et al. Feasibility, utility, and safety of midodrine during recovery phase from septic shock. Chest. 2016;149:1380–3. DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.02.657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Poveromo LB, Michalets EL, Sutherland SE. Midodrine for the weaning of vasopressor infusions. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2016;41:260–5. DOI: 10.1111/jcpt.12375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rizvi MS, Trivedi V, Nasim F, et al. Trends in use of midodrine in the ICU: A single-center retrospective case series. Crit Care Med. 2018;46:e628–33. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tremblay J, Laramée P, Lamarche Y, et al. Potential risks in using midodrine for persistent hypotension after cardiac surgery: a comparative cohort study. Ann Intensive Care. 2020;10:121. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-020-00737-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Santer P, Anstey MH, Patrocínio MD, et al. Effect of midodrine versus placebo on time to vasopressor discontinuation in patients with persistent hypotension in the intensive care unit (MIDAS): an international randomised clinical trial. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46:1884–93. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-020-06216-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wright RA, Kaufmann HC, Perera R, et al. A double-blind, dose-response study of midodrine in neurogenic orthostatic hypotension. Neurology. 1998;51:120–4. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.51.1.120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Midodrine [package insert]. Shire US Inc., 300 Shire Way, Lexington, MA 02421, USA. Accessed December 14, 2021. Available at: ProAmatine (midodrine hydrochloride) Label (fda.gov).
  • 10.Macielak SA, Vollmer NJ, Haddad NA, Nabzdyk CGS, Nei SD. Hemodynamic effects of an increased midodrine dosing frequency. Crit Care Explor. 2021;3:e0405. DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES