Abstract
Golgi apparatus (GA) is the hub of intracellular trafficking, but selectively targeting GA remains a challenge. We show an unconventional type of peptide thioesters, consisting of an aminoethyl thioester and being substrates of thioesterases, for instantly targeting GA of cells. The peptide thioesters, above or below their critical micelle concentrations, enter cells mainly via caveolin-mediated endocytosis or macropinocytosis, respectively. After being hydrolyzed by GA-associated thioesterases, the resulting thiopeptides form dimers and accumulate in the GA. After saturating GA, the thiopeptides enrich in endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Their buildup in ER and GA disrupts protein trafficking, thus lead to cell death via multiple pathways. The peptide thioesters target Golgi of wide variety of cells, including human, murine, and Drosophila cells. Changing D-diphenylalanine to L-diphenylalanine in the peptide maintains the GA-targeting ability. In addition, targeting GA redirects protein (e.g., NRAS) distribution. This work illustrates a thioesterase responsive and redox active molecular platform for targeting GA and controlling cell fates.
Graphical Abstract
Golgi apparatus (GA)1-2 is an important hub for different signaling pathways.3-5 Being an essential component of the secretory pathway used by all eukaryotic cells to distribute membrane and secretory proteins,6 GA is emerging as important target for understanding and treating illnesses such as cancer7 and Alzheimer’s diseases8. The increasing understanding of the protein trafficking to and from Golgi, such as the sophisticated delivery of proteins from endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to GA,9 also highlights a unique opportunity to develop molecules to target GA for modulating cell functions. Although there are several existing molecular probes for imaging GA,10-11 they still require pretreatment,10 take relatively long incubation time,11-12 or only response to certain cells.11 Thus, there is still an unmet need for developing molecules for targeting GA.
Our recent work of thiophosphopeptides instantly targeting GA and selectively killing cancer cells13 reveals two important insights: (i) enzymatic reaction enables the instant and efficient GA targeting; and (ii) redox reaction enables proper thiopeptides to accumulate in GA of cells by self-assembly, dimerization, and the plausible reaction with cysteine rich proteins (CRPs). Replacing thiophosphate group with other sulfur containing moieties and, we unexpectedly found that fluorescent peptide thioesters instantly target GA of a wide variety of cells. Consisting of an aminoethyl thioester as the enzyme responsive cap at a terminal of self-assembling D-diphenylalanine (ff)14 and nitrobenzoxadiazole (NBD) as the fluorophore at the other end of ff, the peptide thioesters (1 and 3, Scheme 1) fail undergoing S-to-N acyl shift15 of the conventional peptide thioesters used for protein synthesis.16-18 The peptide thioester (1 or 3), above or below its critical micelle concentrations (CMC), enters cells mainly via caveolin-mediated endocytosis or macropinocytosis, respectively (Scheme 1). After being hydrolyzed by Golgi-associated thioesterases, such as PPT1,19 LYPLA1,20 or LYPLA2,21 the resulting thiopeptides (2 or 4) (Schemes 1 and S4) form dimers and likely react with cysteine-rich proteins in GA, thus accumulating in the GA. After saturating GA, the peptide thiols enrich in ER. At about 5-10 times of the concentrations used for imaging GA, the peptide thioesters buildup in ER and GA, result in ER-stress, and disrupt protein trafficking (e.g., NRAS trafficking), thus resulting cell death via multiple pathways. While changing ff to L-diphenylalanine (FF) maintains the GA-targeting ability of the peptide thioester (5), additional controls (7-13, Scheme S5), such as replacing the thioester by methylsulfonyl group or thioether, switching the thioester to carboxylester or amide, or mutating the D-phenylalanine to D-alanine, fails to target GA. 1 instantly targets Golgi of a variety of cells, including human, murine, Drosophila cells. In addition, 1 redirects the distribution of NRAS. This work illustrates the unconventional type of self-assembling peptide thioesters as a new and facile molecular platform for targeting GA and controlling cell fates via enzymatic activation and redox reactions in cells.
Scheme 1.
Enzyme responsive peptide thioesters targeting GAs.
1 instantly enters the cells, and the fluorescence resulted from 1 overlaps with Golgi-RFP (Figure 1A). Fluorescence appears in cytosolic region and at GA immediately after the addition of 1 and GA becomes distinguishable in less than 1 min (Figure S1, S2, video S1). Single cell imaging analysis (Figure 1B) confirms faster fluorescence increase inside than outside GA: the fluorescence plateaus in less than 15 min or longer than 45 min at GA or outside GA, respectively; the plateaus of the fluorescence are higher at GA than outside GA. LC/MS analysis of the lysate of the HeLa cells incubated with 1 for 24 h reveals that about 60% of the peptide thioester (1) turns into the corresponding thiol (2) and around 55% of 2 forms a dimer (Figure S3). The dimers, resulted from intracellular oxidants to oxidize 2, enhance the accumulation of 2 at GA. These results indicate that 1, being deacetylated to give 2, accumulates primarily at GA.
Figure 1.
(A) CLSM of Golgi-RFP transfected HeLa treated with 1 (10 μM, 30 min); (B) Single cell analysis of fluorescence inside and outside GA of HeLa treated with 1 (10 μM, 60 min); (C) CMC of 1; (D) CLSM of HeLa treated with 1 (10 μM or 2 μM) for 30 min. Bar = 20 μm.
1 enters HeLa cells differently below and above its critical micelle concentration (CMC = 2.1 μM, Figure 1C). mβCD,22 a caveolin-mediated endocytosis (CME) inhibitor, significantly slows down the fluorescence build-up at GA of the cell treated with 10 μM of 1; CytD,23 a macropinocytosis inhibitor, dramatically decreases the fluorescence at GA of the cells incubated with 2 μM of 1 (Figure S4). Single cell analysis (Figure S5, S6, S7) confirms that mβCD is more potent to inhibit the GA accumulation than CytD when HeLa cells being treated with 10 μM of 1, while CytD is more potent in the case of 2 μM of 1. Treating the HeLa with chlorpromazine suggests that 1 hardly or only slightly depends on clathrin-mediated endocytosis (Figure S8) at 2 and 10 μM, respectively. These results suggest that the assemblies and monomers of 1 enter cells mainly via CME and micropinocytosis, respectively.
Thioesterase inhibitors, ML21124-26 or DC66127, by itself or in combination, efficiently block 1 accumulating at GA (Figures S4, S9, and S10). Meanwhile, both inhibitors cannot block the GA accumulation of commercial Golgi dye, C6-NBD-Ceramide28 (Figures S11 and S12). Although carboxylesterase (CES1) is able to catalyze the hydrolysis of 1 in a cell free assay (Figure S13), pretreating HeLa cells with a nonspecific esterase inhibitor bis(p-nitrophenyl) phosphate29 hardly decrease the rate of fluorescence increase from 1 at GA (Figure S14). These results suggest that thioesterases (i.e., LYPLA1, LYPLA2, and PPT1) contribute to the deacetylation of 1 to form 2 and act as main control for 1 to target GA.
Fluorescence appears instantly inside cells in less than 1 minute after adding 1 in the culture of HeLa cells (Figure 2A). The fluorescence at GA increases significantly with the time of incubation of 1, and GA can be easily distinguished from the background in less than 4 minutes (Figure 2A). There are at least 3 times enhancement of fluorescence intensity at GA from 1 minute to 8 minutes (Figure S15). The fluorescence outside GA increases significantly after 16 min, likely due to the retrograde Golgi to ER trafficking.30 While C6-NBD-ceramide28 shows dim fluorescence over 16 minutes (Figure S16), 1 exhibits a superior ability for targeting GA . Unlike the thiophosphopeptide,13 1 is able to target GA of various cells from different organisms (Figure 2B), such as Homo sapiens (HeLa, Saos-2, HEK293 , MCF-7, HS-5, SJSA-1 and HepG2), Mus musculus (B16F10), and Drosophila (S2). Single cell analysis of fluorescence at GA (Figure S17) and CLSM images (Figures S18-S23) of different cell lines confirm that 1 accumulates at the GA of these cells swiftly. 1 also rapidly enters primary cells, such as neutrophils (polymorphonuclear leukocytes), and localizes at GA (Figure S24). These results establish that 1 is able to target GA of a wide variety of cells, likely due to that thioesterases are essential and ubiquitous.31
Figure 2.
CLSM images of (A) HeLa treated with 1 for 1, 4, 8 and 16 min; (B) different cells (Saos-2, HEK293, MCF-7, HS-5, SJSA-1, HepG2, B16F10, S2) treated with 1 for 8 min. [1] = 10 μM, Bar = 20 μm.
At above 20 μM, 1 significantly inhibits HeLa, HEK293, Saos-2, MCF-7 and HS-5 cells (Figure 3A) with the IC50 values of 15.0, 10.9, 9.5, 14.5 and 14.9 μM, respectively. Several commonly used inhibitors (Z-VAD-FMK, NAc, Nec-1, DFO, disulfiram and PD150606)32 of cell death hardly rescue these four cell lines (Figure S25), indicating that 1 results in cell death via multiple pathways or possibly a new mechanism. 1 shows slightly mild cytotoxicity against SJSA-1 cells (IC50 = 22.5 μM) and exhibits rather low inhibitory activity against HepG2 cells, with the IC50 values above 100 μM (Figure 3B). These results coincide with the high level of glutathione (GSH) in hepatocytes33 and in SJSA-134 as GSH compromises the cytotoxicity of the redox-active 2. Depletion of GSH in HepG2 cells by L-buthionine-sulfoximine (BSO)35 significantly increase of cytotoxicity of 1 against HepG2 cells (IC50 drops to 13.45 μM, Figure S26), which supports that GSH antagonizes the peptide thioesters.
Figure 3.
(A) Cytotoxicity and (B) IC50 of 1 against different cell lines (HeLa, HEK293, Saos-2, MCF-7, HS-5, SJSA-1, HepG2); (C) ICC staining of MCF-7 with NRAS antibody after the pretreatment with or without 1 (10 μM, 30 min). Bar = 20 μm.
Because the trafficking of oncogenic NRAS between GA and plasma membrane is essential for tumor growth,36 we determined the intracellular distribution of NRAS of MCF-7 cells. NRAS, being overexpressed in MCF-7,37 relocates from mainly plasma membrane to overwhelmingly GA after the pretreatment of 1 for 30 minutes (Figure 3C left, middle). No fluorescence in the NBD channel (green, Figure 3C) after the standard immunocytochemistry staining excludes that the re-distribution of NRAS is due to bleed-through. As S-palmitoylation is a critical process for protein trafficking,38 this result suggests that 1 disrupts GA functions and interferes with the secretory pathway, which likely contributes to its cytotoxicity when the accumulation of 1 at GA reaches certain threshold.
3, behaving similarly as 1, enters cells in a concentration-dependent manner (Figures S27, S28, and S29) and accumulates at GA swiftly (Figure S30A, Video S2). Thioesterase inhibitors slow the GA accumulation of 3 (Figures S31, S32). The cytotoxicity of 3 is slightly lower than that of 1, but with the similar trend (Figure S30B), indicating that (i) acetyl thioester is enzymatic responsive on either C- or N-terminal of the peptide thioester and (ii) 1 and 3 likely enter and accumulate at GA via similar mechanisms. 5, having FF instead of ff, accumulates at GA with the similar rate as 1 does (Figures S30A, S33, Video S3). These results suggest that the cellular uptake of 1, 3, or 5 and the rapid GA accumulation of 2, 4, or 6 depend rather on the enzyme response of the thioester group than on the configurations of them. The cytotoxicity of 5 is much lower than that of 1 (Figure S30B), agreeing with the proteolysis of 5. Replacing the thioester with methylsulfonyl group or methyl thioether, respectively (Scheme S5), and resists enzymatic cleavage (Figure S34), 7 or 8 fails to accumulate at GA (Figures S35, S36, and S37). The analogues replace thioester with ester (9) or amide (10) (Scheme S5) are unable to accumulate at GA (Figures S35, S38, and S39). Although cells cleave the ester bond of 9 (Figure S40A), there is little fluorescence at GA, confirming that redox active thiol is crucial for GA targeting. With D-dialanine replacing diphenylalanine, 11 (Scheme S5), though being enzymatically responsive (Figure S40B), hardly enters cells and accumulates at GA (Figures S35 and S41). Omitting ff motif from 1, 12 (Scheme S5) exhibits the similar intracellular behavior as 11, not targeting GA (Figures S35, S41, and S42). TEM shows that 11 hardly self-assembles while 1 self-assembles into nanoparticles and nanofibers at 20 μM (Figure S43). These results indicate that self-assembly is essential for the peptide thioesters to target GA. 13, with thioester on a cysteine residue (Scheme S5) as the enzymatically responsive thioester bond (Figure S40C), fails targeting GA (Figures S35 and S44). 7-13 exhibits low cytotoxicity against HeLa cells (Figure S30C), agreeing with their inability to target GA.
In summary, this work illustrates that several peptide thioesters undergo enzymatic hydrolysis and instantly accumulate at GA. Although 2 also accumulates at GA slowly,13 the thioester group, acting as a pre-form of thiol and one type of high energy bond in vivo,39 is a unique and useful building block for enzymatic response. This instant GA targeting process not only allows the imaging of ER and GA trafficking,40 but also provides new insights for developing supramolecular assemblies41-44 for disrupting protein trafficking and further controls cell fates. Although the detailed mechanism remains to be further elucidated, dimerization of the thiopeptides and the likely reaction with CRPs in GA45 contributes to the GA accumulation, providing a new way for modulating GA signaling cascades.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work is partially supported by NIH (CA142746, AI141386) and NSF (DMR-2011846).
Footnotes
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Materials and detailed experimental procedures, TEM and CLSM images, cell viabilities, LC/MS spectra, chemical structures of the compounds (PDF)
1 (10 μM) incubated with HeLa cells over 30 min (AVI)
3 (10 μM) incubated with HeLa cells over 30 min (AVI)
5 (10 μM) incubated with HeLa cells over 30 min (AVI)
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
REFERENCES
- 1.Kulkarni-Gosavi P; Makhoul C; Gleeson PA, Form and function of the Golgi apparatus: scaffolds, cytoskeleton and signalling. FEBS Lett. 2019, 593, 2289–2305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lee MC; Miller EA; Goldberg J; Orci L; Schekman R, Bi-directional protein transport between the ER and Golgi. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol 2004, 20, 87–123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bivona TG; Pérez de Castro I; Ahearn IM; Grana TM; Chiu VK; Lockyer PJ; Cullen PJ; Pellicer A; Cox AD; Philips MR, Phospholipase Cγ activates Ras on the Golgi apparatus by means of RasGRP1. Nature 2003, 424, 694–698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Farber-Katz SE; Dippold HC; Buschman MD; Peterman MC; Xing M; Noakes CJ; Tat J; Ng MM; Rahajeng J; Cowan DM; Fuchs GJ; Zhou H; Field SJ, DNA damage triggers golgi dispersal via DNA-PK and GOLPH3. Cell 2014, 156, 413–427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rieger L; O’Shea S; Godsmark G; Stanicka J; Kelly G; O’Connor R, IGF-1 receptor activity in the Golgi of migratory cancer cells depends on adhesion-dependent phosphorylation of Tyr1250 and Tyr1251. Sci. Signal 2020, 13, eaba3176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Barlowe C; Helenius A, Cargo Capture and Bulk Flow in the Early Secretory Pathway. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol 2016, 32, 197–222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wlodkowic D; Skommer J; McGuinness D; Hillier C; Darzynkiewicz Z, ER-Golgi network-A future target for anti-cancer therapy. Leukemia Res. 2009, 33, 1440–1447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Joshi G; Chi Y; Huang Z; Wang Y, Aβ-induced Golgi fragmentation in Alzheimer's disease enhances Aβ production. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 2014, 111, E1230–E1239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Weigel AV; Chang C-L; Shtengel G; Xu CS; Hoffman DP; Freeman M; Iyer N; Aaron J; Khuon S; Bogovic J; Qiu W; Hess HF; Lippincott-Schwartz J, ER-to-Golgi protein delivery through an interwoven, tubular network extending from ER. Cell 2021, 184, 2412–2429.e16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.van Echten-Deckert G; Giannis A; Schwarz A; Futerman AH; Sandhoff K, 1-Methylthiodihydroceramide, a novel analog of dihydroceramide, stimulates sphinganine degradation resulting in decreased de novo sphingolipid biosynthesis. J. Biol. Chem 1998, 273, 1184–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhang H; Fan J; Wang J; Zhang S; Dou B; Peng X, An off–on Cox-2-specific fluorescent probe: Targeting the golgi apparatus of cancer cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2013, 135, 11663–11669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hu X; Hai Z; Wu C; Zhan W; Liang G, A Golgi-Targeting and Dual-Color “Turn-On” Probe for Spatially Precise Imaging of Furin. Anal. Chem 2021, 93, 1636–1642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tan W; Zhang Q; Wang J; Yi M; He H; Xu B, Enzymatic Assemblies of Thiophosphopeptides Instantly Target Golgi Apparatus and Selectively Kill Cancer Cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2021, 60, 12796–12801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Reches M; Gazit E, Casting Metal Nanowires Within Discrete Self-Assembled Peptide Nanotubes. Science 2003, 300, 625–627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dang B; Kubota T; Mandal K; Bezanilla F; Kent SBH, Native Chemical Ligation at Asx-Cys, Glx-Cys: Chemical Synthesis and High-Resolution X-ray Structure of ShK Toxin by Racemic Protein Crystallography. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2013, 135, 11911–11919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Canne LE; Bark SJ; Kent SBH, Extending the Applicability of Native Chemical Ligation. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1996, 118, 5891–5896. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Blanco-Canosa JB; Nardone B; Albericio F; Dawson PE, Chemical Protein Synthesis Using a Second-Generation N-Acylurea Linker for the Preparation of Peptide-Thioester Precursors. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2015, 137, 7197–7209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Asahina Y; Komiya S; Ohagi A; Fujimoto R; Tamagaki H; Nakagawa K; Sato T; Akira S; Takao T; Ishii A; Nakahara Y; Hojo H, Chemical Synthesis of O-Glycosylated Human Interleukin-2 by the Reverse Polarity Protection Strategy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2015, 54, 8226–8230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Camp LA; Verkruyse LA; Afendis SJ; Slaughter CA; Hofmann SL, Molecular cloning and expression of palmitoyl-protein thioesterase. J. Biol. Chem 1994, 269, 23212–23219. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Duncan JA; Gilman AG, A cytoplasmic acyl-protein thioesterase that removes palmitate from G protein α subunits and p21RAS. J. Biol. Chem 1998, 273, 15830–15837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Toyoda T; Sugimoto H; Yamashita S, Sequence, expression in Escherichia coli, and characterization of lysophospholipase II. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. Mol. Cell. Biol. Lipids 1999, 1437, 182–193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rodal SK; Skretting G; Garred Ø; Vilhardt F; Deurs B. v.; Sandvig K, Extraction of Cholesterol with Methyl-β-Cyclodextrin Perturbs Formation of Clathrin-coated Endocytic Vesicles. Mol. Biol. Cell 1999, 10, 961–974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lamaze C; Fujimoto LM; Yin HL; Schmid SL, The actin cytoskeleton is required for receptor-mediated endocytosis in mammalian cells. J. Biol. Chem 1997, 272, 20332–20335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Singha PK; Mäklin K; Vihavainen T; Laitinen T; Nevalainen TJ; Patil MR; Tonduru AK; Poso A; Laitinen JT; Savinainen JR, Evaluation of FASN inhibitors by a versatile toolkit reveals differences in pharmacology between human and rodent FASN preparations and in antiproliferative efficacy in vitro vs. in situ in human cancer cells. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci 2020, 149, 105321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Casasanta MA; Yoo CC; Smith HB; Duncan AJ; Cochrane K; Varano AC; Allen-Vercoe E; Slade DJ, A chemical and biological toolbox for Type Vd secretion: Characterization of the phospholipase A1 autotransporter FplA from Fusobacterium nucleatum. J. Biol. Chem 2017, 292, 20240–20254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hernandez JL; Davda D; Cheung See Kit M; Majmudar JD; Won SJ; Gang M; Pasupuleti SC; Choi AI; Bartkowiak CM; Martin BR, APT2 Inhibition Restores Scribble Localization and S-Palmitoylation in Snail-Transformed Cells. Cell Chem. Biol 2017, 24, 87–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rebecca VW; Nicastri MC; Fennelly C; Chude CI; Barber-Rotenberg JS; Ronghe A; McAfee Q; McLaughlin NP; Zhang G; Goldman AR; Ojha R; Piao S; Noguera-Ortega E; Martorella A; Alicea GM; Lee JJ; Schuchter LM; Xu X; Herlyn M; Marmorstein R; Gimotty PA; Speicher DW; Winkler JD; Amaravadi RK, PPT1 Promotes Tumor Growth and Is the Molecular Target of Chloroquine Derivatives in Cancer. Cancer Discov. 2019, 9, 220–229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Paul P; Kamisaka Y; Marks DL; Pagano RE, Purification and Characterization of UDP-glucose:Ceramide Glucosyltransferase from Rat Liver Golgi Membranes. J. Biol. Chem 1996, 271, 2287–2293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Heymann E; Krisch K; Büch H; Buzello W, Inhibition of phenacetin- and acetanilide-induced methemoglobinemia in the rat by the carboxylesterase inhibitor Bis-[p-nitrophenyl] phosphate. Biochem. Pharmacol 1969, 18, 801–811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lee MCS; Miller EA; Goldberg J; Orci L; Schekman R, Bi-directional protein transport between the ER and Golgi. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol 2004, 20, 87–123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cantu DC; Chen Y; Reilly PJ, Thioesterases: A new perspective based on their primary and tertiary structures. Protein Sci. 2010, 19, 1281–1295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Tang D; Kang R; Berghe TV; Vandenabeele P; Kroemer G, The molecular machinery of regulated cell death. Cell Res. 2019, 29, 347–364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kretzschmar M, Regulation of hepatic glutathione metabolism and its role in hepatotoxicity. Exp. Toxicol. Pathol 1996, 48, 439–446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Su L; Li R; Khan S; Clanton R; Zhang F; Lin Y-N; Song Y; Wang H; Fan J; Hernandez S; Butters AS; Akabani G; MacLoughlin R; Smolen J; Wooley KL, Chemical Design of Both a Glutathione-Sensitive Dimeric Drug Guest and a Glucose-Derived Nanocarrier Host to Achieve Enhanced Osteosarcoma Lung Metastatic Anticancer Selectivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140, 1438–1446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Romero FJ; Sies H, Subcellular glutathione contents in isolated hepatocytes treated with L-buthionine sulfoximine. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 1984, 123, 1116–1121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ko P-J; Dixon SJ, Protein palmitoylation and cancer. Embo. Rep 2018, 19, e46666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Graham KA; Richardson CL; Minden MD; Trent JM; Buick RN, Varying Degrees of Amplification of the N-RAS Oncogene in the Human Breast Cancer Cell Line MCF-7. Cancer Res. 1985, 45, 2201–2205. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Rocks O; Gerauer M; Vartak N; Koch S; Huang Z-P; Pechlivanis M; Kuhlmann J; Brunsveld L; Chandra A; Ellinger B, The palmitoylation machinery is a spatially organizing system for peripheral membrane proteins. Cell 2010, 141, 458–471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Goldford JE; Hartman H; Smith TF; Segrè D, Remnants of an Ancient Metabolism without Phosphate. Cell 2017, 168, 1126–1134.e9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Tamura T; Fujisawa A; Tsuchiya M; Shen Y; Nagao K; Kawano S; Tamura Y; Endo T; Umeda M; Hamachi I, Organelle membrane-specific chemical labeling and dynamic imaging in living cells. Nat. Chem. Biol 2020, 16, 1361–1367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Liang G; Ren H; Rao J, A biocompatible condensation reaction for controlled assembly of nanostructures in living cells. Nat. Chem 2010, 2, 54–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lock LL; Reyes CD; Zhang P; Cui H, Tuning Cellular Uptake of Molecular Probes by Rational Design of Their Assembly into Supramolecular Nanoprobes. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2016, 138, 3533–3540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Wang F; Gnewou O; Wang S; Osinski T; Zuo X; Egelman EH; Conticello VP, Deterministic chaos in the self-assembly of β sheet nanotubes from an amphipathic oligopeptide. Matter 2021, 4, 3217–3231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Shi J; Fichman G; Schneider JP, Enzymatic Control of the Conformational Landscape of Self-Assembling Peptides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2018, 57, 11188–11192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lyles MM; Gilbert HF, Catalysis of the oxidative folding of ribonuclease A by protein disulfide isomerase: pre-steady-state kinetics and the utilization of the oxidizing equivalents of the isomerase. Biochemistry 1991, 30, 619–625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.