Skip to main content
RSC Advances logoLink to RSC Advances
. 2019 Sep 2;9(47):27510–27540. doi: 10.1039/c9ra04917g

Natural source, bioactivity and synthesis of benzofuran derivatives

Yu-hang Miao 1,2,3,4, Yu-heng Hu 1,2,3,4, Jie Yang 1,2,3,4, Teng Liu 1,2,3,4, Jie Sun 1,2,3,4,, Xiao-jing Wang 1,2,3,4,
PMCID: PMC9070854  PMID: 35529241

Abstract

Benzofuran compounds are a class of compounds that are ubiquitous in nature. Numerous studies have shown that most benzofuran compounds have strong biological activities such as anti-tumor, antibacterial, anti-oxidative, and anti-viral activities. Owing to these biological activities and potential applications in many aspects, benzofuran compounds have attracted more and more attention of chemical and pharmaceutical researchers worldwide, making these substances potential natural drug lead compounds. For example, the recently discovered novel macrocyclic benzofuran compound has anti-hepatitis C virus activity and is expected to be an effective therapeutic drug for hepatitis C disease; novel scaffold compounds of benzothiophene and benzofuran have been developed and utilized as anticancer agents. Novel methods for constructing benzofuran rings have been discovered in recent years. A complex benzofuran derivative is constructed by a unique free radical cyclization cascade, which is an excellent method for the synthesis of a series of difficult-to-prepare polycyclic benzofuran compounds. Another benzofuran ring constructed by proton quantum tunneling has not only fewer side reactions, but also high yield, which is conducive to the construction of complex benzofuran ring systems. This review summarizes the recent studies on the various aspects of benzofuran derivatives including their important natural product sources, biological activities and drug prospects, and chemical synthesis, as well as the relationship between the bioactivities and structures.


Benzofuran compounds are a class of compounds that are ubiquitous in nature.graphic file with name c9ra04917g-ga.jpg

1. Introduction

A great number of heterocyclic compounds and heterocyclic fragments are present in many drugs due to their versatility and unique physicochemical properties and have become an important basis for medicinal chemistry.1 Many significant natural products and natural medicines have these structures. Natural products containing benzofuran rings are the main source of some drugs and clinical drug candidates.2 The heterocyclic compound having a benzofuran ring as a core is a basic structural unit of various biologically active natural medicines and synthetic chemical raw materials.3 The broad range of clinical uses of benzofuran derivatives indicate the diverse pharmacological activities of this series of compounds, so benzofuran and its derivatives have attracted much attention owing to their biological activities (Fig. 1 percentage distribution of various subject categories) and potential applications as drugs.4 Benzofuran compounds are widely distributed in higher plants such as Asteraceae, Rutaceae, Liliaceae, and Cyperaceae. The number of such compounds discovered from Asteraceae is the highest.5 Studies have found that benzofuran and its derivatives are diverse in nature and exist widely in natural and non-natural compounds. The natural products containing benzofuran compounds are mainly isolated from Krameria ramosissima, Machilus glaucescens, Ophryosporus lorentzii, Ophryosporus charua and Zanthoxylum ailanthoidol. These compounds have a wide range of biological and pharmacological activities, and therefore have great values in the field of new drug research.6,7 Moreover, benzofuran derivatives are also biodynamic agents that can be used to design and develop new potential therapeutic agents.8 In recent years, researchers have found that such compounds have various biological activities including: anti-tumor,9 antibacterial,10,11 anti-oxidative,1,12,13 anti-AD,14 anti-parasitic,15 anti-acetylcholine,16 and anti-inflammatory activities.17 They can also be used as bone anabolic agent,18 and fluorescent sensor for analgesic19 The most well-known and recognized natural products containing benzofuran ring structure, include ailanthoidol, amiodarone and bufuralol compounds.20,21 In addition, some 2-arylbenzofurans derived from natural products also have good biological activities,22 such as anti-cancer,23 anti-inflammatory,24 anti-oxidative,25 and antibacterial activities26,27 Recently, an oral active and blood–brain barrier permeable benzofuran analog has been found to exhibit potent anti-amyloid aggregation activity, which can provide an alternative treatment for Alzheimer's disease (AD).28 In addition, the benzofuran analog oxazolidine was found to be a potential multifunctional molecule, and its anti-proliferative activity allows it to plays an important role in the treatment of tumors.29 Benzofuran compounds are expected to be important compounds for the treatment of multifactorial diseases. This review includes five parts: the drugs on the market with benzofuran structure, (1) (2) the main natural sources, (3) diversified pharmacological activities, (4) common synthetic methods and (5) synthetic examples of various active compounds (a summary of the review is shown in Fig. 2). The purpose of this review is to summarize the recently reported natural sources of benzofuran derivatives, the research progress of their biological activities and the synthesis of some common benzofuran compounds, to help readers deeply understand the important roles of benzofurans in medicinal chemistry.

Fig. 1. Literature of benzofuran compounds by subject category in the past decade.

Fig. 1

Fig. 2. Comprehensive understanding of benzofurans through biological activities, natural sources, and synthetic methods.

Fig. 2

2Examples of drugs containing a benzofuran moiety

The most recognized benzofuran compounds with extensive pharmaceutical applications include amiodarone, angelicin, bergapten, nodekenetin, xanthotoxin, and usnic acid. These compounds have been widely used in antiarrhythmic, dermatological and anticancer therapy, illustrating the critical clinical application value of benzofuran compounds and the significant potentials for these compounds in drug development in the future.

The broad-spectrum antiarrhythmic drug amiodarone is a representative benzofuran drug. The drug can inhibit rapid sodium ion influx in atrial and myocardial conduction fibers, slow down conduction velocity, reduce sinus node autonomy, and has a good effect in dealing with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, atrial premature beats, and premature ventricular contractions. It is mainly used as an antiarrhythmic and anti-angina drug (Fig. 3).30,31

Fig. 3. Structure of benzofuran derivative amiodarone.

Fig. 3

Psoralen is a furocoumarin compound formed by fusion of furan with coumarin, which is naturally exists in some plant species or is synthesized in vitro (Fig. 4). Psoralen exists in many natural plants, including limes, lemons and parsnips. An important feature of furocoumarin compounds is their ability to produce singlet oxygen.32

Fig. 4. Structure of benzofuran derivative psoralen.

Fig. 4

It has been reported that the furocoumarin angelicin (2) found in the fruit of Psoralea corylifolia L. is structurally related to psoralen, a well-known chemical photosensitizer, which is used for treatment of different skin diseases such as psoriasis and vitiligo due to its anti-proliferative effect.33,34 Anti-cancer studies treatment have found that angelicin is a natural compound that effectively induces apoptosis in human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells, indicating this compound has potential effect in treatment of human neuroblastoma cancer.35

Bergapten (3) is a conventional photochemotherapy drug for psoriasis36 in the course of cancer treatment. Bergapten can be combined with other forms of targeted chemotherapy to improve cancer treatment outcomes based on its metabolic targeting.37

In anti-inflammatory treatment, bergapten can participate in the treatment of inflammation by inhibiting the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines.38

Nodekenetin (4) and xanthotoxin (5) are effective against skin diseases including cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, vitiligo, atopic dermatitis, and psoriasis.32

Usnic acid is an antibiotic and both its (+) and (−) enantiomers (Fig. 5) are effective against a variety of Gram-positive (G+) bacterial strains; notably, they can inhibit the growth of multi-drug resistant strains such as S. aureus, Enterococcus and Mycobacterium. The (+)-usnic acid appears to be selective for Streptococcus mutans without effects on the oral saprophytic flora.39 Usnic acid also has potential anti-tumor activity as well as other biological properties against mitosis and antioxidants.40–42

Fig. 5. Structure of compound usnic acid.

Fig. 5

3. Natural compounds containing benzofuran ring

Benzofuran compounds are a class of organic compounds widely distributed in nature and have long been the focus of attention. Thousands of natural compounds have been discovered and isolated so far. This part will review the benzofuran compounds discovered and isolated from natural animals and plants in recent years (Table 1).

Natural products have been obtained in recent years from biologically active compounds and benzofuran compounds.

Structure Genus and species name Territorial Extraction isolation year Biological activity Ref.
graphic file with name c9ra04917g-u1.jpg (Asteraceae) Ageratina adenophora Mexico 2018 Anti-fungal activity Dehydrotrienone benzofuran derivative, eco-friendly antifungal agent 43
graphic file with name c9ra04917g-u2.jpg (Fabaceae) Calpocalyx dinklagei Western Central Africa 2017 Anti-inflammatory Inflammatory disease multi-target agent 44
graphic file with name c9ra04917g-u3.jpg (Artocarpus) Artocarpus heterophyllus Tropical regions of Asia 2017 Anti-cancer activity Cytotoxic activity against human oral cancer (KB), human breast cancer (MCF-7) and lung cancer (NCI-H187) cell lines 45
graphic file with name c9ra04917g-u4.jpg (Moraceae) Artocarpus lakoocha Asia and Southeast Asia 2017 AChE and BChE inhibitory As a potential new anti-ChE agent 46
graphic file with name c9ra04917g-u5.jpg (Moraceae) Chlorophora regia Tropical West Africa, Senegal, Gambia and Ghana 2016 Anti-inflammatory As an antioxidant inhibitor 25
graphic file with name c9ra04917g-u6.jpg (Asterothamnu) Asterothamnus centrali-asiaticus Gansu, Nei Mongol, Ningxia, Qinghai, SE Xinjiang (S Mongolia) 2016 Anti-oxidant As a potential antioxidant 47
graphic file with name c9ra04917g-u7.jpg (Moraceae) Morus alba Asia (Vietnam, China, Japan, and South Korea) 2016 Inhibition of pancreatic lipase Effectively inhibit pancreatic lipase as a potential diet pills 48
graphic file with name c9ra04917g-u8.jpg (Moraceae) Morus nigra West Asia 2018 Anti-tumor Multifunctional anti-tumor agent 49
graphic file with name c9ra04917g-u9.jpg (Butterbure) Mappianthus iodoies Southern China 2017 Anti-cancer activity Cytotoxicity against HL-60, SMMC7721, A-549, MCF-7 and SW-480 50
graphic file with name c9ra04917g-u10.jpg
graphic file with name c9ra04917g-u11.jpg
graphic file with name c9ra04917g-u12.jpg (Butterbure) Petasites hybridus Europe, West Asia, North America 2015 Anti-cancer activity It has cytotoxic and apoptotic effects on human breast cancer MCF-7 cells 51
graphic file with name c9ra04917g-u13.jpg (Fabaceae) Tephrosia purpurea Eastern India to Central Bangladesh 2015 Anti-allergic activity For the treatment of allergic diseases, including rhinitis 52
graphic file with name c9ra04917g-u14.jpg (Leguminosae) Sophora tonkinensis South China, Korea 2014 Anti-allergic activity Inhibition of IL-6 production in HMC-1 cells produces anti-allergic effects 53
graphic file with name c9ra04917g-u15.jpg (Aristolochiaceae) Aristolochia fordiana Southwestern China 2013 Anti-oxidation activity Inhibition of NO release in cells 54
graphic file with name c9ra04917g-u16.jpg Flemingia philippinensis Southern Asia 2012 Anti-oxidation activity Potential antioxidant 55
graphic file with name c9ra04917g-u17.jpg (Ficus) Ficus tikoua Bur South China, India, Vietam and Laos 2011 Anti-oxidation activity As a source of antioxidants 56
graphic file with name c9ra04917g-u18.jpg (Moraceae) Morusalba var. multicaulis Throughout Asia, Europe, North and South America, and Africa 2011 Anti-obesity and anti-inflammatory activity Potential drug with anti-obesity and anti-inflammatory activities 57
graphic file with name c9ra04917g-u19.jpg Radix Eupatorii Chinensis Southern China 2009 Anti-fungal, anti-oxidation and anti-tumor activity Potential multi-targeted drug with antifungal, anti-oxidant and anti-tumor activities 58
graphic file with name c9ra04917g-u20.jpg
graphic file with name c9ra04917g-u21.jpg (Morus) Morus wittiorum Tropical and Subtropical regions of Asia, Africa, South America 2014 Anti-oxidant activity Potentially effective antioxidants 59
graphic file with name c9ra04917g-u22.jpg (Leguminosae) Mucuna birdwoodiana Southern China 2009 Anti-oxidation Potentially effective antioxidants 60
graphic file with name c9ra04917g-u23.jpg (Morus) Morus wittiorum Southern China 2010 Anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidation As a multi-target potential anti-inflammatory drug 61
graphic file with name c9ra04917g-u24.jpg
graphic file with name c9ra04917g-u25.jpg (Morus) Morus wittiorum Southern China 2010 Anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidation As a multi-target potential anti-inflammatory drug 61

4. Activity of benzofuran derivatives

Many benzofuran compounds, including those isolated from plants as well as obtained by synthesis, exhibit a variety of biological activity.62 In recent years, these compounds have received widespread attention from researchers. The literature shows that compounds with benzofuran nucleus have a wide range of therapeutic potentials, including antibacterial, antifungal, anti-inflammatory, analgesic, anti-depressant, anticonvulsant, anti-tumor, anti-HIV, anti-diabetic, anti-tuberculosis, anti-oxidation, among others activities.63 Many efforts have been made to achieve efficient synthesis of these motifs.64 The synthesis of benzofuran can be divided into phenol, benzoic acid and miscellaneous methods according to the raw materials of the reaction.65 Preliminary studies on the structure–activity relationship of benzofuran compounds showed that the ester group at the C-2 position is a key site for the cytotoxic activity of the compounds, and the introduction of heterocyclic substitution at the C-2 position also has a certain effect on cytotoxicity. The introduction of the substituents at the 2-position phenyl group and the 5-position hydroxyl group, halogen, and amino group is closely related to the antibacterial activity of the benzofuran. Here we review the structure and biological activities of benzofuran compounds and their synthesis methods. The benzofuran derivates in this review are classified according to their biological activities.

4.1. Antitumor activity

Malignant tumors are one of the major diseases that threaten human health. Nowadays, the mortality rate of malignant tumors is second only to cardiovascular disease.66 Therefore, finding novel and effective anticancer drugs and treatment methods to overcome malignant tumors is an important research topic in the field of medicine and pharmacy.67 With the continuous development of related research, the anti-tumor activity of benzofuran compounds has attracted more and more attention from scientists in recent years.

A series of benzofuran-2-yl-(4,5-dihydro-3,5-substituted diphenylpyrazol-1-yl)methanone compounds have been obtained by microwave-assisted synthesis (MWI). The anticancer activity of this class of compounds against the human ovarian cancer cell line A2780 was evaluated. Compound 32 (IC50 = 12 μM) and compound 33 (IC50 = 11 μM) (Fig. 6) were found to be the most active ones among this series of compounds.68

Fig. 6. Benzofuran derivatives 32 and 33 active against ovarian cancer.

Fig. 6

A series of new benzofuran- and 2,3-dihydrobenzofuran-2-carboxylic acid N-(substituted) phenylamide derivatives were designed and synthesized from the lead compound 34 (KL-1156). Among them, compound 35 (Fig. 7) showed significant growth inhibitory activity against a series of cancer cell lines with GI50 values of 2.74 μM (ACHN), 2.37 μM (HCT15), 2.20 μM (MM231), 2.48 μM (NUGC-3), 5.86 μM (NCI-H23) and 2.68 μM (PC-3).69 Compound 35 also showed excellent NF-κB inhibitory activity.70

Fig. 7. (a) Structure of the lead compound 34 (KL-1156). (b) Compound 35 exhibiting excellent anticancer and NF-κB inhibitory activity.

Fig. 7

Development of promising compounds with target therapy potentials and little side effects is the main goal of medical researchers.71 Literature has shown that some substituted benzofurans have dramatic anticancer activities.71 Compound 36 (Fig. 8) was found to have significant cell growth inhibitory effects, and the inhibition rates in different types of cancer cells by 10 μM of compound 36 are as follows: Leukemia K-562 and SR (inhibition rate: 56.84% and 60.89% respectively), Non-small cell lung cancer NCI-H322M and NCI-H460 (inhibition rate: 40.87% and 80.92% respectively), Colon cancer HCT-116, KM12 and SW-620 (inhibition rate: 72.14%, 41.49 and 40.82% respectively), CNS cancer SNB-75 and U251 (inhibition rate: 58.02% and 73.94% respectively), Melanoma LOX IMVI and MDA-MB-435 (inhibition rate: 72.69% and 50.64% respectively), and Ovarian cancer OVCAR-4 and OVCAR-8 (inhibition rate: 56.45% and 44.50% respectively). Compound 36 (10 μM) also produced a significant inhibitory on Src kinase (inhibition rate: 59%). These results indicate that compound 36 has good anticancer activity.

Fig. 8. A benzofuran-pyrazole derivative compound 36 having good anticancer activity.

Fig. 8

Benzofuran substituted chalcone compounds are also important anticancer drug research directions in recent years. A novel series of chalcones, 3-aryl-1-(5-bromo-1-benzofuran-2-yl)-2-propanones propenones (37a–f), were designed, synthesized, and characterized (Fig. 9). The in vitro antitumor activities of the newly synthesized (37a–f) and previously synthesized (37g–j) chalcone compounds were determined by using human breast (MCF-7) and prostate (PC-3) cancer cell lines.72 The structure and activity comparison between these chalcone derivatives and the starting material (D1) in Table 2 indicates that the benzofuran-substituted chalcone exhibits a better activity than the raw material with only the unsubstituted benzofuran ring (D1).

Fig. 9. The structure of the chalcone derivatives 37a–37j and benzofuranone D1.

Fig. 9

Evaluation of the cytotoxicity and log IC50 values (μM) of chalcone compounds and docetaxel (reference chemotherapeutic drug) on two cancer cell linesa.

Compound MCF-7 log IC50 (μM) PC-3 log IC50 (μM)
D1 2.12 1.54
37a 1.89 1.67
37b 1.15 1.24
37c 5.01 6.31
37d 5.79 1.81
37e 0.42 0.67
37d 2.30 2.47
37f 4.43 6.11
37g 2.55 2.57
37h 6.28 6.30
37i −0.21 0.92
Docetaxel (reference drug) −0.52 −0.52
a

All the compounds at 100 μM significantly reduced the viability of PC-3 and MCF-7 cells (p < 0.001).66

Recently some new benzofurans with N-aryl piperazine derivatives were discovered or synthesized. These compounds have been identified in a series of in vitro screening models to exhibit good activities especially anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer activities. The results showed that compound 38 (Fig. 10) inhibited NO production (IC50 = 5.28 μM) and selectively inhibited the proliferation of human lung cancer cell line (A549) and gastric cancer cells (SGC7901) (IC50 = 0.12 μM and 2.75 μM, respectively); therefore compound 38 is an excellent anti-inflammatory and anti-tumor drug.64

Fig. 10. Structure of compound 38 having anti-inflammatory, anti-tumor, and antioxidant biological activities.

Fig. 10

Chondrosarcoma is a bone tumor with high mortality and has weak responsiveness radiation therapy and chemotherapy. The newly synthesized attractive lead compound 39 (Fig. 11) showed good pharmacological properties in terms of anti-human chondrosarcoma. It can be further developed as a lead compound for anti-human chondrosarcoma.73

Fig. 11. The structure of the compound 2-amino-3-(2-chlorophenyl)-6-(4-dimethylaminophenyl)benzofuran-4-yl acetate (39).

Fig. 11

4.2. Antimicrobial activity

4.2.1. Anti-bacterial

The research of antifungal drugs has a history of nearly 100 years. Traditional benzofuran drugs such as imidazole,74 pyrimidine,75 and triazole10,76,77 and antibiotics and propionamides, have been widely applied clinically; and they all show good antibacterial activities. However, in recent years, the drug abuse, the emergence of new immunosuppressive agents, as well as clinical radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and organ transplantation all led to impaired immune system function and dysbacteriosis, resulting in decreased immunity of the body, eventually leading to an increase in fungal infection rate. In addition, since both fungi and human cells are eukaryotic cells, they are usually toxic to host cells after long-term administration. Therefore, the immunity of pathogenic fungi to existing antifungal drugs becomes a more serious problem. Seeking effective and low-toxic antifungal drugs has become the focus of current research. Pharmaceutical chemists have found that benzofuran and its derivatives are very suitable for this because they exist widely in natural products and have a wide range of biological and pharmacological activities; therefore, benzofurans have drawn considerable attention in this field.78

Mohamed et al. synthesized a series of benzofuran-based pyrazoline-thiazoles 40(a–d) and fluorinated pyrazole-thiazole (41–43) derivatives and tested their potential antimicrobial activities against four Gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus (SA)), Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis (BS)), Bacillus megaterium (B. megaterium (BM)), and Sarcina lutea) and Gram-negative bacteria (Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae (KP)), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa (PA)), and Escherichia coli (E. coli (EC))).79 Among all the compounds tested, 40c showed excellent antimicrobial activity compared to the control drug (ciprofloxacin and ketoconazole) and had inhibitory activity against most microorganisms.80 Compounds 40b and 40d suppressed the growth of S. aureus with inhibition zones (IZ) of 23 and 20 mm, respectively, while compound 41a showed promising antifungal activity against K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, and E. coli with an IZ of about 24 mm. Structure activity relationship studies have shown that the antibacterial activity of these compounds is closely related to the presence of chloro substituents on the pyrazoline and pyrazole moieties (40c and 41a) (Fig. 12).

Fig. 12. Structures of fluorinated 2-(3-(benzofuran-2-yl)pyrazol-1-yl)thiazoles.

Fig. 12

In order to develop new antibacterial benzofuran compounds Sayed Hasan Mehdi synthesized compound 46 and evaluated its biological activity using microdilution method against Gram-positive (B. subtilis, B. cereus, S. pneumoniae, and S. aureus) and Gram-negative (K. pneumoniae, S. flexneri, P. aeruginosa, E. aerogenes, and E. coli) bacterial and fungal (C. albicans) strains81 The MIC value of compound 46 tested microorganisms were found to be between 0.5 and 1 mg mL−1, comparable to the MIC value of the clinically used antimicrobial agents (Fig. 13).82

Fig. 13. Structure of compound 46.

Fig. 13

A series of compounds containing benzofuran ring with oxadiazoles and pyrazoles were constructed and tested against five bacterial (E. coli, K. pneumonia, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, and Streptococcus faecalis) and five fungal strains (A. flavous, A. fumigatus, C. albicans, Penicillium notatum, and Rhizopus). Among them, compound 47 showed strong activities against all the tested microbial species (Fig. 14).62

Fig. 14. Structure of compound 47.

Fig. 14

Some benzofuran derivatives linked to other heterocycles (quinazolines) have been used in antibacterial research in recent years. The antibacterial activities of these synthesized compounds were evaluated against three Gram-negative (Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Saμmonella typhi), three Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis and Listeria monocytogenes) and one yeast-like fungi (Candida albicans). Among them, compound 48 showed the highest antimicrobial activity against all the tested strains (Fig. 15).83

Fig. 15. Structure of novel antibacterial compound 48.

Fig. 15

Talaromyces amestolkiae YX1 is a marine fungal strain obtained from the fresh tissue of the marine mangrove plant Kandelia obovata. The compound obtained by extracting the fungal fermentation broth using EtOAc was shown to have an inhibitory effect on the activity of α-glucosidase. Two novel benzofuran compounds were obtained by further fractionating the biologically active extract (Fig. 16).84

Fig. 16. Structures of the isolated compounds 49 and 50.

Fig. 16

The 2-salicylidene benzofuran derivatives showed an antibacterial effect. Compound 51 showed the most potent antibacterial activity with MIC values of 0.06–0.12 mM against three Gram-(+) bacterial strains (Fig. 17).85

Fig. 17. Design of novel 2-salicyloylbenzofuran derivatives as antibacterial agents.

Fig. 17

Biologically active benzofuran compounds containing pyrimidine ring were constructed from benzofuran chalcones which have high chemical reactivity and diverse synthetic applications. Antimicrobial activity test results showed that the presence of hydroxyl, thiol, and amino groups in the pyrimidine ring significantly contributes to their antimicrobial activities (Fig. 18).86

Fig. 18. Structure of benzofuran pyrimidine derivatives 52 and 53.

Fig. 18

4.2.2. Antiviral activity

Viruses are an important class of pathogens harmful to human health. They are highly contagious and can lead to far-reaching harm to many other diseases (such as cancer). Viral structure is very simple, and intracellular parasites and viral replication depend on the characteristics of the host cell, which results in most antiviral drugs being more toxic to the body or having a lower antiviral effect when used therapeutically. This is one of the reasons for the slow development of antiviral drugs. New benzofuran antiviral drugs were obtained by hybridization of natural products (homologous) egonol, thymol and artemisinin. Some hybrid compounds are also potential antiviral drugs due to their excellent anti-HCMV activity in the micromolar to sub-micromolar range, wherein the ether-linked artemisinin-homologous triol mixture 55 exhibits the strongest anti-HCMV activity with an EC50 value of 0.13 μM. It is 20 times more active than the control drug ganciclovir. Hybrid 54 was linked by another ether consisting of egonol and dihydroartemisinin with an EC50 value of 0.17 μM (Fig. 19).87

Fig. 19. The structure of compounds 54 and 55 with inhibition of HCMV Mars.

Fig. 19

Compound 56 is a benzofuran derivative having antiviral activity found in Eupatorium adenophorum which exhibits antiviral effects against RSV LONG and A2 strains with IC50 values of 2.3 and 2.8 μM, respectively. The results of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiolan-2-yl)-2,5 diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay showed that compound 56 is cytotoxic and has a 50% cytotoxicity (CC50) value of 7.9 μM. Although it is considered to have a lower selection index (SI, ratio of CC50 to IC50) of 3.4 and 2.8, respectively, it can be used as an antiviral drug to optimize drug selectivity (Fig. 20).88

Fig. 20. Chemical structures of 56.

Fig. 20

Benzofuran-type hepatitis C virus inhibitors were discovered recently through high-throughput screening. Shanshan He and co-workers discovered compounds 57 and 58, which showed promising antiviral activities. Notably, it was observed that such compounds were able to significantly reduce intracellular viral levels, suggesting that compounds 57 and 58 may be effective against early infection of HCV. At the same time, the cytotoxicity of the compounds was further determined in HepG2 cells and primary human hepatocytes, and the compounds showed low cytotoxicity for both types of cells. The experimental results also indicate that one of the advantages of this series of antiviral compounds is their low cytotoxicity to human hepatocytes (CC50 > 31.6 μM) (Fig. 21).89

Fig. 21. Structure of compounds 57 and 58 of benzofuran analogs of HCV inhibitors.

Fig. 21

4.3. Antioxidant activity

Free radicals produced by normal biochemical reactions in the body play an important role in the human body and become harmful only when they are produced in large quantities. The human body has an innate defense mechanism to resist free radicals such as superoxide dismutase, catalase and glutathione peroxidase.90 Studies have found that benzofuran compounds have good antioxidant activity (Fig. 22).91,92

Fig. 22. Chemical structures of compounds 59 and 60.

Fig. 22

A new line of benzofuran compounds 59 and 60 were isolated from D. latifolia. These compounds had moderate antioxidant activity and were tested by DPPH free radical scavenging test with an IC50 value of 96.7 ± 8.9 μM.93

The flavonoids and benzofurans have been identified as novel antioxidants in medicinal chemistry and have become a new research direction for antioxidants. The 1,3-benzofuran derivatives (Fig. 23) (61–63) have very similar antioxidant activities with EC50 values of 8.57, 9.72, 8.27 and 10.59 mM, respectively.1

Fig. 23. Structures of the compounds (61–63).

Fig. 23

Benzofuran esters are also an important development direction of antioxidant drugs. A series of new benzofuran ester compounds have been synthesized and their activity has been detected. Results showed that a compound 64 (DPPH) has the highest free radical scavenging activity (Fig. 24).94

Fig. 24. Chemical structure of benzofuran ester compound 64 having antioxidant activity.

Fig. 24

The novel benzofuran-2-carboxamide derivatives also exhibited certain antioxidant activity. Compound 65 exhibited moderate to appreciable antioxidant activity. At 100 μM, the inhibition rate on LPO was 62%, and the inhibition rate on DPPH radical formation was 23.5% (Fig. 25).95

Fig. 25. The structure of the 7-methoxy-N-(substituted phenyl)benzofuran-2-carboxamide derivative.

Fig. 25

The substituted benzofuran derivative 66 was tested with the antioxidant l-ascorbic acid as a positive control, and the antioxidant activity tests at concentrations of 200, 100 and 50 μg mL−1 showed that the compounds 66a–66g had excellent antioxidant activity (Table 3).96

Structure and antioxidant activity data of compounds 66(a–g).

Compounds R1 R Concentration in (μg mL−1)
200 100 50
66a (ref. 96) Morpholine Br 95.3 95.3 91.9
66b (ref. 96) Morpholine OMe 100 95.3 88.1
66c (ref. 96) N-methyl piperazine OMe 94.6 80.2 28.7
66d (ref. 96) Thiomorpholine Br 98.1 91 89.8
66e (ref. 96) 1-Pyridyl-2-ylpiperazine Br 97.9 94 85.7
66f (ref. 96) 1-Pyridyl-2-ylpiperazine OMe 100 97.2 93.6
66g (ref. 96) 2-Piperzin-1-ylethanol OMe 94.2 93.2 92.6
l-Ascorbic acid 99.2 99 98.8

4.4. Anti-AD activity and synthesis of benzofuran derivatives

AD is one of the most common neurodegenerative diseases and is ranked as the fourth most common disease among the elderly and an important cause of death in the elderly. Alzheimer's disease is a type of neurological disease that has attracted more and more attention in recent years.97 Many pharmaceutical companies have used classical methods to find new drugs for treating AD through different stages of clinical trials. In recent years, more than a dozen of different drugs have been tested clinically and have not shown positive results or efficacy.98 Benzofurans and terpenoids as inhibitors of butyryl cholinesterase (BuChE), acetylcholinesterase (AChE), gamma secretase, β-secretase, tau misfolding and β-amyloid (Aβ) aggregation, have good effects in the treatment of AD.99

The novel tacrine-benzofuran hybrids were synthesized and evaluated on key molecular targets of AD (Scheme 1). Most hybrids exhibit good inhibitory activity against cholinesterase and Aβ self-aggregation. Selected compounds showed significant inhibition of human β-secretase-1 (hBACE-1). Among these hybrids, compound 69 showed the best activity as a good inhibitor of subnanomolar selective human acetylcholinesterase (hAChE) (IC50 = 0.86 nM) and Aβ aggregation (hAChE- and self-induction, 61.3% and 58.4% respectively) and hBACE-1 activity (IC50 = 1.35 μM).100

Scheme 1. Synthesis of compound 69.

Scheme 1

4.5. Anti-inflammatory activity of benzofuran derivative and its synthesis

In multicellular organisms, inflammation is the primary host defense response to tissue damage, infectious agents or autoimmune responses, and is also an important component of the immune response. Symptoms of inflammation include swelling, redness of the skin, and pain. It can be acute or chronic depending on time and pathological characteristics.101 In recent years, studies on benzofuran derivatives have found that individual derivatives have good anti-inflammatory activity. The core compound 2-acetylbenzofuran was synthesized by coupling 3-(trifluoromethyl) phenyl diazo chloride with salicylaldehyde. Then cyclization condensation reaction was carried out with 5-((3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)diazenyl)salicylaldehyde and alkenyl salicylaldehyde.102 The acetyl group in compound 72 is a general precursor for the synthesis of chalcone and pyrazoline derivatives, and therefore anhydrous potassium carbonate must be present in the reaction. Claisen–Schmidt condensation of 2-acetylbenzofuran with formylpyrazole gives the corresponding chalcone derivatives 73a and 73b, which are compounds with good anti-inflammatory activity (Scheme 2).

Scheme 2. Synthetic route for acetyl benzofuran 73.

Scheme 2

4.6. Vasorelaxant agents

Vasodilators are a class of smooth muscle relaxants that have the effect of dilating blood vessels. They are mainly used to treat high blood pressure, heart failure and angina. Benzofurans are promising candidates because of their antiarrhythmic, hypotensive, and vasodilating effects. At the same time, the morpholine scaffold is a very versatile structure in the drug design process and has a variety of biological and pharmacological activities. A novel vasodilating compound may be provided by the combination of these two active structures. Among the several types of compounds designed by the principle of active molecular assembly, the N-acetylpyrazoline derivative exhibits the highest activity, and the pyrazoline thiocarboxamide also has a good activity. The results for N-acetylpyrazoline 75a–e showed that compounds 75a–c (IC50 0.4171, 0.4550 and 0.3704 mM) showed better activity than prazocin, while the activity of compound 74d (IC50 0.4951 mM) was comparable to that of prazocin and compound 74e (IC50 0.5340 mM), and was slight less than that of prazocin. In the case of pyrazoline, the carboxamide derivatives 75a and c (IC50 0.4475 and 0.4158 mM, respectively) showed better activity than prazocin. The thiosulfamide derivatives 75b, d and e (IC50 0.4212, 0.4041 and 0.3505 mM) showed better activity, and the compound 75c (IC50 0.5815 mM) showed a lower activity than the prazocin (Fig. 26).103

Fig. 26. Some benzofuran–morpholinomethyl–pyrazoline hybrids with vasodilating activity.

Fig. 26

5. General synthesis method of benzofuran

There are many ways to construct benzofuran rings. The most common methods are dehydration of phenoxyalkanone under acidic condition,104 dehydration of o-hydroxybenzophenone under acidic condition,105 decarboxylation of o-acetylphenoxyacetic acid or ester under alkaline condition,106 and cyclization of o-hydroxybenzophenone to construct benzofuran ring.107 These four types are the traditional methods of constructing benzofuran ring. In addition to the well-known typical methods for construction of benzofuran rings, there are also some specially named reactions and photochemical reaction. These abundant reaction types indicate that the construction of benzofuran ring is well developed in organic synthesis, and this provides an excellent foundation for further development of new synthetic methods in the future (Scheme 3).

Scheme 3. Common four methods for synthesizing benzofuran.

Scheme 3

5.1. Photochemical reaction

It is well known that photochemical synthesis methods are very interesting in organic synthesis. For example, the Suzuki–Miyaura type coupling reaction uses photochemistry for organic synthesis. Scheme 4 describes a new method for the synthesis of benzofurans. The synthesis of 2-aryl/alkyl benzofurans by intramolecular photochemical Wittig reaction is achieved by photochemical reaction. There are fewer additional by-products in the reaction and can be controlled while the reaction also meets the green chemical requirements, but the compound yield is relatively low in this reaction (Scheme 4).108

Scheme 4. The benzofuran compound was synthesized by the photochemical reaction method under both hv and MW conditions.

Scheme 4

5.2. Coupling reaction

5.2.1. Sonogashira reaction

In the synthesis of 2,3-disubstituted benzofuran, it can be completed by a one-step reaction. It is prepared by coupling-cyclizing o-iodophenol with a terminal alkyne in the presence of a powder of potassium fluoride doped alumina in the presence of a mixture of palladium in the form of powder, cuprous iodide, and triphenylphosphine. The organic reaction starting materials are abundant and readily available, and most compounds have higher yields. Detailed studies on the optimization of reaction conditions and reaction mechanisms for such reactions are the subject of the future (Schemes 5 and 6).109,110

Scheme 5. The benzofuran ring was constructed by a coupling-cyclization reaction of o-iodophenol with a terminal alkyne.

Scheme 5

Scheme 6. Synthesis of 2,3-diphenyl benzofuran via coupling of phenol with diphenylacetylene.

Scheme 6

A method of constructing a benzofuran ring by a coupling reaction of a diene acetylene compound with a Fischer carbene complex such as Scheme 7. The reaction is treated with iodine to give an uncomplexed benzofuran derivative (Scheme 7).111

Scheme 7. Constructed of benzofuran ring by coupling reaction.

Scheme 7

5.2.2. Sonogashira reaction (metal–organic compound)

The Sonogashira coupling reaction of the metal–organic compound is carried out by a ring closure reaction to prepare a metal-containing benzofuran compound. Ferrocene acetylene and 5-iodovanillin are reacted in Pd (PPh3)2Cl2 with CuI and the yield of the metal–organic compound obtained by the reaction is high (Scheme 8).112

Scheme 8. The metal-containing benzofuran 102 was prepared by a Sonogashira coupling reaction.

Scheme 8

5.3. Knoevenegal

Polymer II was synthesized by Knoevenagel polycondensation under the guidance of new nonlinear optics (NLO photons). The process is first carried out in anhydrous THF, followed by solid state polycondensation, and finally a backbone polymer having a high yield can be obtained. It is found that the shoulder-to-shoulder arrangement of the NLO chromophore introduced a backbone polymer with a large off-diagonal tensor component (Scheme 9).113,114

Scheme 9. Preparation of compound 99 by Knoevenegal reaction.

Scheme 9

5.4. Intramolecular Heck reaction

The Pd-catalyzed intramolecular Heck reaction in the construction of the benzofuran ring is a well-known reaction. The advantage of Pd-catalyzed intramolecular Heck reaction by ionic liquid catalysis is also evident (e.g., Scheme 10). This type of ionic liquid is an ideal fixative to increase the rate and selectivity of the organic reaction, while post-treatment of the experiment is also simple. The ionic liquid with metal catalyst can be recycled and reused, which is also in line with the concept of current green chemistry.115

Scheme 10. Synthesis of benzofuran in ionic liquid by a PdCl2-catalyzed intramolecular Heck reaction.

Scheme 10

5.5. Heterocyclization

The benzofuran derivative is obtained by NBS or NIS mediated cyclization and then post-treated with NaOMe or DBU. The overall yield of the reaction is relatively good, and the reaction conditions are mild. Therefore, the construction of a benzofuran ring by NBS or NIS-mediated electrophilic cyclization is a worthwhile approach (Scheme 11).116

Scheme 11. The benzofuran compound 106 was synthesized by a heterocyclization reaction.

Scheme 11

6. Synthesis of various active compounds

With the popularization of the concept of green chemistry and the requirements for high yield and low toxicity of synthesis methods, the optimization and innovation of the synthetic routes of benzofuran compounds have made great progress in recent years. The construction of complex benzofuran ring using different methods also accelerated the clinical application of this kind of drugs. In this part, the synthetic methods of benzofuran compounds are illustrated with examples according to the relevant pharmacological activities of these compounds described above.

6.1. Synthesis of antitumor benzofuran derivatives

A series of novel hybrid compounds between benzofuran and N-aryl piperazine were designed and synthesized. The in vitro antitumor analysis results indicated that the amide derivatives generally have a higher biological activity than the sulfonamide compounds, and the chlorine or trifluoromethyl substituent is critical for regulating their cytotoxicity. The synthesis of these compounds is shown in Scheme 11. Compound 109 was found to be the most potent compound against four human tumor cell lines (Scheme 12).117

Scheme 12. Synthetic routes of hybrid derivatives.

Scheme 12

It is a very viable strategy to design and synthesize new series of benzofuran derivatives with new scaffolds. Compounds containing heteroatoms have better physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties than previously reported compounds. Compound 118 has a good proliferation inhibitory effect on tumor cells, and it has been found that the antitumor activity of such compounds is related to the anti-angiogenic activity via the anti-HIF-1α pathway (Scheme 13).9

Scheme 13. Synthetic path of compound 118.

Scheme 13

The novel 1,2,4-oxadiazole fused benzofuran derivatives (126A–126J) were synthesized. The anticancer properties of these compounds were determined by MTT methods using a series of cancer cell lines. Combretastatin-A4 was used as a positive control, in which compounds 126B, 126C, 126D, 126G, 126H and 126J showed better activity than the positive control (Scheme 14).118

Scheme 14. Synthesis route of 1,2,4-oxadiazole fused benzofuran derivatives (126A–126J).

Scheme 14

6.2. Synthesis of anti-bacterial benzofuran derivatives

Synthetic route of benzofuran compound 53 with antibacterial activity.

The benzofuran based lead compounds were synthesized, and the obtained 2-hydroxy-5-nitrobenzaldehyde (132) was subsequently treated with ethyl bromoacetate in the presence of sodium carbonate in N-methyl pyrrolidine, and the ethyl 5-nitrobenzofuran-2-carboxylate was obtained in good yields and purity.119 Subsequent reduction of the nitro group at the 5th position of the benzofuran ring gives the corresponding ethyl 5-aminobenzofuran-2-carboxylate (136) compound. The advantage of this method is the high synthesis yield (Schemes 15 and 16).

Scheme 15. Synthesis of benzofuran derivative 130. Reagents and conditions.

Scheme 15

Scheme 16. Synthesis of ethyl 5-aminobenzofuran-2-carboxylate compound 136.

Scheme 16

A series of novel benzofuran-triazole hybrids were designed by click chemistry and found to have moderate to satisfactory antifungal activity by testing the target compounds.10 The reaction of 2′,6′-dihydroxyacetophenone with the corresponding 2-bromoacetophenone under the modified Rap–Stoermer reaction condition gave the hydroxy alkylation of the benzofuran scaffold (139a, b) and the propargyl bromide compound to obtain the end Alkyne derivative (140a, b). The aromatic azide (140a–i) was prepared from the corresponding aniline under Sandmeyer conditions. Finally, the target compound (141a–r) was obtained by click chemistry, and the yield was good (Scheme 17).10

Scheme 17. Synthesis of the target compound 141a–r.

Scheme 17

The benzofuran-5-ol derivative was synthesized and tested for its in vitro antifungal activity against Candida, Aspergillus species and Cryptococcus neoformans, and it showed good antifungal activity, suggesting that benzofuran-5-ol is a promising antifungal agent (Scheme 18).120

Scheme 18. Synthesis of benzofuran-5-ol derivatives. Reagents and conditions.

Scheme 18

A series of antibacterial benzofuran compounds were designed and synthesized.121 The ketone ligands were synthesized at the C-3 position and their antibacterial and antifungal activities were screened. They have good biological activity against four bacterial strains Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis and fungus Candida albicans.121 Among them, compound 152 showed excellent antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA (Scheme 19).

Scheme 19. Synthesis route of benzofuran compound 152.

Scheme 19

Monoiodo-phenol was obtained by iodinating phenol with NaI in the presence of NaOH and NaClO at low temperature (0 °C) and treated with acetyl chloride to obtain an intermediate. The combination of palladium and cuprous catalysts is typically used for the cross-coupling of aryl halides with terminal acetylenes to yield the corresponding aryl acetylenes.122 Intramolecular cyclization of the compound stilbene in potassium by Friedel–Crafts method, treatment of commercially available benzoic acid with SOCl2, followed by the addition of tin chloride to obtain the final compound. The acetylated compounds are hydrolyzed with KOH to give their respective phenolic compounds.121 In palladium-catalyzed reactions, alkyne substrates have been widely used to form carbon–carbon bonds, resulting in cyclic and polycyclic structures of macrocyclic isoflavones and chromene quinoline derivatives γ-butyrolactone and hydrazine. Therefore, the method for synthesizing benzofuran from o-iodophenol and acetylenic compounds under palladium catalysis is convenient and versatile.123,124

6.3. Synthesis of antiviral benzofuran compounds

A series of new potent antiviral benzofuran derivatives can be synthesized by naturally occurring furanone compounds (khellin (153a) and visnagin (153b)). Khellin (153a) and visnagin (153b) are very sensitive to alkali. The solvent used in the reaction has a great influence on the obtained product. Alcohol hydrolysis of 153a and 153b with potassium hydroxide gives different products, namely x-acetyl ketone (156a) and x-acetylisoxanthone (156b). The hydrolysate is an important molecule for the synthesis of new furanone. Compounds 154a and 154b were directly used in the synthesis of 5-oxo-5H-furo[3,2-g] chromene-6-formaldehyde by Vilsmeier–Haack reaction125 (Schemes 20 and 21).

Scheme 20. The synthesis route of 5-oxo-5H-furo[3,2-g]chromene-6-carboxaldehyde by the Vilsmeier–Haack reaction starting from compounds 154a and 154b.

Scheme 20

Scheme 21. Synthetic route of compounds 161 and 162.

Scheme 21

6.4. Synthesis of antioxidant active benzofuran derivatives

In order to find new antioxidants and antibacterial agents with improved efficacy, a series of benzofuranyl 1,3,5-substituted pyrazole analogs were synthesized (Schemes 22 and 23). Screening for their antioxidant activity indicated that these compounds have good antioxidant activity, and the synthetic route of this benzofuranyl 1,3,5-substituted pyrazole analog is as follows.126

Scheme 22. Synthesis of 2-acetyl benzofuran 164.

Scheme 22

Scheme 23. Reaction pathway for the synthesis of benzofuran based 1,3,5-substituted pyrazole derivatives 170.

Scheme 23

With the development of medicinal chemistry, palladium-mediated synthesis of common synthons and antioxidant analogs for the synthesis of naturally occurring salvianolic acid has been proposed (Scheme 24). Synthetic pathways can be used to obtain analogs with balanced lipophilic/hydrophilic properties that can lead to potentially interesting LDL antioxidants for prevention of cardiovascular disease.127 The 2-substituted benzofuran compound is synthesized by heterocyclic reaction of o-iodophenol with an acetylene substrate containing a terminal acetylene group. This synthetic route has focused on the use of palladium catalysts to form carbon–carbon bonds and carbon-heteroatom bonds. This route is also a versatile and simple method for the synthesis of benzofuran compounds.128–130

Scheme 24. Synthetic route to salvianolic acid derivatives.

Scheme 24

The benzofuran-2-one derivatives were synthesized (Scheme 25) and found to have good antioxidant activity. The antioxidant capacity of the most stable compounds was evaluated by both DPPH assay and cyclic voltammetry analyses performed in alcoholic media (methanol) as well as in aprotic solvent (acetonitrile). The experimental method is a short-term and practical reaction of 3-hydroxy-3H-benzofuran-2-one, and the possibility of obtaining various phenol derivatives by the domino reaction involving the first Friedel-alkylation and subsequent intramolecular lactonization. Specifically, phenolic malonate or 3,3,3-trifluoromethylacetone as an electrophilic counterpart in the presence of polyphenol as a substrate and TiCl4 (10 mol%) as a catalyst, the acid ester 3,3,3-trifluoromethylacetone undergoes a reaction that activate the alkylation reaction (Scheme 26).131

Scheme 25. Friedel–Crafts alkylation/lactonization of polyphenols was carried out using TiCl4 as a catalyst.

Scheme 25

Scheme 26. Benzofuran fused compound structure.

Scheme 26

7. Benzofuran fused derivative

The benzofuran fused derivative are also an important class of benzofuran derivatives such as usnic acid. In recent years, great progress has been made in the study of benzofuran fused derivatives. Since this strategy is believed to have the potential to increase the potency of the compound. A new one-pot synthesis of a benzofuran-fused N-heterocycle is achieved by AlCl3-mediated C–C followed by a C–O bond between 2,3-dichloropyrazine or a derivative thereof and phenol. The new compound can be used as a potential inhibitor of PDE4B. The docking of the compound 180 with the PDE4B protein showed that the key role was achieved via the inhibition of the benzofuran moiety in PDE4B. Compound 180 may also have therapeutic potential because the intended inhibitors are beneficial for the treatment of inflammatory and immune diseases.132 The biological evaluation of various cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors revealed that benzofuran fused derivative 181 has a certain activity and is expected to be further developed in future studies.133

8. Conclusions and perspective

This review has highlighted the various aspects of benzofuran derivatives including their important natural product sources, biological activities and drug prospects, and chemical synthesis. Benzofuran compounds exhibit potent biological properties including analgesic, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, antifungal, antitumor, antiviral, and enzyme inhibitory activities. There are also fluorescently active benzofuran compounds which have received increasing attention. Substitutions at the C-2, C-3 position in the benzofuran ring, as well as compounds substituted on the phenyl ring, encompass most of the benzofuran derivative ring systems. The most well-known benzofuran derivatives are amiodarone, geranium xanthine toxin, bergapten, globulin and usnic acid compounds, most of which have been used as lead compounds in drug design and new drug development.

Benzofuran scaffolds have a wide range of biological activities, and the review of such compounds can further understand the application of such compounds in medicinal chemistry. This review details the various pharmacological activities of benzofuran derivatives and several compounds that have been successfully used in clinical practice. The clinical pharmacological activities of these compounds provide a new basis for the study of benzofuran analogs and novel potential scaffolds. In the synthesis of benzofuran compounds, this review summarizes the synthesis of benzofurans by classifying the activity of the compounds. These methods can be further used to synthesize benzofuran compounds with promising active structural units. In the natural source part, by summarizing the activity and structure of the natural products of benzofuran in the past ten years, important references are provided for structural modification of natural products in the field of medicinal chemistry to improve biological activity. Although great progresses have been made in benzofuran skeleton activity and synthesis research the structure optimization and modification of benzofuran compounds still needs more work to improve the selectivity of the compounds. It is hoped that the ideas in this review article and the cited examples will motivate and further optimize the full potential of benzofuran compounds, to improve the design selectivity, optimization and multifunctional opportunities of benzofuran compounds, and to help in the treatment of multifactorial diseases in the future.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that this article content has no conflict of interest.

Supplementary Material

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Shandong Provincial Academy of Medical Sciences for the scientific research project (2017-16), and the Shandong Natural Science Foundation [ZR2018LH021].

Notes and references

  1. Chand K. Rajeshwari Hiremathad A. Singh M. Santos M. A. Keri R. S. Pharmacol. Rep. 2017;69:281–295. doi: 10.1016/j.pharep.2016.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Radadiya A. Shah A. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015;46:356–376. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jung J. W. Park J. H. Seo K. H. Oh E. J. Lee D. Y. Lim D. W. J. Korean Soc. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2015;58:541–543. doi: 10.1007/s13765-015-0071-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Khanam H. Shamsuzzaman Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015;97:483–504. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.11.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Proksch P. Rodriguez E. Phytochemistry. 1983;22:2335–2348. doi: 10.1016/0031-9422(83)80118-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Asif M. J. Anal. Pharm. Res. 2016;3(2):00048–00050. [Google Scholar]
  7. Heravi M. M. Zadsirjan V. Hamidi H. Amiri P. H. T. RSC Adv. 2017;7:24470–24521. doi: 10.1039/C7RA03551A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kamal M. Shakya A. Jawaid T. International Journal of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2011;1:1–15. [Google Scholar]
  9. Xu X. L. Yang Y. R. Mo X. F. Wei J. L. Zhang X. J. You Q. D. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017;137:45–62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.05.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Liang Z. Xu H. Tian Y. Guo M. Su X. Guo C. Molecules. 2016;21:732. doi: 10.3390/molecules21060732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kenchappa R. Bodke Y. D. Telkar S. Sindhe M. A. J. Chem. Bio. 2017;10:1–13. doi: 10.1007/s12154-016-0159-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Aswathanarayanappa C. Bheemappa E. Bodke Y. D. Bhovi V. K. Ningegowda R. Shivakumar M. C. Med. Chem. Res. 2012;22:78–87. doi: 10.1007/s00044-012-0017-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Marwa Abdel-motaal E. Kandeel M. Abou-Elzahab M. Elghareeb F. European Scientific Journal. 2017;13:297–313. doi: 10.19044/esj.2017.v13n30p297. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hiremathad A. Chand K. Keri R. S. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2018;92:1497–1503. doi: 10.1111/cbdd.13316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Thévenin M. Thoret S. Grellier P. Dubois J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2013;21:4885–4892. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2013.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ragab H. M. Ashour H. M. A. Galal A. et al. . J. Med. Chem. 2008;51:2883–2886. doi: 10.1021/jm8002747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Xie Y. S. Kumar D. Bodduri V. D. V. Tarani P. S. Zhao B. X. Miao J. Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014;55(17):2796–2800. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2014.02.116. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Higashi A. Kishikawa N. Ohyama K. Kuroda N. Tetrahedron Lett. 2017;58:2774–2778. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2017.06.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gupta S. Adhikary S. Modukuri R. K. Choudhary D. Trivedi R. Sashidhara K. V. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2018;28:1719–1724. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2018.04.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ka C. L. Chern J. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001;42:1111–1113. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4039(00)02163-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ugale V. Patel H. Patel B. Bari S. Arabian J. Chem. 2017;10:S389–S396. doi: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2012.09.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sharma U. Naveen T. Maji A. Manna S. Maiti D. Angew. Chem. 2013;52:12669–12673. doi: 10.1002/anie.201305326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Promchai T. Janhom P. Maneerat W. Rattanajak R. Kamchonwongpaisan S. Pyne S. G. Limtharakul T. Nat. Prod. Res. 2018:1–5. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2018.1512990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Chen H. Zeng X. Gao C. Ming P. Zhang J. Guo C. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:10893. doi: 10.1038/srep10893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Zelová H. Hanáková Z. Čermáková Z. J. Nat. Prod. 2014;77:1297–1303. doi: 10.1021/np401025f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kyekyeku J. O. Kusari S. Adosraku R. K. Fitoterapia. 2016;108:41–47. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2015.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Tan Y. X. Wang H. Q. Chen R. Y. Fitoterapia. 2012;83:750–753. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2012.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ha H. J. Kang D. W. Kim H. M. J. Med. Chem. 2018;61:396–402. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b00844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Baldisserotto A. Demurtas M. Lampronti I. Moi D. Balboni G. Vertuani S. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018;156:118–125. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. John A. Oates M. D. N. Engl. J. Med. 1987;316:455–466. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198702193160807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Leo S. D. and Braverman L. E., The Thyroid and Its Diseases, 2019, pp. 417–433 [Google Scholar]
  32. Mouli P. E. Parthiban S. Priya R. Selvakumar T. Deivanayagi M. Kumar S. Int. J. Nutr., Pharmacol., Neurol. Dis. 2013;3:229. doi: 10.4103/2231-0738.114840. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wei D. Z. Guo X. Y. Lin L. N. Inflammation. 2016;39:1876–1882. doi: 10.1007/s10753-016-0423-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lampronti I. Bianchi N. Borgatti M. Eur. J. Haematol. 2003;71:189–195. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0609.2003.00113.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Rahman M. A. Kim N. H. Yang H. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2012;369:95–104. doi: 10.1007/s11010-012-1372-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Tanew A. Ortel B. Rappersberger K. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1988;18:333–338. doi: 10.1016/S0190-9622(88)70048-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Santoro M. Guido C. De Amicis F. Oncol. Rep. 2016;35:568–576. doi: 10.3892/or.2015.4327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Bose S. K. Dewanjee S. Sahu R. Nat. Prod. Res. 2011;25:1444–1449. doi: 10.1080/14786410902800665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Vijayakumar C. S. Viswanathan S. Kannappa Reddy M. Parvathavarthini S. Kundu A. B. Sukumar E. Fitoterapia. 2000;71:564–566. doi: 10.1016/S0367-326X(00)00209-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Takai M. Uehara Y. J. Med. Chem. 1979;22:1380–1384. doi: 10.1021/jm00197a019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Cardarelli M. Serino G. Campanella L. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 1997;53:667–672. doi: 10.1007/s000180050086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Odabasoglu F. Cakir A. Suleyman H. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2006;103:59–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2005.06.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Zheng G. Luo S. Li S. Hua J. Li W. Li S. Phytochemistry. 2018;148:57–62. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2018.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Dwfg K. Lekane N. M. Kulabas S. S. Ipek H. Tok T. T. Ngadjui B. T. Phytochemistry. 2017;141:70–79. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2017.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Boonyaketgoson S. Rukachaisirikul V. Phongpaichit S. Trisuwan K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2017;58:1585–1589. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2017.03.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Boonyaketgoson S. Rukachaisirikul V. Phongpaichit S. Trisuwan K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2017;58:1585–1589. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2017.03.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wang Y. M. Zhao J. Q. Zhou S. Y. Yang J. L. Yao X. J. Tao Y. D. Tetrahedron. 2016;72:4910–4917. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2016.06.061. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Ha M. T. Tran M. H. Ah K. J. Jo K. J. Kim J. Kim W. D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2016;26:2788–2794. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2016.04.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Zoofishan Z. Hohmann J. Hunyadi A. Phytochem. Rev. 2018;13:1–15. [Google Scholar]
  50. Jiang Z. H. Liu Y. P. Huang Z. H. Wang T. T. Feng X. Y. Yue H. Guo W. Fu Y. H. Bioorg. Chem. 2017;75:260–264. doi: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2017.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Soleimani A. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screening. 2015;18:505–513. doi: 10.2174/1386207318666150430114815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Shill M. C. Das A. K. Itou T. Karmakar S. Mukherjee P. K. Mizuguchi H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2015;23:6869–6874. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2015.09.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Yoo H. Chae H. S. Kim Y. M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2015;46:5644–5647. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2014.10.077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhou Z. B. Luo J. G. Pan K. Planta Med. 2013;79:1730–1735. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1351100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Li H. Zhai F. Yang M. Li X. Wang P. Ma X. Molecules. 2012;17:7637. doi: 10.3390/molecules17077637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Wei S. P. Luan J. Y. Lu L. N. Wu W. J. Ji Z. Q. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011;12:4946–4952. doi: 10.3390/ijms12084946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Yang Z. G. Jia L. N. Shen Y. Ohmura A. Kitanaka S. Molecules. 2011;16:6010–6022. doi: 10.3390/molecules16076010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Xie X. L. Xu X. J. Li R. M. Wan J. Z. Xie C. Y. Yang D. P. Nat. Prod. Res. 2010;24:1854–1860. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2010.482935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Zheng Z. P. Xu Y. Qin C. Zhang S. Gu X. Lin Y. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014;62:5519–5527. doi: 10.1021/jf500159z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Gong T. Wang D. X. Yang Y. Liu P. Chen R. Y. Yu D. Q. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2010;58:254–256. doi: 10.1248/cpb.58.254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Tan Y. X. Gong T. Liu C. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2010;58:579–581. doi: 10.1248/cpb.58.579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Yuan H. Bi K. J. Li B. Org. Lett. 2013;15:4742–4745. doi: 10.1021/ol4021095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Mehnaz K. Ashok K. Talha J. International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2011;1:1–15. [Google Scholar]
  64. Zeng W. Wu W. Jiang H. Huang L. Sun Y. Chen Z. ChemInform. 2013;49:6611–6613. doi: 10.1039/c3cc42326c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Abu-Hashem A. A. RHussein H. A. Aly A. S. Gouda M. A. ChemInform. 2014;44:2285–2312. [Google Scholar]
  66. Yang Y. R. Wei J. L. Mo X. F. Yuan Z. W. Wang J. L. Zhang C. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2016;26:2713–2718. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2016.03.112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Gomha S. M. Abdelhamid A. O. Abdelrehem N. Kandeel S. M. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2018;55:995–1001. doi: 10.1002/jhet.3131. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  68. Nevagi R. J. Dighe S. N. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015;97:561–581. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.10.085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Martins P. Jesus J. Santos S. Raposo L. R. Roma-Rodrigues C. Baptista P. V. Molecules. 2015;20:16852–16891. doi: 10.3390/molecules200916852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Ma Y. Zheng X. Gao H. Wan C. Mao Z. Molecules. 2016;21:1684. doi: 10.3390/molecules21121684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Abd El-Karim S. S. Anwar M. M. Mohamed N. A. Bioorg. Chem. 2015;63:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2015.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Having T. C. System D. J. Chem. 2016;3:1–8. doi: 10.2174/1874842201603010001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  73. Su C. M. Chen C. Y. Lu T. Oncotarget. 2016;7:83530–83543. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Shankerrao S. Bodke Y. D. Santoshkumar S. Arabian J. Chem. 2017;10:S554–S558. doi: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2012.10.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  75. Venkatesh T. Bodke Y. D. Joy N. M. Lakkappa D. B. Ramakrishnan S. Iran. J. Pharm. Res. 2018;17:75–86. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Guo W. Yu Z. W. Adv. Mater. Res. 2012;368–373:317–320. [Google Scholar]
  77. Fiandanese V. Bottalico D. Marchese G. Punzi A. Quarta M. R. Fittipaldi M. ChemInform. 2009;22:3853–3859. [Google Scholar]
  78. Mbaveng A. T. Sandjo L. P. Tankeo S. B. Ndifor A. R. Ambassa P. Nagdjui B. T. SpringerPlus. 2015;4:823–831. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1645-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. EI-Zahar M. I. EI-karim A. Somaia S. Anwar M. M. S. Afr. J. Chem. 2009;62:189–199. [Google Scholar]
  80. Hiremathad A. Patil M. R. Chethana K. R. Chand K. Santos M. A. Keri R. S. RSC Adv. 2015;5:96809–96828. doi: 10.1039/C5RA20658H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  81. Mehdi S. H. Hashim R. Ghalib R. M. Silva M. F. C. G. D. Sulaiman O. Murugaiyah V. Marimuthu M. M. J. Mol. Struct. 2011;1006:318–323. doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2011.09.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  82. Khodarahmi G. Asadi P. Hassanzadeh F. Khodarahmi E. J. Res. Med. Sci. 2015;20:1094–1104. doi: 10.4103/1735-1995.172835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Asadi P. Khodarahmi G. Jahanian-Najafabadi A. Saghaie L. Hassanzadeh F. Chem. Biodiversity. 2017;14:1–40. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.201600411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Chen S. Liu Y. Liu Z. Cai R. Lu Y. Huang X. RSC Adv. 2016;6:26412–26420. doi: 10.1039/C6RA02566H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  85. Phan P. T. Nguyen T. T. Nguyen H. T. Le B. N. Vu T. T. Tran D. C. Molecules. 2017;22:687. doi: 10.3390/molecules22050687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Venkatesh T. Bodke Y. D. Joy M. N. Iran. J. Pharm Res. 2017;17:75–86. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Karagöz A. Ç. Reiter C. Seo E. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2018;26:3610–3618. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2018.05.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Wang W. J. Wang L. Liu Z. Jiang R. W. Liu Z. W. Li M. M. Phytochemistry. 2016;122:238–245. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2015.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. He S. Jain P. Lin B. Ferrer M. Hu Z. Southall N. Hu X. Zheng W. Neuenswander B. Cho C. H. Chen Y. Worlikar S. A. Aubé J. Larock R. C. Schoenen F. J. Marugan J. J. Liang T. J. Frankowski K. J. ACS Comb. Sci. 2015;17:641–652. doi: 10.1021/acscombsci.5b00101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Manuel J. E. Carlos V. C. Adriana G. E. BMC Complementary Altern. Med. 2013;13:12. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-13-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Xin M. Qiu Z. H. Zhong X. J. Vinyl Addit. Technol. 2013;19:198–202. doi: 10.1002/vnl.21307. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  92. Rindhe S. S. Rode M. A. Karale B. K. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2010;72:231–235. doi: 10.4103/0250-474X.65022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Liu R. H. Mei D. Y. Lin S. Wang D. Q. Shao F. Chen L. Y. Guo S. L. Nat. Prod. Res. 2018:1–6. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2018.1431639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Kumar C. Li T. Tze C. Siddegowda C. Yip-Foo W. Shaida S. Hashim N. S. Ooi K. L. Quah C. K. Fun H. K. Molecules. 2015;20:16566–16581. doi: 10.3390/molecules200916566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Cho J. Park C. Lee Y. Kim S. Bose S. Choi M. Kumar A. S. Jung J. K. Lee H. Biomol. Ther. 2015;23:275–282. doi: 10.4062/biomolther.2015.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Rindhe S. S. Rode M. A. Karale B. K. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2010;72:231–235. doi: 10.4103/0250-474X.65022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Abedinifar F. Farnia S. M. F. Mahdavi M. Nadri H. Moradi A. Ghasemi J. B. Bioorg. Chem. 2018;80:180–188. doi: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2018.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Lien E. J. Adams J. D. Lien L. L. Law M. J—Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal. 2018;1:2–7. [Google Scholar]
  99. Goyal D. Kaur A. Goyal B. ChemMedChem. 2018;13:1275–1299. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.201800156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Zha X. Lamba D. Zhang L. Lou Y. Xu C. Kang D. J. Med. Chem. 2016;59:114–131. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Seo Y. H. Damodar K. Kim J. K. Jun J. G. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2016;26:1521–1524. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2016.02.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Farag A. A. El Shehry M. F. Abbas S. Y. Abd-Alrahman S. N. Atrees A. A. Al-Basheer H. Z. Ammar Y. A. Z. Naturforsch., B: J. Chem. Sci. 2015;70:519–526. [Google Scholar]
  103. Hassan G. S. Rahman D. E. Abdel Saleh D. O. Abdel Jaleel G. A. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2014;62:1238–1251. doi: 10.1248/cpb.c14-00572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Muller A. Kormendy M. Kormendy K. J. Org. Chem. 1954;19:472–484. doi: 10.1021/jo01368a030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  105. Adams R. Whitaker L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1956;78:658–663. doi: 10.1021/ja01584a037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  106. Royer R. Bisagni E. Hudry C. Cheutin A. Desvoye M. L. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1963;8–9:1746. [Google Scholar]
  107. Nicolaou K. C. Snyder S. A. Bigot A. Pfefferkorn J. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000;39:1093–1096. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(20000317)39:6&#x0003c;1093::AID-ANIE1093&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Ghosh S. Das J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011;52:1112–1116. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2010.12.104. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  109. Kabalka G. W. Wang L. Pagni R. M. Tetrahedron. 2001;57:8017–8028. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4020(01)00774-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  110. Kuram M. R. Bhanuchandra M. Sahoo A. K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013;52:4607–4612. doi: 10.1002/anie.201210217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Heravi M. M. Zadsirjan V. Adv. Heterocycl. Chem. 2015;117:261–376. doi: 10.1016/bs.aihch.2015.08.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  112. Torres J. C. Pilli R. A. Vargas M. D. Violante F. A. Garden S. J. Pinto A. C. Tetrahedron. 2002;58:4487–4492. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4020(02)00394-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  113. Zhang Y. D. Wang L. M. Wada T. Sasabe H. Macromolecules. 1996;29:1569–1573. doi: 10.1021/ma950585v. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  114. Namazi H. Assadpour A. Pourabbas B. Entezami A. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2001;81:505–511. doi: 10.1002/app.1464. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  115. Xie X. Chen B. Lu J. Han J. She X. Pan X. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004;45:6235–6237. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2004.06.110. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  116. Mphahlele M. J. Moekwa T. B. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005;3:2469–2475. doi: 10.1039/B505491E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Mao Z. W. Zheng X. Lin Y. P. Hu C. Y. Wang X. L. Wan C. P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2016;26:3421–3424. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2016.06.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Pervaram S. Ashok D. Sarasija M. Reddy C. V. R. Sridhar G. Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2018;88:1219–1223. doi: 10.1134/S1070363218060282. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  119. Reddy K. I. Srihari K. Renuka J. Sree K. S. Chuppala A. Jeankumar V. U. Sridevi J. P. Babu K. S. Yogeeswari P. Sriram D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2014;22:6552–6563. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2014.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Chungkyu R. Song A. L. Jungyoon L. Hong J. A. Joohee Y. Aram K. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010;20:6777–6780. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.08.129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Jiang X. Liu W. Zhang W. Jiang F. Gao Z. Zhuang H. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2011;46:3526–3530. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2011.04.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Torii S. Xu L. H. Okumoto H. Synlett. 1992:515–516. doi: 10.1055/s-1992-21399. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  123. Kundu N. G. Pal M. Mahanty J. S. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1992:41–42. doi: 10.1039/C39920000041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  124. Pal M. Subramanian V. Yeleswarapu K. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003;44:8221–8225. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2003.09.080. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  125. Galal S. A. El-All A. S. A. Abdallah M. M. El-Diwani H. I. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009;19:2420–2428. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2009.03.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Rangaswamy J. Kumar H. V. Harini S. T. Naik N. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2012;22:4773–4777. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2012.05.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. López-Frías G. Camacho-Dávila A. A. Chávez-Flores D. Molecules. 2015;20:8654–8665. doi: 10.3390/molecules20058654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Arcadi A. Marinelli F. Cacchi S. Synthesis. 1986:749–751. doi: 10.1055/s-1986-31764. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  129. Villemin D. Goussu D. Heterocycles. 1989;29:1255–1261. doi: 10.3987/COM-89-S129. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  130. Kundu N. G. Pal M. Mahanty J. S. De M. J. Chem. Soc. Pak. 1997;19:2815–2820. [Google Scholar]
  131. Miceli M. Roma E. Rosa P. Molecules. 2018;23:710. doi: 10.3390/molecules23040710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Kumar K. S. Adepu R. Kapavarapu R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012;53:1134–1138. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2011.12.096. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  133. Voigt B. Meijer L. Lozach O. Schächtele C. Totzke F. Hilgeroth A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005;15:823–825. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2004.10.091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from RSC Advances are provided here courtesy of Royal Society of Chemistry

RESOURCES