Abstract
Chromosomally acquired streptomycin resistance is frequently due to mutations in the gene encoding the ribosomal protein S12, rpsL. The presence of several rRNA operons (rrn) and a single rpsL gene in most bacterial genomes prohibits the isolation of streptomycin-resistant mutants in which resistance is mediated by mutations in the 16S rRNA gene (rrs). Three strains were constructed in this investigation: Mycobacterium smegmatis rrnB, M. smegmatis rpsL3+, and M. smegmatis rrnB rpsL3+. M. smegmatis rrnB carries a single functional rrn operon, i.e., rrnA (comprised of 16S, 23S, and 5S rRNA genes) and a single rpsL+ gene; M. smegmatis rpsL3+ is characterized by the presence of two rrn operons (rrnA and rrnB) and three rpsL+ genes; and M. smegmatis rrnB rpsL3+ carries a single functional rrn operon (rrnA) and three rpsL+ genes. By genetically altering the number of rpsL and rrs alleles in the bacterial genome, mutations in rrs conferring streptomycin resistance could be selected, as revealed by analysis of streptomycin-resistant derivatives of M. smegmatis rrnB rpsL3+. Besides mutations well known to confer streptomycin resistance, novel streptomycin resistance conferring mutations were isolated. Most of the mutations were found to map to a functional pseudoknot structure within the 530 loop region of the 16S rRNA. One of the mutations observed, i.e., 524G→C, severely distorts the interaction between nucleotides 524G and 507C, a Watson-Crick interaction which has been thought to be essential for ribosome function. The use of the single rRNA allelic M. smegmatis strain should help to elucidate the principles of ribosome-drug interactions.
Many antibiotics inhibit the growth of bacteria by targeting protein biosynthesis (3, 7, 34). Streptomycin, an aminocyclitol aminoglycoside, has been shown to interact directly with the small ribosomal subunit (8, 24). The ribosome accuracy center is a highly conserved component of the translational apparatus (1), comprising an rRNA domain and several polypeptides of the small subunit, including the ribosomal protein S12 (8, 29). A number of mutations in the rpsL gene encoding the S12 polypeptide generate resistance to streptomycin (10, 36, 46, 47, 49).
Rather than being a mere scaffold for ribosomal proteins, the rRNA has important functions and is a main target for drugs interfering with bacterial protein synthesis (12, 26, 33, 42). Mutations within rRNA genes have been found to confer drug resistance; for some of these mutations experimental proof for a cause-effect relationship has been provided (9, 21, 40, 50). More recently, mutations in rRNA genes have been found to be associated with in vivo acquired drug resistance in bacterial pathogens, e.g., in Mycobacterium tuberculosis resistant to streptomycin (10); most of the mutations found mapped to the 530 region of 16S rRNA (15, 27). This unique mechanism of acquired resistance due to mutational rRNA alterations has been attributed to the presence of a single rrn operon in this pathogen (7).
The 530 loop region is one of the most highly conserved 16S rRNA regions both in sequence and in secondary structure (13). The 530 loop region is part of the aminoacyl-tRNA binding site (A-site) and is involved in the decoding process (8, 25). Several lines of evidence indicate that the universally conserved 530 loop of 16S rRNA—in particular a pseudoknot structure formed by residues 526-CCG-524 and 505-GGC-507—plays a crucial role in translation, with mild perturbations of this structure, e.g., creation of G-U wobble base pairs, generating resistance to and reducing affinity for streptomycin (31). Data from in vitro assembly studies suggest that the pseudoknot structure is stabilized by ribosomal protein S12, which protects these bases from attack by kethoxal and dimethyl sulfate (44). The specificity of these probes for N1 and N2 of guanine and N3 of cytosine provided direct evidence for a Watson-Crick pairing, rather than some alternative mode of base pair interaction.
During the past years tremendous progress has been made in the analysis of ribosomes and most recently their structure has been resolved at an atomic resolution (4, 28, 39, 48). The crystal structure of the 30S subunit complexed with streptomycin (8) identified the 16S rRNA nucleotides directly involved in drug binding. However, streptomycin resistance-associated mutations have not only been observed in nucleotides directly involved in drug binding (10, 15, 16, 27). In addition, translation is a highly dynamic process which requires alterations in base pairing resulting in conformational changes (20). Thus, besides crystallographic analyses, additional investigations including chemical, biochemical, and genetic methods will be necessary to elucidate the mechanisms of antibiotic action.
M. tuberculosis is a pathogenic microorganism which grows very slowly (generation time, 20 to 24 h) and is hardly amenable to genetic manipulations. The lack of a eubacterium suitable for genetic manipulations, which allows the isolation of in vivo selection-driven mutational rrs alterations conferring resistance to streptomycin, severely hampers our understanding of structure-function relationship within rRNAs. The presence of a limited number of rRNA operons, its apathogenic nature, the high growth rate, and the ability for genetic manipulations make Mycobacterium smegmatis an ideal host for the investigation of eubacterial rRNA structure-function relationships (32, 37, 38). More recently, functional inactivation of the Escherichia coli rrn operons has been used to generate strains with a single rRNA operon (2).
To learn more about (i) mechanisms of streptomycin resistance in general, (ii) structure-function relationships in rRNA, in particular 16S rRNA-mediated streptomycin resistance, and (iii) dominance-recessivity relationships of ribosomal resistance mechanisms, M. smegmatis strains with different copy numbers of genes encoding the targets of streptomycin, i.e., rpsL and rrs, were generated. Strains were constructed to allow selection of streptomycin resistance-conferring mutations to appear exclusively in rrs. Drug resistance mutations were mapped in rrs, and by allele exchange techniques a cause-effect relationship of the mutations observed was demonstrated. We made the surprising finding that a base pair interaction thought to be required for proper ribosome function is severely affected by one of the most frequently identified mutations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
DNA manipulations.
Standard methods were used for restriction endonuclease digestion of DNA, hybridization analysis, and other manipulations (35). Plasmid DNA was isolated by the alkaline lysis method (5) or by using the Qiagen plasmid DNA preparation kit according to the manufacturer's instructions. All initial cloning procedures were performed with E. coli XL-1 Blue MRF′ (Stratagene). Transformants were grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium containing ampicillin (100 μg/ml) or kanamycin (50 μg/ml). Ampicillin, kanamycin, gentamicin, and hygromycin were obtained from Sigma; clarithromycin was a generous gift from Abbott GmbH (Wiesbaden).
DNA probes for Southern blot hybridization were labeled with digoxigenin according to the manufacturer's instructions (Boehringer Mannheim).
Strains and plasmids.
The strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. Plasmid prRNA::aph-sacB was constructed by digestion of plasmid prRNA4-4K1 with SalI and ligation to a 2-kbp sacB gene fragment (EcoRV/BamHI) from plasmid pLO2 (19).
TABLE 1.
Strains and plasmids used in the study
Strain or plasmid | Source or reference | Description |
---|---|---|
Strains | ||
E. coli XL-1 Blue MRF′ | Stratagene | |
M. smegmatis mc2 155 | 41 | Two functional rrn operons, one rpsL |
M. smegmatis rpsL3+ | This study | Two functional rrn operons, three rpsL |
M. smegmatis rrnB | This study | One functional rrn operon, one rpsL |
M. smegmatis rrnB rpsL3+ | This study | One functional rrn operon, three rpsL |
Plasmids | ||
prRNA4-4K1 | 36 | |
pGEM-T vector | Promega | |
pLO2 | 19 | |
pHRM3-Gma | 11 | |
pMV361-H-rRNA2058G | 38 | |
prRNA::aph-sacBb | This study | |
pMV361-H-rRNA523C/2058Gc | This study | |
pMV361-H-rRNA524C/2058Gc | This study | |
pMV361-H-rRNA526T/2058Gc | This study |
pyrF targeting vector.
Targeting vector for inactivation of rrnB.
Integrating vector with mutated rrn operon.
16S rRNA gene fragments carrying mutations rrs523A→C, rrs524G→C, and rrs526C→T were obtained by PCR amplification using DNA isolated from spontaneous streptomycin-resistant M. smegmatis strains carrying the corresponding mutation. PCR amplification was performed with primers #285 and #251 (Table 2). PCR products were subcloned into the pGEM-T vector (Promega). A 600-bp XhoI/EcoRV fragment containing the 530 loop region was isolated and used to replace the homologous gene fragment in plasmid pMV361-H-rRNA2058G, which previously was digested to completion with EcoRV and partially digested with XhoI. Plasmid pMV361-H-rRNA2058G expresses a functional rrnB operon under control of its own promoter. Sequencing with primers #242 and #259 confirmed that only the desired mutation was present. Resulting plasmids were pMV361-H-rRNA523C/2058G, pMV361-H-rRNA524C/2058G, and pMV361-H-rRNA526T/2058G, respectively.
TABLE 2.
Primers used in the study
Primer | Sequence | Source | Gene or phage amplified | Positiona |
---|---|---|---|---|
#11 | GTCGAGGTCACGGCGTAC | M. tuberculosis | rpsL | 181–198 |
#211 | CCCACCATTCAGCAGCTGGT | Mycobacteria | rpsL | |
#212 | GTCGAGCGAACCGCGAATGA | Mycobacteria | rpsL | |
#242 | CTACGGGAGGCAGCAGTGGG | M. smegmatis | rrs | 340–359 |
#251 | GGCATCGCAGCCCTTTGTAC | M. smegmatis | rrs | 1,256–1,237 |
#259 | TTTCACGAACAACGCGACAA | M. smegmatis | rrs | 599–580 |
#261 | AAGGAGGTGATCCAGCCGCA | M. smegmatis | rrs | 1,539–1,520 |
#264 | TGCACACAGGCCACAAGGGA | M. smegmatis | rrs | 1,072–1,052 |
#285 | GAGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG | M. smegmatis | rrs | 9–29 |
#612 | GTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGC | pHRM3-GM | T7 | 625–646 |
#651 | AATTAACCCTCACTAAAGGG | pHRM3-GM | T3 | 2,890–2,871 |
E. coli numbering. The positions of primers #211 and #212 can be found in reference 15.
Transformation of mycobacteria.
Mycobacteria were made electrocompetent essentially as described previously (36). This method is a modification of the method described by Jacobs et al. (17). In short, M. smegmatis strains were grown until an optical density at 600 nm of 0.4 to 0.6 was achieved, and cells were incubated on ice for 1.5 h. The cells were then collected by centrifugation, washed several times with ice-cold glycerol (10%, vol/vol), and finally were resuspended in a 1/500 volume of glycerol (10%). Cells (100 μl) were mixed with 1 μg of plasmid DNA. Electroporation was performed in 0.2-cm cuvettes with a single pulse (2.5 kV, 25 μF, 1,000 Ω) in a Bio-Rad gene pulser. Cells were immediately resuspended in 1 ml of brain heart infusion medium and incubated for 2 h with vigorous shaking at 37°C. Afterwards serial dilutions were plated. When appropriate, antibiotics or sucrose was added at the following concentrations: kanamycin, hygromycin, or clarithromycin, 50 μg/ml; gentamicin, 15 μg/ml; sucrose, 7.5% (wt/vol).
Mapping of streptomycin resistance-conferring mutations.
Spontaneous streptomycin-resistant mutants were generated by spreading 1 × 108 to 5 × 109 bacteria on brain heart infusion agar plates containing streptomycin at a concentration of 20 μg/ml; in parallel, dilutions of the bacterial suspension were plated on antibiotic-free medium. The frequency of resistance mutations was calculated by dividing the number of CFU on selective medium by the number of CFU on nonselective medium. An approximation of the mutational rate is given as the median of at least five independent experiments. MICs of streptomycin were determined by spreading mutants on agar plates containing 20, 100, and 200 μg of streptomycin/ml. Incubation time was between 3 and 5 days.
For nucleic acid extraction, a small loop of bacteria was dispersed in 100 μl of H2O and heated for 10 min at 80°C. After addition of glass beads (100-μm diameter; Sigma) a tissue disintegrator (H. Mickle) was used to disrupt the cells. Following centrifugation the supernatant was transferred to a fresh microcentrifuge tube, and 5 μl was used as template for amplification PCRs.
Primers #211 and #212 (15) (see Table 2) were used to amplify rpsL, and primers #285 and #261 were used for amplification of rrs. Sequencing of rpsL was performed with #211; sequencing of rrs was performed with primers #242, #259, #261, #264, and #285. Primer #11 in combination with primer #612 or #651 was used to confirm transformation with plasmid pHRM3-Gm. An ABI 373 sequencer was used for sequence determination.
RecA-mediated gene conversion.
To obtain strains which had undergone homologous recombination, clones obtained by transformation with vectors pMV361-H-rRNA523C/2058G, pMV361-H-rRNA524C/2058G, and pMV361-H-rRNA526T/2058G were grown in liquid broth, and serial dilutions were plated on LB agar containing streptomycin at a concentration of 20 μg/ml. The frequency of streptomycin-resistant recombinants was calculated by dividing the number of CFU obtained on agar plates containing streptomycin by the number of CFU obtained on nonselective medium.
Transformants were analyzed by manual DNA sequencing of the 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) PCR products (see above) using 32P-labeled dCTP, sequenase (U.S. Biochemicals), and primer #259 to investigate their genotype (homogeneous or heterogeneous).
RESULTS
Generation of strains.
The genome of M. smegmatis carries two rrn operons (rrnA and rrnB) and a single rpsL gene. Genetic engineering techniques were used to generate strains of M. smegmatis with different copy numbers of the main streptomycin target genes. The strains and plasmids used are shown in Table 1. prRNA::aph-sacB carries an inactivated rrnB operon from M. smegmatis, including the promoter region, the 5′ part of rrs, the 3′ part of rrl, and the entire rrf. An aph cassette cloned between the partially deleted rrs and rrl confers resistance to kanamycin; the inactivated rrn operon was cloned proximal to a sacB cassette. sacB facilitates the isolation of allelic replacement mutants, as it confers sensitivity towards sucrose in mycobacteria (30).
Following transformation with prRNA::aph-sacB, clones resistant to kanamycin and sucrose were characterized genetically. Investigation by PCR and Southern blot analysis (Fig. 1) demonstrated inactivation of the rrnB operon in two of seven strains analyzed (M. smegmatis rrnB strains 1432 and 1434).
FIG. 1.
Southern blot analysis (A) and schematic drawing (B) of the rrn loci. Lane 1, M. smegmatis mc2 155; lane 2, M. smegmatis mc2 155 rpsL3+; lane 3, M. smegmatis rrnB (#1432); lane 4, M. smegmatis rrnB (#1434). Approximately 200 ng of genomic DNA was digested to completion with SmaI and hybridized to a 5′ probe of the M. smegmatis 16S rRNA gene (16S rRNA positions 5 to 788). Hybridization was performed under stringent conditions. The lower band corresponds to the rrnA operon, and the upper band corresponds to the rrnB operon. A shift of the upper band indicates functional inactivation of the rrnB operon. wt, wild type; M, molecular size standards.
We next wanted to integrate additional rpsL+ alleles into the genome of M. smegmatis. Previous investigations have revealed that the integrative vector pMV361 is unstable under negative selective pressure and is frequently lost from the genome (43). To ensure that the introduced rpsL alleles are stably maintained, they were integrated into a specific chromosomal position using a targeting vector. Strains M. smegmatis rrnB 1432 and 1434 as well as the parental strain M. smegmatis mc2 155 (41) were transformed with plasmid pHRM3-Gm, a derivative of the suicide vector pHRM3, which targets pyrF (11). The coding region of pyrF is interrupted by a gentamicin resistance marker gene. Each side of the pyrF gene (5′ and 3′ regions) is flanked by a wild-type rpsL gene from Mycobacterium bovis BCG. Transformants were selected on uracil-free medium (to ensure a single crossover at the pyrF, thereby retaining a functional pyrF allele) in the presence of gentamicin. The presence of two additional M. bovis BCG rpsL wild-type genes in the transformants was confirmed by PCR analysis (data not shown). Southern blot analysis demonstrated that plasmid pHRM3-Gm had integrated at the genomic pyrF locus by homologous recombination (Fig. 2).
FIG. 2.
Southern blot analysis (A) and schematic drawing (B) of the pyrF locus. Lane 1, M. smegmatis mc2 155; lane 2, M. smegmatis rrnB; lane 3, M. smegmatis rpsL3+; lane 4, M. smegmatis rrnB rpsL3+; lane 5, streptomycin-resistant mutant (rrs524C) of M. smegmatis rrnB rpsL3+. M, molecular size standard. Approximately 200 ng of genomic DNA was digested to completion with MluI and hybridized to a 1-kb SacI fragment of the pyrF gene. Additional recognition sites are given for better orientation. Integration of vector pHRM3-Gm at the pyrF locus by a single crossover (sco) is indicated by a shift of the hybridizing fragment. wt, wild type.
After transformation, strains with the following genotypes were generated: (i) M. smegmatis rrnB (strain with a single functional rrn operon and a single rpsL+ gene), (ii) M. smegmatis rpsL3+ (rrn wild-type strain with three rpsL+ genes), and (iii) M. smegmatis rrnB rpsL3+ (single rrn allelic strain with three rpsL+ genes [Table 3]).
TABLE 3.
Frequency of streptomycin-resistant mutants of M. smegmatis strains carrying different numbers of functional rrn and rpsL genes
Strain | No. of rrn operons | No. of rpsL genes | Median mutation frequencya | Mutation frequency range |
---|---|---|---|---|
M. smegmatis mc2 155 (wild type) | 2 | 1 | 1.3 × 10−8 | 6.6 × 10−8–1.5 × 10−9 |
M. smegmatis rpsL3+ | 2 | 3 | <2 × 10−12 | |
M. smegmatis rrnB | 1 | 1 | 6.6 × 10−9 | 2.1 × 10−8–1.3 × 10−9 |
M. smegmatis rrnB rpsL3+ | 1 | 3 | 4.4 × 10−10 | 1.3 × 10−8–2.0 × 10−10 |
Median from at least five experiments.
Isolation of streptomycin-resistant mutants.
To select for streptomycin-resistant mutants, strains M. smegmatis mc2 155, M. smegmatis rrnB, M. smegmatis rpsL3+, and M. smegmatis rrnB rpsL3+ were plated on agar containing streptomycin at a concentration of 20 μg/ml. Mutants were readily obtained for strains containing either a single rpsL+ gene (M. smegmatis mc2 155, M. smegmatis rrnB) or a single functional rRNA operon (M. smegmatis rrnB rpsL3+). No streptomycin-resistant mutants could be isolated from M. smegmatis carrying two rrn operons and three rpsL genes (M. smegmatis rpsL3+). The mutation frequencies determined are given in Table 3.
Characterization of spontaneous streptomycin-resistant strains.
To locate the genetic alterations associated with streptomycin resistance, sequence analysis of rpsL and rrs genes was performed. Investigation of 20 streptomycin-resistant derivatives of M. smegmatis mc2 155 identified rpsL mutations in each of these mutants. Mutations were restricted to codons 42 and 87. Changes in codon 42 resulted in the replacement of Lys by Arg, Thr, Asn, or Met; changes in codon 87 resulted in the replacement of Lys by Glu or Arg. The streptomycin-resistant derivatives of the single rrn allelic strain M. smegmatis rrnB also revealed an altered rpsL sequence (four of four investigated; see Table 4). Sequence analysis of the single functional rrs gene in streptomycin-resistant derivatives of M. smegmatis rrnB rpsL3+ demonstrated alterations in the 530 loop region in all mutants (22 of 22 investigated; see Table 4) (Fig. 3). The frequency with which mutants appeared on the selection plate corresponds to the frequency of single point mutations in M. smegmatis rDNA (10−8 to 10−10 [37, 38]). The most frequent mutation (found in 12 out of 22 sequences) observed was a G→C transversion at position 524 (E. coli numbering). A mutation at this position previously has not been associated with resistance to streptomycin. The other prominent mutation was a 526 C→T transition (found in 7 out of 22 sequences). Two mutants exhibited a C→T transition at position 522, and a single resistant strain showed a 523A→C transversion. No mutations were found in rrs nucleotides directly interacting with streptomycin (e.g., G527, A913, and A914). However, the possibility that additional mutants, e.g., in the 912 region (15), might be isolated when screening a larger number of mutants cannot be excluded.
TABLE 4.
Streptomycin resistance-associated mutations
Mutated gene or nucleotide change |
M. smegmatis strain investigated (no. of altered sequences/total no. investigated)
|
||
---|---|---|---|
mc2 155 | rrnB | rrnB rpsL3+ | |
rpsL | 20/20 | 4/4 | 0/22 |
rrs | 0/20 | 0/4 | 22/22 |
522C→T | 2/22 | ||
523A→C | 1/22 | ||
524G→C | 12/22 | ||
526C→T | 7/22 |
FIG. 3.
Secondary structure of the 530 loop region. rrs mutations associated with streptomycin resistance and isolated in this study are indicated by an arrow. Nucleotides involved in tertiary structure interaction resulting in pseudoknots are shown in gray and are connected by dotted lines.
The MICs determined (Table 5) showed high levels of streptomycin resistance for rpsL mutant strains and for rrs mutation 524G→C (>200 μg/ml). rrs mutations 526C→T, 522 C→T, and 523 A→C conferred an intermediate level of resistance (100 μg/ml). Strains carrying the mutation rrs524G→C grew poorly in the absence of streptomycin; growth was restored in the presence of streptomycin, indicating that rrs524C confers a streptomycin-dependent phenotype.
TABLE 5.
Streptomycin MICs for rpsL and rrs mutant strains
Strain | MIC (μg/ml) |
---|---|
Parental strains | |
M. smegmatis mc2 155 | <20 |
M. smegmatis rpsL3+ | <20 |
M. smegmatis rrnB | <20 |
M. smegmatis rrnB rpsL3+ | <20 |
rpsL mutant strains | |
rpsL42Lys→Arg | >200 |
rpsL42Lys→Asn | >200 |
rpsL42Lys→Thr | >200 |
rpsL42Lys→Met | >200 |
rpsL88Lys→Glu | 200 |
rpsL88Lys→Arg | 200 |
rrs mutant strains | |
rrs524G→C | >200 |
rrs526C→T | 20–100 |
rrs522C→T | 20–100 |
rrs523A→C | 20–100 |
rrs mutant strains transformed with rrs wild-type gene | |
rrs524G→C::pMV361-H-rRNA2058G | <20 |
rrs526C→T::pMV361-H-rRNA2058G | <20 |
rrs523A→C::pMV361-H-rRNA2058G | <20 |
rrnB knockout strain transformed with different rrs allelesa | |
pMV361-H-rRNA2058bc | <20 |
pMV361-H-rRNA524C2058Gb | >200 |
pMV361-H-rRNA526T2058Gb | 20–100 |
pMV361-H-rRNA523C2058Gc | 20–100 |
Mutants were tested after selection on medium containing hygromycin (50 μg/ml) plus streptomycin (20 μg/ml).
Strain rrnB was transformed.
Strain rrnB rpsL3+ was transformed.
Introduction of sensitive and resistant rrs alleles into wild-type and mutant strains.
To demonstrate that the observed streptomycin-resistant phenotype in strains carrying rrs mutations maps to the small subunit rRNA and to exclude other unknown mutations, transformations with vector pMV361-H-rRNA2058G (38) were carried out in strains carrying mutations rrs523C, rrs524C, and rrs526T. pMV361 is a vector that integrates once into the mycobacterial genome at the attB site (45). pMV361-H-rRNA2058G contains a hygromycin resistance gene and the entire rrnB operon from M. smegmatis. An A→G transition at position 2058 in the 23S rRNA gene confers resistance to clarithromycin (resistant phenotype is dominant [38]), allowing phenotypic characterization of the plasmid-carried rRNA operon. Given that streptomycin resistance-conferring mutations are recessive in a merodiploid strain (18), we reasoned that transfection with a wild-type rrs allele should render the strains with a streptomycin resistance-conferring mutation in rrs sensitive to this drug. Following selection on hygromycin, the transformants were plated on streptomycin- or clarithromycin-containing agar. While transformants exhibited a clarithromycin-resistant phenotype, plating on streptomycin demonstrated that upon transformation with the rrn-2058G operon a streptomycin-sensitive phenotype was restored (see Table 5). These results indicate that the resistant phenotype maps to rrn.
RecA-mediated gene conversion (32) was used to experimentally verify that the 16S rRNA mutations observed confer a resistant phenotype and to exclude the possibility of compensatory mutations. Site-directed mutations were introduced into plasmid pMV361-H-rRNA2058G, resulting in plasmids pMV361-H-rRNA523C/2058G, pMV361-H-rRNA524C/2058G, and pMV361-H-rRNA526T/2058G. The plasmids were subsequently transformed into the single rrn allelic strain M. smegmatis rrnB. Following selection on hygromycin to ensure integration of the vector, the cells were plated on hygromycin plus streptomycin to select for RecA-mediated gene conversion of the mutant allele (32). Streptomycin-resistant transformants were obtained with a frequency of 10−5 to 10−6. This frequency is several orders of magnitude higher than the frequency of spontaneous resistance (10−8 to 10−10).
Using PCR-mediated sequence analysis, the 16S rRNA gene of streptomycin-resistant mutants was analyzed. In transformants grown in the presence of streptomycin, a homogeneous mutant genotype was observed at the mutated 16S rRNA position introduced, i.e., positions 523, 524, and 526 (Fig. 4). These transformants originate from RecA-mediated homologous recombination between the vector-derived rrn operon and the single functional chromosomal rrn operon resulting in gene conversion of the mutant allele.
FIG. 4.
16S rDNA sequence of the 530 loop region. The wild-type sequence of a single rRNA allelic strain (A) is shown along with the same region of transformants obtained with plasmids pMV361-H-rRNA523C/2058G (B), pMV361-H-rRNA524C/2058G (C), and pMV361-H-rRNA526T/2058G (D) after selection on streptomycin. The mutated nucleotide is indicated by an asterisk.
Physiological investigations demonstrated that streptomycin MIC levels for the strains with RecA-mediated homogeneous mutant rRNA alleles were identical to those for the spontaneous resistant mutants with the corresponding mutation (see Table 5). In particular, introduction of mutation rrs524C resulted in a streptomycin-dependent phenotype.
DISCUSSION
Ribosomal protein S12 (RpsL) and the small subunit rRNA are the main targets of streptomycin-mediated translational inhibition. By altering the number of genes expressing sensitive alleles in M. smegmatis, we have generated strains of eubacteria which allow a detailed investigation of the mechanisms underlying streptomycin resistance. Our results seem to be somewhat in contrast to those of a previous report, where mutations in rpsD of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium have been postulated to confer streptomycin resistance. However, it should be noted that these mutations were isolated by selecting for chromosomal alterations, which would compensate for streptomycin-dependent rpsL alleles, rather than by selecting for streptomycin resistance itself (6). Although we cannot exclude the theoretical possibility that some rare mutations outside rrs and rpsL may cause primary ribosomal resistance to streptomycin and were missed in our selection procedure, we consider this possibility highly unlikely, as (i) a low drug concentration (20 μg/ml) was used in the selection procedure, and (ii) no resistant mutants were isolated from M. smegmatis carrying two rrs genes and three rpsL genes. Our data are supported by recent structural analyses of the 30S ribosomal subunit demonstrating that the streptomycin binding site is composed of defined rrs nucleotides and stabilized by the RpsL protein (8).
These data suggest that strain M. smegmatis rrnB rpsL3+ can only become streptomycin resistant by mutations in a rRNA gene. We have isolated resistant strains covering a total of four different mutations. All streptomycin-resistant mutants isolated in these experiments show a single point mutation in a small region of the 16S rRNA.
The frequency of appearance of resistant rRNA mutants (10−10) falls within the mutation frequency of M. smegmatis, strongly suggesting that no second-site mutations (for example, in ribosomal protein genes) contributed to resistance. This conclusion was further corroborated by introducing the respective mutations into rrnB strains; the mutants were resistant to streptomycin. These experiments also effectively rule out the possibility of compensatory mutations.
Mutation rrs523A→C has been found previously to be associated with streptomycin resistance in Chlamydomonas chloroplasts (http://www.fandm.edu/departments/biology/databases /16SMDBexp.html); mutations rrs522C→T, 523A→C, and 526C→T have been observed to be associated with resistance to streptomycin in clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis (10, 22). However, with the exception of rrs523A→C (23), experimental proof for a cause-effect relationship was lacking. Structural analyses may offer a rationale for some resistance-conferring mutations (8), but prediction of resistance-conferring mutations is not exhaustive.
Previous investigations on the universally conserved pseudoknot structure within the 530 region and resistance-conferring 16S rRNA mutations were limited by a lack of selection-driven mutational resistance. With respect to the interaction between nucleotides 505-GGC-507 and 526-CCG-524, these studies demonstrated that (i) mutations that disrupt pairing between these bases are deleterious in E. coli, i.e., 505G-526A, 506A-525C, and 507C-524A; (ii) compensating changes restoring base pairing restored growth, i.e., 505U-526A, 506A-525U, and 507U-524A; and (iii) certain mild perturbations creating G/U wobble base pairs are compatible with 16S rRNA function and confer resistance to streptomycin, i.e., 506G-525U and 507U-524G (31). Although these landmark studies clearly established that mild perturbations within the pseudoknot structure can lead to streptomycin resistance, those mutations investigated, e.g., rrs507C→T and 525C→T, had to be chosen at will and bear little relationship to selection-derived mutations within this structure, i.e., 524G→C and 526C→T. The possibility of investigating selection-driven mutational alterations allows one to define and characterize those rRNA mutations which confer a resistant phenotype while simultaneously respecting the structural and functional confinements of the ribosome.
One of the most frequent mutations isolated in our work (rrs524G→C) so far has neither been investigated in genetically engineered mutants nor has it been observed in in vitro-selected mutants or in clinical isolates. The absence of rrs524C mutants in clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis most likely is due to its streptomycin-dependent phenotype. As demonstrated by genetic exchange experiments, the 524C mutation confers high-level streptomycin resistance. The 524G→C alteration is particularly interesting, as it dramatically weakens the proposed pseudoknot structure between bases 505-GGC-507 and 526-CCG-524. As discussed above, perturbations of this pseudoknot structure have been shown to severely impair growth, which could be restored partially by compensatory mutations of nucleotides involved in base pairing (31). These effects have been investigated in mutants with a 525C→T or 507C→T alteration, as these mutations allow wobble base pairing between the respective nucleotides, i.e., 505-GGC-507–526-CUG-524 and 505-GGU-507–526-CCG-524, respectively. While our data are in accordance with the view that creation of a G-U wobble base pair within the pseudoknot structure is compatible with rRNA function and confers resistance to streptomycin (as exemplified by the mutation 526C→T), either the isolation of mutation 524G→C questions the postulate of a strict base pairing requirement within the pseudoknot structure for ribosome function (31) or streptomycin induces a distortion that compensates for the perturbation of the base pairing within the pseudoknot.
Streptomycin is an antibiotic which causes misreading of the genetic code by stabilizing the ribosomal ambiguity state, a conformation in which the aminoacyl-tRNA binding site of the ribosome has high affinity even to noncognate tRNAs. Streptomycin resistance mutations in rpsL often lead to hyperaccurate but slower ribosomes. While a weak hyperaccuracy results in streptomycin resistance, a strong hyperaccuracy causes streptomycin dependence. Mutations causing streptomycin dependence have been found to map in rpsL but also in rrs (16). In mutant rrs524C the ribosome most likely is trapped in the restrictive state unless streptomycin suppresses this mutational effect (8).
The approach taken in this work, i.e., the generation of a nonpathogenic single rRNA allelic eubacterium carrying a multitude of stably integrated rpsL genes, allows selection of streptomycin resistance-conferring mutations in the 16S rRNA gene. E. coli is the model organism for eubacteria in general and for investigation of ribosome structure in particular. However, the establishment of additional model systems, such as the single rRNA allelic M. smegmatis, a gram-positive microorganism, will help to elucidate common principles in ribosome action and ribosome-drug interaction. In addition, gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria differ with respect to susceptibility to drugs targeting the bacterial ribosome, e.g., oxazolidinones (14). The availability of a suitable gram-positive microorganism will extend our possibilities to study structure-function relationships of rRNAs.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank C. K. Stover for plasmid pMV361, W. R. Jacobs for providing M. smegmatis mc2 155, B. Friedrich for providing plasmid pLO2, and T. Kieser for providing plasmid pIJ963.
This work was supported in part by grants from the Bundesministerium für Forschung und Technologie (Verbund Mykobakterielle Infektionen) and from the Commission of the European Community. T. Prammananan and Y. G. Kidan are supported by fellowships from the Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst.
REFERENCES
- 1.Alksne L E, Anthony R A, Liebman S W, Warner J R. An accuracy center in the ribosome conserved over 2 billion years. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:9538–9541. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.20.9538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Asai T, Zaporojets D, Squires C, Squires C L. An Escherichia coli strain with all chromosomal rRNA operons inactivated: complete exchange of rRNA genes between bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:1971–1976. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.5.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bakker E P. Aminoglycoside and amincyclitol antibiotics: hygromycin B is an atypical bactericidal compound that exerts effects on cells of Escherichia coli characteristic for bacteriostatic aminocylitols. J Gen Microbiol. 1992;138:563–569. doi: 10.1099/00221287-138-3-563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ban N, Nissen P, Hansen J, Moore P B, Steitz T A. The complete atomic structure of the large ribosomal subunit at 2.4 A resolution. Science. 2000;289:905–919. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5481.905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Birnboim H C, Doly J. A rapid procedure for screening recombinant plasmid DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979;7:1513–1523. doi: 10.1093/nar/7.6.1513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Björkmann J, Samuelson P, Andersson D I, Hughes D. Novel ribosomal mutations affecting translational accuracy, antibiotic resistance and virulence of Salmonella typhimurium. Mol Microbiol. 1999;31:53–58. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01142.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Böttger E C. Resistance to drugs targeting protein synthesis in mycobacteria. Trends Microbiol. 1994;2:416–421. doi: 10.1016/0966-842x(94)90622-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Carter A P, Clemons W M, Brodersen D E, Morgan-Warren R J, Wimberly B T, Ramakrishnan V. Functional insights from the structure of the 30S ribosomal subunit and its interaction with antibiotics. Nature. 2000;407:340–348. doi: 10.1038/35030019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.De Stasio E A, Moazed D, Noller H F, Dahlberg A E. Mutations in 16S ribosomal RNA disrupt antibiotic-RNA interactions. EMBO J. 1989;8:1213–1216. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03494.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Finken M, Kirschner P, Meier A, Böttger E C. Molecular basis of streptomycin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: alterations of the ribosomal protein S12 gene and point mutations within a functional 16S ribosomal RNA pseudoknot. Mol Microbiol. 1993;9:1239–1246. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01253.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Frischkorn K, Sander P, Scholz M, Teschner K, Prammananan T, Böttger E C. Investigation of mycobacterial recA function: protein introns in the RecA of pathogenic mycobacteria do not affect competency for homologous recombination. Mol Microbiol. 1998;29:1203–1214. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.01003.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Garvin R T, Biswas D K, Gorini L. The effects of streptomycin or dihydrostreptomycin binding to 16S RNA or to 30S ribosomal subunits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1974;71:3814–3818. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.10.3814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gutell R R, Larsen N, Woese C R. Lessons from an evolving rRNA: 16S and 23S rRNA structures from a comparative perspective. Microbiol Rev. 1994;58:10–26. doi: 10.1128/mr.58.1.10-26.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hamel J C, Stapert D, Moerman J K, Ford C W. Linezolid, critical characteristics. Infection. 2000;28:60–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Honoré N, Cole S T. Streptomycin resistance in mycobacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:238–242. doi: 10.1128/aac.38.2.238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Honoré N, Marchal G, Cole S T. Novel mutation in 16S rRNA associated with streptomycin dependence in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:769–770. doi: 10.1128/AAC.39.3.769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jacobs W R, Kalpana G V, Cirillio J D, Pascopella L, Snapper S B, Udani R A, Jones W, Barletta R G, Bloom B R. Genetic systems for mycobacteria. Methods Enzymol. 1991;204:537–555. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)04027-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lederberg J. Streptomycin resistance: a genetically recessive mutation. J Bacteriol. 1951;61:549–554. doi: 10.1128/jb.61.5.549-550.1951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lenz O, Schwartz E, Dernedde J, Eitinger M, Friedrich B. The Alcaligenes eutrophus H16 hoxX gene participates in hydrogenase regulation. J Bacteriol. 1994;176:4385–4393. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.14.4385-4393.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lodmell J S, Dahlberg A E. A conformational switch in Escherichia coli 16S ribosomal RNA during decoding of messenger RNA. Science. 1997;277:1262–1267. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5330.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mark L G, Sigmund C D, Morgan E A. Spectinomycin resistance due to a mutation in a rRNA operon of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1983;155:989–994. doi: 10.1128/jb.155.3.989-994.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Meier A, Sander P, Schaper K J, Scholz M, Böttger E C. Correlation of molecular resistance mechanisms and phenotypic resistance levels in streptomycin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:2452–2454. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.11.2452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Melancon P, Lemieux C, Brakier-Gingras L. A mutation in the 530 loop of Escherichia coli 16S ribosomal RNA causes resistance to streptomycin. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988;16:9631–9639. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.20.9631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mingeot-Leclercq M P, Glupczynski Y, Tulkens P M. Aminoglycosides: activity and resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43:727–737. doi: 10.1128/aac.43.4.727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Moazed D, Noller H F. Transfer RNA shields specific nucleotides in 16S ribosomal RNA from an attack by chemical probes. Cell. 1986;47:985–994. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90813-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Moazed D, Noller H F. Interaction of antibiotics with functional sites in 16S ribosomal RNA. Nature. 1987;327:389–394. doi: 10.1038/327389a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Musser J M. Antimicrobial agent resistance in mycobacteria: molecular genetic insights. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1995;8:496–514. doi: 10.1128/cmr.8.4.496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nissen P, Hansen J, Ban N, Moore P B, Steitz T A. The structural basis of ribosome activity in peptide bond synthesis. Science. 2000;289:920–930. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5481.920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Noller H F. Ribosomal RNA and translation. Annu Rev Biochem. 1991;60:191–227. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.60.070191.001203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Pelicic V, Reyrat J M, Gicquel B. Positive selection of allelic exchange mutants in Mycobacterium bovis BCG. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1996;144:161–166. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1996.tb08524.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Powers T, Noller H F. A functional pseudoknot in 16S ribosomal RNA. EMBO J. 1991;10:2203–2214. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07756.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Prammananan T, Sander P, Springer B, Böttger E C. RecA- mediated gene conversion and aminoglycoside resistance in strains heterozygous for rRNA. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43:447–453. doi: 10.1128/aac.43.3.447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Purohit P, Stern S. Interaction of a small RNA with antibiotic and RNA ligands of the 30S subunit. Nature. 1994;370:659–662. doi: 10.1038/370659a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Rice L B, Bonomo R A. Genetic and biochemical mechanisms of bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents. In: Lorian V, editor. Antibiotics in laboratory medicine. 4th ed. Baltimore, Md: Williams and Wilkins; 1996. pp. 453–501. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sambrook J, Fritsch E F, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1989. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sander P, Meier A, Böttger E C. rpsL, a dominant selectable marker for gene replacement in mycobacteria. Mol Microbiol. 1995;16:991–1000. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.tb02324.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Sander P, Prammananan T, Böttger E C. Introducing mutations into a chromosomal rRNA gene using a genetically modified eubacterial host with a single rRNA operon. Mol Microbiol. 1996;22:841–848. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1996.01532.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sander P, Prammananan T, Meier A, Frischkorn K, Böttger E C. The role of ribosomal RNAs in macrolide resistance. Mol Microbiol. 1997;26:469–480. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.5811946.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Schluenzen F, Tocilj A, Zarivach R, Harms J, Gluehman M, Janell D, Bashan A, Bartels H, Agmon I, Franceschi F, Yonath A. Structure of functionally activated small ribosomal subunit at 3.3 angstroms resolution. Cell. 2000;102:615–623. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00084-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sigmund C D, Morgan E A. Erythromycin resistance due to a mutation in a ribosomal RNA operon of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1982;79:5602–5606. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.18.5602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Snapper S B, Melton R E, Mustafa S, Kieser T, Jacobs W R. Isolation and characterization of efficient plasmid transformation mutants of Mycobacterium smegmatis. Mol Microbiol. 1990;4:1911–1919. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1990.tb02040.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Spickler C, Brunelle M N, Brakier-Gingras L. Streptomycin binds to the decoding center of 16S ribosomal RNA. J Mol Biol. 1997;273:586–599. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Springer B, Sander P, Sedlacek L, Ellrott K, Böttger E C. Instability and site-specific excision of integration-proficient mycobacteriophage L5 plasmids: development of stably maintained integrative vectors. Int J Med Microbiol. 2001;290:669–675. doi: 10.1016/S1438-4221(01)80004-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Stern S, Powers T, Changchien L M, Noller H F. Interaction of ribosomal protein S5: S6, S11, S12, S18 and S21 with 16S rRNA. J Mol Biol. 1988;201:683–695. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90467-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Stover C K, de la Cruz V F, Fuerst T R, Burlein J E, Benson L A, Bennett L T, Bansal G P, Young J F, Lee M H, Hatfull G F, Snapper S B, Barletta R G, Jacobs W R, Bloom B R. New use of BCG for recombinant vaccines. Nature. 1991;351:456–460. doi: 10.1038/351456a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Timms A R, Steingrimsdottir H, Lehmann A R, Bridges R A. Mutant sequences in the rpsL gene of Escherichia coli B/r: mechanistic implications for spontaneous and ultraviolet light mutagenesis. Mol Gen Genet. 1992;232:89–96. doi: 10.1007/BF00299141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Toivonen J M, Boocock M R, Jacobs H T. Modelling in Escherichia coli of mutations in mitoribosomal protein S12: novel mutant phenotypes of rpsL. Mol Microbiol. 1999;31:1735–1746. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01307.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wimberly B T, Brodersen D E, Clemons W M, Morgan-Warren R J, Carter A P, Vonrhein C, Hartsch T, Ramakrishnan V. Structure of the 30S ribosomal subunit. Nature. 2000;407:327–339. doi: 10.1038/35030006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Wittmann H G, Apirion D. Analysis of ribosomal proteins in streptomycin resistant and dependent mutants isolated from streptomycin independent Escherichia coli strains. Mol Gen Genet. 1975;141:331–341. doi: 10.1007/BF00331454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Xiong L, Shah S, Mauvais P, Mankin A S. A ketolide resistance mutation in domain II of 23S rRNA reveals the proximity of hairpin 35 to the peptidyl transferase centre. Mol Microbiol. 1999;31:633–639. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01203.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]