Abstract
The relationships between hyaluronic acid (HA) and pathological microorganisms incite new understandings on microbial infection, tissue penetration, disease progression and lastly, potential treatments. These understandings are important for the advancement of next generation antimicrobial therapeutical strategies for the control of healthcare-associated infections. Herein, this review will focus on the interplay between HA, bacteria, fungi, and viruses. This review will also comprehensively detail and discuss the antimicrobial activity displayed by various HA molecular weights for a variety of biomedical and pharmaceutical applications, including microbiology, pharmaceutics, and tissue engineering.
Keywords: Hyaluronic acid, Hyaluronidase, Virulence, Antibacterial, Antifungal, Antiviral
Graphical abstract
Highlights
-
•
Latest antimicrobial therapeutical approaches involving HA.
-
•
The role of HA structure in antimicrobial activity.
-
•
Relationship between microorganisms and HA metabolism.
-
•
Emerging HA based antibiotic, antimycotic and antiviral delivery systems.
1. Introduction
Polysaccharides are one of the major classes of biopolymers being exploited in the development of novel therapeutics in pharmaceutical and biomedical fields [1]. Biofilm-related infections and contamination of materials are major problems encountered specifically in the biomedical field [2]. Recent studies indicate that bacterial contamination in open wounds may adversely affect the formation of bone and newly formed connective tissue. Certainly, less bacterial burden in wound site improves clinical outcomes in regenerative therapy. A variety of polysaccharides, such as chitosan, and their derivatives have been explored for antimicrobial applications [3]. HA is a non-sulphated glycosaminoglycan (GAG) that is an essential component of the extracellular and pericellular matrixes of all tissues in the body. However, HA occurrence in various human tissues may differ in concentration and molecular size. For example, navel cords contain 4.10 mg/mL of HA, joint synovial fluid contains 1.50–3.60 mg/mL of HA, vitreous humour contains 0.14–0.34 mg/g of HA, and the dermis and epidermis contain 0.20–0.50 and 0.10 mg/g of HA, respectively. For instance, the synovial fluid contains HA with molecular weight around 6500 kDa [4]. HA is a natural biopolymer of increasing importance in the fields of biomedical engineering, pharmaceutical science and medicine [5]. Its physiochemical properties are ideally suited for emerging bioengineering advances concerned with all aspects of bodily reconstruction and tissue regeneration [6,7]. The HA structure contains alternating repeat units of β-1,4-d-glucuronicacid-β-1,3-N-acetyl-d-glucosamine. HA is the only GAG that is biosynthesized at the cell membrane and not linked to proteoglycans [8]. It is known to bind to its own synthases and to RHAMM and CD44 cell surface receptors [9], so it is critical to cell function responses [10]. The molecular size of HA is proportional to the activity of its synthesizing and degrading enzymes. Three isoforms of hyaluronan synthase (HAS) namely HAS-1, 2 and 3 exist in mammals and they produce HA of different sizes [11]. HA degradation in vivo begins on its linkage to HA receptors for endocytosis on the cell membrane [12]. It degrades quickly in the presence of hyaluronidases (HYAL) to shorter polymer chains that have size-dependent properties and functions [13]. Hyaluronidase-1 (HYAL-1), located in the lysosome, utilizes HA with any size as substrate to generate tetrasaccharides. While HYAL-2, located in the plasma membrane, breaks down HA to lower molecular weights of ∼20 kDa [14].
The biological effects of HA depend heavily on molecular weight. HA with ultra-low molecular weights (0.4–4.0 kDa) acts as an inducer of heat shock proteins and has a non-apoptotic property. HA with super low molecular weights (below 60 kDa) and low molecular weights (60–200 kDa) possess immunostimulatory, angiogenic, and phlogotic activities. HA with a medium molecular weight of 200–500 kDa takes part in biological processes such as embryonic development, wound healing, and ovulation. By contrast, high molecular weight hyaluronic acid (>500 kDa) has anti-angiogenic activity, and can function as a space filler and a natural immunologic depressant [4]. HMW HA shows to inhibit neutrophil aggregation in a dose-dependent manner [15]. Which demonstrates that processes such as inflammation and wound healing could be modulated with the application of HA of different MW sizes for the development of biomedical engineering constructs [16,17]. However, many types of chemical modification are utilized to ensure HA integrity in vivo [18]. HA carboxylic acid groups are modified by for example by ester formation; while hydroxyl groups can be modified by for example utilizing glutaraldehyde [19]. HA derivatives often crosslinked using physical or covalent crosslinks [20]. Crosslinking strategies form 3 dimensional polymeric networks capable of storing water known as hydrogels. These gels have similar properties to biological tissues, and are inherently biocompatible [21]. HA has been reviewed recently with emphasis on chemistry [19,22], medicine [23], membranes for healing [24], reconstruction of tissues [21], delivery of pharmaceuticals [25], transplantation [26] and immune response modulation [27], but, to date, no review has been published on the emerging potential of HA as an antimicrobial biomaterial. Therefore, this review focuses on the relationship between HA and the three different classes of microbes (bacteria, fungi, and viruses), as well the intrinsic antimicrobial activity that exogenous HA may pose to combat microbial infections and improve wound healing for biomedical applications. This study acknowledges that the antimicrobial mechanisms presented on this review are only hypothetical, as there has never been any report in the literature that studied the precise antimicrobial mechanisms of action exerted by HA. With this review, we highlight and express the need to develop more research targeting to unveil the biomolecular mechanisms associated with the antimicrobial activity of HA.
2. The intrinsic relationship between microorganisms and HA metabolism
The growing demand for the commercial production of HA has shifted its production from animal to microbiological sources. HA was first isolated from streptococci A and C back in 1937 [28], and remains to this date the most cost sensitive and the best source for scaled production of HA. Furthermore, in the same matter, the commercial production of HA lyases has been shifting from animal sources such as from bovine testes to microbiological sources including Bacillus sp. and Streptomyces roseofulvus S10 [[29], [30], [31]].
The ability of many strains of bacteria (Streptococcus pneumoniae, Bacillus anthracis, and Haemophilus influenzae) and yeast (Cryptococcus neoformans) to produce HA is associated with an elevated pathogenic virulence factor [32]. Moreover, viruses such as Paranecium bursaria Chlorella virus (PBCV-1) have also been discovered to present the HAS gene and to direct its host to produce HA in early infection [33,34].
The strains of bacteria that produce HA, incorporate the newly synthesized HA to the bacterial mucoid capsule, which confers to the bacteria resistance to opsonization, immune camouflage and protection against the host immune system [35,36]. Kass and Seastone have demonstrated that when group A and C streptococci have their mucoid capsule degraded by hyaluronidases, they decreased their infectiousness in mice, as their susceptibility to phagocytosis by leukocytes increase [37]. Other studies have confirmed the association between HA capsule production and virulence by deletion or mutation of the bacterial chromosome. Wessels et al. have shown that an acapsular mutant strain derived from mucoid bacteria was relatively increased sensitivity to phagocytosis and less virulent in mice than their wild strain [38]. Whereas the transfection of a mucoid plasmid into an acapsular strain was able to promote the production of HA and render the microorganism resistant to phagocytic killing [39].
It is also believed that the HA produced by mucoid bacteria can also serve as an adhesion contact point for host cells via linkages with HA-binding proteins [35]. Attachment of the bacteria to the host tissue shows a remarkable invasive infection capacity not observed with acapsular bacteria [40].
Microorganisms, such as bacteria, fungi and bacteriophages, are also able to produce HA degrading enzymes, generally called HA lyases to differ from hyaluronidases produced by vertebrates [41]. Some pathogenic Gram-positive bacteria produce membrane-bound HA lyases shown as a virulence factor in a variety of infection models, which is due to its role in facilitating local spread of infection [42]. For example, Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) produces HA lyases encoded in the hysA gene. When hysA positive and a mutant type hysA negative S. aureus were cultured in catheters prior to implantation in a murine model, the hysA positive bacteria were more invasive and increased lesion distribution and severity in comparison to hysA negative bacteria [43]. Group A streptococcus relies on the HA capsule to avoid phagocytosis by the innate immune system and to interact with epithelial cells, paradoxically, these bacteria also produce HA lyases. It is often assumed that HA lyases breakdown similar HA chains in human tissue in an effort to promote bacterial spread [44]. Van de Rijn et al. has demonstrated that streptococcal strains (A and C) at the stationary phase were able to degrade HA irrespective of their ability to produce HA [45].
The microbial ability to secrete HA lyases, highly associated with virulence, is also believed to be involved in the bacteriostatic mechanism of action shown by exogenous HA. In session 3.4, a further discussion of this mechanism of action will be presented. Briefly, it is hypothesized that in HA-enriched substrates, the microbial HA lyases become saturated, leading to a decrease in microbial proliferation and tissue penetration.
Other microorganisms including Paracoccidioides brasiliensis, Candida albicans, C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis, C. guilliermondii, C. krusei and Malassezia pachydermatis are also shown to produce HA lyases [[46], [47], [48]]. Bacteriophage viruses, such as virulent phage A25 and Saphexavirus (vB_EfaS_TV16) are shown to present gene encoding HA lyase enzymes, which help with phage burst in mucoid bacteria [49,50]. This characteristic shown by bacteriophages is particularly interesting for phage therapy, a method to treat bacterial infections resistant to antibiotics [50].
Recently, oncolytic viruses have been employed in the aid to treat cancer (Fig. 1). For example, adenovirus expressing hyaluronidase (ICOVIR17) is known to mediate HA degradation in local glioblastoma, which enhanced viral spread throughout the tumour and resulted in significant tumour suppression and mice survival [51,52]. Also employed in the treatment of cancer, bacteria expressing hyaluronidase, such as Salmonella typhimurium, were capable of degrading HA deposited within pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma tumours [53].
Fig. 1.
Oncolytic virotherapy. A) Oncolytic adenovirus (ICOVIR15) and oncolytic adenovirus expressing the promoter PH20 for hyaluronidase (ICOVIR17). Reproduced with Open Access permission from Ref. [52]. B) Kaplan–Meier survival curves of treated mice. P1 represents P value with PBS-treated group as reference and p2 represents P value with ICOVIR15 group as reference. C) Quantification of adenovirus staining. D) HA staining of brain with ICOVIR15 or ICOVIR17 treated groups. E) Quantification of HA levels. Bars, +SE (n = 5) and *P < 0.05 ICOVIR15 and ICOVIR17 versus PBS control; P = 0.15 ICOVIR17 versus ICOVIR15 at day 24 (student t-test, two-sided). Bar = 50 μm. Reproduced with permission from Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license from Ref. [51].
3. Antibiotic activity of HA
3.1. Gram-positive bacteria
S. aureus are non-motile, Gram-positive, non-spore forming facultative anaerobic cocci bacteria. With a diameter circa 1 μm they grow via aerobic respiration from room temperature to 45 °C [54]. They are often located in mucous membranes and skin without symptoms [55]. They are usually transmitted by contaminated surfaces, direct contact to predisposed humans and air borne. They are known to spread quickly in clinical settings, such as surgical wards [56].
S. aureus are often located on wound surfaces specifically chronic wounds [57]. Wound healing process during remodelling produces conditions which can often promote growth of S. aureus [58]. These opportunistic pathogens are involved in a number of life-threatening infectious diseases. For example, they commonly are g the source of staphylococcal infections and initiate diseases such as osteomyelitis and food poisoning [59,60].
In surgical settings, S. aureus are a major reason for chronic biofilm formation which impacts cardiology and orthopaedics amongst other procedures. S. aureus infections are associated with implantable devices, such as in catheters, central blood lines, mechanical ventilation, prostheses, etc [61]. Treatment often consists of long antibiotics administration and in some cases additional surgeries, for the removal of infection causing device surfaces for example [43].
Amongst various polymers tested for antibacterial coatings, HA and its derivates may offer a solution and long-term safety with a known ability to retard bacterial adhesion and the formation of biofilm [62]. HA has recently been investigated to assess its bacteriostatic properties and it shows dose-dependent effects on different microorganisms. The bacteriostatic activity of crosslinked HA films has shown to be higher in HMW than in LMW films [63]. HA coatings on titanium are decreased the density of S. aureus and adhesion, revealing the potential for application of HA-based coatings in osteosynthesis, orthopedics and dental surgery [64].
HA of varying MW and concentrations interacts with bacteria and trigger differing growth profiles. Three HA MW (low = 0.14 MDa, medium = 0.76 MDa and high = 1.3 MDa) were tested on S. aureus ATCC 9996, Streptococcus mutans ATCC 10449, and Propionibacterium acnes, with each showing reductions in proliferation in media containing HA. Moreover, the medium-sized MW showed the highest bacterial growth inhibition [65]. Regardless of HA MW and concentration, no bactericidal effects were detected.
Collagen, hydroxyapatite (HAp), PLGA and HYAFF-11™, a benzyl-ester LMW (0.2 MDa) HA derivate produced by Fidia Advanced Biopolymers, have been tested against S. aureus (ATCC 25923), S. epidermidis (ATCC 12228), β-haemolytic Streptococcus (ATCC 19615) cultures [66]. The results showed that HA significantly suppressed the growth rate of bacteria in comparison with the other biomaterials. (Fig. 2A). This was related to the saturation of the bacterial hyaluronidase by excessive HA, preventing the bacteria from maintaining tissue permeability [67].
Fig. 2.
(A) Growth curves of different bacteria in the presence of various biomaterials. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [67]. Hyaluronic acid demonstrated statistically significant bacteriostatic effect against S. aureus, S. epidermidis, Streptococcus β-haemolytic apart from P. auruginosa. (B) Evaluation of HMW HA effects on wound healing and wound contamination against saline treatment. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [70].
Hyaloss is a benzyl alcohol esterification of hyaluronic acid. At higher percentages of esterification, HA becomes insoluble in water. These HA esters can be extruded to produce membranes and fibres, lyophilized to obtain sponges, or processed by spray-drying, extraction, and evaporation to produce microspheres. The degree of esterification influences the size of hydrophobic patches, which produces a polymer chain network that are rigid and less susceptible to enzymatic degradation. These materials show a bacteriostatic effect in the treatment of periodontal defects [68].
Study in vivo with Hyruan Plus®, a linear HMW HA (3 MDa) produced by LG life sciences (Iksan/South Korea) [65], was placed in surgical wounds inoculated with S. aureus (SC 2406). As observed, the HA increased wound healing through its bacteriostatic properties, as shown in Fig. 2B [69,70]. In this study, the animal treated with HA had their wounds healed faster (wound area 26.54% ± 6.12%) and showed less purulence (bacterial count 4.69 ± 0.45 logCFU/mL) in comparison with the control group (wound area 50.59% ± 5.50% and bacterial count 5.31 ± 0.27 logCFU/mL).
Seprafilm ® (Genzyme Corporation, Japan) is a gel made of HMW HA and carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) at a 2:1 ratio by weight [71]. For these materials, as the concentration of HA in S. aureus ATCC 27217 cultures increased, the optical density (OD) of the bacteria medium decreased. Thereby demonstrating the bacteriostatic properties of HA against this bacterial strain [72]. Other antimicrobial studies using Gram-positive bacteria from the streptococcus and enterococcus species showed that HMW HA (1.8 MDa) against Streptococcus mutans ATCC 25175, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 and Enterococcus hirae ATCC 10541 also possesses dose-dependent bacteriostatic effects [73]. A porous tissue engineering scaffold produced from HA (125 kDa) decreased the colony formation units (CFU) from 1 × 107 (control) to 1.1 × 103 (HA) of S. aureus ATCC 6538 [74].
In orthodontics, bacteria proliferation and biofilm formation are the main cause of gingivitis, plaque formation, and periodontitis, which can lead to tooth loss [75]. This can be interrupted with tooth brushing and mouthwash application. For example, Gengigel ® is a mouthwash containing 0.2% of HA with reported antimicrobial activity against S. aureus and S. mitis [76] and Streptococcus constellatus [77].
Colonization of S. aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae in the airways is responsible for respiratory tract infections (RTI). A pharmaceutical solution of HMW HA (1 MDa) Yabro ® (IBSA, Lugano, Switzerland) has been developed to treat the main symptoms of emphysema and asthma [78]. Two different concentrations (0.15 and 0.3% v/v) of Yabro ® have been tested for antimicrobial activity against S. aureus and S. pneumoniae. HA was found to reduce 56% of biofilm formation [79].
In ophthalmological applications, HA is used in eye drop solutions to increase the solution viscosity for lubrication purposes [80]. Moreover, HA is also used in the fabrication of contact lenses as a wetting or comfort agent [81]. Both ophthalmological products are known to suffer from microbial contamination [82]. The contamination of eye drops and contact lenses pose risks to the patients using them, as they can transfer the bacteria to the eye and leading to the development of corneal infections, such as bacterial keratitis [83]. In bacterial keratitis the most common infections are associated with Gram positive bacteria, such as Staphylococci [84]. In contact lenses, specifically, bacterial populations develop into biofilms, which provide protection against higher dosages of antibacterial drugs in contrast to their free-floating planktonic forms [82].
3.2. Gram-negative bacteria
Escherichia coli (E. coli) is a popular organism for the study of the basic mechanisms of molecular genetics. E. coli is Gram-negative bacillus, with 1 μm in length and 0.35 μm in width, but this depends on strain type and growth conditions. It may contain whip-like flagella for movement, or hair-like pili for the attachment to surfaces [85].
Seprafilm® shows bacteriostatic effect against E. coli ATCC 25922 in a concentration-dependent manner [72]. A porous tissue engineering scaffold produced from HA (125 kDa) has bacteriostatic effects by decreasing the colony formation units (CFU) of E. coli (ATCC 11229) from 3.9 × 107 (control) to 50 (with HA) [74]. This result was confirmed elsewhere for HMW HA (1 MDa) [86,87].
Porphyromonas gengivalis (ATCC 33277), Prevotella oris (ATCC 33573), and Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans Y4 have been tested against three HA MWs (0.14, 0.76, and 1.3 MDa). Each bacteria displayed distinct growth inhibition indexes, where A. actino showed higher growth inhibition in comparison to P. oris and P. gingivalis, respectively [65]. HA (HYAFF-11™) significantly supresses the growth rate of Pseudomonas aeruginosas (ATCC 27853), when compared to collagen, HAp, and PLGA [67]. Hyabest® (S) LF-P shows antibacterial activity against Proteus mirabilis (ATCC 35508) [88]. While Gengigel ®, displayed bacteriostatic effects when evaluated against E. coli, and other microorganisms found in dental plaque, such as Fusobacterium nucleatum and Eikenella corrodens [77].
Urinary tract infections (UTI) are associated with uropathogenic E. coli. Antibiotics can provide symptomatic relief; however, they do not prevent recurrence. In this situation, clinical evidence suggests intravesical HA therapy helps reduce UTI [89]. HMW HA (1.5–1.8 MDa) reduces bacterial adherence and urothelial disruption by uropathogenic E. coli (strain TPA493J) [90].
In respiratory tract infections (RTI), administration of HA into the airways reduces occurrence. Two different concentrations (0.15 and 0.3% v/v) of HMW Yabro ® have been tested for antimicrobial activity against Moraxella catarrhalis and Haemophilus influezae. HA was found to reduce up to 30% of biofilm formation from these two bacteria species [79].
3.3. Mycobacteria
Mycobacteria invade the lungs through the interaction with GAG, such as HA. Three strains of mycobacteria (M. tuberculosis H37Rv, M. smegmatis mc2155, and M. avium type 4) were used to determine the influence of HA on infection and disease. Interestingly, HA promotes mycobacteria invasion and proliferation [91].
HA has been widely utilized to encapsulate drugs, including antibiotics. Aminoglycoside antibiotics (such as streptomycin) are highly hydrophilic. The hydrophilicity of this drug poses pharmacological challenges, particularly in the treatment of intracellular bacterial infections, such as those from mycobacteria. Due to its high hydrophilicity, it has poor penetration within the eukaryotic cell membranes, often high doses of antibiotic still display subtherapeutic concentration inside the cell [92]. It was speculated that HA could be an antibiotic carrier for the treatment of intracellular bacterial infections. Antibiotics conjugated to HA can be phagocytised by infected eukaryotic cells through a CD44-mediated pathway [93].
3.4. Bacteriostatic mechanism of action from HA
3.4.1. Bacteria expressing HA lyases
Although bacteria show different susceptibility to HA, it is of interest to understand the exact mechanism involved in the antimicrobial activity of HA. The expression of bacterial exoenzymes has also been correlated to their virulence. HA lyase is shown to be a pathogenic bacterial spreading factor that catalyses the degradation of HA through an enzymatic β-elimination process [94]. Because HA is an important constituent of the extracellular matrix (ECM), its bacterial degradation may contribute to bacterial spread via increased tissue permeability, causing wound infection, respiratory disease, and sepsis [67].
However, some studies have shown that the bacteriostatic effect of soluble HA in vitro may be attributed to the saturation of the bacterial hyaluronidase by excess of HA in the medium [67]. Thus, slowing their proliferation profiles (Fig. 3i). Some studies in the treatment of wounds speculate that the lower proliferation rate of bacteria in vivo in the presence of excess HA is due to the bacterial lyase being unable to break down HA efficiently (Fig. 3.ii), which prevents the bacteria from maintaining the elevated levels of permeability in tissue [70]. This leads to the inability of bacteria to attach and form biofilms in the wound area (antiadherent/antiadhesive substrate), inhibiting bacteria colonization [79,95]. In turn, the LMW fragments of HA generated by bacterial lyases, further instigate the ability of the host's immune system to remove pathogens [96]. For instance, it is well known that LMW HA fragments activate toll-like receptors for the stimulation of leukocyte recruitment and adhesion to the injured site [97,98]. These LMW HA fragments enhance neutrophil aggregation and macrophage activation [15], which are two of the most important immune cells associated with the combat of bacterial infections [99,100].
Fig. 3.
Proposed antimicrobial mechanisms of HA shown in the literature. i) The direct bacteriostatic mechanism of action of HA shown in in vitro studies is believed to be due to bacteria hyaluronidase saturation by excess HA, making the bacteria unable to efficiently breakdown HA and decreasing bacteria proliferation rate. ii) In sutdies in vivo, the antimicrobial mechanism of HA is hyphothesized to be indirect: A) bacterial lyase breaks down HA, making bacteria unable to attach to the substrate (antiadherent/antiadhesive substrate), which inhibit bacteria colonization. B) In turn, the LMW fragments of HA are released. C) These LMW fragments recruit innate immune cells, such as neutrophils, to the infection site. D) Neutrophils are able to obliterate bacteria. iii) Anti-biofouling properties of HA based on hydrophylicity and net negative charge that repels positive charged cell wall from bacteria.
3.4.2. Bacteria unable to express HA lyases
The above-mentioned antibacterial mechanisms of action of HA are related to bacteria that can synthesize HA lyases. However, as shown previously, bacteria which cannot synthesize HA lyases are also unable to proliferate in HA coatings. To explain this phenomenon, The anti-biofouling property of HA which is attributed to the chemical and physical characteristics of HA molecule may contribute to the lower rates of contamination, colonization, and biofilm formation in HA substrates (Fig. 3iii).
Many polymers have shown to possess anti-biofouling properties, such as low-attachment hydrophobic materials, hydrophilic polymers, and zwitterionic materials [101]. HA is composed of alternating units of glucuronic acid β(1–3) and N-acetylglucosamine β(1–4), which possess abundant amide (CO–NH) and carboxyl (COOH) groups. These groups provide a net negative charge and hydrogen-bond donors/acceptors improving surface hydration [102]. HA's negative net charge can induce steric repulsion of the bacteria cell wall (also negatively charged), thus improving its antifouling performance against bio contaminants in comparison to other hydrophilic biopolymers, such as chitosan (a cationic hydrophilic polymer) [103]. For example, HMW HA/dopamine conjugates exhibited non-fouling properties in various biomaterials commonly used as implantable substrates (i.e., polyimide, gold, poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), polytetrafluoroethylene, and polyurethane [104,105]. In another study, LMW HA was modified using bisphosphonic acid derivatives. These derivates were developed as coatings for titanium Grade 4 used in implants. Non-modified HA was able to reduce the colonization of S. aureus P 209 and E. faecium Ef79OSA, and modified HA significantly decreased bacterial colonization of S. aureus and E. faecium and P. aeruginosa ATCC 27,853 [106]. Moreover, the development of coatings based on polyelectrolyte multilayers consisting of HA and chitosan have been extensively studied for biomedical applications and suppression of bacterial and protein attachment on implantable devices such as intraocular lenses, stents and catheters) to reduce implant-related infections [107].
3.5. HA derivates for antibiotic delivery applications
HA has been widely used to encapsulate a wide range of drugs, including antibiotics. In this section, the latest studies utilizing HA derivates as vehicles for antibiotic drugs are reviewed, as shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
Summary of HA loaded or conjugated to antibiotic agents.
| HA MW | Processing | Antibacterial agent | Bacteria type | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.2 MDa | HA-cholesterol nanohydrogels (NHs) | Levofloxacin (LVF) | P. aeruginosa (PAO1), methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA - ATCC 6538P) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA - USA300-0114) | LVF-NHs removes bacterial infections [109] |
| 0.25 MDa | Deacetylation | Streptomycin | S. aureus and Listeria monocytogenes | LVF-NHs eradicated bacteria in intracellular infections Conjugation of streptomycin to HA decreased bacterial burden in vivo with no nephrotoxicity [93] |
| 0.12–0.15 MDa | Collagen (COL)-conjugated | Tobramycin or ciprofloxacin | P. aeruginosa (ATCC 9027) | Antibiotic-loaded collagen-HA matrix for a skin substitute was found to inhibit bacteria growth [110] |
| Not shown | Chemical conjugation and physical absorption | Ciprofloxacin or vancomycin | P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, and B. subtilis | HA microgel loaded with antibiotics showed long lasting antibiotic release, while preventing bacterial infections with no toxicity to corneal endothelium [111] |
| 0.35 MDa | HA and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) blend | Ciprofloxacin | S. aureus, E. coli and P. aeruginosa | Multi-layered films showed biocompatibility, antibacterial activity, and resorbed in vivo [112] |
| 0.17 MDa | Polyelectrolyte complexes (PECs) | Gentamicin | Not shown | HA derivative PECs can modulate the availability of the gentamycin by increasing the half‐life and extending the release time of the antibiotic [113] |
| 1.8 × 106 g/mol | HA/COL/chitosan (CHI) blend | Gentamicin | S. aureus (ATCC6538), E. coli (ATCC8739) and P. aeruginosa (ATCC15442) | Films based on natural polymers enriched in gentamicin sulphate inhibit the growth of Gram negative and positive bacteria [114] |
| Not shown | COL/HA polyelectrolyte multilayers (PEMs) | LL-37 peptide | E. coli (DH10B strain) | The LL-37-modfied PEMs prevented bacterial adhesion, killed bacteria in broth and neutralized an E. coli culture [115] |
| Not shown | Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-grafted HA | Chlorhexidine, gentamicin, rifampicin, and vancomycin | S. aureus (ATCC 25923), MRSA (ATCC 43300), S. epidermidis (ATCC 35984), and E coli (ATCC 25922) | HApN can be loaded with antiseptic or antibiotics, which prevents the growth of multiple bacteria (prophylactic effect) [116] |
| 0.0095 MDa | Oleylamine (OLA)-HA conjugates | Vancomycin | S. aureus (ATCC 25923) and MRSA (ATCC 700699) | HA-OLA conjugates self-assembled into polymersomes entrapping Vancomycin and showed enhanced anti-MRSA activity compared to free drug [117] |
| Not shown | HA-Graphene oxide composite | Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) | S. aureus | HA-Graphene Oxide Composites loaded with AgNPs showed excellent antibacterial activity against S. aureus [118] |
| Not shown | HA-CHI blend | AgNPs | E. coli (ATCC 25922), S. aureus (ATCC 35556), MRSA (ATCC, p1030, p1077), P. Aeruginosa (strain 01847) and Klebsiella pneumonia | Chitosan–HA/AgNPs composite sponges showed potent antimicrobial property against the tested microorganisms [119] |
| 1.3 MDa | HA/polycaprolactone (PCL) nanofibrous membranes (NFMs) | AgNPs | S. aureus (BCRC 10451) and E. coli (BCRC 11634) | The release of Ag from HA/PCL + Ag NFMs plateaued after 4 days, which confirmed the short-term anti-bacterial effect [120] |
| 0.2 MDa | HA/CHI | Vancomycin | MRSA | vancomycin-loaded CC/AHA injectable hydrogels showed pH-dependent vancomycin delivery [121] |
| 0.6–1.1 MDa | Electrosprayed films | Cefoxitin (Cef) | Klebsiella pneumoniae (Xen39), S. aureus (Xen 36), and Listeria monocytogenes (EDGe) | Nanofiber scaffolds of HA containing Cef may be used in dressings to control postoperative infections [122] |
| 0.2 MDa | HA/COL/Alginate matrix | AMP tet213 peptide | E. coli (ATCC25922), MRSA (ATCC33592), and S. aureus (ATCC6538) | AMP-loaded wound dressing released AMP in a sustainable manner, exhibiting antimicrobial activity against different bacterial strains [123] |
| Not shown | HA/Aloe vera NP | Doxycycline | E. coli and S. aureus | Nanocarriers affected both bacteria [124] |
| 0.05 MDa | Octenyl succinic anhydride (OSA)-modified HA | DJK-5 peptide | P. aeruginosa (LESB58) | Upon subcutaneous administration, the toxicity of the DJK-5 in nanogels was decreased four-fold compared to non-formulated peptide [125] |
| 0.7–1.0 MDa | HA/CHI PEMs | Triclosan (TRI) and rifampicin (RIF) | E. coli (ATCC 11229) | PEMs-loaded TRI and RIF showed good antimicrobial coating for PET devices [87] |
| Not shown | 11-amino-1-undecanethiol (AT)-conjugated HA nanogel | LLKK18 peptide | Mycobacterium avium (ATCC 2447 and 25291) and M. tuberculosis H37Rv | Intra-tracheal administration of peptide-loaded nanogels significantly reduced infection levels in mice [126] |
| 0.6–1.1 MDa | Polyethylene oxide (PEO)-HA nanofibers | Kanamycin | Listeria monocytogenes (EDGe) and P. aeruginosa (PA01) | The kanamycin-PEO-HA nanofibers inhibited bacterial growth, suggesting its use to coat prosthetic implants to prevent secondary infections [127] |
| 2 MDa | Eggshell membrane composite | KR-12 peptide | S. aureus (ATCC 25923), MRSA (ATCC 43300) and E. coli (ATCC 25922) | In vitro results revealed that the composite membrane had excellent antibacterial activity against all bacteria tested and it could prevent MRSA biofilm formation on its surface [128] |
| 420 000 g/mol | Cateslytin | Micrococcus luteus (A270) and S. aureus (ATCC25923) | HA‐CTL‐C/CHI films fully inhibit the development of S. aureus which is a common and virulent pathogen encountered in care‐associated diseases [129] | |
| Not shown | Green tea (GT) | E. coli (KCTC1041), Salmonella typhimurium (KCTC2054), Pseudomonas putida (KCTC1134), B. subtilis (KCTC2217) and S. aureus (KCTC1916) | Microneedles composed of GT extract and HA exhibit ∼95% growth reduction of Gram-negative and positive bacteria [130] | |
| 0.35 MDa | Carvacrol prodrugs | Gram-negative Klebsiella pneumoniae (ATCC 700603), E. coli (ATCC 25922), Acinetobacter baumannii (ATCC 19606), and P. aeruginosa (ATCC 27853) and Gram-positive MRSA (ATCC 43300), S. aureus (ATCC 29213), S. epidermidis (RP62A), E. faecalis (ATCC 29212), E. faecium 64/3, Streptococcus agalactiae (ATCC 2603), Streptococcus pneumoniae (ATCC 49916), and Streptococcus pyogenes (12RF) | HA-loaded carvacrol prodrugs shows better minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values against E. faecium and E. faecalis compared to those of carvacrol [131] | |
| Not shown | HA/adipic acid dihydrazide hydrogel | Vancomycin | MRSA (ATCC 29213) | Vancomycin-loaded gels exhibited excellent drug release and in vitro antimicrobial activity with minimal cell toxicity [132] |
| 8–10 MDa | Genipin-crosslinked gelatin/hyaluronic acid gel | Hinokitiol | S. aureus (ATCC 25923) and E. coli (ATCC 10798) | Gels loaded with hinokitiol showed significant antibacterial activity [133] |
| Not shown | HA/palm oil-based organogel | Maraviroc | L. crispatus (ATCC 33197) | HA/palm oil-based organogel could be exploited for vahinal delivery of maraviroc microbicide [134] |
| Not shown | Polyurethane-HA microfibers | Ethanolic extract of propolis (EEP) | S. aureus and E. coli | EEP-incorporated samples caused formation of considerable inhibition zones against these bacteria [135] |
| 140 000 g/mol | HA nanocapsules (NCs) | Polyhexanide (PH) | S. aureus (ATCC 29213 and ATCC 43300) and E. coli (ATCC 25922) | HA-loaded PH exhibited antibacterial action [136] |
| 0.035 MDa | OSA-modified HA | Novicidin peptide | S. aureus (ATCC 25923) and E. coli (ATCC 25922) | Self-assembly of novicidin with HA into nanogels significantly improved the safety profile when tested in HUVECs and NIH 3T3 cells, whilst showing no loss of antimicrobial [137] |
| Not shown | Ag NPs | S. aureus | HA-loaded Ag NPs showed some antibacterial activity, however the highest antimicrobial properties was shown to chitosan- loaded Ag NPs [138] | |
| 401.3 g mol−1 | Polyelectrolyte-assembly over fabric viscose (CV) | Surfactant MKM | E. coli, S. aureus and S. agalactiae | Exceptional antimicrobial activity has been shown to CV-functionalized MKM, making it highly interesting for potential use in medicine [139] |
| HA-EP3 (1600 KDa-2500 K Da) | Mesoporous microparticle crosslinked using divinyl sulfone (DVS) | Vancomycin | Drug release profile of these mesoporous microparticles showed that the crosslinking ratio increased the drug releasing amount decreased [140] | |
| 1.5 to 2.2 million Da | HA and HA/Sucrose particles were synthesized using two different crosslinkers: DVS and glycerol diglycidyl ether (GDE) | Ciprofloxacin | E. coli (ATCC 8739), P. aeruginosa (ATCC 10145), S. aureus (ATCC 6538), and B. subtilis (ATCC 6633) | No bacterial effect was observed for bare HA and HA/sucrose particles. However, ciprofloxacin-loaded particles showed MIC and MBC values of 0.25–2 mg ml−1 and 0.25–4 mg ml−1 against all bacteria species, respectively [141] |
Encapsulating antibiotics in HA matrixes combines a synergistic strategy for the targeted treatment of bacterial infections. For example, Tian et al. designed an antimicrobial hydrogel based on HA [108]. Bacterial HA lyases target the degradation of the HA hydrogel, which releases Fe3+. Bacteria take up Fe3+ and reduce it into Fe2+. Subsequently, Fe2+ reacts with H2O2 to form hydroxyl radicals leading to bacterial cell death (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4.
Illustration of bacteria-responsive, iron-releasing (Fe3+) HA hydrogels. Bacteria (turquoise) secrete HA lyases, degrade the HA releasing Fe3+ ions. Fe3+ is absorbed by the bacteria and reduced intracellularly to Fe2+. Fe2+ reacts with H2O2 to form a hydroxyl radical, killing the bacterial cell (grey). Photographs of actual CFUs of E. coli (a) and S. aureus (b) on agar plates from diluted bacterial suspension without (i) and with (ii) HA-Fe-EDTA hydrogel treatment. (c) Log reduction of the HA-Fe-EDTA hydrogels against E. coli and S. aureus calculated from the photographs (pristine Luria−Bertani broth was used as control group) (mean ± SD, n = 3). Reproduced with permission from Standard ACS Editors' Choice usage agreement [108].
Furthermore, aminoglycoside antibiotics (such as streptomycin) are hydrophilic. This poses pharmacological challenges, particularly in the treatment of intracellular bacterial infections. Due to its hydrophilicity, it has poor penetration within eukaryotic cell membranes, often high doses of antibiotic may still display subtherapeutic concentration inside the cell [92]. It has been proposed that HA could be an antibiotic carrier for the treatment of intracellular bacterial infections. Antibiotics conjugated to HA were able to be phagocytised by infected eukaryotic cells through a CD44-mediated pathway and were able to eradicate bacteria in intracellular infections [93].
4. Antifungal activity of HA
Fungi are a type of eukaryote. They contain membrane-bound sub-compartments that separate specific functions, particularly the nucleus. Fungi can be single-celled, like yeast, or multicellular, like mould. Similar to bacteria, fungi can proliferate via asexual and sexual replication. Fungi are important to society, and are used in food preparations, such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a yeast used in the fermentation of sugars to produce alcohol and to raise bread. Fungi are also important in pharmaceutics, for example Penicillium chrysogenum produces penicillin [142]. Alterations in the intestinal microbiome are associated with many diseases, and alterations (dysbiosis) of fungal communities may contribute to disease. Many factors are likely able to promote fungal dysbiosis including exposure to antibiotic, for example, exposure to antibacterial antibiotics has long been known to promote the overgrowth of Candida in the gut. Likewise, treatment with antifungal antibiotics reduces the prevalence of some fungi, while it increases the prevalence of others [143]. HMW HA (1.8 MDa) displays intrinsic antifungal properties against Candida glabrata ATCC 90030 and Candida parapsilosis ATCC 22019 (Fig. 5), with fungistatic activity reported to be dose-dependent [73]. Other study, evaluated the fungistatic activity of LMW HA (1630 kDa) against Candida albicans (ATCC 10231, 18804, and 11006) [144]. This study reported that HA solutions displayed concentration-dependent activity (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg mL−1) against candida strains, where greatest inhibition was observed against C. albicans ATCC 11006 strain and weakest inhibition was observed against ATCC 18804. No candidacidal activity was reported in the study [144].
Fig. 5.
Growth profile of C. albicans ATCC 90029 (a), glabrata ATCC 90030 (b), and C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019 (c) at 5 × 106 CFU/mL exposed to HA 1837 kDa. Five different concentrations of HA were used: 4 mg mL−1 (square), 2 mg mL−1 (triangle), 1 mg mL−1 (times), 0.5 mg mL−1 (snowflake) and 0.25 mg mL−1 (circle), and no HA (filled diamonds). **Highly significant (P < 0.01); *significant (P < 0.05); - not significant (P > 0.05). Reproduced with permission [73].
4.1. HA derivates for antimycotic delivery applications
The three classes of antifungals currently in clinical use are polyenes (i.e., Amphotericin B), triazoles (i.e., Ketoconazole), and echinocandins (i.e., Caspofungin) [107]. Polyenes and triazoles are exhibiting declining efficacy due to the development of drug-resistant fungal strains [145]. In order to overcome the antifungal resistance, novel formulations availing of various drug delivery matrixes and adjuvants have been studied. In this landscape, HA has been employed as to enhance hydrophobic molecules to improve their bioavailability (shown in Table 2). Poor water soluble clotrimazole has been encapsulated in ionic polymeric micelles based on HA to improve clotrimazole's bioavailability [146]. Another study has used HA hydrogels to load selenium and ketoconazole nanoparticles for the topical treatment of seborrheic dermatitis [147]. Amphotericin B has also been incorporated into HA microneedle patches for a topical ocular drug delivery treatment in corneal fungal infections [148].
Table 2.
Summary of HA loaded or conjugated to antimycotic agents.
| HA MW | Processing | Antimycotic agent | Fungi type | Outcome | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 420,000 g/mol | Cateslytin | Candida albicans | HA‐CTL‐C films fully inhibit the development of C. albicans, which are common pathogens encountered in care‐associated diseases | [129] | |
| Not shown | Glycyrrhetinic acid (1818β-GA) | C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. krusei, C. guillier-Mondii, C. lusitaniae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Zygosaccharomyce spp. | 18β-GA and HA, alone and in combination show antimycotic activity, being considered as possible alternative to azole antifungal agents for the topical treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis | [149] | |
| 0.001 MDa | poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)/HA gels | Ketoconazole (KCL) | C. albicans | In vivo antimicrobial study shows growth inhibition growth of C. albicans inoculated in rabbit eyes | [150] |
| 0.8–1.17 MDa | HA gel -integrated liposomes | Fluconazole | Potential use for the treatment of fungal keratitis | [151] | |
| 1.01 MDa | HA-H5 PEMs | Polypeptide histatin-5 (H5) | C. albicans (ATCC 10231) | The PEM inhibited fungal attachment/adhesion, significantly reduced fungal biofilm formation, and showed synergistic effects with the antifungal drug miconazole. This novel coating is expected to treat Candida-associated denture stomatitis | [152] |
| 15,000–30,000 g/mol | Eudragit RL100/amphotericin B NP coated with HA | Amphotericin B | C. albicans (ATCC 14053) | Nanoparticles showed rapid C. albicans elimination and efficacy against in vivo vulvovaginal candidiasis | [153] |
| Not shown | HA-loaded MZ based gel | Miconazole (MZ) | C. albicans | HA-loaded MZ based gel demonstrated better antifungal activity, indicating its potential in oral thrush pharmacotherapy | [154] |
| 1.3 MDa | Clotrimazole |
C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. tropicalis and S. cerevisiae |
CTZ-loaded HA gel showed fungistatic activity for more than 24h. This formulation shows to be a potential drug delivery system for local therapy of vaginal candidiasis and other similar infections | [155] | |
| 401.3 g mol−1 | Polyelectrolyte-assembly over fabric viscose (CV) | Surfactant MKM | C. albicans and C. glabrata | Exceptional antimicrobial activity was shown for the functionalized CV, making it highly interesting for potential use in medicine | [139] |
| 1000 Da | HA polynucleotide (HA-PN) | Ketoconazole | C. albicans | New Zealand White rabbits presenting fungal keratitis were used for in vivo antimicrobial studies, showing that this formulation cured 91.7% of rabbits in comparison to commercial ketoconazole eye drop (66.7%). | [150] |
5. Antiviral activity of HA
The influence of HA on viruses is an emerging topic and to date there has been relatively few studies. However, evidence of antiviral activity of HA has been shown in vitro with respect to the herpes simplex virus (HSV-2) [156], while interestingly other studies on type 1 HSV-1, show that HA could be involved in HSV-1 infection in brain and skin tissues [157]. In the case of HIV infection, exogenous HA reduced HIV infection of unstimulated CD4+ T helper (Th) cells in a CD44-dependent manner, while, hyaluronidase-mediated degradation of endogenous HA on the cell surface aid HIV binding and infection of unstimulated CD4+ Th cells [158].
The levels of HA produced by rheumatoid arthritis (RA) synovial cell lines have been examined, they were shown to be resistant to infection with Newcastle disease virus (NDV), vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), and rubella virus (RV). While normal foetal synovial cells lines were susceptible to NDV, VSV, and RV. Interestingly, RA cells became infected when HA was degraded, HA prevented infection of normal synovial cells with VSV [159].
Another study has shown that different cell lines pre-treated with HMW HA (1800 KDa) demonstrated strong antiviral activity against Coxsackievirus B5 (COXB5), mumps virus (MV) and influenza virus A/H1N1, with mild antiviral activity against HSV-1 and porcine parvovirus (PPV), and no activity against Adenovirus 5 (ADV-5), human Herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6), porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) as shown in Fig. 6. In all cases, no virucidal activity of HA was observed [160].
Fig. 6.
Virus yield of various infected cell lines after the exposure to HA in different concentrations. A) VERO cells infected with COXB5, B) VERO cells infected with MV, C) VERO cells infected with HSV-1, D) VERO cells infected with ADV-5, E) WSN33, F) PK15 cell line infected with PPV, G) JJHAN cell line infected with HHV-6, and H) MARC145 cells infected with PRRSV. Open access reprinting from Ref. [160].
As alluded to above, HA degradation is a virulence factor in a variety of infection models and facilitates local spread of the pathogens. The Zika flavivirus infection, a concern during pregnancy, infects human placentas, inducing defects in the developing foetus. The Flavivirus non-structural protein 1 (NS1) alters the GAG on the endothelium of placenta, causing hyperpermeability in vitro and vascular leakage in vivo in a tissue-dependent manner. NS1 induced shedding of HA and heparan sulphate (HS) as well as altering the expression of CD44 and LYVE-1 HA receptors on stromal fibroblasts and Hofbauer macrophages in villous cores. The mechanism behind this is postulated to be the stimulation of hyaluronidase in NS1-treated trophoblasts which leads to HA degradation [161].
5.1. Antiviral mechanism of action from HA and other polysaccharides
Researchers have proven that the antiviral activity of polysaccharides is associated with their anionic groups and chemical modifications with the inclusion of sulphate groups. According to their structural features, polysaccharides can inhibit the virus cycle at different stages, such as at the internalization, uncoating, and transcription phases, or even by directly killing the virus (Fig. 7) [162]. The antiviral mechanisms of HA polysaccharides involve two major criteria: (1) inhibit the virus activity by binding to envelope ligand sites thus inactivating the virus itself; (2) which inhibits the viral docking, internalization and uncoating in host cells; and (3) improve the immune response of the host against the virus, thus, indirectly inhibiting the virus replication process and fastening the viral clearance [163]. The latter mechanism of action can also be also applied as a strategy for the delivery of novel vaccines. Where HA can boost the immune response of the host cells by activating the production of antiviral immune factors [164]. This will be further discussed in the next section 5.2.
Fig. 7.
Steps of viral replication inhibition by antiviral polysaccharides. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [162].
5.2. HA derivates for antiviral delivery applications
HA has been used to encapsulate a wide range of antiviral drugs (summarized on Table 3). It is worth to mention that the use of HA as an encapsulant for the delivery of inactivated viruses and antigens can boost immunization efficiency in the development of vaccines [165], even in the current context of SARS-CoV-2 [166]. In this regard, mice immunized with a HA complex carrying the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) exhibited a significant increase (6-fold) in cellular immune response and (120-fold) in humoral immune response relative to mice vaccinated with HBsAg alone. This shows that HA employed for the production of these novel vaccine carriers was pivotal for enhancing immune activation at the delivery site against hepatitis B [164]. Other HA-based vaccines showed remarkable protection against rabies [167] and Ebola viruses [168].
Table 3.
Summary of HA loaded or conjugated to anti-viral agents.
| HA MW | Modification | Drug | Virus | Outcome | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 kDa | Tetraglycine-l-octaarginine | Inactivated H1N1 A/New Caledonia/20/99 IVR116 (NCL) viruses | PR8 viruses | Infection with PR8 viruses were completely circumvented through nasal immunization with a mixture of inactivated NCL viruses and tetraglycine-l-octaarginine-linked HA | [175] |
| 650 kDa | Cyclodextrin (CD) | Acyclovir (Acy) | Herpes viruses (HSV-1, HSV-2 and VZV) | HA-CD/Acy complex showed good antiviral activity together with a delayed release of Acy from HA-CD/Acy | [176] |
| Not shown | HA/palm oil-based organogel | Maraviroc | TZM-b1 cells inoculated with HIV-1 NL4-3 virus | HA/palm oil-based organogel could be exploited for vaginal delivery of maraviroc as anti-HIV microbicide | [134] |
| Not shown | Zidovudine and Lamivudine | TZM-b1 cells inoculated with HIV-1 virus | HIV reverse transcriptase inhibitors Zidovudine and Lamivudine were successfully encapsulated into the HA polymer assembly in a noncovalent manner. The supramolecular assembly exert potent antiviral activity and allow sustained drug release | [177] |
Intranasal administration of vaccines has been developed as an innovative form of immunization. In this context, the pharmacokinetics for novel HA vaccine delivery systems appeared to be optimum when using HA with lower MWs (<67 kDa), as they showed more rapid systemic distribution than higher MWs (>215 kDa) [169]. New cationic liposome-HA nanoparticles were developed as a carrier for F1–V, a recombinant antigen for plague virus. The study showed that these novel nanoparticles induced potent humoral immune responses as an intranasal vaccine platform against Yersinia pestis [170]. Another study used HA to encapsulate inactivated influenza virus for a flu vaccine using HA (HYAFF) microspheres. The microspheres showed significant higher immunization response following intranasal administration than those induced by traditional intramuscular immunization at the same vaccine dose [171]. A quadrivalent influenza virus vaccines based on HA with a MW of 27 kDa was developed. The quadrivalent influenza virus HA vaccine induced serum IgG and intranasal-secreted IgA with antigen-specificity [172].
The transcutaneous route of administration of vaccines through the use of microneedle patches has gained great interest in the last couple of years. It has been shown that dissolvable HA microneedle tips were able to deliver antigens derived from influenza virus, including A/H1N1, A/H3N2 strains and A/canine/VC378/2012, and promote a humoral response two times higher than those induced by intramuscular injections [173,174].
6. Antimicrobial properties of HA in comparison to other biopolymers
When comparing the antimicrobial effects of HA against other polymers sourced in nature, it can be noticed that chitosan and alginates also show to possess antimicrobial properties similar to those presented by HA. All polymers and their derivates show an antimicrobial effect which is dependent to dose/concentration and MW. However, the antimicrobial mechanism of action is distinct for each polymer. For example, positive charged chitosan molecules (either LMW or HMW), through electrostatic interaction with the membrane of bacteria, change the bacterial membrane permeability which inhibits their proliferation. Moreover, it is expected that LMW chitosan can penetrate through the microbial membrane and interact with its DNA. This will lead to the inhibition of the microbial mRNA and protein synthesis [178,179]. It is also postulated that the antifungal mechanism of action of LMW chitosan is associated with its ability to be taken up by the cells and to chelate intracellular metals, to suppress spore elements and to bind to essential nutrients to fungal growth [180]. However, the use of chitosan for antimicrobial applications is hampered due to belonging to a weak class of polyamine (with a pKa of around 6.5) which imparts pH-responsiveness. Chitosan shows antifungal activity only under acidic conditions [181].
For chitosan, its degree of acetylation also influences the antimicrobial effectiveness of the polymer. It is observed that the antimicrobial effect of chitosan improves as the degree of acetylation decreases [180]. In Gram-negative E. coli, its growth rate is highly inhibited with LMW (5 kDa) chitosan. While, Gram-positive S. aureus is more susceptible to inhibition in HMW (∼305 kDa) chitosan formulations [182]. Chitosan nanoparticles [183] and derivates also present antimicrobial effects [184]. Where carboxy methylation of chitosan has significantly improved antibacterial [185,186] and antifungal effects [181]. Other chitosan derivates such as quaternary ammonium chitosan nanoparticles also decreases the contamination of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) bone cement [187].The antiviral activity of chitosan has also been observed in plants [188] and mammalians [189,190], where its antiviral activity has been shown to increase as its molecular weight decreases [162]. It is postulated that chitosan can inhibit SARS-CoV-2 infection, by preventing the viral spike protein from docking in angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE-2) on the surface of host cells [166].
In case of alginate and its derivates, the study by Salem et al., shows that algino-1,2-phenelinide has bigger bacterial inhibition to both Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria, however, algino-4-chloro-1,2-phenelinide has a more prominent inhibition effect on fungi [191]. In another study, utilizing polyurethane and alginate blend scaffolds, the incremental addition of alginate content (up to 1%) increased the hydrophilicity of the scaffold, thus decreasing bacterial adhesion and proliferation [192]. Other studies have demonstrated that alginates also possess antiviral properties [193,194]. Although the antimicrobial properties of chitosan and alginates may compare to those presented by HA, the latter still possess other beneficial properties (biocompatibility and immune regulator) that contribute to outperform the two previous biomaterials. For example, alginates with high mannuronic acid or impurity content are potentially immunogenic, which decreases its desirability for applications such as antimicrobial wound dressings or catheter coatings [195]. Regarding chitosan, due to its cationic nature, the adsorption of proteins in chitosan coatings may prove difficult its applications as an antimicrobial coating for catheters [103].
7. Conclusion and perspectives
Bacteria, fungi, and viruses are in close association with HA and its metabolism to surpass host defences and thrive. Specifically, in the case of bacteria, there are two main contributing factors to increase virulence. One is associated with their ability to produce a mucoid capsule containing HA, which decreases their recognition by surveillant host immune cells. The other contributing factor is associated with their ability to produce HA lyases to degrade endogenous HA, which enhances bacterial penetration and spread within tissues. However, treatment of wounds with exogenous HA are shown to decrease bacterial infection. Their ability to produce HA lyases can be exploited to counteract their virulence. Some researchers postulated that bombarding wounded sites with HA may overwhelm bacteria capable of producing HA lyases, thereby suppressing bacterial growth. In the studies presented in this review, all molecular weights of HA exhibit antimicrobial activity at some level, but it is worth mentioning that HMW HA shows better antimicrobial properties in comparison to LMW HA. It does not come as a surprise, as HMW HA contains longer polymeric chains which HA lyases will take longer to break down in comparison to LMW HA. Moreover, HA also possess physical properties that enable HA matrixes to repel bacteria adhesiveness (anti-biofouling effect) through its superhydrophilicity and negative net charge.
The exact mechanism of action by which HA can down-regulate the proliferation of bacteria and fungi, and the infection of healthy cells with some viral strains, needs to be studied in more detail. While there has been relatively little attention to date on the antiviral activity of HA, it offers intriguing possibilities for the treatment of a variety of ailments such as Herpes, HIV, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), mumps and others. Research findings associated with HA encoding viruses may be of particular interest to treat SARS-CoV-2 infections. It is known that during SARS-CoV-2 infection, the lungs of patients produce a gel like substance that lines the alveoli and decreases oxygen exchange in the lungs [196]. This overproduction of HA may be associated with the virus itself as it can induce the production of HA by using the host translational machinery. The treatment of these patients with HA synthase inhibitors may overt COVID-19 symptoms [197]. Moreover, viruses encoding HYAL genes maybe be used for the targeted treatment of multiple drug-resistant bacterial infections (bacteriophages), or these viruses can be used for the treatment of cancers (oncolytic viruses).
Researchers in the field of microbiology have an exciting new area for exploration in order to unveil the biochemical cascade mechanisms that are associated with the intrinsic antimicrobial activity of HA. The encapsulation of many antimicrobial agents in HA substrates results in novel therapeutics that can target and enhance the delivery of drugs to the local infection site. Moreover, as HA also possess bacteriostatic properties, the encapsulation of antibiotics in HA matrixes can have a synergistic effect to hamper bacterial proliferation and treat multidrug-resistant bacterial strains. When HA is utilized for prophylactic purposes against microbial infections, the use of LMW HA would be recommended as they can boost local immune surveillance, being commonly employed as adjuvants in vaccine development.
HA hydrogels, coatings and films show excellent biocompatibility, biodegradability, immunomodulatory, and antimicrobial properties, all of which are suitable for the development of tissue engineering constructs and biomedical-associated devices that may impact positively healthcare-associated infections. In conclusion, HA may prove to be a complete biopolymer that possesses all desirable properties that are important for the development of contact lenses, wound dressings, scaffolds for tissue reconstruction, implants coatings, and drug delivery systems.
Declaration of interests
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the funding provided by the Irish Research Council through the IRC Postdoctoral Fellowship (GOIPG/2021/75).
Footnotes
Peer review under responsibility of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
References
- 1.Yang C., et al. Cellular fluidic-based vascular networks for tissue engineering. Engineered Regen. 2021;2:171–174. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lynch A.S., Robertson G.T. Bacterial and fungal biofilm infections. Annu. Rev. Med. 2008;59:415–428. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.59.110106.132000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Xia G.-X., et al. Antimicrobial properties and application of polysaccharides and their derivatives. Chin. J. Polym. Sci. 2021;39(2):133–146. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Snetkov P., et al. Hyaluronic acid: the influence of molecular weight on structural, physical, physico-chemical, and degradable properties of biopolymer. Polymers. 2020;12(8):1800. doi: 10.3390/polym12081800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zamboni F., et al. Enhanced cell viability in hyaluronic acid coated poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) porous scaffolds within microfluidic channels. Int. J. Pharm. 2017;532(1):595–602. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.09.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Souness A., et al. Influence of scaffold design on 3D printed cell constructs. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2018;106(2):533–545. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.33863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zamboni F., et al. Labile crosslinked hyaluronic acid via urethane formation using bis(β-isocyanatoethyl) disulphide with tuneable physicochemical and immunomodulatory properties. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020;245:116501. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Theocharis A.D., et al. Extracellular matrix structure. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2016;97:4–27. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2015.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Acharya P.S., et al. Fibroblast migration is mediated by CD44-dependent TGF beta activation. J. Cell Sci. 2008;121(Pt 9):1393–1402. doi: 10.1242/jcs.021683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nasreen N., et al. Low molecular weight hyaluronan induces malignant mesothelioma cell (MMC) proliferation and haptotaxis: role of CD44 receptor in MMC proliferation and haptotaxis. Oncol. Res. 2002;13(2):71–78. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Weigel P.H. Hyaluronan synthase: the mechanism of initiation at the reducing end and a pendulum model for polysaccharide translocation to the cell exterior. Int. J. cell Biol. 2015;2015:367579. doi: 10.1155/2015/367579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pandey M.S., Weigel P.H. Hyaluronic acid receptor for endocytosis (HARE)-mediated endocytosis of hyaluronan, heparin, dermatan sulfate, and acetylated low density lipoprotein (AcLDL), but not chondroitin sulfate types A, C, D, or E, activates NF-kappaB-regulated gene expression. J. Biol. Chem. 2014;289(3):1756–1767. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.510339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kaul A., et al. Hyaluronidases in human diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22(6):3204. doi: 10.3390/ijms22063204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Stern R. Hyaluronan catabolism: a new metabolic pathway. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2004;83(7):317–325. doi: 10.1078/0171-9335-00392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Forrester J.V., Lackie J.M. Effect of hyaluronic acid on neutrophil adhesion. J. Cell Sci. 1981;50:329–344. doi: 10.1242/jcs.50.1.329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rayahin J.E., et al. High and low molecular weight hyaluronic acid differentially influence macrophage activation. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2015;1(7):481–493. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5b00181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chen G., et al. Immune tolerance induced by immune-homeostatic particles. Engineered Regen. 2021;2:133–136. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Collins M.N., Birkinshaw C. Comparison of the effectiveness of four different crosslinking agents with hyaluronic acid hydrogel films for tisslue-culture applications. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2007;104(5):3183–3191. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Schante C.E., et al. Chemical modifications of hyaluronic acid for the synthesis of derivatives for a broad range of biomedical applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011;85(3):469–489. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Collins M.N., Birkinshaw C. Physical properties of crosslinked hyaluronic acid hydrogels. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2008;19(11):3335–3343. doi: 10.1007/s10856-008-3476-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Collins M.N., Birkinshaw C. Hyaluronic acid based scaffolds for tissue engineering-A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013;92(2):1262–1279. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.10.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Burdick J.A., Prestwich G.D. Hyaluronic acid hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv. Mater. 2011;23(12):H41–H56. doi: 10.1002/adma.201003963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Moreland L.W. Intra-articular hyaluronan (hyaluronic acid) and hylans for the treatment of osteoarthritis: mechanisms of action. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2003;5(2):54–67. doi: 10.1186/ar623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gocmen G., et al. The antioxidant and anti-inflammatory efficiency of hyaluronic acid after third molar extraction. J. Cranio-Maxillo-Fac. Surg. 2015;43(7):1033–1037. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.04.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Eenschooten C., et al. Novel self-associative and multiphasic nanostructured soft carriers based on amphiphilic hyaluronic acid derivatives. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012;87(1):444–451. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zamboni F., et al. Towards the development of a female animal model of T1DM using hyaluronic acid nanocoated cell transplantation: refinements and considerations for future protocols. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13(11):1925. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13111925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zamboni F., et al. The potential of hyaluronic acid in immunoprotection and immunomodulation: chemistry, processing and function. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2018;97:97–122. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kendall F.E., Heidelberger M., Dawson M.H. A serologically inactive polysaccharide elaborated BY mucoid strains OF group A hemolytic STREPTOCOCCUS. J. Biol. Chem. 1937;118(1):61–69. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Karimi Z., et al. Computational analysis of phylogenetic, functional and structural features of Bacillus hyaluronate lyases. Biologia. 2021;76(1):381–393. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Reda F., El-Shanawany S. Characterization and immobilization of a novel hyaluronidase produced by Streptomyces roseofulvus. Egypt. J. Bot. 2020;60(1):213–224. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Guo X., et al. A novel hyaluronidase Produced by Bacillus sp. A50. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e94156. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jong A., et al. Identification and characterization of CPS1 as a hyaluronic acid synthase contributing to the pathogenesis of cryptococcus neoformans infection. Eukaryot. Cell. 2007;6(8):1486–1496. doi: 10.1128/EC.00120-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.DeAngelis P.L., et al. Hyaluronan synthase of chlorella virus PBCV-1. Science. 1997;278(5344):1800–1803. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5344.1800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Graves M.V., et al. Hyaluronan synthesis in virus PBCV-1-infected chlorella-like green algae. Virology. 1999;257(1):15–23. doi: 10.1006/viro.1999.9628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.DeAngelis P.L. Hyaluronan synthases: fascinating glycosyltransferases from vertebrates, bacterial pathogens, and algal viruses. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 1999;56(8):670–682. doi: 10.1007/s000180050461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Dale J.B., et al. Hyaluronate capsule and surface M protein in resistance to opsonization of group A streptococci. Infect. Immun. 1996;64(5):1495–1501. doi: 10.1128/iai.64.5.1495-1501.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kass E.H., Seastone C.V. The role OF the mucoid polysaccharide (hyaluronic acid) IN the virulence OF group A hemolytic streptococci. J. Exp. Med. 1944;79(3):319–330. doi: 10.1084/jem.79.3.319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wessels M.R., et al. Effects on virulence of mutations in a locus essential for hyaluronic acid capsule expression in group A streptococci. Infect. Immun. 1994;62(2):433–441. doi: 10.1128/iai.62.2.433-441.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Moses A.E., et al. Relative contributions of hyaluronic acid capsule and M protein to virulence in a mucoid strain of the group A Streptococcus. Infect. Immun. 1997;65(1):64–71. doi: 10.1128/iai.65.1.64-71.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Schrager H.M., Rheinwald J.G., Wessels M.R. Hyaluronic acid capsule and the role of streptococcal entry into keratinocytes in invasive skin infection. J. Clin. Invest. 1996;98(9):1954–1958. doi: 10.1172/JCI118998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sindelar M., et al. Hyaluronidases and hyaluronate lyases: from humans to bacteriophages. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces. 2021;208:112095. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.112095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hynes W.L., Walton S.L. Hyaluronidases of gram-positive bacteria. FEMS (Fed. Eur. Microbiol. Soc.) Microbiol. Lett. 2000;183(2):201–207. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb08958.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ibberson C.B., et al. Hyaluronan modulation impacts Staphylococcus aureus biofilm infection. Infect. Immun. 2016;84(6):1917–1929. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01418-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Starr C.R., Engleberg N.C. Role of hyaluronidase in subcutaneous spread and growth of group A Streptococcus. Infect. Immun. 2006;74(1):40–48. doi: 10.1128/IAI.74.1.40-48.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.van de Rijn I. Streptococcal hyaluronic acid: proposed mechanisms of degradation and loss of synthesis during stationary phase. J. Bacteriol. 1983;156(3):1059–1065. doi: 10.1128/jb.156.3.1059-1065.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.de Assis C.M., et al. Biosynthesis of chondroitinase and hyaluronidase by different strains of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis. J. Med. Microbiol. 2003;52(6):479–481. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.04933-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Shimizu M.T., et al. Hyaluronidase and chondroitin sulphatase production by different species of Candida. J. Med. Vet. Mycol. 1995;33(1):27–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Coutinho S.D., Paula C.R. Proteinase, phospholipase, hyaluronidase and chondroitin-sulphatase production by Malassezia pachydermatis. Med. Mycol. 2000;38(1):73–76. doi: 10.1080/mmy.38.1.73.76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Benchetrit L.C., Gray E.D., Wannamaker L.W. Hyaluronidase activity of bacteriophages of group A streptococci. Infect. Immun. 1977;15(2):527–532. doi: 10.1128/iai.15.2.527-532.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Di Lallo G., et al. Analysis of four new Enterococcus faecalis phages and modeling of a hyaluronidase catalytic domain from Saphexavirus. PHAGE. 2021;2(3):131–141. doi: 10.1089/phage.2021.0003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Martinez-Quintanilla J., et al. Encapsulated stem cells loaded with hyaluronidase-expressing oncolytic virus for brain tumor therapy. Mol. Ther. 2015;23(1):108–118. doi: 10.1038/mt.2014.204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Guedan S., et al. Hyaluronidase expression by an oncolytic adenovirus enhances its intratumoral spread and suppresses tumor growth. Mol. Ther. 2010;18(7):1275–1283. doi: 10.1038/mt.2010.79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ebelt N.D., et al. Hyaluronidase-expressing <em>Salmonella</em> effectively targets tumor-associated hyaluronic Acid in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Mol. Cancer Therapeut. 2020;19(2):706–716. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Jorgensen J.H., Pfaller M.A., Carroll K.C. ASM Press; 2015. Manual of Clinical Microbiology. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Bhattacharya M., et al. Prevention and treatment of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 2015;13(12):1499–1516. doi: 10.1586/14787210.2015.1100533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Forster A.J., et al. Patient-level factors associated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage at hospital admission: a systematic review. Am. J. Infect. Control. 2013;41(3):214–220. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.03.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Gjodsbol K., et al. Multiple bacterial species reside in chronic wounds: a longitudinal study. Int. Wound J. 2006;3(3):225–231. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2006.00159.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Serra R., et al. Chronic wound infections: the role of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 2015;13(5):605–613. doi: 10.1586/14787210.2015.1023291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Bukowski M., Wladyka B., Dubin G. Exfoliative toxins of Staphylococcus aureus. Toxins (Basel) 2010;2(5):1148–1165. doi: 10.3390/toxins2051148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Mitchell D.H., Howden B.P. Diagnosis and management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. Intern. Med. J. 2005;35(Suppl 2):S17–S24. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0903.2005.00977.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Joshi Navare K., et al. In: Racing for the Surface: Pathogenesis of Implant Infection and Advanced Antimicrobial Strategies. Li B., et al., editors. Springer International Publishing; Cham: 2020. Antimicrobial hydrogels: key considerations and engineering strategies for biomedical applications; pp. 511–542. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Romanò C.L., et al. Hyaluronic acid and its composites as a local antimicrobial/antiadhesive barrier. J. Bone Joint Infection. 2017;2(1):63–72. doi: 10.7150/jbji.17705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Zamboni F., et al. 2021. On the Bacteriostatic Activity of Hyaluronic Acid Composite Films. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Harris L.G., Richards R.G. Staphylococcus aureus adhesion to different treated titanium surfaces. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2004;15(4):311–314. doi: 10.1023/b:jmsm.0000021093.84680.bb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Pirnazar P., et al. Bacteriostatic effects of hyaluronic acid. J. Periodontol. 1999;70(4):370–374. doi: 10.1902/jop.1999.70.4.370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Rohr R.v., Trepp C. Process Technology Proceedings. Elsevier. xvii; Amsterdam ; New York: 1996. High pressure chemical engineering : proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on high pressure chemical engineering, Zürich, Switzerland, October 7-9, 1996; p. 710. [Google Scholar]
- 67.Carlson G.A., et al. Bacteriostatic properties of biomatrices against common orthopaedic pathogens. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004;321(2):472–478. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.06.165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Ballini A., et al. Esterified hyaluronic acid and autologous bone in the surgical correction of the infra-bone defects. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2009;6(2):65–71. doi: 10.7150/ijms.6.65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Ha C.-W., et al. Efficacy and safety of single injection of cross-linked sodium hyaluronate vs. three injections of high molecular weight sodium hyaluronate for osteoarthritis of the knee: a double-blind, randomized, multi-center, non-inferiority study. BMC Muscoskel. Disord. 2017;18(1) doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1591-4. 223-223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Park J.H., Park E.J., Yi H.S. Wound healing and anti-inflammatory effects of topical hyaluronic acid injection in surgical-site infection caused by Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Low. Extrem. Wounds. 2017;16(3):202–207. doi: 10.1177/1534734617714142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.DiZerega G.S. Springer-Verlag; New York: 1999. Peritoneal Surgery. [Google Scholar]
- 72.Uchida K., et al. Bacteriostatic effects of hyaluronan-based bioresorsable membrane. Surg. Sci. 2011;2:6. [Google Scholar]
- 73.Ardizzoni A., et al. Influence of hyaluronic acid on bacterial and fungal species, including clinically relevant opportunistic pathogens. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2011;22(10):2329. doi: 10.1007/s10856-011-4408-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Guzińska K., et al. Anti-bacterial materials based on hyaluronic acid: selection of research methodology and analysis of their anti-bacterial properties. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2018;93:800–808. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.08.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Sahayata V.N., Bhavsar N.V., Brahmbhatt N.A. An evaluation of 0.2% hyaluronic acid gel (Gengigel (R)) in the treatment of gingivitis: a clinical & microbiological study. Oral Health Dent. Manag. 2014;13(3):779–785. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Batavia P., et al. Use of hyaluronan (Gengigel) in the treatment of gingivitis in orthodontic patients: a clinical, biochemical, and microbiological study. J. Int. Clin. Dental Res. Organiz. 2016;8:44. [Google Scholar]
- 77.Al-Bayaty F., Taiyeb-Ali T., Abdulla M. Antibacterial effects of Oradex, Gengigel and Salviathymol-n mouthwash on dental biofilm bacteria. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2011;5:636–642. [Google Scholar]
- 78.Zhou T., et al. Instillation of hyaluronan reverses acid instillation injury to the mammalian blood gas barrier. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2018;314(5):L808–L821. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00510.2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Drago L., et al. Antiadhesive and antibiofilm activity of hyaluronic acid against bacteria responsible for respiratory tract infections. APMIS. 2014;122(10):1013–1019. doi: 10.1111/apm.12254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Macri A., et al. Evaluation of oxidative stress levels in the conjunctival epithelium of patients with or without dry eye, and dry eye patients treated with preservative-free hyaluronic acid 0.15 % and vitamin B12 eye drops. Graefe’s Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2015;253(3):425–430. doi: 10.1007/s00417-014-2853-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Chang W.-H., et al. Applications of hyaluronic acid in ophthalmology and contact lenses. Molecules. 2021;26(9):2485. doi: 10.3390/molecules26092485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Khan S.A., Lee C.-S. Recent progress and strategies to develop antimicrobial contact lenses and lens cases for different types of microbial keratitis. Acta Biomater. 2020;113:101–118. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.06.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Urwin L., et al. Corneal infection models: tools to investigate the role of biofilms in bacterial keratitis. Cells. 2020;9(11):2450. doi: 10.3390/cells9112450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Cabrera-Aguas M., et al. Antimicrobial resistance trends in bacterial keratitis over 5 years in Sydney, Australia. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2020;48(2):183–191. doi: 10.1111/ceo.13672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Blount Z.D. The unexhausted potential of E. coli. Elife. 2015;4:e05826. doi: 10.7554/eLife.05826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.del Hoyo-Gallego S., et al. Construction of antibacterial poly(ethylene terephthalate) films via layer by layer assembly of chitosan and hyaluronic acid. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016;143:35–43. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Pérez-Álvarez L., et al. Development of multiactive antibacterial multilayers of hyaluronic acid and chitosan onto poly(ethylene terephthalate) Eur. Polym. J. 2019;112:31–37. [Google Scholar]
- 88.Larraneta E., et al. Synthesis and characterization of hyaluronic acid hydrogels crosslinked using a solvent-free process for potential biomedical applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018;181:1194–1205. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.12.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Ciani O., et al. Intravesical administration of combined hyaluronic acid (HA) and chondroitin sulfate (CS) for the treatment of female recurrent urinary tract infections: a European multicentre nested case-control study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(3):e009669. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Mowbray C.A., et al. High molecular weight hyaluronic acid: a two-pronged protectant against infection of the urogenital tract? Clin. Transl. ImmunoL. 2018;7(6):e1021. doi: 10.1002/cti2.1021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Hirayama Y., et al. Mycobacteria exploit host hyaluronan for efficient extracellular replication. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5(10):e1000643. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Maurin M., Raoult D. Use of aminoglycosides in treatment of infections due to intracellular bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2001;45(11):2977–2986. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.11.2977-2986.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Qiu Y., et al. Hyaluronic acid conjugation facilitates clearance of intracellular bacterial infections by streptomycin with neglectable nephrotoxicity. Glycobiology. 2017;27(9):861–867. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwx061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Ibberson C., et al. Staphylococcus aureus hyaluronidase is a CodY-regulated virulence factor. Infect. Immun. 2014:82. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01710-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Aninwene G.E., 2nd, et al. Lubricin: a novel means to decrease bacterial adhesion and proliferation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2015;103(2):451–462. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Tomlin H., Piccinini A.M. A complex interplay between the extracellular matrix and the innate immune response to microbial pathogens. Immunology. 2018;155(2):186–201. doi: 10.1111/imm.12972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Jiang D., Liang J., Noble P.W. Hyaluronan as an immune regulator in human diseases. Physiol. Rev. 2011;91(1):221–264. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00052.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Vigetti D., et al. Epigenetics in extracellular matrix remodeling and hyaluronan metabolism. FEBS J. 2014;281(22):4980–4992. doi: 10.1111/febs.12938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Guo B., et al. Quantitative impact of neutrophils on bacterial clearance in a murine pneumonia model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011;55(10):4601–4605. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00508-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Koppe U., Suttorp N., Opitz B. Recognition of Streptococcus pneumoniae by the innate immune system. Cell Microbiol. 2012;14(4):460–466. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2011.01746.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Sheridan M., et al. Biomaterials: antimicrobial surfaces in biomedical engineering and healthcare. Curr. Opin. Biomed. Eng. 2022:100373. [Google Scholar]
- 102.Xia Y., et al. Synergy between zwitterionic polymers and hyaluronic acid enhances antifouling performance. Langmuir. 2019;35(48):15535–15542. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b01876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Zhang P., et al. Designing bioinspired anti-biofouling surfaces based on a superwettability strategy. Small. 2017;13(4):1503334. doi: 10.1002/smll.201503334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Kim S., et al. Electrochemical Co-deposition of polydopamine/hyaluronic acid for anti-biofouling bioelectrodes. Front. Chem. 2019;7 doi: 10.3389/fchem.2019.00262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Lee S., et al. Universal surface modification using dopamine-hyaluronic acid conjugates for anti-biofouling. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020;151:1314–1321. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.10.177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Parfenova L.V., et al. Hyaluronic acid bisphosphonates as antifouling antimicrobial coatings for PEO-modified titanium implants. Surface. Interfac. 2022;28:101678. [Google Scholar]
- 107.Yu W., et al. Layer-by-layer constructed hyaluronic acid/chitosan multilayers as antifouling and fouling-release coatings. Biointerphases. 2019;14(5):51002. doi: 10.1116/1.5110887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Tian R., et al. Fabrication of self-healing hydrogels with on-demand antimicrobial activity and sustained biomolecule release for infected skin regeneration. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018;10(20):17018–17027. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b01740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Montanari E., et al. Chasing bacteria within the cells using levofloxacin-loaded hyaluronic acid nanohydrogels. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2014;87(3):518–523. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2014.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Park S.-N., Kim J.K., Suh H. Evaluation of antibiotic-loaded collagen-hyaluronic acid matrix as a skin substitute. Biomaterials. 2004;25(17):3689–3698. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Zhang Z., et al. Antimicrobial activity and biocompatibility of slow-release hyaluronic acid-antibiotic conjugated particles. Int. J. Pharm. 2020;576:119024. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Contardi M., et al. Polyvinylpyrrolidone/hyaluronic acid-based bilayer constructs for sequential delivery of cutaneous antiseptic and antibiotic. Chem. Eng. J. 2019;358:912–923. [Google Scholar]
- 113.ter Boo G.-J.A., et al. Hyaluronic acid derivatives and its polyelectrolyte complexes with gentamicin as a delivery system for antibiotics. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2017;28(10):1325–1333. [Google Scholar]
- 114.Michalska-Sionkowska M., et al. Antimicrobial activity of new materials based on the blends of collagen/chitosan/hyaluronic acid with gentamicin sulfate addition. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2018;86:103–108. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Cassin M.E., et al. The design of antimicrobial LL37-modified collagen-hyaluronic acid detachable multilayers. Acta Biomater. 2016;40:119–129. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.04.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Pérez-Köhler B., et al. Efficacy of antimicrobial agents delivered to hernia meshes using an adaptable thermo-responsive hyaluronic acid-based coating. Hernia : J. Hernias Abdominal Wall Surg. 2019 doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02096-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Walvekar P., et al. Self-assembled oleylamine grafted hyaluronic acid polymersomes for delivery of vancomycin against methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces. 2019;182:110388. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.110388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Ran X., et al. Hyaluronic acid-templated Ag nanoparticles/Graphene oxide composites for synergistic therapy of bacteria infection. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017;9(23):19717–19724. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b05584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Anisha B.S., et al. Chitosan–hyaluronic acid/nano silver composite sponges for drug resistant bacteria infected diabetic wounds. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013;62:310–320. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Chen C.-H., et al. Dual functional core–sheath electrospun hyaluronic acid/polycaprolactone nanofibrous membranes embedded with silver nanoparticles for prevention of peritendinous adhesion. Acta Biomater. 2015;26:225–235. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.07.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Huang J., et al. Tunable sequential drug delivery system based on chitosan/hyaluronic acid hydrogels and PLGA microspheres for management of non-healing infected wounds. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2018;89:213–222. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Ahire J.J., Dicks L.M.T. Antimicrobial hyaluronic acid–cefoxitin sodium thin films produced by electrospraying. Curr. Microbiol. 2016;73(2):236–241. doi: 10.1007/s00284-016-1057-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Lin Z., et al. Biofunctions of antimicrobial peptide-conjugated alginate/hyaluronic acid/collagen wound dressings promote wound healing of a mixed-bacteria-infected wound. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019;140:330–342. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.08.087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Mirshafiei M., Boddohi S. Preparation of hyaluronic acid-aloevera nanoparticles for sustained delivery of doxycycline. Iran. J. Polym. Sci. Technol. 2019;31:539–550. [Google Scholar]
- 125.Kłodzińska S.N., et al. Hyaluronic acid-based nanogels improve in vivo compatibility of the anti-biofilm peptide DJK-5. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2019;20:102022. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2019.102022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Silva J.P., et al. Delivery of LLKKK18 loaded into self-assembling hyaluronic acid nanogel for tuberculosis treatment. J. Contr. Release. 2016;235:112–124. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.05.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Ahire J.J., et al. Polyethylene oxide (PEO)-hyaluronic acid (HA) nanofibers with kanamycin inhibits the growth of Listeria monocytogenes. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017;86:143–148. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2016.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Liu M., et al. Fabrication of KR-12 peptide-containing hyaluronic acid immobilized fibrous eggshell membrane effectively kills multi-drug-resistant bacteria, promotes angiogenesis and accelerates re-epithelialization. Int. J. Nanomed. 2019;14:3345–3360. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S199618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Cado G., et al. Self-defensive biomaterial coating against bacteria and yeasts: polysaccharide multilayer film with embedded antimicrobial peptide. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013;23(38):4801–4809. [Google Scholar]
- 130.Park S.Y., et al. Wound healing potential of antibacterial microneedles loaded with green tea extracts. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2014;42:757–762. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2014.06.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Marinelli L., et al. Viscoelastic behaviour of hyaluronic acid formulations containing carvacrol prodrugs with antibacterial properties. Int. J. Pharm. 2020;582:119306. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Liao C.-H., et al. Vancomycin-loaded oxidized hyaluronic acid and adipic acid dihydrazide hydrogel: bio-compatibility, drug release, antimicrobial activity, and biofilm model. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2019 doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2019.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Chang K.-C., et al. Characterization of genipin-crosslinked gelatin/hyaluronic acid-based hydrogel membranes and loaded with hinokitiol: in vitro evaluation of antibacterial activity and biocompatibility. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2019;105:110074. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.110074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Ilomuanya M.O., et al. Development of trigger sensitive hyaluronic acid/palm oil-based organogel for in vitro release of HIV/AIDS microbicides using artificial neural networks. Future J. Pharmaceut. Sci. 2020;6(1):1. [Google Scholar]
- 135.Eskandarinia A., et al. A propolis enriched polyurethane-hyaluronic acid nanofibrous wound dressing with remarkable antibacterial and wound healing activities. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020;149:467–476. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.01.255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Baier G., et al. Enzyme responsive hyaluronic acid nanocapsules containing polyhexanide and their exposure to bacteria to prevent infection. Biomacromolecules. 2013;14(4):1103–1112. doi: 10.1021/bm302003m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Water J.J., et al. Hyaluronic acid-based nanogels produced by microfluidics-facilitated self-assembly improves the safety profile of the cationic host defense peptide novicidin. Pharmaceut. Res. 2015;32(8):2727–2735. doi: 10.1007/s11095-015-1658-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Chudobova D., et al. Complexes of silver(I) ions and silver phosphate nanoparticles with hyaluronic acid and/or chitosan as promising antimicrobial agents for vascular grafts. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013;14(7):13592–13614. doi: 10.3390/ijms140713592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Bračič M., et al. A novel synergistic formulation between a cationic surfactant from lysine and hyaluronic acid as an antimicrobial coating for advanced cellulose materials. Cellulose. 2014;21(4):2647–2663. [Google Scholar]
- 140.Sahiner N., Suner S.S., Ayyala R.S. Mesoporous, degradable hyaluronic acid microparticles for sustainable drug delivery application. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces. 2019;177:284–293. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Sahiner N., Suner S.S., Ayyala R.S. Preparation of hyaluronic acid and copolymeric hyaluronic acid: sucrose particles as tunable antibiotic carriers. J. Polym. Res. 2020;27(7):192. [Google Scholar]
- 142.Houbraken J., et al. New penicillin-producing Penicillium species and an overview of section Chrysogena. Persoonia. 2012;29:78–100. doi: 10.3767/003158512X660571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Limon J.J., Skalski J.H., Underhill D.M. Commensal fungi in health and disease. Cell Host Microbe. 2017;22(2):156–165. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2017.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Kang J.-H., et al. Influences of hyaluronic acid on the anticandidal activities of lysozyme and the peroxidase system. Oral Dis. 2011;17(6):577–583. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2011.01807.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.McCarthy M., O'Shaughnessy E.M., Walsh T.J., Amphotericin B. In: Mayers D.L., et al., editors. Vol. 1. Springer International Publishing; Cham: 2017. Polyene resistance mechanisms; pp. 387–395. (Antimicrobial Drug Resistance: Mechanisms of Drug Resistance). [Google Scholar]
- 146.Catenacci L., et al. Design of experiments-assisted development of clotrimazole-loaded ionic polymeric micelles based on hyaluronic acid. Nanomaterials. 2020;10(4):635. doi: 10.3390/nano10040635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Garg A., et al. Topical application of nanoparticles integrated supramolecular hydrogels for the potential treatment of seborrhoeic dermatitis. Pharmaceut. Dev. Technol. 2020;25(6):748–756. doi: 10.1080/10837450.2020.1740932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Albadr A.A., et al. Rapidly dissolving microneedle patch of amphotericin B for intracorneal fungal infections. Drug Delivery Transl. Res. 2022;12(4):931–943. doi: 10.1007/s13346-021-01032-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Martina S., et al. In vitro effects of glycyrrhetinic acid and hyaluronic acid on the growth of vulvovaginal Candida albicans and other yeasts. Microbiologia Medica. 2017;32(4) [Google Scholar]
- 150.Zhu M., Wang J., Li N. A novel thermo-sensitive hydrogel-based on poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)/hyaluronic acid of ketoconazole for ophthalmic delivery. Artif. Cell Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2018;46(6):1282–1287. doi: 10.1080/21691401.2017.1368024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Moustafa M.A., et al. Hyalugel-integrated liposomes as a novel ocular nanosized delivery system of fluconazole with promising prolonged effect. Int. J. Pharm. 2017;534(1):14–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Wen J., Yeh C.-K., Sun Y. Salivary polypeptide/hyaluronic acid multilayer coatings act as fungal repellents and prevent biofilm formation on biomaterials. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2018;6(10):1452–1457. doi: 10.1039/c7tb02592k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Melo C.M., et al. Amphotericin B-loaded Eudragit RL100 nanoparticles coated with hyaluronic acid for the treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020;230:115608. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Hosny K., et al. Preparation, optimization, and evaluation of hyaluronic acid-based hydrogel loaded with miconazole self-nanoemulsion for the treatment of oral thrush. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2019;20(7):1–12. doi: 10.1208/s12249-019-1496-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Venkatachalam S., et al. Enhanced bio-adhesion and sustained delivery of clotrimazole encapsulated solid lipid nanoparticles loaded in hyaluronic acid gel as anti-fungal therapy. Br. J. Pharmaceut. Res. 2017;17:12. [Google Scholar]
- 156.Tiunnikov G., et al. Effects of hyaluronic acid preparation on the development of herpetic infection in cell culture. Vopr. Virusol. 2002;47:37–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Cohen M., et al. Restrictions that control herpes simplex virus type 1 infection in mouse brain ex vivo. J. Gen. Virol. 2011;92(10):2383–2393. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.031013-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Li P., et al. Exogenous and endogenous hyaluronic acid reduces HIV infection of CD4(+) T cells. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2014;92(9):770–780. doi: 10.1038/icb.2014.50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Patterson R.L., et al. Rubella and rheumatoid arthritis: hyaluronic acid and susceptibility of cultured rheumatoid synovial cells to viruses. PSEBM (Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med.) 1975;149(3):594–598. doi: 10.3181/00379727-149-38859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Cermelli C., et al. In vitro evaluation of antiviral and virucidal activity of a high molecular weight hyaluronic acid. Virol. J. 2011;8(1):141. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-8-141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Puerta-Guardo H., et al. Zika virus non-structural protein 1 disrupts glycosaminoglycans and causes permeability in developing human placentas. J. Infect. Dis. 2019:221. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Claus-Desbonnet H., et al. Polysaccharides and their derivatives as potential antiviral molecules. Viruses. 2022;14(2):426. doi: 10.3390/v14020426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Geetha Bai R., Tuvikene R. Potential antiviral properties of industrially important marine algal polysaccharides and their significance in fighting a future viral pandemic. Viruses. 2021;13(9):1817. doi: 10.3390/v13091817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Moon S.H., et al. Evaluation of hyaluronic acid-based combination adjuvant containing monophosphoryl lipid A and aluminum salt for hepatitis B vaccine. Vaccine. 2015;33(38):4762–4769. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Lin C.-A., et al. Hyaluronic acid-glycine-cholesterol conjugate-based nanoemulsion as a potent vaccine adjuvant for T cell-mediated immunity. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13(10) doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13101569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Mallakpour S., Azadi E., Hussain C.M. Chitosan, alginate, hyaluronic acid, gums, and β-glucan as potent adjuvants and vaccine delivery systems for viral threats including SARS-CoV-2: a review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021;182:1931–1940. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.05.155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Shebl R.I., et al. Staphylococcus aureus derived hyaluronic acid and bacillus Calmette-Guérin purified proteins as immune enhancers to rabies vaccine and related immuno-histopathological alterations. Clin. Exp. Vaccine Res. 2021;10(3):229–239. doi: 10.7774/cevr.2021.10.3.229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Fan Y., et al. Multilamellar vaccine particle elicits potent immune activation with protein antigens and protects mice against Ebola virus infection. ACS Nano. 2019;13(10):11087–11096. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b03660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Collins M.N., et al. In: Polysaccharides of Microbial Origin: Biomedical Applications. Oliveira J.M., Radhouani H., Reis R.L., editors. Springer International Publishing; Cham: 2022. The role of hyaluronic acid in tissue engineering; pp. 1063–1116. [Google Scholar]
- 170.Fan Y., et al. Cationic liposome-hyaluronic acid hybrid nanoparticles for intranasal vaccination with subunit antigens. J. Contr. Release. 2015;208:121–129. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.04.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Singh M., Briones M., O'Hagan D.T. A novel bioadhesive intranasal delivery system for inactivated influenza vaccines. J. Contr. Release. 2001;70(3):267–276. doi: 10.1016/s0168-3659(00)00330-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Ukawa M., et al. Biodegradable hyaluronic acid modified with tetraglycine-l-octaarginine as a safe adjuvant for mucosal vaccination. Mol. Pharm. 2019;16(3):1105–1118. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.8b01110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Choi I.-J., et al. Insertion-responsive microneedles for rapid intradermal delivery of canine influenza vaccine. J. Contr. Release. 2018;286:460–466. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Hirobe S., et al. Clinical study and stability assessment of a novel transcutaneous influenza vaccination using a dissolving microneedle patch. Biomaterials. 2015;57:50–58. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Tanishita S., et al. Cross-protective abilities of hyaluronic acid modified with tetraglycine-l-octaarginine as a mucosal adjuvant against infection with heterologous influenza viruses. Bioconjugate Chem. 2019;30(12):3028–3037. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.9b00644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Piperno A., et al. Exploring the entrapment of antiviral agents in hyaluronic acid-cyclodextrin conjugates. J. Inclusion Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem. 2019;93(1):33–40. [Google Scholar]
- 177.Song B., et al. Hyaluronic acid-based biocompatible supramolecular assembly for sustained release of antiretroviral drug. J. Pharmaceut. Sci. 2016;105 doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2016.01.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Ke C.-L., et al. Antimicrobial actions and applications of chitosan. Polymers. 2021;13(6):904. doi: 10.3390/polym13060904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Meng D., et al. Antifungal activity of chitosan against Aspergillus ochraceus and its possible mechanisms of action. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020;158:1063–1070. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.04.213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Goy R.C., Britto Douglas de, Assis Odilio B.G. A review of the antimicrobial activity of chitosan. Polímeros. 2009;19(3):7. [Google Scholar]
- 181.Qin Y., Li P., Guo Z. Cationic chitosan derivatives as potential antifungals: a review of structural optimization and applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020;236:116002. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Zheng L.-Y., Zhu J.-F. Study on antimicrobial activity of chitosan with different molecular weights. Carbohydr. Polym. 2003;54(4):527–530. [Google Scholar]
- 183.Chandrasekaran M., Kim K.D., Chun S.C. Antibacterial activity of chitosan nanoparticles: a review. Processes. 2020;8(9):1173. [Google Scholar]
- 184.del Carpio-Perochena A., et al. Chelating and antibacterial properties of chitosan nanoparticles on dentin. rde. 2015;40(3):195–201. doi: 10.5395/rde.2015.40.3.195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Anitha A., et al. Synthesis, characterization, cytotoxicity and antibacterial studies of chitosan, O-carboxymethyl and N,O-carboxymethyl chitosan nanoparticles. Carbohydr. Polym. 2009;78(4):672–677. [Google Scholar]
- 186.Oh J.-W., Chun S.C., Chandrasekaran M. Preparation and in vitro characterization of chitosan nanoparticles and their broad-spectrum antifungal action compared to antibacterial activities against phytopathogens of tomato. Agronomy. 2019;9(1):21. [Google Scholar]
- 187.Shi Z., et al. Antibacterial and mechanical properties of bone cement impregnated with chitosan nanoparticles. Biomaterials. 2006;27(11):2440–2449. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Kulikov S.N., et al. Effect of the molecular weight of chitosan on its antiviral activity in plants. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2006;42(2):200–203. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Jaber N., et al. A review of the antiviral activity of Chitosan, including patented applications and its potential use against COVID-19. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2022;132(1):41–58. doi: 10.1111/jam.15202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.He X., et al. The improved antiviral activities of amino-modified chitosan derivatives on Newcastle virus. Drug Chem. Toxicol. 2021;44(4):335–340. doi: 10.1080/01480545.2019.1620264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Salem D.M.S.A., Sallam M.A.E., Youssef T.N.M.A. Synthesis of compounds having antimicrobial activity from alginate. Bioorg. Chem. 2019;87:103–111. doi: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2019.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Khan S.U., et al. Sodium alginate blended membrane with polyurethane: desalination performance and antimicrobial activity evaluation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021;182:72–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.03.188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Serrano-Aroca Á., Ferrandis-Montesinos M., Wang R. Antiviral properties of alginate-based biomaterials: promising antiviral agents against SARS-CoV-2. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2021;4(8):5897–5907. doi: 10.1021/acsabm.1c00523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Cano-Vicent A.H.R., Takayama K., Serrano-Aroca Á. Biocompatible films of calcium alginate inactivate enveloped viruses such as SARS-CoV-2. Preprints. 2022 doi: 10.3390/polym14071483. 2022030035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Lee K.Y., Mooney D.J. Alginate: properties and biomedical applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2012;37(1):106–126. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Queisser K.A., et al. COVID-19 generates hyaluronan fragments that directly induce endothelial barrier dysfunction. JCI insight. 2021;6(17):e147472. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.147472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Ontong P., Prachayasittikul V. Unraveled roles of hyaluronan in severe COVID-19. EXCLI J. 2021;20:117–125. doi: 10.17179/excli2020-3215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]








